late diagnosis = poorer outcome6 we know more about the different routes to diagnosis 0 25,000...
TRANSCRIPT
1
RESEARCH & EVIDENCE: DRIVING IMPROVEMENTS IN EARLY DIAGNOSIS
EARLY DIAGNOSIS RESEARCH
CONFERENCE, 23 FEB 2017
Harpal Kumar
CEO
CANCER RESEARCH UK
THE IMPORTANCE OF EARLY DIAGNOSIS
2
LATE DIAGNOSIS = POORER OUTCOME
2014
2
HOW CAN WE IMPROVE EARLY DIAGNOSIS?
Hiom et al. (2015) Diagnosing cancer earlier: reviewing the evidence for improving cancer survival. BJC (1) Robb et al, 2009; Waller et al, 2009; Quaife et al, 2014; Keeble et al, 2014; (2) Lyratzopoulos et al, 2012, 2013; (3) Von Wagner et al, 2011; Lo et al, 2014; (4) Shawihdi et al, 2014; (5) Elliss-Brookes et al, 2012; Mitchell et al, personal communication; (6) Cancer Waiting Times; NHS England, 2015; (7) Maringe et al, 2012, 2013; Walters et al, 2013a, b; National Cancer Intelligence Network (2015); (8) McPhail et al, 2013; (9) De Angelis et al, 2014; Allemani et al, 2014; Coleman et al, 2011; and (10) Abdel-Rahman et al, 2009.
HOW WE’RE WORKING TO IMPROVE EARLY DIAGNOSIS
First
pre-
cancerou
s
indicato
r
First
development
of cancer
First
symptom
First
presentati
on/
clinical
appearance
Investigat
ion of
related
symptoms
Referral
to
secondary
care
First
special
ist
visit
Diagnosi
s/
referral
to
treatmen
t
Start of
treatmen
t
Potential screening interval Primary care interval Secondary care interval
Early
biomarke
rs
Screening Symptomatic Treatment
Early
biomarke
rs
Treatment
CanTest Catalyst award
EDAG Early
Diagnosis Advisory
Group
Lung Matrix
Cytosponge
3
UPTAKE OF BOWEL CANCER SCREENING IS POOR
5
– Bowel screening (gFOBT) is about 10 years old
now, but uptake remains lower than other
national screening programmes
– Bowel cancer mortality is 25% lower in those
who’ve taken part in bowel screening (gFOBT)
– There are significant inequalities in uptake
related to:
• Deprivation
• Sex (lower in men)
• Age
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Uptake of National Screening Programmes (England)
Bowel (FOBT) Breast (50-70) Cervical (25-64)
BOWEL CANCER SCREENING
6
– Bowel screening uptake looks set to improve through:
• Implementation of FIT in England and Scotland
• Bowel scope roll-out in England
– We’re supporting these changes through:
• Publication of GP good practice guide
• Be Clear On Cancer: Bowel screening regional pilot
(Jan – March 2017)
Advertising: Jan – Mar 17
Bowel Cancer Screening Regional Pilot NORTH WEST ENGLAND: JAN – MAR 17
Direct mail: Feb – Mar 17
4
CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING
7
– Testing for HPV as a first test in cervical screening is more
effective than current cytology-only screening
• England, Scotland and Wales have committed to introducing
this test.
– Women who test HPV-negative would need to be screened
less often
• 5 year screening interval
• Cost-saving to NHS
LOCAL STAGING DATA COMPLETENESS IS IMPROVING
8
Percentage of cases, of known stage, diagnosed at stage I and II, for patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2014.
Based on Public Health England data.
5
REGIONAL VARIATION IN STAGE AT DIAGNOSIS
SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS
AGE
GENDER
ETHNICITY
ADDITIONAL
DRIVERS OF
VARIATION
UNADJUSTED ADJUSTED FOR
CANCER TYPE
WE KNOW MORE ABOUT THE DIFFERENT ROUTES TO DIAGNOSIS
ALL CANCERS BOWEL CANCER
6
WE KNOW MORE ABOUT THE DIFFERENT ROUTES TO DIAGNOSIS
0
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
125,000
150,000
Oct
-09
Jan
-10
Ap
r-10
Jul-
10
Oct
-10
Jan
-11
Ap
r-11
Jul-
11
Oct
-11
Jan
-12
Ap
r-12
Jul-
12
Oct
-12
Jan
-13
Ap
r-13
Jul-
13
Oct
-13
Jan
-14
Ap
r-14
Jul-
14
Oct
-14
Jan
-15
Ap
r-15
Jul-
15
Oct
-15
Jan
-16
Ap
r-16
Jul-
16
Oct
-16
GP Urgent Referrals (from Waiting time data)
GP Urgent Referrals Patients beginning treatment following GP Urgent Referral2009 2016
WE’RE NOT MEETING WAITING TIME TARGETS
12
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
Oct
-09
Jan
-10
Apr
-10
Jul-
10
Oct
-10
Jan
-11
Apr
-11
Jul-
11
Oct
-11
Jan
-12
Apr
-12
Jul-
12
Oct
-12
Jan
-13
Apr
-13
Jul-
13
Oct
-13
Jan
-14
Apr
-14
Jul-
14
Oct
-14
Jan
-15
Apr
-15
Jul-
15
Oct
-15
Jan
-16
Apr
-16
Jul-
16
Oct
-16
Performance against 62 day standard from GP Urgent Referral to First Treatment
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
Oct
-09
Jan
-10
Apr
-10
Jul-
10
Oct
-10
Jan
-11
Apr
-11
Jul-
11
Oct
-11
Jan
-12
Apr
-12
Jul-
12
Oct
-12
Jan
-13
Apr
-13
Jul-
13
Oct
-13
Jan
-14
Apr
-14
Jul-
14
Oct
-14
Jan
-15
Apr
-15
Jul-
15
Oct
-15
Jan
-16
Apr
-16
Jul-
16
Oct
-16
Percent of patients waiting more than 6 weeks for a diagnostic test
Combined endoscopies (Colon-, Flexi sig-, Cyto-, Gastro-) % 6+ Week
High volume Imaging (MRI, CT, US) % 6+ Week
7
PATIENTS WAITING MORE THAN SIX WEEKS FOR
PATHOLOGY DIAGNOSTICS AT QUARTER END
PATIENTS WAITING >12 WEEKS FOR PATHOLOGY
DIAGNOSTICS AT QUARTER END
WAITING TIMES FOR PATHOLOGY SERVICES ARE INCREASING
WE KNOW WE HAVE LESS IMAGING EQUIPMENT AND FEWER
TRAINED STAFF IN THE UK
8
15
CRUK COMMISSIONED WORK ON ENDOSCOPY,
IMAGING AND PATHOLOGY SERVICES
KEY RECOMMENDATIONS
INCREASE INVESTMENT IN DIAGNOSTIC
SERVICES
RECRUIT AND TRAIN MORE STAFF
INCREASE NUMBER OF IMAGING MACHINES IN
A WIDER RANGE OF LOCATIONS
CONTINUE CONSOLIDATION OF NETWORKING
FUTUREPROOFING
WE NEED GREATER DIAGNOSTIC CAPACITY
Endoscopy report: University of Birmingham and the Strategy Unit at NHS Midlands and Lancashire
commissioning support unit
Imaging report: 2020 delivery
Pathology report: 2020 delivery
A FASTER DIAGNOSIS STANDARD HAS BEEN SET
16
9
THE ACE PROGRAMME
• A programme to
accelerate,
coordinate and
evaluate (ACE)
innovation and
streamline diagnostic
pathways to achieve
earlier diagnosis of
cancer.
• ACE 2 is piloting six
projects trialling a
new diagnostic
pathway for patients
with vague symptoms –
an approach
incorporating a
Multidisciplinary
Diagnostic Centre as
in Denmark.
THE INTERNATIONAL CANCER BENCHMARKING PARTNERSHIP
18
19 jurisdictions in 6 countries
8 cancers
PHASE 2
10
LOOKING TO THE FUTURE
19
New research directions:
- Biomarkers of disease:
- Pre-cursors
- Early cancers
- New imaging modalities
- Distinguishing lethal cancers that need treating from non-lethal ones which don’t
- Use of AI/machine learning:
- Radiology and pathology – capacity (and accuracy?)
- Investigation or presentation patterns
LOOKING TO THE FUTURE
20
– Screening: diagnose bowel cancer earlier through screening
– UK wide implementation of FIT
– Evaluating ACE: ensure appropriate recognition, management and referral of
patients in primary care
– Implementing good practice
– Diagnostics: ensure swift access to, and reporting of, appropriate diagnostic tests
– Greater diagnostic capacity
– Improved diagnostic efficiency
– Improved skills mix in workforce and networking of specialists
11
RESEARCH & EVIDENCE: DRIVING IMPROVEMENTS IN EARLY DIAGNOSIS
EARLY DIAGNOSIS RESEARCH
CONFERENCE, 23 FEB 2017
Harpal Kumar
CEO
CANCER RESEARCH UK