iscott summary sheet

PreStaff_Date: 6/29/2021

Location: Vermont Street, North of 23rd Street

Subject: Red Zone

PROPOSAL / REQUEST:ESTABLISH RED ZONE Vermont Street, west side, from 195 to 225 feet north of 23rd Street (Supervisor District 10)

Removal of two Zuckerberg General Hospital staff parking spaces, adjacent to the new driveway for Building 7, is required to provide adequate sight visibility for outbound driveway vehicles exiting onto Vermont Street.

Norman Wong, [email protected]

BACKGROUND INFORMATION / COMMENTS

Handled: Norman Wong 646-2766

Section Head :

No objections:____________

Item Held:________________

Other:__________________

Requested_by:Public Hearing Consent

Public Hearing Regular

HEARING NOTIFICATION AND PROCESSING NOTES: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE BY:

SFMTA - TASC SUMMARY SHEET

UCSF

Informational / OtherBW PH - Regular

SFMTA Attached Pending

Wednesday, June 23, 2021

nowong

Line

nowong

Line

CO

CO

FH

UCO

W

W

W

W

G

G

COWM

WM

CO

WM

JP

E

CO

WM

JP

S

U

TP

W

W

W

G

G

G

G

W

JP

01

A

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

E

D

C

B

SHEET NOTES

SIGNAGE LOCATIONS

CONTRACTOR

THE BOLDT COMPANY

375 BEALE STREET, SUITE 500

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

CAMPUS CAAN

SHEET NUMBER

SHEET NAME

PROJECT NUMBER UCSF PROJECT NUMBER

ARCHITECT

SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL LLP

ONE MARITIME PLAZA


CIVIL

FREYER & LAURETA, INC

150 EXECUTIVE PARK BLVD., SUITE 4200


STRUCTURAL

DEGENKOLB



MECHANICAL

TAYLOR ENGINEERING

1080 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY, SUITE 501

ALAMEDA, CA 94501

PLUMBING

SOUTHLAND INDUSTRIES

33225 WESTERN AVENUE

UNION CITY, CA 94587

ELECTRICAL

SILVERMAN & LIGHT

1201 PARK AVENUE, SUITE 100

EMERYVILLE, CA 94608

LAB PLANNER

JACOBS CONSULTANCY

401 B STREET, SUITE 1560

SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

3/27/2019 12:27:34 A

M

ZSFG 3079

PRJ-168

NO. DESCRIPTION DATE

290001

UCSF ROADWAY AND

SITE IMPROVEMENTS

AT ZSFG

BUILDING 7

1001 POTRERO AVENUE,


ASSESSOR'S LOT 1

BLOCK 4154

SIGNED ON 07/27/2020

SEAL & SIGNATURE

C-1005

STRIPING &

SIGNAGE PLAN

2019.04.08DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

2019.07.10100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 2020.01.09

2020.02.14DBI BACKCHECK 11


2020.04.23BULLETIN AA

2020.05.15BULLETIN BB

2020.08.04DBI BULLETIN CC

David M. Jones

November 13, 2020

December 03, 2020202009164315_BLDG DWGS

Red Curb(removes 2 spaces)

Overall Site Plan

nowong

Line

nowong

Line

17

SHEET NOTES

CONTRACTOR

THE BOLDT COMPANY



CAMPUS CAAN

SHEET NUMBER

SHEET NAME

PROJECT NUMBER UCSF PROJECT NUMBER

NO. DESCRIPTION DATE

ARCHITECT

SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL LLP

ONE MARITIME PLAZA


CIVIL

FREYER & LAURETA, INC

150 EXECUTIVE PARK BLVD., SUITE 4200


STRUCTURAL

DEGENKOLB



MECHANICAL

TAYLOR ENGINEERING

1080 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY, SUITE 501

ALAMEDA, CA 94501

PLUMBING

SOUTHLAND INDUSTRIES

33225 WESTERN AVENUE

UNION CITY, CA 94587

ELECTRICAL

SILVERMAN & LIGHT

1201 PARK AVENUE, SUITE 100

EMERYVILLE, CA 94608

LAB PLANNER

JACOBS CONSULTANCY

401 B STREET, SUITE 1560

SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

ZSFGZSFG 3079

290001

SEAL & SIGNATURE

SIGNED ON 02/18/2020

C-3003

PRJ-168

RSI EASTERN

SIDEWALK AND

DRIVEWAY

GRADING PLAN

2019.04.08DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

2019.07.10100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 2020.01.09



UCSF ROADWAY ANDSITE IMPROVEMENTS

AT ZSFGBUILDING 7

1001 POTRERO AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94110

ASSESSOR'S LOT 1BLOCK 4154

Red Curb

Zoom in view at future driveway

nowong

Line

nowong

Line

View of Vermont (north of 23rd St)

Future driveway

Future red curb and 2 spaces to be removed

Notice of Determination Appendix D

To: l Office of Planning and Research From: Univershy of CaliforniaP0 Box 3044, 1400 Tenth Street, Room 222 Physical & Environmental PlanningSacramento. CA 958 12-3044 1111 franklin Street, 6th floor

Li County Clerk County of_________ Oakland, California 94607-5200

Subject: Filing of Notice of Determinationin Compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resource Code.

State Clearinghouse Number: 2015102010Project Title: UCSF Research Building and City Parking Garage Expansion at the Priscilla Chan and

Mark Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center CampusProject Applicant: University of California, San FranciscoParties Undertaking Project: University of CaliforniaProject Location: Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma

Center campus (Twenty-Third Street between Vermont and Utah streets)County: San Francisco

Project Description: The project consists of a new 1 75,000 gross-square-foot research btiildingcomprised of wet and dry laboratory and administrative desktop space at the Priscilla Chan and MarkZuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center campus. The building would beconstructed on land ground-leased from the City and County of San Francisco.

This Notice of Determination is to advise that the University of California ll Lead Agency has approvedthe above-described project on Voventher 14, 2019 and has made the following determinations:

1. An Addendum to the UCSF Research Building and City Parking Garage Expansion at thePriscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center Campusfinal Environmental Impact Report (Final FIR) was prepared for this project pursuant to theprovisions of CEQA.

2. Mitigation measures from the Final EIR were made a condition of the approal of the project:no new project-specific mitigation measures are required.

3. The implementation of applicable UCSF Research Building and City Parking Garage Expansion atthe Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuickerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma CenterCampus Final FIR mitigation measures ill be monitored and reported purstiant to the Final EIR”sMitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

4. The pre ious statement of overriding considerations in the UCSF Research Building and CityParking Garage Expansion at the Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerherg San Francisco General1-lospital and Trauma Center Campus final FIR was reaffirmed for this project.

5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

This is to certit\ that the final En ironmental Impact Report ith comments and responses and record ofproject approval is available to the general ptiblic at: Unhersit of California San Francisco CampusPlanning. 654 Minnesota Street, 2nd Floor, 94 143-0286, Attn: Environmental Coordinator. Diane Wong.(41) 50-595

Signature:Bnan Harrington

Phy sical and En ironmental Planning

NO’ 15 2O1Dated Receied for tiling at OPR

STATfNGHOUSE\uthorit cited Sections 21083 and 2 087. Public Resources CodeReterenee Sections 21000-21171. Public Resources Code

nowong

Text Box

CEQA Review

MemoDate: M

To: Sa

From: By

Fr

Re: V

This memintersectiofollowing

1. Dve

2. Dto

3. Dro

Method

Sight dista2018 Highstreet withdriveway drawings.

Stopping

- Thsp

- Thfo

- Th

orandumMay 28, 2020

arah Tenpas, B

yung Lee, PE,

rank Feng, CH

isibility Analy

orandum deson with Vermareas:

Determine if adertical alignm

Determine if tho be removed

Determine the oadway that w

ology

ance analysis hway Design Mh 45-degree ais a 20-foot-w

sight distance

he minimum peed for Vermhe minimum or the new dri

he decision po Roadwo Vermoo The dr

extento The ob

m

BOLDT

TE, CHS Cons

HS Consulting

sis for UCSF Z

scribes the visont Street. Sp

dequate sightment of the newhe angled par. maximum he

would allow a

was performeManual, 6th Ediangled on-stre

wide one-way

e and sight di

recommendemont Street is

recommendeveway is 10 m

oint has the foway’s line of siont Street’s linriver sits 10 feet. bject stands 0

sulting Group

Group

ZSFG Roadway

sibility analysipecifically, ana

t distance is pw driveway atking spaces, l

eight and exteppropriate vis

ed at the newition (HDM). Veet parking onexit driveway

stance triang

ed stopping si25 mph.

ed stopping simph.

ollowing propght is along it

ne of sight is aet set back fro

.5 feet vertica

1

y and Site Imp

s for outbounalyses and rec

provided for ot Vermont Strocated imme

ension of the sibility.

w driveway andVermont Streen both sides oy with approxi

le have the fo

ight distance

ight distance

perties (HDM)ts centerline, wlong its cente

om the stop b

ally (object he

provements P

nd vehicles oncommendatio

utbound vehreet. ediately north

ramp walls at

d Vermont baet is a 46-footof the street wimately 12 %

ollowing assum

is 150 feet pe

is 50 feet per

): which is 10 fe

erline, which ibar, or 7 feet s

eight) at the si

220 SuiteSan (415www

Project

n the new drivons are perform

icles on both

of the new ro

t the north an

ased on the cut-wide southb

within the studgrade per the

mptions and

er HDM, assum

HDM, assumi

eet from eithes 23 feet fromet back from

dewalk curbs

Montgomery Ste 346 Francisco, CA 94) 392-9688 P

w.chsconsulting

veway at the med on the

the horizonta

oadway, will n

nd south of the

urrent Caltranbound one-wady area. The ne UCSF RSI --- D

standards (HD

ming that desi

ing design sp

er ramp wall. m either curbs

the ramp wal

side.

treet

4104

.net

al and

need

e

ns ay new DBI

DM):

ign

eed

ide. l

nowong

Text Box

Visibility Analysis Prepared by Project

- Vo

Results a

The minimmph. Appplan viewtwo existiwill not onis recommbe improv

Appendixside of thedriver’s eyfeet, whicto be restrbe shorten

The measprofile viesidewalk tstopping sof drivewa

Recomm

Based on

1. Twbb

2. Thre

3. Ba(R

Append

Appendix

ertical sight dn eye height,

and Analys

mum recommpendix 1 (left . The sight disng angled panly fall within

mended to elimved.

x 1 (bottom-rie roadway. Thye height at dh is 0.5 foot hricted to no mned horizonta

ured sight disew shows the to the driver losight distanceay is not adeq

mendations

the results an

wo existing ane removed beut also exceedhe height andestricted to on

a. The mb. The ea

from eased on 48 fe

R2-1) sign to li

ix

x 1: Sight Dist

distance is theobject height

es

ended horizofigure) shows

stance trianglrking spaces, the sight dist

minate two an

ight figure) shhe south rampecision point.igher than dr

more than 93.6ally to the wes

stance at the nline of sight docated 48 feee is 50 feet forquate.

s

nd analyses, th

ngled parkingecause the pad the driver’s d extension ofne of the folloaximum heig

ast end of the existing designet of sight disimit the vehic

tance Analysis

e horizontal dit, and geomet

ontal stoppings the sight dise shows that located imme

tance trianglengled parking

hows the heigp wall is comp. However, theriver’s eye heig68 feet in elevst by at least 3

new drivewaydrawn along tet away whoser a vehicle trav

he following r

g spaces, locatrked vehicleseye height off the south ram

owing: ht should be wall should b

n. stance along tcle speed at 5

s Exhibit

2

istance betwetry of the des

g sight distancstance trianglethere is an obediately north

e and but also g on the west

ght and extenpliant becausee design elevaght at decisio

vation. Alterna3.5 feet from e

y is 48 feet as she new drivew

e eye height isvelling at 10 m

ecommendat

ted immediat will not only

f 3.5 feet. mp wall is com

no more thanbe shortened

the new drivemph.

een the pedesign vertical cu

ce is 150 feete drawn from

bstruction limh of the new d exceed the dside of Vermo

sion of the rae existing desiation of north

on point. As a atively, the eaexisting desig

shown on Apway from thes 3.5 feet. Themph. Therefor

tions are mad

tely north of tfall within the

mpliant, but t

n driver’s eye hhorizontally t

eway, it is reco

strian and theurve (HDM).

for a vehicle t driver’s decisiting the sigh

driveway. Thedriver’s eye heont Street, so

mp wall on thign is already

h wall at the eresult, the no

ast end of the gn to Station 3

ppendix 1 (tope object 0.5-foe minimum rere, sight dista

de:

the new roadwe sight distan

the north wall

height at decto the west by

ommended to

e driver. It is ba

travelling at 2sion point in tt distance du

e parked vehiceight of 3.5 fee

sight distance

he north and slower than

east end is 94.0orth wall will n

wall will need3+88.60.

p-right figureoot-high on thecommended

nce for this se

way, will needce triangle an

l will need to

ision point. y at least 3.5 fe

o install speed

ased

25 the e to cles et. It e will

south

08 need d to

). The he

ection

d to nd

be

eet

d limit

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO

ZSFG ROADWAY AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS

LEGEND

VISIBILITY ANALYSIS

1

Wong, Norman

From: Sarah Tenpas <[email protected]>Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 12:14 PMTo: Wong, NormanSubject: SFFD sign off of USCF RoadwayAttachments: P168 RSI CD Drawings - Permit Set_APPROVED 20200420_ASK-064.pdf; 20200420 Building Permit

App APPROVED.pdf

Hi Norman, See attached reviewed drawing provided to SFFD for our building permit 202001162041. Permit was signed off by Cap. Tracy O’Keeffe with SFFD. Let me know if there’s anything else we can provide. Best, Sarah

Sarah Tenpas, CM-Lean Superintendent

415.583.2777 | Cell/Text [email protected] Profile | LinkedIn 375 Beale Street Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94105

EXT

This message is from outside of the SFMTA email system. Please review the email carefully before responding, clicking links, or opening attachments.

nowong

Text Box

Fire review/approval of plan set

iscott summary sheet

Documents