local public health system assessment using the nphpsp local instrument

21
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 10 Research for New Insights and Innovative Solutions to Health Problems

Upload: tatum-andrews

Post on 15-Mar-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

. . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

Local Public Health System Assessment using the

NPHPSP Local Instrument

Essential Service 10 Research for New Insights and

Innovative Solutions to Health Problems

Page 2: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument
Page 3: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.1.1 Do LPHS organizations encourage staff to develop new solutions to health problems in the community?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 4: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.1.1.1 Do LPHS organizations provide time and/or resources for staff to pilot test or conduct studies to determine new solutions?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 5: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.1.2 During the past two years, have LPHS organizations proposed to research organizations one or more public health issues for inclusion in their research agenda?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 6: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.1.3 Do LPHS organizations identify and stay current with best practices developed by other public health agencies or organizations?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 7: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.1.4 Do LPHS organizations encourage community participation in the development or implementation of research?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 8: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument
Page 9: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.2.1Does the LPHS develop relationships with institutions of higher learning and/or research organizations?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 10: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.2.2 Does the LPHS partner with at least one institution of higher learning and/or research organization to conduct research related to the public’s health?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 11: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.2.3 Does the LPHS encourage collaboration between the academic and practice communities?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 12: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument
Page 13: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.3.1 Does the LPHS have access to researchers (either on staff or through other arrangements)?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 14: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.3.2 Is there access to resources to facilitate research within the LPHS?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 15: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.3.3 Does the LPHS disseminate findings from their research?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 16: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.3.4 Does the LPHS evaluate its research activities?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 17: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.3.4.1 Does the LPHS evaluate the:Development of research activities?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 18: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.3.4.2 Does the LPHS evaluate the:Implementation of research activities?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 19: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.3.4.3 Does the LPHS evaluate the:Impact of research activities on public health practice?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 20: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

10.3.4.4 Does the LPHS evaluate the:Involvement of community representatives in collaborative research efforts (i.e., community-based participatory research)?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 21: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

Schools

Recreation Centers

Employers

Transit

Elected Officials

Doctors

EMS

Law Enforcement

Nursing Homes

Fire

Corrections

Mental Health

Faith Institutions

Civic Groups

Non-Profit Organizations

Neighborhood Organizations

Laboratories

Home Health

Community Health

Centers

Hospitals

Tribal Health

Drug Treatment Public Health

Agency

Thank You!