leeds beckett university board of examiners: staff development sessions for academic staff quality...
TRANSCRIPT
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY
BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS FOR ACADEMIC STAFFQuality Assurance Services
AIMS OF THE SESSION• Provide a brief overview of Exam
Committee and BOE process
• Provide details of the regulations and how they should be applied
• Provide the opportunity to rehearse the BOE process
PART A
General Overview:
Examination Committees
Board of Examiners
Examination Committees andBoard of ExaminersExamination Committee (Module Outcomes) The Board can delegate some of its powers to an Examination Committee. A Committee will consider outcomes at module level, confirm credit and may determine progression at level 4.
Board of Examiners (Progression and Awards) A Board is required for each course and is responsible for all levels. No other body has the power to confer an award or to amend a decision of the Board (except an Appeal Panel).
Key Points to Remember:Examination Committees• Determine standard of module outcomes• Consider the amendment of cohort marks as
appropriate• Record credit • Note cases of Cheating, Plagiarism or Other Unfair
Practice• Progression from L4 to L5• They cannot confirm awards at L4• All external examiners required to attend
Key Points to Remember:Boards of Examiners• Only body with power to determine Progression and
Awards• Receive Faculty Mitigation Panel outcomes• Receive RPL Approval Board decisions• Implement UPB decisions as appropriate• Confirming entitlement to Contained Awards• Responsible for the publication of Results Online
(within 5 Working Days)• One or all external examiner(s) must attend
Board of Examiners - RolesChair: conduct the meeting; advise on regulations; sign the marks sheet and results list; check minutes; chair’s actions
Course Leader: oversight of moderation; timely marks to BOE; advising students post-outcomes
Module Leader: module moderation; raising of any issues affecting cohort performance; advising students post-outcomes
External Examiner: assuring standards; discussing performance; signing marks sheet
Secretary: organising the meeting; preparing marks sheets; minuting; entering outcomes and releasing results
PART B
Progression and
Award Requirements
Progression from L4 & L5
To progress from Level 4 to 5 or Level 5 to 6, students must have:
• Pursued a programme of study of 120C at the level concerned (includes any recognition of prior learning)
• Submitted in all components recorded in Banner• Achieved a minimum of 40% or more in modules equivalent to
100C at the level concerned• Achieved an average of 30% or more in each module studied• Achieved an overall average of 40% or more across the level
Students may be re-assessed in all modules
Requirement Regulations
Credits studied per level (inc. RPL) 120 @ Final Level
Submission in… All Components
Passed Credits Min. (@ 40% or more) 100
Overall Level Average - Across all modules 40% Min.
Min. Fail Mark 30
Re-assessment allowance Re-assessment in all modules
Re-assessment undertaken at... At component level
Award Eligibility @ Final Level (UG)
Award Eligibility @ PG LevelRequirement Regulations
Credits studied per level (inc. RPL) 180 @ MA/MSC120 @ PGDIP60 @ PGCERT (No RPL allowed)
Submission in… All Components
Passed Credits Min. (40% or more) MA/MSC = 160PGDIP = 100PGCERT = 60
Overall Level Average Across All Modules 40% min.
Min. Fail Mark 30PGCERT – Must pass all modules
Re-assessment allowance Re-assessment in all modules
Re-assessment undertaken at… At component level
Re-Assessment (UG & PG)Required where the student has…• Not submitted in ALL components of a module
AND/ OR • Less than 40% OVERALL module score (after 1st sit)
How it works…• Re-assessed in components ‘NS’ or less than 40% ONLY• Re-assessed COMPONENTS capped at 40% (not
module)• Overall module score marked with ‘R’ (e.g. ‘45R’)
NB: if late submission penalties are to be applied to
re-assessments, this should occur prior to adding
the re-assessment cap
Re-Assessment – ExamplesComponent Attempt 1 Attempt 2 (capped
at maximum of 40%)
Module Mark
A) Course work (50%)
80 n/a 45r
B) Examination (50%)
NS 10 (capped at 40 but lower so mark remains)
Component Attempt 1 Attempt 2 (capped at maximum of 40%)
Module Mark
A) Course work (50%)
NS 80 (capped at 40) 25r
B) Examination (50%)
NS 10 (capped at 40 but mark is lower so remains)
Repeating a Level (UG & PG)
• Decided after all re-assessment opportunties are spent
• Permitted once only
• ‘Fail Withdraw’ – Non-Submissions (confirming entitlement to any contained awards)
Repeating (Cont.)
Repeat PART Level(Progression)
Repeat FULL Level(Progression)
Repeating at the Final Level
Passed 50% or more of Credit for Level
Passed less than 50% of Credit for Level
Repeat whatever Failed
Keep Marks for Passed Modules
All previous marks are ‘wiped out’
Keep Marks for Passed Modules
Applicable Classification Methods – (Honours Degrees) – 2 Different Approaches
• Group 1 Students
(Admit term = 2011/12 or earlier)• Group 2 Students
(Admit term = 2012/13 or later)
“Did the student start their current registration with our university prior to August 2012 (i.e. is their ‘Admit Term’ 2011/12 or earlier)?”
YES = OLD and NEW methods / NO = NEW method only
Group 1 Students - 2011/12 & Earlier:
• Best 100• Profile• Weighted L5 & L6 average
Group 2 Students - 2012/13 & Later:
• Best 100
‘Best 100’ Method
• Average of Best 100 credits – Level 5 (25%)
+• Average of Best 100 credits – Level 6 (75%)
Meaning…• Worst 20 credit module at L5 is not counted in level
average (before weighting @ 25%)• Worst 20 credit module at L6 is not counted in level
average (before weighting @ 75%)
Weighted Average and Profile – Group 1 Students Only (2011/12 or earlier)Weighted Average:
Level 5 average – across ALL modules (25% weighting)
plus
Level 6 average – across ALL modules (75% weighting)
or
Profiling:
The attribution of a weighting to modules in each classification band (0.25 for level 5 and 0.75 for level 6).
A student must score MORE THAN half of the total within a classification band to receive it.
“Mixed Economy” Students• Some students have undertaken a mixture of 15 and 20 credit point
modules at L5/ 6 following the rolling implementation of UG refocus
EG: PT students continuing on L6 this year
Temp WD FT students who returned this year
Placement students undertaking SW Y4 this year
• Award eligibility requirements for these students are standard
• Classification may require application of “Best 105” model
• Profiling requires the use of different module weightings if there is mixed economy within a level
Board Reports will handle these scenarios
Merit and Distinctions
• Option for all awards except honours degrees• Must be written into the course documents
Awarded based on achievement of:
• Merit - 60% Average (across all modules)• Distinction – 70% Average (across all modules)
-OR- • ‘A defined profile of achievement’
Recognition of Prior Learning
• Do not carry ‘marks’ – just credit
• RPL does not count towards any calculations
• RPL credit is automatically ‘dropped’ in ‘Best 100’ method
Key Points/Questions to Consider
• Hold a pre-board meeting:– Chair, Secretary and Course Leader(s) to attend
• Agenda:– Are there any students who started or re-started the level
before August 2011?– Did the student’s current registration start before 2012/13?– Have all Chair’s Actions been addressed?– Review marks sheets – Discuss category A mitigation– Does the External Examiner need to be briefed on
key matters
PART C
Board of Examiners
Exercise
Exercise• Work with a partner• Review the profiles provided• Act as a BOE meeting and make decisions
Points to remember:• Students have submitted in all components• All re-assessment have been taken• Look at all the details provided• Confirm eligibility for an award first
Exercise – Answers and Discussion
• What should the decisions be for each student?
• Why was that decision made?
Any Questions?
Further information:• Guide to BOE and Exam Committeeswww.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/partners/boards-of-examiners.htm
• Quality Manualwww.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/partners/quality-manual.htm
• Faculty Quality Assurance & Governance Teams• Quality Assurance [email protected]