kentucky travel demand model users group overview for the tnmug organizational meeting on january...

24
Kentucky Travel Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Demand Model Users Group Overview Group Overview for the for the TNMUG Organizational TNMUG Organizational Meeting Meeting on January 26, 2004 in on January 26, 2004 in Nashville Nashville by by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of Multimodal Division of Multimodal Programs Programs

Upload: edgar-lewis

Post on 15-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Kentucky Travel Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Demand Model Users

Group OverviewGroup Overviewfor the for the

TNMUG Organizational TNMUG Organizational MeetingMeeting

on January 26, 2004 in Nashvilleon January 26, 2004 in Nashville

by by

Rob Bostrom, P.E.Rob Bostrom, P.E.

Division of Multimodal ProgramsDivision of Multimodal Programs

Page 2: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Presentation OverviewPresentation Overview

Overview of Travel Demand Modeling in KYOverview of Travel Demand Modeling in KY• PurposePurpose• PlayersPlayers• Model TypesModel Types• Model UsesModel Uses• Model SoftwareModel Software

KY MUG OverviewKY MUG Overview• Meeting topicsMeeting topics• Web siteWeb site• Running the MUGRunning the MUG• ChangesChanges

Page 3: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Travel Demand Models/UsesTravel Demand Models/Uses Forecasting - Forecasting - especially new facilitiesespecially new facilities

Air Quality - Air Quality - VMT, speed forecasting, VMT, speed forecasting, Mobile 5.0b/6.0 inputsMobile 5.0b/6.0 inputs

Transportation Plans - Transportation Plans - used for MPO and small used for MPO and small urban area needs analysisurban area needs analysis

Corridor studies - Corridor studies - I-66, I-69, I-74, and other major I-66, I-69, I-74, and other major routesroutes

Special - Special - CVM (Commercial Vehicle Monitoring) CVM (Commercial Vehicle Monitoring) station optimization, User Cost Analysis, Detour Analysisstation optimization, User Cost Analysis, Detour Analysis

Page 4: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Modeling PlayersModeling Players In-HouseIn-House

• Multimodal Multimodal

• MPOsMPOs KIPDA,KIPDA, OKI OKI LexingtonLexington Ashland, Clarksville, Owensboro, E-town, Bowling Green, Ashland, Clarksville, Owensboro, E-town, Bowling Green,

Henderson/EvansvilleHenderson/Evansville

ConsultantsConsultants• Four Statewide On-Demand ContractsFour Statewide On-Demand Contracts• Others on individual projectsOthers on individual projects

Page 5: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Modeling SoftwareModeling Software MinUTPMinUTP

• Old modelsOld models• Hybrid Models (Owensboro)Hybrid Models (Owensboro)• Current KYSTMCurrent KYSTM

TransCADTransCAD• New modelsNew models

Page 6: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Travel Demand Models/TypesTravel Demand Models/Types

KYSTMKYSTM MPOMPO County-levelCounty-level Small urbanSmall urban SubareaSubarea SketchSketch

Page 7: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Travel Demand Models/StatewiTravel Demand Models/Statewidede

Page 8: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Travel Demand Travel Demand Models/StatewideModels/Statewide

Page 9: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Travel Demand Models/MPOTravel Demand Models/MPO

Page 10: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Travel Demand Models/MPOTravel Demand Models/MPO

Page 11: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Travel Demand ModelsTravel Demand ModelsCounty-LevelCounty-Level

Page 12: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Travel Demand ModelsTravel Demand ModelsCounty-LevelCounty-Level

Page 13: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Travel Demand Models/Small Travel Demand Models/Small Urban AreaUrban Area

Page 14: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Travel Demand Models/SubareaTravel Demand Models/Subarea

1

2

10

87

6

5

4

181

16

14

13

12

11

19

17

20

15

21

3

22

9

23

27

28

24

25

26

Location Run 6 Run 7 Run 8 Run 9 Run 10 Run 111 14,700 26,400 12,600 25,900 18,200 24,9002 8,300 15,300 14,400 16,100 10,100 14,7003 23,700 34,800 26,300 38,800 26,500 34,0004 14,200 14,500 13,300 12,500 14,200 14,3005 16,300 16,700 16,300 15,400 17,100 16,7006 26,400 26,000 27,400 26,400 26,400 26,3007 8,500 9,800 10,500 10,500 8,700 9,7008 19,500 13,900 23,500 19,300 18,700 15,6009 22,700 19,100 29,900 27,000 22,100 21,00010 6,600 3,300 5,600 4,500 5,900 3,80011 5,800 3,700 6,600 5,100 5,400 3,90012 7,900 5,700 10,200 8,800 7,600 6,30013 5,700 6,200 4,600 3,500 5,900 5,70014 4,900 4,100 4,500 1,100 5,000 3,50015 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,80016 1,200 1,000 800 800 1,400 1,00017 400 100 100 100 400 10018 800 900 700 700 900 90019 100 200 100 100 200 20020 200 400 100 400 200 40021 200 100 200 200 100 10022 4,000 2,200 1,300 800 3,900 2,30023 45,600 42,900 66,300 60,800 45,200 43,30024 45,500 42,900 66,100 60,700 45,300 43,40025 35,700 34,200 52,600 48,200 35,700 34,10026 29,100 29,600 45,100 45,100 29,400 29,50027 23,700 34,800 26,300 38,800 26,500 34,00028 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500

Page 15: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

MUG BackgroundMUG Background Going since 1995Going since 1995 Formed because of need Formed because of need

to evaluate new softwareto evaluate new software Meet about 3 times/yearMeet about 3 times/year WorkshopsWorkshops Morning meetingsMorning meetings Participants: Participants: State, local, State, local,

consultants, MPO, academic, consultants, MPO, academic, FHWAFHWA

Page 16: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

MUG TopicsMUG Topics Travel Demand ModelsTravel Demand Models

• SoftwareSoftware• TRANSIMSTRANSIMS• Statewide ModelStatewide Model• MPO ModelsMPO Models• Urbanized modelsUrbanized models

Page 17: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

MUG TopicsMUG Topics Travel Demand Model InterfacesTravel Demand Model Interfaces

• Forecasting/projectsForecasting/projects• DataData

TMSTMS SurveysSurveys SE dataSE data ODOD

• Air quality/Mobile6.0Air quality/Mobile6.0 Other toolsOther tools

• Traffic simulation modelsTraffic simulation models• Freight/ReebieFreight/Reebie• GISGIS

Page 18: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

MUG Web SiteMUG Web Site Web: Web:

http://www.kytc.state.ky.us/Multimodal/KyTraffic_MUG.htmhttp://www.kytc.state.ky.us/Multimodal/KyTraffic_MUG.htm

MembersMembers• ~114~114• Put in Access data basePut in Access data base• Share w/ whoeverShare w/ whoever

PresentationsPresentations LinksLinks

• TMIPTMIP• TRB statewide model committeeTRB statewide model committee• Other MUGsOther MUGs

Page 19: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

Running the MUGRunning the MUG Steering CommitteeSteering Committee

• 3-man planning team3-man planning team• Everybody helpsEverybody helps

MeetingsMeetings• Topic selection Topic selection • Securing speakersSecuring speakers• Meeting prep.Meeting prep.• Day of meetingDay of meeting• HonorariumsHonorariums• Meeting follow-upMeeting follow-up• Training creditTraining credit

PublicityPublicity• Email Distribution ListEmail Distribution List

• Member listMember list

Page 20: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

MUG Meeting DetailsMUG Meeting Details WorkshopsWorkshops

• 4-6 hours4-6 hours• 6-10 sessions6-10 sessions• National experts & local National experts & local

expertsexperts• TopicsTopics

Speed EstimationSpeed Estimation Traffic SimulationTraffic Simulation Travel SurveysTravel Surveys Statewide Model StakeholdersStatewide Model Stakeholders Travel Demand Model DataTravel Demand Model Data Innovative Modeling TechnologiesInnovative Modeling Technologies

Page 21: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

MUG Meeting DetailsMUG Meeting Details

Morning meetingsMorning meetings• 2-3 hours2-3 hours• 4-5 presentations4-5 presentations

Sponsorship of FHWA/other Sponsorship of FHWA/other trainingtraining• HERS/ST (FHWA)HERS/ST (FHWA)• REMIREMI• TransCAD (Caliper)TransCAD (Caliper)• Statewide Traffic Forecasting (FHWA)Statewide Traffic Forecasting (FHWA)

Page 22: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

MUG Meeting DetailsMUG Meeting Details

• AttendanceAttendance Morning meetings ~ 30-40Morning meetings ~ 30-40 Workshops ~ 40-60Workshops ~ 40-60 15-20 different states including 15-20 different states including

presenters from CA, FL, DC, TX and presenters from CA, FL, DC, TX and othersothers

Usually have KY, IN, OH, and WV.Usually have KY, IN, OH, and WV.

Page 23: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

ConclusionConclusion KY MUG has served KYTC well.KY MUG has served KYTC well.

• InterdisciplinaryInterdisciplinary• TrainingTraining• SynergySynergy• Win-winWin-win• InnovativeInnovative

KY MUG prototype for other KY MUG prototype for other data/analysis partnershipsdata/analysis partnerships• FreightFreight• Congestion PMsCongestion PMs

Page 24: Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of

ContactsContacts KYTC:KYTC:

• Rob Bostrom, [email protected] Bostrom, [email protected]• Lynn Soporowski [email protected] Soporowski [email protected]

Thank you for your attention!Thank you for your attention!