l'europe et au-delà

Europe and beyond: an appropriate scale forEurope and beyond: an appropriate scale forOpen Archives (repositories)

Paris, 2 April 2009Dr Norbert LossauDr. Norbert Lossau,

Director Göttingen State and University Library & Scientific Coordinator DRIVER& Scientific Coordinator DRIVER

1This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License

Attribution Non-commercial ShareAlike 2.0 Germany

Topics

Why do we need repositories?R it d l t h d t d?Repository development: where do we stand?DRIVER: from local repositories to an international repositories infrastructureSome challenges - and initiatives to address themg(PEER, OAPEN, datatsets in „enhancedpublications“)p )The need for an independent International Repositories Organisation (IRO)Repositories Organisation (IRO)What you can do to promote the development ofrepositories in France


Attribution Non-commercial ShareAlike 2.0 Germany 2This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License


repositories in France

2

The „Berlin Declaration“ requests…

F d t i t dFree and unrestricted accessto sciences and human knowledge representation

worldwide(October 2003)

Needs a global interoperable trusted long-termNeeds a global, interoperable, trusted, long termrepository infrastructure




Repository Development: where do we stand?

“R h R i i i E• “Research Repositories in Europe: the 2008 DRIVER Inventory study”, Maurits van d G f ( b h lf f SURF DRIVER)der Graaf (on behalf of SURF, DRIVER)

=>…




Research Repositories in Europe

TopicsG th t t l b d it tiGrowth, total number and situationContents, coverage and depositing T h i l i d t d dTechnical issues and standardsServices on top of repositories

Steady increase of number of Digital Repositories

Total of 280, yearly increase by 25-30Large part of universities in half of European countries




Conclusions content, coverage and depositing

More flexibility in access formsTrend to more OATrend to more OAVersion of deposited full text articles

Trend towards depositing postprint stage Work processes for depositing

No harmonisationG i ( tl ) d t d itiGrowing (partly) mandatory depositing

32% in 2008, while 25% in 2006(Still) Coverage of a third(Still) Coverage of a third

33% of Researchers delivering in repositories 35% of Research output of an institution deposited




Technical issues

Various technical issues 2008 2006persistent identifier 84% 75%persistent identifier 84% 75%

long-term availability secured 52% 73%

statistical data on access and usage 72% 70%

some form of subject indexing 86% 93%

author identifier 31% 33% locally developed

CDSwareDIVA Fedora

OPUS

ARNO Digitool

DIVA

DSpace

Fedora

GNU EPrint

iTOR

MyCoRe VITAL other




t

Repository Development: where do we stand?

O DOAR h i i t f di it l• OpenDOAR – a comprehensive register of digital repositories worldwide− More than 1300 repositories listed

=>…




OpenDOAR

Repository Typep y yp=>1072 institutional and177 disciplinary

Content Type=>815 hold journal articlesjournal articles, 318 Multimedia, audiovisualaudiovisual….69 datasets,




27 software etc.…

OpenDOAR

=>Disciplines763 Multidisciplinary86 Science General…99 Health andmedicine…98 History andA h lArchaeology…75 Social Sciences75 Social SciencesGeneral




DRIVER: The implementation ofa cross-country, repositoryinfrastructureast uctu e

DRIVER



Attribution Non-commercial ShareAlike 2.0 Germany 1

General Information: DRIVER II

Duration: 24 monthsBudget: 2.7 m EUR

cont…Univ. of Bath (UK)

Timeplan: 12/’07 -11/’09Main Deliverables:

Digital Repository Infrastructure

Univ. of Bath (UK)Univ. of Warszawski (PO)Univ of Gent (BE)Digital Repository Infrastructure

European Digital Repository ConfederationFunded by the European Commission,“Research Infrastructure” Unit FP 7

Univ. of Gent (BE)Univ. of Goettingen (GE)

Research Infrastructure Unit, FP 7Consortium Partners

Univ.of Athens (GR)

Danish Technical University (DK)Universidade do

Univ. of Bielefeld (GE)CNR-ISTI (IT)STICHTING SURF (NL)

Minho (PT)Narodna in univerzitetna knijznica

Univ. of Nottingham (UK)j

(SLO)



Attribution Non-commercial ShareAlike 2.0 Germany 112

DRIVER II activity areas and outcomes

Organization of Digital Confederation

Community Building &

Repository Infrastructure Providers DRIVER Portal &

H l d kCommunity Building & Support

D NET S ft

Helpdesk

Open Source Software

“European Information

D-NET Software

Digital Repository Infrastructure (Services & Data)

European InformationSpace”

Focused Studies & Demonstrators (e g “enhanced publications”)

Studies &Discovery



Attribution Non-commercial ShareAlike 2.0 GermanyDRIVER Midterm Review Pisa 30 January

13(e.g. enhanced publications ) Discovery

The DRIVER Portal




15www.driver-community.eu

D-NET Software: DRIVER Network-Evolution-Toolkit

Version 1.0 released under the Open Source Apache License in June 2008; Version 2.0 scheduled for June 2009in June 2008; Version 2.0 scheduled for June 2009

The DRIVER Infrastructure Software includes:The DRIVER Infrastructure Software includes:Repository network administration software (such as the Repository Network Manager, Resource Monitoring)epos o y e o a age , esou ce o o g)Support service to local repository managers andaggregators (Validation Tool)gg g ( )Demonstrate end-user services(Search, Browse, Profiling)




16

DRIVER Infrastructure

First implementation in operation: “European Information Space”Information SpaceMoved to production mode on the 20 June 2008Today 210+ repositories from 23 countriesToday 210+ repositories from 23 countries

S t th fSupports three groups of users:1.The repository manager2 Th i id2.The service provider3.The researcher, reader, public (demonstration of the

infrastructure)infrastructure)




17

Repository Map

210harvested repositories p

23 countriescountries

1,000,000+ documents



Attribution Non-commercial ShareAlike 2.0 Germany1818

Service Open Infrastructure (SOI)

Functionality LayerUser Interface

ServiceRecomm.Service

CommunityService

on eet e

UserService

SearchService

Info

rmat

ioS

ervi

ce

Res

ulS

eS

ervi

ce

UserService

RepositorieOAI-PMHService

IndexService

BrowseServiceer eut

hne

StoreService

AggregatorServiceM

anag

Ser

vic

Aut

hz&

Au

Ser

vic

Text EngineService

Data Layer

ValidatorServiceEnabling

Layer

CollectionService




yLayer

Service Map

9hosting nodes

25+ Functionality typologiestypologies(services)

36serviceInstances

3




3applications: DRIVER Main, Belgium, Spain-Recolecta

DRIVER Admin (Internal) Control Panel I

Monitor repository landscape I




DRIVER Admin (Internal) Control Panel II

Monitor repository landscape II




DRIVER Admin (Internal) Control Panel III

MR Monitor

Reposi r &

Prtory D rocess

Data

s




DRIVER Admin (Internal) Control Panel V

Chec

index ck repox profil ository

le upd y dates




Interoperability: DRIVER GuidelinesChapter 1: Use of OAI PMH - Chapter 1: Use of OAI-PMH

- Chapter 2: Use of Metadata OAI_DC - Chapter 3: Use of Best Practices for OAI DCChapter 3: Use of Best Practices for OAI_DC- Chapter 4: Use of Compound Object Wrapping - Chapter 5: Use of Vocabularies and Semantics

Ch t 6 U f Q lit l b l - Chapter 6: Use of Quality labels - Chapter 7: Use of Persistent Identifiers- Chapter 8: Use of Usage Statistics ExchangeChapter 8: Use of Usage Statistics Exchange- Chapter 9: Use of Intellectual Property Rights

(IPR)



DRIVER Guidelines in various languages




Guidelines

From the inventory study:

Does your repository follow the DRIVER guidelines? n %

We do not know about the DRIVER guidelines 49 27.5

We know about the DRIVER guidelines, 32 18 0but do not follow them 32 18.0

We know about the DRIVER guidelines and (make every effort) to follow them 97 54.5

72.5% knows DRIVER Guidelines; 54.5% tries to follow them

(make every effort) to follow them

them



Attribution Non-commercial ShareAlike 2.0 GermanyThis is as optional footer

How does DRIVER relate to international repository communities?

DRIVER sees it’s mission asDRIVER sees it s mission as Catalyst for a global repository infrastructureDevelop and maintain the European repository p p p yinfrastructure node

DRIVER liaises already with institutions and initiatives from the U S Latin America Chinainitiatives from the U.S., Latin America, China, Japan, India and AfricaDRIVER collaborates with eIFL, the library support organisation for developing countriesDRIVER liaises with the Object Reuse and Exchange (ORE) project and SPARC U SExchange (ORE) project and SPARC, U.S.




Some challenges - and initiatives to addressththem

Filling repositories with contentFilling repositories with contentAutomated transfer from content to and amongrepositoriesrepositoriesOpen Access in the Humanities & SocialS iSciencesCombining publications and datasets „enhancedpublications“




An introduction to:An introduction to:

F b 2009February 2009

Supported by the EC eContentplus programme

PEER Publishing and the Ecology of European Research www.peerproject.eu

Stakeholders in scholarly communicationStakeholders in scholarly communication

There are four key stakeholder groups:• Publishers• Researchers – authors and users• Libraries and repositories• Funding agencies

– All of the above stakeholder groups are represented within PEER, both within the consortium & an advisory board

– PEER will look at the effects of the systematic archiving ofPEER will look at the effects of the systematic archiving of ‘stage two’ outputs: the version of the author’s manuscript accepted for publication


Purpose of PEERpPublishing & the Ecology of European Research

• Publishers and research community collaborate

• Develop an “observatory” to monitor the impact of systematically depositing stage-two outputs on a large scalescale

• Gather hard evidence to inform future policies• Gather hard evidence to inform future policies


ObjectivesObjectives

D t i h l l d it f t t t t• Determine how large-scale deposit of stage-two outputs will affect journal viability

• Determine whether it increases access

• Determine whether it affects the broader ecology ofDetermine whether it affects the broader ecology of European research

• Determine the factors affecting readiness to deposit and• Determine the factors affecting readiness to deposit and associated costs

D l d l( ) t h h t diti l bli hi• Develop model(s) to show how traditional publishing can coexist with self-archiving


Consortium & other participantsConsortium & other participants

The PEER consortium:The PEER consortium:• International Association of Scientific, Technical and

Medical Publishers (STM)( )• European Science Foundation (ESF)• Göttingen State and University Library (UGOE)

M Pl k G ll h ft (MPG)• Max Planck Gesellschaft (MPG)• Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en

Automatique (INRIA)u o a que ( )Plus technical partners: SURF & Universität Bielefeld

With other participants including:• 11 STM publishers; Koninklijke Bibliotheek; Research

Teams and Expert Advisors from all stakeholder groupsTeams and Expert Advisors from all stakeholder groups


Publishers at January 2009Publishers at January 2009

BMJ Publishing Group• BMJ Publishing Group• Cambridge University Press• ElsevierElsevier• IOP Publishing• Nature Publishing Group• Oxford University Press• Portland Press• Sage Publications• Sage Publications• Springer• Taylor & Francis GroupTaylor & Francis Group• Wiley-Blackwell


ContentContent

• Participating publishers collectively volunteer 300 journals (Life Sciences, Medicine, Physical Sciences, Social Sciences & Humanities & other professional publications)Sciences & Humanities & other professional publications)

• Selection criteria– European content – 20% or greater– Quality – good quality, but reflecting a range by impact

f tfactor– Subject – wide range

• Publishers set embargo periods appropriate for journal


User Involvement & FeedbackUser Involvement & Feedback

A thAuthors• Deposit their stage-two outputs• Participate in the behavioural research• Participate in the behavioural research• Representative authors participate in Author/User group

Repository Users• Participate in the behavioural researchParticipate in the behavioural research• Representative users participate in Author/User group


PEER WorkflowPEER Workflow

OAPEN – Open Access Publishing in European NetworksEuropean Networks<Scientific Board Meeting Amsterdam 2009-03-02

The Consortium

Partners: Amsterdam University Press, Georg-A t U i ität Götti M T lAugust-Universität Göttingen, Museum TusculanumPress, Manchester University Press, Presses Universitaire de Lyon, Firenze University Press, U i it f A t d U i it f L idUniversity of Amsterdam, University of Leiden

Seven university presses as content providersSeven university presses as content providersTwo universities, as technology and research partnerAimed at Academic publishers in Humanities and Social Sciences Building a network around OA publishing for stakeholders within the academic communitystakeholders within the academic community

Expected ResultsPublication ModelPublication Model

OA funding model for e-books based on scientific studies(user needs publication cultures OA models)(user needs, publication cultures, OA models)Services and business plan for OA books and servicesContract for licensing contentAgreement for OAPEN partnerships

P bli hi Pl tfPublishing Platformdedicated to monograph content in HSS in all its dimensions (text, multimedia, data, reader interaction)supplemented by tools and services for e-publication, digital printing (PoD)digital printing (PoD),marketing and digitization

Networked Online-LibraryyAggregated collection of OA booksMulti-lingual search

Website: www.oapen.net

DRIVER – Enhanced PublicationsThe most important requirements for this demonstrator are: Cover multiple scientific disciplines. The enhanced publications for the demonstrator are chosen to cover typical material from the three scientificdemonstrator are chosen to cover typical material from the three scientific disciplines: a hebrew database from the Alpha-studies, measurements from the Beta-studies and survey data from the Gamma-studies. Use OAI-ORE. OAI-ORE, as suggested in the report about Object Models, and RDF are used to aggregate and serialize enhanced publicationsand RDF are used to aggregate and serialize enhanced publications. Display data. Data is too often just a compressed archive of files. This demonstrator should present the data behind a publication. Navigation. Users can browse through all objects of the enhancedNavigation. Users can browse through all objects of the enhanced publication. Identification. All elements of the enhanced publications are atomic and citable web resources that are identified by a persistent identifier. Sh i t l ti E h d bli ti t i tiShow interrelations. Enhanced publications connect existing resources. Seen from the other side: existing resources will connect two enhanced publication. Enhanced publications can create flocks of related research activities

www.driver-community.eu



Attribution Non-commercial ShareAlike 2.0 GermanyLossau

Technical issues

Is your repository technically prepared for Enhanced Publications?Enhanced Publications?

no but we have plans to prepare our repository

YESN b t

no, but we have plans to prepare our repository

no, no plans

46 1% 32 6%

No, butNO

21 3%

Metadata standards on the rise:

46.1% 32.6% 21.3%

DIDL, MODS and OAI-ORE




The need for an independent International R it i O i ti (IRO)Repositories Organisation (IRO)

To build a collective, powerful international voice in ti OA it i d i tpromoting OA repositories and appropriate

infrastructuresTo make regional and national repository efforts visibleTo make regional and national repository efforts visibleon a global scaleTo create a network of expertise; broker & connect theTo create a network of expertise; broker & connect the people and stakeholdersTo help develop industry-like interoperability standardsTo help develop industry like interoperability standardsTo provide a seal for qualityTo support professional education for repositoryTo support professional education for repositorymanagersTo facilitate funding for repository infrastructures (for




To facilitate funding for repository infrastructures (forbeneficiaries outside of the actual IRO)

Confederation or an International RepositoriesO i ti (IRO) t l iOrganisation (IRO) current planning

Initial stimulus by the DRIVER project(„Confederation“)Group of founding members prepares statutes, p g p p ,governance & finance model etc.Membership and partners/alliesMembership and partners/alliesWider call for participation goes out in thebeginning of Junebeginning of JuneLaunch scheduled for October 2009




What you can do to promote the developmentf it i i F ?of repositories in France?

1. Build informed communities within France, ,address various stakeholders

2 Introduce OA-components in your licencing2. Introduce OA components in your licencingagreements with publishers

3 Support technical interoperability3. Support technical interoperability4. Connect to international initiatives, e.g.

1. As (founding) member in the upcoming International Repositories organistion

2 Th h ti ti i ti i th i t ti l O2. Through active participation in the international Open Access and repositories infrastructure development(cf OpenAIRE proposal to the EC)




(cf. OpenAIRE proposal to the EC)

Thank you for yourattention!

Photos: Ronald Schmidt GöttingenSchmidt, Göttingen

Contact: [email protected]




@ g g

l'europe et au-delà

Education