kick-off meeting february 18, 2009 st - crolles - france

Kick Off meeting, Room Belledonne ST Crolles

04/22/23

1

Kick-Off MeetingFebruary 18, 2009

ST - Crolles - France


04/22/23

2

Agenda - 18 February 2009• 9:00 Welcome, individual presentations, coffee• 9:30 Key figures of the project PC• 10:15 Project Organization/Management PC• 11:00 Coffee break• 11:15 WP Key figures, organization of technical work, preparation

of milestones and deliverables WP leaders– 11:15 WP1 Giuliana Gangemi– 11:45 WP2 Andre Juge – 12:15 WP3 Paul Van de Wiel– 12:45 WP4 Davide Pandini– 13:15 WP5 Loris Vendrame

• 13:30 Lunch• 14:30 Status of negotiations in each country all• 15:00 Website demo, choice of Logo and site Content all• 15:15 Partner Consortium Agreement (incl. IPR Mngt) PC• 15:45 Conclusions and next meetings all• 16:00 End

+ 16:00-18:00 Room Les Vans for ENIAC Call2 (contact Enrico Macii)+ 20:00 Social Dinner (contact JPS)


04/22/23

3

Message from MunEDAreceived on Februrary 13, 2009

Dear Jean-Pierre,Dear MODERN project partners,

This is to inform you that MunEDA unfortunately will not take part in the MODERN project. This is due to the reason that there is no funding situation supported in Germany and therefore also the EU-JU funding is not possible to achieve.We are very sorry about this because the MODERN project ideally fits into our own R&D strategy also in cooperation with the project partners. Nevertheless we further will bring in our engagement into the other ongoing project initiatives and also on bilateral basis with our industry and academic partners. Especially I want to thank Jean-Pierre Schoellkopf and the WP-leaders for his/their enormous efforts to bring this large project up and running.We wish the MODERN project a good run and large success!Hear you soon again.Best regards.

Andreas Ripp and the MunEDA team.

Need to change the Technical Annex, especially WP3: -52 PM !


04/22/23

4

Key Figures of MODERN

Project Coordinator


04/22/23

5

country name type

France

ST-F Big C

IMEP Small L

STF2 Big C

LETI Big L

LIRM Small L

THL Big C

TMPO Small C

DK TEKL Small C

Austria

AMS Big C

IFXA Big C

TUGI Small L

TUW Small L

Italy

UNET Big L

NMX Big C

POLI Big L

ST-I Big C

UNBO Small L

UNCA Small L

UNRM Small L

SpainELX Small C

UPC Small L

CHCSEM Big L

SNPS Small C

Greece ISD Small C

NL

NXP Big C

TUD Small L

TUE Small L

UK UNGL Big L


04/22/23

6

MODERN: Key Figures(updated after MunEDA exit)

• 28 partners:– 26 companies/institutions– MunEDA is finally OUT

• 9 countries:– Germany is now totally OUT

• Cost figures:– Total cost: 26 599 130 € (26.6M€)– Total JU funding (16%): 4 257 687 €– Total NAT funding (29%): 7 732 107 €– Total funding (45%): 11 989 794 € (12M€)

• Effort figures:– Total Person.Month 2 418.5 over 3 years– Total Person.Year 201.5 over 3 years

67 persons working full time on MODERN during 3 years !


04/22/23

7

Cost breakdown by Country

total cost

25%

0%

23%10%

26%

2%3%4% 6%1%Italian Cluster

German Cluster

French Cluster

Austrian Cluster

Dutch Cluster

Spanish Cluster

Greek Cluster

Swiss Cluster

British Cluster

Danish Cluster


04/22/23

8

Resource Breakdown by Institution type

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

300.00

350.00

400.00

WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6

Total Big C

Total Big Labs

Total Small C

Total Small Labs


04/22/23

9

Ressource Breakdown by WP

Grand Total PM

0.00

100.00

200.00

300.00

400.00

500.00

600.00

700.00

800.00

WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6

Grand Total PM


04/22/23

10

Project Organizationand Management

Project Coordinator


04/22/23

11

Global Organization

TBD

External reviewers


04/22/23

12

MODERN Organization (1/3) Coordinator (= General Project Coordinator) Modern

• The GPC is responsible for the following tasks:– Interface to the European Commission and ENIAC

• Negotiate the funding budget• Preparation and submitting data to ENIAC or EC

– Preparation of Reviews and Project meetings (SB/PCC, EB/PTC)– Chairing of SB/PCC (and also EB/PTC ?)– Negotiate on contract, budget, Consortium Agreement, LOI– Representation of the Consortium – Management of the Consortium in the wide sense on a continuous

basis• Monitor project progress and workload consumption, • anticipate corrective actions when/if necessary, • resolve conflicts within the Consortium as earlier as possible, • serve as project secretary and archive, • collect the partner’s financial statements and audit certificates.


04/22/23

13

MODERN Organization (1/3) Coordinator (= General Project Coordinator) Improve

• Main tasks will be related to the following activities, aiming at ensuring efficient project organization towards ENIAC Joint Undertaking requirements and enhancing communication within the consortium: – technical monitoring, – meetings organization, – financial flows, – reporting, – official communication, – consortium management, – contracts management, – internal quality policy


04/22/23

14

MODERN Organization (2/3) Strategic Board (= Project Coordination Committee)

• SB is composed of– seniors representatives of all the industrial partners– one representative of the Solutions Providers– one representative of the Universities.

• SB is in charge of the overall direction and major decisions• SB is responsible for the approval of the following items to be proposed by the

Executive Committee EB:– Consortium: actions against a defaulting partner, integration of new

partners…– Budgets allocation and questions related to the ENIAC Grant agreement.– Contractual: changes to the ENIAC Grant agreement or the Project

Agreement– Technical: major changes in work, project orientations– IPR and dissemination: approving procedures and policies for the

management of the Knowledge;• SB will meet at least on a six-monthly basis

– Plus two-monthly intermediary internet forums/phone conferences • Each consortium member will receive equal voting rights:

– During SB meetings, all decisions should be taken by vote under 2/3rd majority.


04/22/23

15

Members of the Strategic Boardname type Strategic Board memberST-F Big C Jean-Francois Hugues (chairman)LETI Big L Jean-Rene LequepeysTHL Big C Philippe BonnotTMPO Small C Marc RenaudinAMS Big C Ehrenfried SeebacherIFXA Big C Michael FuldeUNET Big L Enrico SangiorgiNMX Big C Andrea MarmiroliPOLI Big L Enrico MaciiST-I Big C Salvatore RinaudoSNPS Small C Ronald GullNXP Big C Name tbd (Paul Van de Wiel) UNGL Big L Asen Asenov


04/22/23

16

MODERN Organization (3/3) Executive Board (= Project Technical Committee)

• EB is composed of the WP Leaders plus the GPC• EB is chaired by GPC or one WP leader (to be defined ???)• EB is responsible for the monitoring of the project progress and the

preparation, review and updating of the detailed work-plan.• The decisions will be taken by consensus or by a double majority in

the case where consensus is not possible. • Each member of the EB will have one vote. • Changes to the work-plan will require consensus or a double majority.• EB will meet every 2 months. • The voting procedure as well as the responsibilities of the EB will be

laid down in the Project Consortium Agreement (PCA)


04/22/23

17

Work Package Leadersare members of the Executive Board

Partner WP Leader NameWP1 ST-I [email protected] STF2 [email protected] NXP [email protected] ST-I [email protected] NMX [email protected] ST-F [email protected]


04/22/23

18

All Tasks have one Task LeaderTask Leaders are « reporting to » the WP leader

Partner Task Leader Name

T2.1 ST-I [email protected]

T2.2 UNGL [email protected]

T2.3 NXP [email protected]

T2.4 AMS [email protected]

T2.5 UNET [email protected]

T3.1 TUD [email protected]

T3.2 UNBO [email protected]

T3.3 POLI [email protected]

T3.4 NXP [email protected]

T4.1 LETI [email protected]

T4.2 ELX [email protected]

T4.3 ISD [email protected]

T4.4 ST-I [email protected]

T4.5 THL [email protected]

T5.1 AMS [email protected]

T5.2 IFXA [email protected]

T5.3 SNPS [email protected]

T6.1 ST-F [email protected]

T6.2 UNET [email protected]

T6.3 ST-F [email protected]


04/22/23

19

Work PackagesKey Figures

Project CoordinatorIntroducingWP leaders


04/22/23

20

WP1: leader [email protected]

Task Task title Leader Leader Start End Task Leader

T1.1Problem Definition

19 ST-I M01 M03 [email protected]

T1.2Technology Definition


T1.3Feasibility Study


T1.4Definition of Tool

Specifications 19 ST-I M06 M09 [email protected]

T1.5

Specification of Tool demonstration and validation 19 ST-I M06 M12 [email protected]

T1.6Documentation and user

guides 19 ST-I M24 M33 [email protected]

T1.7 Integration Plan 19 ST-I M12 M18 [email protected]


04/22/23

21

WP1 total resources: 69.6 PM

Work package number

WP1 Start date or starting event:

M1

Work package title Target technologies, application domains, design/tool requirements

Participant number 1 2 6 15 16 19 21

Participant short name

ST-F AMS IFXA NMX NXP ST-I THL

Person-months per participant

12 4.8 4.8 6 6 30 6


04/22/23

22


Task. Task title Leader Leader Start End Task Leader

T2.1PV-aware process

simulation 19 ST-I M01 M33 [email protected]

T2.2PV-aware device

simulation 29 UNGL M01 M36 [email protected]

T2.3

Electrical characterization of PV, software (TCAD) / hardware comparison & calibration 16 NXP M01 M36 [email protected]

T2.4

Correlation between PV and reliability, reliability modeling 2 AMS M01 M36

[email protected]

T2.5PV-aware compact

modelling 11 UNET M01 M36 [email protected]


04/22/23

23


Work package number WP2 Start date or starting event: M1

Work package title Process/device to compact modeling


Participant short name AMS IMEP STF2 UNET LETI NMX NXP


19.2 54 84 60 24 42 48

Participant number 18 19 20 26 28 29

Participant short name POLI ST-I SNPS TUW UNCA UNGL


18 48 23 32.4 12 174


04/22/23

24



T3.1 PV-aware circuit models 23 TUD M01 M36 [email protected]

T3.2

Methodologies, tools and flows for manufacturability, testability, reliability and yield 27 UNBO M01 M36 [email protected]

T3.3 PV-aware design 18 POLI M01 M36 [email protected]

T3.4Design for low noise and

EMI/EMC 16 NXP M01 M36 [email protected]


04/22/23

25



Work package title Physical/circuit to RT-level: PV-aware and PV-robust modeling and design


Participant short name CSEM IFXA LETI LIRM MUN NMX NXP


44 36 13.2 24 51.9 18 222Participant number 18 19 23 24 29 27 28

Participant short name POLI ST-I TUD TUE UNGL UNBO UNCA


60 102 108 18 12 23 15

Participant number 30 31

Participant short name UNRM UPC


27 20


04/22/23

26

Impact of MunEDA exit on T3.2 ?Task T3.2: Methodologies, tools and flows for manufacturability, testability, reliability and yield (Task Leader = [email protected])The models that will be developed in task 3.1 need to predict accurately the impact of process variation. To compensate for process variation during circuit design the PV-aware circuit models need to be used in new methods for circuit design and future design tools and flows. Partners: UNBO, MUN, NMX, NXP, ST-I, UNCA, UNGL, UNRMIn this task the development and application is performed of non-normal distributions and non-linear correlations in a statistical static timing analysis and multi-objective optimization flow for improved yield and reliability prediction that helps in determining the impact of process variations and doping fluctuations on performance. MUN will analyse standardized process development kits (pdk). ST-I and UNRM will work on a speed-up algorithm for PV-aware circuit optimization. The before mentioned work of MUN, ST-I and UNRM will be combined to develop/improve an integrated standardized PV-aware high-speed design platform adding behaviour models for circuit sizing. UNBO and UNCA will analyze new circuit design techniques and these will be applied for industrial applications to enhance new methods of improving parametric design performance and yield. A PV-aware circuit simulation tool is developed by UNGL, which may serve as reference for newly developed faster flows. NXP will analyse a statistical timing flow based on reduced parameter lib cell models and measurement results from WP5 will serve as reference for the tool and flow validation. NMX will implement and use the PV methodologies and models from WP2 for logic devices and NVM memory array optimization.


04/22/23

27



T4.1 Variability-aware design 12 LETI M01 M36 [email protected]

T4.2

Variation-tolerant, robust, low-noise and low-EMI architectures/micro-architectures 4 ELX M01 M36 [email protected]

T4.3 Design of reliable systems 10 ISD M01 M36 [email protected]

T4.4

Design of regular architectures and circuits for high manufacturability and yield 19 ST-I M01 M36 [email protected]

T4.5

Distributed reconfigurable PV-robust architectures 21 THL M01 M36 [email protected]


04/22/23

28



Work package title Architectural to system level: modeling, analysis and design


Participant short name ST-F CSEM ELX ISD LETI LIRM NMX

Person-months per participant 18 24 36 78 36 30 30


Participant short name POLI ST-I THL TMPO UNBO UPC TEKL

Person-months per participant 36 72 60 57.6 23 42 12


04/22/23

29



T5.1

Test structures for PV analysis: design, implementation and characterization 2 AMS M01 M33

[email protected]

T5.2

Demonstrator: design, implementation and characterization 6 IFXA M01 M36 [email protected]

T5.3

Software demonstrator and tool prototype 20 SNPS M01 M36 [email protected]


04/22/23

30


Work package number

WP5 Start date or starting event: M1

Work package title Test structures and demonstrators


Participant short name ST-F AMS IFXA LETI NMX NXP ST-I


18 14.4 63 19.2 6 54 24

Participant number 20 21 22 25 31

Participant short name SNPS THL TMPO TUGI UPC


10 18 12 37.7 16


04/22/23

31


Task. Task title Leader Leader Start End Tasl Leader

T6.1 Management 1 ST-F M01 M36 [email protected]

T6.2 Dissemination 11 UNET M01 M36 [email protected]

T6.3 Exploitation 1 ST-F M01 M36 [email protected]


04/22/23

32

WP6 total resources: 123.3 PMWork package number WP6 Start date or starting event: M1

Work package title Project Management, Dissemination and Exploitation


Participant short name ST-F AMS CSEM ELX IFXA IMEP ISD


18 4.8 5 6 4.8 2.4 6


Participant short name UNET LETI LIRM MUN NMX NXP POLI


6 2.4 2.4 2.1 6 12 6


Participant short name ST-I SNPS THL TMPO UNBO UNCA UNRM


12 3 6 2.4 4 3 3

Participant number 31

Participant short name UPC


6


04/22/23

33

Status of Negotiationsin each country

Project Coordinator(from inputs of the Project Officer

Received on Feb. 17 at 6PM)


04/22/23

34

Message from the Project Officer(Michel Hordies)

• Dear Jean-Pierre,• • good to see that the project is entering in its active phase.• • Your questions:• • …• • I wish you a very successful meeting. Please give my best

wishes for a successful project to all the partners.• • Here is a status of the remaining issues to be cleared asap:• • …• • Best regards,

Michel•


04/22/23

35

(1) negotiations• the negotiation of the project is terminated since

December. • At national level, there are no further negotiations but

only the establishment of national grant agreements (NGA) for which the PAs might need some additional information such as cost eligibility issues. This is important to pass on to the partners.

• The French NGAs are all signed. • The other countries are all working on their NGAs and

we expect most of them to be ready later this month. • In Italy, the delay might be longer but we are working on

a potential solution for that.


04/22/23

36

(2) JU agreement

• It is almost ready. We are collecting the last missing bank information from the partners. Please remind those concerned that they should send the requested e-mail confirming the address registered with their bank.

• I hope we can submit the JU GA for your signature by the end of the month at the latest.

• The partners will then be able to acceed to the JU GA once their NGA is signed. See below for detailed status report.


04/22/23

37

(3) Starting Date • I thought we had agreed on a starting date of 1

January. • The starting date for the project can be

retroactive. If the project did not start, then I assume the starting date could be 1 Feb.

• If you make it later, the costs of the kick-off meeting might not be eligible.

• I need this information to be put in the JU GA.

Starting Date =


04/22/23

38

status of remaining issues to be cleared asap (1/2) • Legal validation:

– ELASTIC CLOCKS S.L. needs to provide a recent excerpt of Trade Register containing "HOJA" number ( Spanish word for identification number).

• Bank accounts: – 1 ST-France– 9 STF2 (CROLLES)– 20 SNPS– 26 TU WIEN– need to provide e-mail to « [email protected] »

with the following text: " concerning the registration of our bank account to the European commission, I confirm that my company XXXX (name) has registered its address : … (address) at the bank YYYY (name + address) and ask to be paid on this IBAN number ZZZZZ for its participation to the ENIAC project AAAA."

• GPF's : – original signed GPF A24 & A25 from coordinator + original signed

A24 from all participants– except 13 LIRM, 19 STItaly, 22 TMPO, 28 UNICAL.


04/22/23

39

status of remaining issues to be cleared asap (2/2)• National Grant Agreements: to be sent by all participants

except FRANCE • Budget: When changes appear in the contract vs.

negotiation, the technical annex needs to be modified accordingly. Budget tables must comply with PAB decisions and National Grants Agreements need to be in line with any redistribution of funds.

• Discrepancies identified in the figures: – 1 ST-France : the national GA funding in the DOW is different

from the amount mentioned in the PAB decision and GPF A3.2– 2 AMS AG: the JU funding in the DOW is different from the

amount mentioned in the PAB decision and GPF A3.2– 21 THL: the national GA funding in the GPF A3.2 is different

from the amount mentioned in the DOW and in the PAB decision– 31 UPC: The national GA funding and the JU funding in the GPF

A3.2 are different from the figures mentioned in the DOW and in the PAB decision


04/22/23

40

Website demo


04/22/23

41

PCA

Project Consortium Agreement


04/22/23

42

Project Consortium Agreement

• Legal agreement about Governance and IPRights• Templates:

– FP6– FP7– Artemis– ENIAC-IMPROVE

• We will rely on « ENIAC-IMPROVE » when it will be mature enough


04/22/23

43

MilestonesDeliverables


04/22/23

44

Del. no. Deliverable name WP . N Diss Date Contrib Title

D6.1.01 Internal project website 6 P CO M01 ST-F Internal project website

D6.1.02 IPR management guidelines 6 R CO M01 ST-F IPR management guidelines

D6.2.1 Public part of project web-site 6 D PU M01 ST-I Public part of project web-site

D6.2.2 Press release at the start of the project

6 R PU M03 ST-I Press release at the start of the project

D1.1 Definitions of problems and technologies,Specifications for tools, methods and design techniques

1 R PP M06 ST-IST-FAMSIFXANMXNXPTHL

T1.1 Problem Definition, Definition of Technologies, Define a list of tools, methods and design techniques (produce one or more documents)T1.2 Specifications for each tool, method and design techniques to be developed in WP2/3/4.(produce one or more documents)

D2.2.1 Assessment of state-of-the-art TCAD methodology and usability concerning PV for industrial purposes including identification of current deficiencies of tools

2 R CO M06 UNGL Assessment of state-of-the-art TCAD methodology and usability concerning PV for industrial purposes including identification of current deficiencies of tools

D2.4.1 Specification of considered degradation effects, modeling approaches and device parameters

2 R CO M06 UNGL,TUW

Specification of considered degradation effects, modeling approaches and device parameters

D6.1.03 Risk management plan 6 R CO M06 ST-F Risk management plan

D6.1.04 Semi-annual project progress report

6 R CO M06 ST-F, all Semi-annual project progress report


04/22/23

45

Milestones up to M12Milestone

numberMilestone name Work package(s)

involvedExpected

dateMeans of verification

M6.1 First project review by ENIAC all M08 Reviewer’s feedback

M5.1 Identification of sw tools to be interfaced 2, 5 M09 Status activities on WP2

M4.1 PV-tolerant asynchronous/de-synchronized, ultra low-power, robust functional blocks, and SystemC models

4 M10 D4.2.1D4.3.1

M4.2 Prototype asynchronous/de-synchronization flow 4 M10 D4.2.1

M1.1 Problem Definition and Tests 1,2,3,4 M12 D 1.1, D1.2

M3.1 Abstract Models CMOS and AMS&RF 3 M12 Abstract models for CMOS cell libraries reported and verified

M3.3 PV aware circuit simulation techniques 3 M12 PV aware circuit simulation techniques working and verified

M3.5 M&C strategies for digital and AMS&RF 3 M12 M&C strategies for digital and AMS&RF developed and verified

M3.7 RF interaction models 3 M12 RF interaction models developed

M5.2 New test structure definition 5 M12 D5.1.1

M5.3 Demonstrators/test chips detailed content and technology definition 2, 3, 4, 5 M12 Intermediate results from WP 2,3,4


04/22/23

46

Conclusions


04/22/23

47

Next SB and EB meetings

• Date: end of June, 2009• Location: ST – Crolles - France

kick-off meeting february 18, 2009 st - crolles - france

Documents