lecture overview our thoughts about others our feelings about others our actions toward others...

29
Lecture Overview Our Thoughts About Others Our Feelings About Others Our Actions Toward Others Applying Social Psychology t o Social Problems ©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Post on 20-Dec-2015

247 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Lecture Overview

• Our Thoughts About Others

• Our Feelings About Others

• Our Actions Toward Others

• Applying Social Psychology to Social Problems

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Introductory Definition

• Social Psychology: study of how other people influence our thoughts, feelings, & actions

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Social psychology • examines how other

persons influence our thoughts, feelings and actions– Thoughts include

attitudes and attributions

– Feelings include attraction and dislike

• Actions include social influence, aggression, and altruism

Attitude:

• learned predisposition to respond cognitively, affectively, & behaviorally to a particular object

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Attitudes:

• Cognitive: what you think

• Affective: physiological changes

• Behavioral: what you do

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Thoughts About Others: Cognitive Dissonance

• Cognitive Dissonance: feeling of discomfort created from a mismatch between an attitude & a behavior or between two competing attitudes

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Thoughts About Others:

Cognitive Dissonance (Continued)

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Thoughts About Others: Cognitive Dissonance (Continued)

• Festinger & Carlsmith’s Cognitive Dissonance Study. Participants given VERY boring tasks to complete, & then paid either $1 or $20 to tell next participant the task was “very enjoyable” & “fun.”

• Result? Those paid $1 experienced greater cognitive dissonance, & therefore changed their attitude more than those paid $20.

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

• Three Key Factors:• Physical Attractiveness • Most important, yet culturally• influenced• Proximity: geographic closeness • Similarity: people prefer those who are like

themselves

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Interpersonal attraction

Interpersonal attraction

• People do tend to stick with people as attractive as they : the “matching hypothesis” This works between and within sexes.

• Why does this happen?

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Interpersonal attraction

• In a normal distribution of people 96% are neither extraordinary good looking nor extraordinarily unattractive. Most people in that 96% do not feel they have settled in choosing their mate.

• In fact, most married people rate their spouses as more attractive than themselves .

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Criteria for sexual selection?

• Rather consistently, women prefer mates somewhat older, men prefer younger mates.

• Women prefer wealthy high-status males• Men prefer younger, attractive women

• Any idea why?

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Interpersonal attraction

• Proximity: geographic closeness • Logistics• Familiarity• Mere exposure increases liking• Keeping a lasting relationship Similarity: people prefer those who are like

themselvesSo, do opposites attract? Maybe in personality

but not in social background or values.©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

D

• “What is Beautiful is Good”; Dion et al. , 1972People who are attractive are expectedto have better jobs, be nicer people etc.“Halo effect”

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Social Influence

• Conformity: changing behavior because of real or imagined group pressure

• Obedience: following direct commands, usually from an authority figure

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: ConformityAsch’s Conformity Study• Participants were asked to select

the line closest in length to X.• When confederates first gave

obviously wrong answers (A or C), more than 1/3 of true subjects conformed & agreed with the incorrect choices.

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Conformity (Continued)

Why do we conform?• Normative Social Influence: need for

approval & acceptance i.e. what are you wearing to the party?• Informational Social Influence: need

for information & direction: teach me!

• Reference Groups: we conform to people we like & admire because we want to be like them

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Obedience

• Milgram’s obedience study: Participants serving as “teachers” were ordered to continue shocking someone with a known heart condition who is begging to be released.

• Result? 65% of “teachers” delivered highest level of shock (450 volts) to the pseudo-heart condition “learner.”

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Milgram’s Shock Generator

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Obedience (Continued)

Four major factors affecting obedience:1. legitimacy & closeness of the authority

figure2. remoteness of the victim3. assignment of responsibility4. modeling/imitation

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Group Processes

• Group membership involves:– Roles: set of behavior patterns

connected with particular – social positions– Deindividuation: anonymity leads to

reduced inhibition vs self-consciousness, & personal

responsibility

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Group Processes: “Power of the Situation”

Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Study• Students were randomly assigned to play

the role of either “prisoner” or “guard.”

• Original study, scheduled for 2 weeks, was stopped after 6 days due to serious psychological changes in both “prisoners” & “guards.”

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Group Processes: Problems with Decision Making

• Group Polarization: group movement toward either a riskier or more conservative decision; result depends on the members’ initial dominant tendency

• Groupthink: faulty decision making occurring when a highly cohesive group seeks agreement & avoids inconsistent information

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Group Processes (Continued)

Symptoms of Groupthink: Illusion of invulnerability Belief in group’s morality Collective rationalizations Stereotypes of out-groups Self-censorship Illusion of unanimity Direct pressure on dissenters

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Altruism

Why Don’t We Help?

• Diffusion of Responsibility: dilution, or diffusion, of personal responsibility

• Ambiguity of the Situation: unclear what help is needed

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Latane & Darley’s 5-Step Decision Process

for Helping

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Our Actions Toward Others: Altruism

• How can we increase helping?• Assign responsibility• Reduce

ambiguity • Increase

societal rewards

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010

Applying Social Psychology to Social Problems:

• How can we reduce destructive obedience? 1. Adjust socialization toward obedience2. Recognize power of the situation3. Protect against groupthink4. Avoid foot-in-the-door technique:

making a small request followed by increasingly larger requests

5. Guard against relaxed moral guard6. Increase disobedient models

©John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2010