is magma generated due to retreating ice caps, likely to...
TRANSCRIPT
January 26, 2010 1
Is magma generated due to retreating ice caps, likely to erupt? Constraints on lower-crustal stress
from InSAR
Andy Hooper1, Benedikt Ofeigsson2, Freysteinn Sigmundsson2, Halldór Geirsson3 , Pall
Einarsson2 and Erik Sturkell4
1Delft University of Technology2University of Iceland3Icelandic Meteorological Office4University of Gothenburg
Iceland Volcanic Systems
January 26, 2010 2
Iceland Volcanic Systems
January 26, 2010 3
Ice Loss and Magma Generation
• Estimated 14 million m3 extra magma generated per year by decompression melting, due to ice loss (Pagli and Sigmundsson, 2008)
• What proportion is likely to erupt?
• Can some be accommodated in crust due to stress change induced by melting ice?
1/26/2010 4
1/26/2010 6
Maximum deviatoric stress (tensile)
Instantaneous Stress Change
S
N•Integration of point loads over ice sheet
1/26/2010 7
Maximum deviatoric stress (tensile)
Instantaneous Stress Change
S
N•Integration of point loads over ice sheet
1/26/2010 8
Maximum deviatoric stress (tensile)
•Integration of point loads over ice sheet
•Ignores ductile response of lower crust (Maxwell time ~ 1-80 years?)
Instantaneous Stress Change
S
N
Ductile
Iceland Volcanic Systems
January 26, 2010 9
KverkfjöllVolcanic System
1/26/2010 10
2007-2008 Intrusion
(Relocated earthquakes, Jakobsdóttir et al, 2008)
1/26/2010 11
Maximum deviatoric stress (tensile)
Instantaneous Stress Change
Effect of relaxation through ductile flow below 10 km?
Ductile
1/26/2010 12
Decomposed InSAR + GPS
~Up East -6 cm 8.5-1.5 cm 6.5
1/26/2010 13
Boundary Element Model
• Planar dike with irregular outline
• Lithospheric
pressure
• Hydrostatic overpressure (=250 kg/m3),
• Uniform deviatoric
stress
• Prior probability density for strike and dip from seismicity
• Vertically varying elastic stiffness
• Bayesian Markov-chain Monte Carlo inversion
1/26/2010 14
Model Results
Maximum Likelihood solution (surface projection)
Plate spreading
1/26/2010 15
Model Results
Mean opening (surface projection)Distribution of dike position (profile)
1/26/2010 16
Comparison to DataData
Model
Residual
Up
East
-6 cm 8.5
-1.5 cm 6.5
1/26/2010 17
Tensile stress results
• Strike of maximum tensile normal stress: 129±9°(consistent with plate-spreading direction).
• Magnitude of deviatoric stress ~106 Pa, implying relaxation time >100 yr (loading ~104 Pa/yr).
• Implies that deviatoric stress due to ice-loss will build over time, leading to extra accommodation space for magma in lower crust.
Conclusions• Dike not emplaced perpendicular to maximum
tensile stress, as usually the case (=> significant shear on dike walls).
• Large deviatoric stress in lower crust consistent with plate-spreading.
• At least some of the extra magma generated will be captured in the lower crust, not erupted.
1/26/2010 18