l'oréal of paris
DESCRIPTION
L'Oréal of ParisBringing ´Class to Massµ with Plénitude- B A K E - syndicateMaria Alfa Raniadita Edhita Paradevi Trisya Kansya Salea La Ode M Arief Akbar 29109317 29109324 29109329 29109367Case Backgroundy y y y yPlenitude line introduced in 1982. Very success in the France skin care market Strong introduction in US Market US sales grow pretty well through 1991 After 9 years introduction in US still not make moneyProblem IdentificationMany types of productsHow to improve furtherTRANSCRIPT
L'Oréal of ParisBringing “Class to Mass” with Plénitude
- B A K E - syndicate
Maria Alfa Raniadita
Edhita ParadeviTrisya Kansya
SaleaLa Ode M Arief
Akbar
29109317291093242910932929109367
Case BackgroundPlenitude line introduced in 1982.Very success in the France skin care marketStrong introduction in US MarketUS sales grow pretty well through 1991After 9 years introduction in US still not make
money
Problem Identification
Rethink all
Aspect
Many types of products
Premium Pricing
Strategy
“Star” System
“Too French” for US
Brand Utilizatio
n
How to improve further upon Plenitude’s
current operations in the U.S ?
How to introduce a new product (Revitalift-Eye)
into the existing product line
L'OréalFounded by Eugene Schueller in 1907.Initially develop and market a new
hair coloring.2,000 products with 500 brand
names,150 countries.Worldwide presenceConsolidated sales: 53.4 billion French
Franc in 1995 from over 2,000 products
L'OréalBeauty, personal and high tech
productsCosmetics represent 81% of revenues$300 million on research & 300 new
patent worldwide in 1996Acquires Maybelline to broadened
participation in the mass market.Combining Hair care and Cosmetics
Division
Plénitude At 1982 launched in France Positioned as : high end, superior performance, but
accessible (class to mass strategy) Strategy :
◦ Firstly introduce moisturizer until it had helped established the “technologically advance” image and then introduce cleanser
◦ Supported by massive advertising (star philosophy) Result : Achieving sales of one million units in 1983 and
continue its success in 1987 Formula for success :
◦ Have technologically Superior Products◦ Concentrate Resources and Support on newest “star product”
to pull the entire line◦ Follow the golden rules of advertising : feature star product,
provide technologically superior evidence
The U. S Launch & Early Result• First test marketed in Atalanta and Dallas at
1988• Strategy “class to mass”• Positioning “ Reduces the Signs of aging”• Covering 3 products :• Basic moisturizers• Treatment moisturizers• Cleansers
• Before Plenitude entered, L'Oreal had good reputation for its cosmetic and hair product, so the name was critical to sell the products.
• Used the same formula "star" philosophy in advertising as in France
Market Size and Brand
Market Size and Brand
• Increasing Trend in Total Retail Market for Moisturizers and Cleansers.
• Stagnancy in Plenitude sales for both category.
Market Size and Brand
US Market Analysis
25%17%
17%22% 18%
UnconcernedIngredient ApatheticPrice Conscious Socializers
• Assumed that advertising spending in all brand used for moisturizers and cleansers
• Plenitude has poor advertising performance than Olay and Ponds
• Plenitude brand not strong recognized in US• Market study divide consumers into 5
segments:
Acceptor/Rejecter Studies• Brand name cited• Brand name meant• Department store quality
Motivation for Trial
• Young rejecters found it too heavy and greasy• Didn’t absorb into skin
Respond to Product
Formulas• Having large number of products but have plus
and minus• Individual products could be more helpful in
through the line
Perception as Full Product
Line
• Packaging seemed feminine and expensive look• Confusing and have lot to read
Respond to Packaging
• Perceived targeted to older women• Not for 20s, and maybe not even 30s
Perceived Target
Consumer
Acceptor/Rejecter Studies• Olay dry skin, light and soaked,
ads on magazines• Pond’s staple of life
Motivation for Trial
• Olay light and reasonable priced• Pond’s reliable, accessible, and
reasonable priced
Product Satisfaction
Sources
• Olay traditional & generational brand
• Pond’s older, down to earthBrand Imagery
• Overwhelming & confusing• Need more time to read it
Perception of the Plenitude
Line and Packaging
Shelf Shopping Study• + : Fun, meet the different need of
consumers,• - : So many selection, it’s very
confusing
Shopping Experience
• Olay: Pink cream, old fashioned, nice packaging
• Ponds: Really heavy & greasy, for older women
• L’Oreal: Really expensive
Competitors Brand Image
• + : Very informational, very helpful• - : Look complicated, very confusing
Product Line
Presentation
Developing the Plénitude Plan• Introduced in 1995 • Quickly represented 20% of Plénitude sales with
heavy support • Attract 40% new users to the Plénitude
franchise & younger customers problem: consumer’s perceptions of the brand (a treatment product for people who have problem)
• Options: Launch a new product as a Revitalift extension “Star product” philosophy high support
Bring out the product & not make it ours “star”
Brand Development
Brand Aware EverTried
Conversation Ratio
Currently User
Retention
Ratio
Oil of Olay
96% 77% 80 34% 44
Pond’s 93% 52% 56 16% 31
Avon 91% 68% 75 23% 34
Revlon 90% 35% 39 10% 29
Plenitude
78% 23% 29 7% 30
Nivea 76% 26% 34 6% 23
Taken from Exhibit 11
Poor Plenitude Sales
Performance
Low Consumers Ever TriedLow Conversation RatioLow Current UsedLow Retention Ratio
Competitor AnalysisAspects L’Oreal
(Plenitude) Oil of Olay Pond’s
Motivation for Trial
Premium and Expensive
Generated by information / advertisement
Seen as a staple of life
Product Satisfaction
Sources
Good quality product
Light and reasonably priced
Reliable, accessible and reasonably priced
Brand Imagery
Hard to understand
Traditional, generational brand
Older and down-to-earth
France vs. USUnknown US consumer behaviorIn France, successive product launch, but, in
US product launch simultaneously. It May confused consumer.
Benefit Positioning in France of Aging perception succeed while in US not succeed.
France consumer have more high concern regarding beauty perception than US consumer
US consumer more pragmatism than France consumer regarding beauty knowledge
France vs. US
FRENCH
• Sophisticated in using a skin care (technology advanced product)
• High-end market (not price sensitive)
• Premium quality
UNITED STATES
• Didn’t much know about skin care need to educated them at the point-of-purchase
• Price sensitive• Need effective
product
Revitalift Introduced in September 1995Product innovation incorporating pro-retinol A & ETreatment product for people who have problemSupported by $5 Million in TV advertisingQuickly represent 20% plenitude salesTarget Younger Consumer Bring new buyer
Revitalift Key SuccessKeep superiority in Research & Development Increase U.S. consumers knowledge on skin
care products Creating demand in a younger consumer
market Improving the global L’Oreal Brand Increase sales and market share
SWOT Analysis
STRENGHTS• Known with good quality• Great Research &
Development department
• Have a good experience in handling cosmetic product
WEAKNESSES• Unknown about
consumer behavior in US• The product cover
unattractive• L’Oreal need to upgrade
awareness of US consumer
OPPORTUNITIES• Big market in US• Young consumer felt
local product is old fashioned
• Us maker has many channel for L’Oreal product
THREATS• Expensive product
Image• Consumer’s loyalty to
competitor product• Local product known
about US consumer behavior
SWOT
RecommendationIncrease consumer knowledge by
advertising and at the point of purchase Packaging modifications simple
information, change the Plenitude name
Launch Revitalift Eye with star productUse premium price to maintain product
prestigiousStep by step Product Line Extensions.Target a younger executive woman to
create consumers base
thanks for your attention
Exhibit 7. Market Size & Brand Shares on $ Basis (‘91-’95)
Moisturizer - All Mass Outlets1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
Dollar vol. (Retail $) $309MM $338MM $375MM $440MM $471MMPlénitude 11,7 13,6 14,1 13,8 14,0Olay 38,3 36,1 32,3 29,7 28,2Almay 5,4 6,0 5,6 4,4 4,6Nivea 4,8 5,5 6,0 6,2 6,2Pond's 5,0 4,6 9,1 13,9 15,1Alpha-Hydrox - 1,0 3,8 5,7 5,4Neutrogena 7,0 6,5 5,7 4,8 5,2Cleansers - All Mass Outlets
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995Dollar vol. (Retail $) $252MM $288MM $308MM $308MM $328MMPlénitude 3,2 3,2 3,1 3,1 3,4Olay 11,0 9,9 7,6 6,4 7,9Almay 4,8 4,8 4,9 4,4 4,1Noxzema 22,9 24,4 23,8 22,9 21,6Pond's 11,7 12,6 11,6 12,2 11,2Neutrogena 4,9 4,9 6,0 6,3 6,2Sea Breeze - - - 9,4 8,9Clean and Clear - - - 4,9 6,7
Everyday Average Retail
Moisturizers-DailyActive Daily Moisturizer-Regular 4,00 4,72 7,11 2,39Active Daily Moisturizer-Oil Free 4,00 4,72 7,17 2,45Active Daily Moisturizer- SPF 15 4,00 4,72 7,21 2,49Hydra - Renewal Jar 1,70 6,83 10,17 3,34Hydra - Renewal Tube 1,60 6,09 9,13 3,04
Moisturizers - TreatmentAdvanced Wrinkle Defence Crème - Jar 1,70 8,87 12,15 3,28Advanced Wrinkle Defence Crème - Tube 1,20 7,07 10,30 3,23Advanced Overnight 1,40 8,87 12,26 3,39Eye Defense 0,50 8,87 12,07 3,2Excell Cream 1,40 8,42 11,36 2,94 Excell Lotion 4,00 8,42 11,51 3,09Serum 1,00 10,43 15,19 4,76Revitalift - Face 1,70 8,87 12,31 3,44
CleansersDeep Cleansing Gel 5,00 5,50 6,97 1,47Hydrating Clenasing Cream 6,00 5,50 7,07 1,57Hydrating Floral Toner 8,50 5,50 6,94 1,44Clarifying Foaming Gel 4,00 6,25 8,06 1,81Clarifying Mask 2,80 6,25 8,09 1,84Clarifying Toner 8,50 6,25 8,26 2,01
Size (oz) Trade Price ?
Exhibit 8A. Plénitude Product Line Pricing of Chain Drug Stores
Everyday Average Retail
Procter & Gamble - OlayFoaming Face Wash 6,78 2,12 3,17 1,05Facial Cleansing Lotion 6,78 3,09 4,56 1,47Refreshing Toner 7,20 2,69 3,98 1,29Age Defying Daily Renewal 6,78 N/A 4,76 -
Pond'sCold Cream 3,50 2,78Self Foaming Cleanser 4,00 5,03 7,44 2,412 in 1 Cleanser - Tube 4,00 2,79 4,22 1,432 in 1 Cleanser - Pump 7,00 3,88 5,60 1,72
NeutrogenaFacial Cleanser 8,00 5,91 8,33 2,42Deep Clean 6,00 4,10 6,07 1,97Deep Pore 2,00 5,50 8,06 2,56
NoxzemaMedicated Skin Care 10,00 2,68 3,71 1,03
Size (oz) Trade Price ?
Exhibit 8B. Competitive Cleansers Pricing of Retail Drug Stores
Everyday Average Retail
Procter & Gamble - OlayOriginal Beauty Fluid 4,00 5,86 6,59 0,73Oil Free Beauty Fluid 4,00 5,86 6,65 0,79Sensitive Skin Beauty Fluid 4,00 5,86 6,66 0,80U/V Protectant Beauty Fluid 3,50 5,86 6,74 0,88Original Beauty Fluid (Larger Size) 6,00 7,53 8,76 1,23U/V Protectant Beauty Fluid (Larger Size) 5,25 7,53 9,60 2,07
Pond'sDry Skin Cream 11,00 5,50 8,19 2,69
NiveaShine Control Mattifying Fluid 3,00 4,84 7,15 2,31Facial Nourishing Lotion 3,00 4,58 6,87 2,29
NeutrogenaCombination Skin 4,00 7,50 10,43 2,93
Size (oz) Trade Price ?
Exhibit 8C. Competitive Daily Moisturizer Pricing of Chain Drug Stores
Exhibit 8D. Competitive Treatment Moisturizers Pricing
Everyday Average Retail
Procter & Gamble - OlayNight of Olay 2,00 4,49 6,45 1,96Replenishing Cream 2,00 4,58 8,73 4,15Age Defying Protective Renewal Cream 2,00 N/A 7,31 -Age Defying Protective Renewal Lotion 4,00 N/A 7,36 -
Pond'sAge Defying Lotion 3,00 7,80 10,99 3,19Age Defying Lotion 2,00 7,80 11,23 3,43Prevent and Correct Lotion 4,25 10,80 14,94 4,14Prevent and Correct Cream 2,50 10,80 15,20 4,40
NiveaAnti-Wrinkle Cream 1,70 4,84 9,22 4,38 Optimale 1,70 4,58 10,52 5,94
NeutrogenaHealhty Skin Oil Free Bottle 2,50 7,50 10,55 3,05
Size (oz) Trade Price ?