Project Status Evaluation

Complex Approach

Origin

902071

Pro

ject

sV

isib

ility

Implications

Firefighting

Inefficient resource

usage Client dissatisfactio

n

Component #1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

1

2

3

4

5

6

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

QC coverage of developed features

Implemented by Dev Verified by QC US tested US implemented

Iterations

# o

f im

ple

men

ted

/teste

d f

eatu

res p

er

itera

tion

Tota

l #

of

im

ple

men

ted

featu

res

Component #2

SolutionProject

L1 Assessment: Health check (metrics analysis)Goal: Identify projects which require immediate assistanceL2 Assessment: Project Performance ReviewGoal: Identify gaps and areas for improvementL3 Assessment: Deep analysis and crisis managementGoal: Develop step-by-step action plan and assist in it’s implementation

PL1L2L3

L1 Assessment

L1 focus

Project metrics monitoring by Expert Group

Low performe

rs list

High performer

s list

Projects for best practices

application

Projects for best practices elicitation

L2 Assessment

L2 focus

SDLC

Project Manageme

nt

Software Developme

nt

Quality Control

Business Analysys

L3 Assessment

L3 focus

Exact practice

implementation

Tools

ArtefactsProcesses

Result

• Improved visibility to real project status

• Decreased reaction time

• Predictive analytics and corrective actions

• Best practices identification and distribution across the company

• And other cool stuff…

Questions