isolation scanner

Upload: amr-hegazy

Post on 20-Feb-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/24/2019 Isolation Scanner

    1/8

    Isolation ScannerAdvanced evaluation of wellbore integrity

  • 7/24/2019 Isolation Scanner

    2/8

    Cement placement is a critical component of a wells architecturefor ensuring mechanical support of the casing, providing protectio

    from fluid corrosion, and, most importantly, isolating permeable zones

    with different pressure regimes to prevent hydraulic communication.

    Conventional cement bond log (CBL) and ultrasonic pulse-echo tech-

    niques are sometimes used together to diagnose zonal isolation but

    encounter difficulties when attempting to evaluate cements with low

    acoustic impedance or cements contaminated with mud. Ambiguity can

    result because these tools rely on a significant contrast in acoustic

    impedance between the cement and displaced fluid to identify solids.

    Isolation Scanner cement evaluation service provides more certainty bycombining the pulse-echo technique with a new ultrasonic technique th

    induces a flexural wave in the casing with a transmitter and measures the

    resulting signals at two receivers. The attenuation calculated between th

    two receivers provides an independent response that is paired with the

    pulse-echo measurement and compared with a laboratory-measured

    database to produce an image of the material immediately behind the

    casing. By measuring radially beyond traditional cement evaluation boundarie

    Isolation Scanner service confirms zonal isolation, pinpoints any channels in

    the cement, and ensures confident squeeze or no-squeeze decisions.

    The signals following the casing arrivals arising from the interface

    between the annulus and the borehole or outer casing can be detected

    and measured. These third-interface echoes (TIEs) provide the position

    f the casing within the borehole, and if the borehole size is known, the

    velocity of the annulus material can be determined. This additional

    information, available only through the flexural measurements, can

    provide useful information for remedial applications and serve to confirm

    or determine the correct interpretation for complex evaluations.

    Isolation Scanner* cement evaluation service integrates the conventionapulse-echo technique with flexural wave propagation to fully characterize

    the cased hole annular environment while evaluating casing condition

    APPLICATIONS Differentiate high-

    performance lightweight

    cements from liquids

    Map annulus material as

    solid, liquid, or gas

    Assess hydraulic isolation

    Identify channels and defects

    in annular isolating material

    Determine casing internal

    diameter and thickness

    Assess annulus beyond the

    casing/cement interface

    Difficult to diagnose with

    acoustic impedance or

    CBL measurements alone

    Increasingcontamination6

    4

    2

    0

    Neat

    Light

    8

    Acoustic impedance,

    Mrayl

    GasLiquid

    CementContaminated cement

    Identifying and distinguishing various well fluids from cement with low acousticimpedance is difficult for CBL and ultrasonic pulse-echo techniques.

    Isolation Scanner cement evaluationservice fully characterizes the casedhole environment, including casingposition in the borehole, borehole andouter string imaging, and materialidentification from velocity analysis.

  • 7/24/2019 Isolation Scanner

    3/8

    PITCH-CATCH PROPAGATION

    The Isolation Scanner pulse-echo acoustic impedance measurement

    is made with a rotating subassembly containing four transducers.

    The normal-incidence transducer is oriented 180 from the other

    three transducers. The three obliquely aligned transducers transmit

    and receive high-frequency pulsed beams (on the order of 250 kHz)

    to excite the casing in a flexural mode. Once excited in the casing,

    the flexural wave propagates while radiating acoustic energy into

    the annulus and back toward the receiving transducers, resulting

    in a circumferential scan of the casing, annulus, cement, and near-

    wellbore formation. The annulus-propagating energy is reflected at

    interfaces that present an acoustic contrast, such as the cement/

    formation interface, and propagates back through the casing predomi-

    nantly as a flexural wave that reradiates energy into the casing fluid.

    Annulus

    Borehole

    Formation

    Casing

    Time, us

    80 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170

    R

    T

    Pulseecho

    Flexural wave imaging

    Pulse-echo tool

    90

    The Isolation Scanner sub implements thepulse-echo (normal-incidence) techniquewith four transducers: a transreceiver andthe flexural wave imager comprising onetransmitter and two receivers obliquelyaligned to excite the casing flexural mode.

    Geometrical interpretation of signal propagation for the pulse-echo(blue paths) and flexural wave imaging (green paths) techniques showsthat the pitch-catch flexural wave signal separates into an early-arriving(or casing) signal and a later-arriving (TIE) signal in reference to the firstinterface encountered in the annulus (the inner and outer walls of the casingare the first and second interfaces, respectively). The attenuation of thecasing arrival amplitude complements the pulse-echo measurement todetermine whether the material behind the casing is a fluid or a solid. IfTIEs are present in the acquired data, they are used to further enhancethe characterization of the cased hole environment in terms of the state andacoustic properties (wave speed) of the material filling the annulus, the posi-tion of the casing within the hole, and the geometrical shape of the hole.

    Flexural wave (TIE)

    Flexural wave (casing arrival)

    Ultrasonic wave

  • 7/24/2019 Isolation Scanner

    4/8

    INSIGHT THROUGH ATTENUATION

    The rate of energy radiation into the annulus depends on the acoustic

    properties of the annular fill. The attenuation is estimated by captur-

    ing the reflected signals at two of the receivers, which are a known

    distance apart, and calculating the decay rate of the received signal.

    Attenuation is expressed in decibels per centimeter.

    For a fluid filling the annulus, the attenuation is approximately propor-

    tional to the acoustic impedance. For cement bonded to the casing, the

    attenuation exhibits a more complex behavior as a function of the

    velocities at which the compressional and shear waves propagate in

    the cement. As shown in the plot of flexural attenuation versus acoustic

    impedance for a well-bonded cement, below a critical impedance (Zc)

    of approximately 3.9 Mrayl, the attenuation increases linearly with the

    impedance of the annular fill, whether the fill is liquid or solid. Beyond

    3.9-Mrayl Zc, only the shear waves can propagate in the cement, and

    the attenuation drops sharply to small values. A high-impedance cement,

    such as Class G, has an attenuation similar to that of a liquid. This

    ambiguity in identifying cement is resolved by determining the acoustic

    impedance of the cement with the pulse-echo technique. However, the

    distinct attenuation of low-impedance cements, such as lightweight or

    contaminated cements, is used to differentiate them from fluids.

    Zc

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    Acoustic impedance, Mrayl

    SolidLiquid

    Water

    Gas

    Flexural attenuation,

    dB/cm

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Flexural wave attenuation of a well-bonded cement is plotted as a functionof acoustic impedance for various materials. The value of Z

    ccorresponds to

    the critical compressional wave speed of the cement.

    Three clouds of points are generated in SLG mapping of the measurementplane for a Class G cement. Zusit is the impedance determined by the pulse-echo technique; the attenuation is for the flexural wave technique.

    86420-2 1

    Zusit, Mrayl

    1.6

    1.4

    1.8

    1

    0.8

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    0

    0.2

    GasLiquidSolid

    Nominal uncontaminatedClass G cement

    1.2

    Attenuation,dB/cm

    SOLID-LIQUID-GAS MAPPING

    The first goal of Isolation Scanner processing is to provide a robust

    interpreted image of the material immediately behind the casing. The

    inputs are cement impedance determined by the pulse-echo mea-

    surement and flexural wave attenuation computed from the amplitude of

    the casing arrivals on the near and far receivers. These two independent

    measurements are linked to the properties of both the fluid insidethe casing and the outside medium through an invertible relation.

    Combining them accounts for the effect of the inside fluid, which

    eliminates the need for logging specific fluid-property measurements

    The processing output is a solid-liquid-gas (SLG) map displaying the

    most likely material behind the casing. The map is computed during

    an initialization step before logging by using a priori knowledge of the

    possible materials:

    Gas is defined as a very low impedance material, independent of

    any input.

    Liquid is defined as a liquid with the expected acoustic impedance

    of the mud displaced by the cement, with provisions for possible

    deviations from this value.

    Solid is defined through the expected type of cement. A laboratory-

    measured database is used to convert the material selection into

    acoustic properties, again with provisions made for some contami-

    nation or incompletely set cement.

    Areas corresponding to inconsistencies between the measure-

    ments (for example, at collars) are shown in white.

    The mapped states are obtained for each azimuth by locating the

    pulse-echo and flexural attenuation measurements, corrected for theeffect of the inside fluid, on the map with the areas encompassed by

    each state.

  • 7/24/2019 Isolation Scanner

    5/8

    CasingCollar

    Locator

    10 30

    Amplitudeof Echo

    Minus Max.(Rugosity)

    InternalRadii Minus

    Average,in

    MaximumInternalRadius

    ExternalRadius

    Average

    (ERAV)

    MinimumInternalRadius

    4.5 3.0in

    4.5 3.0in

    4.5 3.0in

    MinimumInternalRadius

    ExternalRadius

    Average

    (ERAV)

    MaximumInternalRadius

    3.0 4.5in

    3.0 4.5in

    3.0 4.5in

    ThicknessMinus

    Average,in

    Impedance,Mrayl

    FlexuralAttenuation,

    dB/m SLG Map

    HydraulicCommun-

    icationMap

    500.0000

    6.0000

    5.6000

    5.2000

    4.8000

    4.4000

    3.6000

    3.2000

    2.6000

    2.4000

    2.0000

    1.6000

    1.2000

    0.6000

    0.40000.5000

    500.0000

    0.0780

    0.0680

    0.0520

    0.0440

    0.0380

    0.0280

    0.0200

    0.0120

    0.0040

    0.0120

    0.0280

    0.0360

    0.0440

    0.0520

    0.0600

    0.0880

    0.0760

    500.0000

    0.0780

    0.0680

    0.0520

    0.0440

    0.0380

    0.0280

    0.0200

    0.0120

    0.0040

    0.0040

    0.0120

    0.0200

    0.0280

    0.03600.0440

    0.0520

    0.0600

    0.0680

    0.0760

    500.0000

    0.03000

    2.8000

    2.9091

    3.0182

    3.1273

    3.2364

    3.3454

    3.5638

    3.6727

    3.7818

    3.8909

    4.0000

    0.0000

    50.0000

    57.0000

    64.0000

    71.0000

    78.0000

    85.0000

    92.0000

    99.0000

    106.0000

    113.0000

    120.0000

    127.0000

    134.0000

    141.0000155.0000

    SolidLiquidGas

    SealNo seal

    Depth, m

    x200

    x250

    x300

    x350

    In additional to pulse-echo information on the rugosity, radius, cross section, and thickness of the 7-in [17.8-cm] casing, Isolation Scanner service processed theacoustic impedance and flexural attenuation data to produce an SLG map. Although the cement is heavy Class G, the flexural attenuation map clearly displayslow-density material from X,320 to X,270 m, revealing that the cement is contaminated in that interval. Regardless of the density difference, the material is correctlyindicated as solid on the SLG map.

    By measuring radially and beyond traditional cement evaluation boundaries,

    Isolation Scanner service confirms zonal isolation, pinpoints any channels

    in the cement, and ensures confident squeeze or no-squeeze decisions.

  • 7/24/2019 Isolation Scanner

    6/8

    NEW MEASUREMENTS FROM FORMATION-WALL ECHOES

    In addition to the SLG map identifying the annular fill immediately

    behind the casing, a further Isolation Scanner objective is to extract

    relevant information from the annulus/formation reflection echo or

    echoes for quantifying the state of the annulus between the casing

    and formation. First, the echoes following the casing arrival are detected

    and their time of arrival and amplitude measured. From the time differ-ences between the reflection echoes and the casing arrivalprovided

    sufficient echo azimuthal presence is available in the datathe casing

    centering within the borehole can be determined. This is conveniently

    presented as a percentage, with 100% representing perfect centering

    and 0% for fully eccentered casing, in contact with the formation wall.

    If the borehole diameter is known, the time-difference processing can

    be further converted into material wave velocity and is displayed as

    an annulus velocity map.

    Other new measurements possible with the Isolation Scanner TIE

    reflected from the cement/formation interface are

    estimated wave velocity, which can be used to confirm the

    SLG map and better understand cement placement

    imaged borehole shape

    imaged outer string to reveal corrosion and damage.

    Isolation Scanner imaging of the formation wall through casing and cement revealshole enlargement (caving) in the reflection echo from the cement/formation interface attwo opposite azimuths in the intervals X,673X,675 m and X,679X,682 m. The left-sideimage, displaying the raw data at all azimuths, shows that the formation-wall echo ispresent at nearly all azimuths. Echo moveout appears sinusoidal because of casingeccentering. Each cycle represents a tool azimuthal scan.

    Holeenlargement

    Hole

    enlargement

    Casingarrival

    Echo fromformation

    wall

    X,673

    X,684

    X,674

    X,675

    X,676

    X,677

    X,678

    X,679

    X,680

    X,681

    X,682

    X,683

    Depth, m

  • 7/24/2019 Isolation Scanner

    7/8

    Isolation Scanner Tool

    Output Solid-liquid-gas map of annulus material, hydrauliccommunication map, acoustic impedance, flexuralattenuation, rugosity image, casing thickness image,internal radius image

    Max. logging speed Standard resolution (6 in, 10 sampling): 823 m/h

    [2,700 ft/h]High resolution (0.6 in, 5 sampling): 172 m/h[563 ft/h]

    Range of measurement Min. casing thickness: 0.38 cm [0.15 in]Max. casing thickness: 2.01 cm [0.79 in]

    Vertical resolution High resolution: 1.52 cm [0.6 in]High speed: 15.24 cm [6 in]

    Acoustic impedance Range: 0 to 10 MraylResolution: 0.2 MraylAccuracy: 0 to 3.3 Mrayl = 0.5 Mrayl,>3.3 Mrayl = 15%

    Flexural attenuation Range: 0 to 2 dB/cmResolution: 0.05 dB/cmAccuracy: 0.01 dB/cm

    Min. quantifiable channel width 30 mm [1.2 in]Depth of investigation Casing and annulus up to 7.62 cm [3 in]

    Mud type or weight limitation Conditions simulated before logging

    Combinability Bottom only, combinable with most wireline toolsTelemetry: fast transfer bus (FTB) or enhanced FTB(EFTB)

    Special applications H2S service Investigation of annulus width depends on the presence of third-interface echoes. Analysis and processing

    beyond cement evaluation can yield additional answers through additional outputs, including the VariableDensity log (VDL) of the annulus waveform and polar movies in AVI format.

    Differentiation of materials by acoustic impedance alone requires a minimum gap of 0.5 MRayl betweenthe fluid behind the casing and a solid.

    For 8-mm [0.3-in] casing thickness.

    Max. mud weight depends on the mud formulation, sub used, and casing size and weight, which aresimulated before logging.

    Measurement Specifications

    Isolation Scanner Tool

    Max. temperature 177 degC [350 degF]

    Pressure range 1 to 138 MPa [145 to 20,000 psi]

    Casing sizemin. 412in (min. pass-through restriction: 4 in)

    Casing sizemax. 958in

    Outside diameter IBCS-A: 8.57 cm [3.375 in]IBCS-B: 11.36 cm [4.472 in]IBCS-C: 16.91 cm [6.657 in]

    Length without sub 6.01 m [19.73 ft]

    Weight without sub 151 kg [333 lbm]

    Sub length, weight IBCS-A: 61.22 cm [24.10 in], 7.59 kg [16.75 lbm]IBCS-B: 60.32 cm [23.75 in], 9.36 kg [20.64 lbm]IBCS-C: 60.32 cm [23.75 in], 10.73 kg [23.66 lbm]

    Sub max. tension 10,000 N [2,250 lbf]

    Sub max. compression 50,000 N [12,250 lbf] Limits for casing size depend on the sub used. Data can be acquired in casing larger than 9 58in with

    low-attenuation mud (e.g., water, brine).

    Mechanical Specifications

  • 7/24/2019 Isolation Scanner

    8/8

    www.slb.com/scanner

    *Mark of Schlumberger

    Copyright 2011 Schlumberger. All rights reserved. 11-PR-0028

    Isolation Scanner