little fish, big impact
DESCRIPTION
A REPORT FROM THE LENFEST FORAGE FISH TASK FORCE. Little Fish, Big Impact. A SUMMARY OF NEW SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS. Managing a crucial link in ocean food webs. What Are Forage Fish?. Crucial species in food webs Small, often schooling pelagic species - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Little Fish, Big Impact
A SUMMARY OF NEW SCIENTIFIC ANALYSISManaging a crucial link in ocean
food webs
A R E P O RT F R O M T H E L E N F E S T F O RA G E F I S H TA S K F O RC E
![Page 2: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What Are Forage Fish?• Crucial species in
food webs
• Small, often schooling pelagic species
• Sardines, anchovies, sand eels, krill, herring…
• Feed on plankton and transfer energy to upper trophic levels
![Page 3: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
37% of the world’s marine catch is forage fish
(Alder et al. 2008)
Anchoveta processing plant. Paracas, Peru 2011
Fish meal
Fish oil
3
![Page 4: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Important Forage Fish Characteristics • Historical view:
forage fish are beyond the capacity of man to deplete.
![Page 5: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Collapses have occurredCalifornia sardine-
1950sPeruvian anchoveta-
1970s
Namibian sardine-1970s
Japanese sardine- 1990s
![Page 6: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Task Force Members
Dr. Ellen K. Pikitch, ChairDr. P. Dee BoersmaDr. Ian L. BoydDr. David O. ConoverDr. Philippe CuryDr. Tim EssingtonDr. Selina S. HeppellDr. Edward D. HoudeDr. Marc Mangel
Dr. Daniel PaulyDr. Éva PlagányiDr. Keith SainsburyDr. Robert S. Steneck
Objective: Develop consensus recommendations on sustainable management of forage fish which accounts for their vital role in ocean ecosystems.
![Page 7: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Task Force Approach
• Workshops and site visits
• Review of theory and practice
• Case studies - ecosystems
• Data – forage fish and predators
• New science• Ecopath models• Ecosim models• Predator Response to
Exploitation of Prey (PREP) equation
![Page 8: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Forage Fisheries Case Studies: Learning from
examples
1. Antarctic2. Baltic Sea3. Barents Sea4. Benguela Current5. California Current
6. Chesapeake Bay7. Gulf of Maine8. Humboldt Current9. North Sea
![Page 9: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Case Study: Barents Sea
An Effective Threshold
To protect the world’s largest stock of cod, Norway and Russia prohibit fishing for capelin if its biomass falls below 200,000 tonnes. Since adopting this rule, capelin collapses attributable to fishing have not been repeated, and many fish stocks are now abundant.
capelin
Norway Russia
![Page 10: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Foraging Distance & Magellanic Penguins
Foraging-trip distance predicted Magellanic penguin reproductive success in Punta Tombo, Argentina. (Boersma and Rebstock 2009)
![Page 11: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Cury, Boyd et al 2011, Science
![Page 12: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Cury et al. Science 2011;334:1703-1706
![Page 13: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Meta-analysis:
one third for the birds
7 marine ecosystems
14 seabird species
438 years of observation
![Page 14: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Minimum Biomass Threshold
![Page 15: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Approximate locations of the 72 Ecopath models used
in this analysis
Pikitch, Rountos et al. 2012, Fish and Fisheries
![Page 16: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Mackerel
Horse Mackerel
Other large pelagics Hake
FlatfishesMedium demersals
Medium sciaenids
Chondrichthyans
Jumbo squid
Benthic elasmobranchs
SeabirdsPinnipeds
Cetaceans
Forage Fish
Ecological Importance
Sea robin
95%
15%
62%
83%
29%
46%
28%
10%
12%
3%
3%22%
39%
33%
![Page 17: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Ecological Importance of Forage Species
The Task Force found that 75% of the ecosystems studied have at least one highly or extremely dependent predator.
![Page 18: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Forage Fish
Mackerel
Horse Mackerel
Other large pelagics Hake
FlatfishesMedium demersals
Medium sciaenids
Jumbo squid
Benthic elasmobranchs
Chondrichthyans
Economic Importance
![Page 19: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Economic Value of Forage Fish
FORAGE FISH DIRECT VALUE
FORAGE FISH SUPPORTIVE VALUE
Direct value of commercial catch = $5.6 billionSupportive commercial value = $11.3 billionTotal global commercial value = $16.9 billion Value in 2006 dollars
First ever estimate of total value of forage fish to all fisheries
![Page 20: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Ecosim modeling approach
• Ecosystem Modeling Setup• Ecosim with MSE Batch Module: Allows for
examination of implementation error and a wide variety of harvest strategies
• 10 Ecosystem models • 2 upwelling (N. Humboldt & Northern
California)• 1 Semi Enclosed Sea (Baltic Sea) • 3 Non-Upwelling Coastal (Gulf of Mexico,
North Sea, Western English Channel)• 3 Arctic-High Latitude (Aleutian Islands,
GoA, Barents)• 1 Estuaries/ Bay (Chesapeake Bay)
![Page 21: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Forage fish are valuable as preyMany predators are highly dependent on
forage fish...
Predators that have a higher proportion of forage fish in their diet generally exhibit greater declines as forage fish abundance decreases.
…and decline when forage fish decline.
![Page 22: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Minimum Biomass Threshold
![Page 23: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Results: Critical biomass levelsCritical forage fish biomass needed to avoid a 50% decline in predators. Predator Diet (% forage fish)
Biomass needed (proportion of B0) for 95% confidence of success
All groups
Seabirds
25% 0.79 0.7450% 0.85 0.8875% 0.88 0.90Max 0.90 0.91R = Predator Decline (as %); D = Diet Dependency (as a fraction of the total diet); B = Forage Fish Biomass
Results from PREP Equation (Predator Response to Exploitation of Prey):
![Page 24: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Comparing Fishing Strategies
Six fishing strategies were compared using simulation models. Here we compare the most precautionary strategy with conventional management.
![Page 25: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Only Precautionary Management Protects Predators and Fisheries
![Page 26: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Focus on predatorsConsider spatial & temporal managementCut forage fishing in half and leave twice as much fish in the ocean compared with conventional management in many ecosystems.Tailor management to available information
Key Recommendations
![Page 28: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
A Lower Ceiling on Forage Fishing
![Page 29: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
A Higher Floor on Forage Fish Biomass
![Page 30: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Credit: themaxfiles.blogspot.com
fireflyafrica.blogspot.com
Time and space-based management
Scope of Management Strategies
![Page 31: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Concluding Remarks
Step toward ecosystem-based management
Benefits both the ecosystem and fisheries Maintains ecological roles and support
services Reduces risk of forage fishery collapse May increase catch of commercially
valuable fish Positive incentives for increasing
knowledge
![Page 32: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Special Thanks To:
Task Force Members Christine Santora, Project
Director Konstantine Rountos Kristin Broms Tess Geers Natasha Gownaris Steve Munch David Conover Jesse Bruschini Shaily Rahman Joel Rice
![Page 34: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Comparison ofharvest control rulesConstant yield and constant fishing (CF) mortality rules.
![Page 36: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Comparison ofharvest control rulesBiomass limit rules.
![Page 37: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Comparison ofharvest control rulesHockey stick rules.
![Page 38: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Predator Criterion Adopt harvest strategies and
management measures so that there is a greater than 95 percent chance that fishing on forage fish will not deplete any dependent predator population to levels that would meet the IUCN “vulnerable” criteria.
“Dependent Predator Performance Criterion”
![Page 39: Little Fish, Big Impact](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081422/568164e3550346895dd746d3/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)