it’s contribution to sustainable value creation within ing
DESCRIPTION
IT’s Contribution to Sustainable Value Creation within ING. A joint study by ING Corporate IT and IBM carried out in 2002. ‘Another way to restore trust in corporations is to increase transparency in the way we do business and in how we report on our business’ Ewald Kist CEO of ING Group - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
IT’s Contribution to Sustainable Value Creation within ING
A joint study by ING Corporate IT and IBM
carried out in 2002
2
‘Another way to restore trust in corporations is to increase transparency in the way we do business and in how we report on our business’
Ewald Kist
CEO of ING Group
Yale University 14 November 2002
3
Is IT Delivering Value?
‘IT investment did not improve productivity in 53 out of 59 industry sectors’
McKinsey 2001
‘High IT spending does not translate into better company results’
Forrester Research 2002
‘20% of spending on IT is wasted’
Gartner 2002
4
“Our single corporate measure of success is Total Returns to Shareholders (TRS).”
ABN AMRO, Annual Report 2001
“For stockholders the emphasis must be on achieving attractive shareholder returns.”
Aegon Annual Report 2001
“Our total return for shareholders has outperformed both our sector and the FTSE 100 over one, five and ten years. This reflects the soundness of our business model.”
Headline of Chairman’s Statement
Legal & General, Annual Report 2001
“Our commitment to the shareholders who own Prudential is to maximise the value over time of their investment. …Our aim is to deliver top quartile performance among our international Peer Group in terms of Total Shareholder Returns.”
Cover of Prudential PLC Annual Report 2001
“The scorecard is our performance, based on total shareholder return in relation to the best in our sector.”
Ahold President & CEO Cees van der Hoeven. Press Conference, November 19, 2002
The Importance of Total Shareholder Return
Total shareholder return represents the increase in value of the share price plus the re-investment of shareholder dividends
5
“Our single corporate measure of success is Total Returns to Shareholders (TRS).”
ABN AMRO, Annual Report 2001
“For stockholders the emphasis must be on achieving attractive shareholder returns.”
Aegon Annual Report 2001
“Our total return for shareholders has outperformed both our sector and the FTSE 100 over one, five and ten years. This reflects the soundness of our business model.”
Headline of Chairman’s Statement
Legal & General, Annual Report 2001
“Our commitment to the shareholders who own Prudential is to maximise the value over time of their investment. …Our aim is to deliver top quartile performance among our international Peer Group in terms of Total Shareholder Returns.”
Cover of Prudential PLC Annual Report 2001
“The scorecard is our performance, based on total shareholder return in relation to the best in our sector.”
Ahold President & CEO Cees van der Hoeven. Press Conference, November 19, 2002
The Importance of Total Shareholder Return
Total shareholder return represents the increase in value of the share price plus the re-investment of shareholder dividends
6
The
Intelligent Growth Study
7
8
80 largest insurers worldwide Insurers with net premiums over $1.5
billion and 40% cumulative share Total net premiums of $1.5 trillion Average asset size of $110 billion
Screening approach based on key operating and financial performance metrics
Select set of intelligent growth companies
Winning strategies and tactics for achieving and sustaining intelligent growth
5 years of performance – 1996 to 2000 Public filings and secondary data Private equity and analyst reports Executive interviews
IBM’s Intelligent Growth Study analysed the 80 largest insurers worldwide over a five year period.
9
Study of shareholder return in the insurance industry (1996-2000)
Total Insurers(80 insurers,
100%)
Total Insurers(80 insurers,
100%) 7%
Above Average(35 insurers, 44%)Above Average
(35 insurers, 44%)
Below Average(45 insurers, 56%)Below Average
(45 insurers, 56%)
15%
Above Average(12 insurers, 15%)Above Average
(12 insurers, 15%)
Below Average(23 insurers, 29%)Below Average
(23 insurers, 29%)
Above Average(7 insurers, 9%)Above Average(7 insurers, 9%)
3%
Below Average(5 insurers, 6%)Below Average(5 insurers, 6%)
19%
30%
4%
PREMIUM GROWTHCAGR in Net Premiums Written (NPW)
PROFITABILITYOp. Cash Flow as % of NPW
CAPITAL EFFICIENCYOp. Cash Flow as % of Assets
10
Best in class companies outperform major financial indices
CAGR
DAX +21.1%
IG +29.0%
S&P +15.7%
FTSE +10.6%
NIKKEI -7.9% 2001
Total Shareholder Return
-60
-20
20
60
100
140
180
220
260
300
% T
ota
l S
ha
reh
old
er
Re
turn
1997 1998 1999 2000
1996 – 2000
11
ING identified as best in class companyHowever, intelligent growth due largely to M&A rather than operational
excellence
S&P+15.7%
NIKKEI-7.9%
FTSE+10.6%
DAX+21.1%0%
0%-10% +10% +20% +30% +40%
30.3%
28.1%
22.3%
31.1%
31.3%
29.5%
N/A
12
2002
-60
-20
20
60
100
140
180
220
260
300
% T
ota
l Sh
areh
old
er R
etu
rn
1997 1999 2000 2001
DAX +6.4%
IG +15.0%
S&P +5.7%
FTSE +1.9%
NIKKEI-10.7%
CAGR1996 – August 2002
Total Shareholder Return
1998
Even when adding in the more volatile years of 2001 and 2002 (up to August) the shareholder returns for the intelligent growers continued to outperform these indices.
13
IT Peer Group40 financial services providers for which ING gathers data on IT investments, IT expenditure and financial key ratios
Intelligent Growth Study analysis of Total Shareholder Return (TSR) for 80 largest insurers worldwide divided into four categories.
16 insurers evenly spread over four
categories
POOR PERFORMERS
INTELLIGENT GROWTHPOTENTIAL
EFFICIENTLY OPERATEDSLOW GROWERS
INTELLIGENTGROWERS
Combining Metrics from IBM and ING
14
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Poor performers
Intelligent growers
Average performers
Note: Average performers are slow growers or potential intelligent growers
Total Shareholder Return
HighLow
Co
st
to P
rem
ium
s r
ati
o
Fa
vo
ura
ble
Un
fav
ou
rab
le
Total Shareholder Return related to better cost management
An additional financial performance metric was identified which was to be used in further analysis – the operating cost to premium ratio. It was clear from the work already done that the higher performers had a significantly lower cost to premium income ratio, the high performers averaging around 12% with the low performers averaging around 25 %. This means that intelligent growth companies were better at managing their Total Operational Costs.
15
Intelligent Growers invest differently – partly due to focus on core IT activities. They are also innovative in their use of IT
TOC as % of Premium Income
Out-sourcing as % of IT Cost
IT Cost as % of TOC
New Develop-ment. as % of IT Cost
Mainten-ance as % of IT Cost
Lower cost structure and a greater degree of IT Outsourcing
Higher spending on IT and more emphasis on new development as opposed to maintenance
Poor Performers
Slow Growers
Potential Intelligent Growers
Intelligent Growers
16
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
12 17 22 27 32 37
% New Development Cost related to Revenue CAGR
High performers tend to have a higher ratio of New Development Cost ING combines high Revenue CAGR with a lower ratio of New Development Cost
HighLow% New Development Cost
Re
ve
nu
e C
AG
R
Lo
wH
igh
R2 = 0.85Corr. = 0.92
Note: Only for 8 of the 15 competitors IT metrics could be related directly to individual competitors Total Shareholder value ranking is based on ranking points for Revenue CAGR, Operational Cash / Revenue and Operational Cash / Assets
High performers
Low performers
New Development cost as % of IT Cost
ING
17
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
% Maintenance related to Cost to premiums ratio
High performers tend to have a lower ratio of IT maintenance cost
Maintenance cost as % of IT CostHighLow
Co
st
to p
rem
ium
s r
ati
o
Hig
h p
erf
orm
ers
Lo
w p
erf
orm
ers
R2 = 0.46Corr. = 0.68
ING
18
% Outsourcing related to Shareholder Return High performers tend to have a higher ratio of outsourcing cost
Note: Only for 8 of the 15 competitors IT metrics could be related directly to individual competitors Total Shareholder value ranking is based on ranking points for Revenue CAGR, Operational Cash / Revenue and Operational Cash / Assets
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 5 10 15 20
HighLow% Outsourcing cost
To
tal
Sh
are
ho
lde
r R
etu
rn R
an
kin
g
Lo
wH
igh
R2 = 0.54Corr. = 0.83
High performers
Low performers
19
ING group compared to best practice ING insurance is a high performer in terms of cost to premiums ratio
ING insurance has IT intensity comparable with high performers of peer group
13%
8%
32%
16%
25%
14%
15%
15%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
External labour cost as %of total IT cost
% IT Maintenance Cost
% IT New DevelopmentCost
IT Intensity (% of TotalOperational Cost)
High performers peer group: Cost to premiums ratio = 12% ING group: Cost to premiums ratio = 11%
20
IT intensity
IT Cost drivers related to Shareholder Return High Shareholder return is related to favourable Cost to premiums
ratio
Total Shareholder
Return
- Cost to Premiums
Ratio
%New Development
% Maintenance
% Outsourcing
+
++
-
++
Legend:+: positive influence-: negative influence0: No influence
%Strategic
%Transactional
%InfrastructureIT I
nve
stm
ent
Mix
IT C
ost
Str
uct
ure
Financial Performance
+
+
+
Eco
no
me
tric
al A
nal
ysis
Po
rtfo
lio
an
alys
is
+
-
21
Conclusions from Econometric Analysis
• Continued cost management focus needed on enhancing cost to premium ratio by replacing labour with capital projects in IT
• Shift of expenditure from legacy maintenance to new developments must be continuously encouraged
• Continue to actively seek favourable outsourcing opportunities (including offshore)
22
Conclusions and Actions• Continued cost management focus needed on enhancing cost to premium ratio by replacing
labour with capital projects in IT
• Shift of expenditure from legacy maintenance to new developments must be continuously encouraged
• Continue to actively seek favourable outsourcing opportunities (including offshore)
• Keep active watch on investment portfolio balance. Encourage optimum mix of strategic, transactional, infrastructure, and informational investments
• Use outputs from current MTP/IT dashboard process to provide further intelligence and actions
• Encourage greater entrepreneurial culture amongst CIOs to strike an appropriate balance between the taking of calculated risks and undue risk aversion in their approach to IT investments. Incorporate such evaluations in CIO performance appraisals and rewards
• Bear in mind the Ewald Kist requirement to provide greater transparency to shareholders and other stakeholders on how we govern and manage critical and expensive resources such as IT
• Develop article for Shareholder Bulletin and presentation for Executive Board
IT’s Contribution to Sustainable Value Creation within ING
A joint study by ING Corporate IT and IBM
11 December 2002
DISCUSSION