local public health system assessment using the nphpsp local instrument

38
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 1 Monitor Health Status to Identify Community Health Problems

Upload: kaseem-bond

Post on 30-Dec-2015

25 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

. . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

Local Public Health System Assessment using the

NPHPSP Local Instrument

Essential Service 1 Monitor Health Status to Identify

Community Health Problems

Page 2: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument
Page 3: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument
Page 4: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.1 Has the LPHS conducted a community health assessment?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 5: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.1.1 Is the community health assessment updated at least every 3 years?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 6: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.1.2 Are data from the assessment compared to data from other representative areas or populations?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 7: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.1.3 Are data used to track trends over time?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 8: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.1.4 Does the LPHS use data from community health assessments to monitor progress toward health-related objectives?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 9: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2 Does the LPHS compile data from the community health assessment(s) into a community health profile (CHP)?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 10: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.1 Do CHP data elements include:Community demographic characteristics?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 11: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.2 Do CHP data elements include:Community socioeconomic characteristics?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 12: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.3 Do CHP data elements include:Health resource availability data?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 13: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.4 Do CHP data elements include:Quality of life data for the community?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 14: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.5 Do CHP data elements include:Behavioral risk factors for the community?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 15: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.6 Do CHP data elements include:Community environmental health indicators?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 16: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.7 Do CHP data elements include:Social and mental health data?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 17: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.8 Do CHP data elements include:Maternal and child health data?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 18: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.9 Do CHP data elements include:Death, illness, and/or injury data?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 19: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.10 Do CHP data elements include:Communicable disease data?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 20: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.11 Do CHP data elements include:Sentinel events data for the community?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 21: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.12 Has the LPHS identified the individuals or organizations responsible for contributing data and /or resources to produce the CHP?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 22: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.2.13 Does each contributor of data have access to the completed CHP?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 23: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.3 Is community-wide use of community health assessment or CHP data promoted?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 24: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.3.1 Is a media strategy in place to promote community-wide use of the CHP?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 25: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.3.2 Is the information easily accessible by the general public?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 26: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.1.3.3 Do organizations in the LPHS use the CHP to inform health policy and planning decisions?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 27: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument
Page 28: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.2.1 Does the LPHS use state-of-the-art technology to support health profile databases?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 29: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.2.1.1 Is technology utilized to make community health data available electronically?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 30: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.2.2 Does the LPHS have access to geocoded health data?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 31: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.2.2.1 Does the LPHS use geographic information systems (GIS)?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 32: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.2.3 Does the LPHS use computer-generated graphics to identify trends and/or compare data by relevant categories (i.e., race, gender, age group)?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 33: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument
Page 34: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.3.1 Does the LPHS maintain and/or contribute to one or more population health registries?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 35: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.3.1.1 Are there standards for data collection?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 36: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.3.1.2 Are there established processes for reporting health events to the registry or registries?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 37: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

1.3.2 In the past year, has the LPHS used information from one or more population health registries?

1 2 3 4 5

0% 0% 0%0%0%

1. No (0% or absolutely no activity)

2. Minimal (1% - 25%)

3. Moderate (26% - 50%)

4. Significant (51% - 75%)

5. Optimal (greater than 75%)

10

Page 38: Local Public Health System Assessment using the  NPHPSP Local Instrument

Schools

Recreation Centers

Employers

Transit

Elected Officials

Doctors

EMS

Law Enforcement

Nursing Homes

Fire

Corrections

Mental Health

Faith Institutions

Civic Groups

Non-Profit Organizations

Neighborhood Organizations

Laboratories

Home Health

Community Health

Centers

Hospitals

Tribal Health

Drug Treatment Public Health

Agency

Thank You!