laser feedback 1.pdf

Upload: egrumel

Post on 06-Jul-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/17/2019 Laser feedback 1.pdf

    1/6

    :

    1.

    Introduction

    I)1'nanic

    light-scnttering

    (DLS)

    lhcory

    has

    been

    well

    i:lccepted

    br

    the

    l¿rst

    bu¡

    clecaclcs

    rrrci

    tas

    been

    usecl

    to

    utrcierstand

    hc.

    nlelact,ion

    of.l Íght

    with

    ¿l vstelr

    of

    lrovrng

    ¡:articlr:s.r

    (lumntins

    ttl

    a,l.

    fi¡s1;

    tucliecl

    he ,

    l iner.vidth broaderrrirrg f ' scattcrecl l igh1, lirough an

    optical

    herreroclv'c

    proccss

    to

    .bt,¿ri '

    i .frrrrirtion

    ¿rbrnt

    thr. i

    cl.ynalnic:s

    f '

    tl-re

    scat,1,Lll.r,r.s,

    r-rch

    ¿rs

    he

    clifl ir-*io.

    co' ' 'sr¿:i l 'rl

    rrcl

    he

    size

    or'1,hci

    carterri 'g

    par-

    ticles.

    Yelr

    ancl

    (lrrrnnrir.rs:r

    also

    str-rcliecl

    o¡ipletr.-

    shifted

    scattcleci

    l ight

    fi 'orn

    ¿r luicl

    f lorv.

    Two

    üicat

    lrlrxll lg pt'occsses,

    hontoclvDe

    ¿rn

  • 8/17/2019 Laser feedback 1.pdf

    2/6

    Here

    Jt.,

    is

    a

    constant

    scattering f¿rct,or

    anrl

    6cr(q,

    )

    :

    o( /)exp[ iq .r ( f

    ) j ,

    where q

    is

    the

    scatter ing

    vector

    and r(/) is

    the

    position

    of the

    center

    of mass

    of

    the

    particle

    at tirne

    /. The

    lotation

    and vibration

    of

    moiecules

    are

    observable

    hrough

    variations

    of'cr(f),

    ¿rnd

    the

    translation

    of' molecules

    is

    observable

    through

    expllq

    .r(¿).].'For

    a heteroclvne

    mixing

    pr.o-

    cess,

    he

    intensity

    autocorrelation

    f'unction,

    Clt4,

    il ,

    is proportional

    to

    the

    autocorrelation

    of t\cr(q,

    l

    ¿rs

    fbllowss:

    Cíq, t) z (Ecr ' : " (e,)s(r (q, / ) ) .

    \2)

    The

    autocorrelation

    function

    arid the

    power

    spoc-

    trum

    aLe related

    through

    the Fourier

    translbrrn.,l

    Therefor:e

    t is

    possible

    to

    obtain the

    light-intensity

    power

    spectrum

    or heterodyne

    spetctrurn Z\q,

    tIL

    as

    follows:

    Z(.q,

    { I ) :

    Ecr(q,

    ) )6CI. : ' (q ,

    ) )

    ú;)exp( lf ) / )dl,

    3)

    where () is the frequency and Do(q, )) is the Fourier

    transform

    of'

    Ecr

    q,

    1 .

    Hence

    the

    time autocorrelation

    or the

    power

    spec-

    trum

    of

    the light

    intensrty

    on a heterodync

    rnixing

    process

    s

    userclo

    extlact

    dynamjc infbrmation

    on thr:

    scatterers.

    3.

    Theory

    of

    Self-Mixing nterferometry

    Light

    reentcring

    a

    laser

    cavity

    will

    producer

    ¿rnef'fect

    that

    can be modeled

    bv modifying

    tho

    c'lectric field

    rate

    equations.

    lhe rate

    equations

    used

    to simulate

    the

    feedbackprocess

    n

    a

    lascr

    diode were

    cleveloped

    by

    Lang

    ancl

    Kobayashi

    (LK)1?:

    d

    r

    1_

    _t

    u,

    E1f

    expl l r l l

    -

    1io,1ir)

    . . ,

    G(rr ,

    Et f t l

    I '

    l f

    il

    I

    zr

    \ . / ¡

    :

    3.ff:ii'i'l]f

    u.'

    "

    (4t

    Here

    ú s

    the tirne,

    B(¿) s

    the slowly

    varying

    electric

    n

    is

    the

    carrier densitv,

    or s

    the longitudinill,

    requency,

    -u s

    the cavity loss,

    is

    thi:

    time,

    and r<

    s the

    parameter

    to the

    coupling

    strcngth

    given

    bv r<

    :

    (l

    rl)(r2f r)

    x

    c:(2p"7¿¡¡)

    ,

    wherec is the lighL

    velocrty

    Fig. 1

    for

    a clefinition

    f'the other

    parameters).

    ignored and omitted the Langevin r-ioise

    in

    the equation

    o

    gain

    insight frorn

    the

    deter'-

    approximation,

    h.ich s valicl

    f 'one s will-

    tci ook

    at

    quasi-stationary

    oiutions

    of'the fieki

    weah

    eedbach

    owers

    and

    operation

    above aser.

    The

    gain,

    G,

    is

    given

    by

    Gpt, E' . . t ¡ ) :G,,1rt

    nn)[1

    -

    eE21t¡) ,

    (5)

    o

    1¿¡

    L+li i¡

    I' ig. 1.

    ' l 'hrr¡e-lltirro¡

    ct¿.rvitl '

    noclel

    trseri

    |tr analyzer

    thr:

    optical

    fcedb¿rck

    cnnligurarlion:

    r',,

    ancl r.,.

    iaser.

    r-nirror

    leflectivilies:

    i.r.

    extr:r'n¿¡l

    targct)

    reflectrvity:

    lr_,,.

    avil,v

    ler-rgth;

    p.. rr:fi.active

    ínrlcx

    of lJre

    gain

    n.lcclia;

    -1-,

    ist¿rncrr,¡

    o the

    extsln¿¡i

    target.

    wherc (i ,, is the modal gain coetfYicient.r,, s 1,ire ar -

    rier

    clensity

    at

    tlansparc:ncy,

    and e

    is tür:

    nonlinear

    gain

    srrJrprr:ssion

    iictor.

    'l'hc

    ratc

    ecluation

    for

    the calr"ier

    densit.y

    is

    clcr-

    scriberdas

    d.l

    df

    ,r : ^ t t t

    Gln.E¿¡t) lUf

    l

    ( , ' , .

    (6)

    where

    1

    is

    ilre

    inverse

    spontaneous

    lifi:tinret

    ol'the

    excitcd carliet's,

    J is

    the curr.ent

    density,

    ¡:

    is

    Lhcr

    electronic

    cirarge,

    ¿ind

    cl

    s

    the

    ¿rctive

    ayei

    thick,ress.

    Consider

    the

    optical

    feeclback

    o be

    a resr.rlt

    ol 'cly-

    namic backscattered light ancl s given, for a l ixecl q,

    bv

    Enl /)

    as p lescnted

    in

    Sect ion

    2. This

    si tuat ion

    c¿rn

    be ir-rclucled

    n

    trq.

    (4)

    ¿rs irl lorvs:

    d

    E(1)cxp(r tof

    -

    l l

    i , ' :1r i ¡

    2l f

    ; tn. l l - t t r

    t , t l f

    - )

    x

    E(t¡ i :xp1r.orú)

    i

    r

  • 8/17/2019 Laser feedback 1.pdf

    3/6

    \ 'h€trel

    w€rc

    ¿rvcr

    clefir-retd

    cr,(/)

    cr(/)clxpf

    (q

    .

    rÍ)

    *

    tn/2t1.

    Ii 'or

    sm¡rll-lcvel

    fbcclb¿rck,

    he

    systen

    c¿rn

    ber cle_

    sclibccl

    ¿rs

    ln¿rll

    luct¡-ratir.l-rs

    rr.or_rncl

    tationar..y

    al -

    ur , 's .r9

    pl i t t i l ts

    EO.

    B) in

    ¿¡ l tp l i t l rc ler .

    / , . ( / ) ,

    1ncl [ase.

  • 8/17/2019 Laser feedback 1.pdf

    4/6

    1

    :)

    5 o.s

    o

    o v.o

    ó

    n

    -

    ^A

     

    V. T

    q)

    .N

    > tt /

    z

    n

    0.5

    FrequencyHz)

    x

    10o

    tr' ig.

    3. Nornt¿rlizr:d

    photodiode

    (pDr

    voltage

    s¡rr:ct,nrrn

    hor.r,ing

    ¿r

    single-{}ecluenc.y

    eak

    p.orl'c.cl

    rrv

    ¿r *,heor

    .or.tirg

    a1

    trr.srurrt

    'elocitr' .

    l)att

    rro.et

    ¡rrcrviously

    re¡t.r.tr:rl

    olsr.w,h.l.r:r1i

    r,t

    arc i'_

    clucled

    hel'e

    fbr

    cnmpletor.ioss,

    Difl 'usion-broaclenrng

    rneasLrrclr(lnLs

    were

    ob -

    tained

    bv

    ulacing

    a dilutc

    sllspellsiolt

    of

    polystvrcnct

    sllhere)sas a target. 'Jlhcconcentr.¿ltionof' pher:eiswas

    less

    than

    0.5%

    in

    volllme.

    'I'his

    c¿.rse

    s

    lvell

    uncLrr.-

    stood

    by

    quasi-elastic

    ight-scattering

    (etrLS)

    t, i reory;

    thc

    spectrum

    is expectecl

    o

    fbllor.v

    ¿r ,orentzi¿rn

    lirrri-

    tion

    with

    half-width

    ¿rt

    half'-maximum

    (HWFIM).

    IO.

    inversiiy

    proportioni.i l

    o

    the raclius

    of'the

    sphe¡e.

    .c...

    .\ f

    )

    ¡

    l),

    where

    D

    .'

    1/o

    is

    ther

    diffusion

    conilant

    anci.

    according

    to

    the

    Stokes-Einstein

    approximation,

    is

    inversely

    proportional

    to

    the

    sphere radius,

    ¿,

    uncler-

    going

    Brownian

    motion.ñ

    t

    has recentlv

    been shown

    th¡rt, fbr

    this

    sensing

    conligulation,

    the

    iJWHM

    does

    fbllow

    this

    functional

    depenclence.

    rj

    Figule

    4

    slrorvs

    the intensity

    power

    spectltul

    ol'the l¿rst,r:

    bt¡rineci

    br

    hrc-.e

    ifferent

    samples:

    The

    first

    contains pure

    water

    nly (no poivst.vrenespheres in suspension) ¿lnci s

    as

    a ref'erencc;

    the,

    othel

    trvo

    sarlples

    ¿tlrc) l

    of'spheres

    (Polyscieuces

    nc. )

    n'ith

    di¿rnr-

    of 58.8

    and

    20

    nm.

    lt

    c¿ur

    e seen

    that

    íher

    spec:-

    is

    well

    clcscribecl

    v

    ¿i

    Lole.ntzian

    ciisl,ri i tution.

    expecüect.

    Ii'igure

    5 shor,vs

    a signa.l

    obtainecl

    when

    a tljlutcr

    of'

    polystylene

    spheres

    with

    radius

    (Iiolysciences

    nc.)

    is

    set intcl

    lamin¿rr

    l iou,.

    concelntration

    f'spheres

    was iess

    than

    0.5?1,

    n

    case

    is

    also

    lvell

    under"stoocl

    b.y

    CJELS

    and

    the

    spectrum

    is

    expected

    to ibllów

    ¿r

    f'uncticin

    centrcd

    at thó

    Doppler-shift

    fre-

    corresponcling

    to

    the

    averag.e

    vclocity

    of, he,The fiuid w¿rsplrmpecl ¿rt

    ¿,1onstant

    l"ate

    the tuber

    intelnal

    diauleter

    of

    1.b

    mm),

    Lrsing

    ¿r

    sydnge pump

    set

    at 65

    ml/h,

    vielcling:

    i

    velocity

    at the

    cenlrcr'

    of'the

    tube

    of'

    r,,,

    20.4

    mnl/s. 'lhe

    hvciraulic

    system

    ensured

    a lor,v

    number

    to

    plriduce

    the

    clersilcld

    ¿lminar.

    profile.2r

    T'he

    r:.ngle

    of incicleltce

    betrveen

    the

    (incident)

    wave vector

    ancl

    the

    veioclty

    \¡crctor

    ¿rdiusted

    o 0

    ..'

    6{J".

    _F'or

    lb¿lcksc¿iLtetring

    onfig-

    0

    5000

    1

    0000

    Frequency

    Hz)

    F-Jg.

    1.

    íOolor

    oulint, ,)

    Nonlal izerl

    phot

  • 8/17/2019 Laser feedback 1.pdf

    5/6

    :

    s

    o

    ^.

    ) u .a

    o

    ^

    n4

    o-

    ñ

    c)

    N

    ^,

      tt 4

    (ú-

    e

    z

    0.2

    Froquency

    Hz )

    xi0

    Lorentzi¿Ltl

    uncti, .s.

    ot l t l

    t te lt t .red

    r i t

    zorrr

    )

    ecltrcncr ' .

    rc l

    1 , l l t ,

    t ' r , . .c l

    'e

    at

    26.s

    l i l lz),

    ['-rec1uency-shifted

    ¡:tical

    'eoclb¿,ic]i

    ri

    ¿r

    ¿rselr

    liocle

    rv¿ls

    irst

    str-rcliecl

    y

    Richter

    ¿ucl

    {ii¡sch,r,,

    b¿l"ell

    orr

    the.LKequations;

    ancl

    consider'"¿

    ii.i.u*r,

    fbr

    strong

    f'eedback

    evels.

    Nlartin

    t:t

    o,1..)s

    n"esiigatea

    he

    c¿rse

    firr

    f'eedback

    e.vels

    owerl

    h¿rn

    hert

    recir_rirecl

    br

    cro_

    I'fli1.:i.:.:tI'pse,

    ncl

    ircy

    ¡.,,,á

    lr,.i

    n,,

    .",rrili,rity

    or

    tnc

    conrp0rrr rd

    avi tv

    [o

    changt,s

    r , f

    t i re

    ( ,xte l . t ]a l

    cavüy

    length

    was

    clinlinatercl.

    n'200i

    j,¿rcot

    ,,¡

    ,11..tg

    stucliecl

    n greater

    detail

    this

    si tt

    aliÁ

    fbr

    feedbacl<

    levels

    falling

    r.vithin

    ther

    stabier

    r*g,,ri";

    tl_re.-v

    buncl

    t'at'rodulation of'the e'rissio. at i iri ,le,t ou'cl_t' i1,r

    Irecll lency

    shift

    ,¡,¿rs

    igl,rest

    it

    a

    1i.crqlrr:ncv

    csonant

    r.vith

    he

    rerl¿ixation

    scil lation

    i i ., ,q,,,r icv.

    ,ire_

    pticil

    shiÍts

    in

    the¡se¡

    xper:i'ents

    \4.ri.c

    of'

    trle

    o'.rerr

    of'

    a

    neg.hertz

    ¿tttd

    weret

    .trotl,cercl

    ' ia

    a'

    .c'usLo_olttic

    frerquency

    shifterr.

    _..-l.T1l:.i.

    exi:erirncrrt¿rl

    results

    for

    serlf._mixing

    n_

    ¡er' lel 'ometry

    h¿rvc

    becn

    e_-xplainclc]

    s

    being

    a result

    of ,

    variations

    of

    the gain

    thrri,sholcl

    .,.iti i"*t*,.nal

    opti_

    cal

    feredbackil

    bui

    h¿,rr,er

    rot

    l¡eern

    derivcci

    in

    lelins

    r.rf.

    the

    dynaurics

    of

    the

    scattering

    sanrplc.

    IJ¿rsecl

    n

    thcr

    ::.:irl

    ."r:?rch

    by

    LaroL

    et

    ¿1t,I*t

    ¡rr

    )LS

    expcnrrenrs,

    Í.1..1.]t,"]ll:,tiv,c

    erspective

    is

    ¡rresenteci

    o

    áxplain

    thá

    rasef'

    nrensrty

    p'wer

    spectrurn

    in

    te.ms

    ofrthe

    Jrct_

    e¡oe.yne. spectrult; in ¿rddition, i ts ecluivalcnccr o

    standald

    methods

    is

    shr¡lr,n.

    The

    experimcnt¿rl-resujts

    basecl

    on

    self._rl ixing

    n_

    ter"ferometry

    ¿¡rc:

    veIl

    explainecl

    U"

    h,1.'iIlJI

    thlolrgh

    f- 3

    helcrocl"yne

    spectrr,ll,

    .

    M",0r.,.;";;,;.

    of

    rh

    e i

    ¿rs

    r

    ln[ens]tv.p'wer

    spectlrrnr

    ¿rre

    n

    agrercrment

    ith

    ther

    expectcd

    heter:oclyne

    ltcctrum

    prec.lictecl

    y

    DLS

    ttre-

    r:x'v fhe

    relev¿rnci:

    of

    tÉer

    'roaer

    i"rlr-

    i,:,trtirmecr

    i.orn

    flre

    experin'rerrti lr

    csurts

    obtainccl

    o¡r

    con.sta.t'rrtion

    il ' ig.

    13),

    l i l fusion

    broaclening.¡i,e.

    ;,,

    l ,rr, j

    iowmetr.y

    {Fig.

    5

    ).

    ,Ioreover,

    hcse

    lesri]ts

    tiave

    bee,r

    p.",riouslv

    observecl

    ; '

    usi 'g

    tJris

    ech'i lu"

    "; i " ;;; ;

    first

    vcloci-

    metrv

    applications,r,r

    lnri

    the

    recertrt

    part;icle_siziti"q

    applicatioir.rtj

    Flow

    rrre¿rsuretrlenls,

  • 8/17/2019 Laser feedback 1.pdf

    6/6

    rate equationsrT

    hat

    considers

    optical

    fbecll lacl<

    ls

    a

    result

    ofdynarnic

    bacl