lecture 1 - massachusetts institute of technology€¦ · lecture 1 introduction to water and...
TRANSCRIPT
Lecture 1
Introduction to water and wastewater treatment processes
Significant dates in public water supply
97 Inhabitants in ancient Rome use about 38 gpcd 1619 New River Company first to supply each home
directly with its own water for a few hours per day 1854 John Snow establishes source of cholera
epidemic in London as a contaminated supply well – first understanding of water and health
1873 Continuous supplies in general use in London 1900 Most cities have a water supply with service
pipes to homes
Sour
ce:
Envi
ronm
ent C
anad
a, 2
004.
Wat
er a
vaila
bilit
y ve
rsus
pop
ulat
ion.
ht
tp://
ww
w.e
c.gc
.ca/
wat
er/im
ages
/info
/fact
s/e-
Wat
er_a
vaila
bilit
y.jp
g. A
cces
sed
Dec
embe
r 10,
20
04.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
()
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
)
U.S. total water use over time
Asi
aex
clud
ing
Mid
dle
East
Cen
tral
Am
eric
a &
C
arib
bean Eu
rope
Mid
dle
East
& N
orth
A
fric
a
Nor
th A
mer
ica
Oce
ania
Sout
h A
mer
ica
Sub-
Saha
ran
Afr
ica
Dev
elop
ed C
ount
ries
Dev
elop
ing
Cou
ntrie
s
Hig
h In
com
e C
ount
ries
Mid
dle
Inco
me
Cou
ntrie
s
Low
Inco
me
Cou
ntrie
s
Uni
ted
Stat
es
Dom
estic
wat
er u
se (l
/cap
/day
Dom
estic
wat
er u
se (g
al/c
ap/d
ay
Per c
apita
use
(l/d
/cap
)
AL
AK
AZ
AR
C
A
CO
C
TD
E
FL
GA
H
IID
IL
IN
IA
KS KY LA M
EM
DM
A MI
MN
MS
MO
MT
NE
NV
NH NJ
NM NY
NC
ND
OH
OK
OR PA PR RI
SC
SD TN TX UT
VT VI VA WA
WV WI
WY
US
tota
l
Average
0
200
400
600
800
350
US VI
Domestic water use by state
1000
1200
1400
1600 NEVADA
UTAH
MAINE
IDAHO
Per c
apita
use
(gpd
/cap
) 300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
200
400
600
800
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
)
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Bal
timor
e, M
D
Ber
kele
y, C
A
Bos
ton,
MA
Gra
nd R
apid
s, M
I
Gre
envi
lle C
ount
y, S
C
Hag
erst
own,
MD
Jeffe
rson
Cou
nty,
AL
Jeffe
rson
Cou
nty,
KS
Lanc
aste
r Cou
nty,
NE
Las
Vega
s, N
V
Littl
e R
ock,
AR
Los
Ang
eles
, CA
LA C
ount
y, C
A
Gre
ater
Peo
ria, I
L
Mem
phis
, TN
Orla
ndo,
FL
Rap
id C
ity, S
D
Sant
a M
onic
a, C
A
Wyo
min
g, M
I
US
aver
age
Wat
er C
onsu
mpt
ion
(l/d/
cap
Wat
er C
onsu
mpt
ion
(gpd
/cap
()
84 8 4 0
2 26 6
()
88 44 0
o
o
Wat
er U
se g
pd p
er d
wel
ling
unit
12 12 12 P.M A.M
Time of Day
Daily Water Use Patterns, Maximum Day & Winter Day
400
200
600
800
1000
1200
1600
1400
1800
2000
2200
10 10
Typical Maximum Day
Typical Winter Day
Wat
er U
se g
pd p
er d
wel
ling
unit
12 12 12 P.M A.M Time of Day
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200 Daily Water Use Patterns in R-6 Area: Maximum Day
& Minimum Day
90 F Day without Rain
90 F Day with Rain
Figure by MIT OCW. Figure by MIT OCW.
0 i
(l
it)
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Leakage Domestic Spr nkling Total
Wat
er u
sage
ga
lons
per
day
per
dw
ellin
g un Metered
Flat-rate
1890 1895 1900 1905 1910 1915 1920
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
10
30
50
70
90
Gal
lons
per
cap
ita
Perc
enta
ge o
f ser
vice
s met
ered
Consumption & use of meters, Boston metropolitan district.
Figure by MIT OCW.
Adapted from: Viessman, W., Jr., and M. J. Hammer. Water Supply and Pollution Control. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PearsonEducation, Inc., 2005.
Adapted from: Turneaure, F. E., H. L. Russell, and M. S. Nichols. Public WaterSupplies: Requirements, Resources, and the Construction of Works.New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1940.
0 1
(
()
0
0 1
)
( )
3
2
1
()
(n) 0
0
0
0
( )
( )
()
()
20
40
60
80
100
120
32 53 94 125 156 187 218 248 280 311 342
Time day of year)
Min
& M
ax te
mpe
ratu
re o
F
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
31 52 93 124 155 186 217 248 279 310 341 372 403
32 53 94 125 156 187 218 248 280 311 342
Time (day of year
Time day of year
Tota
l wat
er u
se m
gd
Daily min-max temperature, precipitation & water use in new york city for 1982.
Prec
ipita
tion
20 40 60 80 100 -200
200
200
400
600
20 40 60 80 100
-200
-400
400
600
Avg Temperature oF
Avg Temperature oF
Diff
from
yea
r avg
wat
er u
se m
gdD
iff fr
om y
ear a
vg w
ater
use
mgd
Deviations from annual average water use versus average daily temperature for 1982 & 1983
1983
1982
Figure by MIT OCW. Figure by MIT OCW.
1940
0
( )
?
0
(/
)
i
12 1210 102 24 46 68 8 0
20
40
80
80
80
60
60
60
100 120
120
160
160
160
100
100 120
140
140
140
180 40
40
180
180 200
ROCKFORD, III
Maximum Day
Maximum Day
Maximum Day
NO
ON
A.M Hourly rates of consumption.
Daily water use
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
10
20 30 40 50 60
70 80
MONTHLY AVERAGE TEMPERATURE & PRECIPITATION
Temperature oF
Precipitation
10
20
30
40
50
60
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 YEAR
Wat
er u
se m
gam
onth
Thou
sand
s
Monthly average temperature, Precipitation, & water use in new York c ty for 1982 to 1991
MONTHLY WATER USE
Aver
age
Tem
pera
ture
& P
reci
pita
tion Average Day
Maximum = 181% of Av. Max. Hr.=188 x 181 = 340% Av. Average per cap = 67.5 Gal.
MADISON, WIS.
Average Day
Maximum = 196% of Av. Max.Hr.=175 x 196 = 343% Av. Average per cap = 117 Gal.
MILWAUKEE, WIS.
Average Day
Maximum = 171% of Av. Max.Hr.= 185 x 171 = 317% Av. Average per cap = 138 Gal.
PER
CEN
TAG
ES
P.M
Figure by MIT OCW. Figure by MIT OCW.
Adapted from: Protopapas, A., S. Katchamart, and A. Platonova. "Weather effects on daily water use in New York City."Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE 5, no. 3 (July 2000): 332-338.
Adapted from: Protopapas, A., S. Katchamart, and A. Platonova.
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE 5, no. 3 (July 2000): 332-338."Weather effects on daily water use in New York City."
Adapted from: Turneaure, F. E., H. L. Russell, and M. S. Nichols.Public Water Supplies: Requirements, Resources, and theConstruction of Works. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1940.
Per capita use of municipal water in United States
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Per c
apita
use
(l/d
/cap
)
0
50
100
150
200
Per c
apita
use
(gal
/d/c
ap)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
1950 1965 1970 1985 1990 2000
Percent U.S. population served by municipal water supply
100%
1955 1960 1975 1980 1995
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
/d/c
ap)
0
50
100
150
200
/cap
)
Surface-water drinking water plant
Surface-water supply
Coagulant addition and rapid mix Flocculation Settling tank Filtration
Chlorine and fluoride
Activated carbon
1000
Bal
timor
e, M
D
Ber
kele
y, C
A
Bos
ton,
MA
Gra
nd R
apid
s, M
I
Gre
envi
lle C
ount
y, S
C
Hag
erst
own,
MD
Jeffe
rson
Cou
nty,
AL
Jeffe
rson
Cou
nty,
KS
Lanc
aste
r Cou
nty,
NE
Las
Vega
s, N
V
Littl
e R
ock,
AR
Los
Ang
eles
, CA
LA C
ount
y, C
A
Gre
ater
Peo
ria, I
L
Mem
phis
, TN
Orla
ndo,
FL
Rap
id C
ity, S
D
Sant
a M
onic
a, C
A
Wyo
min
g, M
I
Was
tew
ater
Gen
erat
ion
(l
Was
tew
ater
Gen
erat
ion
(gpd
Intake Structure Chemical Addition / Disinfection
Alum: Promote flocculation
Chattahoochee Water Treatment Plant –
River Flow Sodium Hypochlorite: Disinfection
Courtesy of Joe Lin. Used with permission. Courtesy of Joe Lin. Used with permission.
Chemical mixing Flocculation / Sedimentation
Flocculation
Sedimentation
Courtesy of Joe Lin. Used with permission. Courtesy of Joe Lin. Used with permission.
Flocculation tank Sedimentation tank (clarifier)
Sludge scraper
Courtesy of Joe Lin. Used with permission. Courtesy of Joe Lin. Used with permission.
FiltrationSedimentation tank collection troughs
Flow from sedimentation tanks
Courtesy of Joe Lin. Used with permission. Courtesy of Joe Lin. Used with permission.
Post-Treatment Chemical AdditionFluoride: To prevent tooth decayLime: To raise the pHPhosphoric acid: To prevent corrosion of piping in the distribution systemSodium hypochlorite: To maintain disinfection residual in distribution system
Ground-water drinking water treatment plants
Disinfection and fluoridation
Iron and manganese removal
Chlorine Fluoride
Chlorine Fluoride
Chlorine orpermanganate
Aerator FilterContacttank
Ground-water drinking water treatment plants
Softening
Aerator FlocculationMixer
LimeSoda ash
Chlorine Fluoride
FilterSettling tank Recarbonation
CO2
Building parcelsSupply wells4" Main6" Main8" Main10" Main12" Main16" Main
West Bridgewater, MA water distribution
system
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
)
l/i (l/d/
Wastewater generated vs water used
Bal
timor
e, M
D
Ber
kele
y, C
A
Bos
ton,
MA
Gra
nd R
apid
s, M
I
Gre
envi
lle C
ount
y, S
C
Hag
erst
own,
MD
Jeffe
rson
Cou
nty,
AL
Jeffe
rson
Cou
nty,
KS
Lanc
aste
r Cou
nty,
NE
Las
Vega
s, N
V
Littl
e R
ock,
AR
Los
Ang
eles
, CA
LA C
ount
y, C
A
Gre
ater
Peo
ria, I
L
Mem
phis
, TN
Orla
ndo,
FL
Rap
id C
ity, S
D
Sant
a M
onic
a, C
A
Wyo
min
g, M
I
Rat
e (l/
d/ca
p
Rat
e (g
pd/c
ap
Water Consumption ( d/cap) Wastewater Generat on cap)
4 8 84 0
()
( ) ( )
12
200
400
600
AM PM NOON
Time of Day June 23,1961
Wat
er u
se a
nd w
aste
wat
er f
low
gpd
per
serv
ice
Comparison of water use solid line & wastewater flow dashed lines on days when little sprinkling occurred.
WATER
WASTEWATER
Figure by MIT OCW.
Toilfl
Bathi
5%
Typical Domestic Water Use
et ushing 40%
ng 30%
Laundry 15%
Kitchen 10%
Other 1
2
4
5
C C D C A B C D D C D D
E D B
0 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 0800 0600 0400 0200 0000
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Total Daily Use: 245 Gal. Peak Demand
Duration-min Gal
15
60
10
20
26
64
A - Home Laundry
B - Dishwasher
C - Foodwaste Disposer
D - Shower
E- Bath
Demand rates calculated over 4-min intervals were used.
Wat
er D
eman
d -g
pm
Water Use
TYPICAL DAILY HYDROGRAPH FROM TEST HOME II
Figure by MIT OCW.
Adapted from: Viessman, W., Jr., and M. J. Hammer. Water Supplyand Pollution Control. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PearsonEducation, Inc., 2005.
Adapted from: Anderson, J. S., and K. S. Watson. "Patterns of householdusage." Journal American Water Works Association 59, no. 10 (October 1967): 1228-1237.
Pollutants in domestic wastewater High strength Medium strength Low strength
TSS, Total suspended solids (mg/L) 120 210 400
BOD, 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (mg/L) 110 190 350
Ammonia nitrogen (mg/L as N) 12 25 45
Organic nitrogen (mg/L as N) 8 15 25
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 4 7 12
Oil and grease (mg/L) 50 90 100
Total coliform bacteria (number/100 ml) 106 – 108 107 – 109 107 - 1010
Fecal coliform bacteria (number/100 ml) 103 – 105 104 – 106 105 - 108
Cryptosporidium oocysts (number/100 ml) 0.1 - 1 0.1 - 10 0.1 – 100
Giardia lamblia cysts (number/100 ml) 0.1 – 10 0.1 - 100 0.1 - 1000
0 2 4 6 8 0 0
/m 3
/h
3 /s
10 14 16 18 20 22 24
50
100
150
200
250
300
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.15
Midnight Midnight
Noon
Time of Day
BO
D c
once
ntra
tion,
g&
BO
D m
ass l
oadi
ng, k
g
Flow
rate
, m
Typical hourly variations in flow & strength of domestic wastewater.
Flowrate
BOD Concentration
BOD Mass Loading
Figure by MIT OCW.
Sludge thickening
Sludge digestion
Bar Screen
Grit Chamber
Primary settling
Activated sludge biological treatment
Final settling
Contact basin
Chlorination
Activated sludge recycle
Bar Screen
Grit Chamber
Primary settling
Activated sludge biological treatment
Final settling
Contact basin
Chlorination
Activated sludge recycle
Typical wastewater treatment plant Typical wastewater treatment plant
Preliminary treatment
Primary treatment
Secondary treatment
Disinfection
Can also have tertiary treatment to remove nutrients and other pollutants
Adapted from: G. Tchobanoglous, F. L. Burton, and H. D. Stensel.Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. 4th ed. Metcalf &Eddy Inc., New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
Lynn, MA wastewater treatment plant
chambers
Bar screens
Grit
Bar screens
Bar screens Traveling screen
Primary
Lynn, MA wastewater treatment plant
clarifiers
Primary clarifiers
Primary clarifiers – sludge scrapers Primary clarifiers – effluent wier
AST aeration tanks
Activated sludge aeration tankLynn, MA wastewater treatment plant
Lynn, MA wastewater treatment plant
Secondary clarifiers
Secondary clarifiers
Lynn, MA wastewater treatment plant
ChlorineContactchambers
Chlorine contract chambers
Virtual tours of wastewater plants
Englewood, Colorado –http://www.englewoodgov.org/wwtp/
Lynn, Massachusetts –http://members.aol.com/erikschiff/prelim.htm
Lexington, Kentucky –http://www.lfucg.com/sewers/TBTour.asp