katarina mareckova, robert wankmueller, marion pinterits, melanie tista ceip, etc acm tfeip, 11 may...
TRANSCRIPT
Katarina Mareckova, Robert Wankmueller, Marion Pinterits, Melanie Tista
CEIP, ETC ACM TFEIP, 11 May 2015, Milan
Status of emission reporting
Review of inventories
Content• Status of reporting • Review • Time Series Consistency • Data comparison
http://www.ceip.at/status_reporting/2015_submissions
Reporting under the CLRTAP in
2015http://www.ceip.at/status_reporting/2015_submissions
Review results S1 & S2
• Completeness
• Recalculations
• Time Series Consistency
• Key Category Analysis
• Inventory Comparisons (CLRTAP/NECD/UNFCCC)
• Comparability (emissions per capita/per GDP)
http://www.ceip.at/review_results/review_results_2015
Reporting under the CLRTAP in
2015
• 41 (80 %) submissions from 51 Parties, 30 Parties within deadline • 10 are missing• 31 IIRs, 32 Activity data
Status of reporting under NECD
• All 28 EU MS submitted 2012 and 2013 data
• 25 MS on time
• Italy, Hungary and Greece after deadline
Time Series Consistency• Check for dips and jumps (review 2014)
Time Series Consistency
• Consistency between PM2.5 and PM10 emissionsReported PM2.5 emissions should not exceed PM10
emissions as they are a subset of PM10 emissions Findings:4 countries reported higher PM2.5 emissions than PM10
emissions:Lithuania, Czech Republic, Malta, Ukraine
Black Carbon:• First year of reporting• 25 parties (49%) reported BC
Time Series Consistency• Expert estimates for gapfilling of data
Reported data NFR14
Expert data
Linear Interpolation
Copy of dataLinear Extrapolation
Sum of Sectors
Other (e.g. GDP Trend, data from IIASA, share from reported years,…)
Reported Data NFR02/NFR09
Submission of NH3-emissions 2015
Time Series Consistency
About 40% of data reportedPM (PM2.5 + PM10 + PMcoarse): only 26% of data reported
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Comparison with IIASA/GAINS
Adjustment applications 2015
Adjustment applications 2014
• 7 countries: Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain
• Sectors: Energy , Transport, Agriculture
• Pollutants: NOx, NMVOC, NH3
• Why: New sources, revised EFs (methods? )
• 6 countries applied and reviewed
• 2 approved applications of Germany and Denmark
http://www.ceip.at/adjustments_gp
Review in 2015Stage 3
Review of Adjustments
10 countries / all sectors / all pollutants
LRs: Anne Misra (UK) and Ole Kenneth (DK)
Time schedule
• Data for reviewers – after TF meeting; CEIP website + wiki
• Initial questions to be sent ASAP (mid June latest)
• Reports / chapterso first draft mid Julyo to be completed latest
August/ Sept
7 countries / 3 sectors/ NMVOC, NH3, NOx
ALR: Chris Dore (UK)Time scheduleo Data posted on the CEIP
website in Aprilo Desk review May –June o Consultations: online + meeting
CPHo Summary for the status report
26 Juneo Finalisation of review and
review reports by the end of June (mid July?)
Roster of experts
24 Parties to the Convention (out of 51) have nominated experts
the roster currently contains a total of 78 inventory experts
http://www.ceip.at/review_process/stage3_review_ae
Awarded IIRs
2013Finland SwedenCroatiaEstoniaPoland
Spain
2014NorwayFrance DenmarkLatviaBelgiumSlovenia
UK