kccident and emergency department organisation …

140
kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT : " .ORGANISATION UTILISATION . , " 1/ . . . .

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jun-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …

kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

ORGANISATION ~ND UTILISATION

1

~--

H-328

New Zealand Department of Health

LIBRARY Box 5013 Wellington

73467Accession No

Classification WX 215 [Qj WH

Location 6129378-Y94

ISSN 0548-944X

Department of Health

ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION AND UTILISATION

SPECIAL REPORT 70

by

B CAllan BSc (Hons) J Reinken PhD

Issued by the Management Services and Research Unit Department of Health Wellington

1984

LIBRARY bull DEPARTMENT OF HEAlrRJ

WELLINGTON

FOREWORD

Over the last twenty years there have been a number of accident and emergency studies in New Zealand hospitals For the most part these have been place and topic specifics This study by Bridget Allan and Judith Reinken is different It begins with an historical review of previous work in the field This is followed by a wide ranging study of accident and emergency services based on field work carried out in a representative sample of hospitals The data are analysed and presented taking account of the relevant international literature The resulting consolidation of knowledge provides a sound basis not only for further research but more importantly for the further development of accident and emergency services

The report provides at least tentative answers to a number of questions regularly asked about accident and emergency services Do general practitioners and accident and emergency departments provide competing services lhe answer appears to be no The public seem to discriminate sensibly between what are for the most part complementary services Is cost a factor in accident and emergency attendance as opposed to a visit to the general practitioner Again the answer appears to be no - cost is not an important factor Are socio-economic status and ethnicity associated with the rate of A amp E attendance Perhaps but distance and other factors concerned with accessibility appear to be more important

The study shows wide variation in the way in which A amp E services are provided in different hospitals This ranges from the size and shape of the physical facilities and the type and level of staffing relative to the workload to the way in which individual patient problems are dealt with Those responsible for the planning and operation of A amp E departments should find these comparisons informative Consideration of the data may perhaps prompt questions which in their answering lead to greater cost effectiveness and to service improvement

As well as providing answers the research raises questions It points yet again to the need in New Zealand for a regional study of accidents and accident services Accidents are a major cause of premature death and morbidity Many organisations are involved in the prevention and treatment of accidents but so far it has not been possible to mount a comprehensive study which includes and integrates all interests Until this is done fragmentation of services is likely to continue

By highlighting access to services the study points up the need for more information about communication and transport patterns in health care delivery Again this is a neglected area of research which could have far reaching implication for the planning and operation of health services

Finally the report raises questions about the interaction between general practitioners and A amp E services That these services are largely complementary is clear but unfortunately the communication between them is often not as good as it could and should be Further research has a contribution here but will not solve the problem Better communication and understanding is needed on both sides

The researchers have provided us with a much needed and timely review of an important and sometimes controversial aspect of health services Theirjete audience

G C Salmond ---shyDeputy Director-General of Health Department of Health

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Many people have helped with this study In particular we would like to thank

o John Mills who visited the hospitals drafted the physical characteristics chapter and gave freely of his time and expertise

o the staff of the hospitals visited for sharing their time and thoughts with us

o Desmond Keenan Shelagh McRae and Denis Snelgar for allowing us to use the information they had collected

o Clare Salmond Mike Moore and Sylvia Nichol for their assistance with computer analysis

o readers ofmiddot drafts of this report who offered helpful criticism and suggestion

o the typists and publication staff of the Department of Health

We also acknowledge the Director-General of Health for permission to publish

DISCLAIMER

The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Health

COPYRIGHT

Provided the source is acknowledged information contained in this report may be freely used by any person

CONTENTS

Page

ACKNOWIEDGEMENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

1 INTRODUCTION I

Background Thewider questions of emergency medical services The overseas situation An historical perspective in New Zealand

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments Record studies on the utili satjon of A amp E departments Studies of the organisation of A amp E departments

Overview of this study Aims Sources of information

References

2 DEFINITIONS 11

The Accident and Emergency department Attendance The hospitals Recording systems References

3 PROCEDURES IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT 15

Entry Sorting 1 reatmen t Disposal Follow-upcare Admissions Discussion References

4 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 23

PrinCiples Size Location

Entrances Access to other hospital facilities

Layout Waiting area Examination and treatment area Resuscitation area Operating theatre Plaster room Interview room Reception and records office Staff offices Holding ward

Discussion References

5

6

7

8

STAFFING OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 35

Medical staffing Senior medical staffing Junior medical staffing Accident and emergency work as a career

Nurse staffing Other staff involved with the A amp E department

Reception and clerical staff Orderlies Social workers Ambulance personnel

Discussion References

PATIENT ATTENDANCE CHARACTERISTICS 55

Overall attendance and trends Age and sex Conditions

Injury conditions Sickness conditions

Recall attendance GP-load

Non-urgent sickness Discussion References

PATIENT ATTI~UDES TO THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT AND STAFF ATTITUDES TO THE PATIENTS 75

Reasons for visiting the A amp E department Overseas studies New Zealand studies

Effect of health centres and deputising services on A amp E utilisation A amp E staff views of patients

Overseas studies The New Zealand situation

Discussion References

UTILISATION OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 91

Comparison of A amp E utilisation among hospital catchment areas Results Effect of general practitioner availability

Factors explaining catchment area variations in A amp E utilisation Method Results of the mUltivariate analyses

Comparison of A amp E use and general practitioner use Discussion References

9 CONCLUSIONS 107

The A amp E department as a hospital department The A amp E department as an emergency service The A amp E department as a primary care service Where from here

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A QUestion sheets 116

APPENDIX B Accident and emergency department records 120

APPENDIX C Statistical analyses of accident and 123 emergency department attendance rates by neighbourhoods

APPENDIX D Childrens use of general practitioners 128 and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

TABLES

Table

1 Proportion of first attendance patients discharged recalled referred or admitted

2 Areas of A amp E department~

3 Area to attendance ratios for adjusted total areas and waiting areas of A amp E departments by first attendance and total attendance

4 Numbers of examination and treatment cubicles or rooms and recommended numbers based on first attendance and total attendance

Medical staffing of A amp E departments

6 Total medical staffing (full-time equivalents) and medical staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

7 Nurse staffing of A amp E departments excluding student nurses and hospital aids

Nurse staffing (full-time equivalents) and nurse staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

Average attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

10 Trends in attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

11 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was recall attendance

12 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was for sickness

13 Proportion of total A amp E attendance that was for Sickness by policy and age groups

14 Use of general practitioners by first attenders at A amp E departments

15 Reasons for A amp E first attendance from three New Zealand studiesmiddot

Itgt Attendance (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) within each A amp E department catchment area

Page

18

24

25

29

37

39

45

46

56

57

66middot

70

71

77

78

92

(continued)

Table Page

17 Hospital admissionsfor accidental injury (mean 93 age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) and death due to accidental injury (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) within each A amp E department catchment area

IB Attendance (mean age-adjusted and neighbourhoodshy 99 adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) and populationshyto-general practitioner ratio within each A amp E department catchment area

19 Comparison of first attendances for injury at A amp E 101 departments and general practitioners

FIGURES

Figure Page

1 Percentage of total attendance at 58 A amp E departments by age and sex

2 Percentage of total attendance at 59 A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

3 Injury first attendances by type of injury 6U all ages

4 Injury first attendances by type of injury 61 by age groups

5 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 62 all ages

6 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 63 by age groups

7 Comparison of medical staff availability and 67 level of recall attendance

Comparison of nursing staff availability and 67 level of attendance

9 Location at which accidents happened by those 79 attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments 131 by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

1

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

BACKGROUND

This report arises f rom concerns expressed by several groups about the availability especially out of hours of emergency car~ and its provision by Accident and Emergency (A amp E) departments in New Zealand

In _SQe mid 1970 s the people of Porirua were worried that local general -pr-actitioners were not available at nights and weekends and by the delays

involved in travelling to Wellington and Hutt A amp E departments [IJ At the same time the people of North Shore were campaigning to keep their local A amp E department open More recently community groups in Upper Hutt have been pressing for the addition of an A amp E service to a local health centre Overall people are concerned that appropriate care (including facilities such as x-rays) is readily available in emergency situations

General practitioners are another group who have been concerned about A amp E departments in particular about inappropriate uses of A amp E departments A long-standing complaint bas been that patients are using A amp E departments for care which wou~d be better given by a general practitioner and that the A amp E departments retain patients instead of referr ing them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care [2 3J In 1981 the research group of the Wellington Faculty of the Royal NZ College of General Practitioners sponsored a study of children presenting at A amp E departments because they were worried that unnecessary admissions of children to hospital occurred because their parents had bypassed the general practitioners and gone straight to hospital [4J

Also A amp E staff and hospital administrators have been concerned that caring for patients who could have been treated by general practitioners has limited their ability to deal with emergency cases [567]

THE WIDER QUESTIONS OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

Emergency care requires not only the provision of hospital services (the A amp E department with back-up from other hospital facilities) but also the organisation of services outside the hospital and co-ordination between both sets of services Emergency medical services outside the hospital include alarm and communication systems transport systems and first aid services There are important questions for New Zealand within this framework For example what should be the role of general practitioners in on-site emergency care What level of training is appropriate for ambulance officers Should voluntary personnel staff ambulances To what extent is double manning of ambulances required [8910]

In order to limit the study to manageable proportions this report focusses only on the hospital services namely the A amp E department Emergency medical services provided outside hospitals are mentioned only where they impinge noticeably on the A ampE department It is hoped that due attention will be given to the wider questions of emergency medical services in the future (see Chapter 9)

2

THE OVERSEAS SITUATION

Concern with emergencymiddot care facilities especially their increasing use has been apparent in other countries for the past thirty years While some articles report on the situation in Canada Australia Sweden France and the USSR most of the literature is about the United States and Britain This section briefly outlines the major themes of the literature and their relevance to New Zealand More specific aspects are covered in the appropriate chapters

Many United States researchers have studied the operations of different emergency rooms exploring patients reasons for using the emergency room their demographic characteristics and their use of the family doctor Often the studies have tried to explain an increasing use of emergency rooms and some have reported on the effectiVeness of measures introduced to reduce thei r use These studies provided models for some of the analyses carried out in this study However the debate in the United States over appropriate methods of funding and staffing for emergency rooms is seldom relevant to New Zealand because of the differences both in philosophy and organisation of medical care in the two countries

The Platt [11] committee on A amp E services in Britain in 1962 was concerned about casual attenders ie patients not in need of urgent attention but wishing to avoid the trouble of attending their general practitioners surgery They also criticised the unsuitable accommodation and the insufficient numbers of senior medical staff supervising Casualty Departments The report recommended changing the name Casualty Service to Accident and Emergency Service (to discourage casual attendance) and rationalising the service by clOSing smaller A amp E units and centralising facilities These recommendations have been partially carried out

However there has been continuing research in Br i tain into the reasons given by patients particularly self-referred patients for their use of A amp E departments and the trade-off between general practitioner and A amp E services There has also been continuing debate over the medical staffing of A amp E departments

The British studies are of some relevance to the New Zealand situation since the organisation of medical care here is similar but no overseas experience can provide a blueprint for New Zealand For example the direct cost to the patient of general practice care in New Zealand raises the possibility of patients attending the A amp E department because it is free whereas the British system of general practitioner funding provides no such incentive

AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE IN NEW ZEALAND

Little is known about the historical development of A amp E services in New Zealand Presumably they followed the British tradition described in the Platt report [11 p23-24)

The word casualty in its proper meaning of a serious injury has a long history It occurs in Shakespeare and Dickens writing in 1837 used casualty ward to describe the ward in a hospital in which accidents were treated Unfortunately the meaning alt~red in the second half of the last century The Nuffield Report (1960) Casualty Services and their Setting

3

gives an interesting quotation from a survey made by the Lancet in 1869 The out-patients at St Bartholomews Hospital are it says divided into two categories They are the middotcasualtymiddot which comprises those who are supposed to require temporary treatment for diseases or injuries of a trifling character and the middotout-patientsmiddot properly so called who after receiving a regular letter of admission are entitled to the advice of the assistant surgeons and physicians for a period of 12 months It is in the casualty division that the increase of numbers has been most marked bullbullbull It is estimated that not less than a thousand patients frequently attend on a Monday or Tuesday morning

Certainly by 1872 vlellingtons private medical practitioners were incensed at the hospitals provision of free treatment for their patients Five hundred outpatients were treated in Wellington that year [12] Separate casualty departments were operating at Wellington Hospital by 1924 [12] at Auckland Hospital by the 1940s [13] and Christchurch Hospital by 1952 [14]

The 1960 Board of Health report [15] on outpatient servicesmiddot expressed concern over the duplication of services by outpatient departments which were also available from general practitioners However it recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times

Since the late 1960s a series of New Zealand studies have considered the use of A amp E departments either by interviewing patients or by analysing data drawn from A amp E record systems and the organisation of A amp E departments

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

The first interview study was an investigation of first attenders at the Dunedin A amp E department in 1968 by Dixon et al [2] Their results have not been contradicted by any of the later studies

They found that the principal attenders were males aged 15 to 24 who recorded first attendance rates of over 100 per 1000 each year The young men were also the most likely to report having no general practitioner Dixon found that the age and sex pattern of those attending at the A amp E department was nearly converse to the pattern of those attending a general practitioner

Dixon pointed out that the conditions treated at the A amp E department were rarely disease-related rather they were predominantly lacerations and open wounds bruising sprains and strains effects of foreign bodies and fractures The major reason given for attending the department was that it was seen as appropriate

Dixon concluded that the A amp E service was complementary and not competitive to general practice that the public were realistic in regarding it as the only practical and effective primary medical care for accident and emergency injuries and that payment for service did not appear to figure in the decision to attend the department

o

4

TwO interview studies of first attenders at Auckland Hospital A amp E department have been carried out by Hunton in 1972 and Richards in 1975 [16] Both studies included an assessment by the student interviewers and A amp E staff as to the suitability of the patients condition for general practice care 42-43 per cent were considered suitable Richards concluded that public education programmes encouraging people to use their general practitioner prior to attending the A amp E department should be instituted

In 1978 Keenan interviewed patients who had attended Christchurch A amp E department collecting detailed information on the accident or sickness leading to the attendance (unpublished see Chapter 6 and 7) He found the same set of reasons for using A amp E departments as Dixon found the A amp E department was seen as appropriate and accessible

Kljakovic found similar results when interviewing the parents of children attending A amp E departments in the Wellington region in 1978 [4] He also found that in choosing between the general practitioner and the A amp E department parents were more likely to use the service which was closer to the family home Children f rom lower socio-economic status families were more likely than other children to see thei r general practitioner before gOing to the A amp E department

Records studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

Several studies have gathered data from A amp E records to investigate A amp E utilisation In 1979 Snelgar described the characteristics of people attending Northland Base Hospital A amp E department [17] He found similar results to Dixon apart from a higher proportion of injuries In the same year McRae reviewed all attendances at Waikato Hospital A amp E department and found a similar picture [lB]

Three records studies have looked at the relationship between A amp E use and general practitioner use Maynard looked at Mosgiel residents use of Dunedin A amp E facilities for three years before and three years after the opening of a local health centre [19] No difference was found ~asap

investigated assertions that people from one part of the Wellington Hospital catchment area had suddenly begun to use the A amp E department heavily for conditions that should have been seen by a general practitioner [20] In fact that part of the catchment area had much lower rates of A amp E use than other areas Reinken tested whether the doubling of general practitioner cover in one part of the Wellington region affected A amp E presentation rates differently than in other areas nearby [21] There was no clear evidence that the increased cover had any effect

Studies on the organisation of A amp E departments

As part of a thesis looking at young doctors Salmond examined the work of house surgeons in A amp E departments using a postal questionnaire [22J He concluded that working in an A amp E department was good experience for a house surgeon only if second year house surgeons were deployed in the department the house surgeon was well-supervised by senior medical staff there was a good working relationship with the A amp E chargemiddot nurse and the house surgeon was not over-tired He also suggested that good senior staffing was closely related to effective administration and better service in the A amp E department

5

The Hospital Design and EValuation Unit of the Department of Health prepared a report documenting the planning requirements of New Zealand A amp E departments [23] The report outlined several principles of A amp E design and made detailed recommendations on the facilities rooms and equipment necessary

OVERVIEW OF THIS STUDY

Aims

The aim of this study is to describe A amp E departments in New Zealand Because the material presented in the previous section was collected by different researchers at different times and from different A amp E

departments detailed comparisons across the studies have been difficult To get a more comprehensive picture of A amp E use in New Zealand a systematic investigation was necessary

The specific aims of this report are

o to describe the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at their procedures physical characteristics and staffing patterns

o to describe attendance at A amp E departments including the patients profile and pattern of attendance and the load placed on the departments by patients who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner

o to describe the use of A amp E departments by consumers by analysing patients reasons for attending the departments and analysing demographic factors inrelation to A amp E attendance

Sources of information

Information was gathered from three sources

The site visits

Fourteen A amp E departments were visited between May and September 1981 by a Department of Health study team consisting of a medical officer from the Division of Hospitals and a res~arch officer from the Management Services and Research Unit

At each hospital the team examined the facilities and spoke with staff involved with the A amp E department including

o the medical superintendent (and in some hospitals the principal nurse)

o the A amp E officer or medical officer in charge of the A amp E department (where such a position existed and was filled)

o the nurse supervisor andor charge nurse of the A amp E department

o at least one house surgeon working in the A amp E department

6

In some hospitals the team also spoke with other staff members including experienced A amp E staff nurses and hospital social workers

Question sheets were used during interviews so that a comparable body of information was collected at each hospital Interviews were open-ended to allow discussion of local procedures or problems (See Appendix A for question sheets)

Hospitals were carefully selected so that the A amp E departments in the study would represent a cross-section of New Zealand A amp E departments Those selected served a range of communities in both the North and South Islands

o major urban Dunedin)

areas (Auckland Wellington Christchurch and

o provincial centres (Rotorua Taranaki and Timaru)

o predominantly rural areas (Whakatane and Grey)

In centres with more than one A amp E department all were visited so that a complete picture of the services and use could be developed This involved visiting Auckland Green Lane Middlemore and North Shore hospitals in Auckland and Wellington Hutt and Kenepuru hospitals in Wellington

The information gathered in the site visits has been used in describing the organisation of A amp E departments (Chapters 3 4 arid 5)

The A amp E records data collection

On each site visit a sample of 1981 attendances was drawn from the A amp E record system and the following information was recorded for each person age sex presenting condition (sickness or injury) time of presentation residential address and whether the visit was a first attendance for the condition or a recall visit

Exceptions were Christchurch and the three Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments Comparable data collected by Keenan in Ch ristchurch in 1978 and Allan in Wellington during 1980 were used instead

This information has been used to describe the attendance at A amp E departments (Chapter 6) and for the analysis of demographic factors in relation to attendance (Chapter 8)

The consumer studies

In 1978 Keenan carried out interviews with patients attending Christchurch A amp E department working from a one in eight sample drawn from the A amp E log over a four-week period and gaining a 99 response rate Results from this study have been analysed and compared with the results of the published New Zealand interview studies [2416] Anecdotal material from Kljakovic s study of children attending Wellington A amp E departments has also been included to illustrate the results of the numerical analysis

We realise that in studying only a selection of A amp E departments some local variations may have been missed but we are confident that the broad pattern and major issues in the organisation of A amp E care have been

7

covered Also as the A amp E departments studied serve two-thirds of the population of New Zealand the utilisation patterns discussed in the report are likely to prevail throughout New Zealand We hope that the mater ial presented the conclusions drawn and the questions raised in this report will encourage discussion about the current operation and future developmiant of A amp E departments in NewmiddotZealand

a

8

REFERENCES

1 de LACEY A REINKEN J and SALMOND C E - Community attitudes to sickness and health stimulus and response v 3 Community attitudes - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 103-105 (Special report series no 56)

2 DIXON C W Emery G M and SPEARS G F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) p 272-279

3 [Editorial] in G P Journal of the General Practitioner Society no 42 (1981) P 1-2

4 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN BC and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

5 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble Jr et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

6 MAYNARD Edward J - The application of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment shyUniversity of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

7 Hospital misuse brings protest in Taranaki Daily News (1 Sept 1980) bull

8 FAHEY Morgan - The role of the family doctor in disaster and emergency medicine in NZ Family Physician - v 5 no 1 (1978) p 42-44

9 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 19-23 March 1979 in NZ Med J - (1980) P 194-196

10 Double manning of ambulances [editorial] in NZ Hosp - v 32 no 3 (1980) p 1

11 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medicine Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

12 BARBER Laurie H and TOWERS Roy J - Wellington Hospital 1847-1976 Wellington Wellington Hospital Board 1976

13 The story of Auckland Hospital 1847-1977 edited by David Scott -Auckland Medical Historical Library Committee of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians in New Zealand 1977 p 35-36

14 BENNETT FO - Hospital on the Avon the story of the Christchurch Hospital 1862-1962 Christchurch North Canterbury Hospital

o Board 1962

9

15 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 196U (Report series Board of Health no 2)

16 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

17 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

18 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

19 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency department in Med Care - v 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

20 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

21 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

22 SALMOND G C - Young doctors an exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

23 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

11

CHAPTER 2

Definitions

lhis chapter provides the definitions of terms used in our study In general our terminology is consistent with the literature However in some areas such as the classification of presenting conditions as sickness or injury or the description of GP-load there is no general consistency and we have developed our own definitions

THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

This name is the one commonly used in New Zealand We have used it in preference to the older description Casualty Depariment [1] and the American description of Emergency Department It is one hospital department which patients can approach without prior notification

Emergencies can be any condition that - in the opinion of the patient their family or whoever assumes the responsibility of bringing the patient to the hospital - requires immediate medical attention

However using such a definition means every case is an emergency In New Zealand A amp E departments patients tend to be classified in a similar way to the description given by the American Hospital Association [2]

o emergencies where delay is harmful and the condition potentially threatens life or function

a urgent cases which require attention within a few hours

o non-urgent cases where the condition is minor or non-acute and does not require the resources of the emergency service

An accident is an unexpected event Accidents which have resulted in attendance at an A amp E department are ones that have caused some trauma whether through shock or other injury The Platt report [1] decided on the term A amp E department in recognition that the real emergencies were a trickle while the accidents were a mighty flood

In general the A amp E department is regarded as part of the hospitals outpatient services and like these in day to day running it provides specific clinics generally for the treatment of traumatic injury x-ray burns dressings plasters and so forth

An accident and emergency patient is a person who is entered in the A amp E log book This can involve a certain amount of error however as some outpatients or discharged patients may return for follow-up care through the A amp E department Also the A amp E department often handles the acute admissions to the hospital

12

ATrENDANCE

A first visit (or first attendance) is the first visit a patient makes for one particular condition

A recall visit is any visit made for one particular condition which is not the first visit for the condition Some recall visits are patient initiated (eg due to pain bleeding infection or an accident to the dressing or plaster) but for the most part revisits are scheduled return visits suggested by A amp E staff

Total attendance is the sum of first visits and recall visits

Inj ury attendances are defined to include the results of trauma (cuts burns fractures sprains strains bruises head injuries multiple injur ies and so forth) as well as foreign bodies in the eye or other orifices and toxic effects whether from accidental or self-poisoning events Late effects of minor injury (pain bleeding abscesses or such) are not included as injury but as sickness

Sickness attendances include collapse (whether stroke coma heart attack or other) shortness of breath abdominal pain general sickness (fever vomiting diarrhoea unwell) mental distress and minor conditions

Non-urgent sicknesses are defined as the minor conditions abdominal pain and general sickness except for preschool children and adults over 65 where the general sickness and abdominal pain conditions can be urgent A amp E staff defined non-urgent sickness less specifically they tended to define it as longstanding or minor sickness

GP-load describes the patients whom A amp E staff feel should have seen a general practitioner It includes patients with longstanding or minor sickness conditions and patients with minor traumatic injury (eg cuts bumps and bruises)

In hours attendance refers to all attendances in the normal working hours of 0800 to 1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays

Out of hours attendance refers to all other attendances outside the defined normal working hours

In an average week 50 hours fall in the in hours category and 118 hours in the out of hours category If we assume that an average person sleeps eight hours a night then that person is awake for 62 hours in the out of hours category (and all the in hours of course) Thus the out of hours category is 70 per cent of the total time in a week and 55 per cent of the waking time in a week

Minor conditions included abscesses backaches infected wounds or wound pain headache pain (unspecified) earaches eye problems toothaches nosebleeds limb pains We have called it the skin pain or bleeding category in Chapter 6

13

Attendance rates measure the use of A amp E departments for a defined population They express the number of cases from an area over a defined period per 1000 population in that area Rates were obtained by age and sex for sickness and injury and in and out of hours for each census area unit or neighbourhood served by each hospital

THE- HOSPITALS

We grouped hospitals into four types

o urban hospitals (where average annual first attendances at A amp E departments are over 25000 patients)

o provincial hospitals (serving 6000 to 12000 new A amp E patients each year)

o rural hospitals (serving fewer than 6000 new A amp E patients each year)

o suburban hospitals where A amp E departments are not open 24 hours per day North Shore Hospital was open 7 days a week 830 am shy530 pm and Kenepuru Hospital was open 5 days a week 830 am shy430 pm

Most of the A amp E departments visited had a senior position variously called the A amp E officer the A amp E director the senior medical officer or the medical officer in charge For convenience we call this position the A amp E officer

RECORDING SYSTEMS

The log is the record kept at the A amp E department which records some information on every patient who presents It will often give no more than the patients name the date and time of visit

The A amp E record is usually a card and it records basic patient information and case notes It may be held for several years in the A amp E department and may therefore contain information on a series of separate events for anyone patient

14

REFERENCES

1 GtBrit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the sUbcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

2 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p vii-viii

15

D

CHAPTER 3

Procedures in the accident and emergency department

In this chapter we begin describing the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at the way they operate We follow the course of a patients care entry to the A amp E department sorting into priority order for care (triage) treatment and follow-up care

ENTRY

Most people presenting at the A amp E department were ambulant (the walking wounded as they are colloquially known) They came through the A amp E departments main entrance to the reception desk where they were first seen by a receptionist or nurse (Exceptions to this occurred in the smaller hospitals where patients presenting at night were first seen by the telephonist who called the nursing staff) Nurses did reception duties at

all the provincial and rural A amp E departments and at two of the urban A amp E departments when receptionists were not on duty (eg lunchtimes nights) bull At times nurses found that having to cover the reception desk interfered with their care of patients

When the receptionists are off duty the nurses do the reception work This can be a nuisance because it interferes with patient care and sometimes patients ring the bell at the reception desk and the staff working in the resuscitation room dont hear it

A amp E nurse

Unless their condition required immediate care the ambulant patients then spent several minutes at the reception desk while their details (eg name address general practitioner complaint) were noted on the A ampE records (See Appendix B for more information on A amp E records) Then they waited in the waiting room until they were called for treatment

A small proportion of patients arrived by ambulance andmiddot at almost all hospitals entered the A amp E department through a separate ambulance entrance In the larger hospitals some nursing staff were stationed in or near the ambulance entrance to care for these patients In other hospitals the staff had often been warned of incoming urgent cases and were standing by when the ambulance arrived As the condition of ambulance patients tended to be urgent they were usually taken straight to a resuscitation or treatment area patients condition permitted or friends or the ambulance driver

Record with the

keeping assist

was ance

carried of thei r

out r

when elativ

the es

SORTING

All A amp E departments operated some triage system to sort the ambulant patients by the urgency of their need for care (Themiddot only exception was Grey A amp E department where there was seldom more than one patient in the department at a time) At most A amp E departments the patients were sorted

16

into urgent and non-urgent categories with urgent cases being seen immediately and non-urgent cases being seen in the order they presented At some of the urban A amp E departments a more complex sorting was done For example

Priority is given in the following order

urgent need very young and very old patients those with general practitioner notes those without general practitioner notes

A lie E nurse

Usually ambulance cases were not triaged since they tended to arrive on their own and required urgent care However several A lie E departments had triage arrangements planned for the arrival of many ambulance cases at once as in a disaster

Sorting was largely a responsibility of the nurses although some A amp E doctors would occasionally check the condition of patients- in the waiting room too The receptionists often played a role in triage as well alerting the nursing staff to urgent cases This happened more in A amp E departments where the physical layout made it difficult for nurses to watch the entrance and the waiting room

The receptionists do tQe basic sorting They have guidelines to follow distressed patients severe cuts or bleeding go straight to the nurses open wounds or eye injuries go directly to a cubicle and are assessed by the nurses patients with abdominal pain or chest pain go on to trolleys and wait in the recovery room This system usually works well although occasionally a fracture patient will not be recognised and will sit in the waiting room

A lie E nurse

In several A lie E departments doctors and nurses stressed the value of an experienced receptionist in recognising and reacting quickly to acutely ill or injured patients

TREATMENT

Almost all the A amp Edepartments visited had a policy that all patients presenting had to be seen by a doctor The doctor did not necessarily have to treat the patient he or she could advise the patient to see a general practitioner Some A amp E doctors commented that by the time they saw the patients it was as easy to treat them as to send them away_ At a few departments the nurses (and occasionally the receptionist) could advise the patient that the department was not an appropriate place for their condition and that they should see a general practitioner This was usually done in consultation with the A E doctor but at times the nurses acted on their own initiative In these places a triage system similar to that reported by Weinerman et al [1] where patients were assigned to the appropriate service inside or outsidemiddot the hospital appeared to be operating

7

The assessment of patients the ordering of tests andmiddot the supervision of treatment were usually seen ~s medical functions The nurses would prepare patients for treatment (removing dressings) and carry out urgent first aid measures (stem bleeding start gastric lavage or cardio-pulmonary resuscitation) Generally however a nurse would only initiate treatment if the patients condition was urgent and a doctor was not available or was already busy with another emergency Exceptions to this situation occurred in some hospitals with A amp E nurse training programmes and in some smaller hospitals where the doctor is on call rather than working in the A amp E department In these departments experienced nurses could order tests such as x-rays and initiate treatments such as suturing and removing foreign bodies from eyes

In most A amp E departments nurses would perform some treatments under a doctors supervision However the range of treatments nurses were allowed to perform varied considerably among hospitals At some hospitals nurses sutured after training but at others they never sutured

The nurses do not suture although they would like to There are four reasons for this there is no full-time A amp E officer so good standards of sutur ing could not be maintained there could be medico-legal problems if a nurse sutured a cut which was more complicated than it looked eg with tendon involvement the nurses have enough to do at present and if they start suturing they will be expected to do it always and the young doctors need to learn suturing as part of their training

Principal nurse

Electrocardiograms were taken by nurses in some A amp E departments by technicians at others Taking blood samples was a doctors job in some departments but was done by nurses in others Similarly gastric lavage using a def ibrillator and plaster work were done by nurses in some departments Most A amp E nurses would maintain intra-venous drips but only nurses with special training WOUld insert them

Some nurses expressed frustration at restrictions on the treatments they were allowed to perform However several sen~or nurses stressed that they had to select carefully the nurses they allowed to perform more difficult treatments

We are very selective about choosing the nurses to do triage suturing and the more complicated procedures This seems to have been successful weve had no problems with nurses undertaking treatment theyre not competent to provide

A amp E senior nurse

I make sure the nurses understand they can be dangerous people If theyre not aware of their limitations theyre not suitable for A amp E work

A amp E senior nurse o

Also one department which had comparatively few nurses discouraged them from increasing the range of treatments they performed so that their workload did not become overwhelming

18

For diagnosis the A amp E departments made heavy use of the x-ray departments (The Design and Evaluation Unit study [21 estimated that 30 per cent of A amp E attenders had an x-ray during their visit) Some A amp E departments found their arrangements with the x-ray department very convenient with an x-ray machine aVailable 24 hours a day in or close to the A amp E department and with patients and x-ray films or reports returning within an hour At other hospitals arrangements Were less convenient in some places reporting bac k of x-rays took two or three hours delaying patients considerably while in others the x-ray departmentmiddot was located on a different floor from the A amp E ~epartment causing difficulties in transporting and accompanying patients there

Little use was made of the laboratory services other than for blood and urine tests and arrangements were generally satisfactory However in many hospitals x-ray and laboratory staff had to be called in to perform tests out of hours and because of the expense involved these out of hours tests were discouraged Some house surgeons found this a difficult situation

I I m caught between contradictory pressures the orthopaedic surgeons say that x-rays are necessary for proper diagnosis and the hospital board is trying to limit out of hours x-rays to save money

House surgeon

DISPOSAL

After treating the patient the A amp E doctor decides on the appropriate disposal discharging from care arranging follow-up treatment by referring to another source of care or recalling to the A amp E department or admitting the patient Information on disposal was only readily available from three A amp E departments The most common disposal pattern was in fact discharging from care with 40 to 55 per cent of patients making a first Visit being discharged

TABLE I PROPORTION OF FIRST ATTENDANCE PATIENrs DISCHARGED RECALLED REFERRED OR ADMITTED

Discharged Recalled Referred to Admitted Other First to A amp E GP Specialist attendance

Clinic tallied

Waikato l 393 132 222 99 134 19 25 707 Green Lane2 550 220 110 40 80 Unknown Taranaki 41 5 268 73 103 116 24 164

1 From McRaes study of Waikato A amp E departmen~ in 1979 2 From a study carried out by Green Lane A amp E department

19

FOLLOW-UP CARE

The decision to be made on follow-up care was usually between re~alling to the A amp E department or referring back to the patient I s general practitioner Some A amp E departments also referred patients (especially children) to district nurses or patients with work 1n]uries to an occupational health nurse or clinic Many departments referred fracture patients to orthopaedic clinics held in the hospital outpatients department and one A amp E department which was very short of space referred patients needing redressings to the outpatients department

There were large differences in referral practices (see Table 1) Between 13 and 27 per cent of first attenders were recalled to the A amp E department for follow-up care while 15 to 30 per cent were referred elsewhere either to a general practitioner or to a specialist clinic Also recall attendances expressed as a proportion of total attendances varied considerably among the A amp E departments from 10 per cent to 50 per cent (see Chapter 6 Table 11) and clearly reflected different follow-up practices

All of the urban and two of the provincial A amp E departments had a policy of referring most patients requiring follow-up care to a general practitioner and of keeping recall visits as low as possible This was similar to general policy in both Britain and the United States which appears to discourage re-at tendance at A amp E departments [34] However in the suburban rural and other provincial A amp E departments the decision on follow-up care was left to the judgement of the A amp E doctor

In practice however the choice to refer or to recall was reiated to several factors First the decision related to characteristics of the patients If the patients had serious wounds or burns or injuries which could develop complications they were usually recalled They were also recalled if the A amp E staff thought they would not receive appropriate care at home or they would not see a general practitioner for follow-up care Patients living a long way from the hospital were usually referred to their general practitioner At some A amp E departments patients were given the choice of referral or recall according to A amp E staff comments most chose to return to theA amp E department

The patients prefer to come back to the hospital Money is not a factor in this because the ACC pays for accident treatment at the general practitioner

A amp E nurse

Second there were general practitioner factors If the local general practitioners were unhappy about the A amp E department recalling patients or if a general practitioner had referred the patient to the department originally the A amp E doctors would refemiddotr rather than recall However if the A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner did not have the facilities and in some cases the ability to provide follow-up care (eg for serious woundS eye injuries) they would recall the patient

Some GPs dont like following up care initiated by the A amp E department or dont have the necessary facilities so I tend not to send patients back to them

A amp E officer

20

Im more likely to refer a patient back to a GP who is reliable

House surgeon

Third many of the house surgeons said they would recall patients if they were interested in the condition or if they were worried about their diagnosis and treatment and wanted to see the outcome Several medical superintendents noted that recalling under these circumstances was acceptable because it comprised part of the house surgeons training

Fourth the workload of the A amp E department sometimes affected the follow-up decision with very busy departments actively discouraging recalls And finally there was the philosophy of A amp E medicine held by the A amp E doctor In one department where the A amp E officer considered it an ethical duty to see any treatment initiated through to a successful conclusion almost all patients who needed follow-up care were recalled At two other departments the A amp E officers stressed the importance of being able to deal efficiently with any emergencies presenting they kept recalls low so that the department was not clogged with extra patients Other A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner could provide better continuity of care than the A amp E department so they referred as many patients as possible

When referring patients to the general practitionermiddot most of the A amp E doctors made a verbal recommendation to the patient and then relied on the patient to attend the general practitioner They would only write a formal referral letter if the patients condition was serious In several A amp E departments however greater efforts were made to inform the patient t s general practitioner Three departments gave referred patients cyclostyled forms with details of diagnosis and treatment to be passed to their general practitioner while the Whakatane department sent a copy of the A amp E record form to each patients general practitioner

ADMISSIONS

Table I suggests that between a and 14 per cent of all first attendances were admitted to the hospitals Admissions could well be higher for children Kljakovic [5] found that 20 per cent of the children presenting at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments were admitted

The A amp E departments were involved in several different pathways for the admission of acutely ill or injured patients (Scheduled admissions did not involve the A amp E department at any of the hospitals visited) Self-referred patients could be admitted directly from the A amp E department to the wards or could be cared for in a holding (or acute admitting) ward before going to the wards

There was considerable variation among the hospitals as to which members of the medical staff were able to admit patients At some of the urban hospitals only the registrars could admit while at others the A amp E doctor could admit if the registrar was delayed and unable to assess the patient quickly At some of the provincial and one of the urban hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit in consultation with the admitting officer or appropriate registrar while at-another urban hospital and the rural A amp E departments the A amp E doctors regularly admitted patients

21

Hospitals with lower levels of bed occupancy were more likely to allow A amp E doctors to admit Senior A amp E doctors were more likely to play a role in admissions (actually admitting patients or advising the registrar) than house surgeons

Some patients referred by a general practitioner for acute admission also passed through the A amp E department At one hospital the general practitioners rang the A amp E officer to arrange for all acute admissions and all such GP-referred patients were seen first in the A amp E department However more usually the general practitioners rang the appropriate registrar to make arrangements and the registrar decided whether to admit the patient directly to the wards or through the A amp E department The involvement of A amp E staff with patients requiring admission ranged from almost none (where the patient went directly from the A amp E department to the ward or specialist unit) to a full initial assessment including tests (often undertaken at the request of the registrar responsible for the patient) bull

Generally the A amp E doctors were satisfied with the admission procedures However at one hospital where the A amp E doctors could not admit patients waiting for admission tended to clog the department The doctorselt that if they had admission rights the situation would be remedied

DISCUSSION

There were few differences among the A amp E departments in the reception and sorting of patients However there were differences in some aspects of treatment follow-up care and admission procedures

lhe role of the A amp E nurses in treatment varied considerably with some departments allowing nurses to initiate and perform many treatments and other departments allowing little autonomy Careful training and selection were essential before nurses increased their responsibility for treatment bull

Policies on follow-up care differed among the departments with the urban and provincial departments generally referring patients to general practitioners and the rural and suburban departments leaving the referral decision to the A amp E doctor In practice however the differences were less clear-cut with several factors other than the patient I s condition affecting the follow-up care decisions These factors included the A amp E staffs communicat ion with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs of house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors philosophy with regard to A amp E medicine

The A amp E departments also differed considerably in thei r procedures for acute admissions At some hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit an A amp E patient while at others the patient had to be held in the department until admitted by a registrar Also at some hospitals patients referred by general practitioners for acute admission were seen in the A amp E department before going to a ward While having to hold patients sometimes caused

clogging in the department A amp E staff were generally satisfied with the procedures

22

REfERENCES

1 WEINERMAN E Richard RUfZEN S Robert and PEARSON David shyEffects of medical -triage- in hospital emergency service in Public health reports - v 80 no 5 (May 1965) p 389-399

2 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

3 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM (68)83

4 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL Jenkins - St Louis Hosby 1975

5 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

23

CHAPTER 4

Phy~i~~1 c~~raft~rhtics of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the physical characteristics of A amp E departments their overall size location and layout as well as specific areas within the departments It discusses the effects of the physical characteristlcs on the organisation and functioning of the A amp E departments Our investigation worked from the detailed base established in bullAccident and emergency departments a studY of planning r~quirements a report prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation gnit Departmellt of HeCilth [1]

PRINCIPLES

The 1973 Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit (DEU) report [l] outlined the following principles to be applied in designing A amp E departments

o the A amp E department must be patients seeking emergency care

ready to receive and deal with

o the A amp E department mus~ be able load within a reasonable period

to cope with an average i

busy

o the A amp E department must be capable of adaptation to exceptional situations arising from major accidents ltgtrqther disasters

o the layout should be simple easily unqerstood and compact

o the layout and procedures should facilitate easy flow of patients through the department

o spaces should be multipurpose to give greatest versatility

o p~tient ~ovew~n~ should be minimised )

priv~cy for patientsshould be provided as far as is practicable andconsistent with the need for supervisi0rt

SIZE

There was considerable variation in the total sizes of the A amp E -a~1-ftment~ vi~ited witll floor areas ranging from 250 sql1a~e metres to 2115 ~guare m~ties (see Table 2) Eight of the 14 departments visited had i

hhid1pgw~fd~oracUte admitting ward However even wt)en ~he area of th~ f~ ~ bull ~middotc1~A~- _ ~ - bull bull ~

AampE department WCiS adjusted for the presence of a holding ward this I~1-getv~-rH~tion in irea reniained

24

TABLE 2 AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Total area Holding ward Adjusted total Waiting room area areal area

sqm sqm sqm sqm

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 2 115 225 1 890 55 Middlemore 1 045 140 905 50 Green Lane 960 240 720 70 Wellington 575 190 385 75 Hutt 270 270 30 Christchurch 470 470 40 Dunedin 635 90 545 20

Provincial Rotorua 515 20 495 90 Taranaki Base 720 90 630 40 Timaru 605 70 535 80

Rural Whakatane 430 430 20 Grey 310 310 15

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 255 255 30 Kenepuru 540 540 30

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area Considerable sharing with outpatients department

The area of the A amp E department was not closely related to the attendance (see Table 3) Obviously there is a certain minimum size for an A amp E department since certain facilities are essential regardless of the attendance served Thus as would be expected the rural and to a lesser extent the provincial A amp E departments had high area to attendance ratios However even within the group of urban A amp E departments there was a fourfold difference in the total area to attendance ratio

The design at Auckland~ laid out along several corridors with many separate consulting and treatment rooms possibly contributed to its high ratio At Wellington Hutt and Christchurch hospitals staff commented on their difficulties working in cramped conditions The lack of space often forced staff to work under extreme pressure to move patients through the departments very quickly

25

TABLE 3 AREA TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR ADJUSTED TOTAL AREAS 1 AND WAITING AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS BY FIRST ATTENDANCE2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Adjusted total area to attendance ratio Waiting area to to attendance ratio

Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 first attendance total attendance total attendance pa p a p a

Full-time departments ~

Urban Auckland 323 291 08 Middlemore 232 157 09 Green Lane 3 230 168 16 Wellington 80 69 13 Hutt 82 63 07 Christchurch 76 64 05 Dunedin 200 143 05

Provincial Rotorua 404 293 53 Taranaki Base 609 399 25 Timaru 466 266 403

Rural Whakatane 718 490 23 Grey 805 61 2 30

Part-time departments

Suburban I INorth Shore 272 148 17

Kenepuru 924 597 33

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Considerable sharing with outpatients department

Spearman rank correlations [2] of adjusted total area with

( a) first attendance r = 0310 p gt 010 Not significant ( b) total attendance r = 0297 pgt 010 Not significant

26

LOCATION

There is broad agreement that the A amp E department should be located on the ground floor well signposted and easily accessible to ambulatory patients and ambulances The ambulance entrance should be able to handle several ambulances at once and should have adequate turning space It should be projected from the weather and screened from the view of the other A amp E department patients

The A amp E department should also be located as closely as possible to radiology facilities (either the x-ray department itself or a branch) The A amp E department and the outpatients department can share some facilities and provide additional staff and accommodation in an emergen~y

situation if they are sited together Acute patient care areas (operating theatres intensive care unitsmiddot and cardiac care units) and laboratory services should also be readily accessible from the A amp E department [134]

Entrances

Almost all of the A amp E departments visited were on the ground floor of the hospital and were well signposted Generally access for ambulatory patients was good apart from two hospitals where they had to walk up steps to enter the building o

Few departments had ambulance access which could cope with a shuttle of ambulances bringing mass casualties from a disaster There w~s little relation between the size of the department or the population served and the ease of ambulance flow Indeed those departments with a relatively low probability of being involved in a mass casualty situation had good ambulance flow (eg Whakatane) while those with a greater possibility had relatively poor ambulance access (eg Wellington) Several departments had particularly poor a~bulance flow with only a one-lane access Three departments had good drive-straight-through access while at the rest ambulances had to reverse However there were advantages to some of the bull reversing I situations in that the bays into which the ambulances had to reverse were more likely to give the patient protection from the weather All the A amp E departments visited had separate ambulance entrances which in all but three cases guaranteed screening of ambulance patients from public view

Access to other hospital facilities

In many of the hospitals the A amp E department was adjacent to the outpatients department or to the orthopaedic outpatients section When this occurred the plaster room and x-ray facilities were usually shared and waiting areas and the records office were sometimes shared In the smaller hospitals both departments often shared the nursing staff

The access to the x-ray department ranged from excellent in places which had x-ray facilities immediately adjacent to the A amp E department to very poor where the patient had to be transported hundreds of metres and to a different floor The time taken for the A amp E doctor to get the result of the x-ray varied from five minutes to over two hours though the physical separation of the two departments was only one of the factors which affected this

27

Access to acute care facilities was similarly variable In Christchurch the intensive care unit was adjacent to the A amp E department while in Rotorua it was at the other end of the hospital In many cases additions or alterations to the hospital buildings and changes of function of certain areas have meant that the A amp E department no longer bears the same physical relationship to other hospital departments as was originally the case

LAYOUT

Several studies have concluded that the A amp Edepartment should be designed so that there is an orderly progression of patients from registration to examination to investigations if necessary to treatment and to referral admission or discharge Staff time and effort is best conserved by a compact plan with waiting areas and treatment areas easily accessible and supervised However the need for easy supervision has to be balanced by consideration of the patients privacy Two basic A amp E plans have evolved

o a radial plan where the waiting examination and treatment rooms are arranged on the perimeter of the departmentmiddot with the nurses station doctors room and records office in the centre

o a linear plan where the examination and treatment rooms are arranged down each side of a corridor with the waiting area records office and staff offices at one end [145]

Many of the A amp E departments visited had a linear layout with the largest Auckland being arranged along several corridors In these departments staff often commented that their overall view of the patients was not good and a considerable amount of walking was needed to supervise them Middlemore A amp E department and the treatment areas of several other departments had radial layouts which staff found very satisfactory Generally the A amp E staff prefer red open plan layouts using curtained cubicles rather than enclosed rooms Staff (especially nursing staff) often commented that their department would be better if certain walls or partitions were removed to give easier surveillance of the department as a whole However staff also commented on the relative lack of privacy for patients being examined or treated and noted that some private rooms were needed for instance for obstetric or paediatric patients

Waiting area

There is general agreement that the waiting area should be adjacent to the reception desk easily visible to the receptionist and if possible overlooked by the nurses office or station It should be a cheerful comfortable area with toys provided for children and a range of magazines and books Public toiletspublic telephones and arrangements for refreshments are also needed [146]

The size of the waiting area varied considerably among the A amp E departments visited (refer back tomiddot Table 2) Again this variation bore little relationship to the workload of the department (see Table 3) Some waiting areas were clearly too small and this put pressure on the staff to deal with patients quickly in order to clear the waiting room

28

Staff comments suggested that not only the size of the waiting area but also its design affected its crowding Basically square rooms with seats around the edges had fewer problems than corridor-style rooms with only one row of seats

In all the A amp E departments visited the waiting areas were adjacent to the reception area Sometimes they were visible from the nurses office or work area but where this was not possible the nurses relied on the receptionists to alert them to urgent cases or checked the wai Hng area often themselves

Facilities in waiting areas varied from nothing but seats to areas in which there were hot and cold drink dispensing machines a childrens play area with toys and health-related poster and pamphlet displays Some had a TV set or a tropical fish tank Most staff were agreed that a pleasant atmosphere in the waiting room was important and adVerse comments about the waiting area were made by staff in departments which lacked this In some departments staff commented that vandalism made it difficult to retain facilities and a pleasant atmosphere

Examination and treatment area

The examination and treatment area provides for the needs of all A amp E patients other than those with serious conditions requiring the resuscitation room or those needing special facilities such as plastering Because special purpose areas are frequently under-utilised flexibility is a key requi rement Hence multipurpose cubicles with standardised equipment are usually recommended The cubicles must be big enough to give easy access for patients (not necessarily walking) to accommodate eqUipment and to give staff enough room to work Curtained cubicles are generally sufficient but at least one enclosed cubicle is required for patients needing extra privacy or for light control in eye examinations A cubicle especially set up for children (with appropriately-sized equipment toys and posters) is also desirable [1346]

Most of themiddot A ~ E departments visited had curtained cubicles in the examination and treatment area with perhaps one or two enclosed cubicles or rooms as well Four A amp E departments only had separate rooms for treatment Curtained cubicles made for ease of access while separate rooms did present some difficulties in manoeuvering patient trolleys and wheelchairs In one case it was impossible to get a patient trolley into the room at all and the room was consequently little used

Curtained cubicles did afford greater flexibility in use and did provide more room to work but had the disadvantage of being considerably less private than rooms Surveillance was easier in departments with curtains than those withmiddot walls and doors In the Auckland A amp E department treatment rooms doors had been removed in the interests of improved surveillance Staff in this department commented that its rigid design could lead to difficulties in accommodating a large number of patients in a disaster

The DEU report [1] recommended that the number of cubicles required by an A amp E department was NIlS where N is the anticipated average number of new patients per day It noted that in A amp E departments with few new patients per day a minimum of two cubicles should be provided It also recommended that the flow of recalled patients should be regulated so that they did not greatly affect the need for cubicles

29

As can be seen from Table 4 most departments had enough cubicles to cope with their first attendance workload Even applying the DEU recommendation of N18 to their total attendance most of the departments had an adequate number of cubicles The exceptions were Hutt Christchurch and Dunedin

TABLE 4 NUMBERS OF EXAMINATION AND TREATMENT CUBICLES OR ROOMS AND RECOMMENDED NUMBERS l BASED ON FIRST ATTENDANCE 2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Actual number of DEU recommended numbers (minimum of 2) cubiclesrooms based on

first attendance total attendance pa pa

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 13 89 99 Middlemore 9 59 88

Green Lane 7 40 65 Wellington 10 73 85 Hutt 4 51 66 Christchurch 7 94 11 2 Dunedin 3 41 58

Provincial Rotorua 4 2 26 Taranaki Base 4 2 24 Timaru 6 2 31

Rural Whakatane 3 2 2 Grey 3 2 2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3 8 22 37 Kenepuru3 6 22 30

1 Based on DEU report [l which recommended NIS cubicles where N average number of new patients per day ie N6750 where N = average first attendance pa

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Recommended numbers increased to adjust for North Shore and Kenepuru treating their attendance numbers in part-time rather than full-time hours

30

Resuscitation area

The resusciation area is used for the immediate life--saving treatment of seriously injured or sick patients It is the acute treatment area in contrast to the examination and treatment area which is used for relatively minor procedures In making its recommendations about the resuscitation area the DEU report [I] balanced the probability of the A amp E department having to treat multiple accident victims with the comparative rarity of use of resuscitation rooms It recommended that a resuscitation room of suff icient size to deal with two patients concurrently be provided in all A amp E departments It also noted that the ambulance entrance and resuscitation area should be located as close together as possible

Most of the departments visited had purpose-built resuscitation rooms of varying size and with varying degrees of sophistication in equipment Some had x-ray facilities in the resuscitat ion area and in those that did not its absence was regarded as a serious impediment to the efficient care of severe trauma

In four of the seven urban A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms were regarded by the staff as being too small The comment was made in one urban department that because of the small size of the resuscitation area patients sometimes had to be moved out of the area before it was felt clinically desirable to do so in order to accommodate incoming patients In the rural and prOVincial A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms wereshyadequate for the demands placed on them

Most resuscitation rooms were sited close to the ambulance entrance and afforded good access to stretcher patients However in three A amp E departments patients had to be moved some distance and in another department up one floor by lift

Operating theatre

In discussing provision of operating theatres in the A amp E departments the DEU report [1] noted that

o most surgery done is minor requires only local anaesthesia and could be done within adequately designed cubicles

o the A amp E department is not a proper place for general anaesthesia

o using A amp Etheatres for day surgery tends to block other A amp E facilities and staff causin~ delay in treating A amp E patients

The report concluded that special facilities appear to be justified only if there is a clear intention of widening the scope of accident surgery in the departments

bullMinor ops theatres of varying sizes and equipped to varying standards were available in many departments Very variable use was made of such theatres - never in some departments to daily in others It was used less in departments with very heavy workloads and where the medical staff were not satisfied that sufficiently sterile conditions could be maintained In one department the theatre was only used for day surgery cases

31

Plaster room

In the plaster room casts are applied and removed and fractures and dislocations can be manipulated The DEU report [1] noted that the plaster room could be an integral part of the A amp E department or shared with the orthopaedic department or belonging entirely to the latter It recommended that the plaster room be close to the A amp E department and the x-ray department

Most departments had a separate plaster room available In many cases this was shared with an adjacent orthopaedic outpatients or fracture clinic Th~ staff generally found the plaste~-rooms satisfactory although two particularly narrow rooms were difficult to work in

Interview room

The DEU report [l] recommended that A amp E departments in medium-sized and larger hospitals should have a small interview room where a patient IS

relatives could talk with A amp E staff the police or others

No A amp E department had a room specifically designated as an interview room for bereaved or distressed relatives although one A amp E department shared such a room with another department In most departments one of the staff off ices was generally used for this purpose In departments where staff offices were small or crowded the lack of an interview room was seen as a serious flaw in departmental layout

Reception and records office

The reception desk should be immediately visible to ambulant patients arriving at the A amp E department and it is desirable for the receptionist to be aware of what is happening at the ambulance entrance as well The current A amp E records should be held at the reception desk or nearby [1]

In the A ampE departments visited the reception desk was usually well-placed for dealing with ambulant patients but in only four cases did it overlook the ambulance entrance In two departments the reception desk was some distance from the treatment area (separated by a waiting room or outpatients room) and the nursing staff found it difficult to oversee incoming patients Current A amp E records were held at the reception desk in all but one of the departments visited The amount of space available in relation to the throughput of patients was a major factor in determining the length of time records could be kept within the department This in turn affected the ease and therefore speed of record retrieval

Staff offices

These ranged from non existent to very cramped spaces serving many other functions to pleasant specifically designated and relatively quiet areas The latter offices are conducive to good staff morale and being a place for exchange of views and experiences could be expected to contribute quite markedly to the overall effectiveness and eff iciency of the department

32

Holding ward

The DEU report [1] said that holding beds should be used primarily for A amp E patients requiring a period of observation prior to a decision about admission or for those who could be expected to go home after a rest period The report noted that using holding beds as recovery beds for day patients for arranged admissions or for pre-admission clinics was not desirable

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments visited had holding or acute admitting wards These holding wards were used mainly for assessing patients requiring acute admission but in some hospitals were also used for observing patients (eg with suspected concussion) and for holding night admissions till the morning to save disturbing the wards Neither of the rural A amp E departments had a holding ward although one had an I A amp E admission procedure where a patient could be admitted for up to 24 hours for observation without the need for full admission procedures In the A amp E departments with holding wards a patient staying for more than four hours was formally admitted

Our study showed that the A amp E departments had some problems using holding wards properly In two A amp E departments holding wards were little used at night because nursing levels were too low to staff them safely In another department the beds were used for patients recovering from day surgery and even for some pre-ar ranged admissions At times general practitioner-referred admissions could also clog the holding wards

DISCUSSION

Most of the A amp E departments were generally adequate in size location and layout The exceptions were Christchurch and Butt where conditions were very cramped with particularly limited examination and treatment areas and poor layout We understand that improvements are planned at Hutt and that recent extensions have improved the Christchurch department considerably but at the time of our visits staff in both these departments were working under extreme pressure because of the physical conditions

Despite the general adequacy of the departments almost all had some flaw which affected their operation and inconvenienced staff and patients Major flaws found in several A amp E departments included

o ambulance access unsuitable for a shuttle of ambulances in a disaster

o difficult access to the x-ray department

o resuscitation room too small for easy treatment of more than one patient at a time

o no interview room for relatives of patients

33

REFERENCES

1 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

2 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

3 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 44-49

4 Emer~ency department organisation and management edited by A L Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975 p 8-16

5 Design of departments in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) p 1204-7

6 McKINLAY Robin - The care of children in New Zealand hospitals -Aucklandmiddot National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1982 p 79-80

35

CHAPTER 5

Staffing of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the staffing both medical and nursing looking at their numbers and experience their previous training and the training they receive in the A amp E department and their satisfaction with their work and conditions We also describe the clerical and reception staff and briefly the involvement of other workers (orderlies social workers and ambulance personnel) in the departments

MEDICAL STAFFING

Senior medical staffing

Organising appropriate medical staffing for hospital emergency services is a prQblem in many countries [1] The variety of staffing arrangements in A amp E departments within many countries suggests that none have established a generally satisfactory pattern of medical staffing

The Platt report [2] found that in Br itish A amp E departments the great majority of patients were seen by junior staff only and that supervision of the A amp E departments by conSUltants was often little more than nominal The committee recommended that

o the junior medical staff should be adequately supervised by consultants

o a consultant orthopaedic surgeon should normally be in charge of theA amp E unit

o an accident and emergency unit should have at least three consultant surgeons each giving a substantial part of their time to this work

o the primary task of general practitioners in emergency services is to deal with minor accidents and emergencies at any time of the day or night (by organising a rota to answer emergency calls within their practice by working sessions in A amp E departments or by attending cottage hospitals at short notice for emergency calls) bull

Since then some progress has been made but standards continue to lag behind those recommended [34] There has been considerable debate over the appropriate staffing arrangements for A amp E departments Some hospitals have implemented the Platt report recommendations others have appointed a full-time A amp E specialist others have employed a full-time non-specialist doctor and some have employed general practitioners

Despite the various systems there is a consensus in both the United States and Britain that experienced medical staffmiddot are essential in the A amp E department They are necessary for prompt effective treatment of emergency conditions for efficient running of the departments and for adequate supervision of the junior doctors employed [23567 p 17-23]

36

Similar concerns have been expressed in New Zealand since the Board of Health report on outpatient services in 1960 [8] This report recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times and staffed by experiencedmedical officers

Salmond [9] found that when a senior A amp E officer directed the department A amp E work was handled more efficiently and house surgeons were more closely supervised and supported He suggested that one senior member of the hospital staff (ideally a full-time A amp E officer) should accept full responsibility for the overall supervision of A amp E services

Most of the A amp E departments that we visited had an A amp E officer The position was vacant at both Wellington and Hutt hospitals at the time of our visit while at North Shore Hospital responsibility for the A amp E department was shared by two senior doctors The A amp E departments of the rural hospitals had no senior medical staff

In A amp E departments with heavy workloads additional experienced doctors were often employed as deputy A amp E officers usually medical officer special scale or as Medical Reserve Scheme registrars (see Table 5) There was no general practitioner staffing of any of the Aamp E departments visited although general practitioners had been part-time staff of some of themiddot smaller A amp E departments in previous years One medical superintendent commented that since very few general practitioners could be classified as specialists they could only be paid as medical officers special scale This low level of payment acted as a disincentive to general practitioner recruitment

The A amp E officers usually worked normal office hours (830 am - 430 pm or 9 am - 5 pm weekdays) apart from two who worked part-time covering morning periods If additional experienced doctors were employed they usually covered evening periods (eg 5 pm - 10 pm) and weekend day shifts

There was a wide range of experience among the A amp E officers Half of the senior A amp E doctors had a general practice background and these doctors often had specific surgical medical pharmacological or Armed Forces medical experience as well Several A amp E officers had primarily a surgical background while others had a considerable range of hospital experience In hospitals where the A amp E officers had a general practice background the Medical Superintendent or the A amp E officer often stressed the suitability of this background for A amp E work

An extensive general practitioner background is useful in dealing with the multitude of problems seen in an Accident and Emergency department An orthopaedic or surgical background is not as necessary because of the good backup from the specialties And staff who have only had hospital experience particularly junior staff can lack skills in general assessment and triage

A amp E officer

In other hospitals staff stressed that an orthopaedic and surgical background was very valuable as was experience in dealing with specific types of injury such as soft tissue wounds

37

TABLE 5 MEDICAL STAFFING OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington2

Hutt2

Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Senior medical staffing

Number of full-time equivalents

A amp E officer ( including deputies) 25 15 I 16

I 2

I 03 I

2 05

Registrar

06

1 1

House surgeons

Number on Number A amp E runs covering

some shifts in A amp E deptl

6 2-3 6 2 5 I 5 4 2-3 5 2 2

All on rotating basis 1 3 1 2

5 on rotating basis 4 on rotating basis

None in A amp E dept 4 on rotating basis

1 On general relieving duties 2 Senior A amp E position vacant at time of visit

Junior medical staffing

The issues

Junior medical staffing of A amp E departments has concerned many commentators in the United States Britain and New Zealand The Platt report [2] noted that recently qualified staff when serving in the casualty department undertake responsibility which they would not have in the wards or outpatient clinics

38

In 1960 the New Zealand Board of Health report [8] on out-patient services deplored the staffing of casualty departments by I relatively inexperienced men [sic] and suggested that these staff I should be regarded more as assistants under supervision and training than responsible officers in the outpatients departments The undesirability of staffing A amp E departments with first year house surgeons (or pre-registration doctors) has been reiterated since Junior doctors are often unsure when to ask for advice or help and are sometimes unwilling to admit that they are over-tired and unable to cope [91011)

The report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers [12] noted the heavy load carried by house surgeons working long shifts in A amp E departments It also commented that when house surgeons are required to look after the A amp E department while carrying out ward duties inadequate cover of the A amp E department could result

The New Zealand situation

The urban A amp E departments had between two and six house surgeons working on three month A amp E runs and in several of these hospitals another one to three house surgeons on general relieving duties covered some A amp E shifts There were more house surgeons in A amp E departments with heavier workloads or with fewer senior medical staff The provincial and rural departments did not usually have house surgeons working on specific A amp E runs rather the A amp E department was covered by all (or most) of the house surgeons in the hospital on a rotatng basis Of the two suburban A amp E departments Kenepuru was covered by the house surgeons on a rotating basis while North Shore did not have any house surgeons because there was no inpatient or consultative backup available (see Table 5)

The total medical staffing of the departments (senior A amp E doctors and house surgeons together) ranged from 10 to 100 full-time equivalents and was closely related to the attendance at the departments (see Table 6) The provincial and rural A amp E departments had higher medical staff to attendance ratios because they had to provide a 24-hour service regardless of the size of the attendance

Each A amp E department visited rostered its house surgeons differently depending on the availability of senior medical staff the workload of the department and the house surgeons other duties In the urban departments house surgeons worked between 45 and 60 hours a week on shifts usually 8 to 12 hours long Many of the house surgeons working in these departments complained about long shifts and suggested that more staff were needed to reduce the shift lengths Split shifts were also unpopular

The most worrying aspect of the staff ing arrangements in bhe Accident and Emergency department is the long hours We need another house surgeon to reduce the hours on some shifts and to proviae another pair of hands in busy periods (eg Friday and Saturday night Sunday afternoon)

House surgeon

39

TABLE 6 TOTAL MEDICAL STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND MEDICAL STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE I AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Total medical Total medical staffing to staffing attendance ratio

FTE per FTE per 10000 first 10000 total

Full-time attendance attendance equivalents p a pa

Full-time departments

Urban

Auckland2 100 17 15 Middlemore2 91 23 16 Green Lane2 65 25 15 Wellington 66 14 12 Hutt2 55 17 13 Christchurch 70 11 10 Dunedin2 60 22 16

Provincial Rotorua 42 34 25 Taranaki Base2 28 27 18 Timaru 22 19 11

Rural Whakatane3 15 25 17 Grey 10 26 20

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 20 21 12 Kenepuru3 20 34 22

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE estimated since A amp E department partially covered by house

surgeons on general relieving duties 3 FTE estimated since A amp E department covered by house surgeons on

rotating basis

Spearman rank correlations [131 of total medical staffing with

(a) first attendance r = 0953 p lt 001 (b) total attendance r = 0933 p 001

In the provincial and rural hospitals house surgeons were often on call for long shifts over nights and weekends They were usually covering a ward or the whole hospital at the same time and simultaneous demands from the wards and the A amp E department sometimes caused problems However

40

these house surgeons generally found their rostering satisfactory despite the long hours on call perhaps because the actual work required in the A amp E department was comparatively light

An ordinary week night is usually quiet after midnight thered be three to five calls and Id have to get up once on average Weekend nights are busier but I usually get at least two or three hours sleep

House surgeon

Several house surgeons were irritated that while they worked more intensively on A amp E runs than on ward runs they spent fewer hours on-call and consequently they were paid less

Supervision by senior medical staff

In the larger A amp F departments house surgeons worked with the senior medical staff on most day and some evening shifts only on night shifts (and some evening shifts) were house surgeons the sole medical staff in a department By contrast in the smaller and part-time departments house surgeons covered the department alone seldom working with any senior A amp E medical staff

Several nurses commented that the A amp E department ran less efficiently outside normal working hours because the house surgeons inexperience meant assessment and treatment times were longer and tests were used more often than when the A amp E officer was present

Many senior medical staff in the urban A amp E departments were concerned at the lack of supervision for house surgeons outside normal working hours and so would have Ii ked more senior A amp E staff Several of the house surgeons were also concerned although others enjoyed the autonomy they had and were not concerned about working without supervision

I am not happy with house surgeons managing the A amp E department on their own They only have a three month shift in the department and often most of this time is spent learning how to do A amp E wor k The house surgeons can have problems deciding when to call a registrar to treat a patient and there can be delays in obtaining a registrar The A amp E department needs full-time trained medical staff on duty 24 hours a day to give proper supervision to the house surgeons and to run an efficient department

A amp E officer

On night shift I can feel rather alone if something goes wrong

House surgeon

I enjoy the variety of work and the independence I have to treat most patients as I see fit

House surgeon

41 _A

Arraflgements for consultative backup and support when senior A amp E staff were not on duty varied from hospital to hospital according to hospital size n urban hospitals the house surgeons would usually call on the appropriate registrar and the acute admitting or specialist teams for emergencymiddot cases In some places the house surgeons could calIon the consultant if a registrar was unavailable but this was usually seen as a last resort call In the provincial and rural hospitals the house surgeons would call on the appropriate senior doctor who was available This was usually one of the cQnsultants or a registrar if any were employed by the hospital The A amp E Qfficer might occasionally be called and in hospitals without an A~amp E oHicer th~ medical superintendent would also provid~ backup

Generally house surgeons were happy with the support they received A physically compact hospital was mentioned several times as facilitating ~ ~ fast back-up Howeve( in some hospitals there could be considerable delays in 9etting surgical and orthopaedic registrars to the A amp E department usually because they were in theatre Also at two hospitals backup in the minor specialties was considered inadequate bull

Use of first year house surgeons

Urban and suburban hospitals had a policy of using second year house surgeons as much as possible in the A amp E department and of using first year house surgeons only in their second six months This policy was generally butmiddot not always carried out For example the on-call arrangements of some urban A amp E departments resulted in inexperienced first year house surgeons working in the department In the smaller hospitals also the limited pool of house surgeons available tended to result in more first year house surgeons working in the department

The hospital could not provide cover for the A amp E department without using first year house surgeons However there are always senior staff and the medical registrar readily available as backup

Medical superintendent

When direct supervision was limited first year house surgeons did find A amp E work difficult

Training

The training received by the house surgeons in the A amp E departments varied greatly Two hospitals ran half-day or one-day orientation courses before -house surgeons started in the department Three A amp E departments ran weekly or fortnightly training sessions on specific conditions while another department ran sessions on an irregular basis However house surgeons often missed training sessions because they were treating pat~entsln more than half tmiddothe A amp E departments no formal training was giVen and house surgeons were taught on-the-job when senior A amp E staff were available This teaching placed a considerable load on senior staff

The three-monthly changeover of house surgeons is frustrating and the first month with new house surgeons is very demanding because they have little confidence or competence

A amp E officer

42

If the A amp E department had no senior staff or if the house surgeons shifts did not coincide with those of the senior staff the house surgeons had to gain their training whenever and wherever they could Both house surgeons and nurses commented that house surgeons often required guidance from the nursing staff

We get on-the-job training relying very heavily on the nurses to say IDr X (the A amp E officer) normally does bullbullbull I was rather scared the first few days in the A amp E department

House surgeon

Several house surgeons commented that they would have liked more training particularly when they were first in the A amp E department and more guidance on hospital policy and administration

Manuals (middotor sets of standingmiddot orders) out-lining the clinical and administrative procedures required under different bull circumstances have been widely recognised as essential in the A amp E department They are particularly useful to new A amp E doctors as an explanationoof their duties 7 p 79914J

Senior medical staff at 13 of the hospitals visited said they had standing orders covering ~A amp E administration procedures or were revising them These standing orders were either specific A amp E booklets or sections of the full hospital standing orders Several house surgeons commented that they found the standlng orders useful while others relied more on verbal advice from the A amp E officer or nurses Two of the latter house surgeons said they had not seen any A amp E standing orders when in fact the full hospital standing orders did contain a section on the A amp E department One A amp E department had no standing orders (apartmiddot from protocols for the care of coronary patients) and the house surgeons there would have liked more guidelines

Accident and emergency work as a career

Advantages and disadvantages

The senior medical staff who expressed their views on A amp E work as a career had all previously been general practitioners and their comments largely reflected comparisons of A amp E work with general practice They tended to cite the regular hours good conditions of service and salaries competitive with general practice as advantages of A amp E work and the limited range of clinical material and lack of continuity of care as disadvantages

When house surgeons were asked whether they would be intercested in A amp E work as careers for themselVes their responses were more negative than those of the senior ~ amp E staff All of them mentioned some disadvantages of A amp E work To those mentioned by senior staff they added the problems of irregular hours and having to deal with many trivial complaints The lack of recognition of A amp E work as a specialty (and consequent lack of status within the hospital) was also seen as a disadvantage Some mentioned the advantages cited by the senior staff and added variety of work as another advantage These advantages and disadvantages mirror those noted by British and United States writers [315]

43

Accident and emergency work as a sp~cialty

Over the past two decades in the United States the increasing use of emergency rooms has led to the development of training programmes for emergency room doctors and in 1979 to the granting of specialty status to emergency medicine The American College of Emergency Physicians in 1975 defined the emergency physician as I a specialist in breadth whose training is focused ~n the acute and the life-threatening aspects of medical care and who~ by ~he nature of his practice is available when the patient needs him [cited in 16]

vlhile emergency medicine has much the same content as family practice the different emphasis approach and method of handling have been cited as justifying a separate specialty [16] Critics have disputed the specialty status of emergency medicine stating that although a broad clinical knowledge is required this knowledge is also shallow [15]

In Britain similar debates have taken place While the Platt report [2] recommended that one consultant should be in administrative charge of an A amp E department it did not favour the development of accident surgery as a specialty in its own right nor the appointment of consultants to work full-time in A amp E departments However the Increasing number of A amp E conSUltants middotthe development of training posts and the formation of an association of A amp E consultants [4] have signaled a de facto recognition of A amp E work as a specialty The role of general practitioners in A amp E departments has also been debated Their suitability for sorting and treating casual attenders has been stressed and their ability to work without consultant supervision has been seen as an advantage 21718]

An emergency care seminar held in Auckland in 1979 recognised the inadequacy of training at all levels for work in A amp E departments in New Zealand The suggestions made to rectify this situation included the recruitment of sp~cialist -staff at a career level

Senior staff in some of the urban A amp E departments stressed the need for a post-graduate A amp E specialist training in New Zealand They gave two reasons for this that more senior staff were required to supervise and properly train house surgeons working in A amp E departments and that more senior staff were needed to improve the efficiency

More senior staff would improve standards of care speed throughput reduce the need for tests and reduce recalls as well as improving the supervision of house surgeons

A amp E officer

The staff of the smaller hospitals commented that full-time specialists could be warranted in large urban A amp E departments but were not necessary in provincial hospitals

Full-time A amp E specialists are only warranted in very big hospitals where there is enough emergency work to justify a trauma centre and 24 hour senior doctor cover A specialist cannot work well in isolation so the workload has to be large enough to justify three or four A amp E consultants

A amp E officer

44

NURSE STAFFING

Accident and emergency nursing

As noted by Jenkins [7 p41-42 J nursing in the emergency department is different from in-hospital nursing The nature of work in the department requires the ability to perceive and act quickly and to adapt to constantly changing circumstances

The A amp E nurse needs skills in assessment and examination in critical care and emergency treatment in public relations and must be able to act calmly under pressure Increasingly experienced nurses are expected to carry out triage Special training both on-the-job and in study courses is therefore essential [27 p 36 1419J

The need to have experienced senior nursing staff working in the A amp E department at all times has been recognised for many years The senior nurse in charge of the department has a key role being responsible for the day-to-day administration of the department for the supervision of the nursing care given and often for supporting the junior medical staff [259] Again as Jenkins [7 p 27] noted the emergency department nurse is one cornerstone of the department and often acts as the stablizing element in a chaotic milieu especially in those hospitals where the medical staff rotates

New Zealand arrangements

There was considerable variation in both the total numbers and the levels of experience of nursing staff among the A amp E departments (see Table 7) Some departments had a nurse supervisor in control and several charge nurses while other departments had a charge nurse in control A amp E nurses were mainly staff nurses although some departments used substantial numbers of enrolled nursesmiddot Student nurses were present in most of the departments but they were often there for a few weeks only so they have been excluded from the tables

The number of nurses on duty in the A amp E department varied over the time of the day and the day of the week with more nurses on duty at times of heavy workload such as Friday and Saturday evenings and also weekday mornings when dressing clinics were held Most departments organised some staggering of shifts so that good cover was maintained throughout the day In three of the smaller hospitals (Timaru Whakatane and Grey)middot the A amp E department was covered at night by separate nursing staff usually the night supervisors who were covering other parts of the hospital as well

In several of the small hospitals the nursing staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department Generally this was satisfactory but occasionally the steady workload of the outpatients department left the A amp E department short of nursing cover

The total nurse staffing of the A amp E departments visited ranged from 25 to 278 full-time equivalents and this variation was partially related to the attendance of the department and whether or not the department had a holding ward (see Table 8) However even after adjusting for the staff required in the holding wards there was a threefold variation in the

45

nursing staff to attendance ratios of the urban A amp E departments Other factors such as the small size of the Hutt and Christchurch A amp E departments and greater use of student nurses may have been involved

TABLE 7 NURSE STAfFING OF HOSPITAL AIDS

Nurse lt bullbull

sup~rvisors

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland l 1 Middlemorel 1 Green Lane l 1 Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin 1

Provincial Rotorua 1 Taranaki Basel

Timarul 2

Rural Whakatane2 Grey2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Charge Staff nurses Full-

Time

4 21 4 11 2 11 1 19 1 8 1 11 2 3

5 I 10 1 3

1 4 1 2

1 7middot 1 1

EXCLUDING

nurses Part-Time

2 12

7

2 2 4

1

STUDENT NURSES AND

Enrolled nurses Full- Part shytime Time

4 2

2 1 2

1 4 1

1 1

3

1 Holding ward attachedto Aamp E department covered completely or partly by A amp E nursing staff

2 A amp E department covered by separate nursing staff at night (numbers not included here)

Work in both the A amp E department and the outpatients department

The relatively low attendance at the provincial rural and suburban departments contributed to their somewhat higher nursing staff to attendance ratios The high level of nursing staff at North Shore may be related to the additional duties of nurses in that department in escorting patients to other hospitals and working in the plaster room

TABLE 8 NURSE STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND NU~E STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Nurse staffing Nur~estaffing to attendance ratios

Full-time Adjusted Adjusted FTE Adjusted PTE equiva- full-time perlOOOO per 10000 lents2 equival- first atten- total attendshy

3ents dance pa dance p a

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane4

Wellington HuH Christchurch Dunedin

270 278 172 200 1l~0 130 80

220 258 122 170 110 130 80

3bull 8 66 47 35 33 21 29

34 45 29 30 26 18 21

Provincial Rotorua4

Taranaki Base Timaru

77 160 75

77 80 55

63 77 55

46 51 27

Rural Whakatane4 Grey4

52 25

52 25

87 65

59 49

Part-time depa rtment s

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

110 28

110 28

117 48

64 31

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE calculatedfrom Table 7 (with part-timenurses counted as 05

FTE) unless exact FTE figures supplied by hospitals 3 FTE adjusted by removing nurses covering the holding ward 4 Nurses covering both the A amp E department and the outpatients department counted as 07 FTE in the A amp E department and separate night nursing staff counted as 10 FTE extra

Spearman rank correlations (13] of adjusted nurse staffing with

( a) first attendance r = 0869 p lt 001 ( b) total attendance r = 0895 P lt 001

47

In seven A amp E departments nurses were satisfied with staffing arrangements liowever nurses in four departments (not necessarily those with relatively ~~w nurses) said that nurse numbers were too low while at two other departments weekend shortages of nurses and diff iculty getting replacements for numiddotreesmiddotmiddot off sick were mentioned as problems One hospitals policy of rotating all nurses at or below staff nurse level throughout the h6spital was criticised because it left too few nurses with A amp E experiance worlting in t)le department At another hospital nurses appreciated the reguiar check made on their job satisfaction by the nurse supervisors

In several A amp E departmentsmiddotmiddotr-ourseswere dissatisfied with the medical staffing arrangements~Cl some wani~d a senior doctor interested in A amp E work in charge of the department Others wanted A amp E doctors to spend

Imiddot ~~fU

more time in the department ~specially outside normal working hours

Training

In most of th~ A amp E departments visited junior nurses received on-the-job training wo~king alongside semor nurses and being rotateQ through different areas of the department However where a department was short of nursing staff or had a heavy workload senior nurses often had insuffficient time to teach the junior nurses Senior nurses often found that training new hurses both increased their workload markedly and slowed down the work of the department However as one principal nurse said

We train nurses on-the-job If we waited for experienced nurses to app1Y we I d nev~rltlet them

Principal nurse

At several A amp E departments junior nurses did not work either on their own or in areas requiring more judgement (for example the resuscitation room or the waiting room) until they were more experienced Often this changeover did not happen until the nurses in charge of the department had made a formal appraisal of the junior nurse There was a consensus among senior A amp E nurses that three to six months working in the department was required to train an A amp E nurse

I think A amp E nurses need a three month training course - their student training is not enough A nurse needs three to six months experience before she is fully competent to work permanently in the A amp E department Also its difficult to get fully trained on-the-job in a smaller hospital because theres too few patients coming through

A amp E nurse

Usually some form of procedure manual orientation book andor job description was provided for the nursing staff outlining their duties and responsibilities in the A amp E department A few departments also ran occasional lectures and inservice training At Auckland Middlemore and North Shore hospitals the A amp E department ran specific inservice training courses for staff nurses

48

The course at Auckland for example took six nurses at a time involved one study day per fortnight over 10-12 months and covered all aspects of A amp E work Nurses had to have six months experience in the A amp E

department before taking the course Senior nurses commented that the courses were valuable in improving the nurses abilities confidence and morale and felt that nurses who had been through the courses tended to stay in the department longer and were less prone to absenteeism Junior nurses at several hospitals without A amp E training courses said they would find such a course useful

At more than half the A amp E departments visited nurses commented on the necessity for them to guide the house surgeons particularly early in the three-month runs

The junior medical staff training is on-the-job and its largely done behind the door by the nursing staff The nurses will encourage the house surgeon to call a consultant if necessary (but not in front of a patient) or if they are very worried the nurses will ring a consultant themselves The house surgeons this year are very good and pleasant but it can be very wearying when they begin their three month shifts

A amp E nurse

At some hospitals this need to guide house surgeons had provilt1ed the impetus for developing A amp E nurse training courses

Many of the nurses said that they enjoyed A amp E nursing because of its specialised nature It had a fast pace and a stop-start quality thereI

was never a routine because of the high patient turnover the variety of complaints presenting and the drama associated with some cases As with the house surgeons nurses often found themselves carrying more responsibility working in the A amp E department than in the wards and they relished this Several hospitals had waiting lists of nurses wishing to work in the A amp E depart~entbull

OTHER STAFF INVOLVED WITH THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

An efficient and effective A amp E department needs not only adequate medical and nursing staff it also requires secretarial clerical reception and orderly staff [27 p 24-251

Reception and clerical staff

Most urban A amp E departments had receptionist cover 24 hours a day Usually therewere two or three receptionists on duty during the day with one receptionist on duty during evenings and at night At the provincial departments and at Hutt and Dunedin departments reception staff covered days (and sometimes evenings) for seven days a week In the rural A amp E departments a receptionist was on duty weekdays only When the receptionist was not on duty nursing staff carried out the duties In several of the smaller hospitals patients arriving at night were first seen by the hospital telephonist who then called the nursing staff

Usually the receptionists duties were to note the patients details on the A amp E record form and on the A amp E log The receptionists often helped with triage by alerting nursing staff to urgent cases In some

49

departments the receptionist also dealt with Ace forms made appointments for return visits and carried out admitting procedures at night However in one hospital the reception staff were not specifically attached to the A amp E department and only noted the patients details on the A amp E record form All other duties were performed by the nurses (and sometimes the A amp E doctors) who resented this added workload In several of the smaller A amp E departments reception staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department quite satisfactorily

Several receptionists had years of experience in the A amp E department as well as other relevant experience (eg ambulance dr i ver ECG technician) and were highly valued by the other A amp E staff

In addition to the receptionists some of the urban A amp E departments had hostesses andor hospital aids for odd jobs such as dealing with enquiries taking messages filling out laboratory forms putting away stores and making tea

TO meet the secretarial needs of the A amp E department (eg referral letters to general practitioners) the staff generally used secretaries in other parts of the hospital This service was not always adequate and one department used form letters completed by the A amp E doctors by hand for much of its correspondence Another department employed a part-time secretary for the doctors

Orderlies

Orderlies were generally used to move patients within the A amp E department as well as to other parts o~ the hospital In some hospitals they also assisted with plaster work

Some of the urban and provincial A amp E departments had an orderly during day-time hours but outside these hours and in all other departments orderlies were called from the hospital pool Some A amp E staff commented that delays involved in getting an orderly from the pool could be frustrating when the department was busy

Social workers

The A amp E departments visited had various methods for coping with patients with social or emotional problems

The urban A amp E departments could often calIon psychiatric backup such as a crisis team or an individual psychiatrist psychiatric nurse or counsellor Four of the urban A amp E departments had a social worker allocated to work in the department for some time each day who was also on call for the department while carrying out other duties The rest of the departments called on the pool of hospital social workers In the smaller hospitals social workers were not always available at nights or on weekends although in some places the social workers had made themselves available on an informal basis A amp E staff had mixed views on the usefulness of social workers

The social worker is essential to the work of the A amp E department

A amp E officer

50

The nature of social work has changed over the years and its hard now to make contact with the social workers and to get the support the department wants The department does social work itself and has good liaison with the Salvation Army and other welfare groups

A amp E officer

Ambulance personnel

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments were served by the Order of St John ambulances The exceptions were the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments which were served by the Wellington Free Ambulance and Taranaki A amp E department which worked with the hospital board ambulances Both the rural A amp E departments were served by hospital board ambulance services during the day and St John services at night

Generally the A amp E staff found that liaison between themselves and the ambulance personnel was good Many ambulancemiddot officers had had some training in the A amp E department and were familiar withmiddot its procedures Communications between the two were usually satisfactory with radio-telephones being used to alert the A amp E department to incoming urgent cases or to ask for advice on patient treatment

However some A amp E staff expressed concern abut the suitability of treatment provided by ambulance personnel They were particularly worried about the sophisticated techniques being used at times by some ambulance officers

Many ambulance officers are doing advanced courses and theyre enthusiastic about treating people - putting in drips or giving drugs Mostly the officers are excellent but some are over-enthusiastic

A amp E doctor

In the Auckland and Wellington urban areas there were several A amp E departments and as a working rule ambulance officers took patients to the nearest department However this rule was modified by the facilities available at the nearest hospital and whether or not the nearest A amp E department was open For example if the nearest hospital had no orthopaedic backup the ambulance would ptobably take a patient requiring orthopaedic care to the next closest hospital or if one of the part-time A amp E departments was nearest but closed the ambulance would go to another hospital At times the ambulance officers consulted with the A amp E staff by radio-telephone as to the appropriate A amp E department for a patient they were transporting

DISCUSSION

The patterns of medical staffing in terms of the number of senior A amp E doctors and the rostering of house surgeons reflectedmiddot the attendances and locations of the different A amp E departments The numbers of doctors and nurses (expressed as full-time equivalents) generally reflected the attendance at the departments However there was considerable variation in the level of nursing staff relative to attendance which could not be easily explained

51

Training in A amp E work for the house surgeons was inadequate with little formal training available for them In some places they had little opportunity to learn on-the-job beside a senior doctor Obviously greater time working alongside a senior doctor would be valuable as would intensive one or two-day orientation courses bull

Training was an important matter for the nursing staff also since very experienced nurses clearly were needed in the A amp E departments Inservice training courses are desirable both to develop experienced nurses as quickly as possible and to reduce the load that on-the-job training puts on the existing experienced nurses The training courses run in the Auckland hospitals appeared to be very successful and they could be used as a basis for courses in other hospitals and in post-basic programmes

The house surgeons in urban A amp E departments found their 10 and 12 hour shifts exhausting Also there was some evidence that where house surgeons covered other parts of the hospital as well as the A amp E department conflicting demands resulted in poor cover of the~ department Both of these problems would be alleviated by rostering more staff to the A amp E department We understand that this has happened in some departments in response to the Report on working conditions of resident medical officers Part I [12]

Inadequate supervision of house surgeons and the use of inexperienced first year house surgeons in A amp E departments were widespread In some places there were difficulties in getting backup from specialist staff and the house surgeons were very much on their own in the department There was also some evidence that A amp E departments were less efficient out of normal office hours due to delays in getting registrars and consultants and more especially due to the house surgeons inexperience

Employing more senior doctors both to improve the supervision and training of house surgeons and to improve the efficiency of the A amp E departments would be desirable But at present there are difficulties finding suitable applicants for A amp E officer positions These difficulties are at least partially oue to the low status of the A amp E department within the medical structure and the lack of career prospects for A amp E doctors The increasing numbers of doctors in the 1980 s and the opportunities for part-time work that the A amp E department offers to doctors with family responsibilities may make the department a more attractive choice However if these factors do not improve the senior medical staffing the development of A amp E medicine as a specialty will continue to ~e suggested

Does A amp E medicine in New Zealand require the extra training that would be provided by a post-graduate A amp E specialist programme Given the range of backgrounds currently found suitable for A amp E doctors it would appear that A amp E medicine in rural and provincial hospitals does not require much extra training although some training in particular aspects (eg soft-tissue injuries) could be useful In the urban hospitals the much higher load of major trauma cases could justify a post-graduate training programme However at present the number of senior A amp E doctors in the urban hospitals is insufficient to justify a specialist programme If numbers increase in the future perhaps the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine could sponsor a suitable post-graduate programme They coulo also play an extremely useful role by preparing a manual outlining clinical procedures for A amp E departments and distributing regular bulletins up-dating this material

52

REFERENCES

1 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services report on a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional off ice for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

2 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

3 ELSON Reginald - The medical staff of British accident and emergency units in Br J Hosp Med - (August 1971) p 161-170

4 New thoughts from casualty [editorial] in Br Med J - v 1 (1976) p 1299-1300

5 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 21-24

6 Community-wide emergency medical services recommendations by the Committee on Acute Medicine of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists in JAMA - v 204 no 7 (1968) p 595-602

7 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL~ Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975

8 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 1960 (Report series Board of Health no 2)

9 SALMOND GC - Young doctors an exercise in social researchmiddot methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

10 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM 68(83)

11 CANT BR staffing of A amp E departments in NZ Med J - v 94 (1981) p 471

12 Report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers Pt 1 Report of the Working Party established by the Hospital Medical Officers Advisory Committee and the Minister of Health - Wellington Dept of Health 1981 (unpublished)

13 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraW-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

14 OWENS J Cuthbert - Survey discovers what is wrong with hospitals emergency service in Mod Hosp - vl06no 1 (1966) p 82-85

15 LEITZELL James p - An uncertain future in N Eng J Med - v 304 no 8 (1981) p 477-480

16 RIGGS Leonard M Jr - A vigorous new speCialty in N Eng J Med shyv 304 no 8 (1981) p 480-483

53

17 HONIGSBAUM F - General practitioner work in British hospitals Soc Econ Admin - vl (1967) p 34-44bull

in

18 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL DJ and WALKER JH~ - Practitioners patients and the accident department in Hosp Health Services - (1975) p 80-84

Rev

19 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 1979 in NZ Med J - v 91(1980) p 194-196

19-23 March

55

CHAPTER 6

Patient att~ndance characteristics

This chapter considers the general pattern of attendance at A amp E departments noting overall levels and time trends the age and SeX distribution of patients and the conditions with which they come to the department Next we look at recall visits particularly the hospital to hospital variations Then the use of A amp E departments by people who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner is discussed

The materiai has been gathered by examining the A amp E records and talking with the staff of the 14 A amp E departments visited Data from the re~ords at Northland Base Hospital A amp E department have also been incorporated

Detailed patterns of attendance by hour of the day and day of the week have not been analysed Other researchers have documented these for A amp E departments in New Zealand and overseas [123456789] While detailed information is useful for good management of departments and setting adequate staffing levels for the busiest periods it is usually specific to a particular department and is not relevant to the questions addressed in this report For our purposes it has been sufficient to divide the week into normal working hours (in hours defined as 0800-1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays) and the remaining hours (out of hours)

OVERALL ATTENDANCE AND TRENDS

Since 1978 hospitals have reported total attendance at outpatient departments to the National Health Statistics Centre distinguishing A amp E attendance from other attendance and first attendance from recall attendance Table 9 shows the average annual attendance at the 15 A amp E departments for the period from 1978 to 1981 Table 10 presents the trends in A amp E attendance over the same period compared with the changes in population of the hospital catchment areas between the 1976 and 1981 censuses

There has been an overall increase in first attendance of 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 This increase is somewhat higher than we would expect from the growth in New Zealand population over the same period However the increase in first attendance has been partially counter-balanced by a decrease of 25 per cent in recall attendance

Table 10 shows too that there is no general trend towards increased first attendancemiddot among the urban hospitals The non-urban hospitals have experienced increasing first attendance although even there Northland Base and Rotorua show no increase

56

TABLE 9 AVERAGE ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-19811

First Recall Total attendance attendance attendance

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 58 506 6 272 64 777 Middlemore 39 032 18 686 57 718 Green Lane 26 079 16 635 42 714 Wellington 48 011 7 748 55 759 Hutt 33 266 9 807 43 072 Christchurch 61 516 12 010 73 526 Dunedin 27 202 10 802 38 004

Provincial Northland Base 7 794 3 144 10 938 Rotorua 12 265 4 636 16 900 Taranaki Base 10 341 5 462 15 803 Timaru 9 971 10 102 20 072

Rural Whakatane 5 992 2 177 8 769 Grey 3 850 1 214 5 064

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore2 9 388 7 900 17 288 Kenepuru 3 5 843 3 209 9 052

All public hospitals 524 442 226 251 750 693

1 Source Hospital Management Data 1978-1981 - Wellington National Health Statistics Centre Dept of Health Simple average unless otherwise noted

2 Estimated as average of 1978 1979 and 1981 figures as the North Shore A amp E department was closed for part of 1980

3 Estimated for 1979-1981 only since the Kenepuru A amp E department was not open ~or all of 1978

57

TABLE 10 TRENDS IN ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-1981

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Midd1emore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3

Kenepuru 4

All public hospitals

Average annual percentage change in A amp E attendance l

First attendance

-36 07 16

-22 -79

00 48

-07 06 64

185

61 90

59 179

15

Recall attendance

lo3-07

66 -155 -34

63 08

33 -45

23 02

1253 06

374 89

-25

Estimated annual percentage change in population of hospital bull s catchment

area

1976-19812

07

-04 -02 -10

14 12

-02 -06

12 -04

07 -04

02

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

2 Source NZ Wellington

Census of Population Dept of Statistics

and Dwellings 1976 and 1981

3 Estimated from 1978 and 1981 flUctuations in intervening years

figures only because of extreme

4 Estimated for 1979-1981 for all of 1978

only since Kenepuru A amp E department not open

Figure for entire hospital board area used

58

AGE AND SEX

The characteristic age and sex distributions of total A amp E attendance are shown in Figure 1 Nearly half of the attendances are by young adults 15-29 years Schoolage children too formed a larger part of the attendance than their numbers in the community would lead one to expect These two age groups which are also the age groups most likely to be active and daring accounted for nearly two thirds of all attendances The age distribution of attendance was similar from hospital to hospital

About twice as many males as females attended A amp E departments (66 per cent to 34 per cent) When age and sex were considered together I it was the school age and young adult males who made up the majority of attenders Even in the 30-64-year-old group men outnumbered women two to one These age and sex distributions are similar to those found by other researchers in New Zealand [1410] in Britain [1112] and the United States [1314]

Figure 1 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments by age and sex

Male Female

3L1

30

20 20

E ~ 128 shy

108

10

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65_ Age Group Age Group

CONDITIONS

Of the total A amp E attendances 81 per cent were for injury conditions and 19 per cent were for sickness conditions Adjusting for the recall visits we estimated that 73 to 78 per cent of first visits were for injury conditions Our results were similar to Platts [15] as far as we can tell given the different definitions used In another British study Lewis and Bradbury [12] found 90 per cent of visits were for injury However

59

this higher level is not surprising since they considered only cases which were waiting for attention ignoring ambulance cases and the very seriously ill

Out of hours sickness conditions made up 25 per cent of all visits and in hours they were 14 per cent Preschool children and people 65 years and over were more likely to attend for sickness conditions than those aged 5-64 years (Figure 2) The preponderance of males over females in the 15-64 year old groups was accounted for by injury conditions rather than by sickness

Figure 2 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

Male Femate

IIIiI A trendance for _ sickness condiHons 30

remainder for injury condItions

20

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 f Age Group Age Group

In the following sections information from some of the hospitals about the types of injury and sickness conditions is presented We have had problems in classifying the conditions since at some hospitals few details of the patients conditions were recorded on the A amp E log Even where details were recorded only 60 per cent of injury attendances and 80 per cent of sickness attendances have been able to be consistently classified

Injury conditions

Data on the type of injury was extracted from only six A amp E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch and Northland Base hospitals) There was very little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 3 shows the types of injuries as proportions of first injury attendances The category

60

of cuts (which included scrapes amputations and punctures) accounted for almost 30 per cent of first injury attendances The severity of the cuts could not be judged from log entries but in the case of Northland Base Hospital cuts identified as probably needing suturing formed a substantial part of this category Fractures made up 15 per cent of the first injury attendance with foreign body injuries (mostly in the eye) burns and toxic effects accounting for another 14 per cent

Figure 3 Injury first attendances by type of injury all ages

Other (414)

Cuts (291)Fractures (154)

The category labelled other accounted for 40 per cent of all first injury attendances and included some serious conditions such as falls crushing injuries and various states of shock However many of the other injuries were regarded as minor conditions by the Aamp E staff It was impossible to judge the severity of injuries from the detail recorded on the logs so no estimate of the percentage of injuries which required urgent attention has been made

For most types of injuries sex and age had little bearing There were exceptions (Figure 4) Toxic effects were four times as likely among preschool children as among other age groups Fractures were twice as likely both for school age children and for those 65 years and over as for other age groups Somewhat surprisingly adult men and women differed little in the types of injuries

Figure 4 Injury first attendances by type of injury by age groups

0-4 (ears 5-14 years 15-29 years

Other (308)

Cuts (321 )

Toxic effects (13) Burns (21 )

Foreign bodies (24)

Fractures (254)

Other (408)

Cuts (280)

Toxic effects (28)

Burns (41)

Other (452)

Cuts (286)

30-64 years 65+ years

Other (393) Other (341)

Cuts (308) Fractures (301)

62

People were more likely to present with injury conditions in hours rather than out of hours From the information collected at the four Auckland hospitals we can say that 43 per cent of first injury visits happened out of hours whereas 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category

Sickness conditions

Data on the type of sickness was extracted from only 10 A lie E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch Dunedin Northland Rotorua Taranaki and Grey) There was little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 5 shows the types of sickness conditions as proportions of all sick~ess attendance

Figure 5 Sickness attendance by type of sickness all ages

General sickness

(110)

Abdominal pain (132) Other (20 1 )

Shortness of breath (150)

Skin pain bleeding (229) Collapse (179)

TwO prominent categories shortness ofmiddot breath and collapse (including diabetic coma heart at tacks congestive heart failure and chest pain) accounted for one-third of all sickness attendances

General sickness covered fever diarrhoea and vomiting feeling unwell convulsions renal failure and abdominal pain recorded as being related to urinary retention Abdominal pain was generally recorded simply as such but acute appendix and similar terms and miscarriage or bleeding from the vagina were included in abdominal pain

Figure 6 Sickness attendance by type of sickness by age groups

0-4 years 5-14 years 15-29 years

General sickness (79)

General ~ickness (380)

Other (90) i

Shortness ofSkin pain I breath (148)

bleeding (100) Sickness pain Shortness of breath (320) bleeding (270) ClI

IN

Collapse (30)

30-64 years 65+ years

Abdominal pain (110) General sickness (102)

Shortness of breath (184) Ot 1159~

Skin pain I bleeding (10 1)

Collapse (358)

64

Unspecified pain or other bleeding have been included in the category of generally minor conditions involving skin pain or bleeding Such minor conditions accounted for almost a quarter of the sickness attendances Abscesses or infected wounds made up a quarter of the skin pain or bleeding category while a further 21 per cent involved pain such as back pain headaches or other pain

Ear and eye conditions toothache and other miscellaneous or undefined conditions made up the other category which formed 20 per cent of the sickness attendance

Were the sickness conditions urgent enough to require treatment at an A amp E department This was a difficult question to answer from the information available on the A amp E logs We have concluded that the collapse and shortness of breath conditions were likely to be emergencies and that for the preschool age group and probably those 65 years and over abdominal pain and general sickness required urgent attention We have described all the other sickness conditions as non-urgent sickness Thus at least 39 per cent of the ickness conditions required urgent attention

The type of sickness attendance differed between the age groups (Figure 6) Preschool children rarely came for superficial reasons Only 11 per cent of their sickness attendances were for skin pain or bleeding conditions Shortness of breath was a major condition for all children preschool or school age Skin pain or bleeding conditions were more prominent among the school age children than the preschool

Young adults tended to come for minor conditions Thirty per cent of their sickness attendance was for skin pain or bleeding conditions and only 20 per cent was for the emergency categories of collapse or shortness of breath

Among the adults 30-64 years old however emergencies formed a substantial part of sickness attendance with 27 per cent belonging to the collapse category Among those 64 years and over few non-urgent conditions were recorded with 40 per cent of the sickness attendance being for collapse The skin pain or bleeding conditions accounted for only 10 per cent of their sickness attendance

Fifty-eight per cent of all sickness attendances occurred out of hours~ as would have been expected given that 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category However nearly three-quarters of preschool sickness visits happened out of hours while less than half of the sickness visits by those 30 years and over were out of hours

RECALL ATTENDANCE

Almost all recall visits were for injury conditions velY few sickness patients were recalled for follow-up care As was noted in Chapter 3 policies on recall visits differed among the departments Several factors ~ffected the decision to recall the patients condition the A amp E staffs communication with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs middotof house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors ~hilosophy of A amp E medicine From the comments made by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the departments into two groups

65

RECALL POLICY

DO FAVOUR A policy favouring recall visits

DO NOT lAVOUR A policy not favouring recall visits with most patients being referred to a general practitioner However fractures and soft-tissue or serious wounds tend to be recalled

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

DO FAVOUR Taranaki Base Grey North Shore

DO NOT FAVOUR Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Rotorua Timaru Whakatane Kenepuru

-----_--------- ----------------------~

It is diff icult to compare the policies of the departments with their actual performances since some A amp E logs did not completely identify all recall visits Table 11 presents recall attendance as a proportion of total attendance For the departments where recall visits were fully identified there appears to be reasonable agreement between the Hospital Management Data figures and the figures derived from our tallies The exceptions are Whakatane where staff told us that return visits pad dropped from 1979 to 1981 and Auckland where we have no explanation It should be noted that the tally figures are estimates based on one-week to one-month samples and so may be less accurate than the Hospital Mlmagement Data which are complete counts over an entire year

Overall 25-30 per cent of all visits were recall visits There was considerable variation among departments in the level of recall visits OFlanagan [16] found similar variation among British A amp E departments

The recall polic ies were not closely related to the departments performances as measured by the proportion of all visits that were recalls While North Shore with a recall-favouring A amp E department had a very high level of recalls (many were plaster checks) so did Timaru a department with a policy of not favouring recalls The other recall-favouring A amp E departments at Grey and Taranaki Base hospitals had only average levels of recalls

The departments performances however were related to the levels of medical and nursing staff as measured by the tatal medical staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 6 and the nurse staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 8) A amp E departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits (see Table 11 and Figures 7 and 8) Perhaps these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat recalled patients

66

TABLE 11 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS RECALL ATTENDANCE

Hospital Tally sources Management Data Recalls as Recalls as Total Recalls as percentage percentage attend-percentage of total attendancel

of total attendance

of injury attendance

ance tallied2

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 97 198 278 948 Middlemore 324 327 399 1137 Green Lane 389 401 439 868 Wellington3 139 116 172 3568

(4 weeks) Hutt3 228 280 379 2766

( 4 weeks) Christchurch 163 166 216 1233 Dunedin3 284 278 334 749

Provincial Northland Base 287 275 328 2092

03 weeks) Rotorua 274 214 250 334 Taranaki Base 346 327 353 270 Timaru3 504 460 51 6 174

Rural Whakatane 317 152 175 259

( 2 weeks) Grey3 240 238 293 330

o month)

Part-time departments

Suburban North Sh~re 457 521 539 512 Kenepuru 355 383 422 451

(4 weeks)

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations lOne week tally unless otherwise noted 3 Tally data partially estimated from Hospital Managementmiddot Data (see

Table 9) to adjust for incomplete recording

Spearman rank correlations [18] of recalls as percentage of total attendances (Hospital Management Data) with

(a) FTE medical staff per 10000 first attendance r = 0459 P lt 005 (b) FTE nurse staffing (adjusted for holding ward) per 10000 first

attendance r = 0547 P lt 005

67

Figure 7 Comparison of medical staff availability and level of recall attendance

u c ro 50 Timaru

C c ~ North Shore m ro S 40 Greenlane 0

Kenepuru

Cl ro Taranaki E = 30

Middlemore bull bull Whakatane

Cl Dunedin Rotoruae

ro

u Hutt Grey

c ro

C 20 C

~ m Christchurch

ro Wellington u

0 10 Auckland

10 20 30 40

Number of medical staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance

Figure 8 Comparison of nursing staff availability and level of recall attendance

Timaru50

North Shore

40 Greenlanee

Kenepuru Taranaki

Middlemore bull Whakatane bull 30

Dunedin ROlorua

GreyHutt

20

Christchurch Wellington

10 Auokland

3 4 5 6 8 9 10 II 12

Number of nursing staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance lexcluding nurses staffing holding wards)

68

It has been suggested that house surgeons are more likely to recall than senior A amp E doctors [17] If this were so we would expect that A amp E departments where house surgeons worked with very little direct senior superv1s1on (Hutt Taranaki Whakatane Grey Kenepuru) would have had higher proportions of recalls than departments with much greater supervision (Auckland and Dunedin) This was not the case Also North Shore with no house surgeons had a high proportion of recalls Thus the recall levels do not suggest that the house surgeons had any greater propensity than senior A amp E doctors to recall patients

GP-LOAD

A amp E staff use the term GP-load as shorthand for people who in their eyes would more appropriately be treated by a general practitioner Other studies in New Zealand and overseas have estimated that between 36 and 61 per -cent of all A amp E patients could have been successfully treated by a general practitioner [41920] When we discussed this topic with A amp E staff we found a similar variation in their estimates of the GP-10ad This variation may be due to differing views as to which injury and sickness conditions should be treated in the A amp E department it may be due to different beliefs about the abilities and facilities of general practitioners and it may reflect differences in the patients ~erved by different A amp E departments

The role of general practitioners in the treatment of injury is a matter of debate However there is more agreement over sickness conditions A sickness emergency is traditionally accepted as suitable for A amp E treatment whereas a non-urgent sickness condition is seen as more appropriate for general practitioner treatment

Non-urgent sickness

A amp E staff estimated that patients with long standing or minor sickness conditions constituted from 2 to 30 per cent of the attendance However tallies from the A amp E logs showed that non-urgent sickness attendance ranged from 6 to 24 per cent averaging about 12 per cent At most departments staff oVer-estimated the level At a typical hospital staff opinion placed non-urgent sickness at 20 to 25 per cent of the attendance while the A amp E log showed only 19 per cent coming for any sickness condition and fewer than 12 per cent for non-urgent sickness Only in one A amp E department was the tally evidence of non-urgent sickness greater than the staffs estimate The general oVer-estimation of non-urgent sickness visits probably means that A amp E staff were also over-estimating the total GP-load bull

In general A amp E staff felt that patients with non-urgent sickness would be better off being seen by their own general practitioners However the departments differed in the ways they dealt with these patients Some staff mentioned that when they treated such patients they would discourage further visits by explaining the role of the A amp E department Some departments had notices in the waiting rooms stating that the department was for treatment of accidents and emergencies and that people should see their general practitioner for other conditions Some hospitals had placed advertisements with similar messages in local newspapers

From the comments of A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the A amp E departments into two groups

69

OPEN DOOR POLICY

OPEN An open policy where almtreated They may then general practitioner

ost be

all patients advised to see

are a

RESTRICTED A restricted policy where patients are not treated a general practitioner

nbut

on-urgent are re

sicknferred

ess to

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

OPEN Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Whakatane Grey North Shore

RESTRICTED Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru Kenepuru

The open door policies were reflected somewhat in the proportion of all A amp E visits that were f or sickness (see Table 12) The departments with restricted policies (which were all non-urban) tended to have lower proportions of sickness visits than those with open policies However the non-urban departments with open policies did not have substantially higher proportions of sickness visits than the restricted departments Rather some of the urban departments (Auckland Wellington Hutt and Christchurch) had particularly high proportions of sickness visits These departments were also particularly busy with large numbers of first attendances and relatively low levels of medical staffing One would expect that in a very busy department staff would discourage inappropriate visits However A amp E staff at Auckand and Wellington hospitals commented that although non-urgent sickness patients needed general practitioner care they tended to treat them anyway because it was quicker to treat them than to send them away This may be a partial explanation for the high levels of sickness visits but other factors related to the populations served by the departments are probably involved (see Chapter 8)

A common exception to the open door policies was made for children At most hospitals staff said that sick children were always seen As Table 13 suggests children as described by staff are probably preschool children rather than all those under 15 years The departments with restricted policies had considerably lower proportions of sickness visits in the preschool and school age groups than did the open policy departments Table 13 also shows that toe agemiddot group most likely to appear with sickness conditions is the elderly There was Tess difference in proportions of sickness visits between the restricted policy and open policy departments for patients aged 30 and over

It would appear that a restricted policy towards non-urgent sickness patients does tend to discourage sickness Visits particularly for preschool age children However a restricted policy does not markedly appear to discourage sickness visits by the elderly

70

TABLE 12 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESS 1

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Butt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru3

Rural Whakatane Grey3

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Estimated Percentage of percentage total attenshyof first ance that was attendance for sickness that was for sickness

378 303 235 158 187 112 365 323 361 260 301 251 233 168

162 183 144 110 74 109 59

156 132 190 145

58 28 152 94

Total attendance tallied2

948 1137

868 3568 (4 weeks) 2766 ( 4 weeks) 1233

749

2092 (13 weeks) 334 270 174

259 (2 weeks) 330 (l month)

572 451 (4 weeks)

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 One-week tally unless otherwise noted

3 For Timaru and Grey the percentage of first attendance that was for sickness is the actual figure derived from the tallies and the percentage of total attendance that was for sickness has been estimated

71

TABLE 13 PROPORTION OF TOTAL A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESSl BY OPEN DOOR POLICY AND AGE GROUPS

Percentage of total attendance that was for sickness

under 5 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 All years years years years years amp age

over groups

Open policy departments 367 111 148 245 433 201

Restricted policy departments 102 66 80 181 311 110

All departments studied 33 bull2 104 141 238 425 191

1 Source Tallies taken from A E logs by authors hospitals represented in one-week equivalents

DISCUSSION

At all public hospitals first visits to A amp E departments increased by 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 However this increase was not consistent with most of the urban A E departments reporting a decrease or no change in first visits Recall visits for all public hospital A E departments decreased by 25 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 The decrease was not consistent in fact the reported changes in recall attendance were highly variable It has been suggested that the cost of general practitioner services and dissatisfaction with the unavailability of general practitioners have caused increased use of A amp E departments However it seems unlikely that any single reason could explain these highly variable changes in A amp E attendance in New Zealand

The people visiting A amp E departments were predominantly school age or young adults and male Men aged 15 to 29 years formed the largest single group almost one-third of all attendances Eighty-one per cent of attendances were for injuries and the 19 per cent attending for sickness conditions tended to be preschoolers or people aged 65 years or more Injury visits were more common in hours and sickness visits out of hours probably because accidents tend to happen in daylight hours Also sic kness conditions often seem worse at night and if the patients do not want to bother their general practitioner they may go straight to the A amp E department (see Chapter 7)

72

It was difficult to classify conditions accurately from the information on A amp E logs since insufficient detail and little indication of severity was usually recorded Thus we have not been able to estimate the proportion of injuries which really required A amp E care Similarly there were difficulties in classifying the sickness conditions middotalthough almost 40 per cent appeared to require urgent attention

There was considerable variation among the A amp E departments studied in the proportion of all visits that were recall visits However contrary to our expectations this variation was not related to the policy on recalling patients stated by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents Nor did it appear to be related to the inexperience of unsupervised house surgeons Rather it was related to staffing levels Departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits It is likely that staff in these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat more recalled patients If departments wish to change their recall levels an examination of thei r staffing levels would be an obvious place to start

The other component of the workload which A amp E departments often wish to control is the non-urgent sickness attendance A amp E staff saw such visits as inappropr iate and they consistently over-estimated the proportion of non-urgent sickness patients they were treating Ullman (3] and Roth [21] have found similar processes of oVer-estimation occurring among staff in United States emergency rooms The level of non-urgent sickness visits was not high on average comprising only 12 per cent of the attendance However applying a restricted policy (referring to general practitioners for treatment displaying notices in the department and advertisements in local newspapers) appeared to discourage such visits particularly for preschool children Thus non-urgent sickness attendance was not a problem in some A amp E departments Where departments see such visits as a problem applying a restricted policy could ease it

13

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS E F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J -V 71 0970rgt212-219

2 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard ~ Emergency department utHisation in ail urban community implications for community ambulatory careinJAMA v 216 no 2 (191l) p 301-312

3 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SfRATMANN William C- An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1915) P 1011-1020

4 RICHARDSJ G and WHITE GR~ - Accident and emergency services at AucklandHospital inNZmiddotMed J - v 85 (1977) P 272~274

5 INGRAM D R CLARKE D -R and MURDIE R A -Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1918) P 55-62

6 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referral patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

1 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

McRAE She1agh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience of Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

9 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (A amp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 319-388

10 SNELGAR Denis- Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

11 Casual attenders a socio-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcast1e-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

12 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A amp E in Health Soc Serv J (1981) p 1139-1142

13 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

14 WALKER L L - Inpatient and emergency department utilisation the effect of distance social class age sex and marital status in J Amer ColI Emergency Phycns - v 5 no 2 (1976) p 105-110

15 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

74

16 OFLANAGAN P - The work of an accident and emergency department in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 26 no 162 (1976) p 54-60

17 What are accident and emergency departments for in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) P 837-839

18 SIEGEL Sydney_ - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

19 CROMBIE D L - A casualty survey in J ColI Gen Pract - v 2 (1959) P 346-356

20 SKUDDER Paul A McCarroll James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1913 p 11-35

21 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) P 839-856

75

CHAPTER 7

Patient attitudes to the accident and emergency department and staff attitudes to the patients

In this chapter we look at the attitudes of patients to the A amp E department and particularly the reasons they give for attending it Summaries of the results of overseas studies are given followed by detailed information from several New Zealand studies where patients were interviewed the Dunedin study carried out by Dixon in 1968[1] Richards Auckland study of 1975 [2] Keenans unpublished Christchurch study of 1978 the Wei~ington childrens study carried out by Kljakovic in 1978 [3] and McRaes Waikato study of I~H9 [4] Then we discuss the effect that health centres and deputising services have on A amp E use Finally we explore the views that A amp E staff have of their patients

REASONS FOR VISITING THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

Overseas studies

A substantial number of overseas studies have explored the reasons given by patients attending A amp E departments One major reason was the availability of the A amp E department open 24 hours a day and always staffed compared to the actual or perceived unavailability of the general practitioner [56789]

People mentioned the accessibility of the A amp E department as a reason for attending citing its location ease of transport to and from it and its convenience for work schedules and other arrangements [671011]

Another major reason for visiting the A amp E department was its appropriateness as a source of care particularly because of the equipment and facilities available [5612] with many conditions particularly injuries A amp E patients made their own diagnosis They therefore omitted the diagnosis-seeking part of care (where the general practitioner was seen as appropriate) and sought confirmation arid immediate treatment at the A amp E department [1314]

People also saw the A ampE department as the appropriate place to go because of the urgency of their condition especially if the person needing treatment was a child [7141516] However A amp E staff and A amp E patients often had conflicting perceptions of the seriousness of the condition Patients tended to see their complaint as more serious and urgent than did the A amp E doctor [9101117]

Advice from other people was another reason given for visiting the A amp E department [61218] People were more likely to visit the department rather than the general practitioner when the decision to seek care was made outside the home and where someone other than the patient or a close

relative was involved in the decision (eg a policeman an employer a teacher or bystander) In some cases such as traffic accidents and some

work and school accidents it was automatic procedure to send the patient straight to the A amp E department [1819]

76

Some people using the A amp E department did not have a family doctor because they were new to the area or transient or for other reasons [78] In the United States the proportions without a doctor were high ranging from 40 per cent to 86 per cent [5171920]

The proportion of patients who tried to contact their doctor before going to the A amp E department also varied considerably from 6 per cent to 42 per cent in different North American studies [59202122] 14 per cent in a Canadian study and SO per cent in a Swedish study [23] Holohan et al [24J found that over SO per cent of patients attending a British A amp E department were unaware or inaccurately informed about their general practitioners out of hours care arrangements

Dissatisfaction with their general practitioner led to some people visiting the A amp E department Organisational factors such as appointment systems deputising serVices and health centres all made it more difficult for patients to contact their doctor [142425) Dissatisfaction with the doctors treatment and wanting a second opinion were also reasons [26] As well language difficulties were a problem In Australia immigrants used the hospital foi childrens emergencies because interpreters were available and they did not have to use the telephone to arrange a visit [27]

It has been suggested that people use A amp E departments rather than general practitioners because the department is free This is unlikely to be a reason in Britain where general practitioner care is free under the National Health Service Studies in the United States found that very few respondents said that the cost of seeing a doctor was a major reason for visiting the A amp E department [511)

New Zealand studies

Use of general practitioners

It has been suggested that people use the A amp E department because they are visitors to a city or do not have a general practitioner The New Zealand studies foundmiddot that the proportion of those interviewed who had a general practitioner varied considerably from city to city (see Table 14) The high level in Wellington [3] was not surprising given that most families with children have a general practitioner The transience of local populations as suggested by Richards [2] may explain some of the differences between the studies Dixon [1] noted that the age and sex structure of the people visiting the A amp E department with the preponderance of young males was the opposite to that of people visiting general practitioners

The Wellington study found that for a very high proportion of children (39 per cent) there had been an attempt to contact a general practitioner before going to the A amp E department and 25 per cent had actuallY seen the doctor [3) The other studies found smaller proportions British studies have reported similar variations with Lewis and Bradbury [14] finding 8 per cent of A amp E attenders had been referred by their general practitioner and Conway (25] reporting 41 per cent

The Chr istchurch study found that the people who did not see a doctor before coming to the A amp E department were more likely to be injured rather than sick to visit the department out of hours rather than in

77

hours and to be 15 to 29 years old Also during work hours people who had accidents at work were less likely to see the doctor before going to the A amp E department than people with home or sports accidents

TABLE 14 USE OF GENERAL PRACT IT lONERS BY FIRST ATTENDERS AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Percentage of all those interviewed who

had a regular general attempted to contact their practitioner general practitioner before

going to the A amp E department

Dunedin 1968 92 16 Auckland 1975 72 21 Christchurch 1978 85 23 Wellington 1978 98 39

Derived from 84 per cent who were sent directly or chose to go to casualty without seeing a doctor

Specific reasons for using the A amp E department

Turning now to the reasons given by patients for their A amp E visit the New Zealand studies found a similar range of reasons to the overseas studies Keenan collected detailed information in Christchurch and this is presented in Table 15 and in the following sections Comparable information from the other studies where available has been included

Others advised the patient to go to the A amp E department The most common reason given by the Christchurch patients (and by the people interviewed by Dixon [1] in Dunedin) was that others (employers teachers traffic officers sports coach neighbours friends) advised them to go to the A amp E department There appeared to be an automatic procedure following many school work sports and traffic accidents of sending the patient straight to the A amp E department

There was no evidence that injuries happening at other locations (eg at home) were any less likely to go to the A amp E department A comparison of the Waikato and Christchurch A amp E injury attenders with people consulting general practitioners for accidental injuries [28] showed similar proportions of attendance by the location of the accident (Figure 9) In Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14] found similar results when studying A amp E attendance in the North Western Regional Health Authority

76

TABLE 15 REASONS FOR A amp E FIRST ATTENDANCE FROM THREE NEW ZEALAND STUDIES

Reasons Christchurch 1976

Wellington ( children)

1978

Auckland 1975

SAW GP BEFORE A amp E 186 250

A amp E MORE AVAILABLE GP found to be unavailable

or thought to be unavailable Did not want to bother GP

Cost of GP care a factor

125

( 65) ( 41)

(19)

233

119

(24) ( 79)

(16)

A amp E MORE ACCESSIBLE More convenient closer

phone or transport problems in contacting GP

214

A amp E MORE APPROPRIATE Condition of type not dealt

with by GP requiring A amp E facilities

Need for attention was urgent

140

( 5 0) (90)

389 671

OTHERS ADVISED TO GO TO A amp E 233 61

OTHER Includes having no GP

trained by GP to go to A amp E needed a dentist and so on

94 68

Number of people interviewed 565 428 1147

Tried to contact general practitioner did not necessarily see doctor

A amp E department more available Only 125 per cent of the Christchurch sample went to the A amp E department because it was more available than their general practitioner Richards [2] found a similar proportion in Auckland Not surprisingly the availability reasons were given more by people visiting the Christchurch A amp E department out of hours than in hours and more for children and older adults than the 15 to 29 age group The cost of visiting a general practitioner was hardly mentioned as a reason for visiting the A amp E department

79

In Wellington Kljakovic [3] found parents saying abOut the A amp E department

you can go anytime - 24 hour service when everyones at the end of their tether theyre there and theyre open

and about general practitioners

didnt know you could get a doctor on the weekends on other occasions you get an answering service - not worth bothering the doctor

midnight - too late to call a doctor

Figure 9 location at which accidents happened by those attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Presenting at A amp E department Presenting at general practitioner

Home (389) Home (290)

Work schooL Work school public buildings (336) public buddings (39 0)

A amp E department more accessible Over 20 per cent of the Christchurch attenders went to the A amp E department because it was more convenient closer or involved fewer transport or communic~tion problems These reasons were given more out of hours than in hours particularly by the 15 to 29 age group Injured patients especially those with sports injuries were more likely to give these reasons

A amp E department more appropriate Only 14 per cent of the Chr istchurch sample gave appropriateness as a reason while Richards [2] found 67 per cent in Auckland and Kljakovic [3] reported 39 per cent in Wellington These differences may reflect different interview situations since Richards interviewed patients at the A amp E department while Keenan and Kljakovic questioned people through telephone or personal interviews in their own homes Christchurch people suffering traffic accidents or poisonings (largely self-poisonings) were more Ii kely to give this reason than other reasons

80

In Wellington parents often said about the A amp E department

thats what its there for they have everything there

Several parents also commented that

general practitioners dont do stitches the GP is for minor things - not eager to corne to an emergency the doctor would only send us on to the hospital anyway thought leg was broken - needed an x-ray

Many parents decided to go to the A amp E department because they had already made a diagnosis and thought the condition required A amp E treatment others were unsure of the urgency of the childs condition A mother whose two-year-old son had hit his nose on a shower box at 755 am rang the doctor The child was crying his nose was bleeding and looked flattened The message on the answer phone was that the doctor could be contacted only in a real emergency She was unsure what a real emergency was so took the child to hospital not wanting to feel a fool by ringing the doctor

Some parents particularly those with asthmatic children were well aware that the condition required urgent care and had previously been told to go straight to the A amp E department

Dissatisfaction with the general practitioner Satisfaction is notoriously difficult to measure particularly when normal levels of satisfaction are between 85 and 90 per cent satisfied Only in the Wellington study [3] of childrens A amp E attendance was a direct question asked about satisfaction with the general practitioner service Forty-one per cent expressed some dissatisfaction mostly mentioning concern over difficulty in seeing the doctor Problems with getting an appointment with waiting because there was no appointment system with unsympathetic receptionists and with doctors not being willing to visit the horne were all mentioned Some parents commented that at a health centre they were unlikely to see their own doctor so they might as well go to the A amp E department Four per cent of parents were dissatisfied with the general practitioners treatment and came to the A amp E department for better treatment The cost of visiting the general practitioner was only mentioned by three parents (07 per cent)

Satisfaction with A amp E department The Wellington study [3] found that 73 per cent of parents were satisfied with the A amp E department For those who were dissatisfied the urgency of their visit was uppermost and they were unhappy at having to wait too long Parents also commented disapprovingly that the departments were understaffed or very busy The A amp E staff carne in for very little criticism only 07 per cent of parents made critical comments Many parents expressed their satisfaction with the reassuring aspects of the A amp E department its availability and its size A typical comment was its big they have everything there In one case parents dissatisfied with the treatment of their sick child at one A amp E department went to another department because it was bigger

81

Views of A amp E staff

When we asked A amp E staff why people visi ted the department they offered the same reasons that patients had given as explanations ie appropriateness availability and satisfaction Staff also commented that Pacific Islanders were accustomed to using hospital services for all their medical care in the islands andmiddot continued tomiddot use the hospital in New Zealand either as a first resort or for a second opinion Kinloch [29] demonstrated that while this was so for recent Samoan migrants in Wellington after some years New Zealand residence their pattern of hospital usage because similar to that of the population as a whole

A amp E staff thought that the major reason for the GP-load patients visiting the department was general practitioner unavailability They recognised

that many patients did not have a general practitioner because they were new to the area transient or on holiday Many staff mentioned the cost of visiting a doctor as a major reason although a few staff strongly asserted that cost was not important

EFFECT Of HIEALTH CENTRES AND DEPUTISING SERVICES ON A 8t IE UTILISATION

It has been assumed that the unavailability of a family doctor has been a major reason for people attending an A amp E department Consequently health centres with more facilities for treatment of injuries and open for longer hours than the usual doctors surgery have been set up Two United States studies [3031] found that the health centres they looked at appeared to have reduced the use of A amp E departments by people in the local neighbourhood either absolutely or relativemiddot to people in other neighbourhoods However in New Zealand data collected from Dunedin A amp E records by Maynard [32] three years before and three years after the Mosgiel health centre opened andmiddot by ourselves six years after it opened gave no evidence of a decline inA amp E use by Mosgiel residents It appeared that since the A amp E department was rarely used for routine primary care problems there was little opportunity for the health centre to substitute for the department Possibly a neighbourhood closer to the A amp E department would have shown more effect from a health centre Also as Alpert et al [33] suggested habit patterns of usage could be difficult to change

Williams et al [34] investigated the effect of general practitioner deputising services on A amp E department use in the Sheffield Hospital region They found that deputising service referrals did not add significantly to the workloads of A amp Edepartments nor did it appear that many patients referred themselves to the A amp E departments in preference to consulting the deputising service doctors They commented that the deputising services may have been meeting a demand previously coped with by the hospitals

It is possible that health centres ana deputising services have contradictory effects on A amp E department visits People who realise a doctor is readily available through these services may use thatmiddot service rather than the A amp E department Other people may reason that if they cannot see their usual doctor it is just as convenient to use the A amp E department as the health centre or deputising service

82

A amp E STAFF VIEWS OF PATIENTS

Overseas studies

Several overseas studies have explored the views of A amp E staff about their patients Roth [35] found that staff applied concepts of social worth which were common in the larger society to their patients so that higher status people were likely to get more respectful treatment than lower status Staff tended tomiddot oVerestimate the numbers of patients seen as undesirable such as drunks venereal disease cases and welfare cases as well as overestimating the numbers using the department inappropriately Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff categorised patients as good (clinically interesting allowing staff to practise their skills and testing the competence of staff) and rubbish (a socially-defined category including drunks overdoses tramps and trivia which were usually minor injuries or conditions not requiring medical attention) Hughes [37] commented that the good and rubbish categories were relatively small groups and that staff had a neutral attitude to the bulk of the people visiting the department

Jeffery [36] found that staff reacted punitively to rubbish patients using delay verbal hostility and vigorous restraint of unco-operative patients particularly overdoses According to Roth (35] patients seen as unco-operative will be told to wait their turn and may be threatened with refusal of treatment Several authors found that patients visiting for tri vial complaints tended to be handled with surface politenessmiddot even if they were subject to post-hoc attacks in written records or departmental gossip [363738]

Burgess and Holmstrom [39] found that the attitudes and actions of health providers could increase or diminish the psychological consequencies for women who had been raped and suggested that staff awareness and training would be valuable Alexander [40] studied nurses preceptions of women who had been raped and found that while the womens characteristics were important the nurses own personality and attitudes were more important Alexander concluded that short-term sensitivity training was unlikely to be effective and that great care was necessary in selecting health providers to care for raped women

Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff viewed patients as having a legitimate claim to medical care if they were not responsible for their condition if they were restricted in their reasonable activities by the condition if they viewed their condition as an undesirable state and if they co-operated in trying to get well He commented that people visiting repeatedly because of overdoses or fights were regarded as not co-operating while repeated injuries from sports activities were viewed as legitimate Roth [19] in a study of five United States A amp E departments found that staff views on the legitimacy of a visit depended partly on the patients source of referral People referred by health professionals were usually accepted as legitimate exceptmiddot where A amp E staff suspected a doctor of dumping an unwanted patient on to the department Contract cases where the hospital had a contractual relationship with the school nursing home or workplace the patient came from were immediately accepted as appropriate People brought in by police came into this category Self-referred patients were classified as legitimate or not depending on their social characteristics their condition and the kind of demands they were making on the department In a later paper Roth [35] noted that cases where a definite diagnosis could be made (surgical conditions asthma overdoses maternity

83

patients) were considered legitimate whereas psychiatric conditions and cases requiring more subtle or complex diagnosis were regarded as illeg i timate

The New Zealand situation

While this study did not observe staff-patient interactions in detail we asked A amp E staff about the patients and how they dealt with them and we watched staff at work for some time in each department

We found some evidence that New Zealand A amp E staff shared the views of their British and United States counterparts House surgeons tended to regard the clinically interesting patients as goodand often commented unfavourably on patients whose condition was not easily diagnosed With regard to the rubbish category of patients some A amp E staff disapproved of them while others accepted the whole range of patients as part of working in the department We saw little evidence of punitive reactions to patients although delay andmiddot the intimidating effect of a white coat appeared to be used at times The views of A amp E staff about specific categories of patients are covered in the next sections

Sports injuries

From the Christchurch and Waikato [4] studies we have estimated that 13 per cent of A amp E injury visits were for sports injuries At Green Lane A amp E department staff had recorded all rugby injuries on the A amp E log in the late April week sampled the rugby injuries comprised six per cent of all injuries

A amp E staff saw the department as the appropriate place for the treatment of sports injuries One staff member commented that most general practitioners would get a shock if presented with a sports injury to treat Staff also understood that coaches usually sent people straight to the A amp E department as an automatic procedure and that this was often legitimate since the injury might have required an x-ray However a frequently mentioned source of annoyance was people presenting with a sports injury some considerable time after the event such as on Monday morning or after the post-match drinking bout A amp E staff thought these patients should have seen a general practitioner particularly when the condi tion was not acute A few A amp E staff commented that they were beginning to regard repeated sports injuries as self-inflicted injuries and were less sympathetic to those patients

Alcohol-related visits

In all the A amp E departments staff commented that many of the assault and motor vehicle accident injuries were directlyassociated with alcohol (The only exceptions were the suburban hospitals which Were closed evenings and nights) Staff estimated that from half to all patients seen on Friday and Saturday evenings had been drinking or had been hurt by someone who was drinking This estimate may seem exaggerated but inspection of Wellington A amp E logs by Reinken [41] suggested that an estimate of 50 to 79 per cent was reasonable Staff at three of the central city A amp E departments commented that they treated a number of old alcoholic and derelict people usually for chronic complaints or because they had been attacked

84

From time to time staff as well as facilities have suffered abuse and violence A amp E nurses always commented on problems with disorderly behaviour both by patients and by friends of patients in the waiting room In two hospitals nurses had little faith in the security provisions made for their safety but mostly the nurses seemed to cope reasonably well House surgeons said they found intoxicated patients difficult to treat because of their lack of co-operation A amp E officers had few comments on alcohol-related visits probably because they rarely worked evening or weekend shifts

Domestic violence and rape

Unfortunately we did not ask specific questions about these topics but at three hospitals nurses mentioned that they saw cases of child abuse and at another three hospitals wife-beating was mentioned We have few details as to how staff dealt with these women and children but from the comments made by the nurses and on house surgeon they felt a need for more psychiatric or social work backup There were no comments about women who had been raped attending the department

_Regular visitors

At most of the urban A amp E departments and at Rotorua and Whakatane staff commented that they had a group of regular visitors This group was never large unlike the 20 to 60 per cent of workload reported as regular visi tors by two United states public hospitals [19] Asthmatics (who had previously been advised to go straight to the department) were regarded as legitimate visitors and staff watched for children visiting regularly with injur-ies in order to detect cases of chi ld abuse However people who repeatedly presented drunk or with overdoses or with an emotional or social problem were regarded with resigned acceptance or some annoyance One A amp E department maintained a special file for the records of regular visitors while in other departments a bulky bundle of cards stapled together alerted staff to yet another visit from a regular client_

Trivia

When the A amp E staff talked about trivia they mentioned some of the minor injuries and sickness from the GP-Ioad category but also included very minor injuries such as a splinter in a finger or a cut needing only a Bandaid Some A amp E staff felt that trivial conditions did not require any medical treatment especially not from a department designed to treat emergency conditions A few staff members commented that people with minor conditions cluttered up the waiting room and were physically in the way Some also said that knowing the waiting room was full put more pressure on them However other A amp E staff stressed that apparently trivial conditions were important and worrying to the patients involved and that reassurance at least was required

It has been suggested that people using the A amp E department for trivial conditions decrease the ability of the department to cope with emergencies [42431 Most staff interviewed felt confident that people attending for trivial complaints in no way jeopardised the quality of care given to the more urgent cases because the latter were seen first ThUS the minor complaints were annoying and added work but did not compromise the departments ability to give good care

85

DISCUSSION

Why do patients attend the A amp E department The public seem to have a rough and ready decision tree if you are sick go to your doctor if you are hurt go to the Aamp E department

The department is definitely seen as the appropriate place for treating accidental injuries People say thats what its there forI and they have everything there A visit to the general practitioner for such an injury is seen as unnecessary and delaying

A significant proportion of accidents and some sickness conditions happen away from home The patient may decide to go to the A amp E department because it is closer or easier for transport or work reasons Often someone else (a schoolteacher a coach or traffic officer) sends the patient to the A ampE department as an automatic procedure

Most people with sickness conditions visit their general practitioner so it is not surprising that those who visit the A amp E department have often been referred by their doctor The sick patients who corne directly to the department usually see their condition as needing urgent care Therefore if they try to contact their doctor and fail or if they think the doctor will be unavailable they head for the hospital

It is also possible that the general practitioners surgery is associated with waiting while the hospital is associated with swift action perhaps due to televised images as noted by Cooke [44] In fact the waiting times are generally equivalent in both settings it is the significance of that waiting which is different The patients may feel that if something happens to worsen their case they will be attended to quickly if they are waiting in the A amp E department rather than waiting at home for the general practitioner to visit

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners formiddot patients From the patients comments one of the main attractions of the A amp E department is its availability that it is always open and staffed In comparison general practitioners were often seen as not being available as difficult to contact or as unable to respond quickly to an emergency In this sense A amp E departments appear to be competitive with general practitioners As was noted in Chapter 6 sickness visits to the A amp E department were more likely to happen out of hour s than in hours The overseas studies suggest that health centres and deputising services which offer greater availability of doctors particularly out of hours may reduce the use of A amp E departments The only way general practitioners could compete with the availability of the A amp E department would be to improve their own out-of-hours service

The cost of visiting a general practitioner has also been cited as a reason for people visiting the A amp E department where treatment is free This is only relevant for sickness conditions since the cost of general practitioner treatment for accidental injuries is covered by the Accident Compensation Corporation However in none of the New Zealand studies covered in this chapter did people give cost of treatment as a major reason for attending the A amp E department A amp E staff tended to over-estimate the importance of cost as a reason but this was not surprising as they also oVer-estimated the number of people visiting the department for sickness conditions

86

Despite sickness visits to the doctor being free in Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14 J found similar levels of A amp E sickness attendance there as here Steinmetz [45) reported that on the introduction of Medicare in Quebec doctors no longer charged patients whereas previously only care in an emergency room was free He found that the demand for medical care increased at both sites the doctor and the emergency room but that there was no evidence of a shift from the emergency room back to the doctor Thus there is little evidence that the cost of visiting a general practitioner causes people to visit the A amp E department Rather people use the department because they see it as the appropriate place for treatment of their condition and it is available

Turning now to staff a~titudes to the patients it seems that acceptance of the great variety of people (and their conditions) is a necessary part of working in the A amp E department However the staff comments do raise some concerns Abusive and violent patients have been a problem in some hospitals and a reappraisal of security arrangements in some of the urban A amp Edepartments would be desirable

A amp E staff should be aware that women and children presenting with injuries may have received them in domestic violence and that full information on how the injury happened may not be volunteered It is difficult for staff to do more than treat the injuries when there are few specialised support services available However some attempts are being made to provide such services for children [46] and through v9luntary organisations such as womens refuges A amp E staff should maintain good contact with these services where they exist and work with others to institute them where they do not

Staff should also maintain contact with rape crisIs centres so that women who have been raped can ring them for short or long-term support if they want it Alexanders work [40] suggests that while a raped woman is in the department she should be cared for by a crisis team of hospital staff (not necessarily A amp E staff) who have volunteered for that work Perhaps this approach could be tried in New Zealand A amp E departments

87

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S - Ca$ualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) P 272-279

2 RICHARDS JG and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

3 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C andREINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

4 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

5 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care Vbull Determinants of use of hospital emergency services E Richard Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

6 Casual attenders a socia-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcastle-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

7 STRATMANN William C and ULLMAN Ralph - A study of consumer attitudes about health care the role of the emergency room in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1033-1043

8 KELMAN Howard Rand LAWE Dorothy S- Usemiddot of the hospital emergency room in re1atiop to th~ use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

9 INGRAMD R CLARKE D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

fO GARRAWAY W M - The work of a casualty department in Health Bulletin - v 27 no 3 (1969) p 26-30

11 KAHN Lawrence ANDERSON Mary and PERKOFF Gerald T - Patients perceptions and uses of a pediatric emergency room in Soc Sci Med - v 7 (1973) p 155-160

12 CALNAN M ABSON I E P and BUTLER J R - In case of emergency inI

Health Soc Serv J - (1982) p 615-617

13 HOLOHAN Ann M - Accident and emergency departments illness and accident behaviour in Social Rev (Mono] - (1976) p 111-119

14 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Serv J - (1981) ~ 1139-1142

15 The functioning of a childrens hospital casualty department Susan Lovell et aI in Med J Aust - v 1 (1975) P 135-138

16 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R Call Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

88

17 WINGERT WA Friedman D B and LARSON W R - The demographic and ecological characteristics of a large urban paediatric outpatient population and implications for improving community paediatric care in A~ J Public Health - v 58 (1968) p-859

18 CALNAN M - Managing -minor- disorders pathways to a hospital accident and emergency department in Sociol Health Illness- v 5 no 2 (1983) p 149-167

19 ROTH J A - Utilisation of the hospital emergency department in J Health Soc Behav - v 12 (1971) P 312-320

20 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) P 163

21 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 no 2 (1971) p307-312

22 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J- Help The hospital emergency unit as community physician in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) P 248-260

23 MAGNUSSON G - The use and abuse of accident and emergency departments - the Stockholm experience in World Hosp - vIS no 3 (1979) p 170-172

24 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL D J and WALKER J H - Practitioners patients and the accident department I in Hosp Health Serv Rev shy(1975) P 80-84 I

25 CONWAY Hugh - Emergency medical care in Br Med J - v 2 (1976) p 511-513

26 PEASE R - A study of patients in a London accident and emergency department with special reference to general practice in Practitioner - v 211 (1973) p 634-638

27 MOK CH - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

28a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident s~atistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington- Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

89

29 KINLOCH P J - Samoan health practices -in Wellington - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 9-iO (Occasional paper series no 12)

30 MOORE_ Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEHect of a neighbourhood health centre onhospi tal emergency room us~e - in Med Care v 10 no 3 (1972) P 240-247

31 HOCHEISERLouis I WOODWARD Kenneth and CHARNEY Evan - Effect of the neighbourhood health centre on the use of pediatric emergency departments 1n ROchester~ New York in N Eng J Med - v 285 no 3 (1971) p 148-152

32 _MAYNARD Edward Jand DODGE Jeffrey S -- Introducing a community health centre at M05giel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (Aamp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

33 The types of families that use an emergency clinic Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ala New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

34 WILLIAMS B T DIXON R A and KNOWELDEN J - The impact of general practitioner deputising services on accident and emergency departments in the Sheffield hospital region in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 23 (1973) p 638-645

35 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) p 839-856

36 JEFFERY R - Normal rubbish deviant patients in casualty departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 1 no 1 (1979) p 90-107

37 HUGHES D - Lay assessment of clinical seriousness practical decision-making by non-medical staff in a hospi tal casualty department - University of Wales Swansea 1980 Ph D Thesis

38 DINGWALL R and MURRAY T - Categorisation in accident departments -good- patients -bad- patients and middotchildren- in Sociol Health Illness - v 5 no 2 (1983) p 127-148

39 BURGESS Ann Wolbert and HOLMSTROM Lynda Lytle - The rape victim in the emergency ward in American Journal of Nursing - v 73 no 10 (1973) p 1741-1745

40 ALEXANDER Cheryl S - The responsible victim nurses perceptions of victims of rape in Journal of Health and Social Behaviour - v 21 (March 1980) p 22-23

41 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

90

42 MAYNARD Edward J - The appication of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment -University of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 161-194

43 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - NewYork Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

44 COOKE Alistair - The doctor (1981) p 1652-1655

in society in Br Med J - v 283

45 STEINMETZ Nicholas and HOEY John R - Hospital emergency utilisation in Montreal before and after Medicare experience in Med Care - v 16 no 2 (1978) pl33-139

room the Quebec

46 GEDDIS D C - Child Abuse report of national symposium held in Dunedin September 1979 - Auckland National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1979 p 30-34 60-63

91

CHAPTER 8

Utilisation of accident and emergency departments

In this chapter we consider A amp E ufefrom a new perspective looking at the rates of attendance by people in different neighbourhoods We examine variations in the rates among areas and we discuss the evidence they provide as to the effect of doctor availability on A amp E use Next we analyse several factors which could account for the variations in attendance rates including distance from the hospi tal social characteristics of the areas and A amp E department characteristics Finally we present results from several studies which compare rates of attendance at general practitioners and at A amp E departments

COMPARISON OF A amp E UTILISATION AMONG HOSPITAL CATCHMENT AREAS

The neighbourhoods that we have used are census area units sometimes grouped contiguously to achieve socially and economically homogeneous areas that have populations of about 2000 or more We grouped all of New Zealand into 682 such neighbourhoods Of these 442 neighbourhoods are in the catchment irea of one of the 15 A amp E departments studied

Using the attendance numbers taken from the A amp E logs age-adjusted quarterly rates of attendancemiddot have been calculated (indirectly standardised to the total New Zealand population at the 1981 census) These rates have been calculated for each neighbourhood separately for injury and sickness conditions for in and out of hours and for first and recall visits Because there were very few recall visits for sickness conditions they have been omitted from the analyses in this chapter When we talk about recall visits we are referring only to recall visits for injuries

The attendance rates have been combined for the neighbourhoods making up the catchment area of an A amp E department These rates measure the use made by people living in a particular area of any A amp E department in their region Usually people living in the catchment area of an A amp E department do visit that department However particularly in the North Shore and Kenepuru areas a large number of residents attend other A amp E departments Thus the rates presented here should be interpreted as attendance rates of people living in an area not necessarily attendance rates at particular A amp E departments

The rates for each catchment area are presented in Table 16 In Table 17 the annual rates of accidental death and admission to hospital for accidental injury similarly age-adjusted are presented

Results

As Table 16 shows the overall attendance rates varied considerably in the A amp E department catchment areas studied

92

Sickness attendance

Among the urban catchment areas the Wellington Board region showed very high rates of use of A amp E departments for sickness attendance Except for Rotorua and Whakatane out of hours the provincial and rural areas had very low rates of sickness attendance

TABLE 16 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3

Midd1emore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals studied

First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness In Out of hours hours

35 55 41 67 82 121 72 105 54 72 52 64

17 26 36 51 09 17 21 23

12 8B 54 26

36 36 72 61

46 63

Injury In Out of In Out of hours hours hours hours

125 130 137 25 151 130 159 25 17 0 196 36 41 127 156 87 B8 136 151 54 30 229 240 123 42

79 70 42 29 241 215 99 72 203 96 64 10 14 4 213 66 98

173 179 59 62 223 85 83 32

194 92 216 47 164 96 116 20

154 145 101 38

Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 Since few recall visits were for sickness conditions only recall visits for injury have been included in this category

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

1

93

TABLE 17 HOSPITAL ADMISSION FOR ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR)l AND DEATH DUE TO ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR) 2 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area Admitted for Died from Population accidental accidental of ca tchment injury injury area

Full-time departments

U rban Auckland3

Middlemore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals

104 123 146 153 140 142

194 169 196 149

243 214

95 133

139

067 062 062 059 058 072

070 089 065 068

059 075

048 096

066

408 948 264 093 133 611 147 858 336 420 III 981

110 205 56 613 98 883 50 250

39 087 37 767

146 661 52 389

3 126 747

1 Source Hospital Discharges 1979 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

2 Source Mortality Data 1974-1978 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

common catchment

Injury attendance

First attendances for injury also showed wide variations among the hospital catchment areas Wellington Rotorua Whakatane and Dunedin catchment areas showed relatively high rates of first attendance for injury both in

94

and out of hours Timarus catchment area had high rates only out of hours while those of Grey Taranaki and North Shore were high only during normal work hours Northlands catchment area had very low attendance rates both in and out of hours

The pattern of difference from place to place in first attendance rates for injury means that in any year a person in Rotorua would have more than one chance in six of attending the A amp E department for an injury while a person in Northland has but one chance in 16 of doing so

~s this due to a difference in the rate at which accidents occur It does not appear so since neither the rates for death due to accidental injury nor the rates of hospital admission for accidental injury follow the same pattern as A amp E attendance (see Table 11) In fact the death rates were low in Christchurch and North Shore areas (where A amp E attendance was average) and high in Kenepuru areas where A amp E attendance was low Similarly admission rates were sometimes higher in areas where rates of A amp E attendance for injury were lower (Northland and Taranaki) and vice versa (North Shore)

Also the admission rates probably reflect a tendency for more rural hospi tals to admit injured patients more readily because of the distance they would have to travel for outpatient care

Recall attendance

As noted in Chapter 6 the practice of recalling patients was different from hospital to hospital and affected the composition of the A amp E department 5 total attendance Naturally the rate of recall visits also differed markedly in the catchment areas

Relatively low rates of recall visits characterised the Northland Wellington Christchurch and Taranaki areas The Auckland Hospital Board areas had very different patterns in and out of hours with high rates of recall visits in hours and low rates out of hours

Effect of general practitioner availability

Is there any evidence from these rates (Table 16) that availability of general practitioners had an effect on A amp E use If there was an effect it would be evident from comparing in hours sickness attendance with out of hours sickness attendance since when the general practitioner is less available out of hours the patients may be more likely to present at hospital Was the out of hours rate higher than the in hours rate taking into account the different proportions of peoples waking hours in each category Overall this did not appear to be so Compared to the in hours rate the out of hours rate was only slightly higher than would been expected Only in Whakatane was the out of hours sickness rate markedly higher than would have been expected Thus any effect of doctor availability on A amp E use would seem to be very small

See next page

95

FACTORS EXPLAINING CATCHMENT AREA VARIATIONS IN A amp E UTILISATION

There are several possible explanations for the variations in A amp E use

o that the hospital attracts those nearby and if the neighbourhoods near the hospital are densely populated then more people will attend the A amp E department

o that the social characteristics of the catchment areas are different

a that the A amp E department does or does not encourage the public to attend through its policy or practice

Several studies have suggested that distance and socio-economic factors are related to A amp E attendance Distance has been found to be inversely related to attendance in Sweden [1] the United States [23] Britain [4] and New Zealand [5] Some studies have found that lower socio-economic status people use A amp E departments more [678910] although Kljakovic [5] found that Wellington children from lower socio-economic status families were more likely to see a doctor before going to the A amp E department than children from higher status families Berki and Kobashigiwa [11] found that less educated groups used A amp E more while Weinermann [6] and Ullman (12) found no effect Several studies have found that minority group members (67913] and immigrants [1141 tend to use A amp E departments more Kelman and Lane [15] found that family characteristics such as size and age of head-of-household also relamiddotted to A amp E use Cohen et al (16] found no income or employment effects on A amp E use but did find that use was positively related to the number of hospital-based doctors per capita

METHOD

Using multivariate statistical methods it is possible to evaluate which of the explanations ( or which combination of them) best accounts for the observed variations in A amp E use among the neighbourhoods (See Appendix C for the details of the multivariate analyses) Overseas researchers have used similar statistical techniques to explore factors related to A amp E attendance [131116] The factors we chose to explore are described on the next page

We computed the expected value assuming that in any week in hours comprised 50 hours and out of hours comprised 118 hours of which 62 hours were spent awake

Therefore the out of hours rate should equal 62 ~ 50 = 124 times the in hours rate plus E where E is a correction term for night time attendance About eight per cent of total attendance was in the eight-hours night time period [1317] so E can be estimated as eight per cent of the total sickness attendance ie E = 008 x 109 = 087

Therefore the expected out of hours attendance A is

A = (124 x 46) + 087 = 658

The observed value was in fact 63 per 1000 similar to the expected rate

96

One factor was the distance from the centre of the neighbourhood to the A amp E department For neighbourhoods near Kenepuru and North Shore Hospitals in hours and out of hours distances to the nearest open department were calculated separately_

Another factor was the social characteristics of the neighbourhood using variables derived from the 1981 Census of Population and Dwellings chosen on the basis of known or posited relevance to health services utilisation These social characteristics can be listed as follows

o age structure - the proportions of the population under 5 years between 5 and 14 years and 65 years or more

o ethnicity the proportions of the population classed as European ethnicity and Maori ethnicity

o marital status - the proportion of adults separated widowed or divorced

o education - the proportion of adults without tertiary education

o income - the per capita earned income for adults and the proportion of the adults on a means-tested benefit

o employment - the proportions of adults actively seeking work in a bluecollar occupation and partiCipating in the paid workforce

o tenure of dwellings the average weekly rental and the proportion of owner-occupied dwellings

o car ownership - the proportions of households without a car and with two or more cars

o a measure of the north-to-south gradient over the country

A third factor was the general practitioner prOVision as measured by the population-ta-general practitioner ratio

Finally the characteristics of the A amp E department made up a fourth factor We focussed on the following areas

o our classification of the departments and their catchment area into urban prOVincial rural and suburban

o departmental policy on recalling patients (see Chapter 6)

o departmental open door policy on treating sickness attenders (see Chapter 6)

o medical and nurse staffing levels (from Chapter 5) relative to the-population of the catchment area

Production workers transport and equipment operators labourers agricultural workers animal husbandry and forestry workers fishermen hunters

I

97

Results of the multivariate analyses

The effects of distance

Sickness first attendance The distance from hospital affected the rates of sickness first attendance for out of hours visits accounting for nearly 20 per cent of the variance It had less effect on in hours sickness visits accounting for only 9 per cent of the variance

Injury first attendance The most significant characteristic explaining neighbourhood differences in injury first attendance rates was the distance from the A amp E department In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than half the total variance In urban areas it was less important accounting for one-eighth of the variance for in hours rates and one-sixth for out of hours rates

Recall attendance The distange from the hospital was related to in hours recall attendance In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than 40 per cent of the variance but it was much less important in urban neighbourhoods

In summary distance was inversely related to attendance rates with neighbourhoods further from the hospital having lower rates The effect of distance was stronger for injury attendances than for sickness attendances

The effects of social characteristics

Sickness first attendances Out of hours social factors had a substantial effect on sickness attendance People from neighbourhoods where many households were car less were more likely to attend the A amp E department and this factor accounted foi 19 percent of the variance in attendance rate Taking car lessness into account people f rom neighbourhoods where adults were better educated were more likely to attend the A amp E department Adding in the level of educational attainment raised the percentage of variance explained to 265 per cent The same pattern relating carlessness and higher educational attainment to high attendance rates applied to sickness attendance in hours but the effects were less marked In combination with distance the social factors explained 16 per cent of the variance of in hours sickness attendance rates

Injury first attendance In hours the rate of attendance for injury causes was only slightly related to social characteristics of the neighbourhoods adding 6 per cent to the variance explained Out of hours the social factors had a similarly minor effect adding 4 per cent

Recall attendance The social characteristics bad some effect on in hours recall attendance in urban areas In combination with a small distance effect the social factors explained 18 per cent of the variation For non-urban areas the social factors had no effect on in hours recall attendance only distance was important

Thus some of the differences among A amp E departments in the rates of sickness and recall attendance were due to differences in the social characteristics of the departments catchment areas However social factors were not important for injury attendances

98

Tbe effect of general practitioner provision

Initial correlation analyses showed that the population-to-general practitioner ratio was not significantly related to out of hours sickness attendance rates However it was positively related to out of hours injury attendance largely because the numbermiddot of people per doctor in a neighbourhood increases as the distance of the neighbourhood from the hospital decreases

In the multiple regression analyses the ratio nevermiddot entered as a significant variable Thus there was no significant effect of general practitioner provision in the community on A amp E attendance rates (see Table 18)

The effect of A amp E department characteristics

To look at the effect of A amp E characteristics on attendance rates it was necessary to cor rect the rates for the distance and social character istic effects just presented This was done (see Appendix C for details of the principal components analysis used to reduce the data)

Controlling for the neighbourhood factors thedepartment-to-department differences in rates were substantially reduced but were still present (see Table 18) Some patterns in the adjusted rates for sickness and 1nJury could be distinguished The areas served by urban departments tended to have low injury rates especially in hours and high sickness rates especially out of hours The Dunedin areas were an exception their rates were more like those of the areas served by provincial departments which had moderately high injury rates and low sickness rates The rural areas had very high injury rates and high sickness rates The suburban areas were similar to the urban areas except that North Shore areas had high injury rates The adjusted rates for recall attendance were highly variable and demonstrated no clear patterns among the departments

Further analyses were carried out to determine how the A amp E department characteristics related to the adjusted rates (Appendix C contains details of the analyses of variance the Student-Newman-Keuls means tests and the regression analyses of these differences) Only the statistically significant results are presented below

A amp E department classification Out or hours the adjusted sickness rates were lower in the provincial departments areas than elsewhere The sickness rates for the Wellington Hospital Board areas were no longer markedly higher than other areas

In hours the adjusted injury rates were higher in rural departments areas for first visits and in suburban departments areas for recall visits than elsewhere

Open door policy Adjusted rates of attendance for sickness (in and out of hours) were higher where departments had a stated open door policy than elsewhere This explains the low sickness rates in the provincial departments since most of them had restricted policies Where departments had a restricted policy adjusted rates of in hours injury attendance were higher than in open places

99

Recall policy In hours the adjusted injury attendance rates (both first and recall) were higher in areasmiddot where departments had a stated policy favouring recalling patients Out of hours adjusted rates of sickness visits were lower in areas with recall-favouring departments

TABLE 18 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED AND NEIGHBOURHOOD-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 AND POPULATION-TO-GENERAL PRACTITIONER RATI02 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchinent area First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness Injury Population In Out of In Out of In Out of to-GP ratio

hours hours hours hours hours hours

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3 44 57 130 144 100 24 1 476

Middlemore 52 74 165 148 131 24 2 078

Wellington 55 77 160 153 54 30 1 630 Hutt 61 89 130 137 10~9 83 2 237 Christchurch 50 71 116 117 76 27 1 651 Dunedin 40 52 204 193 159 38 1 558

Provincial Northland Base 46 56 128 132 53 45 1 735 Rotorua 34 33 188 163 73 57 1 656 Taranaki Base 17 29 227 ll8 81 19 2 243 Timaru 21 35 168 209 83 88 2 085

Rural Whakatane 29 91 207 222 81 84 1 679 Grey 67 57 286 135 131 39 2 310

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 51 69 198 156 175 57 1 865 Kenepuru 47 54 146 131 129 31 2 035

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors The attendance rates given in Table 16 have been adjusted for neighbourhood-determined factors ie distance from the hospital and social characteristics

2 Source Doctor numbers in full-time equivalents from Medical Council data unpublished

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

100

Staffing levels Adjusted first In]Ury attendance rates were positively related to levels of medical staffing and less impressively to levels of nurse staffing Neither the policy variables nor the size of department accounted for the relationship between lnJury attendance rates and staffing However there was no significant relationship between staffing levels and the adjusted rates of sickness and recall visits

COMPARISON OF A amp E USE AND GENERAL PRACTITIONER USE

Material for comparisons of this sort is hard to find We have compared the level of childrens attendance at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments found by Kljakovic [5] with childrens attendance at general practitioners in the same area over the same period (derived from General Medical Services benefit claims made by general practitioners) In an average week 652 per 1000 children in the Wellington Hospital Board area consulted a general practitioner whereas 35 per 1000 children visited an A amp E department (see Appendix D for details)

Similarly in Tauranga during an average week in the period 1979 to 1982 48 per 1000 people attended the A amp E department while 53 Sper 1000 people consulted a general practitioner [18]

Snelgar [19] compared attendance at Northland Base A amp E department with urgent consultations made by general practitioners (derived from the General Medical Services benefit claims) In an average week 36 per 1000 people in the whangarei area consulted a general practitioner for an urgent condi Hon while 09 per 1000 people made a first visit to the A amp E department

For first injury attendances we have compared rates derived from surveys ot people treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident [20] with similar rates obtained from our tallies at Auckland Hospital Board A amp E departments and data made available to usmiddot by Snelgar McRae and Keenan In a week 37 per 1000 people living in the catchment areas of the above A amp E departments made a first injury visit to an A amp E department while 1 per 1000 New Zealanders made a first injury visit to a general practitioner (see Tab~e 19)

Elderly people were as likely to go to the general practitioner as to the A amp E department for an accidental injury whereas children and young adults were five to six times more likely to go to the A amp E department as the general practitioner Foreign body injuries and cuts appeared to predispose attendance at an A amp E department whereas burns and falls tended to be taken to the general practitioner more than other injuries

In summary people visited general practitioners much more than the A amp E department even for urgent conditions It was only for specific injury conditions that the A amp E department was consulted more than general practitioners

101

TABLE 19 COMPARISON OF FIRST ATTENDANCES FOR INJURY AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS AND GENERAL PRACTITIONERS

Rates per 1000 per week A amp E departments l General practitioners2

Age distribution

All ages 37 10 0-4 years 38 06 5-14 years 39 08 15-29 years 66 11 30-64 years 23 11 65 years and over 11 10

Injury conditions3

Falls 066 027 Cuts 045 009 Foreign bodies 025 002 Toxic effects 014 001 Burns 007 003 Other 232 058

1 Calculated from the author st tallies at Auckland Middlemore Green Lane and NorthShore A amp E departments and data from Northland Base Waikato and Christchurch A amp E departments

2 Calculated from ACC Statistical Supplements - Wellington Accident Compensation Corporation November 1977 March 1978 September 1978 March 1979 and personal communications

3 These categories have been derived from those used in the A amp E department tallies and the type of accident categories used by the ACC

DISCUSSION

The analyses presented in this chapter confirm that distance and social factors are related to A amp E use in New Zealand Their effects were not independent but rather were entwined in a complex way Even within the group of social factors the interactions were complex and there were no simple relations between a specific social factor and A amp E attendance

However distance from the hospital was clearly a major determinant of A amp E use particularly for injury conditions both first and recall The distance effect was especially strong in non-urban areas perhaps because of the greater distances people had to travel in order to reach the hospital Altogether the strong effect of distance was not surprising given the body of overseas literature documenting distance as a factor in health services utilisation and also the number of A amp E attenders citing the accessibility of the department as a reason for using it (see Chapter 7)

102

The social factors were important determinants of sickness attendance with a stronger effect out of hours than in hours They were not important for injury conditions Possibly the appropriateness of the A amp E department for injury conditions as cited by attenders (see Chapter 7) overrides the effect of the social factors

One social factor which had a relatively strong effect on sickness attendance particularly out of hours was car ownership Areas where many households had no car tended to have high sickness rates Perhaps people who have to call a taxi or borrow someone elses car to get medical care go to the A amp E department because they know it will be open and treatment will be available

During our discussions A amp E staff had suggested that Pacific Islanders made greater use of the department because they were accustomed to using the hospital for all medical care in the islands If this was an important factor we would have expected ethnicity to figure prominently in the statistical analyses However for first attendances ethnicity had only a minor effect and in fact areas with high proportions of Pacific Islanders tended to have low attendance rates

Many A amp E staff also suggested that the cost of visiting a general practitioner was a major reason for sickness attendance at the department So we would have expected low income unemployment or receipt of a means-tested benefit to have been related to increased sickness attendance rates However neither income nor receipt of a benefit were at all related to the sickness rates and areas with a low proportion of adults in the paid workforce tended to have low attendance rates Thus contrary to general opinion neither the cost of visiting a general practitioner nor a Pacific Island background appear to have a strong effect on A amp E use

As noted in Chapter 7 we found that some patients were attracted to the A amp E department by the size of the hospital and the impression that specialised equipment was available there However the urban departments which were the largest and which had the most specialised equipment did not have higher attendance rates than the other departments In fact they tended to have slightly lower rates of injury attendance than the other departments

The results presented in this chapter show clearly that even aft~r

controlling for distance and social effects departmental characteristics are related to A amp E attendance It is understandable that rates of sickness attendance reflect whether a department has an open door or restricted policy However the relation between high injury rates and a restricted policy on- sickness attendance requires some explanation Perhaps these departments have always had a high injury rate and have restricted the access of sickness patients so they could cope with the injured patients Conversely the operation of a restricted policy may have convinced the local community that while the department is only to be used for injuries it is indeed the place for all injuries so generating a high attendance rate

It was also understandable that departments with a policy of favouring recalls did have high rates of recall visits But why did these departments have high first attendance rates for injury This probably happens because high recall rates and high first attendance for injury rates go together since larger numbers of injured patients tend to produce larger numbers of patients requiring specialised A amp E follow-up care

103

There was a positive association between first injury attendance rates and staffing levels which could not be explained by the policies or the classification of the department The explanation of these associations is not straightforward The h~gher staffing levels may somehow account for the higher attendance - levels for example attracting clients by keeping the waiting time sh~rt Alternatively an unexamined feature of th department or its catchment area could generate higher attendance levels and staffing levels mayhavebeen adjusted to meetthe demand

Thus departmental characteristics such as policies on non-urgent sickness patients and on recall viSits and levels of medical and nurse staffing are related to attendance rates

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners for patients Looking first at the availability of the two services the greater availability of the A amp E department out of hours did not result in a higher than expected use over those hours Also doctor prOVision (as measured by the populationto-genetal practitioner ratio) was not Significantly related to A amp E attendance rates Thus while the A amp E department was described by patients as desirable because of its availability - (Chapter 7) the attendance rates of the neighbourhoods did not refiect the lcwer availability of general practitioner services

Secondly the comparison of attendance at A amp E departments and general practitioners suggested that in an average week out of 1000 New zealanders four or five would go to an A amp E department and 50 to 60 would go to a general practitioner Of those Visiting the A amp E department on average only one would be attending for sickness Given that non-urgent sickness visits were only 60 per cent of all sickness visits (see Chapter 6) it is clear that general practitioners were losing only a tiny proportion of their workload when A amp E departments treated non-urgent sickness patients~

It - is also clear that general practitioners did not treat many injured people Only one of the 50 to 60 per 1000 people visiting a general practitioner in an average week would be making a first injury visit It would seem that thetwo serVices A amp E departments and general practice arecomplementaiy rather than competiti-ve

REFERENCES

1 MAGNUSSON Gudjon - The role of proximity in the use of hospital emergency departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 2 no 2 (1980) p 202-214

2 INGRAM D R CLARK D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Hed - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

3 ROGHHANN Klaus J and ZASTOWNY Thomas R - Proximity as a factor in the selection of health care providers emergency room visits compared to obstetric admissions and abortions in Soc Sci Med - v 13(0) (1979) p 61-69

4 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referred patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

5 KLJAKOVIC H ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

6 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care V Determinants of use of hospital emergency services Richard E Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

7 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

8 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 nomiddot 2 (1971) p 307-312

9 The types of families that use an emergency clinic - Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

10 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Servo - (1981) p 1139-1142

11 BERKI S E and KOBASHIGAWA B - Education and income effects in the use of ambulatory services in the United States an analysis of the 1970 National Health Interview Survey data in Int J Health Servo shyv 8 no 2 (1978) p 361-365

12 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SlRATMANN William c - An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1011-1020

13 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at AUckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

105

14 MOK C H - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

15 KELMAN Howard R and LANE Dorothy S - Use of the hospital emergency room in relation to the use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

16 COHEN Susan D GINSBERG Allen Sand VLADECK Bruce C - The middoteffects of unemployment and inflation on hospital-based ambulatory care in Am J Public Health - v 68 no 12 (1978) p 1219-1221

17 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

18 DALDY B M REINKEN J and SEDDON T D S - Report on the effect of funding in primary medical care - Tauranga Otumoetai Health Centre 1984 (In preparation)

19 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

20a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

107middot

CHAfTER 9

Conclusions

TheAamp E department is a complex changeable and challenging place It is also an ambiguous place since itmiddot fulfils several different and at times conflicting roles it is a hospital department an emergency service and a primary care service

THEA amp E DEPARTMENT AS A HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT

As a hospital department the A amp E department is the bullodd-one-out It differs from the other departments not only by being accessible at all times to people seeking medical care but also in the number of patients seen and the diversity and severity of illness and injury to be treated

Because of this diversity the A amp E service has little status within medical circles It tends to be seen as an area requiring few special skills and therefore not warranting specialty status However as Salmond [1] noted the humble casualty department provides a hospital with a display window where like it or not hospital wares are constantly on show to the public Good public relations require effective and efficient management of the Amiddotamp E department Also the doctors interviewed for this study stated that special skills in assessment surgery and orthopaedics were required The status of the A amp E department should be improved through a recognition both of the breadth and experience required for A amp E medicine and of the departments importance in the public view of the hospital While a post-graduate specialist programme is probably not warranted at present it should remain an option for future development

The Aamp E department plays a major partin the teaching of house surgeons Junior doctors quickly learn avariety of skills such as suturing lavage reading x-rays and resuscitation More importantly the A amp E department is usually their first experience of practising medicine without any immediately available consultation This study like Salmonds study in 1970 has demonstrated the lack of initial training and orientation and the inadequate senior supervisionrecei ved by many house surgeons in the A amp E department Clearly this should be remedied by the provision of specific training sessions at the beginning of the house surgeons A amp E run and by

increased senior supervision fn the A amp E department )

This study has also highlighted the desirability ofmiddot specific training courses for A amp E nurses Such coursesmiddot can improve the skills and confidence of the nurses and develop the different approach required for A amp E nursing compared to ward nursing The courses run by the Auckland hospitals may provide a useful basis for the development of postbasic and inservice training courses

Working in an A amp E department demands from all staff members an awareness of the social and emotional contexts of the people attending and the possible implications of their conditions for example people who have attempted suicide parents of- an infantmiddot with convulsions and women who have

108

been raped One aim of all training carried out in the department should be to foster such awareness Also it would be desirable for house surgeons to have experienced a psychological medicine run as well as a general medicine run and a surgical run before they work in the A amp E department All A amp E staff should be aware of the support services that they can calIon (eg social workers psychiatrists Salvation Army) or that the patient can contact (eg rape crisis centres womens refuges)

AS an important training site for house surgeons nurses and emergency workers such as ambulance personnel and police officers the A amp E department has a particular responsibility to maintain a high standard of care This study has not assessed quality of care directly although we have considered related areas such as the level of staffing and the experience of staff There is scope for evaluation of the quality of care gi ven for specific conditions The work reported by Mates and Sidel [2] provides some guidelines and a model whereby both process (measured by adherence to standards) and outcome can be studied Their example considered treatment of adult asthma patients and might for a start be replicated here in New Zealand

There is also scope for extending Mates and Sidels method to cover other conditions The ARCOS study [3] provides one model per taining to acute coronary or cardiovascular episodes There is less precendent for evaluating the quality of care in surgical or orthopaedic emergencies but the presentations of abdominal pain might be investigated as a usefUl beginning Removing healthy appendices is an expensive placebo The process evaluation of trauma care has not been reported on though wound sepsis might provide a suitable outcome measure Staff interviewed in our study discussed standards of suturing but no formal studies of quality of care in that respect have been reported

It must be considered that one explanation for the lack of study in the whole area is that very high standards prevail and the need for evaluation is therefore minimal Given patients high expectations and satisfaction with the service that explanation cannot be dismissed Yet studies that demonstrated a satisfactory level of care would confirm the high quality of care In some A amp E departments a small study of one reasonably significant type of emergency should be undertaken possibly modelled on the work of Mates and Sidel

As Gi bson [4] has pointed out the A amp E department acts not only as an entry point to the hospital but as a screen for the other outpatient and inpatient units of the hospital We found this was true of the New Zealand departments studied with only five to ten per cent of first attendances being referred to specialist outpatient clinics and five to fifteen per cent being admitted There were wide variations both in policy and practice with respect to patient disposition We consider that further study of acute medical admission practices focussing particularly on unnecessary hospitalisation is warranted

Some New Zealand studies [56J have tried to evaluate the need for care of patients presenting at the A amp E department They have tended to depend on the A amp E staffs assessment of whether a general practitioner (and a hypothetical one at that) could have dealt adequately with the case No studies have attempted to give a general practitioner assessment So the question of need for A amp E care remains open However it does not seem practical to devote more research effort to this topic until more is known

about the variable costmiddots oftreating minor injuries If such research is contemplated the techniques of activity analysis and recording systems proposed by Dalbyetal [7] andRoberts et al [8] could be useful

tmiddot bullmiddot

This study has not attempted to estimate the cost of A amp E care The information presented aboutothe physical size and staffing levels of A amp E departments suggests that the hospital service commits only a small share of resources to the A amp E department However with the continuing pressure on hospital resources the cost of A amp E care particularly if it is high relative to care by general practitioners has some importance Even a rough and ready costing of the whole service would be a first step Following that an indication of which parts are fixed costs to keep the essential service viable and which vary by volume or by character of workload would be a next step_ The variation in recall levels that we found suggests that savings in variable costs could be possible Gibson et al [9] in their account of a study of operating and patient care activity costs provide a valuable model on which some New Zealand studies could be based

THE A amp E DEPARTMENT AS AN EMERGENCY SERVICE

The A amp E department must be ready to cope with all kinds of emergencies whether they involve one or two badly hurt car-crash victims or the sudden influx of many patients after a natural disaster A major tool ensuring that a department is always prepared for a crisis situation is the disaster plan The United States Joint Committee on Accreditation of Hospitals requires every hospital to have a written disaster plan developed in conjunction with other relevant agencies which is tested in a full-scale drill at least twice a year The plan should cover assigning staff summoning staff to emergency duty setting aside parts of the hospital for specified purposes maintaining adequate supplies and co-ordination and communication within the hospital and with other hospitals police fire health and ambulance services and civil defence officials

Most of the- departments we studied had close liaison with the ambulance service and to a lesser extent with other services such as police fire and civil defence Six of the hospitals had adequate disaster plans which were revised on a reasonably regular basis but very few hospitals had had a full-scale drill to test the plan Many of the departments with inadequate disaster plans were in the process of revising them We commend this since we consider a comprehensive disaster plan which is regularly revised and tested at least annually to be an essential part of the A amp E service

While discussing emergency services it is worth noting that there has been little research done in New Zealand on the use of ambulance services There is a need both to document the coverage and formal structure of the service and to explore the effects if any of the different methods of funding this essential service The former is a necessary first step the latter presumes a study of both ambulance workload and of organisational matters such as staffing training and triage

Internationally there has been considerable discusion over the optimal distribution of A amp E departments nationwide Platt [IO] recommended that as a minimUm a population of 150 UOO was required to justify a full A amp E centre with seven days a week and 24 hours a day staffingbull Several

llO

authors [101112] have indicated the need for regional central or major accident centres with specialised services such as neurosurgery plastic and thoracic surgery and treatment of burns or poisonings serving a population of 500000 to 750000 An emergency service organised in levels as suggested requires careful planning so that all elements are integrated and good communications are maintained It is particularly desirable for ambulance personnel the police and perhaps taxi driVers to be aware of the level of treatment available at different hospitals

There has been disagreement over whether or nor smaller A amp E centres are justified It seems that densely-populated countries or regions with good transport systems do not need smaller A amp E units whereas more sparsely-populated regions often rural do need them [1013] New Zealand definitely falls into the second category Only our urban A amp E departments fulfil (or come close to) Platts criteria of 150000 population yet all of the A amp E departments visited in this study provide an essential service to their communities In New Zealand the distances that patients would have to travel preclude any concentration of emergency care within a few highly-equipped hospitals

THE A 8t E DEPARTMENT AS A PRIMARY CARE SERVICE

The A amp E department is a primary care service since few of the people Visiting it have been referred by a health professional most patients being self-referred or sent by someone else This primary care role could conf lict with the departments role as an emergency service if patients with minor injuries filled the department and hindered the care of emergency patients However by using triage the A amp E departments studied generally avoided this conflict Some departments discouraged visits for sickness conditions and recall visits so that the department would always be ready for an emergency situation

The A amp E department and general practice are both primary care services However the department differs greatly from the general practitioner in many aspects it is readily available 24 hours a day staff have little background knowledge of the patient and there is little continuity of care There has been concern that A amp E departments are stealing patients from general practitioners because the department is always available and care is free there This study has shown that such concern is not warranted

Looking first at the cost of general practitioner treatment as a reason for visiting the A amp E department we note that this is only relevant for sickness conditions since treatment of injury conditions is paid for by the Accident Compensation Corporation The interview studies have shown that very few patients give cost as a reason for attending the department Also the census area unit analysis showed that low income and receipt of a means-tested benefit were not related to sickness attendance rates and that areas with high unemployment had relatively low sickness rates We would expect contrary results if cost was a major factor As well our comparison of attendance rates at A amp E departments and general practitioners indicates that general practitioners would be losing at most one per cent of their workload when A amp E departments treat non-urgent sickness patients Even if all A amp E departments instituted a policy of discouraging such patients the effect on general practice would be negligible

111

The interview studies have demonstrated that patients do find the ready availability of the A amp E department attractive However our analyses of out of hours use compared to in hours use and our explorations of the effect of population-to-doctor ratios have shown that this attractiveness does not translate into significantly higher rates of A amp E attendance This suggests that improving the availability of general practitioner services is unlikely to have a major effect on the use of either service

There are two major factors related to peoples use of A amp E departments The first is distance from the hospital with people living close to the hospital being much more likely to visit the A amp E department It is hard to see any way of changing this factor The second factor is peoples perception of the A amp E department as the appropriate place for injury treatment The verY name of A amp E departments (instituted folJowing the Platt report) implies that the department is for the treatment of injuries It would be very difficult to change this perception and probably would not be desirable given the facilities experience and availability of the A amp E department for injury treatment

There has also been concern that A amp E departments recall patients instead of referring them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care It appears that A amp E departments recall a similar number of patients (10 to 30 per cent- of firstmiddot attenders) as they refer back to the general practitioners (10 to 20 per cent of first attenders) Some of the recall visits are middotjustified because they require the facilities of the A amp E department It hasmiddot been suggested that house surgeons tend to recall patients because of inexperience and to aid their training While this undoubtedly happens we found no evidence that it has a major effect on the level of recall visits However we did find that departments with high levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have high levels of recall visits possibly because the staff had more time to treat the recalled patients This suggests that recall attendance could be reduced in some cases shy

Ov~rseas studies [141516] have discussed A amp E departments as fulfilling three roles

o trauma treatment centre for the community providing acute emergency care

o substitute for the private phYSician when not available

o family physician for the poor particularly minority group poqr

This study has shown that New Zealand A amp E departments operate largely in the first role of trauma treatment centre providing care for both urgent and non-urgent injury conditions The departments also fulfil the second role of out of hours general practitioner substitute to some extent but they hardly ever operate in the third role of family doctor to the poor

This study has not explored in detail general practitioners views and use of A amp E departments although some information on these topics is implicit in the descriptions of procedures in Chapter 3 and the analysis of reasons for visiting the department in Chapter 7 More information about general practitioners perspectives and the actual availability of general practice care outside normal surgery hours could be gathered However we consider that as well as carrying out further research efforts should be made to develop better communication and understanding between general

112

practitioners and A amp E departments Towards this end we would suggest that A amp E departments make greater efforts to inform general practitioners about the conditions of patients attending the department perhaps using prepared forms or cards (see page 15) We hope too that this report will foster greater recognition among general practitioners of the valuable activities of A amp E departments and allay fears that the department is substituting for the family doctor

We conclude as Dixon [17] did in 1970 that the A amp E department and general practice are complementary services rather than competitive We cannot justify further investigation of the hypothesis that A amp E departments steal patients from general practitioners Possibly a study replicating the Northland comprehensive study of urgent medical care utilisation [18] in an urban area coupled with a study monitoring general practitioner availability out of normal surgery hours would finally lay the ghost of competition for patients However given the evidence presented in this report this does not seem a high priority

WHERE FROM HERE

We considet that research effort could now be turned to two areas First a study of the whole area of accidents is definitely warranted Accidents account for a significant proportion of early deaths and long-term disability and the volume of less severe accidents strains the financial and caring resources of the community The research of the Accident Compensation Corporation has understandably focussed on general practitioner care since the Corporation does not bear the costs of treatment at or in hospital Studies of hospital activity neglect general practitioner care of accident victims A broad study would have to involve not only A amp E departments and general practitioners but also occupational health clinics ambulance and other first aid services Only a comprehensi ve study can provide a firm basis for setting priorities for accident prevention efforts

The need for such a study raises the issue of recording systems both in terms of themiddot classification of type and severity of injury and of the context or cause of the accident Not only is there a need for a fairly simple and versatile system but there is also a need for all the many services to use it consistently For medical emergencies where diagnosis follows professional examination the issue is not crucial For injuries where the events immediately before and after the trauma are relevant the recording of cause and context is important Studies of treatment alternatives and costs depend on a detailed description of the injury which is probably worthwhile only for more severe injuries For example we have noted that many A amp E visits are for bumps and bruises minor lacerations or pain from past inj ury Elaborate description of minor conditions only obscures the nature of the more important cases Clearly before such research can proceed some small-scale attempts at coordinated recording and a form of information triage are called for

The second area warranting study middotis that of the emergency services and their coordination The A amp E department and ambulance services would obviously be covered but the civil defence police and fire service should also be involved Disaster plans drills communications and supplies would be important aspects to be considered

113

This study has focussed on what happens inside the doors of A amp E departments and why people go there We hope that it provides a comprehensive view of the organisation and utilisation of New Zealand A amp E departments and that it will be useful not only to those working within the hospital service but also to all those concerned with primary health care and emergency services

114

REFERENCES

1 SALMOND G C - Young doctors An exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

2 MATES Susan and SIDEL Victor W - Quality assessment by process and outcome methods evaluation of emergency room care of asthmatic adults in Am J Public Health - v 71 no 7 (1981) p 687-693

3 BONITA Ruth - Stroke rehabilitation who gets what - how when where and why in Commun Health Studies - v 7 no 3 (1983) p 347

4 GIBSON Geoffrey - The emergency department as a screening point for hospital specialty services inclusionary vs exclusionary strategies in Soc Sci Med - v l3(A) (1979) p 495-498

5 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

6 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

7 DALBY B C S FARRER J A and HARVEY P W - Casualty activity analysis coding and computing in Computer Programs in Biomedicine - v 3 (1974) P 254-266

8 ROBERTS Jean FARRER J and HARVEY P - A progressive study of the emergency room demand by the community in Med Inf - v 2 no 3 (1977) p 197-201

9 GIBSON Geoffrey BUGBEE George and ANDERSON Odin W - Emergency medical services in the Chicago area - Chicago Centre for Health Administration Studies University of Chicago 1970

10 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

11 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 55-58

12 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services - report of a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional office for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

13 PLANT Janet and AMES Seth - Emergencyoutpatient satellites serve as rural outposts in Hospitals Journal of the American Hospitals Association - v 52 no 5 (March I 1978) P 87-92

14 TORRENS Paul R and YEDVAB Donna G - Variations among emergency room populations a comparison of four hospitals in New York City in Med Care - v 8 no 1 (1970) p 60-75

115

15 MOORE Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEffect of a neighbourhood health centre on hospital emergency room use in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) p 240-247

16 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J emergency unit as community physician (1972) p 248-260

17 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S shyutilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71

- Help The hospital in Med Care - v 10 no 3

Casualty department (1970) p 272-279

18 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

Paper Development

- ~

C) w CJ C Z w c 0 laquo

118

APPENDIX A

Question sheets

MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT

1middot Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others

a number b levelsmiddotof experience c background experience

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties eg nurses doing clerical work

2 Policy (on procedures) 21 Standing orders 22 Sorting of patients at presentation who does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admit 26 Relations with other hospital departmentswards eg sharing of

facilitiesstaff with outpatients 27 Relations with other A amp E departments

peripheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

3 Relations with GPs

31 Any involvement of local GPs in A amp E department eg staffing 32 Policy on GP-load presentations

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A amp E service iri general

PRINCIPAL NURSE

1 Staffing

11 Nurses a number b levels of experience c background experience

2 Policy (on procedures) - ~ -

~ ~ bull - - I bull

22 Sorting of patients atprese~ation 23 Level of treatment provic)e~ by nurses 26 Relations with other hospitaldepartmentswards eg sharing

nurses 27 Relationsiith other ~ ~ltE 9~parlttm~nt~periPheral hospitals

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others a number I

b levels of experience c background experience d at different times

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties egnur~esdoing cler~cal work

2 Procedures ~ - ~

21 standing orclers ~ 22 Sorting of patients at pr~seniation~ho does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admitZ 26 Relat io~s witll oth~r )()sIgti taidepa rtmentswards

ashCl~in9 q~i facilitiesstaff with out-patients b go9rdinat~pgwith xray and laboratory

27 Relations with other A amp E departmentsperipheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

4 workload

41 Number of patient visits per year 42 Seasonal variation

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases -definiUon

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp B

120

~~

55 Relations with local GPs ~i~ 56 Alcohol involved in presehttionsbull 57 Administration - recordstystem 58 Hospital policy (if mentiOPed earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A E service in general

HOUSE SURGEONS

Jobdescription

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

2 Procedures

21 Standing orders 24 Follow-up recalls or referrals1

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-load cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A 81

55 Relations with local GPs 56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A E department or the A E service in general

NURSES

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

121

2 Procedures

21 Standing order s 22 Sorting of pati~nts at presentation 23 Level of treatment provided by nurses

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp E

56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A ampE department or the A amp E service in general

A amp E DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST ON PHYSICAL FACILITIES

Waiting room size seating atmospheredecor childrens facilities - screening of ambulance entrance

Treatment rooms size privacy ease of working

Overall layout ambulance flow ease of working holding ward for admission

Relations with rest of hospital

_ proximity ~Qxray level ofl~poratory service ease of ~dJllJtting towards

122

APPENDIX B

Accident and emergency department records

THE STATE OF A amp E RECORDS Most of the A amp E departments visited kept a log or register of A amp E attendance This was a large book or folder where the patients name and other details were entered in order of presentation at the department Usually A amp E department logs contained the following information

the patients name and age the date and time of presentation a one-word description of the patients complaint whether the visit was a first attendance for a complaint

or a return visit the patient I s disposal

All except one of the A amp E departments visited had their own record system (independent of the hospital inpatient system) with one recordmiddot kept for each patient presenting This record was usually an A5 card although one department used a multiple copy A4 sheet Most of the A amp E department records contained the following information

the patients name age sex occupation GP address and phone number the date and time of presentation a one-to-ten word description of the patients complaint the A amp Edoctor(s) seen their clinical notes of

diagnosis and treatment the patients disposal ACC details if the complaint results from an accident other details on tetanus prophylaxis allergies and medical alerts

There were of course variations in the information contained on the logs and records of different A amp E departments An outline of the points where the log and records of each hospital differ from the general descriptions given above appears at the end of this Appendix

The quality of data collected was variable with the out of hours collection often being sketchier than the in hours This was probably due to nursing and medical staff doing the recording as well as their usual duties when receptionists were not on duty The basic details (such as name age and sex) were usually complete but more descriptive details (such as the site cause and sequence of an accident) were not always noted Some receptionists recorded no details about the accident whereas others took considerable care to summarise accurately the relevant information

USES OF A 8t E RECORDS The major users of A amp E records are the A amp E departments themselves and the hospitals A primary use is the estimation of the size and the content of the A amp E workload at different times of the day and the week This information is valuable for planning staffing levels and physical facilities in the A amp E department The A amp E staff also find the information contained in A amp E records useful in dealing appropriately with

123

patients who repeatedy present at the d~parmeptlHSo at times the information recorded in the A amp E depatinienf farequired as evidence in court proceedings

On a broader f ront~ amp E records are useful for sOme research purposes Certainly theyprovide~nsights i nl 0 who USeE the A amp E department (see Chapter 6) At some A amp E departments ~ufficientlY detailed information about accidents resulting in a presentation (eg type site possible cause of accident and occupation of patient) is collected for developing accident prevention programmes However most A amp E records are too sketchy for direct use in this way although they could be used as sampling frames for some accident research

There are disadvantages in using A amp E records for health services research purposes

I A amp E departments deliver only a small part of ambulatory medical care They deliver care to a selected age group and to a group who by and large happen to live nearby

2 Generally A amp E records are one-off and do not have the longitudinal perspective of general practice records or even hospital notes

3 Even for an epidemiological survey of accidents A amp E departments see an incomplete caseload They do not see all fractures much less all wounds concussions eye injuries etc

POINTS OF DIFFERENCE fROM GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS GIVEN

Full-time Information on log Information on A amp E record departments

Urban Auckland Age not noted

Middlemore Motor vehicle accident also noted

Green Lane Age not noted Sports and motor vehicle accidents also noted Residential area (not street address) also noted

Address A amp E doctor and Length Of stay and homeWellington 1A amp E patient number also address collected for nonshy

Hutt noted New and return New Zealand residents visits not always differentiated

Christchurch Sex address GP referral and motor vehicle accidents also noted

Dunedin [NO log kept Records held in alphabetical order for each months presentations]

Full-time departments

Provincial Rotorua

Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane

Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore

Kenepuru

124

Information on log

GP A amp E doctor case history and treatment also noted

Only patient name and date of presentation noted

Source of referral location of accident and special accident cases also noted

[Not seen]

Information on log

Complaint not noted

Address A amp E doctor and A amp E patient number also noted New and return visits not always differentiated

)

Information on A amp E record

Different cards used for work and non-work accidents

[None]

Specific places allocated on A4 sheet for case history lab and x-ray reports and follow-up

Time of presentation not noted

Information on A amp E record

Length of stay and home address collected for nonshyNew Zealand residents

125

APPENDIX C

StatisticalanaIY$es of accident and emergency department attendance riltes by neighbourhoods

METHOD

The analysis set out to test

o the effect of distance

o the effect of social factors

o the effect of A ampE department characteristics on A amp E attendance rates

The first two of these effects are not independent It was therefore necessary to use multivariate methods to assess the effect of distance controlling for social factors and for social factors controlling for distance

Other analyses of New Zealand geographical areas (in preparation Reinkeii) have found distinct differences between urban areas (those with populations exceeding 35000) and non-urban areas Therefore the multivariate analyses have been carried out separately for the 355 urban neighbourhoods and the 86 non-urban neighbourhoods One neighbourhood did not have complete census data and was omitted from the multivariate analysis Where we found differing results for urban and non-urban areas they have been mentioned separately Otherwise the results are presented as general findings

STEPWISE MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Initially a simple stepwise regression analysis was carried out The results are shown below Variables are presented in decreasing order of importance and are related to high attendance rates

All Neighbourhoods Urban Neighbourhoods Non-urban Neighbourhoods

Out of hours sickness

37 of the variance is 34 of the Variance is 36 of the variance is explained by explained by the same explained by many carless households features as all neighshy near the hospital near the hospital bourhoods many households with cars young age-structure few in the paid workforce many with higher few school-age children education many Maori many blue collar many in the paid workforce

All Neighbourhoods

out of hours injury

35 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many children many married many Europeans few households with two cars

In hours sickness

16 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many car less households few separated widowed or divorced low average rental many in paid workforce many with higher education

In hours injury

31 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars many school-age children few Pacific Island Chinese or Indian

Recall visits in hours

23 of the variance is explained by near the hospital high average rental many households with two cars few with higher education many in the paid workforce few European many separated widowed or divorced many school-age children

Urban Neighbourhoods

28 ofmiddotthe variance is explained by near the hospital few households with two cars many with higher education many blue-collar many European few separated widowed or divorced many seeking work

14 of the variance is explained by few households with two cars near the hospital low average rent high income many in paid workforce few separated widowed or divorced

16 of the variance is expla ined by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars

18 of the variance is exp lai ned by high average rental near the hospital many households with two cars many Maori many separated widowed or divorced few seeking work many with higher education

Non-urban Neighbourhoods

62 of the Variance is explained by near the hospital few in the paid workforce

7 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

57 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many one-car households

42 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

127

Few recall visits happened out of hours so the out of hours recall attendance rates are low ~ndhlghlY yariable NO adequate model was found in the analyses so 19 resultsare presented here

Clearly distance was an important determinant of rates of attendance The social characteristics had a )I9dest effect on injury first attendance a more substantial effect on rates of recall visits and a very substantial effect on the rates of sickness attendance in the different neighbourhoods

The pattern was quite different for the urban and non-urban areas as were the associations among the social variables A more complex analysis was needed

2 DATA REDUCTION

Separate principal components analyses for urban and non-urban areas were done on the social factors and yielded sets of four components with eigenvalues of one or more For clarity of interpretation the four-vector model was rotated (using a varimax method) and yielded four urban parameters and four non-urban parameters as shown Variables are shown in decreasing order of importance for each parameter

Urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few home-owners young ageshy low income in the northerry many carless structure few with higher regions higher many on benef it many Maori education average rental many seeking work many blue-collar few in the paid many separated work force widowed or divorced many blue-collar

Non-urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few separated many Maori bull many home- low average widowed or manyseeking owners rental divorced work few in the paid few with higher few old in the workforce education many two-car and northern many blue-collar few carless regions high income many blue-collar many children

3 PRODUCING ADJUSTED RArES

We fitted a regression equation for each attendance rate on the distance factor and the eight social factor parameters For urban neighbourhoods the four non-urban parameters were held at zero and vice versa for the non-urban neighbourhoods

128

The regression equations using this method allowed non-urban and urban areas to be analysed together and yielded levels of variance explained generally equal to those derived from the significant predictors in the simple stepwise regressions

Variance in attendance rates explained by different methods

Regression In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Using or iginal variables 16 31 23 37 35 14

Using rotated parameters 18 26 29 36 37 14

Each parameter-based equation yielded a rate of attendance expected on the basis of purely neighbourhood characteristics The difference between this expected rate and the actual observed rate gave a measure of the attendance rate adjusted for neighbourhood-determined features After this adjustment for distance and social factors the department-to-department differences remaining were muted In fact the F-tests of the differences among the departments showed the following changes

Changes in F-test values from unadjusted to adjusted rates

In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Unadjusted rates 74 69 195 132 96 123 Adjusted rates 23 65 107 53 41 119

4 TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE

Analyses of variance were carried out on the attendance rates adjusted for neighhourhood-determined factors for in hours and out of hours and looking separately at sickness first injury and recall visits First the A amp E department was used as the independent variable (except that Auckland and Green Lane were combined since they share a single catchment area) Then tests were done on the departments categorised into urban provincial rural and suburban open door policy and recall policy When the analyses of variance showed significant effects Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used to identify single departments or groups of departments that differed significantly from the others

Staffing levels were plotted against the adjusted rates When the correlations were significant the slope of the simple regression was examined

129middot

Results of analyses of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls means tests on adjusted attendance ratesmiddot

Differencemiddots Differences Differences among among between

Neighbourhood- A amp E categories of open-door adjusted departments A amp E department and attendance ( urban restricted

provincial departments rural or suburban)

Out of hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Provincial Open rates

rates lower higher than than others restricted

First injury Yes

Recall injury Yes Yes

In hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Open rates

higher than restricted

First injury Yes Yes Yes Grey rates Rural rates Restricted higher than higher than rates others others higher than

open

Recall injury Yes Yes Suburban rates higher than others

Only statistically significant results presented

Differences between departments favouri ng and not favouring recalls

Yes Recall-favouring rates lower than others

Yes Recall shyfavoumiddotring rates higher than others

Yes Recall shyfavouring rates higher than others

130

APPENDIX D

Childrens use of general practitioners and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

In conjunction with the 1981 Kljakovic study of chi ldren s attendance at A amp E departments in Wellington a parallel study of childrens visits to and by general practitioners was undertaken General Medical Services benefit claims for the same period were examined noting for each juvenile (0-14 years) visit the census area unit of the residence and the address of the general practitioner or locum This yielded rates of child attendance both for normal surgery hours and for urgent visits (out of surgery hours) for the whole region These were adjusted to give estimates for the 0-12 year old population and were then compared with the rates of A amp E attendance found by Kljakovic

AS Figure 10 shows the use of A amp E services was a very small part of childrens primary medical care During surgery hours visits to the A amp E department which were not preceded by contact with the general practitioner were only 16 per cent of first medical contacts Outside normal surgery hours the visits to A amp E departments that bypassed a general practitioner were more frequent I but they rose only to 194 per cent of first medical contacts

This comparison of overall use of medical services for children showed some tendency for parents to use A amp E more when they used general practitioners less comparing in hours with out of hours This was not surprising given that many of the in hours visits to general practit ioners would be for non-urgent conditions or even routine preventive care

Eighty-four neighbourhoods in the Wellingtoh region (the census area units or groupings of the same) were examined to see which of four factors (the distance of the neighbourhood from the A amp E department the use of general practitioners the per capita income and the ethnicity of the neighbourhood) were related to the use of A amp E departments The most important factor was distance from the A amp E department Then taking distance into account there was a slight tendency for areas where parents made less use of the general practitioner during normal surgery hours to be areas of more frequent use of the A amp E department However this tendency was not statistically significant and no such tendency was found for out of hours use Overall there was little evidence of competition between general practitioners and A amp E departments for patients

Figure 10 Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

In hours Out of hours

Need for medical care recognised

I I bull I I I I I Ifail Try to Try to fail Still need Icontact contact careI

general generalI 0gt practitioner practitioner w-- I succeed I succeed

I I I I

AampE 13 yes Still need Contact Contact Still need yesI department care general general care departmentI

practitioner I practitioner

I I I

7650 824I egt I I

Still need Visit Visit Still need I care general general careI

practitioner practitionerI I I I I I

~X-215 -[Ql--~-~- 7346 ALLAN Bridget ClairtJ ) Accident and emergency departmem ~

organisation and utilisation

WX 215 73467 [QJ 1shy

j

ALL

shyUBRARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

WELLINGTON L

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH-SPECIAL REPORT SERIES

Issued by

Management Services amp Research Unit (MSRU) or National Health Statistics Centre (NHSC) Department of Health Private Bag 2 PO Box 5013 Wellington Upper Willis Street Wellington

No TITLE

1 Maori-European standards of health 2 Domestic accidents (public hospital admissions) 3 The Grey Valley survey (lung function in coal miners) 4 Elderly patients in public hospitals 1958 5 Smoking habits of school children 6 Survey of work in compressed air-Auckland harbour bridge 7 Tuberculosis in Canterbury 8 Maori patients in mental hospitals 9 Census of mental hospital patients 1961 10 Elderly persons accommodation needs in New Zealand 1962 11 Patient-nurse dependency exploratory study 12 Patient-nurse dependency general survey data

13 Patient-nurse dependency gynaecology 14 Patient-nurse dependency geriatrics

15 Patient-nurse dependency in Christchurch paediatrics 16 Smoking habits of New Zealand doctors 17 Infant and foetal loss in New Zealand 18 Trends in notifiable disease 19 Survey of factory first aid 1963-64 20 Patient-nurse dependency general surgery 21 Patient-nurse dependency orthopaedic surgery 22 Patient-nurse dependency general medicine 23 Patient-nurse dependency GU Eye ENT

24 Diseases of the ear nose and throat in Maori children 25 Maori patients in public hospitals 26 The health of two groups of Cook Island Maoris

27 Mental hospitals admission and release data cohort study of first admissions 1962

28 Occupational mortality among male population other than Maoris 20 to 64 years of age

29 Dental health status of the New Zealand population in late adolescence and young adulthood

30 Census of mental hospital patients 1966 31 Survey of the public dental health service in Niue and plan for development 32 Hospital food services 33 Bibliography of the epidemiology of New Zealand and its Island Territories

34 Census of public and private hospital patients and old peoples homes 1966 35 Domestic accidents 36 An evaluation of a regional mass miniature radiography programme 1956-67 37 Maori-European comparisons in mortality

38 Physical development of New Zealand school children 1969 39 Psychiatric illness causing hospitalization or death 1967 t40 Census of mental hospital patients 1971 t41 Census of public private and maternity hospital patients and old peoples

homes 1971 t42 Cancer of the lung in New Zealand t43 Organisation of the work of hospital house surgeons 44 Growth of New Zealand pre-school children 45 Maternal and infant care in Wellington-a health care consumer study

46 Accommodation and service needs of the elderly t47 Survey of patients in psychiatric hospitals 48 Family growth study 49 A patient opinion survey Wellington hospital

ISSUED BY

NHSC 1960 NHSC 1960middot NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1963 NHSC 1963 MSRU 1963 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1963 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC ]966

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 MSRU 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1972 MSRU 1971 NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973

NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1974 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1977

llHII tIffPllfJlJ c

~~~~~~~~ f lt b tf

f ()

11

bull

Page 2: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …

H-328

New Zealand Department of Health

LIBRARY Box 5013 Wellington

73467Accession No

Classification WX 215 [Qj WH

Location 6129378-Y94

ISSN 0548-944X

Department of Health

ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION AND UTILISATION

SPECIAL REPORT 70

by

B CAllan BSc (Hons) J Reinken PhD

Issued by the Management Services and Research Unit Department of Health Wellington

1984

LIBRARY bull DEPARTMENT OF HEAlrRJ

WELLINGTON

FOREWORD

Over the last twenty years there have been a number of accident and emergency studies in New Zealand hospitals For the most part these have been place and topic specifics This study by Bridget Allan and Judith Reinken is different It begins with an historical review of previous work in the field This is followed by a wide ranging study of accident and emergency services based on field work carried out in a representative sample of hospitals The data are analysed and presented taking account of the relevant international literature The resulting consolidation of knowledge provides a sound basis not only for further research but more importantly for the further development of accident and emergency services

The report provides at least tentative answers to a number of questions regularly asked about accident and emergency services Do general practitioners and accident and emergency departments provide competing services lhe answer appears to be no The public seem to discriminate sensibly between what are for the most part complementary services Is cost a factor in accident and emergency attendance as opposed to a visit to the general practitioner Again the answer appears to be no - cost is not an important factor Are socio-economic status and ethnicity associated with the rate of A amp E attendance Perhaps but distance and other factors concerned with accessibility appear to be more important

The study shows wide variation in the way in which A amp E services are provided in different hospitals This ranges from the size and shape of the physical facilities and the type and level of staffing relative to the workload to the way in which individual patient problems are dealt with Those responsible for the planning and operation of A amp E departments should find these comparisons informative Consideration of the data may perhaps prompt questions which in their answering lead to greater cost effectiveness and to service improvement

As well as providing answers the research raises questions It points yet again to the need in New Zealand for a regional study of accidents and accident services Accidents are a major cause of premature death and morbidity Many organisations are involved in the prevention and treatment of accidents but so far it has not been possible to mount a comprehensive study which includes and integrates all interests Until this is done fragmentation of services is likely to continue

By highlighting access to services the study points up the need for more information about communication and transport patterns in health care delivery Again this is a neglected area of research which could have far reaching implication for the planning and operation of health services

Finally the report raises questions about the interaction between general practitioners and A amp E services That these services are largely complementary is clear but unfortunately the communication between them is often not as good as it could and should be Further research has a contribution here but will not solve the problem Better communication and understanding is needed on both sides

The researchers have provided us with a much needed and timely review of an important and sometimes controversial aspect of health services Theirjete audience

G C Salmond ---shyDeputy Director-General of Health Department of Health

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Many people have helped with this study In particular we would like to thank

o John Mills who visited the hospitals drafted the physical characteristics chapter and gave freely of his time and expertise

o the staff of the hospitals visited for sharing their time and thoughts with us

o Desmond Keenan Shelagh McRae and Denis Snelgar for allowing us to use the information they had collected

o Clare Salmond Mike Moore and Sylvia Nichol for their assistance with computer analysis

o readers ofmiddot drafts of this report who offered helpful criticism and suggestion

o the typists and publication staff of the Department of Health

We also acknowledge the Director-General of Health for permission to publish

DISCLAIMER

The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Health

COPYRIGHT

Provided the source is acknowledged information contained in this report may be freely used by any person

CONTENTS

Page

ACKNOWIEDGEMENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

1 INTRODUCTION I

Background Thewider questions of emergency medical services The overseas situation An historical perspective in New Zealand

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments Record studies on the utili satjon of A amp E departments Studies of the organisation of A amp E departments

Overview of this study Aims Sources of information

References

2 DEFINITIONS 11

The Accident and Emergency department Attendance The hospitals Recording systems References

3 PROCEDURES IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT 15

Entry Sorting 1 reatmen t Disposal Follow-upcare Admissions Discussion References

4 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 23

PrinCiples Size Location

Entrances Access to other hospital facilities

Layout Waiting area Examination and treatment area Resuscitation area Operating theatre Plaster room Interview room Reception and records office Staff offices Holding ward

Discussion References

5

6

7

8

STAFFING OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 35

Medical staffing Senior medical staffing Junior medical staffing Accident and emergency work as a career

Nurse staffing Other staff involved with the A amp E department

Reception and clerical staff Orderlies Social workers Ambulance personnel

Discussion References

PATIENT ATTENDANCE CHARACTERISTICS 55

Overall attendance and trends Age and sex Conditions

Injury conditions Sickness conditions

Recall attendance GP-load

Non-urgent sickness Discussion References

PATIENT ATTI~UDES TO THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT AND STAFF ATTITUDES TO THE PATIENTS 75

Reasons for visiting the A amp E department Overseas studies New Zealand studies

Effect of health centres and deputising services on A amp E utilisation A amp E staff views of patients

Overseas studies The New Zealand situation

Discussion References

UTILISATION OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 91

Comparison of A amp E utilisation among hospital catchment areas Results Effect of general practitioner availability

Factors explaining catchment area variations in A amp E utilisation Method Results of the mUltivariate analyses

Comparison of A amp E use and general practitioner use Discussion References

9 CONCLUSIONS 107

The A amp E department as a hospital department The A amp E department as an emergency service The A amp E department as a primary care service Where from here

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A QUestion sheets 116

APPENDIX B Accident and emergency department records 120

APPENDIX C Statistical analyses of accident and 123 emergency department attendance rates by neighbourhoods

APPENDIX D Childrens use of general practitioners 128 and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

TABLES

Table

1 Proportion of first attendance patients discharged recalled referred or admitted

2 Areas of A amp E department~

3 Area to attendance ratios for adjusted total areas and waiting areas of A amp E departments by first attendance and total attendance

4 Numbers of examination and treatment cubicles or rooms and recommended numbers based on first attendance and total attendance

Medical staffing of A amp E departments

6 Total medical staffing (full-time equivalents) and medical staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

7 Nurse staffing of A amp E departments excluding student nurses and hospital aids

Nurse staffing (full-time equivalents) and nurse staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

Average attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

10 Trends in attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

11 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was recall attendance

12 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was for sickness

13 Proportion of total A amp E attendance that was for Sickness by policy and age groups

14 Use of general practitioners by first attenders at A amp E departments

15 Reasons for A amp E first attendance from three New Zealand studiesmiddot

Itgt Attendance (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) within each A amp E department catchment area

Page

18

24

25

29

37

39

45

46

56

57

66middot

70

71

77

78

92

(continued)

Table Page

17 Hospital admissionsfor accidental injury (mean 93 age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) and death due to accidental injury (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) within each A amp E department catchment area

IB Attendance (mean age-adjusted and neighbourhoodshy 99 adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) and populationshyto-general practitioner ratio within each A amp E department catchment area

19 Comparison of first attendances for injury at A amp E 101 departments and general practitioners

FIGURES

Figure Page

1 Percentage of total attendance at 58 A amp E departments by age and sex

2 Percentage of total attendance at 59 A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

3 Injury first attendances by type of injury 6U all ages

4 Injury first attendances by type of injury 61 by age groups

5 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 62 all ages

6 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 63 by age groups

7 Comparison of medical staff availability and 67 level of recall attendance

Comparison of nursing staff availability and 67 level of attendance

9 Location at which accidents happened by those 79 attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments 131 by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

1

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

BACKGROUND

This report arises f rom concerns expressed by several groups about the availability especially out of hours of emergency car~ and its provision by Accident and Emergency (A amp E) departments in New Zealand

In _SQe mid 1970 s the people of Porirua were worried that local general -pr-actitioners were not available at nights and weekends and by the delays

involved in travelling to Wellington and Hutt A amp E departments [IJ At the same time the people of North Shore were campaigning to keep their local A amp E department open More recently community groups in Upper Hutt have been pressing for the addition of an A amp E service to a local health centre Overall people are concerned that appropriate care (including facilities such as x-rays) is readily available in emergency situations

General practitioners are another group who have been concerned about A amp E departments in particular about inappropriate uses of A amp E departments A long-standing complaint bas been that patients are using A amp E departments for care which wou~d be better given by a general practitioner and that the A amp E departments retain patients instead of referr ing them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care [2 3J In 1981 the research group of the Wellington Faculty of the Royal NZ College of General Practitioners sponsored a study of children presenting at A amp E departments because they were worried that unnecessary admissions of children to hospital occurred because their parents had bypassed the general practitioners and gone straight to hospital [4J

Also A amp E staff and hospital administrators have been concerned that caring for patients who could have been treated by general practitioners has limited their ability to deal with emergency cases [567]

THE WIDER QUESTIONS OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

Emergency care requires not only the provision of hospital services (the A amp E department with back-up from other hospital facilities) but also the organisation of services outside the hospital and co-ordination between both sets of services Emergency medical services outside the hospital include alarm and communication systems transport systems and first aid services There are important questions for New Zealand within this framework For example what should be the role of general practitioners in on-site emergency care What level of training is appropriate for ambulance officers Should voluntary personnel staff ambulances To what extent is double manning of ambulances required [8910]

In order to limit the study to manageable proportions this report focusses only on the hospital services namely the A amp E department Emergency medical services provided outside hospitals are mentioned only where they impinge noticeably on the A ampE department It is hoped that due attention will be given to the wider questions of emergency medical services in the future (see Chapter 9)

2

THE OVERSEAS SITUATION

Concern with emergencymiddot care facilities especially their increasing use has been apparent in other countries for the past thirty years While some articles report on the situation in Canada Australia Sweden France and the USSR most of the literature is about the United States and Britain This section briefly outlines the major themes of the literature and their relevance to New Zealand More specific aspects are covered in the appropriate chapters

Many United States researchers have studied the operations of different emergency rooms exploring patients reasons for using the emergency room their demographic characteristics and their use of the family doctor Often the studies have tried to explain an increasing use of emergency rooms and some have reported on the effectiVeness of measures introduced to reduce thei r use These studies provided models for some of the analyses carried out in this study However the debate in the United States over appropriate methods of funding and staffing for emergency rooms is seldom relevant to New Zealand because of the differences both in philosophy and organisation of medical care in the two countries

The Platt [11] committee on A amp E services in Britain in 1962 was concerned about casual attenders ie patients not in need of urgent attention but wishing to avoid the trouble of attending their general practitioners surgery They also criticised the unsuitable accommodation and the insufficient numbers of senior medical staff supervising Casualty Departments The report recommended changing the name Casualty Service to Accident and Emergency Service (to discourage casual attendance) and rationalising the service by clOSing smaller A amp E units and centralising facilities These recommendations have been partially carried out

However there has been continuing research in Br i tain into the reasons given by patients particularly self-referred patients for their use of A amp E departments and the trade-off between general practitioner and A amp E services There has also been continuing debate over the medical staffing of A amp E departments

The British studies are of some relevance to the New Zealand situation since the organisation of medical care here is similar but no overseas experience can provide a blueprint for New Zealand For example the direct cost to the patient of general practice care in New Zealand raises the possibility of patients attending the A amp E department because it is free whereas the British system of general practitioner funding provides no such incentive

AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE IN NEW ZEALAND

Little is known about the historical development of A amp E services in New Zealand Presumably they followed the British tradition described in the Platt report [11 p23-24)

The word casualty in its proper meaning of a serious injury has a long history It occurs in Shakespeare and Dickens writing in 1837 used casualty ward to describe the ward in a hospital in which accidents were treated Unfortunately the meaning alt~red in the second half of the last century The Nuffield Report (1960) Casualty Services and their Setting

3

gives an interesting quotation from a survey made by the Lancet in 1869 The out-patients at St Bartholomews Hospital are it says divided into two categories They are the middotcasualtymiddot which comprises those who are supposed to require temporary treatment for diseases or injuries of a trifling character and the middotout-patientsmiddot properly so called who after receiving a regular letter of admission are entitled to the advice of the assistant surgeons and physicians for a period of 12 months It is in the casualty division that the increase of numbers has been most marked bullbullbull It is estimated that not less than a thousand patients frequently attend on a Monday or Tuesday morning

Certainly by 1872 vlellingtons private medical practitioners were incensed at the hospitals provision of free treatment for their patients Five hundred outpatients were treated in Wellington that year [12] Separate casualty departments were operating at Wellington Hospital by 1924 [12] at Auckland Hospital by the 1940s [13] and Christchurch Hospital by 1952 [14]

The 1960 Board of Health report [15] on outpatient servicesmiddot expressed concern over the duplication of services by outpatient departments which were also available from general practitioners However it recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times

Since the late 1960s a series of New Zealand studies have considered the use of A amp E departments either by interviewing patients or by analysing data drawn from A amp E record systems and the organisation of A amp E departments

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

The first interview study was an investigation of first attenders at the Dunedin A amp E department in 1968 by Dixon et al [2] Their results have not been contradicted by any of the later studies

They found that the principal attenders were males aged 15 to 24 who recorded first attendance rates of over 100 per 1000 each year The young men were also the most likely to report having no general practitioner Dixon found that the age and sex pattern of those attending at the A amp E department was nearly converse to the pattern of those attending a general practitioner

Dixon pointed out that the conditions treated at the A amp E department were rarely disease-related rather they were predominantly lacerations and open wounds bruising sprains and strains effects of foreign bodies and fractures The major reason given for attending the department was that it was seen as appropriate

Dixon concluded that the A amp E service was complementary and not competitive to general practice that the public were realistic in regarding it as the only practical and effective primary medical care for accident and emergency injuries and that payment for service did not appear to figure in the decision to attend the department

o

4

TwO interview studies of first attenders at Auckland Hospital A amp E department have been carried out by Hunton in 1972 and Richards in 1975 [16] Both studies included an assessment by the student interviewers and A amp E staff as to the suitability of the patients condition for general practice care 42-43 per cent were considered suitable Richards concluded that public education programmes encouraging people to use their general practitioner prior to attending the A amp E department should be instituted

In 1978 Keenan interviewed patients who had attended Christchurch A amp E department collecting detailed information on the accident or sickness leading to the attendance (unpublished see Chapter 6 and 7) He found the same set of reasons for using A amp E departments as Dixon found the A amp E department was seen as appropriate and accessible

Kljakovic found similar results when interviewing the parents of children attending A amp E departments in the Wellington region in 1978 [4] He also found that in choosing between the general practitioner and the A amp E department parents were more likely to use the service which was closer to the family home Children f rom lower socio-economic status families were more likely than other children to see thei r general practitioner before gOing to the A amp E department

Records studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

Several studies have gathered data from A amp E records to investigate A amp E utilisation In 1979 Snelgar described the characteristics of people attending Northland Base Hospital A amp E department [17] He found similar results to Dixon apart from a higher proportion of injuries In the same year McRae reviewed all attendances at Waikato Hospital A amp E department and found a similar picture [lB]

Three records studies have looked at the relationship between A amp E use and general practitioner use Maynard looked at Mosgiel residents use of Dunedin A amp E facilities for three years before and three years after the opening of a local health centre [19] No difference was found ~asap

investigated assertions that people from one part of the Wellington Hospital catchment area had suddenly begun to use the A amp E department heavily for conditions that should have been seen by a general practitioner [20] In fact that part of the catchment area had much lower rates of A amp E use than other areas Reinken tested whether the doubling of general practitioner cover in one part of the Wellington region affected A amp E presentation rates differently than in other areas nearby [21] There was no clear evidence that the increased cover had any effect

Studies on the organisation of A amp E departments

As part of a thesis looking at young doctors Salmond examined the work of house surgeons in A amp E departments using a postal questionnaire [22J He concluded that working in an A amp E department was good experience for a house surgeon only if second year house surgeons were deployed in the department the house surgeon was well-supervised by senior medical staff there was a good working relationship with the A amp E chargemiddot nurse and the house surgeon was not over-tired He also suggested that good senior staffing was closely related to effective administration and better service in the A amp E department

5

The Hospital Design and EValuation Unit of the Department of Health prepared a report documenting the planning requirements of New Zealand A amp E departments [23] The report outlined several principles of A amp E design and made detailed recommendations on the facilities rooms and equipment necessary

OVERVIEW OF THIS STUDY

Aims

The aim of this study is to describe A amp E departments in New Zealand Because the material presented in the previous section was collected by different researchers at different times and from different A amp E

departments detailed comparisons across the studies have been difficult To get a more comprehensive picture of A amp E use in New Zealand a systematic investigation was necessary

The specific aims of this report are

o to describe the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at their procedures physical characteristics and staffing patterns

o to describe attendance at A amp E departments including the patients profile and pattern of attendance and the load placed on the departments by patients who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner

o to describe the use of A amp E departments by consumers by analysing patients reasons for attending the departments and analysing demographic factors inrelation to A amp E attendance

Sources of information

Information was gathered from three sources

The site visits

Fourteen A amp E departments were visited between May and September 1981 by a Department of Health study team consisting of a medical officer from the Division of Hospitals and a res~arch officer from the Management Services and Research Unit

At each hospital the team examined the facilities and spoke with staff involved with the A amp E department including

o the medical superintendent (and in some hospitals the principal nurse)

o the A amp E officer or medical officer in charge of the A amp E department (where such a position existed and was filled)

o the nurse supervisor andor charge nurse of the A amp E department

o at least one house surgeon working in the A amp E department

6

In some hospitals the team also spoke with other staff members including experienced A amp E staff nurses and hospital social workers

Question sheets were used during interviews so that a comparable body of information was collected at each hospital Interviews were open-ended to allow discussion of local procedures or problems (See Appendix A for question sheets)

Hospitals were carefully selected so that the A amp E departments in the study would represent a cross-section of New Zealand A amp E departments Those selected served a range of communities in both the North and South Islands

o major urban Dunedin)

areas (Auckland Wellington Christchurch and

o provincial centres (Rotorua Taranaki and Timaru)

o predominantly rural areas (Whakatane and Grey)

In centres with more than one A amp E department all were visited so that a complete picture of the services and use could be developed This involved visiting Auckland Green Lane Middlemore and North Shore hospitals in Auckland and Wellington Hutt and Kenepuru hospitals in Wellington

The information gathered in the site visits has been used in describing the organisation of A amp E departments (Chapters 3 4 arid 5)

The A amp E records data collection

On each site visit a sample of 1981 attendances was drawn from the A amp E record system and the following information was recorded for each person age sex presenting condition (sickness or injury) time of presentation residential address and whether the visit was a first attendance for the condition or a recall visit

Exceptions were Christchurch and the three Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments Comparable data collected by Keenan in Ch ristchurch in 1978 and Allan in Wellington during 1980 were used instead

This information has been used to describe the attendance at A amp E departments (Chapter 6) and for the analysis of demographic factors in relation to attendance (Chapter 8)

The consumer studies

In 1978 Keenan carried out interviews with patients attending Christchurch A amp E department working from a one in eight sample drawn from the A amp E log over a four-week period and gaining a 99 response rate Results from this study have been analysed and compared with the results of the published New Zealand interview studies [2416] Anecdotal material from Kljakovic s study of children attending Wellington A amp E departments has also been included to illustrate the results of the numerical analysis

We realise that in studying only a selection of A amp E departments some local variations may have been missed but we are confident that the broad pattern and major issues in the organisation of A amp E care have been

7

covered Also as the A amp E departments studied serve two-thirds of the population of New Zealand the utilisation patterns discussed in the report are likely to prevail throughout New Zealand We hope that the mater ial presented the conclusions drawn and the questions raised in this report will encourage discussion about the current operation and future developmiant of A amp E departments in NewmiddotZealand

a

8

REFERENCES

1 de LACEY A REINKEN J and SALMOND C E - Community attitudes to sickness and health stimulus and response v 3 Community attitudes - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 103-105 (Special report series no 56)

2 DIXON C W Emery G M and SPEARS G F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) p 272-279

3 [Editorial] in G P Journal of the General Practitioner Society no 42 (1981) P 1-2

4 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN BC and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

5 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble Jr et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

6 MAYNARD Edward J - The application of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment shyUniversity of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

7 Hospital misuse brings protest in Taranaki Daily News (1 Sept 1980) bull

8 FAHEY Morgan - The role of the family doctor in disaster and emergency medicine in NZ Family Physician - v 5 no 1 (1978) p 42-44

9 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 19-23 March 1979 in NZ Med J - (1980) P 194-196

10 Double manning of ambulances [editorial] in NZ Hosp - v 32 no 3 (1980) p 1

11 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medicine Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

12 BARBER Laurie H and TOWERS Roy J - Wellington Hospital 1847-1976 Wellington Wellington Hospital Board 1976

13 The story of Auckland Hospital 1847-1977 edited by David Scott -Auckland Medical Historical Library Committee of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians in New Zealand 1977 p 35-36

14 BENNETT FO - Hospital on the Avon the story of the Christchurch Hospital 1862-1962 Christchurch North Canterbury Hospital

o Board 1962

9

15 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 196U (Report series Board of Health no 2)

16 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

17 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

18 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

19 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency department in Med Care - v 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

20 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

21 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

22 SALMOND G C - Young doctors an exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

23 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

11

CHAPTER 2

Definitions

lhis chapter provides the definitions of terms used in our study In general our terminology is consistent with the literature However in some areas such as the classification of presenting conditions as sickness or injury or the description of GP-load there is no general consistency and we have developed our own definitions

THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

This name is the one commonly used in New Zealand We have used it in preference to the older description Casualty Depariment [1] and the American description of Emergency Department It is one hospital department which patients can approach without prior notification

Emergencies can be any condition that - in the opinion of the patient their family or whoever assumes the responsibility of bringing the patient to the hospital - requires immediate medical attention

However using such a definition means every case is an emergency In New Zealand A amp E departments patients tend to be classified in a similar way to the description given by the American Hospital Association [2]

o emergencies where delay is harmful and the condition potentially threatens life or function

a urgent cases which require attention within a few hours

o non-urgent cases where the condition is minor or non-acute and does not require the resources of the emergency service

An accident is an unexpected event Accidents which have resulted in attendance at an A amp E department are ones that have caused some trauma whether through shock or other injury The Platt report [1] decided on the term A amp E department in recognition that the real emergencies were a trickle while the accidents were a mighty flood

In general the A amp E department is regarded as part of the hospitals outpatient services and like these in day to day running it provides specific clinics generally for the treatment of traumatic injury x-ray burns dressings plasters and so forth

An accident and emergency patient is a person who is entered in the A amp E log book This can involve a certain amount of error however as some outpatients or discharged patients may return for follow-up care through the A amp E department Also the A amp E department often handles the acute admissions to the hospital

12

ATrENDANCE

A first visit (or first attendance) is the first visit a patient makes for one particular condition

A recall visit is any visit made for one particular condition which is not the first visit for the condition Some recall visits are patient initiated (eg due to pain bleeding infection or an accident to the dressing or plaster) but for the most part revisits are scheduled return visits suggested by A amp E staff

Total attendance is the sum of first visits and recall visits

Inj ury attendances are defined to include the results of trauma (cuts burns fractures sprains strains bruises head injuries multiple injur ies and so forth) as well as foreign bodies in the eye or other orifices and toxic effects whether from accidental or self-poisoning events Late effects of minor injury (pain bleeding abscesses or such) are not included as injury but as sickness

Sickness attendances include collapse (whether stroke coma heart attack or other) shortness of breath abdominal pain general sickness (fever vomiting diarrhoea unwell) mental distress and minor conditions

Non-urgent sicknesses are defined as the minor conditions abdominal pain and general sickness except for preschool children and adults over 65 where the general sickness and abdominal pain conditions can be urgent A amp E staff defined non-urgent sickness less specifically they tended to define it as longstanding or minor sickness

GP-load describes the patients whom A amp E staff feel should have seen a general practitioner It includes patients with longstanding or minor sickness conditions and patients with minor traumatic injury (eg cuts bumps and bruises)

In hours attendance refers to all attendances in the normal working hours of 0800 to 1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays

Out of hours attendance refers to all other attendances outside the defined normal working hours

In an average week 50 hours fall in the in hours category and 118 hours in the out of hours category If we assume that an average person sleeps eight hours a night then that person is awake for 62 hours in the out of hours category (and all the in hours of course) Thus the out of hours category is 70 per cent of the total time in a week and 55 per cent of the waking time in a week

Minor conditions included abscesses backaches infected wounds or wound pain headache pain (unspecified) earaches eye problems toothaches nosebleeds limb pains We have called it the skin pain or bleeding category in Chapter 6

13

Attendance rates measure the use of A amp E departments for a defined population They express the number of cases from an area over a defined period per 1000 population in that area Rates were obtained by age and sex for sickness and injury and in and out of hours for each census area unit or neighbourhood served by each hospital

THE- HOSPITALS

We grouped hospitals into four types

o urban hospitals (where average annual first attendances at A amp E departments are over 25000 patients)

o provincial hospitals (serving 6000 to 12000 new A amp E patients each year)

o rural hospitals (serving fewer than 6000 new A amp E patients each year)

o suburban hospitals where A amp E departments are not open 24 hours per day North Shore Hospital was open 7 days a week 830 am shy530 pm and Kenepuru Hospital was open 5 days a week 830 am shy430 pm

Most of the A amp E departments visited had a senior position variously called the A amp E officer the A amp E director the senior medical officer or the medical officer in charge For convenience we call this position the A amp E officer

RECORDING SYSTEMS

The log is the record kept at the A amp E department which records some information on every patient who presents It will often give no more than the patients name the date and time of visit

The A amp E record is usually a card and it records basic patient information and case notes It may be held for several years in the A amp E department and may therefore contain information on a series of separate events for anyone patient

14

REFERENCES

1 GtBrit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the sUbcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

2 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p vii-viii

15

D

CHAPTER 3

Procedures in the accident and emergency department

In this chapter we begin describing the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at the way they operate We follow the course of a patients care entry to the A amp E department sorting into priority order for care (triage) treatment and follow-up care

ENTRY

Most people presenting at the A amp E department were ambulant (the walking wounded as they are colloquially known) They came through the A amp E departments main entrance to the reception desk where they were first seen by a receptionist or nurse (Exceptions to this occurred in the smaller hospitals where patients presenting at night were first seen by the telephonist who called the nursing staff) Nurses did reception duties at

all the provincial and rural A amp E departments and at two of the urban A amp E departments when receptionists were not on duty (eg lunchtimes nights) bull At times nurses found that having to cover the reception desk interfered with their care of patients

When the receptionists are off duty the nurses do the reception work This can be a nuisance because it interferes with patient care and sometimes patients ring the bell at the reception desk and the staff working in the resuscitation room dont hear it

A amp E nurse

Unless their condition required immediate care the ambulant patients then spent several minutes at the reception desk while their details (eg name address general practitioner complaint) were noted on the A ampE records (See Appendix B for more information on A amp E records) Then they waited in the waiting room until they were called for treatment

A small proportion of patients arrived by ambulance andmiddot at almost all hospitals entered the A amp E department through a separate ambulance entrance In the larger hospitals some nursing staff were stationed in or near the ambulance entrance to care for these patients In other hospitals the staff had often been warned of incoming urgent cases and were standing by when the ambulance arrived As the condition of ambulance patients tended to be urgent they were usually taken straight to a resuscitation or treatment area patients condition permitted or friends or the ambulance driver

Record with the

keeping assist

was ance

carried of thei r

out r

when elativ

the es

SORTING

All A amp E departments operated some triage system to sort the ambulant patients by the urgency of their need for care (Themiddot only exception was Grey A amp E department where there was seldom more than one patient in the department at a time) At most A amp E departments the patients were sorted

16

into urgent and non-urgent categories with urgent cases being seen immediately and non-urgent cases being seen in the order they presented At some of the urban A amp E departments a more complex sorting was done For example

Priority is given in the following order

urgent need very young and very old patients those with general practitioner notes those without general practitioner notes

A lie E nurse

Usually ambulance cases were not triaged since they tended to arrive on their own and required urgent care However several A lie E departments had triage arrangements planned for the arrival of many ambulance cases at once as in a disaster

Sorting was largely a responsibility of the nurses although some A amp E doctors would occasionally check the condition of patients- in the waiting room too The receptionists often played a role in triage as well alerting the nursing staff to urgent cases This happened more in A amp E departments where the physical layout made it difficult for nurses to watch the entrance and the waiting room

The receptionists do tQe basic sorting They have guidelines to follow distressed patients severe cuts or bleeding go straight to the nurses open wounds or eye injuries go directly to a cubicle and are assessed by the nurses patients with abdominal pain or chest pain go on to trolleys and wait in the recovery room This system usually works well although occasionally a fracture patient will not be recognised and will sit in the waiting room

A lie E nurse

In several A lie E departments doctors and nurses stressed the value of an experienced receptionist in recognising and reacting quickly to acutely ill or injured patients

TREATMENT

Almost all the A amp Edepartments visited had a policy that all patients presenting had to be seen by a doctor The doctor did not necessarily have to treat the patient he or she could advise the patient to see a general practitioner Some A amp E doctors commented that by the time they saw the patients it was as easy to treat them as to send them away_ At a few departments the nurses (and occasionally the receptionist) could advise the patient that the department was not an appropriate place for their condition and that they should see a general practitioner This was usually done in consultation with the A E doctor but at times the nurses acted on their own initiative In these places a triage system similar to that reported by Weinerman et al [1] where patients were assigned to the appropriate service inside or outsidemiddot the hospital appeared to be operating

7

The assessment of patients the ordering of tests andmiddot the supervision of treatment were usually seen ~s medical functions The nurses would prepare patients for treatment (removing dressings) and carry out urgent first aid measures (stem bleeding start gastric lavage or cardio-pulmonary resuscitation) Generally however a nurse would only initiate treatment if the patients condition was urgent and a doctor was not available or was already busy with another emergency Exceptions to this situation occurred in some hospitals with A amp E nurse training programmes and in some smaller hospitals where the doctor is on call rather than working in the A amp E department In these departments experienced nurses could order tests such as x-rays and initiate treatments such as suturing and removing foreign bodies from eyes

In most A amp E departments nurses would perform some treatments under a doctors supervision However the range of treatments nurses were allowed to perform varied considerably among hospitals At some hospitals nurses sutured after training but at others they never sutured

The nurses do not suture although they would like to There are four reasons for this there is no full-time A amp E officer so good standards of sutur ing could not be maintained there could be medico-legal problems if a nurse sutured a cut which was more complicated than it looked eg with tendon involvement the nurses have enough to do at present and if they start suturing they will be expected to do it always and the young doctors need to learn suturing as part of their training

Principal nurse

Electrocardiograms were taken by nurses in some A amp E departments by technicians at others Taking blood samples was a doctors job in some departments but was done by nurses in others Similarly gastric lavage using a def ibrillator and plaster work were done by nurses in some departments Most A amp E nurses would maintain intra-venous drips but only nurses with special training WOUld insert them

Some nurses expressed frustration at restrictions on the treatments they were allowed to perform However several sen~or nurses stressed that they had to select carefully the nurses they allowed to perform more difficult treatments

We are very selective about choosing the nurses to do triage suturing and the more complicated procedures This seems to have been successful weve had no problems with nurses undertaking treatment theyre not competent to provide

A amp E senior nurse

I make sure the nurses understand they can be dangerous people If theyre not aware of their limitations theyre not suitable for A amp E work

A amp E senior nurse o

Also one department which had comparatively few nurses discouraged them from increasing the range of treatments they performed so that their workload did not become overwhelming

18

For diagnosis the A amp E departments made heavy use of the x-ray departments (The Design and Evaluation Unit study [21 estimated that 30 per cent of A amp E attenders had an x-ray during their visit) Some A amp E departments found their arrangements with the x-ray department very convenient with an x-ray machine aVailable 24 hours a day in or close to the A amp E department and with patients and x-ray films or reports returning within an hour At other hospitals arrangements Were less convenient in some places reporting bac k of x-rays took two or three hours delaying patients considerably while in others the x-ray departmentmiddot was located on a different floor from the A amp E ~epartment causing difficulties in transporting and accompanying patients there

Little use was made of the laboratory services other than for blood and urine tests and arrangements were generally satisfactory However in many hospitals x-ray and laboratory staff had to be called in to perform tests out of hours and because of the expense involved these out of hours tests were discouraged Some house surgeons found this a difficult situation

I I m caught between contradictory pressures the orthopaedic surgeons say that x-rays are necessary for proper diagnosis and the hospital board is trying to limit out of hours x-rays to save money

House surgeon

DISPOSAL

After treating the patient the A amp E doctor decides on the appropriate disposal discharging from care arranging follow-up treatment by referring to another source of care or recalling to the A amp E department or admitting the patient Information on disposal was only readily available from three A amp E departments The most common disposal pattern was in fact discharging from care with 40 to 55 per cent of patients making a first Visit being discharged

TABLE I PROPORTION OF FIRST ATTENDANCE PATIENrs DISCHARGED RECALLED REFERRED OR ADMITTED

Discharged Recalled Referred to Admitted Other First to A amp E GP Specialist attendance

Clinic tallied

Waikato l 393 132 222 99 134 19 25 707 Green Lane2 550 220 110 40 80 Unknown Taranaki 41 5 268 73 103 116 24 164

1 From McRaes study of Waikato A amp E departmen~ in 1979 2 From a study carried out by Green Lane A amp E department

19

FOLLOW-UP CARE

The decision to be made on follow-up care was usually between re~alling to the A amp E department or referring back to the patient I s general practitioner Some A amp E departments also referred patients (especially children) to district nurses or patients with work 1n]uries to an occupational health nurse or clinic Many departments referred fracture patients to orthopaedic clinics held in the hospital outpatients department and one A amp E department which was very short of space referred patients needing redressings to the outpatients department

There were large differences in referral practices (see Table 1) Between 13 and 27 per cent of first attenders were recalled to the A amp E department for follow-up care while 15 to 30 per cent were referred elsewhere either to a general practitioner or to a specialist clinic Also recall attendances expressed as a proportion of total attendances varied considerably among the A amp E departments from 10 per cent to 50 per cent (see Chapter 6 Table 11) and clearly reflected different follow-up practices

All of the urban and two of the provincial A amp E departments had a policy of referring most patients requiring follow-up care to a general practitioner and of keeping recall visits as low as possible This was similar to general policy in both Britain and the United States which appears to discourage re-at tendance at A amp E departments [34] However in the suburban rural and other provincial A amp E departments the decision on follow-up care was left to the judgement of the A amp E doctor

In practice however the choice to refer or to recall was reiated to several factors First the decision related to characteristics of the patients If the patients had serious wounds or burns or injuries which could develop complications they were usually recalled They were also recalled if the A amp E staff thought they would not receive appropriate care at home or they would not see a general practitioner for follow-up care Patients living a long way from the hospital were usually referred to their general practitioner At some A amp E departments patients were given the choice of referral or recall according to A amp E staff comments most chose to return to theA amp E department

The patients prefer to come back to the hospital Money is not a factor in this because the ACC pays for accident treatment at the general practitioner

A amp E nurse

Second there were general practitioner factors If the local general practitioners were unhappy about the A amp E department recalling patients or if a general practitioner had referred the patient to the department originally the A amp E doctors would refemiddotr rather than recall However if the A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner did not have the facilities and in some cases the ability to provide follow-up care (eg for serious woundS eye injuries) they would recall the patient

Some GPs dont like following up care initiated by the A amp E department or dont have the necessary facilities so I tend not to send patients back to them

A amp E officer

20

Im more likely to refer a patient back to a GP who is reliable

House surgeon

Third many of the house surgeons said they would recall patients if they were interested in the condition or if they were worried about their diagnosis and treatment and wanted to see the outcome Several medical superintendents noted that recalling under these circumstances was acceptable because it comprised part of the house surgeons training

Fourth the workload of the A amp E department sometimes affected the follow-up decision with very busy departments actively discouraging recalls And finally there was the philosophy of A amp E medicine held by the A amp E doctor In one department where the A amp E officer considered it an ethical duty to see any treatment initiated through to a successful conclusion almost all patients who needed follow-up care were recalled At two other departments the A amp E officers stressed the importance of being able to deal efficiently with any emergencies presenting they kept recalls low so that the department was not clogged with extra patients Other A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner could provide better continuity of care than the A amp E department so they referred as many patients as possible

When referring patients to the general practitionermiddot most of the A amp E doctors made a verbal recommendation to the patient and then relied on the patient to attend the general practitioner They would only write a formal referral letter if the patients condition was serious In several A amp E departments however greater efforts were made to inform the patient t s general practitioner Three departments gave referred patients cyclostyled forms with details of diagnosis and treatment to be passed to their general practitioner while the Whakatane department sent a copy of the A amp E record form to each patients general practitioner

ADMISSIONS

Table I suggests that between a and 14 per cent of all first attendances were admitted to the hospitals Admissions could well be higher for children Kljakovic [5] found that 20 per cent of the children presenting at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments were admitted

The A amp E departments were involved in several different pathways for the admission of acutely ill or injured patients (Scheduled admissions did not involve the A amp E department at any of the hospitals visited) Self-referred patients could be admitted directly from the A amp E department to the wards or could be cared for in a holding (or acute admitting) ward before going to the wards

There was considerable variation among the hospitals as to which members of the medical staff were able to admit patients At some of the urban hospitals only the registrars could admit while at others the A amp E doctor could admit if the registrar was delayed and unable to assess the patient quickly At some of the provincial and one of the urban hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit in consultation with the admitting officer or appropriate registrar while at-another urban hospital and the rural A amp E departments the A amp E doctors regularly admitted patients

21

Hospitals with lower levels of bed occupancy were more likely to allow A amp E doctors to admit Senior A amp E doctors were more likely to play a role in admissions (actually admitting patients or advising the registrar) than house surgeons

Some patients referred by a general practitioner for acute admission also passed through the A amp E department At one hospital the general practitioners rang the A amp E officer to arrange for all acute admissions and all such GP-referred patients were seen first in the A amp E department However more usually the general practitioners rang the appropriate registrar to make arrangements and the registrar decided whether to admit the patient directly to the wards or through the A amp E department The involvement of A amp E staff with patients requiring admission ranged from almost none (where the patient went directly from the A amp E department to the ward or specialist unit) to a full initial assessment including tests (often undertaken at the request of the registrar responsible for the patient) bull

Generally the A amp E doctors were satisfied with the admission procedures However at one hospital where the A amp E doctors could not admit patients waiting for admission tended to clog the department The doctorselt that if they had admission rights the situation would be remedied

DISCUSSION

There were few differences among the A amp E departments in the reception and sorting of patients However there were differences in some aspects of treatment follow-up care and admission procedures

lhe role of the A amp E nurses in treatment varied considerably with some departments allowing nurses to initiate and perform many treatments and other departments allowing little autonomy Careful training and selection were essential before nurses increased their responsibility for treatment bull

Policies on follow-up care differed among the departments with the urban and provincial departments generally referring patients to general practitioners and the rural and suburban departments leaving the referral decision to the A amp E doctor In practice however the differences were less clear-cut with several factors other than the patient I s condition affecting the follow-up care decisions These factors included the A amp E staffs communicat ion with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs of house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors philosophy with regard to A amp E medicine

The A amp E departments also differed considerably in thei r procedures for acute admissions At some hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit an A amp E patient while at others the patient had to be held in the department until admitted by a registrar Also at some hospitals patients referred by general practitioners for acute admission were seen in the A amp E department before going to a ward While having to hold patients sometimes caused

clogging in the department A amp E staff were generally satisfied with the procedures

22

REfERENCES

1 WEINERMAN E Richard RUfZEN S Robert and PEARSON David shyEffects of medical -triage- in hospital emergency service in Public health reports - v 80 no 5 (May 1965) p 389-399

2 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

3 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM (68)83

4 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL Jenkins - St Louis Hosby 1975

5 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

23

CHAPTER 4

Phy~i~~1 c~~raft~rhtics of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the physical characteristics of A amp E departments their overall size location and layout as well as specific areas within the departments It discusses the effects of the physical characteristlcs on the organisation and functioning of the A amp E departments Our investigation worked from the detailed base established in bullAccident and emergency departments a studY of planning r~quirements a report prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation gnit Departmellt of HeCilth [1]

PRINCIPLES

The 1973 Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit (DEU) report [l] outlined the following principles to be applied in designing A amp E departments

o the A amp E department must be patients seeking emergency care

ready to receive and deal with

o the A amp E department mus~ be able load within a reasonable period

to cope with an average i

busy

o the A amp E department must be capable of adaptation to exceptional situations arising from major accidents ltgtrqther disasters

o the layout should be simple easily unqerstood and compact

o the layout and procedures should facilitate easy flow of patients through the department

o spaces should be multipurpose to give greatest versatility

o p~tient ~ovew~n~ should be minimised )

priv~cy for patientsshould be provided as far as is practicable andconsistent with the need for supervisi0rt

SIZE

There was considerable variation in the total sizes of the A amp E -a~1-ftment~ vi~ited witll floor areas ranging from 250 sql1a~e metres to 2115 ~guare m~ties (see Table 2) Eight of the 14 departments visited had i

hhid1pgw~fd~oracUte admitting ward However even wt)en ~he area of th~ f~ ~ bull ~middotc1~A~- _ ~ - bull bull ~

AampE department WCiS adjusted for the presence of a holding ward this I~1-getv~-rH~tion in irea reniained

24

TABLE 2 AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Total area Holding ward Adjusted total Waiting room area areal area

sqm sqm sqm sqm

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 2 115 225 1 890 55 Middlemore 1 045 140 905 50 Green Lane 960 240 720 70 Wellington 575 190 385 75 Hutt 270 270 30 Christchurch 470 470 40 Dunedin 635 90 545 20

Provincial Rotorua 515 20 495 90 Taranaki Base 720 90 630 40 Timaru 605 70 535 80

Rural Whakatane 430 430 20 Grey 310 310 15

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 255 255 30 Kenepuru 540 540 30

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area Considerable sharing with outpatients department

The area of the A amp E department was not closely related to the attendance (see Table 3) Obviously there is a certain minimum size for an A amp E department since certain facilities are essential regardless of the attendance served Thus as would be expected the rural and to a lesser extent the provincial A amp E departments had high area to attendance ratios However even within the group of urban A amp E departments there was a fourfold difference in the total area to attendance ratio

The design at Auckland~ laid out along several corridors with many separate consulting and treatment rooms possibly contributed to its high ratio At Wellington Hutt and Christchurch hospitals staff commented on their difficulties working in cramped conditions The lack of space often forced staff to work under extreme pressure to move patients through the departments very quickly

25

TABLE 3 AREA TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR ADJUSTED TOTAL AREAS 1 AND WAITING AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS BY FIRST ATTENDANCE2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Adjusted total area to attendance ratio Waiting area to to attendance ratio

Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 first attendance total attendance total attendance pa p a p a

Full-time departments ~

Urban Auckland 323 291 08 Middlemore 232 157 09 Green Lane 3 230 168 16 Wellington 80 69 13 Hutt 82 63 07 Christchurch 76 64 05 Dunedin 200 143 05

Provincial Rotorua 404 293 53 Taranaki Base 609 399 25 Timaru 466 266 403

Rural Whakatane 718 490 23 Grey 805 61 2 30

Part-time departments

Suburban I INorth Shore 272 148 17

Kenepuru 924 597 33

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Considerable sharing with outpatients department

Spearman rank correlations [2] of adjusted total area with

( a) first attendance r = 0310 p gt 010 Not significant ( b) total attendance r = 0297 pgt 010 Not significant

26

LOCATION

There is broad agreement that the A amp E department should be located on the ground floor well signposted and easily accessible to ambulatory patients and ambulances The ambulance entrance should be able to handle several ambulances at once and should have adequate turning space It should be projected from the weather and screened from the view of the other A amp E department patients

The A amp E department should also be located as closely as possible to radiology facilities (either the x-ray department itself or a branch) The A amp E department and the outpatients department can share some facilities and provide additional staff and accommodation in an emergen~y

situation if they are sited together Acute patient care areas (operating theatres intensive care unitsmiddot and cardiac care units) and laboratory services should also be readily accessible from the A amp E department [134]

Entrances

Almost all of the A amp E departments visited were on the ground floor of the hospital and were well signposted Generally access for ambulatory patients was good apart from two hospitals where they had to walk up steps to enter the building o

Few departments had ambulance access which could cope with a shuttle of ambulances bringing mass casualties from a disaster There w~s little relation between the size of the department or the population served and the ease of ambulance flow Indeed those departments with a relatively low probability of being involved in a mass casualty situation had good ambulance flow (eg Whakatane) while those with a greater possibility had relatively poor ambulance access (eg Wellington) Several departments had particularly poor a~bulance flow with only a one-lane access Three departments had good drive-straight-through access while at the rest ambulances had to reverse However there were advantages to some of the bull reversing I situations in that the bays into which the ambulances had to reverse were more likely to give the patient protection from the weather All the A amp E departments visited had separate ambulance entrances which in all but three cases guaranteed screening of ambulance patients from public view

Access to other hospital facilities

In many of the hospitals the A amp E department was adjacent to the outpatients department or to the orthopaedic outpatients section When this occurred the plaster room and x-ray facilities were usually shared and waiting areas and the records office were sometimes shared In the smaller hospitals both departments often shared the nursing staff

The access to the x-ray department ranged from excellent in places which had x-ray facilities immediately adjacent to the A amp E department to very poor where the patient had to be transported hundreds of metres and to a different floor The time taken for the A amp E doctor to get the result of the x-ray varied from five minutes to over two hours though the physical separation of the two departments was only one of the factors which affected this

27

Access to acute care facilities was similarly variable In Christchurch the intensive care unit was adjacent to the A amp E department while in Rotorua it was at the other end of the hospital In many cases additions or alterations to the hospital buildings and changes of function of certain areas have meant that the A amp E department no longer bears the same physical relationship to other hospital departments as was originally the case

LAYOUT

Several studies have concluded that the A amp Edepartment should be designed so that there is an orderly progression of patients from registration to examination to investigations if necessary to treatment and to referral admission or discharge Staff time and effort is best conserved by a compact plan with waiting areas and treatment areas easily accessible and supervised However the need for easy supervision has to be balanced by consideration of the patients privacy Two basic A amp E plans have evolved

o a radial plan where the waiting examination and treatment rooms are arranged on the perimeter of the departmentmiddot with the nurses station doctors room and records office in the centre

o a linear plan where the examination and treatment rooms are arranged down each side of a corridor with the waiting area records office and staff offices at one end [145]

Many of the A amp E departments visited had a linear layout with the largest Auckland being arranged along several corridors In these departments staff often commented that their overall view of the patients was not good and a considerable amount of walking was needed to supervise them Middlemore A amp E department and the treatment areas of several other departments had radial layouts which staff found very satisfactory Generally the A amp E staff prefer red open plan layouts using curtained cubicles rather than enclosed rooms Staff (especially nursing staff) often commented that their department would be better if certain walls or partitions were removed to give easier surveillance of the department as a whole However staff also commented on the relative lack of privacy for patients being examined or treated and noted that some private rooms were needed for instance for obstetric or paediatric patients

Waiting area

There is general agreement that the waiting area should be adjacent to the reception desk easily visible to the receptionist and if possible overlooked by the nurses office or station It should be a cheerful comfortable area with toys provided for children and a range of magazines and books Public toiletspublic telephones and arrangements for refreshments are also needed [146]

The size of the waiting area varied considerably among the A amp E departments visited (refer back tomiddot Table 2) Again this variation bore little relationship to the workload of the department (see Table 3) Some waiting areas were clearly too small and this put pressure on the staff to deal with patients quickly in order to clear the waiting room

28

Staff comments suggested that not only the size of the waiting area but also its design affected its crowding Basically square rooms with seats around the edges had fewer problems than corridor-style rooms with only one row of seats

In all the A amp E departments visited the waiting areas were adjacent to the reception area Sometimes they were visible from the nurses office or work area but where this was not possible the nurses relied on the receptionists to alert them to urgent cases or checked the wai Hng area often themselves

Facilities in waiting areas varied from nothing but seats to areas in which there were hot and cold drink dispensing machines a childrens play area with toys and health-related poster and pamphlet displays Some had a TV set or a tropical fish tank Most staff were agreed that a pleasant atmosphere in the waiting room was important and adVerse comments about the waiting area were made by staff in departments which lacked this In some departments staff commented that vandalism made it difficult to retain facilities and a pleasant atmosphere

Examination and treatment area

The examination and treatment area provides for the needs of all A amp E patients other than those with serious conditions requiring the resuscitation room or those needing special facilities such as plastering Because special purpose areas are frequently under-utilised flexibility is a key requi rement Hence multipurpose cubicles with standardised equipment are usually recommended The cubicles must be big enough to give easy access for patients (not necessarily walking) to accommodate eqUipment and to give staff enough room to work Curtained cubicles are generally sufficient but at least one enclosed cubicle is required for patients needing extra privacy or for light control in eye examinations A cubicle especially set up for children (with appropriately-sized equipment toys and posters) is also desirable [1346]

Most of themiddot A ~ E departments visited had curtained cubicles in the examination and treatment area with perhaps one or two enclosed cubicles or rooms as well Four A amp E departments only had separate rooms for treatment Curtained cubicles made for ease of access while separate rooms did present some difficulties in manoeuvering patient trolleys and wheelchairs In one case it was impossible to get a patient trolley into the room at all and the room was consequently little used

Curtained cubicles did afford greater flexibility in use and did provide more room to work but had the disadvantage of being considerably less private than rooms Surveillance was easier in departments with curtains than those withmiddot walls and doors In the Auckland A amp E department treatment rooms doors had been removed in the interests of improved surveillance Staff in this department commented that its rigid design could lead to difficulties in accommodating a large number of patients in a disaster

The DEU report [1] recommended that the number of cubicles required by an A amp E department was NIlS where N is the anticipated average number of new patients per day It noted that in A amp E departments with few new patients per day a minimum of two cubicles should be provided It also recommended that the flow of recalled patients should be regulated so that they did not greatly affect the need for cubicles

29

As can be seen from Table 4 most departments had enough cubicles to cope with their first attendance workload Even applying the DEU recommendation of N18 to their total attendance most of the departments had an adequate number of cubicles The exceptions were Hutt Christchurch and Dunedin

TABLE 4 NUMBERS OF EXAMINATION AND TREATMENT CUBICLES OR ROOMS AND RECOMMENDED NUMBERS l BASED ON FIRST ATTENDANCE 2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Actual number of DEU recommended numbers (minimum of 2) cubiclesrooms based on

first attendance total attendance pa pa

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 13 89 99 Middlemore 9 59 88

Green Lane 7 40 65 Wellington 10 73 85 Hutt 4 51 66 Christchurch 7 94 11 2 Dunedin 3 41 58

Provincial Rotorua 4 2 26 Taranaki Base 4 2 24 Timaru 6 2 31

Rural Whakatane 3 2 2 Grey 3 2 2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3 8 22 37 Kenepuru3 6 22 30

1 Based on DEU report [l which recommended NIS cubicles where N average number of new patients per day ie N6750 where N = average first attendance pa

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Recommended numbers increased to adjust for North Shore and Kenepuru treating their attendance numbers in part-time rather than full-time hours

30

Resuscitation area

The resusciation area is used for the immediate life--saving treatment of seriously injured or sick patients It is the acute treatment area in contrast to the examination and treatment area which is used for relatively minor procedures In making its recommendations about the resuscitation area the DEU report [I] balanced the probability of the A amp E department having to treat multiple accident victims with the comparative rarity of use of resuscitation rooms It recommended that a resuscitation room of suff icient size to deal with two patients concurrently be provided in all A amp E departments It also noted that the ambulance entrance and resuscitation area should be located as close together as possible

Most of the departments visited had purpose-built resuscitation rooms of varying size and with varying degrees of sophistication in equipment Some had x-ray facilities in the resuscitat ion area and in those that did not its absence was regarded as a serious impediment to the efficient care of severe trauma

In four of the seven urban A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms were regarded by the staff as being too small The comment was made in one urban department that because of the small size of the resuscitation area patients sometimes had to be moved out of the area before it was felt clinically desirable to do so in order to accommodate incoming patients In the rural and prOVincial A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms wereshyadequate for the demands placed on them

Most resuscitation rooms were sited close to the ambulance entrance and afforded good access to stretcher patients However in three A amp E departments patients had to be moved some distance and in another department up one floor by lift

Operating theatre

In discussing provision of operating theatres in the A amp E departments the DEU report [1] noted that

o most surgery done is minor requires only local anaesthesia and could be done within adequately designed cubicles

o the A amp E department is not a proper place for general anaesthesia

o using A amp Etheatres for day surgery tends to block other A amp E facilities and staff causin~ delay in treating A amp E patients

The report concluded that special facilities appear to be justified only if there is a clear intention of widening the scope of accident surgery in the departments

bullMinor ops theatres of varying sizes and equipped to varying standards were available in many departments Very variable use was made of such theatres - never in some departments to daily in others It was used less in departments with very heavy workloads and where the medical staff were not satisfied that sufficiently sterile conditions could be maintained In one department the theatre was only used for day surgery cases

31

Plaster room

In the plaster room casts are applied and removed and fractures and dislocations can be manipulated The DEU report [1] noted that the plaster room could be an integral part of the A amp E department or shared with the orthopaedic department or belonging entirely to the latter It recommended that the plaster room be close to the A amp E department and the x-ray department

Most departments had a separate plaster room available In many cases this was shared with an adjacent orthopaedic outpatients or fracture clinic Th~ staff generally found the plaste~-rooms satisfactory although two particularly narrow rooms were difficult to work in

Interview room

The DEU report [l] recommended that A amp E departments in medium-sized and larger hospitals should have a small interview room where a patient IS

relatives could talk with A amp E staff the police or others

No A amp E department had a room specifically designated as an interview room for bereaved or distressed relatives although one A amp E department shared such a room with another department In most departments one of the staff off ices was generally used for this purpose In departments where staff offices were small or crowded the lack of an interview room was seen as a serious flaw in departmental layout

Reception and records office

The reception desk should be immediately visible to ambulant patients arriving at the A amp E department and it is desirable for the receptionist to be aware of what is happening at the ambulance entrance as well The current A amp E records should be held at the reception desk or nearby [1]

In the A ampE departments visited the reception desk was usually well-placed for dealing with ambulant patients but in only four cases did it overlook the ambulance entrance In two departments the reception desk was some distance from the treatment area (separated by a waiting room or outpatients room) and the nursing staff found it difficult to oversee incoming patients Current A amp E records were held at the reception desk in all but one of the departments visited The amount of space available in relation to the throughput of patients was a major factor in determining the length of time records could be kept within the department This in turn affected the ease and therefore speed of record retrieval

Staff offices

These ranged from non existent to very cramped spaces serving many other functions to pleasant specifically designated and relatively quiet areas The latter offices are conducive to good staff morale and being a place for exchange of views and experiences could be expected to contribute quite markedly to the overall effectiveness and eff iciency of the department

32

Holding ward

The DEU report [1] said that holding beds should be used primarily for A amp E patients requiring a period of observation prior to a decision about admission or for those who could be expected to go home after a rest period The report noted that using holding beds as recovery beds for day patients for arranged admissions or for pre-admission clinics was not desirable

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments visited had holding or acute admitting wards These holding wards were used mainly for assessing patients requiring acute admission but in some hospitals were also used for observing patients (eg with suspected concussion) and for holding night admissions till the morning to save disturbing the wards Neither of the rural A amp E departments had a holding ward although one had an I A amp E admission procedure where a patient could be admitted for up to 24 hours for observation without the need for full admission procedures In the A amp E departments with holding wards a patient staying for more than four hours was formally admitted

Our study showed that the A amp E departments had some problems using holding wards properly In two A amp E departments holding wards were little used at night because nursing levels were too low to staff them safely In another department the beds were used for patients recovering from day surgery and even for some pre-ar ranged admissions At times general practitioner-referred admissions could also clog the holding wards

DISCUSSION

Most of the A amp E departments were generally adequate in size location and layout The exceptions were Christchurch and Butt where conditions were very cramped with particularly limited examination and treatment areas and poor layout We understand that improvements are planned at Hutt and that recent extensions have improved the Christchurch department considerably but at the time of our visits staff in both these departments were working under extreme pressure because of the physical conditions

Despite the general adequacy of the departments almost all had some flaw which affected their operation and inconvenienced staff and patients Major flaws found in several A amp E departments included

o ambulance access unsuitable for a shuttle of ambulances in a disaster

o difficult access to the x-ray department

o resuscitation room too small for easy treatment of more than one patient at a time

o no interview room for relatives of patients

33

REFERENCES

1 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

2 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

3 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 44-49

4 Emer~ency department organisation and management edited by A L Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975 p 8-16

5 Design of departments in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) p 1204-7

6 McKINLAY Robin - The care of children in New Zealand hospitals -Aucklandmiddot National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1982 p 79-80

35

CHAPTER 5

Staffing of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the staffing both medical and nursing looking at their numbers and experience their previous training and the training they receive in the A amp E department and their satisfaction with their work and conditions We also describe the clerical and reception staff and briefly the involvement of other workers (orderlies social workers and ambulance personnel) in the departments

MEDICAL STAFFING

Senior medical staffing

Organising appropriate medical staffing for hospital emergency services is a prQblem in many countries [1] The variety of staffing arrangements in A amp E departments within many countries suggests that none have established a generally satisfactory pattern of medical staffing

The Platt report [2] found that in Br itish A amp E departments the great majority of patients were seen by junior staff only and that supervision of the A amp E departments by conSUltants was often little more than nominal The committee recommended that

o the junior medical staff should be adequately supervised by consultants

o a consultant orthopaedic surgeon should normally be in charge of theA amp E unit

o an accident and emergency unit should have at least three consultant surgeons each giving a substantial part of their time to this work

o the primary task of general practitioners in emergency services is to deal with minor accidents and emergencies at any time of the day or night (by organising a rota to answer emergency calls within their practice by working sessions in A amp E departments or by attending cottage hospitals at short notice for emergency calls) bull

Since then some progress has been made but standards continue to lag behind those recommended [34] There has been considerable debate over the appropriate staffing arrangements for A amp E departments Some hospitals have implemented the Platt report recommendations others have appointed a full-time A amp E specialist others have employed a full-time non-specialist doctor and some have employed general practitioners

Despite the various systems there is a consensus in both the United States and Britain that experienced medical staffmiddot are essential in the A amp E department They are necessary for prompt effective treatment of emergency conditions for efficient running of the departments and for adequate supervision of the junior doctors employed [23567 p 17-23]

36

Similar concerns have been expressed in New Zealand since the Board of Health report on outpatient services in 1960 [8] This report recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times and staffed by experiencedmedical officers

Salmond [9] found that when a senior A amp E officer directed the department A amp E work was handled more efficiently and house surgeons were more closely supervised and supported He suggested that one senior member of the hospital staff (ideally a full-time A amp E officer) should accept full responsibility for the overall supervision of A amp E services

Most of the A amp E departments that we visited had an A amp E officer The position was vacant at both Wellington and Hutt hospitals at the time of our visit while at North Shore Hospital responsibility for the A amp E department was shared by two senior doctors The A amp E departments of the rural hospitals had no senior medical staff

In A amp E departments with heavy workloads additional experienced doctors were often employed as deputy A amp E officers usually medical officer special scale or as Medical Reserve Scheme registrars (see Table 5) There was no general practitioner staffing of any of the Aamp E departments visited although general practitioners had been part-time staff of some of themiddot smaller A amp E departments in previous years One medical superintendent commented that since very few general practitioners could be classified as specialists they could only be paid as medical officers special scale This low level of payment acted as a disincentive to general practitioner recruitment

The A amp E officers usually worked normal office hours (830 am - 430 pm or 9 am - 5 pm weekdays) apart from two who worked part-time covering morning periods If additional experienced doctors were employed they usually covered evening periods (eg 5 pm - 10 pm) and weekend day shifts

There was a wide range of experience among the A amp E officers Half of the senior A amp E doctors had a general practice background and these doctors often had specific surgical medical pharmacological or Armed Forces medical experience as well Several A amp E officers had primarily a surgical background while others had a considerable range of hospital experience In hospitals where the A amp E officers had a general practice background the Medical Superintendent or the A amp E officer often stressed the suitability of this background for A amp E work

An extensive general practitioner background is useful in dealing with the multitude of problems seen in an Accident and Emergency department An orthopaedic or surgical background is not as necessary because of the good backup from the specialties And staff who have only had hospital experience particularly junior staff can lack skills in general assessment and triage

A amp E officer

In other hospitals staff stressed that an orthopaedic and surgical background was very valuable as was experience in dealing with specific types of injury such as soft tissue wounds

37

TABLE 5 MEDICAL STAFFING OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington2

Hutt2

Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Senior medical staffing

Number of full-time equivalents

A amp E officer ( including deputies) 25 15 I 16

I 2

I 03 I

2 05

Registrar

06

1 1

House surgeons

Number on Number A amp E runs covering

some shifts in A amp E deptl

6 2-3 6 2 5 I 5 4 2-3 5 2 2

All on rotating basis 1 3 1 2

5 on rotating basis 4 on rotating basis

None in A amp E dept 4 on rotating basis

1 On general relieving duties 2 Senior A amp E position vacant at time of visit

Junior medical staffing

The issues

Junior medical staffing of A amp E departments has concerned many commentators in the United States Britain and New Zealand The Platt report [2] noted that recently qualified staff when serving in the casualty department undertake responsibility which they would not have in the wards or outpatient clinics

38

In 1960 the New Zealand Board of Health report [8] on out-patient services deplored the staffing of casualty departments by I relatively inexperienced men [sic] and suggested that these staff I should be regarded more as assistants under supervision and training than responsible officers in the outpatients departments The undesirability of staffing A amp E departments with first year house surgeons (or pre-registration doctors) has been reiterated since Junior doctors are often unsure when to ask for advice or help and are sometimes unwilling to admit that they are over-tired and unable to cope [91011)

The report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers [12] noted the heavy load carried by house surgeons working long shifts in A amp E departments It also commented that when house surgeons are required to look after the A amp E department while carrying out ward duties inadequate cover of the A amp E department could result

The New Zealand situation

The urban A amp E departments had between two and six house surgeons working on three month A amp E runs and in several of these hospitals another one to three house surgeons on general relieving duties covered some A amp E shifts There were more house surgeons in A amp E departments with heavier workloads or with fewer senior medical staff The provincial and rural departments did not usually have house surgeons working on specific A amp E runs rather the A amp E department was covered by all (or most) of the house surgeons in the hospital on a rotatng basis Of the two suburban A amp E departments Kenepuru was covered by the house surgeons on a rotating basis while North Shore did not have any house surgeons because there was no inpatient or consultative backup available (see Table 5)

The total medical staffing of the departments (senior A amp E doctors and house surgeons together) ranged from 10 to 100 full-time equivalents and was closely related to the attendance at the departments (see Table 6) The provincial and rural A amp E departments had higher medical staff to attendance ratios because they had to provide a 24-hour service regardless of the size of the attendance

Each A amp E department visited rostered its house surgeons differently depending on the availability of senior medical staff the workload of the department and the house surgeons other duties In the urban departments house surgeons worked between 45 and 60 hours a week on shifts usually 8 to 12 hours long Many of the house surgeons working in these departments complained about long shifts and suggested that more staff were needed to reduce the shift lengths Split shifts were also unpopular

The most worrying aspect of the staff ing arrangements in bhe Accident and Emergency department is the long hours We need another house surgeon to reduce the hours on some shifts and to proviae another pair of hands in busy periods (eg Friday and Saturday night Sunday afternoon)

House surgeon

39

TABLE 6 TOTAL MEDICAL STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND MEDICAL STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE I AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Total medical Total medical staffing to staffing attendance ratio

FTE per FTE per 10000 first 10000 total

Full-time attendance attendance equivalents p a pa

Full-time departments

Urban

Auckland2 100 17 15 Middlemore2 91 23 16 Green Lane2 65 25 15 Wellington 66 14 12 Hutt2 55 17 13 Christchurch 70 11 10 Dunedin2 60 22 16

Provincial Rotorua 42 34 25 Taranaki Base2 28 27 18 Timaru 22 19 11

Rural Whakatane3 15 25 17 Grey 10 26 20

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 20 21 12 Kenepuru3 20 34 22

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE estimated since A amp E department partially covered by house

surgeons on general relieving duties 3 FTE estimated since A amp E department covered by house surgeons on

rotating basis

Spearman rank correlations [131 of total medical staffing with

(a) first attendance r = 0953 p lt 001 (b) total attendance r = 0933 p 001

In the provincial and rural hospitals house surgeons were often on call for long shifts over nights and weekends They were usually covering a ward or the whole hospital at the same time and simultaneous demands from the wards and the A amp E department sometimes caused problems However

40

these house surgeons generally found their rostering satisfactory despite the long hours on call perhaps because the actual work required in the A amp E department was comparatively light

An ordinary week night is usually quiet after midnight thered be three to five calls and Id have to get up once on average Weekend nights are busier but I usually get at least two or three hours sleep

House surgeon

Several house surgeons were irritated that while they worked more intensively on A amp E runs than on ward runs they spent fewer hours on-call and consequently they were paid less

Supervision by senior medical staff

In the larger A amp F departments house surgeons worked with the senior medical staff on most day and some evening shifts only on night shifts (and some evening shifts) were house surgeons the sole medical staff in a department By contrast in the smaller and part-time departments house surgeons covered the department alone seldom working with any senior A amp E medical staff

Several nurses commented that the A amp E department ran less efficiently outside normal working hours because the house surgeons inexperience meant assessment and treatment times were longer and tests were used more often than when the A amp E officer was present

Many senior medical staff in the urban A amp E departments were concerned at the lack of supervision for house surgeons outside normal working hours and so would have Ii ked more senior A amp E staff Several of the house surgeons were also concerned although others enjoyed the autonomy they had and were not concerned about working without supervision

I am not happy with house surgeons managing the A amp E department on their own They only have a three month shift in the department and often most of this time is spent learning how to do A amp E wor k The house surgeons can have problems deciding when to call a registrar to treat a patient and there can be delays in obtaining a registrar The A amp E department needs full-time trained medical staff on duty 24 hours a day to give proper supervision to the house surgeons and to run an efficient department

A amp E officer

On night shift I can feel rather alone if something goes wrong

House surgeon

I enjoy the variety of work and the independence I have to treat most patients as I see fit

House surgeon

41 _A

Arraflgements for consultative backup and support when senior A amp E staff were not on duty varied from hospital to hospital according to hospital size n urban hospitals the house surgeons would usually call on the appropriate registrar and the acute admitting or specialist teams for emergencymiddot cases In some places the house surgeons could calIon the consultant if a registrar was unavailable but this was usually seen as a last resort call In the provincial and rural hospitals the house surgeons would call on the appropriate senior doctor who was available This was usually one of the cQnsultants or a registrar if any were employed by the hospital The A amp E Qfficer might occasionally be called and in hospitals without an A~amp E oHicer th~ medical superintendent would also provid~ backup

Generally house surgeons were happy with the support they received A physically compact hospital was mentioned several times as facilitating ~ ~ fast back-up Howeve( in some hospitals there could be considerable delays in 9etting surgical and orthopaedic registrars to the A amp E department usually because they were in theatre Also at two hospitals backup in the minor specialties was considered inadequate bull

Use of first year house surgeons

Urban and suburban hospitals had a policy of using second year house surgeons as much as possible in the A amp E department and of using first year house surgeons only in their second six months This policy was generally butmiddot not always carried out For example the on-call arrangements of some urban A amp E departments resulted in inexperienced first year house surgeons working in the department In the smaller hospitals also the limited pool of house surgeons available tended to result in more first year house surgeons working in the department

The hospital could not provide cover for the A amp E department without using first year house surgeons However there are always senior staff and the medical registrar readily available as backup

Medical superintendent

When direct supervision was limited first year house surgeons did find A amp E work difficult

Training

The training received by the house surgeons in the A amp E departments varied greatly Two hospitals ran half-day or one-day orientation courses before -house surgeons started in the department Three A amp E departments ran weekly or fortnightly training sessions on specific conditions while another department ran sessions on an irregular basis However house surgeons often missed training sessions because they were treating pat~entsln more than half tmiddothe A amp E departments no formal training was giVen and house surgeons were taught on-the-job when senior A amp E staff were available This teaching placed a considerable load on senior staff

The three-monthly changeover of house surgeons is frustrating and the first month with new house surgeons is very demanding because they have little confidence or competence

A amp E officer

42

If the A amp E department had no senior staff or if the house surgeons shifts did not coincide with those of the senior staff the house surgeons had to gain their training whenever and wherever they could Both house surgeons and nurses commented that house surgeons often required guidance from the nursing staff

We get on-the-job training relying very heavily on the nurses to say IDr X (the A amp E officer) normally does bullbullbull I was rather scared the first few days in the A amp E department

House surgeon

Several house surgeons commented that they would have liked more training particularly when they were first in the A amp E department and more guidance on hospital policy and administration

Manuals (middotor sets of standingmiddot orders) out-lining the clinical and administrative procedures required under different bull circumstances have been widely recognised as essential in the A amp E department They are particularly useful to new A amp E doctors as an explanationoof their duties 7 p 79914J

Senior medical staff at 13 of the hospitals visited said they had standing orders covering ~A amp E administration procedures or were revising them These standing orders were either specific A amp E booklets or sections of the full hospital standing orders Several house surgeons commented that they found the standlng orders useful while others relied more on verbal advice from the A amp E officer or nurses Two of the latter house surgeons said they had not seen any A amp E standing orders when in fact the full hospital standing orders did contain a section on the A amp E department One A amp E department had no standing orders (apartmiddot from protocols for the care of coronary patients) and the house surgeons there would have liked more guidelines

Accident and emergency work as a career

Advantages and disadvantages

The senior medical staff who expressed their views on A amp E work as a career had all previously been general practitioners and their comments largely reflected comparisons of A amp E work with general practice They tended to cite the regular hours good conditions of service and salaries competitive with general practice as advantages of A amp E work and the limited range of clinical material and lack of continuity of care as disadvantages

When house surgeons were asked whether they would be intercested in A amp E work as careers for themselVes their responses were more negative than those of the senior ~ amp E staff All of them mentioned some disadvantages of A amp E work To those mentioned by senior staff they added the problems of irregular hours and having to deal with many trivial complaints The lack of recognition of A amp E work as a specialty (and consequent lack of status within the hospital) was also seen as a disadvantage Some mentioned the advantages cited by the senior staff and added variety of work as another advantage These advantages and disadvantages mirror those noted by British and United States writers [315]

43

Accident and emergency work as a sp~cialty

Over the past two decades in the United States the increasing use of emergency rooms has led to the development of training programmes for emergency room doctors and in 1979 to the granting of specialty status to emergency medicine The American College of Emergency Physicians in 1975 defined the emergency physician as I a specialist in breadth whose training is focused ~n the acute and the life-threatening aspects of medical care and who~ by ~he nature of his practice is available when the patient needs him [cited in 16]

vlhile emergency medicine has much the same content as family practice the different emphasis approach and method of handling have been cited as justifying a separate specialty [16] Critics have disputed the specialty status of emergency medicine stating that although a broad clinical knowledge is required this knowledge is also shallow [15]

In Britain similar debates have taken place While the Platt report [2] recommended that one consultant should be in administrative charge of an A amp E department it did not favour the development of accident surgery as a specialty in its own right nor the appointment of consultants to work full-time in A amp E departments However the Increasing number of A amp E conSUltants middotthe development of training posts and the formation of an association of A amp E consultants [4] have signaled a de facto recognition of A amp E work as a specialty The role of general practitioners in A amp E departments has also been debated Their suitability for sorting and treating casual attenders has been stressed and their ability to work without consultant supervision has been seen as an advantage 21718]

An emergency care seminar held in Auckland in 1979 recognised the inadequacy of training at all levels for work in A amp E departments in New Zealand The suggestions made to rectify this situation included the recruitment of sp~cialist -staff at a career level

Senior staff in some of the urban A amp E departments stressed the need for a post-graduate A amp E specialist training in New Zealand They gave two reasons for this that more senior staff were required to supervise and properly train house surgeons working in A amp E departments and that more senior staff were needed to improve the efficiency

More senior staff would improve standards of care speed throughput reduce the need for tests and reduce recalls as well as improving the supervision of house surgeons

A amp E officer

The staff of the smaller hospitals commented that full-time specialists could be warranted in large urban A amp E departments but were not necessary in provincial hospitals

Full-time A amp E specialists are only warranted in very big hospitals where there is enough emergency work to justify a trauma centre and 24 hour senior doctor cover A specialist cannot work well in isolation so the workload has to be large enough to justify three or four A amp E consultants

A amp E officer

44

NURSE STAFFING

Accident and emergency nursing

As noted by Jenkins [7 p41-42 J nursing in the emergency department is different from in-hospital nursing The nature of work in the department requires the ability to perceive and act quickly and to adapt to constantly changing circumstances

The A amp E nurse needs skills in assessment and examination in critical care and emergency treatment in public relations and must be able to act calmly under pressure Increasingly experienced nurses are expected to carry out triage Special training both on-the-job and in study courses is therefore essential [27 p 36 1419J

The need to have experienced senior nursing staff working in the A amp E department at all times has been recognised for many years The senior nurse in charge of the department has a key role being responsible for the day-to-day administration of the department for the supervision of the nursing care given and often for supporting the junior medical staff [259] Again as Jenkins [7 p 27] noted the emergency department nurse is one cornerstone of the department and often acts as the stablizing element in a chaotic milieu especially in those hospitals where the medical staff rotates

New Zealand arrangements

There was considerable variation in both the total numbers and the levels of experience of nursing staff among the A amp E departments (see Table 7) Some departments had a nurse supervisor in control and several charge nurses while other departments had a charge nurse in control A amp E nurses were mainly staff nurses although some departments used substantial numbers of enrolled nursesmiddot Student nurses were present in most of the departments but they were often there for a few weeks only so they have been excluded from the tables

The number of nurses on duty in the A amp E department varied over the time of the day and the day of the week with more nurses on duty at times of heavy workload such as Friday and Saturday evenings and also weekday mornings when dressing clinics were held Most departments organised some staggering of shifts so that good cover was maintained throughout the day In three of the smaller hospitals (Timaru Whakatane and Grey)middot the A amp E department was covered at night by separate nursing staff usually the night supervisors who were covering other parts of the hospital as well

In several of the small hospitals the nursing staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department Generally this was satisfactory but occasionally the steady workload of the outpatients department left the A amp E department short of nursing cover

The total nurse staffing of the A amp E departments visited ranged from 25 to 278 full-time equivalents and this variation was partially related to the attendance of the department and whether or not the department had a holding ward (see Table 8) However even after adjusting for the staff required in the holding wards there was a threefold variation in the

45

nursing staff to attendance ratios of the urban A amp E departments Other factors such as the small size of the Hutt and Christchurch A amp E departments and greater use of student nurses may have been involved

TABLE 7 NURSE STAfFING OF HOSPITAL AIDS

Nurse lt bullbull

sup~rvisors

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland l 1 Middlemorel 1 Green Lane l 1 Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin 1

Provincial Rotorua 1 Taranaki Basel

Timarul 2

Rural Whakatane2 Grey2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Charge Staff nurses Full-

Time

4 21 4 11 2 11 1 19 1 8 1 11 2 3

5 I 10 1 3

1 4 1 2

1 7middot 1 1

EXCLUDING

nurses Part-Time

2 12

7

2 2 4

1

STUDENT NURSES AND

Enrolled nurses Full- Part shytime Time

4 2

2 1 2

1 4 1

1 1

3

1 Holding ward attachedto Aamp E department covered completely or partly by A amp E nursing staff

2 A amp E department covered by separate nursing staff at night (numbers not included here)

Work in both the A amp E department and the outpatients department

The relatively low attendance at the provincial rural and suburban departments contributed to their somewhat higher nursing staff to attendance ratios The high level of nursing staff at North Shore may be related to the additional duties of nurses in that department in escorting patients to other hospitals and working in the plaster room

TABLE 8 NURSE STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND NU~E STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Nurse staffing Nur~estaffing to attendance ratios

Full-time Adjusted Adjusted FTE Adjusted PTE equiva- full-time perlOOOO per 10000 lents2 equival- first atten- total attendshy

3ents dance pa dance p a

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane4

Wellington HuH Christchurch Dunedin

270 278 172 200 1l~0 130 80

220 258 122 170 110 130 80

3bull 8 66 47 35 33 21 29

34 45 29 30 26 18 21

Provincial Rotorua4

Taranaki Base Timaru

77 160 75

77 80 55

63 77 55

46 51 27

Rural Whakatane4 Grey4

52 25

52 25

87 65

59 49

Part-time depa rtment s

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

110 28

110 28

117 48

64 31

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE calculatedfrom Table 7 (with part-timenurses counted as 05

FTE) unless exact FTE figures supplied by hospitals 3 FTE adjusted by removing nurses covering the holding ward 4 Nurses covering both the A amp E department and the outpatients department counted as 07 FTE in the A amp E department and separate night nursing staff counted as 10 FTE extra

Spearman rank correlations (13] of adjusted nurse staffing with

( a) first attendance r = 0869 p lt 001 ( b) total attendance r = 0895 P lt 001

47

In seven A amp E departments nurses were satisfied with staffing arrangements liowever nurses in four departments (not necessarily those with relatively ~~w nurses) said that nurse numbers were too low while at two other departments weekend shortages of nurses and diff iculty getting replacements for numiddotreesmiddotmiddot off sick were mentioned as problems One hospitals policy of rotating all nurses at or below staff nurse level throughout the h6spital was criticised because it left too few nurses with A amp E experiance worlting in t)le department At another hospital nurses appreciated the reguiar check made on their job satisfaction by the nurse supervisors

In several A amp E departmentsmiddotmiddotr-ourseswere dissatisfied with the medical staffing arrangements~Cl some wani~d a senior doctor interested in A amp E work in charge of the department Others wanted A amp E doctors to spend

Imiddot ~~fU

more time in the department ~specially outside normal working hours

Training

In most of th~ A amp E departments visited junior nurses received on-the-job training wo~king alongside semor nurses and being rotateQ through different areas of the department However where a department was short of nursing staff or had a heavy workload senior nurses often had insuffficient time to teach the junior nurses Senior nurses often found that training new hurses both increased their workload markedly and slowed down the work of the department However as one principal nurse said

We train nurses on-the-job If we waited for experienced nurses to app1Y we I d nev~rltlet them

Principal nurse

At several A amp E departments junior nurses did not work either on their own or in areas requiring more judgement (for example the resuscitation room or the waiting room) until they were more experienced Often this changeover did not happen until the nurses in charge of the department had made a formal appraisal of the junior nurse There was a consensus among senior A amp E nurses that three to six months working in the department was required to train an A amp E nurse

I think A amp E nurses need a three month training course - their student training is not enough A nurse needs three to six months experience before she is fully competent to work permanently in the A amp E department Also its difficult to get fully trained on-the-job in a smaller hospital because theres too few patients coming through

A amp E nurse

Usually some form of procedure manual orientation book andor job description was provided for the nursing staff outlining their duties and responsibilities in the A amp E department A few departments also ran occasional lectures and inservice training At Auckland Middlemore and North Shore hospitals the A amp E department ran specific inservice training courses for staff nurses

48

The course at Auckland for example took six nurses at a time involved one study day per fortnight over 10-12 months and covered all aspects of A amp E work Nurses had to have six months experience in the A amp E

department before taking the course Senior nurses commented that the courses were valuable in improving the nurses abilities confidence and morale and felt that nurses who had been through the courses tended to stay in the department longer and were less prone to absenteeism Junior nurses at several hospitals without A amp E training courses said they would find such a course useful

At more than half the A amp E departments visited nurses commented on the necessity for them to guide the house surgeons particularly early in the three-month runs

The junior medical staff training is on-the-job and its largely done behind the door by the nursing staff The nurses will encourage the house surgeon to call a consultant if necessary (but not in front of a patient) or if they are very worried the nurses will ring a consultant themselves The house surgeons this year are very good and pleasant but it can be very wearying when they begin their three month shifts

A amp E nurse

At some hospitals this need to guide house surgeons had provilt1ed the impetus for developing A amp E nurse training courses

Many of the nurses said that they enjoyed A amp E nursing because of its specialised nature It had a fast pace and a stop-start quality thereI

was never a routine because of the high patient turnover the variety of complaints presenting and the drama associated with some cases As with the house surgeons nurses often found themselves carrying more responsibility working in the A amp E department than in the wards and they relished this Several hospitals had waiting lists of nurses wishing to work in the A amp E depart~entbull

OTHER STAFF INVOLVED WITH THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

An efficient and effective A amp E department needs not only adequate medical and nursing staff it also requires secretarial clerical reception and orderly staff [27 p 24-251

Reception and clerical staff

Most urban A amp E departments had receptionist cover 24 hours a day Usually therewere two or three receptionists on duty during the day with one receptionist on duty during evenings and at night At the provincial departments and at Hutt and Dunedin departments reception staff covered days (and sometimes evenings) for seven days a week In the rural A amp E departments a receptionist was on duty weekdays only When the receptionist was not on duty nursing staff carried out the duties In several of the smaller hospitals patients arriving at night were first seen by the hospital telephonist who then called the nursing staff

Usually the receptionists duties were to note the patients details on the A amp E record form and on the A amp E log The receptionists often helped with triage by alerting nursing staff to urgent cases In some

49

departments the receptionist also dealt with Ace forms made appointments for return visits and carried out admitting procedures at night However in one hospital the reception staff were not specifically attached to the A amp E department and only noted the patients details on the A amp E record form All other duties were performed by the nurses (and sometimes the A amp E doctors) who resented this added workload In several of the smaller A amp E departments reception staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department quite satisfactorily

Several receptionists had years of experience in the A amp E department as well as other relevant experience (eg ambulance dr i ver ECG technician) and were highly valued by the other A amp E staff

In addition to the receptionists some of the urban A amp E departments had hostesses andor hospital aids for odd jobs such as dealing with enquiries taking messages filling out laboratory forms putting away stores and making tea

TO meet the secretarial needs of the A amp E department (eg referral letters to general practitioners) the staff generally used secretaries in other parts of the hospital This service was not always adequate and one department used form letters completed by the A amp E doctors by hand for much of its correspondence Another department employed a part-time secretary for the doctors

Orderlies

Orderlies were generally used to move patients within the A amp E department as well as to other parts o~ the hospital In some hospitals they also assisted with plaster work

Some of the urban and provincial A amp E departments had an orderly during day-time hours but outside these hours and in all other departments orderlies were called from the hospital pool Some A amp E staff commented that delays involved in getting an orderly from the pool could be frustrating when the department was busy

Social workers

The A amp E departments visited had various methods for coping with patients with social or emotional problems

The urban A amp E departments could often calIon psychiatric backup such as a crisis team or an individual psychiatrist psychiatric nurse or counsellor Four of the urban A amp E departments had a social worker allocated to work in the department for some time each day who was also on call for the department while carrying out other duties The rest of the departments called on the pool of hospital social workers In the smaller hospitals social workers were not always available at nights or on weekends although in some places the social workers had made themselves available on an informal basis A amp E staff had mixed views on the usefulness of social workers

The social worker is essential to the work of the A amp E department

A amp E officer

50

The nature of social work has changed over the years and its hard now to make contact with the social workers and to get the support the department wants The department does social work itself and has good liaison with the Salvation Army and other welfare groups

A amp E officer

Ambulance personnel

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments were served by the Order of St John ambulances The exceptions were the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments which were served by the Wellington Free Ambulance and Taranaki A amp E department which worked with the hospital board ambulances Both the rural A amp E departments were served by hospital board ambulance services during the day and St John services at night

Generally the A amp E staff found that liaison between themselves and the ambulance personnel was good Many ambulancemiddot officers had had some training in the A amp E department and were familiar withmiddot its procedures Communications between the two were usually satisfactory with radio-telephones being used to alert the A amp E department to incoming urgent cases or to ask for advice on patient treatment

However some A amp E staff expressed concern abut the suitability of treatment provided by ambulance personnel They were particularly worried about the sophisticated techniques being used at times by some ambulance officers

Many ambulance officers are doing advanced courses and theyre enthusiastic about treating people - putting in drips or giving drugs Mostly the officers are excellent but some are over-enthusiastic

A amp E doctor

In the Auckland and Wellington urban areas there were several A amp E departments and as a working rule ambulance officers took patients to the nearest department However this rule was modified by the facilities available at the nearest hospital and whether or not the nearest A amp E department was open For example if the nearest hospital had no orthopaedic backup the ambulance would ptobably take a patient requiring orthopaedic care to the next closest hospital or if one of the part-time A amp E departments was nearest but closed the ambulance would go to another hospital At times the ambulance officers consulted with the A amp E staff by radio-telephone as to the appropriate A amp E department for a patient they were transporting

DISCUSSION

The patterns of medical staffing in terms of the number of senior A amp E doctors and the rostering of house surgeons reflectedmiddot the attendances and locations of the different A amp E departments The numbers of doctors and nurses (expressed as full-time equivalents) generally reflected the attendance at the departments However there was considerable variation in the level of nursing staff relative to attendance which could not be easily explained

51

Training in A amp E work for the house surgeons was inadequate with little formal training available for them In some places they had little opportunity to learn on-the-job beside a senior doctor Obviously greater time working alongside a senior doctor would be valuable as would intensive one or two-day orientation courses bull

Training was an important matter for the nursing staff also since very experienced nurses clearly were needed in the A amp E departments Inservice training courses are desirable both to develop experienced nurses as quickly as possible and to reduce the load that on-the-job training puts on the existing experienced nurses The training courses run in the Auckland hospitals appeared to be very successful and they could be used as a basis for courses in other hospitals and in post-basic programmes

The house surgeons in urban A amp E departments found their 10 and 12 hour shifts exhausting Also there was some evidence that where house surgeons covered other parts of the hospital as well as the A amp E department conflicting demands resulted in poor cover of the~ department Both of these problems would be alleviated by rostering more staff to the A amp E department We understand that this has happened in some departments in response to the Report on working conditions of resident medical officers Part I [12]

Inadequate supervision of house surgeons and the use of inexperienced first year house surgeons in A amp E departments were widespread In some places there were difficulties in getting backup from specialist staff and the house surgeons were very much on their own in the department There was also some evidence that A amp E departments were less efficient out of normal office hours due to delays in getting registrars and consultants and more especially due to the house surgeons inexperience

Employing more senior doctors both to improve the supervision and training of house surgeons and to improve the efficiency of the A amp E departments would be desirable But at present there are difficulties finding suitable applicants for A amp E officer positions These difficulties are at least partially oue to the low status of the A amp E department within the medical structure and the lack of career prospects for A amp E doctors The increasing numbers of doctors in the 1980 s and the opportunities for part-time work that the A amp E department offers to doctors with family responsibilities may make the department a more attractive choice However if these factors do not improve the senior medical staffing the development of A amp E medicine as a specialty will continue to ~e suggested

Does A amp E medicine in New Zealand require the extra training that would be provided by a post-graduate A amp E specialist programme Given the range of backgrounds currently found suitable for A amp E doctors it would appear that A amp E medicine in rural and provincial hospitals does not require much extra training although some training in particular aspects (eg soft-tissue injuries) could be useful In the urban hospitals the much higher load of major trauma cases could justify a post-graduate training programme However at present the number of senior A amp E doctors in the urban hospitals is insufficient to justify a specialist programme If numbers increase in the future perhaps the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine could sponsor a suitable post-graduate programme They coulo also play an extremely useful role by preparing a manual outlining clinical procedures for A amp E departments and distributing regular bulletins up-dating this material

52

REFERENCES

1 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services report on a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional off ice for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

2 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

3 ELSON Reginald - The medical staff of British accident and emergency units in Br J Hosp Med - (August 1971) p 161-170

4 New thoughts from casualty [editorial] in Br Med J - v 1 (1976) p 1299-1300

5 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 21-24

6 Community-wide emergency medical services recommendations by the Committee on Acute Medicine of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists in JAMA - v 204 no 7 (1968) p 595-602

7 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL~ Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975

8 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 1960 (Report series Board of Health no 2)

9 SALMOND GC - Young doctors an exercise in social researchmiddot methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

10 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM 68(83)

11 CANT BR staffing of A amp E departments in NZ Med J - v 94 (1981) p 471

12 Report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers Pt 1 Report of the Working Party established by the Hospital Medical Officers Advisory Committee and the Minister of Health - Wellington Dept of Health 1981 (unpublished)

13 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraW-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

14 OWENS J Cuthbert - Survey discovers what is wrong with hospitals emergency service in Mod Hosp - vl06no 1 (1966) p 82-85

15 LEITZELL James p - An uncertain future in N Eng J Med - v 304 no 8 (1981) p 477-480

16 RIGGS Leonard M Jr - A vigorous new speCialty in N Eng J Med shyv 304 no 8 (1981) p 480-483

53

17 HONIGSBAUM F - General practitioner work in British hospitals Soc Econ Admin - vl (1967) p 34-44bull

in

18 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL DJ and WALKER JH~ - Practitioners patients and the accident department in Hosp Health Services - (1975) p 80-84

Rev

19 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 1979 in NZ Med J - v 91(1980) p 194-196

19-23 March

55

CHAPTER 6

Patient att~ndance characteristics

This chapter considers the general pattern of attendance at A amp E departments noting overall levels and time trends the age and SeX distribution of patients and the conditions with which they come to the department Next we look at recall visits particularly the hospital to hospital variations Then the use of A amp E departments by people who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner is discussed

The materiai has been gathered by examining the A amp E records and talking with the staff of the 14 A amp E departments visited Data from the re~ords at Northland Base Hospital A amp E department have also been incorporated

Detailed patterns of attendance by hour of the day and day of the week have not been analysed Other researchers have documented these for A amp E departments in New Zealand and overseas [123456789] While detailed information is useful for good management of departments and setting adequate staffing levels for the busiest periods it is usually specific to a particular department and is not relevant to the questions addressed in this report For our purposes it has been sufficient to divide the week into normal working hours (in hours defined as 0800-1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays) and the remaining hours (out of hours)

OVERALL ATTENDANCE AND TRENDS

Since 1978 hospitals have reported total attendance at outpatient departments to the National Health Statistics Centre distinguishing A amp E attendance from other attendance and first attendance from recall attendance Table 9 shows the average annual attendance at the 15 A amp E departments for the period from 1978 to 1981 Table 10 presents the trends in A amp E attendance over the same period compared with the changes in population of the hospital catchment areas between the 1976 and 1981 censuses

There has been an overall increase in first attendance of 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 This increase is somewhat higher than we would expect from the growth in New Zealand population over the same period However the increase in first attendance has been partially counter-balanced by a decrease of 25 per cent in recall attendance

Table 10 shows too that there is no general trend towards increased first attendancemiddot among the urban hospitals The non-urban hospitals have experienced increasing first attendance although even there Northland Base and Rotorua show no increase

56

TABLE 9 AVERAGE ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-19811

First Recall Total attendance attendance attendance

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 58 506 6 272 64 777 Middlemore 39 032 18 686 57 718 Green Lane 26 079 16 635 42 714 Wellington 48 011 7 748 55 759 Hutt 33 266 9 807 43 072 Christchurch 61 516 12 010 73 526 Dunedin 27 202 10 802 38 004

Provincial Northland Base 7 794 3 144 10 938 Rotorua 12 265 4 636 16 900 Taranaki Base 10 341 5 462 15 803 Timaru 9 971 10 102 20 072

Rural Whakatane 5 992 2 177 8 769 Grey 3 850 1 214 5 064

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore2 9 388 7 900 17 288 Kenepuru 3 5 843 3 209 9 052

All public hospitals 524 442 226 251 750 693

1 Source Hospital Management Data 1978-1981 - Wellington National Health Statistics Centre Dept of Health Simple average unless otherwise noted

2 Estimated as average of 1978 1979 and 1981 figures as the North Shore A amp E department was closed for part of 1980

3 Estimated for 1979-1981 only since the Kenepuru A amp E department was not open ~or all of 1978

57

TABLE 10 TRENDS IN ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-1981

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Midd1emore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3

Kenepuru 4

All public hospitals

Average annual percentage change in A amp E attendance l

First attendance

-36 07 16

-22 -79

00 48

-07 06 64

185

61 90

59 179

15

Recall attendance

lo3-07

66 -155 -34

63 08

33 -45

23 02

1253 06

374 89

-25

Estimated annual percentage change in population of hospital bull s catchment

area

1976-19812

07

-04 -02 -10

14 12

-02 -06

12 -04

07 -04

02

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

2 Source NZ Wellington

Census of Population Dept of Statistics

and Dwellings 1976 and 1981

3 Estimated from 1978 and 1981 flUctuations in intervening years

figures only because of extreme

4 Estimated for 1979-1981 for all of 1978

only since Kenepuru A amp E department not open

Figure for entire hospital board area used

58

AGE AND SEX

The characteristic age and sex distributions of total A amp E attendance are shown in Figure 1 Nearly half of the attendances are by young adults 15-29 years Schoolage children too formed a larger part of the attendance than their numbers in the community would lead one to expect These two age groups which are also the age groups most likely to be active and daring accounted for nearly two thirds of all attendances The age distribution of attendance was similar from hospital to hospital

About twice as many males as females attended A amp E departments (66 per cent to 34 per cent) When age and sex were considered together I it was the school age and young adult males who made up the majority of attenders Even in the 30-64-year-old group men outnumbered women two to one These age and sex distributions are similar to those found by other researchers in New Zealand [1410] in Britain [1112] and the United States [1314]

Figure 1 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments by age and sex

Male Female

3L1

30

20 20

E ~ 128 shy

108

10

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65_ Age Group Age Group

CONDITIONS

Of the total A amp E attendances 81 per cent were for injury conditions and 19 per cent were for sickness conditions Adjusting for the recall visits we estimated that 73 to 78 per cent of first visits were for injury conditions Our results were similar to Platts [15] as far as we can tell given the different definitions used In another British study Lewis and Bradbury [12] found 90 per cent of visits were for injury However

59

this higher level is not surprising since they considered only cases which were waiting for attention ignoring ambulance cases and the very seriously ill

Out of hours sickness conditions made up 25 per cent of all visits and in hours they were 14 per cent Preschool children and people 65 years and over were more likely to attend for sickness conditions than those aged 5-64 years (Figure 2) The preponderance of males over females in the 15-64 year old groups was accounted for by injury conditions rather than by sickness

Figure 2 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

Male Femate

IIIiI A trendance for _ sickness condiHons 30

remainder for injury condItions

20

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 f Age Group Age Group

In the following sections information from some of the hospitals about the types of injury and sickness conditions is presented We have had problems in classifying the conditions since at some hospitals few details of the patients conditions were recorded on the A amp E log Even where details were recorded only 60 per cent of injury attendances and 80 per cent of sickness attendances have been able to be consistently classified

Injury conditions

Data on the type of injury was extracted from only six A amp E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch and Northland Base hospitals) There was very little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 3 shows the types of injuries as proportions of first injury attendances The category

60

of cuts (which included scrapes amputations and punctures) accounted for almost 30 per cent of first injury attendances The severity of the cuts could not be judged from log entries but in the case of Northland Base Hospital cuts identified as probably needing suturing formed a substantial part of this category Fractures made up 15 per cent of the first injury attendance with foreign body injuries (mostly in the eye) burns and toxic effects accounting for another 14 per cent

Figure 3 Injury first attendances by type of injury all ages

Other (414)

Cuts (291)Fractures (154)

The category labelled other accounted for 40 per cent of all first injury attendances and included some serious conditions such as falls crushing injuries and various states of shock However many of the other injuries were regarded as minor conditions by the Aamp E staff It was impossible to judge the severity of injuries from the detail recorded on the logs so no estimate of the percentage of injuries which required urgent attention has been made

For most types of injuries sex and age had little bearing There were exceptions (Figure 4) Toxic effects were four times as likely among preschool children as among other age groups Fractures were twice as likely both for school age children and for those 65 years and over as for other age groups Somewhat surprisingly adult men and women differed little in the types of injuries

Figure 4 Injury first attendances by type of injury by age groups

0-4 (ears 5-14 years 15-29 years

Other (308)

Cuts (321 )

Toxic effects (13) Burns (21 )

Foreign bodies (24)

Fractures (254)

Other (408)

Cuts (280)

Toxic effects (28)

Burns (41)

Other (452)

Cuts (286)

30-64 years 65+ years

Other (393) Other (341)

Cuts (308) Fractures (301)

62

People were more likely to present with injury conditions in hours rather than out of hours From the information collected at the four Auckland hospitals we can say that 43 per cent of first injury visits happened out of hours whereas 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category

Sickness conditions

Data on the type of sickness was extracted from only 10 A lie E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch Dunedin Northland Rotorua Taranaki and Grey) There was little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 5 shows the types of sickness conditions as proportions of all sick~ess attendance

Figure 5 Sickness attendance by type of sickness all ages

General sickness

(110)

Abdominal pain (132) Other (20 1 )

Shortness of breath (150)

Skin pain bleeding (229) Collapse (179)

TwO prominent categories shortness ofmiddot breath and collapse (including diabetic coma heart at tacks congestive heart failure and chest pain) accounted for one-third of all sickness attendances

General sickness covered fever diarrhoea and vomiting feeling unwell convulsions renal failure and abdominal pain recorded as being related to urinary retention Abdominal pain was generally recorded simply as such but acute appendix and similar terms and miscarriage or bleeding from the vagina were included in abdominal pain

Figure 6 Sickness attendance by type of sickness by age groups

0-4 years 5-14 years 15-29 years

General sickness (79)

General ~ickness (380)

Other (90) i

Shortness ofSkin pain I breath (148)

bleeding (100) Sickness pain Shortness of breath (320) bleeding (270) ClI

IN

Collapse (30)

30-64 years 65+ years

Abdominal pain (110) General sickness (102)

Shortness of breath (184) Ot 1159~

Skin pain I bleeding (10 1)

Collapse (358)

64

Unspecified pain or other bleeding have been included in the category of generally minor conditions involving skin pain or bleeding Such minor conditions accounted for almost a quarter of the sickness attendances Abscesses or infected wounds made up a quarter of the skin pain or bleeding category while a further 21 per cent involved pain such as back pain headaches or other pain

Ear and eye conditions toothache and other miscellaneous or undefined conditions made up the other category which formed 20 per cent of the sickness attendance

Were the sickness conditions urgent enough to require treatment at an A amp E department This was a difficult question to answer from the information available on the A amp E logs We have concluded that the collapse and shortness of breath conditions were likely to be emergencies and that for the preschool age group and probably those 65 years and over abdominal pain and general sickness required urgent attention We have described all the other sickness conditions as non-urgent sickness Thus at least 39 per cent of the ickness conditions required urgent attention

The type of sickness attendance differed between the age groups (Figure 6) Preschool children rarely came for superficial reasons Only 11 per cent of their sickness attendances were for skin pain or bleeding conditions Shortness of breath was a major condition for all children preschool or school age Skin pain or bleeding conditions were more prominent among the school age children than the preschool

Young adults tended to come for minor conditions Thirty per cent of their sickness attendance was for skin pain or bleeding conditions and only 20 per cent was for the emergency categories of collapse or shortness of breath

Among the adults 30-64 years old however emergencies formed a substantial part of sickness attendance with 27 per cent belonging to the collapse category Among those 64 years and over few non-urgent conditions were recorded with 40 per cent of the sickness attendance being for collapse The skin pain or bleeding conditions accounted for only 10 per cent of their sickness attendance

Fifty-eight per cent of all sickness attendances occurred out of hours~ as would have been expected given that 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category However nearly three-quarters of preschool sickness visits happened out of hours while less than half of the sickness visits by those 30 years and over were out of hours

RECALL ATTENDANCE

Almost all recall visits were for injury conditions velY few sickness patients were recalled for follow-up care As was noted in Chapter 3 policies on recall visits differed among the departments Several factors ~ffected the decision to recall the patients condition the A amp E staffs communication with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs middotof house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors ~hilosophy of A amp E medicine From the comments made by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the departments into two groups

65

RECALL POLICY

DO FAVOUR A policy favouring recall visits

DO NOT lAVOUR A policy not favouring recall visits with most patients being referred to a general practitioner However fractures and soft-tissue or serious wounds tend to be recalled

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

DO FAVOUR Taranaki Base Grey North Shore

DO NOT FAVOUR Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Rotorua Timaru Whakatane Kenepuru

-----_--------- ----------------------~

It is diff icult to compare the policies of the departments with their actual performances since some A amp E logs did not completely identify all recall visits Table 11 presents recall attendance as a proportion of total attendance For the departments where recall visits were fully identified there appears to be reasonable agreement between the Hospital Management Data figures and the figures derived from our tallies The exceptions are Whakatane where staff told us that return visits pad dropped from 1979 to 1981 and Auckland where we have no explanation It should be noted that the tally figures are estimates based on one-week to one-month samples and so may be less accurate than the Hospital Mlmagement Data which are complete counts over an entire year

Overall 25-30 per cent of all visits were recall visits There was considerable variation among departments in the level of recall visits OFlanagan [16] found similar variation among British A amp E departments

The recall polic ies were not closely related to the departments performances as measured by the proportion of all visits that were recalls While North Shore with a recall-favouring A amp E department had a very high level of recalls (many were plaster checks) so did Timaru a department with a policy of not favouring recalls The other recall-favouring A amp E departments at Grey and Taranaki Base hospitals had only average levels of recalls

The departments performances however were related to the levels of medical and nursing staff as measured by the tatal medical staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 6 and the nurse staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 8) A amp E departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits (see Table 11 and Figures 7 and 8) Perhaps these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat recalled patients

66

TABLE 11 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS RECALL ATTENDANCE

Hospital Tally sources Management Data Recalls as Recalls as Total Recalls as percentage percentage attend-percentage of total attendancel

of total attendance

of injury attendance

ance tallied2

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 97 198 278 948 Middlemore 324 327 399 1137 Green Lane 389 401 439 868 Wellington3 139 116 172 3568

(4 weeks) Hutt3 228 280 379 2766

( 4 weeks) Christchurch 163 166 216 1233 Dunedin3 284 278 334 749

Provincial Northland Base 287 275 328 2092

03 weeks) Rotorua 274 214 250 334 Taranaki Base 346 327 353 270 Timaru3 504 460 51 6 174

Rural Whakatane 317 152 175 259

( 2 weeks) Grey3 240 238 293 330

o month)

Part-time departments

Suburban North Sh~re 457 521 539 512 Kenepuru 355 383 422 451

(4 weeks)

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations lOne week tally unless otherwise noted 3 Tally data partially estimated from Hospital Managementmiddot Data (see

Table 9) to adjust for incomplete recording

Spearman rank correlations [18] of recalls as percentage of total attendances (Hospital Management Data) with

(a) FTE medical staff per 10000 first attendance r = 0459 P lt 005 (b) FTE nurse staffing (adjusted for holding ward) per 10000 first

attendance r = 0547 P lt 005

67

Figure 7 Comparison of medical staff availability and level of recall attendance

u c ro 50 Timaru

C c ~ North Shore m ro S 40 Greenlane 0

Kenepuru

Cl ro Taranaki E = 30

Middlemore bull bull Whakatane

Cl Dunedin Rotoruae

ro

u Hutt Grey

c ro

C 20 C

~ m Christchurch

ro Wellington u

0 10 Auckland

10 20 30 40

Number of medical staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance

Figure 8 Comparison of nursing staff availability and level of recall attendance

Timaru50

North Shore

40 Greenlanee

Kenepuru Taranaki

Middlemore bull Whakatane bull 30

Dunedin ROlorua

GreyHutt

20

Christchurch Wellington

10 Auokland

3 4 5 6 8 9 10 II 12

Number of nursing staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance lexcluding nurses staffing holding wards)

68

It has been suggested that house surgeons are more likely to recall than senior A amp E doctors [17] If this were so we would expect that A amp E departments where house surgeons worked with very little direct senior superv1s1on (Hutt Taranaki Whakatane Grey Kenepuru) would have had higher proportions of recalls than departments with much greater supervision (Auckland and Dunedin) This was not the case Also North Shore with no house surgeons had a high proportion of recalls Thus the recall levels do not suggest that the house surgeons had any greater propensity than senior A amp E doctors to recall patients

GP-LOAD

A amp E staff use the term GP-load as shorthand for people who in their eyes would more appropriately be treated by a general practitioner Other studies in New Zealand and overseas have estimated that between 36 and 61 per -cent of all A amp E patients could have been successfully treated by a general practitioner [41920] When we discussed this topic with A amp E staff we found a similar variation in their estimates of the GP-10ad This variation may be due to differing views as to which injury and sickness conditions should be treated in the A amp E department it may be due to different beliefs about the abilities and facilities of general practitioners and it may reflect differences in the patients ~erved by different A amp E departments

The role of general practitioners in the treatment of injury is a matter of debate However there is more agreement over sickness conditions A sickness emergency is traditionally accepted as suitable for A amp E treatment whereas a non-urgent sickness condition is seen as more appropriate for general practitioner treatment

Non-urgent sickness

A amp E staff estimated that patients with long standing or minor sickness conditions constituted from 2 to 30 per cent of the attendance However tallies from the A amp E logs showed that non-urgent sickness attendance ranged from 6 to 24 per cent averaging about 12 per cent At most departments staff oVer-estimated the level At a typical hospital staff opinion placed non-urgent sickness at 20 to 25 per cent of the attendance while the A amp E log showed only 19 per cent coming for any sickness condition and fewer than 12 per cent for non-urgent sickness Only in one A amp E department was the tally evidence of non-urgent sickness greater than the staffs estimate The general oVer-estimation of non-urgent sickness visits probably means that A amp E staff were also over-estimating the total GP-load bull

In general A amp E staff felt that patients with non-urgent sickness would be better off being seen by their own general practitioners However the departments differed in the ways they dealt with these patients Some staff mentioned that when they treated such patients they would discourage further visits by explaining the role of the A amp E department Some departments had notices in the waiting rooms stating that the department was for treatment of accidents and emergencies and that people should see their general practitioner for other conditions Some hospitals had placed advertisements with similar messages in local newspapers

From the comments of A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the A amp E departments into two groups

69

OPEN DOOR POLICY

OPEN An open policy where almtreated They may then general practitioner

ost be

all patients advised to see

are a

RESTRICTED A restricted policy where patients are not treated a general practitioner

nbut

on-urgent are re

sicknferred

ess to

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

OPEN Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Whakatane Grey North Shore

RESTRICTED Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru Kenepuru

The open door policies were reflected somewhat in the proportion of all A amp E visits that were f or sickness (see Table 12) The departments with restricted policies (which were all non-urban) tended to have lower proportions of sickness visits than those with open policies However the non-urban departments with open policies did not have substantially higher proportions of sickness visits than the restricted departments Rather some of the urban departments (Auckland Wellington Hutt and Christchurch) had particularly high proportions of sickness visits These departments were also particularly busy with large numbers of first attendances and relatively low levels of medical staffing One would expect that in a very busy department staff would discourage inappropriate visits However A amp E staff at Auckand and Wellington hospitals commented that although non-urgent sickness patients needed general practitioner care they tended to treat them anyway because it was quicker to treat them than to send them away This may be a partial explanation for the high levels of sickness visits but other factors related to the populations served by the departments are probably involved (see Chapter 8)

A common exception to the open door policies was made for children At most hospitals staff said that sick children were always seen As Table 13 suggests children as described by staff are probably preschool children rather than all those under 15 years The departments with restricted policies had considerably lower proportions of sickness visits in the preschool and school age groups than did the open policy departments Table 13 also shows that toe agemiddot group most likely to appear with sickness conditions is the elderly There was Tess difference in proportions of sickness visits between the restricted policy and open policy departments for patients aged 30 and over

It would appear that a restricted policy towards non-urgent sickness patients does tend to discourage sickness Visits particularly for preschool age children However a restricted policy does not markedly appear to discourage sickness visits by the elderly

70

TABLE 12 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESS 1

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Butt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru3

Rural Whakatane Grey3

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Estimated Percentage of percentage total attenshyof first ance that was attendance for sickness that was for sickness

378 303 235 158 187 112 365 323 361 260 301 251 233 168

162 183 144 110 74 109 59

156 132 190 145

58 28 152 94

Total attendance tallied2

948 1137

868 3568 (4 weeks) 2766 ( 4 weeks) 1233

749

2092 (13 weeks) 334 270 174

259 (2 weeks) 330 (l month)

572 451 (4 weeks)

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 One-week tally unless otherwise noted

3 For Timaru and Grey the percentage of first attendance that was for sickness is the actual figure derived from the tallies and the percentage of total attendance that was for sickness has been estimated

71

TABLE 13 PROPORTION OF TOTAL A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESSl BY OPEN DOOR POLICY AND AGE GROUPS

Percentage of total attendance that was for sickness

under 5 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 All years years years years years amp age

over groups

Open policy departments 367 111 148 245 433 201

Restricted policy departments 102 66 80 181 311 110

All departments studied 33 bull2 104 141 238 425 191

1 Source Tallies taken from A E logs by authors hospitals represented in one-week equivalents

DISCUSSION

At all public hospitals first visits to A amp E departments increased by 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 However this increase was not consistent with most of the urban A E departments reporting a decrease or no change in first visits Recall visits for all public hospital A E departments decreased by 25 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 The decrease was not consistent in fact the reported changes in recall attendance were highly variable It has been suggested that the cost of general practitioner services and dissatisfaction with the unavailability of general practitioners have caused increased use of A amp E departments However it seems unlikely that any single reason could explain these highly variable changes in A amp E attendance in New Zealand

The people visiting A amp E departments were predominantly school age or young adults and male Men aged 15 to 29 years formed the largest single group almost one-third of all attendances Eighty-one per cent of attendances were for injuries and the 19 per cent attending for sickness conditions tended to be preschoolers or people aged 65 years or more Injury visits were more common in hours and sickness visits out of hours probably because accidents tend to happen in daylight hours Also sic kness conditions often seem worse at night and if the patients do not want to bother their general practitioner they may go straight to the A amp E department (see Chapter 7)

72

It was difficult to classify conditions accurately from the information on A amp E logs since insufficient detail and little indication of severity was usually recorded Thus we have not been able to estimate the proportion of injuries which really required A amp E care Similarly there were difficulties in classifying the sickness conditions middotalthough almost 40 per cent appeared to require urgent attention

There was considerable variation among the A amp E departments studied in the proportion of all visits that were recall visits However contrary to our expectations this variation was not related to the policy on recalling patients stated by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents Nor did it appear to be related to the inexperience of unsupervised house surgeons Rather it was related to staffing levels Departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits It is likely that staff in these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat more recalled patients If departments wish to change their recall levels an examination of thei r staffing levels would be an obvious place to start

The other component of the workload which A amp E departments often wish to control is the non-urgent sickness attendance A amp E staff saw such visits as inappropr iate and they consistently over-estimated the proportion of non-urgent sickness patients they were treating Ullman (3] and Roth [21] have found similar processes of oVer-estimation occurring among staff in United States emergency rooms The level of non-urgent sickness visits was not high on average comprising only 12 per cent of the attendance However applying a restricted policy (referring to general practitioners for treatment displaying notices in the department and advertisements in local newspapers) appeared to discourage such visits particularly for preschool children Thus non-urgent sickness attendance was not a problem in some A amp E departments Where departments see such visits as a problem applying a restricted policy could ease it

13

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS E F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J -V 71 0970rgt212-219

2 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard ~ Emergency department utHisation in ail urban community implications for community ambulatory careinJAMA v 216 no 2 (191l) p 301-312

3 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SfRATMANN William C- An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1915) P 1011-1020

4 RICHARDSJ G and WHITE GR~ - Accident and emergency services at AucklandHospital inNZmiddotMed J - v 85 (1977) P 272~274

5 INGRAM D R CLARKE D -R and MURDIE R A -Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1918) P 55-62

6 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referral patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

1 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

McRAE She1agh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience of Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

9 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (A amp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 319-388

10 SNELGAR Denis- Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

11 Casual attenders a socio-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcast1e-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

12 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A amp E in Health Soc Serv J (1981) p 1139-1142

13 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

14 WALKER L L - Inpatient and emergency department utilisation the effect of distance social class age sex and marital status in J Amer ColI Emergency Phycns - v 5 no 2 (1976) p 105-110

15 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

74

16 OFLANAGAN P - The work of an accident and emergency department in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 26 no 162 (1976) p 54-60

17 What are accident and emergency departments for in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) P 837-839

18 SIEGEL Sydney_ - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

19 CROMBIE D L - A casualty survey in J ColI Gen Pract - v 2 (1959) P 346-356

20 SKUDDER Paul A McCarroll James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1913 p 11-35

21 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) P 839-856

75

CHAPTER 7

Patient attitudes to the accident and emergency department and staff attitudes to the patients

In this chapter we look at the attitudes of patients to the A amp E department and particularly the reasons they give for attending it Summaries of the results of overseas studies are given followed by detailed information from several New Zealand studies where patients were interviewed the Dunedin study carried out by Dixon in 1968[1] Richards Auckland study of 1975 [2] Keenans unpublished Christchurch study of 1978 the Wei~ington childrens study carried out by Kljakovic in 1978 [3] and McRaes Waikato study of I~H9 [4] Then we discuss the effect that health centres and deputising services have on A amp E use Finally we explore the views that A amp E staff have of their patients

REASONS FOR VISITING THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

Overseas studies

A substantial number of overseas studies have explored the reasons given by patients attending A amp E departments One major reason was the availability of the A amp E department open 24 hours a day and always staffed compared to the actual or perceived unavailability of the general practitioner [56789]

People mentioned the accessibility of the A amp E department as a reason for attending citing its location ease of transport to and from it and its convenience for work schedules and other arrangements [671011]

Another major reason for visiting the A amp E department was its appropriateness as a source of care particularly because of the equipment and facilities available [5612] with many conditions particularly injuries A amp E patients made their own diagnosis They therefore omitted the diagnosis-seeking part of care (where the general practitioner was seen as appropriate) and sought confirmation arid immediate treatment at the A amp E department [1314]

People also saw the A ampE department as the appropriate place to go because of the urgency of their condition especially if the person needing treatment was a child [7141516] However A amp E staff and A amp E patients often had conflicting perceptions of the seriousness of the condition Patients tended to see their complaint as more serious and urgent than did the A amp E doctor [9101117]

Advice from other people was another reason given for visiting the A amp E department [61218] People were more likely to visit the department rather than the general practitioner when the decision to seek care was made outside the home and where someone other than the patient or a close

relative was involved in the decision (eg a policeman an employer a teacher or bystander) In some cases such as traffic accidents and some

work and school accidents it was automatic procedure to send the patient straight to the A amp E department [1819]

76

Some people using the A amp E department did not have a family doctor because they were new to the area or transient or for other reasons [78] In the United States the proportions without a doctor were high ranging from 40 per cent to 86 per cent [5171920]

The proportion of patients who tried to contact their doctor before going to the A amp E department also varied considerably from 6 per cent to 42 per cent in different North American studies [59202122] 14 per cent in a Canadian study and SO per cent in a Swedish study [23] Holohan et al [24J found that over SO per cent of patients attending a British A amp E department were unaware or inaccurately informed about their general practitioners out of hours care arrangements

Dissatisfaction with their general practitioner led to some people visiting the A amp E department Organisational factors such as appointment systems deputising serVices and health centres all made it more difficult for patients to contact their doctor [142425) Dissatisfaction with the doctors treatment and wanting a second opinion were also reasons [26] As well language difficulties were a problem In Australia immigrants used the hospital foi childrens emergencies because interpreters were available and they did not have to use the telephone to arrange a visit [27]

It has been suggested that people use A amp E departments rather than general practitioners because the department is free This is unlikely to be a reason in Britain where general practitioner care is free under the National Health Service Studies in the United States found that very few respondents said that the cost of seeing a doctor was a major reason for visiting the A amp E department [511)

New Zealand studies

Use of general practitioners

It has been suggested that people use the A amp E department because they are visitors to a city or do not have a general practitioner The New Zealand studies foundmiddot that the proportion of those interviewed who had a general practitioner varied considerably from city to city (see Table 14) The high level in Wellington [3] was not surprising given that most families with children have a general practitioner The transience of local populations as suggested by Richards [2] may explain some of the differences between the studies Dixon [1] noted that the age and sex structure of the people visiting the A amp E department with the preponderance of young males was the opposite to that of people visiting general practitioners

The Wellington study found that for a very high proportion of children (39 per cent) there had been an attempt to contact a general practitioner before going to the A amp E department and 25 per cent had actuallY seen the doctor [3) The other studies found smaller proportions British studies have reported similar variations with Lewis and Bradbury [14] finding 8 per cent of A amp E attenders had been referred by their general practitioner and Conway (25] reporting 41 per cent

The Chr istchurch study found that the people who did not see a doctor before coming to the A amp E department were more likely to be injured rather than sick to visit the department out of hours rather than in

77

hours and to be 15 to 29 years old Also during work hours people who had accidents at work were less likely to see the doctor before going to the A amp E department than people with home or sports accidents

TABLE 14 USE OF GENERAL PRACT IT lONERS BY FIRST ATTENDERS AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Percentage of all those interviewed who

had a regular general attempted to contact their practitioner general practitioner before

going to the A amp E department

Dunedin 1968 92 16 Auckland 1975 72 21 Christchurch 1978 85 23 Wellington 1978 98 39

Derived from 84 per cent who were sent directly or chose to go to casualty without seeing a doctor

Specific reasons for using the A amp E department

Turning now to the reasons given by patients for their A amp E visit the New Zealand studies found a similar range of reasons to the overseas studies Keenan collected detailed information in Christchurch and this is presented in Table 15 and in the following sections Comparable information from the other studies where available has been included

Others advised the patient to go to the A amp E department The most common reason given by the Christchurch patients (and by the people interviewed by Dixon [1] in Dunedin) was that others (employers teachers traffic officers sports coach neighbours friends) advised them to go to the A amp E department There appeared to be an automatic procedure following many school work sports and traffic accidents of sending the patient straight to the A amp E department

There was no evidence that injuries happening at other locations (eg at home) were any less likely to go to the A amp E department A comparison of the Waikato and Christchurch A amp E injury attenders with people consulting general practitioners for accidental injuries [28] showed similar proportions of attendance by the location of the accident (Figure 9) In Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14] found similar results when studying A amp E attendance in the North Western Regional Health Authority

76

TABLE 15 REASONS FOR A amp E FIRST ATTENDANCE FROM THREE NEW ZEALAND STUDIES

Reasons Christchurch 1976

Wellington ( children)

1978

Auckland 1975

SAW GP BEFORE A amp E 186 250

A amp E MORE AVAILABLE GP found to be unavailable

or thought to be unavailable Did not want to bother GP

Cost of GP care a factor

125

( 65) ( 41)

(19)

233

119

(24) ( 79)

(16)

A amp E MORE ACCESSIBLE More convenient closer

phone or transport problems in contacting GP

214

A amp E MORE APPROPRIATE Condition of type not dealt

with by GP requiring A amp E facilities

Need for attention was urgent

140

( 5 0) (90)

389 671

OTHERS ADVISED TO GO TO A amp E 233 61

OTHER Includes having no GP

trained by GP to go to A amp E needed a dentist and so on

94 68

Number of people interviewed 565 428 1147

Tried to contact general practitioner did not necessarily see doctor

A amp E department more available Only 125 per cent of the Christchurch sample went to the A amp E department because it was more available than their general practitioner Richards [2] found a similar proportion in Auckland Not surprisingly the availability reasons were given more by people visiting the Christchurch A amp E department out of hours than in hours and more for children and older adults than the 15 to 29 age group The cost of visiting a general practitioner was hardly mentioned as a reason for visiting the A amp E department

79

In Wellington Kljakovic [3] found parents saying abOut the A amp E department

you can go anytime - 24 hour service when everyones at the end of their tether theyre there and theyre open

and about general practitioners

didnt know you could get a doctor on the weekends on other occasions you get an answering service - not worth bothering the doctor

midnight - too late to call a doctor

Figure 9 location at which accidents happened by those attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Presenting at A amp E department Presenting at general practitioner

Home (389) Home (290)

Work schooL Work school public buildings (336) public buddings (39 0)

A amp E department more accessible Over 20 per cent of the Christchurch attenders went to the A amp E department because it was more convenient closer or involved fewer transport or communic~tion problems These reasons were given more out of hours than in hours particularly by the 15 to 29 age group Injured patients especially those with sports injuries were more likely to give these reasons

A amp E department more appropriate Only 14 per cent of the Chr istchurch sample gave appropriateness as a reason while Richards [2] found 67 per cent in Auckland and Kljakovic [3] reported 39 per cent in Wellington These differences may reflect different interview situations since Richards interviewed patients at the A amp E department while Keenan and Kljakovic questioned people through telephone or personal interviews in their own homes Christchurch people suffering traffic accidents or poisonings (largely self-poisonings) were more Ii kely to give this reason than other reasons

80

In Wellington parents often said about the A amp E department

thats what its there for they have everything there

Several parents also commented that

general practitioners dont do stitches the GP is for minor things - not eager to corne to an emergency the doctor would only send us on to the hospital anyway thought leg was broken - needed an x-ray

Many parents decided to go to the A amp E department because they had already made a diagnosis and thought the condition required A amp E treatment others were unsure of the urgency of the childs condition A mother whose two-year-old son had hit his nose on a shower box at 755 am rang the doctor The child was crying his nose was bleeding and looked flattened The message on the answer phone was that the doctor could be contacted only in a real emergency She was unsure what a real emergency was so took the child to hospital not wanting to feel a fool by ringing the doctor

Some parents particularly those with asthmatic children were well aware that the condition required urgent care and had previously been told to go straight to the A amp E department

Dissatisfaction with the general practitioner Satisfaction is notoriously difficult to measure particularly when normal levels of satisfaction are between 85 and 90 per cent satisfied Only in the Wellington study [3] of childrens A amp E attendance was a direct question asked about satisfaction with the general practitioner service Forty-one per cent expressed some dissatisfaction mostly mentioning concern over difficulty in seeing the doctor Problems with getting an appointment with waiting because there was no appointment system with unsympathetic receptionists and with doctors not being willing to visit the horne were all mentioned Some parents commented that at a health centre they were unlikely to see their own doctor so they might as well go to the A amp E department Four per cent of parents were dissatisfied with the general practitioners treatment and came to the A amp E department for better treatment The cost of visiting the general practitioner was only mentioned by three parents (07 per cent)

Satisfaction with A amp E department The Wellington study [3] found that 73 per cent of parents were satisfied with the A amp E department For those who were dissatisfied the urgency of their visit was uppermost and they were unhappy at having to wait too long Parents also commented disapprovingly that the departments were understaffed or very busy The A amp E staff carne in for very little criticism only 07 per cent of parents made critical comments Many parents expressed their satisfaction with the reassuring aspects of the A amp E department its availability and its size A typical comment was its big they have everything there In one case parents dissatisfied with the treatment of their sick child at one A amp E department went to another department because it was bigger

81

Views of A amp E staff

When we asked A amp E staff why people visi ted the department they offered the same reasons that patients had given as explanations ie appropriateness availability and satisfaction Staff also commented that Pacific Islanders were accustomed to using hospital services for all their medical care in the islands andmiddot continued tomiddot use the hospital in New Zealand either as a first resort or for a second opinion Kinloch [29] demonstrated that while this was so for recent Samoan migrants in Wellington after some years New Zealand residence their pattern of hospital usage because similar to that of the population as a whole

A amp E staff thought that the major reason for the GP-load patients visiting the department was general practitioner unavailability They recognised

that many patients did not have a general practitioner because they were new to the area transient or on holiday Many staff mentioned the cost of visiting a doctor as a major reason although a few staff strongly asserted that cost was not important

EFFECT Of HIEALTH CENTRES AND DEPUTISING SERVICES ON A 8t IE UTILISATION

It has been assumed that the unavailability of a family doctor has been a major reason for people attending an A amp E department Consequently health centres with more facilities for treatment of injuries and open for longer hours than the usual doctors surgery have been set up Two United States studies [3031] found that the health centres they looked at appeared to have reduced the use of A amp E departments by people in the local neighbourhood either absolutely or relativemiddot to people in other neighbourhoods However in New Zealand data collected from Dunedin A amp E records by Maynard [32] three years before and three years after the Mosgiel health centre opened andmiddot by ourselves six years after it opened gave no evidence of a decline inA amp E use by Mosgiel residents It appeared that since the A amp E department was rarely used for routine primary care problems there was little opportunity for the health centre to substitute for the department Possibly a neighbourhood closer to the A amp E department would have shown more effect from a health centre Also as Alpert et al [33] suggested habit patterns of usage could be difficult to change

Williams et al [34] investigated the effect of general practitioner deputising services on A amp E department use in the Sheffield Hospital region They found that deputising service referrals did not add significantly to the workloads of A amp Edepartments nor did it appear that many patients referred themselves to the A amp E departments in preference to consulting the deputising service doctors They commented that the deputising services may have been meeting a demand previously coped with by the hospitals

It is possible that health centres ana deputising services have contradictory effects on A amp E department visits People who realise a doctor is readily available through these services may use thatmiddot service rather than the A amp E department Other people may reason that if they cannot see their usual doctor it is just as convenient to use the A amp E department as the health centre or deputising service

82

A amp E STAFF VIEWS OF PATIENTS

Overseas studies

Several overseas studies have explored the views of A amp E staff about their patients Roth [35] found that staff applied concepts of social worth which were common in the larger society to their patients so that higher status people were likely to get more respectful treatment than lower status Staff tended tomiddot oVerestimate the numbers of patients seen as undesirable such as drunks venereal disease cases and welfare cases as well as overestimating the numbers using the department inappropriately Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff categorised patients as good (clinically interesting allowing staff to practise their skills and testing the competence of staff) and rubbish (a socially-defined category including drunks overdoses tramps and trivia which were usually minor injuries or conditions not requiring medical attention) Hughes [37] commented that the good and rubbish categories were relatively small groups and that staff had a neutral attitude to the bulk of the people visiting the department

Jeffery [36] found that staff reacted punitively to rubbish patients using delay verbal hostility and vigorous restraint of unco-operative patients particularly overdoses According to Roth (35] patients seen as unco-operative will be told to wait their turn and may be threatened with refusal of treatment Several authors found that patients visiting for tri vial complaints tended to be handled with surface politenessmiddot even if they were subject to post-hoc attacks in written records or departmental gossip [363738]

Burgess and Holmstrom [39] found that the attitudes and actions of health providers could increase or diminish the psychological consequencies for women who had been raped and suggested that staff awareness and training would be valuable Alexander [40] studied nurses preceptions of women who had been raped and found that while the womens characteristics were important the nurses own personality and attitudes were more important Alexander concluded that short-term sensitivity training was unlikely to be effective and that great care was necessary in selecting health providers to care for raped women

Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff viewed patients as having a legitimate claim to medical care if they were not responsible for their condition if they were restricted in their reasonable activities by the condition if they viewed their condition as an undesirable state and if they co-operated in trying to get well He commented that people visiting repeatedly because of overdoses or fights were regarded as not co-operating while repeated injuries from sports activities were viewed as legitimate Roth [19] in a study of five United States A amp E departments found that staff views on the legitimacy of a visit depended partly on the patients source of referral People referred by health professionals were usually accepted as legitimate exceptmiddot where A amp E staff suspected a doctor of dumping an unwanted patient on to the department Contract cases where the hospital had a contractual relationship with the school nursing home or workplace the patient came from were immediately accepted as appropriate People brought in by police came into this category Self-referred patients were classified as legitimate or not depending on their social characteristics their condition and the kind of demands they were making on the department In a later paper Roth [35] noted that cases where a definite diagnosis could be made (surgical conditions asthma overdoses maternity

83

patients) were considered legitimate whereas psychiatric conditions and cases requiring more subtle or complex diagnosis were regarded as illeg i timate

The New Zealand situation

While this study did not observe staff-patient interactions in detail we asked A amp E staff about the patients and how they dealt with them and we watched staff at work for some time in each department

We found some evidence that New Zealand A amp E staff shared the views of their British and United States counterparts House surgeons tended to regard the clinically interesting patients as goodand often commented unfavourably on patients whose condition was not easily diagnosed With regard to the rubbish category of patients some A amp E staff disapproved of them while others accepted the whole range of patients as part of working in the department We saw little evidence of punitive reactions to patients although delay andmiddot the intimidating effect of a white coat appeared to be used at times The views of A amp E staff about specific categories of patients are covered in the next sections

Sports injuries

From the Christchurch and Waikato [4] studies we have estimated that 13 per cent of A amp E injury visits were for sports injuries At Green Lane A amp E department staff had recorded all rugby injuries on the A amp E log in the late April week sampled the rugby injuries comprised six per cent of all injuries

A amp E staff saw the department as the appropriate place for the treatment of sports injuries One staff member commented that most general practitioners would get a shock if presented with a sports injury to treat Staff also understood that coaches usually sent people straight to the A amp E department as an automatic procedure and that this was often legitimate since the injury might have required an x-ray However a frequently mentioned source of annoyance was people presenting with a sports injury some considerable time after the event such as on Monday morning or after the post-match drinking bout A amp E staff thought these patients should have seen a general practitioner particularly when the condi tion was not acute A few A amp E staff commented that they were beginning to regard repeated sports injuries as self-inflicted injuries and were less sympathetic to those patients

Alcohol-related visits

In all the A amp E departments staff commented that many of the assault and motor vehicle accident injuries were directlyassociated with alcohol (The only exceptions were the suburban hospitals which Were closed evenings and nights) Staff estimated that from half to all patients seen on Friday and Saturday evenings had been drinking or had been hurt by someone who was drinking This estimate may seem exaggerated but inspection of Wellington A amp E logs by Reinken [41] suggested that an estimate of 50 to 79 per cent was reasonable Staff at three of the central city A amp E departments commented that they treated a number of old alcoholic and derelict people usually for chronic complaints or because they had been attacked

84

From time to time staff as well as facilities have suffered abuse and violence A amp E nurses always commented on problems with disorderly behaviour both by patients and by friends of patients in the waiting room In two hospitals nurses had little faith in the security provisions made for their safety but mostly the nurses seemed to cope reasonably well House surgeons said they found intoxicated patients difficult to treat because of their lack of co-operation A amp E officers had few comments on alcohol-related visits probably because they rarely worked evening or weekend shifts

Domestic violence and rape

Unfortunately we did not ask specific questions about these topics but at three hospitals nurses mentioned that they saw cases of child abuse and at another three hospitals wife-beating was mentioned We have few details as to how staff dealt with these women and children but from the comments made by the nurses and on house surgeon they felt a need for more psychiatric or social work backup There were no comments about women who had been raped attending the department

_Regular visitors

At most of the urban A amp E departments and at Rotorua and Whakatane staff commented that they had a group of regular visitors This group was never large unlike the 20 to 60 per cent of workload reported as regular visi tors by two United states public hospitals [19] Asthmatics (who had previously been advised to go straight to the department) were regarded as legitimate visitors and staff watched for children visiting regularly with injur-ies in order to detect cases of chi ld abuse However people who repeatedly presented drunk or with overdoses or with an emotional or social problem were regarded with resigned acceptance or some annoyance One A amp E department maintained a special file for the records of regular visitors while in other departments a bulky bundle of cards stapled together alerted staff to yet another visit from a regular client_

Trivia

When the A amp E staff talked about trivia they mentioned some of the minor injuries and sickness from the GP-Ioad category but also included very minor injuries such as a splinter in a finger or a cut needing only a Bandaid Some A amp E staff felt that trivial conditions did not require any medical treatment especially not from a department designed to treat emergency conditions A few staff members commented that people with minor conditions cluttered up the waiting room and were physically in the way Some also said that knowing the waiting room was full put more pressure on them However other A amp E staff stressed that apparently trivial conditions were important and worrying to the patients involved and that reassurance at least was required

It has been suggested that people using the A amp E department for trivial conditions decrease the ability of the department to cope with emergencies [42431 Most staff interviewed felt confident that people attending for trivial complaints in no way jeopardised the quality of care given to the more urgent cases because the latter were seen first ThUS the minor complaints were annoying and added work but did not compromise the departments ability to give good care

85

DISCUSSION

Why do patients attend the A amp E department The public seem to have a rough and ready decision tree if you are sick go to your doctor if you are hurt go to the Aamp E department

The department is definitely seen as the appropriate place for treating accidental injuries People say thats what its there forI and they have everything there A visit to the general practitioner for such an injury is seen as unnecessary and delaying

A significant proportion of accidents and some sickness conditions happen away from home The patient may decide to go to the A amp E department because it is closer or easier for transport or work reasons Often someone else (a schoolteacher a coach or traffic officer) sends the patient to the A ampE department as an automatic procedure

Most people with sickness conditions visit their general practitioner so it is not surprising that those who visit the A amp E department have often been referred by their doctor The sick patients who corne directly to the department usually see their condition as needing urgent care Therefore if they try to contact their doctor and fail or if they think the doctor will be unavailable they head for the hospital

It is also possible that the general practitioners surgery is associated with waiting while the hospital is associated with swift action perhaps due to televised images as noted by Cooke [44] In fact the waiting times are generally equivalent in both settings it is the significance of that waiting which is different The patients may feel that if something happens to worsen their case they will be attended to quickly if they are waiting in the A amp E department rather than waiting at home for the general practitioner to visit

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners formiddot patients From the patients comments one of the main attractions of the A amp E department is its availability that it is always open and staffed In comparison general practitioners were often seen as not being available as difficult to contact or as unable to respond quickly to an emergency In this sense A amp E departments appear to be competitive with general practitioners As was noted in Chapter 6 sickness visits to the A amp E department were more likely to happen out of hour s than in hours The overseas studies suggest that health centres and deputising services which offer greater availability of doctors particularly out of hours may reduce the use of A amp E departments The only way general practitioners could compete with the availability of the A amp E department would be to improve their own out-of-hours service

The cost of visiting a general practitioner has also been cited as a reason for people visiting the A amp E department where treatment is free This is only relevant for sickness conditions since the cost of general practitioner treatment for accidental injuries is covered by the Accident Compensation Corporation However in none of the New Zealand studies covered in this chapter did people give cost of treatment as a major reason for attending the A amp E department A amp E staff tended to over-estimate the importance of cost as a reason but this was not surprising as they also oVer-estimated the number of people visiting the department for sickness conditions

86

Despite sickness visits to the doctor being free in Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14 J found similar levels of A amp E sickness attendance there as here Steinmetz [45) reported that on the introduction of Medicare in Quebec doctors no longer charged patients whereas previously only care in an emergency room was free He found that the demand for medical care increased at both sites the doctor and the emergency room but that there was no evidence of a shift from the emergency room back to the doctor Thus there is little evidence that the cost of visiting a general practitioner causes people to visit the A amp E department Rather people use the department because they see it as the appropriate place for treatment of their condition and it is available

Turning now to staff a~titudes to the patients it seems that acceptance of the great variety of people (and their conditions) is a necessary part of working in the A amp E department However the staff comments do raise some concerns Abusive and violent patients have been a problem in some hospitals and a reappraisal of security arrangements in some of the urban A amp Edepartments would be desirable

A amp E staff should be aware that women and children presenting with injuries may have received them in domestic violence and that full information on how the injury happened may not be volunteered It is difficult for staff to do more than treat the injuries when there are few specialised support services available However some attempts are being made to provide such services for children [46] and through v9luntary organisations such as womens refuges A amp E staff should maintain good contact with these services where they exist and work with others to institute them where they do not

Staff should also maintain contact with rape crisIs centres so that women who have been raped can ring them for short or long-term support if they want it Alexanders work [40] suggests that while a raped woman is in the department she should be cared for by a crisis team of hospital staff (not necessarily A amp E staff) who have volunteered for that work Perhaps this approach could be tried in New Zealand A amp E departments

87

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S - Ca$ualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) P 272-279

2 RICHARDS JG and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

3 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C andREINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

4 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

5 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care Vbull Determinants of use of hospital emergency services E Richard Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

6 Casual attenders a socia-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcastle-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

7 STRATMANN William C and ULLMAN Ralph - A study of consumer attitudes about health care the role of the emergency room in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1033-1043

8 KELMAN Howard Rand LAWE Dorothy S- Usemiddot of the hospital emergency room in re1atiop to th~ use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

9 INGRAMD R CLARKE D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

fO GARRAWAY W M - The work of a casualty department in Health Bulletin - v 27 no 3 (1969) p 26-30

11 KAHN Lawrence ANDERSON Mary and PERKOFF Gerald T - Patients perceptions and uses of a pediatric emergency room in Soc Sci Med - v 7 (1973) p 155-160

12 CALNAN M ABSON I E P and BUTLER J R - In case of emergency inI

Health Soc Serv J - (1982) p 615-617

13 HOLOHAN Ann M - Accident and emergency departments illness and accident behaviour in Social Rev (Mono] - (1976) p 111-119

14 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Serv J - (1981) ~ 1139-1142

15 The functioning of a childrens hospital casualty department Susan Lovell et aI in Med J Aust - v 1 (1975) P 135-138

16 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R Call Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

88

17 WINGERT WA Friedman D B and LARSON W R - The demographic and ecological characteristics of a large urban paediatric outpatient population and implications for improving community paediatric care in A~ J Public Health - v 58 (1968) p-859

18 CALNAN M - Managing -minor- disorders pathways to a hospital accident and emergency department in Sociol Health Illness- v 5 no 2 (1983) p 149-167

19 ROTH J A - Utilisation of the hospital emergency department in J Health Soc Behav - v 12 (1971) P 312-320

20 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) P 163

21 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 no 2 (1971) p307-312

22 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J- Help The hospital emergency unit as community physician in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) P 248-260

23 MAGNUSSON G - The use and abuse of accident and emergency departments - the Stockholm experience in World Hosp - vIS no 3 (1979) p 170-172

24 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL D J and WALKER J H - Practitioners patients and the accident department I in Hosp Health Serv Rev shy(1975) P 80-84 I

25 CONWAY Hugh - Emergency medical care in Br Med J - v 2 (1976) p 511-513

26 PEASE R - A study of patients in a London accident and emergency department with special reference to general practice in Practitioner - v 211 (1973) p 634-638

27 MOK CH - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

28a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident s~atistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington- Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

89

29 KINLOCH P J - Samoan health practices -in Wellington - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 9-iO (Occasional paper series no 12)

30 MOORE_ Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEHect of a neighbourhood health centre onhospi tal emergency room us~e - in Med Care v 10 no 3 (1972) P 240-247

31 HOCHEISERLouis I WOODWARD Kenneth and CHARNEY Evan - Effect of the neighbourhood health centre on the use of pediatric emergency departments 1n ROchester~ New York in N Eng J Med - v 285 no 3 (1971) p 148-152

32 _MAYNARD Edward Jand DODGE Jeffrey S -- Introducing a community health centre at M05giel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (Aamp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

33 The types of families that use an emergency clinic Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ala New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

34 WILLIAMS B T DIXON R A and KNOWELDEN J - The impact of general practitioner deputising services on accident and emergency departments in the Sheffield hospital region in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 23 (1973) p 638-645

35 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) p 839-856

36 JEFFERY R - Normal rubbish deviant patients in casualty departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 1 no 1 (1979) p 90-107

37 HUGHES D - Lay assessment of clinical seriousness practical decision-making by non-medical staff in a hospi tal casualty department - University of Wales Swansea 1980 Ph D Thesis

38 DINGWALL R and MURRAY T - Categorisation in accident departments -good- patients -bad- patients and middotchildren- in Sociol Health Illness - v 5 no 2 (1983) p 127-148

39 BURGESS Ann Wolbert and HOLMSTROM Lynda Lytle - The rape victim in the emergency ward in American Journal of Nursing - v 73 no 10 (1973) p 1741-1745

40 ALEXANDER Cheryl S - The responsible victim nurses perceptions of victims of rape in Journal of Health and Social Behaviour - v 21 (March 1980) p 22-23

41 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

90

42 MAYNARD Edward J - The appication of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment -University of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 161-194

43 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - NewYork Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

44 COOKE Alistair - The doctor (1981) p 1652-1655

in society in Br Med J - v 283

45 STEINMETZ Nicholas and HOEY John R - Hospital emergency utilisation in Montreal before and after Medicare experience in Med Care - v 16 no 2 (1978) pl33-139

room the Quebec

46 GEDDIS D C - Child Abuse report of national symposium held in Dunedin September 1979 - Auckland National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1979 p 30-34 60-63

91

CHAPTER 8

Utilisation of accident and emergency departments

In this chapter we consider A amp E ufefrom a new perspective looking at the rates of attendance by people in different neighbourhoods We examine variations in the rates among areas and we discuss the evidence they provide as to the effect of doctor availability on A amp E use Next we analyse several factors which could account for the variations in attendance rates including distance from the hospi tal social characteristics of the areas and A amp E department characteristics Finally we present results from several studies which compare rates of attendance at general practitioners and at A amp E departments

COMPARISON OF A amp E UTILISATION AMONG HOSPITAL CATCHMENT AREAS

The neighbourhoods that we have used are census area units sometimes grouped contiguously to achieve socially and economically homogeneous areas that have populations of about 2000 or more We grouped all of New Zealand into 682 such neighbourhoods Of these 442 neighbourhoods are in the catchment irea of one of the 15 A amp E departments studied

Using the attendance numbers taken from the A amp E logs age-adjusted quarterly rates of attendancemiddot have been calculated (indirectly standardised to the total New Zealand population at the 1981 census) These rates have been calculated for each neighbourhood separately for injury and sickness conditions for in and out of hours and for first and recall visits Because there were very few recall visits for sickness conditions they have been omitted from the analyses in this chapter When we talk about recall visits we are referring only to recall visits for injuries

The attendance rates have been combined for the neighbourhoods making up the catchment area of an A amp E department These rates measure the use made by people living in a particular area of any A amp E department in their region Usually people living in the catchment area of an A amp E department do visit that department However particularly in the North Shore and Kenepuru areas a large number of residents attend other A amp E departments Thus the rates presented here should be interpreted as attendance rates of people living in an area not necessarily attendance rates at particular A amp E departments

The rates for each catchment area are presented in Table 16 In Table 17 the annual rates of accidental death and admission to hospital for accidental injury similarly age-adjusted are presented

Results

As Table 16 shows the overall attendance rates varied considerably in the A amp E department catchment areas studied

92

Sickness attendance

Among the urban catchment areas the Wellington Board region showed very high rates of use of A amp E departments for sickness attendance Except for Rotorua and Whakatane out of hours the provincial and rural areas had very low rates of sickness attendance

TABLE 16 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3

Midd1emore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals studied

First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness In Out of hours hours

35 55 41 67 82 121 72 105 54 72 52 64

17 26 36 51 09 17 21 23

12 8B 54 26

36 36 72 61

46 63

Injury In Out of In Out of hours hours hours hours

125 130 137 25 151 130 159 25 17 0 196 36 41 127 156 87 B8 136 151 54 30 229 240 123 42

79 70 42 29 241 215 99 72 203 96 64 10 14 4 213 66 98

173 179 59 62 223 85 83 32

194 92 216 47 164 96 116 20

154 145 101 38

Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 Since few recall visits were for sickness conditions only recall visits for injury have been included in this category

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

1

93

TABLE 17 HOSPITAL ADMISSION FOR ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR)l AND DEATH DUE TO ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR) 2 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area Admitted for Died from Population accidental accidental of ca tchment injury injury area

Full-time departments

U rban Auckland3

Middlemore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals

104 123 146 153 140 142

194 169 196 149

243 214

95 133

139

067 062 062 059 058 072

070 089 065 068

059 075

048 096

066

408 948 264 093 133 611 147 858 336 420 III 981

110 205 56 613 98 883 50 250

39 087 37 767

146 661 52 389

3 126 747

1 Source Hospital Discharges 1979 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

2 Source Mortality Data 1974-1978 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

common catchment

Injury attendance

First attendances for injury also showed wide variations among the hospital catchment areas Wellington Rotorua Whakatane and Dunedin catchment areas showed relatively high rates of first attendance for injury both in

94

and out of hours Timarus catchment area had high rates only out of hours while those of Grey Taranaki and North Shore were high only during normal work hours Northlands catchment area had very low attendance rates both in and out of hours

The pattern of difference from place to place in first attendance rates for injury means that in any year a person in Rotorua would have more than one chance in six of attending the A amp E department for an injury while a person in Northland has but one chance in 16 of doing so

~s this due to a difference in the rate at which accidents occur It does not appear so since neither the rates for death due to accidental injury nor the rates of hospital admission for accidental injury follow the same pattern as A amp E attendance (see Table 11) In fact the death rates were low in Christchurch and North Shore areas (where A amp E attendance was average) and high in Kenepuru areas where A amp E attendance was low Similarly admission rates were sometimes higher in areas where rates of A amp E attendance for injury were lower (Northland and Taranaki) and vice versa (North Shore)

Also the admission rates probably reflect a tendency for more rural hospi tals to admit injured patients more readily because of the distance they would have to travel for outpatient care

Recall attendance

As noted in Chapter 6 the practice of recalling patients was different from hospital to hospital and affected the composition of the A amp E department 5 total attendance Naturally the rate of recall visits also differed markedly in the catchment areas

Relatively low rates of recall visits characterised the Northland Wellington Christchurch and Taranaki areas The Auckland Hospital Board areas had very different patterns in and out of hours with high rates of recall visits in hours and low rates out of hours

Effect of general practitioner availability

Is there any evidence from these rates (Table 16) that availability of general practitioners had an effect on A amp E use If there was an effect it would be evident from comparing in hours sickness attendance with out of hours sickness attendance since when the general practitioner is less available out of hours the patients may be more likely to present at hospital Was the out of hours rate higher than the in hours rate taking into account the different proportions of peoples waking hours in each category Overall this did not appear to be so Compared to the in hours rate the out of hours rate was only slightly higher than would been expected Only in Whakatane was the out of hours sickness rate markedly higher than would have been expected Thus any effect of doctor availability on A amp E use would seem to be very small

See next page

95

FACTORS EXPLAINING CATCHMENT AREA VARIATIONS IN A amp E UTILISATION

There are several possible explanations for the variations in A amp E use

o that the hospital attracts those nearby and if the neighbourhoods near the hospital are densely populated then more people will attend the A amp E department

o that the social characteristics of the catchment areas are different

a that the A amp E department does or does not encourage the public to attend through its policy or practice

Several studies have suggested that distance and socio-economic factors are related to A amp E attendance Distance has been found to be inversely related to attendance in Sweden [1] the United States [23] Britain [4] and New Zealand [5] Some studies have found that lower socio-economic status people use A amp E departments more [678910] although Kljakovic [5] found that Wellington children from lower socio-economic status families were more likely to see a doctor before going to the A amp E department than children from higher status families Berki and Kobashigiwa [11] found that less educated groups used A amp E more while Weinermann [6] and Ullman (12) found no effect Several studies have found that minority group members (67913] and immigrants [1141 tend to use A amp E departments more Kelman and Lane [15] found that family characteristics such as size and age of head-of-household also relamiddotted to A amp E use Cohen et al (16] found no income or employment effects on A amp E use but did find that use was positively related to the number of hospital-based doctors per capita

METHOD

Using multivariate statistical methods it is possible to evaluate which of the explanations ( or which combination of them) best accounts for the observed variations in A amp E use among the neighbourhoods (See Appendix C for the details of the multivariate analyses) Overseas researchers have used similar statistical techniques to explore factors related to A amp E attendance [131116] The factors we chose to explore are described on the next page

We computed the expected value assuming that in any week in hours comprised 50 hours and out of hours comprised 118 hours of which 62 hours were spent awake

Therefore the out of hours rate should equal 62 ~ 50 = 124 times the in hours rate plus E where E is a correction term for night time attendance About eight per cent of total attendance was in the eight-hours night time period [1317] so E can be estimated as eight per cent of the total sickness attendance ie E = 008 x 109 = 087

Therefore the expected out of hours attendance A is

A = (124 x 46) + 087 = 658

The observed value was in fact 63 per 1000 similar to the expected rate

96

One factor was the distance from the centre of the neighbourhood to the A amp E department For neighbourhoods near Kenepuru and North Shore Hospitals in hours and out of hours distances to the nearest open department were calculated separately_

Another factor was the social characteristics of the neighbourhood using variables derived from the 1981 Census of Population and Dwellings chosen on the basis of known or posited relevance to health services utilisation These social characteristics can be listed as follows

o age structure - the proportions of the population under 5 years between 5 and 14 years and 65 years or more

o ethnicity the proportions of the population classed as European ethnicity and Maori ethnicity

o marital status - the proportion of adults separated widowed or divorced

o education - the proportion of adults without tertiary education

o income - the per capita earned income for adults and the proportion of the adults on a means-tested benefit

o employment - the proportions of adults actively seeking work in a bluecollar occupation and partiCipating in the paid workforce

o tenure of dwellings the average weekly rental and the proportion of owner-occupied dwellings

o car ownership - the proportions of households without a car and with two or more cars

o a measure of the north-to-south gradient over the country

A third factor was the general practitioner prOVision as measured by the population-ta-general practitioner ratio

Finally the characteristics of the A amp E department made up a fourth factor We focussed on the following areas

o our classification of the departments and their catchment area into urban prOVincial rural and suburban

o departmental policy on recalling patients (see Chapter 6)

o departmental open door policy on treating sickness attenders (see Chapter 6)

o medical and nurse staffing levels (from Chapter 5) relative to the-population of the catchment area

Production workers transport and equipment operators labourers agricultural workers animal husbandry and forestry workers fishermen hunters

I

97

Results of the multivariate analyses

The effects of distance

Sickness first attendance The distance from hospital affected the rates of sickness first attendance for out of hours visits accounting for nearly 20 per cent of the variance It had less effect on in hours sickness visits accounting for only 9 per cent of the variance

Injury first attendance The most significant characteristic explaining neighbourhood differences in injury first attendance rates was the distance from the A amp E department In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than half the total variance In urban areas it was less important accounting for one-eighth of the variance for in hours rates and one-sixth for out of hours rates

Recall attendance The distange from the hospital was related to in hours recall attendance In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than 40 per cent of the variance but it was much less important in urban neighbourhoods

In summary distance was inversely related to attendance rates with neighbourhoods further from the hospital having lower rates The effect of distance was stronger for injury attendances than for sickness attendances

The effects of social characteristics

Sickness first attendances Out of hours social factors had a substantial effect on sickness attendance People from neighbourhoods where many households were car less were more likely to attend the A amp E department and this factor accounted foi 19 percent of the variance in attendance rate Taking car lessness into account people f rom neighbourhoods where adults were better educated were more likely to attend the A amp E department Adding in the level of educational attainment raised the percentage of variance explained to 265 per cent The same pattern relating carlessness and higher educational attainment to high attendance rates applied to sickness attendance in hours but the effects were less marked In combination with distance the social factors explained 16 per cent of the variance of in hours sickness attendance rates

Injury first attendance In hours the rate of attendance for injury causes was only slightly related to social characteristics of the neighbourhoods adding 6 per cent to the variance explained Out of hours the social factors had a similarly minor effect adding 4 per cent

Recall attendance The social characteristics bad some effect on in hours recall attendance in urban areas In combination with a small distance effect the social factors explained 18 per cent of the variation For non-urban areas the social factors had no effect on in hours recall attendance only distance was important

Thus some of the differences among A amp E departments in the rates of sickness and recall attendance were due to differences in the social characteristics of the departments catchment areas However social factors were not important for injury attendances

98

Tbe effect of general practitioner provision

Initial correlation analyses showed that the population-to-general practitioner ratio was not significantly related to out of hours sickness attendance rates However it was positively related to out of hours injury attendance largely because the numbermiddot of people per doctor in a neighbourhood increases as the distance of the neighbourhood from the hospital decreases

In the multiple regression analyses the ratio nevermiddot entered as a significant variable Thus there was no significant effect of general practitioner provision in the community on A amp E attendance rates (see Table 18)

The effect of A amp E department characteristics

To look at the effect of A amp E characteristics on attendance rates it was necessary to cor rect the rates for the distance and social character istic effects just presented This was done (see Appendix C for details of the principal components analysis used to reduce the data)

Controlling for the neighbourhood factors thedepartment-to-department differences in rates were substantially reduced but were still present (see Table 18) Some patterns in the adjusted rates for sickness and 1nJury could be distinguished The areas served by urban departments tended to have low injury rates especially in hours and high sickness rates especially out of hours The Dunedin areas were an exception their rates were more like those of the areas served by provincial departments which had moderately high injury rates and low sickness rates The rural areas had very high injury rates and high sickness rates The suburban areas were similar to the urban areas except that North Shore areas had high injury rates The adjusted rates for recall attendance were highly variable and demonstrated no clear patterns among the departments

Further analyses were carried out to determine how the A amp E department characteristics related to the adjusted rates (Appendix C contains details of the analyses of variance the Student-Newman-Keuls means tests and the regression analyses of these differences) Only the statistically significant results are presented below

A amp E department classification Out or hours the adjusted sickness rates were lower in the provincial departments areas than elsewhere The sickness rates for the Wellington Hospital Board areas were no longer markedly higher than other areas

In hours the adjusted injury rates were higher in rural departments areas for first visits and in suburban departments areas for recall visits than elsewhere

Open door policy Adjusted rates of attendance for sickness (in and out of hours) were higher where departments had a stated open door policy than elsewhere This explains the low sickness rates in the provincial departments since most of them had restricted policies Where departments had a restricted policy adjusted rates of in hours injury attendance were higher than in open places

99

Recall policy In hours the adjusted injury attendance rates (both first and recall) were higher in areasmiddot where departments had a stated policy favouring recalling patients Out of hours adjusted rates of sickness visits were lower in areas with recall-favouring departments

TABLE 18 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED AND NEIGHBOURHOOD-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 AND POPULATION-TO-GENERAL PRACTITIONER RATI02 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchinent area First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness Injury Population In Out of In Out of In Out of to-GP ratio

hours hours hours hours hours hours

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3 44 57 130 144 100 24 1 476

Middlemore 52 74 165 148 131 24 2 078

Wellington 55 77 160 153 54 30 1 630 Hutt 61 89 130 137 10~9 83 2 237 Christchurch 50 71 116 117 76 27 1 651 Dunedin 40 52 204 193 159 38 1 558

Provincial Northland Base 46 56 128 132 53 45 1 735 Rotorua 34 33 188 163 73 57 1 656 Taranaki Base 17 29 227 ll8 81 19 2 243 Timaru 21 35 168 209 83 88 2 085

Rural Whakatane 29 91 207 222 81 84 1 679 Grey 67 57 286 135 131 39 2 310

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 51 69 198 156 175 57 1 865 Kenepuru 47 54 146 131 129 31 2 035

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors The attendance rates given in Table 16 have been adjusted for neighbourhood-determined factors ie distance from the hospital and social characteristics

2 Source Doctor numbers in full-time equivalents from Medical Council data unpublished

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

100

Staffing levels Adjusted first In]Ury attendance rates were positively related to levels of medical staffing and less impressively to levels of nurse staffing Neither the policy variables nor the size of department accounted for the relationship between lnJury attendance rates and staffing However there was no significant relationship between staffing levels and the adjusted rates of sickness and recall visits

COMPARISON OF A amp E USE AND GENERAL PRACTITIONER USE

Material for comparisons of this sort is hard to find We have compared the level of childrens attendance at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments found by Kljakovic [5] with childrens attendance at general practitioners in the same area over the same period (derived from General Medical Services benefit claims made by general practitioners) In an average week 652 per 1000 children in the Wellington Hospital Board area consulted a general practitioner whereas 35 per 1000 children visited an A amp E department (see Appendix D for details)

Similarly in Tauranga during an average week in the period 1979 to 1982 48 per 1000 people attended the A amp E department while 53 Sper 1000 people consulted a general practitioner [18]

Snelgar [19] compared attendance at Northland Base A amp E department with urgent consultations made by general practitioners (derived from the General Medical Services benefit claims) In an average week 36 per 1000 people in the whangarei area consulted a general practitioner for an urgent condi Hon while 09 per 1000 people made a first visit to the A amp E department

For first injury attendances we have compared rates derived from surveys ot people treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident [20] with similar rates obtained from our tallies at Auckland Hospital Board A amp E departments and data made available to usmiddot by Snelgar McRae and Keenan In a week 37 per 1000 people living in the catchment areas of the above A amp E departments made a first injury visit to an A amp E department while 1 per 1000 New Zealanders made a first injury visit to a general practitioner (see Tab~e 19)

Elderly people were as likely to go to the general practitioner as to the A amp E department for an accidental injury whereas children and young adults were five to six times more likely to go to the A amp E department as the general practitioner Foreign body injuries and cuts appeared to predispose attendance at an A amp E department whereas burns and falls tended to be taken to the general practitioner more than other injuries

In summary people visited general practitioners much more than the A amp E department even for urgent conditions It was only for specific injury conditions that the A amp E department was consulted more than general practitioners

101

TABLE 19 COMPARISON OF FIRST ATTENDANCES FOR INJURY AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS AND GENERAL PRACTITIONERS

Rates per 1000 per week A amp E departments l General practitioners2

Age distribution

All ages 37 10 0-4 years 38 06 5-14 years 39 08 15-29 years 66 11 30-64 years 23 11 65 years and over 11 10

Injury conditions3

Falls 066 027 Cuts 045 009 Foreign bodies 025 002 Toxic effects 014 001 Burns 007 003 Other 232 058

1 Calculated from the author st tallies at Auckland Middlemore Green Lane and NorthShore A amp E departments and data from Northland Base Waikato and Christchurch A amp E departments

2 Calculated from ACC Statistical Supplements - Wellington Accident Compensation Corporation November 1977 March 1978 September 1978 March 1979 and personal communications

3 These categories have been derived from those used in the A amp E department tallies and the type of accident categories used by the ACC

DISCUSSION

The analyses presented in this chapter confirm that distance and social factors are related to A amp E use in New Zealand Their effects were not independent but rather were entwined in a complex way Even within the group of social factors the interactions were complex and there were no simple relations between a specific social factor and A amp E attendance

However distance from the hospital was clearly a major determinant of A amp E use particularly for injury conditions both first and recall The distance effect was especially strong in non-urban areas perhaps because of the greater distances people had to travel in order to reach the hospital Altogether the strong effect of distance was not surprising given the body of overseas literature documenting distance as a factor in health services utilisation and also the number of A amp E attenders citing the accessibility of the department as a reason for using it (see Chapter 7)

102

The social factors were important determinants of sickness attendance with a stronger effect out of hours than in hours They were not important for injury conditions Possibly the appropriateness of the A amp E department for injury conditions as cited by attenders (see Chapter 7) overrides the effect of the social factors

One social factor which had a relatively strong effect on sickness attendance particularly out of hours was car ownership Areas where many households had no car tended to have high sickness rates Perhaps people who have to call a taxi or borrow someone elses car to get medical care go to the A amp E department because they know it will be open and treatment will be available

During our discussions A amp E staff had suggested that Pacific Islanders made greater use of the department because they were accustomed to using the hospital for all medical care in the islands If this was an important factor we would have expected ethnicity to figure prominently in the statistical analyses However for first attendances ethnicity had only a minor effect and in fact areas with high proportions of Pacific Islanders tended to have low attendance rates

Many A amp E staff also suggested that the cost of visiting a general practitioner was a major reason for sickness attendance at the department So we would have expected low income unemployment or receipt of a means-tested benefit to have been related to increased sickness attendance rates However neither income nor receipt of a benefit were at all related to the sickness rates and areas with a low proportion of adults in the paid workforce tended to have low attendance rates Thus contrary to general opinion neither the cost of visiting a general practitioner nor a Pacific Island background appear to have a strong effect on A amp E use

As noted in Chapter 7 we found that some patients were attracted to the A amp E department by the size of the hospital and the impression that specialised equipment was available there However the urban departments which were the largest and which had the most specialised equipment did not have higher attendance rates than the other departments In fact they tended to have slightly lower rates of injury attendance than the other departments

The results presented in this chapter show clearly that even aft~r

controlling for distance and social effects departmental characteristics are related to A amp E attendance It is understandable that rates of sickness attendance reflect whether a department has an open door or restricted policy However the relation between high injury rates and a restricted policy on- sickness attendance requires some explanation Perhaps these departments have always had a high injury rate and have restricted the access of sickness patients so they could cope with the injured patients Conversely the operation of a restricted policy may have convinced the local community that while the department is only to be used for injuries it is indeed the place for all injuries so generating a high attendance rate

It was also understandable that departments with a policy of favouring recalls did have high rates of recall visits But why did these departments have high first attendance rates for injury This probably happens because high recall rates and high first attendance for injury rates go together since larger numbers of injured patients tend to produce larger numbers of patients requiring specialised A amp E follow-up care

103

There was a positive association between first injury attendance rates and staffing levels which could not be explained by the policies or the classification of the department The explanation of these associations is not straightforward The h~gher staffing levels may somehow account for the higher attendance - levels for example attracting clients by keeping the waiting time sh~rt Alternatively an unexamined feature of th department or its catchment area could generate higher attendance levels and staffing levels mayhavebeen adjusted to meetthe demand

Thus departmental characteristics such as policies on non-urgent sickness patients and on recall viSits and levels of medical and nurse staffing are related to attendance rates

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners for patients Looking first at the availability of the two services the greater availability of the A amp E department out of hours did not result in a higher than expected use over those hours Also doctor prOVision (as measured by the populationto-genetal practitioner ratio) was not Significantly related to A amp E attendance rates Thus while the A amp E department was described by patients as desirable because of its availability - (Chapter 7) the attendance rates of the neighbourhoods did not refiect the lcwer availability of general practitioner services

Secondly the comparison of attendance at A amp E departments and general practitioners suggested that in an average week out of 1000 New zealanders four or five would go to an A amp E department and 50 to 60 would go to a general practitioner Of those Visiting the A amp E department on average only one would be attending for sickness Given that non-urgent sickness visits were only 60 per cent of all sickness visits (see Chapter 6) it is clear that general practitioners were losing only a tiny proportion of their workload when A amp E departments treated non-urgent sickness patients~

It - is also clear that general practitioners did not treat many injured people Only one of the 50 to 60 per 1000 people visiting a general practitioner in an average week would be making a first injury visit It would seem that thetwo serVices A amp E departments and general practice arecomplementaiy rather than competiti-ve

REFERENCES

1 MAGNUSSON Gudjon - The role of proximity in the use of hospital emergency departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 2 no 2 (1980) p 202-214

2 INGRAM D R CLARK D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Hed - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

3 ROGHHANN Klaus J and ZASTOWNY Thomas R - Proximity as a factor in the selection of health care providers emergency room visits compared to obstetric admissions and abortions in Soc Sci Med - v 13(0) (1979) p 61-69

4 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referred patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

5 KLJAKOVIC H ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

6 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care V Determinants of use of hospital emergency services Richard E Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

7 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

8 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 nomiddot 2 (1971) p 307-312

9 The types of families that use an emergency clinic - Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

10 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Servo - (1981) p 1139-1142

11 BERKI S E and KOBASHIGAWA B - Education and income effects in the use of ambulatory services in the United States an analysis of the 1970 National Health Interview Survey data in Int J Health Servo shyv 8 no 2 (1978) p 361-365

12 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SlRATMANN William c - An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1011-1020

13 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at AUckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

105

14 MOK C H - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

15 KELMAN Howard R and LANE Dorothy S - Use of the hospital emergency room in relation to the use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

16 COHEN Susan D GINSBERG Allen Sand VLADECK Bruce C - The middoteffects of unemployment and inflation on hospital-based ambulatory care in Am J Public Health - v 68 no 12 (1978) p 1219-1221

17 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

18 DALDY B M REINKEN J and SEDDON T D S - Report on the effect of funding in primary medical care - Tauranga Otumoetai Health Centre 1984 (In preparation)

19 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

20a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

107middot

CHAfTER 9

Conclusions

TheAamp E department is a complex changeable and challenging place It is also an ambiguous place since itmiddot fulfils several different and at times conflicting roles it is a hospital department an emergency service and a primary care service

THEA amp E DEPARTMENT AS A HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT

As a hospital department the A amp E department is the bullodd-one-out It differs from the other departments not only by being accessible at all times to people seeking medical care but also in the number of patients seen and the diversity and severity of illness and injury to be treated

Because of this diversity the A amp E service has little status within medical circles It tends to be seen as an area requiring few special skills and therefore not warranting specialty status However as Salmond [1] noted the humble casualty department provides a hospital with a display window where like it or not hospital wares are constantly on show to the public Good public relations require effective and efficient management of the Amiddotamp E department Also the doctors interviewed for this study stated that special skills in assessment surgery and orthopaedics were required The status of the A amp E department should be improved through a recognition both of the breadth and experience required for A amp E medicine and of the departments importance in the public view of the hospital While a post-graduate specialist programme is probably not warranted at present it should remain an option for future development

The Aamp E department plays a major partin the teaching of house surgeons Junior doctors quickly learn avariety of skills such as suturing lavage reading x-rays and resuscitation More importantly the A amp E department is usually their first experience of practising medicine without any immediately available consultation This study like Salmonds study in 1970 has demonstrated the lack of initial training and orientation and the inadequate senior supervisionrecei ved by many house surgeons in the A amp E department Clearly this should be remedied by the provision of specific training sessions at the beginning of the house surgeons A amp E run and by

increased senior supervision fn the A amp E department )

This study has also highlighted the desirability ofmiddot specific training courses for A amp E nurses Such coursesmiddot can improve the skills and confidence of the nurses and develop the different approach required for A amp E nursing compared to ward nursing The courses run by the Auckland hospitals may provide a useful basis for the development of postbasic and inservice training courses

Working in an A amp E department demands from all staff members an awareness of the social and emotional contexts of the people attending and the possible implications of their conditions for example people who have attempted suicide parents of- an infantmiddot with convulsions and women who have

108

been raped One aim of all training carried out in the department should be to foster such awareness Also it would be desirable for house surgeons to have experienced a psychological medicine run as well as a general medicine run and a surgical run before they work in the A amp E department All A amp E staff should be aware of the support services that they can calIon (eg social workers psychiatrists Salvation Army) or that the patient can contact (eg rape crisis centres womens refuges)

AS an important training site for house surgeons nurses and emergency workers such as ambulance personnel and police officers the A amp E department has a particular responsibility to maintain a high standard of care This study has not assessed quality of care directly although we have considered related areas such as the level of staffing and the experience of staff There is scope for evaluation of the quality of care gi ven for specific conditions The work reported by Mates and Sidel [2] provides some guidelines and a model whereby both process (measured by adherence to standards) and outcome can be studied Their example considered treatment of adult asthma patients and might for a start be replicated here in New Zealand

There is also scope for extending Mates and Sidels method to cover other conditions The ARCOS study [3] provides one model per taining to acute coronary or cardiovascular episodes There is less precendent for evaluating the quality of care in surgical or orthopaedic emergencies but the presentations of abdominal pain might be investigated as a usefUl beginning Removing healthy appendices is an expensive placebo The process evaluation of trauma care has not been reported on though wound sepsis might provide a suitable outcome measure Staff interviewed in our study discussed standards of suturing but no formal studies of quality of care in that respect have been reported

It must be considered that one explanation for the lack of study in the whole area is that very high standards prevail and the need for evaluation is therefore minimal Given patients high expectations and satisfaction with the service that explanation cannot be dismissed Yet studies that demonstrated a satisfactory level of care would confirm the high quality of care In some A amp E departments a small study of one reasonably significant type of emergency should be undertaken possibly modelled on the work of Mates and Sidel

As Gi bson [4] has pointed out the A amp E department acts not only as an entry point to the hospital but as a screen for the other outpatient and inpatient units of the hospital We found this was true of the New Zealand departments studied with only five to ten per cent of first attendances being referred to specialist outpatient clinics and five to fifteen per cent being admitted There were wide variations both in policy and practice with respect to patient disposition We consider that further study of acute medical admission practices focussing particularly on unnecessary hospitalisation is warranted

Some New Zealand studies [56J have tried to evaluate the need for care of patients presenting at the A amp E department They have tended to depend on the A amp E staffs assessment of whether a general practitioner (and a hypothetical one at that) could have dealt adequately with the case No studies have attempted to give a general practitioner assessment So the question of need for A amp E care remains open However it does not seem practical to devote more research effort to this topic until more is known

about the variable costmiddots oftreating minor injuries If such research is contemplated the techniques of activity analysis and recording systems proposed by Dalbyetal [7] andRoberts et al [8] could be useful

tmiddot bullmiddot

This study has not attempted to estimate the cost of A amp E care The information presented aboutothe physical size and staffing levels of A amp E departments suggests that the hospital service commits only a small share of resources to the A amp E department However with the continuing pressure on hospital resources the cost of A amp E care particularly if it is high relative to care by general practitioners has some importance Even a rough and ready costing of the whole service would be a first step Following that an indication of which parts are fixed costs to keep the essential service viable and which vary by volume or by character of workload would be a next step_ The variation in recall levels that we found suggests that savings in variable costs could be possible Gibson et al [9] in their account of a study of operating and patient care activity costs provide a valuable model on which some New Zealand studies could be based

THE A amp E DEPARTMENT AS AN EMERGENCY SERVICE

The A amp E department must be ready to cope with all kinds of emergencies whether they involve one or two badly hurt car-crash victims or the sudden influx of many patients after a natural disaster A major tool ensuring that a department is always prepared for a crisis situation is the disaster plan The United States Joint Committee on Accreditation of Hospitals requires every hospital to have a written disaster plan developed in conjunction with other relevant agencies which is tested in a full-scale drill at least twice a year The plan should cover assigning staff summoning staff to emergency duty setting aside parts of the hospital for specified purposes maintaining adequate supplies and co-ordination and communication within the hospital and with other hospitals police fire health and ambulance services and civil defence officials

Most of the- departments we studied had close liaison with the ambulance service and to a lesser extent with other services such as police fire and civil defence Six of the hospitals had adequate disaster plans which were revised on a reasonably regular basis but very few hospitals had had a full-scale drill to test the plan Many of the departments with inadequate disaster plans were in the process of revising them We commend this since we consider a comprehensive disaster plan which is regularly revised and tested at least annually to be an essential part of the A amp E service

While discussing emergency services it is worth noting that there has been little research done in New Zealand on the use of ambulance services There is a need both to document the coverage and formal structure of the service and to explore the effects if any of the different methods of funding this essential service The former is a necessary first step the latter presumes a study of both ambulance workload and of organisational matters such as staffing training and triage

Internationally there has been considerable discusion over the optimal distribution of A amp E departments nationwide Platt [IO] recommended that as a minimUm a population of 150 UOO was required to justify a full A amp E centre with seven days a week and 24 hours a day staffingbull Several

llO

authors [101112] have indicated the need for regional central or major accident centres with specialised services such as neurosurgery plastic and thoracic surgery and treatment of burns or poisonings serving a population of 500000 to 750000 An emergency service organised in levels as suggested requires careful planning so that all elements are integrated and good communications are maintained It is particularly desirable for ambulance personnel the police and perhaps taxi driVers to be aware of the level of treatment available at different hospitals

There has been disagreement over whether or nor smaller A amp E centres are justified It seems that densely-populated countries or regions with good transport systems do not need smaller A amp E units whereas more sparsely-populated regions often rural do need them [1013] New Zealand definitely falls into the second category Only our urban A amp E departments fulfil (or come close to) Platts criteria of 150000 population yet all of the A amp E departments visited in this study provide an essential service to their communities In New Zealand the distances that patients would have to travel preclude any concentration of emergency care within a few highly-equipped hospitals

THE A 8t E DEPARTMENT AS A PRIMARY CARE SERVICE

The A amp E department is a primary care service since few of the people Visiting it have been referred by a health professional most patients being self-referred or sent by someone else This primary care role could conf lict with the departments role as an emergency service if patients with minor injuries filled the department and hindered the care of emergency patients However by using triage the A amp E departments studied generally avoided this conflict Some departments discouraged visits for sickness conditions and recall visits so that the department would always be ready for an emergency situation

The A amp E department and general practice are both primary care services However the department differs greatly from the general practitioner in many aspects it is readily available 24 hours a day staff have little background knowledge of the patient and there is little continuity of care There has been concern that A amp E departments are stealing patients from general practitioners because the department is always available and care is free there This study has shown that such concern is not warranted

Looking first at the cost of general practitioner treatment as a reason for visiting the A amp E department we note that this is only relevant for sickness conditions since treatment of injury conditions is paid for by the Accident Compensation Corporation The interview studies have shown that very few patients give cost as a reason for attending the department Also the census area unit analysis showed that low income and receipt of a means-tested benefit were not related to sickness attendance rates and that areas with high unemployment had relatively low sickness rates We would expect contrary results if cost was a major factor As well our comparison of attendance rates at A amp E departments and general practitioners indicates that general practitioners would be losing at most one per cent of their workload when A amp E departments treat non-urgent sickness patients Even if all A amp E departments instituted a policy of discouraging such patients the effect on general practice would be negligible

111

The interview studies have demonstrated that patients do find the ready availability of the A amp E department attractive However our analyses of out of hours use compared to in hours use and our explorations of the effect of population-to-doctor ratios have shown that this attractiveness does not translate into significantly higher rates of A amp E attendance This suggests that improving the availability of general practitioner services is unlikely to have a major effect on the use of either service

There are two major factors related to peoples use of A amp E departments The first is distance from the hospital with people living close to the hospital being much more likely to visit the A amp E department It is hard to see any way of changing this factor The second factor is peoples perception of the A amp E department as the appropriate place for injury treatment The verY name of A amp E departments (instituted folJowing the Platt report) implies that the department is for the treatment of injuries It would be very difficult to change this perception and probably would not be desirable given the facilities experience and availability of the A amp E department for injury treatment

There has also been concern that A amp E departments recall patients instead of referring them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care It appears that A amp E departments recall a similar number of patients (10 to 30 per cent- of firstmiddot attenders) as they refer back to the general practitioners (10 to 20 per cent of first attenders) Some of the recall visits are middotjustified because they require the facilities of the A amp E department It hasmiddot been suggested that house surgeons tend to recall patients because of inexperience and to aid their training While this undoubtedly happens we found no evidence that it has a major effect on the level of recall visits However we did find that departments with high levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have high levels of recall visits possibly because the staff had more time to treat the recalled patients This suggests that recall attendance could be reduced in some cases shy

Ov~rseas studies [141516] have discussed A amp E departments as fulfilling three roles

o trauma treatment centre for the community providing acute emergency care

o substitute for the private phYSician when not available

o family physician for the poor particularly minority group poqr

This study has shown that New Zealand A amp E departments operate largely in the first role of trauma treatment centre providing care for both urgent and non-urgent injury conditions The departments also fulfil the second role of out of hours general practitioner substitute to some extent but they hardly ever operate in the third role of family doctor to the poor

This study has not explored in detail general practitioners views and use of A amp E departments although some information on these topics is implicit in the descriptions of procedures in Chapter 3 and the analysis of reasons for visiting the department in Chapter 7 More information about general practitioners perspectives and the actual availability of general practice care outside normal surgery hours could be gathered However we consider that as well as carrying out further research efforts should be made to develop better communication and understanding between general

112

practitioners and A amp E departments Towards this end we would suggest that A amp E departments make greater efforts to inform general practitioners about the conditions of patients attending the department perhaps using prepared forms or cards (see page 15) We hope too that this report will foster greater recognition among general practitioners of the valuable activities of A amp E departments and allay fears that the department is substituting for the family doctor

We conclude as Dixon [17] did in 1970 that the A amp E department and general practice are complementary services rather than competitive We cannot justify further investigation of the hypothesis that A amp E departments steal patients from general practitioners Possibly a study replicating the Northland comprehensive study of urgent medical care utilisation [18] in an urban area coupled with a study monitoring general practitioner availability out of normal surgery hours would finally lay the ghost of competition for patients However given the evidence presented in this report this does not seem a high priority

WHERE FROM HERE

We considet that research effort could now be turned to two areas First a study of the whole area of accidents is definitely warranted Accidents account for a significant proportion of early deaths and long-term disability and the volume of less severe accidents strains the financial and caring resources of the community The research of the Accident Compensation Corporation has understandably focussed on general practitioner care since the Corporation does not bear the costs of treatment at or in hospital Studies of hospital activity neglect general practitioner care of accident victims A broad study would have to involve not only A amp E departments and general practitioners but also occupational health clinics ambulance and other first aid services Only a comprehensi ve study can provide a firm basis for setting priorities for accident prevention efforts

The need for such a study raises the issue of recording systems both in terms of themiddot classification of type and severity of injury and of the context or cause of the accident Not only is there a need for a fairly simple and versatile system but there is also a need for all the many services to use it consistently For medical emergencies where diagnosis follows professional examination the issue is not crucial For injuries where the events immediately before and after the trauma are relevant the recording of cause and context is important Studies of treatment alternatives and costs depend on a detailed description of the injury which is probably worthwhile only for more severe injuries For example we have noted that many A amp E visits are for bumps and bruises minor lacerations or pain from past inj ury Elaborate description of minor conditions only obscures the nature of the more important cases Clearly before such research can proceed some small-scale attempts at coordinated recording and a form of information triage are called for

The second area warranting study middotis that of the emergency services and their coordination The A amp E department and ambulance services would obviously be covered but the civil defence police and fire service should also be involved Disaster plans drills communications and supplies would be important aspects to be considered

113

This study has focussed on what happens inside the doors of A amp E departments and why people go there We hope that it provides a comprehensive view of the organisation and utilisation of New Zealand A amp E departments and that it will be useful not only to those working within the hospital service but also to all those concerned with primary health care and emergency services

114

REFERENCES

1 SALMOND G C - Young doctors An exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

2 MATES Susan and SIDEL Victor W - Quality assessment by process and outcome methods evaluation of emergency room care of asthmatic adults in Am J Public Health - v 71 no 7 (1981) p 687-693

3 BONITA Ruth - Stroke rehabilitation who gets what - how when where and why in Commun Health Studies - v 7 no 3 (1983) p 347

4 GIBSON Geoffrey - The emergency department as a screening point for hospital specialty services inclusionary vs exclusionary strategies in Soc Sci Med - v l3(A) (1979) p 495-498

5 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

6 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

7 DALBY B C S FARRER J A and HARVEY P W - Casualty activity analysis coding and computing in Computer Programs in Biomedicine - v 3 (1974) P 254-266

8 ROBERTS Jean FARRER J and HARVEY P - A progressive study of the emergency room demand by the community in Med Inf - v 2 no 3 (1977) p 197-201

9 GIBSON Geoffrey BUGBEE George and ANDERSON Odin W - Emergency medical services in the Chicago area - Chicago Centre for Health Administration Studies University of Chicago 1970

10 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

11 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 55-58

12 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services - report of a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional office for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

13 PLANT Janet and AMES Seth - Emergencyoutpatient satellites serve as rural outposts in Hospitals Journal of the American Hospitals Association - v 52 no 5 (March I 1978) P 87-92

14 TORRENS Paul R and YEDVAB Donna G - Variations among emergency room populations a comparison of four hospitals in New York City in Med Care - v 8 no 1 (1970) p 60-75

115

15 MOORE Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEffect of a neighbourhood health centre on hospital emergency room use in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) p 240-247

16 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J emergency unit as community physician (1972) p 248-260

17 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S shyutilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71

- Help The hospital in Med Care - v 10 no 3

Casualty department (1970) p 272-279

18 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

Paper Development

- ~

C) w CJ C Z w c 0 laquo

118

APPENDIX A

Question sheets

MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT

1middot Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others

a number b levelsmiddotof experience c background experience

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties eg nurses doing clerical work

2 Policy (on procedures) 21 Standing orders 22 Sorting of patients at presentation who does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admit 26 Relations with other hospital departmentswards eg sharing of

facilitiesstaff with outpatients 27 Relations with other A amp E departments

peripheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

3 Relations with GPs

31 Any involvement of local GPs in A amp E department eg staffing 32 Policy on GP-load presentations

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A amp E service iri general

PRINCIPAL NURSE

1 Staffing

11 Nurses a number b levels of experience c background experience

2 Policy (on procedures) - ~ -

~ ~ bull - - I bull

22 Sorting of patients atprese~ation 23 Level of treatment provic)e~ by nurses 26 Relations with other hospitaldepartmentswards eg sharing

nurses 27 Relationsiith other ~ ~ltE 9~parlttm~nt~periPheral hospitals

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others a number I

b levels of experience c background experience d at different times

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties egnur~esdoing cler~cal work

2 Procedures ~ - ~

21 standing orclers ~ 22 Sorting of patients at pr~seniation~ho does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admitZ 26 Relat io~s witll oth~r )()sIgti taidepa rtmentswards

ashCl~in9 q~i facilitiesstaff with out-patients b go9rdinat~pgwith xray and laboratory

27 Relations with other A amp E departmentsperipheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

4 workload

41 Number of patient visits per year 42 Seasonal variation

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases -definiUon

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp B

120

~~

55 Relations with local GPs ~i~ 56 Alcohol involved in presehttionsbull 57 Administration - recordstystem 58 Hospital policy (if mentiOPed earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A E service in general

HOUSE SURGEONS

Jobdescription

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

2 Procedures

21 Standing orders 24 Follow-up recalls or referrals1

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-load cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A 81

55 Relations with local GPs 56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A E department or the A E service in general

NURSES

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

121

2 Procedures

21 Standing order s 22 Sorting of pati~nts at presentation 23 Level of treatment provided by nurses

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp E

56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A ampE department or the A amp E service in general

A amp E DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST ON PHYSICAL FACILITIES

Waiting room size seating atmospheredecor childrens facilities - screening of ambulance entrance

Treatment rooms size privacy ease of working

Overall layout ambulance flow ease of working holding ward for admission

Relations with rest of hospital

_ proximity ~Qxray level ofl~poratory service ease of ~dJllJtting towards

122

APPENDIX B

Accident and emergency department records

THE STATE OF A amp E RECORDS Most of the A amp E departments visited kept a log or register of A amp E attendance This was a large book or folder where the patients name and other details were entered in order of presentation at the department Usually A amp E department logs contained the following information

the patients name and age the date and time of presentation a one-word description of the patients complaint whether the visit was a first attendance for a complaint

or a return visit the patient I s disposal

All except one of the A amp E departments visited had their own record system (independent of the hospital inpatient system) with one recordmiddot kept for each patient presenting This record was usually an A5 card although one department used a multiple copy A4 sheet Most of the A amp E department records contained the following information

the patients name age sex occupation GP address and phone number the date and time of presentation a one-to-ten word description of the patients complaint the A amp Edoctor(s) seen their clinical notes of

diagnosis and treatment the patients disposal ACC details if the complaint results from an accident other details on tetanus prophylaxis allergies and medical alerts

There were of course variations in the information contained on the logs and records of different A amp E departments An outline of the points where the log and records of each hospital differ from the general descriptions given above appears at the end of this Appendix

The quality of data collected was variable with the out of hours collection often being sketchier than the in hours This was probably due to nursing and medical staff doing the recording as well as their usual duties when receptionists were not on duty The basic details (such as name age and sex) were usually complete but more descriptive details (such as the site cause and sequence of an accident) were not always noted Some receptionists recorded no details about the accident whereas others took considerable care to summarise accurately the relevant information

USES OF A 8t E RECORDS The major users of A amp E records are the A amp E departments themselves and the hospitals A primary use is the estimation of the size and the content of the A amp E workload at different times of the day and the week This information is valuable for planning staffing levels and physical facilities in the A amp E department The A amp E staff also find the information contained in A amp E records useful in dealing appropriately with

123

patients who repeatedy present at the d~parmeptlHSo at times the information recorded in the A amp E depatinienf farequired as evidence in court proceedings

On a broader f ront~ amp E records are useful for sOme research purposes Certainly theyprovide~nsights i nl 0 who USeE the A amp E department (see Chapter 6) At some A amp E departments ~ufficientlY detailed information about accidents resulting in a presentation (eg type site possible cause of accident and occupation of patient) is collected for developing accident prevention programmes However most A amp E records are too sketchy for direct use in this way although they could be used as sampling frames for some accident research

There are disadvantages in using A amp E records for health services research purposes

I A amp E departments deliver only a small part of ambulatory medical care They deliver care to a selected age group and to a group who by and large happen to live nearby

2 Generally A amp E records are one-off and do not have the longitudinal perspective of general practice records or even hospital notes

3 Even for an epidemiological survey of accidents A amp E departments see an incomplete caseload They do not see all fractures much less all wounds concussions eye injuries etc

POINTS OF DIFFERENCE fROM GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS GIVEN

Full-time Information on log Information on A amp E record departments

Urban Auckland Age not noted

Middlemore Motor vehicle accident also noted

Green Lane Age not noted Sports and motor vehicle accidents also noted Residential area (not street address) also noted

Address A amp E doctor and Length Of stay and homeWellington 1A amp E patient number also address collected for nonshy

Hutt noted New and return New Zealand residents visits not always differentiated

Christchurch Sex address GP referral and motor vehicle accidents also noted

Dunedin [NO log kept Records held in alphabetical order for each months presentations]

Full-time departments

Provincial Rotorua

Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane

Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore

Kenepuru

124

Information on log

GP A amp E doctor case history and treatment also noted

Only patient name and date of presentation noted

Source of referral location of accident and special accident cases also noted

[Not seen]

Information on log

Complaint not noted

Address A amp E doctor and A amp E patient number also noted New and return visits not always differentiated

)

Information on A amp E record

Different cards used for work and non-work accidents

[None]

Specific places allocated on A4 sheet for case history lab and x-ray reports and follow-up

Time of presentation not noted

Information on A amp E record

Length of stay and home address collected for nonshyNew Zealand residents

125

APPENDIX C

StatisticalanaIY$es of accident and emergency department attendance riltes by neighbourhoods

METHOD

The analysis set out to test

o the effect of distance

o the effect of social factors

o the effect of A ampE department characteristics on A amp E attendance rates

The first two of these effects are not independent It was therefore necessary to use multivariate methods to assess the effect of distance controlling for social factors and for social factors controlling for distance

Other analyses of New Zealand geographical areas (in preparation Reinkeii) have found distinct differences between urban areas (those with populations exceeding 35000) and non-urban areas Therefore the multivariate analyses have been carried out separately for the 355 urban neighbourhoods and the 86 non-urban neighbourhoods One neighbourhood did not have complete census data and was omitted from the multivariate analysis Where we found differing results for urban and non-urban areas they have been mentioned separately Otherwise the results are presented as general findings

STEPWISE MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Initially a simple stepwise regression analysis was carried out The results are shown below Variables are presented in decreasing order of importance and are related to high attendance rates

All Neighbourhoods Urban Neighbourhoods Non-urban Neighbourhoods

Out of hours sickness

37 of the variance is 34 of the Variance is 36 of the variance is explained by explained by the same explained by many carless households features as all neighshy near the hospital near the hospital bourhoods many households with cars young age-structure few in the paid workforce many with higher few school-age children education many Maori many blue collar many in the paid workforce

All Neighbourhoods

out of hours injury

35 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many children many married many Europeans few households with two cars

In hours sickness

16 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many car less households few separated widowed or divorced low average rental many in paid workforce many with higher education

In hours injury

31 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars many school-age children few Pacific Island Chinese or Indian

Recall visits in hours

23 of the variance is explained by near the hospital high average rental many households with two cars few with higher education many in the paid workforce few European many separated widowed or divorced many school-age children

Urban Neighbourhoods

28 ofmiddotthe variance is explained by near the hospital few households with two cars many with higher education many blue-collar many European few separated widowed or divorced many seeking work

14 of the variance is explained by few households with two cars near the hospital low average rent high income many in paid workforce few separated widowed or divorced

16 of the variance is expla ined by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars

18 of the variance is exp lai ned by high average rental near the hospital many households with two cars many Maori many separated widowed or divorced few seeking work many with higher education

Non-urban Neighbourhoods

62 of the Variance is explained by near the hospital few in the paid workforce

7 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

57 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many one-car households

42 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

127

Few recall visits happened out of hours so the out of hours recall attendance rates are low ~ndhlghlY yariable NO adequate model was found in the analyses so 19 resultsare presented here

Clearly distance was an important determinant of rates of attendance The social characteristics had a )I9dest effect on injury first attendance a more substantial effect on rates of recall visits and a very substantial effect on the rates of sickness attendance in the different neighbourhoods

The pattern was quite different for the urban and non-urban areas as were the associations among the social variables A more complex analysis was needed

2 DATA REDUCTION

Separate principal components analyses for urban and non-urban areas were done on the social factors and yielded sets of four components with eigenvalues of one or more For clarity of interpretation the four-vector model was rotated (using a varimax method) and yielded four urban parameters and four non-urban parameters as shown Variables are shown in decreasing order of importance for each parameter

Urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few home-owners young ageshy low income in the northerry many carless structure few with higher regions higher many on benef it many Maori education average rental many seeking work many blue-collar few in the paid many separated work force widowed or divorced many blue-collar

Non-urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few separated many Maori bull many home- low average widowed or manyseeking owners rental divorced work few in the paid few with higher few old in the workforce education many two-car and northern many blue-collar few carless regions high income many blue-collar many children

3 PRODUCING ADJUSTED RArES

We fitted a regression equation for each attendance rate on the distance factor and the eight social factor parameters For urban neighbourhoods the four non-urban parameters were held at zero and vice versa for the non-urban neighbourhoods

128

The regression equations using this method allowed non-urban and urban areas to be analysed together and yielded levels of variance explained generally equal to those derived from the significant predictors in the simple stepwise regressions

Variance in attendance rates explained by different methods

Regression In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Using or iginal variables 16 31 23 37 35 14

Using rotated parameters 18 26 29 36 37 14

Each parameter-based equation yielded a rate of attendance expected on the basis of purely neighbourhood characteristics The difference between this expected rate and the actual observed rate gave a measure of the attendance rate adjusted for neighbourhood-determined features After this adjustment for distance and social factors the department-to-department differences remaining were muted In fact the F-tests of the differences among the departments showed the following changes

Changes in F-test values from unadjusted to adjusted rates

In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Unadjusted rates 74 69 195 132 96 123 Adjusted rates 23 65 107 53 41 119

4 TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE

Analyses of variance were carried out on the attendance rates adjusted for neighhourhood-determined factors for in hours and out of hours and looking separately at sickness first injury and recall visits First the A amp E department was used as the independent variable (except that Auckland and Green Lane were combined since they share a single catchment area) Then tests were done on the departments categorised into urban provincial rural and suburban open door policy and recall policy When the analyses of variance showed significant effects Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used to identify single departments or groups of departments that differed significantly from the others

Staffing levels were plotted against the adjusted rates When the correlations were significant the slope of the simple regression was examined

129middot

Results of analyses of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls means tests on adjusted attendance ratesmiddot

Differencemiddots Differences Differences among among between

Neighbourhood- A amp E categories of open-door adjusted departments A amp E department and attendance ( urban restricted

provincial departments rural or suburban)

Out of hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Provincial Open rates

rates lower higher than than others restricted

First injury Yes

Recall injury Yes Yes

In hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Open rates

higher than restricted

First injury Yes Yes Yes Grey rates Rural rates Restricted higher than higher than rates others others higher than

open

Recall injury Yes Yes Suburban rates higher than others

Only statistically significant results presented

Differences between departments favouri ng and not favouring recalls

Yes Recall-favouring rates lower than others

Yes Recall shyfavoumiddotring rates higher than others

Yes Recall shyfavouring rates higher than others

130

APPENDIX D

Childrens use of general practitioners and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

In conjunction with the 1981 Kljakovic study of chi ldren s attendance at A amp E departments in Wellington a parallel study of childrens visits to and by general practitioners was undertaken General Medical Services benefit claims for the same period were examined noting for each juvenile (0-14 years) visit the census area unit of the residence and the address of the general practitioner or locum This yielded rates of child attendance both for normal surgery hours and for urgent visits (out of surgery hours) for the whole region These were adjusted to give estimates for the 0-12 year old population and were then compared with the rates of A amp E attendance found by Kljakovic

AS Figure 10 shows the use of A amp E services was a very small part of childrens primary medical care During surgery hours visits to the A amp E department which were not preceded by contact with the general practitioner were only 16 per cent of first medical contacts Outside normal surgery hours the visits to A amp E departments that bypassed a general practitioner were more frequent I but they rose only to 194 per cent of first medical contacts

This comparison of overall use of medical services for children showed some tendency for parents to use A amp E more when they used general practitioners less comparing in hours with out of hours This was not surprising given that many of the in hours visits to general practit ioners would be for non-urgent conditions or even routine preventive care

Eighty-four neighbourhoods in the Wellingtoh region (the census area units or groupings of the same) were examined to see which of four factors (the distance of the neighbourhood from the A amp E department the use of general practitioners the per capita income and the ethnicity of the neighbourhood) were related to the use of A amp E departments The most important factor was distance from the A amp E department Then taking distance into account there was a slight tendency for areas where parents made less use of the general practitioner during normal surgery hours to be areas of more frequent use of the A amp E department However this tendency was not statistically significant and no such tendency was found for out of hours use Overall there was little evidence of competition between general practitioners and A amp E departments for patients

Figure 10 Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

In hours Out of hours

Need for medical care recognised

I I bull I I I I I Ifail Try to Try to fail Still need Icontact contact careI

general generalI 0gt practitioner practitioner w-- I succeed I succeed

I I I I

AampE 13 yes Still need Contact Contact Still need yesI department care general general care departmentI

practitioner I practitioner

I I I

7650 824I egt I I

Still need Visit Visit Still need I care general general careI

practitioner practitionerI I I I I I

~X-215 -[Ql--~-~- 7346 ALLAN Bridget ClairtJ ) Accident and emergency departmem ~

organisation and utilisation

WX 215 73467 [QJ 1shy

j

ALL

shyUBRARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

WELLINGTON L

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH-SPECIAL REPORT SERIES

Issued by

Management Services amp Research Unit (MSRU) or National Health Statistics Centre (NHSC) Department of Health Private Bag 2 PO Box 5013 Wellington Upper Willis Street Wellington

No TITLE

1 Maori-European standards of health 2 Domestic accidents (public hospital admissions) 3 The Grey Valley survey (lung function in coal miners) 4 Elderly patients in public hospitals 1958 5 Smoking habits of school children 6 Survey of work in compressed air-Auckland harbour bridge 7 Tuberculosis in Canterbury 8 Maori patients in mental hospitals 9 Census of mental hospital patients 1961 10 Elderly persons accommodation needs in New Zealand 1962 11 Patient-nurse dependency exploratory study 12 Patient-nurse dependency general survey data

13 Patient-nurse dependency gynaecology 14 Patient-nurse dependency geriatrics

15 Patient-nurse dependency in Christchurch paediatrics 16 Smoking habits of New Zealand doctors 17 Infant and foetal loss in New Zealand 18 Trends in notifiable disease 19 Survey of factory first aid 1963-64 20 Patient-nurse dependency general surgery 21 Patient-nurse dependency orthopaedic surgery 22 Patient-nurse dependency general medicine 23 Patient-nurse dependency GU Eye ENT

24 Diseases of the ear nose and throat in Maori children 25 Maori patients in public hospitals 26 The health of two groups of Cook Island Maoris

27 Mental hospitals admission and release data cohort study of first admissions 1962

28 Occupational mortality among male population other than Maoris 20 to 64 years of age

29 Dental health status of the New Zealand population in late adolescence and young adulthood

30 Census of mental hospital patients 1966 31 Survey of the public dental health service in Niue and plan for development 32 Hospital food services 33 Bibliography of the epidemiology of New Zealand and its Island Territories

34 Census of public and private hospital patients and old peoples homes 1966 35 Domestic accidents 36 An evaluation of a regional mass miniature radiography programme 1956-67 37 Maori-European comparisons in mortality

38 Physical development of New Zealand school children 1969 39 Psychiatric illness causing hospitalization or death 1967 t40 Census of mental hospital patients 1971 t41 Census of public private and maternity hospital patients and old peoples

homes 1971 t42 Cancer of the lung in New Zealand t43 Organisation of the work of hospital house surgeons 44 Growth of New Zealand pre-school children 45 Maternal and infant care in Wellington-a health care consumer study

46 Accommodation and service needs of the elderly t47 Survey of patients in psychiatric hospitals 48 Family growth study 49 A patient opinion survey Wellington hospital

ISSUED BY

NHSC 1960 NHSC 1960middot NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1963 NHSC 1963 MSRU 1963 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1963 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC ]966

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 MSRU 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1972 MSRU 1971 NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973

NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1974 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1977

llHII tIffPllfJlJ c

~~~~~~~~ f lt b tf

f ()

11

bull

Page 3: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …

ISSN 0548-944X

Department of Health

ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION AND UTILISATION

SPECIAL REPORT 70

by

B CAllan BSc (Hons) J Reinken PhD

Issued by the Management Services and Research Unit Department of Health Wellington

1984

LIBRARY bull DEPARTMENT OF HEAlrRJ

WELLINGTON

FOREWORD

Over the last twenty years there have been a number of accident and emergency studies in New Zealand hospitals For the most part these have been place and topic specifics This study by Bridget Allan and Judith Reinken is different It begins with an historical review of previous work in the field This is followed by a wide ranging study of accident and emergency services based on field work carried out in a representative sample of hospitals The data are analysed and presented taking account of the relevant international literature The resulting consolidation of knowledge provides a sound basis not only for further research but more importantly for the further development of accident and emergency services

The report provides at least tentative answers to a number of questions regularly asked about accident and emergency services Do general practitioners and accident and emergency departments provide competing services lhe answer appears to be no The public seem to discriminate sensibly between what are for the most part complementary services Is cost a factor in accident and emergency attendance as opposed to a visit to the general practitioner Again the answer appears to be no - cost is not an important factor Are socio-economic status and ethnicity associated with the rate of A amp E attendance Perhaps but distance and other factors concerned with accessibility appear to be more important

The study shows wide variation in the way in which A amp E services are provided in different hospitals This ranges from the size and shape of the physical facilities and the type and level of staffing relative to the workload to the way in which individual patient problems are dealt with Those responsible for the planning and operation of A amp E departments should find these comparisons informative Consideration of the data may perhaps prompt questions which in their answering lead to greater cost effectiveness and to service improvement

As well as providing answers the research raises questions It points yet again to the need in New Zealand for a regional study of accidents and accident services Accidents are a major cause of premature death and morbidity Many organisations are involved in the prevention and treatment of accidents but so far it has not been possible to mount a comprehensive study which includes and integrates all interests Until this is done fragmentation of services is likely to continue

By highlighting access to services the study points up the need for more information about communication and transport patterns in health care delivery Again this is a neglected area of research which could have far reaching implication for the planning and operation of health services

Finally the report raises questions about the interaction between general practitioners and A amp E services That these services are largely complementary is clear but unfortunately the communication between them is often not as good as it could and should be Further research has a contribution here but will not solve the problem Better communication and understanding is needed on both sides

The researchers have provided us with a much needed and timely review of an important and sometimes controversial aspect of health services Theirjete audience

G C Salmond ---shyDeputy Director-General of Health Department of Health

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Many people have helped with this study In particular we would like to thank

o John Mills who visited the hospitals drafted the physical characteristics chapter and gave freely of his time and expertise

o the staff of the hospitals visited for sharing their time and thoughts with us

o Desmond Keenan Shelagh McRae and Denis Snelgar for allowing us to use the information they had collected

o Clare Salmond Mike Moore and Sylvia Nichol for their assistance with computer analysis

o readers ofmiddot drafts of this report who offered helpful criticism and suggestion

o the typists and publication staff of the Department of Health

We also acknowledge the Director-General of Health for permission to publish

DISCLAIMER

The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Health

COPYRIGHT

Provided the source is acknowledged information contained in this report may be freely used by any person

CONTENTS

Page

ACKNOWIEDGEMENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

1 INTRODUCTION I

Background Thewider questions of emergency medical services The overseas situation An historical perspective in New Zealand

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments Record studies on the utili satjon of A amp E departments Studies of the organisation of A amp E departments

Overview of this study Aims Sources of information

References

2 DEFINITIONS 11

The Accident and Emergency department Attendance The hospitals Recording systems References

3 PROCEDURES IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT 15

Entry Sorting 1 reatmen t Disposal Follow-upcare Admissions Discussion References

4 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 23

PrinCiples Size Location

Entrances Access to other hospital facilities

Layout Waiting area Examination and treatment area Resuscitation area Operating theatre Plaster room Interview room Reception and records office Staff offices Holding ward

Discussion References

5

6

7

8

STAFFING OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 35

Medical staffing Senior medical staffing Junior medical staffing Accident and emergency work as a career

Nurse staffing Other staff involved with the A amp E department

Reception and clerical staff Orderlies Social workers Ambulance personnel

Discussion References

PATIENT ATTENDANCE CHARACTERISTICS 55

Overall attendance and trends Age and sex Conditions

Injury conditions Sickness conditions

Recall attendance GP-load

Non-urgent sickness Discussion References

PATIENT ATTI~UDES TO THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT AND STAFF ATTITUDES TO THE PATIENTS 75

Reasons for visiting the A amp E department Overseas studies New Zealand studies

Effect of health centres and deputising services on A amp E utilisation A amp E staff views of patients

Overseas studies The New Zealand situation

Discussion References

UTILISATION OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 91

Comparison of A amp E utilisation among hospital catchment areas Results Effect of general practitioner availability

Factors explaining catchment area variations in A amp E utilisation Method Results of the mUltivariate analyses

Comparison of A amp E use and general practitioner use Discussion References

9 CONCLUSIONS 107

The A amp E department as a hospital department The A amp E department as an emergency service The A amp E department as a primary care service Where from here

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A QUestion sheets 116

APPENDIX B Accident and emergency department records 120

APPENDIX C Statistical analyses of accident and 123 emergency department attendance rates by neighbourhoods

APPENDIX D Childrens use of general practitioners 128 and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

TABLES

Table

1 Proportion of first attendance patients discharged recalled referred or admitted

2 Areas of A amp E department~

3 Area to attendance ratios for adjusted total areas and waiting areas of A amp E departments by first attendance and total attendance

4 Numbers of examination and treatment cubicles or rooms and recommended numbers based on first attendance and total attendance

Medical staffing of A amp E departments

6 Total medical staffing (full-time equivalents) and medical staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

7 Nurse staffing of A amp E departments excluding student nurses and hospital aids

Nurse staffing (full-time equivalents) and nurse staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

Average attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

10 Trends in attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

11 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was recall attendance

12 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was for sickness

13 Proportion of total A amp E attendance that was for Sickness by policy and age groups

14 Use of general practitioners by first attenders at A amp E departments

15 Reasons for A amp E first attendance from three New Zealand studiesmiddot

Itgt Attendance (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) within each A amp E department catchment area

Page

18

24

25

29

37

39

45

46

56

57

66middot

70

71

77

78

92

(continued)

Table Page

17 Hospital admissionsfor accidental injury (mean 93 age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) and death due to accidental injury (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) within each A amp E department catchment area

IB Attendance (mean age-adjusted and neighbourhoodshy 99 adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) and populationshyto-general practitioner ratio within each A amp E department catchment area

19 Comparison of first attendances for injury at A amp E 101 departments and general practitioners

FIGURES

Figure Page

1 Percentage of total attendance at 58 A amp E departments by age and sex

2 Percentage of total attendance at 59 A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

3 Injury first attendances by type of injury 6U all ages

4 Injury first attendances by type of injury 61 by age groups

5 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 62 all ages

6 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 63 by age groups

7 Comparison of medical staff availability and 67 level of recall attendance

Comparison of nursing staff availability and 67 level of attendance

9 Location at which accidents happened by those 79 attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments 131 by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

1

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

BACKGROUND

This report arises f rom concerns expressed by several groups about the availability especially out of hours of emergency car~ and its provision by Accident and Emergency (A amp E) departments in New Zealand

In _SQe mid 1970 s the people of Porirua were worried that local general -pr-actitioners were not available at nights and weekends and by the delays

involved in travelling to Wellington and Hutt A amp E departments [IJ At the same time the people of North Shore were campaigning to keep their local A amp E department open More recently community groups in Upper Hutt have been pressing for the addition of an A amp E service to a local health centre Overall people are concerned that appropriate care (including facilities such as x-rays) is readily available in emergency situations

General practitioners are another group who have been concerned about A amp E departments in particular about inappropriate uses of A amp E departments A long-standing complaint bas been that patients are using A amp E departments for care which wou~d be better given by a general practitioner and that the A amp E departments retain patients instead of referr ing them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care [2 3J In 1981 the research group of the Wellington Faculty of the Royal NZ College of General Practitioners sponsored a study of children presenting at A amp E departments because they were worried that unnecessary admissions of children to hospital occurred because their parents had bypassed the general practitioners and gone straight to hospital [4J

Also A amp E staff and hospital administrators have been concerned that caring for patients who could have been treated by general practitioners has limited their ability to deal with emergency cases [567]

THE WIDER QUESTIONS OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

Emergency care requires not only the provision of hospital services (the A amp E department with back-up from other hospital facilities) but also the organisation of services outside the hospital and co-ordination between both sets of services Emergency medical services outside the hospital include alarm and communication systems transport systems and first aid services There are important questions for New Zealand within this framework For example what should be the role of general practitioners in on-site emergency care What level of training is appropriate for ambulance officers Should voluntary personnel staff ambulances To what extent is double manning of ambulances required [8910]

In order to limit the study to manageable proportions this report focusses only on the hospital services namely the A amp E department Emergency medical services provided outside hospitals are mentioned only where they impinge noticeably on the A ampE department It is hoped that due attention will be given to the wider questions of emergency medical services in the future (see Chapter 9)

2

THE OVERSEAS SITUATION

Concern with emergencymiddot care facilities especially their increasing use has been apparent in other countries for the past thirty years While some articles report on the situation in Canada Australia Sweden France and the USSR most of the literature is about the United States and Britain This section briefly outlines the major themes of the literature and their relevance to New Zealand More specific aspects are covered in the appropriate chapters

Many United States researchers have studied the operations of different emergency rooms exploring patients reasons for using the emergency room their demographic characteristics and their use of the family doctor Often the studies have tried to explain an increasing use of emergency rooms and some have reported on the effectiVeness of measures introduced to reduce thei r use These studies provided models for some of the analyses carried out in this study However the debate in the United States over appropriate methods of funding and staffing for emergency rooms is seldom relevant to New Zealand because of the differences both in philosophy and organisation of medical care in the two countries

The Platt [11] committee on A amp E services in Britain in 1962 was concerned about casual attenders ie patients not in need of urgent attention but wishing to avoid the trouble of attending their general practitioners surgery They also criticised the unsuitable accommodation and the insufficient numbers of senior medical staff supervising Casualty Departments The report recommended changing the name Casualty Service to Accident and Emergency Service (to discourage casual attendance) and rationalising the service by clOSing smaller A amp E units and centralising facilities These recommendations have been partially carried out

However there has been continuing research in Br i tain into the reasons given by patients particularly self-referred patients for their use of A amp E departments and the trade-off between general practitioner and A amp E services There has also been continuing debate over the medical staffing of A amp E departments

The British studies are of some relevance to the New Zealand situation since the organisation of medical care here is similar but no overseas experience can provide a blueprint for New Zealand For example the direct cost to the patient of general practice care in New Zealand raises the possibility of patients attending the A amp E department because it is free whereas the British system of general practitioner funding provides no such incentive

AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE IN NEW ZEALAND

Little is known about the historical development of A amp E services in New Zealand Presumably they followed the British tradition described in the Platt report [11 p23-24)

The word casualty in its proper meaning of a serious injury has a long history It occurs in Shakespeare and Dickens writing in 1837 used casualty ward to describe the ward in a hospital in which accidents were treated Unfortunately the meaning alt~red in the second half of the last century The Nuffield Report (1960) Casualty Services and their Setting

3

gives an interesting quotation from a survey made by the Lancet in 1869 The out-patients at St Bartholomews Hospital are it says divided into two categories They are the middotcasualtymiddot which comprises those who are supposed to require temporary treatment for diseases or injuries of a trifling character and the middotout-patientsmiddot properly so called who after receiving a regular letter of admission are entitled to the advice of the assistant surgeons and physicians for a period of 12 months It is in the casualty division that the increase of numbers has been most marked bullbullbull It is estimated that not less than a thousand patients frequently attend on a Monday or Tuesday morning

Certainly by 1872 vlellingtons private medical practitioners were incensed at the hospitals provision of free treatment for their patients Five hundred outpatients were treated in Wellington that year [12] Separate casualty departments were operating at Wellington Hospital by 1924 [12] at Auckland Hospital by the 1940s [13] and Christchurch Hospital by 1952 [14]

The 1960 Board of Health report [15] on outpatient servicesmiddot expressed concern over the duplication of services by outpatient departments which were also available from general practitioners However it recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times

Since the late 1960s a series of New Zealand studies have considered the use of A amp E departments either by interviewing patients or by analysing data drawn from A amp E record systems and the organisation of A amp E departments

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

The first interview study was an investigation of first attenders at the Dunedin A amp E department in 1968 by Dixon et al [2] Their results have not been contradicted by any of the later studies

They found that the principal attenders were males aged 15 to 24 who recorded first attendance rates of over 100 per 1000 each year The young men were also the most likely to report having no general practitioner Dixon found that the age and sex pattern of those attending at the A amp E department was nearly converse to the pattern of those attending a general practitioner

Dixon pointed out that the conditions treated at the A amp E department were rarely disease-related rather they were predominantly lacerations and open wounds bruising sprains and strains effects of foreign bodies and fractures The major reason given for attending the department was that it was seen as appropriate

Dixon concluded that the A amp E service was complementary and not competitive to general practice that the public were realistic in regarding it as the only practical and effective primary medical care for accident and emergency injuries and that payment for service did not appear to figure in the decision to attend the department

o

4

TwO interview studies of first attenders at Auckland Hospital A amp E department have been carried out by Hunton in 1972 and Richards in 1975 [16] Both studies included an assessment by the student interviewers and A amp E staff as to the suitability of the patients condition for general practice care 42-43 per cent were considered suitable Richards concluded that public education programmes encouraging people to use their general practitioner prior to attending the A amp E department should be instituted

In 1978 Keenan interviewed patients who had attended Christchurch A amp E department collecting detailed information on the accident or sickness leading to the attendance (unpublished see Chapter 6 and 7) He found the same set of reasons for using A amp E departments as Dixon found the A amp E department was seen as appropriate and accessible

Kljakovic found similar results when interviewing the parents of children attending A amp E departments in the Wellington region in 1978 [4] He also found that in choosing between the general practitioner and the A amp E department parents were more likely to use the service which was closer to the family home Children f rom lower socio-economic status families were more likely than other children to see thei r general practitioner before gOing to the A amp E department

Records studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

Several studies have gathered data from A amp E records to investigate A amp E utilisation In 1979 Snelgar described the characteristics of people attending Northland Base Hospital A amp E department [17] He found similar results to Dixon apart from a higher proportion of injuries In the same year McRae reviewed all attendances at Waikato Hospital A amp E department and found a similar picture [lB]

Three records studies have looked at the relationship between A amp E use and general practitioner use Maynard looked at Mosgiel residents use of Dunedin A amp E facilities for three years before and three years after the opening of a local health centre [19] No difference was found ~asap

investigated assertions that people from one part of the Wellington Hospital catchment area had suddenly begun to use the A amp E department heavily for conditions that should have been seen by a general practitioner [20] In fact that part of the catchment area had much lower rates of A amp E use than other areas Reinken tested whether the doubling of general practitioner cover in one part of the Wellington region affected A amp E presentation rates differently than in other areas nearby [21] There was no clear evidence that the increased cover had any effect

Studies on the organisation of A amp E departments

As part of a thesis looking at young doctors Salmond examined the work of house surgeons in A amp E departments using a postal questionnaire [22J He concluded that working in an A amp E department was good experience for a house surgeon only if second year house surgeons were deployed in the department the house surgeon was well-supervised by senior medical staff there was a good working relationship with the A amp E chargemiddot nurse and the house surgeon was not over-tired He also suggested that good senior staffing was closely related to effective administration and better service in the A amp E department

5

The Hospital Design and EValuation Unit of the Department of Health prepared a report documenting the planning requirements of New Zealand A amp E departments [23] The report outlined several principles of A amp E design and made detailed recommendations on the facilities rooms and equipment necessary

OVERVIEW OF THIS STUDY

Aims

The aim of this study is to describe A amp E departments in New Zealand Because the material presented in the previous section was collected by different researchers at different times and from different A amp E

departments detailed comparisons across the studies have been difficult To get a more comprehensive picture of A amp E use in New Zealand a systematic investigation was necessary

The specific aims of this report are

o to describe the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at their procedures physical characteristics and staffing patterns

o to describe attendance at A amp E departments including the patients profile and pattern of attendance and the load placed on the departments by patients who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner

o to describe the use of A amp E departments by consumers by analysing patients reasons for attending the departments and analysing demographic factors inrelation to A amp E attendance

Sources of information

Information was gathered from three sources

The site visits

Fourteen A amp E departments were visited between May and September 1981 by a Department of Health study team consisting of a medical officer from the Division of Hospitals and a res~arch officer from the Management Services and Research Unit

At each hospital the team examined the facilities and spoke with staff involved with the A amp E department including

o the medical superintendent (and in some hospitals the principal nurse)

o the A amp E officer or medical officer in charge of the A amp E department (where such a position existed and was filled)

o the nurse supervisor andor charge nurse of the A amp E department

o at least one house surgeon working in the A amp E department

6

In some hospitals the team also spoke with other staff members including experienced A amp E staff nurses and hospital social workers

Question sheets were used during interviews so that a comparable body of information was collected at each hospital Interviews were open-ended to allow discussion of local procedures or problems (See Appendix A for question sheets)

Hospitals were carefully selected so that the A amp E departments in the study would represent a cross-section of New Zealand A amp E departments Those selected served a range of communities in both the North and South Islands

o major urban Dunedin)

areas (Auckland Wellington Christchurch and

o provincial centres (Rotorua Taranaki and Timaru)

o predominantly rural areas (Whakatane and Grey)

In centres with more than one A amp E department all were visited so that a complete picture of the services and use could be developed This involved visiting Auckland Green Lane Middlemore and North Shore hospitals in Auckland and Wellington Hutt and Kenepuru hospitals in Wellington

The information gathered in the site visits has been used in describing the organisation of A amp E departments (Chapters 3 4 arid 5)

The A amp E records data collection

On each site visit a sample of 1981 attendances was drawn from the A amp E record system and the following information was recorded for each person age sex presenting condition (sickness or injury) time of presentation residential address and whether the visit was a first attendance for the condition or a recall visit

Exceptions were Christchurch and the three Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments Comparable data collected by Keenan in Ch ristchurch in 1978 and Allan in Wellington during 1980 were used instead

This information has been used to describe the attendance at A amp E departments (Chapter 6) and for the analysis of demographic factors in relation to attendance (Chapter 8)

The consumer studies

In 1978 Keenan carried out interviews with patients attending Christchurch A amp E department working from a one in eight sample drawn from the A amp E log over a four-week period and gaining a 99 response rate Results from this study have been analysed and compared with the results of the published New Zealand interview studies [2416] Anecdotal material from Kljakovic s study of children attending Wellington A amp E departments has also been included to illustrate the results of the numerical analysis

We realise that in studying only a selection of A amp E departments some local variations may have been missed but we are confident that the broad pattern and major issues in the organisation of A amp E care have been

7

covered Also as the A amp E departments studied serve two-thirds of the population of New Zealand the utilisation patterns discussed in the report are likely to prevail throughout New Zealand We hope that the mater ial presented the conclusions drawn and the questions raised in this report will encourage discussion about the current operation and future developmiant of A amp E departments in NewmiddotZealand

a

8

REFERENCES

1 de LACEY A REINKEN J and SALMOND C E - Community attitudes to sickness and health stimulus and response v 3 Community attitudes - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 103-105 (Special report series no 56)

2 DIXON C W Emery G M and SPEARS G F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) p 272-279

3 [Editorial] in G P Journal of the General Practitioner Society no 42 (1981) P 1-2

4 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN BC and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

5 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble Jr et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

6 MAYNARD Edward J - The application of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment shyUniversity of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

7 Hospital misuse brings protest in Taranaki Daily News (1 Sept 1980) bull

8 FAHEY Morgan - The role of the family doctor in disaster and emergency medicine in NZ Family Physician - v 5 no 1 (1978) p 42-44

9 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 19-23 March 1979 in NZ Med J - (1980) P 194-196

10 Double manning of ambulances [editorial] in NZ Hosp - v 32 no 3 (1980) p 1

11 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medicine Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

12 BARBER Laurie H and TOWERS Roy J - Wellington Hospital 1847-1976 Wellington Wellington Hospital Board 1976

13 The story of Auckland Hospital 1847-1977 edited by David Scott -Auckland Medical Historical Library Committee of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians in New Zealand 1977 p 35-36

14 BENNETT FO - Hospital on the Avon the story of the Christchurch Hospital 1862-1962 Christchurch North Canterbury Hospital

o Board 1962

9

15 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 196U (Report series Board of Health no 2)

16 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

17 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

18 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

19 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency department in Med Care - v 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

20 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

21 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

22 SALMOND G C - Young doctors an exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

23 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

11

CHAPTER 2

Definitions

lhis chapter provides the definitions of terms used in our study In general our terminology is consistent with the literature However in some areas such as the classification of presenting conditions as sickness or injury or the description of GP-load there is no general consistency and we have developed our own definitions

THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

This name is the one commonly used in New Zealand We have used it in preference to the older description Casualty Depariment [1] and the American description of Emergency Department It is one hospital department which patients can approach without prior notification

Emergencies can be any condition that - in the opinion of the patient their family or whoever assumes the responsibility of bringing the patient to the hospital - requires immediate medical attention

However using such a definition means every case is an emergency In New Zealand A amp E departments patients tend to be classified in a similar way to the description given by the American Hospital Association [2]

o emergencies where delay is harmful and the condition potentially threatens life or function

a urgent cases which require attention within a few hours

o non-urgent cases where the condition is minor or non-acute and does not require the resources of the emergency service

An accident is an unexpected event Accidents which have resulted in attendance at an A amp E department are ones that have caused some trauma whether through shock or other injury The Platt report [1] decided on the term A amp E department in recognition that the real emergencies were a trickle while the accidents were a mighty flood

In general the A amp E department is regarded as part of the hospitals outpatient services and like these in day to day running it provides specific clinics generally for the treatment of traumatic injury x-ray burns dressings plasters and so forth

An accident and emergency patient is a person who is entered in the A amp E log book This can involve a certain amount of error however as some outpatients or discharged patients may return for follow-up care through the A amp E department Also the A amp E department often handles the acute admissions to the hospital

12

ATrENDANCE

A first visit (or first attendance) is the first visit a patient makes for one particular condition

A recall visit is any visit made for one particular condition which is not the first visit for the condition Some recall visits are patient initiated (eg due to pain bleeding infection or an accident to the dressing or plaster) but for the most part revisits are scheduled return visits suggested by A amp E staff

Total attendance is the sum of first visits and recall visits

Inj ury attendances are defined to include the results of trauma (cuts burns fractures sprains strains bruises head injuries multiple injur ies and so forth) as well as foreign bodies in the eye or other orifices and toxic effects whether from accidental or self-poisoning events Late effects of minor injury (pain bleeding abscesses or such) are not included as injury but as sickness

Sickness attendances include collapse (whether stroke coma heart attack or other) shortness of breath abdominal pain general sickness (fever vomiting diarrhoea unwell) mental distress and minor conditions

Non-urgent sicknesses are defined as the minor conditions abdominal pain and general sickness except for preschool children and adults over 65 where the general sickness and abdominal pain conditions can be urgent A amp E staff defined non-urgent sickness less specifically they tended to define it as longstanding or minor sickness

GP-load describes the patients whom A amp E staff feel should have seen a general practitioner It includes patients with longstanding or minor sickness conditions and patients with minor traumatic injury (eg cuts bumps and bruises)

In hours attendance refers to all attendances in the normal working hours of 0800 to 1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays

Out of hours attendance refers to all other attendances outside the defined normal working hours

In an average week 50 hours fall in the in hours category and 118 hours in the out of hours category If we assume that an average person sleeps eight hours a night then that person is awake for 62 hours in the out of hours category (and all the in hours of course) Thus the out of hours category is 70 per cent of the total time in a week and 55 per cent of the waking time in a week

Minor conditions included abscesses backaches infected wounds or wound pain headache pain (unspecified) earaches eye problems toothaches nosebleeds limb pains We have called it the skin pain or bleeding category in Chapter 6

13

Attendance rates measure the use of A amp E departments for a defined population They express the number of cases from an area over a defined period per 1000 population in that area Rates were obtained by age and sex for sickness and injury and in and out of hours for each census area unit or neighbourhood served by each hospital

THE- HOSPITALS

We grouped hospitals into four types

o urban hospitals (where average annual first attendances at A amp E departments are over 25000 patients)

o provincial hospitals (serving 6000 to 12000 new A amp E patients each year)

o rural hospitals (serving fewer than 6000 new A amp E patients each year)

o suburban hospitals where A amp E departments are not open 24 hours per day North Shore Hospital was open 7 days a week 830 am shy530 pm and Kenepuru Hospital was open 5 days a week 830 am shy430 pm

Most of the A amp E departments visited had a senior position variously called the A amp E officer the A amp E director the senior medical officer or the medical officer in charge For convenience we call this position the A amp E officer

RECORDING SYSTEMS

The log is the record kept at the A amp E department which records some information on every patient who presents It will often give no more than the patients name the date and time of visit

The A amp E record is usually a card and it records basic patient information and case notes It may be held for several years in the A amp E department and may therefore contain information on a series of separate events for anyone patient

14

REFERENCES

1 GtBrit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the sUbcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

2 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p vii-viii

15

D

CHAPTER 3

Procedures in the accident and emergency department

In this chapter we begin describing the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at the way they operate We follow the course of a patients care entry to the A amp E department sorting into priority order for care (triage) treatment and follow-up care

ENTRY

Most people presenting at the A amp E department were ambulant (the walking wounded as they are colloquially known) They came through the A amp E departments main entrance to the reception desk where they were first seen by a receptionist or nurse (Exceptions to this occurred in the smaller hospitals where patients presenting at night were first seen by the telephonist who called the nursing staff) Nurses did reception duties at

all the provincial and rural A amp E departments and at two of the urban A amp E departments when receptionists were not on duty (eg lunchtimes nights) bull At times nurses found that having to cover the reception desk interfered with their care of patients

When the receptionists are off duty the nurses do the reception work This can be a nuisance because it interferes with patient care and sometimes patients ring the bell at the reception desk and the staff working in the resuscitation room dont hear it

A amp E nurse

Unless their condition required immediate care the ambulant patients then spent several minutes at the reception desk while their details (eg name address general practitioner complaint) were noted on the A ampE records (See Appendix B for more information on A amp E records) Then they waited in the waiting room until they were called for treatment

A small proportion of patients arrived by ambulance andmiddot at almost all hospitals entered the A amp E department through a separate ambulance entrance In the larger hospitals some nursing staff were stationed in or near the ambulance entrance to care for these patients In other hospitals the staff had often been warned of incoming urgent cases and were standing by when the ambulance arrived As the condition of ambulance patients tended to be urgent they were usually taken straight to a resuscitation or treatment area patients condition permitted or friends or the ambulance driver

Record with the

keeping assist

was ance

carried of thei r

out r

when elativ

the es

SORTING

All A amp E departments operated some triage system to sort the ambulant patients by the urgency of their need for care (Themiddot only exception was Grey A amp E department where there was seldom more than one patient in the department at a time) At most A amp E departments the patients were sorted

16

into urgent and non-urgent categories with urgent cases being seen immediately and non-urgent cases being seen in the order they presented At some of the urban A amp E departments a more complex sorting was done For example

Priority is given in the following order

urgent need very young and very old patients those with general practitioner notes those without general practitioner notes

A lie E nurse

Usually ambulance cases were not triaged since they tended to arrive on their own and required urgent care However several A lie E departments had triage arrangements planned for the arrival of many ambulance cases at once as in a disaster

Sorting was largely a responsibility of the nurses although some A amp E doctors would occasionally check the condition of patients- in the waiting room too The receptionists often played a role in triage as well alerting the nursing staff to urgent cases This happened more in A amp E departments where the physical layout made it difficult for nurses to watch the entrance and the waiting room

The receptionists do tQe basic sorting They have guidelines to follow distressed patients severe cuts or bleeding go straight to the nurses open wounds or eye injuries go directly to a cubicle and are assessed by the nurses patients with abdominal pain or chest pain go on to trolleys and wait in the recovery room This system usually works well although occasionally a fracture patient will not be recognised and will sit in the waiting room

A lie E nurse

In several A lie E departments doctors and nurses stressed the value of an experienced receptionist in recognising and reacting quickly to acutely ill or injured patients

TREATMENT

Almost all the A amp Edepartments visited had a policy that all patients presenting had to be seen by a doctor The doctor did not necessarily have to treat the patient he or she could advise the patient to see a general practitioner Some A amp E doctors commented that by the time they saw the patients it was as easy to treat them as to send them away_ At a few departments the nurses (and occasionally the receptionist) could advise the patient that the department was not an appropriate place for their condition and that they should see a general practitioner This was usually done in consultation with the A E doctor but at times the nurses acted on their own initiative In these places a triage system similar to that reported by Weinerman et al [1] where patients were assigned to the appropriate service inside or outsidemiddot the hospital appeared to be operating

7

The assessment of patients the ordering of tests andmiddot the supervision of treatment were usually seen ~s medical functions The nurses would prepare patients for treatment (removing dressings) and carry out urgent first aid measures (stem bleeding start gastric lavage or cardio-pulmonary resuscitation) Generally however a nurse would only initiate treatment if the patients condition was urgent and a doctor was not available or was already busy with another emergency Exceptions to this situation occurred in some hospitals with A amp E nurse training programmes and in some smaller hospitals where the doctor is on call rather than working in the A amp E department In these departments experienced nurses could order tests such as x-rays and initiate treatments such as suturing and removing foreign bodies from eyes

In most A amp E departments nurses would perform some treatments under a doctors supervision However the range of treatments nurses were allowed to perform varied considerably among hospitals At some hospitals nurses sutured after training but at others they never sutured

The nurses do not suture although they would like to There are four reasons for this there is no full-time A amp E officer so good standards of sutur ing could not be maintained there could be medico-legal problems if a nurse sutured a cut which was more complicated than it looked eg with tendon involvement the nurses have enough to do at present and if they start suturing they will be expected to do it always and the young doctors need to learn suturing as part of their training

Principal nurse

Electrocardiograms were taken by nurses in some A amp E departments by technicians at others Taking blood samples was a doctors job in some departments but was done by nurses in others Similarly gastric lavage using a def ibrillator and plaster work were done by nurses in some departments Most A amp E nurses would maintain intra-venous drips but only nurses with special training WOUld insert them

Some nurses expressed frustration at restrictions on the treatments they were allowed to perform However several sen~or nurses stressed that they had to select carefully the nurses they allowed to perform more difficult treatments

We are very selective about choosing the nurses to do triage suturing and the more complicated procedures This seems to have been successful weve had no problems with nurses undertaking treatment theyre not competent to provide

A amp E senior nurse

I make sure the nurses understand they can be dangerous people If theyre not aware of their limitations theyre not suitable for A amp E work

A amp E senior nurse o

Also one department which had comparatively few nurses discouraged them from increasing the range of treatments they performed so that their workload did not become overwhelming

18

For diagnosis the A amp E departments made heavy use of the x-ray departments (The Design and Evaluation Unit study [21 estimated that 30 per cent of A amp E attenders had an x-ray during their visit) Some A amp E departments found their arrangements with the x-ray department very convenient with an x-ray machine aVailable 24 hours a day in or close to the A amp E department and with patients and x-ray films or reports returning within an hour At other hospitals arrangements Were less convenient in some places reporting bac k of x-rays took two or three hours delaying patients considerably while in others the x-ray departmentmiddot was located on a different floor from the A amp E ~epartment causing difficulties in transporting and accompanying patients there

Little use was made of the laboratory services other than for blood and urine tests and arrangements were generally satisfactory However in many hospitals x-ray and laboratory staff had to be called in to perform tests out of hours and because of the expense involved these out of hours tests were discouraged Some house surgeons found this a difficult situation

I I m caught between contradictory pressures the orthopaedic surgeons say that x-rays are necessary for proper diagnosis and the hospital board is trying to limit out of hours x-rays to save money

House surgeon

DISPOSAL

After treating the patient the A amp E doctor decides on the appropriate disposal discharging from care arranging follow-up treatment by referring to another source of care or recalling to the A amp E department or admitting the patient Information on disposal was only readily available from three A amp E departments The most common disposal pattern was in fact discharging from care with 40 to 55 per cent of patients making a first Visit being discharged

TABLE I PROPORTION OF FIRST ATTENDANCE PATIENrs DISCHARGED RECALLED REFERRED OR ADMITTED

Discharged Recalled Referred to Admitted Other First to A amp E GP Specialist attendance

Clinic tallied

Waikato l 393 132 222 99 134 19 25 707 Green Lane2 550 220 110 40 80 Unknown Taranaki 41 5 268 73 103 116 24 164

1 From McRaes study of Waikato A amp E departmen~ in 1979 2 From a study carried out by Green Lane A amp E department

19

FOLLOW-UP CARE

The decision to be made on follow-up care was usually between re~alling to the A amp E department or referring back to the patient I s general practitioner Some A amp E departments also referred patients (especially children) to district nurses or patients with work 1n]uries to an occupational health nurse or clinic Many departments referred fracture patients to orthopaedic clinics held in the hospital outpatients department and one A amp E department which was very short of space referred patients needing redressings to the outpatients department

There were large differences in referral practices (see Table 1) Between 13 and 27 per cent of first attenders were recalled to the A amp E department for follow-up care while 15 to 30 per cent were referred elsewhere either to a general practitioner or to a specialist clinic Also recall attendances expressed as a proportion of total attendances varied considerably among the A amp E departments from 10 per cent to 50 per cent (see Chapter 6 Table 11) and clearly reflected different follow-up practices

All of the urban and two of the provincial A amp E departments had a policy of referring most patients requiring follow-up care to a general practitioner and of keeping recall visits as low as possible This was similar to general policy in both Britain and the United States which appears to discourage re-at tendance at A amp E departments [34] However in the suburban rural and other provincial A amp E departments the decision on follow-up care was left to the judgement of the A amp E doctor

In practice however the choice to refer or to recall was reiated to several factors First the decision related to characteristics of the patients If the patients had serious wounds or burns or injuries which could develop complications they were usually recalled They were also recalled if the A amp E staff thought they would not receive appropriate care at home or they would not see a general practitioner for follow-up care Patients living a long way from the hospital were usually referred to their general practitioner At some A amp E departments patients were given the choice of referral or recall according to A amp E staff comments most chose to return to theA amp E department

The patients prefer to come back to the hospital Money is not a factor in this because the ACC pays for accident treatment at the general practitioner

A amp E nurse

Second there were general practitioner factors If the local general practitioners were unhappy about the A amp E department recalling patients or if a general practitioner had referred the patient to the department originally the A amp E doctors would refemiddotr rather than recall However if the A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner did not have the facilities and in some cases the ability to provide follow-up care (eg for serious woundS eye injuries) they would recall the patient

Some GPs dont like following up care initiated by the A amp E department or dont have the necessary facilities so I tend not to send patients back to them

A amp E officer

20

Im more likely to refer a patient back to a GP who is reliable

House surgeon

Third many of the house surgeons said they would recall patients if they were interested in the condition or if they were worried about their diagnosis and treatment and wanted to see the outcome Several medical superintendents noted that recalling under these circumstances was acceptable because it comprised part of the house surgeons training

Fourth the workload of the A amp E department sometimes affected the follow-up decision with very busy departments actively discouraging recalls And finally there was the philosophy of A amp E medicine held by the A amp E doctor In one department where the A amp E officer considered it an ethical duty to see any treatment initiated through to a successful conclusion almost all patients who needed follow-up care were recalled At two other departments the A amp E officers stressed the importance of being able to deal efficiently with any emergencies presenting they kept recalls low so that the department was not clogged with extra patients Other A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner could provide better continuity of care than the A amp E department so they referred as many patients as possible

When referring patients to the general practitionermiddot most of the A amp E doctors made a verbal recommendation to the patient and then relied on the patient to attend the general practitioner They would only write a formal referral letter if the patients condition was serious In several A amp E departments however greater efforts were made to inform the patient t s general practitioner Three departments gave referred patients cyclostyled forms with details of diagnosis and treatment to be passed to their general practitioner while the Whakatane department sent a copy of the A amp E record form to each patients general practitioner

ADMISSIONS

Table I suggests that between a and 14 per cent of all first attendances were admitted to the hospitals Admissions could well be higher for children Kljakovic [5] found that 20 per cent of the children presenting at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments were admitted

The A amp E departments were involved in several different pathways for the admission of acutely ill or injured patients (Scheduled admissions did not involve the A amp E department at any of the hospitals visited) Self-referred patients could be admitted directly from the A amp E department to the wards or could be cared for in a holding (or acute admitting) ward before going to the wards

There was considerable variation among the hospitals as to which members of the medical staff were able to admit patients At some of the urban hospitals only the registrars could admit while at others the A amp E doctor could admit if the registrar was delayed and unable to assess the patient quickly At some of the provincial and one of the urban hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit in consultation with the admitting officer or appropriate registrar while at-another urban hospital and the rural A amp E departments the A amp E doctors regularly admitted patients

21

Hospitals with lower levels of bed occupancy were more likely to allow A amp E doctors to admit Senior A amp E doctors were more likely to play a role in admissions (actually admitting patients or advising the registrar) than house surgeons

Some patients referred by a general practitioner for acute admission also passed through the A amp E department At one hospital the general practitioners rang the A amp E officer to arrange for all acute admissions and all such GP-referred patients were seen first in the A amp E department However more usually the general practitioners rang the appropriate registrar to make arrangements and the registrar decided whether to admit the patient directly to the wards or through the A amp E department The involvement of A amp E staff with patients requiring admission ranged from almost none (where the patient went directly from the A amp E department to the ward or specialist unit) to a full initial assessment including tests (often undertaken at the request of the registrar responsible for the patient) bull

Generally the A amp E doctors were satisfied with the admission procedures However at one hospital where the A amp E doctors could not admit patients waiting for admission tended to clog the department The doctorselt that if they had admission rights the situation would be remedied

DISCUSSION

There were few differences among the A amp E departments in the reception and sorting of patients However there were differences in some aspects of treatment follow-up care and admission procedures

lhe role of the A amp E nurses in treatment varied considerably with some departments allowing nurses to initiate and perform many treatments and other departments allowing little autonomy Careful training and selection were essential before nurses increased their responsibility for treatment bull

Policies on follow-up care differed among the departments with the urban and provincial departments generally referring patients to general practitioners and the rural and suburban departments leaving the referral decision to the A amp E doctor In practice however the differences were less clear-cut with several factors other than the patient I s condition affecting the follow-up care decisions These factors included the A amp E staffs communicat ion with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs of house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors philosophy with regard to A amp E medicine

The A amp E departments also differed considerably in thei r procedures for acute admissions At some hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit an A amp E patient while at others the patient had to be held in the department until admitted by a registrar Also at some hospitals patients referred by general practitioners for acute admission were seen in the A amp E department before going to a ward While having to hold patients sometimes caused

clogging in the department A amp E staff were generally satisfied with the procedures

22

REfERENCES

1 WEINERMAN E Richard RUfZEN S Robert and PEARSON David shyEffects of medical -triage- in hospital emergency service in Public health reports - v 80 no 5 (May 1965) p 389-399

2 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

3 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM (68)83

4 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL Jenkins - St Louis Hosby 1975

5 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

23

CHAPTER 4

Phy~i~~1 c~~raft~rhtics of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the physical characteristics of A amp E departments their overall size location and layout as well as specific areas within the departments It discusses the effects of the physical characteristlcs on the organisation and functioning of the A amp E departments Our investigation worked from the detailed base established in bullAccident and emergency departments a studY of planning r~quirements a report prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation gnit Departmellt of HeCilth [1]

PRINCIPLES

The 1973 Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit (DEU) report [l] outlined the following principles to be applied in designing A amp E departments

o the A amp E department must be patients seeking emergency care

ready to receive and deal with

o the A amp E department mus~ be able load within a reasonable period

to cope with an average i

busy

o the A amp E department must be capable of adaptation to exceptional situations arising from major accidents ltgtrqther disasters

o the layout should be simple easily unqerstood and compact

o the layout and procedures should facilitate easy flow of patients through the department

o spaces should be multipurpose to give greatest versatility

o p~tient ~ovew~n~ should be minimised )

priv~cy for patientsshould be provided as far as is practicable andconsistent with the need for supervisi0rt

SIZE

There was considerable variation in the total sizes of the A amp E -a~1-ftment~ vi~ited witll floor areas ranging from 250 sql1a~e metres to 2115 ~guare m~ties (see Table 2) Eight of the 14 departments visited had i

hhid1pgw~fd~oracUte admitting ward However even wt)en ~he area of th~ f~ ~ bull ~middotc1~A~- _ ~ - bull bull ~

AampE department WCiS adjusted for the presence of a holding ward this I~1-getv~-rH~tion in irea reniained

24

TABLE 2 AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Total area Holding ward Adjusted total Waiting room area areal area

sqm sqm sqm sqm

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 2 115 225 1 890 55 Middlemore 1 045 140 905 50 Green Lane 960 240 720 70 Wellington 575 190 385 75 Hutt 270 270 30 Christchurch 470 470 40 Dunedin 635 90 545 20

Provincial Rotorua 515 20 495 90 Taranaki Base 720 90 630 40 Timaru 605 70 535 80

Rural Whakatane 430 430 20 Grey 310 310 15

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 255 255 30 Kenepuru 540 540 30

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area Considerable sharing with outpatients department

The area of the A amp E department was not closely related to the attendance (see Table 3) Obviously there is a certain minimum size for an A amp E department since certain facilities are essential regardless of the attendance served Thus as would be expected the rural and to a lesser extent the provincial A amp E departments had high area to attendance ratios However even within the group of urban A amp E departments there was a fourfold difference in the total area to attendance ratio

The design at Auckland~ laid out along several corridors with many separate consulting and treatment rooms possibly contributed to its high ratio At Wellington Hutt and Christchurch hospitals staff commented on their difficulties working in cramped conditions The lack of space often forced staff to work under extreme pressure to move patients through the departments very quickly

25

TABLE 3 AREA TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR ADJUSTED TOTAL AREAS 1 AND WAITING AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS BY FIRST ATTENDANCE2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Adjusted total area to attendance ratio Waiting area to to attendance ratio

Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 first attendance total attendance total attendance pa p a p a

Full-time departments ~

Urban Auckland 323 291 08 Middlemore 232 157 09 Green Lane 3 230 168 16 Wellington 80 69 13 Hutt 82 63 07 Christchurch 76 64 05 Dunedin 200 143 05

Provincial Rotorua 404 293 53 Taranaki Base 609 399 25 Timaru 466 266 403

Rural Whakatane 718 490 23 Grey 805 61 2 30

Part-time departments

Suburban I INorth Shore 272 148 17

Kenepuru 924 597 33

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Considerable sharing with outpatients department

Spearman rank correlations [2] of adjusted total area with

( a) first attendance r = 0310 p gt 010 Not significant ( b) total attendance r = 0297 pgt 010 Not significant

26

LOCATION

There is broad agreement that the A amp E department should be located on the ground floor well signposted and easily accessible to ambulatory patients and ambulances The ambulance entrance should be able to handle several ambulances at once and should have adequate turning space It should be projected from the weather and screened from the view of the other A amp E department patients

The A amp E department should also be located as closely as possible to radiology facilities (either the x-ray department itself or a branch) The A amp E department and the outpatients department can share some facilities and provide additional staff and accommodation in an emergen~y

situation if they are sited together Acute patient care areas (operating theatres intensive care unitsmiddot and cardiac care units) and laboratory services should also be readily accessible from the A amp E department [134]

Entrances

Almost all of the A amp E departments visited were on the ground floor of the hospital and were well signposted Generally access for ambulatory patients was good apart from two hospitals where they had to walk up steps to enter the building o

Few departments had ambulance access which could cope with a shuttle of ambulances bringing mass casualties from a disaster There w~s little relation between the size of the department or the population served and the ease of ambulance flow Indeed those departments with a relatively low probability of being involved in a mass casualty situation had good ambulance flow (eg Whakatane) while those with a greater possibility had relatively poor ambulance access (eg Wellington) Several departments had particularly poor a~bulance flow with only a one-lane access Three departments had good drive-straight-through access while at the rest ambulances had to reverse However there were advantages to some of the bull reversing I situations in that the bays into which the ambulances had to reverse were more likely to give the patient protection from the weather All the A amp E departments visited had separate ambulance entrances which in all but three cases guaranteed screening of ambulance patients from public view

Access to other hospital facilities

In many of the hospitals the A amp E department was adjacent to the outpatients department or to the orthopaedic outpatients section When this occurred the plaster room and x-ray facilities were usually shared and waiting areas and the records office were sometimes shared In the smaller hospitals both departments often shared the nursing staff

The access to the x-ray department ranged from excellent in places which had x-ray facilities immediately adjacent to the A amp E department to very poor where the patient had to be transported hundreds of metres and to a different floor The time taken for the A amp E doctor to get the result of the x-ray varied from five minutes to over two hours though the physical separation of the two departments was only one of the factors which affected this

27

Access to acute care facilities was similarly variable In Christchurch the intensive care unit was adjacent to the A amp E department while in Rotorua it was at the other end of the hospital In many cases additions or alterations to the hospital buildings and changes of function of certain areas have meant that the A amp E department no longer bears the same physical relationship to other hospital departments as was originally the case

LAYOUT

Several studies have concluded that the A amp Edepartment should be designed so that there is an orderly progression of patients from registration to examination to investigations if necessary to treatment and to referral admission or discharge Staff time and effort is best conserved by a compact plan with waiting areas and treatment areas easily accessible and supervised However the need for easy supervision has to be balanced by consideration of the patients privacy Two basic A amp E plans have evolved

o a radial plan where the waiting examination and treatment rooms are arranged on the perimeter of the departmentmiddot with the nurses station doctors room and records office in the centre

o a linear plan where the examination and treatment rooms are arranged down each side of a corridor with the waiting area records office and staff offices at one end [145]

Many of the A amp E departments visited had a linear layout with the largest Auckland being arranged along several corridors In these departments staff often commented that their overall view of the patients was not good and a considerable amount of walking was needed to supervise them Middlemore A amp E department and the treatment areas of several other departments had radial layouts which staff found very satisfactory Generally the A amp E staff prefer red open plan layouts using curtained cubicles rather than enclosed rooms Staff (especially nursing staff) often commented that their department would be better if certain walls or partitions were removed to give easier surveillance of the department as a whole However staff also commented on the relative lack of privacy for patients being examined or treated and noted that some private rooms were needed for instance for obstetric or paediatric patients

Waiting area

There is general agreement that the waiting area should be adjacent to the reception desk easily visible to the receptionist and if possible overlooked by the nurses office or station It should be a cheerful comfortable area with toys provided for children and a range of magazines and books Public toiletspublic telephones and arrangements for refreshments are also needed [146]

The size of the waiting area varied considerably among the A amp E departments visited (refer back tomiddot Table 2) Again this variation bore little relationship to the workload of the department (see Table 3) Some waiting areas were clearly too small and this put pressure on the staff to deal with patients quickly in order to clear the waiting room

28

Staff comments suggested that not only the size of the waiting area but also its design affected its crowding Basically square rooms with seats around the edges had fewer problems than corridor-style rooms with only one row of seats

In all the A amp E departments visited the waiting areas were adjacent to the reception area Sometimes they were visible from the nurses office or work area but where this was not possible the nurses relied on the receptionists to alert them to urgent cases or checked the wai Hng area often themselves

Facilities in waiting areas varied from nothing but seats to areas in which there were hot and cold drink dispensing machines a childrens play area with toys and health-related poster and pamphlet displays Some had a TV set or a tropical fish tank Most staff were agreed that a pleasant atmosphere in the waiting room was important and adVerse comments about the waiting area were made by staff in departments which lacked this In some departments staff commented that vandalism made it difficult to retain facilities and a pleasant atmosphere

Examination and treatment area

The examination and treatment area provides for the needs of all A amp E patients other than those with serious conditions requiring the resuscitation room or those needing special facilities such as plastering Because special purpose areas are frequently under-utilised flexibility is a key requi rement Hence multipurpose cubicles with standardised equipment are usually recommended The cubicles must be big enough to give easy access for patients (not necessarily walking) to accommodate eqUipment and to give staff enough room to work Curtained cubicles are generally sufficient but at least one enclosed cubicle is required for patients needing extra privacy or for light control in eye examinations A cubicle especially set up for children (with appropriately-sized equipment toys and posters) is also desirable [1346]

Most of themiddot A ~ E departments visited had curtained cubicles in the examination and treatment area with perhaps one or two enclosed cubicles or rooms as well Four A amp E departments only had separate rooms for treatment Curtained cubicles made for ease of access while separate rooms did present some difficulties in manoeuvering patient trolleys and wheelchairs In one case it was impossible to get a patient trolley into the room at all and the room was consequently little used

Curtained cubicles did afford greater flexibility in use and did provide more room to work but had the disadvantage of being considerably less private than rooms Surveillance was easier in departments with curtains than those withmiddot walls and doors In the Auckland A amp E department treatment rooms doors had been removed in the interests of improved surveillance Staff in this department commented that its rigid design could lead to difficulties in accommodating a large number of patients in a disaster

The DEU report [1] recommended that the number of cubicles required by an A amp E department was NIlS where N is the anticipated average number of new patients per day It noted that in A amp E departments with few new patients per day a minimum of two cubicles should be provided It also recommended that the flow of recalled patients should be regulated so that they did not greatly affect the need for cubicles

29

As can be seen from Table 4 most departments had enough cubicles to cope with their first attendance workload Even applying the DEU recommendation of N18 to their total attendance most of the departments had an adequate number of cubicles The exceptions were Hutt Christchurch and Dunedin

TABLE 4 NUMBERS OF EXAMINATION AND TREATMENT CUBICLES OR ROOMS AND RECOMMENDED NUMBERS l BASED ON FIRST ATTENDANCE 2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Actual number of DEU recommended numbers (minimum of 2) cubiclesrooms based on

first attendance total attendance pa pa

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 13 89 99 Middlemore 9 59 88

Green Lane 7 40 65 Wellington 10 73 85 Hutt 4 51 66 Christchurch 7 94 11 2 Dunedin 3 41 58

Provincial Rotorua 4 2 26 Taranaki Base 4 2 24 Timaru 6 2 31

Rural Whakatane 3 2 2 Grey 3 2 2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3 8 22 37 Kenepuru3 6 22 30

1 Based on DEU report [l which recommended NIS cubicles where N average number of new patients per day ie N6750 where N = average first attendance pa

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Recommended numbers increased to adjust for North Shore and Kenepuru treating their attendance numbers in part-time rather than full-time hours

30

Resuscitation area

The resusciation area is used for the immediate life--saving treatment of seriously injured or sick patients It is the acute treatment area in contrast to the examination and treatment area which is used for relatively minor procedures In making its recommendations about the resuscitation area the DEU report [I] balanced the probability of the A amp E department having to treat multiple accident victims with the comparative rarity of use of resuscitation rooms It recommended that a resuscitation room of suff icient size to deal with two patients concurrently be provided in all A amp E departments It also noted that the ambulance entrance and resuscitation area should be located as close together as possible

Most of the departments visited had purpose-built resuscitation rooms of varying size and with varying degrees of sophistication in equipment Some had x-ray facilities in the resuscitat ion area and in those that did not its absence was regarded as a serious impediment to the efficient care of severe trauma

In four of the seven urban A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms were regarded by the staff as being too small The comment was made in one urban department that because of the small size of the resuscitation area patients sometimes had to be moved out of the area before it was felt clinically desirable to do so in order to accommodate incoming patients In the rural and prOVincial A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms wereshyadequate for the demands placed on them

Most resuscitation rooms were sited close to the ambulance entrance and afforded good access to stretcher patients However in three A amp E departments patients had to be moved some distance and in another department up one floor by lift

Operating theatre

In discussing provision of operating theatres in the A amp E departments the DEU report [1] noted that

o most surgery done is minor requires only local anaesthesia and could be done within adequately designed cubicles

o the A amp E department is not a proper place for general anaesthesia

o using A amp Etheatres for day surgery tends to block other A amp E facilities and staff causin~ delay in treating A amp E patients

The report concluded that special facilities appear to be justified only if there is a clear intention of widening the scope of accident surgery in the departments

bullMinor ops theatres of varying sizes and equipped to varying standards were available in many departments Very variable use was made of such theatres - never in some departments to daily in others It was used less in departments with very heavy workloads and where the medical staff were not satisfied that sufficiently sterile conditions could be maintained In one department the theatre was only used for day surgery cases

31

Plaster room

In the plaster room casts are applied and removed and fractures and dislocations can be manipulated The DEU report [1] noted that the plaster room could be an integral part of the A amp E department or shared with the orthopaedic department or belonging entirely to the latter It recommended that the plaster room be close to the A amp E department and the x-ray department

Most departments had a separate plaster room available In many cases this was shared with an adjacent orthopaedic outpatients or fracture clinic Th~ staff generally found the plaste~-rooms satisfactory although two particularly narrow rooms were difficult to work in

Interview room

The DEU report [l] recommended that A amp E departments in medium-sized and larger hospitals should have a small interview room where a patient IS

relatives could talk with A amp E staff the police or others

No A amp E department had a room specifically designated as an interview room for bereaved or distressed relatives although one A amp E department shared such a room with another department In most departments one of the staff off ices was generally used for this purpose In departments where staff offices were small or crowded the lack of an interview room was seen as a serious flaw in departmental layout

Reception and records office

The reception desk should be immediately visible to ambulant patients arriving at the A amp E department and it is desirable for the receptionist to be aware of what is happening at the ambulance entrance as well The current A amp E records should be held at the reception desk or nearby [1]

In the A ampE departments visited the reception desk was usually well-placed for dealing with ambulant patients but in only four cases did it overlook the ambulance entrance In two departments the reception desk was some distance from the treatment area (separated by a waiting room or outpatients room) and the nursing staff found it difficult to oversee incoming patients Current A amp E records were held at the reception desk in all but one of the departments visited The amount of space available in relation to the throughput of patients was a major factor in determining the length of time records could be kept within the department This in turn affected the ease and therefore speed of record retrieval

Staff offices

These ranged from non existent to very cramped spaces serving many other functions to pleasant specifically designated and relatively quiet areas The latter offices are conducive to good staff morale and being a place for exchange of views and experiences could be expected to contribute quite markedly to the overall effectiveness and eff iciency of the department

32

Holding ward

The DEU report [1] said that holding beds should be used primarily for A amp E patients requiring a period of observation prior to a decision about admission or for those who could be expected to go home after a rest period The report noted that using holding beds as recovery beds for day patients for arranged admissions or for pre-admission clinics was not desirable

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments visited had holding or acute admitting wards These holding wards were used mainly for assessing patients requiring acute admission but in some hospitals were also used for observing patients (eg with suspected concussion) and for holding night admissions till the morning to save disturbing the wards Neither of the rural A amp E departments had a holding ward although one had an I A amp E admission procedure where a patient could be admitted for up to 24 hours for observation without the need for full admission procedures In the A amp E departments with holding wards a patient staying for more than four hours was formally admitted

Our study showed that the A amp E departments had some problems using holding wards properly In two A amp E departments holding wards were little used at night because nursing levels were too low to staff them safely In another department the beds were used for patients recovering from day surgery and even for some pre-ar ranged admissions At times general practitioner-referred admissions could also clog the holding wards

DISCUSSION

Most of the A amp E departments were generally adequate in size location and layout The exceptions were Christchurch and Butt where conditions were very cramped with particularly limited examination and treatment areas and poor layout We understand that improvements are planned at Hutt and that recent extensions have improved the Christchurch department considerably but at the time of our visits staff in both these departments were working under extreme pressure because of the physical conditions

Despite the general adequacy of the departments almost all had some flaw which affected their operation and inconvenienced staff and patients Major flaws found in several A amp E departments included

o ambulance access unsuitable for a shuttle of ambulances in a disaster

o difficult access to the x-ray department

o resuscitation room too small for easy treatment of more than one patient at a time

o no interview room for relatives of patients

33

REFERENCES

1 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

2 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

3 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 44-49

4 Emer~ency department organisation and management edited by A L Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975 p 8-16

5 Design of departments in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) p 1204-7

6 McKINLAY Robin - The care of children in New Zealand hospitals -Aucklandmiddot National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1982 p 79-80

35

CHAPTER 5

Staffing of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the staffing both medical and nursing looking at their numbers and experience their previous training and the training they receive in the A amp E department and their satisfaction with their work and conditions We also describe the clerical and reception staff and briefly the involvement of other workers (orderlies social workers and ambulance personnel) in the departments

MEDICAL STAFFING

Senior medical staffing

Organising appropriate medical staffing for hospital emergency services is a prQblem in many countries [1] The variety of staffing arrangements in A amp E departments within many countries suggests that none have established a generally satisfactory pattern of medical staffing

The Platt report [2] found that in Br itish A amp E departments the great majority of patients were seen by junior staff only and that supervision of the A amp E departments by conSUltants was often little more than nominal The committee recommended that

o the junior medical staff should be adequately supervised by consultants

o a consultant orthopaedic surgeon should normally be in charge of theA amp E unit

o an accident and emergency unit should have at least three consultant surgeons each giving a substantial part of their time to this work

o the primary task of general practitioners in emergency services is to deal with minor accidents and emergencies at any time of the day or night (by organising a rota to answer emergency calls within their practice by working sessions in A amp E departments or by attending cottage hospitals at short notice for emergency calls) bull

Since then some progress has been made but standards continue to lag behind those recommended [34] There has been considerable debate over the appropriate staffing arrangements for A amp E departments Some hospitals have implemented the Platt report recommendations others have appointed a full-time A amp E specialist others have employed a full-time non-specialist doctor and some have employed general practitioners

Despite the various systems there is a consensus in both the United States and Britain that experienced medical staffmiddot are essential in the A amp E department They are necessary for prompt effective treatment of emergency conditions for efficient running of the departments and for adequate supervision of the junior doctors employed [23567 p 17-23]

36

Similar concerns have been expressed in New Zealand since the Board of Health report on outpatient services in 1960 [8] This report recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times and staffed by experiencedmedical officers

Salmond [9] found that when a senior A amp E officer directed the department A amp E work was handled more efficiently and house surgeons were more closely supervised and supported He suggested that one senior member of the hospital staff (ideally a full-time A amp E officer) should accept full responsibility for the overall supervision of A amp E services

Most of the A amp E departments that we visited had an A amp E officer The position was vacant at both Wellington and Hutt hospitals at the time of our visit while at North Shore Hospital responsibility for the A amp E department was shared by two senior doctors The A amp E departments of the rural hospitals had no senior medical staff

In A amp E departments with heavy workloads additional experienced doctors were often employed as deputy A amp E officers usually medical officer special scale or as Medical Reserve Scheme registrars (see Table 5) There was no general practitioner staffing of any of the Aamp E departments visited although general practitioners had been part-time staff of some of themiddot smaller A amp E departments in previous years One medical superintendent commented that since very few general practitioners could be classified as specialists they could only be paid as medical officers special scale This low level of payment acted as a disincentive to general practitioner recruitment

The A amp E officers usually worked normal office hours (830 am - 430 pm or 9 am - 5 pm weekdays) apart from two who worked part-time covering morning periods If additional experienced doctors were employed they usually covered evening periods (eg 5 pm - 10 pm) and weekend day shifts

There was a wide range of experience among the A amp E officers Half of the senior A amp E doctors had a general practice background and these doctors often had specific surgical medical pharmacological or Armed Forces medical experience as well Several A amp E officers had primarily a surgical background while others had a considerable range of hospital experience In hospitals where the A amp E officers had a general practice background the Medical Superintendent or the A amp E officer often stressed the suitability of this background for A amp E work

An extensive general practitioner background is useful in dealing with the multitude of problems seen in an Accident and Emergency department An orthopaedic or surgical background is not as necessary because of the good backup from the specialties And staff who have only had hospital experience particularly junior staff can lack skills in general assessment and triage

A amp E officer

In other hospitals staff stressed that an orthopaedic and surgical background was very valuable as was experience in dealing with specific types of injury such as soft tissue wounds

37

TABLE 5 MEDICAL STAFFING OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington2

Hutt2

Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Senior medical staffing

Number of full-time equivalents

A amp E officer ( including deputies) 25 15 I 16

I 2

I 03 I

2 05

Registrar

06

1 1

House surgeons

Number on Number A amp E runs covering

some shifts in A amp E deptl

6 2-3 6 2 5 I 5 4 2-3 5 2 2

All on rotating basis 1 3 1 2

5 on rotating basis 4 on rotating basis

None in A amp E dept 4 on rotating basis

1 On general relieving duties 2 Senior A amp E position vacant at time of visit

Junior medical staffing

The issues

Junior medical staffing of A amp E departments has concerned many commentators in the United States Britain and New Zealand The Platt report [2] noted that recently qualified staff when serving in the casualty department undertake responsibility which they would not have in the wards or outpatient clinics

38

In 1960 the New Zealand Board of Health report [8] on out-patient services deplored the staffing of casualty departments by I relatively inexperienced men [sic] and suggested that these staff I should be regarded more as assistants under supervision and training than responsible officers in the outpatients departments The undesirability of staffing A amp E departments with first year house surgeons (or pre-registration doctors) has been reiterated since Junior doctors are often unsure when to ask for advice or help and are sometimes unwilling to admit that they are over-tired and unable to cope [91011)

The report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers [12] noted the heavy load carried by house surgeons working long shifts in A amp E departments It also commented that when house surgeons are required to look after the A amp E department while carrying out ward duties inadequate cover of the A amp E department could result

The New Zealand situation

The urban A amp E departments had between two and six house surgeons working on three month A amp E runs and in several of these hospitals another one to three house surgeons on general relieving duties covered some A amp E shifts There were more house surgeons in A amp E departments with heavier workloads or with fewer senior medical staff The provincial and rural departments did not usually have house surgeons working on specific A amp E runs rather the A amp E department was covered by all (or most) of the house surgeons in the hospital on a rotatng basis Of the two suburban A amp E departments Kenepuru was covered by the house surgeons on a rotating basis while North Shore did not have any house surgeons because there was no inpatient or consultative backup available (see Table 5)

The total medical staffing of the departments (senior A amp E doctors and house surgeons together) ranged from 10 to 100 full-time equivalents and was closely related to the attendance at the departments (see Table 6) The provincial and rural A amp E departments had higher medical staff to attendance ratios because they had to provide a 24-hour service regardless of the size of the attendance

Each A amp E department visited rostered its house surgeons differently depending on the availability of senior medical staff the workload of the department and the house surgeons other duties In the urban departments house surgeons worked between 45 and 60 hours a week on shifts usually 8 to 12 hours long Many of the house surgeons working in these departments complained about long shifts and suggested that more staff were needed to reduce the shift lengths Split shifts were also unpopular

The most worrying aspect of the staff ing arrangements in bhe Accident and Emergency department is the long hours We need another house surgeon to reduce the hours on some shifts and to proviae another pair of hands in busy periods (eg Friday and Saturday night Sunday afternoon)

House surgeon

39

TABLE 6 TOTAL MEDICAL STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND MEDICAL STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE I AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Total medical Total medical staffing to staffing attendance ratio

FTE per FTE per 10000 first 10000 total

Full-time attendance attendance equivalents p a pa

Full-time departments

Urban

Auckland2 100 17 15 Middlemore2 91 23 16 Green Lane2 65 25 15 Wellington 66 14 12 Hutt2 55 17 13 Christchurch 70 11 10 Dunedin2 60 22 16

Provincial Rotorua 42 34 25 Taranaki Base2 28 27 18 Timaru 22 19 11

Rural Whakatane3 15 25 17 Grey 10 26 20

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 20 21 12 Kenepuru3 20 34 22

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE estimated since A amp E department partially covered by house

surgeons on general relieving duties 3 FTE estimated since A amp E department covered by house surgeons on

rotating basis

Spearman rank correlations [131 of total medical staffing with

(a) first attendance r = 0953 p lt 001 (b) total attendance r = 0933 p 001

In the provincial and rural hospitals house surgeons were often on call for long shifts over nights and weekends They were usually covering a ward or the whole hospital at the same time and simultaneous demands from the wards and the A amp E department sometimes caused problems However

40

these house surgeons generally found their rostering satisfactory despite the long hours on call perhaps because the actual work required in the A amp E department was comparatively light

An ordinary week night is usually quiet after midnight thered be three to five calls and Id have to get up once on average Weekend nights are busier but I usually get at least two or three hours sleep

House surgeon

Several house surgeons were irritated that while they worked more intensively on A amp E runs than on ward runs they spent fewer hours on-call and consequently they were paid less

Supervision by senior medical staff

In the larger A amp F departments house surgeons worked with the senior medical staff on most day and some evening shifts only on night shifts (and some evening shifts) were house surgeons the sole medical staff in a department By contrast in the smaller and part-time departments house surgeons covered the department alone seldom working with any senior A amp E medical staff

Several nurses commented that the A amp E department ran less efficiently outside normal working hours because the house surgeons inexperience meant assessment and treatment times were longer and tests were used more often than when the A amp E officer was present

Many senior medical staff in the urban A amp E departments were concerned at the lack of supervision for house surgeons outside normal working hours and so would have Ii ked more senior A amp E staff Several of the house surgeons were also concerned although others enjoyed the autonomy they had and were not concerned about working without supervision

I am not happy with house surgeons managing the A amp E department on their own They only have a three month shift in the department and often most of this time is spent learning how to do A amp E wor k The house surgeons can have problems deciding when to call a registrar to treat a patient and there can be delays in obtaining a registrar The A amp E department needs full-time trained medical staff on duty 24 hours a day to give proper supervision to the house surgeons and to run an efficient department

A amp E officer

On night shift I can feel rather alone if something goes wrong

House surgeon

I enjoy the variety of work and the independence I have to treat most patients as I see fit

House surgeon

41 _A

Arraflgements for consultative backup and support when senior A amp E staff were not on duty varied from hospital to hospital according to hospital size n urban hospitals the house surgeons would usually call on the appropriate registrar and the acute admitting or specialist teams for emergencymiddot cases In some places the house surgeons could calIon the consultant if a registrar was unavailable but this was usually seen as a last resort call In the provincial and rural hospitals the house surgeons would call on the appropriate senior doctor who was available This was usually one of the cQnsultants or a registrar if any were employed by the hospital The A amp E Qfficer might occasionally be called and in hospitals without an A~amp E oHicer th~ medical superintendent would also provid~ backup

Generally house surgeons were happy with the support they received A physically compact hospital was mentioned several times as facilitating ~ ~ fast back-up Howeve( in some hospitals there could be considerable delays in 9etting surgical and orthopaedic registrars to the A amp E department usually because they were in theatre Also at two hospitals backup in the minor specialties was considered inadequate bull

Use of first year house surgeons

Urban and suburban hospitals had a policy of using second year house surgeons as much as possible in the A amp E department and of using first year house surgeons only in their second six months This policy was generally butmiddot not always carried out For example the on-call arrangements of some urban A amp E departments resulted in inexperienced first year house surgeons working in the department In the smaller hospitals also the limited pool of house surgeons available tended to result in more first year house surgeons working in the department

The hospital could not provide cover for the A amp E department without using first year house surgeons However there are always senior staff and the medical registrar readily available as backup

Medical superintendent

When direct supervision was limited first year house surgeons did find A amp E work difficult

Training

The training received by the house surgeons in the A amp E departments varied greatly Two hospitals ran half-day or one-day orientation courses before -house surgeons started in the department Three A amp E departments ran weekly or fortnightly training sessions on specific conditions while another department ran sessions on an irregular basis However house surgeons often missed training sessions because they were treating pat~entsln more than half tmiddothe A amp E departments no formal training was giVen and house surgeons were taught on-the-job when senior A amp E staff were available This teaching placed a considerable load on senior staff

The three-monthly changeover of house surgeons is frustrating and the first month with new house surgeons is very demanding because they have little confidence or competence

A amp E officer

42

If the A amp E department had no senior staff or if the house surgeons shifts did not coincide with those of the senior staff the house surgeons had to gain their training whenever and wherever they could Both house surgeons and nurses commented that house surgeons often required guidance from the nursing staff

We get on-the-job training relying very heavily on the nurses to say IDr X (the A amp E officer) normally does bullbullbull I was rather scared the first few days in the A amp E department

House surgeon

Several house surgeons commented that they would have liked more training particularly when they were first in the A amp E department and more guidance on hospital policy and administration

Manuals (middotor sets of standingmiddot orders) out-lining the clinical and administrative procedures required under different bull circumstances have been widely recognised as essential in the A amp E department They are particularly useful to new A amp E doctors as an explanationoof their duties 7 p 79914J

Senior medical staff at 13 of the hospitals visited said they had standing orders covering ~A amp E administration procedures or were revising them These standing orders were either specific A amp E booklets or sections of the full hospital standing orders Several house surgeons commented that they found the standlng orders useful while others relied more on verbal advice from the A amp E officer or nurses Two of the latter house surgeons said they had not seen any A amp E standing orders when in fact the full hospital standing orders did contain a section on the A amp E department One A amp E department had no standing orders (apartmiddot from protocols for the care of coronary patients) and the house surgeons there would have liked more guidelines

Accident and emergency work as a career

Advantages and disadvantages

The senior medical staff who expressed their views on A amp E work as a career had all previously been general practitioners and their comments largely reflected comparisons of A amp E work with general practice They tended to cite the regular hours good conditions of service and salaries competitive with general practice as advantages of A amp E work and the limited range of clinical material and lack of continuity of care as disadvantages

When house surgeons were asked whether they would be intercested in A amp E work as careers for themselVes their responses were more negative than those of the senior ~ amp E staff All of them mentioned some disadvantages of A amp E work To those mentioned by senior staff they added the problems of irregular hours and having to deal with many trivial complaints The lack of recognition of A amp E work as a specialty (and consequent lack of status within the hospital) was also seen as a disadvantage Some mentioned the advantages cited by the senior staff and added variety of work as another advantage These advantages and disadvantages mirror those noted by British and United States writers [315]

43

Accident and emergency work as a sp~cialty

Over the past two decades in the United States the increasing use of emergency rooms has led to the development of training programmes for emergency room doctors and in 1979 to the granting of specialty status to emergency medicine The American College of Emergency Physicians in 1975 defined the emergency physician as I a specialist in breadth whose training is focused ~n the acute and the life-threatening aspects of medical care and who~ by ~he nature of his practice is available when the patient needs him [cited in 16]

vlhile emergency medicine has much the same content as family practice the different emphasis approach and method of handling have been cited as justifying a separate specialty [16] Critics have disputed the specialty status of emergency medicine stating that although a broad clinical knowledge is required this knowledge is also shallow [15]

In Britain similar debates have taken place While the Platt report [2] recommended that one consultant should be in administrative charge of an A amp E department it did not favour the development of accident surgery as a specialty in its own right nor the appointment of consultants to work full-time in A amp E departments However the Increasing number of A amp E conSUltants middotthe development of training posts and the formation of an association of A amp E consultants [4] have signaled a de facto recognition of A amp E work as a specialty The role of general practitioners in A amp E departments has also been debated Their suitability for sorting and treating casual attenders has been stressed and their ability to work without consultant supervision has been seen as an advantage 21718]

An emergency care seminar held in Auckland in 1979 recognised the inadequacy of training at all levels for work in A amp E departments in New Zealand The suggestions made to rectify this situation included the recruitment of sp~cialist -staff at a career level

Senior staff in some of the urban A amp E departments stressed the need for a post-graduate A amp E specialist training in New Zealand They gave two reasons for this that more senior staff were required to supervise and properly train house surgeons working in A amp E departments and that more senior staff were needed to improve the efficiency

More senior staff would improve standards of care speed throughput reduce the need for tests and reduce recalls as well as improving the supervision of house surgeons

A amp E officer

The staff of the smaller hospitals commented that full-time specialists could be warranted in large urban A amp E departments but were not necessary in provincial hospitals

Full-time A amp E specialists are only warranted in very big hospitals where there is enough emergency work to justify a trauma centre and 24 hour senior doctor cover A specialist cannot work well in isolation so the workload has to be large enough to justify three or four A amp E consultants

A amp E officer

44

NURSE STAFFING

Accident and emergency nursing

As noted by Jenkins [7 p41-42 J nursing in the emergency department is different from in-hospital nursing The nature of work in the department requires the ability to perceive and act quickly and to adapt to constantly changing circumstances

The A amp E nurse needs skills in assessment and examination in critical care and emergency treatment in public relations and must be able to act calmly under pressure Increasingly experienced nurses are expected to carry out triage Special training both on-the-job and in study courses is therefore essential [27 p 36 1419J

The need to have experienced senior nursing staff working in the A amp E department at all times has been recognised for many years The senior nurse in charge of the department has a key role being responsible for the day-to-day administration of the department for the supervision of the nursing care given and often for supporting the junior medical staff [259] Again as Jenkins [7 p 27] noted the emergency department nurse is one cornerstone of the department and often acts as the stablizing element in a chaotic milieu especially in those hospitals where the medical staff rotates

New Zealand arrangements

There was considerable variation in both the total numbers and the levels of experience of nursing staff among the A amp E departments (see Table 7) Some departments had a nurse supervisor in control and several charge nurses while other departments had a charge nurse in control A amp E nurses were mainly staff nurses although some departments used substantial numbers of enrolled nursesmiddot Student nurses were present in most of the departments but they were often there for a few weeks only so they have been excluded from the tables

The number of nurses on duty in the A amp E department varied over the time of the day and the day of the week with more nurses on duty at times of heavy workload such as Friday and Saturday evenings and also weekday mornings when dressing clinics were held Most departments organised some staggering of shifts so that good cover was maintained throughout the day In three of the smaller hospitals (Timaru Whakatane and Grey)middot the A amp E department was covered at night by separate nursing staff usually the night supervisors who were covering other parts of the hospital as well

In several of the small hospitals the nursing staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department Generally this was satisfactory but occasionally the steady workload of the outpatients department left the A amp E department short of nursing cover

The total nurse staffing of the A amp E departments visited ranged from 25 to 278 full-time equivalents and this variation was partially related to the attendance of the department and whether or not the department had a holding ward (see Table 8) However even after adjusting for the staff required in the holding wards there was a threefold variation in the

45

nursing staff to attendance ratios of the urban A amp E departments Other factors such as the small size of the Hutt and Christchurch A amp E departments and greater use of student nurses may have been involved

TABLE 7 NURSE STAfFING OF HOSPITAL AIDS

Nurse lt bullbull

sup~rvisors

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland l 1 Middlemorel 1 Green Lane l 1 Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin 1

Provincial Rotorua 1 Taranaki Basel

Timarul 2

Rural Whakatane2 Grey2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Charge Staff nurses Full-

Time

4 21 4 11 2 11 1 19 1 8 1 11 2 3

5 I 10 1 3

1 4 1 2

1 7middot 1 1

EXCLUDING

nurses Part-Time

2 12

7

2 2 4

1

STUDENT NURSES AND

Enrolled nurses Full- Part shytime Time

4 2

2 1 2

1 4 1

1 1

3

1 Holding ward attachedto Aamp E department covered completely or partly by A amp E nursing staff

2 A amp E department covered by separate nursing staff at night (numbers not included here)

Work in both the A amp E department and the outpatients department

The relatively low attendance at the provincial rural and suburban departments contributed to their somewhat higher nursing staff to attendance ratios The high level of nursing staff at North Shore may be related to the additional duties of nurses in that department in escorting patients to other hospitals and working in the plaster room

TABLE 8 NURSE STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND NU~E STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Nurse staffing Nur~estaffing to attendance ratios

Full-time Adjusted Adjusted FTE Adjusted PTE equiva- full-time perlOOOO per 10000 lents2 equival- first atten- total attendshy

3ents dance pa dance p a

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane4

Wellington HuH Christchurch Dunedin

270 278 172 200 1l~0 130 80

220 258 122 170 110 130 80

3bull 8 66 47 35 33 21 29

34 45 29 30 26 18 21

Provincial Rotorua4

Taranaki Base Timaru

77 160 75

77 80 55

63 77 55

46 51 27

Rural Whakatane4 Grey4

52 25

52 25

87 65

59 49

Part-time depa rtment s

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

110 28

110 28

117 48

64 31

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE calculatedfrom Table 7 (with part-timenurses counted as 05

FTE) unless exact FTE figures supplied by hospitals 3 FTE adjusted by removing nurses covering the holding ward 4 Nurses covering both the A amp E department and the outpatients department counted as 07 FTE in the A amp E department and separate night nursing staff counted as 10 FTE extra

Spearman rank correlations (13] of adjusted nurse staffing with

( a) first attendance r = 0869 p lt 001 ( b) total attendance r = 0895 P lt 001

47

In seven A amp E departments nurses were satisfied with staffing arrangements liowever nurses in four departments (not necessarily those with relatively ~~w nurses) said that nurse numbers were too low while at two other departments weekend shortages of nurses and diff iculty getting replacements for numiddotreesmiddotmiddot off sick were mentioned as problems One hospitals policy of rotating all nurses at or below staff nurse level throughout the h6spital was criticised because it left too few nurses with A amp E experiance worlting in t)le department At another hospital nurses appreciated the reguiar check made on their job satisfaction by the nurse supervisors

In several A amp E departmentsmiddotmiddotr-ourseswere dissatisfied with the medical staffing arrangements~Cl some wani~d a senior doctor interested in A amp E work in charge of the department Others wanted A amp E doctors to spend

Imiddot ~~fU

more time in the department ~specially outside normal working hours

Training

In most of th~ A amp E departments visited junior nurses received on-the-job training wo~king alongside semor nurses and being rotateQ through different areas of the department However where a department was short of nursing staff or had a heavy workload senior nurses often had insuffficient time to teach the junior nurses Senior nurses often found that training new hurses both increased their workload markedly and slowed down the work of the department However as one principal nurse said

We train nurses on-the-job If we waited for experienced nurses to app1Y we I d nev~rltlet them

Principal nurse

At several A amp E departments junior nurses did not work either on their own or in areas requiring more judgement (for example the resuscitation room or the waiting room) until they were more experienced Often this changeover did not happen until the nurses in charge of the department had made a formal appraisal of the junior nurse There was a consensus among senior A amp E nurses that three to six months working in the department was required to train an A amp E nurse

I think A amp E nurses need a three month training course - their student training is not enough A nurse needs three to six months experience before she is fully competent to work permanently in the A amp E department Also its difficult to get fully trained on-the-job in a smaller hospital because theres too few patients coming through

A amp E nurse

Usually some form of procedure manual orientation book andor job description was provided for the nursing staff outlining their duties and responsibilities in the A amp E department A few departments also ran occasional lectures and inservice training At Auckland Middlemore and North Shore hospitals the A amp E department ran specific inservice training courses for staff nurses

48

The course at Auckland for example took six nurses at a time involved one study day per fortnight over 10-12 months and covered all aspects of A amp E work Nurses had to have six months experience in the A amp E

department before taking the course Senior nurses commented that the courses were valuable in improving the nurses abilities confidence and morale and felt that nurses who had been through the courses tended to stay in the department longer and were less prone to absenteeism Junior nurses at several hospitals without A amp E training courses said they would find such a course useful

At more than half the A amp E departments visited nurses commented on the necessity for them to guide the house surgeons particularly early in the three-month runs

The junior medical staff training is on-the-job and its largely done behind the door by the nursing staff The nurses will encourage the house surgeon to call a consultant if necessary (but not in front of a patient) or if they are very worried the nurses will ring a consultant themselves The house surgeons this year are very good and pleasant but it can be very wearying when they begin their three month shifts

A amp E nurse

At some hospitals this need to guide house surgeons had provilt1ed the impetus for developing A amp E nurse training courses

Many of the nurses said that they enjoyed A amp E nursing because of its specialised nature It had a fast pace and a stop-start quality thereI

was never a routine because of the high patient turnover the variety of complaints presenting and the drama associated with some cases As with the house surgeons nurses often found themselves carrying more responsibility working in the A amp E department than in the wards and they relished this Several hospitals had waiting lists of nurses wishing to work in the A amp E depart~entbull

OTHER STAFF INVOLVED WITH THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

An efficient and effective A amp E department needs not only adequate medical and nursing staff it also requires secretarial clerical reception and orderly staff [27 p 24-251

Reception and clerical staff

Most urban A amp E departments had receptionist cover 24 hours a day Usually therewere two or three receptionists on duty during the day with one receptionist on duty during evenings and at night At the provincial departments and at Hutt and Dunedin departments reception staff covered days (and sometimes evenings) for seven days a week In the rural A amp E departments a receptionist was on duty weekdays only When the receptionist was not on duty nursing staff carried out the duties In several of the smaller hospitals patients arriving at night were first seen by the hospital telephonist who then called the nursing staff

Usually the receptionists duties were to note the patients details on the A amp E record form and on the A amp E log The receptionists often helped with triage by alerting nursing staff to urgent cases In some

49

departments the receptionist also dealt with Ace forms made appointments for return visits and carried out admitting procedures at night However in one hospital the reception staff were not specifically attached to the A amp E department and only noted the patients details on the A amp E record form All other duties were performed by the nurses (and sometimes the A amp E doctors) who resented this added workload In several of the smaller A amp E departments reception staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department quite satisfactorily

Several receptionists had years of experience in the A amp E department as well as other relevant experience (eg ambulance dr i ver ECG technician) and were highly valued by the other A amp E staff

In addition to the receptionists some of the urban A amp E departments had hostesses andor hospital aids for odd jobs such as dealing with enquiries taking messages filling out laboratory forms putting away stores and making tea

TO meet the secretarial needs of the A amp E department (eg referral letters to general practitioners) the staff generally used secretaries in other parts of the hospital This service was not always adequate and one department used form letters completed by the A amp E doctors by hand for much of its correspondence Another department employed a part-time secretary for the doctors

Orderlies

Orderlies were generally used to move patients within the A amp E department as well as to other parts o~ the hospital In some hospitals they also assisted with plaster work

Some of the urban and provincial A amp E departments had an orderly during day-time hours but outside these hours and in all other departments orderlies were called from the hospital pool Some A amp E staff commented that delays involved in getting an orderly from the pool could be frustrating when the department was busy

Social workers

The A amp E departments visited had various methods for coping with patients with social or emotional problems

The urban A amp E departments could often calIon psychiatric backup such as a crisis team or an individual psychiatrist psychiatric nurse or counsellor Four of the urban A amp E departments had a social worker allocated to work in the department for some time each day who was also on call for the department while carrying out other duties The rest of the departments called on the pool of hospital social workers In the smaller hospitals social workers were not always available at nights or on weekends although in some places the social workers had made themselves available on an informal basis A amp E staff had mixed views on the usefulness of social workers

The social worker is essential to the work of the A amp E department

A amp E officer

50

The nature of social work has changed over the years and its hard now to make contact with the social workers and to get the support the department wants The department does social work itself and has good liaison with the Salvation Army and other welfare groups

A amp E officer

Ambulance personnel

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments were served by the Order of St John ambulances The exceptions were the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments which were served by the Wellington Free Ambulance and Taranaki A amp E department which worked with the hospital board ambulances Both the rural A amp E departments were served by hospital board ambulance services during the day and St John services at night

Generally the A amp E staff found that liaison between themselves and the ambulance personnel was good Many ambulancemiddot officers had had some training in the A amp E department and were familiar withmiddot its procedures Communications between the two were usually satisfactory with radio-telephones being used to alert the A amp E department to incoming urgent cases or to ask for advice on patient treatment

However some A amp E staff expressed concern abut the suitability of treatment provided by ambulance personnel They were particularly worried about the sophisticated techniques being used at times by some ambulance officers

Many ambulance officers are doing advanced courses and theyre enthusiastic about treating people - putting in drips or giving drugs Mostly the officers are excellent but some are over-enthusiastic

A amp E doctor

In the Auckland and Wellington urban areas there were several A amp E departments and as a working rule ambulance officers took patients to the nearest department However this rule was modified by the facilities available at the nearest hospital and whether or not the nearest A amp E department was open For example if the nearest hospital had no orthopaedic backup the ambulance would ptobably take a patient requiring orthopaedic care to the next closest hospital or if one of the part-time A amp E departments was nearest but closed the ambulance would go to another hospital At times the ambulance officers consulted with the A amp E staff by radio-telephone as to the appropriate A amp E department for a patient they were transporting

DISCUSSION

The patterns of medical staffing in terms of the number of senior A amp E doctors and the rostering of house surgeons reflectedmiddot the attendances and locations of the different A amp E departments The numbers of doctors and nurses (expressed as full-time equivalents) generally reflected the attendance at the departments However there was considerable variation in the level of nursing staff relative to attendance which could not be easily explained

51

Training in A amp E work for the house surgeons was inadequate with little formal training available for them In some places they had little opportunity to learn on-the-job beside a senior doctor Obviously greater time working alongside a senior doctor would be valuable as would intensive one or two-day orientation courses bull

Training was an important matter for the nursing staff also since very experienced nurses clearly were needed in the A amp E departments Inservice training courses are desirable both to develop experienced nurses as quickly as possible and to reduce the load that on-the-job training puts on the existing experienced nurses The training courses run in the Auckland hospitals appeared to be very successful and they could be used as a basis for courses in other hospitals and in post-basic programmes

The house surgeons in urban A amp E departments found their 10 and 12 hour shifts exhausting Also there was some evidence that where house surgeons covered other parts of the hospital as well as the A amp E department conflicting demands resulted in poor cover of the~ department Both of these problems would be alleviated by rostering more staff to the A amp E department We understand that this has happened in some departments in response to the Report on working conditions of resident medical officers Part I [12]

Inadequate supervision of house surgeons and the use of inexperienced first year house surgeons in A amp E departments were widespread In some places there were difficulties in getting backup from specialist staff and the house surgeons were very much on their own in the department There was also some evidence that A amp E departments were less efficient out of normal office hours due to delays in getting registrars and consultants and more especially due to the house surgeons inexperience

Employing more senior doctors both to improve the supervision and training of house surgeons and to improve the efficiency of the A amp E departments would be desirable But at present there are difficulties finding suitable applicants for A amp E officer positions These difficulties are at least partially oue to the low status of the A amp E department within the medical structure and the lack of career prospects for A amp E doctors The increasing numbers of doctors in the 1980 s and the opportunities for part-time work that the A amp E department offers to doctors with family responsibilities may make the department a more attractive choice However if these factors do not improve the senior medical staffing the development of A amp E medicine as a specialty will continue to ~e suggested

Does A amp E medicine in New Zealand require the extra training that would be provided by a post-graduate A amp E specialist programme Given the range of backgrounds currently found suitable for A amp E doctors it would appear that A amp E medicine in rural and provincial hospitals does not require much extra training although some training in particular aspects (eg soft-tissue injuries) could be useful In the urban hospitals the much higher load of major trauma cases could justify a post-graduate training programme However at present the number of senior A amp E doctors in the urban hospitals is insufficient to justify a specialist programme If numbers increase in the future perhaps the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine could sponsor a suitable post-graduate programme They coulo also play an extremely useful role by preparing a manual outlining clinical procedures for A amp E departments and distributing regular bulletins up-dating this material

52

REFERENCES

1 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services report on a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional off ice for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

2 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

3 ELSON Reginald - The medical staff of British accident and emergency units in Br J Hosp Med - (August 1971) p 161-170

4 New thoughts from casualty [editorial] in Br Med J - v 1 (1976) p 1299-1300

5 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 21-24

6 Community-wide emergency medical services recommendations by the Committee on Acute Medicine of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists in JAMA - v 204 no 7 (1968) p 595-602

7 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL~ Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975

8 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 1960 (Report series Board of Health no 2)

9 SALMOND GC - Young doctors an exercise in social researchmiddot methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

10 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM 68(83)

11 CANT BR staffing of A amp E departments in NZ Med J - v 94 (1981) p 471

12 Report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers Pt 1 Report of the Working Party established by the Hospital Medical Officers Advisory Committee and the Minister of Health - Wellington Dept of Health 1981 (unpublished)

13 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraW-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

14 OWENS J Cuthbert - Survey discovers what is wrong with hospitals emergency service in Mod Hosp - vl06no 1 (1966) p 82-85

15 LEITZELL James p - An uncertain future in N Eng J Med - v 304 no 8 (1981) p 477-480

16 RIGGS Leonard M Jr - A vigorous new speCialty in N Eng J Med shyv 304 no 8 (1981) p 480-483

53

17 HONIGSBAUM F - General practitioner work in British hospitals Soc Econ Admin - vl (1967) p 34-44bull

in

18 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL DJ and WALKER JH~ - Practitioners patients and the accident department in Hosp Health Services - (1975) p 80-84

Rev

19 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 1979 in NZ Med J - v 91(1980) p 194-196

19-23 March

55

CHAPTER 6

Patient att~ndance characteristics

This chapter considers the general pattern of attendance at A amp E departments noting overall levels and time trends the age and SeX distribution of patients and the conditions with which they come to the department Next we look at recall visits particularly the hospital to hospital variations Then the use of A amp E departments by people who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner is discussed

The materiai has been gathered by examining the A amp E records and talking with the staff of the 14 A amp E departments visited Data from the re~ords at Northland Base Hospital A amp E department have also been incorporated

Detailed patterns of attendance by hour of the day and day of the week have not been analysed Other researchers have documented these for A amp E departments in New Zealand and overseas [123456789] While detailed information is useful for good management of departments and setting adequate staffing levels for the busiest periods it is usually specific to a particular department and is not relevant to the questions addressed in this report For our purposes it has been sufficient to divide the week into normal working hours (in hours defined as 0800-1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays) and the remaining hours (out of hours)

OVERALL ATTENDANCE AND TRENDS

Since 1978 hospitals have reported total attendance at outpatient departments to the National Health Statistics Centre distinguishing A amp E attendance from other attendance and first attendance from recall attendance Table 9 shows the average annual attendance at the 15 A amp E departments for the period from 1978 to 1981 Table 10 presents the trends in A amp E attendance over the same period compared with the changes in population of the hospital catchment areas between the 1976 and 1981 censuses

There has been an overall increase in first attendance of 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 This increase is somewhat higher than we would expect from the growth in New Zealand population over the same period However the increase in first attendance has been partially counter-balanced by a decrease of 25 per cent in recall attendance

Table 10 shows too that there is no general trend towards increased first attendancemiddot among the urban hospitals The non-urban hospitals have experienced increasing first attendance although even there Northland Base and Rotorua show no increase

56

TABLE 9 AVERAGE ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-19811

First Recall Total attendance attendance attendance

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 58 506 6 272 64 777 Middlemore 39 032 18 686 57 718 Green Lane 26 079 16 635 42 714 Wellington 48 011 7 748 55 759 Hutt 33 266 9 807 43 072 Christchurch 61 516 12 010 73 526 Dunedin 27 202 10 802 38 004

Provincial Northland Base 7 794 3 144 10 938 Rotorua 12 265 4 636 16 900 Taranaki Base 10 341 5 462 15 803 Timaru 9 971 10 102 20 072

Rural Whakatane 5 992 2 177 8 769 Grey 3 850 1 214 5 064

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore2 9 388 7 900 17 288 Kenepuru 3 5 843 3 209 9 052

All public hospitals 524 442 226 251 750 693

1 Source Hospital Management Data 1978-1981 - Wellington National Health Statistics Centre Dept of Health Simple average unless otherwise noted

2 Estimated as average of 1978 1979 and 1981 figures as the North Shore A amp E department was closed for part of 1980

3 Estimated for 1979-1981 only since the Kenepuru A amp E department was not open ~or all of 1978

57

TABLE 10 TRENDS IN ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-1981

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Midd1emore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3

Kenepuru 4

All public hospitals

Average annual percentage change in A amp E attendance l

First attendance

-36 07 16

-22 -79

00 48

-07 06 64

185

61 90

59 179

15

Recall attendance

lo3-07

66 -155 -34

63 08

33 -45

23 02

1253 06

374 89

-25

Estimated annual percentage change in population of hospital bull s catchment

area

1976-19812

07

-04 -02 -10

14 12

-02 -06

12 -04

07 -04

02

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

2 Source NZ Wellington

Census of Population Dept of Statistics

and Dwellings 1976 and 1981

3 Estimated from 1978 and 1981 flUctuations in intervening years

figures only because of extreme

4 Estimated for 1979-1981 for all of 1978

only since Kenepuru A amp E department not open

Figure for entire hospital board area used

58

AGE AND SEX

The characteristic age and sex distributions of total A amp E attendance are shown in Figure 1 Nearly half of the attendances are by young adults 15-29 years Schoolage children too formed a larger part of the attendance than their numbers in the community would lead one to expect These two age groups which are also the age groups most likely to be active and daring accounted for nearly two thirds of all attendances The age distribution of attendance was similar from hospital to hospital

About twice as many males as females attended A amp E departments (66 per cent to 34 per cent) When age and sex were considered together I it was the school age and young adult males who made up the majority of attenders Even in the 30-64-year-old group men outnumbered women two to one These age and sex distributions are similar to those found by other researchers in New Zealand [1410] in Britain [1112] and the United States [1314]

Figure 1 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments by age and sex

Male Female

3L1

30

20 20

E ~ 128 shy

108

10

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65_ Age Group Age Group

CONDITIONS

Of the total A amp E attendances 81 per cent were for injury conditions and 19 per cent were for sickness conditions Adjusting for the recall visits we estimated that 73 to 78 per cent of first visits were for injury conditions Our results were similar to Platts [15] as far as we can tell given the different definitions used In another British study Lewis and Bradbury [12] found 90 per cent of visits were for injury However

59

this higher level is not surprising since they considered only cases which were waiting for attention ignoring ambulance cases and the very seriously ill

Out of hours sickness conditions made up 25 per cent of all visits and in hours they were 14 per cent Preschool children and people 65 years and over were more likely to attend for sickness conditions than those aged 5-64 years (Figure 2) The preponderance of males over females in the 15-64 year old groups was accounted for by injury conditions rather than by sickness

Figure 2 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

Male Femate

IIIiI A trendance for _ sickness condiHons 30

remainder for injury condItions

20

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 f Age Group Age Group

In the following sections information from some of the hospitals about the types of injury and sickness conditions is presented We have had problems in classifying the conditions since at some hospitals few details of the patients conditions were recorded on the A amp E log Even where details were recorded only 60 per cent of injury attendances and 80 per cent of sickness attendances have been able to be consistently classified

Injury conditions

Data on the type of injury was extracted from only six A amp E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch and Northland Base hospitals) There was very little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 3 shows the types of injuries as proportions of first injury attendances The category

60

of cuts (which included scrapes amputations and punctures) accounted for almost 30 per cent of first injury attendances The severity of the cuts could not be judged from log entries but in the case of Northland Base Hospital cuts identified as probably needing suturing formed a substantial part of this category Fractures made up 15 per cent of the first injury attendance with foreign body injuries (mostly in the eye) burns and toxic effects accounting for another 14 per cent

Figure 3 Injury first attendances by type of injury all ages

Other (414)

Cuts (291)Fractures (154)

The category labelled other accounted for 40 per cent of all first injury attendances and included some serious conditions such as falls crushing injuries and various states of shock However many of the other injuries were regarded as minor conditions by the Aamp E staff It was impossible to judge the severity of injuries from the detail recorded on the logs so no estimate of the percentage of injuries which required urgent attention has been made

For most types of injuries sex and age had little bearing There were exceptions (Figure 4) Toxic effects were four times as likely among preschool children as among other age groups Fractures were twice as likely both for school age children and for those 65 years and over as for other age groups Somewhat surprisingly adult men and women differed little in the types of injuries

Figure 4 Injury first attendances by type of injury by age groups

0-4 (ears 5-14 years 15-29 years

Other (308)

Cuts (321 )

Toxic effects (13) Burns (21 )

Foreign bodies (24)

Fractures (254)

Other (408)

Cuts (280)

Toxic effects (28)

Burns (41)

Other (452)

Cuts (286)

30-64 years 65+ years

Other (393) Other (341)

Cuts (308) Fractures (301)

62

People were more likely to present with injury conditions in hours rather than out of hours From the information collected at the four Auckland hospitals we can say that 43 per cent of first injury visits happened out of hours whereas 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category

Sickness conditions

Data on the type of sickness was extracted from only 10 A lie E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch Dunedin Northland Rotorua Taranaki and Grey) There was little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 5 shows the types of sickness conditions as proportions of all sick~ess attendance

Figure 5 Sickness attendance by type of sickness all ages

General sickness

(110)

Abdominal pain (132) Other (20 1 )

Shortness of breath (150)

Skin pain bleeding (229) Collapse (179)

TwO prominent categories shortness ofmiddot breath and collapse (including diabetic coma heart at tacks congestive heart failure and chest pain) accounted for one-third of all sickness attendances

General sickness covered fever diarrhoea and vomiting feeling unwell convulsions renal failure and abdominal pain recorded as being related to urinary retention Abdominal pain was generally recorded simply as such but acute appendix and similar terms and miscarriage or bleeding from the vagina were included in abdominal pain

Figure 6 Sickness attendance by type of sickness by age groups

0-4 years 5-14 years 15-29 years

General sickness (79)

General ~ickness (380)

Other (90) i

Shortness ofSkin pain I breath (148)

bleeding (100) Sickness pain Shortness of breath (320) bleeding (270) ClI

IN

Collapse (30)

30-64 years 65+ years

Abdominal pain (110) General sickness (102)

Shortness of breath (184) Ot 1159~

Skin pain I bleeding (10 1)

Collapse (358)

64

Unspecified pain or other bleeding have been included in the category of generally minor conditions involving skin pain or bleeding Such minor conditions accounted for almost a quarter of the sickness attendances Abscesses or infected wounds made up a quarter of the skin pain or bleeding category while a further 21 per cent involved pain such as back pain headaches or other pain

Ear and eye conditions toothache and other miscellaneous or undefined conditions made up the other category which formed 20 per cent of the sickness attendance

Were the sickness conditions urgent enough to require treatment at an A amp E department This was a difficult question to answer from the information available on the A amp E logs We have concluded that the collapse and shortness of breath conditions were likely to be emergencies and that for the preschool age group and probably those 65 years and over abdominal pain and general sickness required urgent attention We have described all the other sickness conditions as non-urgent sickness Thus at least 39 per cent of the ickness conditions required urgent attention

The type of sickness attendance differed between the age groups (Figure 6) Preschool children rarely came for superficial reasons Only 11 per cent of their sickness attendances were for skin pain or bleeding conditions Shortness of breath was a major condition for all children preschool or school age Skin pain or bleeding conditions were more prominent among the school age children than the preschool

Young adults tended to come for minor conditions Thirty per cent of their sickness attendance was for skin pain or bleeding conditions and only 20 per cent was for the emergency categories of collapse or shortness of breath

Among the adults 30-64 years old however emergencies formed a substantial part of sickness attendance with 27 per cent belonging to the collapse category Among those 64 years and over few non-urgent conditions were recorded with 40 per cent of the sickness attendance being for collapse The skin pain or bleeding conditions accounted for only 10 per cent of their sickness attendance

Fifty-eight per cent of all sickness attendances occurred out of hours~ as would have been expected given that 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category However nearly three-quarters of preschool sickness visits happened out of hours while less than half of the sickness visits by those 30 years and over were out of hours

RECALL ATTENDANCE

Almost all recall visits were for injury conditions velY few sickness patients were recalled for follow-up care As was noted in Chapter 3 policies on recall visits differed among the departments Several factors ~ffected the decision to recall the patients condition the A amp E staffs communication with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs middotof house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors ~hilosophy of A amp E medicine From the comments made by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the departments into two groups

65

RECALL POLICY

DO FAVOUR A policy favouring recall visits

DO NOT lAVOUR A policy not favouring recall visits with most patients being referred to a general practitioner However fractures and soft-tissue or serious wounds tend to be recalled

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

DO FAVOUR Taranaki Base Grey North Shore

DO NOT FAVOUR Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Rotorua Timaru Whakatane Kenepuru

-----_--------- ----------------------~

It is diff icult to compare the policies of the departments with their actual performances since some A amp E logs did not completely identify all recall visits Table 11 presents recall attendance as a proportion of total attendance For the departments where recall visits were fully identified there appears to be reasonable agreement between the Hospital Management Data figures and the figures derived from our tallies The exceptions are Whakatane where staff told us that return visits pad dropped from 1979 to 1981 and Auckland where we have no explanation It should be noted that the tally figures are estimates based on one-week to one-month samples and so may be less accurate than the Hospital Mlmagement Data which are complete counts over an entire year

Overall 25-30 per cent of all visits were recall visits There was considerable variation among departments in the level of recall visits OFlanagan [16] found similar variation among British A amp E departments

The recall polic ies were not closely related to the departments performances as measured by the proportion of all visits that were recalls While North Shore with a recall-favouring A amp E department had a very high level of recalls (many were plaster checks) so did Timaru a department with a policy of not favouring recalls The other recall-favouring A amp E departments at Grey and Taranaki Base hospitals had only average levels of recalls

The departments performances however were related to the levels of medical and nursing staff as measured by the tatal medical staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 6 and the nurse staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 8) A amp E departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits (see Table 11 and Figures 7 and 8) Perhaps these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat recalled patients

66

TABLE 11 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS RECALL ATTENDANCE

Hospital Tally sources Management Data Recalls as Recalls as Total Recalls as percentage percentage attend-percentage of total attendancel

of total attendance

of injury attendance

ance tallied2

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 97 198 278 948 Middlemore 324 327 399 1137 Green Lane 389 401 439 868 Wellington3 139 116 172 3568

(4 weeks) Hutt3 228 280 379 2766

( 4 weeks) Christchurch 163 166 216 1233 Dunedin3 284 278 334 749

Provincial Northland Base 287 275 328 2092

03 weeks) Rotorua 274 214 250 334 Taranaki Base 346 327 353 270 Timaru3 504 460 51 6 174

Rural Whakatane 317 152 175 259

( 2 weeks) Grey3 240 238 293 330

o month)

Part-time departments

Suburban North Sh~re 457 521 539 512 Kenepuru 355 383 422 451

(4 weeks)

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations lOne week tally unless otherwise noted 3 Tally data partially estimated from Hospital Managementmiddot Data (see

Table 9) to adjust for incomplete recording

Spearman rank correlations [18] of recalls as percentage of total attendances (Hospital Management Data) with

(a) FTE medical staff per 10000 first attendance r = 0459 P lt 005 (b) FTE nurse staffing (adjusted for holding ward) per 10000 first

attendance r = 0547 P lt 005

67

Figure 7 Comparison of medical staff availability and level of recall attendance

u c ro 50 Timaru

C c ~ North Shore m ro S 40 Greenlane 0

Kenepuru

Cl ro Taranaki E = 30

Middlemore bull bull Whakatane

Cl Dunedin Rotoruae

ro

u Hutt Grey

c ro

C 20 C

~ m Christchurch

ro Wellington u

0 10 Auckland

10 20 30 40

Number of medical staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance

Figure 8 Comparison of nursing staff availability and level of recall attendance

Timaru50

North Shore

40 Greenlanee

Kenepuru Taranaki

Middlemore bull Whakatane bull 30

Dunedin ROlorua

GreyHutt

20

Christchurch Wellington

10 Auokland

3 4 5 6 8 9 10 II 12

Number of nursing staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance lexcluding nurses staffing holding wards)

68

It has been suggested that house surgeons are more likely to recall than senior A amp E doctors [17] If this were so we would expect that A amp E departments where house surgeons worked with very little direct senior superv1s1on (Hutt Taranaki Whakatane Grey Kenepuru) would have had higher proportions of recalls than departments with much greater supervision (Auckland and Dunedin) This was not the case Also North Shore with no house surgeons had a high proportion of recalls Thus the recall levels do not suggest that the house surgeons had any greater propensity than senior A amp E doctors to recall patients

GP-LOAD

A amp E staff use the term GP-load as shorthand for people who in their eyes would more appropriately be treated by a general practitioner Other studies in New Zealand and overseas have estimated that between 36 and 61 per -cent of all A amp E patients could have been successfully treated by a general practitioner [41920] When we discussed this topic with A amp E staff we found a similar variation in their estimates of the GP-10ad This variation may be due to differing views as to which injury and sickness conditions should be treated in the A amp E department it may be due to different beliefs about the abilities and facilities of general practitioners and it may reflect differences in the patients ~erved by different A amp E departments

The role of general practitioners in the treatment of injury is a matter of debate However there is more agreement over sickness conditions A sickness emergency is traditionally accepted as suitable for A amp E treatment whereas a non-urgent sickness condition is seen as more appropriate for general practitioner treatment

Non-urgent sickness

A amp E staff estimated that patients with long standing or minor sickness conditions constituted from 2 to 30 per cent of the attendance However tallies from the A amp E logs showed that non-urgent sickness attendance ranged from 6 to 24 per cent averaging about 12 per cent At most departments staff oVer-estimated the level At a typical hospital staff opinion placed non-urgent sickness at 20 to 25 per cent of the attendance while the A amp E log showed only 19 per cent coming for any sickness condition and fewer than 12 per cent for non-urgent sickness Only in one A amp E department was the tally evidence of non-urgent sickness greater than the staffs estimate The general oVer-estimation of non-urgent sickness visits probably means that A amp E staff were also over-estimating the total GP-load bull

In general A amp E staff felt that patients with non-urgent sickness would be better off being seen by their own general practitioners However the departments differed in the ways they dealt with these patients Some staff mentioned that when they treated such patients they would discourage further visits by explaining the role of the A amp E department Some departments had notices in the waiting rooms stating that the department was for treatment of accidents and emergencies and that people should see their general practitioner for other conditions Some hospitals had placed advertisements with similar messages in local newspapers

From the comments of A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the A amp E departments into two groups

69

OPEN DOOR POLICY

OPEN An open policy where almtreated They may then general practitioner

ost be

all patients advised to see

are a

RESTRICTED A restricted policy where patients are not treated a general practitioner

nbut

on-urgent are re

sicknferred

ess to

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

OPEN Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Whakatane Grey North Shore

RESTRICTED Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru Kenepuru

The open door policies were reflected somewhat in the proportion of all A amp E visits that were f or sickness (see Table 12) The departments with restricted policies (which were all non-urban) tended to have lower proportions of sickness visits than those with open policies However the non-urban departments with open policies did not have substantially higher proportions of sickness visits than the restricted departments Rather some of the urban departments (Auckland Wellington Hutt and Christchurch) had particularly high proportions of sickness visits These departments were also particularly busy with large numbers of first attendances and relatively low levels of medical staffing One would expect that in a very busy department staff would discourage inappropriate visits However A amp E staff at Auckand and Wellington hospitals commented that although non-urgent sickness patients needed general practitioner care they tended to treat them anyway because it was quicker to treat them than to send them away This may be a partial explanation for the high levels of sickness visits but other factors related to the populations served by the departments are probably involved (see Chapter 8)

A common exception to the open door policies was made for children At most hospitals staff said that sick children were always seen As Table 13 suggests children as described by staff are probably preschool children rather than all those under 15 years The departments with restricted policies had considerably lower proportions of sickness visits in the preschool and school age groups than did the open policy departments Table 13 also shows that toe agemiddot group most likely to appear with sickness conditions is the elderly There was Tess difference in proportions of sickness visits between the restricted policy and open policy departments for patients aged 30 and over

It would appear that a restricted policy towards non-urgent sickness patients does tend to discourage sickness Visits particularly for preschool age children However a restricted policy does not markedly appear to discourage sickness visits by the elderly

70

TABLE 12 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESS 1

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Butt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru3

Rural Whakatane Grey3

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Estimated Percentage of percentage total attenshyof first ance that was attendance for sickness that was for sickness

378 303 235 158 187 112 365 323 361 260 301 251 233 168

162 183 144 110 74 109 59

156 132 190 145

58 28 152 94

Total attendance tallied2

948 1137

868 3568 (4 weeks) 2766 ( 4 weeks) 1233

749

2092 (13 weeks) 334 270 174

259 (2 weeks) 330 (l month)

572 451 (4 weeks)

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 One-week tally unless otherwise noted

3 For Timaru and Grey the percentage of first attendance that was for sickness is the actual figure derived from the tallies and the percentage of total attendance that was for sickness has been estimated

71

TABLE 13 PROPORTION OF TOTAL A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESSl BY OPEN DOOR POLICY AND AGE GROUPS

Percentage of total attendance that was for sickness

under 5 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 All years years years years years amp age

over groups

Open policy departments 367 111 148 245 433 201

Restricted policy departments 102 66 80 181 311 110

All departments studied 33 bull2 104 141 238 425 191

1 Source Tallies taken from A E logs by authors hospitals represented in one-week equivalents

DISCUSSION

At all public hospitals first visits to A amp E departments increased by 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 However this increase was not consistent with most of the urban A E departments reporting a decrease or no change in first visits Recall visits for all public hospital A E departments decreased by 25 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 The decrease was not consistent in fact the reported changes in recall attendance were highly variable It has been suggested that the cost of general practitioner services and dissatisfaction with the unavailability of general practitioners have caused increased use of A amp E departments However it seems unlikely that any single reason could explain these highly variable changes in A amp E attendance in New Zealand

The people visiting A amp E departments were predominantly school age or young adults and male Men aged 15 to 29 years formed the largest single group almost one-third of all attendances Eighty-one per cent of attendances were for injuries and the 19 per cent attending for sickness conditions tended to be preschoolers or people aged 65 years or more Injury visits were more common in hours and sickness visits out of hours probably because accidents tend to happen in daylight hours Also sic kness conditions often seem worse at night and if the patients do not want to bother their general practitioner they may go straight to the A amp E department (see Chapter 7)

72

It was difficult to classify conditions accurately from the information on A amp E logs since insufficient detail and little indication of severity was usually recorded Thus we have not been able to estimate the proportion of injuries which really required A amp E care Similarly there were difficulties in classifying the sickness conditions middotalthough almost 40 per cent appeared to require urgent attention

There was considerable variation among the A amp E departments studied in the proportion of all visits that were recall visits However contrary to our expectations this variation was not related to the policy on recalling patients stated by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents Nor did it appear to be related to the inexperience of unsupervised house surgeons Rather it was related to staffing levels Departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits It is likely that staff in these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat more recalled patients If departments wish to change their recall levels an examination of thei r staffing levels would be an obvious place to start

The other component of the workload which A amp E departments often wish to control is the non-urgent sickness attendance A amp E staff saw such visits as inappropr iate and they consistently over-estimated the proportion of non-urgent sickness patients they were treating Ullman (3] and Roth [21] have found similar processes of oVer-estimation occurring among staff in United States emergency rooms The level of non-urgent sickness visits was not high on average comprising only 12 per cent of the attendance However applying a restricted policy (referring to general practitioners for treatment displaying notices in the department and advertisements in local newspapers) appeared to discourage such visits particularly for preschool children Thus non-urgent sickness attendance was not a problem in some A amp E departments Where departments see such visits as a problem applying a restricted policy could ease it

13

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS E F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J -V 71 0970rgt212-219

2 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard ~ Emergency department utHisation in ail urban community implications for community ambulatory careinJAMA v 216 no 2 (191l) p 301-312

3 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SfRATMANN William C- An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1915) P 1011-1020

4 RICHARDSJ G and WHITE GR~ - Accident and emergency services at AucklandHospital inNZmiddotMed J - v 85 (1977) P 272~274

5 INGRAM D R CLARKE D -R and MURDIE R A -Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1918) P 55-62

6 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referral patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

1 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

McRAE She1agh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience of Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

9 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (A amp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 319-388

10 SNELGAR Denis- Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

11 Casual attenders a socio-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcast1e-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

12 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A amp E in Health Soc Serv J (1981) p 1139-1142

13 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

14 WALKER L L - Inpatient and emergency department utilisation the effect of distance social class age sex and marital status in J Amer ColI Emergency Phycns - v 5 no 2 (1976) p 105-110

15 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

74

16 OFLANAGAN P - The work of an accident and emergency department in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 26 no 162 (1976) p 54-60

17 What are accident and emergency departments for in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) P 837-839

18 SIEGEL Sydney_ - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

19 CROMBIE D L - A casualty survey in J ColI Gen Pract - v 2 (1959) P 346-356

20 SKUDDER Paul A McCarroll James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1913 p 11-35

21 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) P 839-856

75

CHAPTER 7

Patient attitudes to the accident and emergency department and staff attitudes to the patients

In this chapter we look at the attitudes of patients to the A amp E department and particularly the reasons they give for attending it Summaries of the results of overseas studies are given followed by detailed information from several New Zealand studies where patients were interviewed the Dunedin study carried out by Dixon in 1968[1] Richards Auckland study of 1975 [2] Keenans unpublished Christchurch study of 1978 the Wei~ington childrens study carried out by Kljakovic in 1978 [3] and McRaes Waikato study of I~H9 [4] Then we discuss the effect that health centres and deputising services have on A amp E use Finally we explore the views that A amp E staff have of their patients

REASONS FOR VISITING THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

Overseas studies

A substantial number of overseas studies have explored the reasons given by patients attending A amp E departments One major reason was the availability of the A amp E department open 24 hours a day and always staffed compared to the actual or perceived unavailability of the general practitioner [56789]

People mentioned the accessibility of the A amp E department as a reason for attending citing its location ease of transport to and from it and its convenience for work schedules and other arrangements [671011]

Another major reason for visiting the A amp E department was its appropriateness as a source of care particularly because of the equipment and facilities available [5612] with many conditions particularly injuries A amp E patients made their own diagnosis They therefore omitted the diagnosis-seeking part of care (where the general practitioner was seen as appropriate) and sought confirmation arid immediate treatment at the A amp E department [1314]

People also saw the A ampE department as the appropriate place to go because of the urgency of their condition especially if the person needing treatment was a child [7141516] However A amp E staff and A amp E patients often had conflicting perceptions of the seriousness of the condition Patients tended to see their complaint as more serious and urgent than did the A amp E doctor [9101117]

Advice from other people was another reason given for visiting the A amp E department [61218] People were more likely to visit the department rather than the general practitioner when the decision to seek care was made outside the home and where someone other than the patient or a close

relative was involved in the decision (eg a policeman an employer a teacher or bystander) In some cases such as traffic accidents and some

work and school accidents it was automatic procedure to send the patient straight to the A amp E department [1819]

76

Some people using the A amp E department did not have a family doctor because they were new to the area or transient or for other reasons [78] In the United States the proportions without a doctor were high ranging from 40 per cent to 86 per cent [5171920]

The proportion of patients who tried to contact their doctor before going to the A amp E department also varied considerably from 6 per cent to 42 per cent in different North American studies [59202122] 14 per cent in a Canadian study and SO per cent in a Swedish study [23] Holohan et al [24J found that over SO per cent of patients attending a British A amp E department were unaware or inaccurately informed about their general practitioners out of hours care arrangements

Dissatisfaction with their general practitioner led to some people visiting the A amp E department Organisational factors such as appointment systems deputising serVices and health centres all made it more difficult for patients to contact their doctor [142425) Dissatisfaction with the doctors treatment and wanting a second opinion were also reasons [26] As well language difficulties were a problem In Australia immigrants used the hospital foi childrens emergencies because interpreters were available and they did not have to use the telephone to arrange a visit [27]

It has been suggested that people use A amp E departments rather than general practitioners because the department is free This is unlikely to be a reason in Britain where general practitioner care is free under the National Health Service Studies in the United States found that very few respondents said that the cost of seeing a doctor was a major reason for visiting the A amp E department [511)

New Zealand studies

Use of general practitioners

It has been suggested that people use the A amp E department because they are visitors to a city or do not have a general practitioner The New Zealand studies foundmiddot that the proportion of those interviewed who had a general practitioner varied considerably from city to city (see Table 14) The high level in Wellington [3] was not surprising given that most families with children have a general practitioner The transience of local populations as suggested by Richards [2] may explain some of the differences between the studies Dixon [1] noted that the age and sex structure of the people visiting the A amp E department with the preponderance of young males was the opposite to that of people visiting general practitioners

The Wellington study found that for a very high proportion of children (39 per cent) there had been an attempt to contact a general practitioner before going to the A amp E department and 25 per cent had actuallY seen the doctor [3) The other studies found smaller proportions British studies have reported similar variations with Lewis and Bradbury [14] finding 8 per cent of A amp E attenders had been referred by their general practitioner and Conway (25] reporting 41 per cent

The Chr istchurch study found that the people who did not see a doctor before coming to the A amp E department were more likely to be injured rather than sick to visit the department out of hours rather than in

77

hours and to be 15 to 29 years old Also during work hours people who had accidents at work were less likely to see the doctor before going to the A amp E department than people with home or sports accidents

TABLE 14 USE OF GENERAL PRACT IT lONERS BY FIRST ATTENDERS AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Percentage of all those interviewed who

had a regular general attempted to contact their practitioner general practitioner before

going to the A amp E department

Dunedin 1968 92 16 Auckland 1975 72 21 Christchurch 1978 85 23 Wellington 1978 98 39

Derived from 84 per cent who were sent directly or chose to go to casualty without seeing a doctor

Specific reasons for using the A amp E department

Turning now to the reasons given by patients for their A amp E visit the New Zealand studies found a similar range of reasons to the overseas studies Keenan collected detailed information in Christchurch and this is presented in Table 15 and in the following sections Comparable information from the other studies where available has been included

Others advised the patient to go to the A amp E department The most common reason given by the Christchurch patients (and by the people interviewed by Dixon [1] in Dunedin) was that others (employers teachers traffic officers sports coach neighbours friends) advised them to go to the A amp E department There appeared to be an automatic procedure following many school work sports and traffic accidents of sending the patient straight to the A amp E department

There was no evidence that injuries happening at other locations (eg at home) were any less likely to go to the A amp E department A comparison of the Waikato and Christchurch A amp E injury attenders with people consulting general practitioners for accidental injuries [28] showed similar proportions of attendance by the location of the accident (Figure 9) In Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14] found similar results when studying A amp E attendance in the North Western Regional Health Authority

76

TABLE 15 REASONS FOR A amp E FIRST ATTENDANCE FROM THREE NEW ZEALAND STUDIES

Reasons Christchurch 1976

Wellington ( children)

1978

Auckland 1975

SAW GP BEFORE A amp E 186 250

A amp E MORE AVAILABLE GP found to be unavailable

or thought to be unavailable Did not want to bother GP

Cost of GP care a factor

125

( 65) ( 41)

(19)

233

119

(24) ( 79)

(16)

A amp E MORE ACCESSIBLE More convenient closer

phone or transport problems in contacting GP

214

A amp E MORE APPROPRIATE Condition of type not dealt

with by GP requiring A amp E facilities

Need for attention was urgent

140

( 5 0) (90)

389 671

OTHERS ADVISED TO GO TO A amp E 233 61

OTHER Includes having no GP

trained by GP to go to A amp E needed a dentist and so on

94 68

Number of people interviewed 565 428 1147

Tried to contact general practitioner did not necessarily see doctor

A amp E department more available Only 125 per cent of the Christchurch sample went to the A amp E department because it was more available than their general practitioner Richards [2] found a similar proportion in Auckland Not surprisingly the availability reasons were given more by people visiting the Christchurch A amp E department out of hours than in hours and more for children and older adults than the 15 to 29 age group The cost of visiting a general practitioner was hardly mentioned as a reason for visiting the A amp E department

79

In Wellington Kljakovic [3] found parents saying abOut the A amp E department

you can go anytime - 24 hour service when everyones at the end of their tether theyre there and theyre open

and about general practitioners

didnt know you could get a doctor on the weekends on other occasions you get an answering service - not worth bothering the doctor

midnight - too late to call a doctor

Figure 9 location at which accidents happened by those attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Presenting at A amp E department Presenting at general practitioner

Home (389) Home (290)

Work schooL Work school public buildings (336) public buddings (39 0)

A amp E department more accessible Over 20 per cent of the Christchurch attenders went to the A amp E department because it was more convenient closer or involved fewer transport or communic~tion problems These reasons were given more out of hours than in hours particularly by the 15 to 29 age group Injured patients especially those with sports injuries were more likely to give these reasons

A amp E department more appropriate Only 14 per cent of the Chr istchurch sample gave appropriateness as a reason while Richards [2] found 67 per cent in Auckland and Kljakovic [3] reported 39 per cent in Wellington These differences may reflect different interview situations since Richards interviewed patients at the A amp E department while Keenan and Kljakovic questioned people through telephone or personal interviews in their own homes Christchurch people suffering traffic accidents or poisonings (largely self-poisonings) were more Ii kely to give this reason than other reasons

80

In Wellington parents often said about the A amp E department

thats what its there for they have everything there

Several parents also commented that

general practitioners dont do stitches the GP is for minor things - not eager to corne to an emergency the doctor would only send us on to the hospital anyway thought leg was broken - needed an x-ray

Many parents decided to go to the A amp E department because they had already made a diagnosis and thought the condition required A amp E treatment others were unsure of the urgency of the childs condition A mother whose two-year-old son had hit his nose on a shower box at 755 am rang the doctor The child was crying his nose was bleeding and looked flattened The message on the answer phone was that the doctor could be contacted only in a real emergency She was unsure what a real emergency was so took the child to hospital not wanting to feel a fool by ringing the doctor

Some parents particularly those with asthmatic children were well aware that the condition required urgent care and had previously been told to go straight to the A amp E department

Dissatisfaction with the general practitioner Satisfaction is notoriously difficult to measure particularly when normal levels of satisfaction are between 85 and 90 per cent satisfied Only in the Wellington study [3] of childrens A amp E attendance was a direct question asked about satisfaction with the general practitioner service Forty-one per cent expressed some dissatisfaction mostly mentioning concern over difficulty in seeing the doctor Problems with getting an appointment with waiting because there was no appointment system with unsympathetic receptionists and with doctors not being willing to visit the horne were all mentioned Some parents commented that at a health centre they were unlikely to see their own doctor so they might as well go to the A amp E department Four per cent of parents were dissatisfied with the general practitioners treatment and came to the A amp E department for better treatment The cost of visiting the general practitioner was only mentioned by three parents (07 per cent)

Satisfaction with A amp E department The Wellington study [3] found that 73 per cent of parents were satisfied with the A amp E department For those who were dissatisfied the urgency of their visit was uppermost and they were unhappy at having to wait too long Parents also commented disapprovingly that the departments were understaffed or very busy The A amp E staff carne in for very little criticism only 07 per cent of parents made critical comments Many parents expressed their satisfaction with the reassuring aspects of the A amp E department its availability and its size A typical comment was its big they have everything there In one case parents dissatisfied with the treatment of their sick child at one A amp E department went to another department because it was bigger

81

Views of A amp E staff

When we asked A amp E staff why people visi ted the department they offered the same reasons that patients had given as explanations ie appropriateness availability and satisfaction Staff also commented that Pacific Islanders were accustomed to using hospital services for all their medical care in the islands andmiddot continued tomiddot use the hospital in New Zealand either as a first resort or for a second opinion Kinloch [29] demonstrated that while this was so for recent Samoan migrants in Wellington after some years New Zealand residence their pattern of hospital usage because similar to that of the population as a whole

A amp E staff thought that the major reason for the GP-load patients visiting the department was general practitioner unavailability They recognised

that many patients did not have a general practitioner because they were new to the area transient or on holiday Many staff mentioned the cost of visiting a doctor as a major reason although a few staff strongly asserted that cost was not important

EFFECT Of HIEALTH CENTRES AND DEPUTISING SERVICES ON A 8t IE UTILISATION

It has been assumed that the unavailability of a family doctor has been a major reason for people attending an A amp E department Consequently health centres with more facilities for treatment of injuries and open for longer hours than the usual doctors surgery have been set up Two United States studies [3031] found that the health centres they looked at appeared to have reduced the use of A amp E departments by people in the local neighbourhood either absolutely or relativemiddot to people in other neighbourhoods However in New Zealand data collected from Dunedin A amp E records by Maynard [32] three years before and three years after the Mosgiel health centre opened andmiddot by ourselves six years after it opened gave no evidence of a decline inA amp E use by Mosgiel residents It appeared that since the A amp E department was rarely used for routine primary care problems there was little opportunity for the health centre to substitute for the department Possibly a neighbourhood closer to the A amp E department would have shown more effect from a health centre Also as Alpert et al [33] suggested habit patterns of usage could be difficult to change

Williams et al [34] investigated the effect of general practitioner deputising services on A amp E department use in the Sheffield Hospital region They found that deputising service referrals did not add significantly to the workloads of A amp Edepartments nor did it appear that many patients referred themselves to the A amp E departments in preference to consulting the deputising service doctors They commented that the deputising services may have been meeting a demand previously coped with by the hospitals

It is possible that health centres ana deputising services have contradictory effects on A amp E department visits People who realise a doctor is readily available through these services may use thatmiddot service rather than the A amp E department Other people may reason that if they cannot see their usual doctor it is just as convenient to use the A amp E department as the health centre or deputising service

82

A amp E STAFF VIEWS OF PATIENTS

Overseas studies

Several overseas studies have explored the views of A amp E staff about their patients Roth [35] found that staff applied concepts of social worth which were common in the larger society to their patients so that higher status people were likely to get more respectful treatment than lower status Staff tended tomiddot oVerestimate the numbers of patients seen as undesirable such as drunks venereal disease cases and welfare cases as well as overestimating the numbers using the department inappropriately Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff categorised patients as good (clinically interesting allowing staff to practise their skills and testing the competence of staff) and rubbish (a socially-defined category including drunks overdoses tramps and trivia which were usually minor injuries or conditions not requiring medical attention) Hughes [37] commented that the good and rubbish categories were relatively small groups and that staff had a neutral attitude to the bulk of the people visiting the department

Jeffery [36] found that staff reacted punitively to rubbish patients using delay verbal hostility and vigorous restraint of unco-operative patients particularly overdoses According to Roth (35] patients seen as unco-operative will be told to wait their turn and may be threatened with refusal of treatment Several authors found that patients visiting for tri vial complaints tended to be handled with surface politenessmiddot even if they were subject to post-hoc attacks in written records or departmental gossip [363738]

Burgess and Holmstrom [39] found that the attitudes and actions of health providers could increase or diminish the psychological consequencies for women who had been raped and suggested that staff awareness and training would be valuable Alexander [40] studied nurses preceptions of women who had been raped and found that while the womens characteristics were important the nurses own personality and attitudes were more important Alexander concluded that short-term sensitivity training was unlikely to be effective and that great care was necessary in selecting health providers to care for raped women

Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff viewed patients as having a legitimate claim to medical care if they were not responsible for their condition if they were restricted in their reasonable activities by the condition if they viewed their condition as an undesirable state and if they co-operated in trying to get well He commented that people visiting repeatedly because of overdoses or fights were regarded as not co-operating while repeated injuries from sports activities were viewed as legitimate Roth [19] in a study of five United States A amp E departments found that staff views on the legitimacy of a visit depended partly on the patients source of referral People referred by health professionals were usually accepted as legitimate exceptmiddot where A amp E staff suspected a doctor of dumping an unwanted patient on to the department Contract cases where the hospital had a contractual relationship with the school nursing home or workplace the patient came from were immediately accepted as appropriate People brought in by police came into this category Self-referred patients were classified as legitimate or not depending on their social characteristics their condition and the kind of demands they were making on the department In a later paper Roth [35] noted that cases where a definite diagnosis could be made (surgical conditions asthma overdoses maternity

83

patients) were considered legitimate whereas psychiatric conditions and cases requiring more subtle or complex diagnosis were regarded as illeg i timate

The New Zealand situation

While this study did not observe staff-patient interactions in detail we asked A amp E staff about the patients and how they dealt with them and we watched staff at work for some time in each department

We found some evidence that New Zealand A amp E staff shared the views of their British and United States counterparts House surgeons tended to regard the clinically interesting patients as goodand often commented unfavourably on patients whose condition was not easily diagnosed With regard to the rubbish category of patients some A amp E staff disapproved of them while others accepted the whole range of patients as part of working in the department We saw little evidence of punitive reactions to patients although delay andmiddot the intimidating effect of a white coat appeared to be used at times The views of A amp E staff about specific categories of patients are covered in the next sections

Sports injuries

From the Christchurch and Waikato [4] studies we have estimated that 13 per cent of A amp E injury visits were for sports injuries At Green Lane A amp E department staff had recorded all rugby injuries on the A amp E log in the late April week sampled the rugby injuries comprised six per cent of all injuries

A amp E staff saw the department as the appropriate place for the treatment of sports injuries One staff member commented that most general practitioners would get a shock if presented with a sports injury to treat Staff also understood that coaches usually sent people straight to the A amp E department as an automatic procedure and that this was often legitimate since the injury might have required an x-ray However a frequently mentioned source of annoyance was people presenting with a sports injury some considerable time after the event such as on Monday morning or after the post-match drinking bout A amp E staff thought these patients should have seen a general practitioner particularly when the condi tion was not acute A few A amp E staff commented that they were beginning to regard repeated sports injuries as self-inflicted injuries and were less sympathetic to those patients

Alcohol-related visits

In all the A amp E departments staff commented that many of the assault and motor vehicle accident injuries were directlyassociated with alcohol (The only exceptions were the suburban hospitals which Were closed evenings and nights) Staff estimated that from half to all patients seen on Friday and Saturday evenings had been drinking or had been hurt by someone who was drinking This estimate may seem exaggerated but inspection of Wellington A amp E logs by Reinken [41] suggested that an estimate of 50 to 79 per cent was reasonable Staff at three of the central city A amp E departments commented that they treated a number of old alcoholic and derelict people usually for chronic complaints or because they had been attacked

84

From time to time staff as well as facilities have suffered abuse and violence A amp E nurses always commented on problems with disorderly behaviour both by patients and by friends of patients in the waiting room In two hospitals nurses had little faith in the security provisions made for their safety but mostly the nurses seemed to cope reasonably well House surgeons said they found intoxicated patients difficult to treat because of their lack of co-operation A amp E officers had few comments on alcohol-related visits probably because they rarely worked evening or weekend shifts

Domestic violence and rape

Unfortunately we did not ask specific questions about these topics but at three hospitals nurses mentioned that they saw cases of child abuse and at another three hospitals wife-beating was mentioned We have few details as to how staff dealt with these women and children but from the comments made by the nurses and on house surgeon they felt a need for more psychiatric or social work backup There were no comments about women who had been raped attending the department

_Regular visitors

At most of the urban A amp E departments and at Rotorua and Whakatane staff commented that they had a group of regular visitors This group was never large unlike the 20 to 60 per cent of workload reported as regular visi tors by two United states public hospitals [19] Asthmatics (who had previously been advised to go straight to the department) were regarded as legitimate visitors and staff watched for children visiting regularly with injur-ies in order to detect cases of chi ld abuse However people who repeatedly presented drunk or with overdoses or with an emotional or social problem were regarded with resigned acceptance or some annoyance One A amp E department maintained a special file for the records of regular visitors while in other departments a bulky bundle of cards stapled together alerted staff to yet another visit from a regular client_

Trivia

When the A amp E staff talked about trivia they mentioned some of the minor injuries and sickness from the GP-Ioad category but also included very minor injuries such as a splinter in a finger or a cut needing only a Bandaid Some A amp E staff felt that trivial conditions did not require any medical treatment especially not from a department designed to treat emergency conditions A few staff members commented that people with minor conditions cluttered up the waiting room and were physically in the way Some also said that knowing the waiting room was full put more pressure on them However other A amp E staff stressed that apparently trivial conditions were important and worrying to the patients involved and that reassurance at least was required

It has been suggested that people using the A amp E department for trivial conditions decrease the ability of the department to cope with emergencies [42431 Most staff interviewed felt confident that people attending for trivial complaints in no way jeopardised the quality of care given to the more urgent cases because the latter were seen first ThUS the minor complaints were annoying and added work but did not compromise the departments ability to give good care

85

DISCUSSION

Why do patients attend the A amp E department The public seem to have a rough and ready decision tree if you are sick go to your doctor if you are hurt go to the Aamp E department

The department is definitely seen as the appropriate place for treating accidental injuries People say thats what its there forI and they have everything there A visit to the general practitioner for such an injury is seen as unnecessary and delaying

A significant proportion of accidents and some sickness conditions happen away from home The patient may decide to go to the A amp E department because it is closer or easier for transport or work reasons Often someone else (a schoolteacher a coach or traffic officer) sends the patient to the A ampE department as an automatic procedure

Most people with sickness conditions visit their general practitioner so it is not surprising that those who visit the A amp E department have often been referred by their doctor The sick patients who corne directly to the department usually see their condition as needing urgent care Therefore if they try to contact their doctor and fail or if they think the doctor will be unavailable they head for the hospital

It is also possible that the general practitioners surgery is associated with waiting while the hospital is associated with swift action perhaps due to televised images as noted by Cooke [44] In fact the waiting times are generally equivalent in both settings it is the significance of that waiting which is different The patients may feel that if something happens to worsen their case they will be attended to quickly if they are waiting in the A amp E department rather than waiting at home for the general practitioner to visit

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners formiddot patients From the patients comments one of the main attractions of the A amp E department is its availability that it is always open and staffed In comparison general practitioners were often seen as not being available as difficult to contact or as unable to respond quickly to an emergency In this sense A amp E departments appear to be competitive with general practitioners As was noted in Chapter 6 sickness visits to the A amp E department were more likely to happen out of hour s than in hours The overseas studies suggest that health centres and deputising services which offer greater availability of doctors particularly out of hours may reduce the use of A amp E departments The only way general practitioners could compete with the availability of the A amp E department would be to improve their own out-of-hours service

The cost of visiting a general practitioner has also been cited as a reason for people visiting the A amp E department where treatment is free This is only relevant for sickness conditions since the cost of general practitioner treatment for accidental injuries is covered by the Accident Compensation Corporation However in none of the New Zealand studies covered in this chapter did people give cost of treatment as a major reason for attending the A amp E department A amp E staff tended to over-estimate the importance of cost as a reason but this was not surprising as they also oVer-estimated the number of people visiting the department for sickness conditions

86

Despite sickness visits to the doctor being free in Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14 J found similar levels of A amp E sickness attendance there as here Steinmetz [45) reported that on the introduction of Medicare in Quebec doctors no longer charged patients whereas previously only care in an emergency room was free He found that the demand for medical care increased at both sites the doctor and the emergency room but that there was no evidence of a shift from the emergency room back to the doctor Thus there is little evidence that the cost of visiting a general practitioner causes people to visit the A amp E department Rather people use the department because they see it as the appropriate place for treatment of their condition and it is available

Turning now to staff a~titudes to the patients it seems that acceptance of the great variety of people (and their conditions) is a necessary part of working in the A amp E department However the staff comments do raise some concerns Abusive and violent patients have been a problem in some hospitals and a reappraisal of security arrangements in some of the urban A amp Edepartments would be desirable

A amp E staff should be aware that women and children presenting with injuries may have received them in domestic violence and that full information on how the injury happened may not be volunteered It is difficult for staff to do more than treat the injuries when there are few specialised support services available However some attempts are being made to provide such services for children [46] and through v9luntary organisations such as womens refuges A amp E staff should maintain good contact with these services where they exist and work with others to institute them where they do not

Staff should also maintain contact with rape crisIs centres so that women who have been raped can ring them for short or long-term support if they want it Alexanders work [40] suggests that while a raped woman is in the department she should be cared for by a crisis team of hospital staff (not necessarily A amp E staff) who have volunteered for that work Perhaps this approach could be tried in New Zealand A amp E departments

87

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S - Ca$ualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) P 272-279

2 RICHARDS JG and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

3 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C andREINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

4 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

5 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care Vbull Determinants of use of hospital emergency services E Richard Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

6 Casual attenders a socia-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcastle-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

7 STRATMANN William C and ULLMAN Ralph - A study of consumer attitudes about health care the role of the emergency room in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1033-1043

8 KELMAN Howard Rand LAWE Dorothy S- Usemiddot of the hospital emergency room in re1atiop to th~ use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

9 INGRAMD R CLARKE D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

fO GARRAWAY W M - The work of a casualty department in Health Bulletin - v 27 no 3 (1969) p 26-30

11 KAHN Lawrence ANDERSON Mary and PERKOFF Gerald T - Patients perceptions and uses of a pediatric emergency room in Soc Sci Med - v 7 (1973) p 155-160

12 CALNAN M ABSON I E P and BUTLER J R - In case of emergency inI

Health Soc Serv J - (1982) p 615-617

13 HOLOHAN Ann M - Accident and emergency departments illness and accident behaviour in Social Rev (Mono] - (1976) p 111-119

14 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Serv J - (1981) ~ 1139-1142

15 The functioning of a childrens hospital casualty department Susan Lovell et aI in Med J Aust - v 1 (1975) P 135-138

16 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R Call Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

88

17 WINGERT WA Friedman D B and LARSON W R - The demographic and ecological characteristics of a large urban paediatric outpatient population and implications for improving community paediatric care in A~ J Public Health - v 58 (1968) p-859

18 CALNAN M - Managing -minor- disorders pathways to a hospital accident and emergency department in Sociol Health Illness- v 5 no 2 (1983) p 149-167

19 ROTH J A - Utilisation of the hospital emergency department in J Health Soc Behav - v 12 (1971) P 312-320

20 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) P 163

21 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 no 2 (1971) p307-312

22 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J- Help The hospital emergency unit as community physician in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) P 248-260

23 MAGNUSSON G - The use and abuse of accident and emergency departments - the Stockholm experience in World Hosp - vIS no 3 (1979) p 170-172

24 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL D J and WALKER J H - Practitioners patients and the accident department I in Hosp Health Serv Rev shy(1975) P 80-84 I

25 CONWAY Hugh - Emergency medical care in Br Med J - v 2 (1976) p 511-513

26 PEASE R - A study of patients in a London accident and emergency department with special reference to general practice in Practitioner - v 211 (1973) p 634-638

27 MOK CH - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

28a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident s~atistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington- Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

89

29 KINLOCH P J - Samoan health practices -in Wellington - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 9-iO (Occasional paper series no 12)

30 MOORE_ Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEHect of a neighbourhood health centre onhospi tal emergency room us~e - in Med Care v 10 no 3 (1972) P 240-247

31 HOCHEISERLouis I WOODWARD Kenneth and CHARNEY Evan - Effect of the neighbourhood health centre on the use of pediatric emergency departments 1n ROchester~ New York in N Eng J Med - v 285 no 3 (1971) p 148-152

32 _MAYNARD Edward Jand DODGE Jeffrey S -- Introducing a community health centre at M05giel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (Aamp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

33 The types of families that use an emergency clinic Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ala New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

34 WILLIAMS B T DIXON R A and KNOWELDEN J - The impact of general practitioner deputising services on accident and emergency departments in the Sheffield hospital region in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 23 (1973) p 638-645

35 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) p 839-856

36 JEFFERY R - Normal rubbish deviant patients in casualty departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 1 no 1 (1979) p 90-107

37 HUGHES D - Lay assessment of clinical seriousness practical decision-making by non-medical staff in a hospi tal casualty department - University of Wales Swansea 1980 Ph D Thesis

38 DINGWALL R and MURRAY T - Categorisation in accident departments -good- patients -bad- patients and middotchildren- in Sociol Health Illness - v 5 no 2 (1983) p 127-148

39 BURGESS Ann Wolbert and HOLMSTROM Lynda Lytle - The rape victim in the emergency ward in American Journal of Nursing - v 73 no 10 (1973) p 1741-1745

40 ALEXANDER Cheryl S - The responsible victim nurses perceptions of victims of rape in Journal of Health and Social Behaviour - v 21 (March 1980) p 22-23

41 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

90

42 MAYNARD Edward J - The appication of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment -University of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 161-194

43 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - NewYork Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

44 COOKE Alistair - The doctor (1981) p 1652-1655

in society in Br Med J - v 283

45 STEINMETZ Nicholas and HOEY John R - Hospital emergency utilisation in Montreal before and after Medicare experience in Med Care - v 16 no 2 (1978) pl33-139

room the Quebec

46 GEDDIS D C - Child Abuse report of national symposium held in Dunedin September 1979 - Auckland National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1979 p 30-34 60-63

91

CHAPTER 8

Utilisation of accident and emergency departments

In this chapter we consider A amp E ufefrom a new perspective looking at the rates of attendance by people in different neighbourhoods We examine variations in the rates among areas and we discuss the evidence they provide as to the effect of doctor availability on A amp E use Next we analyse several factors which could account for the variations in attendance rates including distance from the hospi tal social characteristics of the areas and A amp E department characteristics Finally we present results from several studies which compare rates of attendance at general practitioners and at A amp E departments

COMPARISON OF A amp E UTILISATION AMONG HOSPITAL CATCHMENT AREAS

The neighbourhoods that we have used are census area units sometimes grouped contiguously to achieve socially and economically homogeneous areas that have populations of about 2000 or more We grouped all of New Zealand into 682 such neighbourhoods Of these 442 neighbourhoods are in the catchment irea of one of the 15 A amp E departments studied

Using the attendance numbers taken from the A amp E logs age-adjusted quarterly rates of attendancemiddot have been calculated (indirectly standardised to the total New Zealand population at the 1981 census) These rates have been calculated for each neighbourhood separately for injury and sickness conditions for in and out of hours and for first and recall visits Because there were very few recall visits for sickness conditions they have been omitted from the analyses in this chapter When we talk about recall visits we are referring only to recall visits for injuries

The attendance rates have been combined for the neighbourhoods making up the catchment area of an A amp E department These rates measure the use made by people living in a particular area of any A amp E department in their region Usually people living in the catchment area of an A amp E department do visit that department However particularly in the North Shore and Kenepuru areas a large number of residents attend other A amp E departments Thus the rates presented here should be interpreted as attendance rates of people living in an area not necessarily attendance rates at particular A amp E departments

The rates for each catchment area are presented in Table 16 In Table 17 the annual rates of accidental death and admission to hospital for accidental injury similarly age-adjusted are presented

Results

As Table 16 shows the overall attendance rates varied considerably in the A amp E department catchment areas studied

92

Sickness attendance

Among the urban catchment areas the Wellington Board region showed very high rates of use of A amp E departments for sickness attendance Except for Rotorua and Whakatane out of hours the provincial and rural areas had very low rates of sickness attendance

TABLE 16 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3

Midd1emore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals studied

First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness In Out of hours hours

35 55 41 67 82 121 72 105 54 72 52 64

17 26 36 51 09 17 21 23

12 8B 54 26

36 36 72 61

46 63

Injury In Out of In Out of hours hours hours hours

125 130 137 25 151 130 159 25 17 0 196 36 41 127 156 87 B8 136 151 54 30 229 240 123 42

79 70 42 29 241 215 99 72 203 96 64 10 14 4 213 66 98

173 179 59 62 223 85 83 32

194 92 216 47 164 96 116 20

154 145 101 38

Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 Since few recall visits were for sickness conditions only recall visits for injury have been included in this category

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

1

93

TABLE 17 HOSPITAL ADMISSION FOR ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR)l AND DEATH DUE TO ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR) 2 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area Admitted for Died from Population accidental accidental of ca tchment injury injury area

Full-time departments

U rban Auckland3

Middlemore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals

104 123 146 153 140 142

194 169 196 149

243 214

95 133

139

067 062 062 059 058 072

070 089 065 068

059 075

048 096

066

408 948 264 093 133 611 147 858 336 420 III 981

110 205 56 613 98 883 50 250

39 087 37 767

146 661 52 389

3 126 747

1 Source Hospital Discharges 1979 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

2 Source Mortality Data 1974-1978 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

common catchment

Injury attendance

First attendances for injury also showed wide variations among the hospital catchment areas Wellington Rotorua Whakatane and Dunedin catchment areas showed relatively high rates of first attendance for injury both in

94

and out of hours Timarus catchment area had high rates only out of hours while those of Grey Taranaki and North Shore were high only during normal work hours Northlands catchment area had very low attendance rates both in and out of hours

The pattern of difference from place to place in first attendance rates for injury means that in any year a person in Rotorua would have more than one chance in six of attending the A amp E department for an injury while a person in Northland has but one chance in 16 of doing so

~s this due to a difference in the rate at which accidents occur It does not appear so since neither the rates for death due to accidental injury nor the rates of hospital admission for accidental injury follow the same pattern as A amp E attendance (see Table 11) In fact the death rates were low in Christchurch and North Shore areas (where A amp E attendance was average) and high in Kenepuru areas where A amp E attendance was low Similarly admission rates were sometimes higher in areas where rates of A amp E attendance for injury were lower (Northland and Taranaki) and vice versa (North Shore)

Also the admission rates probably reflect a tendency for more rural hospi tals to admit injured patients more readily because of the distance they would have to travel for outpatient care

Recall attendance

As noted in Chapter 6 the practice of recalling patients was different from hospital to hospital and affected the composition of the A amp E department 5 total attendance Naturally the rate of recall visits also differed markedly in the catchment areas

Relatively low rates of recall visits characterised the Northland Wellington Christchurch and Taranaki areas The Auckland Hospital Board areas had very different patterns in and out of hours with high rates of recall visits in hours and low rates out of hours

Effect of general practitioner availability

Is there any evidence from these rates (Table 16) that availability of general practitioners had an effect on A amp E use If there was an effect it would be evident from comparing in hours sickness attendance with out of hours sickness attendance since when the general practitioner is less available out of hours the patients may be more likely to present at hospital Was the out of hours rate higher than the in hours rate taking into account the different proportions of peoples waking hours in each category Overall this did not appear to be so Compared to the in hours rate the out of hours rate was only slightly higher than would been expected Only in Whakatane was the out of hours sickness rate markedly higher than would have been expected Thus any effect of doctor availability on A amp E use would seem to be very small

See next page

95

FACTORS EXPLAINING CATCHMENT AREA VARIATIONS IN A amp E UTILISATION

There are several possible explanations for the variations in A amp E use

o that the hospital attracts those nearby and if the neighbourhoods near the hospital are densely populated then more people will attend the A amp E department

o that the social characteristics of the catchment areas are different

a that the A amp E department does or does not encourage the public to attend through its policy or practice

Several studies have suggested that distance and socio-economic factors are related to A amp E attendance Distance has been found to be inversely related to attendance in Sweden [1] the United States [23] Britain [4] and New Zealand [5] Some studies have found that lower socio-economic status people use A amp E departments more [678910] although Kljakovic [5] found that Wellington children from lower socio-economic status families were more likely to see a doctor before going to the A amp E department than children from higher status families Berki and Kobashigiwa [11] found that less educated groups used A amp E more while Weinermann [6] and Ullman (12) found no effect Several studies have found that minority group members (67913] and immigrants [1141 tend to use A amp E departments more Kelman and Lane [15] found that family characteristics such as size and age of head-of-household also relamiddotted to A amp E use Cohen et al (16] found no income or employment effects on A amp E use but did find that use was positively related to the number of hospital-based doctors per capita

METHOD

Using multivariate statistical methods it is possible to evaluate which of the explanations ( or which combination of them) best accounts for the observed variations in A amp E use among the neighbourhoods (See Appendix C for the details of the multivariate analyses) Overseas researchers have used similar statistical techniques to explore factors related to A amp E attendance [131116] The factors we chose to explore are described on the next page

We computed the expected value assuming that in any week in hours comprised 50 hours and out of hours comprised 118 hours of which 62 hours were spent awake

Therefore the out of hours rate should equal 62 ~ 50 = 124 times the in hours rate plus E where E is a correction term for night time attendance About eight per cent of total attendance was in the eight-hours night time period [1317] so E can be estimated as eight per cent of the total sickness attendance ie E = 008 x 109 = 087

Therefore the expected out of hours attendance A is

A = (124 x 46) + 087 = 658

The observed value was in fact 63 per 1000 similar to the expected rate

96

One factor was the distance from the centre of the neighbourhood to the A amp E department For neighbourhoods near Kenepuru and North Shore Hospitals in hours and out of hours distances to the nearest open department were calculated separately_

Another factor was the social characteristics of the neighbourhood using variables derived from the 1981 Census of Population and Dwellings chosen on the basis of known or posited relevance to health services utilisation These social characteristics can be listed as follows

o age structure - the proportions of the population under 5 years between 5 and 14 years and 65 years or more

o ethnicity the proportions of the population classed as European ethnicity and Maori ethnicity

o marital status - the proportion of adults separated widowed or divorced

o education - the proportion of adults without tertiary education

o income - the per capita earned income for adults and the proportion of the adults on a means-tested benefit

o employment - the proportions of adults actively seeking work in a bluecollar occupation and partiCipating in the paid workforce

o tenure of dwellings the average weekly rental and the proportion of owner-occupied dwellings

o car ownership - the proportions of households without a car and with two or more cars

o a measure of the north-to-south gradient over the country

A third factor was the general practitioner prOVision as measured by the population-ta-general practitioner ratio

Finally the characteristics of the A amp E department made up a fourth factor We focussed on the following areas

o our classification of the departments and their catchment area into urban prOVincial rural and suburban

o departmental policy on recalling patients (see Chapter 6)

o departmental open door policy on treating sickness attenders (see Chapter 6)

o medical and nurse staffing levels (from Chapter 5) relative to the-population of the catchment area

Production workers transport and equipment operators labourers agricultural workers animal husbandry and forestry workers fishermen hunters

I

97

Results of the multivariate analyses

The effects of distance

Sickness first attendance The distance from hospital affected the rates of sickness first attendance for out of hours visits accounting for nearly 20 per cent of the variance It had less effect on in hours sickness visits accounting for only 9 per cent of the variance

Injury first attendance The most significant characteristic explaining neighbourhood differences in injury first attendance rates was the distance from the A amp E department In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than half the total variance In urban areas it was less important accounting for one-eighth of the variance for in hours rates and one-sixth for out of hours rates

Recall attendance The distange from the hospital was related to in hours recall attendance In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than 40 per cent of the variance but it was much less important in urban neighbourhoods

In summary distance was inversely related to attendance rates with neighbourhoods further from the hospital having lower rates The effect of distance was stronger for injury attendances than for sickness attendances

The effects of social characteristics

Sickness first attendances Out of hours social factors had a substantial effect on sickness attendance People from neighbourhoods where many households were car less were more likely to attend the A amp E department and this factor accounted foi 19 percent of the variance in attendance rate Taking car lessness into account people f rom neighbourhoods where adults were better educated were more likely to attend the A amp E department Adding in the level of educational attainment raised the percentage of variance explained to 265 per cent The same pattern relating carlessness and higher educational attainment to high attendance rates applied to sickness attendance in hours but the effects were less marked In combination with distance the social factors explained 16 per cent of the variance of in hours sickness attendance rates

Injury first attendance In hours the rate of attendance for injury causes was only slightly related to social characteristics of the neighbourhoods adding 6 per cent to the variance explained Out of hours the social factors had a similarly minor effect adding 4 per cent

Recall attendance The social characteristics bad some effect on in hours recall attendance in urban areas In combination with a small distance effect the social factors explained 18 per cent of the variation For non-urban areas the social factors had no effect on in hours recall attendance only distance was important

Thus some of the differences among A amp E departments in the rates of sickness and recall attendance were due to differences in the social characteristics of the departments catchment areas However social factors were not important for injury attendances

98

Tbe effect of general practitioner provision

Initial correlation analyses showed that the population-to-general practitioner ratio was not significantly related to out of hours sickness attendance rates However it was positively related to out of hours injury attendance largely because the numbermiddot of people per doctor in a neighbourhood increases as the distance of the neighbourhood from the hospital decreases

In the multiple regression analyses the ratio nevermiddot entered as a significant variable Thus there was no significant effect of general practitioner provision in the community on A amp E attendance rates (see Table 18)

The effect of A amp E department characteristics

To look at the effect of A amp E characteristics on attendance rates it was necessary to cor rect the rates for the distance and social character istic effects just presented This was done (see Appendix C for details of the principal components analysis used to reduce the data)

Controlling for the neighbourhood factors thedepartment-to-department differences in rates were substantially reduced but were still present (see Table 18) Some patterns in the adjusted rates for sickness and 1nJury could be distinguished The areas served by urban departments tended to have low injury rates especially in hours and high sickness rates especially out of hours The Dunedin areas were an exception their rates were more like those of the areas served by provincial departments which had moderately high injury rates and low sickness rates The rural areas had very high injury rates and high sickness rates The suburban areas were similar to the urban areas except that North Shore areas had high injury rates The adjusted rates for recall attendance were highly variable and demonstrated no clear patterns among the departments

Further analyses were carried out to determine how the A amp E department characteristics related to the adjusted rates (Appendix C contains details of the analyses of variance the Student-Newman-Keuls means tests and the regression analyses of these differences) Only the statistically significant results are presented below

A amp E department classification Out or hours the adjusted sickness rates were lower in the provincial departments areas than elsewhere The sickness rates for the Wellington Hospital Board areas were no longer markedly higher than other areas

In hours the adjusted injury rates were higher in rural departments areas for first visits and in suburban departments areas for recall visits than elsewhere

Open door policy Adjusted rates of attendance for sickness (in and out of hours) were higher where departments had a stated open door policy than elsewhere This explains the low sickness rates in the provincial departments since most of them had restricted policies Where departments had a restricted policy adjusted rates of in hours injury attendance were higher than in open places

99

Recall policy In hours the adjusted injury attendance rates (both first and recall) were higher in areasmiddot where departments had a stated policy favouring recalling patients Out of hours adjusted rates of sickness visits were lower in areas with recall-favouring departments

TABLE 18 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED AND NEIGHBOURHOOD-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 AND POPULATION-TO-GENERAL PRACTITIONER RATI02 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchinent area First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness Injury Population In Out of In Out of In Out of to-GP ratio

hours hours hours hours hours hours

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3 44 57 130 144 100 24 1 476

Middlemore 52 74 165 148 131 24 2 078

Wellington 55 77 160 153 54 30 1 630 Hutt 61 89 130 137 10~9 83 2 237 Christchurch 50 71 116 117 76 27 1 651 Dunedin 40 52 204 193 159 38 1 558

Provincial Northland Base 46 56 128 132 53 45 1 735 Rotorua 34 33 188 163 73 57 1 656 Taranaki Base 17 29 227 ll8 81 19 2 243 Timaru 21 35 168 209 83 88 2 085

Rural Whakatane 29 91 207 222 81 84 1 679 Grey 67 57 286 135 131 39 2 310

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 51 69 198 156 175 57 1 865 Kenepuru 47 54 146 131 129 31 2 035

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors The attendance rates given in Table 16 have been adjusted for neighbourhood-determined factors ie distance from the hospital and social characteristics

2 Source Doctor numbers in full-time equivalents from Medical Council data unpublished

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

100

Staffing levels Adjusted first In]Ury attendance rates were positively related to levels of medical staffing and less impressively to levels of nurse staffing Neither the policy variables nor the size of department accounted for the relationship between lnJury attendance rates and staffing However there was no significant relationship between staffing levels and the adjusted rates of sickness and recall visits

COMPARISON OF A amp E USE AND GENERAL PRACTITIONER USE

Material for comparisons of this sort is hard to find We have compared the level of childrens attendance at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments found by Kljakovic [5] with childrens attendance at general practitioners in the same area over the same period (derived from General Medical Services benefit claims made by general practitioners) In an average week 652 per 1000 children in the Wellington Hospital Board area consulted a general practitioner whereas 35 per 1000 children visited an A amp E department (see Appendix D for details)

Similarly in Tauranga during an average week in the period 1979 to 1982 48 per 1000 people attended the A amp E department while 53 Sper 1000 people consulted a general practitioner [18]

Snelgar [19] compared attendance at Northland Base A amp E department with urgent consultations made by general practitioners (derived from the General Medical Services benefit claims) In an average week 36 per 1000 people in the whangarei area consulted a general practitioner for an urgent condi Hon while 09 per 1000 people made a first visit to the A amp E department

For first injury attendances we have compared rates derived from surveys ot people treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident [20] with similar rates obtained from our tallies at Auckland Hospital Board A amp E departments and data made available to usmiddot by Snelgar McRae and Keenan In a week 37 per 1000 people living in the catchment areas of the above A amp E departments made a first injury visit to an A amp E department while 1 per 1000 New Zealanders made a first injury visit to a general practitioner (see Tab~e 19)

Elderly people were as likely to go to the general practitioner as to the A amp E department for an accidental injury whereas children and young adults were five to six times more likely to go to the A amp E department as the general practitioner Foreign body injuries and cuts appeared to predispose attendance at an A amp E department whereas burns and falls tended to be taken to the general practitioner more than other injuries

In summary people visited general practitioners much more than the A amp E department even for urgent conditions It was only for specific injury conditions that the A amp E department was consulted more than general practitioners

101

TABLE 19 COMPARISON OF FIRST ATTENDANCES FOR INJURY AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS AND GENERAL PRACTITIONERS

Rates per 1000 per week A amp E departments l General practitioners2

Age distribution

All ages 37 10 0-4 years 38 06 5-14 years 39 08 15-29 years 66 11 30-64 years 23 11 65 years and over 11 10

Injury conditions3

Falls 066 027 Cuts 045 009 Foreign bodies 025 002 Toxic effects 014 001 Burns 007 003 Other 232 058

1 Calculated from the author st tallies at Auckland Middlemore Green Lane and NorthShore A amp E departments and data from Northland Base Waikato and Christchurch A amp E departments

2 Calculated from ACC Statistical Supplements - Wellington Accident Compensation Corporation November 1977 March 1978 September 1978 March 1979 and personal communications

3 These categories have been derived from those used in the A amp E department tallies and the type of accident categories used by the ACC

DISCUSSION

The analyses presented in this chapter confirm that distance and social factors are related to A amp E use in New Zealand Their effects were not independent but rather were entwined in a complex way Even within the group of social factors the interactions were complex and there were no simple relations between a specific social factor and A amp E attendance

However distance from the hospital was clearly a major determinant of A amp E use particularly for injury conditions both first and recall The distance effect was especially strong in non-urban areas perhaps because of the greater distances people had to travel in order to reach the hospital Altogether the strong effect of distance was not surprising given the body of overseas literature documenting distance as a factor in health services utilisation and also the number of A amp E attenders citing the accessibility of the department as a reason for using it (see Chapter 7)

102

The social factors were important determinants of sickness attendance with a stronger effect out of hours than in hours They were not important for injury conditions Possibly the appropriateness of the A amp E department for injury conditions as cited by attenders (see Chapter 7) overrides the effect of the social factors

One social factor which had a relatively strong effect on sickness attendance particularly out of hours was car ownership Areas where many households had no car tended to have high sickness rates Perhaps people who have to call a taxi or borrow someone elses car to get medical care go to the A amp E department because they know it will be open and treatment will be available

During our discussions A amp E staff had suggested that Pacific Islanders made greater use of the department because they were accustomed to using the hospital for all medical care in the islands If this was an important factor we would have expected ethnicity to figure prominently in the statistical analyses However for first attendances ethnicity had only a minor effect and in fact areas with high proportions of Pacific Islanders tended to have low attendance rates

Many A amp E staff also suggested that the cost of visiting a general practitioner was a major reason for sickness attendance at the department So we would have expected low income unemployment or receipt of a means-tested benefit to have been related to increased sickness attendance rates However neither income nor receipt of a benefit were at all related to the sickness rates and areas with a low proportion of adults in the paid workforce tended to have low attendance rates Thus contrary to general opinion neither the cost of visiting a general practitioner nor a Pacific Island background appear to have a strong effect on A amp E use

As noted in Chapter 7 we found that some patients were attracted to the A amp E department by the size of the hospital and the impression that specialised equipment was available there However the urban departments which were the largest and which had the most specialised equipment did not have higher attendance rates than the other departments In fact they tended to have slightly lower rates of injury attendance than the other departments

The results presented in this chapter show clearly that even aft~r

controlling for distance and social effects departmental characteristics are related to A amp E attendance It is understandable that rates of sickness attendance reflect whether a department has an open door or restricted policy However the relation between high injury rates and a restricted policy on- sickness attendance requires some explanation Perhaps these departments have always had a high injury rate and have restricted the access of sickness patients so they could cope with the injured patients Conversely the operation of a restricted policy may have convinced the local community that while the department is only to be used for injuries it is indeed the place for all injuries so generating a high attendance rate

It was also understandable that departments with a policy of favouring recalls did have high rates of recall visits But why did these departments have high first attendance rates for injury This probably happens because high recall rates and high first attendance for injury rates go together since larger numbers of injured patients tend to produce larger numbers of patients requiring specialised A amp E follow-up care

103

There was a positive association between first injury attendance rates and staffing levels which could not be explained by the policies or the classification of the department The explanation of these associations is not straightforward The h~gher staffing levels may somehow account for the higher attendance - levels for example attracting clients by keeping the waiting time sh~rt Alternatively an unexamined feature of th department or its catchment area could generate higher attendance levels and staffing levels mayhavebeen adjusted to meetthe demand

Thus departmental characteristics such as policies on non-urgent sickness patients and on recall viSits and levels of medical and nurse staffing are related to attendance rates

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners for patients Looking first at the availability of the two services the greater availability of the A amp E department out of hours did not result in a higher than expected use over those hours Also doctor prOVision (as measured by the populationto-genetal practitioner ratio) was not Significantly related to A amp E attendance rates Thus while the A amp E department was described by patients as desirable because of its availability - (Chapter 7) the attendance rates of the neighbourhoods did not refiect the lcwer availability of general practitioner services

Secondly the comparison of attendance at A amp E departments and general practitioners suggested that in an average week out of 1000 New zealanders four or five would go to an A amp E department and 50 to 60 would go to a general practitioner Of those Visiting the A amp E department on average only one would be attending for sickness Given that non-urgent sickness visits were only 60 per cent of all sickness visits (see Chapter 6) it is clear that general practitioners were losing only a tiny proportion of their workload when A amp E departments treated non-urgent sickness patients~

It - is also clear that general practitioners did not treat many injured people Only one of the 50 to 60 per 1000 people visiting a general practitioner in an average week would be making a first injury visit It would seem that thetwo serVices A amp E departments and general practice arecomplementaiy rather than competiti-ve

REFERENCES

1 MAGNUSSON Gudjon - The role of proximity in the use of hospital emergency departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 2 no 2 (1980) p 202-214

2 INGRAM D R CLARK D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Hed - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

3 ROGHHANN Klaus J and ZASTOWNY Thomas R - Proximity as a factor in the selection of health care providers emergency room visits compared to obstetric admissions and abortions in Soc Sci Med - v 13(0) (1979) p 61-69

4 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referred patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

5 KLJAKOVIC H ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

6 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care V Determinants of use of hospital emergency services Richard E Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

7 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

8 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 nomiddot 2 (1971) p 307-312

9 The types of families that use an emergency clinic - Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

10 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Servo - (1981) p 1139-1142

11 BERKI S E and KOBASHIGAWA B - Education and income effects in the use of ambulatory services in the United States an analysis of the 1970 National Health Interview Survey data in Int J Health Servo shyv 8 no 2 (1978) p 361-365

12 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SlRATMANN William c - An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1011-1020

13 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at AUckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

105

14 MOK C H - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

15 KELMAN Howard R and LANE Dorothy S - Use of the hospital emergency room in relation to the use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

16 COHEN Susan D GINSBERG Allen Sand VLADECK Bruce C - The middoteffects of unemployment and inflation on hospital-based ambulatory care in Am J Public Health - v 68 no 12 (1978) p 1219-1221

17 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

18 DALDY B M REINKEN J and SEDDON T D S - Report on the effect of funding in primary medical care - Tauranga Otumoetai Health Centre 1984 (In preparation)

19 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

20a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

107middot

CHAfTER 9

Conclusions

TheAamp E department is a complex changeable and challenging place It is also an ambiguous place since itmiddot fulfils several different and at times conflicting roles it is a hospital department an emergency service and a primary care service

THEA amp E DEPARTMENT AS A HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT

As a hospital department the A amp E department is the bullodd-one-out It differs from the other departments not only by being accessible at all times to people seeking medical care but also in the number of patients seen and the diversity and severity of illness and injury to be treated

Because of this diversity the A amp E service has little status within medical circles It tends to be seen as an area requiring few special skills and therefore not warranting specialty status However as Salmond [1] noted the humble casualty department provides a hospital with a display window where like it or not hospital wares are constantly on show to the public Good public relations require effective and efficient management of the Amiddotamp E department Also the doctors interviewed for this study stated that special skills in assessment surgery and orthopaedics were required The status of the A amp E department should be improved through a recognition both of the breadth and experience required for A amp E medicine and of the departments importance in the public view of the hospital While a post-graduate specialist programme is probably not warranted at present it should remain an option for future development

The Aamp E department plays a major partin the teaching of house surgeons Junior doctors quickly learn avariety of skills such as suturing lavage reading x-rays and resuscitation More importantly the A amp E department is usually their first experience of practising medicine without any immediately available consultation This study like Salmonds study in 1970 has demonstrated the lack of initial training and orientation and the inadequate senior supervisionrecei ved by many house surgeons in the A amp E department Clearly this should be remedied by the provision of specific training sessions at the beginning of the house surgeons A amp E run and by

increased senior supervision fn the A amp E department )

This study has also highlighted the desirability ofmiddot specific training courses for A amp E nurses Such coursesmiddot can improve the skills and confidence of the nurses and develop the different approach required for A amp E nursing compared to ward nursing The courses run by the Auckland hospitals may provide a useful basis for the development of postbasic and inservice training courses

Working in an A amp E department demands from all staff members an awareness of the social and emotional contexts of the people attending and the possible implications of their conditions for example people who have attempted suicide parents of- an infantmiddot with convulsions and women who have

108

been raped One aim of all training carried out in the department should be to foster such awareness Also it would be desirable for house surgeons to have experienced a psychological medicine run as well as a general medicine run and a surgical run before they work in the A amp E department All A amp E staff should be aware of the support services that they can calIon (eg social workers psychiatrists Salvation Army) or that the patient can contact (eg rape crisis centres womens refuges)

AS an important training site for house surgeons nurses and emergency workers such as ambulance personnel and police officers the A amp E department has a particular responsibility to maintain a high standard of care This study has not assessed quality of care directly although we have considered related areas such as the level of staffing and the experience of staff There is scope for evaluation of the quality of care gi ven for specific conditions The work reported by Mates and Sidel [2] provides some guidelines and a model whereby both process (measured by adherence to standards) and outcome can be studied Their example considered treatment of adult asthma patients and might for a start be replicated here in New Zealand

There is also scope for extending Mates and Sidels method to cover other conditions The ARCOS study [3] provides one model per taining to acute coronary or cardiovascular episodes There is less precendent for evaluating the quality of care in surgical or orthopaedic emergencies but the presentations of abdominal pain might be investigated as a usefUl beginning Removing healthy appendices is an expensive placebo The process evaluation of trauma care has not been reported on though wound sepsis might provide a suitable outcome measure Staff interviewed in our study discussed standards of suturing but no formal studies of quality of care in that respect have been reported

It must be considered that one explanation for the lack of study in the whole area is that very high standards prevail and the need for evaluation is therefore minimal Given patients high expectations and satisfaction with the service that explanation cannot be dismissed Yet studies that demonstrated a satisfactory level of care would confirm the high quality of care In some A amp E departments a small study of one reasonably significant type of emergency should be undertaken possibly modelled on the work of Mates and Sidel

As Gi bson [4] has pointed out the A amp E department acts not only as an entry point to the hospital but as a screen for the other outpatient and inpatient units of the hospital We found this was true of the New Zealand departments studied with only five to ten per cent of first attendances being referred to specialist outpatient clinics and five to fifteen per cent being admitted There were wide variations both in policy and practice with respect to patient disposition We consider that further study of acute medical admission practices focussing particularly on unnecessary hospitalisation is warranted

Some New Zealand studies [56J have tried to evaluate the need for care of patients presenting at the A amp E department They have tended to depend on the A amp E staffs assessment of whether a general practitioner (and a hypothetical one at that) could have dealt adequately with the case No studies have attempted to give a general practitioner assessment So the question of need for A amp E care remains open However it does not seem practical to devote more research effort to this topic until more is known

about the variable costmiddots oftreating minor injuries If such research is contemplated the techniques of activity analysis and recording systems proposed by Dalbyetal [7] andRoberts et al [8] could be useful

tmiddot bullmiddot

This study has not attempted to estimate the cost of A amp E care The information presented aboutothe physical size and staffing levels of A amp E departments suggests that the hospital service commits only a small share of resources to the A amp E department However with the continuing pressure on hospital resources the cost of A amp E care particularly if it is high relative to care by general practitioners has some importance Even a rough and ready costing of the whole service would be a first step Following that an indication of which parts are fixed costs to keep the essential service viable and which vary by volume or by character of workload would be a next step_ The variation in recall levels that we found suggests that savings in variable costs could be possible Gibson et al [9] in their account of a study of operating and patient care activity costs provide a valuable model on which some New Zealand studies could be based

THE A amp E DEPARTMENT AS AN EMERGENCY SERVICE

The A amp E department must be ready to cope with all kinds of emergencies whether they involve one or two badly hurt car-crash victims or the sudden influx of many patients after a natural disaster A major tool ensuring that a department is always prepared for a crisis situation is the disaster plan The United States Joint Committee on Accreditation of Hospitals requires every hospital to have a written disaster plan developed in conjunction with other relevant agencies which is tested in a full-scale drill at least twice a year The plan should cover assigning staff summoning staff to emergency duty setting aside parts of the hospital for specified purposes maintaining adequate supplies and co-ordination and communication within the hospital and with other hospitals police fire health and ambulance services and civil defence officials

Most of the- departments we studied had close liaison with the ambulance service and to a lesser extent with other services such as police fire and civil defence Six of the hospitals had adequate disaster plans which were revised on a reasonably regular basis but very few hospitals had had a full-scale drill to test the plan Many of the departments with inadequate disaster plans were in the process of revising them We commend this since we consider a comprehensive disaster plan which is regularly revised and tested at least annually to be an essential part of the A amp E service

While discussing emergency services it is worth noting that there has been little research done in New Zealand on the use of ambulance services There is a need both to document the coverage and formal structure of the service and to explore the effects if any of the different methods of funding this essential service The former is a necessary first step the latter presumes a study of both ambulance workload and of organisational matters such as staffing training and triage

Internationally there has been considerable discusion over the optimal distribution of A amp E departments nationwide Platt [IO] recommended that as a minimUm a population of 150 UOO was required to justify a full A amp E centre with seven days a week and 24 hours a day staffingbull Several

llO

authors [101112] have indicated the need for regional central or major accident centres with specialised services such as neurosurgery plastic and thoracic surgery and treatment of burns or poisonings serving a population of 500000 to 750000 An emergency service organised in levels as suggested requires careful planning so that all elements are integrated and good communications are maintained It is particularly desirable for ambulance personnel the police and perhaps taxi driVers to be aware of the level of treatment available at different hospitals

There has been disagreement over whether or nor smaller A amp E centres are justified It seems that densely-populated countries or regions with good transport systems do not need smaller A amp E units whereas more sparsely-populated regions often rural do need them [1013] New Zealand definitely falls into the second category Only our urban A amp E departments fulfil (or come close to) Platts criteria of 150000 population yet all of the A amp E departments visited in this study provide an essential service to their communities In New Zealand the distances that patients would have to travel preclude any concentration of emergency care within a few highly-equipped hospitals

THE A 8t E DEPARTMENT AS A PRIMARY CARE SERVICE

The A amp E department is a primary care service since few of the people Visiting it have been referred by a health professional most patients being self-referred or sent by someone else This primary care role could conf lict with the departments role as an emergency service if patients with minor injuries filled the department and hindered the care of emergency patients However by using triage the A amp E departments studied generally avoided this conflict Some departments discouraged visits for sickness conditions and recall visits so that the department would always be ready for an emergency situation

The A amp E department and general practice are both primary care services However the department differs greatly from the general practitioner in many aspects it is readily available 24 hours a day staff have little background knowledge of the patient and there is little continuity of care There has been concern that A amp E departments are stealing patients from general practitioners because the department is always available and care is free there This study has shown that such concern is not warranted

Looking first at the cost of general practitioner treatment as a reason for visiting the A amp E department we note that this is only relevant for sickness conditions since treatment of injury conditions is paid for by the Accident Compensation Corporation The interview studies have shown that very few patients give cost as a reason for attending the department Also the census area unit analysis showed that low income and receipt of a means-tested benefit were not related to sickness attendance rates and that areas with high unemployment had relatively low sickness rates We would expect contrary results if cost was a major factor As well our comparison of attendance rates at A amp E departments and general practitioners indicates that general practitioners would be losing at most one per cent of their workload when A amp E departments treat non-urgent sickness patients Even if all A amp E departments instituted a policy of discouraging such patients the effect on general practice would be negligible

111

The interview studies have demonstrated that patients do find the ready availability of the A amp E department attractive However our analyses of out of hours use compared to in hours use and our explorations of the effect of population-to-doctor ratios have shown that this attractiveness does not translate into significantly higher rates of A amp E attendance This suggests that improving the availability of general practitioner services is unlikely to have a major effect on the use of either service

There are two major factors related to peoples use of A amp E departments The first is distance from the hospital with people living close to the hospital being much more likely to visit the A amp E department It is hard to see any way of changing this factor The second factor is peoples perception of the A amp E department as the appropriate place for injury treatment The verY name of A amp E departments (instituted folJowing the Platt report) implies that the department is for the treatment of injuries It would be very difficult to change this perception and probably would not be desirable given the facilities experience and availability of the A amp E department for injury treatment

There has also been concern that A amp E departments recall patients instead of referring them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care It appears that A amp E departments recall a similar number of patients (10 to 30 per cent- of firstmiddot attenders) as they refer back to the general practitioners (10 to 20 per cent of first attenders) Some of the recall visits are middotjustified because they require the facilities of the A amp E department It hasmiddot been suggested that house surgeons tend to recall patients because of inexperience and to aid their training While this undoubtedly happens we found no evidence that it has a major effect on the level of recall visits However we did find that departments with high levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have high levels of recall visits possibly because the staff had more time to treat the recalled patients This suggests that recall attendance could be reduced in some cases shy

Ov~rseas studies [141516] have discussed A amp E departments as fulfilling three roles

o trauma treatment centre for the community providing acute emergency care

o substitute for the private phYSician when not available

o family physician for the poor particularly minority group poqr

This study has shown that New Zealand A amp E departments operate largely in the first role of trauma treatment centre providing care for both urgent and non-urgent injury conditions The departments also fulfil the second role of out of hours general practitioner substitute to some extent but they hardly ever operate in the third role of family doctor to the poor

This study has not explored in detail general practitioners views and use of A amp E departments although some information on these topics is implicit in the descriptions of procedures in Chapter 3 and the analysis of reasons for visiting the department in Chapter 7 More information about general practitioners perspectives and the actual availability of general practice care outside normal surgery hours could be gathered However we consider that as well as carrying out further research efforts should be made to develop better communication and understanding between general

112

practitioners and A amp E departments Towards this end we would suggest that A amp E departments make greater efforts to inform general practitioners about the conditions of patients attending the department perhaps using prepared forms or cards (see page 15) We hope too that this report will foster greater recognition among general practitioners of the valuable activities of A amp E departments and allay fears that the department is substituting for the family doctor

We conclude as Dixon [17] did in 1970 that the A amp E department and general practice are complementary services rather than competitive We cannot justify further investigation of the hypothesis that A amp E departments steal patients from general practitioners Possibly a study replicating the Northland comprehensive study of urgent medical care utilisation [18] in an urban area coupled with a study monitoring general practitioner availability out of normal surgery hours would finally lay the ghost of competition for patients However given the evidence presented in this report this does not seem a high priority

WHERE FROM HERE

We considet that research effort could now be turned to two areas First a study of the whole area of accidents is definitely warranted Accidents account for a significant proportion of early deaths and long-term disability and the volume of less severe accidents strains the financial and caring resources of the community The research of the Accident Compensation Corporation has understandably focussed on general practitioner care since the Corporation does not bear the costs of treatment at or in hospital Studies of hospital activity neglect general practitioner care of accident victims A broad study would have to involve not only A amp E departments and general practitioners but also occupational health clinics ambulance and other first aid services Only a comprehensi ve study can provide a firm basis for setting priorities for accident prevention efforts

The need for such a study raises the issue of recording systems both in terms of themiddot classification of type and severity of injury and of the context or cause of the accident Not only is there a need for a fairly simple and versatile system but there is also a need for all the many services to use it consistently For medical emergencies where diagnosis follows professional examination the issue is not crucial For injuries where the events immediately before and after the trauma are relevant the recording of cause and context is important Studies of treatment alternatives and costs depend on a detailed description of the injury which is probably worthwhile only for more severe injuries For example we have noted that many A amp E visits are for bumps and bruises minor lacerations or pain from past inj ury Elaborate description of minor conditions only obscures the nature of the more important cases Clearly before such research can proceed some small-scale attempts at coordinated recording and a form of information triage are called for

The second area warranting study middotis that of the emergency services and their coordination The A amp E department and ambulance services would obviously be covered but the civil defence police and fire service should also be involved Disaster plans drills communications and supplies would be important aspects to be considered

113

This study has focussed on what happens inside the doors of A amp E departments and why people go there We hope that it provides a comprehensive view of the organisation and utilisation of New Zealand A amp E departments and that it will be useful not only to those working within the hospital service but also to all those concerned with primary health care and emergency services

114

REFERENCES

1 SALMOND G C - Young doctors An exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

2 MATES Susan and SIDEL Victor W - Quality assessment by process and outcome methods evaluation of emergency room care of asthmatic adults in Am J Public Health - v 71 no 7 (1981) p 687-693

3 BONITA Ruth - Stroke rehabilitation who gets what - how when where and why in Commun Health Studies - v 7 no 3 (1983) p 347

4 GIBSON Geoffrey - The emergency department as a screening point for hospital specialty services inclusionary vs exclusionary strategies in Soc Sci Med - v l3(A) (1979) p 495-498

5 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

6 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

7 DALBY B C S FARRER J A and HARVEY P W - Casualty activity analysis coding and computing in Computer Programs in Biomedicine - v 3 (1974) P 254-266

8 ROBERTS Jean FARRER J and HARVEY P - A progressive study of the emergency room demand by the community in Med Inf - v 2 no 3 (1977) p 197-201

9 GIBSON Geoffrey BUGBEE George and ANDERSON Odin W - Emergency medical services in the Chicago area - Chicago Centre for Health Administration Studies University of Chicago 1970

10 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

11 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 55-58

12 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services - report of a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional office for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

13 PLANT Janet and AMES Seth - Emergencyoutpatient satellites serve as rural outposts in Hospitals Journal of the American Hospitals Association - v 52 no 5 (March I 1978) P 87-92

14 TORRENS Paul R and YEDVAB Donna G - Variations among emergency room populations a comparison of four hospitals in New York City in Med Care - v 8 no 1 (1970) p 60-75

115

15 MOORE Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEffect of a neighbourhood health centre on hospital emergency room use in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) p 240-247

16 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J emergency unit as community physician (1972) p 248-260

17 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S shyutilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71

- Help The hospital in Med Care - v 10 no 3

Casualty department (1970) p 272-279

18 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

Paper Development

- ~

C) w CJ C Z w c 0 laquo

118

APPENDIX A

Question sheets

MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT

1middot Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others

a number b levelsmiddotof experience c background experience

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties eg nurses doing clerical work

2 Policy (on procedures) 21 Standing orders 22 Sorting of patients at presentation who does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admit 26 Relations with other hospital departmentswards eg sharing of

facilitiesstaff with outpatients 27 Relations with other A amp E departments

peripheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

3 Relations with GPs

31 Any involvement of local GPs in A amp E department eg staffing 32 Policy on GP-load presentations

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A amp E service iri general

PRINCIPAL NURSE

1 Staffing

11 Nurses a number b levels of experience c background experience

2 Policy (on procedures) - ~ -

~ ~ bull - - I bull

22 Sorting of patients atprese~ation 23 Level of treatment provic)e~ by nurses 26 Relations with other hospitaldepartmentswards eg sharing

nurses 27 Relationsiith other ~ ~ltE 9~parlttm~nt~periPheral hospitals

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others a number I

b levels of experience c background experience d at different times

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties egnur~esdoing cler~cal work

2 Procedures ~ - ~

21 standing orclers ~ 22 Sorting of patients at pr~seniation~ho does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admitZ 26 Relat io~s witll oth~r )()sIgti taidepa rtmentswards

ashCl~in9 q~i facilitiesstaff with out-patients b go9rdinat~pgwith xray and laboratory

27 Relations with other A amp E departmentsperipheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

4 workload

41 Number of patient visits per year 42 Seasonal variation

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases -definiUon

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp B

120

~~

55 Relations with local GPs ~i~ 56 Alcohol involved in presehttionsbull 57 Administration - recordstystem 58 Hospital policy (if mentiOPed earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A E service in general

HOUSE SURGEONS

Jobdescription

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

2 Procedures

21 Standing orders 24 Follow-up recalls or referrals1

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-load cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A 81

55 Relations with local GPs 56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A E department or the A E service in general

NURSES

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

121

2 Procedures

21 Standing order s 22 Sorting of pati~nts at presentation 23 Level of treatment provided by nurses

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp E

56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A ampE department or the A amp E service in general

A amp E DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST ON PHYSICAL FACILITIES

Waiting room size seating atmospheredecor childrens facilities - screening of ambulance entrance

Treatment rooms size privacy ease of working

Overall layout ambulance flow ease of working holding ward for admission

Relations with rest of hospital

_ proximity ~Qxray level ofl~poratory service ease of ~dJllJtting towards

122

APPENDIX B

Accident and emergency department records

THE STATE OF A amp E RECORDS Most of the A amp E departments visited kept a log or register of A amp E attendance This was a large book or folder where the patients name and other details were entered in order of presentation at the department Usually A amp E department logs contained the following information

the patients name and age the date and time of presentation a one-word description of the patients complaint whether the visit was a first attendance for a complaint

or a return visit the patient I s disposal

All except one of the A amp E departments visited had their own record system (independent of the hospital inpatient system) with one recordmiddot kept for each patient presenting This record was usually an A5 card although one department used a multiple copy A4 sheet Most of the A amp E department records contained the following information

the patients name age sex occupation GP address and phone number the date and time of presentation a one-to-ten word description of the patients complaint the A amp Edoctor(s) seen their clinical notes of

diagnosis and treatment the patients disposal ACC details if the complaint results from an accident other details on tetanus prophylaxis allergies and medical alerts

There were of course variations in the information contained on the logs and records of different A amp E departments An outline of the points where the log and records of each hospital differ from the general descriptions given above appears at the end of this Appendix

The quality of data collected was variable with the out of hours collection often being sketchier than the in hours This was probably due to nursing and medical staff doing the recording as well as their usual duties when receptionists were not on duty The basic details (such as name age and sex) were usually complete but more descriptive details (such as the site cause and sequence of an accident) were not always noted Some receptionists recorded no details about the accident whereas others took considerable care to summarise accurately the relevant information

USES OF A 8t E RECORDS The major users of A amp E records are the A amp E departments themselves and the hospitals A primary use is the estimation of the size and the content of the A amp E workload at different times of the day and the week This information is valuable for planning staffing levels and physical facilities in the A amp E department The A amp E staff also find the information contained in A amp E records useful in dealing appropriately with

123

patients who repeatedy present at the d~parmeptlHSo at times the information recorded in the A amp E depatinienf farequired as evidence in court proceedings

On a broader f ront~ amp E records are useful for sOme research purposes Certainly theyprovide~nsights i nl 0 who USeE the A amp E department (see Chapter 6) At some A amp E departments ~ufficientlY detailed information about accidents resulting in a presentation (eg type site possible cause of accident and occupation of patient) is collected for developing accident prevention programmes However most A amp E records are too sketchy for direct use in this way although they could be used as sampling frames for some accident research

There are disadvantages in using A amp E records for health services research purposes

I A amp E departments deliver only a small part of ambulatory medical care They deliver care to a selected age group and to a group who by and large happen to live nearby

2 Generally A amp E records are one-off and do not have the longitudinal perspective of general practice records or even hospital notes

3 Even for an epidemiological survey of accidents A amp E departments see an incomplete caseload They do not see all fractures much less all wounds concussions eye injuries etc

POINTS OF DIFFERENCE fROM GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS GIVEN

Full-time Information on log Information on A amp E record departments

Urban Auckland Age not noted

Middlemore Motor vehicle accident also noted

Green Lane Age not noted Sports and motor vehicle accidents also noted Residential area (not street address) also noted

Address A amp E doctor and Length Of stay and homeWellington 1A amp E patient number also address collected for nonshy

Hutt noted New and return New Zealand residents visits not always differentiated

Christchurch Sex address GP referral and motor vehicle accidents also noted

Dunedin [NO log kept Records held in alphabetical order for each months presentations]

Full-time departments

Provincial Rotorua

Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane

Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore

Kenepuru

124

Information on log

GP A amp E doctor case history and treatment also noted

Only patient name and date of presentation noted

Source of referral location of accident and special accident cases also noted

[Not seen]

Information on log

Complaint not noted

Address A amp E doctor and A amp E patient number also noted New and return visits not always differentiated

)

Information on A amp E record

Different cards used for work and non-work accidents

[None]

Specific places allocated on A4 sheet for case history lab and x-ray reports and follow-up

Time of presentation not noted

Information on A amp E record

Length of stay and home address collected for nonshyNew Zealand residents

125

APPENDIX C

StatisticalanaIY$es of accident and emergency department attendance riltes by neighbourhoods

METHOD

The analysis set out to test

o the effect of distance

o the effect of social factors

o the effect of A ampE department characteristics on A amp E attendance rates

The first two of these effects are not independent It was therefore necessary to use multivariate methods to assess the effect of distance controlling for social factors and for social factors controlling for distance

Other analyses of New Zealand geographical areas (in preparation Reinkeii) have found distinct differences between urban areas (those with populations exceeding 35000) and non-urban areas Therefore the multivariate analyses have been carried out separately for the 355 urban neighbourhoods and the 86 non-urban neighbourhoods One neighbourhood did not have complete census data and was omitted from the multivariate analysis Where we found differing results for urban and non-urban areas they have been mentioned separately Otherwise the results are presented as general findings

STEPWISE MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Initially a simple stepwise regression analysis was carried out The results are shown below Variables are presented in decreasing order of importance and are related to high attendance rates

All Neighbourhoods Urban Neighbourhoods Non-urban Neighbourhoods

Out of hours sickness

37 of the variance is 34 of the Variance is 36 of the variance is explained by explained by the same explained by many carless households features as all neighshy near the hospital near the hospital bourhoods many households with cars young age-structure few in the paid workforce many with higher few school-age children education many Maori many blue collar many in the paid workforce

All Neighbourhoods

out of hours injury

35 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many children many married many Europeans few households with two cars

In hours sickness

16 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many car less households few separated widowed or divorced low average rental many in paid workforce many with higher education

In hours injury

31 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars many school-age children few Pacific Island Chinese or Indian

Recall visits in hours

23 of the variance is explained by near the hospital high average rental many households with two cars few with higher education many in the paid workforce few European many separated widowed or divorced many school-age children

Urban Neighbourhoods

28 ofmiddotthe variance is explained by near the hospital few households with two cars many with higher education many blue-collar many European few separated widowed or divorced many seeking work

14 of the variance is explained by few households with two cars near the hospital low average rent high income many in paid workforce few separated widowed or divorced

16 of the variance is expla ined by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars

18 of the variance is exp lai ned by high average rental near the hospital many households with two cars many Maori many separated widowed or divorced few seeking work many with higher education

Non-urban Neighbourhoods

62 of the Variance is explained by near the hospital few in the paid workforce

7 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

57 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many one-car households

42 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

127

Few recall visits happened out of hours so the out of hours recall attendance rates are low ~ndhlghlY yariable NO adequate model was found in the analyses so 19 resultsare presented here

Clearly distance was an important determinant of rates of attendance The social characteristics had a )I9dest effect on injury first attendance a more substantial effect on rates of recall visits and a very substantial effect on the rates of sickness attendance in the different neighbourhoods

The pattern was quite different for the urban and non-urban areas as were the associations among the social variables A more complex analysis was needed

2 DATA REDUCTION

Separate principal components analyses for urban and non-urban areas were done on the social factors and yielded sets of four components with eigenvalues of one or more For clarity of interpretation the four-vector model was rotated (using a varimax method) and yielded four urban parameters and four non-urban parameters as shown Variables are shown in decreasing order of importance for each parameter

Urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few home-owners young ageshy low income in the northerry many carless structure few with higher regions higher many on benef it many Maori education average rental many seeking work many blue-collar few in the paid many separated work force widowed or divorced many blue-collar

Non-urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few separated many Maori bull many home- low average widowed or manyseeking owners rental divorced work few in the paid few with higher few old in the workforce education many two-car and northern many blue-collar few carless regions high income many blue-collar many children

3 PRODUCING ADJUSTED RArES

We fitted a regression equation for each attendance rate on the distance factor and the eight social factor parameters For urban neighbourhoods the four non-urban parameters were held at zero and vice versa for the non-urban neighbourhoods

128

The regression equations using this method allowed non-urban and urban areas to be analysed together and yielded levels of variance explained generally equal to those derived from the significant predictors in the simple stepwise regressions

Variance in attendance rates explained by different methods

Regression In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Using or iginal variables 16 31 23 37 35 14

Using rotated parameters 18 26 29 36 37 14

Each parameter-based equation yielded a rate of attendance expected on the basis of purely neighbourhood characteristics The difference between this expected rate and the actual observed rate gave a measure of the attendance rate adjusted for neighbourhood-determined features After this adjustment for distance and social factors the department-to-department differences remaining were muted In fact the F-tests of the differences among the departments showed the following changes

Changes in F-test values from unadjusted to adjusted rates

In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Unadjusted rates 74 69 195 132 96 123 Adjusted rates 23 65 107 53 41 119

4 TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE

Analyses of variance were carried out on the attendance rates adjusted for neighhourhood-determined factors for in hours and out of hours and looking separately at sickness first injury and recall visits First the A amp E department was used as the independent variable (except that Auckland and Green Lane were combined since they share a single catchment area) Then tests were done on the departments categorised into urban provincial rural and suburban open door policy and recall policy When the analyses of variance showed significant effects Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used to identify single departments or groups of departments that differed significantly from the others

Staffing levels were plotted against the adjusted rates When the correlations were significant the slope of the simple regression was examined

129middot

Results of analyses of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls means tests on adjusted attendance ratesmiddot

Differencemiddots Differences Differences among among between

Neighbourhood- A amp E categories of open-door adjusted departments A amp E department and attendance ( urban restricted

provincial departments rural or suburban)

Out of hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Provincial Open rates

rates lower higher than than others restricted

First injury Yes

Recall injury Yes Yes

In hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Open rates

higher than restricted

First injury Yes Yes Yes Grey rates Rural rates Restricted higher than higher than rates others others higher than

open

Recall injury Yes Yes Suburban rates higher than others

Only statistically significant results presented

Differences between departments favouri ng and not favouring recalls

Yes Recall-favouring rates lower than others

Yes Recall shyfavoumiddotring rates higher than others

Yes Recall shyfavouring rates higher than others

130

APPENDIX D

Childrens use of general practitioners and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

In conjunction with the 1981 Kljakovic study of chi ldren s attendance at A amp E departments in Wellington a parallel study of childrens visits to and by general practitioners was undertaken General Medical Services benefit claims for the same period were examined noting for each juvenile (0-14 years) visit the census area unit of the residence and the address of the general practitioner or locum This yielded rates of child attendance both for normal surgery hours and for urgent visits (out of surgery hours) for the whole region These were adjusted to give estimates for the 0-12 year old population and were then compared with the rates of A amp E attendance found by Kljakovic

AS Figure 10 shows the use of A amp E services was a very small part of childrens primary medical care During surgery hours visits to the A amp E department which were not preceded by contact with the general practitioner were only 16 per cent of first medical contacts Outside normal surgery hours the visits to A amp E departments that bypassed a general practitioner were more frequent I but they rose only to 194 per cent of first medical contacts

This comparison of overall use of medical services for children showed some tendency for parents to use A amp E more when they used general practitioners less comparing in hours with out of hours This was not surprising given that many of the in hours visits to general practit ioners would be for non-urgent conditions or even routine preventive care

Eighty-four neighbourhoods in the Wellingtoh region (the census area units or groupings of the same) were examined to see which of four factors (the distance of the neighbourhood from the A amp E department the use of general practitioners the per capita income and the ethnicity of the neighbourhood) were related to the use of A amp E departments The most important factor was distance from the A amp E department Then taking distance into account there was a slight tendency for areas where parents made less use of the general practitioner during normal surgery hours to be areas of more frequent use of the A amp E department However this tendency was not statistically significant and no such tendency was found for out of hours use Overall there was little evidence of competition between general practitioners and A amp E departments for patients

Figure 10 Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

In hours Out of hours

Need for medical care recognised

I I bull I I I I I Ifail Try to Try to fail Still need Icontact contact careI

general generalI 0gt practitioner practitioner w-- I succeed I succeed

I I I I

AampE 13 yes Still need Contact Contact Still need yesI department care general general care departmentI

practitioner I practitioner

I I I

7650 824I egt I I

Still need Visit Visit Still need I care general general careI

practitioner practitionerI I I I I I

~X-215 -[Ql--~-~- 7346 ALLAN Bridget ClairtJ ) Accident and emergency departmem ~

organisation and utilisation

WX 215 73467 [QJ 1shy

j

ALL

shyUBRARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

WELLINGTON L

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH-SPECIAL REPORT SERIES

Issued by

Management Services amp Research Unit (MSRU) or National Health Statistics Centre (NHSC) Department of Health Private Bag 2 PO Box 5013 Wellington Upper Willis Street Wellington

No TITLE

1 Maori-European standards of health 2 Domestic accidents (public hospital admissions) 3 The Grey Valley survey (lung function in coal miners) 4 Elderly patients in public hospitals 1958 5 Smoking habits of school children 6 Survey of work in compressed air-Auckland harbour bridge 7 Tuberculosis in Canterbury 8 Maori patients in mental hospitals 9 Census of mental hospital patients 1961 10 Elderly persons accommodation needs in New Zealand 1962 11 Patient-nurse dependency exploratory study 12 Patient-nurse dependency general survey data

13 Patient-nurse dependency gynaecology 14 Patient-nurse dependency geriatrics

15 Patient-nurse dependency in Christchurch paediatrics 16 Smoking habits of New Zealand doctors 17 Infant and foetal loss in New Zealand 18 Trends in notifiable disease 19 Survey of factory first aid 1963-64 20 Patient-nurse dependency general surgery 21 Patient-nurse dependency orthopaedic surgery 22 Patient-nurse dependency general medicine 23 Patient-nurse dependency GU Eye ENT

24 Diseases of the ear nose and throat in Maori children 25 Maori patients in public hospitals 26 The health of two groups of Cook Island Maoris

27 Mental hospitals admission and release data cohort study of first admissions 1962

28 Occupational mortality among male population other than Maoris 20 to 64 years of age

29 Dental health status of the New Zealand population in late adolescence and young adulthood

30 Census of mental hospital patients 1966 31 Survey of the public dental health service in Niue and plan for development 32 Hospital food services 33 Bibliography of the epidemiology of New Zealand and its Island Territories

34 Census of public and private hospital patients and old peoples homes 1966 35 Domestic accidents 36 An evaluation of a regional mass miniature radiography programme 1956-67 37 Maori-European comparisons in mortality

38 Physical development of New Zealand school children 1969 39 Psychiatric illness causing hospitalization or death 1967 t40 Census of mental hospital patients 1971 t41 Census of public private and maternity hospital patients and old peoples

homes 1971 t42 Cancer of the lung in New Zealand t43 Organisation of the work of hospital house surgeons 44 Growth of New Zealand pre-school children 45 Maternal and infant care in Wellington-a health care consumer study

46 Accommodation and service needs of the elderly t47 Survey of patients in psychiatric hospitals 48 Family growth study 49 A patient opinion survey Wellington hospital

ISSUED BY

NHSC 1960 NHSC 1960middot NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1963 NHSC 1963 MSRU 1963 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1963 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC ]966

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 MSRU 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1972 MSRU 1971 NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973

NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1974 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1977

llHII tIffPllfJlJ c

~~~~~~~~ f lt b tf

f ()

11

bull

Page 4: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …

FOREWORD

Over the last twenty years there have been a number of accident and emergency studies in New Zealand hospitals For the most part these have been place and topic specifics This study by Bridget Allan and Judith Reinken is different It begins with an historical review of previous work in the field This is followed by a wide ranging study of accident and emergency services based on field work carried out in a representative sample of hospitals The data are analysed and presented taking account of the relevant international literature The resulting consolidation of knowledge provides a sound basis not only for further research but more importantly for the further development of accident and emergency services

The report provides at least tentative answers to a number of questions regularly asked about accident and emergency services Do general practitioners and accident and emergency departments provide competing services lhe answer appears to be no The public seem to discriminate sensibly between what are for the most part complementary services Is cost a factor in accident and emergency attendance as opposed to a visit to the general practitioner Again the answer appears to be no - cost is not an important factor Are socio-economic status and ethnicity associated with the rate of A amp E attendance Perhaps but distance and other factors concerned with accessibility appear to be more important

The study shows wide variation in the way in which A amp E services are provided in different hospitals This ranges from the size and shape of the physical facilities and the type and level of staffing relative to the workload to the way in which individual patient problems are dealt with Those responsible for the planning and operation of A amp E departments should find these comparisons informative Consideration of the data may perhaps prompt questions which in their answering lead to greater cost effectiveness and to service improvement

As well as providing answers the research raises questions It points yet again to the need in New Zealand for a regional study of accidents and accident services Accidents are a major cause of premature death and morbidity Many organisations are involved in the prevention and treatment of accidents but so far it has not been possible to mount a comprehensive study which includes and integrates all interests Until this is done fragmentation of services is likely to continue

By highlighting access to services the study points up the need for more information about communication and transport patterns in health care delivery Again this is a neglected area of research which could have far reaching implication for the planning and operation of health services

Finally the report raises questions about the interaction between general practitioners and A amp E services That these services are largely complementary is clear but unfortunately the communication between them is often not as good as it could and should be Further research has a contribution here but will not solve the problem Better communication and understanding is needed on both sides

The researchers have provided us with a much needed and timely review of an important and sometimes controversial aspect of health services Theirjete audience

G C Salmond ---shyDeputy Director-General of Health Department of Health

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Many people have helped with this study In particular we would like to thank

o John Mills who visited the hospitals drafted the physical characteristics chapter and gave freely of his time and expertise

o the staff of the hospitals visited for sharing their time and thoughts with us

o Desmond Keenan Shelagh McRae and Denis Snelgar for allowing us to use the information they had collected

o Clare Salmond Mike Moore and Sylvia Nichol for their assistance with computer analysis

o readers ofmiddot drafts of this report who offered helpful criticism and suggestion

o the typists and publication staff of the Department of Health

We also acknowledge the Director-General of Health for permission to publish

DISCLAIMER

The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Health

COPYRIGHT

Provided the source is acknowledged information contained in this report may be freely used by any person

CONTENTS

Page

ACKNOWIEDGEMENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

1 INTRODUCTION I

Background Thewider questions of emergency medical services The overseas situation An historical perspective in New Zealand

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments Record studies on the utili satjon of A amp E departments Studies of the organisation of A amp E departments

Overview of this study Aims Sources of information

References

2 DEFINITIONS 11

The Accident and Emergency department Attendance The hospitals Recording systems References

3 PROCEDURES IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT 15

Entry Sorting 1 reatmen t Disposal Follow-upcare Admissions Discussion References

4 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 23

PrinCiples Size Location

Entrances Access to other hospital facilities

Layout Waiting area Examination and treatment area Resuscitation area Operating theatre Plaster room Interview room Reception and records office Staff offices Holding ward

Discussion References

5

6

7

8

STAFFING OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 35

Medical staffing Senior medical staffing Junior medical staffing Accident and emergency work as a career

Nurse staffing Other staff involved with the A amp E department

Reception and clerical staff Orderlies Social workers Ambulance personnel

Discussion References

PATIENT ATTENDANCE CHARACTERISTICS 55

Overall attendance and trends Age and sex Conditions

Injury conditions Sickness conditions

Recall attendance GP-load

Non-urgent sickness Discussion References

PATIENT ATTI~UDES TO THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT AND STAFF ATTITUDES TO THE PATIENTS 75

Reasons for visiting the A amp E department Overseas studies New Zealand studies

Effect of health centres and deputising services on A amp E utilisation A amp E staff views of patients

Overseas studies The New Zealand situation

Discussion References

UTILISATION OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 91

Comparison of A amp E utilisation among hospital catchment areas Results Effect of general practitioner availability

Factors explaining catchment area variations in A amp E utilisation Method Results of the mUltivariate analyses

Comparison of A amp E use and general practitioner use Discussion References

9 CONCLUSIONS 107

The A amp E department as a hospital department The A amp E department as an emergency service The A amp E department as a primary care service Where from here

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A QUestion sheets 116

APPENDIX B Accident and emergency department records 120

APPENDIX C Statistical analyses of accident and 123 emergency department attendance rates by neighbourhoods

APPENDIX D Childrens use of general practitioners 128 and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

TABLES

Table

1 Proportion of first attendance patients discharged recalled referred or admitted

2 Areas of A amp E department~

3 Area to attendance ratios for adjusted total areas and waiting areas of A amp E departments by first attendance and total attendance

4 Numbers of examination and treatment cubicles or rooms and recommended numbers based on first attendance and total attendance

Medical staffing of A amp E departments

6 Total medical staffing (full-time equivalents) and medical staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

7 Nurse staffing of A amp E departments excluding student nurses and hospital aids

Nurse staffing (full-time equivalents) and nurse staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

Average attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

10 Trends in attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

11 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was recall attendance

12 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was for sickness

13 Proportion of total A amp E attendance that was for Sickness by policy and age groups

14 Use of general practitioners by first attenders at A amp E departments

15 Reasons for A amp E first attendance from three New Zealand studiesmiddot

Itgt Attendance (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) within each A amp E department catchment area

Page

18

24

25

29

37

39

45

46

56

57

66middot

70

71

77

78

92

(continued)

Table Page

17 Hospital admissionsfor accidental injury (mean 93 age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) and death due to accidental injury (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) within each A amp E department catchment area

IB Attendance (mean age-adjusted and neighbourhoodshy 99 adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) and populationshyto-general practitioner ratio within each A amp E department catchment area

19 Comparison of first attendances for injury at A amp E 101 departments and general practitioners

FIGURES

Figure Page

1 Percentage of total attendance at 58 A amp E departments by age and sex

2 Percentage of total attendance at 59 A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

3 Injury first attendances by type of injury 6U all ages

4 Injury first attendances by type of injury 61 by age groups

5 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 62 all ages

6 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 63 by age groups

7 Comparison of medical staff availability and 67 level of recall attendance

Comparison of nursing staff availability and 67 level of attendance

9 Location at which accidents happened by those 79 attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments 131 by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

1

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

BACKGROUND

This report arises f rom concerns expressed by several groups about the availability especially out of hours of emergency car~ and its provision by Accident and Emergency (A amp E) departments in New Zealand

In _SQe mid 1970 s the people of Porirua were worried that local general -pr-actitioners were not available at nights and weekends and by the delays

involved in travelling to Wellington and Hutt A amp E departments [IJ At the same time the people of North Shore were campaigning to keep their local A amp E department open More recently community groups in Upper Hutt have been pressing for the addition of an A amp E service to a local health centre Overall people are concerned that appropriate care (including facilities such as x-rays) is readily available in emergency situations

General practitioners are another group who have been concerned about A amp E departments in particular about inappropriate uses of A amp E departments A long-standing complaint bas been that patients are using A amp E departments for care which wou~d be better given by a general practitioner and that the A amp E departments retain patients instead of referr ing them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care [2 3J In 1981 the research group of the Wellington Faculty of the Royal NZ College of General Practitioners sponsored a study of children presenting at A amp E departments because they were worried that unnecessary admissions of children to hospital occurred because their parents had bypassed the general practitioners and gone straight to hospital [4J

Also A amp E staff and hospital administrators have been concerned that caring for patients who could have been treated by general practitioners has limited their ability to deal with emergency cases [567]

THE WIDER QUESTIONS OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

Emergency care requires not only the provision of hospital services (the A amp E department with back-up from other hospital facilities) but also the organisation of services outside the hospital and co-ordination between both sets of services Emergency medical services outside the hospital include alarm and communication systems transport systems and first aid services There are important questions for New Zealand within this framework For example what should be the role of general practitioners in on-site emergency care What level of training is appropriate for ambulance officers Should voluntary personnel staff ambulances To what extent is double manning of ambulances required [8910]

In order to limit the study to manageable proportions this report focusses only on the hospital services namely the A amp E department Emergency medical services provided outside hospitals are mentioned only where they impinge noticeably on the A ampE department It is hoped that due attention will be given to the wider questions of emergency medical services in the future (see Chapter 9)

2

THE OVERSEAS SITUATION

Concern with emergencymiddot care facilities especially their increasing use has been apparent in other countries for the past thirty years While some articles report on the situation in Canada Australia Sweden France and the USSR most of the literature is about the United States and Britain This section briefly outlines the major themes of the literature and their relevance to New Zealand More specific aspects are covered in the appropriate chapters

Many United States researchers have studied the operations of different emergency rooms exploring patients reasons for using the emergency room their demographic characteristics and their use of the family doctor Often the studies have tried to explain an increasing use of emergency rooms and some have reported on the effectiVeness of measures introduced to reduce thei r use These studies provided models for some of the analyses carried out in this study However the debate in the United States over appropriate methods of funding and staffing for emergency rooms is seldom relevant to New Zealand because of the differences both in philosophy and organisation of medical care in the two countries

The Platt [11] committee on A amp E services in Britain in 1962 was concerned about casual attenders ie patients not in need of urgent attention but wishing to avoid the trouble of attending their general practitioners surgery They also criticised the unsuitable accommodation and the insufficient numbers of senior medical staff supervising Casualty Departments The report recommended changing the name Casualty Service to Accident and Emergency Service (to discourage casual attendance) and rationalising the service by clOSing smaller A amp E units and centralising facilities These recommendations have been partially carried out

However there has been continuing research in Br i tain into the reasons given by patients particularly self-referred patients for their use of A amp E departments and the trade-off between general practitioner and A amp E services There has also been continuing debate over the medical staffing of A amp E departments

The British studies are of some relevance to the New Zealand situation since the organisation of medical care here is similar but no overseas experience can provide a blueprint for New Zealand For example the direct cost to the patient of general practice care in New Zealand raises the possibility of patients attending the A amp E department because it is free whereas the British system of general practitioner funding provides no such incentive

AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE IN NEW ZEALAND

Little is known about the historical development of A amp E services in New Zealand Presumably they followed the British tradition described in the Platt report [11 p23-24)

The word casualty in its proper meaning of a serious injury has a long history It occurs in Shakespeare and Dickens writing in 1837 used casualty ward to describe the ward in a hospital in which accidents were treated Unfortunately the meaning alt~red in the second half of the last century The Nuffield Report (1960) Casualty Services and their Setting

3

gives an interesting quotation from a survey made by the Lancet in 1869 The out-patients at St Bartholomews Hospital are it says divided into two categories They are the middotcasualtymiddot which comprises those who are supposed to require temporary treatment for diseases or injuries of a trifling character and the middotout-patientsmiddot properly so called who after receiving a regular letter of admission are entitled to the advice of the assistant surgeons and physicians for a period of 12 months It is in the casualty division that the increase of numbers has been most marked bullbullbull It is estimated that not less than a thousand patients frequently attend on a Monday or Tuesday morning

Certainly by 1872 vlellingtons private medical practitioners were incensed at the hospitals provision of free treatment for their patients Five hundred outpatients were treated in Wellington that year [12] Separate casualty departments were operating at Wellington Hospital by 1924 [12] at Auckland Hospital by the 1940s [13] and Christchurch Hospital by 1952 [14]

The 1960 Board of Health report [15] on outpatient servicesmiddot expressed concern over the duplication of services by outpatient departments which were also available from general practitioners However it recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times

Since the late 1960s a series of New Zealand studies have considered the use of A amp E departments either by interviewing patients or by analysing data drawn from A amp E record systems and the organisation of A amp E departments

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

The first interview study was an investigation of first attenders at the Dunedin A amp E department in 1968 by Dixon et al [2] Their results have not been contradicted by any of the later studies

They found that the principal attenders were males aged 15 to 24 who recorded first attendance rates of over 100 per 1000 each year The young men were also the most likely to report having no general practitioner Dixon found that the age and sex pattern of those attending at the A amp E department was nearly converse to the pattern of those attending a general practitioner

Dixon pointed out that the conditions treated at the A amp E department were rarely disease-related rather they were predominantly lacerations and open wounds bruising sprains and strains effects of foreign bodies and fractures The major reason given for attending the department was that it was seen as appropriate

Dixon concluded that the A amp E service was complementary and not competitive to general practice that the public were realistic in regarding it as the only practical and effective primary medical care for accident and emergency injuries and that payment for service did not appear to figure in the decision to attend the department

o

4

TwO interview studies of first attenders at Auckland Hospital A amp E department have been carried out by Hunton in 1972 and Richards in 1975 [16] Both studies included an assessment by the student interviewers and A amp E staff as to the suitability of the patients condition for general practice care 42-43 per cent were considered suitable Richards concluded that public education programmes encouraging people to use their general practitioner prior to attending the A amp E department should be instituted

In 1978 Keenan interviewed patients who had attended Christchurch A amp E department collecting detailed information on the accident or sickness leading to the attendance (unpublished see Chapter 6 and 7) He found the same set of reasons for using A amp E departments as Dixon found the A amp E department was seen as appropriate and accessible

Kljakovic found similar results when interviewing the parents of children attending A amp E departments in the Wellington region in 1978 [4] He also found that in choosing between the general practitioner and the A amp E department parents were more likely to use the service which was closer to the family home Children f rom lower socio-economic status families were more likely than other children to see thei r general practitioner before gOing to the A amp E department

Records studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

Several studies have gathered data from A amp E records to investigate A amp E utilisation In 1979 Snelgar described the characteristics of people attending Northland Base Hospital A amp E department [17] He found similar results to Dixon apart from a higher proportion of injuries In the same year McRae reviewed all attendances at Waikato Hospital A amp E department and found a similar picture [lB]

Three records studies have looked at the relationship between A amp E use and general practitioner use Maynard looked at Mosgiel residents use of Dunedin A amp E facilities for three years before and three years after the opening of a local health centre [19] No difference was found ~asap

investigated assertions that people from one part of the Wellington Hospital catchment area had suddenly begun to use the A amp E department heavily for conditions that should have been seen by a general practitioner [20] In fact that part of the catchment area had much lower rates of A amp E use than other areas Reinken tested whether the doubling of general practitioner cover in one part of the Wellington region affected A amp E presentation rates differently than in other areas nearby [21] There was no clear evidence that the increased cover had any effect

Studies on the organisation of A amp E departments

As part of a thesis looking at young doctors Salmond examined the work of house surgeons in A amp E departments using a postal questionnaire [22J He concluded that working in an A amp E department was good experience for a house surgeon only if second year house surgeons were deployed in the department the house surgeon was well-supervised by senior medical staff there was a good working relationship with the A amp E chargemiddot nurse and the house surgeon was not over-tired He also suggested that good senior staffing was closely related to effective administration and better service in the A amp E department

5

The Hospital Design and EValuation Unit of the Department of Health prepared a report documenting the planning requirements of New Zealand A amp E departments [23] The report outlined several principles of A amp E design and made detailed recommendations on the facilities rooms and equipment necessary

OVERVIEW OF THIS STUDY

Aims

The aim of this study is to describe A amp E departments in New Zealand Because the material presented in the previous section was collected by different researchers at different times and from different A amp E

departments detailed comparisons across the studies have been difficult To get a more comprehensive picture of A amp E use in New Zealand a systematic investigation was necessary

The specific aims of this report are

o to describe the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at their procedures physical characteristics and staffing patterns

o to describe attendance at A amp E departments including the patients profile and pattern of attendance and the load placed on the departments by patients who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner

o to describe the use of A amp E departments by consumers by analysing patients reasons for attending the departments and analysing demographic factors inrelation to A amp E attendance

Sources of information

Information was gathered from three sources

The site visits

Fourteen A amp E departments were visited between May and September 1981 by a Department of Health study team consisting of a medical officer from the Division of Hospitals and a res~arch officer from the Management Services and Research Unit

At each hospital the team examined the facilities and spoke with staff involved with the A amp E department including

o the medical superintendent (and in some hospitals the principal nurse)

o the A amp E officer or medical officer in charge of the A amp E department (where such a position existed and was filled)

o the nurse supervisor andor charge nurse of the A amp E department

o at least one house surgeon working in the A amp E department

6

In some hospitals the team also spoke with other staff members including experienced A amp E staff nurses and hospital social workers

Question sheets were used during interviews so that a comparable body of information was collected at each hospital Interviews were open-ended to allow discussion of local procedures or problems (See Appendix A for question sheets)

Hospitals were carefully selected so that the A amp E departments in the study would represent a cross-section of New Zealand A amp E departments Those selected served a range of communities in both the North and South Islands

o major urban Dunedin)

areas (Auckland Wellington Christchurch and

o provincial centres (Rotorua Taranaki and Timaru)

o predominantly rural areas (Whakatane and Grey)

In centres with more than one A amp E department all were visited so that a complete picture of the services and use could be developed This involved visiting Auckland Green Lane Middlemore and North Shore hospitals in Auckland and Wellington Hutt and Kenepuru hospitals in Wellington

The information gathered in the site visits has been used in describing the organisation of A amp E departments (Chapters 3 4 arid 5)

The A amp E records data collection

On each site visit a sample of 1981 attendances was drawn from the A amp E record system and the following information was recorded for each person age sex presenting condition (sickness or injury) time of presentation residential address and whether the visit was a first attendance for the condition or a recall visit

Exceptions were Christchurch and the three Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments Comparable data collected by Keenan in Ch ristchurch in 1978 and Allan in Wellington during 1980 were used instead

This information has been used to describe the attendance at A amp E departments (Chapter 6) and for the analysis of demographic factors in relation to attendance (Chapter 8)

The consumer studies

In 1978 Keenan carried out interviews with patients attending Christchurch A amp E department working from a one in eight sample drawn from the A amp E log over a four-week period and gaining a 99 response rate Results from this study have been analysed and compared with the results of the published New Zealand interview studies [2416] Anecdotal material from Kljakovic s study of children attending Wellington A amp E departments has also been included to illustrate the results of the numerical analysis

We realise that in studying only a selection of A amp E departments some local variations may have been missed but we are confident that the broad pattern and major issues in the organisation of A amp E care have been

7

covered Also as the A amp E departments studied serve two-thirds of the population of New Zealand the utilisation patterns discussed in the report are likely to prevail throughout New Zealand We hope that the mater ial presented the conclusions drawn and the questions raised in this report will encourage discussion about the current operation and future developmiant of A amp E departments in NewmiddotZealand

a

8

REFERENCES

1 de LACEY A REINKEN J and SALMOND C E - Community attitudes to sickness and health stimulus and response v 3 Community attitudes - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 103-105 (Special report series no 56)

2 DIXON C W Emery G M and SPEARS G F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) p 272-279

3 [Editorial] in G P Journal of the General Practitioner Society no 42 (1981) P 1-2

4 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN BC and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

5 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble Jr et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

6 MAYNARD Edward J - The application of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment shyUniversity of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

7 Hospital misuse brings protest in Taranaki Daily News (1 Sept 1980) bull

8 FAHEY Morgan - The role of the family doctor in disaster and emergency medicine in NZ Family Physician - v 5 no 1 (1978) p 42-44

9 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 19-23 March 1979 in NZ Med J - (1980) P 194-196

10 Double manning of ambulances [editorial] in NZ Hosp - v 32 no 3 (1980) p 1

11 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medicine Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

12 BARBER Laurie H and TOWERS Roy J - Wellington Hospital 1847-1976 Wellington Wellington Hospital Board 1976

13 The story of Auckland Hospital 1847-1977 edited by David Scott -Auckland Medical Historical Library Committee of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians in New Zealand 1977 p 35-36

14 BENNETT FO - Hospital on the Avon the story of the Christchurch Hospital 1862-1962 Christchurch North Canterbury Hospital

o Board 1962

9

15 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 196U (Report series Board of Health no 2)

16 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

17 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

18 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

19 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency department in Med Care - v 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

20 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

21 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

22 SALMOND G C - Young doctors an exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

23 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

11

CHAPTER 2

Definitions

lhis chapter provides the definitions of terms used in our study In general our terminology is consistent with the literature However in some areas such as the classification of presenting conditions as sickness or injury or the description of GP-load there is no general consistency and we have developed our own definitions

THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

This name is the one commonly used in New Zealand We have used it in preference to the older description Casualty Depariment [1] and the American description of Emergency Department It is one hospital department which patients can approach without prior notification

Emergencies can be any condition that - in the opinion of the patient their family or whoever assumes the responsibility of bringing the patient to the hospital - requires immediate medical attention

However using such a definition means every case is an emergency In New Zealand A amp E departments patients tend to be classified in a similar way to the description given by the American Hospital Association [2]

o emergencies where delay is harmful and the condition potentially threatens life or function

a urgent cases which require attention within a few hours

o non-urgent cases where the condition is minor or non-acute and does not require the resources of the emergency service

An accident is an unexpected event Accidents which have resulted in attendance at an A amp E department are ones that have caused some trauma whether through shock or other injury The Platt report [1] decided on the term A amp E department in recognition that the real emergencies were a trickle while the accidents were a mighty flood

In general the A amp E department is regarded as part of the hospitals outpatient services and like these in day to day running it provides specific clinics generally for the treatment of traumatic injury x-ray burns dressings plasters and so forth

An accident and emergency patient is a person who is entered in the A amp E log book This can involve a certain amount of error however as some outpatients or discharged patients may return for follow-up care through the A amp E department Also the A amp E department often handles the acute admissions to the hospital

12

ATrENDANCE

A first visit (or first attendance) is the first visit a patient makes for one particular condition

A recall visit is any visit made for one particular condition which is not the first visit for the condition Some recall visits are patient initiated (eg due to pain bleeding infection or an accident to the dressing or plaster) but for the most part revisits are scheduled return visits suggested by A amp E staff

Total attendance is the sum of first visits and recall visits

Inj ury attendances are defined to include the results of trauma (cuts burns fractures sprains strains bruises head injuries multiple injur ies and so forth) as well as foreign bodies in the eye or other orifices and toxic effects whether from accidental or self-poisoning events Late effects of minor injury (pain bleeding abscesses or such) are not included as injury but as sickness

Sickness attendances include collapse (whether stroke coma heart attack or other) shortness of breath abdominal pain general sickness (fever vomiting diarrhoea unwell) mental distress and minor conditions

Non-urgent sicknesses are defined as the minor conditions abdominal pain and general sickness except for preschool children and adults over 65 where the general sickness and abdominal pain conditions can be urgent A amp E staff defined non-urgent sickness less specifically they tended to define it as longstanding or minor sickness

GP-load describes the patients whom A amp E staff feel should have seen a general practitioner It includes patients with longstanding or minor sickness conditions and patients with minor traumatic injury (eg cuts bumps and bruises)

In hours attendance refers to all attendances in the normal working hours of 0800 to 1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays

Out of hours attendance refers to all other attendances outside the defined normal working hours

In an average week 50 hours fall in the in hours category and 118 hours in the out of hours category If we assume that an average person sleeps eight hours a night then that person is awake for 62 hours in the out of hours category (and all the in hours of course) Thus the out of hours category is 70 per cent of the total time in a week and 55 per cent of the waking time in a week

Minor conditions included abscesses backaches infected wounds or wound pain headache pain (unspecified) earaches eye problems toothaches nosebleeds limb pains We have called it the skin pain or bleeding category in Chapter 6

13

Attendance rates measure the use of A amp E departments for a defined population They express the number of cases from an area over a defined period per 1000 population in that area Rates were obtained by age and sex for sickness and injury and in and out of hours for each census area unit or neighbourhood served by each hospital

THE- HOSPITALS

We grouped hospitals into four types

o urban hospitals (where average annual first attendances at A amp E departments are over 25000 patients)

o provincial hospitals (serving 6000 to 12000 new A amp E patients each year)

o rural hospitals (serving fewer than 6000 new A amp E patients each year)

o suburban hospitals where A amp E departments are not open 24 hours per day North Shore Hospital was open 7 days a week 830 am shy530 pm and Kenepuru Hospital was open 5 days a week 830 am shy430 pm

Most of the A amp E departments visited had a senior position variously called the A amp E officer the A amp E director the senior medical officer or the medical officer in charge For convenience we call this position the A amp E officer

RECORDING SYSTEMS

The log is the record kept at the A amp E department which records some information on every patient who presents It will often give no more than the patients name the date and time of visit

The A amp E record is usually a card and it records basic patient information and case notes It may be held for several years in the A amp E department and may therefore contain information on a series of separate events for anyone patient

14

REFERENCES

1 GtBrit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the sUbcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

2 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p vii-viii

15

D

CHAPTER 3

Procedures in the accident and emergency department

In this chapter we begin describing the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at the way they operate We follow the course of a patients care entry to the A amp E department sorting into priority order for care (triage) treatment and follow-up care

ENTRY

Most people presenting at the A amp E department were ambulant (the walking wounded as they are colloquially known) They came through the A amp E departments main entrance to the reception desk where they were first seen by a receptionist or nurse (Exceptions to this occurred in the smaller hospitals where patients presenting at night were first seen by the telephonist who called the nursing staff) Nurses did reception duties at

all the provincial and rural A amp E departments and at two of the urban A amp E departments when receptionists were not on duty (eg lunchtimes nights) bull At times nurses found that having to cover the reception desk interfered with their care of patients

When the receptionists are off duty the nurses do the reception work This can be a nuisance because it interferes with patient care and sometimes patients ring the bell at the reception desk and the staff working in the resuscitation room dont hear it

A amp E nurse

Unless their condition required immediate care the ambulant patients then spent several minutes at the reception desk while their details (eg name address general practitioner complaint) were noted on the A ampE records (See Appendix B for more information on A amp E records) Then they waited in the waiting room until they were called for treatment

A small proportion of patients arrived by ambulance andmiddot at almost all hospitals entered the A amp E department through a separate ambulance entrance In the larger hospitals some nursing staff were stationed in or near the ambulance entrance to care for these patients In other hospitals the staff had often been warned of incoming urgent cases and were standing by when the ambulance arrived As the condition of ambulance patients tended to be urgent they were usually taken straight to a resuscitation or treatment area patients condition permitted or friends or the ambulance driver

Record with the

keeping assist

was ance

carried of thei r

out r

when elativ

the es

SORTING

All A amp E departments operated some triage system to sort the ambulant patients by the urgency of their need for care (Themiddot only exception was Grey A amp E department where there was seldom more than one patient in the department at a time) At most A amp E departments the patients were sorted

16

into urgent and non-urgent categories with urgent cases being seen immediately and non-urgent cases being seen in the order they presented At some of the urban A amp E departments a more complex sorting was done For example

Priority is given in the following order

urgent need very young and very old patients those with general practitioner notes those without general practitioner notes

A lie E nurse

Usually ambulance cases were not triaged since they tended to arrive on their own and required urgent care However several A lie E departments had triage arrangements planned for the arrival of many ambulance cases at once as in a disaster

Sorting was largely a responsibility of the nurses although some A amp E doctors would occasionally check the condition of patients- in the waiting room too The receptionists often played a role in triage as well alerting the nursing staff to urgent cases This happened more in A amp E departments where the physical layout made it difficult for nurses to watch the entrance and the waiting room

The receptionists do tQe basic sorting They have guidelines to follow distressed patients severe cuts or bleeding go straight to the nurses open wounds or eye injuries go directly to a cubicle and are assessed by the nurses patients with abdominal pain or chest pain go on to trolleys and wait in the recovery room This system usually works well although occasionally a fracture patient will not be recognised and will sit in the waiting room

A lie E nurse

In several A lie E departments doctors and nurses stressed the value of an experienced receptionist in recognising and reacting quickly to acutely ill or injured patients

TREATMENT

Almost all the A amp Edepartments visited had a policy that all patients presenting had to be seen by a doctor The doctor did not necessarily have to treat the patient he or she could advise the patient to see a general practitioner Some A amp E doctors commented that by the time they saw the patients it was as easy to treat them as to send them away_ At a few departments the nurses (and occasionally the receptionist) could advise the patient that the department was not an appropriate place for their condition and that they should see a general practitioner This was usually done in consultation with the A E doctor but at times the nurses acted on their own initiative In these places a triage system similar to that reported by Weinerman et al [1] where patients were assigned to the appropriate service inside or outsidemiddot the hospital appeared to be operating

7

The assessment of patients the ordering of tests andmiddot the supervision of treatment were usually seen ~s medical functions The nurses would prepare patients for treatment (removing dressings) and carry out urgent first aid measures (stem bleeding start gastric lavage or cardio-pulmonary resuscitation) Generally however a nurse would only initiate treatment if the patients condition was urgent and a doctor was not available or was already busy with another emergency Exceptions to this situation occurred in some hospitals with A amp E nurse training programmes and in some smaller hospitals where the doctor is on call rather than working in the A amp E department In these departments experienced nurses could order tests such as x-rays and initiate treatments such as suturing and removing foreign bodies from eyes

In most A amp E departments nurses would perform some treatments under a doctors supervision However the range of treatments nurses were allowed to perform varied considerably among hospitals At some hospitals nurses sutured after training but at others they never sutured

The nurses do not suture although they would like to There are four reasons for this there is no full-time A amp E officer so good standards of sutur ing could not be maintained there could be medico-legal problems if a nurse sutured a cut which was more complicated than it looked eg with tendon involvement the nurses have enough to do at present and if they start suturing they will be expected to do it always and the young doctors need to learn suturing as part of their training

Principal nurse

Electrocardiograms were taken by nurses in some A amp E departments by technicians at others Taking blood samples was a doctors job in some departments but was done by nurses in others Similarly gastric lavage using a def ibrillator and plaster work were done by nurses in some departments Most A amp E nurses would maintain intra-venous drips but only nurses with special training WOUld insert them

Some nurses expressed frustration at restrictions on the treatments they were allowed to perform However several sen~or nurses stressed that they had to select carefully the nurses they allowed to perform more difficult treatments

We are very selective about choosing the nurses to do triage suturing and the more complicated procedures This seems to have been successful weve had no problems with nurses undertaking treatment theyre not competent to provide

A amp E senior nurse

I make sure the nurses understand they can be dangerous people If theyre not aware of their limitations theyre not suitable for A amp E work

A amp E senior nurse o

Also one department which had comparatively few nurses discouraged them from increasing the range of treatments they performed so that their workload did not become overwhelming

18

For diagnosis the A amp E departments made heavy use of the x-ray departments (The Design and Evaluation Unit study [21 estimated that 30 per cent of A amp E attenders had an x-ray during their visit) Some A amp E departments found their arrangements with the x-ray department very convenient with an x-ray machine aVailable 24 hours a day in or close to the A amp E department and with patients and x-ray films or reports returning within an hour At other hospitals arrangements Were less convenient in some places reporting bac k of x-rays took two or three hours delaying patients considerably while in others the x-ray departmentmiddot was located on a different floor from the A amp E ~epartment causing difficulties in transporting and accompanying patients there

Little use was made of the laboratory services other than for blood and urine tests and arrangements were generally satisfactory However in many hospitals x-ray and laboratory staff had to be called in to perform tests out of hours and because of the expense involved these out of hours tests were discouraged Some house surgeons found this a difficult situation

I I m caught between contradictory pressures the orthopaedic surgeons say that x-rays are necessary for proper diagnosis and the hospital board is trying to limit out of hours x-rays to save money

House surgeon

DISPOSAL

After treating the patient the A amp E doctor decides on the appropriate disposal discharging from care arranging follow-up treatment by referring to another source of care or recalling to the A amp E department or admitting the patient Information on disposal was only readily available from three A amp E departments The most common disposal pattern was in fact discharging from care with 40 to 55 per cent of patients making a first Visit being discharged

TABLE I PROPORTION OF FIRST ATTENDANCE PATIENrs DISCHARGED RECALLED REFERRED OR ADMITTED

Discharged Recalled Referred to Admitted Other First to A amp E GP Specialist attendance

Clinic tallied

Waikato l 393 132 222 99 134 19 25 707 Green Lane2 550 220 110 40 80 Unknown Taranaki 41 5 268 73 103 116 24 164

1 From McRaes study of Waikato A amp E departmen~ in 1979 2 From a study carried out by Green Lane A amp E department

19

FOLLOW-UP CARE

The decision to be made on follow-up care was usually between re~alling to the A amp E department or referring back to the patient I s general practitioner Some A amp E departments also referred patients (especially children) to district nurses or patients with work 1n]uries to an occupational health nurse or clinic Many departments referred fracture patients to orthopaedic clinics held in the hospital outpatients department and one A amp E department which was very short of space referred patients needing redressings to the outpatients department

There were large differences in referral practices (see Table 1) Between 13 and 27 per cent of first attenders were recalled to the A amp E department for follow-up care while 15 to 30 per cent were referred elsewhere either to a general practitioner or to a specialist clinic Also recall attendances expressed as a proportion of total attendances varied considerably among the A amp E departments from 10 per cent to 50 per cent (see Chapter 6 Table 11) and clearly reflected different follow-up practices

All of the urban and two of the provincial A amp E departments had a policy of referring most patients requiring follow-up care to a general practitioner and of keeping recall visits as low as possible This was similar to general policy in both Britain and the United States which appears to discourage re-at tendance at A amp E departments [34] However in the suburban rural and other provincial A amp E departments the decision on follow-up care was left to the judgement of the A amp E doctor

In practice however the choice to refer or to recall was reiated to several factors First the decision related to characteristics of the patients If the patients had serious wounds or burns or injuries which could develop complications they were usually recalled They were also recalled if the A amp E staff thought they would not receive appropriate care at home or they would not see a general practitioner for follow-up care Patients living a long way from the hospital were usually referred to their general practitioner At some A amp E departments patients were given the choice of referral or recall according to A amp E staff comments most chose to return to theA amp E department

The patients prefer to come back to the hospital Money is not a factor in this because the ACC pays for accident treatment at the general practitioner

A amp E nurse

Second there were general practitioner factors If the local general practitioners were unhappy about the A amp E department recalling patients or if a general practitioner had referred the patient to the department originally the A amp E doctors would refemiddotr rather than recall However if the A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner did not have the facilities and in some cases the ability to provide follow-up care (eg for serious woundS eye injuries) they would recall the patient

Some GPs dont like following up care initiated by the A amp E department or dont have the necessary facilities so I tend not to send patients back to them

A amp E officer

20

Im more likely to refer a patient back to a GP who is reliable

House surgeon

Third many of the house surgeons said they would recall patients if they were interested in the condition or if they were worried about their diagnosis and treatment and wanted to see the outcome Several medical superintendents noted that recalling under these circumstances was acceptable because it comprised part of the house surgeons training

Fourth the workload of the A amp E department sometimes affected the follow-up decision with very busy departments actively discouraging recalls And finally there was the philosophy of A amp E medicine held by the A amp E doctor In one department where the A amp E officer considered it an ethical duty to see any treatment initiated through to a successful conclusion almost all patients who needed follow-up care were recalled At two other departments the A amp E officers stressed the importance of being able to deal efficiently with any emergencies presenting they kept recalls low so that the department was not clogged with extra patients Other A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner could provide better continuity of care than the A amp E department so they referred as many patients as possible

When referring patients to the general practitionermiddot most of the A amp E doctors made a verbal recommendation to the patient and then relied on the patient to attend the general practitioner They would only write a formal referral letter if the patients condition was serious In several A amp E departments however greater efforts were made to inform the patient t s general practitioner Three departments gave referred patients cyclostyled forms with details of diagnosis and treatment to be passed to their general practitioner while the Whakatane department sent a copy of the A amp E record form to each patients general practitioner

ADMISSIONS

Table I suggests that between a and 14 per cent of all first attendances were admitted to the hospitals Admissions could well be higher for children Kljakovic [5] found that 20 per cent of the children presenting at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments were admitted

The A amp E departments were involved in several different pathways for the admission of acutely ill or injured patients (Scheduled admissions did not involve the A amp E department at any of the hospitals visited) Self-referred patients could be admitted directly from the A amp E department to the wards or could be cared for in a holding (or acute admitting) ward before going to the wards

There was considerable variation among the hospitals as to which members of the medical staff were able to admit patients At some of the urban hospitals only the registrars could admit while at others the A amp E doctor could admit if the registrar was delayed and unable to assess the patient quickly At some of the provincial and one of the urban hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit in consultation with the admitting officer or appropriate registrar while at-another urban hospital and the rural A amp E departments the A amp E doctors regularly admitted patients

21

Hospitals with lower levels of bed occupancy were more likely to allow A amp E doctors to admit Senior A amp E doctors were more likely to play a role in admissions (actually admitting patients or advising the registrar) than house surgeons

Some patients referred by a general practitioner for acute admission also passed through the A amp E department At one hospital the general practitioners rang the A amp E officer to arrange for all acute admissions and all such GP-referred patients were seen first in the A amp E department However more usually the general practitioners rang the appropriate registrar to make arrangements and the registrar decided whether to admit the patient directly to the wards or through the A amp E department The involvement of A amp E staff with patients requiring admission ranged from almost none (where the patient went directly from the A amp E department to the ward or specialist unit) to a full initial assessment including tests (often undertaken at the request of the registrar responsible for the patient) bull

Generally the A amp E doctors were satisfied with the admission procedures However at one hospital where the A amp E doctors could not admit patients waiting for admission tended to clog the department The doctorselt that if they had admission rights the situation would be remedied

DISCUSSION

There were few differences among the A amp E departments in the reception and sorting of patients However there were differences in some aspects of treatment follow-up care and admission procedures

lhe role of the A amp E nurses in treatment varied considerably with some departments allowing nurses to initiate and perform many treatments and other departments allowing little autonomy Careful training and selection were essential before nurses increased their responsibility for treatment bull

Policies on follow-up care differed among the departments with the urban and provincial departments generally referring patients to general practitioners and the rural and suburban departments leaving the referral decision to the A amp E doctor In practice however the differences were less clear-cut with several factors other than the patient I s condition affecting the follow-up care decisions These factors included the A amp E staffs communicat ion with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs of house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors philosophy with regard to A amp E medicine

The A amp E departments also differed considerably in thei r procedures for acute admissions At some hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit an A amp E patient while at others the patient had to be held in the department until admitted by a registrar Also at some hospitals patients referred by general practitioners for acute admission were seen in the A amp E department before going to a ward While having to hold patients sometimes caused

clogging in the department A amp E staff were generally satisfied with the procedures

22

REfERENCES

1 WEINERMAN E Richard RUfZEN S Robert and PEARSON David shyEffects of medical -triage- in hospital emergency service in Public health reports - v 80 no 5 (May 1965) p 389-399

2 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

3 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM (68)83

4 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL Jenkins - St Louis Hosby 1975

5 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

23

CHAPTER 4

Phy~i~~1 c~~raft~rhtics of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the physical characteristics of A amp E departments their overall size location and layout as well as specific areas within the departments It discusses the effects of the physical characteristlcs on the organisation and functioning of the A amp E departments Our investigation worked from the detailed base established in bullAccident and emergency departments a studY of planning r~quirements a report prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation gnit Departmellt of HeCilth [1]

PRINCIPLES

The 1973 Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit (DEU) report [l] outlined the following principles to be applied in designing A amp E departments

o the A amp E department must be patients seeking emergency care

ready to receive and deal with

o the A amp E department mus~ be able load within a reasonable period

to cope with an average i

busy

o the A amp E department must be capable of adaptation to exceptional situations arising from major accidents ltgtrqther disasters

o the layout should be simple easily unqerstood and compact

o the layout and procedures should facilitate easy flow of patients through the department

o spaces should be multipurpose to give greatest versatility

o p~tient ~ovew~n~ should be minimised )

priv~cy for patientsshould be provided as far as is practicable andconsistent with the need for supervisi0rt

SIZE

There was considerable variation in the total sizes of the A amp E -a~1-ftment~ vi~ited witll floor areas ranging from 250 sql1a~e metres to 2115 ~guare m~ties (see Table 2) Eight of the 14 departments visited had i

hhid1pgw~fd~oracUte admitting ward However even wt)en ~he area of th~ f~ ~ bull ~middotc1~A~- _ ~ - bull bull ~

AampE department WCiS adjusted for the presence of a holding ward this I~1-getv~-rH~tion in irea reniained

24

TABLE 2 AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Total area Holding ward Adjusted total Waiting room area areal area

sqm sqm sqm sqm

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 2 115 225 1 890 55 Middlemore 1 045 140 905 50 Green Lane 960 240 720 70 Wellington 575 190 385 75 Hutt 270 270 30 Christchurch 470 470 40 Dunedin 635 90 545 20

Provincial Rotorua 515 20 495 90 Taranaki Base 720 90 630 40 Timaru 605 70 535 80

Rural Whakatane 430 430 20 Grey 310 310 15

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 255 255 30 Kenepuru 540 540 30

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area Considerable sharing with outpatients department

The area of the A amp E department was not closely related to the attendance (see Table 3) Obviously there is a certain minimum size for an A amp E department since certain facilities are essential regardless of the attendance served Thus as would be expected the rural and to a lesser extent the provincial A amp E departments had high area to attendance ratios However even within the group of urban A amp E departments there was a fourfold difference in the total area to attendance ratio

The design at Auckland~ laid out along several corridors with many separate consulting and treatment rooms possibly contributed to its high ratio At Wellington Hutt and Christchurch hospitals staff commented on their difficulties working in cramped conditions The lack of space often forced staff to work under extreme pressure to move patients through the departments very quickly

25

TABLE 3 AREA TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR ADJUSTED TOTAL AREAS 1 AND WAITING AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS BY FIRST ATTENDANCE2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Adjusted total area to attendance ratio Waiting area to to attendance ratio

Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 first attendance total attendance total attendance pa p a p a

Full-time departments ~

Urban Auckland 323 291 08 Middlemore 232 157 09 Green Lane 3 230 168 16 Wellington 80 69 13 Hutt 82 63 07 Christchurch 76 64 05 Dunedin 200 143 05

Provincial Rotorua 404 293 53 Taranaki Base 609 399 25 Timaru 466 266 403

Rural Whakatane 718 490 23 Grey 805 61 2 30

Part-time departments

Suburban I INorth Shore 272 148 17

Kenepuru 924 597 33

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Considerable sharing with outpatients department

Spearman rank correlations [2] of adjusted total area with

( a) first attendance r = 0310 p gt 010 Not significant ( b) total attendance r = 0297 pgt 010 Not significant

26

LOCATION

There is broad agreement that the A amp E department should be located on the ground floor well signposted and easily accessible to ambulatory patients and ambulances The ambulance entrance should be able to handle several ambulances at once and should have adequate turning space It should be projected from the weather and screened from the view of the other A amp E department patients

The A amp E department should also be located as closely as possible to radiology facilities (either the x-ray department itself or a branch) The A amp E department and the outpatients department can share some facilities and provide additional staff and accommodation in an emergen~y

situation if they are sited together Acute patient care areas (operating theatres intensive care unitsmiddot and cardiac care units) and laboratory services should also be readily accessible from the A amp E department [134]

Entrances

Almost all of the A amp E departments visited were on the ground floor of the hospital and were well signposted Generally access for ambulatory patients was good apart from two hospitals where they had to walk up steps to enter the building o

Few departments had ambulance access which could cope with a shuttle of ambulances bringing mass casualties from a disaster There w~s little relation between the size of the department or the population served and the ease of ambulance flow Indeed those departments with a relatively low probability of being involved in a mass casualty situation had good ambulance flow (eg Whakatane) while those with a greater possibility had relatively poor ambulance access (eg Wellington) Several departments had particularly poor a~bulance flow with only a one-lane access Three departments had good drive-straight-through access while at the rest ambulances had to reverse However there were advantages to some of the bull reversing I situations in that the bays into which the ambulances had to reverse were more likely to give the patient protection from the weather All the A amp E departments visited had separate ambulance entrances which in all but three cases guaranteed screening of ambulance patients from public view

Access to other hospital facilities

In many of the hospitals the A amp E department was adjacent to the outpatients department or to the orthopaedic outpatients section When this occurred the plaster room and x-ray facilities were usually shared and waiting areas and the records office were sometimes shared In the smaller hospitals both departments often shared the nursing staff

The access to the x-ray department ranged from excellent in places which had x-ray facilities immediately adjacent to the A amp E department to very poor where the patient had to be transported hundreds of metres and to a different floor The time taken for the A amp E doctor to get the result of the x-ray varied from five minutes to over two hours though the physical separation of the two departments was only one of the factors which affected this

27

Access to acute care facilities was similarly variable In Christchurch the intensive care unit was adjacent to the A amp E department while in Rotorua it was at the other end of the hospital In many cases additions or alterations to the hospital buildings and changes of function of certain areas have meant that the A amp E department no longer bears the same physical relationship to other hospital departments as was originally the case

LAYOUT

Several studies have concluded that the A amp Edepartment should be designed so that there is an orderly progression of patients from registration to examination to investigations if necessary to treatment and to referral admission or discharge Staff time and effort is best conserved by a compact plan with waiting areas and treatment areas easily accessible and supervised However the need for easy supervision has to be balanced by consideration of the patients privacy Two basic A amp E plans have evolved

o a radial plan where the waiting examination and treatment rooms are arranged on the perimeter of the departmentmiddot with the nurses station doctors room and records office in the centre

o a linear plan where the examination and treatment rooms are arranged down each side of a corridor with the waiting area records office and staff offices at one end [145]

Many of the A amp E departments visited had a linear layout with the largest Auckland being arranged along several corridors In these departments staff often commented that their overall view of the patients was not good and a considerable amount of walking was needed to supervise them Middlemore A amp E department and the treatment areas of several other departments had radial layouts which staff found very satisfactory Generally the A amp E staff prefer red open plan layouts using curtained cubicles rather than enclosed rooms Staff (especially nursing staff) often commented that their department would be better if certain walls or partitions were removed to give easier surveillance of the department as a whole However staff also commented on the relative lack of privacy for patients being examined or treated and noted that some private rooms were needed for instance for obstetric or paediatric patients

Waiting area

There is general agreement that the waiting area should be adjacent to the reception desk easily visible to the receptionist and if possible overlooked by the nurses office or station It should be a cheerful comfortable area with toys provided for children and a range of magazines and books Public toiletspublic telephones and arrangements for refreshments are also needed [146]

The size of the waiting area varied considerably among the A amp E departments visited (refer back tomiddot Table 2) Again this variation bore little relationship to the workload of the department (see Table 3) Some waiting areas were clearly too small and this put pressure on the staff to deal with patients quickly in order to clear the waiting room

28

Staff comments suggested that not only the size of the waiting area but also its design affected its crowding Basically square rooms with seats around the edges had fewer problems than corridor-style rooms with only one row of seats

In all the A amp E departments visited the waiting areas were adjacent to the reception area Sometimes they were visible from the nurses office or work area but where this was not possible the nurses relied on the receptionists to alert them to urgent cases or checked the wai Hng area often themselves

Facilities in waiting areas varied from nothing but seats to areas in which there were hot and cold drink dispensing machines a childrens play area with toys and health-related poster and pamphlet displays Some had a TV set or a tropical fish tank Most staff were agreed that a pleasant atmosphere in the waiting room was important and adVerse comments about the waiting area were made by staff in departments which lacked this In some departments staff commented that vandalism made it difficult to retain facilities and a pleasant atmosphere

Examination and treatment area

The examination and treatment area provides for the needs of all A amp E patients other than those with serious conditions requiring the resuscitation room or those needing special facilities such as plastering Because special purpose areas are frequently under-utilised flexibility is a key requi rement Hence multipurpose cubicles with standardised equipment are usually recommended The cubicles must be big enough to give easy access for patients (not necessarily walking) to accommodate eqUipment and to give staff enough room to work Curtained cubicles are generally sufficient but at least one enclosed cubicle is required for patients needing extra privacy or for light control in eye examinations A cubicle especially set up for children (with appropriately-sized equipment toys and posters) is also desirable [1346]

Most of themiddot A ~ E departments visited had curtained cubicles in the examination and treatment area with perhaps one or two enclosed cubicles or rooms as well Four A amp E departments only had separate rooms for treatment Curtained cubicles made for ease of access while separate rooms did present some difficulties in manoeuvering patient trolleys and wheelchairs In one case it was impossible to get a patient trolley into the room at all and the room was consequently little used

Curtained cubicles did afford greater flexibility in use and did provide more room to work but had the disadvantage of being considerably less private than rooms Surveillance was easier in departments with curtains than those withmiddot walls and doors In the Auckland A amp E department treatment rooms doors had been removed in the interests of improved surveillance Staff in this department commented that its rigid design could lead to difficulties in accommodating a large number of patients in a disaster

The DEU report [1] recommended that the number of cubicles required by an A amp E department was NIlS where N is the anticipated average number of new patients per day It noted that in A amp E departments with few new patients per day a minimum of two cubicles should be provided It also recommended that the flow of recalled patients should be regulated so that they did not greatly affect the need for cubicles

29

As can be seen from Table 4 most departments had enough cubicles to cope with their first attendance workload Even applying the DEU recommendation of N18 to their total attendance most of the departments had an adequate number of cubicles The exceptions were Hutt Christchurch and Dunedin

TABLE 4 NUMBERS OF EXAMINATION AND TREATMENT CUBICLES OR ROOMS AND RECOMMENDED NUMBERS l BASED ON FIRST ATTENDANCE 2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Actual number of DEU recommended numbers (minimum of 2) cubiclesrooms based on

first attendance total attendance pa pa

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 13 89 99 Middlemore 9 59 88

Green Lane 7 40 65 Wellington 10 73 85 Hutt 4 51 66 Christchurch 7 94 11 2 Dunedin 3 41 58

Provincial Rotorua 4 2 26 Taranaki Base 4 2 24 Timaru 6 2 31

Rural Whakatane 3 2 2 Grey 3 2 2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3 8 22 37 Kenepuru3 6 22 30

1 Based on DEU report [l which recommended NIS cubicles where N average number of new patients per day ie N6750 where N = average first attendance pa

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Recommended numbers increased to adjust for North Shore and Kenepuru treating their attendance numbers in part-time rather than full-time hours

30

Resuscitation area

The resusciation area is used for the immediate life--saving treatment of seriously injured or sick patients It is the acute treatment area in contrast to the examination and treatment area which is used for relatively minor procedures In making its recommendations about the resuscitation area the DEU report [I] balanced the probability of the A amp E department having to treat multiple accident victims with the comparative rarity of use of resuscitation rooms It recommended that a resuscitation room of suff icient size to deal with two patients concurrently be provided in all A amp E departments It also noted that the ambulance entrance and resuscitation area should be located as close together as possible

Most of the departments visited had purpose-built resuscitation rooms of varying size and with varying degrees of sophistication in equipment Some had x-ray facilities in the resuscitat ion area and in those that did not its absence was regarded as a serious impediment to the efficient care of severe trauma

In four of the seven urban A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms were regarded by the staff as being too small The comment was made in one urban department that because of the small size of the resuscitation area patients sometimes had to be moved out of the area before it was felt clinically desirable to do so in order to accommodate incoming patients In the rural and prOVincial A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms wereshyadequate for the demands placed on them

Most resuscitation rooms were sited close to the ambulance entrance and afforded good access to stretcher patients However in three A amp E departments patients had to be moved some distance and in another department up one floor by lift

Operating theatre

In discussing provision of operating theatres in the A amp E departments the DEU report [1] noted that

o most surgery done is minor requires only local anaesthesia and could be done within adequately designed cubicles

o the A amp E department is not a proper place for general anaesthesia

o using A amp Etheatres for day surgery tends to block other A amp E facilities and staff causin~ delay in treating A amp E patients

The report concluded that special facilities appear to be justified only if there is a clear intention of widening the scope of accident surgery in the departments

bullMinor ops theatres of varying sizes and equipped to varying standards were available in many departments Very variable use was made of such theatres - never in some departments to daily in others It was used less in departments with very heavy workloads and where the medical staff were not satisfied that sufficiently sterile conditions could be maintained In one department the theatre was only used for day surgery cases

31

Plaster room

In the plaster room casts are applied and removed and fractures and dislocations can be manipulated The DEU report [1] noted that the plaster room could be an integral part of the A amp E department or shared with the orthopaedic department or belonging entirely to the latter It recommended that the plaster room be close to the A amp E department and the x-ray department

Most departments had a separate plaster room available In many cases this was shared with an adjacent orthopaedic outpatients or fracture clinic Th~ staff generally found the plaste~-rooms satisfactory although two particularly narrow rooms were difficult to work in

Interview room

The DEU report [l] recommended that A amp E departments in medium-sized and larger hospitals should have a small interview room where a patient IS

relatives could talk with A amp E staff the police or others

No A amp E department had a room specifically designated as an interview room for bereaved or distressed relatives although one A amp E department shared such a room with another department In most departments one of the staff off ices was generally used for this purpose In departments where staff offices were small or crowded the lack of an interview room was seen as a serious flaw in departmental layout

Reception and records office

The reception desk should be immediately visible to ambulant patients arriving at the A amp E department and it is desirable for the receptionist to be aware of what is happening at the ambulance entrance as well The current A amp E records should be held at the reception desk or nearby [1]

In the A ampE departments visited the reception desk was usually well-placed for dealing with ambulant patients but in only four cases did it overlook the ambulance entrance In two departments the reception desk was some distance from the treatment area (separated by a waiting room or outpatients room) and the nursing staff found it difficult to oversee incoming patients Current A amp E records were held at the reception desk in all but one of the departments visited The amount of space available in relation to the throughput of patients was a major factor in determining the length of time records could be kept within the department This in turn affected the ease and therefore speed of record retrieval

Staff offices

These ranged from non existent to very cramped spaces serving many other functions to pleasant specifically designated and relatively quiet areas The latter offices are conducive to good staff morale and being a place for exchange of views and experiences could be expected to contribute quite markedly to the overall effectiveness and eff iciency of the department

32

Holding ward

The DEU report [1] said that holding beds should be used primarily for A amp E patients requiring a period of observation prior to a decision about admission or for those who could be expected to go home after a rest period The report noted that using holding beds as recovery beds for day patients for arranged admissions or for pre-admission clinics was not desirable

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments visited had holding or acute admitting wards These holding wards were used mainly for assessing patients requiring acute admission but in some hospitals were also used for observing patients (eg with suspected concussion) and for holding night admissions till the morning to save disturbing the wards Neither of the rural A amp E departments had a holding ward although one had an I A amp E admission procedure where a patient could be admitted for up to 24 hours for observation without the need for full admission procedures In the A amp E departments with holding wards a patient staying for more than four hours was formally admitted

Our study showed that the A amp E departments had some problems using holding wards properly In two A amp E departments holding wards were little used at night because nursing levels were too low to staff them safely In another department the beds were used for patients recovering from day surgery and even for some pre-ar ranged admissions At times general practitioner-referred admissions could also clog the holding wards

DISCUSSION

Most of the A amp E departments were generally adequate in size location and layout The exceptions were Christchurch and Butt where conditions were very cramped with particularly limited examination and treatment areas and poor layout We understand that improvements are planned at Hutt and that recent extensions have improved the Christchurch department considerably but at the time of our visits staff in both these departments were working under extreme pressure because of the physical conditions

Despite the general adequacy of the departments almost all had some flaw which affected their operation and inconvenienced staff and patients Major flaws found in several A amp E departments included

o ambulance access unsuitable for a shuttle of ambulances in a disaster

o difficult access to the x-ray department

o resuscitation room too small for easy treatment of more than one patient at a time

o no interview room for relatives of patients

33

REFERENCES

1 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

2 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

3 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 44-49

4 Emer~ency department organisation and management edited by A L Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975 p 8-16

5 Design of departments in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) p 1204-7

6 McKINLAY Robin - The care of children in New Zealand hospitals -Aucklandmiddot National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1982 p 79-80

35

CHAPTER 5

Staffing of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the staffing both medical and nursing looking at their numbers and experience their previous training and the training they receive in the A amp E department and their satisfaction with their work and conditions We also describe the clerical and reception staff and briefly the involvement of other workers (orderlies social workers and ambulance personnel) in the departments

MEDICAL STAFFING

Senior medical staffing

Organising appropriate medical staffing for hospital emergency services is a prQblem in many countries [1] The variety of staffing arrangements in A amp E departments within many countries suggests that none have established a generally satisfactory pattern of medical staffing

The Platt report [2] found that in Br itish A amp E departments the great majority of patients were seen by junior staff only and that supervision of the A amp E departments by conSUltants was often little more than nominal The committee recommended that

o the junior medical staff should be adequately supervised by consultants

o a consultant orthopaedic surgeon should normally be in charge of theA amp E unit

o an accident and emergency unit should have at least three consultant surgeons each giving a substantial part of their time to this work

o the primary task of general practitioners in emergency services is to deal with minor accidents and emergencies at any time of the day or night (by organising a rota to answer emergency calls within their practice by working sessions in A amp E departments or by attending cottage hospitals at short notice for emergency calls) bull

Since then some progress has been made but standards continue to lag behind those recommended [34] There has been considerable debate over the appropriate staffing arrangements for A amp E departments Some hospitals have implemented the Platt report recommendations others have appointed a full-time A amp E specialist others have employed a full-time non-specialist doctor and some have employed general practitioners

Despite the various systems there is a consensus in both the United States and Britain that experienced medical staffmiddot are essential in the A amp E department They are necessary for prompt effective treatment of emergency conditions for efficient running of the departments and for adequate supervision of the junior doctors employed [23567 p 17-23]

36

Similar concerns have been expressed in New Zealand since the Board of Health report on outpatient services in 1960 [8] This report recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times and staffed by experiencedmedical officers

Salmond [9] found that when a senior A amp E officer directed the department A amp E work was handled more efficiently and house surgeons were more closely supervised and supported He suggested that one senior member of the hospital staff (ideally a full-time A amp E officer) should accept full responsibility for the overall supervision of A amp E services

Most of the A amp E departments that we visited had an A amp E officer The position was vacant at both Wellington and Hutt hospitals at the time of our visit while at North Shore Hospital responsibility for the A amp E department was shared by two senior doctors The A amp E departments of the rural hospitals had no senior medical staff

In A amp E departments with heavy workloads additional experienced doctors were often employed as deputy A amp E officers usually medical officer special scale or as Medical Reserve Scheme registrars (see Table 5) There was no general practitioner staffing of any of the Aamp E departments visited although general practitioners had been part-time staff of some of themiddot smaller A amp E departments in previous years One medical superintendent commented that since very few general practitioners could be classified as specialists they could only be paid as medical officers special scale This low level of payment acted as a disincentive to general practitioner recruitment

The A amp E officers usually worked normal office hours (830 am - 430 pm or 9 am - 5 pm weekdays) apart from two who worked part-time covering morning periods If additional experienced doctors were employed they usually covered evening periods (eg 5 pm - 10 pm) and weekend day shifts

There was a wide range of experience among the A amp E officers Half of the senior A amp E doctors had a general practice background and these doctors often had specific surgical medical pharmacological or Armed Forces medical experience as well Several A amp E officers had primarily a surgical background while others had a considerable range of hospital experience In hospitals where the A amp E officers had a general practice background the Medical Superintendent or the A amp E officer often stressed the suitability of this background for A amp E work

An extensive general practitioner background is useful in dealing with the multitude of problems seen in an Accident and Emergency department An orthopaedic or surgical background is not as necessary because of the good backup from the specialties And staff who have only had hospital experience particularly junior staff can lack skills in general assessment and triage

A amp E officer

In other hospitals staff stressed that an orthopaedic and surgical background was very valuable as was experience in dealing with specific types of injury such as soft tissue wounds

37

TABLE 5 MEDICAL STAFFING OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington2

Hutt2

Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Senior medical staffing

Number of full-time equivalents

A amp E officer ( including deputies) 25 15 I 16

I 2

I 03 I

2 05

Registrar

06

1 1

House surgeons

Number on Number A amp E runs covering

some shifts in A amp E deptl

6 2-3 6 2 5 I 5 4 2-3 5 2 2

All on rotating basis 1 3 1 2

5 on rotating basis 4 on rotating basis

None in A amp E dept 4 on rotating basis

1 On general relieving duties 2 Senior A amp E position vacant at time of visit

Junior medical staffing

The issues

Junior medical staffing of A amp E departments has concerned many commentators in the United States Britain and New Zealand The Platt report [2] noted that recently qualified staff when serving in the casualty department undertake responsibility which they would not have in the wards or outpatient clinics

38

In 1960 the New Zealand Board of Health report [8] on out-patient services deplored the staffing of casualty departments by I relatively inexperienced men [sic] and suggested that these staff I should be regarded more as assistants under supervision and training than responsible officers in the outpatients departments The undesirability of staffing A amp E departments with first year house surgeons (or pre-registration doctors) has been reiterated since Junior doctors are often unsure when to ask for advice or help and are sometimes unwilling to admit that they are over-tired and unable to cope [91011)

The report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers [12] noted the heavy load carried by house surgeons working long shifts in A amp E departments It also commented that when house surgeons are required to look after the A amp E department while carrying out ward duties inadequate cover of the A amp E department could result

The New Zealand situation

The urban A amp E departments had between two and six house surgeons working on three month A amp E runs and in several of these hospitals another one to three house surgeons on general relieving duties covered some A amp E shifts There were more house surgeons in A amp E departments with heavier workloads or with fewer senior medical staff The provincial and rural departments did not usually have house surgeons working on specific A amp E runs rather the A amp E department was covered by all (or most) of the house surgeons in the hospital on a rotatng basis Of the two suburban A amp E departments Kenepuru was covered by the house surgeons on a rotating basis while North Shore did not have any house surgeons because there was no inpatient or consultative backup available (see Table 5)

The total medical staffing of the departments (senior A amp E doctors and house surgeons together) ranged from 10 to 100 full-time equivalents and was closely related to the attendance at the departments (see Table 6) The provincial and rural A amp E departments had higher medical staff to attendance ratios because they had to provide a 24-hour service regardless of the size of the attendance

Each A amp E department visited rostered its house surgeons differently depending on the availability of senior medical staff the workload of the department and the house surgeons other duties In the urban departments house surgeons worked between 45 and 60 hours a week on shifts usually 8 to 12 hours long Many of the house surgeons working in these departments complained about long shifts and suggested that more staff were needed to reduce the shift lengths Split shifts were also unpopular

The most worrying aspect of the staff ing arrangements in bhe Accident and Emergency department is the long hours We need another house surgeon to reduce the hours on some shifts and to proviae another pair of hands in busy periods (eg Friday and Saturday night Sunday afternoon)

House surgeon

39

TABLE 6 TOTAL MEDICAL STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND MEDICAL STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE I AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Total medical Total medical staffing to staffing attendance ratio

FTE per FTE per 10000 first 10000 total

Full-time attendance attendance equivalents p a pa

Full-time departments

Urban

Auckland2 100 17 15 Middlemore2 91 23 16 Green Lane2 65 25 15 Wellington 66 14 12 Hutt2 55 17 13 Christchurch 70 11 10 Dunedin2 60 22 16

Provincial Rotorua 42 34 25 Taranaki Base2 28 27 18 Timaru 22 19 11

Rural Whakatane3 15 25 17 Grey 10 26 20

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 20 21 12 Kenepuru3 20 34 22

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE estimated since A amp E department partially covered by house

surgeons on general relieving duties 3 FTE estimated since A amp E department covered by house surgeons on

rotating basis

Spearman rank correlations [131 of total medical staffing with

(a) first attendance r = 0953 p lt 001 (b) total attendance r = 0933 p 001

In the provincial and rural hospitals house surgeons were often on call for long shifts over nights and weekends They were usually covering a ward or the whole hospital at the same time and simultaneous demands from the wards and the A amp E department sometimes caused problems However

40

these house surgeons generally found their rostering satisfactory despite the long hours on call perhaps because the actual work required in the A amp E department was comparatively light

An ordinary week night is usually quiet after midnight thered be three to five calls and Id have to get up once on average Weekend nights are busier but I usually get at least two or three hours sleep

House surgeon

Several house surgeons were irritated that while they worked more intensively on A amp E runs than on ward runs they spent fewer hours on-call and consequently they were paid less

Supervision by senior medical staff

In the larger A amp F departments house surgeons worked with the senior medical staff on most day and some evening shifts only on night shifts (and some evening shifts) were house surgeons the sole medical staff in a department By contrast in the smaller and part-time departments house surgeons covered the department alone seldom working with any senior A amp E medical staff

Several nurses commented that the A amp E department ran less efficiently outside normal working hours because the house surgeons inexperience meant assessment and treatment times were longer and tests were used more often than when the A amp E officer was present

Many senior medical staff in the urban A amp E departments were concerned at the lack of supervision for house surgeons outside normal working hours and so would have Ii ked more senior A amp E staff Several of the house surgeons were also concerned although others enjoyed the autonomy they had and were not concerned about working without supervision

I am not happy with house surgeons managing the A amp E department on their own They only have a three month shift in the department and often most of this time is spent learning how to do A amp E wor k The house surgeons can have problems deciding when to call a registrar to treat a patient and there can be delays in obtaining a registrar The A amp E department needs full-time trained medical staff on duty 24 hours a day to give proper supervision to the house surgeons and to run an efficient department

A amp E officer

On night shift I can feel rather alone if something goes wrong

House surgeon

I enjoy the variety of work and the independence I have to treat most patients as I see fit

House surgeon

41 _A

Arraflgements for consultative backup and support when senior A amp E staff were not on duty varied from hospital to hospital according to hospital size n urban hospitals the house surgeons would usually call on the appropriate registrar and the acute admitting or specialist teams for emergencymiddot cases In some places the house surgeons could calIon the consultant if a registrar was unavailable but this was usually seen as a last resort call In the provincial and rural hospitals the house surgeons would call on the appropriate senior doctor who was available This was usually one of the cQnsultants or a registrar if any were employed by the hospital The A amp E Qfficer might occasionally be called and in hospitals without an A~amp E oHicer th~ medical superintendent would also provid~ backup

Generally house surgeons were happy with the support they received A physically compact hospital was mentioned several times as facilitating ~ ~ fast back-up Howeve( in some hospitals there could be considerable delays in 9etting surgical and orthopaedic registrars to the A amp E department usually because they were in theatre Also at two hospitals backup in the minor specialties was considered inadequate bull

Use of first year house surgeons

Urban and suburban hospitals had a policy of using second year house surgeons as much as possible in the A amp E department and of using first year house surgeons only in their second six months This policy was generally butmiddot not always carried out For example the on-call arrangements of some urban A amp E departments resulted in inexperienced first year house surgeons working in the department In the smaller hospitals also the limited pool of house surgeons available tended to result in more first year house surgeons working in the department

The hospital could not provide cover for the A amp E department without using first year house surgeons However there are always senior staff and the medical registrar readily available as backup

Medical superintendent

When direct supervision was limited first year house surgeons did find A amp E work difficult

Training

The training received by the house surgeons in the A amp E departments varied greatly Two hospitals ran half-day or one-day orientation courses before -house surgeons started in the department Three A amp E departments ran weekly or fortnightly training sessions on specific conditions while another department ran sessions on an irregular basis However house surgeons often missed training sessions because they were treating pat~entsln more than half tmiddothe A amp E departments no formal training was giVen and house surgeons were taught on-the-job when senior A amp E staff were available This teaching placed a considerable load on senior staff

The three-monthly changeover of house surgeons is frustrating and the first month with new house surgeons is very demanding because they have little confidence or competence

A amp E officer

42

If the A amp E department had no senior staff or if the house surgeons shifts did not coincide with those of the senior staff the house surgeons had to gain their training whenever and wherever they could Both house surgeons and nurses commented that house surgeons often required guidance from the nursing staff

We get on-the-job training relying very heavily on the nurses to say IDr X (the A amp E officer) normally does bullbullbull I was rather scared the first few days in the A amp E department

House surgeon

Several house surgeons commented that they would have liked more training particularly when they were first in the A amp E department and more guidance on hospital policy and administration

Manuals (middotor sets of standingmiddot orders) out-lining the clinical and administrative procedures required under different bull circumstances have been widely recognised as essential in the A amp E department They are particularly useful to new A amp E doctors as an explanationoof their duties 7 p 79914J

Senior medical staff at 13 of the hospitals visited said they had standing orders covering ~A amp E administration procedures or were revising them These standing orders were either specific A amp E booklets or sections of the full hospital standing orders Several house surgeons commented that they found the standlng orders useful while others relied more on verbal advice from the A amp E officer or nurses Two of the latter house surgeons said they had not seen any A amp E standing orders when in fact the full hospital standing orders did contain a section on the A amp E department One A amp E department had no standing orders (apartmiddot from protocols for the care of coronary patients) and the house surgeons there would have liked more guidelines

Accident and emergency work as a career

Advantages and disadvantages

The senior medical staff who expressed their views on A amp E work as a career had all previously been general practitioners and their comments largely reflected comparisons of A amp E work with general practice They tended to cite the regular hours good conditions of service and salaries competitive with general practice as advantages of A amp E work and the limited range of clinical material and lack of continuity of care as disadvantages

When house surgeons were asked whether they would be intercested in A amp E work as careers for themselVes their responses were more negative than those of the senior ~ amp E staff All of them mentioned some disadvantages of A amp E work To those mentioned by senior staff they added the problems of irregular hours and having to deal with many trivial complaints The lack of recognition of A amp E work as a specialty (and consequent lack of status within the hospital) was also seen as a disadvantage Some mentioned the advantages cited by the senior staff and added variety of work as another advantage These advantages and disadvantages mirror those noted by British and United States writers [315]

43

Accident and emergency work as a sp~cialty

Over the past two decades in the United States the increasing use of emergency rooms has led to the development of training programmes for emergency room doctors and in 1979 to the granting of specialty status to emergency medicine The American College of Emergency Physicians in 1975 defined the emergency physician as I a specialist in breadth whose training is focused ~n the acute and the life-threatening aspects of medical care and who~ by ~he nature of his practice is available when the patient needs him [cited in 16]

vlhile emergency medicine has much the same content as family practice the different emphasis approach and method of handling have been cited as justifying a separate specialty [16] Critics have disputed the specialty status of emergency medicine stating that although a broad clinical knowledge is required this knowledge is also shallow [15]

In Britain similar debates have taken place While the Platt report [2] recommended that one consultant should be in administrative charge of an A amp E department it did not favour the development of accident surgery as a specialty in its own right nor the appointment of consultants to work full-time in A amp E departments However the Increasing number of A amp E conSUltants middotthe development of training posts and the formation of an association of A amp E consultants [4] have signaled a de facto recognition of A amp E work as a specialty The role of general practitioners in A amp E departments has also been debated Their suitability for sorting and treating casual attenders has been stressed and their ability to work without consultant supervision has been seen as an advantage 21718]

An emergency care seminar held in Auckland in 1979 recognised the inadequacy of training at all levels for work in A amp E departments in New Zealand The suggestions made to rectify this situation included the recruitment of sp~cialist -staff at a career level

Senior staff in some of the urban A amp E departments stressed the need for a post-graduate A amp E specialist training in New Zealand They gave two reasons for this that more senior staff were required to supervise and properly train house surgeons working in A amp E departments and that more senior staff were needed to improve the efficiency

More senior staff would improve standards of care speed throughput reduce the need for tests and reduce recalls as well as improving the supervision of house surgeons

A amp E officer

The staff of the smaller hospitals commented that full-time specialists could be warranted in large urban A amp E departments but were not necessary in provincial hospitals

Full-time A amp E specialists are only warranted in very big hospitals where there is enough emergency work to justify a trauma centre and 24 hour senior doctor cover A specialist cannot work well in isolation so the workload has to be large enough to justify three or four A amp E consultants

A amp E officer

44

NURSE STAFFING

Accident and emergency nursing

As noted by Jenkins [7 p41-42 J nursing in the emergency department is different from in-hospital nursing The nature of work in the department requires the ability to perceive and act quickly and to adapt to constantly changing circumstances

The A amp E nurse needs skills in assessment and examination in critical care and emergency treatment in public relations and must be able to act calmly under pressure Increasingly experienced nurses are expected to carry out triage Special training both on-the-job and in study courses is therefore essential [27 p 36 1419J

The need to have experienced senior nursing staff working in the A amp E department at all times has been recognised for many years The senior nurse in charge of the department has a key role being responsible for the day-to-day administration of the department for the supervision of the nursing care given and often for supporting the junior medical staff [259] Again as Jenkins [7 p 27] noted the emergency department nurse is one cornerstone of the department and often acts as the stablizing element in a chaotic milieu especially in those hospitals where the medical staff rotates

New Zealand arrangements

There was considerable variation in both the total numbers and the levels of experience of nursing staff among the A amp E departments (see Table 7) Some departments had a nurse supervisor in control and several charge nurses while other departments had a charge nurse in control A amp E nurses were mainly staff nurses although some departments used substantial numbers of enrolled nursesmiddot Student nurses were present in most of the departments but they were often there for a few weeks only so they have been excluded from the tables

The number of nurses on duty in the A amp E department varied over the time of the day and the day of the week with more nurses on duty at times of heavy workload such as Friday and Saturday evenings and also weekday mornings when dressing clinics were held Most departments organised some staggering of shifts so that good cover was maintained throughout the day In three of the smaller hospitals (Timaru Whakatane and Grey)middot the A amp E department was covered at night by separate nursing staff usually the night supervisors who were covering other parts of the hospital as well

In several of the small hospitals the nursing staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department Generally this was satisfactory but occasionally the steady workload of the outpatients department left the A amp E department short of nursing cover

The total nurse staffing of the A amp E departments visited ranged from 25 to 278 full-time equivalents and this variation was partially related to the attendance of the department and whether or not the department had a holding ward (see Table 8) However even after adjusting for the staff required in the holding wards there was a threefold variation in the

45

nursing staff to attendance ratios of the urban A amp E departments Other factors such as the small size of the Hutt and Christchurch A amp E departments and greater use of student nurses may have been involved

TABLE 7 NURSE STAfFING OF HOSPITAL AIDS

Nurse lt bullbull

sup~rvisors

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland l 1 Middlemorel 1 Green Lane l 1 Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin 1

Provincial Rotorua 1 Taranaki Basel

Timarul 2

Rural Whakatane2 Grey2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Charge Staff nurses Full-

Time

4 21 4 11 2 11 1 19 1 8 1 11 2 3

5 I 10 1 3

1 4 1 2

1 7middot 1 1

EXCLUDING

nurses Part-Time

2 12

7

2 2 4

1

STUDENT NURSES AND

Enrolled nurses Full- Part shytime Time

4 2

2 1 2

1 4 1

1 1

3

1 Holding ward attachedto Aamp E department covered completely or partly by A amp E nursing staff

2 A amp E department covered by separate nursing staff at night (numbers not included here)

Work in both the A amp E department and the outpatients department

The relatively low attendance at the provincial rural and suburban departments contributed to their somewhat higher nursing staff to attendance ratios The high level of nursing staff at North Shore may be related to the additional duties of nurses in that department in escorting patients to other hospitals and working in the plaster room

TABLE 8 NURSE STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND NU~E STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Nurse staffing Nur~estaffing to attendance ratios

Full-time Adjusted Adjusted FTE Adjusted PTE equiva- full-time perlOOOO per 10000 lents2 equival- first atten- total attendshy

3ents dance pa dance p a

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane4

Wellington HuH Christchurch Dunedin

270 278 172 200 1l~0 130 80

220 258 122 170 110 130 80

3bull 8 66 47 35 33 21 29

34 45 29 30 26 18 21

Provincial Rotorua4

Taranaki Base Timaru

77 160 75

77 80 55

63 77 55

46 51 27

Rural Whakatane4 Grey4

52 25

52 25

87 65

59 49

Part-time depa rtment s

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

110 28

110 28

117 48

64 31

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE calculatedfrom Table 7 (with part-timenurses counted as 05

FTE) unless exact FTE figures supplied by hospitals 3 FTE adjusted by removing nurses covering the holding ward 4 Nurses covering both the A amp E department and the outpatients department counted as 07 FTE in the A amp E department and separate night nursing staff counted as 10 FTE extra

Spearman rank correlations (13] of adjusted nurse staffing with

( a) first attendance r = 0869 p lt 001 ( b) total attendance r = 0895 P lt 001

47

In seven A amp E departments nurses were satisfied with staffing arrangements liowever nurses in four departments (not necessarily those with relatively ~~w nurses) said that nurse numbers were too low while at two other departments weekend shortages of nurses and diff iculty getting replacements for numiddotreesmiddotmiddot off sick were mentioned as problems One hospitals policy of rotating all nurses at or below staff nurse level throughout the h6spital was criticised because it left too few nurses with A amp E experiance worlting in t)le department At another hospital nurses appreciated the reguiar check made on their job satisfaction by the nurse supervisors

In several A amp E departmentsmiddotmiddotr-ourseswere dissatisfied with the medical staffing arrangements~Cl some wani~d a senior doctor interested in A amp E work in charge of the department Others wanted A amp E doctors to spend

Imiddot ~~fU

more time in the department ~specially outside normal working hours

Training

In most of th~ A amp E departments visited junior nurses received on-the-job training wo~king alongside semor nurses and being rotateQ through different areas of the department However where a department was short of nursing staff or had a heavy workload senior nurses often had insuffficient time to teach the junior nurses Senior nurses often found that training new hurses both increased their workload markedly and slowed down the work of the department However as one principal nurse said

We train nurses on-the-job If we waited for experienced nurses to app1Y we I d nev~rltlet them

Principal nurse

At several A amp E departments junior nurses did not work either on their own or in areas requiring more judgement (for example the resuscitation room or the waiting room) until they were more experienced Often this changeover did not happen until the nurses in charge of the department had made a formal appraisal of the junior nurse There was a consensus among senior A amp E nurses that three to six months working in the department was required to train an A amp E nurse

I think A amp E nurses need a three month training course - their student training is not enough A nurse needs three to six months experience before she is fully competent to work permanently in the A amp E department Also its difficult to get fully trained on-the-job in a smaller hospital because theres too few patients coming through

A amp E nurse

Usually some form of procedure manual orientation book andor job description was provided for the nursing staff outlining their duties and responsibilities in the A amp E department A few departments also ran occasional lectures and inservice training At Auckland Middlemore and North Shore hospitals the A amp E department ran specific inservice training courses for staff nurses

48

The course at Auckland for example took six nurses at a time involved one study day per fortnight over 10-12 months and covered all aspects of A amp E work Nurses had to have six months experience in the A amp E

department before taking the course Senior nurses commented that the courses were valuable in improving the nurses abilities confidence and morale and felt that nurses who had been through the courses tended to stay in the department longer and were less prone to absenteeism Junior nurses at several hospitals without A amp E training courses said they would find such a course useful

At more than half the A amp E departments visited nurses commented on the necessity for them to guide the house surgeons particularly early in the three-month runs

The junior medical staff training is on-the-job and its largely done behind the door by the nursing staff The nurses will encourage the house surgeon to call a consultant if necessary (but not in front of a patient) or if they are very worried the nurses will ring a consultant themselves The house surgeons this year are very good and pleasant but it can be very wearying when they begin their three month shifts

A amp E nurse

At some hospitals this need to guide house surgeons had provilt1ed the impetus for developing A amp E nurse training courses

Many of the nurses said that they enjoyed A amp E nursing because of its specialised nature It had a fast pace and a stop-start quality thereI

was never a routine because of the high patient turnover the variety of complaints presenting and the drama associated with some cases As with the house surgeons nurses often found themselves carrying more responsibility working in the A amp E department than in the wards and they relished this Several hospitals had waiting lists of nurses wishing to work in the A amp E depart~entbull

OTHER STAFF INVOLVED WITH THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

An efficient and effective A amp E department needs not only adequate medical and nursing staff it also requires secretarial clerical reception and orderly staff [27 p 24-251

Reception and clerical staff

Most urban A amp E departments had receptionist cover 24 hours a day Usually therewere two or three receptionists on duty during the day with one receptionist on duty during evenings and at night At the provincial departments and at Hutt and Dunedin departments reception staff covered days (and sometimes evenings) for seven days a week In the rural A amp E departments a receptionist was on duty weekdays only When the receptionist was not on duty nursing staff carried out the duties In several of the smaller hospitals patients arriving at night were first seen by the hospital telephonist who then called the nursing staff

Usually the receptionists duties were to note the patients details on the A amp E record form and on the A amp E log The receptionists often helped with triage by alerting nursing staff to urgent cases In some

49

departments the receptionist also dealt with Ace forms made appointments for return visits and carried out admitting procedures at night However in one hospital the reception staff were not specifically attached to the A amp E department and only noted the patients details on the A amp E record form All other duties were performed by the nurses (and sometimes the A amp E doctors) who resented this added workload In several of the smaller A amp E departments reception staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department quite satisfactorily

Several receptionists had years of experience in the A amp E department as well as other relevant experience (eg ambulance dr i ver ECG technician) and were highly valued by the other A amp E staff

In addition to the receptionists some of the urban A amp E departments had hostesses andor hospital aids for odd jobs such as dealing with enquiries taking messages filling out laboratory forms putting away stores and making tea

TO meet the secretarial needs of the A amp E department (eg referral letters to general practitioners) the staff generally used secretaries in other parts of the hospital This service was not always adequate and one department used form letters completed by the A amp E doctors by hand for much of its correspondence Another department employed a part-time secretary for the doctors

Orderlies

Orderlies were generally used to move patients within the A amp E department as well as to other parts o~ the hospital In some hospitals they also assisted with plaster work

Some of the urban and provincial A amp E departments had an orderly during day-time hours but outside these hours and in all other departments orderlies were called from the hospital pool Some A amp E staff commented that delays involved in getting an orderly from the pool could be frustrating when the department was busy

Social workers

The A amp E departments visited had various methods for coping with patients with social or emotional problems

The urban A amp E departments could often calIon psychiatric backup such as a crisis team or an individual psychiatrist psychiatric nurse or counsellor Four of the urban A amp E departments had a social worker allocated to work in the department for some time each day who was also on call for the department while carrying out other duties The rest of the departments called on the pool of hospital social workers In the smaller hospitals social workers were not always available at nights or on weekends although in some places the social workers had made themselves available on an informal basis A amp E staff had mixed views on the usefulness of social workers

The social worker is essential to the work of the A amp E department

A amp E officer

50

The nature of social work has changed over the years and its hard now to make contact with the social workers and to get the support the department wants The department does social work itself and has good liaison with the Salvation Army and other welfare groups

A amp E officer

Ambulance personnel

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments were served by the Order of St John ambulances The exceptions were the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments which were served by the Wellington Free Ambulance and Taranaki A amp E department which worked with the hospital board ambulances Both the rural A amp E departments were served by hospital board ambulance services during the day and St John services at night

Generally the A amp E staff found that liaison between themselves and the ambulance personnel was good Many ambulancemiddot officers had had some training in the A amp E department and were familiar withmiddot its procedures Communications between the two were usually satisfactory with radio-telephones being used to alert the A amp E department to incoming urgent cases or to ask for advice on patient treatment

However some A amp E staff expressed concern abut the suitability of treatment provided by ambulance personnel They were particularly worried about the sophisticated techniques being used at times by some ambulance officers

Many ambulance officers are doing advanced courses and theyre enthusiastic about treating people - putting in drips or giving drugs Mostly the officers are excellent but some are over-enthusiastic

A amp E doctor

In the Auckland and Wellington urban areas there were several A amp E departments and as a working rule ambulance officers took patients to the nearest department However this rule was modified by the facilities available at the nearest hospital and whether or not the nearest A amp E department was open For example if the nearest hospital had no orthopaedic backup the ambulance would ptobably take a patient requiring orthopaedic care to the next closest hospital or if one of the part-time A amp E departments was nearest but closed the ambulance would go to another hospital At times the ambulance officers consulted with the A amp E staff by radio-telephone as to the appropriate A amp E department for a patient they were transporting

DISCUSSION

The patterns of medical staffing in terms of the number of senior A amp E doctors and the rostering of house surgeons reflectedmiddot the attendances and locations of the different A amp E departments The numbers of doctors and nurses (expressed as full-time equivalents) generally reflected the attendance at the departments However there was considerable variation in the level of nursing staff relative to attendance which could not be easily explained

51

Training in A amp E work for the house surgeons was inadequate with little formal training available for them In some places they had little opportunity to learn on-the-job beside a senior doctor Obviously greater time working alongside a senior doctor would be valuable as would intensive one or two-day orientation courses bull

Training was an important matter for the nursing staff also since very experienced nurses clearly were needed in the A amp E departments Inservice training courses are desirable both to develop experienced nurses as quickly as possible and to reduce the load that on-the-job training puts on the existing experienced nurses The training courses run in the Auckland hospitals appeared to be very successful and they could be used as a basis for courses in other hospitals and in post-basic programmes

The house surgeons in urban A amp E departments found their 10 and 12 hour shifts exhausting Also there was some evidence that where house surgeons covered other parts of the hospital as well as the A amp E department conflicting demands resulted in poor cover of the~ department Both of these problems would be alleviated by rostering more staff to the A amp E department We understand that this has happened in some departments in response to the Report on working conditions of resident medical officers Part I [12]

Inadequate supervision of house surgeons and the use of inexperienced first year house surgeons in A amp E departments were widespread In some places there were difficulties in getting backup from specialist staff and the house surgeons were very much on their own in the department There was also some evidence that A amp E departments were less efficient out of normal office hours due to delays in getting registrars and consultants and more especially due to the house surgeons inexperience

Employing more senior doctors both to improve the supervision and training of house surgeons and to improve the efficiency of the A amp E departments would be desirable But at present there are difficulties finding suitable applicants for A amp E officer positions These difficulties are at least partially oue to the low status of the A amp E department within the medical structure and the lack of career prospects for A amp E doctors The increasing numbers of doctors in the 1980 s and the opportunities for part-time work that the A amp E department offers to doctors with family responsibilities may make the department a more attractive choice However if these factors do not improve the senior medical staffing the development of A amp E medicine as a specialty will continue to ~e suggested

Does A amp E medicine in New Zealand require the extra training that would be provided by a post-graduate A amp E specialist programme Given the range of backgrounds currently found suitable for A amp E doctors it would appear that A amp E medicine in rural and provincial hospitals does not require much extra training although some training in particular aspects (eg soft-tissue injuries) could be useful In the urban hospitals the much higher load of major trauma cases could justify a post-graduate training programme However at present the number of senior A amp E doctors in the urban hospitals is insufficient to justify a specialist programme If numbers increase in the future perhaps the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine could sponsor a suitable post-graduate programme They coulo also play an extremely useful role by preparing a manual outlining clinical procedures for A amp E departments and distributing regular bulletins up-dating this material

52

REFERENCES

1 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services report on a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional off ice for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

2 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

3 ELSON Reginald - The medical staff of British accident and emergency units in Br J Hosp Med - (August 1971) p 161-170

4 New thoughts from casualty [editorial] in Br Med J - v 1 (1976) p 1299-1300

5 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 21-24

6 Community-wide emergency medical services recommendations by the Committee on Acute Medicine of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists in JAMA - v 204 no 7 (1968) p 595-602

7 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL~ Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975

8 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 1960 (Report series Board of Health no 2)

9 SALMOND GC - Young doctors an exercise in social researchmiddot methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

10 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM 68(83)

11 CANT BR staffing of A amp E departments in NZ Med J - v 94 (1981) p 471

12 Report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers Pt 1 Report of the Working Party established by the Hospital Medical Officers Advisory Committee and the Minister of Health - Wellington Dept of Health 1981 (unpublished)

13 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraW-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

14 OWENS J Cuthbert - Survey discovers what is wrong with hospitals emergency service in Mod Hosp - vl06no 1 (1966) p 82-85

15 LEITZELL James p - An uncertain future in N Eng J Med - v 304 no 8 (1981) p 477-480

16 RIGGS Leonard M Jr - A vigorous new speCialty in N Eng J Med shyv 304 no 8 (1981) p 480-483

53

17 HONIGSBAUM F - General practitioner work in British hospitals Soc Econ Admin - vl (1967) p 34-44bull

in

18 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL DJ and WALKER JH~ - Practitioners patients and the accident department in Hosp Health Services - (1975) p 80-84

Rev

19 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 1979 in NZ Med J - v 91(1980) p 194-196

19-23 March

55

CHAPTER 6

Patient att~ndance characteristics

This chapter considers the general pattern of attendance at A amp E departments noting overall levels and time trends the age and SeX distribution of patients and the conditions with which they come to the department Next we look at recall visits particularly the hospital to hospital variations Then the use of A amp E departments by people who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner is discussed

The materiai has been gathered by examining the A amp E records and talking with the staff of the 14 A amp E departments visited Data from the re~ords at Northland Base Hospital A amp E department have also been incorporated

Detailed patterns of attendance by hour of the day and day of the week have not been analysed Other researchers have documented these for A amp E departments in New Zealand and overseas [123456789] While detailed information is useful for good management of departments and setting adequate staffing levels for the busiest periods it is usually specific to a particular department and is not relevant to the questions addressed in this report For our purposes it has been sufficient to divide the week into normal working hours (in hours defined as 0800-1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays) and the remaining hours (out of hours)

OVERALL ATTENDANCE AND TRENDS

Since 1978 hospitals have reported total attendance at outpatient departments to the National Health Statistics Centre distinguishing A amp E attendance from other attendance and first attendance from recall attendance Table 9 shows the average annual attendance at the 15 A amp E departments for the period from 1978 to 1981 Table 10 presents the trends in A amp E attendance over the same period compared with the changes in population of the hospital catchment areas between the 1976 and 1981 censuses

There has been an overall increase in first attendance of 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 This increase is somewhat higher than we would expect from the growth in New Zealand population over the same period However the increase in first attendance has been partially counter-balanced by a decrease of 25 per cent in recall attendance

Table 10 shows too that there is no general trend towards increased first attendancemiddot among the urban hospitals The non-urban hospitals have experienced increasing first attendance although even there Northland Base and Rotorua show no increase

56

TABLE 9 AVERAGE ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-19811

First Recall Total attendance attendance attendance

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 58 506 6 272 64 777 Middlemore 39 032 18 686 57 718 Green Lane 26 079 16 635 42 714 Wellington 48 011 7 748 55 759 Hutt 33 266 9 807 43 072 Christchurch 61 516 12 010 73 526 Dunedin 27 202 10 802 38 004

Provincial Northland Base 7 794 3 144 10 938 Rotorua 12 265 4 636 16 900 Taranaki Base 10 341 5 462 15 803 Timaru 9 971 10 102 20 072

Rural Whakatane 5 992 2 177 8 769 Grey 3 850 1 214 5 064

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore2 9 388 7 900 17 288 Kenepuru 3 5 843 3 209 9 052

All public hospitals 524 442 226 251 750 693

1 Source Hospital Management Data 1978-1981 - Wellington National Health Statistics Centre Dept of Health Simple average unless otherwise noted

2 Estimated as average of 1978 1979 and 1981 figures as the North Shore A amp E department was closed for part of 1980

3 Estimated for 1979-1981 only since the Kenepuru A amp E department was not open ~or all of 1978

57

TABLE 10 TRENDS IN ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-1981

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Midd1emore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3

Kenepuru 4

All public hospitals

Average annual percentage change in A amp E attendance l

First attendance

-36 07 16

-22 -79

00 48

-07 06 64

185

61 90

59 179

15

Recall attendance

lo3-07

66 -155 -34

63 08

33 -45

23 02

1253 06

374 89

-25

Estimated annual percentage change in population of hospital bull s catchment

area

1976-19812

07

-04 -02 -10

14 12

-02 -06

12 -04

07 -04

02

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

2 Source NZ Wellington

Census of Population Dept of Statistics

and Dwellings 1976 and 1981

3 Estimated from 1978 and 1981 flUctuations in intervening years

figures only because of extreme

4 Estimated for 1979-1981 for all of 1978

only since Kenepuru A amp E department not open

Figure for entire hospital board area used

58

AGE AND SEX

The characteristic age and sex distributions of total A amp E attendance are shown in Figure 1 Nearly half of the attendances are by young adults 15-29 years Schoolage children too formed a larger part of the attendance than their numbers in the community would lead one to expect These two age groups which are also the age groups most likely to be active and daring accounted for nearly two thirds of all attendances The age distribution of attendance was similar from hospital to hospital

About twice as many males as females attended A amp E departments (66 per cent to 34 per cent) When age and sex were considered together I it was the school age and young adult males who made up the majority of attenders Even in the 30-64-year-old group men outnumbered women two to one These age and sex distributions are similar to those found by other researchers in New Zealand [1410] in Britain [1112] and the United States [1314]

Figure 1 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments by age and sex

Male Female

3L1

30

20 20

E ~ 128 shy

108

10

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65_ Age Group Age Group

CONDITIONS

Of the total A amp E attendances 81 per cent were for injury conditions and 19 per cent were for sickness conditions Adjusting for the recall visits we estimated that 73 to 78 per cent of first visits were for injury conditions Our results were similar to Platts [15] as far as we can tell given the different definitions used In another British study Lewis and Bradbury [12] found 90 per cent of visits were for injury However

59

this higher level is not surprising since they considered only cases which were waiting for attention ignoring ambulance cases and the very seriously ill

Out of hours sickness conditions made up 25 per cent of all visits and in hours they were 14 per cent Preschool children and people 65 years and over were more likely to attend for sickness conditions than those aged 5-64 years (Figure 2) The preponderance of males over females in the 15-64 year old groups was accounted for by injury conditions rather than by sickness

Figure 2 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

Male Femate

IIIiI A trendance for _ sickness condiHons 30

remainder for injury condItions

20

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 f Age Group Age Group

In the following sections information from some of the hospitals about the types of injury and sickness conditions is presented We have had problems in classifying the conditions since at some hospitals few details of the patients conditions were recorded on the A amp E log Even where details were recorded only 60 per cent of injury attendances and 80 per cent of sickness attendances have been able to be consistently classified

Injury conditions

Data on the type of injury was extracted from only six A amp E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch and Northland Base hospitals) There was very little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 3 shows the types of injuries as proportions of first injury attendances The category

60

of cuts (which included scrapes amputations and punctures) accounted for almost 30 per cent of first injury attendances The severity of the cuts could not be judged from log entries but in the case of Northland Base Hospital cuts identified as probably needing suturing formed a substantial part of this category Fractures made up 15 per cent of the first injury attendance with foreign body injuries (mostly in the eye) burns and toxic effects accounting for another 14 per cent

Figure 3 Injury first attendances by type of injury all ages

Other (414)

Cuts (291)Fractures (154)

The category labelled other accounted for 40 per cent of all first injury attendances and included some serious conditions such as falls crushing injuries and various states of shock However many of the other injuries were regarded as minor conditions by the Aamp E staff It was impossible to judge the severity of injuries from the detail recorded on the logs so no estimate of the percentage of injuries which required urgent attention has been made

For most types of injuries sex and age had little bearing There were exceptions (Figure 4) Toxic effects were four times as likely among preschool children as among other age groups Fractures were twice as likely both for school age children and for those 65 years and over as for other age groups Somewhat surprisingly adult men and women differed little in the types of injuries

Figure 4 Injury first attendances by type of injury by age groups

0-4 (ears 5-14 years 15-29 years

Other (308)

Cuts (321 )

Toxic effects (13) Burns (21 )

Foreign bodies (24)

Fractures (254)

Other (408)

Cuts (280)

Toxic effects (28)

Burns (41)

Other (452)

Cuts (286)

30-64 years 65+ years

Other (393) Other (341)

Cuts (308) Fractures (301)

62

People were more likely to present with injury conditions in hours rather than out of hours From the information collected at the four Auckland hospitals we can say that 43 per cent of first injury visits happened out of hours whereas 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category

Sickness conditions

Data on the type of sickness was extracted from only 10 A lie E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch Dunedin Northland Rotorua Taranaki and Grey) There was little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 5 shows the types of sickness conditions as proportions of all sick~ess attendance

Figure 5 Sickness attendance by type of sickness all ages

General sickness

(110)

Abdominal pain (132) Other (20 1 )

Shortness of breath (150)

Skin pain bleeding (229) Collapse (179)

TwO prominent categories shortness ofmiddot breath and collapse (including diabetic coma heart at tacks congestive heart failure and chest pain) accounted for one-third of all sickness attendances

General sickness covered fever diarrhoea and vomiting feeling unwell convulsions renal failure and abdominal pain recorded as being related to urinary retention Abdominal pain was generally recorded simply as such but acute appendix and similar terms and miscarriage or bleeding from the vagina were included in abdominal pain

Figure 6 Sickness attendance by type of sickness by age groups

0-4 years 5-14 years 15-29 years

General sickness (79)

General ~ickness (380)

Other (90) i

Shortness ofSkin pain I breath (148)

bleeding (100) Sickness pain Shortness of breath (320) bleeding (270) ClI

IN

Collapse (30)

30-64 years 65+ years

Abdominal pain (110) General sickness (102)

Shortness of breath (184) Ot 1159~

Skin pain I bleeding (10 1)

Collapse (358)

64

Unspecified pain or other bleeding have been included in the category of generally minor conditions involving skin pain or bleeding Such minor conditions accounted for almost a quarter of the sickness attendances Abscesses or infected wounds made up a quarter of the skin pain or bleeding category while a further 21 per cent involved pain such as back pain headaches or other pain

Ear and eye conditions toothache and other miscellaneous or undefined conditions made up the other category which formed 20 per cent of the sickness attendance

Were the sickness conditions urgent enough to require treatment at an A amp E department This was a difficult question to answer from the information available on the A amp E logs We have concluded that the collapse and shortness of breath conditions were likely to be emergencies and that for the preschool age group and probably those 65 years and over abdominal pain and general sickness required urgent attention We have described all the other sickness conditions as non-urgent sickness Thus at least 39 per cent of the ickness conditions required urgent attention

The type of sickness attendance differed between the age groups (Figure 6) Preschool children rarely came for superficial reasons Only 11 per cent of their sickness attendances were for skin pain or bleeding conditions Shortness of breath was a major condition for all children preschool or school age Skin pain or bleeding conditions were more prominent among the school age children than the preschool

Young adults tended to come for minor conditions Thirty per cent of their sickness attendance was for skin pain or bleeding conditions and only 20 per cent was for the emergency categories of collapse or shortness of breath

Among the adults 30-64 years old however emergencies formed a substantial part of sickness attendance with 27 per cent belonging to the collapse category Among those 64 years and over few non-urgent conditions were recorded with 40 per cent of the sickness attendance being for collapse The skin pain or bleeding conditions accounted for only 10 per cent of their sickness attendance

Fifty-eight per cent of all sickness attendances occurred out of hours~ as would have been expected given that 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category However nearly three-quarters of preschool sickness visits happened out of hours while less than half of the sickness visits by those 30 years and over were out of hours

RECALL ATTENDANCE

Almost all recall visits were for injury conditions velY few sickness patients were recalled for follow-up care As was noted in Chapter 3 policies on recall visits differed among the departments Several factors ~ffected the decision to recall the patients condition the A amp E staffs communication with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs middotof house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors ~hilosophy of A amp E medicine From the comments made by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the departments into two groups

65

RECALL POLICY

DO FAVOUR A policy favouring recall visits

DO NOT lAVOUR A policy not favouring recall visits with most patients being referred to a general practitioner However fractures and soft-tissue or serious wounds tend to be recalled

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

DO FAVOUR Taranaki Base Grey North Shore

DO NOT FAVOUR Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Rotorua Timaru Whakatane Kenepuru

-----_--------- ----------------------~

It is diff icult to compare the policies of the departments with their actual performances since some A amp E logs did not completely identify all recall visits Table 11 presents recall attendance as a proportion of total attendance For the departments where recall visits were fully identified there appears to be reasonable agreement between the Hospital Management Data figures and the figures derived from our tallies The exceptions are Whakatane where staff told us that return visits pad dropped from 1979 to 1981 and Auckland where we have no explanation It should be noted that the tally figures are estimates based on one-week to one-month samples and so may be less accurate than the Hospital Mlmagement Data which are complete counts over an entire year

Overall 25-30 per cent of all visits were recall visits There was considerable variation among departments in the level of recall visits OFlanagan [16] found similar variation among British A amp E departments

The recall polic ies were not closely related to the departments performances as measured by the proportion of all visits that were recalls While North Shore with a recall-favouring A amp E department had a very high level of recalls (many were plaster checks) so did Timaru a department with a policy of not favouring recalls The other recall-favouring A amp E departments at Grey and Taranaki Base hospitals had only average levels of recalls

The departments performances however were related to the levels of medical and nursing staff as measured by the tatal medical staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 6 and the nurse staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 8) A amp E departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits (see Table 11 and Figures 7 and 8) Perhaps these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat recalled patients

66

TABLE 11 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS RECALL ATTENDANCE

Hospital Tally sources Management Data Recalls as Recalls as Total Recalls as percentage percentage attend-percentage of total attendancel

of total attendance

of injury attendance

ance tallied2

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 97 198 278 948 Middlemore 324 327 399 1137 Green Lane 389 401 439 868 Wellington3 139 116 172 3568

(4 weeks) Hutt3 228 280 379 2766

( 4 weeks) Christchurch 163 166 216 1233 Dunedin3 284 278 334 749

Provincial Northland Base 287 275 328 2092

03 weeks) Rotorua 274 214 250 334 Taranaki Base 346 327 353 270 Timaru3 504 460 51 6 174

Rural Whakatane 317 152 175 259

( 2 weeks) Grey3 240 238 293 330

o month)

Part-time departments

Suburban North Sh~re 457 521 539 512 Kenepuru 355 383 422 451

(4 weeks)

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations lOne week tally unless otherwise noted 3 Tally data partially estimated from Hospital Managementmiddot Data (see

Table 9) to adjust for incomplete recording

Spearman rank correlations [18] of recalls as percentage of total attendances (Hospital Management Data) with

(a) FTE medical staff per 10000 first attendance r = 0459 P lt 005 (b) FTE nurse staffing (adjusted for holding ward) per 10000 first

attendance r = 0547 P lt 005

67

Figure 7 Comparison of medical staff availability and level of recall attendance

u c ro 50 Timaru

C c ~ North Shore m ro S 40 Greenlane 0

Kenepuru

Cl ro Taranaki E = 30

Middlemore bull bull Whakatane

Cl Dunedin Rotoruae

ro

u Hutt Grey

c ro

C 20 C

~ m Christchurch

ro Wellington u

0 10 Auckland

10 20 30 40

Number of medical staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance

Figure 8 Comparison of nursing staff availability and level of recall attendance

Timaru50

North Shore

40 Greenlanee

Kenepuru Taranaki

Middlemore bull Whakatane bull 30

Dunedin ROlorua

GreyHutt

20

Christchurch Wellington

10 Auokland

3 4 5 6 8 9 10 II 12

Number of nursing staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance lexcluding nurses staffing holding wards)

68

It has been suggested that house surgeons are more likely to recall than senior A amp E doctors [17] If this were so we would expect that A amp E departments where house surgeons worked with very little direct senior superv1s1on (Hutt Taranaki Whakatane Grey Kenepuru) would have had higher proportions of recalls than departments with much greater supervision (Auckland and Dunedin) This was not the case Also North Shore with no house surgeons had a high proportion of recalls Thus the recall levels do not suggest that the house surgeons had any greater propensity than senior A amp E doctors to recall patients

GP-LOAD

A amp E staff use the term GP-load as shorthand for people who in their eyes would more appropriately be treated by a general practitioner Other studies in New Zealand and overseas have estimated that between 36 and 61 per -cent of all A amp E patients could have been successfully treated by a general practitioner [41920] When we discussed this topic with A amp E staff we found a similar variation in their estimates of the GP-10ad This variation may be due to differing views as to which injury and sickness conditions should be treated in the A amp E department it may be due to different beliefs about the abilities and facilities of general practitioners and it may reflect differences in the patients ~erved by different A amp E departments

The role of general practitioners in the treatment of injury is a matter of debate However there is more agreement over sickness conditions A sickness emergency is traditionally accepted as suitable for A amp E treatment whereas a non-urgent sickness condition is seen as more appropriate for general practitioner treatment

Non-urgent sickness

A amp E staff estimated that patients with long standing or minor sickness conditions constituted from 2 to 30 per cent of the attendance However tallies from the A amp E logs showed that non-urgent sickness attendance ranged from 6 to 24 per cent averaging about 12 per cent At most departments staff oVer-estimated the level At a typical hospital staff opinion placed non-urgent sickness at 20 to 25 per cent of the attendance while the A amp E log showed only 19 per cent coming for any sickness condition and fewer than 12 per cent for non-urgent sickness Only in one A amp E department was the tally evidence of non-urgent sickness greater than the staffs estimate The general oVer-estimation of non-urgent sickness visits probably means that A amp E staff were also over-estimating the total GP-load bull

In general A amp E staff felt that patients with non-urgent sickness would be better off being seen by their own general practitioners However the departments differed in the ways they dealt with these patients Some staff mentioned that when they treated such patients they would discourage further visits by explaining the role of the A amp E department Some departments had notices in the waiting rooms stating that the department was for treatment of accidents and emergencies and that people should see their general practitioner for other conditions Some hospitals had placed advertisements with similar messages in local newspapers

From the comments of A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the A amp E departments into two groups

69

OPEN DOOR POLICY

OPEN An open policy where almtreated They may then general practitioner

ost be

all patients advised to see

are a

RESTRICTED A restricted policy where patients are not treated a general practitioner

nbut

on-urgent are re

sicknferred

ess to

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

OPEN Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Whakatane Grey North Shore

RESTRICTED Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru Kenepuru

The open door policies were reflected somewhat in the proportion of all A amp E visits that were f or sickness (see Table 12) The departments with restricted policies (which were all non-urban) tended to have lower proportions of sickness visits than those with open policies However the non-urban departments with open policies did not have substantially higher proportions of sickness visits than the restricted departments Rather some of the urban departments (Auckland Wellington Hutt and Christchurch) had particularly high proportions of sickness visits These departments were also particularly busy with large numbers of first attendances and relatively low levels of medical staffing One would expect that in a very busy department staff would discourage inappropriate visits However A amp E staff at Auckand and Wellington hospitals commented that although non-urgent sickness patients needed general practitioner care they tended to treat them anyway because it was quicker to treat them than to send them away This may be a partial explanation for the high levels of sickness visits but other factors related to the populations served by the departments are probably involved (see Chapter 8)

A common exception to the open door policies was made for children At most hospitals staff said that sick children were always seen As Table 13 suggests children as described by staff are probably preschool children rather than all those under 15 years The departments with restricted policies had considerably lower proportions of sickness visits in the preschool and school age groups than did the open policy departments Table 13 also shows that toe agemiddot group most likely to appear with sickness conditions is the elderly There was Tess difference in proportions of sickness visits between the restricted policy and open policy departments for patients aged 30 and over

It would appear that a restricted policy towards non-urgent sickness patients does tend to discourage sickness Visits particularly for preschool age children However a restricted policy does not markedly appear to discourage sickness visits by the elderly

70

TABLE 12 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESS 1

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Butt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru3

Rural Whakatane Grey3

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Estimated Percentage of percentage total attenshyof first ance that was attendance for sickness that was for sickness

378 303 235 158 187 112 365 323 361 260 301 251 233 168

162 183 144 110 74 109 59

156 132 190 145

58 28 152 94

Total attendance tallied2

948 1137

868 3568 (4 weeks) 2766 ( 4 weeks) 1233

749

2092 (13 weeks) 334 270 174

259 (2 weeks) 330 (l month)

572 451 (4 weeks)

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 One-week tally unless otherwise noted

3 For Timaru and Grey the percentage of first attendance that was for sickness is the actual figure derived from the tallies and the percentage of total attendance that was for sickness has been estimated

71

TABLE 13 PROPORTION OF TOTAL A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESSl BY OPEN DOOR POLICY AND AGE GROUPS

Percentage of total attendance that was for sickness

under 5 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 All years years years years years amp age

over groups

Open policy departments 367 111 148 245 433 201

Restricted policy departments 102 66 80 181 311 110

All departments studied 33 bull2 104 141 238 425 191

1 Source Tallies taken from A E logs by authors hospitals represented in one-week equivalents

DISCUSSION

At all public hospitals first visits to A amp E departments increased by 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 However this increase was not consistent with most of the urban A E departments reporting a decrease or no change in first visits Recall visits for all public hospital A E departments decreased by 25 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 The decrease was not consistent in fact the reported changes in recall attendance were highly variable It has been suggested that the cost of general practitioner services and dissatisfaction with the unavailability of general practitioners have caused increased use of A amp E departments However it seems unlikely that any single reason could explain these highly variable changes in A amp E attendance in New Zealand

The people visiting A amp E departments were predominantly school age or young adults and male Men aged 15 to 29 years formed the largest single group almost one-third of all attendances Eighty-one per cent of attendances were for injuries and the 19 per cent attending for sickness conditions tended to be preschoolers or people aged 65 years or more Injury visits were more common in hours and sickness visits out of hours probably because accidents tend to happen in daylight hours Also sic kness conditions often seem worse at night and if the patients do not want to bother their general practitioner they may go straight to the A amp E department (see Chapter 7)

72

It was difficult to classify conditions accurately from the information on A amp E logs since insufficient detail and little indication of severity was usually recorded Thus we have not been able to estimate the proportion of injuries which really required A amp E care Similarly there were difficulties in classifying the sickness conditions middotalthough almost 40 per cent appeared to require urgent attention

There was considerable variation among the A amp E departments studied in the proportion of all visits that were recall visits However contrary to our expectations this variation was not related to the policy on recalling patients stated by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents Nor did it appear to be related to the inexperience of unsupervised house surgeons Rather it was related to staffing levels Departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits It is likely that staff in these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat more recalled patients If departments wish to change their recall levels an examination of thei r staffing levels would be an obvious place to start

The other component of the workload which A amp E departments often wish to control is the non-urgent sickness attendance A amp E staff saw such visits as inappropr iate and they consistently over-estimated the proportion of non-urgent sickness patients they were treating Ullman (3] and Roth [21] have found similar processes of oVer-estimation occurring among staff in United States emergency rooms The level of non-urgent sickness visits was not high on average comprising only 12 per cent of the attendance However applying a restricted policy (referring to general practitioners for treatment displaying notices in the department and advertisements in local newspapers) appeared to discourage such visits particularly for preschool children Thus non-urgent sickness attendance was not a problem in some A amp E departments Where departments see such visits as a problem applying a restricted policy could ease it

13

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS E F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J -V 71 0970rgt212-219

2 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard ~ Emergency department utHisation in ail urban community implications for community ambulatory careinJAMA v 216 no 2 (191l) p 301-312

3 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SfRATMANN William C- An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1915) P 1011-1020

4 RICHARDSJ G and WHITE GR~ - Accident and emergency services at AucklandHospital inNZmiddotMed J - v 85 (1977) P 272~274

5 INGRAM D R CLARKE D -R and MURDIE R A -Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1918) P 55-62

6 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referral patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

1 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

McRAE She1agh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience of Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

9 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (A amp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 319-388

10 SNELGAR Denis- Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

11 Casual attenders a socio-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcast1e-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

12 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A amp E in Health Soc Serv J (1981) p 1139-1142

13 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

14 WALKER L L - Inpatient and emergency department utilisation the effect of distance social class age sex and marital status in J Amer ColI Emergency Phycns - v 5 no 2 (1976) p 105-110

15 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

74

16 OFLANAGAN P - The work of an accident and emergency department in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 26 no 162 (1976) p 54-60

17 What are accident and emergency departments for in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) P 837-839

18 SIEGEL Sydney_ - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

19 CROMBIE D L - A casualty survey in J ColI Gen Pract - v 2 (1959) P 346-356

20 SKUDDER Paul A McCarroll James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1913 p 11-35

21 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) P 839-856

75

CHAPTER 7

Patient attitudes to the accident and emergency department and staff attitudes to the patients

In this chapter we look at the attitudes of patients to the A amp E department and particularly the reasons they give for attending it Summaries of the results of overseas studies are given followed by detailed information from several New Zealand studies where patients were interviewed the Dunedin study carried out by Dixon in 1968[1] Richards Auckland study of 1975 [2] Keenans unpublished Christchurch study of 1978 the Wei~ington childrens study carried out by Kljakovic in 1978 [3] and McRaes Waikato study of I~H9 [4] Then we discuss the effect that health centres and deputising services have on A amp E use Finally we explore the views that A amp E staff have of their patients

REASONS FOR VISITING THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

Overseas studies

A substantial number of overseas studies have explored the reasons given by patients attending A amp E departments One major reason was the availability of the A amp E department open 24 hours a day and always staffed compared to the actual or perceived unavailability of the general practitioner [56789]

People mentioned the accessibility of the A amp E department as a reason for attending citing its location ease of transport to and from it and its convenience for work schedules and other arrangements [671011]

Another major reason for visiting the A amp E department was its appropriateness as a source of care particularly because of the equipment and facilities available [5612] with many conditions particularly injuries A amp E patients made their own diagnosis They therefore omitted the diagnosis-seeking part of care (where the general practitioner was seen as appropriate) and sought confirmation arid immediate treatment at the A amp E department [1314]

People also saw the A ampE department as the appropriate place to go because of the urgency of their condition especially if the person needing treatment was a child [7141516] However A amp E staff and A amp E patients often had conflicting perceptions of the seriousness of the condition Patients tended to see their complaint as more serious and urgent than did the A amp E doctor [9101117]

Advice from other people was another reason given for visiting the A amp E department [61218] People were more likely to visit the department rather than the general practitioner when the decision to seek care was made outside the home and where someone other than the patient or a close

relative was involved in the decision (eg a policeman an employer a teacher or bystander) In some cases such as traffic accidents and some

work and school accidents it was automatic procedure to send the patient straight to the A amp E department [1819]

76

Some people using the A amp E department did not have a family doctor because they were new to the area or transient or for other reasons [78] In the United States the proportions without a doctor were high ranging from 40 per cent to 86 per cent [5171920]

The proportion of patients who tried to contact their doctor before going to the A amp E department also varied considerably from 6 per cent to 42 per cent in different North American studies [59202122] 14 per cent in a Canadian study and SO per cent in a Swedish study [23] Holohan et al [24J found that over SO per cent of patients attending a British A amp E department were unaware or inaccurately informed about their general practitioners out of hours care arrangements

Dissatisfaction with their general practitioner led to some people visiting the A amp E department Organisational factors such as appointment systems deputising serVices and health centres all made it more difficult for patients to contact their doctor [142425) Dissatisfaction with the doctors treatment and wanting a second opinion were also reasons [26] As well language difficulties were a problem In Australia immigrants used the hospital foi childrens emergencies because interpreters were available and they did not have to use the telephone to arrange a visit [27]

It has been suggested that people use A amp E departments rather than general practitioners because the department is free This is unlikely to be a reason in Britain where general practitioner care is free under the National Health Service Studies in the United States found that very few respondents said that the cost of seeing a doctor was a major reason for visiting the A amp E department [511)

New Zealand studies

Use of general practitioners

It has been suggested that people use the A amp E department because they are visitors to a city or do not have a general practitioner The New Zealand studies foundmiddot that the proportion of those interviewed who had a general practitioner varied considerably from city to city (see Table 14) The high level in Wellington [3] was not surprising given that most families with children have a general practitioner The transience of local populations as suggested by Richards [2] may explain some of the differences between the studies Dixon [1] noted that the age and sex structure of the people visiting the A amp E department with the preponderance of young males was the opposite to that of people visiting general practitioners

The Wellington study found that for a very high proportion of children (39 per cent) there had been an attempt to contact a general practitioner before going to the A amp E department and 25 per cent had actuallY seen the doctor [3) The other studies found smaller proportions British studies have reported similar variations with Lewis and Bradbury [14] finding 8 per cent of A amp E attenders had been referred by their general practitioner and Conway (25] reporting 41 per cent

The Chr istchurch study found that the people who did not see a doctor before coming to the A amp E department were more likely to be injured rather than sick to visit the department out of hours rather than in

77

hours and to be 15 to 29 years old Also during work hours people who had accidents at work were less likely to see the doctor before going to the A amp E department than people with home or sports accidents

TABLE 14 USE OF GENERAL PRACT IT lONERS BY FIRST ATTENDERS AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Percentage of all those interviewed who

had a regular general attempted to contact their practitioner general practitioner before

going to the A amp E department

Dunedin 1968 92 16 Auckland 1975 72 21 Christchurch 1978 85 23 Wellington 1978 98 39

Derived from 84 per cent who were sent directly or chose to go to casualty without seeing a doctor

Specific reasons for using the A amp E department

Turning now to the reasons given by patients for their A amp E visit the New Zealand studies found a similar range of reasons to the overseas studies Keenan collected detailed information in Christchurch and this is presented in Table 15 and in the following sections Comparable information from the other studies where available has been included

Others advised the patient to go to the A amp E department The most common reason given by the Christchurch patients (and by the people interviewed by Dixon [1] in Dunedin) was that others (employers teachers traffic officers sports coach neighbours friends) advised them to go to the A amp E department There appeared to be an automatic procedure following many school work sports and traffic accidents of sending the patient straight to the A amp E department

There was no evidence that injuries happening at other locations (eg at home) were any less likely to go to the A amp E department A comparison of the Waikato and Christchurch A amp E injury attenders with people consulting general practitioners for accidental injuries [28] showed similar proportions of attendance by the location of the accident (Figure 9) In Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14] found similar results when studying A amp E attendance in the North Western Regional Health Authority

76

TABLE 15 REASONS FOR A amp E FIRST ATTENDANCE FROM THREE NEW ZEALAND STUDIES

Reasons Christchurch 1976

Wellington ( children)

1978

Auckland 1975

SAW GP BEFORE A amp E 186 250

A amp E MORE AVAILABLE GP found to be unavailable

or thought to be unavailable Did not want to bother GP

Cost of GP care a factor

125

( 65) ( 41)

(19)

233

119

(24) ( 79)

(16)

A amp E MORE ACCESSIBLE More convenient closer

phone or transport problems in contacting GP

214

A amp E MORE APPROPRIATE Condition of type not dealt

with by GP requiring A amp E facilities

Need for attention was urgent

140

( 5 0) (90)

389 671

OTHERS ADVISED TO GO TO A amp E 233 61

OTHER Includes having no GP

trained by GP to go to A amp E needed a dentist and so on

94 68

Number of people interviewed 565 428 1147

Tried to contact general practitioner did not necessarily see doctor

A amp E department more available Only 125 per cent of the Christchurch sample went to the A amp E department because it was more available than their general practitioner Richards [2] found a similar proportion in Auckland Not surprisingly the availability reasons were given more by people visiting the Christchurch A amp E department out of hours than in hours and more for children and older adults than the 15 to 29 age group The cost of visiting a general practitioner was hardly mentioned as a reason for visiting the A amp E department

79

In Wellington Kljakovic [3] found parents saying abOut the A amp E department

you can go anytime - 24 hour service when everyones at the end of their tether theyre there and theyre open

and about general practitioners

didnt know you could get a doctor on the weekends on other occasions you get an answering service - not worth bothering the doctor

midnight - too late to call a doctor

Figure 9 location at which accidents happened by those attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Presenting at A amp E department Presenting at general practitioner

Home (389) Home (290)

Work schooL Work school public buildings (336) public buddings (39 0)

A amp E department more accessible Over 20 per cent of the Christchurch attenders went to the A amp E department because it was more convenient closer or involved fewer transport or communic~tion problems These reasons were given more out of hours than in hours particularly by the 15 to 29 age group Injured patients especially those with sports injuries were more likely to give these reasons

A amp E department more appropriate Only 14 per cent of the Chr istchurch sample gave appropriateness as a reason while Richards [2] found 67 per cent in Auckland and Kljakovic [3] reported 39 per cent in Wellington These differences may reflect different interview situations since Richards interviewed patients at the A amp E department while Keenan and Kljakovic questioned people through telephone or personal interviews in their own homes Christchurch people suffering traffic accidents or poisonings (largely self-poisonings) were more Ii kely to give this reason than other reasons

80

In Wellington parents often said about the A amp E department

thats what its there for they have everything there

Several parents also commented that

general practitioners dont do stitches the GP is for minor things - not eager to corne to an emergency the doctor would only send us on to the hospital anyway thought leg was broken - needed an x-ray

Many parents decided to go to the A amp E department because they had already made a diagnosis and thought the condition required A amp E treatment others were unsure of the urgency of the childs condition A mother whose two-year-old son had hit his nose on a shower box at 755 am rang the doctor The child was crying his nose was bleeding and looked flattened The message on the answer phone was that the doctor could be contacted only in a real emergency She was unsure what a real emergency was so took the child to hospital not wanting to feel a fool by ringing the doctor

Some parents particularly those with asthmatic children were well aware that the condition required urgent care and had previously been told to go straight to the A amp E department

Dissatisfaction with the general practitioner Satisfaction is notoriously difficult to measure particularly when normal levels of satisfaction are between 85 and 90 per cent satisfied Only in the Wellington study [3] of childrens A amp E attendance was a direct question asked about satisfaction with the general practitioner service Forty-one per cent expressed some dissatisfaction mostly mentioning concern over difficulty in seeing the doctor Problems with getting an appointment with waiting because there was no appointment system with unsympathetic receptionists and with doctors not being willing to visit the horne were all mentioned Some parents commented that at a health centre they were unlikely to see their own doctor so they might as well go to the A amp E department Four per cent of parents were dissatisfied with the general practitioners treatment and came to the A amp E department for better treatment The cost of visiting the general practitioner was only mentioned by three parents (07 per cent)

Satisfaction with A amp E department The Wellington study [3] found that 73 per cent of parents were satisfied with the A amp E department For those who were dissatisfied the urgency of their visit was uppermost and they were unhappy at having to wait too long Parents also commented disapprovingly that the departments were understaffed or very busy The A amp E staff carne in for very little criticism only 07 per cent of parents made critical comments Many parents expressed their satisfaction with the reassuring aspects of the A amp E department its availability and its size A typical comment was its big they have everything there In one case parents dissatisfied with the treatment of their sick child at one A amp E department went to another department because it was bigger

81

Views of A amp E staff

When we asked A amp E staff why people visi ted the department they offered the same reasons that patients had given as explanations ie appropriateness availability and satisfaction Staff also commented that Pacific Islanders were accustomed to using hospital services for all their medical care in the islands andmiddot continued tomiddot use the hospital in New Zealand either as a first resort or for a second opinion Kinloch [29] demonstrated that while this was so for recent Samoan migrants in Wellington after some years New Zealand residence their pattern of hospital usage because similar to that of the population as a whole

A amp E staff thought that the major reason for the GP-load patients visiting the department was general practitioner unavailability They recognised

that many patients did not have a general practitioner because they were new to the area transient or on holiday Many staff mentioned the cost of visiting a doctor as a major reason although a few staff strongly asserted that cost was not important

EFFECT Of HIEALTH CENTRES AND DEPUTISING SERVICES ON A 8t IE UTILISATION

It has been assumed that the unavailability of a family doctor has been a major reason for people attending an A amp E department Consequently health centres with more facilities for treatment of injuries and open for longer hours than the usual doctors surgery have been set up Two United States studies [3031] found that the health centres they looked at appeared to have reduced the use of A amp E departments by people in the local neighbourhood either absolutely or relativemiddot to people in other neighbourhoods However in New Zealand data collected from Dunedin A amp E records by Maynard [32] three years before and three years after the Mosgiel health centre opened andmiddot by ourselves six years after it opened gave no evidence of a decline inA amp E use by Mosgiel residents It appeared that since the A amp E department was rarely used for routine primary care problems there was little opportunity for the health centre to substitute for the department Possibly a neighbourhood closer to the A amp E department would have shown more effect from a health centre Also as Alpert et al [33] suggested habit patterns of usage could be difficult to change

Williams et al [34] investigated the effect of general practitioner deputising services on A amp E department use in the Sheffield Hospital region They found that deputising service referrals did not add significantly to the workloads of A amp Edepartments nor did it appear that many patients referred themselves to the A amp E departments in preference to consulting the deputising service doctors They commented that the deputising services may have been meeting a demand previously coped with by the hospitals

It is possible that health centres ana deputising services have contradictory effects on A amp E department visits People who realise a doctor is readily available through these services may use thatmiddot service rather than the A amp E department Other people may reason that if they cannot see their usual doctor it is just as convenient to use the A amp E department as the health centre or deputising service

82

A amp E STAFF VIEWS OF PATIENTS

Overseas studies

Several overseas studies have explored the views of A amp E staff about their patients Roth [35] found that staff applied concepts of social worth which were common in the larger society to their patients so that higher status people were likely to get more respectful treatment than lower status Staff tended tomiddot oVerestimate the numbers of patients seen as undesirable such as drunks venereal disease cases and welfare cases as well as overestimating the numbers using the department inappropriately Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff categorised patients as good (clinically interesting allowing staff to practise their skills and testing the competence of staff) and rubbish (a socially-defined category including drunks overdoses tramps and trivia which were usually minor injuries or conditions not requiring medical attention) Hughes [37] commented that the good and rubbish categories were relatively small groups and that staff had a neutral attitude to the bulk of the people visiting the department

Jeffery [36] found that staff reacted punitively to rubbish patients using delay verbal hostility and vigorous restraint of unco-operative patients particularly overdoses According to Roth (35] patients seen as unco-operative will be told to wait their turn and may be threatened with refusal of treatment Several authors found that patients visiting for tri vial complaints tended to be handled with surface politenessmiddot even if they were subject to post-hoc attacks in written records or departmental gossip [363738]

Burgess and Holmstrom [39] found that the attitudes and actions of health providers could increase or diminish the psychological consequencies for women who had been raped and suggested that staff awareness and training would be valuable Alexander [40] studied nurses preceptions of women who had been raped and found that while the womens characteristics were important the nurses own personality and attitudes were more important Alexander concluded that short-term sensitivity training was unlikely to be effective and that great care was necessary in selecting health providers to care for raped women

Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff viewed patients as having a legitimate claim to medical care if they were not responsible for their condition if they were restricted in their reasonable activities by the condition if they viewed their condition as an undesirable state and if they co-operated in trying to get well He commented that people visiting repeatedly because of overdoses or fights were regarded as not co-operating while repeated injuries from sports activities were viewed as legitimate Roth [19] in a study of five United States A amp E departments found that staff views on the legitimacy of a visit depended partly on the patients source of referral People referred by health professionals were usually accepted as legitimate exceptmiddot where A amp E staff suspected a doctor of dumping an unwanted patient on to the department Contract cases where the hospital had a contractual relationship with the school nursing home or workplace the patient came from were immediately accepted as appropriate People brought in by police came into this category Self-referred patients were classified as legitimate or not depending on their social characteristics their condition and the kind of demands they were making on the department In a later paper Roth [35] noted that cases where a definite diagnosis could be made (surgical conditions asthma overdoses maternity

83

patients) were considered legitimate whereas psychiatric conditions and cases requiring more subtle or complex diagnosis were regarded as illeg i timate

The New Zealand situation

While this study did not observe staff-patient interactions in detail we asked A amp E staff about the patients and how they dealt with them and we watched staff at work for some time in each department

We found some evidence that New Zealand A amp E staff shared the views of their British and United States counterparts House surgeons tended to regard the clinically interesting patients as goodand often commented unfavourably on patients whose condition was not easily diagnosed With regard to the rubbish category of patients some A amp E staff disapproved of them while others accepted the whole range of patients as part of working in the department We saw little evidence of punitive reactions to patients although delay andmiddot the intimidating effect of a white coat appeared to be used at times The views of A amp E staff about specific categories of patients are covered in the next sections

Sports injuries

From the Christchurch and Waikato [4] studies we have estimated that 13 per cent of A amp E injury visits were for sports injuries At Green Lane A amp E department staff had recorded all rugby injuries on the A amp E log in the late April week sampled the rugby injuries comprised six per cent of all injuries

A amp E staff saw the department as the appropriate place for the treatment of sports injuries One staff member commented that most general practitioners would get a shock if presented with a sports injury to treat Staff also understood that coaches usually sent people straight to the A amp E department as an automatic procedure and that this was often legitimate since the injury might have required an x-ray However a frequently mentioned source of annoyance was people presenting with a sports injury some considerable time after the event such as on Monday morning or after the post-match drinking bout A amp E staff thought these patients should have seen a general practitioner particularly when the condi tion was not acute A few A amp E staff commented that they were beginning to regard repeated sports injuries as self-inflicted injuries and were less sympathetic to those patients

Alcohol-related visits

In all the A amp E departments staff commented that many of the assault and motor vehicle accident injuries were directlyassociated with alcohol (The only exceptions were the suburban hospitals which Were closed evenings and nights) Staff estimated that from half to all patients seen on Friday and Saturday evenings had been drinking or had been hurt by someone who was drinking This estimate may seem exaggerated but inspection of Wellington A amp E logs by Reinken [41] suggested that an estimate of 50 to 79 per cent was reasonable Staff at three of the central city A amp E departments commented that they treated a number of old alcoholic and derelict people usually for chronic complaints or because they had been attacked

84

From time to time staff as well as facilities have suffered abuse and violence A amp E nurses always commented on problems with disorderly behaviour both by patients and by friends of patients in the waiting room In two hospitals nurses had little faith in the security provisions made for their safety but mostly the nurses seemed to cope reasonably well House surgeons said they found intoxicated patients difficult to treat because of their lack of co-operation A amp E officers had few comments on alcohol-related visits probably because they rarely worked evening or weekend shifts

Domestic violence and rape

Unfortunately we did not ask specific questions about these topics but at three hospitals nurses mentioned that they saw cases of child abuse and at another three hospitals wife-beating was mentioned We have few details as to how staff dealt with these women and children but from the comments made by the nurses and on house surgeon they felt a need for more psychiatric or social work backup There were no comments about women who had been raped attending the department

_Regular visitors

At most of the urban A amp E departments and at Rotorua and Whakatane staff commented that they had a group of regular visitors This group was never large unlike the 20 to 60 per cent of workload reported as regular visi tors by two United states public hospitals [19] Asthmatics (who had previously been advised to go straight to the department) were regarded as legitimate visitors and staff watched for children visiting regularly with injur-ies in order to detect cases of chi ld abuse However people who repeatedly presented drunk or with overdoses or with an emotional or social problem were regarded with resigned acceptance or some annoyance One A amp E department maintained a special file for the records of regular visitors while in other departments a bulky bundle of cards stapled together alerted staff to yet another visit from a regular client_

Trivia

When the A amp E staff talked about trivia they mentioned some of the minor injuries and sickness from the GP-Ioad category but also included very minor injuries such as a splinter in a finger or a cut needing only a Bandaid Some A amp E staff felt that trivial conditions did not require any medical treatment especially not from a department designed to treat emergency conditions A few staff members commented that people with minor conditions cluttered up the waiting room and were physically in the way Some also said that knowing the waiting room was full put more pressure on them However other A amp E staff stressed that apparently trivial conditions were important and worrying to the patients involved and that reassurance at least was required

It has been suggested that people using the A amp E department for trivial conditions decrease the ability of the department to cope with emergencies [42431 Most staff interviewed felt confident that people attending for trivial complaints in no way jeopardised the quality of care given to the more urgent cases because the latter were seen first ThUS the minor complaints were annoying and added work but did not compromise the departments ability to give good care

85

DISCUSSION

Why do patients attend the A amp E department The public seem to have a rough and ready decision tree if you are sick go to your doctor if you are hurt go to the Aamp E department

The department is definitely seen as the appropriate place for treating accidental injuries People say thats what its there forI and they have everything there A visit to the general practitioner for such an injury is seen as unnecessary and delaying

A significant proportion of accidents and some sickness conditions happen away from home The patient may decide to go to the A amp E department because it is closer or easier for transport or work reasons Often someone else (a schoolteacher a coach or traffic officer) sends the patient to the A ampE department as an automatic procedure

Most people with sickness conditions visit their general practitioner so it is not surprising that those who visit the A amp E department have often been referred by their doctor The sick patients who corne directly to the department usually see their condition as needing urgent care Therefore if they try to contact their doctor and fail or if they think the doctor will be unavailable they head for the hospital

It is also possible that the general practitioners surgery is associated with waiting while the hospital is associated with swift action perhaps due to televised images as noted by Cooke [44] In fact the waiting times are generally equivalent in both settings it is the significance of that waiting which is different The patients may feel that if something happens to worsen their case they will be attended to quickly if they are waiting in the A amp E department rather than waiting at home for the general practitioner to visit

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners formiddot patients From the patients comments one of the main attractions of the A amp E department is its availability that it is always open and staffed In comparison general practitioners were often seen as not being available as difficult to contact or as unable to respond quickly to an emergency In this sense A amp E departments appear to be competitive with general practitioners As was noted in Chapter 6 sickness visits to the A amp E department were more likely to happen out of hour s than in hours The overseas studies suggest that health centres and deputising services which offer greater availability of doctors particularly out of hours may reduce the use of A amp E departments The only way general practitioners could compete with the availability of the A amp E department would be to improve their own out-of-hours service

The cost of visiting a general practitioner has also been cited as a reason for people visiting the A amp E department where treatment is free This is only relevant for sickness conditions since the cost of general practitioner treatment for accidental injuries is covered by the Accident Compensation Corporation However in none of the New Zealand studies covered in this chapter did people give cost of treatment as a major reason for attending the A amp E department A amp E staff tended to over-estimate the importance of cost as a reason but this was not surprising as they also oVer-estimated the number of people visiting the department for sickness conditions

86

Despite sickness visits to the doctor being free in Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14 J found similar levels of A amp E sickness attendance there as here Steinmetz [45) reported that on the introduction of Medicare in Quebec doctors no longer charged patients whereas previously only care in an emergency room was free He found that the demand for medical care increased at both sites the doctor and the emergency room but that there was no evidence of a shift from the emergency room back to the doctor Thus there is little evidence that the cost of visiting a general practitioner causes people to visit the A amp E department Rather people use the department because they see it as the appropriate place for treatment of their condition and it is available

Turning now to staff a~titudes to the patients it seems that acceptance of the great variety of people (and their conditions) is a necessary part of working in the A amp E department However the staff comments do raise some concerns Abusive and violent patients have been a problem in some hospitals and a reappraisal of security arrangements in some of the urban A amp Edepartments would be desirable

A amp E staff should be aware that women and children presenting with injuries may have received them in domestic violence and that full information on how the injury happened may not be volunteered It is difficult for staff to do more than treat the injuries when there are few specialised support services available However some attempts are being made to provide such services for children [46] and through v9luntary organisations such as womens refuges A amp E staff should maintain good contact with these services where they exist and work with others to institute them where they do not

Staff should also maintain contact with rape crisIs centres so that women who have been raped can ring them for short or long-term support if they want it Alexanders work [40] suggests that while a raped woman is in the department she should be cared for by a crisis team of hospital staff (not necessarily A amp E staff) who have volunteered for that work Perhaps this approach could be tried in New Zealand A amp E departments

87

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S - Ca$ualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) P 272-279

2 RICHARDS JG and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

3 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C andREINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

4 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

5 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care Vbull Determinants of use of hospital emergency services E Richard Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

6 Casual attenders a socia-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcastle-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

7 STRATMANN William C and ULLMAN Ralph - A study of consumer attitudes about health care the role of the emergency room in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1033-1043

8 KELMAN Howard Rand LAWE Dorothy S- Usemiddot of the hospital emergency room in re1atiop to th~ use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

9 INGRAMD R CLARKE D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

fO GARRAWAY W M - The work of a casualty department in Health Bulletin - v 27 no 3 (1969) p 26-30

11 KAHN Lawrence ANDERSON Mary and PERKOFF Gerald T - Patients perceptions and uses of a pediatric emergency room in Soc Sci Med - v 7 (1973) p 155-160

12 CALNAN M ABSON I E P and BUTLER J R - In case of emergency inI

Health Soc Serv J - (1982) p 615-617

13 HOLOHAN Ann M - Accident and emergency departments illness and accident behaviour in Social Rev (Mono] - (1976) p 111-119

14 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Serv J - (1981) ~ 1139-1142

15 The functioning of a childrens hospital casualty department Susan Lovell et aI in Med J Aust - v 1 (1975) P 135-138

16 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R Call Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

88

17 WINGERT WA Friedman D B and LARSON W R - The demographic and ecological characteristics of a large urban paediatric outpatient population and implications for improving community paediatric care in A~ J Public Health - v 58 (1968) p-859

18 CALNAN M - Managing -minor- disorders pathways to a hospital accident and emergency department in Sociol Health Illness- v 5 no 2 (1983) p 149-167

19 ROTH J A - Utilisation of the hospital emergency department in J Health Soc Behav - v 12 (1971) P 312-320

20 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) P 163

21 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 no 2 (1971) p307-312

22 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J- Help The hospital emergency unit as community physician in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) P 248-260

23 MAGNUSSON G - The use and abuse of accident and emergency departments - the Stockholm experience in World Hosp - vIS no 3 (1979) p 170-172

24 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL D J and WALKER J H - Practitioners patients and the accident department I in Hosp Health Serv Rev shy(1975) P 80-84 I

25 CONWAY Hugh - Emergency medical care in Br Med J - v 2 (1976) p 511-513

26 PEASE R - A study of patients in a London accident and emergency department with special reference to general practice in Practitioner - v 211 (1973) p 634-638

27 MOK CH - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

28a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident s~atistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington- Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

89

29 KINLOCH P J - Samoan health practices -in Wellington - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 9-iO (Occasional paper series no 12)

30 MOORE_ Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEHect of a neighbourhood health centre onhospi tal emergency room us~e - in Med Care v 10 no 3 (1972) P 240-247

31 HOCHEISERLouis I WOODWARD Kenneth and CHARNEY Evan - Effect of the neighbourhood health centre on the use of pediatric emergency departments 1n ROchester~ New York in N Eng J Med - v 285 no 3 (1971) p 148-152

32 _MAYNARD Edward Jand DODGE Jeffrey S -- Introducing a community health centre at M05giel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (Aamp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

33 The types of families that use an emergency clinic Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ala New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

34 WILLIAMS B T DIXON R A and KNOWELDEN J - The impact of general practitioner deputising services on accident and emergency departments in the Sheffield hospital region in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 23 (1973) p 638-645

35 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) p 839-856

36 JEFFERY R - Normal rubbish deviant patients in casualty departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 1 no 1 (1979) p 90-107

37 HUGHES D - Lay assessment of clinical seriousness practical decision-making by non-medical staff in a hospi tal casualty department - University of Wales Swansea 1980 Ph D Thesis

38 DINGWALL R and MURRAY T - Categorisation in accident departments -good- patients -bad- patients and middotchildren- in Sociol Health Illness - v 5 no 2 (1983) p 127-148

39 BURGESS Ann Wolbert and HOLMSTROM Lynda Lytle - The rape victim in the emergency ward in American Journal of Nursing - v 73 no 10 (1973) p 1741-1745

40 ALEXANDER Cheryl S - The responsible victim nurses perceptions of victims of rape in Journal of Health and Social Behaviour - v 21 (March 1980) p 22-23

41 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

90

42 MAYNARD Edward J - The appication of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment -University of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 161-194

43 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - NewYork Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

44 COOKE Alistair - The doctor (1981) p 1652-1655

in society in Br Med J - v 283

45 STEINMETZ Nicholas and HOEY John R - Hospital emergency utilisation in Montreal before and after Medicare experience in Med Care - v 16 no 2 (1978) pl33-139

room the Quebec

46 GEDDIS D C - Child Abuse report of national symposium held in Dunedin September 1979 - Auckland National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1979 p 30-34 60-63

91

CHAPTER 8

Utilisation of accident and emergency departments

In this chapter we consider A amp E ufefrom a new perspective looking at the rates of attendance by people in different neighbourhoods We examine variations in the rates among areas and we discuss the evidence they provide as to the effect of doctor availability on A amp E use Next we analyse several factors which could account for the variations in attendance rates including distance from the hospi tal social characteristics of the areas and A amp E department characteristics Finally we present results from several studies which compare rates of attendance at general practitioners and at A amp E departments

COMPARISON OF A amp E UTILISATION AMONG HOSPITAL CATCHMENT AREAS

The neighbourhoods that we have used are census area units sometimes grouped contiguously to achieve socially and economically homogeneous areas that have populations of about 2000 or more We grouped all of New Zealand into 682 such neighbourhoods Of these 442 neighbourhoods are in the catchment irea of one of the 15 A amp E departments studied

Using the attendance numbers taken from the A amp E logs age-adjusted quarterly rates of attendancemiddot have been calculated (indirectly standardised to the total New Zealand population at the 1981 census) These rates have been calculated for each neighbourhood separately for injury and sickness conditions for in and out of hours and for first and recall visits Because there were very few recall visits for sickness conditions they have been omitted from the analyses in this chapter When we talk about recall visits we are referring only to recall visits for injuries

The attendance rates have been combined for the neighbourhoods making up the catchment area of an A amp E department These rates measure the use made by people living in a particular area of any A amp E department in their region Usually people living in the catchment area of an A amp E department do visit that department However particularly in the North Shore and Kenepuru areas a large number of residents attend other A amp E departments Thus the rates presented here should be interpreted as attendance rates of people living in an area not necessarily attendance rates at particular A amp E departments

The rates for each catchment area are presented in Table 16 In Table 17 the annual rates of accidental death and admission to hospital for accidental injury similarly age-adjusted are presented

Results

As Table 16 shows the overall attendance rates varied considerably in the A amp E department catchment areas studied

92

Sickness attendance

Among the urban catchment areas the Wellington Board region showed very high rates of use of A amp E departments for sickness attendance Except for Rotorua and Whakatane out of hours the provincial and rural areas had very low rates of sickness attendance

TABLE 16 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3

Midd1emore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals studied

First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness In Out of hours hours

35 55 41 67 82 121 72 105 54 72 52 64

17 26 36 51 09 17 21 23

12 8B 54 26

36 36 72 61

46 63

Injury In Out of In Out of hours hours hours hours

125 130 137 25 151 130 159 25 17 0 196 36 41 127 156 87 B8 136 151 54 30 229 240 123 42

79 70 42 29 241 215 99 72 203 96 64 10 14 4 213 66 98

173 179 59 62 223 85 83 32

194 92 216 47 164 96 116 20

154 145 101 38

Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 Since few recall visits were for sickness conditions only recall visits for injury have been included in this category

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

1

93

TABLE 17 HOSPITAL ADMISSION FOR ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR)l AND DEATH DUE TO ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR) 2 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area Admitted for Died from Population accidental accidental of ca tchment injury injury area

Full-time departments

U rban Auckland3

Middlemore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals

104 123 146 153 140 142

194 169 196 149

243 214

95 133

139

067 062 062 059 058 072

070 089 065 068

059 075

048 096

066

408 948 264 093 133 611 147 858 336 420 III 981

110 205 56 613 98 883 50 250

39 087 37 767

146 661 52 389

3 126 747

1 Source Hospital Discharges 1979 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

2 Source Mortality Data 1974-1978 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

common catchment

Injury attendance

First attendances for injury also showed wide variations among the hospital catchment areas Wellington Rotorua Whakatane and Dunedin catchment areas showed relatively high rates of first attendance for injury both in

94

and out of hours Timarus catchment area had high rates only out of hours while those of Grey Taranaki and North Shore were high only during normal work hours Northlands catchment area had very low attendance rates both in and out of hours

The pattern of difference from place to place in first attendance rates for injury means that in any year a person in Rotorua would have more than one chance in six of attending the A amp E department for an injury while a person in Northland has but one chance in 16 of doing so

~s this due to a difference in the rate at which accidents occur It does not appear so since neither the rates for death due to accidental injury nor the rates of hospital admission for accidental injury follow the same pattern as A amp E attendance (see Table 11) In fact the death rates were low in Christchurch and North Shore areas (where A amp E attendance was average) and high in Kenepuru areas where A amp E attendance was low Similarly admission rates were sometimes higher in areas where rates of A amp E attendance for injury were lower (Northland and Taranaki) and vice versa (North Shore)

Also the admission rates probably reflect a tendency for more rural hospi tals to admit injured patients more readily because of the distance they would have to travel for outpatient care

Recall attendance

As noted in Chapter 6 the practice of recalling patients was different from hospital to hospital and affected the composition of the A amp E department 5 total attendance Naturally the rate of recall visits also differed markedly in the catchment areas

Relatively low rates of recall visits characterised the Northland Wellington Christchurch and Taranaki areas The Auckland Hospital Board areas had very different patterns in and out of hours with high rates of recall visits in hours and low rates out of hours

Effect of general practitioner availability

Is there any evidence from these rates (Table 16) that availability of general practitioners had an effect on A amp E use If there was an effect it would be evident from comparing in hours sickness attendance with out of hours sickness attendance since when the general practitioner is less available out of hours the patients may be more likely to present at hospital Was the out of hours rate higher than the in hours rate taking into account the different proportions of peoples waking hours in each category Overall this did not appear to be so Compared to the in hours rate the out of hours rate was only slightly higher than would been expected Only in Whakatane was the out of hours sickness rate markedly higher than would have been expected Thus any effect of doctor availability on A amp E use would seem to be very small

See next page

95

FACTORS EXPLAINING CATCHMENT AREA VARIATIONS IN A amp E UTILISATION

There are several possible explanations for the variations in A amp E use

o that the hospital attracts those nearby and if the neighbourhoods near the hospital are densely populated then more people will attend the A amp E department

o that the social characteristics of the catchment areas are different

a that the A amp E department does or does not encourage the public to attend through its policy or practice

Several studies have suggested that distance and socio-economic factors are related to A amp E attendance Distance has been found to be inversely related to attendance in Sweden [1] the United States [23] Britain [4] and New Zealand [5] Some studies have found that lower socio-economic status people use A amp E departments more [678910] although Kljakovic [5] found that Wellington children from lower socio-economic status families were more likely to see a doctor before going to the A amp E department than children from higher status families Berki and Kobashigiwa [11] found that less educated groups used A amp E more while Weinermann [6] and Ullman (12) found no effect Several studies have found that minority group members (67913] and immigrants [1141 tend to use A amp E departments more Kelman and Lane [15] found that family characteristics such as size and age of head-of-household also relamiddotted to A amp E use Cohen et al (16] found no income or employment effects on A amp E use but did find that use was positively related to the number of hospital-based doctors per capita

METHOD

Using multivariate statistical methods it is possible to evaluate which of the explanations ( or which combination of them) best accounts for the observed variations in A amp E use among the neighbourhoods (See Appendix C for the details of the multivariate analyses) Overseas researchers have used similar statistical techniques to explore factors related to A amp E attendance [131116] The factors we chose to explore are described on the next page

We computed the expected value assuming that in any week in hours comprised 50 hours and out of hours comprised 118 hours of which 62 hours were spent awake

Therefore the out of hours rate should equal 62 ~ 50 = 124 times the in hours rate plus E where E is a correction term for night time attendance About eight per cent of total attendance was in the eight-hours night time period [1317] so E can be estimated as eight per cent of the total sickness attendance ie E = 008 x 109 = 087

Therefore the expected out of hours attendance A is

A = (124 x 46) + 087 = 658

The observed value was in fact 63 per 1000 similar to the expected rate

96

One factor was the distance from the centre of the neighbourhood to the A amp E department For neighbourhoods near Kenepuru and North Shore Hospitals in hours and out of hours distances to the nearest open department were calculated separately_

Another factor was the social characteristics of the neighbourhood using variables derived from the 1981 Census of Population and Dwellings chosen on the basis of known or posited relevance to health services utilisation These social characteristics can be listed as follows

o age structure - the proportions of the population under 5 years between 5 and 14 years and 65 years or more

o ethnicity the proportions of the population classed as European ethnicity and Maori ethnicity

o marital status - the proportion of adults separated widowed or divorced

o education - the proportion of adults without tertiary education

o income - the per capita earned income for adults and the proportion of the adults on a means-tested benefit

o employment - the proportions of adults actively seeking work in a bluecollar occupation and partiCipating in the paid workforce

o tenure of dwellings the average weekly rental and the proportion of owner-occupied dwellings

o car ownership - the proportions of households without a car and with two or more cars

o a measure of the north-to-south gradient over the country

A third factor was the general practitioner prOVision as measured by the population-ta-general practitioner ratio

Finally the characteristics of the A amp E department made up a fourth factor We focussed on the following areas

o our classification of the departments and their catchment area into urban prOVincial rural and suburban

o departmental policy on recalling patients (see Chapter 6)

o departmental open door policy on treating sickness attenders (see Chapter 6)

o medical and nurse staffing levels (from Chapter 5) relative to the-population of the catchment area

Production workers transport and equipment operators labourers agricultural workers animal husbandry and forestry workers fishermen hunters

I

97

Results of the multivariate analyses

The effects of distance

Sickness first attendance The distance from hospital affected the rates of sickness first attendance for out of hours visits accounting for nearly 20 per cent of the variance It had less effect on in hours sickness visits accounting for only 9 per cent of the variance

Injury first attendance The most significant characteristic explaining neighbourhood differences in injury first attendance rates was the distance from the A amp E department In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than half the total variance In urban areas it was less important accounting for one-eighth of the variance for in hours rates and one-sixth for out of hours rates

Recall attendance The distange from the hospital was related to in hours recall attendance In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than 40 per cent of the variance but it was much less important in urban neighbourhoods

In summary distance was inversely related to attendance rates with neighbourhoods further from the hospital having lower rates The effect of distance was stronger for injury attendances than for sickness attendances

The effects of social characteristics

Sickness first attendances Out of hours social factors had a substantial effect on sickness attendance People from neighbourhoods where many households were car less were more likely to attend the A amp E department and this factor accounted foi 19 percent of the variance in attendance rate Taking car lessness into account people f rom neighbourhoods where adults were better educated were more likely to attend the A amp E department Adding in the level of educational attainment raised the percentage of variance explained to 265 per cent The same pattern relating carlessness and higher educational attainment to high attendance rates applied to sickness attendance in hours but the effects were less marked In combination with distance the social factors explained 16 per cent of the variance of in hours sickness attendance rates

Injury first attendance In hours the rate of attendance for injury causes was only slightly related to social characteristics of the neighbourhoods adding 6 per cent to the variance explained Out of hours the social factors had a similarly minor effect adding 4 per cent

Recall attendance The social characteristics bad some effect on in hours recall attendance in urban areas In combination with a small distance effect the social factors explained 18 per cent of the variation For non-urban areas the social factors had no effect on in hours recall attendance only distance was important

Thus some of the differences among A amp E departments in the rates of sickness and recall attendance were due to differences in the social characteristics of the departments catchment areas However social factors were not important for injury attendances

98

Tbe effect of general practitioner provision

Initial correlation analyses showed that the population-to-general practitioner ratio was not significantly related to out of hours sickness attendance rates However it was positively related to out of hours injury attendance largely because the numbermiddot of people per doctor in a neighbourhood increases as the distance of the neighbourhood from the hospital decreases

In the multiple regression analyses the ratio nevermiddot entered as a significant variable Thus there was no significant effect of general practitioner provision in the community on A amp E attendance rates (see Table 18)

The effect of A amp E department characteristics

To look at the effect of A amp E characteristics on attendance rates it was necessary to cor rect the rates for the distance and social character istic effects just presented This was done (see Appendix C for details of the principal components analysis used to reduce the data)

Controlling for the neighbourhood factors thedepartment-to-department differences in rates were substantially reduced but were still present (see Table 18) Some patterns in the adjusted rates for sickness and 1nJury could be distinguished The areas served by urban departments tended to have low injury rates especially in hours and high sickness rates especially out of hours The Dunedin areas were an exception their rates were more like those of the areas served by provincial departments which had moderately high injury rates and low sickness rates The rural areas had very high injury rates and high sickness rates The suburban areas were similar to the urban areas except that North Shore areas had high injury rates The adjusted rates for recall attendance were highly variable and demonstrated no clear patterns among the departments

Further analyses were carried out to determine how the A amp E department characteristics related to the adjusted rates (Appendix C contains details of the analyses of variance the Student-Newman-Keuls means tests and the regression analyses of these differences) Only the statistically significant results are presented below

A amp E department classification Out or hours the adjusted sickness rates were lower in the provincial departments areas than elsewhere The sickness rates for the Wellington Hospital Board areas were no longer markedly higher than other areas

In hours the adjusted injury rates were higher in rural departments areas for first visits and in suburban departments areas for recall visits than elsewhere

Open door policy Adjusted rates of attendance for sickness (in and out of hours) were higher where departments had a stated open door policy than elsewhere This explains the low sickness rates in the provincial departments since most of them had restricted policies Where departments had a restricted policy adjusted rates of in hours injury attendance were higher than in open places

99

Recall policy In hours the adjusted injury attendance rates (both first and recall) were higher in areasmiddot where departments had a stated policy favouring recalling patients Out of hours adjusted rates of sickness visits were lower in areas with recall-favouring departments

TABLE 18 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED AND NEIGHBOURHOOD-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 AND POPULATION-TO-GENERAL PRACTITIONER RATI02 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchinent area First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness Injury Population In Out of In Out of In Out of to-GP ratio

hours hours hours hours hours hours

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3 44 57 130 144 100 24 1 476

Middlemore 52 74 165 148 131 24 2 078

Wellington 55 77 160 153 54 30 1 630 Hutt 61 89 130 137 10~9 83 2 237 Christchurch 50 71 116 117 76 27 1 651 Dunedin 40 52 204 193 159 38 1 558

Provincial Northland Base 46 56 128 132 53 45 1 735 Rotorua 34 33 188 163 73 57 1 656 Taranaki Base 17 29 227 ll8 81 19 2 243 Timaru 21 35 168 209 83 88 2 085

Rural Whakatane 29 91 207 222 81 84 1 679 Grey 67 57 286 135 131 39 2 310

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 51 69 198 156 175 57 1 865 Kenepuru 47 54 146 131 129 31 2 035

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors The attendance rates given in Table 16 have been adjusted for neighbourhood-determined factors ie distance from the hospital and social characteristics

2 Source Doctor numbers in full-time equivalents from Medical Council data unpublished

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

100

Staffing levels Adjusted first In]Ury attendance rates were positively related to levels of medical staffing and less impressively to levels of nurse staffing Neither the policy variables nor the size of department accounted for the relationship between lnJury attendance rates and staffing However there was no significant relationship between staffing levels and the adjusted rates of sickness and recall visits

COMPARISON OF A amp E USE AND GENERAL PRACTITIONER USE

Material for comparisons of this sort is hard to find We have compared the level of childrens attendance at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments found by Kljakovic [5] with childrens attendance at general practitioners in the same area over the same period (derived from General Medical Services benefit claims made by general practitioners) In an average week 652 per 1000 children in the Wellington Hospital Board area consulted a general practitioner whereas 35 per 1000 children visited an A amp E department (see Appendix D for details)

Similarly in Tauranga during an average week in the period 1979 to 1982 48 per 1000 people attended the A amp E department while 53 Sper 1000 people consulted a general practitioner [18]

Snelgar [19] compared attendance at Northland Base A amp E department with urgent consultations made by general practitioners (derived from the General Medical Services benefit claims) In an average week 36 per 1000 people in the whangarei area consulted a general practitioner for an urgent condi Hon while 09 per 1000 people made a first visit to the A amp E department

For first injury attendances we have compared rates derived from surveys ot people treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident [20] with similar rates obtained from our tallies at Auckland Hospital Board A amp E departments and data made available to usmiddot by Snelgar McRae and Keenan In a week 37 per 1000 people living in the catchment areas of the above A amp E departments made a first injury visit to an A amp E department while 1 per 1000 New Zealanders made a first injury visit to a general practitioner (see Tab~e 19)

Elderly people were as likely to go to the general practitioner as to the A amp E department for an accidental injury whereas children and young adults were five to six times more likely to go to the A amp E department as the general practitioner Foreign body injuries and cuts appeared to predispose attendance at an A amp E department whereas burns and falls tended to be taken to the general practitioner more than other injuries

In summary people visited general practitioners much more than the A amp E department even for urgent conditions It was only for specific injury conditions that the A amp E department was consulted more than general practitioners

101

TABLE 19 COMPARISON OF FIRST ATTENDANCES FOR INJURY AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS AND GENERAL PRACTITIONERS

Rates per 1000 per week A amp E departments l General practitioners2

Age distribution

All ages 37 10 0-4 years 38 06 5-14 years 39 08 15-29 years 66 11 30-64 years 23 11 65 years and over 11 10

Injury conditions3

Falls 066 027 Cuts 045 009 Foreign bodies 025 002 Toxic effects 014 001 Burns 007 003 Other 232 058

1 Calculated from the author st tallies at Auckland Middlemore Green Lane and NorthShore A amp E departments and data from Northland Base Waikato and Christchurch A amp E departments

2 Calculated from ACC Statistical Supplements - Wellington Accident Compensation Corporation November 1977 March 1978 September 1978 March 1979 and personal communications

3 These categories have been derived from those used in the A amp E department tallies and the type of accident categories used by the ACC

DISCUSSION

The analyses presented in this chapter confirm that distance and social factors are related to A amp E use in New Zealand Their effects were not independent but rather were entwined in a complex way Even within the group of social factors the interactions were complex and there were no simple relations between a specific social factor and A amp E attendance

However distance from the hospital was clearly a major determinant of A amp E use particularly for injury conditions both first and recall The distance effect was especially strong in non-urban areas perhaps because of the greater distances people had to travel in order to reach the hospital Altogether the strong effect of distance was not surprising given the body of overseas literature documenting distance as a factor in health services utilisation and also the number of A amp E attenders citing the accessibility of the department as a reason for using it (see Chapter 7)

102

The social factors were important determinants of sickness attendance with a stronger effect out of hours than in hours They were not important for injury conditions Possibly the appropriateness of the A amp E department for injury conditions as cited by attenders (see Chapter 7) overrides the effect of the social factors

One social factor which had a relatively strong effect on sickness attendance particularly out of hours was car ownership Areas where many households had no car tended to have high sickness rates Perhaps people who have to call a taxi or borrow someone elses car to get medical care go to the A amp E department because they know it will be open and treatment will be available

During our discussions A amp E staff had suggested that Pacific Islanders made greater use of the department because they were accustomed to using the hospital for all medical care in the islands If this was an important factor we would have expected ethnicity to figure prominently in the statistical analyses However for first attendances ethnicity had only a minor effect and in fact areas with high proportions of Pacific Islanders tended to have low attendance rates

Many A amp E staff also suggested that the cost of visiting a general practitioner was a major reason for sickness attendance at the department So we would have expected low income unemployment or receipt of a means-tested benefit to have been related to increased sickness attendance rates However neither income nor receipt of a benefit were at all related to the sickness rates and areas with a low proportion of adults in the paid workforce tended to have low attendance rates Thus contrary to general opinion neither the cost of visiting a general practitioner nor a Pacific Island background appear to have a strong effect on A amp E use

As noted in Chapter 7 we found that some patients were attracted to the A amp E department by the size of the hospital and the impression that specialised equipment was available there However the urban departments which were the largest and which had the most specialised equipment did not have higher attendance rates than the other departments In fact they tended to have slightly lower rates of injury attendance than the other departments

The results presented in this chapter show clearly that even aft~r

controlling for distance and social effects departmental characteristics are related to A amp E attendance It is understandable that rates of sickness attendance reflect whether a department has an open door or restricted policy However the relation between high injury rates and a restricted policy on- sickness attendance requires some explanation Perhaps these departments have always had a high injury rate and have restricted the access of sickness patients so they could cope with the injured patients Conversely the operation of a restricted policy may have convinced the local community that while the department is only to be used for injuries it is indeed the place for all injuries so generating a high attendance rate

It was also understandable that departments with a policy of favouring recalls did have high rates of recall visits But why did these departments have high first attendance rates for injury This probably happens because high recall rates and high first attendance for injury rates go together since larger numbers of injured patients tend to produce larger numbers of patients requiring specialised A amp E follow-up care

103

There was a positive association between first injury attendance rates and staffing levels which could not be explained by the policies or the classification of the department The explanation of these associations is not straightforward The h~gher staffing levels may somehow account for the higher attendance - levels for example attracting clients by keeping the waiting time sh~rt Alternatively an unexamined feature of th department or its catchment area could generate higher attendance levels and staffing levels mayhavebeen adjusted to meetthe demand

Thus departmental characteristics such as policies on non-urgent sickness patients and on recall viSits and levels of medical and nurse staffing are related to attendance rates

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners for patients Looking first at the availability of the two services the greater availability of the A amp E department out of hours did not result in a higher than expected use over those hours Also doctor prOVision (as measured by the populationto-genetal practitioner ratio) was not Significantly related to A amp E attendance rates Thus while the A amp E department was described by patients as desirable because of its availability - (Chapter 7) the attendance rates of the neighbourhoods did not refiect the lcwer availability of general practitioner services

Secondly the comparison of attendance at A amp E departments and general practitioners suggested that in an average week out of 1000 New zealanders four or five would go to an A amp E department and 50 to 60 would go to a general practitioner Of those Visiting the A amp E department on average only one would be attending for sickness Given that non-urgent sickness visits were only 60 per cent of all sickness visits (see Chapter 6) it is clear that general practitioners were losing only a tiny proportion of their workload when A amp E departments treated non-urgent sickness patients~

It - is also clear that general practitioners did not treat many injured people Only one of the 50 to 60 per 1000 people visiting a general practitioner in an average week would be making a first injury visit It would seem that thetwo serVices A amp E departments and general practice arecomplementaiy rather than competiti-ve

REFERENCES

1 MAGNUSSON Gudjon - The role of proximity in the use of hospital emergency departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 2 no 2 (1980) p 202-214

2 INGRAM D R CLARK D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Hed - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

3 ROGHHANN Klaus J and ZASTOWNY Thomas R - Proximity as a factor in the selection of health care providers emergency room visits compared to obstetric admissions and abortions in Soc Sci Med - v 13(0) (1979) p 61-69

4 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referred patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

5 KLJAKOVIC H ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

6 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care V Determinants of use of hospital emergency services Richard E Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

7 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

8 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 nomiddot 2 (1971) p 307-312

9 The types of families that use an emergency clinic - Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

10 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Servo - (1981) p 1139-1142

11 BERKI S E and KOBASHIGAWA B - Education and income effects in the use of ambulatory services in the United States an analysis of the 1970 National Health Interview Survey data in Int J Health Servo shyv 8 no 2 (1978) p 361-365

12 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SlRATMANN William c - An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1011-1020

13 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at AUckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

105

14 MOK C H - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

15 KELMAN Howard R and LANE Dorothy S - Use of the hospital emergency room in relation to the use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

16 COHEN Susan D GINSBERG Allen Sand VLADECK Bruce C - The middoteffects of unemployment and inflation on hospital-based ambulatory care in Am J Public Health - v 68 no 12 (1978) p 1219-1221

17 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

18 DALDY B M REINKEN J and SEDDON T D S - Report on the effect of funding in primary medical care - Tauranga Otumoetai Health Centre 1984 (In preparation)

19 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

20a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

107middot

CHAfTER 9

Conclusions

TheAamp E department is a complex changeable and challenging place It is also an ambiguous place since itmiddot fulfils several different and at times conflicting roles it is a hospital department an emergency service and a primary care service

THEA amp E DEPARTMENT AS A HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT

As a hospital department the A amp E department is the bullodd-one-out It differs from the other departments not only by being accessible at all times to people seeking medical care but also in the number of patients seen and the diversity and severity of illness and injury to be treated

Because of this diversity the A amp E service has little status within medical circles It tends to be seen as an area requiring few special skills and therefore not warranting specialty status However as Salmond [1] noted the humble casualty department provides a hospital with a display window where like it or not hospital wares are constantly on show to the public Good public relations require effective and efficient management of the Amiddotamp E department Also the doctors interviewed for this study stated that special skills in assessment surgery and orthopaedics were required The status of the A amp E department should be improved through a recognition both of the breadth and experience required for A amp E medicine and of the departments importance in the public view of the hospital While a post-graduate specialist programme is probably not warranted at present it should remain an option for future development

The Aamp E department plays a major partin the teaching of house surgeons Junior doctors quickly learn avariety of skills such as suturing lavage reading x-rays and resuscitation More importantly the A amp E department is usually their first experience of practising medicine without any immediately available consultation This study like Salmonds study in 1970 has demonstrated the lack of initial training and orientation and the inadequate senior supervisionrecei ved by many house surgeons in the A amp E department Clearly this should be remedied by the provision of specific training sessions at the beginning of the house surgeons A amp E run and by

increased senior supervision fn the A amp E department )

This study has also highlighted the desirability ofmiddot specific training courses for A amp E nurses Such coursesmiddot can improve the skills and confidence of the nurses and develop the different approach required for A amp E nursing compared to ward nursing The courses run by the Auckland hospitals may provide a useful basis for the development of postbasic and inservice training courses

Working in an A amp E department demands from all staff members an awareness of the social and emotional contexts of the people attending and the possible implications of their conditions for example people who have attempted suicide parents of- an infantmiddot with convulsions and women who have

108

been raped One aim of all training carried out in the department should be to foster such awareness Also it would be desirable for house surgeons to have experienced a psychological medicine run as well as a general medicine run and a surgical run before they work in the A amp E department All A amp E staff should be aware of the support services that they can calIon (eg social workers psychiatrists Salvation Army) or that the patient can contact (eg rape crisis centres womens refuges)

AS an important training site for house surgeons nurses and emergency workers such as ambulance personnel and police officers the A amp E department has a particular responsibility to maintain a high standard of care This study has not assessed quality of care directly although we have considered related areas such as the level of staffing and the experience of staff There is scope for evaluation of the quality of care gi ven for specific conditions The work reported by Mates and Sidel [2] provides some guidelines and a model whereby both process (measured by adherence to standards) and outcome can be studied Their example considered treatment of adult asthma patients and might for a start be replicated here in New Zealand

There is also scope for extending Mates and Sidels method to cover other conditions The ARCOS study [3] provides one model per taining to acute coronary or cardiovascular episodes There is less precendent for evaluating the quality of care in surgical or orthopaedic emergencies but the presentations of abdominal pain might be investigated as a usefUl beginning Removing healthy appendices is an expensive placebo The process evaluation of trauma care has not been reported on though wound sepsis might provide a suitable outcome measure Staff interviewed in our study discussed standards of suturing but no formal studies of quality of care in that respect have been reported

It must be considered that one explanation for the lack of study in the whole area is that very high standards prevail and the need for evaluation is therefore minimal Given patients high expectations and satisfaction with the service that explanation cannot be dismissed Yet studies that demonstrated a satisfactory level of care would confirm the high quality of care In some A amp E departments a small study of one reasonably significant type of emergency should be undertaken possibly modelled on the work of Mates and Sidel

As Gi bson [4] has pointed out the A amp E department acts not only as an entry point to the hospital but as a screen for the other outpatient and inpatient units of the hospital We found this was true of the New Zealand departments studied with only five to ten per cent of first attendances being referred to specialist outpatient clinics and five to fifteen per cent being admitted There were wide variations both in policy and practice with respect to patient disposition We consider that further study of acute medical admission practices focussing particularly on unnecessary hospitalisation is warranted

Some New Zealand studies [56J have tried to evaluate the need for care of patients presenting at the A amp E department They have tended to depend on the A amp E staffs assessment of whether a general practitioner (and a hypothetical one at that) could have dealt adequately with the case No studies have attempted to give a general practitioner assessment So the question of need for A amp E care remains open However it does not seem practical to devote more research effort to this topic until more is known

about the variable costmiddots oftreating minor injuries If such research is contemplated the techniques of activity analysis and recording systems proposed by Dalbyetal [7] andRoberts et al [8] could be useful

tmiddot bullmiddot

This study has not attempted to estimate the cost of A amp E care The information presented aboutothe physical size and staffing levels of A amp E departments suggests that the hospital service commits only a small share of resources to the A amp E department However with the continuing pressure on hospital resources the cost of A amp E care particularly if it is high relative to care by general practitioners has some importance Even a rough and ready costing of the whole service would be a first step Following that an indication of which parts are fixed costs to keep the essential service viable and which vary by volume or by character of workload would be a next step_ The variation in recall levels that we found suggests that savings in variable costs could be possible Gibson et al [9] in their account of a study of operating and patient care activity costs provide a valuable model on which some New Zealand studies could be based

THE A amp E DEPARTMENT AS AN EMERGENCY SERVICE

The A amp E department must be ready to cope with all kinds of emergencies whether they involve one or two badly hurt car-crash victims or the sudden influx of many patients after a natural disaster A major tool ensuring that a department is always prepared for a crisis situation is the disaster plan The United States Joint Committee on Accreditation of Hospitals requires every hospital to have a written disaster plan developed in conjunction with other relevant agencies which is tested in a full-scale drill at least twice a year The plan should cover assigning staff summoning staff to emergency duty setting aside parts of the hospital for specified purposes maintaining adequate supplies and co-ordination and communication within the hospital and with other hospitals police fire health and ambulance services and civil defence officials

Most of the- departments we studied had close liaison with the ambulance service and to a lesser extent with other services such as police fire and civil defence Six of the hospitals had adequate disaster plans which were revised on a reasonably regular basis but very few hospitals had had a full-scale drill to test the plan Many of the departments with inadequate disaster plans were in the process of revising them We commend this since we consider a comprehensive disaster plan which is regularly revised and tested at least annually to be an essential part of the A amp E service

While discussing emergency services it is worth noting that there has been little research done in New Zealand on the use of ambulance services There is a need both to document the coverage and formal structure of the service and to explore the effects if any of the different methods of funding this essential service The former is a necessary first step the latter presumes a study of both ambulance workload and of organisational matters such as staffing training and triage

Internationally there has been considerable discusion over the optimal distribution of A amp E departments nationwide Platt [IO] recommended that as a minimUm a population of 150 UOO was required to justify a full A amp E centre with seven days a week and 24 hours a day staffingbull Several

llO

authors [101112] have indicated the need for regional central or major accident centres with specialised services such as neurosurgery plastic and thoracic surgery and treatment of burns or poisonings serving a population of 500000 to 750000 An emergency service organised in levels as suggested requires careful planning so that all elements are integrated and good communications are maintained It is particularly desirable for ambulance personnel the police and perhaps taxi driVers to be aware of the level of treatment available at different hospitals

There has been disagreement over whether or nor smaller A amp E centres are justified It seems that densely-populated countries or regions with good transport systems do not need smaller A amp E units whereas more sparsely-populated regions often rural do need them [1013] New Zealand definitely falls into the second category Only our urban A amp E departments fulfil (or come close to) Platts criteria of 150000 population yet all of the A amp E departments visited in this study provide an essential service to their communities In New Zealand the distances that patients would have to travel preclude any concentration of emergency care within a few highly-equipped hospitals

THE A 8t E DEPARTMENT AS A PRIMARY CARE SERVICE

The A amp E department is a primary care service since few of the people Visiting it have been referred by a health professional most patients being self-referred or sent by someone else This primary care role could conf lict with the departments role as an emergency service if patients with minor injuries filled the department and hindered the care of emergency patients However by using triage the A amp E departments studied generally avoided this conflict Some departments discouraged visits for sickness conditions and recall visits so that the department would always be ready for an emergency situation

The A amp E department and general practice are both primary care services However the department differs greatly from the general practitioner in many aspects it is readily available 24 hours a day staff have little background knowledge of the patient and there is little continuity of care There has been concern that A amp E departments are stealing patients from general practitioners because the department is always available and care is free there This study has shown that such concern is not warranted

Looking first at the cost of general practitioner treatment as a reason for visiting the A amp E department we note that this is only relevant for sickness conditions since treatment of injury conditions is paid for by the Accident Compensation Corporation The interview studies have shown that very few patients give cost as a reason for attending the department Also the census area unit analysis showed that low income and receipt of a means-tested benefit were not related to sickness attendance rates and that areas with high unemployment had relatively low sickness rates We would expect contrary results if cost was a major factor As well our comparison of attendance rates at A amp E departments and general practitioners indicates that general practitioners would be losing at most one per cent of their workload when A amp E departments treat non-urgent sickness patients Even if all A amp E departments instituted a policy of discouraging such patients the effect on general practice would be negligible

111

The interview studies have demonstrated that patients do find the ready availability of the A amp E department attractive However our analyses of out of hours use compared to in hours use and our explorations of the effect of population-to-doctor ratios have shown that this attractiveness does not translate into significantly higher rates of A amp E attendance This suggests that improving the availability of general practitioner services is unlikely to have a major effect on the use of either service

There are two major factors related to peoples use of A amp E departments The first is distance from the hospital with people living close to the hospital being much more likely to visit the A amp E department It is hard to see any way of changing this factor The second factor is peoples perception of the A amp E department as the appropriate place for injury treatment The verY name of A amp E departments (instituted folJowing the Platt report) implies that the department is for the treatment of injuries It would be very difficult to change this perception and probably would not be desirable given the facilities experience and availability of the A amp E department for injury treatment

There has also been concern that A amp E departments recall patients instead of referring them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care It appears that A amp E departments recall a similar number of patients (10 to 30 per cent- of firstmiddot attenders) as they refer back to the general practitioners (10 to 20 per cent of first attenders) Some of the recall visits are middotjustified because they require the facilities of the A amp E department It hasmiddot been suggested that house surgeons tend to recall patients because of inexperience and to aid their training While this undoubtedly happens we found no evidence that it has a major effect on the level of recall visits However we did find that departments with high levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have high levels of recall visits possibly because the staff had more time to treat the recalled patients This suggests that recall attendance could be reduced in some cases shy

Ov~rseas studies [141516] have discussed A amp E departments as fulfilling three roles

o trauma treatment centre for the community providing acute emergency care

o substitute for the private phYSician when not available

o family physician for the poor particularly minority group poqr

This study has shown that New Zealand A amp E departments operate largely in the first role of trauma treatment centre providing care for both urgent and non-urgent injury conditions The departments also fulfil the second role of out of hours general practitioner substitute to some extent but they hardly ever operate in the third role of family doctor to the poor

This study has not explored in detail general practitioners views and use of A amp E departments although some information on these topics is implicit in the descriptions of procedures in Chapter 3 and the analysis of reasons for visiting the department in Chapter 7 More information about general practitioners perspectives and the actual availability of general practice care outside normal surgery hours could be gathered However we consider that as well as carrying out further research efforts should be made to develop better communication and understanding between general

112

practitioners and A amp E departments Towards this end we would suggest that A amp E departments make greater efforts to inform general practitioners about the conditions of patients attending the department perhaps using prepared forms or cards (see page 15) We hope too that this report will foster greater recognition among general practitioners of the valuable activities of A amp E departments and allay fears that the department is substituting for the family doctor

We conclude as Dixon [17] did in 1970 that the A amp E department and general practice are complementary services rather than competitive We cannot justify further investigation of the hypothesis that A amp E departments steal patients from general practitioners Possibly a study replicating the Northland comprehensive study of urgent medical care utilisation [18] in an urban area coupled with a study monitoring general practitioner availability out of normal surgery hours would finally lay the ghost of competition for patients However given the evidence presented in this report this does not seem a high priority

WHERE FROM HERE

We considet that research effort could now be turned to two areas First a study of the whole area of accidents is definitely warranted Accidents account for a significant proportion of early deaths and long-term disability and the volume of less severe accidents strains the financial and caring resources of the community The research of the Accident Compensation Corporation has understandably focussed on general practitioner care since the Corporation does not bear the costs of treatment at or in hospital Studies of hospital activity neglect general practitioner care of accident victims A broad study would have to involve not only A amp E departments and general practitioners but also occupational health clinics ambulance and other first aid services Only a comprehensi ve study can provide a firm basis for setting priorities for accident prevention efforts

The need for such a study raises the issue of recording systems both in terms of themiddot classification of type and severity of injury and of the context or cause of the accident Not only is there a need for a fairly simple and versatile system but there is also a need for all the many services to use it consistently For medical emergencies where diagnosis follows professional examination the issue is not crucial For injuries where the events immediately before and after the trauma are relevant the recording of cause and context is important Studies of treatment alternatives and costs depend on a detailed description of the injury which is probably worthwhile only for more severe injuries For example we have noted that many A amp E visits are for bumps and bruises minor lacerations or pain from past inj ury Elaborate description of minor conditions only obscures the nature of the more important cases Clearly before such research can proceed some small-scale attempts at coordinated recording and a form of information triage are called for

The second area warranting study middotis that of the emergency services and their coordination The A amp E department and ambulance services would obviously be covered but the civil defence police and fire service should also be involved Disaster plans drills communications and supplies would be important aspects to be considered

113

This study has focussed on what happens inside the doors of A amp E departments and why people go there We hope that it provides a comprehensive view of the organisation and utilisation of New Zealand A amp E departments and that it will be useful not only to those working within the hospital service but also to all those concerned with primary health care and emergency services

114

REFERENCES

1 SALMOND G C - Young doctors An exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

2 MATES Susan and SIDEL Victor W - Quality assessment by process and outcome methods evaluation of emergency room care of asthmatic adults in Am J Public Health - v 71 no 7 (1981) p 687-693

3 BONITA Ruth - Stroke rehabilitation who gets what - how when where and why in Commun Health Studies - v 7 no 3 (1983) p 347

4 GIBSON Geoffrey - The emergency department as a screening point for hospital specialty services inclusionary vs exclusionary strategies in Soc Sci Med - v l3(A) (1979) p 495-498

5 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

6 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

7 DALBY B C S FARRER J A and HARVEY P W - Casualty activity analysis coding and computing in Computer Programs in Biomedicine - v 3 (1974) P 254-266

8 ROBERTS Jean FARRER J and HARVEY P - A progressive study of the emergency room demand by the community in Med Inf - v 2 no 3 (1977) p 197-201

9 GIBSON Geoffrey BUGBEE George and ANDERSON Odin W - Emergency medical services in the Chicago area - Chicago Centre for Health Administration Studies University of Chicago 1970

10 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

11 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 55-58

12 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services - report of a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional office for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

13 PLANT Janet and AMES Seth - Emergencyoutpatient satellites serve as rural outposts in Hospitals Journal of the American Hospitals Association - v 52 no 5 (March I 1978) P 87-92

14 TORRENS Paul R and YEDVAB Donna G - Variations among emergency room populations a comparison of four hospitals in New York City in Med Care - v 8 no 1 (1970) p 60-75

115

15 MOORE Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEffect of a neighbourhood health centre on hospital emergency room use in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) p 240-247

16 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J emergency unit as community physician (1972) p 248-260

17 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S shyutilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71

- Help The hospital in Med Care - v 10 no 3

Casualty department (1970) p 272-279

18 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

Paper Development

- ~

C) w CJ C Z w c 0 laquo

118

APPENDIX A

Question sheets

MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT

1middot Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others

a number b levelsmiddotof experience c background experience

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties eg nurses doing clerical work

2 Policy (on procedures) 21 Standing orders 22 Sorting of patients at presentation who does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admit 26 Relations with other hospital departmentswards eg sharing of

facilitiesstaff with outpatients 27 Relations with other A amp E departments

peripheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

3 Relations with GPs

31 Any involvement of local GPs in A amp E department eg staffing 32 Policy on GP-load presentations

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A amp E service iri general

PRINCIPAL NURSE

1 Staffing

11 Nurses a number b levels of experience c background experience

2 Policy (on procedures) - ~ -

~ ~ bull - - I bull

22 Sorting of patients atprese~ation 23 Level of treatment provic)e~ by nurses 26 Relations with other hospitaldepartmentswards eg sharing

nurses 27 Relationsiith other ~ ~ltE 9~parlttm~nt~periPheral hospitals

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others a number I

b levels of experience c background experience d at different times

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties egnur~esdoing cler~cal work

2 Procedures ~ - ~

21 standing orclers ~ 22 Sorting of patients at pr~seniation~ho does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admitZ 26 Relat io~s witll oth~r )()sIgti taidepa rtmentswards

ashCl~in9 q~i facilitiesstaff with out-patients b go9rdinat~pgwith xray and laboratory

27 Relations with other A amp E departmentsperipheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

4 workload

41 Number of patient visits per year 42 Seasonal variation

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases -definiUon

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp B

120

~~

55 Relations with local GPs ~i~ 56 Alcohol involved in presehttionsbull 57 Administration - recordstystem 58 Hospital policy (if mentiOPed earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A E service in general

HOUSE SURGEONS

Jobdescription

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

2 Procedures

21 Standing orders 24 Follow-up recalls or referrals1

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-load cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A 81

55 Relations with local GPs 56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A E department or the A E service in general

NURSES

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

121

2 Procedures

21 Standing order s 22 Sorting of pati~nts at presentation 23 Level of treatment provided by nurses

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp E

56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A ampE department or the A amp E service in general

A amp E DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST ON PHYSICAL FACILITIES

Waiting room size seating atmospheredecor childrens facilities - screening of ambulance entrance

Treatment rooms size privacy ease of working

Overall layout ambulance flow ease of working holding ward for admission

Relations with rest of hospital

_ proximity ~Qxray level ofl~poratory service ease of ~dJllJtting towards

122

APPENDIX B

Accident and emergency department records

THE STATE OF A amp E RECORDS Most of the A amp E departments visited kept a log or register of A amp E attendance This was a large book or folder where the patients name and other details were entered in order of presentation at the department Usually A amp E department logs contained the following information

the patients name and age the date and time of presentation a one-word description of the patients complaint whether the visit was a first attendance for a complaint

or a return visit the patient I s disposal

All except one of the A amp E departments visited had their own record system (independent of the hospital inpatient system) with one recordmiddot kept for each patient presenting This record was usually an A5 card although one department used a multiple copy A4 sheet Most of the A amp E department records contained the following information

the patients name age sex occupation GP address and phone number the date and time of presentation a one-to-ten word description of the patients complaint the A amp Edoctor(s) seen their clinical notes of

diagnosis and treatment the patients disposal ACC details if the complaint results from an accident other details on tetanus prophylaxis allergies and medical alerts

There were of course variations in the information contained on the logs and records of different A amp E departments An outline of the points where the log and records of each hospital differ from the general descriptions given above appears at the end of this Appendix

The quality of data collected was variable with the out of hours collection often being sketchier than the in hours This was probably due to nursing and medical staff doing the recording as well as their usual duties when receptionists were not on duty The basic details (such as name age and sex) were usually complete but more descriptive details (such as the site cause and sequence of an accident) were not always noted Some receptionists recorded no details about the accident whereas others took considerable care to summarise accurately the relevant information

USES OF A 8t E RECORDS The major users of A amp E records are the A amp E departments themselves and the hospitals A primary use is the estimation of the size and the content of the A amp E workload at different times of the day and the week This information is valuable for planning staffing levels and physical facilities in the A amp E department The A amp E staff also find the information contained in A amp E records useful in dealing appropriately with

123

patients who repeatedy present at the d~parmeptlHSo at times the information recorded in the A amp E depatinienf farequired as evidence in court proceedings

On a broader f ront~ amp E records are useful for sOme research purposes Certainly theyprovide~nsights i nl 0 who USeE the A amp E department (see Chapter 6) At some A amp E departments ~ufficientlY detailed information about accidents resulting in a presentation (eg type site possible cause of accident and occupation of patient) is collected for developing accident prevention programmes However most A amp E records are too sketchy for direct use in this way although they could be used as sampling frames for some accident research

There are disadvantages in using A amp E records for health services research purposes

I A amp E departments deliver only a small part of ambulatory medical care They deliver care to a selected age group and to a group who by and large happen to live nearby

2 Generally A amp E records are one-off and do not have the longitudinal perspective of general practice records or even hospital notes

3 Even for an epidemiological survey of accidents A amp E departments see an incomplete caseload They do not see all fractures much less all wounds concussions eye injuries etc

POINTS OF DIFFERENCE fROM GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS GIVEN

Full-time Information on log Information on A amp E record departments

Urban Auckland Age not noted

Middlemore Motor vehicle accident also noted

Green Lane Age not noted Sports and motor vehicle accidents also noted Residential area (not street address) also noted

Address A amp E doctor and Length Of stay and homeWellington 1A amp E patient number also address collected for nonshy

Hutt noted New and return New Zealand residents visits not always differentiated

Christchurch Sex address GP referral and motor vehicle accidents also noted

Dunedin [NO log kept Records held in alphabetical order for each months presentations]

Full-time departments

Provincial Rotorua

Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane

Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore

Kenepuru

124

Information on log

GP A amp E doctor case history and treatment also noted

Only patient name and date of presentation noted

Source of referral location of accident and special accident cases also noted

[Not seen]

Information on log

Complaint not noted

Address A amp E doctor and A amp E patient number also noted New and return visits not always differentiated

)

Information on A amp E record

Different cards used for work and non-work accidents

[None]

Specific places allocated on A4 sheet for case history lab and x-ray reports and follow-up

Time of presentation not noted

Information on A amp E record

Length of stay and home address collected for nonshyNew Zealand residents

125

APPENDIX C

StatisticalanaIY$es of accident and emergency department attendance riltes by neighbourhoods

METHOD

The analysis set out to test

o the effect of distance

o the effect of social factors

o the effect of A ampE department characteristics on A amp E attendance rates

The first two of these effects are not independent It was therefore necessary to use multivariate methods to assess the effect of distance controlling for social factors and for social factors controlling for distance

Other analyses of New Zealand geographical areas (in preparation Reinkeii) have found distinct differences between urban areas (those with populations exceeding 35000) and non-urban areas Therefore the multivariate analyses have been carried out separately for the 355 urban neighbourhoods and the 86 non-urban neighbourhoods One neighbourhood did not have complete census data and was omitted from the multivariate analysis Where we found differing results for urban and non-urban areas they have been mentioned separately Otherwise the results are presented as general findings

STEPWISE MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Initially a simple stepwise regression analysis was carried out The results are shown below Variables are presented in decreasing order of importance and are related to high attendance rates

All Neighbourhoods Urban Neighbourhoods Non-urban Neighbourhoods

Out of hours sickness

37 of the variance is 34 of the Variance is 36 of the variance is explained by explained by the same explained by many carless households features as all neighshy near the hospital near the hospital bourhoods many households with cars young age-structure few in the paid workforce many with higher few school-age children education many Maori many blue collar many in the paid workforce

All Neighbourhoods

out of hours injury

35 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many children many married many Europeans few households with two cars

In hours sickness

16 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many car less households few separated widowed or divorced low average rental many in paid workforce many with higher education

In hours injury

31 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars many school-age children few Pacific Island Chinese or Indian

Recall visits in hours

23 of the variance is explained by near the hospital high average rental many households with two cars few with higher education many in the paid workforce few European many separated widowed or divorced many school-age children

Urban Neighbourhoods

28 ofmiddotthe variance is explained by near the hospital few households with two cars many with higher education many blue-collar many European few separated widowed or divorced many seeking work

14 of the variance is explained by few households with two cars near the hospital low average rent high income many in paid workforce few separated widowed or divorced

16 of the variance is expla ined by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars

18 of the variance is exp lai ned by high average rental near the hospital many households with two cars many Maori many separated widowed or divorced few seeking work many with higher education

Non-urban Neighbourhoods

62 of the Variance is explained by near the hospital few in the paid workforce

7 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

57 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many one-car households

42 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

127

Few recall visits happened out of hours so the out of hours recall attendance rates are low ~ndhlghlY yariable NO adequate model was found in the analyses so 19 resultsare presented here

Clearly distance was an important determinant of rates of attendance The social characteristics had a )I9dest effect on injury first attendance a more substantial effect on rates of recall visits and a very substantial effect on the rates of sickness attendance in the different neighbourhoods

The pattern was quite different for the urban and non-urban areas as were the associations among the social variables A more complex analysis was needed

2 DATA REDUCTION

Separate principal components analyses for urban and non-urban areas were done on the social factors and yielded sets of four components with eigenvalues of one or more For clarity of interpretation the four-vector model was rotated (using a varimax method) and yielded four urban parameters and four non-urban parameters as shown Variables are shown in decreasing order of importance for each parameter

Urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few home-owners young ageshy low income in the northerry many carless structure few with higher regions higher many on benef it many Maori education average rental many seeking work many blue-collar few in the paid many separated work force widowed or divorced many blue-collar

Non-urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few separated many Maori bull many home- low average widowed or manyseeking owners rental divorced work few in the paid few with higher few old in the workforce education many two-car and northern many blue-collar few carless regions high income many blue-collar many children

3 PRODUCING ADJUSTED RArES

We fitted a regression equation for each attendance rate on the distance factor and the eight social factor parameters For urban neighbourhoods the four non-urban parameters were held at zero and vice versa for the non-urban neighbourhoods

128

The regression equations using this method allowed non-urban and urban areas to be analysed together and yielded levels of variance explained generally equal to those derived from the significant predictors in the simple stepwise regressions

Variance in attendance rates explained by different methods

Regression In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Using or iginal variables 16 31 23 37 35 14

Using rotated parameters 18 26 29 36 37 14

Each parameter-based equation yielded a rate of attendance expected on the basis of purely neighbourhood characteristics The difference between this expected rate and the actual observed rate gave a measure of the attendance rate adjusted for neighbourhood-determined features After this adjustment for distance and social factors the department-to-department differences remaining were muted In fact the F-tests of the differences among the departments showed the following changes

Changes in F-test values from unadjusted to adjusted rates

In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Unadjusted rates 74 69 195 132 96 123 Adjusted rates 23 65 107 53 41 119

4 TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE

Analyses of variance were carried out on the attendance rates adjusted for neighhourhood-determined factors for in hours and out of hours and looking separately at sickness first injury and recall visits First the A amp E department was used as the independent variable (except that Auckland and Green Lane were combined since they share a single catchment area) Then tests were done on the departments categorised into urban provincial rural and suburban open door policy and recall policy When the analyses of variance showed significant effects Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used to identify single departments or groups of departments that differed significantly from the others

Staffing levels were plotted against the adjusted rates When the correlations were significant the slope of the simple regression was examined

129middot

Results of analyses of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls means tests on adjusted attendance ratesmiddot

Differencemiddots Differences Differences among among between

Neighbourhood- A amp E categories of open-door adjusted departments A amp E department and attendance ( urban restricted

provincial departments rural or suburban)

Out of hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Provincial Open rates

rates lower higher than than others restricted

First injury Yes

Recall injury Yes Yes

In hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Open rates

higher than restricted

First injury Yes Yes Yes Grey rates Rural rates Restricted higher than higher than rates others others higher than

open

Recall injury Yes Yes Suburban rates higher than others

Only statistically significant results presented

Differences between departments favouri ng and not favouring recalls

Yes Recall-favouring rates lower than others

Yes Recall shyfavoumiddotring rates higher than others

Yes Recall shyfavouring rates higher than others

130

APPENDIX D

Childrens use of general practitioners and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

In conjunction with the 1981 Kljakovic study of chi ldren s attendance at A amp E departments in Wellington a parallel study of childrens visits to and by general practitioners was undertaken General Medical Services benefit claims for the same period were examined noting for each juvenile (0-14 years) visit the census area unit of the residence and the address of the general practitioner or locum This yielded rates of child attendance both for normal surgery hours and for urgent visits (out of surgery hours) for the whole region These were adjusted to give estimates for the 0-12 year old population and were then compared with the rates of A amp E attendance found by Kljakovic

AS Figure 10 shows the use of A amp E services was a very small part of childrens primary medical care During surgery hours visits to the A amp E department which were not preceded by contact with the general practitioner were only 16 per cent of first medical contacts Outside normal surgery hours the visits to A amp E departments that bypassed a general practitioner were more frequent I but they rose only to 194 per cent of first medical contacts

This comparison of overall use of medical services for children showed some tendency for parents to use A amp E more when they used general practitioners less comparing in hours with out of hours This was not surprising given that many of the in hours visits to general practit ioners would be for non-urgent conditions or even routine preventive care

Eighty-four neighbourhoods in the Wellingtoh region (the census area units or groupings of the same) were examined to see which of four factors (the distance of the neighbourhood from the A amp E department the use of general practitioners the per capita income and the ethnicity of the neighbourhood) were related to the use of A amp E departments The most important factor was distance from the A amp E department Then taking distance into account there was a slight tendency for areas where parents made less use of the general practitioner during normal surgery hours to be areas of more frequent use of the A amp E department However this tendency was not statistically significant and no such tendency was found for out of hours use Overall there was little evidence of competition between general practitioners and A amp E departments for patients

Figure 10 Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

In hours Out of hours

Need for medical care recognised

I I bull I I I I I Ifail Try to Try to fail Still need Icontact contact careI

general generalI 0gt practitioner practitioner w-- I succeed I succeed

I I I I

AampE 13 yes Still need Contact Contact Still need yesI department care general general care departmentI

practitioner I practitioner

I I I

7650 824I egt I I

Still need Visit Visit Still need I care general general careI

practitioner practitionerI I I I I I

~X-215 -[Ql--~-~- 7346 ALLAN Bridget ClairtJ ) Accident and emergency departmem ~

organisation and utilisation

WX 215 73467 [QJ 1shy

j

ALL

shyUBRARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

WELLINGTON L

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH-SPECIAL REPORT SERIES

Issued by

Management Services amp Research Unit (MSRU) or National Health Statistics Centre (NHSC) Department of Health Private Bag 2 PO Box 5013 Wellington Upper Willis Street Wellington

No TITLE

1 Maori-European standards of health 2 Domestic accidents (public hospital admissions) 3 The Grey Valley survey (lung function in coal miners) 4 Elderly patients in public hospitals 1958 5 Smoking habits of school children 6 Survey of work in compressed air-Auckland harbour bridge 7 Tuberculosis in Canterbury 8 Maori patients in mental hospitals 9 Census of mental hospital patients 1961 10 Elderly persons accommodation needs in New Zealand 1962 11 Patient-nurse dependency exploratory study 12 Patient-nurse dependency general survey data

13 Patient-nurse dependency gynaecology 14 Patient-nurse dependency geriatrics

15 Patient-nurse dependency in Christchurch paediatrics 16 Smoking habits of New Zealand doctors 17 Infant and foetal loss in New Zealand 18 Trends in notifiable disease 19 Survey of factory first aid 1963-64 20 Patient-nurse dependency general surgery 21 Patient-nurse dependency orthopaedic surgery 22 Patient-nurse dependency general medicine 23 Patient-nurse dependency GU Eye ENT

24 Diseases of the ear nose and throat in Maori children 25 Maori patients in public hospitals 26 The health of two groups of Cook Island Maoris

27 Mental hospitals admission and release data cohort study of first admissions 1962

28 Occupational mortality among male population other than Maoris 20 to 64 years of age

29 Dental health status of the New Zealand population in late adolescence and young adulthood

30 Census of mental hospital patients 1966 31 Survey of the public dental health service in Niue and plan for development 32 Hospital food services 33 Bibliography of the epidemiology of New Zealand and its Island Territories

34 Census of public and private hospital patients and old peoples homes 1966 35 Domestic accidents 36 An evaluation of a regional mass miniature radiography programme 1956-67 37 Maori-European comparisons in mortality

38 Physical development of New Zealand school children 1969 39 Psychiatric illness causing hospitalization or death 1967 t40 Census of mental hospital patients 1971 t41 Census of public private and maternity hospital patients and old peoples

homes 1971 t42 Cancer of the lung in New Zealand t43 Organisation of the work of hospital house surgeons 44 Growth of New Zealand pre-school children 45 Maternal and infant care in Wellington-a health care consumer study

46 Accommodation and service needs of the elderly t47 Survey of patients in psychiatric hospitals 48 Family growth study 49 A patient opinion survey Wellington hospital

ISSUED BY

NHSC 1960 NHSC 1960middot NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1963 NHSC 1963 MSRU 1963 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1963 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC ]966

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 MSRU 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1972 MSRU 1971 NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973

NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1974 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1977

llHII tIffPllfJlJ c

~~~~~~~~ f lt b tf

f ()

11

bull

Page 5: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Many people have helped with this study In particular we would like to thank

o John Mills who visited the hospitals drafted the physical characteristics chapter and gave freely of his time and expertise

o the staff of the hospitals visited for sharing their time and thoughts with us

o Desmond Keenan Shelagh McRae and Denis Snelgar for allowing us to use the information they had collected

o Clare Salmond Mike Moore and Sylvia Nichol for their assistance with computer analysis

o readers ofmiddot drafts of this report who offered helpful criticism and suggestion

o the typists and publication staff of the Department of Health

We also acknowledge the Director-General of Health for permission to publish

DISCLAIMER

The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Health

COPYRIGHT

Provided the source is acknowledged information contained in this report may be freely used by any person

CONTENTS

Page

ACKNOWIEDGEMENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

1 INTRODUCTION I

Background Thewider questions of emergency medical services The overseas situation An historical perspective in New Zealand

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments Record studies on the utili satjon of A amp E departments Studies of the organisation of A amp E departments

Overview of this study Aims Sources of information

References

2 DEFINITIONS 11

The Accident and Emergency department Attendance The hospitals Recording systems References

3 PROCEDURES IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT 15

Entry Sorting 1 reatmen t Disposal Follow-upcare Admissions Discussion References

4 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 23

PrinCiples Size Location

Entrances Access to other hospital facilities

Layout Waiting area Examination and treatment area Resuscitation area Operating theatre Plaster room Interview room Reception and records office Staff offices Holding ward

Discussion References

5

6

7

8

STAFFING OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 35

Medical staffing Senior medical staffing Junior medical staffing Accident and emergency work as a career

Nurse staffing Other staff involved with the A amp E department

Reception and clerical staff Orderlies Social workers Ambulance personnel

Discussion References

PATIENT ATTENDANCE CHARACTERISTICS 55

Overall attendance and trends Age and sex Conditions

Injury conditions Sickness conditions

Recall attendance GP-load

Non-urgent sickness Discussion References

PATIENT ATTI~UDES TO THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT AND STAFF ATTITUDES TO THE PATIENTS 75

Reasons for visiting the A amp E department Overseas studies New Zealand studies

Effect of health centres and deputising services on A amp E utilisation A amp E staff views of patients

Overseas studies The New Zealand situation

Discussion References

UTILISATION OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 91

Comparison of A amp E utilisation among hospital catchment areas Results Effect of general practitioner availability

Factors explaining catchment area variations in A amp E utilisation Method Results of the mUltivariate analyses

Comparison of A amp E use and general practitioner use Discussion References

9 CONCLUSIONS 107

The A amp E department as a hospital department The A amp E department as an emergency service The A amp E department as a primary care service Where from here

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A QUestion sheets 116

APPENDIX B Accident and emergency department records 120

APPENDIX C Statistical analyses of accident and 123 emergency department attendance rates by neighbourhoods

APPENDIX D Childrens use of general practitioners 128 and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

TABLES

Table

1 Proportion of first attendance patients discharged recalled referred or admitted

2 Areas of A amp E department~

3 Area to attendance ratios for adjusted total areas and waiting areas of A amp E departments by first attendance and total attendance

4 Numbers of examination and treatment cubicles or rooms and recommended numbers based on first attendance and total attendance

Medical staffing of A amp E departments

6 Total medical staffing (full-time equivalents) and medical staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

7 Nurse staffing of A amp E departments excluding student nurses and hospital aids

Nurse staffing (full-time equivalents) and nurse staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

Average attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

10 Trends in attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

11 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was recall attendance

12 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was for sickness

13 Proportion of total A amp E attendance that was for Sickness by policy and age groups

14 Use of general practitioners by first attenders at A amp E departments

15 Reasons for A amp E first attendance from three New Zealand studiesmiddot

Itgt Attendance (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) within each A amp E department catchment area

Page

18

24

25

29

37

39

45

46

56

57

66middot

70

71

77

78

92

(continued)

Table Page

17 Hospital admissionsfor accidental injury (mean 93 age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) and death due to accidental injury (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) within each A amp E department catchment area

IB Attendance (mean age-adjusted and neighbourhoodshy 99 adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) and populationshyto-general practitioner ratio within each A amp E department catchment area

19 Comparison of first attendances for injury at A amp E 101 departments and general practitioners

FIGURES

Figure Page

1 Percentage of total attendance at 58 A amp E departments by age and sex

2 Percentage of total attendance at 59 A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

3 Injury first attendances by type of injury 6U all ages

4 Injury first attendances by type of injury 61 by age groups

5 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 62 all ages

6 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 63 by age groups

7 Comparison of medical staff availability and 67 level of recall attendance

Comparison of nursing staff availability and 67 level of attendance

9 Location at which accidents happened by those 79 attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments 131 by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

1

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

BACKGROUND

This report arises f rom concerns expressed by several groups about the availability especially out of hours of emergency car~ and its provision by Accident and Emergency (A amp E) departments in New Zealand

In _SQe mid 1970 s the people of Porirua were worried that local general -pr-actitioners were not available at nights and weekends and by the delays

involved in travelling to Wellington and Hutt A amp E departments [IJ At the same time the people of North Shore were campaigning to keep their local A amp E department open More recently community groups in Upper Hutt have been pressing for the addition of an A amp E service to a local health centre Overall people are concerned that appropriate care (including facilities such as x-rays) is readily available in emergency situations

General practitioners are another group who have been concerned about A amp E departments in particular about inappropriate uses of A amp E departments A long-standing complaint bas been that patients are using A amp E departments for care which wou~d be better given by a general practitioner and that the A amp E departments retain patients instead of referr ing them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care [2 3J In 1981 the research group of the Wellington Faculty of the Royal NZ College of General Practitioners sponsored a study of children presenting at A amp E departments because they were worried that unnecessary admissions of children to hospital occurred because their parents had bypassed the general practitioners and gone straight to hospital [4J

Also A amp E staff and hospital administrators have been concerned that caring for patients who could have been treated by general practitioners has limited their ability to deal with emergency cases [567]

THE WIDER QUESTIONS OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

Emergency care requires not only the provision of hospital services (the A amp E department with back-up from other hospital facilities) but also the organisation of services outside the hospital and co-ordination between both sets of services Emergency medical services outside the hospital include alarm and communication systems transport systems and first aid services There are important questions for New Zealand within this framework For example what should be the role of general practitioners in on-site emergency care What level of training is appropriate for ambulance officers Should voluntary personnel staff ambulances To what extent is double manning of ambulances required [8910]

In order to limit the study to manageable proportions this report focusses only on the hospital services namely the A amp E department Emergency medical services provided outside hospitals are mentioned only where they impinge noticeably on the A ampE department It is hoped that due attention will be given to the wider questions of emergency medical services in the future (see Chapter 9)

2

THE OVERSEAS SITUATION

Concern with emergencymiddot care facilities especially their increasing use has been apparent in other countries for the past thirty years While some articles report on the situation in Canada Australia Sweden France and the USSR most of the literature is about the United States and Britain This section briefly outlines the major themes of the literature and their relevance to New Zealand More specific aspects are covered in the appropriate chapters

Many United States researchers have studied the operations of different emergency rooms exploring patients reasons for using the emergency room their demographic characteristics and their use of the family doctor Often the studies have tried to explain an increasing use of emergency rooms and some have reported on the effectiVeness of measures introduced to reduce thei r use These studies provided models for some of the analyses carried out in this study However the debate in the United States over appropriate methods of funding and staffing for emergency rooms is seldom relevant to New Zealand because of the differences both in philosophy and organisation of medical care in the two countries

The Platt [11] committee on A amp E services in Britain in 1962 was concerned about casual attenders ie patients not in need of urgent attention but wishing to avoid the trouble of attending their general practitioners surgery They also criticised the unsuitable accommodation and the insufficient numbers of senior medical staff supervising Casualty Departments The report recommended changing the name Casualty Service to Accident and Emergency Service (to discourage casual attendance) and rationalising the service by clOSing smaller A amp E units and centralising facilities These recommendations have been partially carried out

However there has been continuing research in Br i tain into the reasons given by patients particularly self-referred patients for their use of A amp E departments and the trade-off between general practitioner and A amp E services There has also been continuing debate over the medical staffing of A amp E departments

The British studies are of some relevance to the New Zealand situation since the organisation of medical care here is similar but no overseas experience can provide a blueprint for New Zealand For example the direct cost to the patient of general practice care in New Zealand raises the possibility of patients attending the A amp E department because it is free whereas the British system of general practitioner funding provides no such incentive

AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE IN NEW ZEALAND

Little is known about the historical development of A amp E services in New Zealand Presumably they followed the British tradition described in the Platt report [11 p23-24)

The word casualty in its proper meaning of a serious injury has a long history It occurs in Shakespeare and Dickens writing in 1837 used casualty ward to describe the ward in a hospital in which accidents were treated Unfortunately the meaning alt~red in the second half of the last century The Nuffield Report (1960) Casualty Services and their Setting

3

gives an interesting quotation from a survey made by the Lancet in 1869 The out-patients at St Bartholomews Hospital are it says divided into two categories They are the middotcasualtymiddot which comprises those who are supposed to require temporary treatment for diseases or injuries of a trifling character and the middotout-patientsmiddot properly so called who after receiving a regular letter of admission are entitled to the advice of the assistant surgeons and physicians for a period of 12 months It is in the casualty division that the increase of numbers has been most marked bullbullbull It is estimated that not less than a thousand patients frequently attend on a Monday or Tuesday morning

Certainly by 1872 vlellingtons private medical practitioners were incensed at the hospitals provision of free treatment for their patients Five hundred outpatients were treated in Wellington that year [12] Separate casualty departments were operating at Wellington Hospital by 1924 [12] at Auckland Hospital by the 1940s [13] and Christchurch Hospital by 1952 [14]

The 1960 Board of Health report [15] on outpatient servicesmiddot expressed concern over the duplication of services by outpatient departments which were also available from general practitioners However it recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times

Since the late 1960s a series of New Zealand studies have considered the use of A amp E departments either by interviewing patients or by analysing data drawn from A amp E record systems and the organisation of A amp E departments

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

The first interview study was an investigation of first attenders at the Dunedin A amp E department in 1968 by Dixon et al [2] Their results have not been contradicted by any of the later studies

They found that the principal attenders were males aged 15 to 24 who recorded first attendance rates of over 100 per 1000 each year The young men were also the most likely to report having no general practitioner Dixon found that the age and sex pattern of those attending at the A amp E department was nearly converse to the pattern of those attending a general practitioner

Dixon pointed out that the conditions treated at the A amp E department were rarely disease-related rather they were predominantly lacerations and open wounds bruising sprains and strains effects of foreign bodies and fractures The major reason given for attending the department was that it was seen as appropriate

Dixon concluded that the A amp E service was complementary and not competitive to general practice that the public were realistic in regarding it as the only practical and effective primary medical care for accident and emergency injuries and that payment for service did not appear to figure in the decision to attend the department

o

4

TwO interview studies of first attenders at Auckland Hospital A amp E department have been carried out by Hunton in 1972 and Richards in 1975 [16] Both studies included an assessment by the student interviewers and A amp E staff as to the suitability of the patients condition for general practice care 42-43 per cent were considered suitable Richards concluded that public education programmes encouraging people to use their general practitioner prior to attending the A amp E department should be instituted

In 1978 Keenan interviewed patients who had attended Christchurch A amp E department collecting detailed information on the accident or sickness leading to the attendance (unpublished see Chapter 6 and 7) He found the same set of reasons for using A amp E departments as Dixon found the A amp E department was seen as appropriate and accessible

Kljakovic found similar results when interviewing the parents of children attending A amp E departments in the Wellington region in 1978 [4] He also found that in choosing between the general practitioner and the A amp E department parents were more likely to use the service which was closer to the family home Children f rom lower socio-economic status families were more likely than other children to see thei r general practitioner before gOing to the A amp E department

Records studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

Several studies have gathered data from A amp E records to investigate A amp E utilisation In 1979 Snelgar described the characteristics of people attending Northland Base Hospital A amp E department [17] He found similar results to Dixon apart from a higher proportion of injuries In the same year McRae reviewed all attendances at Waikato Hospital A amp E department and found a similar picture [lB]

Three records studies have looked at the relationship between A amp E use and general practitioner use Maynard looked at Mosgiel residents use of Dunedin A amp E facilities for three years before and three years after the opening of a local health centre [19] No difference was found ~asap

investigated assertions that people from one part of the Wellington Hospital catchment area had suddenly begun to use the A amp E department heavily for conditions that should have been seen by a general practitioner [20] In fact that part of the catchment area had much lower rates of A amp E use than other areas Reinken tested whether the doubling of general practitioner cover in one part of the Wellington region affected A amp E presentation rates differently than in other areas nearby [21] There was no clear evidence that the increased cover had any effect

Studies on the organisation of A amp E departments

As part of a thesis looking at young doctors Salmond examined the work of house surgeons in A amp E departments using a postal questionnaire [22J He concluded that working in an A amp E department was good experience for a house surgeon only if second year house surgeons were deployed in the department the house surgeon was well-supervised by senior medical staff there was a good working relationship with the A amp E chargemiddot nurse and the house surgeon was not over-tired He also suggested that good senior staffing was closely related to effective administration and better service in the A amp E department

5

The Hospital Design and EValuation Unit of the Department of Health prepared a report documenting the planning requirements of New Zealand A amp E departments [23] The report outlined several principles of A amp E design and made detailed recommendations on the facilities rooms and equipment necessary

OVERVIEW OF THIS STUDY

Aims

The aim of this study is to describe A amp E departments in New Zealand Because the material presented in the previous section was collected by different researchers at different times and from different A amp E

departments detailed comparisons across the studies have been difficult To get a more comprehensive picture of A amp E use in New Zealand a systematic investigation was necessary

The specific aims of this report are

o to describe the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at their procedures physical characteristics and staffing patterns

o to describe attendance at A amp E departments including the patients profile and pattern of attendance and the load placed on the departments by patients who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner

o to describe the use of A amp E departments by consumers by analysing patients reasons for attending the departments and analysing demographic factors inrelation to A amp E attendance

Sources of information

Information was gathered from three sources

The site visits

Fourteen A amp E departments were visited between May and September 1981 by a Department of Health study team consisting of a medical officer from the Division of Hospitals and a res~arch officer from the Management Services and Research Unit

At each hospital the team examined the facilities and spoke with staff involved with the A amp E department including

o the medical superintendent (and in some hospitals the principal nurse)

o the A amp E officer or medical officer in charge of the A amp E department (where such a position existed and was filled)

o the nurse supervisor andor charge nurse of the A amp E department

o at least one house surgeon working in the A amp E department

6

In some hospitals the team also spoke with other staff members including experienced A amp E staff nurses and hospital social workers

Question sheets were used during interviews so that a comparable body of information was collected at each hospital Interviews were open-ended to allow discussion of local procedures or problems (See Appendix A for question sheets)

Hospitals were carefully selected so that the A amp E departments in the study would represent a cross-section of New Zealand A amp E departments Those selected served a range of communities in both the North and South Islands

o major urban Dunedin)

areas (Auckland Wellington Christchurch and

o provincial centres (Rotorua Taranaki and Timaru)

o predominantly rural areas (Whakatane and Grey)

In centres with more than one A amp E department all were visited so that a complete picture of the services and use could be developed This involved visiting Auckland Green Lane Middlemore and North Shore hospitals in Auckland and Wellington Hutt and Kenepuru hospitals in Wellington

The information gathered in the site visits has been used in describing the organisation of A amp E departments (Chapters 3 4 arid 5)

The A amp E records data collection

On each site visit a sample of 1981 attendances was drawn from the A amp E record system and the following information was recorded for each person age sex presenting condition (sickness or injury) time of presentation residential address and whether the visit was a first attendance for the condition or a recall visit

Exceptions were Christchurch and the three Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments Comparable data collected by Keenan in Ch ristchurch in 1978 and Allan in Wellington during 1980 were used instead

This information has been used to describe the attendance at A amp E departments (Chapter 6) and for the analysis of demographic factors in relation to attendance (Chapter 8)

The consumer studies

In 1978 Keenan carried out interviews with patients attending Christchurch A amp E department working from a one in eight sample drawn from the A amp E log over a four-week period and gaining a 99 response rate Results from this study have been analysed and compared with the results of the published New Zealand interview studies [2416] Anecdotal material from Kljakovic s study of children attending Wellington A amp E departments has also been included to illustrate the results of the numerical analysis

We realise that in studying only a selection of A amp E departments some local variations may have been missed but we are confident that the broad pattern and major issues in the organisation of A amp E care have been

7

covered Also as the A amp E departments studied serve two-thirds of the population of New Zealand the utilisation patterns discussed in the report are likely to prevail throughout New Zealand We hope that the mater ial presented the conclusions drawn and the questions raised in this report will encourage discussion about the current operation and future developmiant of A amp E departments in NewmiddotZealand

a

8

REFERENCES

1 de LACEY A REINKEN J and SALMOND C E - Community attitudes to sickness and health stimulus and response v 3 Community attitudes - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 103-105 (Special report series no 56)

2 DIXON C W Emery G M and SPEARS G F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) p 272-279

3 [Editorial] in G P Journal of the General Practitioner Society no 42 (1981) P 1-2

4 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN BC and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

5 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble Jr et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

6 MAYNARD Edward J - The application of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment shyUniversity of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

7 Hospital misuse brings protest in Taranaki Daily News (1 Sept 1980) bull

8 FAHEY Morgan - The role of the family doctor in disaster and emergency medicine in NZ Family Physician - v 5 no 1 (1978) p 42-44

9 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 19-23 March 1979 in NZ Med J - (1980) P 194-196

10 Double manning of ambulances [editorial] in NZ Hosp - v 32 no 3 (1980) p 1

11 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medicine Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

12 BARBER Laurie H and TOWERS Roy J - Wellington Hospital 1847-1976 Wellington Wellington Hospital Board 1976

13 The story of Auckland Hospital 1847-1977 edited by David Scott -Auckland Medical Historical Library Committee of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians in New Zealand 1977 p 35-36

14 BENNETT FO - Hospital on the Avon the story of the Christchurch Hospital 1862-1962 Christchurch North Canterbury Hospital

o Board 1962

9

15 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 196U (Report series Board of Health no 2)

16 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

17 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

18 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

19 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency department in Med Care - v 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

20 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

21 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

22 SALMOND G C - Young doctors an exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

23 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

11

CHAPTER 2

Definitions

lhis chapter provides the definitions of terms used in our study In general our terminology is consistent with the literature However in some areas such as the classification of presenting conditions as sickness or injury or the description of GP-load there is no general consistency and we have developed our own definitions

THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

This name is the one commonly used in New Zealand We have used it in preference to the older description Casualty Depariment [1] and the American description of Emergency Department It is one hospital department which patients can approach without prior notification

Emergencies can be any condition that - in the opinion of the patient their family or whoever assumes the responsibility of bringing the patient to the hospital - requires immediate medical attention

However using such a definition means every case is an emergency In New Zealand A amp E departments patients tend to be classified in a similar way to the description given by the American Hospital Association [2]

o emergencies where delay is harmful and the condition potentially threatens life or function

a urgent cases which require attention within a few hours

o non-urgent cases where the condition is minor or non-acute and does not require the resources of the emergency service

An accident is an unexpected event Accidents which have resulted in attendance at an A amp E department are ones that have caused some trauma whether through shock or other injury The Platt report [1] decided on the term A amp E department in recognition that the real emergencies were a trickle while the accidents were a mighty flood

In general the A amp E department is regarded as part of the hospitals outpatient services and like these in day to day running it provides specific clinics generally for the treatment of traumatic injury x-ray burns dressings plasters and so forth

An accident and emergency patient is a person who is entered in the A amp E log book This can involve a certain amount of error however as some outpatients or discharged patients may return for follow-up care through the A amp E department Also the A amp E department often handles the acute admissions to the hospital

12

ATrENDANCE

A first visit (or first attendance) is the first visit a patient makes for one particular condition

A recall visit is any visit made for one particular condition which is not the first visit for the condition Some recall visits are patient initiated (eg due to pain bleeding infection or an accident to the dressing or plaster) but for the most part revisits are scheduled return visits suggested by A amp E staff

Total attendance is the sum of first visits and recall visits

Inj ury attendances are defined to include the results of trauma (cuts burns fractures sprains strains bruises head injuries multiple injur ies and so forth) as well as foreign bodies in the eye or other orifices and toxic effects whether from accidental or self-poisoning events Late effects of minor injury (pain bleeding abscesses or such) are not included as injury but as sickness

Sickness attendances include collapse (whether stroke coma heart attack or other) shortness of breath abdominal pain general sickness (fever vomiting diarrhoea unwell) mental distress and minor conditions

Non-urgent sicknesses are defined as the minor conditions abdominal pain and general sickness except for preschool children and adults over 65 where the general sickness and abdominal pain conditions can be urgent A amp E staff defined non-urgent sickness less specifically they tended to define it as longstanding or minor sickness

GP-load describes the patients whom A amp E staff feel should have seen a general practitioner It includes patients with longstanding or minor sickness conditions and patients with minor traumatic injury (eg cuts bumps and bruises)

In hours attendance refers to all attendances in the normal working hours of 0800 to 1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays

Out of hours attendance refers to all other attendances outside the defined normal working hours

In an average week 50 hours fall in the in hours category and 118 hours in the out of hours category If we assume that an average person sleeps eight hours a night then that person is awake for 62 hours in the out of hours category (and all the in hours of course) Thus the out of hours category is 70 per cent of the total time in a week and 55 per cent of the waking time in a week

Minor conditions included abscesses backaches infected wounds or wound pain headache pain (unspecified) earaches eye problems toothaches nosebleeds limb pains We have called it the skin pain or bleeding category in Chapter 6

13

Attendance rates measure the use of A amp E departments for a defined population They express the number of cases from an area over a defined period per 1000 population in that area Rates were obtained by age and sex for sickness and injury and in and out of hours for each census area unit or neighbourhood served by each hospital

THE- HOSPITALS

We grouped hospitals into four types

o urban hospitals (where average annual first attendances at A amp E departments are over 25000 patients)

o provincial hospitals (serving 6000 to 12000 new A amp E patients each year)

o rural hospitals (serving fewer than 6000 new A amp E patients each year)

o suburban hospitals where A amp E departments are not open 24 hours per day North Shore Hospital was open 7 days a week 830 am shy530 pm and Kenepuru Hospital was open 5 days a week 830 am shy430 pm

Most of the A amp E departments visited had a senior position variously called the A amp E officer the A amp E director the senior medical officer or the medical officer in charge For convenience we call this position the A amp E officer

RECORDING SYSTEMS

The log is the record kept at the A amp E department which records some information on every patient who presents It will often give no more than the patients name the date and time of visit

The A amp E record is usually a card and it records basic patient information and case notes It may be held for several years in the A amp E department and may therefore contain information on a series of separate events for anyone patient

14

REFERENCES

1 GtBrit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the sUbcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

2 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p vii-viii

15

D

CHAPTER 3

Procedures in the accident and emergency department

In this chapter we begin describing the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at the way they operate We follow the course of a patients care entry to the A amp E department sorting into priority order for care (triage) treatment and follow-up care

ENTRY

Most people presenting at the A amp E department were ambulant (the walking wounded as they are colloquially known) They came through the A amp E departments main entrance to the reception desk where they were first seen by a receptionist or nurse (Exceptions to this occurred in the smaller hospitals where patients presenting at night were first seen by the telephonist who called the nursing staff) Nurses did reception duties at

all the provincial and rural A amp E departments and at two of the urban A amp E departments when receptionists were not on duty (eg lunchtimes nights) bull At times nurses found that having to cover the reception desk interfered with their care of patients

When the receptionists are off duty the nurses do the reception work This can be a nuisance because it interferes with patient care and sometimes patients ring the bell at the reception desk and the staff working in the resuscitation room dont hear it

A amp E nurse

Unless their condition required immediate care the ambulant patients then spent several minutes at the reception desk while their details (eg name address general practitioner complaint) were noted on the A ampE records (See Appendix B for more information on A amp E records) Then they waited in the waiting room until they were called for treatment

A small proportion of patients arrived by ambulance andmiddot at almost all hospitals entered the A amp E department through a separate ambulance entrance In the larger hospitals some nursing staff were stationed in or near the ambulance entrance to care for these patients In other hospitals the staff had often been warned of incoming urgent cases and were standing by when the ambulance arrived As the condition of ambulance patients tended to be urgent they were usually taken straight to a resuscitation or treatment area patients condition permitted or friends or the ambulance driver

Record with the

keeping assist

was ance

carried of thei r

out r

when elativ

the es

SORTING

All A amp E departments operated some triage system to sort the ambulant patients by the urgency of their need for care (Themiddot only exception was Grey A amp E department where there was seldom more than one patient in the department at a time) At most A amp E departments the patients were sorted

16

into urgent and non-urgent categories with urgent cases being seen immediately and non-urgent cases being seen in the order they presented At some of the urban A amp E departments a more complex sorting was done For example

Priority is given in the following order

urgent need very young and very old patients those with general practitioner notes those without general practitioner notes

A lie E nurse

Usually ambulance cases were not triaged since they tended to arrive on their own and required urgent care However several A lie E departments had triage arrangements planned for the arrival of many ambulance cases at once as in a disaster

Sorting was largely a responsibility of the nurses although some A amp E doctors would occasionally check the condition of patients- in the waiting room too The receptionists often played a role in triage as well alerting the nursing staff to urgent cases This happened more in A amp E departments where the physical layout made it difficult for nurses to watch the entrance and the waiting room

The receptionists do tQe basic sorting They have guidelines to follow distressed patients severe cuts or bleeding go straight to the nurses open wounds or eye injuries go directly to a cubicle and are assessed by the nurses patients with abdominal pain or chest pain go on to trolleys and wait in the recovery room This system usually works well although occasionally a fracture patient will not be recognised and will sit in the waiting room

A lie E nurse

In several A lie E departments doctors and nurses stressed the value of an experienced receptionist in recognising and reacting quickly to acutely ill or injured patients

TREATMENT

Almost all the A amp Edepartments visited had a policy that all patients presenting had to be seen by a doctor The doctor did not necessarily have to treat the patient he or she could advise the patient to see a general practitioner Some A amp E doctors commented that by the time they saw the patients it was as easy to treat them as to send them away_ At a few departments the nurses (and occasionally the receptionist) could advise the patient that the department was not an appropriate place for their condition and that they should see a general practitioner This was usually done in consultation with the A E doctor but at times the nurses acted on their own initiative In these places a triage system similar to that reported by Weinerman et al [1] where patients were assigned to the appropriate service inside or outsidemiddot the hospital appeared to be operating

7

The assessment of patients the ordering of tests andmiddot the supervision of treatment were usually seen ~s medical functions The nurses would prepare patients for treatment (removing dressings) and carry out urgent first aid measures (stem bleeding start gastric lavage or cardio-pulmonary resuscitation) Generally however a nurse would only initiate treatment if the patients condition was urgent and a doctor was not available or was already busy with another emergency Exceptions to this situation occurred in some hospitals with A amp E nurse training programmes and in some smaller hospitals where the doctor is on call rather than working in the A amp E department In these departments experienced nurses could order tests such as x-rays and initiate treatments such as suturing and removing foreign bodies from eyes

In most A amp E departments nurses would perform some treatments under a doctors supervision However the range of treatments nurses were allowed to perform varied considerably among hospitals At some hospitals nurses sutured after training but at others they never sutured

The nurses do not suture although they would like to There are four reasons for this there is no full-time A amp E officer so good standards of sutur ing could not be maintained there could be medico-legal problems if a nurse sutured a cut which was more complicated than it looked eg with tendon involvement the nurses have enough to do at present and if they start suturing they will be expected to do it always and the young doctors need to learn suturing as part of their training

Principal nurse

Electrocardiograms were taken by nurses in some A amp E departments by technicians at others Taking blood samples was a doctors job in some departments but was done by nurses in others Similarly gastric lavage using a def ibrillator and plaster work were done by nurses in some departments Most A amp E nurses would maintain intra-venous drips but only nurses with special training WOUld insert them

Some nurses expressed frustration at restrictions on the treatments they were allowed to perform However several sen~or nurses stressed that they had to select carefully the nurses they allowed to perform more difficult treatments

We are very selective about choosing the nurses to do triage suturing and the more complicated procedures This seems to have been successful weve had no problems with nurses undertaking treatment theyre not competent to provide

A amp E senior nurse

I make sure the nurses understand they can be dangerous people If theyre not aware of their limitations theyre not suitable for A amp E work

A amp E senior nurse o

Also one department which had comparatively few nurses discouraged them from increasing the range of treatments they performed so that their workload did not become overwhelming

18

For diagnosis the A amp E departments made heavy use of the x-ray departments (The Design and Evaluation Unit study [21 estimated that 30 per cent of A amp E attenders had an x-ray during their visit) Some A amp E departments found their arrangements with the x-ray department very convenient with an x-ray machine aVailable 24 hours a day in or close to the A amp E department and with patients and x-ray films or reports returning within an hour At other hospitals arrangements Were less convenient in some places reporting bac k of x-rays took two or three hours delaying patients considerably while in others the x-ray departmentmiddot was located on a different floor from the A amp E ~epartment causing difficulties in transporting and accompanying patients there

Little use was made of the laboratory services other than for blood and urine tests and arrangements were generally satisfactory However in many hospitals x-ray and laboratory staff had to be called in to perform tests out of hours and because of the expense involved these out of hours tests were discouraged Some house surgeons found this a difficult situation

I I m caught between contradictory pressures the orthopaedic surgeons say that x-rays are necessary for proper diagnosis and the hospital board is trying to limit out of hours x-rays to save money

House surgeon

DISPOSAL

After treating the patient the A amp E doctor decides on the appropriate disposal discharging from care arranging follow-up treatment by referring to another source of care or recalling to the A amp E department or admitting the patient Information on disposal was only readily available from three A amp E departments The most common disposal pattern was in fact discharging from care with 40 to 55 per cent of patients making a first Visit being discharged

TABLE I PROPORTION OF FIRST ATTENDANCE PATIENrs DISCHARGED RECALLED REFERRED OR ADMITTED

Discharged Recalled Referred to Admitted Other First to A amp E GP Specialist attendance

Clinic tallied

Waikato l 393 132 222 99 134 19 25 707 Green Lane2 550 220 110 40 80 Unknown Taranaki 41 5 268 73 103 116 24 164

1 From McRaes study of Waikato A amp E departmen~ in 1979 2 From a study carried out by Green Lane A amp E department

19

FOLLOW-UP CARE

The decision to be made on follow-up care was usually between re~alling to the A amp E department or referring back to the patient I s general practitioner Some A amp E departments also referred patients (especially children) to district nurses or patients with work 1n]uries to an occupational health nurse or clinic Many departments referred fracture patients to orthopaedic clinics held in the hospital outpatients department and one A amp E department which was very short of space referred patients needing redressings to the outpatients department

There were large differences in referral practices (see Table 1) Between 13 and 27 per cent of first attenders were recalled to the A amp E department for follow-up care while 15 to 30 per cent were referred elsewhere either to a general practitioner or to a specialist clinic Also recall attendances expressed as a proportion of total attendances varied considerably among the A amp E departments from 10 per cent to 50 per cent (see Chapter 6 Table 11) and clearly reflected different follow-up practices

All of the urban and two of the provincial A amp E departments had a policy of referring most patients requiring follow-up care to a general practitioner and of keeping recall visits as low as possible This was similar to general policy in both Britain and the United States which appears to discourage re-at tendance at A amp E departments [34] However in the suburban rural and other provincial A amp E departments the decision on follow-up care was left to the judgement of the A amp E doctor

In practice however the choice to refer or to recall was reiated to several factors First the decision related to characteristics of the patients If the patients had serious wounds or burns or injuries which could develop complications they were usually recalled They were also recalled if the A amp E staff thought they would not receive appropriate care at home or they would not see a general practitioner for follow-up care Patients living a long way from the hospital were usually referred to their general practitioner At some A amp E departments patients were given the choice of referral or recall according to A amp E staff comments most chose to return to theA amp E department

The patients prefer to come back to the hospital Money is not a factor in this because the ACC pays for accident treatment at the general practitioner

A amp E nurse

Second there were general practitioner factors If the local general practitioners were unhappy about the A amp E department recalling patients or if a general practitioner had referred the patient to the department originally the A amp E doctors would refemiddotr rather than recall However if the A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner did not have the facilities and in some cases the ability to provide follow-up care (eg for serious woundS eye injuries) they would recall the patient

Some GPs dont like following up care initiated by the A amp E department or dont have the necessary facilities so I tend not to send patients back to them

A amp E officer

20

Im more likely to refer a patient back to a GP who is reliable

House surgeon

Third many of the house surgeons said they would recall patients if they were interested in the condition or if they were worried about their diagnosis and treatment and wanted to see the outcome Several medical superintendents noted that recalling under these circumstances was acceptable because it comprised part of the house surgeons training

Fourth the workload of the A amp E department sometimes affected the follow-up decision with very busy departments actively discouraging recalls And finally there was the philosophy of A amp E medicine held by the A amp E doctor In one department where the A amp E officer considered it an ethical duty to see any treatment initiated through to a successful conclusion almost all patients who needed follow-up care were recalled At two other departments the A amp E officers stressed the importance of being able to deal efficiently with any emergencies presenting they kept recalls low so that the department was not clogged with extra patients Other A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner could provide better continuity of care than the A amp E department so they referred as many patients as possible

When referring patients to the general practitionermiddot most of the A amp E doctors made a verbal recommendation to the patient and then relied on the patient to attend the general practitioner They would only write a formal referral letter if the patients condition was serious In several A amp E departments however greater efforts were made to inform the patient t s general practitioner Three departments gave referred patients cyclostyled forms with details of diagnosis and treatment to be passed to their general practitioner while the Whakatane department sent a copy of the A amp E record form to each patients general practitioner

ADMISSIONS

Table I suggests that between a and 14 per cent of all first attendances were admitted to the hospitals Admissions could well be higher for children Kljakovic [5] found that 20 per cent of the children presenting at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments were admitted

The A amp E departments were involved in several different pathways for the admission of acutely ill or injured patients (Scheduled admissions did not involve the A amp E department at any of the hospitals visited) Self-referred patients could be admitted directly from the A amp E department to the wards or could be cared for in a holding (or acute admitting) ward before going to the wards

There was considerable variation among the hospitals as to which members of the medical staff were able to admit patients At some of the urban hospitals only the registrars could admit while at others the A amp E doctor could admit if the registrar was delayed and unable to assess the patient quickly At some of the provincial and one of the urban hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit in consultation with the admitting officer or appropriate registrar while at-another urban hospital and the rural A amp E departments the A amp E doctors regularly admitted patients

21

Hospitals with lower levels of bed occupancy were more likely to allow A amp E doctors to admit Senior A amp E doctors were more likely to play a role in admissions (actually admitting patients or advising the registrar) than house surgeons

Some patients referred by a general practitioner for acute admission also passed through the A amp E department At one hospital the general practitioners rang the A amp E officer to arrange for all acute admissions and all such GP-referred patients were seen first in the A amp E department However more usually the general practitioners rang the appropriate registrar to make arrangements and the registrar decided whether to admit the patient directly to the wards or through the A amp E department The involvement of A amp E staff with patients requiring admission ranged from almost none (where the patient went directly from the A amp E department to the ward or specialist unit) to a full initial assessment including tests (often undertaken at the request of the registrar responsible for the patient) bull

Generally the A amp E doctors were satisfied with the admission procedures However at one hospital where the A amp E doctors could not admit patients waiting for admission tended to clog the department The doctorselt that if they had admission rights the situation would be remedied

DISCUSSION

There were few differences among the A amp E departments in the reception and sorting of patients However there were differences in some aspects of treatment follow-up care and admission procedures

lhe role of the A amp E nurses in treatment varied considerably with some departments allowing nurses to initiate and perform many treatments and other departments allowing little autonomy Careful training and selection were essential before nurses increased their responsibility for treatment bull

Policies on follow-up care differed among the departments with the urban and provincial departments generally referring patients to general practitioners and the rural and suburban departments leaving the referral decision to the A amp E doctor In practice however the differences were less clear-cut with several factors other than the patient I s condition affecting the follow-up care decisions These factors included the A amp E staffs communicat ion with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs of house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors philosophy with regard to A amp E medicine

The A amp E departments also differed considerably in thei r procedures for acute admissions At some hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit an A amp E patient while at others the patient had to be held in the department until admitted by a registrar Also at some hospitals patients referred by general practitioners for acute admission were seen in the A amp E department before going to a ward While having to hold patients sometimes caused

clogging in the department A amp E staff were generally satisfied with the procedures

22

REfERENCES

1 WEINERMAN E Richard RUfZEN S Robert and PEARSON David shyEffects of medical -triage- in hospital emergency service in Public health reports - v 80 no 5 (May 1965) p 389-399

2 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

3 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM (68)83

4 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL Jenkins - St Louis Hosby 1975

5 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

23

CHAPTER 4

Phy~i~~1 c~~raft~rhtics of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the physical characteristics of A amp E departments their overall size location and layout as well as specific areas within the departments It discusses the effects of the physical characteristlcs on the organisation and functioning of the A amp E departments Our investigation worked from the detailed base established in bullAccident and emergency departments a studY of planning r~quirements a report prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation gnit Departmellt of HeCilth [1]

PRINCIPLES

The 1973 Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit (DEU) report [l] outlined the following principles to be applied in designing A amp E departments

o the A amp E department must be patients seeking emergency care

ready to receive and deal with

o the A amp E department mus~ be able load within a reasonable period

to cope with an average i

busy

o the A amp E department must be capable of adaptation to exceptional situations arising from major accidents ltgtrqther disasters

o the layout should be simple easily unqerstood and compact

o the layout and procedures should facilitate easy flow of patients through the department

o spaces should be multipurpose to give greatest versatility

o p~tient ~ovew~n~ should be minimised )

priv~cy for patientsshould be provided as far as is practicable andconsistent with the need for supervisi0rt

SIZE

There was considerable variation in the total sizes of the A amp E -a~1-ftment~ vi~ited witll floor areas ranging from 250 sql1a~e metres to 2115 ~guare m~ties (see Table 2) Eight of the 14 departments visited had i

hhid1pgw~fd~oracUte admitting ward However even wt)en ~he area of th~ f~ ~ bull ~middotc1~A~- _ ~ - bull bull ~

AampE department WCiS adjusted for the presence of a holding ward this I~1-getv~-rH~tion in irea reniained

24

TABLE 2 AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Total area Holding ward Adjusted total Waiting room area areal area

sqm sqm sqm sqm

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 2 115 225 1 890 55 Middlemore 1 045 140 905 50 Green Lane 960 240 720 70 Wellington 575 190 385 75 Hutt 270 270 30 Christchurch 470 470 40 Dunedin 635 90 545 20

Provincial Rotorua 515 20 495 90 Taranaki Base 720 90 630 40 Timaru 605 70 535 80

Rural Whakatane 430 430 20 Grey 310 310 15

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 255 255 30 Kenepuru 540 540 30

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area Considerable sharing with outpatients department

The area of the A amp E department was not closely related to the attendance (see Table 3) Obviously there is a certain minimum size for an A amp E department since certain facilities are essential regardless of the attendance served Thus as would be expected the rural and to a lesser extent the provincial A amp E departments had high area to attendance ratios However even within the group of urban A amp E departments there was a fourfold difference in the total area to attendance ratio

The design at Auckland~ laid out along several corridors with many separate consulting and treatment rooms possibly contributed to its high ratio At Wellington Hutt and Christchurch hospitals staff commented on their difficulties working in cramped conditions The lack of space often forced staff to work under extreme pressure to move patients through the departments very quickly

25

TABLE 3 AREA TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR ADJUSTED TOTAL AREAS 1 AND WAITING AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS BY FIRST ATTENDANCE2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Adjusted total area to attendance ratio Waiting area to to attendance ratio

Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 first attendance total attendance total attendance pa p a p a

Full-time departments ~

Urban Auckland 323 291 08 Middlemore 232 157 09 Green Lane 3 230 168 16 Wellington 80 69 13 Hutt 82 63 07 Christchurch 76 64 05 Dunedin 200 143 05

Provincial Rotorua 404 293 53 Taranaki Base 609 399 25 Timaru 466 266 403

Rural Whakatane 718 490 23 Grey 805 61 2 30

Part-time departments

Suburban I INorth Shore 272 148 17

Kenepuru 924 597 33

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Considerable sharing with outpatients department

Spearman rank correlations [2] of adjusted total area with

( a) first attendance r = 0310 p gt 010 Not significant ( b) total attendance r = 0297 pgt 010 Not significant

26

LOCATION

There is broad agreement that the A amp E department should be located on the ground floor well signposted and easily accessible to ambulatory patients and ambulances The ambulance entrance should be able to handle several ambulances at once and should have adequate turning space It should be projected from the weather and screened from the view of the other A amp E department patients

The A amp E department should also be located as closely as possible to radiology facilities (either the x-ray department itself or a branch) The A amp E department and the outpatients department can share some facilities and provide additional staff and accommodation in an emergen~y

situation if they are sited together Acute patient care areas (operating theatres intensive care unitsmiddot and cardiac care units) and laboratory services should also be readily accessible from the A amp E department [134]

Entrances

Almost all of the A amp E departments visited were on the ground floor of the hospital and were well signposted Generally access for ambulatory patients was good apart from two hospitals where they had to walk up steps to enter the building o

Few departments had ambulance access which could cope with a shuttle of ambulances bringing mass casualties from a disaster There w~s little relation between the size of the department or the population served and the ease of ambulance flow Indeed those departments with a relatively low probability of being involved in a mass casualty situation had good ambulance flow (eg Whakatane) while those with a greater possibility had relatively poor ambulance access (eg Wellington) Several departments had particularly poor a~bulance flow with only a one-lane access Three departments had good drive-straight-through access while at the rest ambulances had to reverse However there were advantages to some of the bull reversing I situations in that the bays into which the ambulances had to reverse were more likely to give the patient protection from the weather All the A amp E departments visited had separate ambulance entrances which in all but three cases guaranteed screening of ambulance patients from public view

Access to other hospital facilities

In many of the hospitals the A amp E department was adjacent to the outpatients department or to the orthopaedic outpatients section When this occurred the plaster room and x-ray facilities were usually shared and waiting areas and the records office were sometimes shared In the smaller hospitals both departments often shared the nursing staff

The access to the x-ray department ranged from excellent in places which had x-ray facilities immediately adjacent to the A amp E department to very poor where the patient had to be transported hundreds of metres and to a different floor The time taken for the A amp E doctor to get the result of the x-ray varied from five minutes to over two hours though the physical separation of the two departments was only one of the factors which affected this

27

Access to acute care facilities was similarly variable In Christchurch the intensive care unit was adjacent to the A amp E department while in Rotorua it was at the other end of the hospital In many cases additions or alterations to the hospital buildings and changes of function of certain areas have meant that the A amp E department no longer bears the same physical relationship to other hospital departments as was originally the case

LAYOUT

Several studies have concluded that the A amp Edepartment should be designed so that there is an orderly progression of patients from registration to examination to investigations if necessary to treatment and to referral admission or discharge Staff time and effort is best conserved by a compact plan with waiting areas and treatment areas easily accessible and supervised However the need for easy supervision has to be balanced by consideration of the patients privacy Two basic A amp E plans have evolved

o a radial plan where the waiting examination and treatment rooms are arranged on the perimeter of the departmentmiddot with the nurses station doctors room and records office in the centre

o a linear plan where the examination and treatment rooms are arranged down each side of a corridor with the waiting area records office and staff offices at one end [145]

Many of the A amp E departments visited had a linear layout with the largest Auckland being arranged along several corridors In these departments staff often commented that their overall view of the patients was not good and a considerable amount of walking was needed to supervise them Middlemore A amp E department and the treatment areas of several other departments had radial layouts which staff found very satisfactory Generally the A amp E staff prefer red open plan layouts using curtained cubicles rather than enclosed rooms Staff (especially nursing staff) often commented that their department would be better if certain walls or partitions were removed to give easier surveillance of the department as a whole However staff also commented on the relative lack of privacy for patients being examined or treated and noted that some private rooms were needed for instance for obstetric or paediatric patients

Waiting area

There is general agreement that the waiting area should be adjacent to the reception desk easily visible to the receptionist and if possible overlooked by the nurses office or station It should be a cheerful comfortable area with toys provided for children and a range of magazines and books Public toiletspublic telephones and arrangements for refreshments are also needed [146]

The size of the waiting area varied considerably among the A amp E departments visited (refer back tomiddot Table 2) Again this variation bore little relationship to the workload of the department (see Table 3) Some waiting areas were clearly too small and this put pressure on the staff to deal with patients quickly in order to clear the waiting room

28

Staff comments suggested that not only the size of the waiting area but also its design affected its crowding Basically square rooms with seats around the edges had fewer problems than corridor-style rooms with only one row of seats

In all the A amp E departments visited the waiting areas were adjacent to the reception area Sometimes they were visible from the nurses office or work area but where this was not possible the nurses relied on the receptionists to alert them to urgent cases or checked the wai Hng area often themselves

Facilities in waiting areas varied from nothing but seats to areas in which there were hot and cold drink dispensing machines a childrens play area with toys and health-related poster and pamphlet displays Some had a TV set or a tropical fish tank Most staff were agreed that a pleasant atmosphere in the waiting room was important and adVerse comments about the waiting area were made by staff in departments which lacked this In some departments staff commented that vandalism made it difficult to retain facilities and a pleasant atmosphere

Examination and treatment area

The examination and treatment area provides for the needs of all A amp E patients other than those with serious conditions requiring the resuscitation room or those needing special facilities such as plastering Because special purpose areas are frequently under-utilised flexibility is a key requi rement Hence multipurpose cubicles with standardised equipment are usually recommended The cubicles must be big enough to give easy access for patients (not necessarily walking) to accommodate eqUipment and to give staff enough room to work Curtained cubicles are generally sufficient but at least one enclosed cubicle is required for patients needing extra privacy or for light control in eye examinations A cubicle especially set up for children (with appropriately-sized equipment toys and posters) is also desirable [1346]

Most of themiddot A ~ E departments visited had curtained cubicles in the examination and treatment area with perhaps one or two enclosed cubicles or rooms as well Four A amp E departments only had separate rooms for treatment Curtained cubicles made for ease of access while separate rooms did present some difficulties in manoeuvering patient trolleys and wheelchairs In one case it was impossible to get a patient trolley into the room at all and the room was consequently little used

Curtained cubicles did afford greater flexibility in use and did provide more room to work but had the disadvantage of being considerably less private than rooms Surveillance was easier in departments with curtains than those withmiddot walls and doors In the Auckland A amp E department treatment rooms doors had been removed in the interests of improved surveillance Staff in this department commented that its rigid design could lead to difficulties in accommodating a large number of patients in a disaster

The DEU report [1] recommended that the number of cubicles required by an A amp E department was NIlS where N is the anticipated average number of new patients per day It noted that in A amp E departments with few new patients per day a minimum of two cubicles should be provided It also recommended that the flow of recalled patients should be regulated so that they did not greatly affect the need for cubicles

29

As can be seen from Table 4 most departments had enough cubicles to cope with their first attendance workload Even applying the DEU recommendation of N18 to their total attendance most of the departments had an adequate number of cubicles The exceptions were Hutt Christchurch and Dunedin

TABLE 4 NUMBERS OF EXAMINATION AND TREATMENT CUBICLES OR ROOMS AND RECOMMENDED NUMBERS l BASED ON FIRST ATTENDANCE 2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Actual number of DEU recommended numbers (minimum of 2) cubiclesrooms based on

first attendance total attendance pa pa

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 13 89 99 Middlemore 9 59 88

Green Lane 7 40 65 Wellington 10 73 85 Hutt 4 51 66 Christchurch 7 94 11 2 Dunedin 3 41 58

Provincial Rotorua 4 2 26 Taranaki Base 4 2 24 Timaru 6 2 31

Rural Whakatane 3 2 2 Grey 3 2 2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3 8 22 37 Kenepuru3 6 22 30

1 Based on DEU report [l which recommended NIS cubicles where N average number of new patients per day ie N6750 where N = average first attendance pa

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Recommended numbers increased to adjust for North Shore and Kenepuru treating their attendance numbers in part-time rather than full-time hours

30

Resuscitation area

The resusciation area is used for the immediate life--saving treatment of seriously injured or sick patients It is the acute treatment area in contrast to the examination and treatment area which is used for relatively minor procedures In making its recommendations about the resuscitation area the DEU report [I] balanced the probability of the A amp E department having to treat multiple accident victims with the comparative rarity of use of resuscitation rooms It recommended that a resuscitation room of suff icient size to deal with two patients concurrently be provided in all A amp E departments It also noted that the ambulance entrance and resuscitation area should be located as close together as possible

Most of the departments visited had purpose-built resuscitation rooms of varying size and with varying degrees of sophistication in equipment Some had x-ray facilities in the resuscitat ion area and in those that did not its absence was regarded as a serious impediment to the efficient care of severe trauma

In four of the seven urban A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms were regarded by the staff as being too small The comment was made in one urban department that because of the small size of the resuscitation area patients sometimes had to be moved out of the area before it was felt clinically desirable to do so in order to accommodate incoming patients In the rural and prOVincial A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms wereshyadequate for the demands placed on them

Most resuscitation rooms were sited close to the ambulance entrance and afforded good access to stretcher patients However in three A amp E departments patients had to be moved some distance and in another department up one floor by lift

Operating theatre

In discussing provision of operating theatres in the A amp E departments the DEU report [1] noted that

o most surgery done is minor requires only local anaesthesia and could be done within adequately designed cubicles

o the A amp E department is not a proper place for general anaesthesia

o using A amp Etheatres for day surgery tends to block other A amp E facilities and staff causin~ delay in treating A amp E patients

The report concluded that special facilities appear to be justified only if there is a clear intention of widening the scope of accident surgery in the departments

bullMinor ops theatres of varying sizes and equipped to varying standards were available in many departments Very variable use was made of such theatres - never in some departments to daily in others It was used less in departments with very heavy workloads and where the medical staff were not satisfied that sufficiently sterile conditions could be maintained In one department the theatre was only used for day surgery cases

31

Plaster room

In the plaster room casts are applied and removed and fractures and dislocations can be manipulated The DEU report [1] noted that the plaster room could be an integral part of the A amp E department or shared with the orthopaedic department or belonging entirely to the latter It recommended that the plaster room be close to the A amp E department and the x-ray department

Most departments had a separate plaster room available In many cases this was shared with an adjacent orthopaedic outpatients or fracture clinic Th~ staff generally found the plaste~-rooms satisfactory although two particularly narrow rooms were difficult to work in

Interview room

The DEU report [l] recommended that A amp E departments in medium-sized and larger hospitals should have a small interview room where a patient IS

relatives could talk with A amp E staff the police or others

No A amp E department had a room specifically designated as an interview room for bereaved or distressed relatives although one A amp E department shared such a room with another department In most departments one of the staff off ices was generally used for this purpose In departments where staff offices were small or crowded the lack of an interview room was seen as a serious flaw in departmental layout

Reception and records office

The reception desk should be immediately visible to ambulant patients arriving at the A amp E department and it is desirable for the receptionist to be aware of what is happening at the ambulance entrance as well The current A amp E records should be held at the reception desk or nearby [1]

In the A ampE departments visited the reception desk was usually well-placed for dealing with ambulant patients but in only four cases did it overlook the ambulance entrance In two departments the reception desk was some distance from the treatment area (separated by a waiting room or outpatients room) and the nursing staff found it difficult to oversee incoming patients Current A amp E records were held at the reception desk in all but one of the departments visited The amount of space available in relation to the throughput of patients was a major factor in determining the length of time records could be kept within the department This in turn affected the ease and therefore speed of record retrieval

Staff offices

These ranged from non existent to very cramped spaces serving many other functions to pleasant specifically designated and relatively quiet areas The latter offices are conducive to good staff morale and being a place for exchange of views and experiences could be expected to contribute quite markedly to the overall effectiveness and eff iciency of the department

32

Holding ward

The DEU report [1] said that holding beds should be used primarily for A amp E patients requiring a period of observation prior to a decision about admission or for those who could be expected to go home after a rest period The report noted that using holding beds as recovery beds for day patients for arranged admissions or for pre-admission clinics was not desirable

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments visited had holding or acute admitting wards These holding wards were used mainly for assessing patients requiring acute admission but in some hospitals were also used for observing patients (eg with suspected concussion) and for holding night admissions till the morning to save disturbing the wards Neither of the rural A amp E departments had a holding ward although one had an I A amp E admission procedure where a patient could be admitted for up to 24 hours for observation without the need for full admission procedures In the A amp E departments with holding wards a patient staying for more than four hours was formally admitted

Our study showed that the A amp E departments had some problems using holding wards properly In two A amp E departments holding wards were little used at night because nursing levels were too low to staff them safely In another department the beds were used for patients recovering from day surgery and even for some pre-ar ranged admissions At times general practitioner-referred admissions could also clog the holding wards

DISCUSSION

Most of the A amp E departments were generally adequate in size location and layout The exceptions were Christchurch and Butt where conditions were very cramped with particularly limited examination and treatment areas and poor layout We understand that improvements are planned at Hutt and that recent extensions have improved the Christchurch department considerably but at the time of our visits staff in both these departments were working under extreme pressure because of the physical conditions

Despite the general adequacy of the departments almost all had some flaw which affected their operation and inconvenienced staff and patients Major flaws found in several A amp E departments included

o ambulance access unsuitable for a shuttle of ambulances in a disaster

o difficult access to the x-ray department

o resuscitation room too small for easy treatment of more than one patient at a time

o no interview room for relatives of patients

33

REFERENCES

1 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

2 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

3 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 44-49

4 Emer~ency department organisation and management edited by A L Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975 p 8-16

5 Design of departments in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) p 1204-7

6 McKINLAY Robin - The care of children in New Zealand hospitals -Aucklandmiddot National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1982 p 79-80

35

CHAPTER 5

Staffing of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the staffing both medical and nursing looking at their numbers and experience their previous training and the training they receive in the A amp E department and their satisfaction with their work and conditions We also describe the clerical and reception staff and briefly the involvement of other workers (orderlies social workers and ambulance personnel) in the departments

MEDICAL STAFFING

Senior medical staffing

Organising appropriate medical staffing for hospital emergency services is a prQblem in many countries [1] The variety of staffing arrangements in A amp E departments within many countries suggests that none have established a generally satisfactory pattern of medical staffing

The Platt report [2] found that in Br itish A amp E departments the great majority of patients were seen by junior staff only and that supervision of the A amp E departments by conSUltants was often little more than nominal The committee recommended that

o the junior medical staff should be adequately supervised by consultants

o a consultant orthopaedic surgeon should normally be in charge of theA amp E unit

o an accident and emergency unit should have at least three consultant surgeons each giving a substantial part of their time to this work

o the primary task of general practitioners in emergency services is to deal with minor accidents and emergencies at any time of the day or night (by organising a rota to answer emergency calls within their practice by working sessions in A amp E departments or by attending cottage hospitals at short notice for emergency calls) bull

Since then some progress has been made but standards continue to lag behind those recommended [34] There has been considerable debate over the appropriate staffing arrangements for A amp E departments Some hospitals have implemented the Platt report recommendations others have appointed a full-time A amp E specialist others have employed a full-time non-specialist doctor and some have employed general practitioners

Despite the various systems there is a consensus in both the United States and Britain that experienced medical staffmiddot are essential in the A amp E department They are necessary for prompt effective treatment of emergency conditions for efficient running of the departments and for adequate supervision of the junior doctors employed [23567 p 17-23]

36

Similar concerns have been expressed in New Zealand since the Board of Health report on outpatient services in 1960 [8] This report recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times and staffed by experiencedmedical officers

Salmond [9] found that when a senior A amp E officer directed the department A amp E work was handled more efficiently and house surgeons were more closely supervised and supported He suggested that one senior member of the hospital staff (ideally a full-time A amp E officer) should accept full responsibility for the overall supervision of A amp E services

Most of the A amp E departments that we visited had an A amp E officer The position was vacant at both Wellington and Hutt hospitals at the time of our visit while at North Shore Hospital responsibility for the A amp E department was shared by two senior doctors The A amp E departments of the rural hospitals had no senior medical staff

In A amp E departments with heavy workloads additional experienced doctors were often employed as deputy A amp E officers usually medical officer special scale or as Medical Reserve Scheme registrars (see Table 5) There was no general practitioner staffing of any of the Aamp E departments visited although general practitioners had been part-time staff of some of themiddot smaller A amp E departments in previous years One medical superintendent commented that since very few general practitioners could be classified as specialists they could only be paid as medical officers special scale This low level of payment acted as a disincentive to general practitioner recruitment

The A amp E officers usually worked normal office hours (830 am - 430 pm or 9 am - 5 pm weekdays) apart from two who worked part-time covering morning periods If additional experienced doctors were employed they usually covered evening periods (eg 5 pm - 10 pm) and weekend day shifts

There was a wide range of experience among the A amp E officers Half of the senior A amp E doctors had a general practice background and these doctors often had specific surgical medical pharmacological or Armed Forces medical experience as well Several A amp E officers had primarily a surgical background while others had a considerable range of hospital experience In hospitals where the A amp E officers had a general practice background the Medical Superintendent or the A amp E officer often stressed the suitability of this background for A amp E work

An extensive general practitioner background is useful in dealing with the multitude of problems seen in an Accident and Emergency department An orthopaedic or surgical background is not as necessary because of the good backup from the specialties And staff who have only had hospital experience particularly junior staff can lack skills in general assessment and triage

A amp E officer

In other hospitals staff stressed that an orthopaedic and surgical background was very valuable as was experience in dealing with specific types of injury such as soft tissue wounds

37

TABLE 5 MEDICAL STAFFING OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington2

Hutt2

Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Senior medical staffing

Number of full-time equivalents

A amp E officer ( including deputies) 25 15 I 16

I 2

I 03 I

2 05

Registrar

06

1 1

House surgeons

Number on Number A amp E runs covering

some shifts in A amp E deptl

6 2-3 6 2 5 I 5 4 2-3 5 2 2

All on rotating basis 1 3 1 2

5 on rotating basis 4 on rotating basis

None in A amp E dept 4 on rotating basis

1 On general relieving duties 2 Senior A amp E position vacant at time of visit

Junior medical staffing

The issues

Junior medical staffing of A amp E departments has concerned many commentators in the United States Britain and New Zealand The Platt report [2] noted that recently qualified staff when serving in the casualty department undertake responsibility which they would not have in the wards or outpatient clinics

38

In 1960 the New Zealand Board of Health report [8] on out-patient services deplored the staffing of casualty departments by I relatively inexperienced men [sic] and suggested that these staff I should be regarded more as assistants under supervision and training than responsible officers in the outpatients departments The undesirability of staffing A amp E departments with first year house surgeons (or pre-registration doctors) has been reiterated since Junior doctors are often unsure when to ask for advice or help and are sometimes unwilling to admit that they are over-tired and unable to cope [91011)

The report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers [12] noted the heavy load carried by house surgeons working long shifts in A amp E departments It also commented that when house surgeons are required to look after the A amp E department while carrying out ward duties inadequate cover of the A amp E department could result

The New Zealand situation

The urban A amp E departments had between two and six house surgeons working on three month A amp E runs and in several of these hospitals another one to three house surgeons on general relieving duties covered some A amp E shifts There were more house surgeons in A amp E departments with heavier workloads or with fewer senior medical staff The provincial and rural departments did not usually have house surgeons working on specific A amp E runs rather the A amp E department was covered by all (or most) of the house surgeons in the hospital on a rotatng basis Of the two suburban A amp E departments Kenepuru was covered by the house surgeons on a rotating basis while North Shore did not have any house surgeons because there was no inpatient or consultative backup available (see Table 5)

The total medical staffing of the departments (senior A amp E doctors and house surgeons together) ranged from 10 to 100 full-time equivalents and was closely related to the attendance at the departments (see Table 6) The provincial and rural A amp E departments had higher medical staff to attendance ratios because they had to provide a 24-hour service regardless of the size of the attendance

Each A amp E department visited rostered its house surgeons differently depending on the availability of senior medical staff the workload of the department and the house surgeons other duties In the urban departments house surgeons worked between 45 and 60 hours a week on shifts usually 8 to 12 hours long Many of the house surgeons working in these departments complained about long shifts and suggested that more staff were needed to reduce the shift lengths Split shifts were also unpopular

The most worrying aspect of the staff ing arrangements in bhe Accident and Emergency department is the long hours We need another house surgeon to reduce the hours on some shifts and to proviae another pair of hands in busy periods (eg Friday and Saturday night Sunday afternoon)

House surgeon

39

TABLE 6 TOTAL MEDICAL STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND MEDICAL STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE I AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Total medical Total medical staffing to staffing attendance ratio

FTE per FTE per 10000 first 10000 total

Full-time attendance attendance equivalents p a pa

Full-time departments

Urban

Auckland2 100 17 15 Middlemore2 91 23 16 Green Lane2 65 25 15 Wellington 66 14 12 Hutt2 55 17 13 Christchurch 70 11 10 Dunedin2 60 22 16

Provincial Rotorua 42 34 25 Taranaki Base2 28 27 18 Timaru 22 19 11

Rural Whakatane3 15 25 17 Grey 10 26 20

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 20 21 12 Kenepuru3 20 34 22

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE estimated since A amp E department partially covered by house

surgeons on general relieving duties 3 FTE estimated since A amp E department covered by house surgeons on

rotating basis

Spearman rank correlations [131 of total medical staffing with

(a) first attendance r = 0953 p lt 001 (b) total attendance r = 0933 p 001

In the provincial and rural hospitals house surgeons were often on call for long shifts over nights and weekends They were usually covering a ward or the whole hospital at the same time and simultaneous demands from the wards and the A amp E department sometimes caused problems However

40

these house surgeons generally found their rostering satisfactory despite the long hours on call perhaps because the actual work required in the A amp E department was comparatively light

An ordinary week night is usually quiet after midnight thered be three to five calls and Id have to get up once on average Weekend nights are busier but I usually get at least two or three hours sleep

House surgeon

Several house surgeons were irritated that while they worked more intensively on A amp E runs than on ward runs they spent fewer hours on-call and consequently they were paid less

Supervision by senior medical staff

In the larger A amp F departments house surgeons worked with the senior medical staff on most day and some evening shifts only on night shifts (and some evening shifts) were house surgeons the sole medical staff in a department By contrast in the smaller and part-time departments house surgeons covered the department alone seldom working with any senior A amp E medical staff

Several nurses commented that the A amp E department ran less efficiently outside normal working hours because the house surgeons inexperience meant assessment and treatment times were longer and tests were used more often than when the A amp E officer was present

Many senior medical staff in the urban A amp E departments were concerned at the lack of supervision for house surgeons outside normal working hours and so would have Ii ked more senior A amp E staff Several of the house surgeons were also concerned although others enjoyed the autonomy they had and were not concerned about working without supervision

I am not happy with house surgeons managing the A amp E department on their own They only have a three month shift in the department and often most of this time is spent learning how to do A amp E wor k The house surgeons can have problems deciding when to call a registrar to treat a patient and there can be delays in obtaining a registrar The A amp E department needs full-time trained medical staff on duty 24 hours a day to give proper supervision to the house surgeons and to run an efficient department

A amp E officer

On night shift I can feel rather alone if something goes wrong

House surgeon

I enjoy the variety of work and the independence I have to treat most patients as I see fit

House surgeon

41 _A

Arraflgements for consultative backup and support when senior A amp E staff were not on duty varied from hospital to hospital according to hospital size n urban hospitals the house surgeons would usually call on the appropriate registrar and the acute admitting or specialist teams for emergencymiddot cases In some places the house surgeons could calIon the consultant if a registrar was unavailable but this was usually seen as a last resort call In the provincial and rural hospitals the house surgeons would call on the appropriate senior doctor who was available This was usually one of the cQnsultants or a registrar if any were employed by the hospital The A amp E Qfficer might occasionally be called and in hospitals without an A~amp E oHicer th~ medical superintendent would also provid~ backup

Generally house surgeons were happy with the support they received A physically compact hospital was mentioned several times as facilitating ~ ~ fast back-up Howeve( in some hospitals there could be considerable delays in 9etting surgical and orthopaedic registrars to the A amp E department usually because they were in theatre Also at two hospitals backup in the minor specialties was considered inadequate bull

Use of first year house surgeons

Urban and suburban hospitals had a policy of using second year house surgeons as much as possible in the A amp E department and of using first year house surgeons only in their second six months This policy was generally butmiddot not always carried out For example the on-call arrangements of some urban A amp E departments resulted in inexperienced first year house surgeons working in the department In the smaller hospitals also the limited pool of house surgeons available tended to result in more first year house surgeons working in the department

The hospital could not provide cover for the A amp E department without using first year house surgeons However there are always senior staff and the medical registrar readily available as backup

Medical superintendent

When direct supervision was limited first year house surgeons did find A amp E work difficult

Training

The training received by the house surgeons in the A amp E departments varied greatly Two hospitals ran half-day or one-day orientation courses before -house surgeons started in the department Three A amp E departments ran weekly or fortnightly training sessions on specific conditions while another department ran sessions on an irregular basis However house surgeons often missed training sessions because they were treating pat~entsln more than half tmiddothe A amp E departments no formal training was giVen and house surgeons were taught on-the-job when senior A amp E staff were available This teaching placed a considerable load on senior staff

The three-monthly changeover of house surgeons is frustrating and the first month with new house surgeons is very demanding because they have little confidence or competence

A amp E officer

42

If the A amp E department had no senior staff or if the house surgeons shifts did not coincide with those of the senior staff the house surgeons had to gain their training whenever and wherever they could Both house surgeons and nurses commented that house surgeons often required guidance from the nursing staff

We get on-the-job training relying very heavily on the nurses to say IDr X (the A amp E officer) normally does bullbullbull I was rather scared the first few days in the A amp E department

House surgeon

Several house surgeons commented that they would have liked more training particularly when they were first in the A amp E department and more guidance on hospital policy and administration

Manuals (middotor sets of standingmiddot orders) out-lining the clinical and administrative procedures required under different bull circumstances have been widely recognised as essential in the A amp E department They are particularly useful to new A amp E doctors as an explanationoof their duties 7 p 79914J

Senior medical staff at 13 of the hospitals visited said they had standing orders covering ~A amp E administration procedures or were revising them These standing orders were either specific A amp E booklets or sections of the full hospital standing orders Several house surgeons commented that they found the standlng orders useful while others relied more on verbal advice from the A amp E officer or nurses Two of the latter house surgeons said they had not seen any A amp E standing orders when in fact the full hospital standing orders did contain a section on the A amp E department One A amp E department had no standing orders (apartmiddot from protocols for the care of coronary patients) and the house surgeons there would have liked more guidelines

Accident and emergency work as a career

Advantages and disadvantages

The senior medical staff who expressed their views on A amp E work as a career had all previously been general practitioners and their comments largely reflected comparisons of A amp E work with general practice They tended to cite the regular hours good conditions of service and salaries competitive with general practice as advantages of A amp E work and the limited range of clinical material and lack of continuity of care as disadvantages

When house surgeons were asked whether they would be intercested in A amp E work as careers for themselVes their responses were more negative than those of the senior ~ amp E staff All of them mentioned some disadvantages of A amp E work To those mentioned by senior staff they added the problems of irregular hours and having to deal with many trivial complaints The lack of recognition of A amp E work as a specialty (and consequent lack of status within the hospital) was also seen as a disadvantage Some mentioned the advantages cited by the senior staff and added variety of work as another advantage These advantages and disadvantages mirror those noted by British and United States writers [315]

43

Accident and emergency work as a sp~cialty

Over the past two decades in the United States the increasing use of emergency rooms has led to the development of training programmes for emergency room doctors and in 1979 to the granting of specialty status to emergency medicine The American College of Emergency Physicians in 1975 defined the emergency physician as I a specialist in breadth whose training is focused ~n the acute and the life-threatening aspects of medical care and who~ by ~he nature of his practice is available when the patient needs him [cited in 16]

vlhile emergency medicine has much the same content as family practice the different emphasis approach and method of handling have been cited as justifying a separate specialty [16] Critics have disputed the specialty status of emergency medicine stating that although a broad clinical knowledge is required this knowledge is also shallow [15]

In Britain similar debates have taken place While the Platt report [2] recommended that one consultant should be in administrative charge of an A amp E department it did not favour the development of accident surgery as a specialty in its own right nor the appointment of consultants to work full-time in A amp E departments However the Increasing number of A amp E conSUltants middotthe development of training posts and the formation of an association of A amp E consultants [4] have signaled a de facto recognition of A amp E work as a specialty The role of general practitioners in A amp E departments has also been debated Their suitability for sorting and treating casual attenders has been stressed and their ability to work without consultant supervision has been seen as an advantage 21718]

An emergency care seminar held in Auckland in 1979 recognised the inadequacy of training at all levels for work in A amp E departments in New Zealand The suggestions made to rectify this situation included the recruitment of sp~cialist -staff at a career level

Senior staff in some of the urban A amp E departments stressed the need for a post-graduate A amp E specialist training in New Zealand They gave two reasons for this that more senior staff were required to supervise and properly train house surgeons working in A amp E departments and that more senior staff were needed to improve the efficiency

More senior staff would improve standards of care speed throughput reduce the need for tests and reduce recalls as well as improving the supervision of house surgeons

A amp E officer

The staff of the smaller hospitals commented that full-time specialists could be warranted in large urban A amp E departments but were not necessary in provincial hospitals

Full-time A amp E specialists are only warranted in very big hospitals where there is enough emergency work to justify a trauma centre and 24 hour senior doctor cover A specialist cannot work well in isolation so the workload has to be large enough to justify three or four A amp E consultants

A amp E officer

44

NURSE STAFFING

Accident and emergency nursing

As noted by Jenkins [7 p41-42 J nursing in the emergency department is different from in-hospital nursing The nature of work in the department requires the ability to perceive and act quickly and to adapt to constantly changing circumstances

The A amp E nurse needs skills in assessment and examination in critical care and emergency treatment in public relations and must be able to act calmly under pressure Increasingly experienced nurses are expected to carry out triage Special training both on-the-job and in study courses is therefore essential [27 p 36 1419J

The need to have experienced senior nursing staff working in the A amp E department at all times has been recognised for many years The senior nurse in charge of the department has a key role being responsible for the day-to-day administration of the department for the supervision of the nursing care given and often for supporting the junior medical staff [259] Again as Jenkins [7 p 27] noted the emergency department nurse is one cornerstone of the department and often acts as the stablizing element in a chaotic milieu especially in those hospitals where the medical staff rotates

New Zealand arrangements

There was considerable variation in both the total numbers and the levels of experience of nursing staff among the A amp E departments (see Table 7) Some departments had a nurse supervisor in control and several charge nurses while other departments had a charge nurse in control A amp E nurses were mainly staff nurses although some departments used substantial numbers of enrolled nursesmiddot Student nurses were present in most of the departments but they were often there for a few weeks only so they have been excluded from the tables

The number of nurses on duty in the A amp E department varied over the time of the day and the day of the week with more nurses on duty at times of heavy workload such as Friday and Saturday evenings and also weekday mornings when dressing clinics were held Most departments organised some staggering of shifts so that good cover was maintained throughout the day In three of the smaller hospitals (Timaru Whakatane and Grey)middot the A amp E department was covered at night by separate nursing staff usually the night supervisors who were covering other parts of the hospital as well

In several of the small hospitals the nursing staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department Generally this was satisfactory but occasionally the steady workload of the outpatients department left the A amp E department short of nursing cover

The total nurse staffing of the A amp E departments visited ranged from 25 to 278 full-time equivalents and this variation was partially related to the attendance of the department and whether or not the department had a holding ward (see Table 8) However even after adjusting for the staff required in the holding wards there was a threefold variation in the

45

nursing staff to attendance ratios of the urban A amp E departments Other factors such as the small size of the Hutt and Christchurch A amp E departments and greater use of student nurses may have been involved

TABLE 7 NURSE STAfFING OF HOSPITAL AIDS

Nurse lt bullbull

sup~rvisors

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland l 1 Middlemorel 1 Green Lane l 1 Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin 1

Provincial Rotorua 1 Taranaki Basel

Timarul 2

Rural Whakatane2 Grey2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Charge Staff nurses Full-

Time

4 21 4 11 2 11 1 19 1 8 1 11 2 3

5 I 10 1 3

1 4 1 2

1 7middot 1 1

EXCLUDING

nurses Part-Time

2 12

7

2 2 4

1

STUDENT NURSES AND

Enrolled nurses Full- Part shytime Time

4 2

2 1 2

1 4 1

1 1

3

1 Holding ward attachedto Aamp E department covered completely or partly by A amp E nursing staff

2 A amp E department covered by separate nursing staff at night (numbers not included here)

Work in both the A amp E department and the outpatients department

The relatively low attendance at the provincial rural and suburban departments contributed to their somewhat higher nursing staff to attendance ratios The high level of nursing staff at North Shore may be related to the additional duties of nurses in that department in escorting patients to other hospitals and working in the plaster room

TABLE 8 NURSE STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND NU~E STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Nurse staffing Nur~estaffing to attendance ratios

Full-time Adjusted Adjusted FTE Adjusted PTE equiva- full-time perlOOOO per 10000 lents2 equival- first atten- total attendshy

3ents dance pa dance p a

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane4

Wellington HuH Christchurch Dunedin

270 278 172 200 1l~0 130 80

220 258 122 170 110 130 80

3bull 8 66 47 35 33 21 29

34 45 29 30 26 18 21

Provincial Rotorua4

Taranaki Base Timaru

77 160 75

77 80 55

63 77 55

46 51 27

Rural Whakatane4 Grey4

52 25

52 25

87 65

59 49

Part-time depa rtment s

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

110 28

110 28

117 48

64 31

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE calculatedfrom Table 7 (with part-timenurses counted as 05

FTE) unless exact FTE figures supplied by hospitals 3 FTE adjusted by removing nurses covering the holding ward 4 Nurses covering both the A amp E department and the outpatients department counted as 07 FTE in the A amp E department and separate night nursing staff counted as 10 FTE extra

Spearman rank correlations (13] of adjusted nurse staffing with

( a) first attendance r = 0869 p lt 001 ( b) total attendance r = 0895 P lt 001

47

In seven A amp E departments nurses were satisfied with staffing arrangements liowever nurses in four departments (not necessarily those with relatively ~~w nurses) said that nurse numbers were too low while at two other departments weekend shortages of nurses and diff iculty getting replacements for numiddotreesmiddotmiddot off sick were mentioned as problems One hospitals policy of rotating all nurses at or below staff nurse level throughout the h6spital was criticised because it left too few nurses with A amp E experiance worlting in t)le department At another hospital nurses appreciated the reguiar check made on their job satisfaction by the nurse supervisors

In several A amp E departmentsmiddotmiddotr-ourseswere dissatisfied with the medical staffing arrangements~Cl some wani~d a senior doctor interested in A amp E work in charge of the department Others wanted A amp E doctors to spend

Imiddot ~~fU

more time in the department ~specially outside normal working hours

Training

In most of th~ A amp E departments visited junior nurses received on-the-job training wo~king alongside semor nurses and being rotateQ through different areas of the department However where a department was short of nursing staff or had a heavy workload senior nurses often had insuffficient time to teach the junior nurses Senior nurses often found that training new hurses both increased their workload markedly and slowed down the work of the department However as one principal nurse said

We train nurses on-the-job If we waited for experienced nurses to app1Y we I d nev~rltlet them

Principal nurse

At several A amp E departments junior nurses did not work either on their own or in areas requiring more judgement (for example the resuscitation room or the waiting room) until they were more experienced Often this changeover did not happen until the nurses in charge of the department had made a formal appraisal of the junior nurse There was a consensus among senior A amp E nurses that three to six months working in the department was required to train an A amp E nurse

I think A amp E nurses need a three month training course - their student training is not enough A nurse needs three to six months experience before she is fully competent to work permanently in the A amp E department Also its difficult to get fully trained on-the-job in a smaller hospital because theres too few patients coming through

A amp E nurse

Usually some form of procedure manual orientation book andor job description was provided for the nursing staff outlining their duties and responsibilities in the A amp E department A few departments also ran occasional lectures and inservice training At Auckland Middlemore and North Shore hospitals the A amp E department ran specific inservice training courses for staff nurses

48

The course at Auckland for example took six nurses at a time involved one study day per fortnight over 10-12 months and covered all aspects of A amp E work Nurses had to have six months experience in the A amp E

department before taking the course Senior nurses commented that the courses were valuable in improving the nurses abilities confidence and morale and felt that nurses who had been through the courses tended to stay in the department longer and were less prone to absenteeism Junior nurses at several hospitals without A amp E training courses said they would find such a course useful

At more than half the A amp E departments visited nurses commented on the necessity for them to guide the house surgeons particularly early in the three-month runs

The junior medical staff training is on-the-job and its largely done behind the door by the nursing staff The nurses will encourage the house surgeon to call a consultant if necessary (but not in front of a patient) or if they are very worried the nurses will ring a consultant themselves The house surgeons this year are very good and pleasant but it can be very wearying when they begin their three month shifts

A amp E nurse

At some hospitals this need to guide house surgeons had provilt1ed the impetus for developing A amp E nurse training courses

Many of the nurses said that they enjoyed A amp E nursing because of its specialised nature It had a fast pace and a stop-start quality thereI

was never a routine because of the high patient turnover the variety of complaints presenting and the drama associated with some cases As with the house surgeons nurses often found themselves carrying more responsibility working in the A amp E department than in the wards and they relished this Several hospitals had waiting lists of nurses wishing to work in the A amp E depart~entbull

OTHER STAFF INVOLVED WITH THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

An efficient and effective A amp E department needs not only adequate medical and nursing staff it also requires secretarial clerical reception and orderly staff [27 p 24-251

Reception and clerical staff

Most urban A amp E departments had receptionist cover 24 hours a day Usually therewere two or three receptionists on duty during the day with one receptionist on duty during evenings and at night At the provincial departments and at Hutt and Dunedin departments reception staff covered days (and sometimes evenings) for seven days a week In the rural A amp E departments a receptionist was on duty weekdays only When the receptionist was not on duty nursing staff carried out the duties In several of the smaller hospitals patients arriving at night were first seen by the hospital telephonist who then called the nursing staff

Usually the receptionists duties were to note the patients details on the A amp E record form and on the A amp E log The receptionists often helped with triage by alerting nursing staff to urgent cases In some

49

departments the receptionist also dealt with Ace forms made appointments for return visits and carried out admitting procedures at night However in one hospital the reception staff were not specifically attached to the A amp E department and only noted the patients details on the A amp E record form All other duties were performed by the nurses (and sometimes the A amp E doctors) who resented this added workload In several of the smaller A amp E departments reception staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department quite satisfactorily

Several receptionists had years of experience in the A amp E department as well as other relevant experience (eg ambulance dr i ver ECG technician) and were highly valued by the other A amp E staff

In addition to the receptionists some of the urban A amp E departments had hostesses andor hospital aids for odd jobs such as dealing with enquiries taking messages filling out laboratory forms putting away stores and making tea

TO meet the secretarial needs of the A amp E department (eg referral letters to general practitioners) the staff generally used secretaries in other parts of the hospital This service was not always adequate and one department used form letters completed by the A amp E doctors by hand for much of its correspondence Another department employed a part-time secretary for the doctors

Orderlies

Orderlies were generally used to move patients within the A amp E department as well as to other parts o~ the hospital In some hospitals they also assisted with plaster work

Some of the urban and provincial A amp E departments had an orderly during day-time hours but outside these hours and in all other departments orderlies were called from the hospital pool Some A amp E staff commented that delays involved in getting an orderly from the pool could be frustrating when the department was busy

Social workers

The A amp E departments visited had various methods for coping with patients with social or emotional problems

The urban A amp E departments could often calIon psychiatric backup such as a crisis team or an individual psychiatrist psychiatric nurse or counsellor Four of the urban A amp E departments had a social worker allocated to work in the department for some time each day who was also on call for the department while carrying out other duties The rest of the departments called on the pool of hospital social workers In the smaller hospitals social workers were not always available at nights or on weekends although in some places the social workers had made themselves available on an informal basis A amp E staff had mixed views on the usefulness of social workers

The social worker is essential to the work of the A amp E department

A amp E officer

50

The nature of social work has changed over the years and its hard now to make contact with the social workers and to get the support the department wants The department does social work itself and has good liaison with the Salvation Army and other welfare groups

A amp E officer

Ambulance personnel

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments were served by the Order of St John ambulances The exceptions were the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments which were served by the Wellington Free Ambulance and Taranaki A amp E department which worked with the hospital board ambulances Both the rural A amp E departments were served by hospital board ambulance services during the day and St John services at night

Generally the A amp E staff found that liaison between themselves and the ambulance personnel was good Many ambulancemiddot officers had had some training in the A amp E department and were familiar withmiddot its procedures Communications between the two were usually satisfactory with radio-telephones being used to alert the A amp E department to incoming urgent cases or to ask for advice on patient treatment

However some A amp E staff expressed concern abut the suitability of treatment provided by ambulance personnel They were particularly worried about the sophisticated techniques being used at times by some ambulance officers

Many ambulance officers are doing advanced courses and theyre enthusiastic about treating people - putting in drips or giving drugs Mostly the officers are excellent but some are over-enthusiastic

A amp E doctor

In the Auckland and Wellington urban areas there were several A amp E departments and as a working rule ambulance officers took patients to the nearest department However this rule was modified by the facilities available at the nearest hospital and whether or not the nearest A amp E department was open For example if the nearest hospital had no orthopaedic backup the ambulance would ptobably take a patient requiring orthopaedic care to the next closest hospital or if one of the part-time A amp E departments was nearest but closed the ambulance would go to another hospital At times the ambulance officers consulted with the A amp E staff by radio-telephone as to the appropriate A amp E department for a patient they were transporting

DISCUSSION

The patterns of medical staffing in terms of the number of senior A amp E doctors and the rostering of house surgeons reflectedmiddot the attendances and locations of the different A amp E departments The numbers of doctors and nurses (expressed as full-time equivalents) generally reflected the attendance at the departments However there was considerable variation in the level of nursing staff relative to attendance which could not be easily explained

51

Training in A amp E work for the house surgeons was inadequate with little formal training available for them In some places they had little opportunity to learn on-the-job beside a senior doctor Obviously greater time working alongside a senior doctor would be valuable as would intensive one or two-day orientation courses bull

Training was an important matter for the nursing staff also since very experienced nurses clearly were needed in the A amp E departments Inservice training courses are desirable both to develop experienced nurses as quickly as possible and to reduce the load that on-the-job training puts on the existing experienced nurses The training courses run in the Auckland hospitals appeared to be very successful and they could be used as a basis for courses in other hospitals and in post-basic programmes

The house surgeons in urban A amp E departments found their 10 and 12 hour shifts exhausting Also there was some evidence that where house surgeons covered other parts of the hospital as well as the A amp E department conflicting demands resulted in poor cover of the~ department Both of these problems would be alleviated by rostering more staff to the A amp E department We understand that this has happened in some departments in response to the Report on working conditions of resident medical officers Part I [12]

Inadequate supervision of house surgeons and the use of inexperienced first year house surgeons in A amp E departments were widespread In some places there were difficulties in getting backup from specialist staff and the house surgeons were very much on their own in the department There was also some evidence that A amp E departments were less efficient out of normal office hours due to delays in getting registrars and consultants and more especially due to the house surgeons inexperience

Employing more senior doctors both to improve the supervision and training of house surgeons and to improve the efficiency of the A amp E departments would be desirable But at present there are difficulties finding suitable applicants for A amp E officer positions These difficulties are at least partially oue to the low status of the A amp E department within the medical structure and the lack of career prospects for A amp E doctors The increasing numbers of doctors in the 1980 s and the opportunities for part-time work that the A amp E department offers to doctors with family responsibilities may make the department a more attractive choice However if these factors do not improve the senior medical staffing the development of A amp E medicine as a specialty will continue to ~e suggested

Does A amp E medicine in New Zealand require the extra training that would be provided by a post-graduate A amp E specialist programme Given the range of backgrounds currently found suitable for A amp E doctors it would appear that A amp E medicine in rural and provincial hospitals does not require much extra training although some training in particular aspects (eg soft-tissue injuries) could be useful In the urban hospitals the much higher load of major trauma cases could justify a post-graduate training programme However at present the number of senior A amp E doctors in the urban hospitals is insufficient to justify a specialist programme If numbers increase in the future perhaps the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine could sponsor a suitable post-graduate programme They coulo also play an extremely useful role by preparing a manual outlining clinical procedures for A amp E departments and distributing regular bulletins up-dating this material

52

REFERENCES

1 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services report on a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional off ice for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

2 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

3 ELSON Reginald - The medical staff of British accident and emergency units in Br J Hosp Med - (August 1971) p 161-170

4 New thoughts from casualty [editorial] in Br Med J - v 1 (1976) p 1299-1300

5 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 21-24

6 Community-wide emergency medical services recommendations by the Committee on Acute Medicine of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists in JAMA - v 204 no 7 (1968) p 595-602

7 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL~ Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975

8 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 1960 (Report series Board of Health no 2)

9 SALMOND GC - Young doctors an exercise in social researchmiddot methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

10 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM 68(83)

11 CANT BR staffing of A amp E departments in NZ Med J - v 94 (1981) p 471

12 Report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers Pt 1 Report of the Working Party established by the Hospital Medical Officers Advisory Committee and the Minister of Health - Wellington Dept of Health 1981 (unpublished)

13 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraW-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

14 OWENS J Cuthbert - Survey discovers what is wrong with hospitals emergency service in Mod Hosp - vl06no 1 (1966) p 82-85

15 LEITZELL James p - An uncertain future in N Eng J Med - v 304 no 8 (1981) p 477-480

16 RIGGS Leonard M Jr - A vigorous new speCialty in N Eng J Med shyv 304 no 8 (1981) p 480-483

53

17 HONIGSBAUM F - General practitioner work in British hospitals Soc Econ Admin - vl (1967) p 34-44bull

in

18 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL DJ and WALKER JH~ - Practitioners patients and the accident department in Hosp Health Services - (1975) p 80-84

Rev

19 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 1979 in NZ Med J - v 91(1980) p 194-196

19-23 March

55

CHAPTER 6

Patient att~ndance characteristics

This chapter considers the general pattern of attendance at A amp E departments noting overall levels and time trends the age and SeX distribution of patients and the conditions with which they come to the department Next we look at recall visits particularly the hospital to hospital variations Then the use of A amp E departments by people who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner is discussed

The materiai has been gathered by examining the A amp E records and talking with the staff of the 14 A amp E departments visited Data from the re~ords at Northland Base Hospital A amp E department have also been incorporated

Detailed patterns of attendance by hour of the day and day of the week have not been analysed Other researchers have documented these for A amp E departments in New Zealand and overseas [123456789] While detailed information is useful for good management of departments and setting adequate staffing levels for the busiest periods it is usually specific to a particular department and is not relevant to the questions addressed in this report For our purposes it has been sufficient to divide the week into normal working hours (in hours defined as 0800-1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays) and the remaining hours (out of hours)

OVERALL ATTENDANCE AND TRENDS

Since 1978 hospitals have reported total attendance at outpatient departments to the National Health Statistics Centre distinguishing A amp E attendance from other attendance and first attendance from recall attendance Table 9 shows the average annual attendance at the 15 A amp E departments for the period from 1978 to 1981 Table 10 presents the trends in A amp E attendance over the same period compared with the changes in population of the hospital catchment areas between the 1976 and 1981 censuses

There has been an overall increase in first attendance of 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 This increase is somewhat higher than we would expect from the growth in New Zealand population over the same period However the increase in first attendance has been partially counter-balanced by a decrease of 25 per cent in recall attendance

Table 10 shows too that there is no general trend towards increased first attendancemiddot among the urban hospitals The non-urban hospitals have experienced increasing first attendance although even there Northland Base and Rotorua show no increase

56

TABLE 9 AVERAGE ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-19811

First Recall Total attendance attendance attendance

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 58 506 6 272 64 777 Middlemore 39 032 18 686 57 718 Green Lane 26 079 16 635 42 714 Wellington 48 011 7 748 55 759 Hutt 33 266 9 807 43 072 Christchurch 61 516 12 010 73 526 Dunedin 27 202 10 802 38 004

Provincial Northland Base 7 794 3 144 10 938 Rotorua 12 265 4 636 16 900 Taranaki Base 10 341 5 462 15 803 Timaru 9 971 10 102 20 072

Rural Whakatane 5 992 2 177 8 769 Grey 3 850 1 214 5 064

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore2 9 388 7 900 17 288 Kenepuru 3 5 843 3 209 9 052

All public hospitals 524 442 226 251 750 693

1 Source Hospital Management Data 1978-1981 - Wellington National Health Statistics Centre Dept of Health Simple average unless otherwise noted

2 Estimated as average of 1978 1979 and 1981 figures as the North Shore A amp E department was closed for part of 1980

3 Estimated for 1979-1981 only since the Kenepuru A amp E department was not open ~or all of 1978

57

TABLE 10 TRENDS IN ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-1981

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Midd1emore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3

Kenepuru 4

All public hospitals

Average annual percentage change in A amp E attendance l

First attendance

-36 07 16

-22 -79

00 48

-07 06 64

185

61 90

59 179

15

Recall attendance

lo3-07

66 -155 -34

63 08

33 -45

23 02

1253 06

374 89

-25

Estimated annual percentage change in population of hospital bull s catchment

area

1976-19812

07

-04 -02 -10

14 12

-02 -06

12 -04

07 -04

02

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

2 Source NZ Wellington

Census of Population Dept of Statistics

and Dwellings 1976 and 1981

3 Estimated from 1978 and 1981 flUctuations in intervening years

figures only because of extreme

4 Estimated for 1979-1981 for all of 1978

only since Kenepuru A amp E department not open

Figure for entire hospital board area used

58

AGE AND SEX

The characteristic age and sex distributions of total A amp E attendance are shown in Figure 1 Nearly half of the attendances are by young adults 15-29 years Schoolage children too formed a larger part of the attendance than their numbers in the community would lead one to expect These two age groups which are also the age groups most likely to be active and daring accounted for nearly two thirds of all attendances The age distribution of attendance was similar from hospital to hospital

About twice as many males as females attended A amp E departments (66 per cent to 34 per cent) When age and sex were considered together I it was the school age and young adult males who made up the majority of attenders Even in the 30-64-year-old group men outnumbered women two to one These age and sex distributions are similar to those found by other researchers in New Zealand [1410] in Britain [1112] and the United States [1314]

Figure 1 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments by age and sex

Male Female

3L1

30

20 20

E ~ 128 shy

108

10

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65_ Age Group Age Group

CONDITIONS

Of the total A amp E attendances 81 per cent were for injury conditions and 19 per cent were for sickness conditions Adjusting for the recall visits we estimated that 73 to 78 per cent of first visits were for injury conditions Our results were similar to Platts [15] as far as we can tell given the different definitions used In another British study Lewis and Bradbury [12] found 90 per cent of visits were for injury However

59

this higher level is not surprising since they considered only cases which were waiting for attention ignoring ambulance cases and the very seriously ill

Out of hours sickness conditions made up 25 per cent of all visits and in hours they were 14 per cent Preschool children and people 65 years and over were more likely to attend for sickness conditions than those aged 5-64 years (Figure 2) The preponderance of males over females in the 15-64 year old groups was accounted for by injury conditions rather than by sickness

Figure 2 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

Male Femate

IIIiI A trendance for _ sickness condiHons 30

remainder for injury condItions

20

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 f Age Group Age Group

In the following sections information from some of the hospitals about the types of injury and sickness conditions is presented We have had problems in classifying the conditions since at some hospitals few details of the patients conditions were recorded on the A amp E log Even where details were recorded only 60 per cent of injury attendances and 80 per cent of sickness attendances have been able to be consistently classified

Injury conditions

Data on the type of injury was extracted from only six A amp E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch and Northland Base hospitals) There was very little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 3 shows the types of injuries as proportions of first injury attendances The category

60

of cuts (which included scrapes amputations and punctures) accounted for almost 30 per cent of first injury attendances The severity of the cuts could not be judged from log entries but in the case of Northland Base Hospital cuts identified as probably needing suturing formed a substantial part of this category Fractures made up 15 per cent of the first injury attendance with foreign body injuries (mostly in the eye) burns and toxic effects accounting for another 14 per cent

Figure 3 Injury first attendances by type of injury all ages

Other (414)

Cuts (291)Fractures (154)

The category labelled other accounted for 40 per cent of all first injury attendances and included some serious conditions such as falls crushing injuries and various states of shock However many of the other injuries were regarded as minor conditions by the Aamp E staff It was impossible to judge the severity of injuries from the detail recorded on the logs so no estimate of the percentage of injuries which required urgent attention has been made

For most types of injuries sex and age had little bearing There were exceptions (Figure 4) Toxic effects were four times as likely among preschool children as among other age groups Fractures were twice as likely both for school age children and for those 65 years and over as for other age groups Somewhat surprisingly adult men and women differed little in the types of injuries

Figure 4 Injury first attendances by type of injury by age groups

0-4 (ears 5-14 years 15-29 years

Other (308)

Cuts (321 )

Toxic effects (13) Burns (21 )

Foreign bodies (24)

Fractures (254)

Other (408)

Cuts (280)

Toxic effects (28)

Burns (41)

Other (452)

Cuts (286)

30-64 years 65+ years

Other (393) Other (341)

Cuts (308) Fractures (301)

62

People were more likely to present with injury conditions in hours rather than out of hours From the information collected at the four Auckland hospitals we can say that 43 per cent of first injury visits happened out of hours whereas 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category

Sickness conditions

Data on the type of sickness was extracted from only 10 A lie E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch Dunedin Northland Rotorua Taranaki and Grey) There was little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 5 shows the types of sickness conditions as proportions of all sick~ess attendance

Figure 5 Sickness attendance by type of sickness all ages

General sickness

(110)

Abdominal pain (132) Other (20 1 )

Shortness of breath (150)

Skin pain bleeding (229) Collapse (179)

TwO prominent categories shortness ofmiddot breath and collapse (including diabetic coma heart at tacks congestive heart failure and chest pain) accounted for one-third of all sickness attendances

General sickness covered fever diarrhoea and vomiting feeling unwell convulsions renal failure and abdominal pain recorded as being related to urinary retention Abdominal pain was generally recorded simply as such but acute appendix and similar terms and miscarriage or bleeding from the vagina were included in abdominal pain

Figure 6 Sickness attendance by type of sickness by age groups

0-4 years 5-14 years 15-29 years

General sickness (79)

General ~ickness (380)

Other (90) i

Shortness ofSkin pain I breath (148)

bleeding (100) Sickness pain Shortness of breath (320) bleeding (270) ClI

IN

Collapse (30)

30-64 years 65+ years

Abdominal pain (110) General sickness (102)

Shortness of breath (184) Ot 1159~

Skin pain I bleeding (10 1)

Collapse (358)

64

Unspecified pain or other bleeding have been included in the category of generally minor conditions involving skin pain or bleeding Such minor conditions accounted for almost a quarter of the sickness attendances Abscesses or infected wounds made up a quarter of the skin pain or bleeding category while a further 21 per cent involved pain such as back pain headaches or other pain

Ear and eye conditions toothache and other miscellaneous or undefined conditions made up the other category which formed 20 per cent of the sickness attendance

Were the sickness conditions urgent enough to require treatment at an A amp E department This was a difficult question to answer from the information available on the A amp E logs We have concluded that the collapse and shortness of breath conditions were likely to be emergencies and that for the preschool age group and probably those 65 years and over abdominal pain and general sickness required urgent attention We have described all the other sickness conditions as non-urgent sickness Thus at least 39 per cent of the ickness conditions required urgent attention

The type of sickness attendance differed between the age groups (Figure 6) Preschool children rarely came for superficial reasons Only 11 per cent of their sickness attendances were for skin pain or bleeding conditions Shortness of breath was a major condition for all children preschool or school age Skin pain or bleeding conditions were more prominent among the school age children than the preschool

Young adults tended to come for minor conditions Thirty per cent of their sickness attendance was for skin pain or bleeding conditions and only 20 per cent was for the emergency categories of collapse or shortness of breath

Among the adults 30-64 years old however emergencies formed a substantial part of sickness attendance with 27 per cent belonging to the collapse category Among those 64 years and over few non-urgent conditions were recorded with 40 per cent of the sickness attendance being for collapse The skin pain or bleeding conditions accounted for only 10 per cent of their sickness attendance

Fifty-eight per cent of all sickness attendances occurred out of hours~ as would have been expected given that 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category However nearly three-quarters of preschool sickness visits happened out of hours while less than half of the sickness visits by those 30 years and over were out of hours

RECALL ATTENDANCE

Almost all recall visits were for injury conditions velY few sickness patients were recalled for follow-up care As was noted in Chapter 3 policies on recall visits differed among the departments Several factors ~ffected the decision to recall the patients condition the A amp E staffs communication with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs middotof house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors ~hilosophy of A amp E medicine From the comments made by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the departments into two groups

65

RECALL POLICY

DO FAVOUR A policy favouring recall visits

DO NOT lAVOUR A policy not favouring recall visits with most patients being referred to a general practitioner However fractures and soft-tissue or serious wounds tend to be recalled

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

DO FAVOUR Taranaki Base Grey North Shore

DO NOT FAVOUR Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Rotorua Timaru Whakatane Kenepuru

-----_--------- ----------------------~

It is diff icult to compare the policies of the departments with their actual performances since some A amp E logs did not completely identify all recall visits Table 11 presents recall attendance as a proportion of total attendance For the departments where recall visits were fully identified there appears to be reasonable agreement between the Hospital Management Data figures and the figures derived from our tallies The exceptions are Whakatane where staff told us that return visits pad dropped from 1979 to 1981 and Auckland where we have no explanation It should be noted that the tally figures are estimates based on one-week to one-month samples and so may be less accurate than the Hospital Mlmagement Data which are complete counts over an entire year

Overall 25-30 per cent of all visits were recall visits There was considerable variation among departments in the level of recall visits OFlanagan [16] found similar variation among British A amp E departments

The recall polic ies were not closely related to the departments performances as measured by the proportion of all visits that were recalls While North Shore with a recall-favouring A amp E department had a very high level of recalls (many were plaster checks) so did Timaru a department with a policy of not favouring recalls The other recall-favouring A amp E departments at Grey and Taranaki Base hospitals had only average levels of recalls

The departments performances however were related to the levels of medical and nursing staff as measured by the tatal medical staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 6 and the nurse staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 8) A amp E departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits (see Table 11 and Figures 7 and 8) Perhaps these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat recalled patients

66

TABLE 11 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS RECALL ATTENDANCE

Hospital Tally sources Management Data Recalls as Recalls as Total Recalls as percentage percentage attend-percentage of total attendancel

of total attendance

of injury attendance

ance tallied2

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 97 198 278 948 Middlemore 324 327 399 1137 Green Lane 389 401 439 868 Wellington3 139 116 172 3568

(4 weeks) Hutt3 228 280 379 2766

( 4 weeks) Christchurch 163 166 216 1233 Dunedin3 284 278 334 749

Provincial Northland Base 287 275 328 2092

03 weeks) Rotorua 274 214 250 334 Taranaki Base 346 327 353 270 Timaru3 504 460 51 6 174

Rural Whakatane 317 152 175 259

( 2 weeks) Grey3 240 238 293 330

o month)

Part-time departments

Suburban North Sh~re 457 521 539 512 Kenepuru 355 383 422 451

(4 weeks)

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations lOne week tally unless otherwise noted 3 Tally data partially estimated from Hospital Managementmiddot Data (see

Table 9) to adjust for incomplete recording

Spearman rank correlations [18] of recalls as percentage of total attendances (Hospital Management Data) with

(a) FTE medical staff per 10000 first attendance r = 0459 P lt 005 (b) FTE nurse staffing (adjusted for holding ward) per 10000 first

attendance r = 0547 P lt 005

67

Figure 7 Comparison of medical staff availability and level of recall attendance

u c ro 50 Timaru

C c ~ North Shore m ro S 40 Greenlane 0

Kenepuru

Cl ro Taranaki E = 30

Middlemore bull bull Whakatane

Cl Dunedin Rotoruae

ro

u Hutt Grey

c ro

C 20 C

~ m Christchurch

ro Wellington u

0 10 Auckland

10 20 30 40

Number of medical staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance

Figure 8 Comparison of nursing staff availability and level of recall attendance

Timaru50

North Shore

40 Greenlanee

Kenepuru Taranaki

Middlemore bull Whakatane bull 30

Dunedin ROlorua

GreyHutt

20

Christchurch Wellington

10 Auokland

3 4 5 6 8 9 10 II 12

Number of nursing staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance lexcluding nurses staffing holding wards)

68

It has been suggested that house surgeons are more likely to recall than senior A amp E doctors [17] If this were so we would expect that A amp E departments where house surgeons worked with very little direct senior superv1s1on (Hutt Taranaki Whakatane Grey Kenepuru) would have had higher proportions of recalls than departments with much greater supervision (Auckland and Dunedin) This was not the case Also North Shore with no house surgeons had a high proportion of recalls Thus the recall levels do not suggest that the house surgeons had any greater propensity than senior A amp E doctors to recall patients

GP-LOAD

A amp E staff use the term GP-load as shorthand for people who in their eyes would more appropriately be treated by a general practitioner Other studies in New Zealand and overseas have estimated that between 36 and 61 per -cent of all A amp E patients could have been successfully treated by a general practitioner [41920] When we discussed this topic with A amp E staff we found a similar variation in their estimates of the GP-10ad This variation may be due to differing views as to which injury and sickness conditions should be treated in the A amp E department it may be due to different beliefs about the abilities and facilities of general practitioners and it may reflect differences in the patients ~erved by different A amp E departments

The role of general practitioners in the treatment of injury is a matter of debate However there is more agreement over sickness conditions A sickness emergency is traditionally accepted as suitable for A amp E treatment whereas a non-urgent sickness condition is seen as more appropriate for general practitioner treatment

Non-urgent sickness

A amp E staff estimated that patients with long standing or minor sickness conditions constituted from 2 to 30 per cent of the attendance However tallies from the A amp E logs showed that non-urgent sickness attendance ranged from 6 to 24 per cent averaging about 12 per cent At most departments staff oVer-estimated the level At a typical hospital staff opinion placed non-urgent sickness at 20 to 25 per cent of the attendance while the A amp E log showed only 19 per cent coming for any sickness condition and fewer than 12 per cent for non-urgent sickness Only in one A amp E department was the tally evidence of non-urgent sickness greater than the staffs estimate The general oVer-estimation of non-urgent sickness visits probably means that A amp E staff were also over-estimating the total GP-load bull

In general A amp E staff felt that patients with non-urgent sickness would be better off being seen by their own general practitioners However the departments differed in the ways they dealt with these patients Some staff mentioned that when they treated such patients they would discourage further visits by explaining the role of the A amp E department Some departments had notices in the waiting rooms stating that the department was for treatment of accidents and emergencies and that people should see their general practitioner for other conditions Some hospitals had placed advertisements with similar messages in local newspapers

From the comments of A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the A amp E departments into two groups

69

OPEN DOOR POLICY

OPEN An open policy where almtreated They may then general practitioner

ost be

all patients advised to see

are a

RESTRICTED A restricted policy where patients are not treated a general practitioner

nbut

on-urgent are re

sicknferred

ess to

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

OPEN Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Whakatane Grey North Shore

RESTRICTED Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru Kenepuru

The open door policies were reflected somewhat in the proportion of all A amp E visits that were f or sickness (see Table 12) The departments with restricted policies (which were all non-urban) tended to have lower proportions of sickness visits than those with open policies However the non-urban departments with open policies did not have substantially higher proportions of sickness visits than the restricted departments Rather some of the urban departments (Auckland Wellington Hutt and Christchurch) had particularly high proportions of sickness visits These departments were also particularly busy with large numbers of first attendances and relatively low levels of medical staffing One would expect that in a very busy department staff would discourage inappropriate visits However A amp E staff at Auckand and Wellington hospitals commented that although non-urgent sickness patients needed general practitioner care they tended to treat them anyway because it was quicker to treat them than to send them away This may be a partial explanation for the high levels of sickness visits but other factors related to the populations served by the departments are probably involved (see Chapter 8)

A common exception to the open door policies was made for children At most hospitals staff said that sick children were always seen As Table 13 suggests children as described by staff are probably preschool children rather than all those under 15 years The departments with restricted policies had considerably lower proportions of sickness visits in the preschool and school age groups than did the open policy departments Table 13 also shows that toe agemiddot group most likely to appear with sickness conditions is the elderly There was Tess difference in proportions of sickness visits between the restricted policy and open policy departments for patients aged 30 and over

It would appear that a restricted policy towards non-urgent sickness patients does tend to discourage sickness Visits particularly for preschool age children However a restricted policy does not markedly appear to discourage sickness visits by the elderly

70

TABLE 12 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESS 1

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Butt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru3

Rural Whakatane Grey3

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Estimated Percentage of percentage total attenshyof first ance that was attendance for sickness that was for sickness

378 303 235 158 187 112 365 323 361 260 301 251 233 168

162 183 144 110 74 109 59

156 132 190 145

58 28 152 94

Total attendance tallied2

948 1137

868 3568 (4 weeks) 2766 ( 4 weeks) 1233

749

2092 (13 weeks) 334 270 174

259 (2 weeks) 330 (l month)

572 451 (4 weeks)

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 One-week tally unless otherwise noted

3 For Timaru and Grey the percentage of first attendance that was for sickness is the actual figure derived from the tallies and the percentage of total attendance that was for sickness has been estimated

71

TABLE 13 PROPORTION OF TOTAL A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESSl BY OPEN DOOR POLICY AND AGE GROUPS

Percentage of total attendance that was for sickness

under 5 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 All years years years years years amp age

over groups

Open policy departments 367 111 148 245 433 201

Restricted policy departments 102 66 80 181 311 110

All departments studied 33 bull2 104 141 238 425 191

1 Source Tallies taken from A E logs by authors hospitals represented in one-week equivalents

DISCUSSION

At all public hospitals first visits to A amp E departments increased by 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 However this increase was not consistent with most of the urban A E departments reporting a decrease or no change in first visits Recall visits for all public hospital A E departments decreased by 25 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 The decrease was not consistent in fact the reported changes in recall attendance were highly variable It has been suggested that the cost of general practitioner services and dissatisfaction with the unavailability of general practitioners have caused increased use of A amp E departments However it seems unlikely that any single reason could explain these highly variable changes in A amp E attendance in New Zealand

The people visiting A amp E departments were predominantly school age or young adults and male Men aged 15 to 29 years formed the largest single group almost one-third of all attendances Eighty-one per cent of attendances were for injuries and the 19 per cent attending for sickness conditions tended to be preschoolers or people aged 65 years or more Injury visits were more common in hours and sickness visits out of hours probably because accidents tend to happen in daylight hours Also sic kness conditions often seem worse at night and if the patients do not want to bother their general practitioner they may go straight to the A amp E department (see Chapter 7)

72

It was difficult to classify conditions accurately from the information on A amp E logs since insufficient detail and little indication of severity was usually recorded Thus we have not been able to estimate the proportion of injuries which really required A amp E care Similarly there were difficulties in classifying the sickness conditions middotalthough almost 40 per cent appeared to require urgent attention

There was considerable variation among the A amp E departments studied in the proportion of all visits that were recall visits However contrary to our expectations this variation was not related to the policy on recalling patients stated by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents Nor did it appear to be related to the inexperience of unsupervised house surgeons Rather it was related to staffing levels Departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits It is likely that staff in these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat more recalled patients If departments wish to change their recall levels an examination of thei r staffing levels would be an obvious place to start

The other component of the workload which A amp E departments often wish to control is the non-urgent sickness attendance A amp E staff saw such visits as inappropr iate and they consistently over-estimated the proportion of non-urgent sickness patients they were treating Ullman (3] and Roth [21] have found similar processes of oVer-estimation occurring among staff in United States emergency rooms The level of non-urgent sickness visits was not high on average comprising only 12 per cent of the attendance However applying a restricted policy (referring to general practitioners for treatment displaying notices in the department and advertisements in local newspapers) appeared to discourage such visits particularly for preschool children Thus non-urgent sickness attendance was not a problem in some A amp E departments Where departments see such visits as a problem applying a restricted policy could ease it

13

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS E F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J -V 71 0970rgt212-219

2 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard ~ Emergency department utHisation in ail urban community implications for community ambulatory careinJAMA v 216 no 2 (191l) p 301-312

3 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SfRATMANN William C- An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1915) P 1011-1020

4 RICHARDSJ G and WHITE GR~ - Accident and emergency services at AucklandHospital inNZmiddotMed J - v 85 (1977) P 272~274

5 INGRAM D R CLARKE D -R and MURDIE R A -Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1918) P 55-62

6 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referral patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

1 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

McRAE She1agh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience of Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

9 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (A amp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 319-388

10 SNELGAR Denis- Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

11 Casual attenders a socio-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcast1e-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

12 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A amp E in Health Soc Serv J (1981) p 1139-1142

13 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

14 WALKER L L - Inpatient and emergency department utilisation the effect of distance social class age sex and marital status in J Amer ColI Emergency Phycns - v 5 no 2 (1976) p 105-110

15 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

74

16 OFLANAGAN P - The work of an accident and emergency department in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 26 no 162 (1976) p 54-60

17 What are accident and emergency departments for in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) P 837-839

18 SIEGEL Sydney_ - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

19 CROMBIE D L - A casualty survey in J ColI Gen Pract - v 2 (1959) P 346-356

20 SKUDDER Paul A McCarroll James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1913 p 11-35

21 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) P 839-856

75

CHAPTER 7

Patient attitudes to the accident and emergency department and staff attitudes to the patients

In this chapter we look at the attitudes of patients to the A amp E department and particularly the reasons they give for attending it Summaries of the results of overseas studies are given followed by detailed information from several New Zealand studies where patients were interviewed the Dunedin study carried out by Dixon in 1968[1] Richards Auckland study of 1975 [2] Keenans unpublished Christchurch study of 1978 the Wei~ington childrens study carried out by Kljakovic in 1978 [3] and McRaes Waikato study of I~H9 [4] Then we discuss the effect that health centres and deputising services have on A amp E use Finally we explore the views that A amp E staff have of their patients

REASONS FOR VISITING THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

Overseas studies

A substantial number of overseas studies have explored the reasons given by patients attending A amp E departments One major reason was the availability of the A amp E department open 24 hours a day and always staffed compared to the actual or perceived unavailability of the general practitioner [56789]

People mentioned the accessibility of the A amp E department as a reason for attending citing its location ease of transport to and from it and its convenience for work schedules and other arrangements [671011]

Another major reason for visiting the A amp E department was its appropriateness as a source of care particularly because of the equipment and facilities available [5612] with many conditions particularly injuries A amp E patients made their own diagnosis They therefore omitted the diagnosis-seeking part of care (where the general practitioner was seen as appropriate) and sought confirmation arid immediate treatment at the A amp E department [1314]

People also saw the A ampE department as the appropriate place to go because of the urgency of their condition especially if the person needing treatment was a child [7141516] However A amp E staff and A amp E patients often had conflicting perceptions of the seriousness of the condition Patients tended to see their complaint as more serious and urgent than did the A amp E doctor [9101117]

Advice from other people was another reason given for visiting the A amp E department [61218] People were more likely to visit the department rather than the general practitioner when the decision to seek care was made outside the home and where someone other than the patient or a close

relative was involved in the decision (eg a policeman an employer a teacher or bystander) In some cases such as traffic accidents and some

work and school accidents it was automatic procedure to send the patient straight to the A amp E department [1819]

76

Some people using the A amp E department did not have a family doctor because they were new to the area or transient or for other reasons [78] In the United States the proportions without a doctor were high ranging from 40 per cent to 86 per cent [5171920]

The proportion of patients who tried to contact their doctor before going to the A amp E department also varied considerably from 6 per cent to 42 per cent in different North American studies [59202122] 14 per cent in a Canadian study and SO per cent in a Swedish study [23] Holohan et al [24J found that over SO per cent of patients attending a British A amp E department were unaware or inaccurately informed about their general practitioners out of hours care arrangements

Dissatisfaction with their general practitioner led to some people visiting the A amp E department Organisational factors such as appointment systems deputising serVices and health centres all made it more difficult for patients to contact their doctor [142425) Dissatisfaction with the doctors treatment and wanting a second opinion were also reasons [26] As well language difficulties were a problem In Australia immigrants used the hospital foi childrens emergencies because interpreters were available and they did not have to use the telephone to arrange a visit [27]

It has been suggested that people use A amp E departments rather than general practitioners because the department is free This is unlikely to be a reason in Britain where general practitioner care is free under the National Health Service Studies in the United States found that very few respondents said that the cost of seeing a doctor was a major reason for visiting the A amp E department [511)

New Zealand studies

Use of general practitioners

It has been suggested that people use the A amp E department because they are visitors to a city or do not have a general practitioner The New Zealand studies foundmiddot that the proportion of those interviewed who had a general practitioner varied considerably from city to city (see Table 14) The high level in Wellington [3] was not surprising given that most families with children have a general practitioner The transience of local populations as suggested by Richards [2] may explain some of the differences between the studies Dixon [1] noted that the age and sex structure of the people visiting the A amp E department with the preponderance of young males was the opposite to that of people visiting general practitioners

The Wellington study found that for a very high proportion of children (39 per cent) there had been an attempt to contact a general practitioner before going to the A amp E department and 25 per cent had actuallY seen the doctor [3) The other studies found smaller proportions British studies have reported similar variations with Lewis and Bradbury [14] finding 8 per cent of A amp E attenders had been referred by their general practitioner and Conway (25] reporting 41 per cent

The Chr istchurch study found that the people who did not see a doctor before coming to the A amp E department were more likely to be injured rather than sick to visit the department out of hours rather than in

77

hours and to be 15 to 29 years old Also during work hours people who had accidents at work were less likely to see the doctor before going to the A amp E department than people with home or sports accidents

TABLE 14 USE OF GENERAL PRACT IT lONERS BY FIRST ATTENDERS AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Percentage of all those interviewed who

had a regular general attempted to contact their practitioner general practitioner before

going to the A amp E department

Dunedin 1968 92 16 Auckland 1975 72 21 Christchurch 1978 85 23 Wellington 1978 98 39

Derived from 84 per cent who were sent directly or chose to go to casualty without seeing a doctor

Specific reasons for using the A amp E department

Turning now to the reasons given by patients for their A amp E visit the New Zealand studies found a similar range of reasons to the overseas studies Keenan collected detailed information in Christchurch and this is presented in Table 15 and in the following sections Comparable information from the other studies where available has been included

Others advised the patient to go to the A amp E department The most common reason given by the Christchurch patients (and by the people interviewed by Dixon [1] in Dunedin) was that others (employers teachers traffic officers sports coach neighbours friends) advised them to go to the A amp E department There appeared to be an automatic procedure following many school work sports and traffic accidents of sending the patient straight to the A amp E department

There was no evidence that injuries happening at other locations (eg at home) were any less likely to go to the A amp E department A comparison of the Waikato and Christchurch A amp E injury attenders with people consulting general practitioners for accidental injuries [28] showed similar proportions of attendance by the location of the accident (Figure 9) In Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14] found similar results when studying A amp E attendance in the North Western Regional Health Authority

76

TABLE 15 REASONS FOR A amp E FIRST ATTENDANCE FROM THREE NEW ZEALAND STUDIES

Reasons Christchurch 1976

Wellington ( children)

1978

Auckland 1975

SAW GP BEFORE A amp E 186 250

A amp E MORE AVAILABLE GP found to be unavailable

or thought to be unavailable Did not want to bother GP

Cost of GP care a factor

125

( 65) ( 41)

(19)

233

119

(24) ( 79)

(16)

A amp E MORE ACCESSIBLE More convenient closer

phone or transport problems in contacting GP

214

A amp E MORE APPROPRIATE Condition of type not dealt

with by GP requiring A amp E facilities

Need for attention was urgent

140

( 5 0) (90)

389 671

OTHERS ADVISED TO GO TO A amp E 233 61

OTHER Includes having no GP

trained by GP to go to A amp E needed a dentist and so on

94 68

Number of people interviewed 565 428 1147

Tried to contact general practitioner did not necessarily see doctor

A amp E department more available Only 125 per cent of the Christchurch sample went to the A amp E department because it was more available than their general practitioner Richards [2] found a similar proportion in Auckland Not surprisingly the availability reasons were given more by people visiting the Christchurch A amp E department out of hours than in hours and more for children and older adults than the 15 to 29 age group The cost of visiting a general practitioner was hardly mentioned as a reason for visiting the A amp E department

79

In Wellington Kljakovic [3] found parents saying abOut the A amp E department

you can go anytime - 24 hour service when everyones at the end of their tether theyre there and theyre open

and about general practitioners

didnt know you could get a doctor on the weekends on other occasions you get an answering service - not worth bothering the doctor

midnight - too late to call a doctor

Figure 9 location at which accidents happened by those attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Presenting at A amp E department Presenting at general practitioner

Home (389) Home (290)

Work schooL Work school public buildings (336) public buddings (39 0)

A amp E department more accessible Over 20 per cent of the Christchurch attenders went to the A amp E department because it was more convenient closer or involved fewer transport or communic~tion problems These reasons were given more out of hours than in hours particularly by the 15 to 29 age group Injured patients especially those with sports injuries were more likely to give these reasons

A amp E department more appropriate Only 14 per cent of the Chr istchurch sample gave appropriateness as a reason while Richards [2] found 67 per cent in Auckland and Kljakovic [3] reported 39 per cent in Wellington These differences may reflect different interview situations since Richards interviewed patients at the A amp E department while Keenan and Kljakovic questioned people through telephone or personal interviews in their own homes Christchurch people suffering traffic accidents or poisonings (largely self-poisonings) were more Ii kely to give this reason than other reasons

80

In Wellington parents often said about the A amp E department

thats what its there for they have everything there

Several parents also commented that

general practitioners dont do stitches the GP is for minor things - not eager to corne to an emergency the doctor would only send us on to the hospital anyway thought leg was broken - needed an x-ray

Many parents decided to go to the A amp E department because they had already made a diagnosis and thought the condition required A amp E treatment others were unsure of the urgency of the childs condition A mother whose two-year-old son had hit his nose on a shower box at 755 am rang the doctor The child was crying his nose was bleeding and looked flattened The message on the answer phone was that the doctor could be contacted only in a real emergency She was unsure what a real emergency was so took the child to hospital not wanting to feel a fool by ringing the doctor

Some parents particularly those with asthmatic children were well aware that the condition required urgent care and had previously been told to go straight to the A amp E department

Dissatisfaction with the general practitioner Satisfaction is notoriously difficult to measure particularly when normal levels of satisfaction are between 85 and 90 per cent satisfied Only in the Wellington study [3] of childrens A amp E attendance was a direct question asked about satisfaction with the general practitioner service Forty-one per cent expressed some dissatisfaction mostly mentioning concern over difficulty in seeing the doctor Problems with getting an appointment with waiting because there was no appointment system with unsympathetic receptionists and with doctors not being willing to visit the horne were all mentioned Some parents commented that at a health centre they were unlikely to see their own doctor so they might as well go to the A amp E department Four per cent of parents were dissatisfied with the general practitioners treatment and came to the A amp E department for better treatment The cost of visiting the general practitioner was only mentioned by three parents (07 per cent)

Satisfaction with A amp E department The Wellington study [3] found that 73 per cent of parents were satisfied with the A amp E department For those who were dissatisfied the urgency of their visit was uppermost and they were unhappy at having to wait too long Parents also commented disapprovingly that the departments were understaffed or very busy The A amp E staff carne in for very little criticism only 07 per cent of parents made critical comments Many parents expressed their satisfaction with the reassuring aspects of the A amp E department its availability and its size A typical comment was its big they have everything there In one case parents dissatisfied with the treatment of their sick child at one A amp E department went to another department because it was bigger

81

Views of A amp E staff

When we asked A amp E staff why people visi ted the department they offered the same reasons that patients had given as explanations ie appropriateness availability and satisfaction Staff also commented that Pacific Islanders were accustomed to using hospital services for all their medical care in the islands andmiddot continued tomiddot use the hospital in New Zealand either as a first resort or for a second opinion Kinloch [29] demonstrated that while this was so for recent Samoan migrants in Wellington after some years New Zealand residence their pattern of hospital usage because similar to that of the population as a whole

A amp E staff thought that the major reason for the GP-load patients visiting the department was general practitioner unavailability They recognised

that many patients did not have a general practitioner because they were new to the area transient or on holiday Many staff mentioned the cost of visiting a doctor as a major reason although a few staff strongly asserted that cost was not important

EFFECT Of HIEALTH CENTRES AND DEPUTISING SERVICES ON A 8t IE UTILISATION

It has been assumed that the unavailability of a family doctor has been a major reason for people attending an A amp E department Consequently health centres with more facilities for treatment of injuries and open for longer hours than the usual doctors surgery have been set up Two United States studies [3031] found that the health centres they looked at appeared to have reduced the use of A amp E departments by people in the local neighbourhood either absolutely or relativemiddot to people in other neighbourhoods However in New Zealand data collected from Dunedin A amp E records by Maynard [32] three years before and three years after the Mosgiel health centre opened andmiddot by ourselves six years after it opened gave no evidence of a decline inA amp E use by Mosgiel residents It appeared that since the A amp E department was rarely used for routine primary care problems there was little opportunity for the health centre to substitute for the department Possibly a neighbourhood closer to the A amp E department would have shown more effect from a health centre Also as Alpert et al [33] suggested habit patterns of usage could be difficult to change

Williams et al [34] investigated the effect of general practitioner deputising services on A amp E department use in the Sheffield Hospital region They found that deputising service referrals did not add significantly to the workloads of A amp Edepartments nor did it appear that many patients referred themselves to the A amp E departments in preference to consulting the deputising service doctors They commented that the deputising services may have been meeting a demand previously coped with by the hospitals

It is possible that health centres ana deputising services have contradictory effects on A amp E department visits People who realise a doctor is readily available through these services may use thatmiddot service rather than the A amp E department Other people may reason that if they cannot see their usual doctor it is just as convenient to use the A amp E department as the health centre or deputising service

82

A amp E STAFF VIEWS OF PATIENTS

Overseas studies

Several overseas studies have explored the views of A amp E staff about their patients Roth [35] found that staff applied concepts of social worth which were common in the larger society to their patients so that higher status people were likely to get more respectful treatment than lower status Staff tended tomiddot oVerestimate the numbers of patients seen as undesirable such as drunks venereal disease cases and welfare cases as well as overestimating the numbers using the department inappropriately Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff categorised patients as good (clinically interesting allowing staff to practise their skills and testing the competence of staff) and rubbish (a socially-defined category including drunks overdoses tramps and trivia which were usually minor injuries or conditions not requiring medical attention) Hughes [37] commented that the good and rubbish categories were relatively small groups and that staff had a neutral attitude to the bulk of the people visiting the department

Jeffery [36] found that staff reacted punitively to rubbish patients using delay verbal hostility and vigorous restraint of unco-operative patients particularly overdoses According to Roth (35] patients seen as unco-operative will be told to wait their turn and may be threatened with refusal of treatment Several authors found that patients visiting for tri vial complaints tended to be handled with surface politenessmiddot even if they were subject to post-hoc attacks in written records or departmental gossip [363738]

Burgess and Holmstrom [39] found that the attitudes and actions of health providers could increase or diminish the psychological consequencies for women who had been raped and suggested that staff awareness and training would be valuable Alexander [40] studied nurses preceptions of women who had been raped and found that while the womens characteristics were important the nurses own personality and attitudes were more important Alexander concluded that short-term sensitivity training was unlikely to be effective and that great care was necessary in selecting health providers to care for raped women

Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff viewed patients as having a legitimate claim to medical care if they were not responsible for their condition if they were restricted in their reasonable activities by the condition if they viewed their condition as an undesirable state and if they co-operated in trying to get well He commented that people visiting repeatedly because of overdoses or fights were regarded as not co-operating while repeated injuries from sports activities were viewed as legitimate Roth [19] in a study of five United States A amp E departments found that staff views on the legitimacy of a visit depended partly on the patients source of referral People referred by health professionals were usually accepted as legitimate exceptmiddot where A amp E staff suspected a doctor of dumping an unwanted patient on to the department Contract cases where the hospital had a contractual relationship with the school nursing home or workplace the patient came from were immediately accepted as appropriate People brought in by police came into this category Self-referred patients were classified as legitimate or not depending on their social characteristics their condition and the kind of demands they were making on the department In a later paper Roth [35] noted that cases where a definite diagnosis could be made (surgical conditions asthma overdoses maternity

83

patients) were considered legitimate whereas psychiatric conditions and cases requiring more subtle or complex diagnosis were regarded as illeg i timate

The New Zealand situation

While this study did not observe staff-patient interactions in detail we asked A amp E staff about the patients and how they dealt with them and we watched staff at work for some time in each department

We found some evidence that New Zealand A amp E staff shared the views of their British and United States counterparts House surgeons tended to regard the clinically interesting patients as goodand often commented unfavourably on patients whose condition was not easily diagnosed With regard to the rubbish category of patients some A amp E staff disapproved of them while others accepted the whole range of patients as part of working in the department We saw little evidence of punitive reactions to patients although delay andmiddot the intimidating effect of a white coat appeared to be used at times The views of A amp E staff about specific categories of patients are covered in the next sections

Sports injuries

From the Christchurch and Waikato [4] studies we have estimated that 13 per cent of A amp E injury visits were for sports injuries At Green Lane A amp E department staff had recorded all rugby injuries on the A amp E log in the late April week sampled the rugby injuries comprised six per cent of all injuries

A amp E staff saw the department as the appropriate place for the treatment of sports injuries One staff member commented that most general practitioners would get a shock if presented with a sports injury to treat Staff also understood that coaches usually sent people straight to the A amp E department as an automatic procedure and that this was often legitimate since the injury might have required an x-ray However a frequently mentioned source of annoyance was people presenting with a sports injury some considerable time after the event such as on Monday morning or after the post-match drinking bout A amp E staff thought these patients should have seen a general practitioner particularly when the condi tion was not acute A few A amp E staff commented that they were beginning to regard repeated sports injuries as self-inflicted injuries and were less sympathetic to those patients

Alcohol-related visits

In all the A amp E departments staff commented that many of the assault and motor vehicle accident injuries were directlyassociated with alcohol (The only exceptions were the suburban hospitals which Were closed evenings and nights) Staff estimated that from half to all patients seen on Friday and Saturday evenings had been drinking or had been hurt by someone who was drinking This estimate may seem exaggerated but inspection of Wellington A amp E logs by Reinken [41] suggested that an estimate of 50 to 79 per cent was reasonable Staff at three of the central city A amp E departments commented that they treated a number of old alcoholic and derelict people usually for chronic complaints or because they had been attacked

84

From time to time staff as well as facilities have suffered abuse and violence A amp E nurses always commented on problems with disorderly behaviour both by patients and by friends of patients in the waiting room In two hospitals nurses had little faith in the security provisions made for their safety but mostly the nurses seemed to cope reasonably well House surgeons said they found intoxicated patients difficult to treat because of their lack of co-operation A amp E officers had few comments on alcohol-related visits probably because they rarely worked evening or weekend shifts

Domestic violence and rape

Unfortunately we did not ask specific questions about these topics but at three hospitals nurses mentioned that they saw cases of child abuse and at another three hospitals wife-beating was mentioned We have few details as to how staff dealt with these women and children but from the comments made by the nurses and on house surgeon they felt a need for more psychiatric or social work backup There were no comments about women who had been raped attending the department

_Regular visitors

At most of the urban A amp E departments and at Rotorua and Whakatane staff commented that they had a group of regular visitors This group was never large unlike the 20 to 60 per cent of workload reported as regular visi tors by two United states public hospitals [19] Asthmatics (who had previously been advised to go straight to the department) were regarded as legitimate visitors and staff watched for children visiting regularly with injur-ies in order to detect cases of chi ld abuse However people who repeatedly presented drunk or with overdoses or with an emotional or social problem were regarded with resigned acceptance or some annoyance One A amp E department maintained a special file for the records of regular visitors while in other departments a bulky bundle of cards stapled together alerted staff to yet another visit from a regular client_

Trivia

When the A amp E staff talked about trivia they mentioned some of the minor injuries and sickness from the GP-Ioad category but also included very minor injuries such as a splinter in a finger or a cut needing only a Bandaid Some A amp E staff felt that trivial conditions did not require any medical treatment especially not from a department designed to treat emergency conditions A few staff members commented that people with minor conditions cluttered up the waiting room and were physically in the way Some also said that knowing the waiting room was full put more pressure on them However other A amp E staff stressed that apparently trivial conditions were important and worrying to the patients involved and that reassurance at least was required

It has been suggested that people using the A amp E department for trivial conditions decrease the ability of the department to cope with emergencies [42431 Most staff interviewed felt confident that people attending for trivial complaints in no way jeopardised the quality of care given to the more urgent cases because the latter were seen first ThUS the minor complaints were annoying and added work but did not compromise the departments ability to give good care

85

DISCUSSION

Why do patients attend the A amp E department The public seem to have a rough and ready decision tree if you are sick go to your doctor if you are hurt go to the Aamp E department

The department is definitely seen as the appropriate place for treating accidental injuries People say thats what its there forI and they have everything there A visit to the general practitioner for such an injury is seen as unnecessary and delaying

A significant proportion of accidents and some sickness conditions happen away from home The patient may decide to go to the A amp E department because it is closer or easier for transport or work reasons Often someone else (a schoolteacher a coach or traffic officer) sends the patient to the A ampE department as an automatic procedure

Most people with sickness conditions visit their general practitioner so it is not surprising that those who visit the A amp E department have often been referred by their doctor The sick patients who corne directly to the department usually see their condition as needing urgent care Therefore if they try to contact their doctor and fail or if they think the doctor will be unavailable they head for the hospital

It is also possible that the general practitioners surgery is associated with waiting while the hospital is associated with swift action perhaps due to televised images as noted by Cooke [44] In fact the waiting times are generally equivalent in both settings it is the significance of that waiting which is different The patients may feel that if something happens to worsen their case they will be attended to quickly if they are waiting in the A amp E department rather than waiting at home for the general practitioner to visit

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners formiddot patients From the patients comments one of the main attractions of the A amp E department is its availability that it is always open and staffed In comparison general practitioners were often seen as not being available as difficult to contact or as unable to respond quickly to an emergency In this sense A amp E departments appear to be competitive with general practitioners As was noted in Chapter 6 sickness visits to the A amp E department were more likely to happen out of hour s than in hours The overseas studies suggest that health centres and deputising services which offer greater availability of doctors particularly out of hours may reduce the use of A amp E departments The only way general practitioners could compete with the availability of the A amp E department would be to improve their own out-of-hours service

The cost of visiting a general practitioner has also been cited as a reason for people visiting the A amp E department where treatment is free This is only relevant for sickness conditions since the cost of general practitioner treatment for accidental injuries is covered by the Accident Compensation Corporation However in none of the New Zealand studies covered in this chapter did people give cost of treatment as a major reason for attending the A amp E department A amp E staff tended to over-estimate the importance of cost as a reason but this was not surprising as they also oVer-estimated the number of people visiting the department for sickness conditions

86

Despite sickness visits to the doctor being free in Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14 J found similar levels of A amp E sickness attendance there as here Steinmetz [45) reported that on the introduction of Medicare in Quebec doctors no longer charged patients whereas previously only care in an emergency room was free He found that the demand for medical care increased at both sites the doctor and the emergency room but that there was no evidence of a shift from the emergency room back to the doctor Thus there is little evidence that the cost of visiting a general practitioner causes people to visit the A amp E department Rather people use the department because they see it as the appropriate place for treatment of their condition and it is available

Turning now to staff a~titudes to the patients it seems that acceptance of the great variety of people (and their conditions) is a necessary part of working in the A amp E department However the staff comments do raise some concerns Abusive and violent patients have been a problem in some hospitals and a reappraisal of security arrangements in some of the urban A amp Edepartments would be desirable

A amp E staff should be aware that women and children presenting with injuries may have received them in domestic violence and that full information on how the injury happened may not be volunteered It is difficult for staff to do more than treat the injuries when there are few specialised support services available However some attempts are being made to provide such services for children [46] and through v9luntary organisations such as womens refuges A amp E staff should maintain good contact with these services where they exist and work with others to institute them where they do not

Staff should also maintain contact with rape crisIs centres so that women who have been raped can ring them for short or long-term support if they want it Alexanders work [40] suggests that while a raped woman is in the department she should be cared for by a crisis team of hospital staff (not necessarily A amp E staff) who have volunteered for that work Perhaps this approach could be tried in New Zealand A amp E departments

87

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S - Ca$ualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) P 272-279

2 RICHARDS JG and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

3 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C andREINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

4 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

5 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care Vbull Determinants of use of hospital emergency services E Richard Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

6 Casual attenders a socia-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcastle-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

7 STRATMANN William C and ULLMAN Ralph - A study of consumer attitudes about health care the role of the emergency room in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1033-1043

8 KELMAN Howard Rand LAWE Dorothy S- Usemiddot of the hospital emergency room in re1atiop to th~ use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

9 INGRAMD R CLARKE D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

fO GARRAWAY W M - The work of a casualty department in Health Bulletin - v 27 no 3 (1969) p 26-30

11 KAHN Lawrence ANDERSON Mary and PERKOFF Gerald T - Patients perceptions and uses of a pediatric emergency room in Soc Sci Med - v 7 (1973) p 155-160

12 CALNAN M ABSON I E P and BUTLER J R - In case of emergency inI

Health Soc Serv J - (1982) p 615-617

13 HOLOHAN Ann M - Accident and emergency departments illness and accident behaviour in Social Rev (Mono] - (1976) p 111-119

14 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Serv J - (1981) ~ 1139-1142

15 The functioning of a childrens hospital casualty department Susan Lovell et aI in Med J Aust - v 1 (1975) P 135-138

16 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R Call Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

88

17 WINGERT WA Friedman D B and LARSON W R - The demographic and ecological characteristics of a large urban paediatric outpatient population and implications for improving community paediatric care in A~ J Public Health - v 58 (1968) p-859

18 CALNAN M - Managing -minor- disorders pathways to a hospital accident and emergency department in Sociol Health Illness- v 5 no 2 (1983) p 149-167

19 ROTH J A - Utilisation of the hospital emergency department in J Health Soc Behav - v 12 (1971) P 312-320

20 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) P 163

21 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 no 2 (1971) p307-312

22 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J- Help The hospital emergency unit as community physician in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) P 248-260

23 MAGNUSSON G - The use and abuse of accident and emergency departments - the Stockholm experience in World Hosp - vIS no 3 (1979) p 170-172

24 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL D J and WALKER J H - Practitioners patients and the accident department I in Hosp Health Serv Rev shy(1975) P 80-84 I

25 CONWAY Hugh - Emergency medical care in Br Med J - v 2 (1976) p 511-513

26 PEASE R - A study of patients in a London accident and emergency department with special reference to general practice in Practitioner - v 211 (1973) p 634-638

27 MOK CH - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

28a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident s~atistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington- Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

89

29 KINLOCH P J - Samoan health practices -in Wellington - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 9-iO (Occasional paper series no 12)

30 MOORE_ Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEHect of a neighbourhood health centre onhospi tal emergency room us~e - in Med Care v 10 no 3 (1972) P 240-247

31 HOCHEISERLouis I WOODWARD Kenneth and CHARNEY Evan - Effect of the neighbourhood health centre on the use of pediatric emergency departments 1n ROchester~ New York in N Eng J Med - v 285 no 3 (1971) p 148-152

32 _MAYNARD Edward Jand DODGE Jeffrey S -- Introducing a community health centre at M05giel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (Aamp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

33 The types of families that use an emergency clinic Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ala New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

34 WILLIAMS B T DIXON R A and KNOWELDEN J - The impact of general practitioner deputising services on accident and emergency departments in the Sheffield hospital region in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 23 (1973) p 638-645

35 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) p 839-856

36 JEFFERY R - Normal rubbish deviant patients in casualty departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 1 no 1 (1979) p 90-107

37 HUGHES D - Lay assessment of clinical seriousness practical decision-making by non-medical staff in a hospi tal casualty department - University of Wales Swansea 1980 Ph D Thesis

38 DINGWALL R and MURRAY T - Categorisation in accident departments -good- patients -bad- patients and middotchildren- in Sociol Health Illness - v 5 no 2 (1983) p 127-148

39 BURGESS Ann Wolbert and HOLMSTROM Lynda Lytle - The rape victim in the emergency ward in American Journal of Nursing - v 73 no 10 (1973) p 1741-1745

40 ALEXANDER Cheryl S - The responsible victim nurses perceptions of victims of rape in Journal of Health and Social Behaviour - v 21 (March 1980) p 22-23

41 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

90

42 MAYNARD Edward J - The appication of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment -University of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 161-194

43 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - NewYork Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

44 COOKE Alistair - The doctor (1981) p 1652-1655

in society in Br Med J - v 283

45 STEINMETZ Nicholas and HOEY John R - Hospital emergency utilisation in Montreal before and after Medicare experience in Med Care - v 16 no 2 (1978) pl33-139

room the Quebec

46 GEDDIS D C - Child Abuse report of national symposium held in Dunedin September 1979 - Auckland National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1979 p 30-34 60-63

91

CHAPTER 8

Utilisation of accident and emergency departments

In this chapter we consider A amp E ufefrom a new perspective looking at the rates of attendance by people in different neighbourhoods We examine variations in the rates among areas and we discuss the evidence they provide as to the effect of doctor availability on A amp E use Next we analyse several factors which could account for the variations in attendance rates including distance from the hospi tal social characteristics of the areas and A amp E department characteristics Finally we present results from several studies which compare rates of attendance at general practitioners and at A amp E departments

COMPARISON OF A amp E UTILISATION AMONG HOSPITAL CATCHMENT AREAS

The neighbourhoods that we have used are census area units sometimes grouped contiguously to achieve socially and economically homogeneous areas that have populations of about 2000 or more We grouped all of New Zealand into 682 such neighbourhoods Of these 442 neighbourhoods are in the catchment irea of one of the 15 A amp E departments studied

Using the attendance numbers taken from the A amp E logs age-adjusted quarterly rates of attendancemiddot have been calculated (indirectly standardised to the total New Zealand population at the 1981 census) These rates have been calculated for each neighbourhood separately for injury and sickness conditions for in and out of hours and for first and recall visits Because there were very few recall visits for sickness conditions they have been omitted from the analyses in this chapter When we talk about recall visits we are referring only to recall visits for injuries

The attendance rates have been combined for the neighbourhoods making up the catchment area of an A amp E department These rates measure the use made by people living in a particular area of any A amp E department in their region Usually people living in the catchment area of an A amp E department do visit that department However particularly in the North Shore and Kenepuru areas a large number of residents attend other A amp E departments Thus the rates presented here should be interpreted as attendance rates of people living in an area not necessarily attendance rates at particular A amp E departments

The rates for each catchment area are presented in Table 16 In Table 17 the annual rates of accidental death and admission to hospital for accidental injury similarly age-adjusted are presented

Results

As Table 16 shows the overall attendance rates varied considerably in the A amp E department catchment areas studied

92

Sickness attendance

Among the urban catchment areas the Wellington Board region showed very high rates of use of A amp E departments for sickness attendance Except for Rotorua and Whakatane out of hours the provincial and rural areas had very low rates of sickness attendance

TABLE 16 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3

Midd1emore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals studied

First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness In Out of hours hours

35 55 41 67 82 121 72 105 54 72 52 64

17 26 36 51 09 17 21 23

12 8B 54 26

36 36 72 61

46 63

Injury In Out of In Out of hours hours hours hours

125 130 137 25 151 130 159 25 17 0 196 36 41 127 156 87 B8 136 151 54 30 229 240 123 42

79 70 42 29 241 215 99 72 203 96 64 10 14 4 213 66 98

173 179 59 62 223 85 83 32

194 92 216 47 164 96 116 20

154 145 101 38

Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 Since few recall visits were for sickness conditions only recall visits for injury have been included in this category

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

1

93

TABLE 17 HOSPITAL ADMISSION FOR ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR)l AND DEATH DUE TO ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR) 2 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area Admitted for Died from Population accidental accidental of ca tchment injury injury area

Full-time departments

U rban Auckland3

Middlemore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals

104 123 146 153 140 142

194 169 196 149

243 214

95 133

139

067 062 062 059 058 072

070 089 065 068

059 075

048 096

066

408 948 264 093 133 611 147 858 336 420 III 981

110 205 56 613 98 883 50 250

39 087 37 767

146 661 52 389

3 126 747

1 Source Hospital Discharges 1979 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

2 Source Mortality Data 1974-1978 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

common catchment

Injury attendance

First attendances for injury also showed wide variations among the hospital catchment areas Wellington Rotorua Whakatane and Dunedin catchment areas showed relatively high rates of first attendance for injury both in

94

and out of hours Timarus catchment area had high rates only out of hours while those of Grey Taranaki and North Shore were high only during normal work hours Northlands catchment area had very low attendance rates both in and out of hours

The pattern of difference from place to place in first attendance rates for injury means that in any year a person in Rotorua would have more than one chance in six of attending the A amp E department for an injury while a person in Northland has but one chance in 16 of doing so

~s this due to a difference in the rate at which accidents occur It does not appear so since neither the rates for death due to accidental injury nor the rates of hospital admission for accidental injury follow the same pattern as A amp E attendance (see Table 11) In fact the death rates were low in Christchurch and North Shore areas (where A amp E attendance was average) and high in Kenepuru areas where A amp E attendance was low Similarly admission rates were sometimes higher in areas where rates of A amp E attendance for injury were lower (Northland and Taranaki) and vice versa (North Shore)

Also the admission rates probably reflect a tendency for more rural hospi tals to admit injured patients more readily because of the distance they would have to travel for outpatient care

Recall attendance

As noted in Chapter 6 the practice of recalling patients was different from hospital to hospital and affected the composition of the A amp E department 5 total attendance Naturally the rate of recall visits also differed markedly in the catchment areas

Relatively low rates of recall visits characterised the Northland Wellington Christchurch and Taranaki areas The Auckland Hospital Board areas had very different patterns in and out of hours with high rates of recall visits in hours and low rates out of hours

Effect of general practitioner availability

Is there any evidence from these rates (Table 16) that availability of general practitioners had an effect on A amp E use If there was an effect it would be evident from comparing in hours sickness attendance with out of hours sickness attendance since when the general practitioner is less available out of hours the patients may be more likely to present at hospital Was the out of hours rate higher than the in hours rate taking into account the different proportions of peoples waking hours in each category Overall this did not appear to be so Compared to the in hours rate the out of hours rate was only slightly higher than would been expected Only in Whakatane was the out of hours sickness rate markedly higher than would have been expected Thus any effect of doctor availability on A amp E use would seem to be very small

See next page

95

FACTORS EXPLAINING CATCHMENT AREA VARIATIONS IN A amp E UTILISATION

There are several possible explanations for the variations in A amp E use

o that the hospital attracts those nearby and if the neighbourhoods near the hospital are densely populated then more people will attend the A amp E department

o that the social characteristics of the catchment areas are different

a that the A amp E department does or does not encourage the public to attend through its policy or practice

Several studies have suggested that distance and socio-economic factors are related to A amp E attendance Distance has been found to be inversely related to attendance in Sweden [1] the United States [23] Britain [4] and New Zealand [5] Some studies have found that lower socio-economic status people use A amp E departments more [678910] although Kljakovic [5] found that Wellington children from lower socio-economic status families were more likely to see a doctor before going to the A amp E department than children from higher status families Berki and Kobashigiwa [11] found that less educated groups used A amp E more while Weinermann [6] and Ullman (12) found no effect Several studies have found that minority group members (67913] and immigrants [1141 tend to use A amp E departments more Kelman and Lane [15] found that family characteristics such as size and age of head-of-household also relamiddotted to A amp E use Cohen et al (16] found no income or employment effects on A amp E use but did find that use was positively related to the number of hospital-based doctors per capita

METHOD

Using multivariate statistical methods it is possible to evaluate which of the explanations ( or which combination of them) best accounts for the observed variations in A amp E use among the neighbourhoods (See Appendix C for the details of the multivariate analyses) Overseas researchers have used similar statistical techniques to explore factors related to A amp E attendance [131116] The factors we chose to explore are described on the next page

We computed the expected value assuming that in any week in hours comprised 50 hours and out of hours comprised 118 hours of which 62 hours were spent awake

Therefore the out of hours rate should equal 62 ~ 50 = 124 times the in hours rate plus E where E is a correction term for night time attendance About eight per cent of total attendance was in the eight-hours night time period [1317] so E can be estimated as eight per cent of the total sickness attendance ie E = 008 x 109 = 087

Therefore the expected out of hours attendance A is

A = (124 x 46) + 087 = 658

The observed value was in fact 63 per 1000 similar to the expected rate

96

One factor was the distance from the centre of the neighbourhood to the A amp E department For neighbourhoods near Kenepuru and North Shore Hospitals in hours and out of hours distances to the nearest open department were calculated separately_

Another factor was the social characteristics of the neighbourhood using variables derived from the 1981 Census of Population and Dwellings chosen on the basis of known or posited relevance to health services utilisation These social characteristics can be listed as follows

o age structure - the proportions of the population under 5 years between 5 and 14 years and 65 years or more

o ethnicity the proportions of the population classed as European ethnicity and Maori ethnicity

o marital status - the proportion of adults separated widowed or divorced

o education - the proportion of adults without tertiary education

o income - the per capita earned income for adults and the proportion of the adults on a means-tested benefit

o employment - the proportions of adults actively seeking work in a bluecollar occupation and partiCipating in the paid workforce

o tenure of dwellings the average weekly rental and the proportion of owner-occupied dwellings

o car ownership - the proportions of households without a car and with two or more cars

o a measure of the north-to-south gradient over the country

A third factor was the general practitioner prOVision as measured by the population-ta-general practitioner ratio

Finally the characteristics of the A amp E department made up a fourth factor We focussed on the following areas

o our classification of the departments and their catchment area into urban prOVincial rural and suburban

o departmental policy on recalling patients (see Chapter 6)

o departmental open door policy on treating sickness attenders (see Chapter 6)

o medical and nurse staffing levels (from Chapter 5) relative to the-population of the catchment area

Production workers transport and equipment operators labourers agricultural workers animal husbandry and forestry workers fishermen hunters

I

97

Results of the multivariate analyses

The effects of distance

Sickness first attendance The distance from hospital affected the rates of sickness first attendance for out of hours visits accounting for nearly 20 per cent of the variance It had less effect on in hours sickness visits accounting for only 9 per cent of the variance

Injury first attendance The most significant characteristic explaining neighbourhood differences in injury first attendance rates was the distance from the A amp E department In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than half the total variance In urban areas it was less important accounting for one-eighth of the variance for in hours rates and one-sixth for out of hours rates

Recall attendance The distange from the hospital was related to in hours recall attendance In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than 40 per cent of the variance but it was much less important in urban neighbourhoods

In summary distance was inversely related to attendance rates with neighbourhoods further from the hospital having lower rates The effect of distance was stronger for injury attendances than for sickness attendances

The effects of social characteristics

Sickness first attendances Out of hours social factors had a substantial effect on sickness attendance People from neighbourhoods where many households were car less were more likely to attend the A amp E department and this factor accounted foi 19 percent of the variance in attendance rate Taking car lessness into account people f rom neighbourhoods where adults were better educated were more likely to attend the A amp E department Adding in the level of educational attainment raised the percentage of variance explained to 265 per cent The same pattern relating carlessness and higher educational attainment to high attendance rates applied to sickness attendance in hours but the effects were less marked In combination with distance the social factors explained 16 per cent of the variance of in hours sickness attendance rates

Injury first attendance In hours the rate of attendance for injury causes was only slightly related to social characteristics of the neighbourhoods adding 6 per cent to the variance explained Out of hours the social factors had a similarly minor effect adding 4 per cent

Recall attendance The social characteristics bad some effect on in hours recall attendance in urban areas In combination with a small distance effect the social factors explained 18 per cent of the variation For non-urban areas the social factors had no effect on in hours recall attendance only distance was important

Thus some of the differences among A amp E departments in the rates of sickness and recall attendance were due to differences in the social characteristics of the departments catchment areas However social factors were not important for injury attendances

98

Tbe effect of general practitioner provision

Initial correlation analyses showed that the population-to-general practitioner ratio was not significantly related to out of hours sickness attendance rates However it was positively related to out of hours injury attendance largely because the numbermiddot of people per doctor in a neighbourhood increases as the distance of the neighbourhood from the hospital decreases

In the multiple regression analyses the ratio nevermiddot entered as a significant variable Thus there was no significant effect of general practitioner provision in the community on A amp E attendance rates (see Table 18)

The effect of A amp E department characteristics

To look at the effect of A amp E characteristics on attendance rates it was necessary to cor rect the rates for the distance and social character istic effects just presented This was done (see Appendix C for details of the principal components analysis used to reduce the data)

Controlling for the neighbourhood factors thedepartment-to-department differences in rates were substantially reduced but were still present (see Table 18) Some patterns in the adjusted rates for sickness and 1nJury could be distinguished The areas served by urban departments tended to have low injury rates especially in hours and high sickness rates especially out of hours The Dunedin areas were an exception their rates were more like those of the areas served by provincial departments which had moderately high injury rates and low sickness rates The rural areas had very high injury rates and high sickness rates The suburban areas were similar to the urban areas except that North Shore areas had high injury rates The adjusted rates for recall attendance were highly variable and demonstrated no clear patterns among the departments

Further analyses were carried out to determine how the A amp E department characteristics related to the adjusted rates (Appendix C contains details of the analyses of variance the Student-Newman-Keuls means tests and the regression analyses of these differences) Only the statistically significant results are presented below

A amp E department classification Out or hours the adjusted sickness rates were lower in the provincial departments areas than elsewhere The sickness rates for the Wellington Hospital Board areas were no longer markedly higher than other areas

In hours the adjusted injury rates were higher in rural departments areas for first visits and in suburban departments areas for recall visits than elsewhere

Open door policy Adjusted rates of attendance for sickness (in and out of hours) were higher where departments had a stated open door policy than elsewhere This explains the low sickness rates in the provincial departments since most of them had restricted policies Where departments had a restricted policy adjusted rates of in hours injury attendance were higher than in open places

99

Recall policy In hours the adjusted injury attendance rates (both first and recall) were higher in areasmiddot where departments had a stated policy favouring recalling patients Out of hours adjusted rates of sickness visits were lower in areas with recall-favouring departments

TABLE 18 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED AND NEIGHBOURHOOD-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 AND POPULATION-TO-GENERAL PRACTITIONER RATI02 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchinent area First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness Injury Population In Out of In Out of In Out of to-GP ratio

hours hours hours hours hours hours

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3 44 57 130 144 100 24 1 476

Middlemore 52 74 165 148 131 24 2 078

Wellington 55 77 160 153 54 30 1 630 Hutt 61 89 130 137 10~9 83 2 237 Christchurch 50 71 116 117 76 27 1 651 Dunedin 40 52 204 193 159 38 1 558

Provincial Northland Base 46 56 128 132 53 45 1 735 Rotorua 34 33 188 163 73 57 1 656 Taranaki Base 17 29 227 ll8 81 19 2 243 Timaru 21 35 168 209 83 88 2 085

Rural Whakatane 29 91 207 222 81 84 1 679 Grey 67 57 286 135 131 39 2 310

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 51 69 198 156 175 57 1 865 Kenepuru 47 54 146 131 129 31 2 035

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors The attendance rates given in Table 16 have been adjusted for neighbourhood-determined factors ie distance from the hospital and social characteristics

2 Source Doctor numbers in full-time equivalents from Medical Council data unpublished

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

100

Staffing levels Adjusted first In]Ury attendance rates were positively related to levels of medical staffing and less impressively to levels of nurse staffing Neither the policy variables nor the size of department accounted for the relationship between lnJury attendance rates and staffing However there was no significant relationship between staffing levels and the adjusted rates of sickness and recall visits

COMPARISON OF A amp E USE AND GENERAL PRACTITIONER USE

Material for comparisons of this sort is hard to find We have compared the level of childrens attendance at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments found by Kljakovic [5] with childrens attendance at general practitioners in the same area over the same period (derived from General Medical Services benefit claims made by general practitioners) In an average week 652 per 1000 children in the Wellington Hospital Board area consulted a general practitioner whereas 35 per 1000 children visited an A amp E department (see Appendix D for details)

Similarly in Tauranga during an average week in the period 1979 to 1982 48 per 1000 people attended the A amp E department while 53 Sper 1000 people consulted a general practitioner [18]

Snelgar [19] compared attendance at Northland Base A amp E department with urgent consultations made by general practitioners (derived from the General Medical Services benefit claims) In an average week 36 per 1000 people in the whangarei area consulted a general practitioner for an urgent condi Hon while 09 per 1000 people made a first visit to the A amp E department

For first injury attendances we have compared rates derived from surveys ot people treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident [20] with similar rates obtained from our tallies at Auckland Hospital Board A amp E departments and data made available to usmiddot by Snelgar McRae and Keenan In a week 37 per 1000 people living in the catchment areas of the above A amp E departments made a first injury visit to an A amp E department while 1 per 1000 New Zealanders made a first injury visit to a general practitioner (see Tab~e 19)

Elderly people were as likely to go to the general practitioner as to the A amp E department for an accidental injury whereas children and young adults were five to six times more likely to go to the A amp E department as the general practitioner Foreign body injuries and cuts appeared to predispose attendance at an A amp E department whereas burns and falls tended to be taken to the general practitioner more than other injuries

In summary people visited general practitioners much more than the A amp E department even for urgent conditions It was only for specific injury conditions that the A amp E department was consulted more than general practitioners

101

TABLE 19 COMPARISON OF FIRST ATTENDANCES FOR INJURY AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS AND GENERAL PRACTITIONERS

Rates per 1000 per week A amp E departments l General practitioners2

Age distribution

All ages 37 10 0-4 years 38 06 5-14 years 39 08 15-29 years 66 11 30-64 years 23 11 65 years and over 11 10

Injury conditions3

Falls 066 027 Cuts 045 009 Foreign bodies 025 002 Toxic effects 014 001 Burns 007 003 Other 232 058

1 Calculated from the author st tallies at Auckland Middlemore Green Lane and NorthShore A amp E departments and data from Northland Base Waikato and Christchurch A amp E departments

2 Calculated from ACC Statistical Supplements - Wellington Accident Compensation Corporation November 1977 March 1978 September 1978 March 1979 and personal communications

3 These categories have been derived from those used in the A amp E department tallies and the type of accident categories used by the ACC

DISCUSSION

The analyses presented in this chapter confirm that distance and social factors are related to A amp E use in New Zealand Their effects were not independent but rather were entwined in a complex way Even within the group of social factors the interactions were complex and there were no simple relations between a specific social factor and A amp E attendance

However distance from the hospital was clearly a major determinant of A amp E use particularly for injury conditions both first and recall The distance effect was especially strong in non-urban areas perhaps because of the greater distances people had to travel in order to reach the hospital Altogether the strong effect of distance was not surprising given the body of overseas literature documenting distance as a factor in health services utilisation and also the number of A amp E attenders citing the accessibility of the department as a reason for using it (see Chapter 7)

102

The social factors were important determinants of sickness attendance with a stronger effect out of hours than in hours They were not important for injury conditions Possibly the appropriateness of the A amp E department for injury conditions as cited by attenders (see Chapter 7) overrides the effect of the social factors

One social factor which had a relatively strong effect on sickness attendance particularly out of hours was car ownership Areas where many households had no car tended to have high sickness rates Perhaps people who have to call a taxi or borrow someone elses car to get medical care go to the A amp E department because they know it will be open and treatment will be available

During our discussions A amp E staff had suggested that Pacific Islanders made greater use of the department because they were accustomed to using the hospital for all medical care in the islands If this was an important factor we would have expected ethnicity to figure prominently in the statistical analyses However for first attendances ethnicity had only a minor effect and in fact areas with high proportions of Pacific Islanders tended to have low attendance rates

Many A amp E staff also suggested that the cost of visiting a general practitioner was a major reason for sickness attendance at the department So we would have expected low income unemployment or receipt of a means-tested benefit to have been related to increased sickness attendance rates However neither income nor receipt of a benefit were at all related to the sickness rates and areas with a low proportion of adults in the paid workforce tended to have low attendance rates Thus contrary to general opinion neither the cost of visiting a general practitioner nor a Pacific Island background appear to have a strong effect on A amp E use

As noted in Chapter 7 we found that some patients were attracted to the A amp E department by the size of the hospital and the impression that specialised equipment was available there However the urban departments which were the largest and which had the most specialised equipment did not have higher attendance rates than the other departments In fact they tended to have slightly lower rates of injury attendance than the other departments

The results presented in this chapter show clearly that even aft~r

controlling for distance and social effects departmental characteristics are related to A amp E attendance It is understandable that rates of sickness attendance reflect whether a department has an open door or restricted policy However the relation between high injury rates and a restricted policy on- sickness attendance requires some explanation Perhaps these departments have always had a high injury rate and have restricted the access of sickness patients so they could cope with the injured patients Conversely the operation of a restricted policy may have convinced the local community that while the department is only to be used for injuries it is indeed the place for all injuries so generating a high attendance rate

It was also understandable that departments with a policy of favouring recalls did have high rates of recall visits But why did these departments have high first attendance rates for injury This probably happens because high recall rates and high first attendance for injury rates go together since larger numbers of injured patients tend to produce larger numbers of patients requiring specialised A amp E follow-up care

103

There was a positive association between first injury attendance rates and staffing levels which could not be explained by the policies or the classification of the department The explanation of these associations is not straightforward The h~gher staffing levels may somehow account for the higher attendance - levels for example attracting clients by keeping the waiting time sh~rt Alternatively an unexamined feature of th department or its catchment area could generate higher attendance levels and staffing levels mayhavebeen adjusted to meetthe demand

Thus departmental characteristics such as policies on non-urgent sickness patients and on recall viSits and levels of medical and nurse staffing are related to attendance rates

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners for patients Looking first at the availability of the two services the greater availability of the A amp E department out of hours did not result in a higher than expected use over those hours Also doctor prOVision (as measured by the populationto-genetal practitioner ratio) was not Significantly related to A amp E attendance rates Thus while the A amp E department was described by patients as desirable because of its availability - (Chapter 7) the attendance rates of the neighbourhoods did not refiect the lcwer availability of general practitioner services

Secondly the comparison of attendance at A amp E departments and general practitioners suggested that in an average week out of 1000 New zealanders four or five would go to an A amp E department and 50 to 60 would go to a general practitioner Of those Visiting the A amp E department on average only one would be attending for sickness Given that non-urgent sickness visits were only 60 per cent of all sickness visits (see Chapter 6) it is clear that general practitioners were losing only a tiny proportion of their workload when A amp E departments treated non-urgent sickness patients~

It - is also clear that general practitioners did not treat many injured people Only one of the 50 to 60 per 1000 people visiting a general practitioner in an average week would be making a first injury visit It would seem that thetwo serVices A amp E departments and general practice arecomplementaiy rather than competiti-ve

REFERENCES

1 MAGNUSSON Gudjon - The role of proximity in the use of hospital emergency departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 2 no 2 (1980) p 202-214

2 INGRAM D R CLARK D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Hed - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

3 ROGHHANN Klaus J and ZASTOWNY Thomas R - Proximity as a factor in the selection of health care providers emergency room visits compared to obstetric admissions and abortions in Soc Sci Med - v 13(0) (1979) p 61-69

4 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referred patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

5 KLJAKOVIC H ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

6 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care V Determinants of use of hospital emergency services Richard E Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

7 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

8 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 nomiddot 2 (1971) p 307-312

9 The types of families that use an emergency clinic - Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

10 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Servo - (1981) p 1139-1142

11 BERKI S E and KOBASHIGAWA B - Education and income effects in the use of ambulatory services in the United States an analysis of the 1970 National Health Interview Survey data in Int J Health Servo shyv 8 no 2 (1978) p 361-365

12 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SlRATMANN William c - An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1011-1020

13 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at AUckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

105

14 MOK C H - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

15 KELMAN Howard R and LANE Dorothy S - Use of the hospital emergency room in relation to the use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

16 COHEN Susan D GINSBERG Allen Sand VLADECK Bruce C - The middoteffects of unemployment and inflation on hospital-based ambulatory care in Am J Public Health - v 68 no 12 (1978) p 1219-1221

17 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

18 DALDY B M REINKEN J and SEDDON T D S - Report on the effect of funding in primary medical care - Tauranga Otumoetai Health Centre 1984 (In preparation)

19 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

20a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

107middot

CHAfTER 9

Conclusions

TheAamp E department is a complex changeable and challenging place It is also an ambiguous place since itmiddot fulfils several different and at times conflicting roles it is a hospital department an emergency service and a primary care service

THEA amp E DEPARTMENT AS A HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT

As a hospital department the A amp E department is the bullodd-one-out It differs from the other departments not only by being accessible at all times to people seeking medical care but also in the number of patients seen and the diversity and severity of illness and injury to be treated

Because of this diversity the A amp E service has little status within medical circles It tends to be seen as an area requiring few special skills and therefore not warranting specialty status However as Salmond [1] noted the humble casualty department provides a hospital with a display window where like it or not hospital wares are constantly on show to the public Good public relations require effective and efficient management of the Amiddotamp E department Also the doctors interviewed for this study stated that special skills in assessment surgery and orthopaedics were required The status of the A amp E department should be improved through a recognition both of the breadth and experience required for A amp E medicine and of the departments importance in the public view of the hospital While a post-graduate specialist programme is probably not warranted at present it should remain an option for future development

The Aamp E department plays a major partin the teaching of house surgeons Junior doctors quickly learn avariety of skills such as suturing lavage reading x-rays and resuscitation More importantly the A amp E department is usually their first experience of practising medicine without any immediately available consultation This study like Salmonds study in 1970 has demonstrated the lack of initial training and orientation and the inadequate senior supervisionrecei ved by many house surgeons in the A amp E department Clearly this should be remedied by the provision of specific training sessions at the beginning of the house surgeons A amp E run and by

increased senior supervision fn the A amp E department )

This study has also highlighted the desirability ofmiddot specific training courses for A amp E nurses Such coursesmiddot can improve the skills and confidence of the nurses and develop the different approach required for A amp E nursing compared to ward nursing The courses run by the Auckland hospitals may provide a useful basis for the development of postbasic and inservice training courses

Working in an A amp E department demands from all staff members an awareness of the social and emotional contexts of the people attending and the possible implications of their conditions for example people who have attempted suicide parents of- an infantmiddot with convulsions and women who have

108

been raped One aim of all training carried out in the department should be to foster such awareness Also it would be desirable for house surgeons to have experienced a psychological medicine run as well as a general medicine run and a surgical run before they work in the A amp E department All A amp E staff should be aware of the support services that they can calIon (eg social workers psychiatrists Salvation Army) or that the patient can contact (eg rape crisis centres womens refuges)

AS an important training site for house surgeons nurses and emergency workers such as ambulance personnel and police officers the A amp E department has a particular responsibility to maintain a high standard of care This study has not assessed quality of care directly although we have considered related areas such as the level of staffing and the experience of staff There is scope for evaluation of the quality of care gi ven for specific conditions The work reported by Mates and Sidel [2] provides some guidelines and a model whereby both process (measured by adherence to standards) and outcome can be studied Their example considered treatment of adult asthma patients and might for a start be replicated here in New Zealand

There is also scope for extending Mates and Sidels method to cover other conditions The ARCOS study [3] provides one model per taining to acute coronary or cardiovascular episodes There is less precendent for evaluating the quality of care in surgical or orthopaedic emergencies but the presentations of abdominal pain might be investigated as a usefUl beginning Removing healthy appendices is an expensive placebo The process evaluation of trauma care has not been reported on though wound sepsis might provide a suitable outcome measure Staff interviewed in our study discussed standards of suturing but no formal studies of quality of care in that respect have been reported

It must be considered that one explanation for the lack of study in the whole area is that very high standards prevail and the need for evaluation is therefore minimal Given patients high expectations and satisfaction with the service that explanation cannot be dismissed Yet studies that demonstrated a satisfactory level of care would confirm the high quality of care In some A amp E departments a small study of one reasonably significant type of emergency should be undertaken possibly modelled on the work of Mates and Sidel

As Gi bson [4] has pointed out the A amp E department acts not only as an entry point to the hospital but as a screen for the other outpatient and inpatient units of the hospital We found this was true of the New Zealand departments studied with only five to ten per cent of first attendances being referred to specialist outpatient clinics and five to fifteen per cent being admitted There were wide variations both in policy and practice with respect to patient disposition We consider that further study of acute medical admission practices focussing particularly on unnecessary hospitalisation is warranted

Some New Zealand studies [56J have tried to evaluate the need for care of patients presenting at the A amp E department They have tended to depend on the A amp E staffs assessment of whether a general practitioner (and a hypothetical one at that) could have dealt adequately with the case No studies have attempted to give a general practitioner assessment So the question of need for A amp E care remains open However it does not seem practical to devote more research effort to this topic until more is known

about the variable costmiddots oftreating minor injuries If such research is contemplated the techniques of activity analysis and recording systems proposed by Dalbyetal [7] andRoberts et al [8] could be useful

tmiddot bullmiddot

This study has not attempted to estimate the cost of A amp E care The information presented aboutothe physical size and staffing levels of A amp E departments suggests that the hospital service commits only a small share of resources to the A amp E department However with the continuing pressure on hospital resources the cost of A amp E care particularly if it is high relative to care by general practitioners has some importance Even a rough and ready costing of the whole service would be a first step Following that an indication of which parts are fixed costs to keep the essential service viable and which vary by volume or by character of workload would be a next step_ The variation in recall levels that we found suggests that savings in variable costs could be possible Gibson et al [9] in their account of a study of operating and patient care activity costs provide a valuable model on which some New Zealand studies could be based

THE A amp E DEPARTMENT AS AN EMERGENCY SERVICE

The A amp E department must be ready to cope with all kinds of emergencies whether they involve one or two badly hurt car-crash victims or the sudden influx of many patients after a natural disaster A major tool ensuring that a department is always prepared for a crisis situation is the disaster plan The United States Joint Committee on Accreditation of Hospitals requires every hospital to have a written disaster plan developed in conjunction with other relevant agencies which is tested in a full-scale drill at least twice a year The plan should cover assigning staff summoning staff to emergency duty setting aside parts of the hospital for specified purposes maintaining adequate supplies and co-ordination and communication within the hospital and with other hospitals police fire health and ambulance services and civil defence officials

Most of the- departments we studied had close liaison with the ambulance service and to a lesser extent with other services such as police fire and civil defence Six of the hospitals had adequate disaster plans which were revised on a reasonably regular basis but very few hospitals had had a full-scale drill to test the plan Many of the departments with inadequate disaster plans were in the process of revising them We commend this since we consider a comprehensive disaster plan which is regularly revised and tested at least annually to be an essential part of the A amp E service

While discussing emergency services it is worth noting that there has been little research done in New Zealand on the use of ambulance services There is a need both to document the coverage and formal structure of the service and to explore the effects if any of the different methods of funding this essential service The former is a necessary first step the latter presumes a study of both ambulance workload and of organisational matters such as staffing training and triage

Internationally there has been considerable discusion over the optimal distribution of A amp E departments nationwide Platt [IO] recommended that as a minimUm a population of 150 UOO was required to justify a full A amp E centre with seven days a week and 24 hours a day staffingbull Several

llO

authors [101112] have indicated the need for regional central or major accident centres with specialised services such as neurosurgery plastic and thoracic surgery and treatment of burns or poisonings serving a population of 500000 to 750000 An emergency service organised in levels as suggested requires careful planning so that all elements are integrated and good communications are maintained It is particularly desirable for ambulance personnel the police and perhaps taxi driVers to be aware of the level of treatment available at different hospitals

There has been disagreement over whether or nor smaller A amp E centres are justified It seems that densely-populated countries or regions with good transport systems do not need smaller A amp E units whereas more sparsely-populated regions often rural do need them [1013] New Zealand definitely falls into the second category Only our urban A amp E departments fulfil (or come close to) Platts criteria of 150000 population yet all of the A amp E departments visited in this study provide an essential service to their communities In New Zealand the distances that patients would have to travel preclude any concentration of emergency care within a few highly-equipped hospitals

THE A 8t E DEPARTMENT AS A PRIMARY CARE SERVICE

The A amp E department is a primary care service since few of the people Visiting it have been referred by a health professional most patients being self-referred or sent by someone else This primary care role could conf lict with the departments role as an emergency service if patients with minor injuries filled the department and hindered the care of emergency patients However by using triage the A amp E departments studied generally avoided this conflict Some departments discouraged visits for sickness conditions and recall visits so that the department would always be ready for an emergency situation

The A amp E department and general practice are both primary care services However the department differs greatly from the general practitioner in many aspects it is readily available 24 hours a day staff have little background knowledge of the patient and there is little continuity of care There has been concern that A amp E departments are stealing patients from general practitioners because the department is always available and care is free there This study has shown that such concern is not warranted

Looking first at the cost of general practitioner treatment as a reason for visiting the A amp E department we note that this is only relevant for sickness conditions since treatment of injury conditions is paid for by the Accident Compensation Corporation The interview studies have shown that very few patients give cost as a reason for attending the department Also the census area unit analysis showed that low income and receipt of a means-tested benefit were not related to sickness attendance rates and that areas with high unemployment had relatively low sickness rates We would expect contrary results if cost was a major factor As well our comparison of attendance rates at A amp E departments and general practitioners indicates that general practitioners would be losing at most one per cent of their workload when A amp E departments treat non-urgent sickness patients Even if all A amp E departments instituted a policy of discouraging such patients the effect on general practice would be negligible

111

The interview studies have demonstrated that patients do find the ready availability of the A amp E department attractive However our analyses of out of hours use compared to in hours use and our explorations of the effect of population-to-doctor ratios have shown that this attractiveness does not translate into significantly higher rates of A amp E attendance This suggests that improving the availability of general practitioner services is unlikely to have a major effect on the use of either service

There are two major factors related to peoples use of A amp E departments The first is distance from the hospital with people living close to the hospital being much more likely to visit the A amp E department It is hard to see any way of changing this factor The second factor is peoples perception of the A amp E department as the appropriate place for injury treatment The verY name of A amp E departments (instituted folJowing the Platt report) implies that the department is for the treatment of injuries It would be very difficult to change this perception and probably would not be desirable given the facilities experience and availability of the A amp E department for injury treatment

There has also been concern that A amp E departments recall patients instead of referring them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care It appears that A amp E departments recall a similar number of patients (10 to 30 per cent- of firstmiddot attenders) as they refer back to the general practitioners (10 to 20 per cent of first attenders) Some of the recall visits are middotjustified because they require the facilities of the A amp E department It hasmiddot been suggested that house surgeons tend to recall patients because of inexperience and to aid their training While this undoubtedly happens we found no evidence that it has a major effect on the level of recall visits However we did find that departments with high levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have high levels of recall visits possibly because the staff had more time to treat the recalled patients This suggests that recall attendance could be reduced in some cases shy

Ov~rseas studies [141516] have discussed A amp E departments as fulfilling three roles

o trauma treatment centre for the community providing acute emergency care

o substitute for the private phYSician when not available

o family physician for the poor particularly minority group poqr

This study has shown that New Zealand A amp E departments operate largely in the first role of trauma treatment centre providing care for both urgent and non-urgent injury conditions The departments also fulfil the second role of out of hours general practitioner substitute to some extent but they hardly ever operate in the third role of family doctor to the poor

This study has not explored in detail general practitioners views and use of A amp E departments although some information on these topics is implicit in the descriptions of procedures in Chapter 3 and the analysis of reasons for visiting the department in Chapter 7 More information about general practitioners perspectives and the actual availability of general practice care outside normal surgery hours could be gathered However we consider that as well as carrying out further research efforts should be made to develop better communication and understanding between general

112

practitioners and A amp E departments Towards this end we would suggest that A amp E departments make greater efforts to inform general practitioners about the conditions of patients attending the department perhaps using prepared forms or cards (see page 15) We hope too that this report will foster greater recognition among general practitioners of the valuable activities of A amp E departments and allay fears that the department is substituting for the family doctor

We conclude as Dixon [17] did in 1970 that the A amp E department and general practice are complementary services rather than competitive We cannot justify further investigation of the hypothesis that A amp E departments steal patients from general practitioners Possibly a study replicating the Northland comprehensive study of urgent medical care utilisation [18] in an urban area coupled with a study monitoring general practitioner availability out of normal surgery hours would finally lay the ghost of competition for patients However given the evidence presented in this report this does not seem a high priority

WHERE FROM HERE

We considet that research effort could now be turned to two areas First a study of the whole area of accidents is definitely warranted Accidents account for a significant proportion of early deaths and long-term disability and the volume of less severe accidents strains the financial and caring resources of the community The research of the Accident Compensation Corporation has understandably focussed on general practitioner care since the Corporation does not bear the costs of treatment at or in hospital Studies of hospital activity neglect general practitioner care of accident victims A broad study would have to involve not only A amp E departments and general practitioners but also occupational health clinics ambulance and other first aid services Only a comprehensi ve study can provide a firm basis for setting priorities for accident prevention efforts

The need for such a study raises the issue of recording systems both in terms of themiddot classification of type and severity of injury and of the context or cause of the accident Not only is there a need for a fairly simple and versatile system but there is also a need for all the many services to use it consistently For medical emergencies where diagnosis follows professional examination the issue is not crucial For injuries where the events immediately before and after the trauma are relevant the recording of cause and context is important Studies of treatment alternatives and costs depend on a detailed description of the injury which is probably worthwhile only for more severe injuries For example we have noted that many A amp E visits are for bumps and bruises minor lacerations or pain from past inj ury Elaborate description of minor conditions only obscures the nature of the more important cases Clearly before such research can proceed some small-scale attempts at coordinated recording and a form of information triage are called for

The second area warranting study middotis that of the emergency services and their coordination The A amp E department and ambulance services would obviously be covered but the civil defence police and fire service should also be involved Disaster plans drills communications and supplies would be important aspects to be considered

113

This study has focussed on what happens inside the doors of A amp E departments and why people go there We hope that it provides a comprehensive view of the organisation and utilisation of New Zealand A amp E departments and that it will be useful not only to those working within the hospital service but also to all those concerned with primary health care and emergency services

114

REFERENCES

1 SALMOND G C - Young doctors An exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

2 MATES Susan and SIDEL Victor W - Quality assessment by process and outcome methods evaluation of emergency room care of asthmatic adults in Am J Public Health - v 71 no 7 (1981) p 687-693

3 BONITA Ruth - Stroke rehabilitation who gets what - how when where and why in Commun Health Studies - v 7 no 3 (1983) p 347

4 GIBSON Geoffrey - The emergency department as a screening point for hospital specialty services inclusionary vs exclusionary strategies in Soc Sci Med - v l3(A) (1979) p 495-498

5 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

6 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

7 DALBY B C S FARRER J A and HARVEY P W - Casualty activity analysis coding and computing in Computer Programs in Biomedicine - v 3 (1974) P 254-266

8 ROBERTS Jean FARRER J and HARVEY P - A progressive study of the emergency room demand by the community in Med Inf - v 2 no 3 (1977) p 197-201

9 GIBSON Geoffrey BUGBEE George and ANDERSON Odin W - Emergency medical services in the Chicago area - Chicago Centre for Health Administration Studies University of Chicago 1970

10 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

11 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 55-58

12 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services - report of a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional office for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

13 PLANT Janet and AMES Seth - Emergencyoutpatient satellites serve as rural outposts in Hospitals Journal of the American Hospitals Association - v 52 no 5 (March I 1978) P 87-92

14 TORRENS Paul R and YEDVAB Donna G - Variations among emergency room populations a comparison of four hospitals in New York City in Med Care - v 8 no 1 (1970) p 60-75

115

15 MOORE Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEffect of a neighbourhood health centre on hospital emergency room use in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) p 240-247

16 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J emergency unit as community physician (1972) p 248-260

17 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S shyutilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71

- Help The hospital in Med Care - v 10 no 3

Casualty department (1970) p 272-279

18 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

Paper Development

- ~

C) w CJ C Z w c 0 laquo

118

APPENDIX A

Question sheets

MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT

1middot Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others

a number b levelsmiddotof experience c background experience

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties eg nurses doing clerical work

2 Policy (on procedures) 21 Standing orders 22 Sorting of patients at presentation who does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admit 26 Relations with other hospital departmentswards eg sharing of

facilitiesstaff with outpatients 27 Relations with other A amp E departments

peripheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

3 Relations with GPs

31 Any involvement of local GPs in A amp E department eg staffing 32 Policy on GP-load presentations

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A amp E service iri general

PRINCIPAL NURSE

1 Staffing

11 Nurses a number b levels of experience c background experience

2 Policy (on procedures) - ~ -

~ ~ bull - - I bull

22 Sorting of patients atprese~ation 23 Level of treatment provic)e~ by nurses 26 Relations with other hospitaldepartmentswards eg sharing

nurses 27 Relationsiith other ~ ~ltE 9~parlttm~nt~periPheral hospitals

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others a number I

b levels of experience c background experience d at different times

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties egnur~esdoing cler~cal work

2 Procedures ~ - ~

21 standing orclers ~ 22 Sorting of patients at pr~seniation~ho does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admitZ 26 Relat io~s witll oth~r )()sIgti taidepa rtmentswards

ashCl~in9 q~i facilitiesstaff with out-patients b go9rdinat~pgwith xray and laboratory

27 Relations with other A amp E departmentsperipheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

4 workload

41 Number of patient visits per year 42 Seasonal variation

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases -definiUon

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp B

120

~~

55 Relations with local GPs ~i~ 56 Alcohol involved in presehttionsbull 57 Administration - recordstystem 58 Hospital policy (if mentiOPed earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A E service in general

HOUSE SURGEONS

Jobdescription

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

2 Procedures

21 Standing orders 24 Follow-up recalls or referrals1

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-load cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A 81

55 Relations with local GPs 56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A E department or the A E service in general

NURSES

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

121

2 Procedures

21 Standing order s 22 Sorting of pati~nts at presentation 23 Level of treatment provided by nurses

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp E

56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A ampE department or the A amp E service in general

A amp E DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST ON PHYSICAL FACILITIES

Waiting room size seating atmospheredecor childrens facilities - screening of ambulance entrance

Treatment rooms size privacy ease of working

Overall layout ambulance flow ease of working holding ward for admission

Relations with rest of hospital

_ proximity ~Qxray level ofl~poratory service ease of ~dJllJtting towards

122

APPENDIX B

Accident and emergency department records

THE STATE OF A amp E RECORDS Most of the A amp E departments visited kept a log or register of A amp E attendance This was a large book or folder where the patients name and other details were entered in order of presentation at the department Usually A amp E department logs contained the following information

the patients name and age the date and time of presentation a one-word description of the patients complaint whether the visit was a first attendance for a complaint

or a return visit the patient I s disposal

All except one of the A amp E departments visited had their own record system (independent of the hospital inpatient system) with one recordmiddot kept for each patient presenting This record was usually an A5 card although one department used a multiple copy A4 sheet Most of the A amp E department records contained the following information

the patients name age sex occupation GP address and phone number the date and time of presentation a one-to-ten word description of the patients complaint the A amp Edoctor(s) seen their clinical notes of

diagnosis and treatment the patients disposal ACC details if the complaint results from an accident other details on tetanus prophylaxis allergies and medical alerts

There were of course variations in the information contained on the logs and records of different A amp E departments An outline of the points where the log and records of each hospital differ from the general descriptions given above appears at the end of this Appendix

The quality of data collected was variable with the out of hours collection often being sketchier than the in hours This was probably due to nursing and medical staff doing the recording as well as their usual duties when receptionists were not on duty The basic details (such as name age and sex) were usually complete but more descriptive details (such as the site cause and sequence of an accident) were not always noted Some receptionists recorded no details about the accident whereas others took considerable care to summarise accurately the relevant information

USES OF A 8t E RECORDS The major users of A amp E records are the A amp E departments themselves and the hospitals A primary use is the estimation of the size and the content of the A amp E workload at different times of the day and the week This information is valuable for planning staffing levels and physical facilities in the A amp E department The A amp E staff also find the information contained in A amp E records useful in dealing appropriately with

123

patients who repeatedy present at the d~parmeptlHSo at times the information recorded in the A amp E depatinienf farequired as evidence in court proceedings

On a broader f ront~ amp E records are useful for sOme research purposes Certainly theyprovide~nsights i nl 0 who USeE the A amp E department (see Chapter 6) At some A amp E departments ~ufficientlY detailed information about accidents resulting in a presentation (eg type site possible cause of accident and occupation of patient) is collected for developing accident prevention programmes However most A amp E records are too sketchy for direct use in this way although they could be used as sampling frames for some accident research

There are disadvantages in using A amp E records for health services research purposes

I A amp E departments deliver only a small part of ambulatory medical care They deliver care to a selected age group and to a group who by and large happen to live nearby

2 Generally A amp E records are one-off and do not have the longitudinal perspective of general practice records or even hospital notes

3 Even for an epidemiological survey of accidents A amp E departments see an incomplete caseload They do not see all fractures much less all wounds concussions eye injuries etc

POINTS OF DIFFERENCE fROM GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS GIVEN

Full-time Information on log Information on A amp E record departments

Urban Auckland Age not noted

Middlemore Motor vehicle accident also noted

Green Lane Age not noted Sports and motor vehicle accidents also noted Residential area (not street address) also noted

Address A amp E doctor and Length Of stay and homeWellington 1A amp E patient number also address collected for nonshy

Hutt noted New and return New Zealand residents visits not always differentiated

Christchurch Sex address GP referral and motor vehicle accidents also noted

Dunedin [NO log kept Records held in alphabetical order for each months presentations]

Full-time departments

Provincial Rotorua

Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane

Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore

Kenepuru

124

Information on log

GP A amp E doctor case history and treatment also noted

Only patient name and date of presentation noted

Source of referral location of accident and special accident cases also noted

[Not seen]

Information on log

Complaint not noted

Address A amp E doctor and A amp E patient number also noted New and return visits not always differentiated

)

Information on A amp E record

Different cards used for work and non-work accidents

[None]

Specific places allocated on A4 sheet for case history lab and x-ray reports and follow-up

Time of presentation not noted

Information on A amp E record

Length of stay and home address collected for nonshyNew Zealand residents

125

APPENDIX C

StatisticalanaIY$es of accident and emergency department attendance riltes by neighbourhoods

METHOD

The analysis set out to test

o the effect of distance

o the effect of social factors

o the effect of A ampE department characteristics on A amp E attendance rates

The first two of these effects are not independent It was therefore necessary to use multivariate methods to assess the effect of distance controlling for social factors and for social factors controlling for distance

Other analyses of New Zealand geographical areas (in preparation Reinkeii) have found distinct differences between urban areas (those with populations exceeding 35000) and non-urban areas Therefore the multivariate analyses have been carried out separately for the 355 urban neighbourhoods and the 86 non-urban neighbourhoods One neighbourhood did not have complete census data and was omitted from the multivariate analysis Where we found differing results for urban and non-urban areas they have been mentioned separately Otherwise the results are presented as general findings

STEPWISE MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Initially a simple stepwise regression analysis was carried out The results are shown below Variables are presented in decreasing order of importance and are related to high attendance rates

All Neighbourhoods Urban Neighbourhoods Non-urban Neighbourhoods

Out of hours sickness

37 of the variance is 34 of the Variance is 36 of the variance is explained by explained by the same explained by many carless households features as all neighshy near the hospital near the hospital bourhoods many households with cars young age-structure few in the paid workforce many with higher few school-age children education many Maori many blue collar many in the paid workforce

All Neighbourhoods

out of hours injury

35 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many children many married many Europeans few households with two cars

In hours sickness

16 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many car less households few separated widowed or divorced low average rental many in paid workforce many with higher education

In hours injury

31 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars many school-age children few Pacific Island Chinese or Indian

Recall visits in hours

23 of the variance is explained by near the hospital high average rental many households with two cars few with higher education many in the paid workforce few European many separated widowed or divorced many school-age children

Urban Neighbourhoods

28 ofmiddotthe variance is explained by near the hospital few households with two cars many with higher education many blue-collar many European few separated widowed or divorced many seeking work

14 of the variance is explained by few households with two cars near the hospital low average rent high income many in paid workforce few separated widowed or divorced

16 of the variance is expla ined by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars

18 of the variance is exp lai ned by high average rental near the hospital many households with two cars many Maori many separated widowed or divorced few seeking work many with higher education

Non-urban Neighbourhoods

62 of the Variance is explained by near the hospital few in the paid workforce

7 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

57 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many one-car households

42 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

127

Few recall visits happened out of hours so the out of hours recall attendance rates are low ~ndhlghlY yariable NO adequate model was found in the analyses so 19 resultsare presented here

Clearly distance was an important determinant of rates of attendance The social characteristics had a )I9dest effect on injury first attendance a more substantial effect on rates of recall visits and a very substantial effect on the rates of sickness attendance in the different neighbourhoods

The pattern was quite different for the urban and non-urban areas as were the associations among the social variables A more complex analysis was needed

2 DATA REDUCTION

Separate principal components analyses for urban and non-urban areas were done on the social factors and yielded sets of four components with eigenvalues of one or more For clarity of interpretation the four-vector model was rotated (using a varimax method) and yielded four urban parameters and four non-urban parameters as shown Variables are shown in decreasing order of importance for each parameter

Urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few home-owners young ageshy low income in the northerry many carless structure few with higher regions higher many on benef it many Maori education average rental many seeking work many blue-collar few in the paid many separated work force widowed or divorced many blue-collar

Non-urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few separated many Maori bull many home- low average widowed or manyseeking owners rental divorced work few in the paid few with higher few old in the workforce education many two-car and northern many blue-collar few carless regions high income many blue-collar many children

3 PRODUCING ADJUSTED RArES

We fitted a regression equation for each attendance rate on the distance factor and the eight social factor parameters For urban neighbourhoods the four non-urban parameters were held at zero and vice versa for the non-urban neighbourhoods

128

The regression equations using this method allowed non-urban and urban areas to be analysed together and yielded levels of variance explained generally equal to those derived from the significant predictors in the simple stepwise regressions

Variance in attendance rates explained by different methods

Regression In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Using or iginal variables 16 31 23 37 35 14

Using rotated parameters 18 26 29 36 37 14

Each parameter-based equation yielded a rate of attendance expected on the basis of purely neighbourhood characteristics The difference between this expected rate and the actual observed rate gave a measure of the attendance rate adjusted for neighbourhood-determined features After this adjustment for distance and social factors the department-to-department differences remaining were muted In fact the F-tests of the differences among the departments showed the following changes

Changes in F-test values from unadjusted to adjusted rates

In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Unadjusted rates 74 69 195 132 96 123 Adjusted rates 23 65 107 53 41 119

4 TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE

Analyses of variance were carried out on the attendance rates adjusted for neighhourhood-determined factors for in hours and out of hours and looking separately at sickness first injury and recall visits First the A amp E department was used as the independent variable (except that Auckland and Green Lane were combined since they share a single catchment area) Then tests were done on the departments categorised into urban provincial rural and suburban open door policy and recall policy When the analyses of variance showed significant effects Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used to identify single departments or groups of departments that differed significantly from the others

Staffing levels were plotted against the adjusted rates When the correlations were significant the slope of the simple regression was examined

129middot

Results of analyses of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls means tests on adjusted attendance ratesmiddot

Differencemiddots Differences Differences among among between

Neighbourhood- A amp E categories of open-door adjusted departments A amp E department and attendance ( urban restricted

provincial departments rural or suburban)

Out of hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Provincial Open rates

rates lower higher than than others restricted

First injury Yes

Recall injury Yes Yes

In hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Open rates

higher than restricted

First injury Yes Yes Yes Grey rates Rural rates Restricted higher than higher than rates others others higher than

open

Recall injury Yes Yes Suburban rates higher than others

Only statistically significant results presented

Differences between departments favouri ng and not favouring recalls

Yes Recall-favouring rates lower than others

Yes Recall shyfavoumiddotring rates higher than others

Yes Recall shyfavouring rates higher than others

130

APPENDIX D

Childrens use of general practitioners and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

In conjunction with the 1981 Kljakovic study of chi ldren s attendance at A amp E departments in Wellington a parallel study of childrens visits to and by general practitioners was undertaken General Medical Services benefit claims for the same period were examined noting for each juvenile (0-14 years) visit the census area unit of the residence and the address of the general practitioner or locum This yielded rates of child attendance both for normal surgery hours and for urgent visits (out of surgery hours) for the whole region These were adjusted to give estimates for the 0-12 year old population and were then compared with the rates of A amp E attendance found by Kljakovic

AS Figure 10 shows the use of A amp E services was a very small part of childrens primary medical care During surgery hours visits to the A amp E department which were not preceded by contact with the general practitioner were only 16 per cent of first medical contacts Outside normal surgery hours the visits to A amp E departments that bypassed a general practitioner were more frequent I but they rose only to 194 per cent of first medical contacts

This comparison of overall use of medical services for children showed some tendency for parents to use A amp E more when they used general practitioners less comparing in hours with out of hours This was not surprising given that many of the in hours visits to general practit ioners would be for non-urgent conditions or even routine preventive care

Eighty-four neighbourhoods in the Wellingtoh region (the census area units or groupings of the same) were examined to see which of four factors (the distance of the neighbourhood from the A amp E department the use of general practitioners the per capita income and the ethnicity of the neighbourhood) were related to the use of A amp E departments The most important factor was distance from the A amp E department Then taking distance into account there was a slight tendency for areas where parents made less use of the general practitioner during normal surgery hours to be areas of more frequent use of the A amp E department However this tendency was not statistically significant and no such tendency was found for out of hours use Overall there was little evidence of competition between general practitioners and A amp E departments for patients

Figure 10 Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

In hours Out of hours

Need for medical care recognised

I I bull I I I I I Ifail Try to Try to fail Still need Icontact contact careI

general generalI 0gt practitioner practitioner w-- I succeed I succeed

I I I I

AampE 13 yes Still need Contact Contact Still need yesI department care general general care departmentI

practitioner I practitioner

I I I

7650 824I egt I I

Still need Visit Visit Still need I care general general careI

practitioner practitionerI I I I I I

~X-215 -[Ql--~-~- 7346 ALLAN Bridget ClairtJ ) Accident and emergency departmem ~

organisation and utilisation

WX 215 73467 [QJ 1shy

j

ALL

shyUBRARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

WELLINGTON L

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH-SPECIAL REPORT SERIES

Issued by

Management Services amp Research Unit (MSRU) or National Health Statistics Centre (NHSC) Department of Health Private Bag 2 PO Box 5013 Wellington Upper Willis Street Wellington

No TITLE

1 Maori-European standards of health 2 Domestic accidents (public hospital admissions) 3 The Grey Valley survey (lung function in coal miners) 4 Elderly patients in public hospitals 1958 5 Smoking habits of school children 6 Survey of work in compressed air-Auckland harbour bridge 7 Tuberculosis in Canterbury 8 Maori patients in mental hospitals 9 Census of mental hospital patients 1961 10 Elderly persons accommodation needs in New Zealand 1962 11 Patient-nurse dependency exploratory study 12 Patient-nurse dependency general survey data

13 Patient-nurse dependency gynaecology 14 Patient-nurse dependency geriatrics

15 Patient-nurse dependency in Christchurch paediatrics 16 Smoking habits of New Zealand doctors 17 Infant and foetal loss in New Zealand 18 Trends in notifiable disease 19 Survey of factory first aid 1963-64 20 Patient-nurse dependency general surgery 21 Patient-nurse dependency orthopaedic surgery 22 Patient-nurse dependency general medicine 23 Patient-nurse dependency GU Eye ENT

24 Diseases of the ear nose and throat in Maori children 25 Maori patients in public hospitals 26 The health of two groups of Cook Island Maoris

27 Mental hospitals admission and release data cohort study of first admissions 1962

28 Occupational mortality among male population other than Maoris 20 to 64 years of age

29 Dental health status of the New Zealand population in late adolescence and young adulthood

30 Census of mental hospital patients 1966 31 Survey of the public dental health service in Niue and plan for development 32 Hospital food services 33 Bibliography of the epidemiology of New Zealand and its Island Territories

34 Census of public and private hospital patients and old peoples homes 1966 35 Domestic accidents 36 An evaluation of a regional mass miniature radiography programme 1956-67 37 Maori-European comparisons in mortality

38 Physical development of New Zealand school children 1969 39 Psychiatric illness causing hospitalization or death 1967 t40 Census of mental hospital patients 1971 t41 Census of public private and maternity hospital patients and old peoples

homes 1971 t42 Cancer of the lung in New Zealand t43 Organisation of the work of hospital house surgeons 44 Growth of New Zealand pre-school children 45 Maternal and infant care in Wellington-a health care consumer study

46 Accommodation and service needs of the elderly t47 Survey of patients in psychiatric hospitals 48 Family growth study 49 A patient opinion survey Wellington hospital

ISSUED BY

NHSC 1960 NHSC 1960middot NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1963 NHSC 1963 MSRU 1963 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1963 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC ]966

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 MSRU 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1972 MSRU 1971 NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973

NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1974 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1977

llHII tIffPllfJlJ c

~~~~~~~~ f lt b tf

f ()

11

bull

Page 6: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …

DISCLAIMER

The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Health

COPYRIGHT

Provided the source is acknowledged information contained in this report may be freely used by any person

CONTENTS

Page

ACKNOWIEDGEMENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

1 INTRODUCTION I

Background Thewider questions of emergency medical services The overseas situation An historical perspective in New Zealand

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments Record studies on the utili satjon of A amp E departments Studies of the organisation of A amp E departments

Overview of this study Aims Sources of information

References

2 DEFINITIONS 11

The Accident and Emergency department Attendance The hospitals Recording systems References

3 PROCEDURES IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT 15

Entry Sorting 1 reatmen t Disposal Follow-upcare Admissions Discussion References

4 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 23

PrinCiples Size Location

Entrances Access to other hospital facilities

Layout Waiting area Examination and treatment area Resuscitation area Operating theatre Plaster room Interview room Reception and records office Staff offices Holding ward

Discussion References

5

6

7

8

STAFFING OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 35

Medical staffing Senior medical staffing Junior medical staffing Accident and emergency work as a career

Nurse staffing Other staff involved with the A amp E department

Reception and clerical staff Orderlies Social workers Ambulance personnel

Discussion References

PATIENT ATTENDANCE CHARACTERISTICS 55

Overall attendance and trends Age and sex Conditions

Injury conditions Sickness conditions

Recall attendance GP-load

Non-urgent sickness Discussion References

PATIENT ATTI~UDES TO THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT AND STAFF ATTITUDES TO THE PATIENTS 75

Reasons for visiting the A amp E department Overseas studies New Zealand studies

Effect of health centres and deputising services on A amp E utilisation A amp E staff views of patients

Overseas studies The New Zealand situation

Discussion References

UTILISATION OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 91

Comparison of A amp E utilisation among hospital catchment areas Results Effect of general practitioner availability

Factors explaining catchment area variations in A amp E utilisation Method Results of the mUltivariate analyses

Comparison of A amp E use and general practitioner use Discussion References

9 CONCLUSIONS 107

The A amp E department as a hospital department The A amp E department as an emergency service The A amp E department as a primary care service Where from here

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A QUestion sheets 116

APPENDIX B Accident and emergency department records 120

APPENDIX C Statistical analyses of accident and 123 emergency department attendance rates by neighbourhoods

APPENDIX D Childrens use of general practitioners 128 and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

TABLES

Table

1 Proportion of first attendance patients discharged recalled referred or admitted

2 Areas of A amp E department~

3 Area to attendance ratios for adjusted total areas and waiting areas of A amp E departments by first attendance and total attendance

4 Numbers of examination and treatment cubicles or rooms and recommended numbers based on first attendance and total attendance

Medical staffing of A amp E departments

6 Total medical staffing (full-time equivalents) and medical staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

7 Nurse staffing of A amp E departments excluding student nurses and hospital aids

Nurse staffing (full-time equivalents) and nurse staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

Average attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

10 Trends in attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

11 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was recall attendance

12 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was for sickness

13 Proportion of total A amp E attendance that was for Sickness by policy and age groups

14 Use of general practitioners by first attenders at A amp E departments

15 Reasons for A amp E first attendance from three New Zealand studiesmiddot

Itgt Attendance (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) within each A amp E department catchment area

Page

18

24

25

29

37

39

45

46

56

57

66middot

70

71

77

78

92

(continued)

Table Page

17 Hospital admissionsfor accidental injury (mean 93 age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) and death due to accidental injury (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) within each A amp E department catchment area

IB Attendance (mean age-adjusted and neighbourhoodshy 99 adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) and populationshyto-general practitioner ratio within each A amp E department catchment area

19 Comparison of first attendances for injury at A amp E 101 departments and general practitioners

FIGURES

Figure Page

1 Percentage of total attendance at 58 A amp E departments by age and sex

2 Percentage of total attendance at 59 A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

3 Injury first attendances by type of injury 6U all ages

4 Injury first attendances by type of injury 61 by age groups

5 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 62 all ages

6 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 63 by age groups

7 Comparison of medical staff availability and 67 level of recall attendance

Comparison of nursing staff availability and 67 level of attendance

9 Location at which accidents happened by those 79 attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments 131 by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

1

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

BACKGROUND

This report arises f rom concerns expressed by several groups about the availability especially out of hours of emergency car~ and its provision by Accident and Emergency (A amp E) departments in New Zealand

In _SQe mid 1970 s the people of Porirua were worried that local general -pr-actitioners were not available at nights and weekends and by the delays

involved in travelling to Wellington and Hutt A amp E departments [IJ At the same time the people of North Shore were campaigning to keep their local A amp E department open More recently community groups in Upper Hutt have been pressing for the addition of an A amp E service to a local health centre Overall people are concerned that appropriate care (including facilities such as x-rays) is readily available in emergency situations

General practitioners are another group who have been concerned about A amp E departments in particular about inappropriate uses of A amp E departments A long-standing complaint bas been that patients are using A amp E departments for care which wou~d be better given by a general practitioner and that the A amp E departments retain patients instead of referr ing them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care [2 3J In 1981 the research group of the Wellington Faculty of the Royal NZ College of General Practitioners sponsored a study of children presenting at A amp E departments because they were worried that unnecessary admissions of children to hospital occurred because their parents had bypassed the general practitioners and gone straight to hospital [4J

Also A amp E staff and hospital administrators have been concerned that caring for patients who could have been treated by general practitioners has limited their ability to deal with emergency cases [567]

THE WIDER QUESTIONS OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

Emergency care requires not only the provision of hospital services (the A amp E department with back-up from other hospital facilities) but also the organisation of services outside the hospital and co-ordination between both sets of services Emergency medical services outside the hospital include alarm and communication systems transport systems and first aid services There are important questions for New Zealand within this framework For example what should be the role of general practitioners in on-site emergency care What level of training is appropriate for ambulance officers Should voluntary personnel staff ambulances To what extent is double manning of ambulances required [8910]

In order to limit the study to manageable proportions this report focusses only on the hospital services namely the A amp E department Emergency medical services provided outside hospitals are mentioned only where they impinge noticeably on the A ampE department It is hoped that due attention will be given to the wider questions of emergency medical services in the future (see Chapter 9)

2

THE OVERSEAS SITUATION

Concern with emergencymiddot care facilities especially their increasing use has been apparent in other countries for the past thirty years While some articles report on the situation in Canada Australia Sweden France and the USSR most of the literature is about the United States and Britain This section briefly outlines the major themes of the literature and their relevance to New Zealand More specific aspects are covered in the appropriate chapters

Many United States researchers have studied the operations of different emergency rooms exploring patients reasons for using the emergency room their demographic characteristics and their use of the family doctor Often the studies have tried to explain an increasing use of emergency rooms and some have reported on the effectiVeness of measures introduced to reduce thei r use These studies provided models for some of the analyses carried out in this study However the debate in the United States over appropriate methods of funding and staffing for emergency rooms is seldom relevant to New Zealand because of the differences both in philosophy and organisation of medical care in the two countries

The Platt [11] committee on A amp E services in Britain in 1962 was concerned about casual attenders ie patients not in need of urgent attention but wishing to avoid the trouble of attending their general practitioners surgery They also criticised the unsuitable accommodation and the insufficient numbers of senior medical staff supervising Casualty Departments The report recommended changing the name Casualty Service to Accident and Emergency Service (to discourage casual attendance) and rationalising the service by clOSing smaller A amp E units and centralising facilities These recommendations have been partially carried out

However there has been continuing research in Br i tain into the reasons given by patients particularly self-referred patients for their use of A amp E departments and the trade-off between general practitioner and A amp E services There has also been continuing debate over the medical staffing of A amp E departments

The British studies are of some relevance to the New Zealand situation since the organisation of medical care here is similar but no overseas experience can provide a blueprint for New Zealand For example the direct cost to the patient of general practice care in New Zealand raises the possibility of patients attending the A amp E department because it is free whereas the British system of general practitioner funding provides no such incentive

AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE IN NEW ZEALAND

Little is known about the historical development of A amp E services in New Zealand Presumably they followed the British tradition described in the Platt report [11 p23-24)

The word casualty in its proper meaning of a serious injury has a long history It occurs in Shakespeare and Dickens writing in 1837 used casualty ward to describe the ward in a hospital in which accidents were treated Unfortunately the meaning alt~red in the second half of the last century The Nuffield Report (1960) Casualty Services and their Setting

3

gives an interesting quotation from a survey made by the Lancet in 1869 The out-patients at St Bartholomews Hospital are it says divided into two categories They are the middotcasualtymiddot which comprises those who are supposed to require temporary treatment for diseases or injuries of a trifling character and the middotout-patientsmiddot properly so called who after receiving a regular letter of admission are entitled to the advice of the assistant surgeons and physicians for a period of 12 months It is in the casualty division that the increase of numbers has been most marked bullbullbull It is estimated that not less than a thousand patients frequently attend on a Monday or Tuesday morning

Certainly by 1872 vlellingtons private medical practitioners were incensed at the hospitals provision of free treatment for their patients Five hundred outpatients were treated in Wellington that year [12] Separate casualty departments were operating at Wellington Hospital by 1924 [12] at Auckland Hospital by the 1940s [13] and Christchurch Hospital by 1952 [14]

The 1960 Board of Health report [15] on outpatient servicesmiddot expressed concern over the duplication of services by outpatient departments which were also available from general practitioners However it recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times

Since the late 1960s a series of New Zealand studies have considered the use of A amp E departments either by interviewing patients or by analysing data drawn from A amp E record systems and the organisation of A amp E departments

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

The first interview study was an investigation of first attenders at the Dunedin A amp E department in 1968 by Dixon et al [2] Their results have not been contradicted by any of the later studies

They found that the principal attenders were males aged 15 to 24 who recorded first attendance rates of over 100 per 1000 each year The young men were also the most likely to report having no general practitioner Dixon found that the age and sex pattern of those attending at the A amp E department was nearly converse to the pattern of those attending a general practitioner

Dixon pointed out that the conditions treated at the A amp E department were rarely disease-related rather they were predominantly lacerations and open wounds bruising sprains and strains effects of foreign bodies and fractures The major reason given for attending the department was that it was seen as appropriate

Dixon concluded that the A amp E service was complementary and not competitive to general practice that the public were realistic in regarding it as the only practical and effective primary medical care for accident and emergency injuries and that payment for service did not appear to figure in the decision to attend the department

o

4

TwO interview studies of first attenders at Auckland Hospital A amp E department have been carried out by Hunton in 1972 and Richards in 1975 [16] Both studies included an assessment by the student interviewers and A amp E staff as to the suitability of the patients condition for general practice care 42-43 per cent were considered suitable Richards concluded that public education programmes encouraging people to use their general practitioner prior to attending the A amp E department should be instituted

In 1978 Keenan interviewed patients who had attended Christchurch A amp E department collecting detailed information on the accident or sickness leading to the attendance (unpublished see Chapter 6 and 7) He found the same set of reasons for using A amp E departments as Dixon found the A amp E department was seen as appropriate and accessible

Kljakovic found similar results when interviewing the parents of children attending A amp E departments in the Wellington region in 1978 [4] He also found that in choosing between the general practitioner and the A amp E department parents were more likely to use the service which was closer to the family home Children f rom lower socio-economic status families were more likely than other children to see thei r general practitioner before gOing to the A amp E department

Records studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

Several studies have gathered data from A amp E records to investigate A amp E utilisation In 1979 Snelgar described the characteristics of people attending Northland Base Hospital A amp E department [17] He found similar results to Dixon apart from a higher proportion of injuries In the same year McRae reviewed all attendances at Waikato Hospital A amp E department and found a similar picture [lB]

Three records studies have looked at the relationship between A amp E use and general practitioner use Maynard looked at Mosgiel residents use of Dunedin A amp E facilities for three years before and three years after the opening of a local health centre [19] No difference was found ~asap

investigated assertions that people from one part of the Wellington Hospital catchment area had suddenly begun to use the A amp E department heavily for conditions that should have been seen by a general practitioner [20] In fact that part of the catchment area had much lower rates of A amp E use than other areas Reinken tested whether the doubling of general practitioner cover in one part of the Wellington region affected A amp E presentation rates differently than in other areas nearby [21] There was no clear evidence that the increased cover had any effect

Studies on the organisation of A amp E departments

As part of a thesis looking at young doctors Salmond examined the work of house surgeons in A amp E departments using a postal questionnaire [22J He concluded that working in an A amp E department was good experience for a house surgeon only if second year house surgeons were deployed in the department the house surgeon was well-supervised by senior medical staff there was a good working relationship with the A amp E chargemiddot nurse and the house surgeon was not over-tired He also suggested that good senior staffing was closely related to effective administration and better service in the A amp E department

5

The Hospital Design and EValuation Unit of the Department of Health prepared a report documenting the planning requirements of New Zealand A amp E departments [23] The report outlined several principles of A amp E design and made detailed recommendations on the facilities rooms and equipment necessary

OVERVIEW OF THIS STUDY

Aims

The aim of this study is to describe A amp E departments in New Zealand Because the material presented in the previous section was collected by different researchers at different times and from different A amp E

departments detailed comparisons across the studies have been difficult To get a more comprehensive picture of A amp E use in New Zealand a systematic investigation was necessary

The specific aims of this report are

o to describe the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at their procedures physical characteristics and staffing patterns

o to describe attendance at A amp E departments including the patients profile and pattern of attendance and the load placed on the departments by patients who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner

o to describe the use of A amp E departments by consumers by analysing patients reasons for attending the departments and analysing demographic factors inrelation to A amp E attendance

Sources of information

Information was gathered from three sources

The site visits

Fourteen A amp E departments were visited between May and September 1981 by a Department of Health study team consisting of a medical officer from the Division of Hospitals and a res~arch officer from the Management Services and Research Unit

At each hospital the team examined the facilities and spoke with staff involved with the A amp E department including

o the medical superintendent (and in some hospitals the principal nurse)

o the A amp E officer or medical officer in charge of the A amp E department (where such a position existed and was filled)

o the nurse supervisor andor charge nurse of the A amp E department

o at least one house surgeon working in the A amp E department

6

In some hospitals the team also spoke with other staff members including experienced A amp E staff nurses and hospital social workers

Question sheets were used during interviews so that a comparable body of information was collected at each hospital Interviews were open-ended to allow discussion of local procedures or problems (See Appendix A for question sheets)

Hospitals were carefully selected so that the A amp E departments in the study would represent a cross-section of New Zealand A amp E departments Those selected served a range of communities in both the North and South Islands

o major urban Dunedin)

areas (Auckland Wellington Christchurch and

o provincial centres (Rotorua Taranaki and Timaru)

o predominantly rural areas (Whakatane and Grey)

In centres with more than one A amp E department all were visited so that a complete picture of the services and use could be developed This involved visiting Auckland Green Lane Middlemore and North Shore hospitals in Auckland and Wellington Hutt and Kenepuru hospitals in Wellington

The information gathered in the site visits has been used in describing the organisation of A amp E departments (Chapters 3 4 arid 5)

The A amp E records data collection

On each site visit a sample of 1981 attendances was drawn from the A amp E record system and the following information was recorded for each person age sex presenting condition (sickness or injury) time of presentation residential address and whether the visit was a first attendance for the condition or a recall visit

Exceptions were Christchurch and the three Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments Comparable data collected by Keenan in Ch ristchurch in 1978 and Allan in Wellington during 1980 were used instead

This information has been used to describe the attendance at A amp E departments (Chapter 6) and for the analysis of demographic factors in relation to attendance (Chapter 8)

The consumer studies

In 1978 Keenan carried out interviews with patients attending Christchurch A amp E department working from a one in eight sample drawn from the A amp E log over a four-week period and gaining a 99 response rate Results from this study have been analysed and compared with the results of the published New Zealand interview studies [2416] Anecdotal material from Kljakovic s study of children attending Wellington A amp E departments has also been included to illustrate the results of the numerical analysis

We realise that in studying only a selection of A amp E departments some local variations may have been missed but we are confident that the broad pattern and major issues in the organisation of A amp E care have been

7

covered Also as the A amp E departments studied serve two-thirds of the population of New Zealand the utilisation patterns discussed in the report are likely to prevail throughout New Zealand We hope that the mater ial presented the conclusions drawn and the questions raised in this report will encourage discussion about the current operation and future developmiant of A amp E departments in NewmiddotZealand

a

8

REFERENCES

1 de LACEY A REINKEN J and SALMOND C E - Community attitudes to sickness and health stimulus and response v 3 Community attitudes - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 103-105 (Special report series no 56)

2 DIXON C W Emery G M and SPEARS G F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) p 272-279

3 [Editorial] in G P Journal of the General Practitioner Society no 42 (1981) P 1-2

4 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN BC and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

5 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble Jr et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

6 MAYNARD Edward J - The application of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment shyUniversity of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

7 Hospital misuse brings protest in Taranaki Daily News (1 Sept 1980) bull

8 FAHEY Morgan - The role of the family doctor in disaster and emergency medicine in NZ Family Physician - v 5 no 1 (1978) p 42-44

9 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 19-23 March 1979 in NZ Med J - (1980) P 194-196

10 Double manning of ambulances [editorial] in NZ Hosp - v 32 no 3 (1980) p 1

11 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medicine Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

12 BARBER Laurie H and TOWERS Roy J - Wellington Hospital 1847-1976 Wellington Wellington Hospital Board 1976

13 The story of Auckland Hospital 1847-1977 edited by David Scott -Auckland Medical Historical Library Committee of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians in New Zealand 1977 p 35-36

14 BENNETT FO - Hospital on the Avon the story of the Christchurch Hospital 1862-1962 Christchurch North Canterbury Hospital

o Board 1962

9

15 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 196U (Report series Board of Health no 2)

16 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

17 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

18 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

19 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency department in Med Care - v 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

20 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

21 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

22 SALMOND G C - Young doctors an exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

23 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

11

CHAPTER 2

Definitions

lhis chapter provides the definitions of terms used in our study In general our terminology is consistent with the literature However in some areas such as the classification of presenting conditions as sickness or injury or the description of GP-load there is no general consistency and we have developed our own definitions

THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

This name is the one commonly used in New Zealand We have used it in preference to the older description Casualty Depariment [1] and the American description of Emergency Department It is one hospital department which patients can approach without prior notification

Emergencies can be any condition that - in the opinion of the patient their family or whoever assumes the responsibility of bringing the patient to the hospital - requires immediate medical attention

However using such a definition means every case is an emergency In New Zealand A amp E departments patients tend to be classified in a similar way to the description given by the American Hospital Association [2]

o emergencies where delay is harmful and the condition potentially threatens life or function

a urgent cases which require attention within a few hours

o non-urgent cases where the condition is minor or non-acute and does not require the resources of the emergency service

An accident is an unexpected event Accidents which have resulted in attendance at an A amp E department are ones that have caused some trauma whether through shock or other injury The Platt report [1] decided on the term A amp E department in recognition that the real emergencies were a trickle while the accidents were a mighty flood

In general the A amp E department is regarded as part of the hospitals outpatient services and like these in day to day running it provides specific clinics generally for the treatment of traumatic injury x-ray burns dressings plasters and so forth

An accident and emergency patient is a person who is entered in the A amp E log book This can involve a certain amount of error however as some outpatients or discharged patients may return for follow-up care through the A amp E department Also the A amp E department often handles the acute admissions to the hospital

12

ATrENDANCE

A first visit (or first attendance) is the first visit a patient makes for one particular condition

A recall visit is any visit made for one particular condition which is not the first visit for the condition Some recall visits are patient initiated (eg due to pain bleeding infection or an accident to the dressing or plaster) but for the most part revisits are scheduled return visits suggested by A amp E staff

Total attendance is the sum of first visits and recall visits

Inj ury attendances are defined to include the results of trauma (cuts burns fractures sprains strains bruises head injuries multiple injur ies and so forth) as well as foreign bodies in the eye or other orifices and toxic effects whether from accidental or self-poisoning events Late effects of minor injury (pain bleeding abscesses or such) are not included as injury but as sickness

Sickness attendances include collapse (whether stroke coma heart attack or other) shortness of breath abdominal pain general sickness (fever vomiting diarrhoea unwell) mental distress and minor conditions

Non-urgent sicknesses are defined as the minor conditions abdominal pain and general sickness except for preschool children and adults over 65 where the general sickness and abdominal pain conditions can be urgent A amp E staff defined non-urgent sickness less specifically they tended to define it as longstanding or minor sickness

GP-load describes the patients whom A amp E staff feel should have seen a general practitioner It includes patients with longstanding or minor sickness conditions and patients with minor traumatic injury (eg cuts bumps and bruises)

In hours attendance refers to all attendances in the normal working hours of 0800 to 1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays

Out of hours attendance refers to all other attendances outside the defined normal working hours

In an average week 50 hours fall in the in hours category and 118 hours in the out of hours category If we assume that an average person sleeps eight hours a night then that person is awake for 62 hours in the out of hours category (and all the in hours of course) Thus the out of hours category is 70 per cent of the total time in a week and 55 per cent of the waking time in a week

Minor conditions included abscesses backaches infected wounds or wound pain headache pain (unspecified) earaches eye problems toothaches nosebleeds limb pains We have called it the skin pain or bleeding category in Chapter 6

13

Attendance rates measure the use of A amp E departments for a defined population They express the number of cases from an area over a defined period per 1000 population in that area Rates were obtained by age and sex for sickness and injury and in and out of hours for each census area unit or neighbourhood served by each hospital

THE- HOSPITALS

We grouped hospitals into four types

o urban hospitals (where average annual first attendances at A amp E departments are over 25000 patients)

o provincial hospitals (serving 6000 to 12000 new A amp E patients each year)

o rural hospitals (serving fewer than 6000 new A amp E patients each year)

o suburban hospitals where A amp E departments are not open 24 hours per day North Shore Hospital was open 7 days a week 830 am shy530 pm and Kenepuru Hospital was open 5 days a week 830 am shy430 pm

Most of the A amp E departments visited had a senior position variously called the A amp E officer the A amp E director the senior medical officer or the medical officer in charge For convenience we call this position the A amp E officer

RECORDING SYSTEMS

The log is the record kept at the A amp E department which records some information on every patient who presents It will often give no more than the patients name the date and time of visit

The A amp E record is usually a card and it records basic patient information and case notes It may be held for several years in the A amp E department and may therefore contain information on a series of separate events for anyone patient

14

REFERENCES

1 GtBrit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the sUbcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

2 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p vii-viii

15

D

CHAPTER 3

Procedures in the accident and emergency department

In this chapter we begin describing the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at the way they operate We follow the course of a patients care entry to the A amp E department sorting into priority order for care (triage) treatment and follow-up care

ENTRY

Most people presenting at the A amp E department were ambulant (the walking wounded as they are colloquially known) They came through the A amp E departments main entrance to the reception desk where they were first seen by a receptionist or nurse (Exceptions to this occurred in the smaller hospitals where patients presenting at night were first seen by the telephonist who called the nursing staff) Nurses did reception duties at

all the provincial and rural A amp E departments and at two of the urban A amp E departments when receptionists were not on duty (eg lunchtimes nights) bull At times nurses found that having to cover the reception desk interfered with their care of patients

When the receptionists are off duty the nurses do the reception work This can be a nuisance because it interferes with patient care and sometimes patients ring the bell at the reception desk and the staff working in the resuscitation room dont hear it

A amp E nurse

Unless their condition required immediate care the ambulant patients then spent several minutes at the reception desk while their details (eg name address general practitioner complaint) were noted on the A ampE records (See Appendix B for more information on A amp E records) Then they waited in the waiting room until they were called for treatment

A small proportion of patients arrived by ambulance andmiddot at almost all hospitals entered the A amp E department through a separate ambulance entrance In the larger hospitals some nursing staff were stationed in or near the ambulance entrance to care for these patients In other hospitals the staff had often been warned of incoming urgent cases and were standing by when the ambulance arrived As the condition of ambulance patients tended to be urgent they were usually taken straight to a resuscitation or treatment area patients condition permitted or friends or the ambulance driver

Record with the

keeping assist

was ance

carried of thei r

out r

when elativ

the es

SORTING

All A amp E departments operated some triage system to sort the ambulant patients by the urgency of their need for care (Themiddot only exception was Grey A amp E department where there was seldom more than one patient in the department at a time) At most A amp E departments the patients were sorted

16

into urgent and non-urgent categories with urgent cases being seen immediately and non-urgent cases being seen in the order they presented At some of the urban A amp E departments a more complex sorting was done For example

Priority is given in the following order

urgent need very young and very old patients those with general practitioner notes those without general practitioner notes

A lie E nurse

Usually ambulance cases were not triaged since they tended to arrive on their own and required urgent care However several A lie E departments had triage arrangements planned for the arrival of many ambulance cases at once as in a disaster

Sorting was largely a responsibility of the nurses although some A amp E doctors would occasionally check the condition of patients- in the waiting room too The receptionists often played a role in triage as well alerting the nursing staff to urgent cases This happened more in A amp E departments where the physical layout made it difficult for nurses to watch the entrance and the waiting room

The receptionists do tQe basic sorting They have guidelines to follow distressed patients severe cuts or bleeding go straight to the nurses open wounds or eye injuries go directly to a cubicle and are assessed by the nurses patients with abdominal pain or chest pain go on to trolleys and wait in the recovery room This system usually works well although occasionally a fracture patient will not be recognised and will sit in the waiting room

A lie E nurse

In several A lie E departments doctors and nurses stressed the value of an experienced receptionist in recognising and reacting quickly to acutely ill or injured patients

TREATMENT

Almost all the A amp Edepartments visited had a policy that all patients presenting had to be seen by a doctor The doctor did not necessarily have to treat the patient he or she could advise the patient to see a general practitioner Some A amp E doctors commented that by the time they saw the patients it was as easy to treat them as to send them away_ At a few departments the nurses (and occasionally the receptionist) could advise the patient that the department was not an appropriate place for their condition and that they should see a general practitioner This was usually done in consultation with the A E doctor but at times the nurses acted on their own initiative In these places a triage system similar to that reported by Weinerman et al [1] where patients were assigned to the appropriate service inside or outsidemiddot the hospital appeared to be operating

7

The assessment of patients the ordering of tests andmiddot the supervision of treatment were usually seen ~s medical functions The nurses would prepare patients for treatment (removing dressings) and carry out urgent first aid measures (stem bleeding start gastric lavage or cardio-pulmonary resuscitation) Generally however a nurse would only initiate treatment if the patients condition was urgent and a doctor was not available or was already busy with another emergency Exceptions to this situation occurred in some hospitals with A amp E nurse training programmes and in some smaller hospitals where the doctor is on call rather than working in the A amp E department In these departments experienced nurses could order tests such as x-rays and initiate treatments such as suturing and removing foreign bodies from eyes

In most A amp E departments nurses would perform some treatments under a doctors supervision However the range of treatments nurses were allowed to perform varied considerably among hospitals At some hospitals nurses sutured after training but at others they never sutured

The nurses do not suture although they would like to There are four reasons for this there is no full-time A amp E officer so good standards of sutur ing could not be maintained there could be medico-legal problems if a nurse sutured a cut which was more complicated than it looked eg with tendon involvement the nurses have enough to do at present and if they start suturing they will be expected to do it always and the young doctors need to learn suturing as part of their training

Principal nurse

Electrocardiograms were taken by nurses in some A amp E departments by technicians at others Taking blood samples was a doctors job in some departments but was done by nurses in others Similarly gastric lavage using a def ibrillator and plaster work were done by nurses in some departments Most A amp E nurses would maintain intra-venous drips but only nurses with special training WOUld insert them

Some nurses expressed frustration at restrictions on the treatments they were allowed to perform However several sen~or nurses stressed that they had to select carefully the nurses they allowed to perform more difficult treatments

We are very selective about choosing the nurses to do triage suturing and the more complicated procedures This seems to have been successful weve had no problems with nurses undertaking treatment theyre not competent to provide

A amp E senior nurse

I make sure the nurses understand they can be dangerous people If theyre not aware of their limitations theyre not suitable for A amp E work

A amp E senior nurse o

Also one department which had comparatively few nurses discouraged them from increasing the range of treatments they performed so that their workload did not become overwhelming

18

For diagnosis the A amp E departments made heavy use of the x-ray departments (The Design and Evaluation Unit study [21 estimated that 30 per cent of A amp E attenders had an x-ray during their visit) Some A amp E departments found their arrangements with the x-ray department very convenient with an x-ray machine aVailable 24 hours a day in or close to the A amp E department and with patients and x-ray films or reports returning within an hour At other hospitals arrangements Were less convenient in some places reporting bac k of x-rays took two or three hours delaying patients considerably while in others the x-ray departmentmiddot was located on a different floor from the A amp E ~epartment causing difficulties in transporting and accompanying patients there

Little use was made of the laboratory services other than for blood and urine tests and arrangements were generally satisfactory However in many hospitals x-ray and laboratory staff had to be called in to perform tests out of hours and because of the expense involved these out of hours tests were discouraged Some house surgeons found this a difficult situation

I I m caught between contradictory pressures the orthopaedic surgeons say that x-rays are necessary for proper diagnosis and the hospital board is trying to limit out of hours x-rays to save money

House surgeon

DISPOSAL

After treating the patient the A amp E doctor decides on the appropriate disposal discharging from care arranging follow-up treatment by referring to another source of care or recalling to the A amp E department or admitting the patient Information on disposal was only readily available from three A amp E departments The most common disposal pattern was in fact discharging from care with 40 to 55 per cent of patients making a first Visit being discharged

TABLE I PROPORTION OF FIRST ATTENDANCE PATIENrs DISCHARGED RECALLED REFERRED OR ADMITTED

Discharged Recalled Referred to Admitted Other First to A amp E GP Specialist attendance

Clinic tallied

Waikato l 393 132 222 99 134 19 25 707 Green Lane2 550 220 110 40 80 Unknown Taranaki 41 5 268 73 103 116 24 164

1 From McRaes study of Waikato A amp E departmen~ in 1979 2 From a study carried out by Green Lane A amp E department

19

FOLLOW-UP CARE

The decision to be made on follow-up care was usually between re~alling to the A amp E department or referring back to the patient I s general practitioner Some A amp E departments also referred patients (especially children) to district nurses or patients with work 1n]uries to an occupational health nurse or clinic Many departments referred fracture patients to orthopaedic clinics held in the hospital outpatients department and one A amp E department which was very short of space referred patients needing redressings to the outpatients department

There were large differences in referral practices (see Table 1) Between 13 and 27 per cent of first attenders were recalled to the A amp E department for follow-up care while 15 to 30 per cent were referred elsewhere either to a general practitioner or to a specialist clinic Also recall attendances expressed as a proportion of total attendances varied considerably among the A amp E departments from 10 per cent to 50 per cent (see Chapter 6 Table 11) and clearly reflected different follow-up practices

All of the urban and two of the provincial A amp E departments had a policy of referring most patients requiring follow-up care to a general practitioner and of keeping recall visits as low as possible This was similar to general policy in both Britain and the United States which appears to discourage re-at tendance at A amp E departments [34] However in the suburban rural and other provincial A amp E departments the decision on follow-up care was left to the judgement of the A amp E doctor

In practice however the choice to refer or to recall was reiated to several factors First the decision related to characteristics of the patients If the patients had serious wounds or burns or injuries which could develop complications they were usually recalled They were also recalled if the A amp E staff thought they would not receive appropriate care at home or they would not see a general practitioner for follow-up care Patients living a long way from the hospital were usually referred to their general practitioner At some A amp E departments patients were given the choice of referral or recall according to A amp E staff comments most chose to return to theA amp E department

The patients prefer to come back to the hospital Money is not a factor in this because the ACC pays for accident treatment at the general practitioner

A amp E nurse

Second there were general practitioner factors If the local general practitioners were unhappy about the A amp E department recalling patients or if a general practitioner had referred the patient to the department originally the A amp E doctors would refemiddotr rather than recall However if the A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner did not have the facilities and in some cases the ability to provide follow-up care (eg for serious woundS eye injuries) they would recall the patient

Some GPs dont like following up care initiated by the A amp E department or dont have the necessary facilities so I tend not to send patients back to them

A amp E officer

20

Im more likely to refer a patient back to a GP who is reliable

House surgeon

Third many of the house surgeons said they would recall patients if they were interested in the condition or if they were worried about their diagnosis and treatment and wanted to see the outcome Several medical superintendents noted that recalling under these circumstances was acceptable because it comprised part of the house surgeons training

Fourth the workload of the A amp E department sometimes affected the follow-up decision with very busy departments actively discouraging recalls And finally there was the philosophy of A amp E medicine held by the A amp E doctor In one department where the A amp E officer considered it an ethical duty to see any treatment initiated through to a successful conclusion almost all patients who needed follow-up care were recalled At two other departments the A amp E officers stressed the importance of being able to deal efficiently with any emergencies presenting they kept recalls low so that the department was not clogged with extra patients Other A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner could provide better continuity of care than the A amp E department so they referred as many patients as possible

When referring patients to the general practitionermiddot most of the A amp E doctors made a verbal recommendation to the patient and then relied on the patient to attend the general practitioner They would only write a formal referral letter if the patients condition was serious In several A amp E departments however greater efforts were made to inform the patient t s general practitioner Three departments gave referred patients cyclostyled forms with details of diagnosis and treatment to be passed to their general practitioner while the Whakatane department sent a copy of the A amp E record form to each patients general practitioner

ADMISSIONS

Table I suggests that between a and 14 per cent of all first attendances were admitted to the hospitals Admissions could well be higher for children Kljakovic [5] found that 20 per cent of the children presenting at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments were admitted

The A amp E departments were involved in several different pathways for the admission of acutely ill or injured patients (Scheduled admissions did not involve the A amp E department at any of the hospitals visited) Self-referred patients could be admitted directly from the A amp E department to the wards or could be cared for in a holding (or acute admitting) ward before going to the wards

There was considerable variation among the hospitals as to which members of the medical staff were able to admit patients At some of the urban hospitals only the registrars could admit while at others the A amp E doctor could admit if the registrar was delayed and unable to assess the patient quickly At some of the provincial and one of the urban hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit in consultation with the admitting officer or appropriate registrar while at-another urban hospital and the rural A amp E departments the A amp E doctors regularly admitted patients

21

Hospitals with lower levels of bed occupancy were more likely to allow A amp E doctors to admit Senior A amp E doctors were more likely to play a role in admissions (actually admitting patients or advising the registrar) than house surgeons

Some patients referred by a general practitioner for acute admission also passed through the A amp E department At one hospital the general practitioners rang the A amp E officer to arrange for all acute admissions and all such GP-referred patients were seen first in the A amp E department However more usually the general practitioners rang the appropriate registrar to make arrangements and the registrar decided whether to admit the patient directly to the wards or through the A amp E department The involvement of A amp E staff with patients requiring admission ranged from almost none (where the patient went directly from the A amp E department to the ward or specialist unit) to a full initial assessment including tests (often undertaken at the request of the registrar responsible for the patient) bull

Generally the A amp E doctors were satisfied with the admission procedures However at one hospital where the A amp E doctors could not admit patients waiting for admission tended to clog the department The doctorselt that if they had admission rights the situation would be remedied

DISCUSSION

There were few differences among the A amp E departments in the reception and sorting of patients However there were differences in some aspects of treatment follow-up care and admission procedures

lhe role of the A amp E nurses in treatment varied considerably with some departments allowing nurses to initiate and perform many treatments and other departments allowing little autonomy Careful training and selection were essential before nurses increased their responsibility for treatment bull

Policies on follow-up care differed among the departments with the urban and provincial departments generally referring patients to general practitioners and the rural and suburban departments leaving the referral decision to the A amp E doctor In practice however the differences were less clear-cut with several factors other than the patient I s condition affecting the follow-up care decisions These factors included the A amp E staffs communicat ion with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs of house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors philosophy with regard to A amp E medicine

The A amp E departments also differed considerably in thei r procedures for acute admissions At some hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit an A amp E patient while at others the patient had to be held in the department until admitted by a registrar Also at some hospitals patients referred by general practitioners for acute admission were seen in the A amp E department before going to a ward While having to hold patients sometimes caused

clogging in the department A amp E staff were generally satisfied with the procedures

22

REfERENCES

1 WEINERMAN E Richard RUfZEN S Robert and PEARSON David shyEffects of medical -triage- in hospital emergency service in Public health reports - v 80 no 5 (May 1965) p 389-399

2 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

3 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM (68)83

4 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL Jenkins - St Louis Hosby 1975

5 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

23

CHAPTER 4

Phy~i~~1 c~~raft~rhtics of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the physical characteristics of A amp E departments their overall size location and layout as well as specific areas within the departments It discusses the effects of the physical characteristlcs on the organisation and functioning of the A amp E departments Our investigation worked from the detailed base established in bullAccident and emergency departments a studY of planning r~quirements a report prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation gnit Departmellt of HeCilth [1]

PRINCIPLES

The 1973 Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit (DEU) report [l] outlined the following principles to be applied in designing A amp E departments

o the A amp E department must be patients seeking emergency care

ready to receive and deal with

o the A amp E department mus~ be able load within a reasonable period

to cope with an average i

busy

o the A amp E department must be capable of adaptation to exceptional situations arising from major accidents ltgtrqther disasters

o the layout should be simple easily unqerstood and compact

o the layout and procedures should facilitate easy flow of patients through the department

o spaces should be multipurpose to give greatest versatility

o p~tient ~ovew~n~ should be minimised )

priv~cy for patientsshould be provided as far as is practicable andconsistent with the need for supervisi0rt

SIZE

There was considerable variation in the total sizes of the A amp E -a~1-ftment~ vi~ited witll floor areas ranging from 250 sql1a~e metres to 2115 ~guare m~ties (see Table 2) Eight of the 14 departments visited had i

hhid1pgw~fd~oracUte admitting ward However even wt)en ~he area of th~ f~ ~ bull ~middotc1~A~- _ ~ - bull bull ~

AampE department WCiS adjusted for the presence of a holding ward this I~1-getv~-rH~tion in irea reniained

24

TABLE 2 AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Total area Holding ward Adjusted total Waiting room area areal area

sqm sqm sqm sqm

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 2 115 225 1 890 55 Middlemore 1 045 140 905 50 Green Lane 960 240 720 70 Wellington 575 190 385 75 Hutt 270 270 30 Christchurch 470 470 40 Dunedin 635 90 545 20

Provincial Rotorua 515 20 495 90 Taranaki Base 720 90 630 40 Timaru 605 70 535 80

Rural Whakatane 430 430 20 Grey 310 310 15

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 255 255 30 Kenepuru 540 540 30

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area Considerable sharing with outpatients department

The area of the A amp E department was not closely related to the attendance (see Table 3) Obviously there is a certain minimum size for an A amp E department since certain facilities are essential regardless of the attendance served Thus as would be expected the rural and to a lesser extent the provincial A amp E departments had high area to attendance ratios However even within the group of urban A amp E departments there was a fourfold difference in the total area to attendance ratio

The design at Auckland~ laid out along several corridors with many separate consulting and treatment rooms possibly contributed to its high ratio At Wellington Hutt and Christchurch hospitals staff commented on their difficulties working in cramped conditions The lack of space often forced staff to work under extreme pressure to move patients through the departments very quickly

25

TABLE 3 AREA TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR ADJUSTED TOTAL AREAS 1 AND WAITING AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS BY FIRST ATTENDANCE2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Adjusted total area to attendance ratio Waiting area to to attendance ratio

Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 first attendance total attendance total attendance pa p a p a

Full-time departments ~

Urban Auckland 323 291 08 Middlemore 232 157 09 Green Lane 3 230 168 16 Wellington 80 69 13 Hutt 82 63 07 Christchurch 76 64 05 Dunedin 200 143 05

Provincial Rotorua 404 293 53 Taranaki Base 609 399 25 Timaru 466 266 403

Rural Whakatane 718 490 23 Grey 805 61 2 30

Part-time departments

Suburban I INorth Shore 272 148 17

Kenepuru 924 597 33

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Considerable sharing with outpatients department

Spearman rank correlations [2] of adjusted total area with

( a) first attendance r = 0310 p gt 010 Not significant ( b) total attendance r = 0297 pgt 010 Not significant

26

LOCATION

There is broad agreement that the A amp E department should be located on the ground floor well signposted and easily accessible to ambulatory patients and ambulances The ambulance entrance should be able to handle several ambulances at once and should have adequate turning space It should be projected from the weather and screened from the view of the other A amp E department patients

The A amp E department should also be located as closely as possible to radiology facilities (either the x-ray department itself or a branch) The A amp E department and the outpatients department can share some facilities and provide additional staff and accommodation in an emergen~y

situation if they are sited together Acute patient care areas (operating theatres intensive care unitsmiddot and cardiac care units) and laboratory services should also be readily accessible from the A amp E department [134]

Entrances

Almost all of the A amp E departments visited were on the ground floor of the hospital and were well signposted Generally access for ambulatory patients was good apart from two hospitals where they had to walk up steps to enter the building o

Few departments had ambulance access which could cope with a shuttle of ambulances bringing mass casualties from a disaster There w~s little relation between the size of the department or the population served and the ease of ambulance flow Indeed those departments with a relatively low probability of being involved in a mass casualty situation had good ambulance flow (eg Whakatane) while those with a greater possibility had relatively poor ambulance access (eg Wellington) Several departments had particularly poor a~bulance flow with only a one-lane access Three departments had good drive-straight-through access while at the rest ambulances had to reverse However there were advantages to some of the bull reversing I situations in that the bays into which the ambulances had to reverse were more likely to give the patient protection from the weather All the A amp E departments visited had separate ambulance entrances which in all but three cases guaranteed screening of ambulance patients from public view

Access to other hospital facilities

In many of the hospitals the A amp E department was adjacent to the outpatients department or to the orthopaedic outpatients section When this occurred the plaster room and x-ray facilities were usually shared and waiting areas and the records office were sometimes shared In the smaller hospitals both departments often shared the nursing staff

The access to the x-ray department ranged from excellent in places which had x-ray facilities immediately adjacent to the A amp E department to very poor where the patient had to be transported hundreds of metres and to a different floor The time taken for the A amp E doctor to get the result of the x-ray varied from five minutes to over two hours though the physical separation of the two departments was only one of the factors which affected this

27

Access to acute care facilities was similarly variable In Christchurch the intensive care unit was adjacent to the A amp E department while in Rotorua it was at the other end of the hospital In many cases additions or alterations to the hospital buildings and changes of function of certain areas have meant that the A amp E department no longer bears the same physical relationship to other hospital departments as was originally the case

LAYOUT

Several studies have concluded that the A amp Edepartment should be designed so that there is an orderly progression of patients from registration to examination to investigations if necessary to treatment and to referral admission or discharge Staff time and effort is best conserved by a compact plan with waiting areas and treatment areas easily accessible and supervised However the need for easy supervision has to be balanced by consideration of the patients privacy Two basic A amp E plans have evolved

o a radial plan where the waiting examination and treatment rooms are arranged on the perimeter of the departmentmiddot with the nurses station doctors room and records office in the centre

o a linear plan where the examination and treatment rooms are arranged down each side of a corridor with the waiting area records office and staff offices at one end [145]

Many of the A amp E departments visited had a linear layout with the largest Auckland being arranged along several corridors In these departments staff often commented that their overall view of the patients was not good and a considerable amount of walking was needed to supervise them Middlemore A amp E department and the treatment areas of several other departments had radial layouts which staff found very satisfactory Generally the A amp E staff prefer red open plan layouts using curtained cubicles rather than enclosed rooms Staff (especially nursing staff) often commented that their department would be better if certain walls or partitions were removed to give easier surveillance of the department as a whole However staff also commented on the relative lack of privacy for patients being examined or treated and noted that some private rooms were needed for instance for obstetric or paediatric patients

Waiting area

There is general agreement that the waiting area should be adjacent to the reception desk easily visible to the receptionist and if possible overlooked by the nurses office or station It should be a cheerful comfortable area with toys provided for children and a range of magazines and books Public toiletspublic telephones and arrangements for refreshments are also needed [146]

The size of the waiting area varied considerably among the A amp E departments visited (refer back tomiddot Table 2) Again this variation bore little relationship to the workload of the department (see Table 3) Some waiting areas were clearly too small and this put pressure on the staff to deal with patients quickly in order to clear the waiting room

28

Staff comments suggested that not only the size of the waiting area but also its design affected its crowding Basically square rooms with seats around the edges had fewer problems than corridor-style rooms with only one row of seats

In all the A amp E departments visited the waiting areas were adjacent to the reception area Sometimes they were visible from the nurses office or work area but where this was not possible the nurses relied on the receptionists to alert them to urgent cases or checked the wai Hng area often themselves

Facilities in waiting areas varied from nothing but seats to areas in which there were hot and cold drink dispensing machines a childrens play area with toys and health-related poster and pamphlet displays Some had a TV set or a tropical fish tank Most staff were agreed that a pleasant atmosphere in the waiting room was important and adVerse comments about the waiting area were made by staff in departments which lacked this In some departments staff commented that vandalism made it difficult to retain facilities and a pleasant atmosphere

Examination and treatment area

The examination and treatment area provides for the needs of all A amp E patients other than those with serious conditions requiring the resuscitation room or those needing special facilities such as plastering Because special purpose areas are frequently under-utilised flexibility is a key requi rement Hence multipurpose cubicles with standardised equipment are usually recommended The cubicles must be big enough to give easy access for patients (not necessarily walking) to accommodate eqUipment and to give staff enough room to work Curtained cubicles are generally sufficient but at least one enclosed cubicle is required for patients needing extra privacy or for light control in eye examinations A cubicle especially set up for children (with appropriately-sized equipment toys and posters) is also desirable [1346]

Most of themiddot A ~ E departments visited had curtained cubicles in the examination and treatment area with perhaps one or two enclosed cubicles or rooms as well Four A amp E departments only had separate rooms for treatment Curtained cubicles made for ease of access while separate rooms did present some difficulties in manoeuvering patient trolleys and wheelchairs In one case it was impossible to get a patient trolley into the room at all and the room was consequently little used

Curtained cubicles did afford greater flexibility in use and did provide more room to work but had the disadvantage of being considerably less private than rooms Surveillance was easier in departments with curtains than those withmiddot walls and doors In the Auckland A amp E department treatment rooms doors had been removed in the interests of improved surveillance Staff in this department commented that its rigid design could lead to difficulties in accommodating a large number of patients in a disaster

The DEU report [1] recommended that the number of cubicles required by an A amp E department was NIlS where N is the anticipated average number of new patients per day It noted that in A amp E departments with few new patients per day a minimum of two cubicles should be provided It also recommended that the flow of recalled patients should be regulated so that they did not greatly affect the need for cubicles

29

As can be seen from Table 4 most departments had enough cubicles to cope with their first attendance workload Even applying the DEU recommendation of N18 to their total attendance most of the departments had an adequate number of cubicles The exceptions were Hutt Christchurch and Dunedin

TABLE 4 NUMBERS OF EXAMINATION AND TREATMENT CUBICLES OR ROOMS AND RECOMMENDED NUMBERS l BASED ON FIRST ATTENDANCE 2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Actual number of DEU recommended numbers (minimum of 2) cubiclesrooms based on

first attendance total attendance pa pa

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 13 89 99 Middlemore 9 59 88

Green Lane 7 40 65 Wellington 10 73 85 Hutt 4 51 66 Christchurch 7 94 11 2 Dunedin 3 41 58

Provincial Rotorua 4 2 26 Taranaki Base 4 2 24 Timaru 6 2 31

Rural Whakatane 3 2 2 Grey 3 2 2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3 8 22 37 Kenepuru3 6 22 30

1 Based on DEU report [l which recommended NIS cubicles where N average number of new patients per day ie N6750 where N = average first attendance pa

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Recommended numbers increased to adjust for North Shore and Kenepuru treating their attendance numbers in part-time rather than full-time hours

30

Resuscitation area

The resusciation area is used for the immediate life--saving treatment of seriously injured or sick patients It is the acute treatment area in contrast to the examination and treatment area which is used for relatively minor procedures In making its recommendations about the resuscitation area the DEU report [I] balanced the probability of the A amp E department having to treat multiple accident victims with the comparative rarity of use of resuscitation rooms It recommended that a resuscitation room of suff icient size to deal with two patients concurrently be provided in all A amp E departments It also noted that the ambulance entrance and resuscitation area should be located as close together as possible

Most of the departments visited had purpose-built resuscitation rooms of varying size and with varying degrees of sophistication in equipment Some had x-ray facilities in the resuscitat ion area and in those that did not its absence was regarded as a serious impediment to the efficient care of severe trauma

In four of the seven urban A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms were regarded by the staff as being too small The comment was made in one urban department that because of the small size of the resuscitation area patients sometimes had to be moved out of the area before it was felt clinically desirable to do so in order to accommodate incoming patients In the rural and prOVincial A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms wereshyadequate for the demands placed on them

Most resuscitation rooms were sited close to the ambulance entrance and afforded good access to stretcher patients However in three A amp E departments patients had to be moved some distance and in another department up one floor by lift

Operating theatre

In discussing provision of operating theatres in the A amp E departments the DEU report [1] noted that

o most surgery done is minor requires only local anaesthesia and could be done within adequately designed cubicles

o the A amp E department is not a proper place for general anaesthesia

o using A amp Etheatres for day surgery tends to block other A amp E facilities and staff causin~ delay in treating A amp E patients

The report concluded that special facilities appear to be justified only if there is a clear intention of widening the scope of accident surgery in the departments

bullMinor ops theatres of varying sizes and equipped to varying standards were available in many departments Very variable use was made of such theatres - never in some departments to daily in others It was used less in departments with very heavy workloads and where the medical staff were not satisfied that sufficiently sterile conditions could be maintained In one department the theatre was only used for day surgery cases

31

Plaster room

In the plaster room casts are applied and removed and fractures and dislocations can be manipulated The DEU report [1] noted that the plaster room could be an integral part of the A amp E department or shared with the orthopaedic department or belonging entirely to the latter It recommended that the plaster room be close to the A amp E department and the x-ray department

Most departments had a separate plaster room available In many cases this was shared with an adjacent orthopaedic outpatients or fracture clinic Th~ staff generally found the plaste~-rooms satisfactory although two particularly narrow rooms were difficult to work in

Interview room

The DEU report [l] recommended that A amp E departments in medium-sized and larger hospitals should have a small interview room where a patient IS

relatives could talk with A amp E staff the police or others

No A amp E department had a room specifically designated as an interview room for bereaved or distressed relatives although one A amp E department shared such a room with another department In most departments one of the staff off ices was generally used for this purpose In departments where staff offices were small or crowded the lack of an interview room was seen as a serious flaw in departmental layout

Reception and records office

The reception desk should be immediately visible to ambulant patients arriving at the A amp E department and it is desirable for the receptionist to be aware of what is happening at the ambulance entrance as well The current A amp E records should be held at the reception desk or nearby [1]

In the A ampE departments visited the reception desk was usually well-placed for dealing with ambulant patients but in only four cases did it overlook the ambulance entrance In two departments the reception desk was some distance from the treatment area (separated by a waiting room or outpatients room) and the nursing staff found it difficult to oversee incoming patients Current A amp E records were held at the reception desk in all but one of the departments visited The amount of space available in relation to the throughput of patients was a major factor in determining the length of time records could be kept within the department This in turn affected the ease and therefore speed of record retrieval

Staff offices

These ranged from non existent to very cramped spaces serving many other functions to pleasant specifically designated and relatively quiet areas The latter offices are conducive to good staff morale and being a place for exchange of views and experiences could be expected to contribute quite markedly to the overall effectiveness and eff iciency of the department

32

Holding ward

The DEU report [1] said that holding beds should be used primarily for A amp E patients requiring a period of observation prior to a decision about admission or for those who could be expected to go home after a rest period The report noted that using holding beds as recovery beds for day patients for arranged admissions or for pre-admission clinics was not desirable

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments visited had holding or acute admitting wards These holding wards were used mainly for assessing patients requiring acute admission but in some hospitals were also used for observing patients (eg with suspected concussion) and for holding night admissions till the morning to save disturbing the wards Neither of the rural A amp E departments had a holding ward although one had an I A amp E admission procedure where a patient could be admitted for up to 24 hours for observation without the need for full admission procedures In the A amp E departments with holding wards a patient staying for more than four hours was formally admitted

Our study showed that the A amp E departments had some problems using holding wards properly In two A amp E departments holding wards were little used at night because nursing levels were too low to staff them safely In another department the beds were used for patients recovering from day surgery and even for some pre-ar ranged admissions At times general practitioner-referred admissions could also clog the holding wards

DISCUSSION

Most of the A amp E departments were generally adequate in size location and layout The exceptions were Christchurch and Butt where conditions were very cramped with particularly limited examination and treatment areas and poor layout We understand that improvements are planned at Hutt and that recent extensions have improved the Christchurch department considerably but at the time of our visits staff in both these departments were working under extreme pressure because of the physical conditions

Despite the general adequacy of the departments almost all had some flaw which affected their operation and inconvenienced staff and patients Major flaws found in several A amp E departments included

o ambulance access unsuitable for a shuttle of ambulances in a disaster

o difficult access to the x-ray department

o resuscitation room too small for easy treatment of more than one patient at a time

o no interview room for relatives of patients

33

REFERENCES

1 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

2 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

3 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 44-49

4 Emer~ency department organisation and management edited by A L Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975 p 8-16

5 Design of departments in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) p 1204-7

6 McKINLAY Robin - The care of children in New Zealand hospitals -Aucklandmiddot National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1982 p 79-80

35

CHAPTER 5

Staffing of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the staffing both medical and nursing looking at their numbers and experience their previous training and the training they receive in the A amp E department and their satisfaction with their work and conditions We also describe the clerical and reception staff and briefly the involvement of other workers (orderlies social workers and ambulance personnel) in the departments

MEDICAL STAFFING

Senior medical staffing

Organising appropriate medical staffing for hospital emergency services is a prQblem in many countries [1] The variety of staffing arrangements in A amp E departments within many countries suggests that none have established a generally satisfactory pattern of medical staffing

The Platt report [2] found that in Br itish A amp E departments the great majority of patients were seen by junior staff only and that supervision of the A amp E departments by conSUltants was often little more than nominal The committee recommended that

o the junior medical staff should be adequately supervised by consultants

o a consultant orthopaedic surgeon should normally be in charge of theA amp E unit

o an accident and emergency unit should have at least three consultant surgeons each giving a substantial part of their time to this work

o the primary task of general practitioners in emergency services is to deal with minor accidents and emergencies at any time of the day or night (by organising a rota to answer emergency calls within their practice by working sessions in A amp E departments or by attending cottage hospitals at short notice for emergency calls) bull

Since then some progress has been made but standards continue to lag behind those recommended [34] There has been considerable debate over the appropriate staffing arrangements for A amp E departments Some hospitals have implemented the Platt report recommendations others have appointed a full-time A amp E specialist others have employed a full-time non-specialist doctor and some have employed general practitioners

Despite the various systems there is a consensus in both the United States and Britain that experienced medical staffmiddot are essential in the A amp E department They are necessary for prompt effective treatment of emergency conditions for efficient running of the departments and for adequate supervision of the junior doctors employed [23567 p 17-23]

36

Similar concerns have been expressed in New Zealand since the Board of Health report on outpatient services in 1960 [8] This report recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times and staffed by experiencedmedical officers

Salmond [9] found that when a senior A amp E officer directed the department A amp E work was handled more efficiently and house surgeons were more closely supervised and supported He suggested that one senior member of the hospital staff (ideally a full-time A amp E officer) should accept full responsibility for the overall supervision of A amp E services

Most of the A amp E departments that we visited had an A amp E officer The position was vacant at both Wellington and Hutt hospitals at the time of our visit while at North Shore Hospital responsibility for the A amp E department was shared by two senior doctors The A amp E departments of the rural hospitals had no senior medical staff

In A amp E departments with heavy workloads additional experienced doctors were often employed as deputy A amp E officers usually medical officer special scale or as Medical Reserve Scheme registrars (see Table 5) There was no general practitioner staffing of any of the Aamp E departments visited although general practitioners had been part-time staff of some of themiddot smaller A amp E departments in previous years One medical superintendent commented that since very few general practitioners could be classified as specialists they could only be paid as medical officers special scale This low level of payment acted as a disincentive to general practitioner recruitment

The A amp E officers usually worked normal office hours (830 am - 430 pm or 9 am - 5 pm weekdays) apart from two who worked part-time covering morning periods If additional experienced doctors were employed they usually covered evening periods (eg 5 pm - 10 pm) and weekend day shifts

There was a wide range of experience among the A amp E officers Half of the senior A amp E doctors had a general practice background and these doctors often had specific surgical medical pharmacological or Armed Forces medical experience as well Several A amp E officers had primarily a surgical background while others had a considerable range of hospital experience In hospitals where the A amp E officers had a general practice background the Medical Superintendent or the A amp E officer often stressed the suitability of this background for A amp E work

An extensive general practitioner background is useful in dealing with the multitude of problems seen in an Accident and Emergency department An orthopaedic or surgical background is not as necessary because of the good backup from the specialties And staff who have only had hospital experience particularly junior staff can lack skills in general assessment and triage

A amp E officer

In other hospitals staff stressed that an orthopaedic and surgical background was very valuable as was experience in dealing with specific types of injury such as soft tissue wounds

37

TABLE 5 MEDICAL STAFFING OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington2

Hutt2

Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Senior medical staffing

Number of full-time equivalents

A amp E officer ( including deputies) 25 15 I 16

I 2

I 03 I

2 05

Registrar

06

1 1

House surgeons

Number on Number A amp E runs covering

some shifts in A amp E deptl

6 2-3 6 2 5 I 5 4 2-3 5 2 2

All on rotating basis 1 3 1 2

5 on rotating basis 4 on rotating basis

None in A amp E dept 4 on rotating basis

1 On general relieving duties 2 Senior A amp E position vacant at time of visit

Junior medical staffing

The issues

Junior medical staffing of A amp E departments has concerned many commentators in the United States Britain and New Zealand The Platt report [2] noted that recently qualified staff when serving in the casualty department undertake responsibility which they would not have in the wards or outpatient clinics

38

In 1960 the New Zealand Board of Health report [8] on out-patient services deplored the staffing of casualty departments by I relatively inexperienced men [sic] and suggested that these staff I should be regarded more as assistants under supervision and training than responsible officers in the outpatients departments The undesirability of staffing A amp E departments with first year house surgeons (or pre-registration doctors) has been reiterated since Junior doctors are often unsure when to ask for advice or help and are sometimes unwilling to admit that they are over-tired and unable to cope [91011)

The report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers [12] noted the heavy load carried by house surgeons working long shifts in A amp E departments It also commented that when house surgeons are required to look after the A amp E department while carrying out ward duties inadequate cover of the A amp E department could result

The New Zealand situation

The urban A amp E departments had between two and six house surgeons working on three month A amp E runs and in several of these hospitals another one to three house surgeons on general relieving duties covered some A amp E shifts There were more house surgeons in A amp E departments with heavier workloads or with fewer senior medical staff The provincial and rural departments did not usually have house surgeons working on specific A amp E runs rather the A amp E department was covered by all (or most) of the house surgeons in the hospital on a rotatng basis Of the two suburban A amp E departments Kenepuru was covered by the house surgeons on a rotating basis while North Shore did not have any house surgeons because there was no inpatient or consultative backup available (see Table 5)

The total medical staffing of the departments (senior A amp E doctors and house surgeons together) ranged from 10 to 100 full-time equivalents and was closely related to the attendance at the departments (see Table 6) The provincial and rural A amp E departments had higher medical staff to attendance ratios because they had to provide a 24-hour service regardless of the size of the attendance

Each A amp E department visited rostered its house surgeons differently depending on the availability of senior medical staff the workload of the department and the house surgeons other duties In the urban departments house surgeons worked between 45 and 60 hours a week on shifts usually 8 to 12 hours long Many of the house surgeons working in these departments complained about long shifts and suggested that more staff were needed to reduce the shift lengths Split shifts were also unpopular

The most worrying aspect of the staff ing arrangements in bhe Accident and Emergency department is the long hours We need another house surgeon to reduce the hours on some shifts and to proviae another pair of hands in busy periods (eg Friday and Saturday night Sunday afternoon)

House surgeon

39

TABLE 6 TOTAL MEDICAL STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND MEDICAL STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE I AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Total medical Total medical staffing to staffing attendance ratio

FTE per FTE per 10000 first 10000 total

Full-time attendance attendance equivalents p a pa

Full-time departments

Urban

Auckland2 100 17 15 Middlemore2 91 23 16 Green Lane2 65 25 15 Wellington 66 14 12 Hutt2 55 17 13 Christchurch 70 11 10 Dunedin2 60 22 16

Provincial Rotorua 42 34 25 Taranaki Base2 28 27 18 Timaru 22 19 11

Rural Whakatane3 15 25 17 Grey 10 26 20

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 20 21 12 Kenepuru3 20 34 22

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE estimated since A amp E department partially covered by house

surgeons on general relieving duties 3 FTE estimated since A amp E department covered by house surgeons on

rotating basis

Spearman rank correlations [131 of total medical staffing with

(a) first attendance r = 0953 p lt 001 (b) total attendance r = 0933 p 001

In the provincial and rural hospitals house surgeons were often on call for long shifts over nights and weekends They were usually covering a ward or the whole hospital at the same time and simultaneous demands from the wards and the A amp E department sometimes caused problems However

40

these house surgeons generally found their rostering satisfactory despite the long hours on call perhaps because the actual work required in the A amp E department was comparatively light

An ordinary week night is usually quiet after midnight thered be three to five calls and Id have to get up once on average Weekend nights are busier but I usually get at least two or three hours sleep

House surgeon

Several house surgeons were irritated that while they worked more intensively on A amp E runs than on ward runs they spent fewer hours on-call and consequently they were paid less

Supervision by senior medical staff

In the larger A amp F departments house surgeons worked with the senior medical staff on most day and some evening shifts only on night shifts (and some evening shifts) were house surgeons the sole medical staff in a department By contrast in the smaller and part-time departments house surgeons covered the department alone seldom working with any senior A amp E medical staff

Several nurses commented that the A amp E department ran less efficiently outside normal working hours because the house surgeons inexperience meant assessment and treatment times were longer and tests were used more often than when the A amp E officer was present

Many senior medical staff in the urban A amp E departments were concerned at the lack of supervision for house surgeons outside normal working hours and so would have Ii ked more senior A amp E staff Several of the house surgeons were also concerned although others enjoyed the autonomy they had and were not concerned about working without supervision

I am not happy with house surgeons managing the A amp E department on their own They only have a three month shift in the department and often most of this time is spent learning how to do A amp E wor k The house surgeons can have problems deciding when to call a registrar to treat a patient and there can be delays in obtaining a registrar The A amp E department needs full-time trained medical staff on duty 24 hours a day to give proper supervision to the house surgeons and to run an efficient department

A amp E officer

On night shift I can feel rather alone if something goes wrong

House surgeon

I enjoy the variety of work and the independence I have to treat most patients as I see fit

House surgeon

41 _A

Arraflgements for consultative backup and support when senior A amp E staff were not on duty varied from hospital to hospital according to hospital size n urban hospitals the house surgeons would usually call on the appropriate registrar and the acute admitting or specialist teams for emergencymiddot cases In some places the house surgeons could calIon the consultant if a registrar was unavailable but this was usually seen as a last resort call In the provincial and rural hospitals the house surgeons would call on the appropriate senior doctor who was available This was usually one of the cQnsultants or a registrar if any were employed by the hospital The A amp E Qfficer might occasionally be called and in hospitals without an A~amp E oHicer th~ medical superintendent would also provid~ backup

Generally house surgeons were happy with the support they received A physically compact hospital was mentioned several times as facilitating ~ ~ fast back-up Howeve( in some hospitals there could be considerable delays in 9etting surgical and orthopaedic registrars to the A amp E department usually because they were in theatre Also at two hospitals backup in the minor specialties was considered inadequate bull

Use of first year house surgeons

Urban and suburban hospitals had a policy of using second year house surgeons as much as possible in the A amp E department and of using first year house surgeons only in their second six months This policy was generally butmiddot not always carried out For example the on-call arrangements of some urban A amp E departments resulted in inexperienced first year house surgeons working in the department In the smaller hospitals also the limited pool of house surgeons available tended to result in more first year house surgeons working in the department

The hospital could not provide cover for the A amp E department without using first year house surgeons However there are always senior staff and the medical registrar readily available as backup

Medical superintendent

When direct supervision was limited first year house surgeons did find A amp E work difficult

Training

The training received by the house surgeons in the A amp E departments varied greatly Two hospitals ran half-day or one-day orientation courses before -house surgeons started in the department Three A amp E departments ran weekly or fortnightly training sessions on specific conditions while another department ran sessions on an irregular basis However house surgeons often missed training sessions because they were treating pat~entsln more than half tmiddothe A amp E departments no formal training was giVen and house surgeons were taught on-the-job when senior A amp E staff were available This teaching placed a considerable load on senior staff

The three-monthly changeover of house surgeons is frustrating and the first month with new house surgeons is very demanding because they have little confidence or competence

A amp E officer

42

If the A amp E department had no senior staff or if the house surgeons shifts did not coincide with those of the senior staff the house surgeons had to gain their training whenever and wherever they could Both house surgeons and nurses commented that house surgeons often required guidance from the nursing staff

We get on-the-job training relying very heavily on the nurses to say IDr X (the A amp E officer) normally does bullbullbull I was rather scared the first few days in the A amp E department

House surgeon

Several house surgeons commented that they would have liked more training particularly when they were first in the A amp E department and more guidance on hospital policy and administration

Manuals (middotor sets of standingmiddot orders) out-lining the clinical and administrative procedures required under different bull circumstances have been widely recognised as essential in the A amp E department They are particularly useful to new A amp E doctors as an explanationoof their duties 7 p 79914J

Senior medical staff at 13 of the hospitals visited said they had standing orders covering ~A amp E administration procedures or were revising them These standing orders were either specific A amp E booklets or sections of the full hospital standing orders Several house surgeons commented that they found the standlng orders useful while others relied more on verbal advice from the A amp E officer or nurses Two of the latter house surgeons said they had not seen any A amp E standing orders when in fact the full hospital standing orders did contain a section on the A amp E department One A amp E department had no standing orders (apartmiddot from protocols for the care of coronary patients) and the house surgeons there would have liked more guidelines

Accident and emergency work as a career

Advantages and disadvantages

The senior medical staff who expressed their views on A amp E work as a career had all previously been general practitioners and their comments largely reflected comparisons of A amp E work with general practice They tended to cite the regular hours good conditions of service and salaries competitive with general practice as advantages of A amp E work and the limited range of clinical material and lack of continuity of care as disadvantages

When house surgeons were asked whether they would be intercested in A amp E work as careers for themselVes their responses were more negative than those of the senior ~ amp E staff All of them mentioned some disadvantages of A amp E work To those mentioned by senior staff they added the problems of irregular hours and having to deal with many trivial complaints The lack of recognition of A amp E work as a specialty (and consequent lack of status within the hospital) was also seen as a disadvantage Some mentioned the advantages cited by the senior staff and added variety of work as another advantage These advantages and disadvantages mirror those noted by British and United States writers [315]

43

Accident and emergency work as a sp~cialty

Over the past two decades in the United States the increasing use of emergency rooms has led to the development of training programmes for emergency room doctors and in 1979 to the granting of specialty status to emergency medicine The American College of Emergency Physicians in 1975 defined the emergency physician as I a specialist in breadth whose training is focused ~n the acute and the life-threatening aspects of medical care and who~ by ~he nature of his practice is available when the patient needs him [cited in 16]

vlhile emergency medicine has much the same content as family practice the different emphasis approach and method of handling have been cited as justifying a separate specialty [16] Critics have disputed the specialty status of emergency medicine stating that although a broad clinical knowledge is required this knowledge is also shallow [15]

In Britain similar debates have taken place While the Platt report [2] recommended that one consultant should be in administrative charge of an A amp E department it did not favour the development of accident surgery as a specialty in its own right nor the appointment of consultants to work full-time in A amp E departments However the Increasing number of A amp E conSUltants middotthe development of training posts and the formation of an association of A amp E consultants [4] have signaled a de facto recognition of A amp E work as a specialty The role of general practitioners in A amp E departments has also been debated Their suitability for sorting and treating casual attenders has been stressed and their ability to work without consultant supervision has been seen as an advantage 21718]

An emergency care seminar held in Auckland in 1979 recognised the inadequacy of training at all levels for work in A amp E departments in New Zealand The suggestions made to rectify this situation included the recruitment of sp~cialist -staff at a career level

Senior staff in some of the urban A amp E departments stressed the need for a post-graduate A amp E specialist training in New Zealand They gave two reasons for this that more senior staff were required to supervise and properly train house surgeons working in A amp E departments and that more senior staff were needed to improve the efficiency

More senior staff would improve standards of care speed throughput reduce the need for tests and reduce recalls as well as improving the supervision of house surgeons

A amp E officer

The staff of the smaller hospitals commented that full-time specialists could be warranted in large urban A amp E departments but were not necessary in provincial hospitals

Full-time A amp E specialists are only warranted in very big hospitals where there is enough emergency work to justify a trauma centre and 24 hour senior doctor cover A specialist cannot work well in isolation so the workload has to be large enough to justify three or four A amp E consultants

A amp E officer

44

NURSE STAFFING

Accident and emergency nursing

As noted by Jenkins [7 p41-42 J nursing in the emergency department is different from in-hospital nursing The nature of work in the department requires the ability to perceive and act quickly and to adapt to constantly changing circumstances

The A amp E nurse needs skills in assessment and examination in critical care and emergency treatment in public relations and must be able to act calmly under pressure Increasingly experienced nurses are expected to carry out triage Special training both on-the-job and in study courses is therefore essential [27 p 36 1419J

The need to have experienced senior nursing staff working in the A amp E department at all times has been recognised for many years The senior nurse in charge of the department has a key role being responsible for the day-to-day administration of the department for the supervision of the nursing care given and often for supporting the junior medical staff [259] Again as Jenkins [7 p 27] noted the emergency department nurse is one cornerstone of the department and often acts as the stablizing element in a chaotic milieu especially in those hospitals where the medical staff rotates

New Zealand arrangements

There was considerable variation in both the total numbers and the levels of experience of nursing staff among the A amp E departments (see Table 7) Some departments had a nurse supervisor in control and several charge nurses while other departments had a charge nurse in control A amp E nurses were mainly staff nurses although some departments used substantial numbers of enrolled nursesmiddot Student nurses were present in most of the departments but they were often there for a few weeks only so they have been excluded from the tables

The number of nurses on duty in the A amp E department varied over the time of the day and the day of the week with more nurses on duty at times of heavy workload such as Friday and Saturday evenings and also weekday mornings when dressing clinics were held Most departments organised some staggering of shifts so that good cover was maintained throughout the day In three of the smaller hospitals (Timaru Whakatane and Grey)middot the A amp E department was covered at night by separate nursing staff usually the night supervisors who were covering other parts of the hospital as well

In several of the small hospitals the nursing staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department Generally this was satisfactory but occasionally the steady workload of the outpatients department left the A amp E department short of nursing cover

The total nurse staffing of the A amp E departments visited ranged from 25 to 278 full-time equivalents and this variation was partially related to the attendance of the department and whether or not the department had a holding ward (see Table 8) However even after adjusting for the staff required in the holding wards there was a threefold variation in the

45

nursing staff to attendance ratios of the urban A amp E departments Other factors such as the small size of the Hutt and Christchurch A amp E departments and greater use of student nurses may have been involved

TABLE 7 NURSE STAfFING OF HOSPITAL AIDS

Nurse lt bullbull

sup~rvisors

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland l 1 Middlemorel 1 Green Lane l 1 Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin 1

Provincial Rotorua 1 Taranaki Basel

Timarul 2

Rural Whakatane2 Grey2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Charge Staff nurses Full-

Time

4 21 4 11 2 11 1 19 1 8 1 11 2 3

5 I 10 1 3

1 4 1 2

1 7middot 1 1

EXCLUDING

nurses Part-Time

2 12

7

2 2 4

1

STUDENT NURSES AND

Enrolled nurses Full- Part shytime Time

4 2

2 1 2

1 4 1

1 1

3

1 Holding ward attachedto Aamp E department covered completely or partly by A amp E nursing staff

2 A amp E department covered by separate nursing staff at night (numbers not included here)

Work in both the A amp E department and the outpatients department

The relatively low attendance at the provincial rural and suburban departments contributed to their somewhat higher nursing staff to attendance ratios The high level of nursing staff at North Shore may be related to the additional duties of nurses in that department in escorting patients to other hospitals and working in the plaster room

TABLE 8 NURSE STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND NU~E STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Nurse staffing Nur~estaffing to attendance ratios

Full-time Adjusted Adjusted FTE Adjusted PTE equiva- full-time perlOOOO per 10000 lents2 equival- first atten- total attendshy

3ents dance pa dance p a

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane4

Wellington HuH Christchurch Dunedin

270 278 172 200 1l~0 130 80

220 258 122 170 110 130 80

3bull 8 66 47 35 33 21 29

34 45 29 30 26 18 21

Provincial Rotorua4

Taranaki Base Timaru

77 160 75

77 80 55

63 77 55

46 51 27

Rural Whakatane4 Grey4

52 25

52 25

87 65

59 49

Part-time depa rtment s

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

110 28

110 28

117 48

64 31

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE calculatedfrom Table 7 (with part-timenurses counted as 05

FTE) unless exact FTE figures supplied by hospitals 3 FTE adjusted by removing nurses covering the holding ward 4 Nurses covering both the A amp E department and the outpatients department counted as 07 FTE in the A amp E department and separate night nursing staff counted as 10 FTE extra

Spearman rank correlations (13] of adjusted nurse staffing with

( a) first attendance r = 0869 p lt 001 ( b) total attendance r = 0895 P lt 001

47

In seven A amp E departments nurses were satisfied with staffing arrangements liowever nurses in four departments (not necessarily those with relatively ~~w nurses) said that nurse numbers were too low while at two other departments weekend shortages of nurses and diff iculty getting replacements for numiddotreesmiddotmiddot off sick were mentioned as problems One hospitals policy of rotating all nurses at or below staff nurse level throughout the h6spital was criticised because it left too few nurses with A amp E experiance worlting in t)le department At another hospital nurses appreciated the reguiar check made on their job satisfaction by the nurse supervisors

In several A amp E departmentsmiddotmiddotr-ourseswere dissatisfied with the medical staffing arrangements~Cl some wani~d a senior doctor interested in A amp E work in charge of the department Others wanted A amp E doctors to spend

Imiddot ~~fU

more time in the department ~specially outside normal working hours

Training

In most of th~ A amp E departments visited junior nurses received on-the-job training wo~king alongside semor nurses and being rotateQ through different areas of the department However where a department was short of nursing staff or had a heavy workload senior nurses often had insuffficient time to teach the junior nurses Senior nurses often found that training new hurses both increased their workload markedly and slowed down the work of the department However as one principal nurse said

We train nurses on-the-job If we waited for experienced nurses to app1Y we I d nev~rltlet them

Principal nurse

At several A amp E departments junior nurses did not work either on their own or in areas requiring more judgement (for example the resuscitation room or the waiting room) until they were more experienced Often this changeover did not happen until the nurses in charge of the department had made a formal appraisal of the junior nurse There was a consensus among senior A amp E nurses that three to six months working in the department was required to train an A amp E nurse

I think A amp E nurses need a three month training course - their student training is not enough A nurse needs three to six months experience before she is fully competent to work permanently in the A amp E department Also its difficult to get fully trained on-the-job in a smaller hospital because theres too few patients coming through

A amp E nurse

Usually some form of procedure manual orientation book andor job description was provided for the nursing staff outlining their duties and responsibilities in the A amp E department A few departments also ran occasional lectures and inservice training At Auckland Middlemore and North Shore hospitals the A amp E department ran specific inservice training courses for staff nurses

48

The course at Auckland for example took six nurses at a time involved one study day per fortnight over 10-12 months and covered all aspects of A amp E work Nurses had to have six months experience in the A amp E

department before taking the course Senior nurses commented that the courses were valuable in improving the nurses abilities confidence and morale and felt that nurses who had been through the courses tended to stay in the department longer and were less prone to absenteeism Junior nurses at several hospitals without A amp E training courses said they would find such a course useful

At more than half the A amp E departments visited nurses commented on the necessity for them to guide the house surgeons particularly early in the three-month runs

The junior medical staff training is on-the-job and its largely done behind the door by the nursing staff The nurses will encourage the house surgeon to call a consultant if necessary (but not in front of a patient) or if they are very worried the nurses will ring a consultant themselves The house surgeons this year are very good and pleasant but it can be very wearying when they begin their three month shifts

A amp E nurse

At some hospitals this need to guide house surgeons had provilt1ed the impetus for developing A amp E nurse training courses

Many of the nurses said that they enjoyed A amp E nursing because of its specialised nature It had a fast pace and a stop-start quality thereI

was never a routine because of the high patient turnover the variety of complaints presenting and the drama associated with some cases As with the house surgeons nurses often found themselves carrying more responsibility working in the A amp E department than in the wards and they relished this Several hospitals had waiting lists of nurses wishing to work in the A amp E depart~entbull

OTHER STAFF INVOLVED WITH THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

An efficient and effective A amp E department needs not only adequate medical and nursing staff it also requires secretarial clerical reception and orderly staff [27 p 24-251

Reception and clerical staff

Most urban A amp E departments had receptionist cover 24 hours a day Usually therewere two or three receptionists on duty during the day with one receptionist on duty during evenings and at night At the provincial departments and at Hutt and Dunedin departments reception staff covered days (and sometimes evenings) for seven days a week In the rural A amp E departments a receptionist was on duty weekdays only When the receptionist was not on duty nursing staff carried out the duties In several of the smaller hospitals patients arriving at night were first seen by the hospital telephonist who then called the nursing staff

Usually the receptionists duties were to note the patients details on the A amp E record form and on the A amp E log The receptionists often helped with triage by alerting nursing staff to urgent cases In some

49

departments the receptionist also dealt with Ace forms made appointments for return visits and carried out admitting procedures at night However in one hospital the reception staff were not specifically attached to the A amp E department and only noted the patients details on the A amp E record form All other duties were performed by the nurses (and sometimes the A amp E doctors) who resented this added workload In several of the smaller A amp E departments reception staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department quite satisfactorily

Several receptionists had years of experience in the A amp E department as well as other relevant experience (eg ambulance dr i ver ECG technician) and were highly valued by the other A amp E staff

In addition to the receptionists some of the urban A amp E departments had hostesses andor hospital aids for odd jobs such as dealing with enquiries taking messages filling out laboratory forms putting away stores and making tea

TO meet the secretarial needs of the A amp E department (eg referral letters to general practitioners) the staff generally used secretaries in other parts of the hospital This service was not always adequate and one department used form letters completed by the A amp E doctors by hand for much of its correspondence Another department employed a part-time secretary for the doctors

Orderlies

Orderlies were generally used to move patients within the A amp E department as well as to other parts o~ the hospital In some hospitals they also assisted with plaster work

Some of the urban and provincial A amp E departments had an orderly during day-time hours but outside these hours and in all other departments orderlies were called from the hospital pool Some A amp E staff commented that delays involved in getting an orderly from the pool could be frustrating when the department was busy

Social workers

The A amp E departments visited had various methods for coping with patients with social or emotional problems

The urban A amp E departments could often calIon psychiatric backup such as a crisis team or an individual psychiatrist psychiatric nurse or counsellor Four of the urban A amp E departments had a social worker allocated to work in the department for some time each day who was also on call for the department while carrying out other duties The rest of the departments called on the pool of hospital social workers In the smaller hospitals social workers were not always available at nights or on weekends although in some places the social workers had made themselves available on an informal basis A amp E staff had mixed views on the usefulness of social workers

The social worker is essential to the work of the A amp E department

A amp E officer

50

The nature of social work has changed over the years and its hard now to make contact with the social workers and to get the support the department wants The department does social work itself and has good liaison with the Salvation Army and other welfare groups

A amp E officer

Ambulance personnel

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments were served by the Order of St John ambulances The exceptions were the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments which were served by the Wellington Free Ambulance and Taranaki A amp E department which worked with the hospital board ambulances Both the rural A amp E departments were served by hospital board ambulance services during the day and St John services at night

Generally the A amp E staff found that liaison between themselves and the ambulance personnel was good Many ambulancemiddot officers had had some training in the A amp E department and were familiar withmiddot its procedures Communications between the two were usually satisfactory with radio-telephones being used to alert the A amp E department to incoming urgent cases or to ask for advice on patient treatment

However some A amp E staff expressed concern abut the suitability of treatment provided by ambulance personnel They were particularly worried about the sophisticated techniques being used at times by some ambulance officers

Many ambulance officers are doing advanced courses and theyre enthusiastic about treating people - putting in drips or giving drugs Mostly the officers are excellent but some are over-enthusiastic

A amp E doctor

In the Auckland and Wellington urban areas there were several A amp E departments and as a working rule ambulance officers took patients to the nearest department However this rule was modified by the facilities available at the nearest hospital and whether or not the nearest A amp E department was open For example if the nearest hospital had no orthopaedic backup the ambulance would ptobably take a patient requiring orthopaedic care to the next closest hospital or if one of the part-time A amp E departments was nearest but closed the ambulance would go to another hospital At times the ambulance officers consulted with the A amp E staff by radio-telephone as to the appropriate A amp E department for a patient they were transporting

DISCUSSION

The patterns of medical staffing in terms of the number of senior A amp E doctors and the rostering of house surgeons reflectedmiddot the attendances and locations of the different A amp E departments The numbers of doctors and nurses (expressed as full-time equivalents) generally reflected the attendance at the departments However there was considerable variation in the level of nursing staff relative to attendance which could not be easily explained

51

Training in A amp E work for the house surgeons was inadequate with little formal training available for them In some places they had little opportunity to learn on-the-job beside a senior doctor Obviously greater time working alongside a senior doctor would be valuable as would intensive one or two-day orientation courses bull

Training was an important matter for the nursing staff also since very experienced nurses clearly were needed in the A amp E departments Inservice training courses are desirable both to develop experienced nurses as quickly as possible and to reduce the load that on-the-job training puts on the existing experienced nurses The training courses run in the Auckland hospitals appeared to be very successful and they could be used as a basis for courses in other hospitals and in post-basic programmes

The house surgeons in urban A amp E departments found their 10 and 12 hour shifts exhausting Also there was some evidence that where house surgeons covered other parts of the hospital as well as the A amp E department conflicting demands resulted in poor cover of the~ department Both of these problems would be alleviated by rostering more staff to the A amp E department We understand that this has happened in some departments in response to the Report on working conditions of resident medical officers Part I [12]

Inadequate supervision of house surgeons and the use of inexperienced first year house surgeons in A amp E departments were widespread In some places there were difficulties in getting backup from specialist staff and the house surgeons were very much on their own in the department There was also some evidence that A amp E departments were less efficient out of normal office hours due to delays in getting registrars and consultants and more especially due to the house surgeons inexperience

Employing more senior doctors both to improve the supervision and training of house surgeons and to improve the efficiency of the A amp E departments would be desirable But at present there are difficulties finding suitable applicants for A amp E officer positions These difficulties are at least partially oue to the low status of the A amp E department within the medical structure and the lack of career prospects for A amp E doctors The increasing numbers of doctors in the 1980 s and the opportunities for part-time work that the A amp E department offers to doctors with family responsibilities may make the department a more attractive choice However if these factors do not improve the senior medical staffing the development of A amp E medicine as a specialty will continue to ~e suggested

Does A amp E medicine in New Zealand require the extra training that would be provided by a post-graduate A amp E specialist programme Given the range of backgrounds currently found suitable for A amp E doctors it would appear that A amp E medicine in rural and provincial hospitals does not require much extra training although some training in particular aspects (eg soft-tissue injuries) could be useful In the urban hospitals the much higher load of major trauma cases could justify a post-graduate training programme However at present the number of senior A amp E doctors in the urban hospitals is insufficient to justify a specialist programme If numbers increase in the future perhaps the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine could sponsor a suitable post-graduate programme They coulo also play an extremely useful role by preparing a manual outlining clinical procedures for A amp E departments and distributing regular bulletins up-dating this material

52

REFERENCES

1 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services report on a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional off ice for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

2 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

3 ELSON Reginald - The medical staff of British accident and emergency units in Br J Hosp Med - (August 1971) p 161-170

4 New thoughts from casualty [editorial] in Br Med J - v 1 (1976) p 1299-1300

5 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 21-24

6 Community-wide emergency medical services recommendations by the Committee on Acute Medicine of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists in JAMA - v 204 no 7 (1968) p 595-602

7 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL~ Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975

8 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 1960 (Report series Board of Health no 2)

9 SALMOND GC - Young doctors an exercise in social researchmiddot methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

10 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM 68(83)

11 CANT BR staffing of A amp E departments in NZ Med J - v 94 (1981) p 471

12 Report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers Pt 1 Report of the Working Party established by the Hospital Medical Officers Advisory Committee and the Minister of Health - Wellington Dept of Health 1981 (unpublished)

13 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraW-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

14 OWENS J Cuthbert - Survey discovers what is wrong with hospitals emergency service in Mod Hosp - vl06no 1 (1966) p 82-85

15 LEITZELL James p - An uncertain future in N Eng J Med - v 304 no 8 (1981) p 477-480

16 RIGGS Leonard M Jr - A vigorous new speCialty in N Eng J Med shyv 304 no 8 (1981) p 480-483

53

17 HONIGSBAUM F - General practitioner work in British hospitals Soc Econ Admin - vl (1967) p 34-44bull

in

18 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL DJ and WALKER JH~ - Practitioners patients and the accident department in Hosp Health Services - (1975) p 80-84

Rev

19 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 1979 in NZ Med J - v 91(1980) p 194-196

19-23 March

55

CHAPTER 6

Patient att~ndance characteristics

This chapter considers the general pattern of attendance at A amp E departments noting overall levels and time trends the age and SeX distribution of patients and the conditions with which they come to the department Next we look at recall visits particularly the hospital to hospital variations Then the use of A amp E departments by people who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner is discussed

The materiai has been gathered by examining the A amp E records and talking with the staff of the 14 A amp E departments visited Data from the re~ords at Northland Base Hospital A amp E department have also been incorporated

Detailed patterns of attendance by hour of the day and day of the week have not been analysed Other researchers have documented these for A amp E departments in New Zealand and overseas [123456789] While detailed information is useful for good management of departments and setting adequate staffing levels for the busiest periods it is usually specific to a particular department and is not relevant to the questions addressed in this report For our purposes it has been sufficient to divide the week into normal working hours (in hours defined as 0800-1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays) and the remaining hours (out of hours)

OVERALL ATTENDANCE AND TRENDS

Since 1978 hospitals have reported total attendance at outpatient departments to the National Health Statistics Centre distinguishing A amp E attendance from other attendance and first attendance from recall attendance Table 9 shows the average annual attendance at the 15 A amp E departments for the period from 1978 to 1981 Table 10 presents the trends in A amp E attendance over the same period compared with the changes in population of the hospital catchment areas between the 1976 and 1981 censuses

There has been an overall increase in first attendance of 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 This increase is somewhat higher than we would expect from the growth in New Zealand population over the same period However the increase in first attendance has been partially counter-balanced by a decrease of 25 per cent in recall attendance

Table 10 shows too that there is no general trend towards increased first attendancemiddot among the urban hospitals The non-urban hospitals have experienced increasing first attendance although even there Northland Base and Rotorua show no increase

56

TABLE 9 AVERAGE ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-19811

First Recall Total attendance attendance attendance

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 58 506 6 272 64 777 Middlemore 39 032 18 686 57 718 Green Lane 26 079 16 635 42 714 Wellington 48 011 7 748 55 759 Hutt 33 266 9 807 43 072 Christchurch 61 516 12 010 73 526 Dunedin 27 202 10 802 38 004

Provincial Northland Base 7 794 3 144 10 938 Rotorua 12 265 4 636 16 900 Taranaki Base 10 341 5 462 15 803 Timaru 9 971 10 102 20 072

Rural Whakatane 5 992 2 177 8 769 Grey 3 850 1 214 5 064

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore2 9 388 7 900 17 288 Kenepuru 3 5 843 3 209 9 052

All public hospitals 524 442 226 251 750 693

1 Source Hospital Management Data 1978-1981 - Wellington National Health Statistics Centre Dept of Health Simple average unless otherwise noted

2 Estimated as average of 1978 1979 and 1981 figures as the North Shore A amp E department was closed for part of 1980

3 Estimated for 1979-1981 only since the Kenepuru A amp E department was not open ~or all of 1978

57

TABLE 10 TRENDS IN ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-1981

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Midd1emore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3

Kenepuru 4

All public hospitals

Average annual percentage change in A amp E attendance l

First attendance

-36 07 16

-22 -79

00 48

-07 06 64

185

61 90

59 179

15

Recall attendance

lo3-07

66 -155 -34

63 08

33 -45

23 02

1253 06

374 89

-25

Estimated annual percentage change in population of hospital bull s catchment

area

1976-19812

07

-04 -02 -10

14 12

-02 -06

12 -04

07 -04

02

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

2 Source NZ Wellington

Census of Population Dept of Statistics

and Dwellings 1976 and 1981

3 Estimated from 1978 and 1981 flUctuations in intervening years

figures only because of extreme

4 Estimated for 1979-1981 for all of 1978

only since Kenepuru A amp E department not open

Figure for entire hospital board area used

58

AGE AND SEX

The characteristic age and sex distributions of total A amp E attendance are shown in Figure 1 Nearly half of the attendances are by young adults 15-29 years Schoolage children too formed a larger part of the attendance than their numbers in the community would lead one to expect These two age groups which are also the age groups most likely to be active and daring accounted for nearly two thirds of all attendances The age distribution of attendance was similar from hospital to hospital

About twice as many males as females attended A amp E departments (66 per cent to 34 per cent) When age and sex were considered together I it was the school age and young adult males who made up the majority of attenders Even in the 30-64-year-old group men outnumbered women two to one These age and sex distributions are similar to those found by other researchers in New Zealand [1410] in Britain [1112] and the United States [1314]

Figure 1 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments by age and sex

Male Female

3L1

30

20 20

E ~ 128 shy

108

10

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65_ Age Group Age Group

CONDITIONS

Of the total A amp E attendances 81 per cent were for injury conditions and 19 per cent were for sickness conditions Adjusting for the recall visits we estimated that 73 to 78 per cent of first visits were for injury conditions Our results were similar to Platts [15] as far as we can tell given the different definitions used In another British study Lewis and Bradbury [12] found 90 per cent of visits were for injury However

59

this higher level is not surprising since they considered only cases which were waiting for attention ignoring ambulance cases and the very seriously ill

Out of hours sickness conditions made up 25 per cent of all visits and in hours they were 14 per cent Preschool children and people 65 years and over were more likely to attend for sickness conditions than those aged 5-64 years (Figure 2) The preponderance of males over females in the 15-64 year old groups was accounted for by injury conditions rather than by sickness

Figure 2 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

Male Femate

IIIiI A trendance for _ sickness condiHons 30

remainder for injury condItions

20

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 f Age Group Age Group

In the following sections information from some of the hospitals about the types of injury and sickness conditions is presented We have had problems in classifying the conditions since at some hospitals few details of the patients conditions were recorded on the A amp E log Even where details were recorded only 60 per cent of injury attendances and 80 per cent of sickness attendances have been able to be consistently classified

Injury conditions

Data on the type of injury was extracted from only six A amp E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch and Northland Base hospitals) There was very little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 3 shows the types of injuries as proportions of first injury attendances The category

60

of cuts (which included scrapes amputations and punctures) accounted for almost 30 per cent of first injury attendances The severity of the cuts could not be judged from log entries but in the case of Northland Base Hospital cuts identified as probably needing suturing formed a substantial part of this category Fractures made up 15 per cent of the first injury attendance with foreign body injuries (mostly in the eye) burns and toxic effects accounting for another 14 per cent

Figure 3 Injury first attendances by type of injury all ages

Other (414)

Cuts (291)Fractures (154)

The category labelled other accounted for 40 per cent of all first injury attendances and included some serious conditions such as falls crushing injuries and various states of shock However many of the other injuries were regarded as minor conditions by the Aamp E staff It was impossible to judge the severity of injuries from the detail recorded on the logs so no estimate of the percentage of injuries which required urgent attention has been made

For most types of injuries sex and age had little bearing There were exceptions (Figure 4) Toxic effects were four times as likely among preschool children as among other age groups Fractures were twice as likely both for school age children and for those 65 years and over as for other age groups Somewhat surprisingly adult men and women differed little in the types of injuries

Figure 4 Injury first attendances by type of injury by age groups

0-4 (ears 5-14 years 15-29 years

Other (308)

Cuts (321 )

Toxic effects (13) Burns (21 )

Foreign bodies (24)

Fractures (254)

Other (408)

Cuts (280)

Toxic effects (28)

Burns (41)

Other (452)

Cuts (286)

30-64 years 65+ years

Other (393) Other (341)

Cuts (308) Fractures (301)

62

People were more likely to present with injury conditions in hours rather than out of hours From the information collected at the four Auckland hospitals we can say that 43 per cent of first injury visits happened out of hours whereas 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category

Sickness conditions

Data on the type of sickness was extracted from only 10 A lie E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch Dunedin Northland Rotorua Taranaki and Grey) There was little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 5 shows the types of sickness conditions as proportions of all sick~ess attendance

Figure 5 Sickness attendance by type of sickness all ages

General sickness

(110)

Abdominal pain (132) Other (20 1 )

Shortness of breath (150)

Skin pain bleeding (229) Collapse (179)

TwO prominent categories shortness ofmiddot breath and collapse (including diabetic coma heart at tacks congestive heart failure and chest pain) accounted for one-third of all sickness attendances

General sickness covered fever diarrhoea and vomiting feeling unwell convulsions renal failure and abdominal pain recorded as being related to urinary retention Abdominal pain was generally recorded simply as such but acute appendix and similar terms and miscarriage or bleeding from the vagina were included in abdominal pain

Figure 6 Sickness attendance by type of sickness by age groups

0-4 years 5-14 years 15-29 years

General sickness (79)

General ~ickness (380)

Other (90) i

Shortness ofSkin pain I breath (148)

bleeding (100) Sickness pain Shortness of breath (320) bleeding (270) ClI

IN

Collapse (30)

30-64 years 65+ years

Abdominal pain (110) General sickness (102)

Shortness of breath (184) Ot 1159~

Skin pain I bleeding (10 1)

Collapse (358)

64

Unspecified pain or other bleeding have been included in the category of generally minor conditions involving skin pain or bleeding Such minor conditions accounted for almost a quarter of the sickness attendances Abscesses or infected wounds made up a quarter of the skin pain or bleeding category while a further 21 per cent involved pain such as back pain headaches or other pain

Ear and eye conditions toothache and other miscellaneous or undefined conditions made up the other category which formed 20 per cent of the sickness attendance

Were the sickness conditions urgent enough to require treatment at an A amp E department This was a difficult question to answer from the information available on the A amp E logs We have concluded that the collapse and shortness of breath conditions were likely to be emergencies and that for the preschool age group and probably those 65 years and over abdominal pain and general sickness required urgent attention We have described all the other sickness conditions as non-urgent sickness Thus at least 39 per cent of the ickness conditions required urgent attention

The type of sickness attendance differed between the age groups (Figure 6) Preschool children rarely came for superficial reasons Only 11 per cent of their sickness attendances were for skin pain or bleeding conditions Shortness of breath was a major condition for all children preschool or school age Skin pain or bleeding conditions were more prominent among the school age children than the preschool

Young adults tended to come for minor conditions Thirty per cent of their sickness attendance was for skin pain or bleeding conditions and only 20 per cent was for the emergency categories of collapse or shortness of breath

Among the adults 30-64 years old however emergencies formed a substantial part of sickness attendance with 27 per cent belonging to the collapse category Among those 64 years and over few non-urgent conditions were recorded with 40 per cent of the sickness attendance being for collapse The skin pain or bleeding conditions accounted for only 10 per cent of their sickness attendance

Fifty-eight per cent of all sickness attendances occurred out of hours~ as would have been expected given that 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category However nearly three-quarters of preschool sickness visits happened out of hours while less than half of the sickness visits by those 30 years and over were out of hours

RECALL ATTENDANCE

Almost all recall visits were for injury conditions velY few sickness patients were recalled for follow-up care As was noted in Chapter 3 policies on recall visits differed among the departments Several factors ~ffected the decision to recall the patients condition the A amp E staffs communication with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs middotof house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors ~hilosophy of A amp E medicine From the comments made by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the departments into two groups

65

RECALL POLICY

DO FAVOUR A policy favouring recall visits

DO NOT lAVOUR A policy not favouring recall visits with most patients being referred to a general practitioner However fractures and soft-tissue or serious wounds tend to be recalled

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

DO FAVOUR Taranaki Base Grey North Shore

DO NOT FAVOUR Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Rotorua Timaru Whakatane Kenepuru

-----_--------- ----------------------~

It is diff icult to compare the policies of the departments with their actual performances since some A amp E logs did not completely identify all recall visits Table 11 presents recall attendance as a proportion of total attendance For the departments where recall visits were fully identified there appears to be reasonable agreement between the Hospital Management Data figures and the figures derived from our tallies The exceptions are Whakatane where staff told us that return visits pad dropped from 1979 to 1981 and Auckland where we have no explanation It should be noted that the tally figures are estimates based on one-week to one-month samples and so may be less accurate than the Hospital Mlmagement Data which are complete counts over an entire year

Overall 25-30 per cent of all visits were recall visits There was considerable variation among departments in the level of recall visits OFlanagan [16] found similar variation among British A amp E departments

The recall polic ies were not closely related to the departments performances as measured by the proportion of all visits that were recalls While North Shore with a recall-favouring A amp E department had a very high level of recalls (many were plaster checks) so did Timaru a department with a policy of not favouring recalls The other recall-favouring A amp E departments at Grey and Taranaki Base hospitals had only average levels of recalls

The departments performances however were related to the levels of medical and nursing staff as measured by the tatal medical staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 6 and the nurse staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 8) A amp E departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits (see Table 11 and Figures 7 and 8) Perhaps these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat recalled patients

66

TABLE 11 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS RECALL ATTENDANCE

Hospital Tally sources Management Data Recalls as Recalls as Total Recalls as percentage percentage attend-percentage of total attendancel

of total attendance

of injury attendance

ance tallied2

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 97 198 278 948 Middlemore 324 327 399 1137 Green Lane 389 401 439 868 Wellington3 139 116 172 3568

(4 weeks) Hutt3 228 280 379 2766

( 4 weeks) Christchurch 163 166 216 1233 Dunedin3 284 278 334 749

Provincial Northland Base 287 275 328 2092

03 weeks) Rotorua 274 214 250 334 Taranaki Base 346 327 353 270 Timaru3 504 460 51 6 174

Rural Whakatane 317 152 175 259

( 2 weeks) Grey3 240 238 293 330

o month)

Part-time departments

Suburban North Sh~re 457 521 539 512 Kenepuru 355 383 422 451

(4 weeks)

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations lOne week tally unless otherwise noted 3 Tally data partially estimated from Hospital Managementmiddot Data (see

Table 9) to adjust for incomplete recording

Spearman rank correlations [18] of recalls as percentage of total attendances (Hospital Management Data) with

(a) FTE medical staff per 10000 first attendance r = 0459 P lt 005 (b) FTE nurse staffing (adjusted for holding ward) per 10000 first

attendance r = 0547 P lt 005

67

Figure 7 Comparison of medical staff availability and level of recall attendance

u c ro 50 Timaru

C c ~ North Shore m ro S 40 Greenlane 0

Kenepuru

Cl ro Taranaki E = 30

Middlemore bull bull Whakatane

Cl Dunedin Rotoruae

ro

u Hutt Grey

c ro

C 20 C

~ m Christchurch

ro Wellington u

0 10 Auckland

10 20 30 40

Number of medical staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance

Figure 8 Comparison of nursing staff availability and level of recall attendance

Timaru50

North Shore

40 Greenlanee

Kenepuru Taranaki

Middlemore bull Whakatane bull 30

Dunedin ROlorua

GreyHutt

20

Christchurch Wellington

10 Auokland

3 4 5 6 8 9 10 II 12

Number of nursing staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance lexcluding nurses staffing holding wards)

68

It has been suggested that house surgeons are more likely to recall than senior A amp E doctors [17] If this were so we would expect that A amp E departments where house surgeons worked with very little direct senior superv1s1on (Hutt Taranaki Whakatane Grey Kenepuru) would have had higher proportions of recalls than departments with much greater supervision (Auckland and Dunedin) This was not the case Also North Shore with no house surgeons had a high proportion of recalls Thus the recall levels do not suggest that the house surgeons had any greater propensity than senior A amp E doctors to recall patients

GP-LOAD

A amp E staff use the term GP-load as shorthand for people who in their eyes would more appropriately be treated by a general practitioner Other studies in New Zealand and overseas have estimated that between 36 and 61 per -cent of all A amp E patients could have been successfully treated by a general practitioner [41920] When we discussed this topic with A amp E staff we found a similar variation in their estimates of the GP-10ad This variation may be due to differing views as to which injury and sickness conditions should be treated in the A amp E department it may be due to different beliefs about the abilities and facilities of general practitioners and it may reflect differences in the patients ~erved by different A amp E departments

The role of general practitioners in the treatment of injury is a matter of debate However there is more agreement over sickness conditions A sickness emergency is traditionally accepted as suitable for A amp E treatment whereas a non-urgent sickness condition is seen as more appropriate for general practitioner treatment

Non-urgent sickness

A amp E staff estimated that patients with long standing or minor sickness conditions constituted from 2 to 30 per cent of the attendance However tallies from the A amp E logs showed that non-urgent sickness attendance ranged from 6 to 24 per cent averaging about 12 per cent At most departments staff oVer-estimated the level At a typical hospital staff opinion placed non-urgent sickness at 20 to 25 per cent of the attendance while the A amp E log showed only 19 per cent coming for any sickness condition and fewer than 12 per cent for non-urgent sickness Only in one A amp E department was the tally evidence of non-urgent sickness greater than the staffs estimate The general oVer-estimation of non-urgent sickness visits probably means that A amp E staff were also over-estimating the total GP-load bull

In general A amp E staff felt that patients with non-urgent sickness would be better off being seen by their own general practitioners However the departments differed in the ways they dealt with these patients Some staff mentioned that when they treated such patients they would discourage further visits by explaining the role of the A amp E department Some departments had notices in the waiting rooms stating that the department was for treatment of accidents and emergencies and that people should see their general practitioner for other conditions Some hospitals had placed advertisements with similar messages in local newspapers

From the comments of A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the A amp E departments into two groups

69

OPEN DOOR POLICY

OPEN An open policy where almtreated They may then general practitioner

ost be

all patients advised to see

are a

RESTRICTED A restricted policy where patients are not treated a general practitioner

nbut

on-urgent are re

sicknferred

ess to

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

OPEN Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Whakatane Grey North Shore

RESTRICTED Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru Kenepuru

The open door policies were reflected somewhat in the proportion of all A amp E visits that were f or sickness (see Table 12) The departments with restricted policies (which were all non-urban) tended to have lower proportions of sickness visits than those with open policies However the non-urban departments with open policies did not have substantially higher proportions of sickness visits than the restricted departments Rather some of the urban departments (Auckland Wellington Hutt and Christchurch) had particularly high proportions of sickness visits These departments were also particularly busy with large numbers of first attendances and relatively low levels of medical staffing One would expect that in a very busy department staff would discourage inappropriate visits However A amp E staff at Auckand and Wellington hospitals commented that although non-urgent sickness patients needed general practitioner care they tended to treat them anyway because it was quicker to treat them than to send them away This may be a partial explanation for the high levels of sickness visits but other factors related to the populations served by the departments are probably involved (see Chapter 8)

A common exception to the open door policies was made for children At most hospitals staff said that sick children were always seen As Table 13 suggests children as described by staff are probably preschool children rather than all those under 15 years The departments with restricted policies had considerably lower proportions of sickness visits in the preschool and school age groups than did the open policy departments Table 13 also shows that toe agemiddot group most likely to appear with sickness conditions is the elderly There was Tess difference in proportions of sickness visits between the restricted policy and open policy departments for patients aged 30 and over

It would appear that a restricted policy towards non-urgent sickness patients does tend to discourage sickness Visits particularly for preschool age children However a restricted policy does not markedly appear to discourage sickness visits by the elderly

70

TABLE 12 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESS 1

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Butt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru3

Rural Whakatane Grey3

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Estimated Percentage of percentage total attenshyof first ance that was attendance for sickness that was for sickness

378 303 235 158 187 112 365 323 361 260 301 251 233 168

162 183 144 110 74 109 59

156 132 190 145

58 28 152 94

Total attendance tallied2

948 1137

868 3568 (4 weeks) 2766 ( 4 weeks) 1233

749

2092 (13 weeks) 334 270 174

259 (2 weeks) 330 (l month)

572 451 (4 weeks)

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 One-week tally unless otherwise noted

3 For Timaru and Grey the percentage of first attendance that was for sickness is the actual figure derived from the tallies and the percentage of total attendance that was for sickness has been estimated

71

TABLE 13 PROPORTION OF TOTAL A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESSl BY OPEN DOOR POLICY AND AGE GROUPS

Percentage of total attendance that was for sickness

under 5 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 All years years years years years amp age

over groups

Open policy departments 367 111 148 245 433 201

Restricted policy departments 102 66 80 181 311 110

All departments studied 33 bull2 104 141 238 425 191

1 Source Tallies taken from A E logs by authors hospitals represented in one-week equivalents

DISCUSSION

At all public hospitals first visits to A amp E departments increased by 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 However this increase was not consistent with most of the urban A E departments reporting a decrease or no change in first visits Recall visits for all public hospital A E departments decreased by 25 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 The decrease was not consistent in fact the reported changes in recall attendance were highly variable It has been suggested that the cost of general practitioner services and dissatisfaction with the unavailability of general practitioners have caused increased use of A amp E departments However it seems unlikely that any single reason could explain these highly variable changes in A amp E attendance in New Zealand

The people visiting A amp E departments were predominantly school age or young adults and male Men aged 15 to 29 years formed the largest single group almost one-third of all attendances Eighty-one per cent of attendances were for injuries and the 19 per cent attending for sickness conditions tended to be preschoolers or people aged 65 years or more Injury visits were more common in hours and sickness visits out of hours probably because accidents tend to happen in daylight hours Also sic kness conditions often seem worse at night and if the patients do not want to bother their general practitioner they may go straight to the A amp E department (see Chapter 7)

72

It was difficult to classify conditions accurately from the information on A amp E logs since insufficient detail and little indication of severity was usually recorded Thus we have not been able to estimate the proportion of injuries which really required A amp E care Similarly there were difficulties in classifying the sickness conditions middotalthough almost 40 per cent appeared to require urgent attention

There was considerable variation among the A amp E departments studied in the proportion of all visits that were recall visits However contrary to our expectations this variation was not related to the policy on recalling patients stated by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents Nor did it appear to be related to the inexperience of unsupervised house surgeons Rather it was related to staffing levels Departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits It is likely that staff in these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat more recalled patients If departments wish to change their recall levels an examination of thei r staffing levels would be an obvious place to start

The other component of the workload which A amp E departments often wish to control is the non-urgent sickness attendance A amp E staff saw such visits as inappropr iate and they consistently over-estimated the proportion of non-urgent sickness patients they were treating Ullman (3] and Roth [21] have found similar processes of oVer-estimation occurring among staff in United States emergency rooms The level of non-urgent sickness visits was not high on average comprising only 12 per cent of the attendance However applying a restricted policy (referring to general practitioners for treatment displaying notices in the department and advertisements in local newspapers) appeared to discourage such visits particularly for preschool children Thus non-urgent sickness attendance was not a problem in some A amp E departments Where departments see such visits as a problem applying a restricted policy could ease it

13

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS E F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J -V 71 0970rgt212-219

2 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard ~ Emergency department utHisation in ail urban community implications for community ambulatory careinJAMA v 216 no 2 (191l) p 301-312

3 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SfRATMANN William C- An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1915) P 1011-1020

4 RICHARDSJ G and WHITE GR~ - Accident and emergency services at AucklandHospital inNZmiddotMed J - v 85 (1977) P 272~274

5 INGRAM D R CLARKE D -R and MURDIE R A -Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1918) P 55-62

6 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referral patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

1 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

McRAE She1agh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience of Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

9 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (A amp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 319-388

10 SNELGAR Denis- Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

11 Casual attenders a socio-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcast1e-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

12 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A amp E in Health Soc Serv J (1981) p 1139-1142

13 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

14 WALKER L L - Inpatient and emergency department utilisation the effect of distance social class age sex and marital status in J Amer ColI Emergency Phycns - v 5 no 2 (1976) p 105-110

15 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

74

16 OFLANAGAN P - The work of an accident and emergency department in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 26 no 162 (1976) p 54-60

17 What are accident and emergency departments for in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) P 837-839

18 SIEGEL Sydney_ - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

19 CROMBIE D L - A casualty survey in J ColI Gen Pract - v 2 (1959) P 346-356

20 SKUDDER Paul A McCarroll James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1913 p 11-35

21 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) P 839-856

75

CHAPTER 7

Patient attitudes to the accident and emergency department and staff attitudes to the patients

In this chapter we look at the attitudes of patients to the A amp E department and particularly the reasons they give for attending it Summaries of the results of overseas studies are given followed by detailed information from several New Zealand studies where patients were interviewed the Dunedin study carried out by Dixon in 1968[1] Richards Auckland study of 1975 [2] Keenans unpublished Christchurch study of 1978 the Wei~ington childrens study carried out by Kljakovic in 1978 [3] and McRaes Waikato study of I~H9 [4] Then we discuss the effect that health centres and deputising services have on A amp E use Finally we explore the views that A amp E staff have of their patients

REASONS FOR VISITING THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

Overseas studies

A substantial number of overseas studies have explored the reasons given by patients attending A amp E departments One major reason was the availability of the A amp E department open 24 hours a day and always staffed compared to the actual or perceived unavailability of the general practitioner [56789]

People mentioned the accessibility of the A amp E department as a reason for attending citing its location ease of transport to and from it and its convenience for work schedules and other arrangements [671011]

Another major reason for visiting the A amp E department was its appropriateness as a source of care particularly because of the equipment and facilities available [5612] with many conditions particularly injuries A amp E patients made their own diagnosis They therefore omitted the diagnosis-seeking part of care (where the general practitioner was seen as appropriate) and sought confirmation arid immediate treatment at the A amp E department [1314]

People also saw the A ampE department as the appropriate place to go because of the urgency of their condition especially if the person needing treatment was a child [7141516] However A amp E staff and A amp E patients often had conflicting perceptions of the seriousness of the condition Patients tended to see their complaint as more serious and urgent than did the A amp E doctor [9101117]

Advice from other people was another reason given for visiting the A amp E department [61218] People were more likely to visit the department rather than the general practitioner when the decision to seek care was made outside the home and where someone other than the patient or a close

relative was involved in the decision (eg a policeman an employer a teacher or bystander) In some cases such as traffic accidents and some

work and school accidents it was automatic procedure to send the patient straight to the A amp E department [1819]

76

Some people using the A amp E department did not have a family doctor because they were new to the area or transient or for other reasons [78] In the United States the proportions without a doctor were high ranging from 40 per cent to 86 per cent [5171920]

The proportion of patients who tried to contact their doctor before going to the A amp E department also varied considerably from 6 per cent to 42 per cent in different North American studies [59202122] 14 per cent in a Canadian study and SO per cent in a Swedish study [23] Holohan et al [24J found that over SO per cent of patients attending a British A amp E department were unaware or inaccurately informed about their general practitioners out of hours care arrangements

Dissatisfaction with their general practitioner led to some people visiting the A amp E department Organisational factors such as appointment systems deputising serVices and health centres all made it more difficult for patients to contact their doctor [142425) Dissatisfaction with the doctors treatment and wanting a second opinion were also reasons [26] As well language difficulties were a problem In Australia immigrants used the hospital foi childrens emergencies because interpreters were available and they did not have to use the telephone to arrange a visit [27]

It has been suggested that people use A amp E departments rather than general practitioners because the department is free This is unlikely to be a reason in Britain where general practitioner care is free under the National Health Service Studies in the United States found that very few respondents said that the cost of seeing a doctor was a major reason for visiting the A amp E department [511)

New Zealand studies

Use of general practitioners

It has been suggested that people use the A amp E department because they are visitors to a city or do not have a general practitioner The New Zealand studies foundmiddot that the proportion of those interviewed who had a general practitioner varied considerably from city to city (see Table 14) The high level in Wellington [3] was not surprising given that most families with children have a general practitioner The transience of local populations as suggested by Richards [2] may explain some of the differences between the studies Dixon [1] noted that the age and sex structure of the people visiting the A amp E department with the preponderance of young males was the opposite to that of people visiting general practitioners

The Wellington study found that for a very high proportion of children (39 per cent) there had been an attempt to contact a general practitioner before going to the A amp E department and 25 per cent had actuallY seen the doctor [3) The other studies found smaller proportions British studies have reported similar variations with Lewis and Bradbury [14] finding 8 per cent of A amp E attenders had been referred by their general practitioner and Conway (25] reporting 41 per cent

The Chr istchurch study found that the people who did not see a doctor before coming to the A amp E department were more likely to be injured rather than sick to visit the department out of hours rather than in

77

hours and to be 15 to 29 years old Also during work hours people who had accidents at work were less likely to see the doctor before going to the A amp E department than people with home or sports accidents

TABLE 14 USE OF GENERAL PRACT IT lONERS BY FIRST ATTENDERS AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Percentage of all those interviewed who

had a regular general attempted to contact their practitioner general practitioner before

going to the A amp E department

Dunedin 1968 92 16 Auckland 1975 72 21 Christchurch 1978 85 23 Wellington 1978 98 39

Derived from 84 per cent who were sent directly or chose to go to casualty without seeing a doctor

Specific reasons for using the A amp E department

Turning now to the reasons given by patients for their A amp E visit the New Zealand studies found a similar range of reasons to the overseas studies Keenan collected detailed information in Christchurch and this is presented in Table 15 and in the following sections Comparable information from the other studies where available has been included

Others advised the patient to go to the A amp E department The most common reason given by the Christchurch patients (and by the people interviewed by Dixon [1] in Dunedin) was that others (employers teachers traffic officers sports coach neighbours friends) advised them to go to the A amp E department There appeared to be an automatic procedure following many school work sports and traffic accidents of sending the patient straight to the A amp E department

There was no evidence that injuries happening at other locations (eg at home) were any less likely to go to the A amp E department A comparison of the Waikato and Christchurch A amp E injury attenders with people consulting general practitioners for accidental injuries [28] showed similar proportions of attendance by the location of the accident (Figure 9) In Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14] found similar results when studying A amp E attendance in the North Western Regional Health Authority

76

TABLE 15 REASONS FOR A amp E FIRST ATTENDANCE FROM THREE NEW ZEALAND STUDIES

Reasons Christchurch 1976

Wellington ( children)

1978

Auckland 1975

SAW GP BEFORE A amp E 186 250

A amp E MORE AVAILABLE GP found to be unavailable

or thought to be unavailable Did not want to bother GP

Cost of GP care a factor

125

( 65) ( 41)

(19)

233

119

(24) ( 79)

(16)

A amp E MORE ACCESSIBLE More convenient closer

phone or transport problems in contacting GP

214

A amp E MORE APPROPRIATE Condition of type not dealt

with by GP requiring A amp E facilities

Need for attention was urgent

140

( 5 0) (90)

389 671

OTHERS ADVISED TO GO TO A amp E 233 61

OTHER Includes having no GP

trained by GP to go to A amp E needed a dentist and so on

94 68

Number of people interviewed 565 428 1147

Tried to contact general practitioner did not necessarily see doctor

A amp E department more available Only 125 per cent of the Christchurch sample went to the A amp E department because it was more available than their general practitioner Richards [2] found a similar proportion in Auckland Not surprisingly the availability reasons were given more by people visiting the Christchurch A amp E department out of hours than in hours and more for children and older adults than the 15 to 29 age group The cost of visiting a general practitioner was hardly mentioned as a reason for visiting the A amp E department

79

In Wellington Kljakovic [3] found parents saying abOut the A amp E department

you can go anytime - 24 hour service when everyones at the end of their tether theyre there and theyre open

and about general practitioners

didnt know you could get a doctor on the weekends on other occasions you get an answering service - not worth bothering the doctor

midnight - too late to call a doctor

Figure 9 location at which accidents happened by those attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Presenting at A amp E department Presenting at general practitioner

Home (389) Home (290)

Work schooL Work school public buildings (336) public buddings (39 0)

A amp E department more accessible Over 20 per cent of the Christchurch attenders went to the A amp E department because it was more convenient closer or involved fewer transport or communic~tion problems These reasons were given more out of hours than in hours particularly by the 15 to 29 age group Injured patients especially those with sports injuries were more likely to give these reasons

A amp E department more appropriate Only 14 per cent of the Chr istchurch sample gave appropriateness as a reason while Richards [2] found 67 per cent in Auckland and Kljakovic [3] reported 39 per cent in Wellington These differences may reflect different interview situations since Richards interviewed patients at the A amp E department while Keenan and Kljakovic questioned people through telephone or personal interviews in their own homes Christchurch people suffering traffic accidents or poisonings (largely self-poisonings) were more Ii kely to give this reason than other reasons

80

In Wellington parents often said about the A amp E department

thats what its there for they have everything there

Several parents also commented that

general practitioners dont do stitches the GP is for minor things - not eager to corne to an emergency the doctor would only send us on to the hospital anyway thought leg was broken - needed an x-ray

Many parents decided to go to the A amp E department because they had already made a diagnosis and thought the condition required A amp E treatment others were unsure of the urgency of the childs condition A mother whose two-year-old son had hit his nose on a shower box at 755 am rang the doctor The child was crying his nose was bleeding and looked flattened The message on the answer phone was that the doctor could be contacted only in a real emergency She was unsure what a real emergency was so took the child to hospital not wanting to feel a fool by ringing the doctor

Some parents particularly those with asthmatic children were well aware that the condition required urgent care and had previously been told to go straight to the A amp E department

Dissatisfaction with the general practitioner Satisfaction is notoriously difficult to measure particularly when normal levels of satisfaction are between 85 and 90 per cent satisfied Only in the Wellington study [3] of childrens A amp E attendance was a direct question asked about satisfaction with the general practitioner service Forty-one per cent expressed some dissatisfaction mostly mentioning concern over difficulty in seeing the doctor Problems with getting an appointment with waiting because there was no appointment system with unsympathetic receptionists and with doctors not being willing to visit the horne were all mentioned Some parents commented that at a health centre they were unlikely to see their own doctor so they might as well go to the A amp E department Four per cent of parents were dissatisfied with the general practitioners treatment and came to the A amp E department for better treatment The cost of visiting the general practitioner was only mentioned by three parents (07 per cent)

Satisfaction with A amp E department The Wellington study [3] found that 73 per cent of parents were satisfied with the A amp E department For those who were dissatisfied the urgency of their visit was uppermost and they were unhappy at having to wait too long Parents also commented disapprovingly that the departments were understaffed or very busy The A amp E staff carne in for very little criticism only 07 per cent of parents made critical comments Many parents expressed their satisfaction with the reassuring aspects of the A amp E department its availability and its size A typical comment was its big they have everything there In one case parents dissatisfied with the treatment of their sick child at one A amp E department went to another department because it was bigger

81

Views of A amp E staff

When we asked A amp E staff why people visi ted the department they offered the same reasons that patients had given as explanations ie appropriateness availability and satisfaction Staff also commented that Pacific Islanders were accustomed to using hospital services for all their medical care in the islands andmiddot continued tomiddot use the hospital in New Zealand either as a first resort or for a second opinion Kinloch [29] demonstrated that while this was so for recent Samoan migrants in Wellington after some years New Zealand residence their pattern of hospital usage because similar to that of the population as a whole

A amp E staff thought that the major reason for the GP-load patients visiting the department was general practitioner unavailability They recognised

that many patients did not have a general practitioner because they were new to the area transient or on holiday Many staff mentioned the cost of visiting a doctor as a major reason although a few staff strongly asserted that cost was not important

EFFECT Of HIEALTH CENTRES AND DEPUTISING SERVICES ON A 8t IE UTILISATION

It has been assumed that the unavailability of a family doctor has been a major reason for people attending an A amp E department Consequently health centres with more facilities for treatment of injuries and open for longer hours than the usual doctors surgery have been set up Two United States studies [3031] found that the health centres they looked at appeared to have reduced the use of A amp E departments by people in the local neighbourhood either absolutely or relativemiddot to people in other neighbourhoods However in New Zealand data collected from Dunedin A amp E records by Maynard [32] three years before and three years after the Mosgiel health centre opened andmiddot by ourselves six years after it opened gave no evidence of a decline inA amp E use by Mosgiel residents It appeared that since the A amp E department was rarely used for routine primary care problems there was little opportunity for the health centre to substitute for the department Possibly a neighbourhood closer to the A amp E department would have shown more effect from a health centre Also as Alpert et al [33] suggested habit patterns of usage could be difficult to change

Williams et al [34] investigated the effect of general practitioner deputising services on A amp E department use in the Sheffield Hospital region They found that deputising service referrals did not add significantly to the workloads of A amp Edepartments nor did it appear that many patients referred themselves to the A amp E departments in preference to consulting the deputising service doctors They commented that the deputising services may have been meeting a demand previously coped with by the hospitals

It is possible that health centres ana deputising services have contradictory effects on A amp E department visits People who realise a doctor is readily available through these services may use thatmiddot service rather than the A amp E department Other people may reason that if they cannot see their usual doctor it is just as convenient to use the A amp E department as the health centre or deputising service

82

A amp E STAFF VIEWS OF PATIENTS

Overseas studies

Several overseas studies have explored the views of A amp E staff about their patients Roth [35] found that staff applied concepts of social worth which were common in the larger society to their patients so that higher status people were likely to get more respectful treatment than lower status Staff tended tomiddot oVerestimate the numbers of patients seen as undesirable such as drunks venereal disease cases and welfare cases as well as overestimating the numbers using the department inappropriately Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff categorised patients as good (clinically interesting allowing staff to practise their skills and testing the competence of staff) and rubbish (a socially-defined category including drunks overdoses tramps and trivia which were usually minor injuries or conditions not requiring medical attention) Hughes [37] commented that the good and rubbish categories were relatively small groups and that staff had a neutral attitude to the bulk of the people visiting the department

Jeffery [36] found that staff reacted punitively to rubbish patients using delay verbal hostility and vigorous restraint of unco-operative patients particularly overdoses According to Roth (35] patients seen as unco-operative will be told to wait their turn and may be threatened with refusal of treatment Several authors found that patients visiting for tri vial complaints tended to be handled with surface politenessmiddot even if they were subject to post-hoc attacks in written records or departmental gossip [363738]

Burgess and Holmstrom [39] found that the attitudes and actions of health providers could increase or diminish the psychological consequencies for women who had been raped and suggested that staff awareness and training would be valuable Alexander [40] studied nurses preceptions of women who had been raped and found that while the womens characteristics were important the nurses own personality and attitudes were more important Alexander concluded that short-term sensitivity training was unlikely to be effective and that great care was necessary in selecting health providers to care for raped women

Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff viewed patients as having a legitimate claim to medical care if they were not responsible for their condition if they were restricted in their reasonable activities by the condition if they viewed their condition as an undesirable state and if they co-operated in trying to get well He commented that people visiting repeatedly because of overdoses or fights were regarded as not co-operating while repeated injuries from sports activities were viewed as legitimate Roth [19] in a study of five United States A amp E departments found that staff views on the legitimacy of a visit depended partly on the patients source of referral People referred by health professionals were usually accepted as legitimate exceptmiddot where A amp E staff suspected a doctor of dumping an unwanted patient on to the department Contract cases where the hospital had a contractual relationship with the school nursing home or workplace the patient came from were immediately accepted as appropriate People brought in by police came into this category Self-referred patients were classified as legitimate or not depending on their social characteristics their condition and the kind of demands they were making on the department In a later paper Roth [35] noted that cases where a definite diagnosis could be made (surgical conditions asthma overdoses maternity

83

patients) were considered legitimate whereas psychiatric conditions and cases requiring more subtle or complex diagnosis were regarded as illeg i timate

The New Zealand situation

While this study did not observe staff-patient interactions in detail we asked A amp E staff about the patients and how they dealt with them and we watched staff at work for some time in each department

We found some evidence that New Zealand A amp E staff shared the views of their British and United States counterparts House surgeons tended to regard the clinically interesting patients as goodand often commented unfavourably on patients whose condition was not easily diagnosed With regard to the rubbish category of patients some A amp E staff disapproved of them while others accepted the whole range of patients as part of working in the department We saw little evidence of punitive reactions to patients although delay andmiddot the intimidating effect of a white coat appeared to be used at times The views of A amp E staff about specific categories of patients are covered in the next sections

Sports injuries

From the Christchurch and Waikato [4] studies we have estimated that 13 per cent of A amp E injury visits were for sports injuries At Green Lane A amp E department staff had recorded all rugby injuries on the A amp E log in the late April week sampled the rugby injuries comprised six per cent of all injuries

A amp E staff saw the department as the appropriate place for the treatment of sports injuries One staff member commented that most general practitioners would get a shock if presented with a sports injury to treat Staff also understood that coaches usually sent people straight to the A amp E department as an automatic procedure and that this was often legitimate since the injury might have required an x-ray However a frequently mentioned source of annoyance was people presenting with a sports injury some considerable time after the event such as on Monday morning or after the post-match drinking bout A amp E staff thought these patients should have seen a general practitioner particularly when the condi tion was not acute A few A amp E staff commented that they were beginning to regard repeated sports injuries as self-inflicted injuries and were less sympathetic to those patients

Alcohol-related visits

In all the A amp E departments staff commented that many of the assault and motor vehicle accident injuries were directlyassociated with alcohol (The only exceptions were the suburban hospitals which Were closed evenings and nights) Staff estimated that from half to all patients seen on Friday and Saturday evenings had been drinking or had been hurt by someone who was drinking This estimate may seem exaggerated but inspection of Wellington A amp E logs by Reinken [41] suggested that an estimate of 50 to 79 per cent was reasonable Staff at three of the central city A amp E departments commented that they treated a number of old alcoholic and derelict people usually for chronic complaints or because they had been attacked

84

From time to time staff as well as facilities have suffered abuse and violence A amp E nurses always commented on problems with disorderly behaviour both by patients and by friends of patients in the waiting room In two hospitals nurses had little faith in the security provisions made for their safety but mostly the nurses seemed to cope reasonably well House surgeons said they found intoxicated patients difficult to treat because of their lack of co-operation A amp E officers had few comments on alcohol-related visits probably because they rarely worked evening or weekend shifts

Domestic violence and rape

Unfortunately we did not ask specific questions about these topics but at three hospitals nurses mentioned that they saw cases of child abuse and at another three hospitals wife-beating was mentioned We have few details as to how staff dealt with these women and children but from the comments made by the nurses and on house surgeon they felt a need for more psychiatric or social work backup There were no comments about women who had been raped attending the department

_Regular visitors

At most of the urban A amp E departments and at Rotorua and Whakatane staff commented that they had a group of regular visitors This group was never large unlike the 20 to 60 per cent of workload reported as regular visi tors by two United states public hospitals [19] Asthmatics (who had previously been advised to go straight to the department) were regarded as legitimate visitors and staff watched for children visiting regularly with injur-ies in order to detect cases of chi ld abuse However people who repeatedly presented drunk or with overdoses or with an emotional or social problem were regarded with resigned acceptance or some annoyance One A amp E department maintained a special file for the records of regular visitors while in other departments a bulky bundle of cards stapled together alerted staff to yet another visit from a regular client_

Trivia

When the A amp E staff talked about trivia they mentioned some of the minor injuries and sickness from the GP-Ioad category but also included very minor injuries such as a splinter in a finger or a cut needing only a Bandaid Some A amp E staff felt that trivial conditions did not require any medical treatment especially not from a department designed to treat emergency conditions A few staff members commented that people with minor conditions cluttered up the waiting room and were physically in the way Some also said that knowing the waiting room was full put more pressure on them However other A amp E staff stressed that apparently trivial conditions were important and worrying to the patients involved and that reassurance at least was required

It has been suggested that people using the A amp E department for trivial conditions decrease the ability of the department to cope with emergencies [42431 Most staff interviewed felt confident that people attending for trivial complaints in no way jeopardised the quality of care given to the more urgent cases because the latter were seen first ThUS the minor complaints were annoying and added work but did not compromise the departments ability to give good care

85

DISCUSSION

Why do patients attend the A amp E department The public seem to have a rough and ready decision tree if you are sick go to your doctor if you are hurt go to the Aamp E department

The department is definitely seen as the appropriate place for treating accidental injuries People say thats what its there forI and they have everything there A visit to the general practitioner for such an injury is seen as unnecessary and delaying

A significant proportion of accidents and some sickness conditions happen away from home The patient may decide to go to the A amp E department because it is closer or easier for transport or work reasons Often someone else (a schoolteacher a coach or traffic officer) sends the patient to the A ampE department as an automatic procedure

Most people with sickness conditions visit their general practitioner so it is not surprising that those who visit the A amp E department have often been referred by their doctor The sick patients who corne directly to the department usually see their condition as needing urgent care Therefore if they try to contact their doctor and fail or if they think the doctor will be unavailable they head for the hospital

It is also possible that the general practitioners surgery is associated with waiting while the hospital is associated with swift action perhaps due to televised images as noted by Cooke [44] In fact the waiting times are generally equivalent in both settings it is the significance of that waiting which is different The patients may feel that if something happens to worsen their case they will be attended to quickly if they are waiting in the A amp E department rather than waiting at home for the general practitioner to visit

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners formiddot patients From the patients comments one of the main attractions of the A amp E department is its availability that it is always open and staffed In comparison general practitioners were often seen as not being available as difficult to contact or as unable to respond quickly to an emergency In this sense A amp E departments appear to be competitive with general practitioners As was noted in Chapter 6 sickness visits to the A amp E department were more likely to happen out of hour s than in hours The overseas studies suggest that health centres and deputising services which offer greater availability of doctors particularly out of hours may reduce the use of A amp E departments The only way general practitioners could compete with the availability of the A amp E department would be to improve their own out-of-hours service

The cost of visiting a general practitioner has also been cited as a reason for people visiting the A amp E department where treatment is free This is only relevant for sickness conditions since the cost of general practitioner treatment for accidental injuries is covered by the Accident Compensation Corporation However in none of the New Zealand studies covered in this chapter did people give cost of treatment as a major reason for attending the A amp E department A amp E staff tended to over-estimate the importance of cost as a reason but this was not surprising as they also oVer-estimated the number of people visiting the department for sickness conditions

86

Despite sickness visits to the doctor being free in Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14 J found similar levels of A amp E sickness attendance there as here Steinmetz [45) reported that on the introduction of Medicare in Quebec doctors no longer charged patients whereas previously only care in an emergency room was free He found that the demand for medical care increased at both sites the doctor and the emergency room but that there was no evidence of a shift from the emergency room back to the doctor Thus there is little evidence that the cost of visiting a general practitioner causes people to visit the A amp E department Rather people use the department because they see it as the appropriate place for treatment of their condition and it is available

Turning now to staff a~titudes to the patients it seems that acceptance of the great variety of people (and their conditions) is a necessary part of working in the A amp E department However the staff comments do raise some concerns Abusive and violent patients have been a problem in some hospitals and a reappraisal of security arrangements in some of the urban A amp Edepartments would be desirable

A amp E staff should be aware that women and children presenting with injuries may have received them in domestic violence and that full information on how the injury happened may not be volunteered It is difficult for staff to do more than treat the injuries when there are few specialised support services available However some attempts are being made to provide such services for children [46] and through v9luntary organisations such as womens refuges A amp E staff should maintain good contact with these services where they exist and work with others to institute them where they do not

Staff should also maintain contact with rape crisIs centres so that women who have been raped can ring them for short or long-term support if they want it Alexanders work [40] suggests that while a raped woman is in the department she should be cared for by a crisis team of hospital staff (not necessarily A amp E staff) who have volunteered for that work Perhaps this approach could be tried in New Zealand A amp E departments

87

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S - Ca$ualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) P 272-279

2 RICHARDS JG and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

3 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C andREINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

4 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

5 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care Vbull Determinants of use of hospital emergency services E Richard Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

6 Casual attenders a socia-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcastle-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

7 STRATMANN William C and ULLMAN Ralph - A study of consumer attitudes about health care the role of the emergency room in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1033-1043

8 KELMAN Howard Rand LAWE Dorothy S- Usemiddot of the hospital emergency room in re1atiop to th~ use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

9 INGRAMD R CLARKE D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

fO GARRAWAY W M - The work of a casualty department in Health Bulletin - v 27 no 3 (1969) p 26-30

11 KAHN Lawrence ANDERSON Mary and PERKOFF Gerald T - Patients perceptions and uses of a pediatric emergency room in Soc Sci Med - v 7 (1973) p 155-160

12 CALNAN M ABSON I E P and BUTLER J R - In case of emergency inI

Health Soc Serv J - (1982) p 615-617

13 HOLOHAN Ann M - Accident and emergency departments illness and accident behaviour in Social Rev (Mono] - (1976) p 111-119

14 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Serv J - (1981) ~ 1139-1142

15 The functioning of a childrens hospital casualty department Susan Lovell et aI in Med J Aust - v 1 (1975) P 135-138

16 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R Call Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

88

17 WINGERT WA Friedman D B and LARSON W R - The demographic and ecological characteristics of a large urban paediatric outpatient population and implications for improving community paediatric care in A~ J Public Health - v 58 (1968) p-859

18 CALNAN M - Managing -minor- disorders pathways to a hospital accident and emergency department in Sociol Health Illness- v 5 no 2 (1983) p 149-167

19 ROTH J A - Utilisation of the hospital emergency department in J Health Soc Behav - v 12 (1971) P 312-320

20 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) P 163

21 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 no 2 (1971) p307-312

22 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J- Help The hospital emergency unit as community physician in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) P 248-260

23 MAGNUSSON G - The use and abuse of accident and emergency departments - the Stockholm experience in World Hosp - vIS no 3 (1979) p 170-172

24 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL D J and WALKER J H - Practitioners patients and the accident department I in Hosp Health Serv Rev shy(1975) P 80-84 I

25 CONWAY Hugh - Emergency medical care in Br Med J - v 2 (1976) p 511-513

26 PEASE R - A study of patients in a London accident and emergency department with special reference to general practice in Practitioner - v 211 (1973) p 634-638

27 MOK CH - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

28a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident s~atistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington- Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

89

29 KINLOCH P J - Samoan health practices -in Wellington - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 9-iO (Occasional paper series no 12)

30 MOORE_ Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEHect of a neighbourhood health centre onhospi tal emergency room us~e - in Med Care v 10 no 3 (1972) P 240-247

31 HOCHEISERLouis I WOODWARD Kenneth and CHARNEY Evan - Effect of the neighbourhood health centre on the use of pediatric emergency departments 1n ROchester~ New York in N Eng J Med - v 285 no 3 (1971) p 148-152

32 _MAYNARD Edward Jand DODGE Jeffrey S -- Introducing a community health centre at M05giel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (Aamp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

33 The types of families that use an emergency clinic Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ala New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

34 WILLIAMS B T DIXON R A and KNOWELDEN J - The impact of general practitioner deputising services on accident and emergency departments in the Sheffield hospital region in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 23 (1973) p 638-645

35 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) p 839-856

36 JEFFERY R - Normal rubbish deviant patients in casualty departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 1 no 1 (1979) p 90-107

37 HUGHES D - Lay assessment of clinical seriousness practical decision-making by non-medical staff in a hospi tal casualty department - University of Wales Swansea 1980 Ph D Thesis

38 DINGWALL R and MURRAY T - Categorisation in accident departments -good- patients -bad- patients and middotchildren- in Sociol Health Illness - v 5 no 2 (1983) p 127-148

39 BURGESS Ann Wolbert and HOLMSTROM Lynda Lytle - The rape victim in the emergency ward in American Journal of Nursing - v 73 no 10 (1973) p 1741-1745

40 ALEXANDER Cheryl S - The responsible victim nurses perceptions of victims of rape in Journal of Health and Social Behaviour - v 21 (March 1980) p 22-23

41 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

90

42 MAYNARD Edward J - The appication of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment -University of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 161-194

43 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - NewYork Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

44 COOKE Alistair - The doctor (1981) p 1652-1655

in society in Br Med J - v 283

45 STEINMETZ Nicholas and HOEY John R - Hospital emergency utilisation in Montreal before and after Medicare experience in Med Care - v 16 no 2 (1978) pl33-139

room the Quebec

46 GEDDIS D C - Child Abuse report of national symposium held in Dunedin September 1979 - Auckland National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1979 p 30-34 60-63

91

CHAPTER 8

Utilisation of accident and emergency departments

In this chapter we consider A amp E ufefrom a new perspective looking at the rates of attendance by people in different neighbourhoods We examine variations in the rates among areas and we discuss the evidence they provide as to the effect of doctor availability on A amp E use Next we analyse several factors which could account for the variations in attendance rates including distance from the hospi tal social characteristics of the areas and A amp E department characteristics Finally we present results from several studies which compare rates of attendance at general practitioners and at A amp E departments

COMPARISON OF A amp E UTILISATION AMONG HOSPITAL CATCHMENT AREAS

The neighbourhoods that we have used are census area units sometimes grouped contiguously to achieve socially and economically homogeneous areas that have populations of about 2000 or more We grouped all of New Zealand into 682 such neighbourhoods Of these 442 neighbourhoods are in the catchment irea of one of the 15 A amp E departments studied

Using the attendance numbers taken from the A amp E logs age-adjusted quarterly rates of attendancemiddot have been calculated (indirectly standardised to the total New Zealand population at the 1981 census) These rates have been calculated for each neighbourhood separately for injury and sickness conditions for in and out of hours and for first and recall visits Because there were very few recall visits for sickness conditions they have been omitted from the analyses in this chapter When we talk about recall visits we are referring only to recall visits for injuries

The attendance rates have been combined for the neighbourhoods making up the catchment area of an A amp E department These rates measure the use made by people living in a particular area of any A amp E department in their region Usually people living in the catchment area of an A amp E department do visit that department However particularly in the North Shore and Kenepuru areas a large number of residents attend other A amp E departments Thus the rates presented here should be interpreted as attendance rates of people living in an area not necessarily attendance rates at particular A amp E departments

The rates for each catchment area are presented in Table 16 In Table 17 the annual rates of accidental death and admission to hospital for accidental injury similarly age-adjusted are presented

Results

As Table 16 shows the overall attendance rates varied considerably in the A amp E department catchment areas studied

92

Sickness attendance

Among the urban catchment areas the Wellington Board region showed very high rates of use of A amp E departments for sickness attendance Except for Rotorua and Whakatane out of hours the provincial and rural areas had very low rates of sickness attendance

TABLE 16 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3

Midd1emore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals studied

First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness In Out of hours hours

35 55 41 67 82 121 72 105 54 72 52 64

17 26 36 51 09 17 21 23

12 8B 54 26

36 36 72 61

46 63

Injury In Out of In Out of hours hours hours hours

125 130 137 25 151 130 159 25 17 0 196 36 41 127 156 87 B8 136 151 54 30 229 240 123 42

79 70 42 29 241 215 99 72 203 96 64 10 14 4 213 66 98

173 179 59 62 223 85 83 32

194 92 216 47 164 96 116 20

154 145 101 38

Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 Since few recall visits were for sickness conditions only recall visits for injury have been included in this category

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

1

93

TABLE 17 HOSPITAL ADMISSION FOR ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR)l AND DEATH DUE TO ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR) 2 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area Admitted for Died from Population accidental accidental of ca tchment injury injury area

Full-time departments

U rban Auckland3

Middlemore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals

104 123 146 153 140 142

194 169 196 149

243 214

95 133

139

067 062 062 059 058 072

070 089 065 068

059 075

048 096

066

408 948 264 093 133 611 147 858 336 420 III 981

110 205 56 613 98 883 50 250

39 087 37 767

146 661 52 389

3 126 747

1 Source Hospital Discharges 1979 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

2 Source Mortality Data 1974-1978 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

common catchment

Injury attendance

First attendances for injury also showed wide variations among the hospital catchment areas Wellington Rotorua Whakatane and Dunedin catchment areas showed relatively high rates of first attendance for injury both in

94

and out of hours Timarus catchment area had high rates only out of hours while those of Grey Taranaki and North Shore were high only during normal work hours Northlands catchment area had very low attendance rates both in and out of hours

The pattern of difference from place to place in first attendance rates for injury means that in any year a person in Rotorua would have more than one chance in six of attending the A amp E department for an injury while a person in Northland has but one chance in 16 of doing so

~s this due to a difference in the rate at which accidents occur It does not appear so since neither the rates for death due to accidental injury nor the rates of hospital admission for accidental injury follow the same pattern as A amp E attendance (see Table 11) In fact the death rates were low in Christchurch and North Shore areas (where A amp E attendance was average) and high in Kenepuru areas where A amp E attendance was low Similarly admission rates were sometimes higher in areas where rates of A amp E attendance for injury were lower (Northland and Taranaki) and vice versa (North Shore)

Also the admission rates probably reflect a tendency for more rural hospi tals to admit injured patients more readily because of the distance they would have to travel for outpatient care

Recall attendance

As noted in Chapter 6 the practice of recalling patients was different from hospital to hospital and affected the composition of the A amp E department 5 total attendance Naturally the rate of recall visits also differed markedly in the catchment areas

Relatively low rates of recall visits characterised the Northland Wellington Christchurch and Taranaki areas The Auckland Hospital Board areas had very different patterns in and out of hours with high rates of recall visits in hours and low rates out of hours

Effect of general practitioner availability

Is there any evidence from these rates (Table 16) that availability of general practitioners had an effect on A amp E use If there was an effect it would be evident from comparing in hours sickness attendance with out of hours sickness attendance since when the general practitioner is less available out of hours the patients may be more likely to present at hospital Was the out of hours rate higher than the in hours rate taking into account the different proportions of peoples waking hours in each category Overall this did not appear to be so Compared to the in hours rate the out of hours rate was only slightly higher than would been expected Only in Whakatane was the out of hours sickness rate markedly higher than would have been expected Thus any effect of doctor availability on A amp E use would seem to be very small

See next page

95

FACTORS EXPLAINING CATCHMENT AREA VARIATIONS IN A amp E UTILISATION

There are several possible explanations for the variations in A amp E use

o that the hospital attracts those nearby and if the neighbourhoods near the hospital are densely populated then more people will attend the A amp E department

o that the social characteristics of the catchment areas are different

a that the A amp E department does or does not encourage the public to attend through its policy or practice

Several studies have suggested that distance and socio-economic factors are related to A amp E attendance Distance has been found to be inversely related to attendance in Sweden [1] the United States [23] Britain [4] and New Zealand [5] Some studies have found that lower socio-economic status people use A amp E departments more [678910] although Kljakovic [5] found that Wellington children from lower socio-economic status families were more likely to see a doctor before going to the A amp E department than children from higher status families Berki and Kobashigiwa [11] found that less educated groups used A amp E more while Weinermann [6] and Ullman (12) found no effect Several studies have found that minority group members (67913] and immigrants [1141 tend to use A amp E departments more Kelman and Lane [15] found that family characteristics such as size and age of head-of-household also relamiddotted to A amp E use Cohen et al (16] found no income or employment effects on A amp E use but did find that use was positively related to the number of hospital-based doctors per capita

METHOD

Using multivariate statistical methods it is possible to evaluate which of the explanations ( or which combination of them) best accounts for the observed variations in A amp E use among the neighbourhoods (See Appendix C for the details of the multivariate analyses) Overseas researchers have used similar statistical techniques to explore factors related to A amp E attendance [131116] The factors we chose to explore are described on the next page

We computed the expected value assuming that in any week in hours comprised 50 hours and out of hours comprised 118 hours of which 62 hours were spent awake

Therefore the out of hours rate should equal 62 ~ 50 = 124 times the in hours rate plus E where E is a correction term for night time attendance About eight per cent of total attendance was in the eight-hours night time period [1317] so E can be estimated as eight per cent of the total sickness attendance ie E = 008 x 109 = 087

Therefore the expected out of hours attendance A is

A = (124 x 46) + 087 = 658

The observed value was in fact 63 per 1000 similar to the expected rate

96

One factor was the distance from the centre of the neighbourhood to the A amp E department For neighbourhoods near Kenepuru and North Shore Hospitals in hours and out of hours distances to the nearest open department were calculated separately_

Another factor was the social characteristics of the neighbourhood using variables derived from the 1981 Census of Population and Dwellings chosen on the basis of known or posited relevance to health services utilisation These social characteristics can be listed as follows

o age structure - the proportions of the population under 5 years between 5 and 14 years and 65 years or more

o ethnicity the proportions of the population classed as European ethnicity and Maori ethnicity

o marital status - the proportion of adults separated widowed or divorced

o education - the proportion of adults without tertiary education

o income - the per capita earned income for adults and the proportion of the adults on a means-tested benefit

o employment - the proportions of adults actively seeking work in a bluecollar occupation and partiCipating in the paid workforce

o tenure of dwellings the average weekly rental and the proportion of owner-occupied dwellings

o car ownership - the proportions of households without a car and with two or more cars

o a measure of the north-to-south gradient over the country

A third factor was the general practitioner prOVision as measured by the population-ta-general practitioner ratio

Finally the characteristics of the A amp E department made up a fourth factor We focussed on the following areas

o our classification of the departments and their catchment area into urban prOVincial rural and suburban

o departmental policy on recalling patients (see Chapter 6)

o departmental open door policy on treating sickness attenders (see Chapter 6)

o medical and nurse staffing levels (from Chapter 5) relative to the-population of the catchment area

Production workers transport and equipment operators labourers agricultural workers animal husbandry and forestry workers fishermen hunters

I

97

Results of the multivariate analyses

The effects of distance

Sickness first attendance The distance from hospital affected the rates of sickness first attendance for out of hours visits accounting for nearly 20 per cent of the variance It had less effect on in hours sickness visits accounting for only 9 per cent of the variance

Injury first attendance The most significant characteristic explaining neighbourhood differences in injury first attendance rates was the distance from the A amp E department In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than half the total variance In urban areas it was less important accounting for one-eighth of the variance for in hours rates and one-sixth for out of hours rates

Recall attendance The distange from the hospital was related to in hours recall attendance In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than 40 per cent of the variance but it was much less important in urban neighbourhoods

In summary distance was inversely related to attendance rates with neighbourhoods further from the hospital having lower rates The effect of distance was stronger for injury attendances than for sickness attendances

The effects of social characteristics

Sickness first attendances Out of hours social factors had a substantial effect on sickness attendance People from neighbourhoods where many households were car less were more likely to attend the A amp E department and this factor accounted foi 19 percent of the variance in attendance rate Taking car lessness into account people f rom neighbourhoods where adults were better educated were more likely to attend the A amp E department Adding in the level of educational attainment raised the percentage of variance explained to 265 per cent The same pattern relating carlessness and higher educational attainment to high attendance rates applied to sickness attendance in hours but the effects were less marked In combination with distance the social factors explained 16 per cent of the variance of in hours sickness attendance rates

Injury first attendance In hours the rate of attendance for injury causes was only slightly related to social characteristics of the neighbourhoods adding 6 per cent to the variance explained Out of hours the social factors had a similarly minor effect adding 4 per cent

Recall attendance The social characteristics bad some effect on in hours recall attendance in urban areas In combination with a small distance effect the social factors explained 18 per cent of the variation For non-urban areas the social factors had no effect on in hours recall attendance only distance was important

Thus some of the differences among A amp E departments in the rates of sickness and recall attendance were due to differences in the social characteristics of the departments catchment areas However social factors were not important for injury attendances

98

Tbe effect of general practitioner provision

Initial correlation analyses showed that the population-to-general practitioner ratio was not significantly related to out of hours sickness attendance rates However it was positively related to out of hours injury attendance largely because the numbermiddot of people per doctor in a neighbourhood increases as the distance of the neighbourhood from the hospital decreases

In the multiple regression analyses the ratio nevermiddot entered as a significant variable Thus there was no significant effect of general practitioner provision in the community on A amp E attendance rates (see Table 18)

The effect of A amp E department characteristics

To look at the effect of A amp E characteristics on attendance rates it was necessary to cor rect the rates for the distance and social character istic effects just presented This was done (see Appendix C for details of the principal components analysis used to reduce the data)

Controlling for the neighbourhood factors thedepartment-to-department differences in rates were substantially reduced but were still present (see Table 18) Some patterns in the adjusted rates for sickness and 1nJury could be distinguished The areas served by urban departments tended to have low injury rates especially in hours and high sickness rates especially out of hours The Dunedin areas were an exception their rates were more like those of the areas served by provincial departments which had moderately high injury rates and low sickness rates The rural areas had very high injury rates and high sickness rates The suburban areas were similar to the urban areas except that North Shore areas had high injury rates The adjusted rates for recall attendance were highly variable and demonstrated no clear patterns among the departments

Further analyses were carried out to determine how the A amp E department characteristics related to the adjusted rates (Appendix C contains details of the analyses of variance the Student-Newman-Keuls means tests and the regression analyses of these differences) Only the statistically significant results are presented below

A amp E department classification Out or hours the adjusted sickness rates were lower in the provincial departments areas than elsewhere The sickness rates for the Wellington Hospital Board areas were no longer markedly higher than other areas

In hours the adjusted injury rates were higher in rural departments areas for first visits and in suburban departments areas for recall visits than elsewhere

Open door policy Adjusted rates of attendance for sickness (in and out of hours) were higher where departments had a stated open door policy than elsewhere This explains the low sickness rates in the provincial departments since most of them had restricted policies Where departments had a restricted policy adjusted rates of in hours injury attendance were higher than in open places

99

Recall policy In hours the adjusted injury attendance rates (both first and recall) were higher in areasmiddot where departments had a stated policy favouring recalling patients Out of hours adjusted rates of sickness visits were lower in areas with recall-favouring departments

TABLE 18 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED AND NEIGHBOURHOOD-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 AND POPULATION-TO-GENERAL PRACTITIONER RATI02 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchinent area First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness Injury Population In Out of In Out of In Out of to-GP ratio

hours hours hours hours hours hours

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3 44 57 130 144 100 24 1 476

Middlemore 52 74 165 148 131 24 2 078

Wellington 55 77 160 153 54 30 1 630 Hutt 61 89 130 137 10~9 83 2 237 Christchurch 50 71 116 117 76 27 1 651 Dunedin 40 52 204 193 159 38 1 558

Provincial Northland Base 46 56 128 132 53 45 1 735 Rotorua 34 33 188 163 73 57 1 656 Taranaki Base 17 29 227 ll8 81 19 2 243 Timaru 21 35 168 209 83 88 2 085

Rural Whakatane 29 91 207 222 81 84 1 679 Grey 67 57 286 135 131 39 2 310

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 51 69 198 156 175 57 1 865 Kenepuru 47 54 146 131 129 31 2 035

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors The attendance rates given in Table 16 have been adjusted for neighbourhood-determined factors ie distance from the hospital and social characteristics

2 Source Doctor numbers in full-time equivalents from Medical Council data unpublished

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

100

Staffing levels Adjusted first In]Ury attendance rates were positively related to levels of medical staffing and less impressively to levels of nurse staffing Neither the policy variables nor the size of department accounted for the relationship between lnJury attendance rates and staffing However there was no significant relationship between staffing levels and the adjusted rates of sickness and recall visits

COMPARISON OF A amp E USE AND GENERAL PRACTITIONER USE

Material for comparisons of this sort is hard to find We have compared the level of childrens attendance at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments found by Kljakovic [5] with childrens attendance at general practitioners in the same area over the same period (derived from General Medical Services benefit claims made by general practitioners) In an average week 652 per 1000 children in the Wellington Hospital Board area consulted a general practitioner whereas 35 per 1000 children visited an A amp E department (see Appendix D for details)

Similarly in Tauranga during an average week in the period 1979 to 1982 48 per 1000 people attended the A amp E department while 53 Sper 1000 people consulted a general practitioner [18]

Snelgar [19] compared attendance at Northland Base A amp E department with urgent consultations made by general practitioners (derived from the General Medical Services benefit claims) In an average week 36 per 1000 people in the whangarei area consulted a general practitioner for an urgent condi Hon while 09 per 1000 people made a first visit to the A amp E department

For first injury attendances we have compared rates derived from surveys ot people treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident [20] with similar rates obtained from our tallies at Auckland Hospital Board A amp E departments and data made available to usmiddot by Snelgar McRae and Keenan In a week 37 per 1000 people living in the catchment areas of the above A amp E departments made a first injury visit to an A amp E department while 1 per 1000 New Zealanders made a first injury visit to a general practitioner (see Tab~e 19)

Elderly people were as likely to go to the general practitioner as to the A amp E department for an accidental injury whereas children and young adults were five to six times more likely to go to the A amp E department as the general practitioner Foreign body injuries and cuts appeared to predispose attendance at an A amp E department whereas burns and falls tended to be taken to the general practitioner more than other injuries

In summary people visited general practitioners much more than the A amp E department even for urgent conditions It was only for specific injury conditions that the A amp E department was consulted more than general practitioners

101

TABLE 19 COMPARISON OF FIRST ATTENDANCES FOR INJURY AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS AND GENERAL PRACTITIONERS

Rates per 1000 per week A amp E departments l General practitioners2

Age distribution

All ages 37 10 0-4 years 38 06 5-14 years 39 08 15-29 years 66 11 30-64 years 23 11 65 years and over 11 10

Injury conditions3

Falls 066 027 Cuts 045 009 Foreign bodies 025 002 Toxic effects 014 001 Burns 007 003 Other 232 058

1 Calculated from the author st tallies at Auckland Middlemore Green Lane and NorthShore A amp E departments and data from Northland Base Waikato and Christchurch A amp E departments

2 Calculated from ACC Statistical Supplements - Wellington Accident Compensation Corporation November 1977 March 1978 September 1978 March 1979 and personal communications

3 These categories have been derived from those used in the A amp E department tallies and the type of accident categories used by the ACC

DISCUSSION

The analyses presented in this chapter confirm that distance and social factors are related to A amp E use in New Zealand Their effects were not independent but rather were entwined in a complex way Even within the group of social factors the interactions were complex and there were no simple relations between a specific social factor and A amp E attendance

However distance from the hospital was clearly a major determinant of A amp E use particularly for injury conditions both first and recall The distance effect was especially strong in non-urban areas perhaps because of the greater distances people had to travel in order to reach the hospital Altogether the strong effect of distance was not surprising given the body of overseas literature documenting distance as a factor in health services utilisation and also the number of A amp E attenders citing the accessibility of the department as a reason for using it (see Chapter 7)

102

The social factors were important determinants of sickness attendance with a stronger effect out of hours than in hours They were not important for injury conditions Possibly the appropriateness of the A amp E department for injury conditions as cited by attenders (see Chapter 7) overrides the effect of the social factors

One social factor which had a relatively strong effect on sickness attendance particularly out of hours was car ownership Areas where many households had no car tended to have high sickness rates Perhaps people who have to call a taxi or borrow someone elses car to get medical care go to the A amp E department because they know it will be open and treatment will be available

During our discussions A amp E staff had suggested that Pacific Islanders made greater use of the department because they were accustomed to using the hospital for all medical care in the islands If this was an important factor we would have expected ethnicity to figure prominently in the statistical analyses However for first attendances ethnicity had only a minor effect and in fact areas with high proportions of Pacific Islanders tended to have low attendance rates

Many A amp E staff also suggested that the cost of visiting a general practitioner was a major reason for sickness attendance at the department So we would have expected low income unemployment or receipt of a means-tested benefit to have been related to increased sickness attendance rates However neither income nor receipt of a benefit were at all related to the sickness rates and areas with a low proportion of adults in the paid workforce tended to have low attendance rates Thus contrary to general opinion neither the cost of visiting a general practitioner nor a Pacific Island background appear to have a strong effect on A amp E use

As noted in Chapter 7 we found that some patients were attracted to the A amp E department by the size of the hospital and the impression that specialised equipment was available there However the urban departments which were the largest and which had the most specialised equipment did not have higher attendance rates than the other departments In fact they tended to have slightly lower rates of injury attendance than the other departments

The results presented in this chapter show clearly that even aft~r

controlling for distance and social effects departmental characteristics are related to A amp E attendance It is understandable that rates of sickness attendance reflect whether a department has an open door or restricted policy However the relation between high injury rates and a restricted policy on- sickness attendance requires some explanation Perhaps these departments have always had a high injury rate and have restricted the access of sickness patients so they could cope with the injured patients Conversely the operation of a restricted policy may have convinced the local community that while the department is only to be used for injuries it is indeed the place for all injuries so generating a high attendance rate

It was also understandable that departments with a policy of favouring recalls did have high rates of recall visits But why did these departments have high first attendance rates for injury This probably happens because high recall rates and high first attendance for injury rates go together since larger numbers of injured patients tend to produce larger numbers of patients requiring specialised A amp E follow-up care

103

There was a positive association between first injury attendance rates and staffing levels which could not be explained by the policies or the classification of the department The explanation of these associations is not straightforward The h~gher staffing levels may somehow account for the higher attendance - levels for example attracting clients by keeping the waiting time sh~rt Alternatively an unexamined feature of th department or its catchment area could generate higher attendance levels and staffing levels mayhavebeen adjusted to meetthe demand

Thus departmental characteristics such as policies on non-urgent sickness patients and on recall viSits and levels of medical and nurse staffing are related to attendance rates

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners for patients Looking first at the availability of the two services the greater availability of the A amp E department out of hours did not result in a higher than expected use over those hours Also doctor prOVision (as measured by the populationto-genetal practitioner ratio) was not Significantly related to A amp E attendance rates Thus while the A amp E department was described by patients as desirable because of its availability - (Chapter 7) the attendance rates of the neighbourhoods did not refiect the lcwer availability of general practitioner services

Secondly the comparison of attendance at A amp E departments and general practitioners suggested that in an average week out of 1000 New zealanders four or five would go to an A amp E department and 50 to 60 would go to a general practitioner Of those Visiting the A amp E department on average only one would be attending for sickness Given that non-urgent sickness visits were only 60 per cent of all sickness visits (see Chapter 6) it is clear that general practitioners were losing only a tiny proportion of their workload when A amp E departments treated non-urgent sickness patients~

It - is also clear that general practitioners did not treat many injured people Only one of the 50 to 60 per 1000 people visiting a general practitioner in an average week would be making a first injury visit It would seem that thetwo serVices A amp E departments and general practice arecomplementaiy rather than competiti-ve

REFERENCES

1 MAGNUSSON Gudjon - The role of proximity in the use of hospital emergency departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 2 no 2 (1980) p 202-214

2 INGRAM D R CLARK D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Hed - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

3 ROGHHANN Klaus J and ZASTOWNY Thomas R - Proximity as a factor in the selection of health care providers emergency room visits compared to obstetric admissions and abortions in Soc Sci Med - v 13(0) (1979) p 61-69

4 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referred patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

5 KLJAKOVIC H ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

6 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care V Determinants of use of hospital emergency services Richard E Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

7 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

8 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 nomiddot 2 (1971) p 307-312

9 The types of families that use an emergency clinic - Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

10 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Servo - (1981) p 1139-1142

11 BERKI S E and KOBASHIGAWA B - Education and income effects in the use of ambulatory services in the United States an analysis of the 1970 National Health Interview Survey data in Int J Health Servo shyv 8 no 2 (1978) p 361-365

12 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SlRATMANN William c - An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1011-1020

13 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at AUckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

105

14 MOK C H - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

15 KELMAN Howard R and LANE Dorothy S - Use of the hospital emergency room in relation to the use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

16 COHEN Susan D GINSBERG Allen Sand VLADECK Bruce C - The middoteffects of unemployment and inflation on hospital-based ambulatory care in Am J Public Health - v 68 no 12 (1978) p 1219-1221

17 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

18 DALDY B M REINKEN J and SEDDON T D S - Report on the effect of funding in primary medical care - Tauranga Otumoetai Health Centre 1984 (In preparation)

19 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

20a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

107middot

CHAfTER 9

Conclusions

TheAamp E department is a complex changeable and challenging place It is also an ambiguous place since itmiddot fulfils several different and at times conflicting roles it is a hospital department an emergency service and a primary care service

THEA amp E DEPARTMENT AS A HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT

As a hospital department the A amp E department is the bullodd-one-out It differs from the other departments not only by being accessible at all times to people seeking medical care but also in the number of patients seen and the diversity and severity of illness and injury to be treated

Because of this diversity the A amp E service has little status within medical circles It tends to be seen as an area requiring few special skills and therefore not warranting specialty status However as Salmond [1] noted the humble casualty department provides a hospital with a display window where like it or not hospital wares are constantly on show to the public Good public relations require effective and efficient management of the Amiddotamp E department Also the doctors interviewed for this study stated that special skills in assessment surgery and orthopaedics were required The status of the A amp E department should be improved through a recognition both of the breadth and experience required for A amp E medicine and of the departments importance in the public view of the hospital While a post-graduate specialist programme is probably not warranted at present it should remain an option for future development

The Aamp E department plays a major partin the teaching of house surgeons Junior doctors quickly learn avariety of skills such as suturing lavage reading x-rays and resuscitation More importantly the A amp E department is usually their first experience of practising medicine without any immediately available consultation This study like Salmonds study in 1970 has demonstrated the lack of initial training and orientation and the inadequate senior supervisionrecei ved by many house surgeons in the A amp E department Clearly this should be remedied by the provision of specific training sessions at the beginning of the house surgeons A amp E run and by

increased senior supervision fn the A amp E department )

This study has also highlighted the desirability ofmiddot specific training courses for A amp E nurses Such coursesmiddot can improve the skills and confidence of the nurses and develop the different approach required for A amp E nursing compared to ward nursing The courses run by the Auckland hospitals may provide a useful basis for the development of postbasic and inservice training courses

Working in an A amp E department demands from all staff members an awareness of the social and emotional contexts of the people attending and the possible implications of their conditions for example people who have attempted suicide parents of- an infantmiddot with convulsions and women who have

108

been raped One aim of all training carried out in the department should be to foster such awareness Also it would be desirable for house surgeons to have experienced a psychological medicine run as well as a general medicine run and a surgical run before they work in the A amp E department All A amp E staff should be aware of the support services that they can calIon (eg social workers psychiatrists Salvation Army) or that the patient can contact (eg rape crisis centres womens refuges)

AS an important training site for house surgeons nurses and emergency workers such as ambulance personnel and police officers the A amp E department has a particular responsibility to maintain a high standard of care This study has not assessed quality of care directly although we have considered related areas such as the level of staffing and the experience of staff There is scope for evaluation of the quality of care gi ven for specific conditions The work reported by Mates and Sidel [2] provides some guidelines and a model whereby both process (measured by adherence to standards) and outcome can be studied Their example considered treatment of adult asthma patients and might for a start be replicated here in New Zealand

There is also scope for extending Mates and Sidels method to cover other conditions The ARCOS study [3] provides one model per taining to acute coronary or cardiovascular episodes There is less precendent for evaluating the quality of care in surgical or orthopaedic emergencies but the presentations of abdominal pain might be investigated as a usefUl beginning Removing healthy appendices is an expensive placebo The process evaluation of trauma care has not been reported on though wound sepsis might provide a suitable outcome measure Staff interviewed in our study discussed standards of suturing but no formal studies of quality of care in that respect have been reported

It must be considered that one explanation for the lack of study in the whole area is that very high standards prevail and the need for evaluation is therefore minimal Given patients high expectations and satisfaction with the service that explanation cannot be dismissed Yet studies that demonstrated a satisfactory level of care would confirm the high quality of care In some A amp E departments a small study of one reasonably significant type of emergency should be undertaken possibly modelled on the work of Mates and Sidel

As Gi bson [4] has pointed out the A amp E department acts not only as an entry point to the hospital but as a screen for the other outpatient and inpatient units of the hospital We found this was true of the New Zealand departments studied with only five to ten per cent of first attendances being referred to specialist outpatient clinics and five to fifteen per cent being admitted There were wide variations both in policy and practice with respect to patient disposition We consider that further study of acute medical admission practices focussing particularly on unnecessary hospitalisation is warranted

Some New Zealand studies [56J have tried to evaluate the need for care of patients presenting at the A amp E department They have tended to depend on the A amp E staffs assessment of whether a general practitioner (and a hypothetical one at that) could have dealt adequately with the case No studies have attempted to give a general practitioner assessment So the question of need for A amp E care remains open However it does not seem practical to devote more research effort to this topic until more is known

about the variable costmiddots oftreating minor injuries If such research is contemplated the techniques of activity analysis and recording systems proposed by Dalbyetal [7] andRoberts et al [8] could be useful

tmiddot bullmiddot

This study has not attempted to estimate the cost of A amp E care The information presented aboutothe physical size and staffing levels of A amp E departments suggests that the hospital service commits only a small share of resources to the A amp E department However with the continuing pressure on hospital resources the cost of A amp E care particularly if it is high relative to care by general practitioners has some importance Even a rough and ready costing of the whole service would be a first step Following that an indication of which parts are fixed costs to keep the essential service viable and which vary by volume or by character of workload would be a next step_ The variation in recall levels that we found suggests that savings in variable costs could be possible Gibson et al [9] in their account of a study of operating and patient care activity costs provide a valuable model on which some New Zealand studies could be based

THE A amp E DEPARTMENT AS AN EMERGENCY SERVICE

The A amp E department must be ready to cope with all kinds of emergencies whether they involve one or two badly hurt car-crash victims or the sudden influx of many patients after a natural disaster A major tool ensuring that a department is always prepared for a crisis situation is the disaster plan The United States Joint Committee on Accreditation of Hospitals requires every hospital to have a written disaster plan developed in conjunction with other relevant agencies which is tested in a full-scale drill at least twice a year The plan should cover assigning staff summoning staff to emergency duty setting aside parts of the hospital for specified purposes maintaining adequate supplies and co-ordination and communication within the hospital and with other hospitals police fire health and ambulance services and civil defence officials

Most of the- departments we studied had close liaison with the ambulance service and to a lesser extent with other services such as police fire and civil defence Six of the hospitals had adequate disaster plans which were revised on a reasonably regular basis but very few hospitals had had a full-scale drill to test the plan Many of the departments with inadequate disaster plans were in the process of revising them We commend this since we consider a comprehensive disaster plan which is regularly revised and tested at least annually to be an essential part of the A amp E service

While discussing emergency services it is worth noting that there has been little research done in New Zealand on the use of ambulance services There is a need both to document the coverage and formal structure of the service and to explore the effects if any of the different methods of funding this essential service The former is a necessary first step the latter presumes a study of both ambulance workload and of organisational matters such as staffing training and triage

Internationally there has been considerable discusion over the optimal distribution of A amp E departments nationwide Platt [IO] recommended that as a minimUm a population of 150 UOO was required to justify a full A amp E centre with seven days a week and 24 hours a day staffingbull Several

llO

authors [101112] have indicated the need for regional central or major accident centres with specialised services such as neurosurgery plastic and thoracic surgery and treatment of burns or poisonings serving a population of 500000 to 750000 An emergency service organised in levels as suggested requires careful planning so that all elements are integrated and good communications are maintained It is particularly desirable for ambulance personnel the police and perhaps taxi driVers to be aware of the level of treatment available at different hospitals

There has been disagreement over whether or nor smaller A amp E centres are justified It seems that densely-populated countries or regions with good transport systems do not need smaller A amp E units whereas more sparsely-populated regions often rural do need them [1013] New Zealand definitely falls into the second category Only our urban A amp E departments fulfil (or come close to) Platts criteria of 150000 population yet all of the A amp E departments visited in this study provide an essential service to their communities In New Zealand the distances that patients would have to travel preclude any concentration of emergency care within a few highly-equipped hospitals

THE A 8t E DEPARTMENT AS A PRIMARY CARE SERVICE

The A amp E department is a primary care service since few of the people Visiting it have been referred by a health professional most patients being self-referred or sent by someone else This primary care role could conf lict with the departments role as an emergency service if patients with minor injuries filled the department and hindered the care of emergency patients However by using triage the A amp E departments studied generally avoided this conflict Some departments discouraged visits for sickness conditions and recall visits so that the department would always be ready for an emergency situation

The A amp E department and general practice are both primary care services However the department differs greatly from the general practitioner in many aspects it is readily available 24 hours a day staff have little background knowledge of the patient and there is little continuity of care There has been concern that A amp E departments are stealing patients from general practitioners because the department is always available and care is free there This study has shown that such concern is not warranted

Looking first at the cost of general practitioner treatment as a reason for visiting the A amp E department we note that this is only relevant for sickness conditions since treatment of injury conditions is paid for by the Accident Compensation Corporation The interview studies have shown that very few patients give cost as a reason for attending the department Also the census area unit analysis showed that low income and receipt of a means-tested benefit were not related to sickness attendance rates and that areas with high unemployment had relatively low sickness rates We would expect contrary results if cost was a major factor As well our comparison of attendance rates at A amp E departments and general practitioners indicates that general practitioners would be losing at most one per cent of their workload when A amp E departments treat non-urgent sickness patients Even if all A amp E departments instituted a policy of discouraging such patients the effect on general practice would be negligible

111

The interview studies have demonstrated that patients do find the ready availability of the A amp E department attractive However our analyses of out of hours use compared to in hours use and our explorations of the effect of population-to-doctor ratios have shown that this attractiveness does not translate into significantly higher rates of A amp E attendance This suggests that improving the availability of general practitioner services is unlikely to have a major effect on the use of either service

There are two major factors related to peoples use of A amp E departments The first is distance from the hospital with people living close to the hospital being much more likely to visit the A amp E department It is hard to see any way of changing this factor The second factor is peoples perception of the A amp E department as the appropriate place for injury treatment The verY name of A amp E departments (instituted folJowing the Platt report) implies that the department is for the treatment of injuries It would be very difficult to change this perception and probably would not be desirable given the facilities experience and availability of the A amp E department for injury treatment

There has also been concern that A amp E departments recall patients instead of referring them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care It appears that A amp E departments recall a similar number of patients (10 to 30 per cent- of firstmiddot attenders) as they refer back to the general practitioners (10 to 20 per cent of first attenders) Some of the recall visits are middotjustified because they require the facilities of the A amp E department It hasmiddot been suggested that house surgeons tend to recall patients because of inexperience and to aid their training While this undoubtedly happens we found no evidence that it has a major effect on the level of recall visits However we did find that departments with high levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have high levels of recall visits possibly because the staff had more time to treat the recalled patients This suggests that recall attendance could be reduced in some cases shy

Ov~rseas studies [141516] have discussed A amp E departments as fulfilling three roles

o trauma treatment centre for the community providing acute emergency care

o substitute for the private phYSician when not available

o family physician for the poor particularly minority group poqr

This study has shown that New Zealand A amp E departments operate largely in the first role of trauma treatment centre providing care for both urgent and non-urgent injury conditions The departments also fulfil the second role of out of hours general practitioner substitute to some extent but they hardly ever operate in the third role of family doctor to the poor

This study has not explored in detail general practitioners views and use of A amp E departments although some information on these topics is implicit in the descriptions of procedures in Chapter 3 and the analysis of reasons for visiting the department in Chapter 7 More information about general practitioners perspectives and the actual availability of general practice care outside normal surgery hours could be gathered However we consider that as well as carrying out further research efforts should be made to develop better communication and understanding between general

112

practitioners and A amp E departments Towards this end we would suggest that A amp E departments make greater efforts to inform general practitioners about the conditions of patients attending the department perhaps using prepared forms or cards (see page 15) We hope too that this report will foster greater recognition among general practitioners of the valuable activities of A amp E departments and allay fears that the department is substituting for the family doctor

We conclude as Dixon [17] did in 1970 that the A amp E department and general practice are complementary services rather than competitive We cannot justify further investigation of the hypothesis that A amp E departments steal patients from general practitioners Possibly a study replicating the Northland comprehensive study of urgent medical care utilisation [18] in an urban area coupled with a study monitoring general practitioner availability out of normal surgery hours would finally lay the ghost of competition for patients However given the evidence presented in this report this does not seem a high priority

WHERE FROM HERE

We considet that research effort could now be turned to two areas First a study of the whole area of accidents is definitely warranted Accidents account for a significant proportion of early deaths and long-term disability and the volume of less severe accidents strains the financial and caring resources of the community The research of the Accident Compensation Corporation has understandably focussed on general practitioner care since the Corporation does not bear the costs of treatment at or in hospital Studies of hospital activity neglect general practitioner care of accident victims A broad study would have to involve not only A amp E departments and general practitioners but also occupational health clinics ambulance and other first aid services Only a comprehensi ve study can provide a firm basis for setting priorities for accident prevention efforts

The need for such a study raises the issue of recording systems both in terms of themiddot classification of type and severity of injury and of the context or cause of the accident Not only is there a need for a fairly simple and versatile system but there is also a need for all the many services to use it consistently For medical emergencies where diagnosis follows professional examination the issue is not crucial For injuries where the events immediately before and after the trauma are relevant the recording of cause and context is important Studies of treatment alternatives and costs depend on a detailed description of the injury which is probably worthwhile only for more severe injuries For example we have noted that many A amp E visits are for bumps and bruises minor lacerations or pain from past inj ury Elaborate description of minor conditions only obscures the nature of the more important cases Clearly before such research can proceed some small-scale attempts at coordinated recording and a form of information triage are called for

The second area warranting study middotis that of the emergency services and their coordination The A amp E department and ambulance services would obviously be covered but the civil defence police and fire service should also be involved Disaster plans drills communications and supplies would be important aspects to be considered

113

This study has focussed on what happens inside the doors of A amp E departments and why people go there We hope that it provides a comprehensive view of the organisation and utilisation of New Zealand A amp E departments and that it will be useful not only to those working within the hospital service but also to all those concerned with primary health care and emergency services

114

REFERENCES

1 SALMOND G C - Young doctors An exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

2 MATES Susan and SIDEL Victor W - Quality assessment by process and outcome methods evaluation of emergency room care of asthmatic adults in Am J Public Health - v 71 no 7 (1981) p 687-693

3 BONITA Ruth - Stroke rehabilitation who gets what - how when where and why in Commun Health Studies - v 7 no 3 (1983) p 347

4 GIBSON Geoffrey - The emergency department as a screening point for hospital specialty services inclusionary vs exclusionary strategies in Soc Sci Med - v l3(A) (1979) p 495-498

5 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

6 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

7 DALBY B C S FARRER J A and HARVEY P W - Casualty activity analysis coding and computing in Computer Programs in Biomedicine - v 3 (1974) P 254-266

8 ROBERTS Jean FARRER J and HARVEY P - A progressive study of the emergency room demand by the community in Med Inf - v 2 no 3 (1977) p 197-201

9 GIBSON Geoffrey BUGBEE George and ANDERSON Odin W - Emergency medical services in the Chicago area - Chicago Centre for Health Administration Studies University of Chicago 1970

10 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

11 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 55-58

12 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services - report of a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional office for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

13 PLANT Janet and AMES Seth - Emergencyoutpatient satellites serve as rural outposts in Hospitals Journal of the American Hospitals Association - v 52 no 5 (March I 1978) P 87-92

14 TORRENS Paul R and YEDVAB Donna G - Variations among emergency room populations a comparison of four hospitals in New York City in Med Care - v 8 no 1 (1970) p 60-75

115

15 MOORE Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEffect of a neighbourhood health centre on hospital emergency room use in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) p 240-247

16 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J emergency unit as community physician (1972) p 248-260

17 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S shyutilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71

- Help The hospital in Med Care - v 10 no 3

Casualty department (1970) p 272-279

18 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

Paper Development

- ~

C) w CJ C Z w c 0 laquo

118

APPENDIX A

Question sheets

MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT

1middot Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others

a number b levelsmiddotof experience c background experience

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties eg nurses doing clerical work

2 Policy (on procedures) 21 Standing orders 22 Sorting of patients at presentation who does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admit 26 Relations with other hospital departmentswards eg sharing of

facilitiesstaff with outpatients 27 Relations with other A amp E departments

peripheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

3 Relations with GPs

31 Any involvement of local GPs in A amp E department eg staffing 32 Policy on GP-load presentations

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A amp E service iri general

PRINCIPAL NURSE

1 Staffing

11 Nurses a number b levels of experience c background experience

2 Policy (on procedures) - ~ -

~ ~ bull - - I bull

22 Sorting of patients atprese~ation 23 Level of treatment provic)e~ by nurses 26 Relations with other hospitaldepartmentswards eg sharing

nurses 27 Relationsiith other ~ ~ltE 9~parlttm~nt~periPheral hospitals

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others a number I

b levels of experience c background experience d at different times

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties egnur~esdoing cler~cal work

2 Procedures ~ - ~

21 standing orclers ~ 22 Sorting of patients at pr~seniation~ho does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admitZ 26 Relat io~s witll oth~r )()sIgti taidepa rtmentswards

ashCl~in9 q~i facilitiesstaff with out-patients b go9rdinat~pgwith xray and laboratory

27 Relations with other A amp E departmentsperipheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

4 workload

41 Number of patient visits per year 42 Seasonal variation

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases -definiUon

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp B

120

~~

55 Relations with local GPs ~i~ 56 Alcohol involved in presehttionsbull 57 Administration - recordstystem 58 Hospital policy (if mentiOPed earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A E service in general

HOUSE SURGEONS

Jobdescription

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

2 Procedures

21 Standing orders 24 Follow-up recalls or referrals1

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-load cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A 81

55 Relations with local GPs 56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A E department or the A E service in general

NURSES

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

121

2 Procedures

21 Standing order s 22 Sorting of pati~nts at presentation 23 Level of treatment provided by nurses

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp E

56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A ampE department or the A amp E service in general

A amp E DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST ON PHYSICAL FACILITIES

Waiting room size seating atmospheredecor childrens facilities - screening of ambulance entrance

Treatment rooms size privacy ease of working

Overall layout ambulance flow ease of working holding ward for admission

Relations with rest of hospital

_ proximity ~Qxray level ofl~poratory service ease of ~dJllJtting towards

122

APPENDIX B

Accident and emergency department records

THE STATE OF A amp E RECORDS Most of the A amp E departments visited kept a log or register of A amp E attendance This was a large book or folder where the patients name and other details were entered in order of presentation at the department Usually A amp E department logs contained the following information

the patients name and age the date and time of presentation a one-word description of the patients complaint whether the visit was a first attendance for a complaint

or a return visit the patient I s disposal

All except one of the A amp E departments visited had their own record system (independent of the hospital inpatient system) with one recordmiddot kept for each patient presenting This record was usually an A5 card although one department used a multiple copy A4 sheet Most of the A amp E department records contained the following information

the patients name age sex occupation GP address and phone number the date and time of presentation a one-to-ten word description of the patients complaint the A amp Edoctor(s) seen their clinical notes of

diagnosis and treatment the patients disposal ACC details if the complaint results from an accident other details on tetanus prophylaxis allergies and medical alerts

There were of course variations in the information contained on the logs and records of different A amp E departments An outline of the points where the log and records of each hospital differ from the general descriptions given above appears at the end of this Appendix

The quality of data collected was variable with the out of hours collection often being sketchier than the in hours This was probably due to nursing and medical staff doing the recording as well as their usual duties when receptionists were not on duty The basic details (such as name age and sex) were usually complete but more descriptive details (such as the site cause and sequence of an accident) were not always noted Some receptionists recorded no details about the accident whereas others took considerable care to summarise accurately the relevant information

USES OF A 8t E RECORDS The major users of A amp E records are the A amp E departments themselves and the hospitals A primary use is the estimation of the size and the content of the A amp E workload at different times of the day and the week This information is valuable for planning staffing levels and physical facilities in the A amp E department The A amp E staff also find the information contained in A amp E records useful in dealing appropriately with

123

patients who repeatedy present at the d~parmeptlHSo at times the information recorded in the A amp E depatinienf farequired as evidence in court proceedings

On a broader f ront~ amp E records are useful for sOme research purposes Certainly theyprovide~nsights i nl 0 who USeE the A amp E department (see Chapter 6) At some A amp E departments ~ufficientlY detailed information about accidents resulting in a presentation (eg type site possible cause of accident and occupation of patient) is collected for developing accident prevention programmes However most A amp E records are too sketchy for direct use in this way although they could be used as sampling frames for some accident research

There are disadvantages in using A amp E records for health services research purposes

I A amp E departments deliver only a small part of ambulatory medical care They deliver care to a selected age group and to a group who by and large happen to live nearby

2 Generally A amp E records are one-off and do not have the longitudinal perspective of general practice records or even hospital notes

3 Even for an epidemiological survey of accidents A amp E departments see an incomplete caseload They do not see all fractures much less all wounds concussions eye injuries etc

POINTS OF DIFFERENCE fROM GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS GIVEN

Full-time Information on log Information on A amp E record departments

Urban Auckland Age not noted

Middlemore Motor vehicle accident also noted

Green Lane Age not noted Sports and motor vehicle accidents also noted Residential area (not street address) also noted

Address A amp E doctor and Length Of stay and homeWellington 1A amp E patient number also address collected for nonshy

Hutt noted New and return New Zealand residents visits not always differentiated

Christchurch Sex address GP referral and motor vehicle accidents also noted

Dunedin [NO log kept Records held in alphabetical order for each months presentations]

Full-time departments

Provincial Rotorua

Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane

Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore

Kenepuru

124

Information on log

GP A amp E doctor case history and treatment also noted

Only patient name and date of presentation noted

Source of referral location of accident and special accident cases also noted

[Not seen]

Information on log

Complaint not noted

Address A amp E doctor and A amp E patient number also noted New and return visits not always differentiated

)

Information on A amp E record

Different cards used for work and non-work accidents

[None]

Specific places allocated on A4 sheet for case history lab and x-ray reports and follow-up

Time of presentation not noted

Information on A amp E record

Length of stay and home address collected for nonshyNew Zealand residents

125

APPENDIX C

StatisticalanaIY$es of accident and emergency department attendance riltes by neighbourhoods

METHOD

The analysis set out to test

o the effect of distance

o the effect of social factors

o the effect of A ampE department characteristics on A amp E attendance rates

The first two of these effects are not independent It was therefore necessary to use multivariate methods to assess the effect of distance controlling for social factors and for social factors controlling for distance

Other analyses of New Zealand geographical areas (in preparation Reinkeii) have found distinct differences between urban areas (those with populations exceeding 35000) and non-urban areas Therefore the multivariate analyses have been carried out separately for the 355 urban neighbourhoods and the 86 non-urban neighbourhoods One neighbourhood did not have complete census data and was omitted from the multivariate analysis Where we found differing results for urban and non-urban areas they have been mentioned separately Otherwise the results are presented as general findings

STEPWISE MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Initially a simple stepwise regression analysis was carried out The results are shown below Variables are presented in decreasing order of importance and are related to high attendance rates

All Neighbourhoods Urban Neighbourhoods Non-urban Neighbourhoods

Out of hours sickness

37 of the variance is 34 of the Variance is 36 of the variance is explained by explained by the same explained by many carless households features as all neighshy near the hospital near the hospital bourhoods many households with cars young age-structure few in the paid workforce many with higher few school-age children education many Maori many blue collar many in the paid workforce

All Neighbourhoods

out of hours injury

35 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many children many married many Europeans few households with two cars

In hours sickness

16 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many car less households few separated widowed or divorced low average rental many in paid workforce many with higher education

In hours injury

31 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars many school-age children few Pacific Island Chinese or Indian

Recall visits in hours

23 of the variance is explained by near the hospital high average rental many households with two cars few with higher education many in the paid workforce few European many separated widowed or divorced many school-age children

Urban Neighbourhoods

28 ofmiddotthe variance is explained by near the hospital few households with two cars many with higher education many blue-collar many European few separated widowed or divorced many seeking work

14 of the variance is explained by few households with two cars near the hospital low average rent high income many in paid workforce few separated widowed or divorced

16 of the variance is expla ined by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars

18 of the variance is exp lai ned by high average rental near the hospital many households with two cars many Maori many separated widowed or divorced few seeking work many with higher education

Non-urban Neighbourhoods

62 of the Variance is explained by near the hospital few in the paid workforce

7 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

57 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many one-car households

42 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

127

Few recall visits happened out of hours so the out of hours recall attendance rates are low ~ndhlghlY yariable NO adequate model was found in the analyses so 19 resultsare presented here

Clearly distance was an important determinant of rates of attendance The social characteristics had a )I9dest effect on injury first attendance a more substantial effect on rates of recall visits and a very substantial effect on the rates of sickness attendance in the different neighbourhoods

The pattern was quite different for the urban and non-urban areas as were the associations among the social variables A more complex analysis was needed

2 DATA REDUCTION

Separate principal components analyses for urban and non-urban areas were done on the social factors and yielded sets of four components with eigenvalues of one or more For clarity of interpretation the four-vector model was rotated (using a varimax method) and yielded four urban parameters and four non-urban parameters as shown Variables are shown in decreasing order of importance for each parameter

Urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few home-owners young ageshy low income in the northerry many carless structure few with higher regions higher many on benef it many Maori education average rental many seeking work many blue-collar few in the paid many separated work force widowed or divorced many blue-collar

Non-urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few separated many Maori bull many home- low average widowed or manyseeking owners rental divorced work few in the paid few with higher few old in the workforce education many two-car and northern many blue-collar few carless regions high income many blue-collar many children

3 PRODUCING ADJUSTED RArES

We fitted a regression equation for each attendance rate on the distance factor and the eight social factor parameters For urban neighbourhoods the four non-urban parameters were held at zero and vice versa for the non-urban neighbourhoods

128

The regression equations using this method allowed non-urban and urban areas to be analysed together and yielded levels of variance explained generally equal to those derived from the significant predictors in the simple stepwise regressions

Variance in attendance rates explained by different methods

Regression In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Using or iginal variables 16 31 23 37 35 14

Using rotated parameters 18 26 29 36 37 14

Each parameter-based equation yielded a rate of attendance expected on the basis of purely neighbourhood characteristics The difference between this expected rate and the actual observed rate gave a measure of the attendance rate adjusted for neighbourhood-determined features After this adjustment for distance and social factors the department-to-department differences remaining were muted In fact the F-tests of the differences among the departments showed the following changes

Changes in F-test values from unadjusted to adjusted rates

In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Unadjusted rates 74 69 195 132 96 123 Adjusted rates 23 65 107 53 41 119

4 TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE

Analyses of variance were carried out on the attendance rates adjusted for neighhourhood-determined factors for in hours and out of hours and looking separately at sickness first injury and recall visits First the A amp E department was used as the independent variable (except that Auckland and Green Lane were combined since they share a single catchment area) Then tests were done on the departments categorised into urban provincial rural and suburban open door policy and recall policy When the analyses of variance showed significant effects Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used to identify single departments or groups of departments that differed significantly from the others

Staffing levels were plotted against the adjusted rates When the correlations were significant the slope of the simple regression was examined

129middot

Results of analyses of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls means tests on adjusted attendance ratesmiddot

Differencemiddots Differences Differences among among between

Neighbourhood- A amp E categories of open-door adjusted departments A amp E department and attendance ( urban restricted

provincial departments rural or suburban)

Out of hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Provincial Open rates

rates lower higher than than others restricted

First injury Yes

Recall injury Yes Yes

In hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Open rates

higher than restricted

First injury Yes Yes Yes Grey rates Rural rates Restricted higher than higher than rates others others higher than

open

Recall injury Yes Yes Suburban rates higher than others

Only statistically significant results presented

Differences between departments favouri ng and not favouring recalls

Yes Recall-favouring rates lower than others

Yes Recall shyfavoumiddotring rates higher than others

Yes Recall shyfavouring rates higher than others

130

APPENDIX D

Childrens use of general practitioners and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

In conjunction with the 1981 Kljakovic study of chi ldren s attendance at A amp E departments in Wellington a parallel study of childrens visits to and by general practitioners was undertaken General Medical Services benefit claims for the same period were examined noting for each juvenile (0-14 years) visit the census area unit of the residence and the address of the general practitioner or locum This yielded rates of child attendance both for normal surgery hours and for urgent visits (out of surgery hours) for the whole region These were adjusted to give estimates for the 0-12 year old population and were then compared with the rates of A amp E attendance found by Kljakovic

AS Figure 10 shows the use of A amp E services was a very small part of childrens primary medical care During surgery hours visits to the A amp E department which were not preceded by contact with the general practitioner were only 16 per cent of first medical contacts Outside normal surgery hours the visits to A amp E departments that bypassed a general practitioner were more frequent I but they rose only to 194 per cent of first medical contacts

This comparison of overall use of medical services for children showed some tendency for parents to use A amp E more when they used general practitioners less comparing in hours with out of hours This was not surprising given that many of the in hours visits to general practit ioners would be for non-urgent conditions or even routine preventive care

Eighty-four neighbourhoods in the Wellingtoh region (the census area units or groupings of the same) were examined to see which of four factors (the distance of the neighbourhood from the A amp E department the use of general practitioners the per capita income and the ethnicity of the neighbourhood) were related to the use of A amp E departments The most important factor was distance from the A amp E department Then taking distance into account there was a slight tendency for areas where parents made less use of the general practitioner during normal surgery hours to be areas of more frequent use of the A amp E department However this tendency was not statistically significant and no such tendency was found for out of hours use Overall there was little evidence of competition between general practitioners and A amp E departments for patients

Figure 10 Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

In hours Out of hours

Need for medical care recognised

I I bull I I I I I Ifail Try to Try to fail Still need Icontact contact careI

general generalI 0gt practitioner practitioner w-- I succeed I succeed

I I I I

AampE 13 yes Still need Contact Contact Still need yesI department care general general care departmentI

practitioner I practitioner

I I I

7650 824I egt I I

Still need Visit Visit Still need I care general general careI

practitioner practitionerI I I I I I

~X-215 -[Ql--~-~- 7346 ALLAN Bridget ClairtJ ) Accident and emergency departmem ~

organisation and utilisation

WX 215 73467 [QJ 1shy

j

ALL

shyUBRARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

WELLINGTON L

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH-SPECIAL REPORT SERIES

Issued by

Management Services amp Research Unit (MSRU) or National Health Statistics Centre (NHSC) Department of Health Private Bag 2 PO Box 5013 Wellington Upper Willis Street Wellington

No TITLE

1 Maori-European standards of health 2 Domestic accidents (public hospital admissions) 3 The Grey Valley survey (lung function in coal miners) 4 Elderly patients in public hospitals 1958 5 Smoking habits of school children 6 Survey of work in compressed air-Auckland harbour bridge 7 Tuberculosis in Canterbury 8 Maori patients in mental hospitals 9 Census of mental hospital patients 1961 10 Elderly persons accommodation needs in New Zealand 1962 11 Patient-nurse dependency exploratory study 12 Patient-nurse dependency general survey data

13 Patient-nurse dependency gynaecology 14 Patient-nurse dependency geriatrics

15 Patient-nurse dependency in Christchurch paediatrics 16 Smoking habits of New Zealand doctors 17 Infant and foetal loss in New Zealand 18 Trends in notifiable disease 19 Survey of factory first aid 1963-64 20 Patient-nurse dependency general surgery 21 Patient-nurse dependency orthopaedic surgery 22 Patient-nurse dependency general medicine 23 Patient-nurse dependency GU Eye ENT

24 Diseases of the ear nose and throat in Maori children 25 Maori patients in public hospitals 26 The health of two groups of Cook Island Maoris

27 Mental hospitals admission and release data cohort study of first admissions 1962

28 Occupational mortality among male population other than Maoris 20 to 64 years of age

29 Dental health status of the New Zealand population in late adolescence and young adulthood

30 Census of mental hospital patients 1966 31 Survey of the public dental health service in Niue and plan for development 32 Hospital food services 33 Bibliography of the epidemiology of New Zealand and its Island Territories

34 Census of public and private hospital patients and old peoples homes 1966 35 Domestic accidents 36 An evaluation of a regional mass miniature radiography programme 1956-67 37 Maori-European comparisons in mortality

38 Physical development of New Zealand school children 1969 39 Psychiatric illness causing hospitalization or death 1967 t40 Census of mental hospital patients 1971 t41 Census of public private and maternity hospital patients and old peoples

homes 1971 t42 Cancer of the lung in New Zealand t43 Organisation of the work of hospital house surgeons 44 Growth of New Zealand pre-school children 45 Maternal and infant care in Wellington-a health care consumer study

46 Accommodation and service needs of the elderly t47 Survey of patients in psychiatric hospitals 48 Family growth study 49 A patient opinion survey Wellington hospital

ISSUED BY

NHSC 1960 NHSC 1960middot NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1963 NHSC 1963 MSRU 1963 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1963 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC ]966

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 MSRU 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1972 MSRU 1971 NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973

NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1974 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1977

llHII tIffPllfJlJ c

~~~~~~~~ f lt b tf

f ()

11

bull

Page 7: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …

CONTENTS

Page

ACKNOWIEDGEMENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

1 INTRODUCTION I

Background Thewider questions of emergency medical services The overseas situation An historical perspective in New Zealand

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments Record studies on the utili satjon of A amp E departments Studies of the organisation of A amp E departments

Overview of this study Aims Sources of information

References

2 DEFINITIONS 11

The Accident and Emergency department Attendance The hospitals Recording systems References

3 PROCEDURES IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT 15

Entry Sorting 1 reatmen t Disposal Follow-upcare Admissions Discussion References

4 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 23

PrinCiples Size Location

Entrances Access to other hospital facilities

Layout Waiting area Examination and treatment area Resuscitation area Operating theatre Plaster room Interview room Reception and records office Staff offices Holding ward

Discussion References

5

6

7

8

STAFFING OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 35

Medical staffing Senior medical staffing Junior medical staffing Accident and emergency work as a career

Nurse staffing Other staff involved with the A amp E department

Reception and clerical staff Orderlies Social workers Ambulance personnel

Discussion References

PATIENT ATTENDANCE CHARACTERISTICS 55

Overall attendance and trends Age and sex Conditions

Injury conditions Sickness conditions

Recall attendance GP-load

Non-urgent sickness Discussion References

PATIENT ATTI~UDES TO THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT AND STAFF ATTITUDES TO THE PATIENTS 75

Reasons for visiting the A amp E department Overseas studies New Zealand studies

Effect of health centres and deputising services on A amp E utilisation A amp E staff views of patients

Overseas studies The New Zealand situation

Discussion References

UTILISATION OF ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS 91

Comparison of A amp E utilisation among hospital catchment areas Results Effect of general practitioner availability

Factors explaining catchment area variations in A amp E utilisation Method Results of the mUltivariate analyses

Comparison of A amp E use and general practitioner use Discussion References

9 CONCLUSIONS 107

The A amp E department as a hospital department The A amp E department as an emergency service The A amp E department as a primary care service Where from here

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A QUestion sheets 116

APPENDIX B Accident and emergency department records 120

APPENDIX C Statistical analyses of accident and 123 emergency department attendance rates by neighbourhoods

APPENDIX D Childrens use of general practitioners 128 and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

TABLES

Table

1 Proportion of first attendance patients discharged recalled referred or admitted

2 Areas of A amp E department~

3 Area to attendance ratios for adjusted total areas and waiting areas of A amp E departments by first attendance and total attendance

4 Numbers of examination and treatment cubicles or rooms and recommended numbers based on first attendance and total attendance

Medical staffing of A amp E departments

6 Total medical staffing (full-time equivalents) and medical staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

7 Nurse staffing of A amp E departments excluding student nurses and hospital aids

Nurse staffing (full-time equivalents) and nurse staffing to attendance ratios for first attendance and total attendance

Average attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

10 Trends in attendance at A amp E departments 1978-1981

11 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was recall attendance

12 Proportion of A amp E attendance that was for sickness

13 Proportion of total A amp E attendance that was for Sickness by policy and age groups

14 Use of general practitioners by first attenders at A amp E departments

15 Reasons for A amp E first attendance from three New Zealand studiesmiddot

Itgt Attendance (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) within each A amp E department catchment area

Page

18

24

25

29

37

39

45

46

56

57

66middot

70

71

77

78

92

(continued)

Table Page

17 Hospital admissionsfor accidental injury (mean 93 age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) and death due to accidental injury (mean age-adjusted rates per 1000 per year) within each A amp E department catchment area

IB Attendance (mean age-adjusted and neighbourhoodshy 99 adjusted rates per 1000 per quarter) and populationshyto-general practitioner ratio within each A amp E department catchment area

19 Comparison of first attendances for injury at A amp E 101 departments and general practitioners

FIGURES

Figure Page

1 Percentage of total attendance at 58 A amp E departments by age and sex

2 Percentage of total attendance at 59 A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

3 Injury first attendances by type of injury 6U all ages

4 Injury first attendances by type of injury 61 by age groups

5 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 62 all ages

6 Sickness attendances by type of sickness 63 by age groups

7 Comparison of medical staff availability and 67 level of recall attendance

Comparison of nursing staff availability and 67 level of attendance

9 Location at which accidents happened by those 79 attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments 131 by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

1

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

BACKGROUND

This report arises f rom concerns expressed by several groups about the availability especially out of hours of emergency car~ and its provision by Accident and Emergency (A amp E) departments in New Zealand

In _SQe mid 1970 s the people of Porirua were worried that local general -pr-actitioners were not available at nights and weekends and by the delays

involved in travelling to Wellington and Hutt A amp E departments [IJ At the same time the people of North Shore were campaigning to keep their local A amp E department open More recently community groups in Upper Hutt have been pressing for the addition of an A amp E service to a local health centre Overall people are concerned that appropriate care (including facilities such as x-rays) is readily available in emergency situations

General practitioners are another group who have been concerned about A amp E departments in particular about inappropriate uses of A amp E departments A long-standing complaint bas been that patients are using A amp E departments for care which wou~d be better given by a general practitioner and that the A amp E departments retain patients instead of referr ing them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care [2 3J In 1981 the research group of the Wellington Faculty of the Royal NZ College of General Practitioners sponsored a study of children presenting at A amp E departments because they were worried that unnecessary admissions of children to hospital occurred because their parents had bypassed the general practitioners and gone straight to hospital [4J

Also A amp E staff and hospital administrators have been concerned that caring for patients who could have been treated by general practitioners has limited their ability to deal with emergency cases [567]

THE WIDER QUESTIONS OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

Emergency care requires not only the provision of hospital services (the A amp E department with back-up from other hospital facilities) but also the organisation of services outside the hospital and co-ordination between both sets of services Emergency medical services outside the hospital include alarm and communication systems transport systems and first aid services There are important questions for New Zealand within this framework For example what should be the role of general practitioners in on-site emergency care What level of training is appropriate for ambulance officers Should voluntary personnel staff ambulances To what extent is double manning of ambulances required [8910]

In order to limit the study to manageable proportions this report focusses only on the hospital services namely the A amp E department Emergency medical services provided outside hospitals are mentioned only where they impinge noticeably on the A ampE department It is hoped that due attention will be given to the wider questions of emergency medical services in the future (see Chapter 9)

2

THE OVERSEAS SITUATION

Concern with emergencymiddot care facilities especially their increasing use has been apparent in other countries for the past thirty years While some articles report on the situation in Canada Australia Sweden France and the USSR most of the literature is about the United States and Britain This section briefly outlines the major themes of the literature and their relevance to New Zealand More specific aspects are covered in the appropriate chapters

Many United States researchers have studied the operations of different emergency rooms exploring patients reasons for using the emergency room their demographic characteristics and their use of the family doctor Often the studies have tried to explain an increasing use of emergency rooms and some have reported on the effectiVeness of measures introduced to reduce thei r use These studies provided models for some of the analyses carried out in this study However the debate in the United States over appropriate methods of funding and staffing for emergency rooms is seldom relevant to New Zealand because of the differences both in philosophy and organisation of medical care in the two countries

The Platt [11] committee on A amp E services in Britain in 1962 was concerned about casual attenders ie patients not in need of urgent attention but wishing to avoid the trouble of attending their general practitioners surgery They also criticised the unsuitable accommodation and the insufficient numbers of senior medical staff supervising Casualty Departments The report recommended changing the name Casualty Service to Accident and Emergency Service (to discourage casual attendance) and rationalising the service by clOSing smaller A amp E units and centralising facilities These recommendations have been partially carried out

However there has been continuing research in Br i tain into the reasons given by patients particularly self-referred patients for their use of A amp E departments and the trade-off between general practitioner and A amp E services There has also been continuing debate over the medical staffing of A amp E departments

The British studies are of some relevance to the New Zealand situation since the organisation of medical care here is similar but no overseas experience can provide a blueprint for New Zealand For example the direct cost to the patient of general practice care in New Zealand raises the possibility of patients attending the A amp E department because it is free whereas the British system of general practitioner funding provides no such incentive

AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE IN NEW ZEALAND

Little is known about the historical development of A amp E services in New Zealand Presumably they followed the British tradition described in the Platt report [11 p23-24)

The word casualty in its proper meaning of a serious injury has a long history It occurs in Shakespeare and Dickens writing in 1837 used casualty ward to describe the ward in a hospital in which accidents were treated Unfortunately the meaning alt~red in the second half of the last century The Nuffield Report (1960) Casualty Services and their Setting

3

gives an interesting quotation from a survey made by the Lancet in 1869 The out-patients at St Bartholomews Hospital are it says divided into two categories They are the middotcasualtymiddot which comprises those who are supposed to require temporary treatment for diseases or injuries of a trifling character and the middotout-patientsmiddot properly so called who after receiving a regular letter of admission are entitled to the advice of the assistant surgeons and physicians for a period of 12 months It is in the casualty division that the increase of numbers has been most marked bullbullbull It is estimated that not less than a thousand patients frequently attend on a Monday or Tuesday morning

Certainly by 1872 vlellingtons private medical practitioners were incensed at the hospitals provision of free treatment for their patients Five hundred outpatients were treated in Wellington that year [12] Separate casualty departments were operating at Wellington Hospital by 1924 [12] at Auckland Hospital by the 1940s [13] and Christchurch Hospital by 1952 [14]

The 1960 Board of Health report [15] on outpatient servicesmiddot expressed concern over the duplication of services by outpatient departments which were also available from general practitioners However it recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times

Since the late 1960s a series of New Zealand studies have considered the use of A amp E departments either by interviewing patients or by analysing data drawn from A amp E record systems and the organisation of A amp E departments

Interview studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

The first interview study was an investigation of first attenders at the Dunedin A amp E department in 1968 by Dixon et al [2] Their results have not been contradicted by any of the later studies

They found that the principal attenders were males aged 15 to 24 who recorded first attendance rates of over 100 per 1000 each year The young men were also the most likely to report having no general practitioner Dixon found that the age and sex pattern of those attending at the A amp E department was nearly converse to the pattern of those attending a general practitioner

Dixon pointed out that the conditions treated at the A amp E department were rarely disease-related rather they were predominantly lacerations and open wounds bruising sprains and strains effects of foreign bodies and fractures The major reason given for attending the department was that it was seen as appropriate

Dixon concluded that the A amp E service was complementary and not competitive to general practice that the public were realistic in regarding it as the only practical and effective primary medical care for accident and emergency injuries and that payment for service did not appear to figure in the decision to attend the department

o

4

TwO interview studies of first attenders at Auckland Hospital A amp E department have been carried out by Hunton in 1972 and Richards in 1975 [16] Both studies included an assessment by the student interviewers and A amp E staff as to the suitability of the patients condition for general practice care 42-43 per cent were considered suitable Richards concluded that public education programmes encouraging people to use their general practitioner prior to attending the A amp E department should be instituted

In 1978 Keenan interviewed patients who had attended Christchurch A amp E department collecting detailed information on the accident or sickness leading to the attendance (unpublished see Chapter 6 and 7) He found the same set of reasons for using A amp E departments as Dixon found the A amp E department was seen as appropriate and accessible

Kljakovic found similar results when interviewing the parents of children attending A amp E departments in the Wellington region in 1978 [4] He also found that in choosing between the general practitioner and the A amp E department parents were more likely to use the service which was closer to the family home Children f rom lower socio-economic status families were more likely than other children to see thei r general practitioner before gOing to the A amp E department

Records studies on the utilisation of A amp E departments

Several studies have gathered data from A amp E records to investigate A amp E utilisation In 1979 Snelgar described the characteristics of people attending Northland Base Hospital A amp E department [17] He found similar results to Dixon apart from a higher proportion of injuries In the same year McRae reviewed all attendances at Waikato Hospital A amp E department and found a similar picture [lB]

Three records studies have looked at the relationship between A amp E use and general practitioner use Maynard looked at Mosgiel residents use of Dunedin A amp E facilities for three years before and three years after the opening of a local health centre [19] No difference was found ~asap

investigated assertions that people from one part of the Wellington Hospital catchment area had suddenly begun to use the A amp E department heavily for conditions that should have been seen by a general practitioner [20] In fact that part of the catchment area had much lower rates of A amp E use than other areas Reinken tested whether the doubling of general practitioner cover in one part of the Wellington region affected A amp E presentation rates differently than in other areas nearby [21] There was no clear evidence that the increased cover had any effect

Studies on the organisation of A amp E departments

As part of a thesis looking at young doctors Salmond examined the work of house surgeons in A amp E departments using a postal questionnaire [22J He concluded that working in an A amp E department was good experience for a house surgeon only if second year house surgeons were deployed in the department the house surgeon was well-supervised by senior medical staff there was a good working relationship with the A amp E chargemiddot nurse and the house surgeon was not over-tired He also suggested that good senior staffing was closely related to effective administration and better service in the A amp E department

5

The Hospital Design and EValuation Unit of the Department of Health prepared a report documenting the planning requirements of New Zealand A amp E departments [23] The report outlined several principles of A amp E design and made detailed recommendations on the facilities rooms and equipment necessary

OVERVIEW OF THIS STUDY

Aims

The aim of this study is to describe A amp E departments in New Zealand Because the material presented in the previous section was collected by different researchers at different times and from different A amp E

departments detailed comparisons across the studies have been difficult To get a more comprehensive picture of A amp E use in New Zealand a systematic investigation was necessary

The specific aims of this report are

o to describe the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at their procedures physical characteristics and staffing patterns

o to describe attendance at A amp E departments including the patients profile and pattern of attendance and the load placed on the departments by patients who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner

o to describe the use of A amp E departments by consumers by analysing patients reasons for attending the departments and analysing demographic factors inrelation to A amp E attendance

Sources of information

Information was gathered from three sources

The site visits

Fourteen A amp E departments were visited between May and September 1981 by a Department of Health study team consisting of a medical officer from the Division of Hospitals and a res~arch officer from the Management Services and Research Unit

At each hospital the team examined the facilities and spoke with staff involved with the A amp E department including

o the medical superintendent (and in some hospitals the principal nurse)

o the A amp E officer or medical officer in charge of the A amp E department (where such a position existed and was filled)

o the nurse supervisor andor charge nurse of the A amp E department

o at least one house surgeon working in the A amp E department

6

In some hospitals the team also spoke with other staff members including experienced A amp E staff nurses and hospital social workers

Question sheets were used during interviews so that a comparable body of information was collected at each hospital Interviews were open-ended to allow discussion of local procedures or problems (See Appendix A for question sheets)

Hospitals were carefully selected so that the A amp E departments in the study would represent a cross-section of New Zealand A amp E departments Those selected served a range of communities in both the North and South Islands

o major urban Dunedin)

areas (Auckland Wellington Christchurch and

o provincial centres (Rotorua Taranaki and Timaru)

o predominantly rural areas (Whakatane and Grey)

In centres with more than one A amp E department all were visited so that a complete picture of the services and use could be developed This involved visiting Auckland Green Lane Middlemore and North Shore hospitals in Auckland and Wellington Hutt and Kenepuru hospitals in Wellington

The information gathered in the site visits has been used in describing the organisation of A amp E departments (Chapters 3 4 arid 5)

The A amp E records data collection

On each site visit a sample of 1981 attendances was drawn from the A amp E record system and the following information was recorded for each person age sex presenting condition (sickness or injury) time of presentation residential address and whether the visit was a first attendance for the condition or a recall visit

Exceptions were Christchurch and the three Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments Comparable data collected by Keenan in Ch ristchurch in 1978 and Allan in Wellington during 1980 were used instead

This information has been used to describe the attendance at A amp E departments (Chapter 6) and for the analysis of demographic factors in relation to attendance (Chapter 8)

The consumer studies

In 1978 Keenan carried out interviews with patients attending Christchurch A amp E department working from a one in eight sample drawn from the A amp E log over a four-week period and gaining a 99 response rate Results from this study have been analysed and compared with the results of the published New Zealand interview studies [2416] Anecdotal material from Kljakovic s study of children attending Wellington A amp E departments has also been included to illustrate the results of the numerical analysis

We realise that in studying only a selection of A amp E departments some local variations may have been missed but we are confident that the broad pattern and major issues in the organisation of A amp E care have been

7

covered Also as the A amp E departments studied serve two-thirds of the population of New Zealand the utilisation patterns discussed in the report are likely to prevail throughout New Zealand We hope that the mater ial presented the conclusions drawn and the questions raised in this report will encourage discussion about the current operation and future developmiant of A amp E departments in NewmiddotZealand

a

8

REFERENCES

1 de LACEY A REINKEN J and SALMOND C E - Community attitudes to sickness and health stimulus and response v 3 Community attitudes - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 103-105 (Special report series no 56)

2 DIXON C W Emery G M and SPEARS G F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) p 272-279

3 [Editorial] in G P Journal of the General Practitioner Society no 42 (1981) P 1-2

4 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN BC and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

5 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble Jr et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

6 MAYNARD Edward J - The application of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment shyUniversity of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

7 Hospital misuse brings protest in Taranaki Daily News (1 Sept 1980) bull

8 FAHEY Morgan - The role of the family doctor in disaster and emergency medicine in NZ Family Physician - v 5 no 1 (1978) p 42-44

9 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 19-23 March 1979 in NZ Med J - (1980) P 194-196

10 Double manning of ambulances [editorial] in NZ Hosp - v 32 no 3 (1980) p 1

11 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medicine Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

12 BARBER Laurie H and TOWERS Roy J - Wellington Hospital 1847-1976 Wellington Wellington Hospital Board 1976

13 The story of Auckland Hospital 1847-1977 edited by David Scott -Auckland Medical Historical Library Committee of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians in New Zealand 1977 p 35-36

14 BENNETT FO - Hospital on the Avon the story of the Christchurch Hospital 1862-1962 Christchurch North Canterbury Hospital

o Board 1962

9

15 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 196U (Report series Board of Health no 2)

16 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

17 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

18 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

19 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency department in Med Care - v 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

20 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

21 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

22 SALMOND G C - Young doctors an exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

23 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

11

CHAPTER 2

Definitions

lhis chapter provides the definitions of terms used in our study In general our terminology is consistent with the literature However in some areas such as the classification of presenting conditions as sickness or injury or the description of GP-load there is no general consistency and we have developed our own definitions

THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

This name is the one commonly used in New Zealand We have used it in preference to the older description Casualty Depariment [1] and the American description of Emergency Department It is one hospital department which patients can approach without prior notification

Emergencies can be any condition that - in the opinion of the patient their family or whoever assumes the responsibility of bringing the patient to the hospital - requires immediate medical attention

However using such a definition means every case is an emergency In New Zealand A amp E departments patients tend to be classified in a similar way to the description given by the American Hospital Association [2]

o emergencies where delay is harmful and the condition potentially threatens life or function

a urgent cases which require attention within a few hours

o non-urgent cases where the condition is minor or non-acute and does not require the resources of the emergency service

An accident is an unexpected event Accidents which have resulted in attendance at an A amp E department are ones that have caused some trauma whether through shock or other injury The Platt report [1] decided on the term A amp E department in recognition that the real emergencies were a trickle while the accidents were a mighty flood

In general the A amp E department is regarded as part of the hospitals outpatient services and like these in day to day running it provides specific clinics generally for the treatment of traumatic injury x-ray burns dressings plasters and so forth

An accident and emergency patient is a person who is entered in the A amp E log book This can involve a certain amount of error however as some outpatients or discharged patients may return for follow-up care through the A amp E department Also the A amp E department often handles the acute admissions to the hospital

12

ATrENDANCE

A first visit (or first attendance) is the first visit a patient makes for one particular condition

A recall visit is any visit made for one particular condition which is not the first visit for the condition Some recall visits are patient initiated (eg due to pain bleeding infection or an accident to the dressing or plaster) but for the most part revisits are scheduled return visits suggested by A amp E staff

Total attendance is the sum of first visits and recall visits

Inj ury attendances are defined to include the results of trauma (cuts burns fractures sprains strains bruises head injuries multiple injur ies and so forth) as well as foreign bodies in the eye or other orifices and toxic effects whether from accidental or self-poisoning events Late effects of minor injury (pain bleeding abscesses or such) are not included as injury but as sickness

Sickness attendances include collapse (whether stroke coma heart attack or other) shortness of breath abdominal pain general sickness (fever vomiting diarrhoea unwell) mental distress and minor conditions

Non-urgent sicknesses are defined as the minor conditions abdominal pain and general sickness except for preschool children and adults over 65 where the general sickness and abdominal pain conditions can be urgent A amp E staff defined non-urgent sickness less specifically they tended to define it as longstanding or minor sickness

GP-load describes the patients whom A amp E staff feel should have seen a general practitioner It includes patients with longstanding or minor sickness conditions and patients with minor traumatic injury (eg cuts bumps and bruises)

In hours attendance refers to all attendances in the normal working hours of 0800 to 1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays

Out of hours attendance refers to all other attendances outside the defined normal working hours

In an average week 50 hours fall in the in hours category and 118 hours in the out of hours category If we assume that an average person sleeps eight hours a night then that person is awake for 62 hours in the out of hours category (and all the in hours of course) Thus the out of hours category is 70 per cent of the total time in a week and 55 per cent of the waking time in a week

Minor conditions included abscesses backaches infected wounds or wound pain headache pain (unspecified) earaches eye problems toothaches nosebleeds limb pains We have called it the skin pain or bleeding category in Chapter 6

13

Attendance rates measure the use of A amp E departments for a defined population They express the number of cases from an area over a defined period per 1000 population in that area Rates were obtained by age and sex for sickness and injury and in and out of hours for each census area unit or neighbourhood served by each hospital

THE- HOSPITALS

We grouped hospitals into four types

o urban hospitals (where average annual first attendances at A amp E departments are over 25000 patients)

o provincial hospitals (serving 6000 to 12000 new A amp E patients each year)

o rural hospitals (serving fewer than 6000 new A amp E patients each year)

o suburban hospitals where A amp E departments are not open 24 hours per day North Shore Hospital was open 7 days a week 830 am shy530 pm and Kenepuru Hospital was open 5 days a week 830 am shy430 pm

Most of the A amp E departments visited had a senior position variously called the A amp E officer the A amp E director the senior medical officer or the medical officer in charge For convenience we call this position the A amp E officer

RECORDING SYSTEMS

The log is the record kept at the A amp E department which records some information on every patient who presents It will often give no more than the patients name the date and time of visit

The A amp E record is usually a card and it records basic patient information and case notes It may be held for several years in the A amp E department and may therefore contain information on a series of separate events for anyone patient

14

REFERENCES

1 GtBrit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the sUbcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

2 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p vii-viii

15

D

CHAPTER 3

Procedures in the accident and emergency department

In this chapter we begin describing the organisation of A amp E departments by looking at the way they operate We follow the course of a patients care entry to the A amp E department sorting into priority order for care (triage) treatment and follow-up care

ENTRY

Most people presenting at the A amp E department were ambulant (the walking wounded as they are colloquially known) They came through the A amp E departments main entrance to the reception desk where they were first seen by a receptionist or nurse (Exceptions to this occurred in the smaller hospitals where patients presenting at night were first seen by the telephonist who called the nursing staff) Nurses did reception duties at

all the provincial and rural A amp E departments and at two of the urban A amp E departments when receptionists were not on duty (eg lunchtimes nights) bull At times nurses found that having to cover the reception desk interfered with their care of patients

When the receptionists are off duty the nurses do the reception work This can be a nuisance because it interferes with patient care and sometimes patients ring the bell at the reception desk and the staff working in the resuscitation room dont hear it

A amp E nurse

Unless their condition required immediate care the ambulant patients then spent several minutes at the reception desk while their details (eg name address general practitioner complaint) were noted on the A ampE records (See Appendix B for more information on A amp E records) Then they waited in the waiting room until they were called for treatment

A small proportion of patients arrived by ambulance andmiddot at almost all hospitals entered the A amp E department through a separate ambulance entrance In the larger hospitals some nursing staff were stationed in or near the ambulance entrance to care for these patients In other hospitals the staff had often been warned of incoming urgent cases and were standing by when the ambulance arrived As the condition of ambulance patients tended to be urgent they were usually taken straight to a resuscitation or treatment area patients condition permitted or friends or the ambulance driver

Record with the

keeping assist

was ance

carried of thei r

out r

when elativ

the es

SORTING

All A amp E departments operated some triage system to sort the ambulant patients by the urgency of their need for care (Themiddot only exception was Grey A amp E department where there was seldom more than one patient in the department at a time) At most A amp E departments the patients were sorted

16

into urgent and non-urgent categories with urgent cases being seen immediately and non-urgent cases being seen in the order they presented At some of the urban A amp E departments a more complex sorting was done For example

Priority is given in the following order

urgent need very young and very old patients those with general practitioner notes those without general practitioner notes

A lie E nurse

Usually ambulance cases were not triaged since they tended to arrive on their own and required urgent care However several A lie E departments had triage arrangements planned for the arrival of many ambulance cases at once as in a disaster

Sorting was largely a responsibility of the nurses although some A amp E doctors would occasionally check the condition of patients- in the waiting room too The receptionists often played a role in triage as well alerting the nursing staff to urgent cases This happened more in A amp E departments where the physical layout made it difficult for nurses to watch the entrance and the waiting room

The receptionists do tQe basic sorting They have guidelines to follow distressed patients severe cuts or bleeding go straight to the nurses open wounds or eye injuries go directly to a cubicle and are assessed by the nurses patients with abdominal pain or chest pain go on to trolleys and wait in the recovery room This system usually works well although occasionally a fracture patient will not be recognised and will sit in the waiting room

A lie E nurse

In several A lie E departments doctors and nurses stressed the value of an experienced receptionist in recognising and reacting quickly to acutely ill or injured patients

TREATMENT

Almost all the A amp Edepartments visited had a policy that all patients presenting had to be seen by a doctor The doctor did not necessarily have to treat the patient he or she could advise the patient to see a general practitioner Some A amp E doctors commented that by the time they saw the patients it was as easy to treat them as to send them away_ At a few departments the nurses (and occasionally the receptionist) could advise the patient that the department was not an appropriate place for their condition and that they should see a general practitioner This was usually done in consultation with the A E doctor but at times the nurses acted on their own initiative In these places a triage system similar to that reported by Weinerman et al [1] where patients were assigned to the appropriate service inside or outsidemiddot the hospital appeared to be operating

7

The assessment of patients the ordering of tests andmiddot the supervision of treatment were usually seen ~s medical functions The nurses would prepare patients for treatment (removing dressings) and carry out urgent first aid measures (stem bleeding start gastric lavage or cardio-pulmonary resuscitation) Generally however a nurse would only initiate treatment if the patients condition was urgent and a doctor was not available or was already busy with another emergency Exceptions to this situation occurred in some hospitals with A amp E nurse training programmes and in some smaller hospitals where the doctor is on call rather than working in the A amp E department In these departments experienced nurses could order tests such as x-rays and initiate treatments such as suturing and removing foreign bodies from eyes

In most A amp E departments nurses would perform some treatments under a doctors supervision However the range of treatments nurses were allowed to perform varied considerably among hospitals At some hospitals nurses sutured after training but at others they never sutured

The nurses do not suture although they would like to There are four reasons for this there is no full-time A amp E officer so good standards of sutur ing could not be maintained there could be medico-legal problems if a nurse sutured a cut which was more complicated than it looked eg with tendon involvement the nurses have enough to do at present and if they start suturing they will be expected to do it always and the young doctors need to learn suturing as part of their training

Principal nurse

Electrocardiograms were taken by nurses in some A amp E departments by technicians at others Taking blood samples was a doctors job in some departments but was done by nurses in others Similarly gastric lavage using a def ibrillator and plaster work were done by nurses in some departments Most A amp E nurses would maintain intra-venous drips but only nurses with special training WOUld insert them

Some nurses expressed frustration at restrictions on the treatments they were allowed to perform However several sen~or nurses stressed that they had to select carefully the nurses they allowed to perform more difficult treatments

We are very selective about choosing the nurses to do triage suturing and the more complicated procedures This seems to have been successful weve had no problems with nurses undertaking treatment theyre not competent to provide

A amp E senior nurse

I make sure the nurses understand they can be dangerous people If theyre not aware of their limitations theyre not suitable for A amp E work

A amp E senior nurse o

Also one department which had comparatively few nurses discouraged them from increasing the range of treatments they performed so that their workload did not become overwhelming

18

For diagnosis the A amp E departments made heavy use of the x-ray departments (The Design and Evaluation Unit study [21 estimated that 30 per cent of A amp E attenders had an x-ray during their visit) Some A amp E departments found their arrangements with the x-ray department very convenient with an x-ray machine aVailable 24 hours a day in or close to the A amp E department and with patients and x-ray films or reports returning within an hour At other hospitals arrangements Were less convenient in some places reporting bac k of x-rays took two or three hours delaying patients considerably while in others the x-ray departmentmiddot was located on a different floor from the A amp E ~epartment causing difficulties in transporting and accompanying patients there

Little use was made of the laboratory services other than for blood and urine tests and arrangements were generally satisfactory However in many hospitals x-ray and laboratory staff had to be called in to perform tests out of hours and because of the expense involved these out of hours tests were discouraged Some house surgeons found this a difficult situation

I I m caught between contradictory pressures the orthopaedic surgeons say that x-rays are necessary for proper diagnosis and the hospital board is trying to limit out of hours x-rays to save money

House surgeon

DISPOSAL

After treating the patient the A amp E doctor decides on the appropriate disposal discharging from care arranging follow-up treatment by referring to another source of care or recalling to the A amp E department or admitting the patient Information on disposal was only readily available from three A amp E departments The most common disposal pattern was in fact discharging from care with 40 to 55 per cent of patients making a first Visit being discharged

TABLE I PROPORTION OF FIRST ATTENDANCE PATIENrs DISCHARGED RECALLED REFERRED OR ADMITTED

Discharged Recalled Referred to Admitted Other First to A amp E GP Specialist attendance

Clinic tallied

Waikato l 393 132 222 99 134 19 25 707 Green Lane2 550 220 110 40 80 Unknown Taranaki 41 5 268 73 103 116 24 164

1 From McRaes study of Waikato A amp E departmen~ in 1979 2 From a study carried out by Green Lane A amp E department

19

FOLLOW-UP CARE

The decision to be made on follow-up care was usually between re~alling to the A amp E department or referring back to the patient I s general practitioner Some A amp E departments also referred patients (especially children) to district nurses or patients with work 1n]uries to an occupational health nurse or clinic Many departments referred fracture patients to orthopaedic clinics held in the hospital outpatients department and one A amp E department which was very short of space referred patients needing redressings to the outpatients department

There were large differences in referral practices (see Table 1) Between 13 and 27 per cent of first attenders were recalled to the A amp E department for follow-up care while 15 to 30 per cent were referred elsewhere either to a general practitioner or to a specialist clinic Also recall attendances expressed as a proportion of total attendances varied considerably among the A amp E departments from 10 per cent to 50 per cent (see Chapter 6 Table 11) and clearly reflected different follow-up practices

All of the urban and two of the provincial A amp E departments had a policy of referring most patients requiring follow-up care to a general practitioner and of keeping recall visits as low as possible This was similar to general policy in both Britain and the United States which appears to discourage re-at tendance at A amp E departments [34] However in the suburban rural and other provincial A amp E departments the decision on follow-up care was left to the judgement of the A amp E doctor

In practice however the choice to refer or to recall was reiated to several factors First the decision related to characteristics of the patients If the patients had serious wounds or burns or injuries which could develop complications they were usually recalled They were also recalled if the A amp E staff thought they would not receive appropriate care at home or they would not see a general practitioner for follow-up care Patients living a long way from the hospital were usually referred to their general practitioner At some A amp E departments patients were given the choice of referral or recall according to A amp E staff comments most chose to return to theA amp E department

The patients prefer to come back to the hospital Money is not a factor in this because the ACC pays for accident treatment at the general practitioner

A amp E nurse

Second there were general practitioner factors If the local general practitioners were unhappy about the A amp E department recalling patients or if a general practitioner had referred the patient to the department originally the A amp E doctors would refemiddotr rather than recall However if the A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner did not have the facilities and in some cases the ability to provide follow-up care (eg for serious woundS eye injuries) they would recall the patient

Some GPs dont like following up care initiated by the A amp E department or dont have the necessary facilities so I tend not to send patients back to them

A amp E officer

20

Im more likely to refer a patient back to a GP who is reliable

House surgeon

Third many of the house surgeons said they would recall patients if they were interested in the condition or if they were worried about their diagnosis and treatment and wanted to see the outcome Several medical superintendents noted that recalling under these circumstances was acceptable because it comprised part of the house surgeons training

Fourth the workload of the A amp E department sometimes affected the follow-up decision with very busy departments actively discouraging recalls And finally there was the philosophy of A amp E medicine held by the A amp E doctor In one department where the A amp E officer considered it an ethical duty to see any treatment initiated through to a successful conclusion almost all patients who needed follow-up care were recalled At two other departments the A amp E officers stressed the importance of being able to deal efficiently with any emergencies presenting they kept recalls low so that the department was not clogged with extra patients Other A amp E doctors thought that the general practitioner could provide better continuity of care than the A amp E department so they referred as many patients as possible

When referring patients to the general practitionermiddot most of the A amp E doctors made a verbal recommendation to the patient and then relied on the patient to attend the general practitioner They would only write a formal referral letter if the patients condition was serious In several A amp E departments however greater efforts were made to inform the patient t s general practitioner Three departments gave referred patients cyclostyled forms with details of diagnosis and treatment to be passed to their general practitioner while the Whakatane department sent a copy of the A amp E record form to each patients general practitioner

ADMISSIONS

Table I suggests that between a and 14 per cent of all first attendances were admitted to the hospitals Admissions could well be higher for children Kljakovic [5] found that 20 per cent of the children presenting at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments were admitted

The A amp E departments were involved in several different pathways for the admission of acutely ill or injured patients (Scheduled admissions did not involve the A amp E department at any of the hospitals visited) Self-referred patients could be admitted directly from the A amp E department to the wards or could be cared for in a holding (or acute admitting) ward before going to the wards

There was considerable variation among the hospitals as to which members of the medical staff were able to admit patients At some of the urban hospitals only the registrars could admit while at others the A amp E doctor could admit if the registrar was delayed and unable to assess the patient quickly At some of the provincial and one of the urban hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit in consultation with the admitting officer or appropriate registrar while at-another urban hospital and the rural A amp E departments the A amp E doctors regularly admitted patients

21

Hospitals with lower levels of bed occupancy were more likely to allow A amp E doctors to admit Senior A amp E doctors were more likely to play a role in admissions (actually admitting patients or advising the registrar) than house surgeons

Some patients referred by a general practitioner for acute admission also passed through the A amp E department At one hospital the general practitioners rang the A amp E officer to arrange for all acute admissions and all such GP-referred patients were seen first in the A amp E department However more usually the general practitioners rang the appropriate registrar to make arrangements and the registrar decided whether to admit the patient directly to the wards or through the A amp E department The involvement of A amp E staff with patients requiring admission ranged from almost none (where the patient went directly from the A amp E department to the ward or specialist unit) to a full initial assessment including tests (often undertaken at the request of the registrar responsible for the patient) bull

Generally the A amp E doctors were satisfied with the admission procedures However at one hospital where the A amp E doctors could not admit patients waiting for admission tended to clog the department The doctorselt that if they had admission rights the situation would be remedied

DISCUSSION

There were few differences among the A amp E departments in the reception and sorting of patients However there were differences in some aspects of treatment follow-up care and admission procedures

lhe role of the A amp E nurses in treatment varied considerably with some departments allowing nurses to initiate and perform many treatments and other departments allowing little autonomy Careful training and selection were essential before nurses increased their responsibility for treatment bull

Policies on follow-up care differed among the departments with the urban and provincial departments generally referring patients to general practitioners and the rural and suburban departments leaving the referral decision to the A amp E doctor In practice however the differences were less clear-cut with several factors other than the patient I s condition affecting the follow-up care decisions These factors included the A amp E staffs communicat ion with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs of house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors philosophy with regard to A amp E medicine

The A amp E departments also differed considerably in thei r procedures for acute admissions At some hospitals the A amp E doctor could admit an A amp E patient while at others the patient had to be held in the department until admitted by a registrar Also at some hospitals patients referred by general practitioners for acute admission were seen in the A amp E department before going to a ward While having to hold patients sometimes caused

clogging in the department A amp E staff were generally satisfied with the procedures

22

REfERENCES

1 WEINERMAN E Richard RUfZEN S Robert and PEARSON David shyEffects of medical -triage- in hospital emergency service in Public health reports - v 80 no 5 (May 1965) p 389-399

2 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

3 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM (68)83

4 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL Jenkins - St Louis Hosby 1975

5 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

23

CHAPTER 4

Phy~i~~1 c~~raft~rhtics of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the physical characteristics of A amp E departments their overall size location and layout as well as specific areas within the departments It discusses the effects of the physical characteristlcs on the organisation and functioning of the A amp E departments Our investigation worked from the detailed base established in bullAccident and emergency departments a studY of planning r~quirements a report prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation gnit Departmellt of HeCilth [1]

PRINCIPLES

The 1973 Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit (DEU) report [l] outlined the following principles to be applied in designing A amp E departments

o the A amp E department must be patients seeking emergency care

ready to receive and deal with

o the A amp E department mus~ be able load within a reasonable period

to cope with an average i

busy

o the A amp E department must be capable of adaptation to exceptional situations arising from major accidents ltgtrqther disasters

o the layout should be simple easily unqerstood and compact

o the layout and procedures should facilitate easy flow of patients through the department

o spaces should be multipurpose to give greatest versatility

o p~tient ~ovew~n~ should be minimised )

priv~cy for patientsshould be provided as far as is practicable andconsistent with the need for supervisi0rt

SIZE

There was considerable variation in the total sizes of the A amp E -a~1-ftment~ vi~ited witll floor areas ranging from 250 sql1a~e metres to 2115 ~guare m~ties (see Table 2) Eight of the 14 departments visited had i

hhid1pgw~fd~oracUte admitting ward However even wt)en ~he area of th~ f~ ~ bull ~middotc1~A~- _ ~ - bull bull ~

AampE department WCiS adjusted for the presence of a holding ward this I~1-getv~-rH~tion in irea reniained

24

TABLE 2 AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Total area Holding ward Adjusted total Waiting room area areal area

sqm sqm sqm sqm

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 2 115 225 1 890 55 Middlemore 1 045 140 905 50 Green Lane 960 240 720 70 Wellington 575 190 385 75 Hutt 270 270 30 Christchurch 470 470 40 Dunedin 635 90 545 20

Provincial Rotorua 515 20 495 90 Taranaki Base 720 90 630 40 Timaru 605 70 535 80

Rural Whakatane 430 430 20 Grey 310 310 15

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 255 255 30 Kenepuru 540 540 30

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area Considerable sharing with outpatients department

The area of the A amp E department was not closely related to the attendance (see Table 3) Obviously there is a certain minimum size for an A amp E department since certain facilities are essential regardless of the attendance served Thus as would be expected the rural and to a lesser extent the provincial A amp E departments had high area to attendance ratios However even within the group of urban A amp E departments there was a fourfold difference in the total area to attendance ratio

The design at Auckland~ laid out along several corridors with many separate consulting and treatment rooms possibly contributed to its high ratio At Wellington Hutt and Christchurch hospitals staff commented on their difficulties working in cramped conditions The lack of space often forced staff to work under extreme pressure to move patients through the departments very quickly

25

TABLE 3 AREA TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR ADJUSTED TOTAL AREAS 1 AND WAITING AREAS OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS BY FIRST ATTENDANCE2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Adjusted total area to attendance ratio Waiting area to to attendance ratio

Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 Sqm per 1000 first attendance total attendance total attendance pa p a p a

Full-time departments ~

Urban Auckland 323 291 08 Middlemore 232 157 09 Green Lane 3 230 168 16 Wellington 80 69 13 Hutt 82 63 07 Christchurch 76 64 05 Dunedin 200 143 05

Provincial Rotorua 404 293 53 Taranaki Base 609 399 25 Timaru 466 266 403

Rural Whakatane 718 490 23 Grey 805 61 2 30

Part-time departments

Suburban I INorth Shore 272 148 17

Kenepuru 924 597 33

1 Adjusted total area = total area minus holding ward area

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Considerable sharing with outpatients department

Spearman rank correlations [2] of adjusted total area with

( a) first attendance r = 0310 p gt 010 Not significant ( b) total attendance r = 0297 pgt 010 Not significant

26

LOCATION

There is broad agreement that the A amp E department should be located on the ground floor well signposted and easily accessible to ambulatory patients and ambulances The ambulance entrance should be able to handle several ambulances at once and should have adequate turning space It should be projected from the weather and screened from the view of the other A amp E department patients

The A amp E department should also be located as closely as possible to radiology facilities (either the x-ray department itself or a branch) The A amp E department and the outpatients department can share some facilities and provide additional staff and accommodation in an emergen~y

situation if they are sited together Acute patient care areas (operating theatres intensive care unitsmiddot and cardiac care units) and laboratory services should also be readily accessible from the A amp E department [134]

Entrances

Almost all of the A amp E departments visited were on the ground floor of the hospital and were well signposted Generally access for ambulatory patients was good apart from two hospitals where they had to walk up steps to enter the building o

Few departments had ambulance access which could cope with a shuttle of ambulances bringing mass casualties from a disaster There w~s little relation between the size of the department or the population served and the ease of ambulance flow Indeed those departments with a relatively low probability of being involved in a mass casualty situation had good ambulance flow (eg Whakatane) while those with a greater possibility had relatively poor ambulance access (eg Wellington) Several departments had particularly poor a~bulance flow with only a one-lane access Three departments had good drive-straight-through access while at the rest ambulances had to reverse However there were advantages to some of the bull reversing I situations in that the bays into which the ambulances had to reverse were more likely to give the patient protection from the weather All the A amp E departments visited had separate ambulance entrances which in all but three cases guaranteed screening of ambulance patients from public view

Access to other hospital facilities

In many of the hospitals the A amp E department was adjacent to the outpatients department or to the orthopaedic outpatients section When this occurred the plaster room and x-ray facilities were usually shared and waiting areas and the records office were sometimes shared In the smaller hospitals both departments often shared the nursing staff

The access to the x-ray department ranged from excellent in places which had x-ray facilities immediately adjacent to the A amp E department to very poor where the patient had to be transported hundreds of metres and to a different floor The time taken for the A amp E doctor to get the result of the x-ray varied from five minutes to over two hours though the physical separation of the two departments was only one of the factors which affected this

27

Access to acute care facilities was similarly variable In Christchurch the intensive care unit was adjacent to the A amp E department while in Rotorua it was at the other end of the hospital In many cases additions or alterations to the hospital buildings and changes of function of certain areas have meant that the A amp E department no longer bears the same physical relationship to other hospital departments as was originally the case

LAYOUT

Several studies have concluded that the A amp Edepartment should be designed so that there is an orderly progression of patients from registration to examination to investigations if necessary to treatment and to referral admission or discharge Staff time and effort is best conserved by a compact plan with waiting areas and treatment areas easily accessible and supervised However the need for easy supervision has to be balanced by consideration of the patients privacy Two basic A amp E plans have evolved

o a radial plan where the waiting examination and treatment rooms are arranged on the perimeter of the departmentmiddot with the nurses station doctors room and records office in the centre

o a linear plan where the examination and treatment rooms are arranged down each side of a corridor with the waiting area records office and staff offices at one end [145]

Many of the A amp E departments visited had a linear layout with the largest Auckland being arranged along several corridors In these departments staff often commented that their overall view of the patients was not good and a considerable amount of walking was needed to supervise them Middlemore A amp E department and the treatment areas of several other departments had radial layouts which staff found very satisfactory Generally the A amp E staff prefer red open plan layouts using curtained cubicles rather than enclosed rooms Staff (especially nursing staff) often commented that their department would be better if certain walls or partitions were removed to give easier surveillance of the department as a whole However staff also commented on the relative lack of privacy for patients being examined or treated and noted that some private rooms were needed for instance for obstetric or paediatric patients

Waiting area

There is general agreement that the waiting area should be adjacent to the reception desk easily visible to the receptionist and if possible overlooked by the nurses office or station It should be a cheerful comfortable area with toys provided for children and a range of magazines and books Public toiletspublic telephones and arrangements for refreshments are also needed [146]

The size of the waiting area varied considerably among the A amp E departments visited (refer back tomiddot Table 2) Again this variation bore little relationship to the workload of the department (see Table 3) Some waiting areas were clearly too small and this put pressure on the staff to deal with patients quickly in order to clear the waiting room

28

Staff comments suggested that not only the size of the waiting area but also its design affected its crowding Basically square rooms with seats around the edges had fewer problems than corridor-style rooms with only one row of seats

In all the A amp E departments visited the waiting areas were adjacent to the reception area Sometimes they were visible from the nurses office or work area but where this was not possible the nurses relied on the receptionists to alert them to urgent cases or checked the wai Hng area often themselves

Facilities in waiting areas varied from nothing but seats to areas in which there were hot and cold drink dispensing machines a childrens play area with toys and health-related poster and pamphlet displays Some had a TV set or a tropical fish tank Most staff were agreed that a pleasant atmosphere in the waiting room was important and adVerse comments about the waiting area were made by staff in departments which lacked this In some departments staff commented that vandalism made it difficult to retain facilities and a pleasant atmosphere

Examination and treatment area

The examination and treatment area provides for the needs of all A amp E patients other than those with serious conditions requiring the resuscitation room or those needing special facilities such as plastering Because special purpose areas are frequently under-utilised flexibility is a key requi rement Hence multipurpose cubicles with standardised equipment are usually recommended The cubicles must be big enough to give easy access for patients (not necessarily walking) to accommodate eqUipment and to give staff enough room to work Curtained cubicles are generally sufficient but at least one enclosed cubicle is required for patients needing extra privacy or for light control in eye examinations A cubicle especially set up for children (with appropriately-sized equipment toys and posters) is also desirable [1346]

Most of themiddot A ~ E departments visited had curtained cubicles in the examination and treatment area with perhaps one or two enclosed cubicles or rooms as well Four A amp E departments only had separate rooms for treatment Curtained cubicles made for ease of access while separate rooms did present some difficulties in manoeuvering patient trolleys and wheelchairs In one case it was impossible to get a patient trolley into the room at all and the room was consequently little used

Curtained cubicles did afford greater flexibility in use and did provide more room to work but had the disadvantage of being considerably less private than rooms Surveillance was easier in departments with curtains than those withmiddot walls and doors In the Auckland A amp E department treatment rooms doors had been removed in the interests of improved surveillance Staff in this department commented that its rigid design could lead to difficulties in accommodating a large number of patients in a disaster

The DEU report [1] recommended that the number of cubicles required by an A amp E department was NIlS where N is the anticipated average number of new patients per day It noted that in A amp E departments with few new patients per day a minimum of two cubicles should be provided It also recommended that the flow of recalled patients should be regulated so that they did not greatly affect the need for cubicles

29

As can be seen from Table 4 most departments had enough cubicles to cope with their first attendance workload Even applying the DEU recommendation of N18 to their total attendance most of the departments had an adequate number of cubicles The exceptions were Hutt Christchurch and Dunedin

TABLE 4 NUMBERS OF EXAMINATION AND TREATMENT CUBICLES OR ROOMS AND RECOMMENDED NUMBERS l BASED ON FIRST ATTENDANCE 2 AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 2

Actual number of DEU recommended numbers (minimum of 2) cubiclesrooms based on

first attendance total attendance pa pa

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 13 89 99 Middlemore 9 59 88

Green Lane 7 40 65 Wellington 10 73 85 Hutt 4 51 66 Christchurch 7 94 11 2 Dunedin 3 41 58

Provincial Rotorua 4 2 26 Taranaki Base 4 2 24 Timaru 6 2 31

Rural Whakatane 3 2 2 Grey 3 2 2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3 8 22 37 Kenepuru3 6 22 30

1 Based on DEU report [l which recommended NIS cubicles where N average number of new patients per day ie N6750 where N = average first attendance pa

2 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

3 Recommended numbers increased to adjust for North Shore and Kenepuru treating their attendance numbers in part-time rather than full-time hours

30

Resuscitation area

The resusciation area is used for the immediate life--saving treatment of seriously injured or sick patients It is the acute treatment area in contrast to the examination and treatment area which is used for relatively minor procedures In making its recommendations about the resuscitation area the DEU report [I] balanced the probability of the A amp E department having to treat multiple accident victims with the comparative rarity of use of resuscitation rooms It recommended that a resuscitation room of suff icient size to deal with two patients concurrently be provided in all A amp E departments It also noted that the ambulance entrance and resuscitation area should be located as close together as possible

Most of the departments visited had purpose-built resuscitation rooms of varying size and with varying degrees of sophistication in equipment Some had x-ray facilities in the resuscitat ion area and in those that did not its absence was regarded as a serious impediment to the efficient care of severe trauma

In four of the seven urban A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms were regarded by the staff as being too small The comment was made in one urban department that because of the small size of the resuscitation area patients sometimes had to be moved out of the area before it was felt clinically desirable to do so in order to accommodate incoming patients In the rural and prOVincial A amp E departments the resuscitation rooms wereshyadequate for the demands placed on them

Most resuscitation rooms were sited close to the ambulance entrance and afforded good access to stretcher patients However in three A amp E departments patients had to be moved some distance and in another department up one floor by lift

Operating theatre

In discussing provision of operating theatres in the A amp E departments the DEU report [1] noted that

o most surgery done is minor requires only local anaesthesia and could be done within adequately designed cubicles

o the A amp E department is not a proper place for general anaesthesia

o using A amp Etheatres for day surgery tends to block other A amp E facilities and staff causin~ delay in treating A amp E patients

The report concluded that special facilities appear to be justified only if there is a clear intention of widening the scope of accident surgery in the departments

bullMinor ops theatres of varying sizes and equipped to varying standards were available in many departments Very variable use was made of such theatres - never in some departments to daily in others It was used less in departments with very heavy workloads and where the medical staff were not satisfied that sufficiently sterile conditions could be maintained In one department the theatre was only used for day surgery cases

31

Plaster room

In the plaster room casts are applied and removed and fractures and dislocations can be manipulated The DEU report [1] noted that the plaster room could be an integral part of the A amp E department or shared with the orthopaedic department or belonging entirely to the latter It recommended that the plaster room be close to the A amp E department and the x-ray department

Most departments had a separate plaster room available In many cases this was shared with an adjacent orthopaedic outpatients or fracture clinic Th~ staff generally found the plaste~-rooms satisfactory although two particularly narrow rooms were difficult to work in

Interview room

The DEU report [l] recommended that A amp E departments in medium-sized and larger hospitals should have a small interview room where a patient IS

relatives could talk with A amp E staff the police or others

No A amp E department had a room specifically designated as an interview room for bereaved or distressed relatives although one A amp E department shared such a room with another department In most departments one of the staff off ices was generally used for this purpose In departments where staff offices were small or crowded the lack of an interview room was seen as a serious flaw in departmental layout

Reception and records office

The reception desk should be immediately visible to ambulant patients arriving at the A amp E department and it is desirable for the receptionist to be aware of what is happening at the ambulance entrance as well The current A amp E records should be held at the reception desk or nearby [1]

In the A ampE departments visited the reception desk was usually well-placed for dealing with ambulant patients but in only four cases did it overlook the ambulance entrance In two departments the reception desk was some distance from the treatment area (separated by a waiting room or outpatients room) and the nursing staff found it difficult to oversee incoming patients Current A amp E records were held at the reception desk in all but one of the departments visited The amount of space available in relation to the throughput of patients was a major factor in determining the length of time records could be kept within the department This in turn affected the ease and therefore speed of record retrieval

Staff offices

These ranged from non existent to very cramped spaces serving many other functions to pleasant specifically designated and relatively quiet areas The latter offices are conducive to good staff morale and being a place for exchange of views and experiences could be expected to contribute quite markedly to the overall effectiveness and eff iciency of the department

32

Holding ward

The DEU report [1] said that holding beds should be used primarily for A amp E patients requiring a period of observation prior to a decision about admission or for those who could be expected to go home after a rest period The report noted that using holding beds as recovery beds for day patients for arranged admissions or for pre-admission clinics was not desirable

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments visited had holding or acute admitting wards These holding wards were used mainly for assessing patients requiring acute admission but in some hospitals were also used for observing patients (eg with suspected concussion) and for holding night admissions till the morning to save disturbing the wards Neither of the rural A amp E departments had a holding ward although one had an I A amp E admission procedure where a patient could be admitted for up to 24 hours for observation without the need for full admission procedures In the A amp E departments with holding wards a patient staying for more than four hours was formally admitted

Our study showed that the A amp E departments had some problems using holding wards properly In two A amp E departments holding wards were little used at night because nursing levels were too low to staff them safely In another department the beds were used for patients recovering from day surgery and even for some pre-ar ranged admissions At times general practitioner-referred admissions could also clog the holding wards

DISCUSSION

Most of the A amp E departments were generally adequate in size location and layout The exceptions were Christchurch and Butt where conditions were very cramped with particularly limited examination and treatment areas and poor layout We understand that improvements are planned at Hutt and that recent extensions have improved the Christchurch department considerably but at the time of our visits staff in both these departments were working under extreme pressure because of the physical conditions

Despite the general adequacy of the departments almost all had some flaw which affected their operation and inconvenienced staff and patients Major flaws found in several A amp E departments included

o ambulance access unsuitable for a shuttle of ambulances in a disaster

o difficult access to the x-ray department

o resuscitation room too small for easy treatment of more than one patient at a time

o no interview room for relatives of patients

33

REFERENCES

1 Accident and emergency departments a study of planning requirements prepared by the Hospital Design and Evaluation Unit - Wellington Department of Health 1973

2 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

3 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 44-49

4 Emer~ency department organisation and management edited by A L Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975 p 8-16

5 Design of departments in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) p 1204-7

6 McKINLAY Robin - The care of children in New Zealand hospitals -Aucklandmiddot National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1982 p 79-80

35

CHAPTER 5

Staffing of accident and emergency departments

This chapter describes the staffing both medical and nursing looking at their numbers and experience their previous training and the training they receive in the A amp E department and their satisfaction with their work and conditions We also describe the clerical and reception staff and briefly the involvement of other workers (orderlies social workers and ambulance personnel) in the departments

MEDICAL STAFFING

Senior medical staffing

Organising appropriate medical staffing for hospital emergency services is a prQblem in many countries [1] The variety of staffing arrangements in A amp E departments within many countries suggests that none have established a generally satisfactory pattern of medical staffing

The Platt report [2] found that in Br itish A amp E departments the great majority of patients were seen by junior staff only and that supervision of the A amp E departments by conSUltants was often little more than nominal The committee recommended that

o the junior medical staff should be adequately supervised by consultants

o a consultant orthopaedic surgeon should normally be in charge of theA amp E unit

o an accident and emergency unit should have at least three consultant surgeons each giving a substantial part of their time to this work

o the primary task of general practitioners in emergency services is to deal with minor accidents and emergencies at any time of the day or night (by organising a rota to answer emergency calls within their practice by working sessions in A amp E departments or by attending cottage hospitals at short notice for emergency calls) bull

Since then some progress has been made but standards continue to lag behind those recommended [34] There has been considerable debate over the appropriate staffing arrangements for A amp E departments Some hospitals have implemented the Platt report recommendations others have appointed a full-time A amp E specialist others have employed a full-time non-specialist doctor and some have employed general practitioners

Despite the various systems there is a consensus in both the United States and Britain that experienced medical staffmiddot are essential in the A amp E department They are necessary for prompt effective treatment of emergency conditions for efficient running of the departments and for adequate supervision of the junior doctors employed [23567 p 17-23]

36

Similar concerns have been expressed in New Zealand since the Board of Health report on outpatient services in 1960 [8] This report recommended that general hospitals continue to provide a casualty service available at all times and staffed by experiencedmedical officers

Salmond [9] found that when a senior A amp E officer directed the department A amp E work was handled more efficiently and house surgeons were more closely supervised and supported He suggested that one senior member of the hospital staff (ideally a full-time A amp E officer) should accept full responsibility for the overall supervision of A amp E services

Most of the A amp E departments that we visited had an A amp E officer The position was vacant at both Wellington and Hutt hospitals at the time of our visit while at North Shore Hospital responsibility for the A amp E department was shared by two senior doctors The A amp E departments of the rural hospitals had no senior medical staff

In A amp E departments with heavy workloads additional experienced doctors were often employed as deputy A amp E officers usually medical officer special scale or as Medical Reserve Scheme registrars (see Table 5) There was no general practitioner staffing of any of the Aamp E departments visited although general practitioners had been part-time staff of some of themiddot smaller A amp E departments in previous years One medical superintendent commented that since very few general practitioners could be classified as specialists they could only be paid as medical officers special scale This low level of payment acted as a disincentive to general practitioner recruitment

The A amp E officers usually worked normal office hours (830 am - 430 pm or 9 am - 5 pm weekdays) apart from two who worked part-time covering morning periods If additional experienced doctors were employed they usually covered evening periods (eg 5 pm - 10 pm) and weekend day shifts

There was a wide range of experience among the A amp E officers Half of the senior A amp E doctors had a general practice background and these doctors often had specific surgical medical pharmacological or Armed Forces medical experience as well Several A amp E officers had primarily a surgical background while others had a considerable range of hospital experience In hospitals where the A amp E officers had a general practice background the Medical Superintendent or the A amp E officer often stressed the suitability of this background for A amp E work

An extensive general practitioner background is useful in dealing with the multitude of problems seen in an Accident and Emergency department An orthopaedic or surgical background is not as necessary because of the good backup from the specialties And staff who have only had hospital experience particularly junior staff can lack skills in general assessment and triage

A amp E officer

In other hospitals staff stressed that an orthopaedic and surgical background was very valuable as was experience in dealing with specific types of injury such as soft tissue wounds

37

TABLE 5 MEDICAL STAFFING OF A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington2

Hutt2

Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Senior medical staffing

Number of full-time equivalents

A amp E officer ( including deputies) 25 15 I 16

I 2

I 03 I

2 05

Registrar

06

1 1

House surgeons

Number on Number A amp E runs covering

some shifts in A amp E deptl

6 2-3 6 2 5 I 5 4 2-3 5 2 2

All on rotating basis 1 3 1 2

5 on rotating basis 4 on rotating basis

None in A amp E dept 4 on rotating basis

1 On general relieving duties 2 Senior A amp E position vacant at time of visit

Junior medical staffing

The issues

Junior medical staffing of A amp E departments has concerned many commentators in the United States Britain and New Zealand The Platt report [2] noted that recently qualified staff when serving in the casualty department undertake responsibility which they would not have in the wards or outpatient clinics

38

In 1960 the New Zealand Board of Health report [8] on out-patient services deplored the staffing of casualty departments by I relatively inexperienced men [sic] and suggested that these staff I should be regarded more as assistants under supervision and training than responsible officers in the outpatients departments The undesirability of staffing A amp E departments with first year house surgeons (or pre-registration doctors) has been reiterated since Junior doctors are often unsure when to ask for advice or help and are sometimes unwilling to admit that they are over-tired and unable to cope [91011)

The report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers [12] noted the heavy load carried by house surgeons working long shifts in A amp E departments It also commented that when house surgeons are required to look after the A amp E department while carrying out ward duties inadequate cover of the A amp E department could result

The New Zealand situation

The urban A amp E departments had between two and six house surgeons working on three month A amp E runs and in several of these hospitals another one to three house surgeons on general relieving duties covered some A amp E shifts There were more house surgeons in A amp E departments with heavier workloads or with fewer senior medical staff The provincial and rural departments did not usually have house surgeons working on specific A amp E runs rather the A amp E department was covered by all (or most) of the house surgeons in the hospital on a rotatng basis Of the two suburban A amp E departments Kenepuru was covered by the house surgeons on a rotating basis while North Shore did not have any house surgeons because there was no inpatient or consultative backup available (see Table 5)

The total medical staffing of the departments (senior A amp E doctors and house surgeons together) ranged from 10 to 100 full-time equivalents and was closely related to the attendance at the departments (see Table 6) The provincial and rural A amp E departments had higher medical staff to attendance ratios because they had to provide a 24-hour service regardless of the size of the attendance

Each A amp E department visited rostered its house surgeons differently depending on the availability of senior medical staff the workload of the department and the house surgeons other duties In the urban departments house surgeons worked between 45 and 60 hours a week on shifts usually 8 to 12 hours long Many of the house surgeons working in these departments complained about long shifts and suggested that more staff were needed to reduce the shift lengths Split shifts were also unpopular

The most worrying aspect of the staff ing arrangements in bhe Accident and Emergency department is the long hours We need another house surgeon to reduce the hours on some shifts and to proviae another pair of hands in busy periods (eg Friday and Saturday night Sunday afternoon)

House surgeon

39

TABLE 6 TOTAL MEDICAL STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND MEDICAL STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE I AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Total medical Total medical staffing to staffing attendance ratio

FTE per FTE per 10000 first 10000 total

Full-time attendance attendance equivalents p a pa

Full-time departments

Urban

Auckland2 100 17 15 Middlemore2 91 23 16 Green Lane2 65 25 15 Wellington 66 14 12 Hutt2 55 17 13 Christchurch 70 11 10 Dunedin2 60 22 16

Provincial Rotorua 42 34 25 Taranaki Base2 28 27 18 Timaru 22 19 11

Rural Whakatane3 15 25 17 Grey 10 26 20

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 20 21 12 Kenepuru3 20 34 22

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE estimated since A amp E department partially covered by house

surgeons on general relieving duties 3 FTE estimated since A amp E department covered by house surgeons on

rotating basis

Spearman rank correlations [131 of total medical staffing with

(a) first attendance r = 0953 p lt 001 (b) total attendance r = 0933 p 001

In the provincial and rural hospitals house surgeons were often on call for long shifts over nights and weekends They were usually covering a ward or the whole hospital at the same time and simultaneous demands from the wards and the A amp E department sometimes caused problems However

40

these house surgeons generally found their rostering satisfactory despite the long hours on call perhaps because the actual work required in the A amp E department was comparatively light

An ordinary week night is usually quiet after midnight thered be three to five calls and Id have to get up once on average Weekend nights are busier but I usually get at least two or three hours sleep

House surgeon

Several house surgeons were irritated that while they worked more intensively on A amp E runs than on ward runs they spent fewer hours on-call and consequently they were paid less

Supervision by senior medical staff

In the larger A amp F departments house surgeons worked with the senior medical staff on most day and some evening shifts only on night shifts (and some evening shifts) were house surgeons the sole medical staff in a department By contrast in the smaller and part-time departments house surgeons covered the department alone seldom working with any senior A amp E medical staff

Several nurses commented that the A amp E department ran less efficiently outside normal working hours because the house surgeons inexperience meant assessment and treatment times were longer and tests were used more often than when the A amp E officer was present

Many senior medical staff in the urban A amp E departments were concerned at the lack of supervision for house surgeons outside normal working hours and so would have Ii ked more senior A amp E staff Several of the house surgeons were also concerned although others enjoyed the autonomy they had and were not concerned about working without supervision

I am not happy with house surgeons managing the A amp E department on their own They only have a three month shift in the department and often most of this time is spent learning how to do A amp E wor k The house surgeons can have problems deciding when to call a registrar to treat a patient and there can be delays in obtaining a registrar The A amp E department needs full-time trained medical staff on duty 24 hours a day to give proper supervision to the house surgeons and to run an efficient department

A amp E officer

On night shift I can feel rather alone if something goes wrong

House surgeon

I enjoy the variety of work and the independence I have to treat most patients as I see fit

House surgeon

41 _A

Arraflgements for consultative backup and support when senior A amp E staff were not on duty varied from hospital to hospital according to hospital size n urban hospitals the house surgeons would usually call on the appropriate registrar and the acute admitting or specialist teams for emergencymiddot cases In some places the house surgeons could calIon the consultant if a registrar was unavailable but this was usually seen as a last resort call In the provincial and rural hospitals the house surgeons would call on the appropriate senior doctor who was available This was usually one of the cQnsultants or a registrar if any were employed by the hospital The A amp E Qfficer might occasionally be called and in hospitals without an A~amp E oHicer th~ medical superintendent would also provid~ backup

Generally house surgeons were happy with the support they received A physically compact hospital was mentioned several times as facilitating ~ ~ fast back-up Howeve( in some hospitals there could be considerable delays in 9etting surgical and orthopaedic registrars to the A amp E department usually because they were in theatre Also at two hospitals backup in the minor specialties was considered inadequate bull

Use of first year house surgeons

Urban and suburban hospitals had a policy of using second year house surgeons as much as possible in the A amp E department and of using first year house surgeons only in their second six months This policy was generally butmiddot not always carried out For example the on-call arrangements of some urban A amp E departments resulted in inexperienced first year house surgeons working in the department In the smaller hospitals also the limited pool of house surgeons available tended to result in more first year house surgeons working in the department

The hospital could not provide cover for the A amp E department without using first year house surgeons However there are always senior staff and the medical registrar readily available as backup

Medical superintendent

When direct supervision was limited first year house surgeons did find A amp E work difficult

Training

The training received by the house surgeons in the A amp E departments varied greatly Two hospitals ran half-day or one-day orientation courses before -house surgeons started in the department Three A amp E departments ran weekly or fortnightly training sessions on specific conditions while another department ran sessions on an irregular basis However house surgeons often missed training sessions because they were treating pat~entsln more than half tmiddothe A amp E departments no formal training was giVen and house surgeons were taught on-the-job when senior A amp E staff were available This teaching placed a considerable load on senior staff

The three-monthly changeover of house surgeons is frustrating and the first month with new house surgeons is very demanding because they have little confidence or competence

A amp E officer

42

If the A amp E department had no senior staff or if the house surgeons shifts did not coincide with those of the senior staff the house surgeons had to gain their training whenever and wherever they could Both house surgeons and nurses commented that house surgeons often required guidance from the nursing staff

We get on-the-job training relying very heavily on the nurses to say IDr X (the A amp E officer) normally does bullbullbull I was rather scared the first few days in the A amp E department

House surgeon

Several house surgeons commented that they would have liked more training particularly when they were first in the A amp E department and more guidance on hospital policy and administration

Manuals (middotor sets of standingmiddot orders) out-lining the clinical and administrative procedures required under different bull circumstances have been widely recognised as essential in the A amp E department They are particularly useful to new A amp E doctors as an explanationoof their duties 7 p 79914J

Senior medical staff at 13 of the hospitals visited said they had standing orders covering ~A amp E administration procedures or were revising them These standing orders were either specific A amp E booklets or sections of the full hospital standing orders Several house surgeons commented that they found the standlng orders useful while others relied more on verbal advice from the A amp E officer or nurses Two of the latter house surgeons said they had not seen any A amp E standing orders when in fact the full hospital standing orders did contain a section on the A amp E department One A amp E department had no standing orders (apartmiddot from protocols for the care of coronary patients) and the house surgeons there would have liked more guidelines

Accident and emergency work as a career

Advantages and disadvantages

The senior medical staff who expressed their views on A amp E work as a career had all previously been general practitioners and their comments largely reflected comparisons of A amp E work with general practice They tended to cite the regular hours good conditions of service and salaries competitive with general practice as advantages of A amp E work and the limited range of clinical material and lack of continuity of care as disadvantages

When house surgeons were asked whether they would be intercested in A amp E work as careers for themselVes their responses were more negative than those of the senior ~ amp E staff All of them mentioned some disadvantages of A amp E work To those mentioned by senior staff they added the problems of irregular hours and having to deal with many trivial complaints The lack of recognition of A amp E work as a specialty (and consequent lack of status within the hospital) was also seen as a disadvantage Some mentioned the advantages cited by the senior staff and added variety of work as another advantage These advantages and disadvantages mirror those noted by British and United States writers [315]

43

Accident and emergency work as a sp~cialty

Over the past two decades in the United States the increasing use of emergency rooms has led to the development of training programmes for emergency room doctors and in 1979 to the granting of specialty status to emergency medicine The American College of Emergency Physicians in 1975 defined the emergency physician as I a specialist in breadth whose training is focused ~n the acute and the life-threatening aspects of medical care and who~ by ~he nature of his practice is available when the patient needs him [cited in 16]

vlhile emergency medicine has much the same content as family practice the different emphasis approach and method of handling have been cited as justifying a separate specialty [16] Critics have disputed the specialty status of emergency medicine stating that although a broad clinical knowledge is required this knowledge is also shallow [15]

In Britain similar debates have taken place While the Platt report [2] recommended that one consultant should be in administrative charge of an A amp E department it did not favour the development of accident surgery as a specialty in its own right nor the appointment of consultants to work full-time in A amp E departments However the Increasing number of A amp E conSUltants middotthe development of training posts and the formation of an association of A amp E consultants [4] have signaled a de facto recognition of A amp E work as a specialty The role of general practitioners in A amp E departments has also been debated Their suitability for sorting and treating casual attenders has been stressed and their ability to work without consultant supervision has been seen as an advantage 21718]

An emergency care seminar held in Auckland in 1979 recognised the inadequacy of training at all levels for work in A amp E departments in New Zealand The suggestions made to rectify this situation included the recruitment of sp~cialist -staff at a career level

Senior staff in some of the urban A amp E departments stressed the need for a post-graduate A amp E specialist training in New Zealand They gave two reasons for this that more senior staff were required to supervise and properly train house surgeons working in A amp E departments and that more senior staff were needed to improve the efficiency

More senior staff would improve standards of care speed throughput reduce the need for tests and reduce recalls as well as improving the supervision of house surgeons

A amp E officer

The staff of the smaller hospitals commented that full-time specialists could be warranted in large urban A amp E departments but were not necessary in provincial hospitals

Full-time A amp E specialists are only warranted in very big hospitals where there is enough emergency work to justify a trauma centre and 24 hour senior doctor cover A specialist cannot work well in isolation so the workload has to be large enough to justify three or four A amp E consultants

A amp E officer

44

NURSE STAFFING

Accident and emergency nursing

As noted by Jenkins [7 p41-42 J nursing in the emergency department is different from in-hospital nursing The nature of work in the department requires the ability to perceive and act quickly and to adapt to constantly changing circumstances

The A amp E nurse needs skills in assessment and examination in critical care and emergency treatment in public relations and must be able to act calmly under pressure Increasingly experienced nurses are expected to carry out triage Special training both on-the-job and in study courses is therefore essential [27 p 36 1419J

The need to have experienced senior nursing staff working in the A amp E department at all times has been recognised for many years The senior nurse in charge of the department has a key role being responsible for the day-to-day administration of the department for the supervision of the nursing care given and often for supporting the junior medical staff [259] Again as Jenkins [7 p 27] noted the emergency department nurse is one cornerstone of the department and often acts as the stablizing element in a chaotic milieu especially in those hospitals where the medical staff rotates

New Zealand arrangements

There was considerable variation in both the total numbers and the levels of experience of nursing staff among the A amp E departments (see Table 7) Some departments had a nurse supervisor in control and several charge nurses while other departments had a charge nurse in control A amp E nurses were mainly staff nurses although some departments used substantial numbers of enrolled nursesmiddot Student nurses were present in most of the departments but they were often there for a few weeks only so they have been excluded from the tables

The number of nurses on duty in the A amp E department varied over the time of the day and the day of the week with more nurses on duty at times of heavy workload such as Friday and Saturday evenings and also weekday mornings when dressing clinics were held Most departments organised some staggering of shifts so that good cover was maintained throughout the day In three of the smaller hospitals (Timaru Whakatane and Grey)middot the A amp E department was covered at night by separate nursing staff usually the night supervisors who were covering other parts of the hospital as well

In several of the small hospitals the nursing staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department Generally this was satisfactory but occasionally the steady workload of the outpatients department left the A amp E department short of nursing cover

The total nurse staffing of the A amp E departments visited ranged from 25 to 278 full-time equivalents and this variation was partially related to the attendance of the department and whether or not the department had a holding ward (see Table 8) However even after adjusting for the staff required in the holding wards there was a threefold variation in the

45

nursing staff to attendance ratios of the urban A amp E departments Other factors such as the small size of the Hutt and Christchurch A amp E departments and greater use of student nurses may have been involved

TABLE 7 NURSE STAfFING OF HOSPITAL AIDS

Nurse lt bullbull

sup~rvisors

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland l 1 Middlemorel 1 Green Lane l 1 Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin 1

Provincial Rotorua 1 Taranaki Basel

Timarul 2

Rural Whakatane2 Grey2

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Charge Staff nurses Full-

Time

4 21 4 11 2 11 1 19 1 8 1 11 2 3

5 I 10 1 3

1 4 1 2

1 7middot 1 1

EXCLUDING

nurses Part-Time

2 12

7

2 2 4

1

STUDENT NURSES AND

Enrolled nurses Full- Part shytime Time

4 2

2 1 2

1 4 1

1 1

3

1 Holding ward attachedto Aamp E department covered completely or partly by A amp E nursing staff

2 A amp E department covered by separate nursing staff at night (numbers not included here)

Work in both the A amp E department and the outpatients department

The relatively low attendance at the provincial rural and suburban departments contributed to their somewhat higher nursing staff to attendance ratios The high level of nursing staff at North Shore may be related to the additional duties of nurses in that department in escorting patients to other hospitals and working in the plaster room

TABLE 8 NURSE STAFFING (FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS) AND NU~E STAFFING TO ATTENDANCE RATIOS FOR FIRST ATTENDANCE AND TOTAL ATTENDANCE 1

Nurse staffing Nur~estaffing to attendance ratios

Full-time Adjusted Adjusted FTE Adjusted PTE equiva- full-time perlOOOO per 10000 lents2 equival- first atten- total attendshy

3ents dance pa dance p a

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane4

Wellington HuH Christchurch Dunedin

270 278 172 200 1l~0 130 80

220 258 122 170 110 130 80

3bull 8 66 47 35 33 21 29

34 45 29 30 26 18 21

Provincial Rotorua4

Taranaki Base Timaru

77 160 75

77 80 55

63 77 55

46 51 27

Rural Whakatane4 Grey4

52 25

52 25

87 65

59 49

Part-time depa rtment s

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

110 28

110 28

117 48

64 31

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations 2 FTE calculatedfrom Table 7 (with part-timenurses counted as 05

FTE) unless exact FTE figures supplied by hospitals 3 FTE adjusted by removing nurses covering the holding ward 4 Nurses covering both the A amp E department and the outpatients department counted as 07 FTE in the A amp E department and separate night nursing staff counted as 10 FTE extra

Spearman rank correlations (13] of adjusted nurse staffing with

( a) first attendance r = 0869 p lt 001 ( b) total attendance r = 0895 P lt 001

47

In seven A amp E departments nurses were satisfied with staffing arrangements liowever nurses in four departments (not necessarily those with relatively ~~w nurses) said that nurse numbers were too low while at two other departments weekend shortages of nurses and diff iculty getting replacements for numiddotreesmiddotmiddot off sick were mentioned as problems One hospitals policy of rotating all nurses at or below staff nurse level throughout the h6spital was criticised because it left too few nurses with A amp E experiance worlting in t)le department At another hospital nurses appreciated the reguiar check made on their job satisfaction by the nurse supervisors

In several A amp E departmentsmiddotmiddotr-ourseswere dissatisfied with the medical staffing arrangements~Cl some wani~d a senior doctor interested in A amp E work in charge of the department Others wanted A amp E doctors to spend

Imiddot ~~fU

more time in the department ~specially outside normal working hours

Training

In most of th~ A amp E departments visited junior nurses received on-the-job training wo~king alongside semor nurses and being rotateQ through different areas of the department However where a department was short of nursing staff or had a heavy workload senior nurses often had insuffficient time to teach the junior nurses Senior nurses often found that training new hurses both increased their workload markedly and slowed down the work of the department However as one principal nurse said

We train nurses on-the-job If we waited for experienced nurses to app1Y we I d nev~rltlet them

Principal nurse

At several A amp E departments junior nurses did not work either on their own or in areas requiring more judgement (for example the resuscitation room or the waiting room) until they were more experienced Often this changeover did not happen until the nurses in charge of the department had made a formal appraisal of the junior nurse There was a consensus among senior A amp E nurses that three to six months working in the department was required to train an A amp E nurse

I think A amp E nurses need a three month training course - their student training is not enough A nurse needs three to six months experience before she is fully competent to work permanently in the A amp E department Also its difficult to get fully trained on-the-job in a smaller hospital because theres too few patients coming through

A amp E nurse

Usually some form of procedure manual orientation book andor job description was provided for the nursing staff outlining their duties and responsibilities in the A amp E department A few departments also ran occasional lectures and inservice training At Auckland Middlemore and North Shore hospitals the A amp E department ran specific inservice training courses for staff nurses

48

The course at Auckland for example took six nurses at a time involved one study day per fortnight over 10-12 months and covered all aspects of A amp E work Nurses had to have six months experience in the A amp E

department before taking the course Senior nurses commented that the courses were valuable in improving the nurses abilities confidence and morale and felt that nurses who had been through the courses tended to stay in the department longer and were less prone to absenteeism Junior nurses at several hospitals without A amp E training courses said they would find such a course useful

At more than half the A amp E departments visited nurses commented on the necessity for them to guide the house surgeons particularly early in the three-month runs

The junior medical staff training is on-the-job and its largely done behind the door by the nursing staff The nurses will encourage the house surgeon to call a consultant if necessary (but not in front of a patient) or if they are very worried the nurses will ring a consultant themselves The house surgeons this year are very good and pleasant but it can be very wearying when they begin their three month shifts

A amp E nurse

At some hospitals this need to guide house surgeons had provilt1ed the impetus for developing A amp E nurse training courses

Many of the nurses said that they enjoyed A amp E nursing because of its specialised nature It had a fast pace and a stop-start quality thereI

was never a routine because of the high patient turnover the variety of complaints presenting and the drama associated with some cases As with the house surgeons nurses often found themselves carrying more responsibility working in the A amp E department than in the wards and they relished this Several hospitals had waiting lists of nurses wishing to work in the A amp E depart~entbull

OTHER STAFF INVOLVED WITH THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

An efficient and effective A amp E department needs not only adequate medical and nursing staff it also requires secretarial clerical reception and orderly staff [27 p 24-251

Reception and clerical staff

Most urban A amp E departments had receptionist cover 24 hours a day Usually therewere two or three receptionists on duty during the day with one receptionist on duty during evenings and at night At the provincial departments and at Hutt and Dunedin departments reception staff covered days (and sometimes evenings) for seven days a week In the rural A amp E departments a receptionist was on duty weekdays only When the receptionist was not on duty nursing staff carried out the duties In several of the smaller hospitals patients arriving at night were first seen by the hospital telephonist who then called the nursing staff

Usually the receptionists duties were to note the patients details on the A amp E record form and on the A amp E log The receptionists often helped with triage by alerting nursing staff to urgent cases In some

49

departments the receptionist also dealt with Ace forms made appointments for return visits and carried out admitting procedures at night However in one hospital the reception staff were not specifically attached to the A amp E department and only noted the patients details on the A amp E record form All other duties were performed by the nurses (and sometimes the A amp E doctors) who resented this added workload In several of the smaller A amp E departments reception staff covered both the A amp E department and the outpatients department quite satisfactorily

Several receptionists had years of experience in the A amp E department as well as other relevant experience (eg ambulance dr i ver ECG technician) and were highly valued by the other A amp E staff

In addition to the receptionists some of the urban A amp E departments had hostesses andor hospital aids for odd jobs such as dealing with enquiries taking messages filling out laboratory forms putting away stores and making tea

TO meet the secretarial needs of the A amp E department (eg referral letters to general practitioners) the staff generally used secretaries in other parts of the hospital This service was not always adequate and one department used form letters completed by the A amp E doctors by hand for much of its correspondence Another department employed a part-time secretary for the doctors

Orderlies

Orderlies were generally used to move patients within the A amp E department as well as to other parts o~ the hospital In some hospitals they also assisted with plaster work

Some of the urban and provincial A amp E departments had an orderly during day-time hours but outside these hours and in all other departments orderlies were called from the hospital pool Some A amp E staff commented that delays involved in getting an orderly from the pool could be frustrating when the department was busy

Social workers

The A amp E departments visited had various methods for coping with patients with social or emotional problems

The urban A amp E departments could often calIon psychiatric backup such as a crisis team or an individual psychiatrist psychiatric nurse or counsellor Four of the urban A amp E departments had a social worker allocated to work in the department for some time each day who was also on call for the department while carrying out other duties The rest of the departments called on the pool of hospital social workers In the smaller hospitals social workers were not always available at nights or on weekends although in some places the social workers had made themselves available on an informal basis A amp E staff had mixed views on the usefulness of social workers

The social worker is essential to the work of the A amp E department

A amp E officer

50

The nature of social work has changed over the years and its hard now to make contact with the social workers and to get the support the department wants The department does social work itself and has good liaison with the Salvation Army and other welfare groups

A amp E officer

Ambulance personnel

Most of the urban and provincial A amp E departments were served by the Order of St John ambulances The exceptions were the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments which were served by the Wellington Free Ambulance and Taranaki A amp E department which worked with the hospital board ambulances Both the rural A amp E departments were served by hospital board ambulance services during the day and St John services at night

Generally the A amp E staff found that liaison between themselves and the ambulance personnel was good Many ambulancemiddot officers had had some training in the A amp E department and were familiar withmiddot its procedures Communications between the two were usually satisfactory with radio-telephones being used to alert the A amp E department to incoming urgent cases or to ask for advice on patient treatment

However some A amp E staff expressed concern abut the suitability of treatment provided by ambulance personnel They were particularly worried about the sophisticated techniques being used at times by some ambulance officers

Many ambulance officers are doing advanced courses and theyre enthusiastic about treating people - putting in drips or giving drugs Mostly the officers are excellent but some are over-enthusiastic

A amp E doctor

In the Auckland and Wellington urban areas there were several A amp E departments and as a working rule ambulance officers took patients to the nearest department However this rule was modified by the facilities available at the nearest hospital and whether or not the nearest A amp E department was open For example if the nearest hospital had no orthopaedic backup the ambulance would ptobably take a patient requiring orthopaedic care to the next closest hospital or if one of the part-time A amp E departments was nearest but closed the ambulance would go to another hospital At times the ambulance officers consulted with the A amp E staff by radio-telephone as to the appropriate A amp E department for a patient they were transporting

DISCUSSION

The patterns of medical staffing in terms of the number of senior A amp E doctors and the rostering of house surgeons reflectedmiddot the attendances and locations of the different A amp E departments The numbers of doctors and nurses (expressed as full-time equivalents) generally reflected the attendance at the departments However there was considerable variation in the level of nursing staff relative to attendance which could not be easily explained

51

Training in A amp E work for the house surgeons was inadequate with little formal training available for them In some places they had little opportunity to learn on-the-job beside a senior doctor Obviously greater time working alongside a senior doctor would be valuable as would intensive one or two-day orientation courses bull

Training was an important matter for the nursing staff also since very experienced nurses clearly were needed in the A amp E departments Inservice training courses are desirable both to develop experienced nurses as quickly as possible and to reduce the load that on-the-job training puts on the existing experienced nurses The training courses run in the Auckland hospitals appeared to be very successful and they could be used as a basis for courses in other hospitals and in post-basic programmes

The house surgeons in urban A amp E departments found their 10 and 12 hour shifts exhausting Also there was some evidence that where house surgeons covered other parts of the hospital as well as the A amp E department conflicting demands resulted in poor cover of the~ department Both of these problems would be alleviated by rostering more staff to the A amp E department We understand that this has happened in some departments in response to the Report on working conditions of resident medical officers Part I [12]

Inadequate supervision of house surgeons and the use of inexperienced first year house surgeons in A amp E departments were widespread In some places there were difficulties in getting backup from specialist staff and the house surgeons were very much on their own in the department There was also some evidence that A amp E departments were less efficient out of normal office hours due to delays in getting registrars and consultants and more especially due to the house surgeons inexperience

Employing more senior doctors both to improve the supervision and training of house surgeons and to improve the efficiency of the A amp E departments would be desirable But at present there are difficulties finding suitable applicants for A amp E officer positions These difficulties are at least partially oue to the low status of the A amp E department within the medical structure and the lack of career prospects for A amp E doctors The increasing numbers of doctors in the 1980 s and the opportunities for part-time work that the A amp E department offers to doctors with family responsibilities may make the department a more attractive choice However if these factors do not improve the senior medical staffing the development of A amp E medicine as a specialty will continue to ~e suggested

Does A amp E medicine in New Zealand require the extra training that would be provided by a post-graduate A amp E specialist programme Given the range of backgrounds currently found suitable for A amp E doctors it would appear that A amp E medicine in rural and provincial hospitals does not require much extra training although some training in particular aspects (eg soft-tissue injuries) could be useful In the urban hospitals the much higher load of major trauma cases could justify a post-graduate training programme However at present the number of senior A amp E doctors in the urban hospitals is insufficient to justify a specialist programme If numbers increase in the future perhaps the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine could sponsor a suitable post-graduate programme They coulo also play an extremely useful role by preparing a manual outlining clinical procedures for A amp E departments and distributing regular bulletins up-dating this material

52

REFERENCES

1 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services report on a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional off ice for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

2 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

3 ELSON Reginald - The medical staff of British accident and emergency units in Br J Hosp Med - (August 1971) p 161-170

4 New thoughts from casualty [editorial] in Br Med J - v 1 (1976) p 1299-1300

5 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 21-24

6 Community-wide emergency medical services recommendations by the Committee on Acute Medicine of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists in JAMA - v 204 no 7 (1968) p 595-602

7 Emergency department organisation and management edited by AL~ Jenkins - St Louis Mosby 1975

8 Outpatient services in public hospitals in New Zealand - Wellington Government Printer 1960 (Report series Board of Health no 2)

9 SALMOND GC - Young doctors an exercise in social researchmiddot methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 179-214

10 Accident and emergency services - Gt Brit National Health Service memorandum HM 68(83)

11 CANT BR staffing of A amp E departments in NZ Med J - v 94 (1981) p 471

12 Report on the working conditions of New Zealand resident medical officers Pt 1 Report of the Working Party established by the Hospital Medical Officers Advisory Committee and the Minister of Health - Wellington Dept of Health 1981 (unpublished)

13 SIEGEL Sydney - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraW-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

14 OWENS J Cuthbert - Survey discovers what is wrong with hospitals emergency service in Mod Hosp - vl06no 1 (1966) p 82-85

15 LEITZELL James p - An uncertain future in N Eng J Med - v 304 no 8 (1981) p 477-480

16 RIGGS Leonard M Jr - A vigorous new speCialty in N Eng J Med shyv 304 no 8 (1981) p 480-483

53

17 HONIGSBAUM F - General practitioner work in British hospitals Soc Econ Admin - vl (1967) p 34-44bull

in

18 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL DJ and WALKER JH~ - Practitioners patients and the accident department in Hosp Health Services - (1975) p 80-84

Rev

19 Proceedings of the emergency care seminar Auckland 1979 in NZ Med J - v 91(1980) p 194-196

19-23 March

55

CHAPTER 6

Patient att~ndance characteristics

This chapter considers the general pattern of attendance at A amp E departments noting overall levels and time trends the age and SeX distribution of patients and the conditions with which they come to the department Next we look at recall visits particularly the hospital to hospital variations Then the use of A amp E departments by people who would be more appropriately treated by a general practitioner is discussed

The materiai has been gathered by examining the A amp E records and talking with the staff of the 14 A amp E departments visited Data from the re~ords at Northland Base Hospital A amp E department have also been incorporated

Detailed patterns of attendance by hour of the day and day of the week have not been analysed Other researchers have documented these for A amp E departments in New Zealand and overseas [123456789] While detailed information is useful for good management of departments and setting adequate staffing levels for the busiest periods it is usually specific to a particular department and is not relevant to the questions addressed in this report For our purposes it has been sufficient to divide the week into normal working hours (in hours defined as 0800-1800 Monday to Friday excluding holidays) and the remaining hours (out of hours)

OVERALL ATTENDANCE AND TRENDS

Since 1978 hospitals have reported total attendance at outpatient departments to the National Health Statistics Centre distinguishing A amp E attendance from other attendance and first attendance from recall attendance Table 9 shows the average annual attendance at the 15 A amp E departments for the period from 1978 to 1981 Table 10 presents the trends in A amp E attendance over the same period compared with the changes in population of the hospital catchment areas between the 1976 and 1981 censuses

There has been an overall increase in first attendance of 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 This increase is somewhat higher than we would expect from the growth in New Zealand population over the same period However the increase in first attendance has been partially counter-balanced by a decrease of 25 per cent in recall attendance

Table 10 shows too that there is no general trend towards increased first attendancemiddot among the urban hospitals The non-urban hospitals have experienced increasing first attendance although even there Northland Base and Rotorua show no increase

56

TABLE 9 AVERAGE ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-19811

First Recall Total attendance attendance attendance

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 58 506 6 272 64 777 Middlemore 39 032 18 686 57 718 Green Lane 26 079 16 635 42 714 Wellington 48 011 7 748 55 759 Hutt 33 266 9 807 43 072 Christchurch 61 516 12 010 73 526 Dunedin 27 202 10 802 38 004

Provincial Northland Base 7 794 3 144 10 938 Rotorua 12 265 4 636 16 900 Taranaki Base 10 341 5 462 15 803 Timaru 9 971 10 102 20 072

Rural Whakatane 5 992 2 177 8 769 Grey 3 850 1 214 5 064

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore2 9 388 7 900 17 288 Kenepuru 3 5 843 3 209 9 052

All public hospitals 524 442 226 251 750 693

1 Source Hospital Management Data 1978-1981 - Wellington National Health Statistics Centre Dept of Health Simple average unless otherwise noted

2 Estimated as average of 1978 1979 and 1981 figures as the North Shore A amp E department was closed for part of 1980

3 Estimated for 1979-1981 only since the Kenepuru A amp E department was not open ~or all of 1978

57

TABLE 10 TRENDS IN ATTENDANCE AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS 1978-1981

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Midd1emore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore3

Kenepuru 4

All public hospitals

Average annual percentage change in A amp E attendance l

First attendance

-36 07 16

-22 -79

00 48

-07 06 64

185

61 90

59 179

15

Recall attendance

lo3-07

66 -155 -34

63 08

33 -45

23 02

1253 06

374 89

-25

Estimated annual percentage change in population of hospital bull s catchment

area

1976-19812

07

-04 -02 -10

14 12

-02 -06

12 -04

07 -04

02

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations

2 Source NZ Wellington

Census of Population Dept of Statistics

and Dwellings 1976 and 1981

3 Estimated from 1978 and 1981 flUctuations in intervening years

figures only because of extreme

4 Estimated for 1979-1981 for all of 1978

only since Kenepuru A amp E department not open

Figure for entire hospital board area used

58

AGE AND SEX

The characteristic age and sex distributions of total A amp E attendance are shown in Figure 1 Nearly half of the attendances are by young adults 15-29 years Schoolage children too formed a larger part of the attendance than their numbers in the community would lead one to expect These two age groups which are also the age groups most likely to be active and daring accounted for nearly two thirds of all attendances The age distribution of attendance was similar from hospital to hospital

About twice as many males as females attended A amp E departments (66 per cent to 34 per cent) When age and sex were considered together I it was the school age and young adult males who made up the majority of attenders Even in the 30-64-year-old group men outnumbered women two to one These age and sex distributions are similar to those found by other researchers in New Zealand [1410] in Britain [1112] and the United States [1314]

Figure 1 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments by age and sex

Male Female

3L1

30

20 20

E ~ 128 shy

108

10

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65_ Age Group Age Group

CONDITIONS

Of the total A amp E attendances 81 per cent were for injury conditions and 19 per cent were for sickness conditions Adjusting for the recall visits we estimated that 73 to 78 per cent of first visits were for injury conditions Our results were similar to Platts [15] as far as we can tell given the different definitions used In another British study Lewis and Bradbury [12] found 90 per cent of visits were for injury However

59

this higher level is not surprising since they considered only cases which were waiting for attention ignoring ambulance cases and the very seriously ill

Out of hours sickness conditions made up 25 per cent of all visits and in hours they were 14 per cent Preschool children and people 65 years and over were more likely to attend for sickness conditions than those aged 5-64 years (Figure 2) The preponderance of males over females in the 15-64 year old groups was accounted for by injury conditions rather than by sickness

Figure 2 Percentage of total attendance at A amp E departments for sickness and injury conditions by age and sex

Male Femate

IIIiI A trendance for _ sickness condiHons 30

remainder for injury condItions

20

0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65+ 0-4 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 f Age Group Age Group

In the following sections information from some of the hospitals about the types of injury and sickness conditions is presented We have had problems in classifying the conditions since at some hospitals few details of the patients conditions were recorded on the A amp E log Even where details were recorded only 60 per cent of injury attendances and 80 per cent of sickness attendances have been able to be consistently classified

Injury conditions

Data on the type of injury was extracted from only six A amp E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch and Northland Base hospitals) There was very little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 3 shows the types of injuries as proportions of first injury attendances The category

60

of cuts (which included scrapes amputations and punctures) accounted for almost 30 per cent of first injury attendances The severity of the cuts could not be judged from log entries but in the case of Northland Base Hospital cuts identified as probably needing suturing formed a substantial part of this category Fractures made up 15 per cent of the first injury attendance with foreign body injuries (mostly in the eye) burns and toxic effects accounting for another 14 per cent

Figure 3 Injury first attendances by type of injury all ages

Other (414)

Cuts (291)Fractures (154)

The category labelled other accounted for 40 per cent of all first injury attendances and included some serious conditions such as falls crushing injuries and various states of shock However many of the other injuries were regarded as minor conditions by the Aamp E staff It was impossible to judge the severity of injuries from the detail recorded on the logs so no estimate of the percentage of injuries which required urgent attention has been made

For most types of injuries sex and age had little bearing There were exceptions (Figure 4) Toxic effects were four times as likely among preschool children as among other age groups Fractures were twice as likely both for school age children and for those 65 years and over as for other age groups Somewhat surprisingly adult men and women differed little in the types of injuries

Figure 4 Injury first attendances by type of injury by age groups

0-4 (ears 5-14 years 15-29 years

Other (308)

Cuts (321 )

Toxic effects (13) Burns (21 )

Foreign bodies (24)

Fractures (254)

Other (408)

Cuts (280)

Toxic effects (28)

Burns (41)

Other (452)

Cuts (286)

30-64 years 65+ years

Other (393) Other (341)

Cuts (308) Fractures (301)

62

People were more likely to present with injury conditions in hours rather than out of hours From the information collected at the four Auckland hospitals we can say that 43 per cent of first injury visits happened out of hours whereas 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category

Sickness conditions

Data on the type of sickness was extracted from only 10 A lie E logs (Auckland Middlemore Green Lane North Shore Christchurch Dunedin Northland Rotorua Taranaki and Grey) There was little hospital to hospital variation so the information from these hospitals has been pooled Figure 5 shows the types of sickness conditions as proportions of all sick~ess attendance

Figure 5 Sickness attendance by type of sickness all ages

General sickness

(110)

Abdominal pain (132) Other (20 1 )

Shortness of breath (150)

Skin pain bleeding (229) Collapse (179)

TwO prominent categories shortness ofmiddot breath and collapse (including diabetic coma heart at tacks congestive heart failure and chest pain) accounted for one-third of all sickness attendances

General sickness covered fever diarrhoea and vomiting feeling unwell convulsions renal failure and abdominal pain recorded as being related to urinary retention Abdominal pain was generally recorded simply as such but acute appendix and similar terms and miscarriage or bleeding from the vagina were included in abdominal pain

Figure 6 Sickness attendance by type of sickness by age groups

0-4 years 5-14 years 15-29 years

General sickness (79)

General ~ickness (380)

Other (90) i

Shortness ofSkin pain I breath (148)

bleeding (100) Sickness pain Shortness of breath (320) bleeding (270) ClI

IN

Collapse (30)

30-64 years 65+ years

Abdominal pain (110) General sickness (102)

Shortness of breath (184) Ot 1159~

Skin pain I bleeding (10 1)

Collapse (358)

64

Unspecified pain or other bleeding have been included in the category of generally minor conditions involving skin pain or bleeding Such minor conditions accounted for almost a quarter of the sickness attendances Abscesses or infected wounds made up a quarter of the skin pain or bleeding category while a further 21 per cent involved pain such as back pain headaches or other pain

Ear and eye conditions toothache and other miscellaneous or undefined conditions made up the other category which formed 20 per cent of the sickness attendance

Were the sickness conditions urgent enough to require treatment at an A amp E department This was a difficult question to answer from the information available on the A amp E logs We have concluded that the collapse and shortness of breath conditions were likely to be emergencies and that for the preschool age group and probably those 65 years and over abdominal pain and general sickness required urgent attention We have described all the other sickness conditions as non-urgent sickness Thus at least 39 per cent of the ickness conditions required urgent attention

The type of sickness attendance differed between the age groups (Figure 6) Preschool children rarely came for superficial reasons Only 11 per cent of their sickness attendances were for skin pain or bleeding conditions Shortness of breath was a major condition for all children preschool or school age Skin pain or bleeding conditions were more prominent among the school age children than the preschool

Young adults tended to come for minor conditions Thirty per cent of their sickness attendance was for skin pain or bleeding conditions and only 20 per cent was for the emergency categories of collapse or shortness of breath

Among the adults 30-64 years old however emergencies formed a substantial part of sickness attendance with 27 per cent belonging to the collapse category Among those 64 years and over few non-urgent conditions were recorded with 40 per cent of the sickness attendance being for collapse The skin pain or bleeding conditions accounted for only 10 per cent of their sickness attendance

Fifty-eight per cent of all sickness attendances occurred out of hours~ as would have been expected given that 55 per cent of waking hours fall into the out of hours category However nearly three-quarters of preschool sickness visits happened out of hours while less than half of the sickness visits by those 30 years and over were out of hours

RECALL ATTENDANCE

Almost all recall visits were for injury conditions velY few sickness patients were recalled for follow-up care As was noted in Chapter 3 policies on recall visits differed among the departments Several factors ~ffected the decision to recall the patients condition the A amp E staffs communication with local general practitioners the inexperience and training needs middotof house surgeons the workload of the department and the senior A amp E doctors ~hilosophy of A amp E medicine From the comments made by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the departments into two groups

65

RECALL POLICY

DO FAVOUR A policy favouring recall visits

DO NOT lAVOUR A policy not favouring recall visits with most patients being referred to a general practitioner However fractures and soft-tissue or serious wounds tend to be recalled

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

DO FAVOUR Taranaki Base Grey North Shore

DO NOT FAVOUR Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Rotorua Timaru Whakatane Kenepuru

-----_--------- ----------------------~

It is diff icult to compare the policies of the departments with their actual performances since some A amp E logs did not completely identify all recall visits Table 11 presents recall attendance as a proportion of total attendance For the departments where recall visits were fully identified there appears to be reasonable agreement between the Hospital Management Data figures and the figures derived from our tallies The exceptions are Whakatane where staff told us that return visits pad dropped from 1979 to 1981 and Auckland where we have no explanation It should be noted that the tally figures are estimates based on one-week to one-month samples and so may be less accurate than the Hospital Mlmagement Data which are complete counts over an entire year

Overall 25-30 per cent of all visits were recall visits There was considerable variation among departments in the level of recall visits OFlanagan [16] found similar variation among British A amp E departments

The recall polic ies were not closely related to the departments performances as measured by the proportion of all visits that were recalls While North Shore with a recall-favouring A amp E department had a very high level of recalls (many were plaster checks) so did Timaru a department with a policy of not favouring recalls The other recall-favouring A amp E departments at Grey and Taranaki Base hospitals had only average levels of recalls

The departments performances however were related to the levels of medical and nursing staff as measured by the tatal medical staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 6 and the nurse staffing to first attendance ratio from Table 8) A amp E departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits (see Table 11 and Figures 7 and 8) Perhaps these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat recalled patients

66

TABLE 11 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS RECALL ATTENDANCE

Hospital Tally sources Management Data Recalls as Recalls as Total Recalls as percentage percentage attend-percentage of total attendancel

of total attendance

of injury attendance

ance tallied2

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 97 198 278 948 Middlemore 324 327 399 1137 Green Lane 389 401 439 868 Wellington3 139 116 172 3568

(4 weeks) Hutt3 228 280 379 2766

( 4 weeks) Christchurch 163 166 216 1233 Dunedin3 284 278 334 749

Provincial Northland Base 287 275 328 2092

03 weeks) Rotorua 274 214 250 334 Taranaki Base 346 327 353 270 Timaru3 504 460 51 6 174

Rural Whakatane 317 152 175 259

( 2 weeks) Grey3 240 238 293 330

o month)

Part-time departments

Suburban North Sh~re 457 521 539 512 Kenepuru 355 383 422 451

(4 weeks)

1 See Table 9 for attendance figures used in calculations lOne week tally unless otherwise noted 3 Tally data partially estimated from Hospital Managementmiddot Data (see

Table 9) to adjust for incomplete recording

Spearman rank correlations [18] of recalls as percentage of total attendances (Hospital Management Data) with

(a) FTE medical staff per 10000 first attendance r = 0459 P lt 005 (b) FTE nurse staffing (adjusted for holding ward) per 10000 first

attendance r = 0547 P lt 005

67

Figure 7 Comparison of medical staff availability and level of recall attendance

u c ro 50 Timaru

C c ~ North Shore m ro S 40 Greenlane 0

Kenepuru

Cl ro Taranaki E = 30

Middlemore bull bull Whakatane

Cl Dunedin Rotoruae

ro

u Hutt Grey

c ro

C 20 C

~ m Christchurch

ro Wellington u

0 10 Auckland

10 20 30 40

Number of medical staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance

Figure 8 Comparison of nursing staff availability and level of recall attendance

Timaru50

North Shore

40 Greenlanee

Kenepuru Taranaki

Middlemore bull Whakatane bull 30

Dunedin ROlorua

GreyHutt

20

Christchurch Wellington

10 Auokland

3 4 5 6 8 9 10 II 12

Number of nursing staff IFTE) per 10000 first attendance lexcluding nurses staffing holding wards)

68

It has been suggested that house surgeons are more likely to recall than senior A amp E doctors [17] If this were so we would expect that A amp E departments where house surgeons worked with very little direct senior superv1s1on (Hutt Taranaki Whakatane Grey Kenepuru) would have had higher proportions of recalls than departments with much greater supervision (Auckland and Dunedin) This was not the case Also North Shore with no house surgeons had a high proportion of recalls Thus the recall levels do not suggest that the house surgeons had any greater propensity than senior A amp E doctors to recall patients

GP-LOAD

A amp E staff use the term GP-load as shorthand for people who in their eyes would more appropriately be treated by a general practitioner Other studies in New Zealand and overseas have estimated that between 36 and 61 per -cent of all A amp E patients could have been successfully treated by a general practitioner [41920] When we discussed this topic with A amp E staff we found a similar variation in their estimates of the GP-10ad This variation may be due to differing views as to which injury and sickness conditions should be treated in the A amp E department it may be due to different beliefs about the abilities and facilities of general practitioners and it may reflect differences in the patients ~erved by different A amp E departments

The role of general practitioners in the treatment of injury is a matter of debate However there is more agreement over sickness conditions A sickness emergency is traditionally accepted as suitable for A amp E treatment whereas a non-urgent sickness condition is seen as more appropriate for general practitioner treatment

Non-urgent sickness

A amp E staff estimated that patients with long standing or minor sickness conditions constituted from 2 to 30 per cent of the attendance However tallies from the A amp E logs showed that non-urgent sickness attendance ranged from 6 to 24 per cent averaging about 12 per cent At most departments staff oVer-estimated the level At a typical hospital staff opinion placed non-urgent sickness at 20 to 25 per cent of the attendance while the A amp E log showed only 19 per cent coming for any sickness condition and fewer than 12 per cent for non-urgent sickness Only in one A amp E department was the tally evidence of non-urgent sickness greater than the staffs estimate The general oVer-estimation of non-urgent sickness visits probably means that A amp E staff were also over-estimating the total GP-load bull

In general A amp E staff felt that patients with non-urgent sickness would be better off being seen by their own general practitioners However the departments differed in the ways they dealt with these patients Some staff mentioned that when they treated such patients they would discourage further visits by explaining the role of the A amp E department Some departments had notices in the waiting rooms stating that the department was for treatment of accidents and emergencies and that people should see their general practitioner for other conditions Some hospitals had placed advertisements with similar messages in local newspapers

From the comments of A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents we were able to divide the A amp E departments into two groups

69

OPEN DOOR POLICY

OPEN An open policy where almtreated They may then general practitioner

ost be

all patients advised to see

are a

RESTRICTED A restricted policy where patients are not treated a general practitioner

nbut

on-urgent are re

sicknferred

ess to

The A amp E departments studied could be grouped as follows

OPEN Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin Northland Base Whakatane Grey North Shore

RESTRICTED Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru Kenepuru

The open door policies were reflected somewhat in the proportion of all A amp E visits that were f or sickness (see Table 12) The departments with restricted policies (which were all non-urban) tended to have lower proportions of sickness visits than those with open policies However the non-urban departments with open policies did not have substantially higher proportions of sickness visits than the restricted departments Rather some of the urban departments (Auckland Wellington Hutt and Christchurch) had particularly high proportions of sickness visits These departments were also particularly busy with large numbers of first attendances and relatively low levels of medical staffing One would expect that in a very busy department staff would discourage inappropriate visits However A amp E staff at Auckand and Wellington hospitals commented that although non-urgent sickness patients needed general practitioner care they tended to treat them anyway because it was quicker to treat them than to send them away This may be a partial explanation for the high levels of sickness visits but other factors related to the populations served by the departments are probably involved (see Chapter 8)

A common exception to the open door policies was made for children At most hospitals staff said that sick children were always seen As Table 13 suggests children as described by staff are probably preschool children rather than all those under 15 years The departments with restricted policies had considerably lower proportions of sickness visits in the preschool and school age groups than did the open policy departments Table 13 also shows that toe agemiddot group most likely to appear with sickness conditions is the elderly There was Tess difference in proportions of sickness visits between the restricted policy and open policy departments for patients aged 30 and over

It would appear that a restricted policy towards non-urgent sickness patients does tend to discourage sickness Visits particularly for preschool age children However a restricted policy does not markedly appear to discourage sickness visits by the elderly

70

TABLE 12 PROPORTION OF A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESS 1

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland Middlemore Green Lane Wellington Butt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru3

Rural Whakatane Grey3

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

Estimated Percentage of percentage total attenshyof first ance that was attendance for sickness that was for sickness

378 303 235 158 187 112 365 323 361 260 301 251 233 168

162 183 144 110 74 109 59

156 132 190 145

58 28 152 94

Total attendance tallied2

948 1137

868 3568 (4 weeks) 2766 ( 4 weeks) 1233

749

2092 (13 weeks) 334 270 174

259 (2 weeks) 330 (l month)

572 451 (4 weeks)

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 One-week tally unless otherwise noted

3 For Timaru and Grey the percentage of first attendance that was for sickness is the actual figure derived from the tallies and the percentage of total attendance that was for sickness has been estimated

71

TABLE 13 PROPORTION OF TOTAL A amp E ATTENDANCE THAT WAS FOR SICKNESSl BY OPEN DOOR POLICY AND AGE GROUPS

Percentage of total attendance that was for sickness

under 5 5-14 15-29 30-64 65 All years years years years years amp age

over groups

Open policy departments 367 111 148 245 433 201

Restricted policy departments 102 66 80 181 311 110

All departments studied 33 bull2 104 141 238 425 191

1 Source Tallies taken from A E logs by authors hospitals represented in one-week equivalents

DISCUSSION

At all public hospitals first visits to A amp E departments increased by 15 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 However this increase was not consistent with most of the urban A E departments reporting a decrease or no change in first visits Recall visits for all public hospital A E departments decreased by 25 per cent annually from 1978 to 1981 The decrease was not consistent in fact the reported changes in recall attendance were highly variable It has been suggested that the cost of general practitioner services and dissatisfaction with the unavailability of general practitioners have caused increased use of A amp E departments However it seems unlikely that any single reason could explain these highly variable changes in A amp E attendance in New Zealand

The people visiting A amp E departments were predominantly school age or young adults and male Men aged 15 to 29 years formed the largest single group almost one-third of all attendances Eighty-one per cent of attendances were for injuries and the 19 per cent attending for sickness conditions tended to be preschoolers or people aged 65 years or more Injury visits were more common in hours and sickness visits out of hours probably because accidents tend to happen in daylight hours Also sic kness conditions often seem worse at night and if the patients do not want to bother their general practitioner they may go straight to the A amp E department (see Chapter 7)

72

It was difficult to classify conditions accurately from the information on A amp E logs since insufficient detail and little indication of severity was usually recorded Thus we have not been able to estimate the proportion of injuries which really required A amp E care Similarly there were difficulties in classifying the sickness conditions middotalthough almost 40 per cent appeared to require urgent attention

There was considerable variation among the A amp E departments studied in the proportion of all visits that were recall visits However contrary to our expectations this variation was not related to the policy on recalling patients stated by A amp E staff and Medical Superintendents Nor did it appear to be related to the inexperience of unsupervised house surgeons Rather it was related to staffing levels Departments with low levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have low levels of recall visits It is likely that staff in these departments were so busy that they referred as many patients as possible whereas departments with more staff had time to treat more recalled patients If departments wish to change their recall levels an examination of thei r staffing levels would be an obvious place to start

The other component of the workload which A amp E departments often wish to control is the non-urgent sickness attendance A amp E staff saw such visits as inappropr iate and they consistently over-estimated the proportion of non-urgent sickness patients they were treating Ullman (3] and Roth [21] have found similar processes of oVer-estimation occurring among staff in United States emergency rooms The level of non-urgent sickness visits was not high on average comprising only 12 per cent of the attendance However applying a restricted policy (referring to general practitioners for treatment displaying notices in the department and advertisements in local newspapers) appeared to discourage such visits particularly for preschool children Thus non-urgent sickness attendance was not a problem in some A amp E departments Where departments see such visits as a problem applying a restricted policy could ease it

13

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS E F S - Casualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J -V 71 0970rgt212-219

2 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard ~ Emergency department utHisation in ail urban community implications for community ambulatory careinJAMA v 216 no 2 (191l) p 301-312

3 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SfRATMANN William C- An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1915) P 1011-1020

4 RICHARDSJ G and WHITE GR~ - Accident and emergency services at AucklandHospital inNZmiddotMed J - v 85 (1977) P 272~274

5 INGRAM D R CLARKE D -R and MURDIE R A -Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1918) P 55-62

6 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referral patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

1 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

McRAE She1agh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience of Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

9 MAYNARD Edward J and DODGE Jeffrey S - Introducing a community health centre at Mosgiel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (A amp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 319-388

10 SNELGAR Denis- Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

11 Casual attenders a socio-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcast1e-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

12 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A amp E in Health Soc Serv J (1981) p 1139-1142

13 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

14 WALKER L L - Inpatient and emergency department utilisation the effect of distance social class age sex and marital status in J Amer ColI Emergency Phycns - v 5 no 2 (1976) p 105-110

15 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

74

16 OFLANAGAN P - The work of an accident and emergency department in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 26 no 162 (1976) p 54-60

17 What are accident and emergency departments for in Br Med J - v 2 (1979) P 837-839

18 SIEGEL Sydney_ - Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences - Tokyo McGraw-Hill Kogakusha 1956 p 202-213

19 CROMBIE D L - A casualty survey in J ColI Gen Pract - v 2 (1959) P 346-356

20 SKUDDER Paul A McCarroll James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - New York Behavioural Publications 1913 p 11-35

21 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) P 839-856

75

CHAPTER 7

Patient attitudes to the accident and emergency department and staff attitudes to the patients

In this chapter we look at the attitudes of patients to the A amp E department and particularly the reasons they give for attending it Summaries of the results of overseas studies are given followed by detailed information from several New Zealand studies where patients were interviewed the Dunedin study carried out by Dixon in 1968[1] Richards Auckland study of 1975 [2] Keenans unpublished Christchurch study of 1978 the Wei~ington childrens study carried out by Kljakovic in 1978 [3] and McRaes Waikato study of I~H9 [4] Then we discuss the effect that health centres and deputising services have on A amp E use Finally we explore the views that A amp E staff have of their patients

REASONS FOR VISITING THE A amp E DEPARTMENT

Overseas studies

A substantial number of overseas studies have explored the reasons given by patients attending A amp E departments One major reason was the availability of the A amp E department open 24 hours a day and always staffed compared to the actual or perceived unavailability of the general practitioner [56789]

People mentioned the accessibility of the A amp E department as a reason for attending citing its location ease of transport to and from it and its convenience for work schedules and other arrangements [671011]

Another major reason for visiting the A amp E department was its appropriateness as a source of care particularly because of the equipment and facilities available [5612] with many conditions particularly injuries A amp E patients made their own diagnosis They therefore omitted the diagnosis-seeking part of care (where the general practitioner was seen as appropriate) and sought confirmation arid immediate treatment at the A amp E department [1314]

People also saw the A ampE department as the appropriate place to go because of the urgency of their condition especially if the person needing treatment was a child [7141516] However A amp E staff and A amp E patients often had conflicting perceptions of the seriousness of the condition Patients tended to see their complaint as more serious and urgent than did the A amp E doctor [9101117]

Advice from other people was another reason given for visiting the A amp E department [61218] People were more likely to visit the department rather than the general practitioner when the decision to seek care was made outside the home and where someone other than the patient or a close

relative was involved in the decision (eg a policeman an employer a teacher or bystander) In some cases such as traffic accidents and some

work and school accidents it was automatic procedure to send the patient straight to the A amp E department [1819]

76

Some people using the A amp E department did not have a family doctor because they were new to the area or transient or for other reasons [78] In the United States the proportions without a doctor were high ranging from 40 per cent to 86 per cent [5171920]

The proportion of patients who tried to contact their doctor before going to the A amp E department also varied considerably from 6 per cent to 42 per cent in different North American studies [59202122] 14 per cent in a Canadian study and SO per cent in a Swedish study [23] Holohan et al [24J found that over SO per cent of patients attending a British A amp E department were unaware or inaccurately informed about their general practitioners out of hours care arrangements

Dissatisfaction with their general practitioner led to some people visiting the A amp E department Organisational factors such as appointment systems deputising serVices and health centres all made it more difficult for patients to contact their doctor [142425) Dissatisfaction with the doctors treatment and wanting a second opinion were also reasons [26] As well language difficulties were a problem In Australia immigrants used the hospital foi childrens emergencies because interpreters were available and they did not have to use the telephone to arrange a visit [27]

It has been suggested that people use A amp E departments rather than general practitioners because the department is free This is unlikely to be a reason in Britain where general practitioner care is free under the National Health Service Studies in the United States found that very few respondents said that the cost of seeing a doctor was a major reason for visiting the A amp E department [511)

New Zealand studies

Use of general practitioners

It has been suggested that people use the A amp E department because they are visitors to a city or do not have a general practitioner The New Zealand studies foundmiddot that the proportion of those interviewed who had a general practitioner varied considerably from city to city (see Table 14) The high level in Wellington [3] was not surprising given that most families with children have a general practitioner The transience of local populations as suggested by Richards [2] may explain some of the differences between the studies Dixon [1] noted that the age and sex structure of the people visiting the A amp E department with the preponderance of young males was the opposite to that of people visiting general practitioners

The Wellington study found that for a very high proportion of children (39 per cent) there had been an attempt to contact a general practitioner before going to the A amp E department and 25 per cent had actuallY seen the doctor [3) The other studies found smaller proportions British studies have reported similar variations with Lewis and Bradbury [14] finding 8 per cent of A amp E attenders had been referred by their general practitioner and Conway (25] reporting 41 per cent

The Chr istchurch study found that the people who did not see a doctor before coming to the A amp E department were more likely to be injured rather than sick to visit the department out of hours rather than in

77

hours and to be 15 to 29 years old Also during work hours people who had accidents at work were less likely to see the doctor before going to the A amp E department than people with home or sports accidents

TABLE 14 USE OF GENERAL PRACT IT lONERS BY FIRST ATTENDERS AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS

Percentage of all those interviewed who

had a regular general attempted to contact their practitioner general practitioner before

going to the A amp E department

Dunedin 1968 92 16 Auckland 1975 72 21 Christchurch 1978 85 23 Wellington 1978 98 39

Derived from 84 per cent who were sent directly or chose to go to casualty without seeing a doctor

Specific reasons for using the A amp E department

Turning now to the reasons given by patients for their A amp E visit the New Zealand studies found a similar range of reasons to the overseas studies Keenan collected detailed information in Christchurch and this is presented in Table 15 and in the following sections Comparable information from the other studies where available has been included

Others advised the patient to go to the A amp E department The most common reason given by the Christchurch patients (and by the people interviewed by Dixon [1] in Dunedin) was that others (employers teachers traffic officers sports coach neighbours friends) advised them to go to the A amp E department There appeared to be an automatic procedure following many school work sports and traffic accidents of sending the patient straight to the A amp E department

There was no evidence that injuries happening at other locations (eg at home) were any less likely to go to the A amp E department A comparison of the Waikato and Christchurch A amp E injury attenders with people consulting general practitioners for accidental injuries [28] showed similar proportions of attendance by the location of the accident (Figure 9) In Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14] found similar results when studying A amp E attendance in the North Western Regional Health Authority

76

TABLE 15 REASONS FOR A amp E FIRST ATTENDANCE FROM THREE NEW ZEALAND STUDIES

Reasons Christchurch 1976

Wellington ( children)

1978

Auckland 1975

SAW GP BEFORE A amp E 186 250

A amp E MORE AVAILABLE GP found to be unavailable

or thought to be unavailable Did not want to bother GP

Cost of GP care a factor

125

( 65) ( 41)

(19)

233

119

(24) ( 79)

(16)

A amp E MORE ACCESSIBLE More convenient closer

phone or transport problems in contacting GP

214

A amp E MORE APPROPRIATE Condition of type not dealt

with by GP requiring A amp E facilities

Need for attention was urgent

140

( 5 0) (90)

389 671

OTHERS ADVISED TO GO TO A amp E 233 61

OTHER Includes having no GP

trained by GP to go to A amp E needed a dentist and so on

94 68

Number of people interviewed 565 428 1147

Tried to contact general practitioner did not necessarily see doctor

A amp E department more available Only 125 per cent of the Christchurch sample went to the A amp E department because it was more available than their general practitioner Richards [2] found a similar proportion in Auckland Not surprisingly the availability reasons were given more by people visiting the Christchurch A amp E department out of hours than in hours and more for children and older adults than the 15 to 29 age group The cost of visiting a general practitioner was hardly mentioned as a reason for visiting the A amp E department

79

In Wellington Kljakovic [3] found parents saying abOut the A amp E department

you can go anytime - 24 hour service when everyones at the end of their tether theyre there and theyre open

and about general practitioners

didnt know you could get a doctor on the weekends on other occasions you get an answering service - not worth bothering the doctor

midnight - too late to call a doctor

Figure 9 location at which accidents happened by those attending the A amp E department or the general practitioner for accidental injury

Presenting at A amp E department Presenting at general practitioner

Home (389) Home (290)

Work schooL Work school public buildings (336) public buddings (39 0)

A amp E department more accessible Over 20 per cent of the Christchurch attenders went to the A amp E department because it was more convenient closer or involved fewer transport or communic~tion problems These reasons were given more out of hours than in hours particularly by the 15 to 29 age group Injured patients especially those with sports injuries were more likely to give these reasons

A amp E department more appropriate Only 14 per cent of the Chr istchurch sample gave appropriateness as a reason while Richards [2] found 67 per cent in Auckland and Kljakovic [3] reported 39 per cent in Wellington These differences may reflect different interview situations since Richards interviewed patients at the A amp E department while Keenan and Kljakovic questioned people through telephone or personal interviews in their own homes Christchurch people suffering traffic accidents or poisonings (largely self-poisonings) were more Ii kely to give this reason than other reasons

80

In Wellington parents often said about the A amp E department

thats what its there for they have everything there

Several parents also commented that

general practitioners dont do stitches the GP is for minor things - not eager to corne to an emergency the doctor would only send us on to the hospital anyway thought leg was broken - needed an x-ray

Many parents decided to go to the A amp E department because they had already made a diagnosis and thought the condition required A amp E treatment others were unsure of the urgency of the childs condition A mother whose two-year-old son had hit his nose on a shower box at 755 am rang the doctor The child was crying his nose was bleeding and looked flattened The message on the answer phone was that the doctor could be contacted only in a real emergency She was unsure what a real emergency was so took the child to hospital not wanting to feel a fool by ringing the doctor

Some parents particularly those with asthmatic children were well aware that the condition required urgent care and had previously been told to go straight to the A amp E department

Dissatisfaction with the general practitioner Satisfaction is notoriously difficult to measure particularly when normal levels of satisfaction are between 85 and 90 per cent satisfied Only in the Wellington study [3] of childrens A amp E attendance was a direct question asked about satisfaction with the general practitioner service Forty-one per cent expressed some dissatisfaction mostly mentioning concern over difficulty in seeing the doctor Problems with getting an appointment with waiting because there was no appointment system with unsympathetic receptionists and with doctors not being willing to visit the horne were all mentioned Some parents commented that at a health centre they were unlikely to see their own doctor so they might as well go to the A amp E department Four per cent of parents were dissatisfied with the general practitioners treatment and came to the A amp E department for better treatment The cost of visiting the general practitioner was only mentioned by three parents (07 per cent)

Satisfaction with A amp E department The Wellington study [3] found that 73 per cent of parents were satisfied with the A amp E department For those who were dissatisfied the urgency of their visit was uppermost and they were unhappy at having to wait too long Parents also commented disapprovingly that the departments were understaffed or very busy The A amp E staff carne in for very little criticism only 07 per cent of parents made critical comments Many parents expressed their satisfaction with the reassuring aspects of the A amp E department its availability and its size A typical comment was its big they have everything there In one case parents dissatisfied with the treatment of their sick child at one A amp E department went to another department because it was bigger

81

Views of A amp E staff

When we asked A amp E staff why people visi ted the department they offered the same reasons that patients had given as explanations ie appropriateness availability and satisfaction Staff also commented that Pacific Islanders were accustomed to using hospital services for all their medical care in the islands andmiddot continued tomiddot use the hospital in New Zealand either as a first resort or for a second opinion Kinloch [29] demonstrated that while this was so for recent Samoan migrants in Wellington after some years New Zealand residence their pattern of hospital usage because similar to that of the population as a whole

A amp E staff thought that the major reason for the GP-load patients visiting the department was general practitioner unavailability They recognised

that many patients did not have a general practitioner because they were new to the area transient or on holiday Many staff mentioned the cost of visiting a doctor as a major reason although a few staff strongly asserted that cost was not important

EFFECT Of HIEALTH CENTRES AND DEPUTISING SERVICES ON A 8t IE UTILISATION

It has been assumed that the unavailability of a family doctor has been a major reason for people attending an A amp E department Consequently health centres with more facilities for treatment of injuries and open for longer hours than the usual doctors surgery have been set up Two United States studies [3031] found that the health centres they looked at appeared to have reduced the use of A amp E departments by people in the local neighbourhood either absolutely or relativemiddot to people in other neighbourhoods However in New Zealand data collected from Dunedin A amp E records by Maynard [32] three years before and three years after the Mosgiel health centre opened andmiddot by ourselves six years after it opened gave no evidence of a decline inA amp E use by Mosgiel residents It appeared that since the A amp E department was rarely used for routine primary care problems there was little opportunity for the health centre to substitute for the department Possibly a neighbourhood closer to the A amp E department would have shown more effect from a health centre Also as Alpert et al [33] suggested habit patterns of usage could be difficult to change

Williams et al [34] investigated the effect of general practitioner deputising services on A amp E department use in the Sheffield Hospital region They found that deputising service referrals did not add significantly to the workloads of A amp Edepartments nor did it appear that many patients referred themselves to the A amp E departments in preference to consulting the deputising service doctors They commented that the deputising services may have been meeting a demand previously coped with by the hospitals

It is possible that health centres ana deputising services have contradictory effects on A amp E department visits People who realise a doctor is readily available through these services may use thatmiddot service rather than the A amp E department Other people may reason that if they cannot see their usual doctor it is just as convenient to use the A amp E department as the health centre or deputising service

82

A amp E STAFF VIEWS OF PATIENTS

Overseas studies

Several overseas studies have explored the views of A amp E staff about their patients Roth [35] found that staff applied concepts of social worth which were common in the larger society to their patients so that higher status people were likely to get more respectful treatment than lower status Staff tended tomiddot oVerestimate the numbers of patients seen as undesirable such as drunks venereal disease cases and welfare cases as well as overestimating the numbers using the department inappropriately Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff categorised patients as good (clinically interesting allowing staff to practise their skills and testing the competence of staff) and rubbish (a socially-defined category including drunks overdoses tramps and trivia which were usually minor injuries or conditions not requiring medical attention) Hughes [37] commented that the good and rubbish categories were relatively small groups and that staff had a neutral attitude to the bulk of the people visiting the department

Jeffery [36] found that staff reacted punitively to rubbish patients using delay verbal hostility and vigorous restraint of unco-operative patients particularly overdoses According to Roth (35] patients seen as unco-operative will be told to wait their turn and may be threatened with refusal of treatment Several authors found that patients visiting for tri vial complaints tended to be handled with surface politenessmiddot even if they were subject to post-hoc attacks in written records or departmental gossip [363738]

Burgess and Holmstrom [39] found that the attitudes and actions of health providers could increase or diminish the psychological consequencies for women who had been raped and suggested that staff awareness and training would be valuable Alexander [40] studied nurses preceptions of women who had been raped and found that while the womens characteristics were important the nurses own personality and attitudes were more important Alexander concluded that short-term sensitivity training was unlikely to be effective and that great care was necessary in selecting health providers to care for raped women

Jeffery [36] found that A amp E staff viewed patients as having a legitimate claim to medical care if they were not responsible for their condition if they were restricted in their reasonable activities by the condition if they viewed their condition as an undesirable state and if they co-operated in trying to get well He commented that people visiting repeatedly because of overdoses or fights were regarded as not co-operating while repeated injuries from sports activities were viewed as legitimate Roth [19] in a study of five United States A amp E departments found that staff views on the legitimacy of a visit depended partly on the patients source of referral People referred by health professionals were usually accepted as legitimate exceptmiddot where A amp E staff suspected a doctor of dumping an unwanted patient on to the department Contract cases where the hospital had a contractual relationship with the school nursing home or workplace the patient came from were immediately accepted as appropriate People brought in by police came into this category Self-referred patients were classified as legitimate or not depending on their social characteristics their condition and the kind of demands they were making on the department In a later paper Roth [35] noted that cases where a definite diagnosis could be made (surgical conditions asthma overdoses maternity

83

patients) were considered legitimate whereas psychiatric conditions and cases requiring more subtle or complex diagnosis were regarded as illeg i timate

The New Zealand situation

While this study did not observe staff-patient interactions in detail we asked A amp E staff about the patients and how they dealt with them and we watched staff at work for some time in each department

We found some evidence that New Zealand A amp E staff shared the views of their British and United States counterparts House surgeons tended to regard the clinically interesting patients as goodand often commented unfavourably on patients whose condition was not easily diagnosed With regard to the rubbish category of patients some A amp E staff disapproved of them while others accepted the whole range of patients as part of working in the department We saw little evidence of punitive reactions to patients although delay andmiddot the intimidating effect of a white coat appeared to be used at times The views of A amp E staff about specific categories of patients are covered in the next sections

Sports injuries

From the Christchurch and Waikato [4] studies we have estimated that 13 per cent of A amp E injury visits were for sports injuries At Green Lane A amp E department staff had recorded all rugby injuries on the A amp E log in the late April week sampled the rugby injuries comprised six per cent of all injuries

A amp E staff saw the department as the appropriate place for the treatment of sports injuries One staff member commented that most general practitioners would get a shock if presented with a sports injury to treat Staff also understood that coaches usually sent people straight to the A amp E department as an automatic procedure and that this was often legitimate since the injury might have required an x-ray However a frequently mentioned source of annoyance was people presenting with a sports injury some considerable time after the event such as on Monday morning or after the post-match drinking bout A amp E staff thought these patients should have seen a general practitioner particularly when the condi tion was not acute A few A amp E staff commented that they were beginning to regard repeated sports injuries as self-inflicted injuries and were less sympathetic to those patients

Alcohol-related visits

In all the A amp E departments staff commented that many of the assault and motor vehicle accident injuries were directlyassociated with alcohol (The only exceptions were the suburban hospitals which Were closed evenings and nights) Staff estimated that from half to all patients seen on Friday and Saturday evenings had been drinking or had been hurt by someone who was drinking This estimate may seem exaggerated but inspection of Wellington A amp E logs by Reinken [41] suggested that an estimate of 50 to 79 per cent was reasonable Staff at three of the central city A amp E departments commented that they treated a number of old alcoholic and derelict people usually for chronic complaints or because they had been attacked

84

From time to time staff as well as facilities have suffered abuse and violence A amp E nurses always commented on problems with disorderly behaviour both by patients and by friends of patients in the waiting room In two hospitals nurses had little faith in the security provisions made for their safety but mostly the nurses seemed to cope reasonably well House surgeons said they found intoxicated patients difficult to treat because of their lack of co-operation A amp E officers had few comments on alcohol-related visits probably because they rarely worked evening or weekend shifts

Domestic violence and rape

Unfortunately we did not ask specific questions about these topics but at three hospitals nurses mentioned that they saw cases of child abuse and at another three hospitals wife-beating was mentioned We have few details as to how staff dealt with these women and children but from the comments made by the nurses and on house surgeon they felt a need for more psychiatric or social work backup There were no comments about women who had been raped attending the department

_Regular visitors

At most of the urban A amp E departments and at Rotorua and Whakatane staff commented that they had a group of regular visitors This group was never large unlike the 20 to 60 per cent of workload reported as regular visi tors by two United states public hospitals [19] Asthmatics (who had previously been advised to go straight to the department) were regarded as legitimate visitors and staff watched for children visiting regularly with injur-ies in order to detect cases of chi ld abuse However people who repeatedly presented drunk or with overdoses or with an emotional or social problem were regarded with resigned acceptance or some annoyance One A amp E department maintained a special file for the records of regular visitors while in other departments a bulky bundle of cards stapled together alerted staff to yet another visit from a regular client_

Trivia

When the A amp E staff talked about trivia they mentioned some of the minor injuries and sickness from the GP-Ioad category but also included very minor injuries such as a splinter in a finger or a cut needing only a Bandaid Some A amp E staff felt that trivial conditions did not require any medical treatment especially not from a department designed to treat emergency conditions A few staff members commented that people with minor conditions cluttered up the waiting room and were physically in the way Some also said that knowing the waiting room was full put more pressure on them However other A amp E staff stressed that apparently trivial conditions were important and worrying to the patients involved and that reassurance at least was required

It has been suggested that people using the A amp E department for trivial conditions decrease the ability of the department to cope with emergencies [42431 Most staff interviewed felt confident that people attending for trivial complaints in no way jeopardised the quality of care given to the more urgent cases because the latter were seen first ThUS the minor complaints were annoying and added work but did not compromise the departments ability to give good care

85

DISCUSSION

Why do patients attend the A amp E department The public seem to have a rough and ready decision tree if you are sick go to your doctor if you are hurt go to the Aamp E department

The department is definitely seen as the appropriate place for treating accidental injuries People say thats what its there forI and they have everything there A visit to the general practitioner for such an injury is seen as unnecessary and delaying

A significant proportion of accidents and some sickness conditions happen away from home The patient may decide to go to the A amp E department because it is closer or easier for transport or work reasons Often someone else (a schoolteacher a coach or traffic officer) sends the patient to the A ampE department as an automatic procedure

Most people with sickness conditions visit their general practitioner so it is not surprising that those who visit the A amp E department have often been referred by their doctor The sick patients who corne directly to the department usually see their condition as needing urgent care Therefore if they try to contact their doctor and fail or if they think the doctor will be unavailable they head for the hospital

It is also possible that the general practitioners surgery is associated with waiting while the hospital is associated with swift action perhaps due to televised images as noted by Cooke [44] In fact the waiting times are generally equivalent in both settings it is the significance of that waiting which is different The patients may feel that if something happens to worsen their case they will be attended to quickly if they are waiting in the A amp E department rather than waiting at home for the general practitioner to visit

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners formiddot patients From the patients comments one of the main attractions of the A amp E department is its availability that it is always open and staffed In comparison general practitioners were often seen as not being available as difficult to contact or as unable to respond quickly to an emergency In this sense A amp E departments appear to be competitive with general practitioners As was noted in Chapter 6 sickness visits to the A amp E department were more likely to happen out of hour s than in hours The overseas studies suggest that health centres and deputising services which offer greater availability of doctors particularly out of hours may reduce the use of A amp E departments The only way general practitioners could compete with the availability of the A amp E department would be to improve their own out-of-hours service

The cost of visiting a general practitioner has also been cited as a reason for people visiting the A amp E department where treatment is free This is only relevant for sickness conditions since the cost of general practitioner treatment for accidental injuries is covered by the Accident Compensation Corporation However in none of the New Zealand studies covered in this chapter did people give cost of treatment as a major reason for attending the A amp E department A amp E staff tended to over-estimate the importance of cost as a reason but this was not surprising as they also oVer-estimated the number of people visiting the department for sickness conditions

86

Despite sickness visits to the doctor being free in Britain Lewis and Bradbury [14 J found similar levels of A amp E sickness attendance there as here Steinmetz [45) reported that on the introduction of Medicare in Quebec doctors no longer charged patients whereas previously only care in an emergency room was free He found that the demand for medical care increased at both sites the doctor and the emergency room but that there was no evidence of a shift from the emergency room back to the doctor Thus there is little evidence that the cost of visiting a general practitioner causes people to visit the A amp E department Rather people use the department because they see it as the appropriate place for treatment of their condition and it is available

Turning now to staff a~titudes to the patients it seems that acceptance of the great variety of people (and their conditions) is a necessary part of working in the A amp E department However the staff comments do raise some concerns Abusive and violent patients have been a problem in some hospitals and a reappraisal of security arrangements in some of the urban A amp Edepartments would be desirable

A amp E staff should be aware that women and children presenting with injuries may have received them in domestic violence and that full information on how the injury happened may not be volunteered It is difficult for staff to do more than treat the injuries when there are few specialised support services available However some attempts are being made to provide such services for children [46] and through v9luntary organisations such as womens refuges A amp E staff should maintain good contact with these services where they exist and work with others to institute them where they do not

Staff should also maintain contact with rape crisIs centres so that women who have been raped can ring them for short or long-term support if they want it Alexanders work [40] suggests that while a raped woman is in the department she should be cared for by a crisis team of hospital staff (not necessarily A amp E staff) who have volunteered for that work Perhaps this approach could be tried in New Zealand A amp E departments

87

REFERENCES

1 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S - Ca$ualty department utilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71 (1970) P 272-279

2 RICHARDS JG and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) P 272-274

3 KLJAKOVIC M ALLAN B C andREINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

4 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

5 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care Vbull Determinants of use of hospital emergency services E Richard Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

6 Casual attenders a socia-medical study of patients attending accident and emergency departments in the Newcastle-upon-Tyne area W Morgan et aI in Hosp Health Serv Rev - (1974) p 189-194

7 STRATMANN William C and ULLMAN Ralph - A study of consumer attitudes about health care the role of the emergency room in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1033-1043

8 KELMAN Howard Rand LAWE Dorothy S- Usemiddot of the hospital emergency room in re1atiop to th~ use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

9 INGRAMD R CLARKE D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Med - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

fO GARRAWAY W M - The work of a casualty department in Health Bulletin - v 27 no 3 (1969) p 26-30

11 KAHN Lawrence ANDERSON Mary and PERKOFF Gerald T - Patients perceptions and uses of a pediatric emergency room in Soc Sci Med - v 7 (1973) p 155-160

12 CALNAN M ABSON I E P and BUTLER J R - In case of emergency inI

Health Soc Serv J - (1982) p 615-617

13 HOLOHAN Ann M - Accident and emergency departments illness and accident behaviour in Social Rev (Mono] - (1976) p 111-119

14 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Serv J - (1981) ~ 1139-1142

15 The functioning of a childrens hospital casualty department Susan Lovell et aI in Med J Aust - v 1 (1975) P 135-138

16 REILLY Philip M - Primary care and accident and emergency departments in an urban area in J R Call Gen Pract - v 31 (1981) p 223-230

88

17 WINGERT WA Friedman D B and LARSON W R - The demographic and ecological characteristics of a large urban paediatric outpatient population and implications for improving community paediatric care in A~ J Public Health - v 58 (1968) p-859

18 CALNAN M - Managing -minor- disorders pathways to a hospital accident and emergency department in Sociol Health Illness- v 5 no 2 (1983) p 149-167

19 ROTH J A - Utilisation of the hospital emergency department in J Health Soc Behav - v 12 (1971) P 312-320

20 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) P 163

21 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 no 2 (1971) p307-312

22 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J- Help The hospital emergency unit as community physician in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) P 248-260

23 MAGNUSSON G - The use and abuse of accident and emergency departments - the Stockholm experience in World Hosp - vIS no 3 (1979) p 170-172

24 HOLOHAN Ann M NEWELL D J and WALKER J H - Practitioners patients and the accident department I in Hosp Health Serv Rev shy(1975) P 80-84 I

25 CONWAY Hugh - Emergency medical care in Br Med J - v 2 (1976) p 511-513

26 PEASE R - A study of patients in a London accident and emergency department with special reference to general practice in Practitioner - v 211 (1973) p 634-638

27 MOK CH - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

28a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident s~atistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington- Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

89

29 KINLOCH P J - Samoan health practices -in Wellington - Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1980 p 9-iO (Occasional paper series no 12)

30 MOORE_ Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEHect of a neighbourhood health centre onhospi tal emergency room us~e - in Med Care v 10 no 3 (1972) P 240-247

31 HOCHEISERLouis I WOODWARD Kenneth and CHARNEY Evan - Effect of the neighbourhood health centre on the use of pediatric emergency departments 1n ROchester~ New York in N Eng J Med - v 285 no 3 (1971) p 148-152

32 _MAYNARD Edward Jand DODGE Jeffrey S -- Introducing a community health centre at M05giel New Zealand effects on use of the hospital accident and emergency (Aamp E) department in Med Care shyv 21 no 4 (1983) p 379-388

33 The types of families that use an emergency clinic Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ala New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

34 WILLIAMS B T DIXON R A and KNOWELDEN J - The impact of general practitioner deputising services on accident and emergency departments in the Sheffield hospital region in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 23 (1973) p 638-645

35 ROTH J A - Some contingencies of the moral evaluation and control of clientele the case of the hospital emergency service in Am J Sociology - v 77 no 5 (1972) p 839-856

36 JEFFERY R - Normal rubbish deviant patients in casualty departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 1 no 1 (1979) p 90-107

37 HUGHES D - Lay assessment of clinical seriousness practical decision-making by non-medical staff in a hospi tal casualty department - University of Wales Swansea 1980 Ph D Thesis

38 DINGWALL R and MURRAY T - Categorisation in accident departments -good- patients -bad- patients and middotchildren- in Sociol Health Illness - v 5 no 2 (1983) p 127-148

39 BURGESS Ann Wolbert and HOLMSTROM Lynda Lytle - The rape victim in the emergency ward in American Journal of Nursing - v 73 no 10 (1973) p 1741-1745

40 ALEXANDER Cheryl S - The responsible victim nurses perceptions of victims of rape in Journal of Health and Social Behaviour - v 21 (March 1980) p 22-23

41 REINKEN J - Effect of changes in general practitioner cover on accident and emergency utilisation in the Porirua Basin Wellington Management Services and Research Unit Dept of Health 1979 (Unpublished)

90

42 MAYNARD Edward J - The appication of epidemiological methods to the evaluation of primary medical care in a health centre environment -University of Otago 1980 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine p 161-194

43 SKUDDER Paul A McCARROLL James R and WADE Preston A - Hospital emergency facilities and services a survey in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale - NewYork Behavioural Publications 1973 p 17-35

44 COOKE Alistair - The doctor (1981) p 1652-1655

in society in Br Med J - v 283

45 STEINMETZ Nicholas and HOEY John R - Hospital emergency utilisation in Montreal before and after Medicare experience in Med Care - v 16 no 2 (1978) pl33-139

room the Quebec

46 GEDDIS D C - Child Abuse report of national symposium held in Dunedin September 1979 - Auckland National Childrens Health Research Foundation 1979 p 30-34 60-63

91

CHAPTER 8

Utilisation of accident and emergency departments

In this chapter we consider A amp E ufefrom a new perspective looking at the rates of attendance by people in different neighbourhoods We examine variations in the rates among areas and we discuss the evidence they provide as to the effect of doctor availability on A amp E use Next we analyse several factors which could account for the variations in attendance rates including distance from the hospi tal social characteristics of the areas and A amp E department characteristics Finally we present results from several studies which compare rates of attendance at general practitioners and at A amp E departments

COMPARISON OF A amp E UTILISATION AMONG HOSPITAL CATCHMENT AREAS

The neighbourhoods that we have used are census area units sometimes grouped contiguously to achieve socially and economically homogeneous areas that have populations of about 2000 or more We grouped all of New Zealand into 682 such neighbourhoods Of these 442 neighbourhoods are in the catchment irea of one of the 15 A amp E departments studied

Using the attendance numbers taken from the A amp E logs age-adjusted quarterly rates of attendancemiddot have been calculated (indirectly standardised to the total New Zealand population at the 1981 census) These rates have been calculated for each neighbourhood separately for injury and sickness conditions for in and out of hours and for first and recall visits Because there were very few recall visits for sickness conditions they have been omitted from the analyses in this chapter When we talk about recall visits we are referring only to recall visits for injuries

The attendance rates have been combined for the neighbourhoods making up the catchment area of an A amp E department These rates measure the use made by people living in a particular area of any A amp E department in their region Usually people living in the catchment area of an A amp E department do visit that department However particularly in the North Shore and Kenepuru areas a large number of residents attend other A amp E departments Thus the rates presented here should be interpreted as attendance rates of people living in an area not necessarily attendance rates at particular A amp E departments

The rates for each catchment area are presented in Table 16 In Table 17 the annual rates of accidental death and admission to hospital for accidental injury similarly age-adjusted are presented

Results

As Table 16 shows the overall attendance rates varied considerably in the A amp E department catchment areas studied

92

Sickness attendance

Among the urban catchment areas the Wellington Board region showed very high rates of use of A amp E departments for sickness attendance Except for Rotorua and Whakatane out of hours the provincial and rural areas had very low rates of sickness attendance

TABLE 16 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3

Midd1emore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals studied

First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness In Out of hours hours

35 55 41 67 82 121 72 105 54 72 52 64

17 26 36 51 09 17 21 23

12 8B 54 26

36 36 72 61

46 63

Injury In Out of In Out of hours hours hours hours

125 130 137 25 151 130 159 25 17 0 196 36 41 127 156 87 B8 136 151 54 30 229 240 123 42

79 70 42 29 241 215 99 72 203 96 64 10 14 4 213 66 98

173 179 59 62 223 85 83 32

194 92 216 47 164 96 116 20

154 145 101 38

Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors

2 Since few recall visits were for sickness conditions only recall visits for injury have been included in this category

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

1

93

TABLE 17 HOSPITAL ADMISSION FOR ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR)l AND DEATH DUE TO ACCIDENTAL INJURY (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER YEAR) 2 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchment area Admitted for Died from Population accidental accidental of ca tchment injury injury area

Full-time departments

U rban Auckland3

Middlemore Wellington Hutt Christchurch Dunedin

Provincial Northland Base Rotorua Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore Kenepuru

All hospitals

104 123 146 153 140 142

194 169 196 149

243 214

95 133

139

067 062 062 059 058 072

070 089 065 068

059 075

048 096

066

408 948 264 093 133 611 147 858 336 420 III 981

110 205 56 613 98 883 50 250

39 087 37 767

146 661 52 389

3 126 747

1 Source Hospital Discharges 1979 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

2 Source Mortality Data 1974-1978 - Wellington Statistics Centre Dept of Health (Unpublished)

National Health

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

common catchment

Injury attendance

First attendances for injury also showed wide variations among the hospital catchment areas Wellington Rotorua Whakatane and Dunedin catchment areas showed relatively high rates of first attendance for injury both in

94

and out of hours Timarus catchment area had high rates only out of hours while those of Grey Taranaki and North Shore were high only during normal work hours Northlands catchment area had very low attendance rates both in and out of hours

The pattern of difference from place to place in first attendance rates for injury means that in any year a person in Rotorua would have more than one chance in six of attending the A amp E department for an injury while a person in Northland has but one chance in 16 of doing so

~s this due to a difference in the rate at which accidents occur It does not appear so since neither the rates for death due to accidental injury nor the rates of hospital admission for accidental injury follow the same pattern as A amp E attendance (see Table 11) In fact the death rates were low in Christchurch and North Shore areas (where A amp E attendance was average) and high in Kenepuru areas where A amp E attendance was low Similarly admission rates were sometimes higher in areas where rates of A amp E attendance for injury were lower (Northland and Taranaki) and vice versa (North Shore)

Also the admission rates probably reflect a tendency for more rural hospi tals to admit injured patients more readily because of the distance they would have to travel for outpatient care

Recall attendance

As noted in Chapter 6 the practice of recalling patients was different from hospital to hospital and affected the composition of the A amp E department 5 total attendance Naturally the rate of recall visits also differed markedly in the catchment areas

Relatively low rates of recall visits characterised the Northland Wellington Christchurch and Taranaki areas The Auckland Hospital Board areas had very different patterns in and out of hours with high rates of recall visits in hours and low rates out of hours

Effect of general practitioner availability

Is there any evidence from these rates (Table 16) that availability of general practitioners had an effect on A amp E use If there was an effect it would be evident from comparing in hours sickness attendance with out of hours sickness attendance since when the general practitioner is less available out of hours the patients may be more likely to present at hospital Was the out of hours rate higher than the in hours rate taking into account the different proportions of peoples waking hours in each category Overall this did not appear to be so Compared to the in hours rate the out of hours rate was only slightly higher than would been expected Only in Whakatane was the out of hours sickness rate markedly higher than would have been expected Thus any effect of doctor availability on A amp E use would seem to be very small

See next page

95

FACTORS EXPLAINING CATCHMENT AREA VARIATIONS IN A amp E UTILISATION

There are several possible explanations for the variations in A amp E use

o that the hospital attracts those nearby and if the neighbourhoods near the hospital are densely populated then more people will attend the A amp E department

o that the social characteristics of the catchment areas are different

a that the A amp E department does or does not encourage the public to attend through its policy or practice

Several studies have suggested that distance and socio-economic factors are related to A amp E attendance Distance has been found to be inversely related to attendance in Sweden [1] the United States [23] Britain [4] and New Zealand [5] Some studies have found that lower socio-economic status people use A amp E departments more [678910] although Kljakovic [5] found that Wellington children from lower socio-economic status families were more likely to see a doctor before going to the A amp E department than children from higher status families Berki and Kobashigiwa [11] found that less educated groups used A amp E more while Weinermann [6] and Ullman (12) found no effect Several studies have found that minority group members (67913] and immigrants [1141 tend to use A amp E departments more Kelman and Lane [15] found that family characteristics such as size and age of head-of-household also relamiddotted to A amp E use Cohen et al (16] found no income or employment effects on A amp E use but did find that use was positively related to the number of hospital-based doctors per capita

METHOD

Using multivariate statistical methods it is possible to evaluate which of the explanations ( or which combination of them) best accounts for the observed variations in A amp E use among the neighbourhoods (See Appendix C for the details of the multivariate analyses) Overseas researchers have used similar statistical techniques to explore factors related to A amp E attendance [131116] The factors we chose to explore are described on the next page

We computed the expected value assuming that in any week in hours comprised 50 hours and out of hours comprised 118 hours of which 62 hours were spent awake

Therefore the out of hours rate should equal 62 ~ 50 = 124 times the in hours rate plus E where E is a correction term for night time attendance About eight per cent of total attendance was in the eight-hours night time period [1317] so E can be estimated as eight per cent of the total sickness attendance ie E = 008 x 109 = 087

Therefore the expected out of hours attendance A is

A = (124 x 46) + 087 = 658

The observed value was in fact 63 per 1000 similar to the expected rate

96

One factor was the distance from the centre of the neighbourhood to the A amp E department For neighbourhoods near Kenepuru and North Shore Hospitals in hours and out of hours distances to the nearest open department were calculated separately_

Another factor was the social characteristics of the neighbourhood using variables derived from the 1981 Census of Population and Dwellings chosen on the basis of known or posited relevance to health services utilisation These social characteristics can be listed as follows

o age structure - the proportions of the population under 5 years between 5 and 14 years and 65 years or more

o ethnicity the proportions of the population classed as European ethnicity and Maori ethnicity

o marital status - the proportion of adults separated widowed or divorced

o education - the proportion of adults without tertiary education

o income - the per capita earned income for adults and the proportion of the adults on a means-tested benefit

o employment - the proportions of adults actively seeking work in a bluecollar occupation and partiCipating in the paid workforce

o tenure of dwellings the average weekly rental and the proportion of owner-occupied dwellings

o car ownership - the proportions of households without a car and with two or more cars

o a measure of the north-to-south gradient over the country

A third factor was the general practitioner prOVision as measured by the population-ta-general practitioner ratio

Finally the characteristics of the A amp E department made up a fourth factor We focussed on the following areas

o our classification of the departments and their catchment area into urban prOVincial rural and suburban

o departmental policy on recalling patients (see Chapter 6)

o departmental open door policy on treating sickness attenders (see Chapter 6)

o medical and nurse staffing levels (from Chapter 5) relative to the-population of the catchment area

Production workers transport and equipment operators labourers agricultural workers animal husbandry and forestry workers fishermen hunters

I

97

Results of the multivariate analyses

The effects of distance

Sickness first attendance The distance from hospital affected the rates of sickness first attendance for out of hours visits accounting for nearly 20 per cent of the variance It had less effect on in hours sickness visits accounting for only 9 per cent of the variance

Injury first attendance The most significant characteristic explaining neighbourhood differences in injury first attendance rates was the distance from the A amp E department In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than half the total variance In urban areas it was less important accounting for one-eighth of the variance for in hours rates and one-sixth for out of hours rates

Recall attendance The distange from the hospital was related to in hours recall attendance In non-urban areas distance accounted for more than 40 per cent of the variance but it was much less important in urban neighbourhoods

In summary distance was inversely related to attendance rates with neighbourhoods further from the hospital having lower rates The effect of distance was stronger for injury attendances than for sickness attendances

The effects of social characteristics

Sickness first attendances Out of hours social factors had a substantial effect on sickness attendance People from neighbourhoods where many households were car less were more likely to attend the A amp E department and this factor accounted foi 19 percent of the variance in attendance rate Taking car lessness into account people f rom neighbourhoods where adults were better educated were more likely to attend the A amp E department Adding in the level of educational attainment raised the percentage of variance explained to 265 per cent The same pattern relating carlessness and higher educational attainment to high attendance rates applied to sickness attendance in hours but the effects were less marked In combination with distance the social factors explained 16 per cent of the variance of in hours sickness attendance rates

Injury first attendance In hours the rate of attendance for injury causes was only slightly related to social characteristics of the neighbourhoods adding 6 per cent to the variance explained Out of hours the social factors had a similarly minor effect adding 4 per cent

Recall attendance The social characteristics bad some effect on in hours recall attendance in urban areas In combination with a small distance effect the social factors explained 18 per cent of the variation For non-urban areas the social factors had no effect on in hours recall attendance only distance was important

Thus some of the differences among A amp E departments in the rates of sickness and recall attendance were due to differences in the social characteristics of the departments catchment areas However social factors were not important for injury attendances

98

Tbe effect of general practitioner provision

Initial correlation analyses showed that the population-to-general practitioner ratio was not significantly related to out of hours sickness attendance rates However it was positively related to out of hours injury attendance largely because the numbermiddot of people per doctor in a neighbourhood increases as the distance of the neighbourhood from the hospital decreases

In the multiple regression analyses the ratio nevermiddot entered as a significant variable Thus there was no significant effect of general practitioner provision in the community on A amp E attendance rates (see Table 18)

The effect of A amp E department characteristics

To look at the effect of A amp E characteristics on attendance rates it was necessary to cor rect the rates for the distance and social character istic effects just presented This was done (see Appendix C for details of the principal components analysis used to reduce the data)

Controlling for the neighbourhood factors thedepartment-to-department differences in rates were substantially reduced but were still present (see Table 18) Some patterns in the adjusted rates for sickness and 1nJury could be distinguished The areas served by urban departments tended to have low injury rates especially in hours and high sickness rates especially out of hours The Dunedin areas were an exception their rates were more like those of the areas served by provincial departments which had moderately high injury rates and low sickness rates The rural areas had very high injury rates and high sickness rates The suburban areas were similar to the urban areas except that North Shore areas had high injury rates The adjusted rates for recall attendance were highly variable and demonstrated no clear patterns among the departments

Further analyses were carried out to determine how the A amp E department characteristics related to the adjusted rates (Appendix C contains details of the analyses of variance the Student-Newman-Keuls means tests and the regression analyses of these differences) Only the statistically significant results are presented below

A amp E department classification Out or hours the adjusted sickness rates were lower in the provincial departments areas than elsewhere The sickness rates for the Wellington Hospital Board areas were no longer markedly higher than other areas

In hours the adjusted injury rates were higher in rural departments areas for first visits and in suburban departments areas for recall visits than elsewhere

Open door policy Adjusted rates of attendance for sickness (in and out of hours) were higher where departments had a stated open door policy than elsewhere This explains the low sickness rates in the provincial departments since most of them had restricted policies Where departments had a restricted policy adjusted rates of in hours injury attendance were higher than in open places

99

Recall policy In hours the adjusted injury attendance rates (both first and recall) were higher in areasmiddot where departments had a stated policy favouring recalling patients Out of hours adjusted rates of sickness visits were lower in areas with recall-favouring departments

TABLE 18 ATTENDANCE (MEAN AGE-ADJUSTED AND NEIGHBOURHOOD-ADJUSTED RATES PER 1000 PER QUARTER) 1 AND POPULATION-TO-GENERAL PRACTITIONER RATI02 WITHIN EACH A amp E DEPARTMENT CATCHMENT AREA

Catchinent area First attendance Recall attendance2

Sickness Injury Population In Out of In Out of In Out of to-GP ratio

hours hours hours hours hours hours

Full-time departments

Urban Auckland 3 44 57 130 144 100 24 1 476

Middlemore 52 74 165 148 131 24 2 078

Wellington 55 77 160 153 54 30 1 630 Hutt 61 89 130 137 10~9 83 2 237 Christchurch 50 71 116 117 76 27 1 651 Dunedin 40 52 204 193 159 38 1 558

Provincial Northland Base 46 56 128 132 53 45 1 735 Rotorua 34 33 188 163 73 57 1 656 Taranaki Base 17 29 227 ll8 81 19 2 243 Timaru 21 35 168 209 83 88 2 085

Rural Whakatane 29 91 207 222 81 84 1 679 Grey 67 57 286 135 131 39 2 310

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore 51 69 198 156 175 57 1 865 Kenepuru 47 54 146 131 129 31 2 035

1 Source Tallies taken from A amp E logs by authors The attendance rates given in Table 16 have been adjusted for neighbourhood-determined factors ie distance from the hospital and social characteristics

2 Source Doctor numbers in full-time equivalents from Medical Council data unpublished

3 Central and West Auckland have been considered the common catchment areas of Auckland and Green Lane A amp E departments

100

Staffing levels Adjusted first In]Ury attendance rates were positively related to levels of medical staffing and less impressively to levels of nurse staffing Neither the policy variables nor the size of department accounted for the relationship between lnJury attendance rates and staffing However there was no significant relationship between staffing levels and the adjusted rates of sickness and recall visits

COMPARISON OF A amp E USE AND GENERAL PRACTITIONER USE

Material for comparisons of this sort is hard to find We have compared the level of childrens attendance at the Wellington Hospital Board A amp E departments found by Kljakovic [5] with childrens attendance at general practitioners in the same area over the same period (derived from General Medical Services benefit claims made by general practitioners) In an average week 652 per 1000 children in the Wellington Hospital Board area consulted a general practitioner whereas 35 per 1000 children visited an A amp E department (see Appendix D for details)

Similarly in Tauranga during an average week in the period 1979 to 1982 48 per 1000 people attended the A amp E department while 53 Sper 1000 people consulted a general practitioner [18]

Snelgar [19] compared attendance at Northland Base A amp E department with urgent consultations made by general practitioners (derived from the General Medical Services benefit claims) In an average week 36 per 1000 people in the whangarei area consulted a general practitioner for an urgent condi Hon while 09 per 1000 people made a first visit to the A amp E department

For first injury attendances we have compared rates derived from surveys ot people treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident [20] with similar rates obtained from our tallies at Auckland Hospital Board A amp E departments and data made available to usmiddot by Snelgar McRae and Keenan In a week 37 per 1000 people living in the catchment areas of the above A amp E departments made a first injury visit to an A amp E department while 1 per 1000 New Zealanders made a first injury visit to a general practitioner (see Tab~e 19)

Elderly people were as likely to go to the general practitioner as to the A amp E department for an accidental injury whereas children and young adults were five to six times more likely to go to the A amp E department as the general practitioner Foreign body injuries and cuts appeared to predispose attendance at an A amp E department whereas burns and falls tended to be taken to the general practitioner more than other injuries

In summary people visited general practitioners much more than the A amp E department even for urgent conditions It was only for specific injury conditions that the A amp E department was consulted more than general practitioners

101

TABLE 19 COMPARISON OF FIRST ATTENDANCES FOR INJURY AT A amp E DEPARTMENTS AND GENERAL PRACTITIONERS

Rates per 1000 per week A amp E departments l General practitioners2

Age distribution

All ages 37 10 0-4 years 38 06 5-14 years 39 08 15-29 years 66 11 30-64 years 23 11 65 years and over 11 10

Injury conditions3

Falls 066 027 Cuts 045 009 Foreign bodies 025 002 Toxic effects 014 001 Burns 007 003 Other 232 058

1 Calculated from the author st tallies at Auckland Middlemore Green Lane and NorthShore A amp E departments and data from Northland Base Waikato and Christchurch A amp E departments

2 Calculated from ACC Statistical Supplements - Wellington Accident Compensation Corporation November 1977 March 1978 September 1978 March 1979 and personal communications

3 These categories have been derived from those used in the A amp E department tallies and the type of accident categories used by the ACC

DISCUSSION

The analyses presented in this chapter confirm that distance and social factors are related to A amp E use in New Zealand Their effects were not independent but rather were entwined in a complex way Even within the group of social factors the interactions were complex and there were no simple relations between a specific social factor and A amp E attendance

However distance from the hospital was clearly a major determinant of A amp E use particularly for injury conditions both first and recall The distance effect was especially strong in non-urban areas perhaps because of the greater distances people had to travel in order to reach the hospital Altogether the strong effect of distance was not surprising given the body of overseas literature documenting distance as a factor in health services utilisation and also the number of A amp E attenders citing the accessibility of the department as a reason for using it (see Chapter 7)

102

The social factors were important determinants of sickness attendance with a stronger effect out of hours than in hours They were not important for injury conditions Possibly the appropriateness of the A amp E department for injury conditions as cited by attenders (see Chapter 7) overrides the effect of the social factors

One social factor which had a relatively strong effect on sickness attendance particularly out of hours was car ownership Areas where many households had no car tended to have high sickness rates Perhaps people who have to call a taxi or borrow someone elses car to get medical care go to the A amp E department because they know it will be open and treatment will be available

During our discussions A amp E staff had suggested that Pacific Islanders made greater use of the department because they were accustomed to using the hospital for all medical care in the islands If this was an important factor we would have expected ethnicity to figure prominently in the statistical analyses However for first attendances ethnicity had only a minor effect and in fact areas with high proportions of Pacific Islanders tended to have low attendance rates

Many A amp E staff also suggested that the cost of visiting a general practitioner was a major reason for sickness attendance at the department So we would have expected low income unemployment or receipt of a means-tested benefit to have been related to increased sickness attendance rates However neither income nor receipt of a benefit were at all related to the sickness rates and areas with a low proportion of adults in the paid workforce tended to have low attendance rates Thus contrary to general opinion neither the cost of visiting a general practitioner nor a Pacific Island background appear to have a strong effect on A amp E use

As noted in Chapter 7 we found that some patients were attracted to the A amp E department by the size of the hospital and the impression that specialised equipment was available there However the urban departments which were the largest and which had the most specialised equipment did not have higher attendance rates than the other departments In fact they tended to have slightly lower rates of injury attendance than the other departments

The results presented in this chapter show clearly that even aft~r

controlling for distance and social effects departmental characteristics are related to A amp E attendance It is understandable that rates of sickness attendance reflect whether a department has an open door or restricted policy However the relation between high injury rates and a restricted policy on- sickness attendance requires some explanation Perhaps these departments have always had a high injury rate and have restricted the access of sickness patients so they could cope with the injured patients Conversely the operation of a restricted policy may have convinced the local community that while the department is only to be used for injuries it is indeed the place for all injuries so generating a high attendance rate

It was also understandable that departments with a policy of favouring recalls did have high rates of recall visits But why did these departments have high first attendance rates for injury This probably happens because high recall rates and high first attendance for injury rates go together since larger numbers of injured patients tend to produce larger numbers of patients requiring specialised A amp E follow-up care

103

There was a positive association between first injury attendance rates and staffing levels which could not be explained by the policies or the classification of the department The explanation of these associations is not straightforward The h~gher staffing levels may somehow account for the higher attendance - levels for example attracting clients by keeping the waiting time sh~rt Alternatively an unexamined feature of th department or its catchment area could generate higher attendance levels and staffing levels mayhavebeen adjusted to meetthe demand

Thus departmental characteristics such as policies on non-urgent sickness patients and on recall viSits and levels of medical and nurse staffing are related to attendance rates

Are A amp E departments competing with general practitioners for patients Looking first at the availability of the two services the greater availability of the A amp E department out of hours did not result in a higher than expected use over those hours Also doctor prOVision (as measured by the populationto-genetal practitioner ratio) was not Significantly related to A amp E attendance rates Thus while the A amp E department was described by patients as desirable because of its availability - (Chapter 7) the attendance rates of the neighbourhoods did not refiect the lcwer availability of general practitioner services

Secondly the comparison of attendance at A amp E departments and general practitioners suggested that in an average week out of 1000 New zealanders four or five would go to an A amp E department and 50 to 60 would go to a general practitioner Of those Visiting the A amp E department on average only one would be attending for sickness Given that non-urgent sickness visits were only 60 per cent of all sickness visits (see Chapter 6) it is clear that general practitioners were losing only a tiny proportion of their workload when A amp E departments treated non-urgent sickness patients~

It - is also clear that general practitioners did not treat many injured people Only one of the 50 to 60 per 1000 people visiting a general practitioner in an average week would be making a first injury visit It would seem that thetwo serVices A amp E departments and general practice arecomplementaiy rather than competiti-ve

REFERENCES

1 MAGNUSSON Gudjon - The role of proximity in the use of hospital emergency departments in Sociol Health Illness - v 2 no 2 (1980) p 202-214

2 INGRAM D R CLARK D R and MURDIE R A - Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department in Soc Sci Hed - v 12 (1978) p 55-62

3 ROGHHANN Klaus J and ZASTOWNY Thomas R - Proximity as a factor in the selection of health care providers emergency room visits compared to obstetric admissions and abortions in Soc Sci Med - v 13(0) (1979) p 61-69

4 INWALD A C - A comparison of self-referred patients to accident and emergency departments between an urban district and a rural district in J R ColI Gen Pract - v 30 (1980) p 220-223

5 KLJAKOVIC H ALLAN B C and REINKEN J - Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department in NZ Med J - v 93 (1981) P 49-52

6 Yale studies in ambulatory medical care V Determinants of use of hospital emergency services Richard E Weinerman et aI in Am J Public Health - v 56 no 7 (1966) p 1037-1056

7 WHITE H A and OCONNOR P A - Use of the emergency room in a community hospital in Public Health Rep - v 85 no 2 (1970) p 163

8 JACOBS Arthur R GAVETT J William and WERSINGER Richard shyEmergency department utilisation in an urban community implications for community ambulatory care in JAMA - v 216 nomiddot 2 (1971) p 307-312

9 The types of families that use an emergency clinic - Joel J Alpert et aI in Emergency medical services behavioural and planning perspectives edited by John H Noble et ale New York Behavioural Publications 1973 p 165-180

10 LEWIS Barbara and BRADBURY Yvonne - Why patients choose A and E in Health Soc Servo - (1981) p 1139-1142

11 BERKI S E and KOBASHIGAWA B - Education and income effects in the use of ambulatory services in the United States an analysis of the 1970 National Health Interview Survey data in Int J Health Servo shyv 8 no 2 (1978) p 361-365

12 ULLMAN Ralph BLOCK James A and SlRATMANN William c - An emergency rooms patients their characteristics and utilisation of hospital services in Med Care - v 13 no 12 (1975) p 1011-1020

13 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at AUckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

105

14 MOK C H - A study of a childrens casualty department in a general hospital in Med J Aust - v 1 no 22 (1972) p 1146-1149

15 KELMAN Howard R and LANE Dorothy S - Use of the hospital emergency room in relation to the use of private physicians in Am J Public Health - v 66 no 12 (1976) p 1189-1191

16 COHEN Susan D GINSBERG Allen Sand VLADECK Bruce C - The middoteffects of unemployment and inflation on hospital-based ambulatory care in Am J Public Health - v 68 no 12 (1978) p 1219-1221

17 McRAE Shelagh and TOPPING Mark - Casualty attendances one years experience at Waikato Hospital in NZ Med J - v 95 (1982) P 12-14

18 DALDY B M REINKEN J and SEDDON T D S - Report on the effect of funding in primary medical care - Tauranga Otumoetai Health Centre 1984 (In preparation)

19 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study Paper prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Development Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

20a People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission November 1977

b People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission March 1978

c People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission September 1978

d People treated by general practitioners for personal injury by accident Statistical supplement Wellington Accident Compensation Commission May 1979

107middot

CHAfTER 9

Conclusions

TheAamp E department is a complex changeable and challenging place It is also an ambiguous place since itmiddot fulfils several different and at times conflicting roles it is a hospital department an emergency service and a primary care service

THEA amp E DEPARTMENT AS A HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT

As a hospital department the A amp E department is the bullodd-one-out It differs from the other departments not only by being accessible at all times to people seeking medical care but also in the number of patients seen and the diversity and severity of illness and injury to be treated

Because of this diversity the A amp E service has little status within medical circles It tends to be seen as an area requiring few special skills and therefore not warranting specialty status However as Salmond [1] noted the humble casualty department provides a hospital with a display window where like it or not hospital wares are constantly on show to the public Good public relations require effective and efficient management of the Amiddotamp E department Also the doctors interviewed for this study stated that special skills in assessment surgery and orthopaedics were required The status of the A amp E department should be improved through a recognition both of the breadth and experience required for A amp E medicine and of the departments importance in the public view of the hospital While a post-graduate specialist programme is probably not warranted at present it should remain an option for future development

The Aamp E department plays a major partin the teaching of house surgeons Junior doctors quickly learn avariety of skills such as suturing lavage reading x-rays and resuscitation More importantly the A amp E department is usually their first experience of practising medicine without any immediately available consultation This study like Salmonds study in 1970 has demonstrated the lack of initial training and orientation and the inadequate senior supervisionrecei ved by many house surgeons in the A amp E department Clearly this should be remedied by the provision of specific training sessions at the beginning of the house surgeons A amp E run and by

increased senior supervision fn the A amp E department )

This study has also highlighted the desirability ofmiddot specific training courses for A amp E nurses Such coursesmiddot can improve the skills and confidence of the nurses and develop the different approach required for A amp E nursing compared to ward nursing The courses run by the Auckland hospitals may provide a useful basis for the development of postbasic and inservice training courses

Working in an A amp E department demands from all staff members an awareness of the social and emotional contexts of the people attending and the possible implications of their conditions for example people who have attempted suicide parents of- an infantmiddot with convulsions and women who have

108

been raped One aim of all training carried out in the department should be to foster such awareness Also it would be desirable for house surgeons to have experienced a psychological medicine run as well as a general medicine run and a surgical run before they work in the A amp E department All A amp E staff should be aware of the support services that they can calIon (eg social workers psychiatrists Salvation Army) or that the patient can contact (eg rape crisis centres womens refuges)

AS an important training site for house surgeons nurses and emergency workers such as ambulance personnel and police officers the A amp E department has a particular responsibility to maintain a high standard of care This study has not assessed quality of care directly although we have considered related areas such as the level of staffing and the experience of staff There is scope for evaluation of the quality of care gi ven for specific conditions The work reported by Mates and Sidel [2] provides some guidelines and a model whereby both process (measured by adherence to standards) and outcome can be studied Their example considered treatment of adult asthma patients and might for a start be replicated here in New Zealand

There is also scope for extending Mates and Sidels method to cover other conditions The ARCOS study [3] provides one model per taining to acute coronary or cardiovascular episodes There is less precendent for evaluating the quality of care in surgical or orthopaedic emergencies but the presentations of abdominal pain might be investigated as a usefUl beginning Removing healthy appendices is an expensive placebo The process evaluation of trauma care has not been reported on though wound sepsis might provide a suitable outcome measure Staff interviewed in our study discussed standards of suturing but no formal studies of quality of care in that respect have been reported

It must be considered that one explanation for the lack of study in the whole area is that very high standards prevail and the need for evaluation is therefore minimal Given patients high expectations and satisfaction with the service that explanation cannot be dismissed Yet studies that demonstrated a satisfactory level of care would confirm the high quality of care In some A amp E departments a small study of one reasonably significant type of emergency should be undertaken possibly modelled on the work of Mates and Sidel

As Gi bson [4] has pointed out the A amp E department acts not only as an entry point to the hospital but as a screen for the other outpatient and inpatient units of the hospital We found this was true of the New Zealand departments studied with only five to ten per cent of first attendances being referred to specialist outpatient clinics and five to fifteen per cent being admitted There were wide variations both in policy and practice with respect to patient disposition We consider that further study of acute medical admission practices focussing particularly on unnecessary hospitalisation is warranted

Some New Zealand studies [56J have tried to evaluate the need for care of patients presenting at the A amp E department They have tended to depend on the A amp E staffs assessment of whether a general practitioner (and a hypothetical one at that) could have dealt adequately with the case No studies have attempted to give a general practitioner assessment So the question of need for A amp E care remains open However it does not seem practical to devote more research effort to this topic until more is known

about the variable costmiddots oftreating minor injuries If such research is contemplated the techniques of activity analysis and recording systems proposed by Dalbyetal [7] andRoberts et al [8] could be useful

tmiddot bullmiddot

This study has not attempted to estimate the cost of A amp E care The information presented aboutothe physical size and staffing levels of A amp E departments suggests that the hospital service commits only a small share of resources to the A amp E department However with the continuing pressure on hospital resources the cost of A amp E care particularly if it is high relative to care by general practitioners has some importance Even a rough and ready costing of the whole service would be a first step Following that an indication of which parts are fixed costs to keep the essential service viable and which vary by volume or by character of workload would be a next step_ The variation in recall levels that we found suggests that savings in variable costs could be possible Gibson et al [9] in their account of a study of operating and patient care activity costs provide a valuable model on which some New Zealand studies could be based

THE A amp E DEPARTMENT AS AN EMERGENCY SERVICE

The A amp E department must be ready to cope with all kinds of emergencies whether they involve one or two badly hurt car-crash victims or the sudden influx of many patients after a natural disaster A major tool ensuring that a department is always prepared for a crisis situation is the disaster plan The United States Joint Committee on Accreditation of Hospitals requires every hospital to have a written disaster plan developed in conjunction with other relevant agencies which is tested in a full-scale drill at least twice a year The plan should cover assigning staff summoning staff to emergency duty setting aside parts of the hospital for specified purposes maintaining adequate supplies and co-ordination and communication within the hospital and with other hospitals police fire health and ambulance services and civil defence officials

Most of the- departments we studied had close liaison with the ambulance service and to a lesser extent with other services such as police fire and civil defence Six of the hospitals had adequate disaster plans which were revised on a reasonably regular basis but very few hospitals had had a full-scale drill to test the plan Many of the departments with inadequate disaster plans were in the process of revising them We commend this since we consider a comprehensive disaster plan which is regularly revised and tested at least annually to be an essential part of the A amp E service

While discussing emergency services it is worth noting that there has been little research done in New Zealand on the use of ambulance services There is a need both to document the coverage and formal structure of the service and to explore the effects if any of the different methods of funding this essential service The former is a necessary first step the latter presumes a study of both ambulance workload and of organisational matters such as staffing training and triage

Internationally there has been considerable discusion over the optimal distribution of A amp E departments nationwide Platt [IO] recommended that as a minimUm a population of 150 UOO was required to justify a full A amp E centre with seven days a week and 24 hours a day staffingbull Several

llO

authors [101112] have indicated the need for regional central or major accident centres with specialised services such as neurosurgery plastic and thoracic surgery and treatment of burns or poisonings serving a population of 500000 to 750000 An emergency service organised in levels as suggested requires careful planning so that all elements are integrated and good communications are maintained It is particularly desirable for ambulance personnel the police and perhaps taxi driVers to be aware of the level of treatment available at different hospitals

There has been disagreement over whether or nor smaller A amp E centres are justified It seems that densely-populated countries or regions with good transport systems do not need smaller A amp E units whereas more sparsely-populated regions often rural do need them [1013] New Zealand definitely falls into the second category Only our urban A amp E departments fulfil (or come close to) Platts criteria of 150000 population yet all of the A amp E departments visited in this study provide an essential service to their communities In New Zealand the distances that patients would have to travel preclude any concentration of emergency care within a few highly-equipped hospitals

THE A 8t E DEPARTMENT AS A PRIMARY CARE SERVICE

The A amp E department is a primary care service since few of the people Visiting it have been referred by a health professional most patients being self-referred or sent by someone else This primary care role could conf lict with the departments role as an emergency service if patients with minor injuries filled the department and hindered the care of emergency patients However by using triage the A amp E departments studied generally avoided this conflict Some departments discouraged visits for sickness conditions and recall visits so that the department would always be ready for an emergency situation

The A amp E department and general practice are both primary care services However the department differs greatly from the general practitioner in many aspects it is readily available 24 hours a day staff have little background knowledge of the patient and there is little continuity of care There has been concern that A amp E departments are stealing patients from general practitioners because the department is always available and care is free there This study has shown that such concern is not warranted

Looking first at the cost of general practitioner treatment as a reason for visiting the A amp E department we note that this is only relevant for sickness conditions since treatment of injury conditions is paid for by the Accident Compensation Corporation The interview studies have shown that very few patients give cost as a reason for attending the department Also the census area unit analysis showed that low income and receipt of a means-tested benefit were not related to sickness attendance rates and that areas with high unemployment had relatively low sickness rates We would expect contrary results if cost was a major factor As well our comparison of attendance rates at A amp E departments and general practitioners indicates that general practitioners would be losing at most one per cent of their workload when A amp E departments treat non-urgent sickness patients Even if all A amp E departments instituted a policy of discouraging such patients the effect on general practice would be negligible

111

The interview studies have demonstrated that patients do find the ready availability of the A amp E department attractive However our analyses of out of hours use compared to in hours use and our explorations of the effect of population-to-doctor ratios have shown that this attractiveness does not translate into significantly higher rates of A amp E attendance This suggests that improving the availability of general practitioner services is unlikely to have a major effect on the use of either service

There are two major factors related to peoples use of A amp E departments The first is distance from the hospital with people living close to the hospital being much more likely to visit the A amp E department It is hard to see any way of changing this factor The second factor is peoples perception of the A amp E department as the appropriate place for injury treatment The verY name of A amp E departments (instituted folJowing the Platt report) implies that the department is for the treatment of injuries It would be very difficult to change this perception and probably would not be desirable given the facilities experience and availability of the A amp E department for injury treatment

There has also been concern that A amp E departments recall patients instead of referring them back to their general practitioner for follow-up care It appears that A amp E departments recall a similar number of patients (10 to 30 per cent- of firstmiddot attenders) as they refer back to the general practitioners (10 to 20 per cent of first attenders) Some of the recall visits are middotjustified because they require the facilities of the A amp E department It hasmiddot been suggested that house surgeons tend to recall patients because of inexperience and to aid their training While this undoubtedly happens we found no evidence that it has a major effect on the level of recall visits However we did find that departments with high levels of medical and nursing staff relative to first attendance tended to have high levels of recall visits possibly because the staff had more time to treat the recalled patients This suggests that recall attendance could be reduced in some cases shy

Ov~rseas studies [141516] have discussed A amp E departments as fulfilling three roles

o trauma treatment centre for the community providing acute emergency care

o substitute for the private phYSician when not available

o family physician for the poor particularly minority group poqr

This study has shown that New Zealand A amp E departments operate largely in the first role of trauma treatment centre providing care for both urgent and non-urgent injury conditions The departments also fulfil the second role of out of hours general practitioner substitute to some extent but they hardly ever operate in the third role of family doctor to the poor

This study has not explored in detail general practitioners views and use of A amp E departments although some information on these topics is implicit in the descriptions of procedures in Chapter 3 and the analysis of reasons for visiting the department in Chapter 7 More information about general practitioners perspectives and the actual availability of general practice care outside normal surgery hours could be gathered However we consider that as well as carrying out further research efforts should be made to develop better communication and understanding between general

112

practitioners and A amp E departments Towards this end we would suggest that A amp E departments make greater efforts to inform general practitioners about the conditions of patients attending the department perhaps using prepared forms or cards (see page 15) We hope too that this report will foster greater recognition among general practitioners of the valuable activities of A amp E departments and allay fears that the department is substituting for the family doctor

We conclude as Dixon [17] did in 1970 that the A amp E department and general practice are complementary services rather than competitive We cannot justify further investigation of the hypothesis that A amp E departments steal patients from general practitioners Possibly a study replicating the Northland comprehensive study of urgent medical care utilisation [18] in an urban area coupled with a study monitoring general practitioner availability out of normal surgery hours would finally lay the ghost of competition for patients However given the evidence presented in this report this does not seem a high priority

WHERE FROM HERE

We considet that research effort could now be turned to two areas First a study of the whole area of accidents is definitely warranted Accidents account for a significant proportion of early deaths and long-term disability and the volume of less severe accidents strains the financial and caring resources of the community The research of the Accident Compensation Corporation has understandably focussed on general practitioner care since the Corporation does not bear the costs of treatment at or in hospital Studies of hospital activity neglect general practitioner care of accident victims A broad study would have to involve not only A amp E departments and general practitioners but also occupational health clinics ambulance and other first aid services Only a comprehensi ve study can provide a firm basis for setting priorities for accident prevention efforts

The need for such a study raises the issue of recording systems both in terms of themiddot classification of type and severity of injury and of the context or cause of the accident Not only is there a need for a fairly simple and versatile system but there is also a need for all the many services to use it consistently For medical emergencies where diagnosis follows professional examination the issue is not crucial For injuries where the events immediately before and after the trauma are relevant the recording of cause and context is important Studies of treatment alternatives and costs depend on a detailed description of the injury which is probably worthwhile only for more severe injuries For example we have noted that many A amp E visits are for bumps and bruises minor lacerations or pain from past inj ury Elaborate description of minor conditions only obscures the nature of the more important cases Clearly before such research can proceed some small-scale attempts at coordinated recording and a form of information triage are called for

The second area warranting study middotis that of the emergency services and their coordination The A amp E department and ambulance services would obviously be covered but the civil defence police and fire service should also be involved Disaster plans drills communications and supplies would be important aspects to be considered

113

This study has focussed on what happens inside the doors of A amp E departments and why people go there We hope that it provides a comprehensive view of the organisation and utilisation of New Zealand A amp E departments and that it will be useful not only to those working within the hospital service but also to all those concerned with primary health care and emergency services

114

REFERENCES

1 SALMOND G C - Young doctors An exercise in social research methodology - University of Otago 1970 Ph D Thesis Social and Preventive Medicine

2 MATES Susan and SIDEL Victor W - Quality assessment by process and outcome methods evaluation of emergency room care of asthmatic adults in Am J Public Health - v 71 no 7 (1981) p 687-693

3 BONITA Ruth - Stroke rehabilitation who gets what - how when where and why in Commun Health Studies - v 7 no 3 (1983) p 347

4 GIBSON Geoffrey - The emergency department as a screening point for hospital specialty services inclusionary vs exclusionary strategies in Soc Sci Med - v l3(A) (1979) p 495-498

5 RICHARDS J G and WHITE G R - Accident and emergency services at Auckland Hospital in NZ Med J - v 85 (1977) p 272-274

6 KASAP D - Personal communication 1975

7 DALBY B C S FARRER J A and HARVEY P W - Casualty activity analysis coding and computing in Computer Programs in Biomedicine - v 3 (1974) P 254-266

8 ROBERTS Jean FARRER J and HARVEY P - A progressive study of the emergency room demand by the community in Med Inf - v 2 no 3 (1977) p 197-201

9 GIBSON Geoffrey BUGBEE George and ANDERSON Odin W - Emergency medical services in the Chicago area - Chicago Centre for Health Administration Studies University of Chicago 1970

10 Gt Brit Central Health Services Council - Standing Medical Advisory Committee Accident and emergency services report of the subcommittee - London HMSO 1962 Chaired by Sir Harry Platt

11 Emergency services the hospital emergency department in an emergency care system Chicago American Hospital Association 1972 p 55-58

12 Planning and organisation of emergency medical services - report of a WHO Technical Group Toulouse 24-28 February 1979 - Copenhagen Regional office for Europe World Health Organisation 1981 (Euro reports and studies no 35)

13 PLANT Janet and AMES Seth - Emergencyoutpatient satellites serve as rural outposts in Hospitals Journal of the American Hospitals Association - v 52 no 5 (March I 1978) P 87-92

14 TORRENS Paul R and YEDVAB Donna G - Variations among emergency room populations a comparison of four hospitals in New York City in Med Care - v 8 no 1 (1970) p 60-75

115

15 MOORE Gordon T BERNSTEIN Roberta and BONANNO Rosemary A shyEffect of a neighbourhood health centre on hospital emergency room use in Med Care - v 10 no 3 (1972) p 240-247

16 SATIN David George and DUHL Frederick J emergency unit as community physician (1972) p 248-260

17 DIXON C W EMERY G M and SPEARS G F S shyutilisation survey in NZ Med J - v 71

- Help The hospital in Med Care - v 10 no 3

Casualty department (1970) p 272-279

18 SNELGAR Denis - Accident and emergency utilisation study prepared for the Primary Health Care Shadow Service Group Northland 1981 (Unpublished)

Paper Development

- ~

C) w CJ C Z w c 0 laquo

118

APPENDIX A

Question sheets

MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT

1middot Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others

a number b levelsmiddotof experience c background experience

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties eg nurses doing clerical work

2 Policy (on procedures) 21 Standing orders 22 Sorting of patients at presentation who does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admit 26 Relations with other hospital departmentswards eg sharing of

facilitiesstaff with outpatients 27 Relations with other A amp E departments

peripheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

3 Relations with GPs

31 Any involvement of local GPs in A amp E department eg staffing 32 Policy on GP-load presentations

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A amp E service iri general

PRINCIPAL NURSE

1 Staffing

11 Nurses a number b levels of experience c background experience

2 Policy (on procedures) - ~ -

~ ~ bull - - I bull

22 Sorting of patients atprese~ation 23 Level of treatment provic)e~ by nurses 26 Relations with other hospitaldepartmentswards eg sharing

nurses 27 Relationsiith other ~ ~ltE 9~parlttm~nt~periPheral hospitals

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Doctors nurses clerical staff orderlies ambulance officers social workers others a number I

b levels of experience c background experience d at different times

12 Back-up consultation and support 13 Overlap of duties egnur~esdoing cler~cal work

2 Procedures ~ - ~

21 standing orclers ~ 22 Sorting of patients at pr~seniation~ho does 23 Level of treatment provided by different staff 24 Follow-up recall or refer to GP 25 Admissions who admitted

Can A amp E Officer admitZ 26 Relat io~s witll oth~r )()sIgti taidepa rtmentswards

ashCl~in9 q~i facilitiesstaff with out-patients b go9rdinat~pgwith xray and laboratory

27 Relations with other A amp E departmentsperipheral hospitals 28 Disaster plan 29 Ambulance system

4 workload

41 Number of patient visits per year 42 Seasonal variation

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases -definiUon

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp B

120

~~

55 Relations with local GPs ~i~ 56 Alcohol involved in presehttionsbull 57 Administration - recordstystem 58 Hospital policy (if mentiOPed earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A amp E department or the A E service in general

HOUSE SURGEONS

Jobdescription

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

2 Procedures

21 Standing orders 24 Follow-up recalls or referrals1

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-load cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A 81

55 Relations with local GPs 56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A E department or the A E service in general

NURSES

Job description

1 Staffing

11 Hours worked 12 Back-up support and consultation

121

2 Procedures

21 Standing order s 22 Sorting of pati~nts at presentation 23 Level of treatment provided by nurses

5 Satisfaction

51 Staffing arrangements 52 Training of staff and career opportunities 53 Physical facilities 54 Patients

a sporting injuries b GP-Ioad cases - definition

- how many - how do staff deal with - do they prejudice emergency care - why do they come to A amp E

56 Alcohol involved in presentations 57 Administration - records system 58 Hospital policy (if mentioned earlier)

Any comments on particular problems or good points of this A ampE department or the A amp E service in general

A amp E DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST ON PHYSICAL FACILITIES

Waiting room size seating atmospheredecor childrens facilities - screening of ambulance entrance

Treatment rooms size privacy ease of working

Overall layout ambulance flow ease of working holding ward for admission

Relations with rest of hospital

_ proximity ~Qxray level ofl~poratory service ease of ~dJllJtting towards

122

APPENDIX B

Accident and emergency department records

THE STATE OF A amp E RECORDS Most of the A amp E departments visited kept a log or register of A amp E attendance This was a large book or folder where the patients name and other details were entered in order of presentation at the department Usually A amp E department logs contained the following information

the patients name and age the date and time of presentation a one-word description of the patients complaint whether the visit was a first attendance for a complaint

or a return visit the patient I s disposal

All except one of the A amp E departments visited had their own record system (independent of the hospital inpatient system) with one recordmiddot kept for each patient presenting This record was usually an A5 card although one department used a multiple copy A4 sheet Most of the A amp E department records contained the following information

the patients name age sex occupation GP address and phone number the date and time of presentation a one-to-ten word description of the patients complaint the A amp Edoctor(s) seen their clinical notes of

diagnosis and treatment the patients disposal ACC details if the complaint results from an accident other details on tetanus prophylaxis allergies and medical alerts

There were of course variations in the information contained on the logs and records of different A amp E departments An outline of the points where the log and records of each hospital differ from the general descriptions given above appears at the end of this Appendix

The quality of data collected was variable with the out of hours collection often being sketchier than the in hours This was probably due to nursing and medical staff doing the recording as well as their usual duties when receptionists were not on duty The basic details (such as name age and sex) were usually complete but more descriptive details (such as the site cause and sequence of an accident) were not always noted Some receptionists recorded no details about the accident whereas others took considerable care to summarise accurately the relevant information

USES OF A 8t E RECORDS The major users of A amp E records are the A amp E departments themselves and the hospitals A primary use is the estimation of the size and the content of the A amp E workload at different times of the day and the week This information is valuable for planning staffing levels and physical facilities in the A amp E department The A amp E staff also find the information contained in A amp E records useful in dealing appropriately with

123

patients who repeatedy present at the d~parmeptlHSo at times the information recorded in the A amp E depatinienf farequired as evidence in court proceedings

On a broader f ront~ amp E records are useful for sOme research purposes Certainly theyprovide~nsights i nl 0 who USeE the A amp E department (see Chapter 6) At some A amp E departments ~ufficientlY detailed information about accidents resulting in a presentation (eg type site possible cause of accident and occupation of patient) is collected for developing accident prevention programmes However most A amp E records are too sketchy for direct use in this way although they could be used as sampling frames for some accident research

There are disadvantages in using A amp E records for health services research purposes

I A amp E departments deliver only a small part of ambulatory medical care They deliver care to a selected age group and to a group who by and large happen to live nearby

2 Generally A amp E records are one-off and do not have the longitudinal perspective of general practice records or even hospital notes

3 Even for an epidemiological survey of accidents A amp E departments see an incomplete caseload They do not see all fractures much less all wounds concussions eye injuries etc

POINTS OF DIFFERENCE fROM GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS GIVEN

Full-time Information on log Information on A amp E record departments

Urban Auckland Age not noted

Middlemore Motor vehicle accident also noted

Green Lane Age not noted Sports and motor vehicle accidents also noted Residential area (not street address) also noted

Address A amp E doctor and Length Of stay and homeWellington 1A amp E patient number also address collected for nonshy

Hutt noted New and return New Zealand residents visits not always differentiated

Christchurch Sex address GP referral and motor vehicle accidents also noted

Dunedin [NO log kept Records held in alphabetical order for each months presentations]

Full-time departments

Provincial Rotorua

Taranaki Base

Timaru

Rural Whakatane

Grey

Part-time departments

Suburban North Shore

Kenepuru

124

Information on log

GP A amp E doctor case history and treatment also noted

Only patient name and date of presentation noted

Source of referral location of accident and special accident cases also noted

[Not seen]

Information on log

Complaint not noted

Address A amp E doctor and A amp E patient number also noted New and return visits not always differentiated

)

Information on A amp E record

Different cards used for work and non-work accidents

[None]

Specific places allocated on A4 sheet for case history lab and x-ray reports and follow-up

Time of presentation not noted

Information on A amp E record

Length of stay and home address collected for nonshyNew Zealand residents

125

APPENDIX C

StatisticalanaIY$es of accident and emergency department attendance riltes by neighbourhoods

METHOD

The analysis set out to test

o the effect of distance

o the effect of social factors

o the effect of A ampE department characteristics on A amp E attendance rates

The first two of these effects are not independent It was therefore necessary to use multivariate methods to assess the effect of distance controlling for social factors and for social factors controlling for distance

Other analyses of New Zealand geographical areas (in preparation Reinkeii) have found distinct differences between urban areas (those with populations exceeding 35000) and non-urban areas Therefore the multivariate analyses have been carried out separately for the 355 urban neighbourhoods and the 86 non-urban neighbourhoods One neighbourhood did not have complete census data and was omitted from the multivariate analysis Where we found differing results for urban and non-urban areas they have been mentioned separately Otherwise the results are presented as general findings

STEPWISE MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Initially a simple stepwise regression analysis was carried out The results are shown below Variables are presented in decreasing order of importance and are related to high attendance rates

All Neighbourhoods Urban Neighbourhoods Non-urban Neighbourhoods

Out of hours sickness

37 of the variance is 34 of the Variance is 36 of the variance is explained by explained by the same explained by many carless households features as all neighshy near the hospital near the hospital bourhoods many households with cars young age-structure few in the paid workforce many with higher few school-age children education many Maori many blue collar many in the paid workforce

All Neighbourhoods

out of hours injury

35 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many children many married many Europeans few households with two cars

In hours sickness

16 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many car less households few separated widowed or divorced low average rental many in paid workforce many with higher education

In hours injury

31 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars many school-age children few Pacific Island Chinese or Indian

Recall visits in hours

23 of the variance is explained by near the hospital high average rental many households with two cars few with higher education many in the paid workforce few European many separated widowed or divorced many school-age children

Urban Neighbourhoods

28 ofmiddotthe variance is explained by near the hospital few households with two cars many with higher education many blue-collar many European few separated widowed or divorced many seeking work

14 of the variance is explained by few households with two cars near the hospital low average rent high income many in paid workforce few separated widowed or divorced

16 of the variance is expla ined by near the hospital many home-owners few households with two cars

18 of the variance is exp lai ned by high average rental near the hospital many households with two cars many Maori many separated widowed or divorced few seeking work many with higher education

Non-urban Neighbourhoods

62 of the Variance is explained by near the hospital few in the paid workforce

7 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

57 of the variance is explained by near the hospital many one-car households

42 of the variance is explained by near the hospital

127

Few recall visits happened out of hours so the out of hours recall attendance rates are low ~ndhlghlY yariable NO adequate model was found in the analyses so 19 resultsare presented here

Clearly distance was an important determinant of rates of attendance The social characteristics had a )I9dest effect on injury first attendance a more substantial effect on rates of recall visits and a very substantial effect on the rates of sickness attendance in the different neighbourhoods

The pattern was quite different for the urban and non-urban areas as were the associations among the social variables A more complex analysis was needed

2 DATA REDUCTION

Separate principal components analyses for urban and non-urban areas were done on the social factors and yielded sets of four components with eigenvalues of one or more For clarity of interpretation the four-vector model was rotated (using a varimax method) and yielded four urban parameters and four non-urban parameters as shown Variables are shown in decreasing order of importance for each parameter

Urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few home-owners young ageshy low income in the northerry many carless structure few with higher regions higher many on benef it many Maori education average rental many seeking work many blue-collar few in the paid many separated work force widowed or divorced many blue-collar

Non-urban neighbourhoods

1 2 3 4

few separated many Maori bull many home- low average widowed or manyseeking owners rental divorced work few in the paid few with higher few old in the workforce education many two-car and northern many blue-collar few carless regions high income many blue-collar many children

3 PRODUCING ADJUSTED RArES

We fitted a regression equation for each attendance rate on the distance factor and the eight social factor parameters For urban neighbourhoods the four non-urban parameters were held at zero and vice versa for the non-urban neighbourhoods

128

The regression equations using this method allowed non-urban and urban areas to be analysed together and yielded levels of variance explained generally equal to those derived from the significant predictors in the simple stepwise regressions

Variance in attendance rates explained by different methods

Regression In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Using or iginal variables 16 31 23 37 35 14

Using rotated parameters 18 26 29 36 37 14

Each parameter-based equation yielded a rate of attendance expected on the basis of purely neighbourhood characteristics The difference between this expected rate and the actual observed rate gave a measure of the attendance rate adjusted for neighbourhood-determined features After this adjustment for distance and social factors the department-to-department differences remaining were muted In fact the F-tests of the differences among the departments showed the following changes

Changes in F-test values from unadjusted to adjusted rates

In hours Out of hours Sickness Injury Recall Sickness Injury Recall

Unadjusted rates 74 69 195 132 96 123 Adjusted rates 23 65 107 53 41 119

4 TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE

Analyses of variance were carried out on the attendance rates adjusted for neighhourhood-determined factors for in hours and out of hours and looking separately at sickness first injury and recall visits First the A amp E department was used as the independent variable (except that Auckland and Green Lane were combined since they share a single catchment area) Then tests were done on the departments categorised into urban provincial rural and suburban open door policy and recall policy When the analyses of variance showed significant effects Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used to identify single departments or groups of departments that differed significantly from the others

Staffing levels were plotted against the adjusted rates When the correlations were significant the slope of the simple regression was examined

129middot

Results of analyses of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls means tests on adjusted attendance ratesmiddot

Differencemiddots Differences Differences among among between

Neighbourhood- A amp E categories of open-door adjusted departments A amp E department and attendance ( urban restricted

provincial departments rural or suburban)

Out of hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Provincial Open rates

rates lower higher than than others restricted

First injury Yes

Recall injury Yes Yes

In hours Yes Yes Yes sickness Open rates

higher than restricted

First injury Yes Yes Yes Grey rates Rural rates Restricted higher than higher than rates others others higher than

open

Recall injury Yes Yes Suburban rates higher than others

Only statistically significant results presented

Differences between departments favouri ng and not favouring recalls

Yes Recall-favouring rates lower than others

Yes Recall shyfavoumiddotring rates higher than others

Yes Recall shyfavouring rates higher than others

130

APPENDIX D

Childrens use of general practitioners and accident and emergency departments in Wellington

In conjunction with the 1981 Kljakovic study of chi ldren s attendance at A amp E departments in Wellington a parallel study of childrens visits to and by general practitioners was undertaken General Medical Services benefit claims for the same period were examined noting for each juvenile (0-14 years) visit the census area unit of the residence and the address of the general practitioner or locum This yielded rates of child attendance both for normal surgery hours and for urgent visits (out of surgery hours) for the whole region These were adjusted to give estimates for the 0-12 year old population and were then compared with the rates of A amp E attendance found by Kljakovic

AS Figure 10 shows the use of A amp E services was a very small part of childrens primary medical care During surgery hours visits to the A amp E department which were not preceded by contact with the general practitioner were only 16 per cent of first medical contacts Outside normal surgery hours the visits to A amp E departments that bypassed a general practitioner were more frequent I but they rose only to 194 per cent of first medical contacts

This comparison of overall use of medical services for children showed some tendency for parents to use A amp E more when they used general practitioners less comparing in hours with out of hours This was not surprising given that many of the in hours visits to general practit ioners would be for non-urgent conditions or even routine preventive care

Eighty-four neighbourhoods in the Wellingtoh region (the census area units or groupings of the same) were examined to see which of four factors (the distance of the neighbourhood from the A amp E department the use of general practitioners the per capita income and the ethnicity of the neighbourhood) were related to the use of A amp E departments The most important factor was distance from the A amp E department Then taking distance into account there was a slight tendency for areas where parents made less use of the general practitioner during normal surgery hours to be areas of more frequent use of the A amp E department However this tendency was not statistically significant and no such tendency was found for out of hours use Overall there was little evidence of competition between general practitioners and A amp E departments for patients

Figure 10 Use of general practitioners and A amp E departments by Wellington children 1978 (rates per 1000 children per quarter)

In hours Out of hours

Need for medical care recognised

I I bull I I I I I Ifail Try to Try to fail Still need Icontact contact careI

general generalI 0gt practitioner practitioner w-- I succeed I succeed

I I I I

AampE 13 yes Still need Contact Contact Still need yesI department care general general care departmentI

practitioner I practitioner

I I I

7650 824I egt I I

Still need Visit Visit Still need I care general general careI

practitioner practitionerI I I I I I

~X-215 -[Ql--~-~- 7346 ALLAN Bridget ClairtJ ) Accident and emergency departmem ~

organisation and utilisation

WX 215 73467 [QJ 1shy

j

ALL

shyUBRARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

WELLINGTON L

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH-SPECIAL REPORT SERIES

Issued by

Management Services amp Research Unit (MSRU) or National Health Statistics Centre (NHSC) Department of Health Private Bag 2 PO Box 5013 Wellington Upper Willis Street Wellington

No TITLE

1 Maori-European standards of health 2 Domestic accidents (public hospital admissions) 3 The Grey Valley survey (lung function in coal miners) 4 Elderly patients in public hospitals 1958 5 Smoking habits of school children 6 Survey of work in compressed air-Auckland harbour bridge 7 Tuberculosis in Canterbury 8 Maori patients in mental hospitals 9 Census of mental hospital patients 1961 10 Elderly persons accommodation needs in New Zealand 1962 11 Patient-nurse dependency exploratory study 12 Patient-nurse dependency general survey data

13 Patient-nurse dependency gynaecology 14 Patient-nurse dependency geriatrics

15 Patient-nurse dependency in Christchurch paediatrics 16 Smoking habits of New Zealand doctors 17 Infant and foetal loss in New Zealand 18 Trends in notifiable disease 19 Survey of factory first aid 1963-64 20 Patient-nurse dependency general surgery 21 Patient-nurse dependency orthopaedic surgery 22 Patient-nurse dependency general medicine 23 Patient-nurse dependency GU Eye ENT

24 Diseases of the ear nose and throat in Maori children 25 Maori patients in public hospitals 26 The health of two groups of Cook Island Maoris

27 Mental hospitals admission and release data cohort study of first admissions 1962

28 Occupational mortality among male population other than Maoris 20 to 64 years of age

29 Dental health status of the New Zealand population in late adolescence and young adulthood

30 Census of mental hospital patients 1966 31 Survey of the public dental health service in Niue and plan for development 32 Hospital food services 33 Bibliography of the epidemiology of New Zealand and its Island Territories

34 Census of public and private hospital patients and old peoples homes 1966 35 Domestic accidents 36 An evaluation of a regional mass miniature radiography programme 1956-67 37 Maori-European comparisons in mortality

38 Physical development of New Zealand school children 1969 39 Psychiatric illness causing hospitalization or death 1967 t40 Census of mental hospital patients 1971 t41 Census of public private and maternity hospital patients and old peoples

homes 1971 t42 Cancer of the lung in New Zealand t43 Organisation of the work of hospital house surgeons 44 Growth of New Zealand pre-school children 45 Maternal and infant care in Wellington-a health care consumer study

46 Accommodation and service needs of the elderly t47 Survey of patients in psychiatric hospitals 48 Family growth study 49 A patient opinion survey Wellington hospital

ISSUED BY

NHSC 1960 NHSC 1960middot NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1961 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1962 NHSC 1963 NHSC 1963 MSRU 1963 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1963 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 NHSC 1964 MSRU 1964 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 MSRU 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC 1965 NHSC ]966

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1967

NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 NHSC 1968 MSRU 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1969 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1970 NHSC 1972 MSRU 1971 NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973

NHSC 1973 NHSC 1973 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1975 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1974 MSRU 1976 MSRU 1977

llHII tIffPllfJlJ c

~~~~~~~~ f lt b tf

f ()

11

bull

Page 8: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 9: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 10: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 11: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 12: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 13: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 14: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 15: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 16: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 17: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 18: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 19: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 20: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 21: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 22: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 23: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 24: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 25: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 26: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 27: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 28: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 29: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 30: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 31: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 32: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 33: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 34: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 35: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 36: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 37: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 38: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 39: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 40: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 41: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 42: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 43: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 44: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 45: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 46: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 47: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 48: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 49: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 50: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 51: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 52: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 53: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 54: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 55: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 56: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 57: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 58: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 59: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 60: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 61: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 62: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 63: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 64: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 65: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 66: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 67: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 68: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 69: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 70: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 71: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 72: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 73: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 74: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 75: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 76: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 77: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 78: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 79: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 80: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 81: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 82: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 83: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 84: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 85: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 86: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 87: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 88: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 89: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 90: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 91: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 92: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 93: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 94: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 95: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 96: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 97: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 98: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 99: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 100: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 101: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 102: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 103: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 104: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 105: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 106: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 107: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 108: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 109: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 110: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 111: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 112: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 113: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 114: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 115: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 116: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 117: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 118: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 119: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 120: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 121: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 122: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 123: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 124: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 125: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 126: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 127: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 128: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 129: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 130: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 131: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 132: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 133: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 134: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 135: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 136: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 137: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 138: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 139: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …
Page 140: kCCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ORGANISATION …