low-latency hd: shared spaces and undersea window

27
John Roston and Jeremy R. Cooperstock Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology McGill University Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Upload: lewis-swanson

Post on 01-Jan-2016

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

John Roston and Jeremy R. Cooperstock Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology McGill University. Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window. Low-latency. Videoconferencing: The Future?. Zack Snyder’s “Online Jam”, October 2001. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

John Roston and Jeremy R. CooperstockCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and TechnologyMcGill University

Low-latency HD:Shared Spaces and

Undersea Window

Page 2: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Low-latency

Page 3: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Videoconferencing: The Future?

Zack Snyder’s “Online Jam”, October 2001

Page 4: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

For those with DSL at home...

yeah, right!

Page 5: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Pinchas Zuckerman, Columbia U, NYC

Wu Ji, Canarie ARDNOC, Ottawa

“Playing Together” experiment

New York-Ottawa, Remote Masters class, Dec. 8, 2000

Page 6: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Latency: The Interaction-Killer

or put another way...

Page 7: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

HD-SDI SDI DV/HDV MPEG

Mbps

Bandwidth vs. Latency

• near-equivalent quality of encoded video (HD-SDI vs HDV or SDI vs DV/MPEG) at greatly reduced bandwidth

• but… compression takes time

Page 8: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

* This is a theoretical “best-case” scenario. Actual performance may vary. The manufacturer makes no warranties, either express or implied, and will not be held liable for damage resulting from use of the product. Certain restrictions may apply. Offer void where prohibited by law. Batteries not included.

compress transmit

100 20 4030 50 7060 80

networks light speed: Mtl-LA

net latency Mtl-LA

large ensemble

activity smallensemble

lip synch

MPEG*acquire

90 100ms

speech, drumming

Tolerated Synchronicity

Page 9: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Current Projects

Page 10: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Going deep under… to 2000m

HD video over new undersea networks –VENUS and NEPTUNE

Page 11: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

“Undersea Window” Project

VENUS – Test Camera 100m

NEPTUNE – Cameras 2,000m

Page 12: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

System Architecture

Page 13: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Shared Spaces: Panoramic High-Def

See everything - no camera panning

Page 14: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Conference Room Configuration

Page 15: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

C4 OME@BCnet

to servers w/GbE i/f

C4 OME@RISQ

UBC 10G switch

McGill 10G switchRISQ

fibreBCnetfibre

OC-19210GWan Phy

to servers w/GbE i/f

10GWan Phy

CA*net 4

local loop for end-end lightpath prgram scope

Network Architecture

Page 16: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

New challenge: Real-time mosaicing

Page 17: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Sample Result

Can your camera do this?

Page 18: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Previous Projects

Page 19: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Distributed Violin Duet

McGill-Université de Montréal demo, Nov. 21, 2001 • IP over 1 Gbps fiber link • < 30ms latency

Page 20: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

McLuhan: “The medium is the message”

Cooperstock's Corollary:

“The medium must be faster than the message.” *

* but between protocol deficiencies (TCP, UDP), competing data flows, process scheduling on a budget, ARQ (retransmission management) without QoS, interface HW/SW “uncooperativeness”, aggressive router policies, multi-format support, echo suppression, and interface complexity… it’s much more than just the medium

Page 21: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Violin Masters Class

Montreal-Ottawa Trial with Pinchas Zuckerman, Feb. 20, 2002

Page 22: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Size does matter

Page 23: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Distributed Jazz Jam

Montreal-Stanford (CCRMA), Research Demo, Oct. 24, 2002

Page 24: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

The “Sweet Spot” Problem

Page 25: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Vibrosensory Transmission

VRQ demo, March 8, 2004

Page 26: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

… and another application

Page 27: Low-latency HD: Shared Spaces and Undersea Window

Thank you.Further information available:

http://ultravideo.mcgill.edu