Download - ISCOTT SUMMARY SHEET
PreStaff_Date: 6/29/2021
Location: Vermont Street, North of 23rd Street
Subject: Red Zone
PROPOSAL / REQUEST:ESTABLISH RED ZONE Vermont Street, west side, from 195 to 225 feet north of 23rd Street (Supervisor District 10)
Removal of two Zuckerberg General Hospital staff parking spaces, adjacent to the new driveway for Building 7, is required to provide adequate sight visibility for outbound driveway vehicles exiting onto Vermont Street.
Norman Wong, [email protected]
BACKGROUND INFORMATION / COMMENTS
Handled: Norman Wong 646-2766
Section Head :
No objections:____________
Item Held:________________
Other:__________________
Requested_by:Public Hearing Consent
Public Hearing Regular
HEARING NOTIFICATION AND PROCESSING NOTES: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE BY:
SFMTA - TASC SUMMARY SHEET
UCSF
Informational / OtherBW PH - Regular
SFMTA Attached Pending
Wednesday, June 23, 2021
CO
CO
FH
UCO
W
W
W
W
G
G
COWM
WM
CO
WM
JP
E
CO
WM
JP
S
U
TP
W
W
W
G
G
G
G
W
JP
01
A
02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
E
D
C
B
SHEET NOTES
SIGNAGE LOCATIONS
CONTRACTOR
THE BOLDT COMPANY
375 BEALE STREET, SUITE 500
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
CAMPUS CAAN
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET NAME
PROJECT NUMBER UCSF PROJECT NUMBER
ARCHITECT
SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
CIVIL
FREYER & LAURETA, INC
150 EXECUTIVE PARK BLVD., SUITE 4200
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94134
STRUCTURAL
DEGENKOLB
375 BEALE STREET, SUITE 500
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
MECHANICAL
TAYLOR ENGINEERING
1080 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY, SUITE 501
ALAMEDA, CA 94501
PLUMBING
SOUTHLAND INDUSTRIES
33225 WESTERN AVENUE
UNION CITY, CA 94587
ELECTRICAL
SILVERMAN & LIGHT
1201 PARK AVENUE, SUITE 100
EMERYVILLE, CA 94608
LAB PLANNER
JACOBS CONSULTANCY
401 B STREET, SUITE 1560
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
3/27/2019 12:27:34 A
M
ZSFG 3079
PRJ-168
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
290001
UCSF ROADWAY AND
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
AT ZSFG
BUILDING 7
1001 POTRERO AVENUE,
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94110
ASSESSOR'S LOT 1
BLOCK 4154
SIGNED ON 07/27/2020
SEAL & SIGNATURE
C-1005
STRIPING &
SIGNAGE PLAN
2019.04.08DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
2019.07.10100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 2020.01.09
2020.02.14DBI BACKCHECK 11
2020.02.18DBI BACKCHECK 22
2020.04.23BULLETIN AA
2020.05.15BULLETIN BB
2020.08.04DBI BULLETIN CC
David M. Jones
November 13, 2020
December 03, 2020202009164315_BLDG DWGS
Red Curb(removes 2 spaces)
Overall Site Plan
17
SHEET NOTES
CONTRACTOR
THE BOLDT COMPANY
375 BEALE STREET, SUITE 500
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
CAMPUS CAAN
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET NAME
PROJECT NUMBER UCSF PROJECT NUMBER
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
ARCHITECT
SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL LLP
ONE MARITIME PLAZA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
CIVIL
FREYER & LAURETA, INC
150 EXECUTIVE PARK BLVD., SUITE 4200
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94134
STRUCTURAL
DEGENKOLB
375 BEALE STREET, SUITE 500
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
MECHANICAL
TAYLOR ENGINEERING
1080 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY, SUITE 501
ALAMEDA, CA 94501
PLUMBING
SOUTHLAND INDUSTRIES
33225 WESTERN AVENUE
UNION CITY, CA 94587
ELECTRICAL
SILVERMAN & LIGHT
1201 PARK AVENUE, SUITE 100
EMERYVILLE, CA 94608
LAB PLANNER
JACOBS CONSULTANCY
401 B STREET, SUITE 1560
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
ZSFGZSFG 3079
290001
SEAL & SIGNATURE
SIGNED ON 02/18/2020
C-3003
PRJ-168
RSI EASTERN
SIDEWALK AND
DRIVEWAY
GRADING PLAN
2019.04.08DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
2019.07.10100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 2020.01.09
2020.02.14DBI BACKCHECK 11
2020.02.18DBI BACKCHECK 22
UCSF ROADWAY ANDSITE IMPROVEMENTS
AT ZSFGBUILDING 7
1001 POTRERO AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94110
ASSESSOR'S LOT 1BLOCK 4154
Red Curb
Zoom in view at future driveway
View of Vermont (north of 23rd St)
Future driveway
Future red curb and 2 spaces to be removed
Notice of Determination Appendix D
To: l Office of Planning and Research From: Univershy of CaliforniaP0 Box 3044, 1400 Tenth Street, Room 222 Physical & Environmental PlanningSacramento. CA 958 12-3044 1111 franklin Street, 6th floor
Li County Clerk County of_________ Oakland, California 94607-5200
Subject: Filing of Notice of Determinationin Compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resource Code.
State Clearinghouse Number: 2015102010Project Title: UCSF Research Building and City Parking Garage Expansion at the Priscilla Chan and
Mark Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center CampusProject Applicant: University of California, San FranciscoParties Undertaking Project: University of CaliforniaProject Location: Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma
Center campus (Twenty-Third Street between Vermont and Utah streets)County: San Francisco
Project Description: The project consists of a new 1 75,000 gross-square-foot research btiildingcomprised of wet and dry laboratory and administrative desktop space at the Priscilla Chan and MarkZuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center campus. The building would beconstructed on land ground-leased from the City and County of San Francisco.
This Notice of Determination is to advise that the University of California ll Lead Agency has approvedthe above-described project on Voventher 14, 2019 and has made the following determinations:
1. An Addendum to the UCSF Research Building and City Parking Garage Expansion at thePriscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center Campusfinal Environmental Impact Report (Final FIR) was prepared for this project pursuant to theprovisions of CEQA.
2. Mitigation measures from the Final EIR were made a condition of the approal of the project:no new project-specific mitigation measures are required.
3. The implementation of applicable UCSF Research Building and City Parking Garage Expansion atthe Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuickerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma CenterCampus Final FIR mitigation measures ill be monitored and reported purstiant to the Final EIR”sMitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
4. The pre ious statement of overriding considerations in the UCSF Research Building and CityParking Garage Expansion at the Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerherg San Francisco General1-lospital and Trauma Center Campus final FIR was reaffirmed for this project.
5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
This is to certit\ that the final En ironmental Impact Report ith comments and responses and record ofproject approval is available to the general ptiblic at: Unhersit of California San Francisco CampusPlanning. 654 Minnesota Street, 2nd Floor, 94 143-0286, Attn: Environmental Coordinator. Diane Wong.(41) 50-595
Signature:Bnan Harrington
Phy sical and En ironmental Planning
NO’ 15 2O1Dated Receied for tiling at OPR
STATfNGHOUSE\uthorit cited Sections 21083 and 2 087. Public Resources CodeReterenee Sections 21000-21171. Public Resources Code
MemoDate: M
To: Sa
From: By
Fr
Re: V
This memintersectiofollowing
1. Dve
2. Dto
3. Dro
Method
Sight dista2018 Highstreet withdriveway drawings.
Stopping
- Thsp
- Thfo
- Th
orandumMay 28, 2020
arah Tenpas, B
yung Lee, PE,
rank Feng, CH
isibility Analy
orandum deson with Vermareas:
Determine if adertical alignm
Determine if tho be removed
Determine the oadway that w
ology
ance analysis hway Design Mh 45-degree ais a 20-foot-w
sight distance
he minimum peed for Vermhe minimum or the new dri
he decision po Roadwo Vermoo The dr
extento The ob
m
BOLDT
TE, CHS Cons
HS Consulting
sis for UCSF Z
scribes the visont Street. Sp
dequate sightment of the newhe angled par. maximum he
would allow a
was performeManual, 6th Ediangled on-stre
wide one-way
e and sight di
recommendemont Street is
recommendeveway is 10 m
oint has the foway’s line of siont Street’s linriver sits 10 feet. bject stands 0
sulting Group
Group
ZSFG Roadway
sibility analysipecifically, ana
t distance is pw driveway atking spaces, l
eight and exteppropriate vis
ed at the newition (HDM). Veet parking onexit driveway
stance triang
ed stopping si25 mph.
ed stopping simph.
ollowing propght is along it
ne of sight is aet set back fro
.5 feet vertica
1
y and Site Imp
s for outbounalyses and rec
provided for ot Vermont Strocated imme
ension of the sibility.
w driveway andVermont Streen both sides oy with approxi
le have the fo
ight distance
ight distance
perties (HDM)ts centerline, wlong its cente
om the stop b
ally (object he
provements P
nd vehicles oncommendatio
utbound vehreet. ediately north
ramp walls at
d Vermont baet is a 46-footof the street wimately 12 %
ollowing assum
is 150 feet pe
is 50 feet per
): which is 10 fe
erline, which ibar, or 7 feet s
eight) at the si
220 SuiteSan (415www
Project
n the new drivons are perform
icles on both
of the new ro
t the north an
ased on the cut-wide southb
within the studgrade per the
mptions and
er HDM, assum
HDM, assumi
eet from eithes 23 feet fromet back from
dewalk curbs
Montgomery Ste 346 Francisco, CA 94) 392-9688 P
w.chsconsulting
veway at the med on the
the horizonta
oadway, will n
nd south of the
urrent Caltranbound one-wady area. The ne UCSF RSI --- D
standards (HD
ming that desi
ing design sp
er ramp wall. m either curbs
the ramp wal
side.
treet
4104
.net
al and
need
e
ns ay new DBI
DM):
ign
eed
ide. l
- Vo
Results a
The minimmph. Appplan viewtwo existiwill not onis recommbe improv
Appendixside of thedriver’s eyfeet, whicto be restrbe shorten
The measprofile viesidewalk tstopping sof drivewa
Recomm
Based on
1. Twbb
2. Thre
3. Ba(R
Append
Appendix
ertical sight dn eye height,
and Analys
mum recommpendix 1 (left . The sight disng angled panly fall within
mended to elimved.
x 1 (bottom-rie roadway. Thye height at dh is 0.5 foot hricted to no mned horizonta
ured sight disew shows the to the driver losight distanceay is not adeq
mendations
the results an
wo existing ane removed beut also exceedhe height andestricted to on
a. The mb. The ea
from eased on 48 fe
R2-1) sign to li
ix
x 1: Sight Dist
distance is theobject height
es
ended horizofigure) shows
stance trianglrking spaces, the sight dist
minate two an
ight figure) shhe south rampecision point.igher than dr
more than 93.6ally to the wes
stance at the nline of sight docated 48 feee is 50 feet forquate.
s
nd analyses, th
ngled parkingecause the pad the driver’s d extension ofne of the folloaximum heig
ast end of the existing designet of sight disimit the vehic
tance Analysis
e horizontal dit, and geomet
ontal stoppings the sight dise shows that located imme
tance trianglengled parking
hows the heigp wall is comp. However, theriver’s eye heig68 feet in elevst by at least 3
new drivewaydrawn along tet away whoser a vehicle trav
he following r
g spaces, locatrked vehicleseye height off the south ram
owing: ht should be wall should b
n. stance along tcle speed at 5
s Exhibit
2
istance betwetry of the des
g sight distancstance trianglethere is an obediately north
e and but also g on the west
ght and extenpliant becausee design elevaght at decisio
vation. Alterna3.5 feet from e
y is 48 feet as she new drivew
e eye height isvelling at 10 m
ecommendat
ted immediat will not only
f 3.5 feet. mp wall is com
no more thanbe shortened
the new drivemph.
een the pedesign vertical cu
ce is 150 feete drawn from
bstruction limh of the new d exceed the dside of Vermo
sion of the rae existing desiation of north
on point. As a atively, the eaexisting desig
shown on Apway from thes 3.5 feet. Themph. Therefor
tions are mad
tely north of tfall within the
mpliant, but t
n driver’s eye hhorizontally t
eway, it is reco
strian and theurve (HDM).
for a vehicle t driver’s decisiting the sigh
driveway. Thedriver’s eye heont Street, so
mp wall on thign is already
h wall at the eresult, the no
ast end of the gn to Station 3
ppendix 1 (tope object 0.5-foe minimum rere, sight dista
de:
the new roadwe sight distan
the north wall
height at decto the west by
ommended to
e driver. It is ba
travelling at 2sion point in tt distance du
e parked vehiceight of 3.5 fee
sight distance
he north and slower than
east end is 94.0orth wall will n
wall will need3+88.60.
p-right figureoot-high on thecommended
nce for this se
way, will needce triangle an
l will need to
ision point. y at least 3.5 fe
o install speed
ased
25 the e to cles et. It e will
south
08 need d to
). The he
ection
d to nd
be
eet
d limit
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
ZSFG ROADWAY AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND
VISIBILITY ANALYSIS
1
Wong, Norman
From: Sarah Tenpas <[email protected]>Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 12:14 PMTo: Wong, NormanSubject: SFFD sign off of USCF RoadwayAttachments: P168 RSI CD Drawings - Permit Set_APPROVED 20200420_ASK-064.pdf; 20200420 Building Permit
App APPROVED.pdf
Hi Norman, See attached reviewed drawing provided to SFFD for our building permit 202001162041. Permit was signed off by Cap. Tracy O’Keeffe with SFFD. Let me know if there’s anything else we can provide. Best, Sarah
Sarah Tenpas, CM-Lean Superintendent
415.583.2777 | Cell/Text [email protected] Profile | LinkedIn 375 Beale Street Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94105
EXT
This message is from outside of the SFMTA email system. Please review the email carefully before responding, clicking links, or opening attachments.