kyoto+montreal

29
MADE BY : VIRANTA (142323) NEHA SINGLA (142325) PAARAS (142326) Vivek (142324)

Upload: shubham

Post on 04-Feb-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

presentation on kyoto environmental conditions

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: KYOTO+MONTREAL

MADE BY :VIRANTA (142323)NEHA SINGLA (142325)PAARAS (142326)Vivek (142324)

Page 2: KYOTO+MONTREAL
Page 3: KYOTO+MONTREAL

The Kyoto Protocol is an international treaty, which extends the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that commits State Parties to reduce greenhouse gases emissions, based on the premise that (a) global warming exists and (b) man-made CO2 emissions have caused it. •The Kyoto Protocol was adopted in Kyoto, Japan, on 11 December 1997 and entered into force on 16 February 2005.•There are currently 192 Parties associated to the Protocol.•Kyoto Protocol entailed “annex 1 countries” to reduce their emissions to ten percent below 1990 levels.

Page 4: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Kyoto Protocol: Emission Regulations

Options to reduce emissions include: Improved technologies Nation-created sinks Tradable Permits for Emissions

Unfortunately, these have some down sides: Sometimes it is less expensive to buy

permits then decrease emissions There are no credit for conservation,

even though existing forests contain 40% of terrestrial carbon.

Page 5: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Kyoto Problems

Currently, 166 countries have ratified the protocol but: United States, the number 1 emitter

of CO2 gases has not joined Developing nations, such as China

(#2 emitter) and India (#5 emitter) are not required to reduce or limit their emissions under the Kyoto Protocol

Page 6: KYOTO+MONTREAL

The Kyoto Debate

The United States has not ratified the Protocol because the Bush Administration believed it gave developing countries an manufacturing advantage that would hurt the U.S. economy.

The rebuttal to the United States point of view is that the developing countries don’t have the financial resources to be able to support the changes needed to decrease emissions

Also, per capita, China and India have very low emissions and it is unfair to be judged nationally.

Page 7: KYOTO+MONTREAL

The Kyoto Debate

Page 8: KYOTO+MONTREAL
Page 9: KYOTO+MONTREAL

The United States

With a 10% reduction, the ppm changes from 395 to about 365

10:59 AM Fri, Dec 01, 2006

Untitled

Page 11958.00 1969.00 1980.00 1991.00 2002.00

Years

1:

1:

1:

305

350

395

1: Atmospheric CO2 ppm

1

1

1

1

10:41 AM Fri, Dec 01, 2006

Untitled

Page 11958.00 1969.00 1980.00 1991.00 2002.00

Years

1:

1:

1:

305

340

375

1: Atmospheric CO2 ppm

1

1

1

1

Current emissions

Page 10: KYOTO+MONTREAL

World With 10% reduction, the ppm

changes from 405 t0 380

11:05 AM Fri, Dec 01, 2006

Untitled

Page 11958.00 1969.00 1980.00 1991.00 2002.00

Years

1:

1:

1:

305

355

405

1: Atmospheric CO2 ppm

1

1

1

1

11:14 AM Fri, Dec 01, 2006

Untitled

Page 11958.00 1969.00 1980.00 1991.00 2002.00

Years

1:

1:

1:

305

355

405

1: Atmospheric CO2 ppm

1

1

1

1

10% reduction in 1990 emissions

Current emissions

Page 11: KYOTO+MONTREAL

The Future These models only show until 2002 levels which we have already reached.

Under the Kyoto Protocol, the future emissions will be reduced through lowering carbon dioxide emissions and increasing sinks.

Page 12: KYOTO+MONTREAL

World Projection to 2150 with current levels of CO2

11:12 AM Fri, Dec 01, 2006

Untitled

Page 12002.00 2039.00 2076.00 2113.00 2150.00

Years

1:

1:

1:

300

450

600

1: Atmospheric CO2 ppm

1

1

1

1

Page 13: KYOTO+MONTREAL

World Projection to 2150 with 10% reduction in CO2 emission (following

Kyoto Protocol):

11:12 AM Fri, Dec 01, 2006

Untitled

Page 12002.00 2039.00 2076.00 2113.00 2150.00

Years

1:

1:

1:

300

450

600

1: Atmospheric CO2 ppm

1

1

1

1

Page 14: KYOTO+MONTREAL

So what does this mean?

Even if the Kyoto Protocol was written more strictly, making every nation reduce emissions by 10%, including developed and developing nations, that would not be enough.

More action must be taken, such as decreased emission limits and more carbon sinks, to have any significant impact on slowing the increase of atmospheric CO2 emissions.

Page 15: KYOTO+MONTREAL

World Projection to 2150 with 10% reduction in CO2 levels (under Kyoto Protocol) and manmade sink through

reforestation of 1 gigaton/year

11:18 AM Fri, Dec 01, 2006

Untitled

Page 12002.00 2039.00 2076.00 2113.00 2150.00

Years

1:

1:

1:

300

450

600

1: Atmospheric CO2 ppm

1

1

1

1

Page 16: KYOTO+MONTREAL
Page 17: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Scope of Montreal ProtocolThe Montreal Protocol is an international agreement

adopted in 1987 to control the production and consumption of specific man-made chemicals that destroy the ozone layer, the earth’s protective shield.

An agreement /mechanism to reduce and eliminate the production and consumption of ODS

Developed and developing countries have different phase out schedules.

Page 18: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Ratification Status

Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer signed in 1985

Montreal Protocol adopted in 1987

191 countries have signed the Montreal Protocol including all the CARIFORUM countries

Page 19: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Depletion of ozone layer

Page 20: KYOTO+MONTREAL

What are Ozone depleting substances (ODS) ?

1. Chemicals that potentially deplete the ozone layer2. Contain chlorine or bromine atoms3. Have long atmospheric life

Examples: Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) e.g. CFC-12 (aka R-12 or F-12) Halons (Bromochlorofluorocarbons) e.g. Halon 1301 Carbon tetrachloride Methyl chloroform Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) e.g. HCFC-22 (aka R-22 or F-22) Hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs) Bromochloromethane Methyl bromide

Page 21: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Main uses of ODS

Refrigerants (gases)Fire extinguishersFumigants, pesticidesFoam-blowing agentsCleaning solventsAerosol propellantsAir-conditioning systems (and components)Refrigerators/freezersCompressorsVehicles (mobile air-conditioning systems)Insulating boards/pipe coversMetered-dose inhalers (medical inhalers

Page 22: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Why control Ozone Depleting Substances?

Harmful to the environment and human health Ozone (Layer) depletion Climate Change Global Warming Economic impact Others?

International agreement for their complete phase out

National legal obligation for their phase out .

Personal obligation to protect and care for our natural environment Our generation Our children’s generation

Page 23: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Some Effects of Ozone Layer Depletion

Human HealthDamages DNA which suppresses immune system resulting inincrease in infectious diseases eg Skin Cancer; Eye Cataracts

Plants & TreesReduces crop production, damage to seedsReduces quality of crops

Aquatic OrganismsDamage to plankton, aquatic plants, fish larvae, shrimp, crabsAffects marine food chain

Materialsdegrades paints, rubber, wood, & plastics, especially in tropical regions

Ground Level Smog Increase in the formation of Ground level ozone as a pollutantHigh economic cost

Damages could be in billions of US dollars

Page 24: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Phasing out ODSParties to the Montreal Protocol must freeze, reduce and phase out their production and consumption of ODS according to a specific step-wise schedule.

- Approaches:Production ControlConsumption ControlTrade, Import, export and reimport controlAdaptation to Ozone Friendly technologyTraining and Capacity Building

Page 25: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Phase-out Mandates of the Montreal Protocol

Ozone depleting Substance Consumption = Imports + production – Exports

developed Country (Article 2 Parties) (this schedule will be applicable for USA CANADA

Article 5 Parties developing Country (Mexico)

CFCs 100% phase out Jan. 1st, 1996

Base level: 1995-97Freeze in Consumption: Jan 1st, 199950% Cut-200585% Cut-2007Phase out: Jan. 1st 2010

Halons 100% phase out Jan. 1st, 1994

Base level: 1995-97Freeze in Consumption: Jan 1st, 199950% Cut-2005Phase out: Jan. 1st 2010

Methyl Bromide Phase out 2005 Base level: 1995-98

Freeze in Consumption:

Jan 1st, 2001

20% Cut-2005

Phase out: Jan. 1st 2015

Page 26: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Monitoring

Most developing countries do not produce ODS and are completely dependent on ODS imports.

Consequently, monitoring the legal trade and preventing the illegal trade of these chemical is crucial to achieving the gradual phase-out of ODS and conversion to non-ODS alternatives.

Page 27: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Measures - Import License System

An Import / Export Licensing System for ODS controlled by Montreal Protocol is necessary to: Facilitate control of ODS supplyIncrease the monitoring / collecting of informationIdentify end usersprevent illegal imports

Page 28: KYOTO+MONTREAL

Conclusions

Montreal Protocol provided dual protection:to Ozone layer and to Climate change

Already achieved climate benefits 5-6 times larger than Kyoto Protocol targets for 2008-2012

Potential for additional climate benefits significant compared to Kyoto Protocol targets (2008-2012): Better containment in refrigeration Destruction of CFCs, HCFC in exiting refrigerators, foams Alternatives with lower GWPs.

28

Page 29: KYOTO+MONTREAL