lcls bunch length monitor conceptual design review instrument design considerations february 23,...
DESCRIPTION
LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Conceptual Design Review Instrument Design Considerations February 23, 2006. LCLS Bunch length monitor system:. Two subsystems: Deflecting structure ‘LOLA’ Accurate, calibrated, complex Destructive – ‘pulse stealing mode ok’ Expensive Tested Radiation monitors - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
1
LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Conceptual Design Review
Instrument Design ConsiderationsFebruary 23, 2006
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
2
LCLS Bunch length monitor system:
• Two subsystems:– Deflecting structure ‘LOLA’
• Accurate, calibrated, complex• Destructive – ‘pulse stealing mode ok’• Expensive• Tested
– Radiation monitors• Dipole radiation• Gap radiation• Simple sensors• Cheap• Tested
Complementary devices
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
3
Bunch length monitor system
LOLAGap radiation
Dipole radiation
Single signal device
Video signal
Pyro-electric detectorHigh frequency diode
WGmm waveoptics
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
4
Two coherent radiation monitors for BC1• Simple ceramic gap surrounded by mm-wave
diode detectors (paired)– Total radiated energy is 2 uJ
• For 1nC, 200 micron bunch. • (energy scales as Q^2/(bunch length)
– Tested at SLC and ESA (actually many years…)
• Annular reflector directs dipole radiation onto mm-wave ‘optics’ – pyroelectric detector– similar total radiated energy– Tested at FFTB/SPPS
Bunch charge distribution • Simple indicator: central frequency of radiated
energy
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
6
Coherent radiation detection strategy:
• Each individual detector has ~ factor 2 range
• Long bunches: use diode sequence– (100, 200, 400, 1000 GHz)– Down to 100 um rms
• Short bunches: use reflector and pyro-electric detectors– Below 150 um rms
• RD required to match – see 2007 testing plan
CERN Bunch length RF gap
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
8
ESA 100 GHz Gap and Detector
gap
ESA gap monitor and detector
• Gap / horn / WG-10 closeup
gap
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
10
400 GHz diode
ESA 100 GHz System – Jan 8, 2006Sig_z_min ~300 um
gap
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
12
Multi-frequency diode ‘xylophone’
Frequency (GHz)
Waveguide Attenuation (20 cm)
Energy in (J) Energy out
100 WR-10 0.8 dB 5 e-9 5e-9 200 WR-4.3 3 dB 1 e-9 500 e-12 400 WR-2.2 8 dB 200 e-12 30 e-12 1000 WR -1.0 22 dB 50 e-12 300 e-15
• 1nC / 200 um example– (Total radiated energy 2uJ)
• “Energy in” assumes catalog item waveguide horn• Detector sensitivity is 2.3e-15J into 50 Ohm out.• Good S/N for 100, 200, 400… 1000GHz ?
gap
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
13
‘Beam view’ of multi-diode / waveguide
assembly
gap
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
14
Reflector• (in use at FFTB for plasma wake exp. – Hogan)
– Thin Ti foil ‘in the beam’ – polished.– Si window– Simple, direct, detector optics– Typically shorter than LCLS BC1 (not BC2)
• LCLS annular reflector will be 30mm diameter with 14 mm aperture– Capture 50% ~ 1 uJ – at best
• Low frequency performance reported to be poor (<300 GHz)
e-
VariablePositionMirror
∆z
Interferometer Pyro Detector
12.5 µm MylarBeam Splitters
RT≈0.17
12.5 µm Mylar1mm HDPE
Vacuum Window(3/4” dia)
Reference Pyro Detector
Alignment Laser1 µm Titanium Foil at 45º
• Interference signal normalized to the reference signal
CTR MICHELSON INTERFEROMETER
• Motion resolution ∆zmin=1 µm or ≈14 fs (round trip)
x=60 µm, y=170 µm N≈1.91010 e-
• Mylar: R≈22%, T≈78%, RT≈0.17 reflector
CTR Energy Correlates withBunch Length
Rel
ativ
e E
nerg
y @
end
of l
inac
reflector
0
5000
1 104
1.5 104
2 104
2.5 104
3 104
3.5 104
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
XCompressionfrom544X OverOpitimumUnder
Am
plitu
de (a
.u.)
Relative Energy (MeV)
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800
544X(Pyro)wwoImage Event with ImageEvent without Image
BP
MS
DR
13 5
44 X
CTR Pyro Amplitude (a.u.)
#61I7
#348I39
#124I14
X-ray
Pyro Is Not The Whole StoryNeed to Look at Details of the Spectra
• Pyro amplitude is ambiguous• Energy spectra are not• They are complimentary diagnostics• Clear correlation between energy spectrum and E-164X outcome
Example: Jitter from North Damping Ring:
Relative Energy [GeV]
reflector
reflectorpyro jitter
distribution – SLC NRTL
stability
Spectra vs pyro-electric signalreflector
reflectorOne pyro vs another
• meets 5 to 10% resolution goal
reflectorPyro for one band vs another
• Pyro response as a function of linac ‘chirp’ (phase - offset)
reflectorpyro response has position correlations:
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
23
MM Wave detector Sensitivity
• Pyroelectric: Basically a charge source, approximately 1.5uC/Joule.• Capacitance is 120pf for 3mm detector. • Charge amplifier (AmpTek A250, external FET), has noise 300
electrons RMS. – Corresponds to 30pJ of mm wave energy
• Typically pyro detectors are supplied with included amplifier, performance tends to be worse.
• Detector is a thermal integrator. Dynamic range is limited by the dynamic range of the amplifier.
– For the AmpTek A250, this is approximately 60,000:1. • Commercial pyroelectric detectors (Scientech PHF02) have noise
level of 3nJ, approx 100uJ maximum signal. • Note, sensitivity is 100X worse than theoretical, dynamic range is
30,000:1
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
24
MM wave diode detectors
• Sensitivity of ~2V/W (into 50 Ohms) with ~100GHz bandwidth (at 300GHz).
• For a 100ps pulse, Bandwidth ~5GHz.– Noise is 2.3e-15J.
• Diodes typically linear to ~30mV output.– 1.5pJ. Dynamic range 700:1
• Expect realistic amplifier (10dB noise figure) to limit dynamic range to 250:1
• Waveguide for 300GHz is WR-2.8, 0.7X0.35mm. – expected attenuation 0.2dB/cm.
• Waveguide for 900MHz is WR-1.0, 0.25X0.13mm. – Expected attenuation 1.1dB/cm
• Need something like 20cm of waveguide for dispersion – The initial pulse is very short, with extremely high peak power. Waveguide
dispersion spreads the pulse in time, while keeping the original frequency content.
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
25
Comparison of pyro and diode detectors
• Pyro detectors have much larger dynamic range (>30,000:1, vs ~200:1).
• Noise energy diodes is 10^4 lower than for pyro detectors• Pyro area (for sample detector) is ~10 mm^2. • Diode (waveguide)
– At 300GHz 0.2mm^2– At 900GHz 0.03mm^2
• Diode Sensitivity / Area is 250x at 300GHz, 30X at 900GHz• Not clear how much gain available from horn antenna. (~10dB?)• Diodes more sensitive than pyros at 300GHz. • At 900GHz, diodes probably slightly less sensitive. • Dynamic range of pyro detectors is better• Diode alignment of waveguide is much easier.
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
26
Controls and data acquisition
• These systems are ‘single signal’ systems, i.e. only a simple gated digitizer is needed*– (Some concerns over gating precision and noise – to be tested)
• BC1 Feedback will require beam intensity normalization and (possibly) steering correction / feedback
• integration with LOLA improves the systematics greatly we strongly recommend an aggressive approach to LOLA data acq./integration.
• Pyro/diode systematics will be different and may require different procedures.
• 2007 testing plan
2/23/2006 LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
27
Testing plan
• ESA – Minimum bunch length ~200 um ?– Multi-channel resolution test– No independent high accuracy reference– April and July 2006
• LCLS injector– Minimum bunch length ~ 50 um– High accuracy reference (29-4 LOLA Transverse cavity