m631: ct guided surgery versus conventional surgery: pros and cons

1
Wolford LM, Chemello PD, Hilliard FW: Occlusal Plane Alteration in Orthognathic Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:730-740, 1993 Cottrell DA, Wolford LM: Altered Orthognathic Surgical Sequencing and a Modified Approach to Model Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:1010-1029, 1994 M631 CT Guided Surgery Versus Conventional Surgery: Pros and Cons Edmond Bedrossian, DDS, San Francisco, CA The growing interest for flapless surgery in conjunc- tion with immediate loading of the edentulous patients has led to the development of software programs which allow for treatment planning, fabrication of a surgical template as well as the production of a prosthesis which can be secured to the patient immediately following the placement of the implants. This presentation will help the implant team understand the steps required for treat- ment planning as well as the fabrication of the provi- sional, immediate-load prosthesis once the surgical tem- plate has been produced from the stereolithographic model. The fact that the prosthesis is connected to the implants immediately following the surgical procedure leaves no room for error. It is imperative that the Oral and Maxillofacial surgeon, the restorative dentist and the laboratory technician be aware of each others’ abilities and limitations. Understanding each others’ responsibil- ities will lead to a more predictable outcome, minimize errors and allow for correction of minor discrepancies during the execution of this treatment concept. Immediate loading of the edentulous patient may also be predictably executed using chair side conversion techniques immediately following the installation of the implants. Treatment of certain clinical conditions includ- ing patients who have an existing full complement of non restorable teeth or existing implants with peri im- plantitis are better managed using chair side conversion technique. This presentation will compare and contrast “analogue vs. computer assisted” protocols for the im- mediate loading of the edentulous patients. References van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, Bajnovic I, Van Cleynen- breugel J, Suetens P, A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:63-70 Marchack CB, An immediately loaded CAD/CAM-guided definitive prosthesis: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dentistry 2005. 93:8-12 Verstreken K, Van Clynenbreugel J, Marchal G, Naert I, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D, Computer-assisted planning of oral implant sur- gery. A three-dimensional approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1996;11:806-10 Bedrossian E. Immediate stabilization at stage II of Zygomatic im- plants: Rationale and technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 2000; 15:10-14 M632 Advanced Approaches to Odontogenic Cysts and Tumors Robert E. Marx, DDS, Miami, FL The odontogenic keratocyst is a cyst of known recur- rence potential. This is due to the potential of any one single cell left behind to clone into a new cyst. Ap- proaches to remove the entire cyst including wide ac- cess transoral approaches and extra oral approaches reduce recurrence to less than 3%. Straightforward enu- cleation and curettage is all that is necessary if accom- plished in a controlled direct vision access manner. The use of adjuncts such as Carnoy’s solution, phenol, and cryotherapy are unnecessary and only risk wound heal- ing complications and compromise bone regeneration in the defect. Odontogenic tumors typified by the ameloblastoma are predictably cured by resective surgery with frozen section control. Today this resective surgery is combined with nerve preservation techniques, nerve re-anastomo- sis techniques, and more rarely nerve grafting to return or restore sensation. In addition, when the condyle re- quires resection titanium condylar replacements in adults allow for precise retention of occlusion and max- imum function. In children, an allogeneic mandibular condylar/ramus support acts as a scaffold for spontane- ous bone regenerations that will include the condyle and even the curettage later pterygoid attachment for pro- trusive and working functions of the mandible. These improvements in surgical approach and materi- als permits surgeons to realize a higher quality outcome and reduced recurrence rates. References Marx RE and Stern ed: Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology: A rationale for diagnosis and treatment. Quintessence Publishing, Hanover Park, IL, 2004 Carlson ER and Marx RE. The Ameloblastoma: Primary curative surgical management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:484-494, 2006 Marx RE: Mandibular Reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 51: 466-482, 1993 M633 Systematic Pretreatment Evaluation and Treatment of the Edentulous Maxilla With Fixed Prosthesis Edmond Bedrossian, DDS, San Francisco, CA Many potential candidates for implant restoration of the fully edentulous maxilla are primarily interested in receiving a fixed prosthesis as opposed to a bar/clip overdenture. In a general sense, three alternative fixed prosthetic designs have been developed. The ability to determine early in the consultation process which of the Surgical Mini-Lectures 138 AAOMS 2008

Upload: edmond-bedrossian

Post on 05-Sep-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Wolford LM, Chemello PD, Hilliard FW: Occlusal Plane Alteration inOrthognathic Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:730-740, 1993

Cottrell DA, Wolford LM: Altered Orthognathic Surgical Sequencingand a Modified Approach to Model Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg52:1010-1029, 1994

M631CT Guided Surgery Versus ConventionalSurgery: Pros and ConsEdmond Bedrossian, DDS, San Francisco, CA

The growing interest for flapless surgery in conjunc-tion with immediate loading of the edentulous patientshas led to the development of software programs whichallow for treatment planning, fabrication of a surgicaltemplate as well as the production of a prosthesis whichcan be secured to the patient immediately following theplacement of the implants. This presentation will helpthe implant team understand the steps required for treat-ment planning as well as the fabrication of the provi-sional, immediate-load prosthesis once the surgical tem-plate has been produced from the stereolithographicmodel. The fact that the prosthesis is connected to theimplants immediately following the surgical procedureleaves no room for error. It is imperative that the Oraland Maxillofacial surgeon, the restorative dentist and thelaboratory technician be aware of each others’ abilitiesand limitations. Understanding each others’ responsibil-ities will lead to a more predictable outcome, minimizeerrors and allow for correction of minor discrepanciesduring the execution of this treatment concept.

Immediate loading of the edentulous patient may alsobe predictably executed using chair side conversiontechniques immediately following the installation of theimplants. Treatment of certain clinical conditions includ-ing patients who have an existing full complement ofnon restorable teeth or existing implants with peri im-plantitis are better managed using chair side conversiontechnique. This presentation will compare and contrast“analogue vs. computer assisted” protocols for the im-mediate loading of the edentulous patients.

References

van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, Bajnovic I, Van Cleynen-breugel J, Suetens P, A custom template and definitive prosthesisallowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report, IntJ Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:63-70

Marchack CB, An immediately loaded CAD/CAM-guided definitiveprosthesis: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dentistry 2005. 93:8-12

Verstreken K, Van Clynenbreugel J, Marchal G, Naert I, Suetens P,van Steenberghe D, Computer-assisted planning of oral implant sur-gery. A three-dimensional approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants1996;11:806-10

Bedrossian E. Immediate stabilization at stage II of Zygomatic im-plants: Rationale and technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 2000;15:10-14

M632Advanced Approaches to OdontogenicCysts and TumorsRobert E. Marx, DDS, Miami, FL

The odontogenic keratocyst is a cyst of known recur-rence potential. This is due to the potential of any onesingle cell left behind to clone into a new cyst. Ap-proaches to remove the entire cyst including wide ac-cess transoral approaches and extra oral approachesreduce recurrence to less than 3%. Straightforward enu-cleation and curettage is all that is necessary if accom-plished in a controlled direct vision access manner. Theuse of adjuncts such as Carnoy’s solution, phenol, andcryotherapy are unnecessary and only risk wound heal-ing complications and compromise bone regeneration inthe defect.

Odontogenic tumors typified by the ameloblastomaare predictably cured by resective surgery with frozensection control. Today this resective surgery is combinedwith nerve preservation techniques, nerve re-anastomo-sis techniques, and more rarely nerve grafting to returnor restore sensation. In addition, when the condyle re-quires resection titanium condylar replacements inadults allow for precise retention of occlusion and max-imum function. In children, an allogeneic mandibularcondylar/ramus support acts as a scaffold for spontane-ous bone regenerations that will include the condyle andeven the curettage later pterygoid attachment for pro-trusive and working functions of the mandible.

These improvements in surgical approach and materi-als permits surgeons to realize a higher quality outcomeand reduced recurrence rates.

References

Marx RE and Stern ed: Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology: A rationalefor diagnosis and treatment. Quintessence Publishing, Hanover Park,IL, 2004

Carlson ER and Marx RE. The Ameloblastoma: Primary curativesurgical management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:484-494, 2006

Marx RE: Mandibular Reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 51:466-482, 1993

M633Systematic Pretreatment Evaluation andTreatment of the Edentulous MaxillaWith Fixed ProsthesisEdmond Bedrossian, DDS, San Francisco, CA

Many potential candidates for implant restoration ofthe fully edentulous maxilla are primarily interested inreceiving a fixed prosthesis as opposed to a bar/clipoverdenture. In a general sense, three alternative fixedprosthetic designs have been developed. The ability todetermine early in the consultation process which of the

Surgical Mini-Lectures

138 AAOMS • 2008