kuliah descriptive epid
DESCRIPTION
EpidemiologiTRANSCRIPT
-
Descriptive EpidemiologyDr. Arulita Ika Fibriana M.Kes
-
Epidemiology: DefinitionDynamic study of theDeterminantsOccurrenceDistributionControl PatternOf health and disease in a population
-
EpidemiologyDescribeshealth eventscause and risk factors of diseaseclinical pattern of diseaseIdentify syndromesIdentify control and/or preventive measures
-
Epidemiology is a Quantitative DisciplineMeasures of frequencyCounts and ratesMeasures of associationRelative riskOdds ratioStatistical inferencep-valueConfidence limits
-
Two Broad Types of EpidemiologyDescriptive EpidemiologyExamining the distribution of disease in a population, and observing the basic features of its distribution
Analytic EpidemiologyTesting a hypothesis about the cause of disease by studying how exposures relate to the disease
-
Kinds of EpidemiologyDescriptive
Analytic
ExperimentalFurther studies to determine the validity of a hypothesis concerning the occurrence of disease.Deliberate manipulation of the cause is predictably followed by an alteration in the effect not due to chanceStudy of the occurrence and distribution of disease
-
Epidemiologic ActivitiesDescriptive epidemiology person, place & timeDemographic distributionGeographic distributionSeasonal patterns etc.Frequency of disease patternsUseful for:Allocating resourcesPlanning programsHypotheses development
-
Epidemiologic ActivitiesAnalytic epidemiologyanalysis of the relationship between two itemsExposuresEffects (disease)looking for determinants or possible causes of diseaseuseful forhypothesis testing
-
Overview of epidemiologic design strategiesDescriptive Populations{Correlational studies} IndividualCase reportCase seriesCross sectional studiesAnalytic studiesObservational Case controlCohortRetrospectiveProspectiveInterventional/ExperimentalRandomized controlled trialField trialClinical trial
-
Descriptive vs. Analytic Epidemiology DescriptiveUsed when little is known about the disease
Rely on preexisting data
Who, where, when
Illustrates potential associations
AnalyticUsed when insight about various aspects of disease is available
Rely on development of new data
Why
Evaluates the causality of associationsBoth are important!
-
Descriptive StudiesRelatively inexpensive and less time-consuming than analytic studies, they describe,
Patterns of disease occurrence, in terms of,Who gets sick and/or who does notWhere rates are highest and lowestTemporal patterns of disease
Data provided are useful for,Public health administrators (for allocation of resources)Epidemiologists (first step in risk factor determination)
-
Objectives of Descriptive EpidemiologyTo evaluate trends in health and disease and allow comparisons among countries and subgroups within countries
To provide a basis for planning, provision and evaluation of services
To identify problems to be studied by analytic methods and to test hypotheses related to those problems
-
Descriptive EpidemiologyCorrelational studies
Case reports
Case series
Cross sectional studies
-
Correlational Studies (Ecological Studies)Uses measures that represent characteristics of entire populations It describes outcomes in relation to age, time, utilization of services, or exposures
ADVANTAGESWe can generate hypotheses for case-control studies and environmental studiesWe can target high-risk populations, time-periods, or geographic regions for future studies
-
Correlational Studies LIMITATIONSBecause data are for groups, we cannot link disease and exposure in individualExample: Percentage of teenagers taking drivers education and fatal teenage car accidents study done by National Safety CouncilWe cannot control for potential confoundersData represent average exposures rather than individual exposures, so we cannot determine a dose-response relationshipCaution must be taken to avoid drawing inappropriate conclusions, or ecological fallacy
-
Breast Cancer Mortality and Dietary Fat Intake
-
Case Reports (case series) Report of a single individual or a group of individuals with the same diagnosisAdvantagesWe can aggregate cases from disparate sources to generate hypotheses and describe new syndromes Example: hepatitis, AIDSLimitationsWe cannot test for statistical association because there is no relevant comparison groupBased on individual exposure {may simply be coincidental}
-
Case report/Case series(contd.)Important interface between clinical medicine & epidemiology
Most common type of studies published in medical journals{1/3rd of all}
e.g. Frisbee finger , break dancing neck
AIDS, 5 cases of P.carinii pneumonia were diagnosed among previously healthy young homosexual males in L.A.
-
Cross-Sectional Studies (prevalence studies)Measures disease and exposure simultaneously in a well-defined populationAdvantagesThey cut across the general population, not simply those seeking medical careGood for identifying prevalence of common outcomes, such as arthritis, blood pressure or allergiesLimitationsCannot determine whether exposure preceded diseaseIt considers prevalent rather than incident cases, results will be influenced by survival factorsRemember: P = I x D
-
Cross-Sectional StudiesCan be used as a type of analytic study for testing hypothesis, when;
Current values of exposure variables are unalterable over time
Represents value present at initiation of disease
E.g. eye colour or blood group
If risk factor is subject to alterations by disease, only hypothesis formulation can be done
-
The epidemiologic approach:Steps to public health actionDESCRIPTIVEWhat (case definition)Who (person)Where (place)When (time)How many (measures)
ANALYTICWhy (Causes)How (Causes)MEASURES Counts Times Rates Risks/Odds Prevalence
METHODS Design Conduct Analysis InterpretationALTERNATIVEEXPLANATIONS Chance Bias Confounding
INFERENCES Epidemiologic CausalACTION Behavioural Clinical Community Environmental
-
Descriptive EpidemiologyStudy of the occurrence and distribution of diseaseTerms:TimePlacePerson
-
What are the three categories of descriptive epidemiologic clues?
Person: Who is getting sick? Place: Where is the sickness occurring? Time: When is the sickness occurring?
PPT = person, place, time
-
TimeSecular
Periodic
Seasonal
Epidemic
-
Secular Trend
The long-time trend of disease occurrence
-
Tetanus by year, USA, 1955-2000During 2000, a total of 35 cases of tetanus were reported. The percentage of cases among persons aged 25-59 yearsHas increased in the last decade. Note: A tetanus vaccine was first available in 1933.
Chart1
700
690
650
630
535
530
425
415
375
385
300
340
225
240
190
148
116
128
101
101
70
88
86
80
98
70
90
94
70
82
68
49
52
52
65
59
49
43
45
50
40
37
49
40
41
38
Year
Sheet1
1955700
1956690
1957650
1958630
1959535
1960530
1961425
1962415
1963375
1964385
1965300
1966340
1967225
1968240
1969190
1970148
1971116
1972128
1973101
1974101
197570
197688
197786
197880
197998
198070
198190
198294
198370
198482
198568
198649
198752
198852
198965
199059
199149
199243
199345
199450
199540
199637
199749
199840
199941
200038
Sheet1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year
Reported Cases per 100,000 Population
Sheet2
196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980
0.311.21.61.51.20.40.20.250.450.9
Sheet3
-
Possible Reasons for Changes in Trends (cont.)RealChanges in age distribution of the populationChanges in survivorshipChanges in incidence of disease resulting fromGenetic factorsEnvironmental factors
-
Possible Reasons for Changes in TrendsArtifactualErrors in numerator due toChanges in the recognition of diseaseChanges in the rules and procedures for classification of causes of deathChanges in the classification code of causes of deathChanges in accuracy of reporting age at deathErrors in the denominator due to error in the enumeration of the population
-
Other phrases Cyclic trends ~ recurrent alterations in occurrence , interval or frequency of diseaseSecular cyclicityLevels of immunizationsBuild up of susceptiblese.g. Hep A-7 yr cycle,Measles-2yr cycleShort term cyclicityChickenpox,salmonella(yearly basis)
-
Periodic Trend
Temporal interruption of the general trend of secular variation
-
Whooping Cough - Four-monthly admissions, 1954-1973
-
SeasonalA cyclic variation in disease frequency by time of year & season.
Seasonal fluctuations in,Environmental factorsOccupational activitiesRecreational activities
-
Seasonal TrendPneumonia-Influenza Deaths By year, 1934-1980
-
EpidemicAn increase in incidence above the expected in a defined geographic area within a defined time period
-
Endemic, Epidemic and Pandemic Endemic - The habitual presence (or usual occurrence) of a disease within a given geographic areaEpidemic - The occurrence of an infectious disease clearly in excess of normal expectancy, and generated from a common or propagated sourcePandemic - A worldwide epidemic affecting an exceptionally high proportion of the global populationNumber of Casesof DiseaseTime
-
Time clusteringTime Place Cluster/disease clusterA group of cases occur close together & have a well aligned distribution pattern {in terms of time and place}
Cluster analysis-used for rare or special disease events.
-
PersonAgeHobbiesSexPetsOccupationTravelImmunization statusPersonal HabitsUnderlying disease StressMedicationFamily unitNutritional statusSchoolSocioeconomic factorsGeneticsCrowdingReligion
-
Descriptive epidemiology :Patterns of Disease Occurrence distribution of disease in populations numerator ( event count ) / denominator ( group at risk ) by person : age , race / ethnicity , gender , occupation , education , marital status , genetic marker , sexual preference by place : residence (urban vs. rural) , worksite , social event by time : week , month , year ; sporadic , seasonal , trends --- incubation period ; latency
-
Sources of informationCensus dataVital statistical recordsEmployment health examinationsClinical records from hospitalsNational figures on food consumption , medications, health events etc
-
Epidemiologic ( scientific ) Approach
1. Identify a PROBLEM : clinical suspicion ; case series ; review of medical literature 2. Formulate a HYPOTHESIS ( asking the right question ) ; good hypotheses are: Specific, Measurable, and Plausible
3. TEST that HYPOTHESIS ( assumptions vs. type of data )
4. always Question the VALIDITY of the result(s) : Chance ; Bias ; and Causality
-
Epidemiologic Study: threats to Validity Chance : role of random error in outcome measure(s) ( p - value ; power of the study and the confidence interval ) --- largely determined by sample size
Bias : role of systematic error in outcome measure(s)
Selection bias - subjects not representative Information bias - error(s) in subject data / classification
Confounding - 3rd variable (causal) assoc. w/ both X and Y
-
What is a hypothesis?
An educated guess
an unproven idea
based on observation or reasoning, that can be proven or disproven through investigation.
-
What goes into a hypothesis?Characteristics of the diseaseThe illnessEstablished modes of transmission
Distribution In timeBy placeBy person
-
MeasuresMorbidity: Refers to the presence of disease in a population
Mortality: Refers to the occurrence of death in a population
-
Methods for MeasuringHow do we determine disease frequency for a population?
Rate = Frequency of defined events in specified population for given time period
Rates allow comparisons between two or more populations of different sizes or of a population over time
-
Compute Disease RateNumber of persons at risk = 5,595,211
Number of persons with disease = 17,382
Rate = 17,382 persons with heart disease5,595,211 persons= .003107 heart disease / resident / year
-
RatesRates are usually expressed as integers and decimals for populations at risk during specified periods to make comparisons easier. .003107 heart disease / resident / year x 100,000
= 310.7 heart disease / 100,000 residents / year
-
Prevalence vs. Incidence
Prevalence is the number of existing cases of disease in the population during a defined period.
Incidence is the number of new cases of disease that develop in the population during a defined period.
-
IncidenceIncidence rate is a measure of the probability of the event among persons at risk.
-
Incidence RatesPopulation denominator:
IR = # new cases during time period X Kspecified population at risk
-
Example (Incidence Rate)During a six-month time period, a total of 53 nosocomial infections were recorded by an infection control nurse at a community hospital. During this time, there were 832 patients with a total of 1,290 patient days. What is the rate of nosocomial infections per 100 patient days?
IR
=
53 X 100
1,290 pt. days
=
4.1 infections per
100 pt. days
-
Mortality RatesA special type of incidence rate
Number of deaths occurring in a specified population in a given time period
-
Use of Mortality ratesMortality rates are used to estimate disease frequency whenincidence data are not available, case-fatality rates are high,
goal is to reduce mortality among screened or targeted populations
-
Mortality Rates: ExamplesCrude mortality: death rate in an entire populationRates can also be calculated for sub-groups within the population
Cause-specific mortality: rate at which deaths occur for a specific cause
-
Mortality Rates: ExamplesCase-fatality: Rate at which deaths occur from a disease among those with the disease
Maternal mortality: Ratio of death from childbearing for a given time period per number of live births during same time period
-
Mortality Rates: ExamplesInfant mortality: Rate of death for children less than 1 year per number of live births
Neonatal mortality: Rate of death for children less than 28 days of age per number of live births
-
PrevalencePrevalence: Existing cases in a specified population during a specified time period (both new and ongoing cases)
Prevalence is a measure of burden of disease or health problem in a population
-
PrevalencePrevalence: The number of existing cases in the population during a given time period.
PR =# existing cases during time periodpopulation at same point in time
Prevalence rates are often expressed as a percentage.
-
Factors Influencing Prevalence Increased by:Longer duration of the diseaseProlongation of life of patients without cure
Increase in new cases(increase in incidence)
In-migration of cases
Out-migration of healthy peopleIn-migration of susceptible people
Improved diagnostic facilities (better reporting)Decreased by:Shorter duration of disease
High case-fatality rate from disease
Decrease in new cases (decrease in incidence)
In-migration of healthy people
Out-migration of cases
Improved cure rate of cases
-
Basic Measures of AssociationRelative risk& odds ratio
We often need to know the relationship between an outcome and certain factors (e.g., age, sex, race, smoking status, etc.)
Used to guide planning and intervention strategies
-
2 x 2 contingency table for Calculation of Measures of AssociationNote: Exposure is a broad term that represents any factor that may be related to an outcome.
OutcomeExposurePresentAbsentTOTALPresentaba+bAbsentcdc+dTOTALa+cb+da+b+c+d
-
Relative RiskRatio of the incidence rates between two groupsCan only be calculated from prospective studies (cohort studies)InterpretationRR > 1: Increased risk of outcome among exposed groupRR < 1: Decreased risk, or protective effects, among exposed groupRR = 1: No association between exposure and outcome
-
Calculation of Relative Risk incidence rate among exposedRR = incidence rate among non-exposed
-
Calculation of Relative RiskRelative Risk =
OutcomeExposurePresentAbsentTOTALPresentaba+bAbsentcdc+dTOTALa+cb+da+b+c+d
-
Relative Risk Case StudySmoking and low birth weight
Birth WeightSmoking status2500 gTOTALSmoker120240360Non-smoker60580640TOTAL1808201000
-
Answers to Relative Risk Case Study1. Incidence of LBW among smokers
2. Incidence of LBW among non-smokers
3. Relative risk for having a LBW baby among smokers versus non-smokers
-
Understanding Probability and OddsProbability: Chance or risk of an event occurring (a proportion)Probability= no. of times an event occurs no. of times an event can occur
Odds: ratio of the probability of an event occurring to the probability of an event not occurring
Odds = P/(1-P)
-
Calculation of Odds RatioOdds Ratio =
OutcomeExposurePresentAbsentTOTALPresentaba+bAbsentcdc+dTOTALa+cb+da+b+c+d
-
Odds RatioThe odds ratio (OR) is a ratio of two odds.
The OR can be calculated for all three study designsCross-sectional Case-controlCohort.
-
Various approaches to Odds ratio
Cross product/odds ratio 2 x 2 contingency table (ad/bc)
Prevalence odds ratio cross sectional studies
Exposure odds ratio( odds of exposure in diseased vs. nondiseased)In rare cases or exotic diseases
Disease odds/Rate odds ratio(odds of getting a disease if exposed or unexposed) Cohort & cross sectional
Risk odds ratioCross sectional ,cohort & case control
-
Odds RatioFor cohort & cross sectional studies: OR is a ratio of the odds of the outcome in exposed persons to the odds of the outcome in non-exposed persons.
For case-control studies: OR is a ratio of the odds of exposure in cases to the odds of exposure in controls.
Provides an estimate of the relative risk when the outcome is rare
-
Interpretation of Odds RatioOR > 1: Increased odds of exposure among those with outcome
OR < 1: Decreased odds, or protective effects, among those with outcome
OR = 1: No association between exposure and outcome
-
Keeping the Terms StraightRisk ratio = relative risk
Relative odds = odds ratio
Remember the key is recognizing the terms risk and odds
-
Appropriateness of MeasuresRemember that the relative risk can only be calculated in prospective studies
Odds ratio can be calculated for any designCohort / prospectiveCase-controlCross-sectional
-
InferenceThe relative risk and odds ratio provide the magnitude of difference between some factor and an outcome
How do we know if the magnitude is statistically significant?
-
Confidence IntervalsA confidence interval is a range of values that is likely (e.g., 95%) to contain the true value in the underlying population
-
The 10 Steps of Outbreak InvestigationPrepare for field workEstablish the existence of an outbreakVerify the diagnosisDefine & identify casesPerform descriptive epidemiologyDevelop hypothesesPerform analytic epidemiologyRefine hypotheses & conduct additional studiesImplement control & prevention measuresCommunicate findings
*****Ecologic correlation of breast cancer mortality and dietary fat intake. Source: Reprinted from Carroll, K.K., Experimental Evidence of Dietary Factors and Hormone-Dependent Cancers, Cancer Research, Vol. 35, p.3379, with permission of Waverly Press, Inc., 1975.