judge yi, kiri - led
TRANSCRIPT
Judge Yi, Kiri
IT Center Public Service History Applications Structure Management
• 1979
⁻ Feasibility study for
computerization of Judiciary
⁻ Set up IT department in
National Court Administration
⁻ CMS for civil & criminal case
(Host based System)
• 1986
⁻ CMS1) for civil case
• 1988
⁻ Client/Server based CMS
• 1992∼1997
• 1998∼2002
⁻CMS for all cases
⁻Registers support system
⁻Supreme Court homepage
⁻Court Auction homepage
⁻Transition to Web-based CMS
⁻Electronic signature System
⁻Nationwide information network
⁻Digital Library System
• 2003∼2004
⁻ Integrated Justice System
⁻ Video witness hearing system
⁻ ECF for Civil Summary
Procedure (Money Claim)
⁻ Standard model e-Courtroom
⁻ BPR/ISP for Next Generation E-
court
• 2004∼2009
⁻ Launch Electronic Case Filing
System
⁻ Judicial Data exchange in
Criminal Cases
⁻ Server Based Computing
⁻ Smart Work System
• 2010 ~ 2015
1) CMS :Case Management System
Phase
IT Center Public Service History Applications Structure Management
Phase
• 1992 CMS(Case Management System) with client/server structure
• 2002 Real Estate/Commercial Registration System
• 2004 Web-based CMS
• 2007 E-Filing of Real Estate Registration
JUSTICE(Judge’s Unified System for Intelligent Case Management)
• 2008 E-Filing of Commercial Registration
Family Relations Registration System
• 2010.4. ECFS(Electronic Case Filing System) – Patent Cases
• 2011.5. ECFS – Civil Cases
• 2013.1. ECFS – Family Affair Cases, Administrative Cases
• 2013.7. Mobile Service (Notification and Viewing)
• 2013.9. ECFS – Provisional Seizures/Preliminary Injunction Cases
• 2014.4. ECFS – Insolvency/Bankruptcy Cases
• 2014.7. E-Filing of Family Relations Registration
• 2015.3. ECFS – Civil Enforcement Cases, Non-Ligitation Cases
IT Center Public Service History Applications Structure Management
99
35 35
7 7 1 1 0
CMS Registry Court
Administration Family
Registration
Operating 176
Developing 9
Court Homepage Case Information
Certificate Issuance Law Search
Self Help Center
⁻ Case Workflow System
⁻ Decision Support System ⁻ Law Search
⁻ Groupware
ECF E-courtroom
⁻ Electronic money Claim
⁻ Electronic Entrusting
⁻ Electronic Property
Inquiry
⁻ Standard E-courtroom
⁻ Audio Video
recording, Video-
Conferencing
⁻ Docket System
⁻ Case Allocation System
⁻ Case Filing System
⁻ Calendaring System
⁻ Service System
⁻ Payment System
⁻ Deposit System
⁻ Case Files Archiving
⁻ Common Service System
IT Center Public Service History Applications Structure Management
IT Center Public Service History Applications Structure Management
CourtNet - Portal
Case Management
IT Center Public Service History Applications Structure Management
IT Center Public Service History Applications Structure Management
Judge Support
IT Center Public Service History Applications Structure Management
Judicial Statistics
IT Center Public Service History Applications Structure Management
Legal Information
Case Search
IT Center Public Service History Applications Structure Management
Road Map of E-Filing
1st Phase
2nd Phase
2010
2011 ∼ 2013
2014 ∼ 2015
3rd Phase
Patent Cases
Patent Cases
Administrative &
Family Affairs Civil Cases
Administrative &
Family Affairs
Injunction Cases
Insolvency Cases
Civil Cases
Injunction Cases
Patent Cases
Execution & Non-
litigation Cases
Why? Road Map Homepage Achievement E-Courtroom Application
Why? Road Map Homepage Achievement E-Courtroom Application
Why? Road Map Homepage Achievement E-Courtroom Application
Experiencing the E-filing Website
Why? Road Map Homepage Achievement E-Courtroom Application
Electronic Record Viewer
Why? Road Map Homepage Achievement E-Courtroom Application
Electronic Record Management
Why? Road Map Homepage Achievement E-Courtroom Application
Mobile Service for users
2011.5. ~ 2015.5.
Why? Road Map Homepage Achievement E-Courtroom Application
E-filing Usage
283,000 Registered Users (2015.5.)
Observations
Step-by-Step Development
CMS → Registration System → E-filing (Patent → Civil → …)
Consideration for Learning Curve, Future Connectivity
The Importance of Initial Work-Process Analysis and System Design
Court Procedures ≠ Common Business Procedures
Needed: Plenty of Time, Experienced Architects, Expert Internal personnel
Acceptance and Training of Internal Personnel
UX – especially ‘Viewing Experience’ (Dual Monitors, etc.)
Time and Training (Video Manuals, etc.)
Speedy Implementation of Feedback
Incentives and Consideration for Public Users
Best Incentive = Good System (E-filing not Mandatory)
Financial Incentives, Easy Payment, Free Viewer Program, Video Tutorials, etc.