lecture 35: conclusion – 911: a macro history 14 th may 2003 (wednesday)

33
Lecture 35: Conclusion – 911: A Macro History 14 th May 2003 (Wednesday)

Post on 21-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Lecture 35: Conclusion –

911: A Macro History

14th May 2003 (Wednesday)

Structure of Lecture 35

Introduction: Concept of the Historical

Cross in Real Life Linear History or Cyclic

History? New Era By Invitation? Old Era of Imposition? Imagine the Future……

PART I: Introduction –

Concept of the Historical Cross in Real Life

Decision-makers of the Post-911 World Order

Challengers: Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and I

slamic Fundamentalism An Anti-American Coalition?

Counter-challengers/ “Re-challengers”: George W Bush, Donald Rumsfel

d and USA An Anti-Terror Coalition?

Responders: Nations and People of the World –

from Europeans to Iraqis

Pre-determinism Vs Voluntarism

Can Human Beings Control their Own Future?

Pre-determinism and Fatalism Importance of the “Externalities” The Prophetic Perspectives Mark Roberti: “The Fall of Hong Kong”?

Voluntarism Importance of Human Consciousness The Marxist (Atheist) Perspectives The Western Expedition of Genghis Khan

Where Does the Post-911 World Order Fit in?

911 as a “Trigger Action” at the Historic Cross

911 as a “Trigger Action” at the Historic Cross ~ Sarajevo Assassination (1914)? ~ Pearl Harbor Incident (1941)? ~ Berlin Blockade Crisis (1948)?

The Choice of the Decision-makers: to Walk Back into the Old History Reaganistic Unilateralism Cold War Ideological Dictatorship Rethinking the Proposal for the New

American Century (PNAC)

911 in the Fatalist—Voluntary Paradigm

Cold War Historian John Gaddis: USA in Europe = “Empire by Invitation

” USSR in Europe = “Empire of Impositi

on” The Pre-determined Part of 911:

Decision-maker = “Fate” (i.e. the Trend of Human Development) through Osama Bin Laden

“New Era by Invitation” The Voluntary Part of 911:

Decision-maker = George W Bush “Old Era of Imposition”

*Graphic Macro History of 911

1945-1985 Peak of Cold War

1985-1989 Peak of Reaganism

1991-2001 Clintonistic Interlude

1945 2001

New Era by Invitation? Substantiation of the Globalized Era

Old Era of Imposition? Return to the Cold War/ Pre-Clintonistic Order

Other Directions: Brand New Era/ Damn Old Era……

PART IILinear History or Cyclic

History?

Linear History? Both Pre-determinism and Vol

untarism One-way Ticket Long-term Historic Trend ~ Ha

ng Seng Index/ SARS Index Y: Year X: Variables (e.g. Human Liveliho

od, Human Evolution, Materialistic Complexity……)

Where is 911 in the Different Graphs? New Era Vs Old Era Debate (PA

RT I)

Cyclic History?

Both Pre-determinism and Voluntarism Arnold Toynbee (1889-1975): A Study of

History Fate of Each Civilization is Pre-

determined Birth Rise Decline Death Western Civilization will be the Only Remaining

Culture (Earlier Version) Chinese Civilization would be the Savior of the

World (Later Version)

But Human Beings Still Have the Ability to Control the PACE

BirthDeath

RiseDecline

911 and the American HegemonyIn the Historic Cycle

911 Speed up the American Cycle or Slow Down the American Cycle?

Starting the End of American Hegemony?

The Short-term Increase of American Power will led to its Long-term Demise?

Prolonging the American Hegemony?

PART IIINew Era

by Invitation?

“Milestone” of George W Bush Tomorrow is September 12th. A milestone is pass

ed, and a mission goes on. Our cause is even larger than our country. Ours is

the cause of human dignity: freedom guided by conscience and guarded by peace. This ideal of America is the hope of all mankind. That hope drew millions to this harbor. That hope still lights our way. And the light shines in the darkness. And the darkness will not overcome it.

-- George W Bush (11 September 2002)

911 as the Real End of Cold War?

Cold War (1945-1991): Bipolarity and Beyond John Gaddis: “We Know Now” – Know

What? The New Cold War Vs Russia and

China (1991-2001)? Anatol Lieven: “The Cold War is

Finally Over” Russian Analyst In What Sense? Really?

Francis Fukuyama’s Argument

Francis Fukuyama American Japanese, Political Scientist The End of History and the Last Man (198

9) “Islamo-Fascism” Challenging the Pre

dicament in Globalization “Western Institutions Hold All the Cards

and for that Reason will Continue to Spread Across the Globe in the Long Run”

911 = Part of the Globalization Process, Still Towards the “End of History”

Revision: Why a Brand New Era?

Asymmetrical Warfare Rise of Non-state Actors Emergence of Terrorists with “No

Common Senses” Rationalization of Extremist

Methods to Fight Against the Extremist Terrorists

Other New Features about the Actor, Event, Venue, Tool and Timing……

Ideals of this New Era

“Lennonism” A World Divided in Values and Culture

s Fall of State Absolutism/ Single Hege

mony A Non-violent Path Towards this Ideal

Or the Terrorist Agenda from the American Perspective? A World Ruled by Terror Fall of Legitimate States Global Terrorism against Human Natu

re

Part IV –Old Era of Imposition?

Eric Hobsbawm’s Argument Eric Hobsbawm

British Leftist Social Historian Rise of American Rightists Before 911

~ Rise of European Rightists Before WWI

~ Rise of European Rightists Before WWII

~ Rise of Communism Before WWII Goal of American Rightists = Establishing

a Military Hegemony of the World ~ Goals of European Rightists and Co

mmunists Bush ~ Hitler?! ……

John Gaddis’s Argument

John Gaddis US Cold War Historian

The World Has Never Changed Since the End of Cold War

Kosovo War in the Globalized Era = “American Bloc Vs Russian Bloc”

911 = American Bloc Vs Terrorist Bloc

Communism = Authoritarianism = Terrorism = American Enemies

Fareed Zakaria’s Argument

Fareed Zakaria: “The Return of History” Newsweek Editor

Return of Politics Political over Economics Again

Return of Government The World Ruled by Big Governments in

stead of Individuals/ Market Again Return of “History” (Ideology)

Christian/ Islamic/ Patriotic Beliefs Back Again

Vs Francis Fukuyama’s “The End of History”

Kenneth Waltz’s Argument

Kenneth Waltz Waltzian Neo-Realism Founder in Internat

ional Relations Discipline Theory of International Politics

The Continuity of International Politics (of the 1990s?) Imbalance of Power in the World Nuclear Proliferation Prevalence of Globalized Crises with Ame

rican Involvement

Revision: Why a Damn Old Era?

Symmetrical Warfare in Favor of the Hegemony

Prolongation of State Actors Pre-emption of Terrorists with

“No Common Senses” Anti-Terrorism becomes a

Moralistic Ideology Other New Features about the

Actor, Event, Venue, Tool and Timing Retreat to their Old Forms?……

Ideals of this “Old” Era

A World with No Terrorists A World United by the American

Values A World of Clear Moralistic Division

A Predictable World Order and Structure based on the US Hegemony Theory of Hegemonic Stability

*Regardless of the Bloody “Transitional” Path Towards this Ideal

Assigned Readings

Main Text: Francis Fukuyama: “History and September 11”

(B&D P.27-36) Anatol Lieven: “The Cold War is Finally Over”

(H&R P.295-306) Fareed Zakaria: “The Return of History” (H&R

P.307-318) Supplementary References:

Kenneth Waltz: “The Continuity of International Politics” (B&D P.348-354)

John Gaddis: “And Now This.” The Age of Terror. Ed. Strobe Talbott and Nayan Chanda. The Perseus Press, 2001. P.1-22.

Conclusion – Imagine

the Future……

Consensus of the Different Interpretations

of the Post-911 World Order

“New Era” Argument also Acknowledges: American Power Expanded Gross Imbalance of Power

Continued ……

“Old Era” Argument also Acknowledges: Alternative Battle Fronts in addition

to Politics/ Military Introduced They are Needed to be Developed

by Other Nations/ Individuals ……

Let’s Complete the Interpretations Together!

Future of USA:Hegemony Forever?

New Americanized Order in the World

Continuation of the Middle East Campaign

Increasing International Bandwagon towards USA

Bilateral Relationship with USA (~Suzerainty of Imperial China) > Multilateral Relationship with UN

….. As Long as the Constraints are

NOT Constraining the US Power, the US Hegemony will Sustain Forever Tautology?! Chicken or Egg?!

Future of USA: Imperial Overreach?

Imperial Overreach like the Roman Empire? Internal Constraints

Political Constraints (Congress, Opposition Party)

Financial Constraints(“Fall Behind Japan” in the 90s?)

External Constraints International Diplomatic Opposition Effective Military Back-off Propaganda Counteraction

Invisible Constraints in History Hygiene/ Plague/ Mystery…

Are these constraints existing today?!

“Pax Globalica”—Ideal of Human Beings?

Imagine there's no heaven,It's easy if you try,No hell below us,Above us only sky,Imagine all the peopleliving for today...

Imagine there's no countries,It isn’t hard to do,Nothing to kill or die for,No religion too,Imagine all the peopleliving life in peace...

Imagine no possessions,I wonder if you can,No need for greed or hunger,A brotherhood of man,Imagine all the peopleSharing all the world...

You may say I’m a dreamer,but I’m not the only one,I hope some day you'll join us,And the world will live as one.

Final Remarks ^o^

Rule No. 1: The Facts Are Unimportant

Rule No. 2: The Analysis and Logic Are More Important

Rule No. 3: The Inter-transferability is the Most Important

Your Feel, My Feel

~~The End~~Thank you very much for your enthusiasm and

consideration in the whole course~

Hope seeing you again in the future!

[email protected] ; [email protected]