joint ventures in business, part 1 & part 2 (60 minutes) · joint ventures in business, part 1...
TRANSCRIPT
JOINT VENTURES IN BUSINESS, PART 1 & PART 2
First Run Broadcast: December 17 & 18, 2013
Live Replay: March 26 & 27, 2014
1:00 p.m. E.T./12:00 p.m. C.T./11:00 a.m. M.T./10:00 a.m. P.T. (60 minutes)
Businesses frequently pool their resources – capital, expertise, marketing power – in joint
ventures to grow in existing or new markets, leveraging their strengths by partnering with
companies with complementary strengths. Joint ventures come in many varieties, including
contractual strategic alliances and formal entity-based ventures. Keys to long-term stability and
success in these ventures include understanding the current and future contributions of each
party, access to information and decision-making authority over time, dispute resolution and
transfers of interests in the JV. This program will provide you with a practical guide to planning
and drafting joint ventures, including financial and tax considerations, decision-making authority
and transfers of interests in the JV, ownership of jointly developed property and dispute
resolution.
Day 1 – March 26, 2014:
Joint ventures in business and real estate – planning and drafting considerations
Types of joint ventures – contractual strategic alliances v. shared entities
Framework of considerations – formality, capital, tax issues, management control, exits
Choice of entity – incorporated entities v. LPs and general partnerships v. LLCs
Decision-making, access to information, deadlocks and resolution
Day 2 – March 27, 2014:
Contributions – capital, marketing and distribution, expertise, intangible assets
Economics – allocation of profits and losses, and distribution policies
Transfers of JV interests – rights of first offer/refusal, restrictions on transfers, dissolution
Ownership – development of intellectual property and ownership of property
Speakers:
Joel R. Buckberg is of counsel in Nashville office of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell &
Berkowitz, P.C., where he has more than 30 years’ experience in corporate and business
transactions. His practice focuses on corporate and asset transactions and operations, particularly
in hospitality, franchising and distribution. He also counsels clients on strategic planning,
financing, mergers and acquisitions, system policy and practice development, regulatory
compliance and contract system drafting. Prior to joining Baker Donelson, he was executive vice
president and deputy general counsel of Cendant Corporation. Mr. Buckberg received his B.S.
form Union College, his M.B.A. from Vanderbilt University, and his J.D. from Vanderbilt
University School of Law.
Peter J. Kinsella is a partner in the Denver office of Perkins Coie, LLP, where he has an
extensive practice advising businesses of every size on technology and commercial transactions,
and joint ventures. Prior to joining his firm, he worked for ten years in various legal capacities
with Qwest Communications International, Inc. and Honeywell, Inc. Mr. Kinsella has extensive
experience structuring and negotiating data sharing agreements, complex procurement
agreements, product distribution agreements, OEM agreements, marketing and advertising
agreements, corporate sponsorship agreements, and various types of patent, trademark and
copyright licenses. Mr. Kinsella received his B.S. from North Dakota State University and his
J.D. from the University of Minnesota Law School.
VT Bar Association Continuing Legal Education Registration Form
Please complete all of the requested information, print this application, and fax with credit info or mail it with payment to: Vermont Bar Association, PO Box 100, Montpelier, VT 05601-0100. Fax: (802) 223-1573 PLEASE USE ONE REGISTRATION FORM PER PERSON. First Name ________________________ Middle Initial____Last Name___________________________
Firm/Organization _____________________________________________________________________
Address ______________________________________________________________________________
City _________________________________ State ____________ ZIP Code ______________________
Phone # ____________________________Fax # ______________________
E-Mail Address ________________________________________________________________________
Joint Ventures in Business, Part 1
Teleseminar March 26, 2014 1:00PM – 2:00PM
1.0 MCLE GENERAL CREDITS
PAYMENT METHOD:
Check enclosed (made payable to Vermont Bar Association) Amount: _________ Credit Card (American Express, Discover, Visa or Mastercard) Credit Card # _______________________________________ Exp. Date _______________ Cardholder: __________________________________________________________________
VBA Members $75
Non-VBA Members $115
NO REFUNDS AFTER March 19, 2014
VT Bar Association Continuing Legal Education Registration Form
Please complete all of the requested information, print this application, and fax with credit info or mail it with payment to: Vermont Bar Association, PO Box 100, Montpelier, VT 05601-0100. Fax: (802) 223-1573 PLEASE USE ONE REGISTRATION FORM PER PERSON. First Name ________________________ Middle Initial____Last Name___________________________
Firm/Organization _____________________________________________________________________
Address ______________________________________________________________________________
City _________________________________ State ____________ ZIP Code ______________________
Phone # ____________________________Fax # ______________________
E-Mail Address ________________________________________________________________________
Joint Ventures in Business, Part 2
Teleseminar March 27, 2014 1:00PM – 2:00PM
1.0 MCLE GENERAL CREDITS
PAYMENT METHOD:
Check enclosed (made payable to Vermont Bar Association) Amount: _________ Credit Card (American Express, Discover, Visa or Mastercard) Credit Card # _______________________________________ Exp. Date _______________ Cardholder: __________________________________________________________________
VBA Members $75
Non-VBA Members $115
NO REFUNDS AFTER March 20, 2014
Vermont Bar Association
CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE
Please note: This form is for your records in the event you are audited Sponsor: Vermont Bar Association Date: March 26, 2014 Seminar Title: Joint Ventures in Business, Part 1
Location: Teleseminar Credits: 1.0 MCLE General Credit Luncheon addresses, business meetings, receptions are not to be included in the computation of credit. This form denotes full attendance. If you arrive late or leave prior to the program ending time, it is your responsibility to adjust CLE hours accordingly.
Vermont Bar Association
CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE
Please note: This form is for your records in the event you are audited Sponsor: Vermont Bar Association Date: March 27, 2014 Seminar Title: Joint Ventures in Business, Part 2
Location: Teleseminar Credits: 1.0 MCLE General Credit Luncheon addresses, business meetings, receptions are not to be included in the computation of credit. This form denotes full attendance. If you arrive late or leave prior to the program ending time, it is your responsibility to adjust CLE hours accordingly.
Joint Ventures in Business
Joel R. Buckberg
615 726-5639
Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.
Nashville, Tennessee
2www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
WHY A JOINT VENTURE?
• Definition - arrangement for 2 or more parties to execute a particularbusiness undertaking in which the parties share in the investment,control and profits and losses of the enterprise.
• Four basic elements establish a joint enterprise:
− (1) an agreement among the members of the group;
− (2) a common purpose;
− (3) a community of pecuniary interest; and
− (4) an equal right to control the enterprise.
• Joint Ventures take 2 distinct forms:
− a contractual joint venture, a general partnership under state lawformed for a specific purpose
Possibly a strategic alliance with a core set of agreements
− an entity joint venture, either a limited liability company orcorporation
3www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
WHY A JOINT VENTURE?
• Until the advent of the LLC, contractual venture was common to avoiddouble taxation.
• Liability exposure covered with insurance, cross indemnities and corporateentities as the ownership of venture interests.
• As a general partnership, the venture partners were liable jointly andseverally for the debts and obligations of the venture.
• Contractual joint venture partner undertook risk it could not controlmanagerially.
• A complex operating agreement shaped rights and obligations
• In riskier activities, joint ventures needed liability shields to avoid unlimited,unmanaged risk.
• Venture partner balance sheet at risk for a venture liabilities
• Principle was severely tested in the product liability cases against DowCorning.
− Economic substance of the joint venture and the reinvestment of profitsallowed partners to avoid liability for silicone breast implants
4www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
WHY A JOINT VENTURE?
• Delaware corporation offers the benefit of a statutory deadlock
resolution procedure under Section 273 of the Delaware Corporation
Law for corporations with 2 stockholders owning 50% of stock
• Tax inefficiency of corporate form:
− double taxation
− dividend exclusion limited to 70%-80% of dividends
− losses trapped and not allocable to owners
• Joint venture co-investment format is a mutual decision to assert
executive management rights by committee instead of relying on
Board of Directors and chosen management
5www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
Distinctions from other forms of business venture:
• Direct investment
• Lending Plus – non-bank loans coupled with enhanced governanceparticipation through covenants, board access; perhaps with equitykicker
• License – one party licenses asset to another in exchange forroyalty, upfront fee, with some retained control over use of licensedproperty
• Franchise – stronger form of license arrangement where assetowner imposes substantial control over operator’s management ofbusiness
• Commercial distribution or other contractual usage arrangement –asset packaged for commercialization by counterparty at itsdiscretion
WHY A JOINT VENTURE?
6www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
WHY A JOINT VENTURE?
Key elements:
• Market potential and best means to exploit not clear at inception
• Parties bring different resources, skills, assets, that must mesh
• Cultures must be compatible or replaced with new common culture
− Think The Devil’s Brigade
• Common goals for venture, consistent with venturer goals
• Compatible investment horizons
• Balanced resource allocation
• Business plan congruity
• Shared vision of control and future growth
7www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
CONTRIBUTIONS
Expertise:
• R&D
• Engineering/Technical
• Planning & Budgeting
• Process and Production
Marketing Power and Prowess
• Distribution Networks
• Define by customer or by product
• Competition restrictions and channel conflict
• The Third Sales Force/Delivery Force
8www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
CONTRIBUTIONS
Intellectual Property Tangled Web
• Each party's own
• Enhancements to each other's IP
• Jointly developed – who owns, or does the venture own
• Mixed ownership – One from column A, one from column B
• Disengagement options
• Updating & Enhancing
• License back and perpetual use rights
• Royalty Trust and License Rights
9www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
CONTRIBUTIONS
Property and Resources
• office & back office
• production/warehouse
• technical
• rolling stock
• Lease/sublease to venture – FMV or below?
− Difference is contribution of capital
10www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
CONTRIBUTIONS
Human Capital
• Executive and managerial talent
• Secondment - the detachment of a person from their regular
organization for temporary assignment elsewhere
• Integration with contributing partners – cultures; facing the common
enemy
• Avoiding dead ends and duds – not a career killer to work for JV
• Benefits harmonization
• Training and Standardization
11www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
GOVERNANCE & MANAGEMENT
Board(s)
• Grand Board – representatives of both sides in proportion toinvestment
• Operating Board – VP level board of operators focused onoperational issues and integration
• Super Board – Partner CEO's or COO's to oversee direction ofventure
• Independence – should venture have non-affiliated board members?
Accounting & Reporting
• Annual Budget approved by parties
• Manage to variance
• Monthly reporting
• Separate audit
12www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
GOVERNANCE & MANAGEMENT
Meetings –
• frequency
• location
• quorum
• agenda and preparation – anti-blindside rule
• participation & reports
• Real v. Show
13www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
GOVERNANCE & MANAGEMENT
Supermajority/Consent of All Sides
• Amend charter or bylaws
• Capital Call
• Issue or redeem equity
• Borrow more than $x
• Capital leases
• Buy or sell real property
• Transactions with related parties
• Acquisitions
• Equity compensation to employees
• Grant indemnification
• Annual plan/budget
• tax elections
14www.bakerdonelson.com© 2013 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
GOVERNANCE & MANAGEMENT
Deadlock
• Super Board meeting
• Specialty arbitration
• Special Board Member Votes only on ties
• Mutual Buy/Sell
• Mandatory Sale
• Judicial intervention – Del. Corp. Law §273
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300 2
Agenda
Day -1
Overview of IP issues arising from Entity and
Contractual JVs
Contributions
Day -2
IP Ownership
IP issues on Exit
The information provided in this presentation does not necessarily reflect the opinions of
Perkins Coie LLP, its clients or even the author.
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
IP issues with Structure - 1
Contractual JV
One or more of the parties to the JV will need to own
the IP (either individually or jointly)
Joint ownership can cause problems when
enforcing the IP against third parties
Each party may grant a license (of a certain scope) to
the other
Entity JV
The JV can own IP, but should it?
4
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
IP issues with Structure - 2
Typical way to think about IP in a JV
Background IP – IP that exists prior to the formation
of the JV
May be licensed or assigned to the JV
Foreground IP – IP created by the JV
May be owned by the JV, if it is in entity
Will need to be owned by a party to the JV or
jointly
5
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Initial Contributions -1
The form of the contribution will differ depending onwhether the Joint Venture is merely a contractual JointVenture or is a legal entity
Contributions in a contractual joint venture willtypically be expressed as obligations to:
provide cash or certain rights or items to the otherparty; or
undertake certain obligations
Contributions to an entity typically take the form of anassignment, license or lease to the new entity
7
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Initial Contributions -2
It is important to identify the form, amount and timing ofthe initial capital contributions
Cash
All at once or over time?
Intellectual property (patents, trademarks, know-how,
trade names)
Assignment or License?
Tangible property (real estate, equipment)
Assignment or Lease?
Services / Human Resources (management,
technical, marketing or administrative)
8
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Common Issues Arising from Non-Cash Contributions
Valuation
Licenses
Permitted scope of intellectual property use
Transfer Pricing / Imputed Income Tax
Warranties concerning the contributions
Terms governing contributed services (service level,indemnification )
Export control issues
Some countries require minimum cash contributions
Tax goals may differ depending on nature of contribution
9
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Subsequent contributions
Procedures for additional capital contributions?
Consequences of a failure to make additional capital
contributions?
partner priority loans?
Need to identify interest rate, maturity date,
security and priority entitlement to cash flow
dilution of ownership interest of a delinquent co-
venturer, and formula for calculating dilution
loss of voting rights for the delinquent co-venturer
10
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Distributions -1 Generally, distributions are made at the discretion of the
JV's management
Some countries impose legal limitations on the
management's discretion
E.g., some countries do not permit distributions if
the JV is running at a loss or fails to maintain
minimum capital requirements
11
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Distributions -2 Frequently, distributions are based on the current
percentage of ownership of the JV
Joint venture agreement can specify otherwise, including
by providing for:
mandatory distributions, such as
specified amounts if certain triggers are met
for pass-through entities, consider providing for
annual distributions sufficient to cover income taxes
that the parties must pay on the JV's profits.
priority of distributions (see next slide)
Consider distribution effects through ancillary documents
Consider effect of international withholding tax issues
12
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Priority of Distributions
Consider effect of payment obligations under ancillary
agreements
Is there a priority return for initial or additional capital
contributions?
Is there a priority based on operating cash flow or other
metric?
identify interest rate on partner loans
address tax distributions (optional, mandatory or none)
consider a “clawback” if a co-venturer receives excess
distributions.
13
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-230015
IP Overview
Type of Right Scope of Coverage Example
Patents Ideas - products,processes
Telephone
Trademarks Identities, Quality Coca-Cola®
Copyrights Expressions of Ideas Movies, Books
Trade Secrets ConfidentialInformation
Strategies,Lists
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
IP Ownership Rules - 1
With respect to intellectual property, the U.S. has
different types of rules for different types of property,
absent a written agreement to the contrary, typically:
Employees retain ownership of patent rights (while
the employer will have a non-transferable license
Employers will own copyrights created by employees
within the scope of their employment
Independent contractors will own everything they
create
Note: different rules may apply in different countries
16
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
IP Ownership Rules - 2
In the United States, absent a written agreement:
people who jointly contribute to a copyrighted work
will jointly own the work, but will have an obligation to
share profits derived from the use of that work
people who joint contribute to a patented invention
will jointly own the patent, and will have the right to
exercise the rights without an obligation to share
profits
Note: different rules may apply in different countries
17
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Common Factors that ImpactOwnership
The type of property (tangible vs. intangible)
Who created the property
Employees or contractors
JV or Owners of the JV
Seconded Employees
The form of JV: Contractual or Entity Based
Terms of Contribution Agreements
Terms of Ancillary Agreements (e.g., License/Lease
Agreement)
Governing law of the country where the JV resides
18
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Issue 1: Trademark Selection
JV's often use the composite name of the co-venturer
This can create several issues:
Allowing the JV to own a composite trademark
could weaken the rights of each co-venturer in
their own trademarks
It may be difficult for the JV to obtain a trademark
registration in certain countries because each co-
venturer has independent trademark rights
19
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Issue 2: JV needs to rely onBackground Technology
JV's often need to rely on background technology
developed by one or both of the co-venturers
Such technology is typically supplied in the form of:
a license agreement or
product supply agreement (for a key component)
Note: If background IP is licensed to the JV, the
license agreement may be used to control ownership
and rights to improvements and related technology
20
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Issue 3: JV Will Develop NewTechnology
Need to determine whether the JV will exclusively own
the new technology or whether it will license the new
technology to the co-venturers for certain purposes
Need to determine ownership and use rights if the JV
has a co-venturer create IP for the JV
Need to determine ownership strategy when the JV
utilizes third parties for IP development
Need to develop clear ownership guidelines if the JV is
using seconded employees of a co-venturer
21
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Issue 4: Joint IP Ownership
Joint IP ownership can present several challenging
issues
Typically, both owners are required to be joined in
order to enforce the rights against an infringer
Agreement needs to account for costs associated
with obtaining applications and registrations for the
IP, and the consequences if a party or the JV
discontinues paying such costs
Joint IP ownership may allow one owner to undercut
the other owner with respect to third party
negotiations
22
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
Issue 5: Exclusivity
Exclusivity issues can sometimes compliment and
overlap with the ownership provisions
Are the co-venturers restricted from engaging in any
particular activities?
Need to specifically define the activity
Need to specifically define the country
Need to specifically define the field
Need to be aware of potential anti-trust issues
23
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
IP Exit Issues-1
Contractual JV
Termination of Cross Licenses ?
May not need to alter the ownership of the IP
established during the term of the JV
Consider whether a broader license (or IP
assignment obligation) is triggered by certain
termination events
25
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-2300
IP Exit Issues-2
Entity JV
Any IP that is owned by the JV needs to be assigned
prior to dissolution
Common Dissolution Structures
Assign Joint Ownership to the members
Assign Ownership to one party – grant broad
“ownership like” license to the other
Consider transferability of background licenses
26
Peter J. Kinsella 303-291-230027
BiographyPeter Kinsella is a partner in the firm's Licensing and Technology and
Intellectual Property Practice groups. His practice is focused on advising
start-up, emerging and large companies on licensing and technology
transaction matters. Prior to joining the firm in 2010, Pete was a partner
with Faegre & Benson. Prior to that, he worked in various legal capacities
with Qwest Communications International, Inc. (formerly U S WEST, Inc.)
in Denver and Honeywell, Inc. in Minneapolis.
Pete offers extensive experience structuring and negotiating domestic and
international agreements in the areas of: outsourcing, product
development, software development, technology transfer, consulting
services, e-commerce, telecommunications, hosting, data sharing,
complex procurement arrangements, product distribution and sales,
contract manufacturing, OEM and ODM arrangements, marketing and
advertising services, content creation and distribution, corporate
sponsorships, hardware acquisition and various types of patent, trademark
and copyright licenses. The value of several of these transactions has
exceeded one billion dollars. He also has significant international
experience, including, joint venture, holding company, transfer pricing,
export control, and international distribution issues.