- 1 - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIM – SECTION 910

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GE

RA

GO

S&

GE

RA

GO

S,

AP

C

HIS

TO

RIC

EN

GIN

E C

O. N

O. 2

8

6

44

So

ut

h F

igu

er

oa

St

re

et

Lo

s A

ng

el

es

, C

al

ifo

rn

ia

90

01

7-3

41

1

GERAGOS & GERAGOS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

LAWYERS

HISTORIC ENGINE CO. NO. 28

644 South Figueroa Street

Los Angeles, California 90017-3411

Telephone (213) 625-3900

Facsimile (213) 232-3255

Geragos@Geragos.com

MARK J. GERAGOS SBN 108325 BEN J. MEISELAS SBN 277412 ZACK V. MULJAT SBN 304531

Attorneys for Putative Plaintiffs Judy Edens, Ashton Kyle by and through his guardian ad

litem Nena Chavez, Stephen Jace Alderman by and through his guardian ad litem

Stephanie Elliott

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIM SECTION 910

KERN COUNTY, CITY OF BAKERSFIELD

JUDY EDENS, an individual (mother);

ASHTON KYLE, by and through his

guardian ad litem NENA CHAVEZ (son);

STEPHEN JACE ALDERMAN, by and

through his guardian ad litem

STEPHANIE ELLIOTT (son) Putative Plaintiffs, adv. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD;

BAKERSFIELD POLICE

DEPARTMENT; OFFICER CHAD

GARRETT; OFFICER RICK WIMBISH;

DOE OFFICERS 1-10; Putative Defendants.

Claim No.: UNASSIGNED

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT TORT

CLAIM PURSUANT TO SECTION 910,

ET AL.; NOTICE AND INTENT TO SUE

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD,

BAKERSFIELD POLICE

DEPARTMENT, OFFICER CHAD

GARRETT, OFFICER RICK WIMBISH;

DOES 1-10

City Clerk, City of Bakersfield

1600 Truxtun Avenue

Bakersfield, California 93301

- 2 - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIM – SECTION 910

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GE

RA

GO

S&

GE

RA

GO

S,

AP

C

HIS

TO

RIC

EN

GIN

E C

O. N

O. 2

8

6

44

So

ut

h F

igu

er

oa

St

re

et

Lo

s A

ng

el

es

, C

al

ifo

rn

ia

90

01

7-3

41

1

I. STATEMENT OF CLAIM

The Alderman family and wrongful death heirs of 29-year old Jason Alderman,

including his two infant sons and mother, bring this Notice of Claim pursuant to California

Government Code Section 910 against the City of Bakersfield, Bakersfield Police

Department, and Bakersfield Police Officers Chad Garrett and Rick Wimbish for the cold-

blooded execution of Jason Alderman on August 22, 2015 at 11:22 PM.

The autopsy investigation report, which purports to be dated November 2, 2015,

confirms what video surveillance also proves, which is that Alderman was shot in the side

and back (back-to-front entrance wounds).

Alderman was shot in the side and back by BPD officers as he was attempting to exit

a Subway restaurant, while crouched down, and his back turned to BPD officers. The

Subway restaurant was located on 1215 Olive Drive, Bakersfield California.

Video surveillance and the November 2015 autopsy investigation report contradict

BPD statements made to the public that Mr. Alderman exited the subway and pointed a

BMW carjack at officers which they mistook for a gun.

The entire duration of when Mr. Alderman entered the Subway to the time he was

executed inside the Subway was approximately 2 minutes and 33 seconds.

BPD officers Garrett and Wimbish have divined themselves judge, jury, and

executioner in their interaction with Bakersfield citizens, treating the use of lethal force as

their first option during a civilian encounter and disregarding de-escalation protocol,

establishing perimeters, calling for backup, and using non-lethal force. “Non-lethal force”

and “de-escalation” are not even in BPDs vocabulary.

BPD Officers Garrett and Wimbish were never even called to the Subway, and were

conducting an entirely separate investigation when, within a 2 minute time period, they

showed up at the Subway and shot and killed Alderman in the back. Garrett and Wimbish

have been involved in multiple other officer-involved-shootings of unarmed men, including

BPDs own confidential informant Jorge Ramirez and 22 year-old James DeLarosa whose

corpse was subsequently manipulated by BPD Officer Stringer who stated he loved tickling

the corpses of people BPD killed.

- 3 - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIM – SECTION 910

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GE

RA

GO

S&

GE

RA

GO

S,

AP

C

HIS

TO

RIC

EN

GIN

E C

O. N

O. 2

8

6

44

So

ut

h F

igu

er

oa

St

re

et

Lo

s A

ng

el

es

, C

al

ifo

rn

ia

90

01

7-3

41

1

II. BPD COVER UP / DISTRICT ATTORNEY COLLUSION

a. The Video

Initially, BPD denied the existence of video footage. Upon the discovery of

functioning video surveillance capabilities at the time of the incident by the Alderman family

attorneys, BPD acknowledged video existed but stated it would not be released for the

dignity of the Alderman family. The Alderman family demanded the video and sent an

investigator to BPD headquarters to retrieve the video. BPD stated it would not turn over the

video to the family after claiming they were not turning over the video to “help” the family.

Nearly 6 months after Jason’s murder, and formal requests which were made shortly

thereafter by Alderman family attorneys for the video, BPD released video to the media

before providing it to the Alderman family. The BPD eventually gave the Alderman family

a non-functioning DVD. The video played by the media contradicts BPD reports that

Alderman exited the Subway and presented an imminent threat to the lives of BPD officers.

The video shows Alderman crouching with his back turned to BPD officers when he was

shot in the back and side and killed.

- 4 - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIM – SECTION 910

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GE

RA

GO

S&

GE

RA

GO

S,

AP

C

HIS

TO

RIC

EN

GIN

E C

O. N

O. 2

8

6

44

So

ut

h F

igu

er

oa

St

re

et

Lo

s A

ng

el

es

, C

al

ifo

rn

ia

90

01

7-3

41

1

b. Fraudulent Critical Incident Review Board Process

BPD’s Critical Incident Review Board cleared BPD Officers Garrett and Wimbish of

misconduct on September 29, 2015. BPD issued a press releases confirming the news.

However, at the time BPD cleared itself, the investigation into the murder of Jason

Alderman was far from complete. In the rush to clear itself at all costs, BPD violated all

independent investigation protocols in reaching self-serving findings of fact before the

Coroner’s investigation report was complete. As shown below, the Coroner’s investigation

is dated November 2, 2015, more than a month after BPD rendered its findings.

- 5 - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIM – SECTION 910

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GE

RA

GO

S&

GE

RA

GO

S,

AP

C

HIS

TO

RIC

EN

GIN

E C

O. N

O. 2

8

6

44

So

ut

h F

igu

er

oa

St

re

et

Lo

s A

ng

el

es

, C

al

ifo

rn

ia

90

01

7-3

41

1

The completed coroner’s investigation report dated November 2, 2015, which had not

been prepared when BPD cleared itself of wrongdoing on September 29, 2015, clearly

demonstrates the efforts by BPD to cover up the facts surrounding their execution of Jason

Alderman. According to the autopsy investigation, BPD initially reported after the incident

that Alderman “exited the Subway,” wearing a black mask, and raised a black colored

object at the officers outside of the Subway. According to the initial reports from BPD

officers, Alderman ran back into the Subway after he was shot. The autopsy report states

the following:

The autopsy report itself is backdated to November 2, 2015, as it references a

communication with BPD Detective Ken Sporer which took place after on November 7,

2015, further questioning the veracity and authenticity of any document relating to the

Alderman investigation. In any event, the November 2, 2015 autopsy investigation report

states that on November 6, 2015, BPD Detective Sporer stated that he “completed his

investigation” and for the first time provided the coroner “with further information,” that

Alderman “never exited the business.” According to the Coroner’s report, this new

information came from the video surveillance.

- 6 - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIM – SECTION 910

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GE

RA

GO

S&

GE

RA

GO

S,

AP

C

HIS

TO

RIC

EN

GIN

E C

O. N

O. 2

8

6

44

So

ut

h F

igu

er

oa

St

re

et

Lo

s A

ng

el

es

, C

al

ifo

rn

ia

90

01

7-3

41

1

c. Results of Autopsy

Far from posing any threat to officers, the autopsy investigation report, which was

completely ignored by BPDs Critical Incident Review Board, reveals what can be seen on

the video surveillance – Jason Alderman was shot in the back in a non-threatening position

as he crouched to the ground. Specifically, gun-shot wounds #6 and #7 are conclusively

back-to-front entry wounds. See below:

- 7 - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIM – SECTION 910

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GE

RA

GO

S&

GE

RA

GO

S,

AP

C

HIS

TO

RIC

EN

GIN

E C

O. N

O. 2

8

6

44

So

ut

h F

igu

er

oa

St

re

et

Lo

s A

ng

el

es

, C

al

ifo

rn

ia

90

01

7-3

41

1

The Coroner diagram shows the following back-to-front entry wounds:

- 8 - CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIM – SECTION 910

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GE

RA

GO

S&

GE

RA

GO

S,

AP

C

HIS

TO

RIC

EN

GIN

E C

O. N

O. 2

8

6

44

So

ut

h F

igu

er

oa

St

re

et

Lo

s A

ng

el

es

, C

al

ifo

rn

ia

90

01

7-3

41

1

d. BPD and District Attorney Collusion

The autopsy report states that the investigation into the death of Jason Alderman was

done in conjunction with BPD and the Kern County DA. While it was previously evident

that the Kern County DA was incapable of performing independent OIS investigations, the

autopsy report makes clear BPD and the Kern County DA were working together, rather than

the DA serving as an independent watchdog. The very fact that BPD was permitted to

release its Critical Incident Review findings clearing itself before the autopsy investigation

report was complete demonstrates the complete and utter taint infused into this skewed and

fraudulent and mangled process.

III. DAMAGES

Damages include but are not limited to:

Violation of civil rights, violation of constitutional rights, emotional injuries, wrongful death, loss of familial relationship, loss of love, comfort and support, punitive damages, and any other remedies as the Court shall order.

IV. DATE AND LOCATION OF INCIDENT

August 22, 2015 through present;

At or around 1215 Olive Drive, Bakersfield California.

V. NAMES OF PERSONS CAUSING INJURIES:

The City of Bakersfield;

The Bakersfield Police Department;

Officer Rick Wimbish;

Officer Chad Garrett;

DOE Officers 1–10

VI. ACTS OR OMISSION CAUSING INJURIES:

Violation of constitutional rights and liberties, use of unnecessary / excessive force

causing death, violation of due process, assault, battery, negligence, negligent hiring,

negligent supervision and training, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent