linkage institutions: elections and interest groups

43
LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Upload: kristian-chumley

Post on 15-Jan-2016

227 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Page 2: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Elections in the United StatesThree Categories:1. Primary Elections and Caucuses

- Used to nominate candidates to run for office- Open (Any voter can cast a ballot in any party’s elections) vs. Closed (voters cans only cast ballots for the party they are registered to) Primaries

2. General Elections- Race between the nominees from each party to determine

who wins the office/seat

3. Policy Elections- Allow the public to pass legislation directly- Referendums and Initiatives

Plurality v. Majority

Page 3: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

2014 – 158 ballot measures in 42 States- 35 Initiatives

2012 – 188 ballot measures in 39 states - 50 Initiatives2010- 184/46, 2008 – 174/68, 2006 – 226/78

Page 4: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Colorado - Legalize recreational use of marijuana with regulations. – APPROVED

Idaho - Would add to the state constitution the right to hunt and fish.- APPROVED

Maine - Would legalize same-sex marriage in the state.- APPROVED

North Dakota - Makes it a felony to maliciously harm a cat, dog, or horse, with exemptions for people with occupations involving animals – REJECTED

Oklahoma - Would ban affirmative action programs in the state – APPROVED

Maryland- Would approve legislation that guarantees in-state tuition to illegal immigrants- APPROVED

Florida - Prohibits public funds for abortions. - REJECTED

Alabama - Would prohibit mandatory participation in any health care system. – APPROVEDTo remove references to segregation of schools in the state constitution. – REJECTED

Page 5: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Presidential Elections

Four Step ProcessAnnouncement (1-2 years before election)Primaries and Caucuses (Jan – June)

Caucus – meeting of party members to deliberate and choose from a list of candidates seeking the Presidency)

Conventions (August/September)General Election (First Tuesday in

November after the 1st)

Page 6: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Nominating Process for PresidentPresidential Primary Trail

- Each state votes on a given day between January and June to award candidates delegates to the convention – which ever candidate gets the majority of the delegates wins their party’s nomination for President- Purpose of the Primary system - Differences between Democrats and Republican

- Democrats – Proportional elections and super delegates (4420/800) – 2008 – Clinton vs. Obama

- Republicans –winner-take-all (2280/123)- Iowa – First Caucus- New Hampshire – First Primary- The rest of the trail and Super Tuesday- The importance of momentum and the expectations game

- Frontloading and 2008

Page 7: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Identify two changes in the Presidential Primary system from 2004 to 2008?What are two impacts these changes have on the strategies for Presidential candidates?What is one impact these changes might have on the American voter?

Page 9: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Problems with the Primary System Importance of early StatesTime and MoneyLow voter turnoutMedia has too much powerSolutions?National Primaries or Regional Primaries

Page 10: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Nominating Process for PresidentNational Conventions - Week long infomercial for

the Party and the Presidential Candidate - Reward the faithful and energize the party

August or September/ LocationDelegates to the Convention - campaign workers,

wealthy, educated, and politically activeDay 1 - Keynote speakerDay 2 - PlatformDay 3 - Nomination of the Presidential CandidateDay 4 - Selection of the VP (Complete the Ticket)

and acceptance speeches

Page 11: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

General Elections: The PresidentThe Electoral College –

Each state gets the number of electoral votes that matches the number of representatives and senators

538 total electoral votes Winner take all in each state (except Maine and

Nebraska) Majority (270 votes) needed to win

Page 13: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Electoral CollegeProblems with the Electoral College

Electors are not required to vote according to the popular vote

If no candidate gets a majority – election decided in the House of Representatives – 1800 and 1824

Presidents have won the electoral vote, but lost the popular vote – 1876, 1888, 2000

Proposed Solutions and likelihood for change Proportional System and District System Popular Vote – Power of the Small States

Page 14: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Mitt Romney From Michigan/

Massachusetts 64 Yrs. Old Married Forty

Years – 5 Sons Mormon Graduated from BYU

, JD from Harvard Governor of Massachusetts,

Business- CEO Baine Capital, Salt Lake Olympics

Fiscal and Social Moderate Weakness – Does not appeal to

Christian Right, Supported Abortion and Gay Rights as Governor of MA

Profile of the Vice President Newt Gingrich From Georgia 68 Years Old Married three times/

2 Daughters Lutheran/Baptist/

Catholic Graduated from Emory, PhD

from Tulane Congressman from Georgia for

20 years, Speaker of the House for 4 years, lobbyist

Fiscal and Social Conservative Weakness – Resigned from the

House and as speaker after getting caught in an ethics scandal

Page 15: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Congressional ElectionsCongress (House) - every two years, Senate - 1/3 every two yearsPlurality in District/State Incumbents usually win reelection

Advertising and Visibility - Travel Allowances and Franking Privileges Credit Claiming - Casework and Pork Barrel Weak Opponents (more House than Senate) Campaign Spending and Paid Staffs

Senate = 2 per state House of Representatives:

Reapportionment – Redistributing the number of Congressmen each state has based on the census – 10 yrs.

Redistricting – State legislatures draw district lines to match the new number of representatives

Gerrymandering – Drawing district lines in a way to produce a particular political outcome

Contiguous lines, must not dilute minority strength, based on population

Presidential Coattails - Presidential Election years vs. Midterms

Page 16: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS
Page 20: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Political CampaignsPrimaries v. General Elections- StrategyOrganization:

Campaign ManagerFundraiserCampaign CounselMedia ConsultantResearch Staff and Policy AdvisorsPollsterPress SecretaryCampaign Staff - Professionals and Volunteers

Page 21: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Campaigning: Use of the MediaPress Secretary and Media Consultant

Paid Media – Spots – 30 – 60 sec ads

- President Obama’s Infomercial – American Stories, American Solutions – Approx $4 million

- Attack ads v. policy ads

Free Media –

- Visuals and Sound bites – Nightly News

- Endorsements

- Televised Debates, Talk Shows

New Media –

- Mass emails, Robocalls, Social

Networking, Blogs, Websites, YouTube

Page 22: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Campaign FinanceFederal Election Campaign Act of 1974 and McCain-Feingold Bipartisan

Campaign Reform Act of 2002

Rules:

- Ban on Soft Money contributions and electioneering within 60 days of elections by Corporations and Unions

- Limits on Individual and PAC contributions ($2300/$5000)

- Mandatory Reporting of all contributions and expenditures

- Matching Funds in Primaries and Lump Sums in General Elections for Presidential Candidates (2012 - $54 mil/$91 mil) – (Obama - $986 Mil/ Romney - $992 Mil)

Is Money Speech?

- Buckley v. Valeo – 1974 – money is speech

- McConnell v. FEC – 2003 – BCRA constitutional

- FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life – 2007 – Issue Ads

- Citizens United v. FEC – 2010 – ruled limits on corporate/union ads unconstitutional

Super PACs - allowed to raise and spend unlimited amounts of money from corporations, unions, individuals and associations; cannot coordinate with candidates ; 2012 - $567 Million

Page 25: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Voting Qualification and RegistrationProperty Owning Males 21 and OverJacksonian Era and Property Requirement, 15th,

19th, 26th AmendmentsToday: Voter Registration

18 years old, a citizen, and a resident of the districtMust Register in advance except for in California,

Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Maine, Wyoming, Wisconsin, and New Hampshire

Motor Voter Act - 199348 States ban voting from prison, 23 States ban

felons on parole, 12 States ban felons for life

Page 26: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Voting Behavior in the United StatesPresidential Elections - 1996 – 51%, 2000 - 54%, 2004 – 60%, 2008 – 62%, 2012 – 58%

Midterm Elections - 1998 – 38%, 2002 – 40%, 2006 - 41%, 2010 – 41%   2004 2008 2012

Age: 18-24 47% 49% 41%

25-34 56% 57% 57%

Over 55 72% 71% 71%

       

Race: White 67% 66% 64%

Black  60% 65% 66%

Hispanic 47% 50% 47%

Asian 44% 47% 48%

  2004 2008 2012Sex: Male 62% 62% 60%

Female 65% 66% 64%       

Income:           < $30,000 48% 52% 48%> $75,000 80% 79% 77%

       

Education: <HS 40% 39% 38%High School 

Graduate 56% 55% 52%College 

Graduate 78% 77% 75%

Page 28: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Why is voter turnout so low?Reasons people gave in the 2012 election:

- Too Busy, Conflict in Schedule – 18%- Don’t Know, Refused – 18%- Illness/Disability – 15%- Not Interested – 13%- Did not like candidates – 13%- Out of Town – 9%- Registration Problems – 6%- Transportation Problems – 5%- Forgot – 3%

Other Reasons:

1. Registration Requirements – Motor Voter Act (Registration Problems )

2. Difficulty of Absentee Ballots (Illness, Disability, Out of Town)

3. Number of Elections

4. Political Attitudes – Political Efficacy v. Political Apathy , Distrust of Government, Length and Negativity of Campaigns (Don’t Know/Refused, Don’t like the candidates, Not interested – 44%)

Page 29: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Possible SolutionsEase Registration Requirements - Same Day

Registration - Automatic RegistrationLengthen Voting Times - Early Voting, Mail-in

Ballots and online voting, Absentee Ballots, Extend Hours

Change Election Day - National Holiday or Saturday/Sunday

Other Ideas - Proportional Voting, Tax Credits, Compulsory Voting, Lottery

Page 30: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

American Voter DecisionsParty Identification

Most powerful predictor of voter behavior (particularly at local and state levels)

Partisanship has decreased since early 1900sIndependents and ticket-splitting

Candidate’s Personal ImageCompetence, Reliability (Flip-flop), Leadership,

Morality and HonestyPolicy and Issue Voting

Election of 2008 - Economy v. TerrorismMandate Theory

Page 31: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Interest GroupsOrganization of people with similar policy

goals that enter the political process to try to achieve those goals

Difference between interest groups and political partiesDo not try to win elections and do not run

candidates - try to influence those in government and who wins elections

Policy specialists not policy generalistsOnly try to satisfy their members, do no try to

appeal to everyone

Page 32: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Democratic Theory and Interest GroupsPluralist (Group) Theory -

Support Interest GroupsProvide linkage between the people and the

government - Alexis De Tocqueville - democratization of American society - Women and African Americans

So many groups that it guarantees that influence is dispersed - no one group will become too dominant (James Madison and Federalist No. 10)

Check on the power of the government

Page 33: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Democratic Theory and Interest GroupsElite Theory - Against Interest Groups

Real power is only held by a few key groups - influence of money - i.e. large corporations, pay for votes

Hyperpluralist Theory - Against Interest GroupsSystem is out of control - so many interest

groups with so much power that the government tries to please them all

Leads to contradictory and confusing policy or legislative gridlock

Can cause runaway spending

Page 34: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Successful Interest GroupsSmall groups often more successful than

large groups because of organization - Mancur Olsen’s Law of Large Groups - Free-Riders

Intensity - how deeply members care about the issues

Leadership and Membership - Good CEO and influential members

Financial Resources

Page 35: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Types of Interest GroupsEconomic Interest Groups

Labor - AFL-CIO, UAW Business - Chamber of Commerce, Microsoft, Google, AMA,

ABAEnvironmental Interests

Sierra Club, National Wildlife Federation, GreenpeaceEquality Interests

NAACP, NOW, AARP, LULAC, ACLUPublic Interests

Common Cause, League of Women Voters, Christian Coalition

Single Issue NRA, National Right to Life Committee, MADD

Page 36: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Methods Used by Interest GroupsLobbyists - Professionals that work for interest groups

and try to influence government - 40% are retired Congressmen/Senators Source of information and expertise Help with political and campaign strategies Source of new policy ideas President, Congressman, Senators, Staffs, and Agencies –

‘wine and dine’Laws regulating lobbyists

Lobbying Disclosure Act - 1995 - Lobbyists must register and file expenditure reports

Honest Leadership and Open Government Act - 2007 - bans on gifts, tougher disclosure laws, lengthen time in between retirement from government and hiring by interest group

Page 37: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Methods Used by Interest GroupsElectioneering

Political Action Committees (PACs)Candidate EndorsementGOTV DrivesCandidate and Office Holders Rating CardsIssue Advertisements (Citizens’ United)

Courts and LitigationAmicus Curiae Briefs Court Appointment - Choice and RatificationClass Action Lawsuits

Grassroots - Public OpinionPetitions, Marchers, email/letter campaigns, protests

Page 38: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Top 20 PAC Contributors to Republican Candidates, 2007-2008

PAC Name Repub Total

National Auto Dealers Assn $1,892,000

National Assn of Realtors $1,679,000

American Bankers Assn $1,671,743

AT&T Inc $1,626,950

Associated Builders & Contractors

$1,430,000

National Beer Wholesalers Assn

$1,361,000

National Assn of Home Builders $1,338,500

United Parcel Service $1,213,273

Honeywell International $1,196,616

Credit Union National Assn $1,089,149

Freedom Project $1,065,398

Every Republican is Crucial PAC

$1,029,500

Koch Industries $1,014,000

American Dental Assn

$883,650

PricewaterhouseCoopers

$877,500

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

$852,000

AFLAC Inc $831,000

National Rifle Assn $821,382

Blue Cross/Blue Shield

$804,340

National Rural Electric Cooperative Assn

$792,174

Page 39: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Top 20 PAC Contributors to Democratic Candidates, 2007-2008

International Assn of Fire Fighters $2,115,900

American Fedn of St/Cnty/Munic Employees

$2,083,093

Air Line Pilots Assn $2,065,500

Communications Workers of America

$2,009,145

United Auto Workers $1,974,950

Sheet Metal Workers Union $1,974,260

United Food & Commercial Workers Union

$1,887,228

National Education Assn $1,857,800

Carpenters & Joiners Union $1,794,700

National Air Traffic Controllers Assn $1,768,975

PAC Name Dem Total

Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $3,270,150

American Assn for Justice $2,576,000

Laborers Union $2,355,850

Operating Engineers Union $2,346,567

National Assn of Realtors $2,340,900

American Federation of Teachers $2,261,750

Machinists/Aerospace Workers Union $2,251,342

Plumbers/Pipefitters Union $2,205,909

Teamsters Union $2,175,950

Service Employees International Union $2,145,100

Page 40: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS
Page 41: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

American Political Participation

Conventional Participation – voting, volunteering for a campaign, running for office, contributing money to a candidate, signing petitions, discussing politics, joining a political party

Unconventional Participation – uncommon, challenging behavior- Protest, Civil Disobedience, sit-ins, strikes, boycotts, marches, demonstrations (Grassroots)- Repeal of Draft and 26th Amendment, Montgomery Bus Boycott, March on Birmingham and Selma

Participation is done through linkage institutions

Page 42: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Elections as Linkage Institutions

Politicians present their platforms to the people – campaign events and mailings

People voice their preferences by voting People can contribute to campaigns and

volunteer to help Policy Elections allow people to voice

opinions on laws

Page 43: LINKAGE INSTITUTIONS: ELECTIONS AND INTEREST GROUPS

Interest Groups as Linkage InstitutionsExpress group members’ preferences to

politiciansCommunicate policy information to group

membersRaise and spend money to advocate for the

interests of the groups – electioneering and political advertisements

Lobbyists try to persuade politicians and provide expert information

Unconventional Participation – Organize Grassroots Protests