irp 4 2009 well testing and fluid handling
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
1/151
Edi t ion 3.1
Sanction October
Date 2009
W ELL TESTI NG AND FL U I D HANDLI NG
AN I NDUSTRY RECOMMENDED PRACTI CE ( I R P )
FOR THE CANADI AN O I L AN D GAS I NDUSTRY
VOLUME 4 2 0 0 9
SANCTI ONED
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
2/151
COPYRI GHT/ RI GHT TO REPRODUCE
Copyright for this I ndustry Recomm ended Practiceis held by Enform, 2009. All rights
reserved. No part of this IRP may be reproduced, republished, redistributed, stored in a
retrieval system, or transmitted unless the user references the copyright ownership of
Enform.
D I SCLAI MER
This IRP is a set of best practices and guidelines compiled by knowledgeable and
experienced industry and government personnel. It is intended to provide the operator
with advice regarding the specific topic. It was developed under the auspices of the
Drilling and Completions Committee (DACC).
The recommendations set out in this IRP are meant to allow flexibility and must be used
in conjunction with competent technical judgment. It remains the responsibility of the
user of the IRP to judge its suitability for a particular application.
If there is any inconsistency or conflict between any of the recommended practices
contained in the IRP and the applicable legislative requirement, the legislative
requirement shall prevail.
Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data and
recommendations contained in the IRP. However, DACC, its subcommittees, and
individual contributors make no representation, warranty, or guarantee in connection
with the publication of the contents of any IRP recommendation, and hereby disclaim
liability or responsibility for loss or damage resulting from the use of this IRP, or for any
violation of any legislative requirements.
AVAILABI L ITY
This document, as well as future revisions and additions, is available from
Enform Canada
5055 11 Street NE
Calgary, AB T2E 8N4
Phone: 403.516.8000
Fax: 403.516.8166
Website:www.enform.ca
http://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/default.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/default.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/default.aspx -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
3/151
Fax 888.362.9722Enform | 5055 - 11 Street, Calgary, AB T2E8N4 | 403.516.8000
Publication Correction Request form for:all Enform Safety Services published documents
Enform welcomes comments at any time on any of these documents. Comments areconsidered on the basis of clarity, intent, accuracy, or omissions. All comments are passedon to the committee chair or held until the next scheduled review, as appropriate. If youhave any comments or suggestions on how we can improve this IRP, please let us know byfilling out this form.This form can be submited by email or fax.
Contact
Contact
Title
Company
Address
City
ProvincePostalCode
Country
Phone No (no spaces)
Fax No (no spaces)
email
If you belong to an Association, please select theappropriate Member Association
Comments
Selectdocument
Correction type: Correction/administrative Technical Broken link
Page #, Section:Description of suggestedchange:
Reasons/rationale for suggestion:
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
4/151
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
5/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents ..................................................................... i List of Tabl es .......................................................................... iv List of Figures.......................................................................... v 4 .0 Scop e an d Con t en t s . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . v i
4.0.1 Purpose ....................................................................................... vi4.0.2 Audience ..................................................................................... vi4.0.3 Scope and Limitations ................................................................... vi4.0.4 Revision Process ........................................................................... vi4.0.5 Revision History .......................................................................... vii4.0.6 Sanction .................................................................................... viii4.0.7 Acknowledgement ....................................................................... viii4.0.8 Copyright Permissions .................................................................... x4.0.9 Scope ........................................................................................... x4.0.10Introduction .................................................................................. x4.0.11Symbols and Abbreviations ............................................................ xi4.0.12Abbreviations and Definitions ........................................................ xii4.0.13Common Terms of Reference and IRPs For All Operations In This Volume
xixAp pe n di x I .............................................................................. l i i
Atmospheric Fluid Scrubber Selection Guidelines ........................................ liiApp end ix I I . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . l i i i
Pressure Rating Formula for Seamless Pipe ............................................... liii4 .1 Dr i l l Stem Testi ng .. . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. 1
4.1.1 Scope ...........................................................................................14.1.2 Planning a Drill Stem Test ...............................................................14.1.3 On-Site Pre-Test Guidelines ............................................................24.1.4 Drill Stem Testing Guidelines...........................................................34.1.5 Sour Drill Stem Test Guidelines .......................................................6
App end ix I I I . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. 9 Recommended Drill Stem Testing Services Inspection Checklist .....................9
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
6/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
ii October 2009
4 .2 W ell Test in g .................................................................. 1 3 4.2.1 Wellhead Control ......................................................................... 134.2.2 Well Testing Equipment Capacities and Pressure Ratings .................. 164.2.3 H2S Service Equipment Requirements ............................................ 214.2.4 Well Testing Equipment Material Conformance ................................ 234.2.5 Equipment Inspections ................................................................. 244.2.6 Well Testing Equipment Spacing .................................................... 254.2.7 Pre Test Equipment Check and Pressure Test................................ 284.2.8 Operational Safety ....................................................................... 304.2.9 Well Testing Workers ................................................................... 33
App end ix I V .. . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . 39 Lease Layout Schematics ........................................................................ 39Sweet Wells .......................................................................................... 40Frac Flowback with Pressure Tank Minimum Spacing Requirements .............. 40
Cold Separators Minimum Spacing Requirements ....................................... 41Heated Test Unit Minimum Spacing Requirements ...................................... 42Sour Wells ............................................................................................ 43Frac Flowback with Pressure Tank Minimum Spacing Requirements .............. 43Heated Test Unit, Pressure Tank and Closed Pressure Storage Tanks Minimum
Spacing Requirements ..................................................................... 44Heated Test Unit and Pressure Tank Minimum Spacing Requirements ........... 46
Ap pe n di x V ............................................................................ 4 7 Production Testing Services Inspection Checklist ....................................... 47
App end ix VI . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . 53 FLARESTACK MAXIMUM AND M I N I M U M FLARE RATES ...................................... 53Gas Exit Velocity of 50.8 mm (2) Pipe ..................................................... 54Gas Exit Velocity of 76.2 mm (3) Pipe ..................................................... 55Gas Exit Velocity of 101.6 mm (4) Pipe ................................................... 56Gas Exit Velocity of 152.4 mm (6) Pipe ................................................... 57Gas Exit Velocity from 203.2 mm (8) Pipe ............................................... 58Gas Exit Velocity from 254 mm (10) Pipe ................................................ 59
App end ix VI I . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . 60 Hydrate Charts ...................................................................................... 60
4 .3 Oth er Flow back s .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . 63 4.3.1 Flowing to Open Top Tank............................................................. 634.3.2 Pumping or Circulating a Well to an Open Tank System .................... 654.3.3 Wellhead Control ......................................................................... 674.3.4 Location of The Rig Pump ............................................................. 674.3.5 Well Killing Operations ................................................................. 674.3.6 Snubbing Operations .................................................................... 704.3.7 High Reid Vapour Fluid Recovery and Handling ................................ 734.3.8 Well Site Workers Competency ...................................................... 78
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
7/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 iii
4 .4 Loading, Un lo ad ing and Transpor ta t ion o f Flu ids .. .. .. .. .. 79 4.4.1 Fluid Hauling Company Procedures ................................................ 794.4.2
Fluid Characteristics ..................................................................... 80
4.4.3 Loading, Unloading and Transportation Practices ............................. 804.4.4 Fluid Hauling Company Worker Qualifications .................................. 844.4.5 Hydrocarbon Transportation: Class & Packing Group (Boiling Point, Flash
Point & Vapour Pressure) .................................................................. 85App end ix VI I I . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . 86
B I BLI OGRAPHY ....................................................................................... 86
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
8/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
iv October 2009
L I ST OF TABLES
Well Testing Review Committee Members .................................................. ixTable 1: Flammable Limits .................................................................. xxviiiTable 2: Pressure Rating of Seamless Pipe ................................................. lvTable 2: IRP 15.3.1.5 Reserve Circulation Sand Cleanout Equipment ............ 72
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
9/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 v
L I ST OF FI GURES
Figure 1: Code for Electrical Installations at Oil and Gas Facilities ................ 28Figure 2: Propane Saturation Curve ......................................................... 75Figure 3: Propane - Heat of Vaporization Volume Basis ............................... 76Figure 4: Liquid Vapour Chart .................................................................. 77
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
10/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
vi October 2009
4 .0 SCOPE AN D CONTENTS4.0 .1 PURPOSEThe purpose of this document is to ensure that guidelines for well testing and fluid
handling operations are in place and readily available for all personnel.
Industry Recommended Practice (IRP) 4 is intended to supplement existing standards
and regulations. It is also intended to establish guidelines in areas where none existed
previously.
4.0 .2 AUDI ENCEThe intended audience of this document includes oil and gas company engineers, field
consultants, well testing and fluid hauling personnel, other specialized well services
personnel, and regulatory bodies.
4.0 .3 SCOPE AND L I M I T A TI O NSThis IRP includes pertinent information about well testing, including the following:
Personnel Requirements
Drill Stem Testing
Loading, Unloading, and Transportation of Fluids
Operational Procedures
IRP 4 supplements existing standards and regulations, and provides guidelines and
recommendations where none existed previously. It also refers to other pertinent
standards where appropriate, and provides information on how to access them. A full list
of the documents referred to in this IRP plus other useful reference material is provided
inAPPENDIX VIII.
4.0 .4 REVI SI ON PROCESSIndustry recommended practices (IRPs) are developed by Enform with the involvement of
both the upstream petroleum industry and relevant regulators. IRPs provide a unique
resource outside of direct regulatory intervention.
This is the second revision to IRP 4. Those who have been familiar with the first two
editions of IRP 4 should take the time to review this edition thoroughly, as it has been
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
11/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 vii
completely redeveloped to address issues brought forward since the last edition by
industry and government stakeholders.
Technical issues brought forward to the Drilling and Completions Committee (DACC) as
well as scheduled review dates can trigger a re-evaluation and review of this IRP, in
whole or in part. For details on the specific process for the creation and revision of IRPs,
visit the Enform website atwww.enform.ca.
4.0 .5 REVI SI ON H I STORYIn 1988 a Well Testing and Fluid Handling Subcommittee (WTFHSC) consisting of
representatives from CAODC, CAPP, PSAC, Alberta OH&S, and the Alberta ERCB were
formed. Under the auspices of the Drilling and Completion Committee (DACC), the
WTFHSC mandate was to investigate and develop minimum recommended practices
respecting equipment, procedures and workers for the safe testing of wells and handling
of fluids. The Recommended Practice (ARP) documents were developed during well
testing and fluids handling operations at wells in Alberta; and were fully supported by the
Alberta ERCB and Alberta OH&S.
In 1999, the scope and breath of recommended practices encompasses many more
issues, companies, associations and governments. The reference to Alberta in the title of
these practices is changed to industry (IRP ) to better reflect the broader scope. Where
industry has grown to other regions of western Canada, these IRPs continue to assist
companies in their daily operations; These IRPs are intended to follow the user to any
site, anywhere in the world, as a minimum operating practice.
In 2005 IRP 4 needed a review and update to reflect the changes in industry and
legislation. With approval from DACC a new committee was formed to address the need
for a complete review and update of the document.
In 2009 IRP 4 added a new section4.3.7 High Reid Vapour Fluid Recovery and Handling
Hyperlinks were updated on all other sections.
http://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/default.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/default.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/default.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/default.aspx -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
12/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
viii October 2009
4.0 .6 SANCTI ONThe following organizations have sanctioned this document:
British Columbia Workers Compensation Board (WorkSafeBC)
Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
Employment, Immigration and Industry, Alberta
Energy Resources Conservation Board, Alberta
International Intervention and Coil Tubing Association (Canada)
National Energy Board
Oil and Gas Commission, British Columbia
Petroleum Services Association of Canada
Saskatchewan Energy Resources
Saskatchewan Labour
4.0 .7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis IRP under the auspices of the Drilling and Completions Committee (DACC), was
originally developed as an Alberta Recommended Practice (ARP) by the Well Testing and
Fluid Handling subcommittee, and subsequently updated by the Well Testing Committee
in 1999.
Acknowledgments of the following individuals is in recognition of their time and effort in
any and all of the meeting and work sessions, and acknowledgement of the corporate
entities that allowed these individuals to take time away from their busy desks to help
complete this project.
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
13/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 ix
Wel l T es t i ng Rev i ew Comm i t t ee Members
Name Com pany O rgan i za t i on
Represented
Craig Marshall, Chair Canadian Sub-Surface Energy Services Inc PSAC
Nicole Axelson Petroleum Services Association of Canada PSAC
Frank A Barlow Conoco Phillips Canada CAPP
Glenn Berry Enseco PSAC
Dustin Brodner Petro-Canada CAPP
Lonnie Campbell Concord Well Servicing Ltd CAODC
Bruce Cazes BC Oil and Gas Commission
Lyle Gallant Weatherford Canada Partnership PSAC
Robert Knowles Weatherford Canada Partnership PSAC
Kevin Kostrub Alberta Energy Utilities Board
Manuel Macias Enform
Lyle Nelson Grant Production Testing Services Ltd PSAC
Greg Onushko Grant Production Testing Services Ltd PSAC
Don Pack Precision Drilling Corporation CAODC
Matthew Ritchie Enseco PSAC
Colby Ruff Alberta Energy Utilities Board
Garth Sampson Weatherford Canada Partnership PSAC
David W Smith Am-Gas Scrubbing Systems (1989) Ltd PSAC
Jack W Thacker Husky Energy Inc CAPP
Emerson Vokes Lonkar Well Testing Ltd PSAC
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
14/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
x October 2009
4.0 .8 COPYRI GHT PERMI SSI ONSThis IRP includes documents or excerpts of documents as follows, for which permission toreproduce has been obtained:
Copyr i gh t ed I n f o rm a t i on Used I n Perm i ssi on f r om
Figure 1 Page 28 Safety Code Council of Alberta
4.0 .9 SCOPEThe purpose of this series of IRPs is to enhance safety during well testing and fluid
handling operations of gas and oil wells.
4.1 Drill Stem Testing contains recommended practices for DST operations including: test
planning, as well as pre-test, post-test, and sour testing guidelines.
4.2 Well Testing details recommended practices for Well Testing operations, including:
equipment design and operation, worker requirements and qualifications, purging and
pressure testing, operational safety, and safety equipment.
4.3 Other Flowbacksaddresses recommended practices for service rig operations
involving the flowback of fluids from the well. Matters addressed include: produced
fluids, venting, well control, equipment, procedures, and well site workers.
4.4 Loading, Unloading, and Transportation of Fluidsprovides recommended proceduresfor the safe transfer of fluids from temporary and permanent production facility tanks to
trucks. The procedures emphasize sour fluids and high vapour pressure hydrocarbon
mixtures. The IRP also addresses transportation.
The practices described in the IRPs should be considered in conjunction with other
industry recommended practices, individual operators well testing and fluid handling
practices, and site specific considerations. It is recognized that other procedures and
practices as well as new technological developments may be equally effective in
promoting safety and efficiency.
4.0 .10 I NTRODUCTI ON An integral part of the exploration and development of oil and gas resources is reservoir
evaluation. Evaluation methods with the greatest inherent environmental and safety
concerns are those which remove reservoir fluids by means of drill stem testing, well
testing or any other methods of flowback.
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
15/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xi
The avoidance of developing a combustible hydrocarbon gas/air mixture, and the safe
handling of highly volatile reservoir or stimulation fluids, and corrosive or toxic fluids are
of concern when evaluating a well.
The environmental, safety, and health risks associated with well testing and fluid
handling can be minimized by properly trained workers implementing prudent procedures
and using properly designed equipment.
4.0 .11 SYMBOLS AND ABBREVI ATI ONSASME: American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASTM: American Society of Testing and Materials
API : American Petroleum Institute
ERCB: Energy Resource Conservation Board (formerly AEUB)
CAPP: Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
CBM: Coalbed Mehane
CAODC: Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors
CPA : Canadian Petroleum Association
CSA : Canadian Standards Association
CRN : Canadian Registration Number
CTU: Coil Tubing Units
DACC: Drilling and Completions Committee
DST: Drill Stem Test
ESD : Emergency Shut Down (valve)
I RP: Industry Recommended Practice
JSA: Job Safety Analysis
LEL: Lower Explosive Limit
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
16/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xii October 2009
MAW P: Maximum Allowable Working Pressure
MSDS: Materials Safety Data Sheet
NACE: National Association of Corrosion Engineers
NORM: Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material
OEL: Occupational Exposure Limit
OH&S: Occupational Health & Safety
OEM: Original Equipment Manufacturer
PSV: Pressure Relief Valve
PSAC: Petroleum Services Association of Canada
PPE: Personal Protective Equipment
SABA: Supplied Air Breathing Apparatus
SCBA: Self-contained Breathing Apparatus
SI THP: Shut In Tubing Head Pressure
SI CHP: Shut In Casing Head Pressure
TDG: Transportation of Dangerous Goods
UEL: Upper Explosive Limit
W H M I S: Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System
4.0 .12 ABBREVI ATI ONS AND DEFI NI T I ONSAdequa t e : For the purposes of this IRP adequate is defined as the result ofconducting a hazard assessment and mitigating risks associated with the job to
be performed.
Adequa t e L igh t i n g : The visibility must be such that the worker will be able to
exit the worksite to a secure area in the event of an emergency. Flashlights, rig
lights, and vehicle lights can be considered as emergency back-up lighting.(Waiting onIRP 23 Lease Lighting Standardsadequate lighting exists when the
http://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/lease_lighting.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/lease_lighting.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/lease_lighting.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/lease_lighting.aspx -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
17/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xiii
site is illuminated sufficiently to ensure that the worker is able to perform routine
duties safely.)
Ref e r ences / L inks
Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia
Saskatchewan Dept of Labour, Occupational Health and Safety
NOTE: Regulations in the provinces of British Columbia and Saskatchewan
define lighting with specific measurement criteria. This should be
referred to when operating in these provinces
NOTE: Consideration must be given to additional lighting on complex
operations.
Bleed Of f : Where pressure is present in the well, or piping systems, andseparating systems and needs depressurizing is required before work cancommence.
Caut ion : Caution must be exercised on wells known to contain lower levels ofH2S or have harmful or toxic substances, have severe abrasives (e.g., frac sand),
have other unusual hazards, and are high pressure. The term cau t i on does not
categorize a well outside of Sweet or Sour.
It is intended to alert owners, employers, and workers to dangers that may
exceed those of routine sweet wells and wells with minimal H2S concentrationwhere prescriptive equipment requirements are not provided.
Cer t i f ied Pressur ized Vessel : A pressurized vessel which has been constructed
following a program of quality control, designed for the application, and isregistered with the provincial agency that applies a stamp of certification on thevessel nameplate. All vessels must have a Canadian Registration Number (CRN)
registered in all provinces of intended use.
Closed Sys tem : A closed system refers to a handling system in which the odours
or emissions from the wellbore effluent are either flared or vented to atmosphere
through an H2S scrubber, in a controlled manner.
Coi led Tub ing Un i t Opera t ion s : Coiled tubing units (CTU) are commonly usedin other flowbacks to recover wellbore effluent. Nitrogen, carbon dioxide or air isused to move and lift proppant, produced sand or stimulation fluids such as acid,
chemicals or hydraulic fracture treatment fluids from the wellbore. Coiled tubing
unit operations may also be undertaken to evaluate well production capability.
Conf ined Space: A space which is enclosed or partially enclosed. Has limited or
restricted means for entry/exit. Is not designed or intended for continuous human
http://www.worksafebc.com/http://www.worksafebc.com/http://www.labour.gov.sk.ca/http://www.labour.gov.sk.ca/http://www.labour.gov.sk.ca/http://www.worksafebc.com/ -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
18/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xiv October 2009
occupancy. Is or may become partially hazardous to a worker entering or that
may complicate the provision of first aid, evacuation, rescue or other emergency
response services. Refer to applicable OHS Regulations
Dr i l l i ng Com pany : An individual or company that enters into a contract with anowner of a wellsite to drill for oil and gas.
Dr i l l S tem Tes t : A method of determining the producing potential of a
formation. This is done by removing the hydrostatic pressure of the drilling fluid
column and allowing formation fluids or gas to flow into an evacuated or partiallyevacuated drill string or production string. This allows the formation pressures tobe monitored and measured to calculate flow and depletion rates. A drill stem
tester represents the company responsible for the downhole and surface
equipment used in identifying the content and production capability of theformations to be tested.
Emp loye r : Means a person, firm, association or body that has, in connection withthe operation of a place of employment, one or more workers in the service of
the person, firm, association or body.
Em er gency Shu t d ow n Dev i se Va lve: It is a hydraulically or pneumatically
operated, high-pressure valve installed on the wellhead with remote or automaticshutdowns. Its purpose is to provide a means to remotely shut in the well in anemergency. An ESD is required on wells to be flowed having a surface pressure
greater than 1379 kPa and a H2S content greater than 1% or release of one
tonne of sulfphur per day.
Flow back : Where pressure on a well is bled off and the well continues to flow,and is allowed to flow to establish a rate of gas and fluid from the well.
High Vapour Pressure Hydro carbons : Hydrocarbon mixtures with a Reidvapour pressure greater than 14 kPa or an API gravity greater than 50Oare
considered to be high vapour pressure hydrocarbons.
NOTE: Reid Vapour Pressure is determined in a laboratory test. API gravity can
be readily measured in the field. C1-C7 content can also be indicative of
a fluids flammability. Flammability increases with increasing C1-C7
content. Fluid analyses, if available should be reviewed. Fluid and
ambient temperatures should be considered.
I n l i ne Test : An inline test is c losed when well effluents measured at the test
separator are diverted to the pipeline in some occasions fluids are produced tostorage.
Mud Can: A device used to contain fluids and direct them away from the drill
pipe when breaking connections.
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
19/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xv
Non - Cer t i f ied Pressur ized Vesse l : A vessel that does not require certification
for use in pressure applications. The vessel must have some form of pressure
relief valve (PSV). If the tank is to be used as the primary vessel, the tank must
have been constructed under a quality control program. Construction, design, andmaterial specification data must be available when requested by the well owner.Government departments may also request this data.
Caut ion : The vessel must be designed for its intended use.
Example : A vessel designed to operate below 103.4 kPa (15 psi) working
pressure does not require provincial certification from local jurisdictions
but is required to be constructed under a registered quality control
program in this IRP.
Occupat ion a l Expo sure Lim i t s Work er Sa fe ty Cons idera t ion
The Occupational Exposure Limit (OEL of H2S is, eight hour OEL: 10 ppm)
In most cases when well testing, workers are in open-air environments and workshifts longer than eight hours. Therefore planning consideration must reviewsituations when workers are exposed to short-term levels of H2S greater than
10ppm and longer-term levels less than 10ppm. The ceiling limits vary through
the various regulatory authorities. The two most common ceiling limits are 10ppm and 15ppm.
Refer to your local and federal Occupat ion a l Exposur e Lim i t s fo r Chem ica l
Subs tances for more information on exposure limits to other chemicals.
Ref e r ences / L inks
Alberta Occupational Health and Safety Act Chemical Hazards
Saskatchewan Occupational Health and Safety Act
Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia OHS & Regulation
Open Sys tem : An open system refers to a handling system, such as a rig tank,in which any gas vapours produced from fluids are vented to atmosphere in an
uncontrolled manner. This type of system requires constant monitoring to ensuretransient vapours/gas are maintained below 20% of LEL and 10 ppm H2S.
Ot he r F lowb acks : Other flowbacks refers to operations, other than production
testing and drill stem testing, in which gas or fluids are flowed or induced to flowfrom the wellbore. This includes well killing operations and the recovery of well
stimulation fluids and solids by flowing, pumping, swabbing or by the circulationof fluids (i.e., coiled tubing.) Refer toSection 4.3 Other Flowbacks for information
specific to testing.
http://www.employment.alberta.ca/SFW/307.htmlhttp://www.employment.alberta.ca/SFW/307.htmlhttp://www.labour.gov.sk.ca/acts-regs/index.htmhttp://www.labour.gov.sk.ca/acts-regs/index.htmhttp://www2.worksafebc.com/Publications/OHSRegulation/guidelines.asphttp://www2.worksafebc.com/Publications/OHSRegulation/guidelines.asphttp://www2.worksafebc.com/Publications/OHSRegulation/guidelines.asphttp://www.labour.gov.sk.ca/acts-regs/index.htmhttp://www.employment.alberta.ca/SFW/307.html -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
20/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xvi October 2009
O w n e r : A person, partnership, company or group of persons who, under contract
and agreement of ownership, direct the activities of one or more employers
involved at a worksite.
Persona l Pro t ec t ive Equ ipm ent ( PPE) : Equipment designed and used toprotect workers.
Posi t i v e Pressure : Positive pressure refers to a pressure greater than
atmospheric pressure (0 kPa gauge).
Pressur ized Truck Tank : A pressurized truck tank must comply with all the CSAB620 requirements as determined by CSA B621. If the maximum allowable
working pressure (MAWP) is greater than 101.3 kPa (15 psi) then ABSA/ASME
certification is also required. The MAWP is specified on the nameplate of mostoilfield production equipment such as all transport and pressure vessel
equipment.
Purge : Where a vessel, container or piping system is evacuated of its gas and/or
fluid contents and replaced with another gas and/or fluid. The general purpose ofpurging is to remove explosive and/or flammable fluids and gases from a closedpiping system prior to opening the system to atmosphere or prior to entry of the
system by workers. The practice of purging usually entails replacing theexplosive/flammable contents with a product that is non-explosive/flammable orto create an atmosphere with an acceptable Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) and
Upper Explosive Limit (UEL) for workers. Purging is also used to aid the removal
hazardous gases and fluids from vessels and piping systems prior to shipment ofequipment or transportation of fluids.
Qual i f ied Wel l Tes t ing Person : An individual who has had a minimum of three
months previous experience with a service company or well owner andunderstands the concept of gas and liquid separation using pressure equipment
and flaring. Without this prior experience, the individual is considered intraining. The individual must be able to provide documented evidence, when
requested, of this experience. The individual must have all certifications required
by provincial regulatory agencies and/or listed in this IRP.Section 4.2.9of this
IRP identifies the qualifications required for a well testing worker to handle
various levels of responsibility.
Supp l i ed A i r B r eat h in g Appa r a t u s ( SABA) : It consists of a small air cylinder(less than 5 minutes of breathing air) and air mask intended to be carried on thehip of a worker with the ability to connect, by hose, to numerous larger air
cylinders. This type of configuration is used for extended work periods where aworker is exposed to an H2S or other hazardous breathing environment.
Sel f -Cont a ined Brea th in g Appara tu s (SCBA) : It consists of an air cylinder
and mask intended to be carried on the back of the worker and has (+)(-) 30minutes of breathing air contained in the cylinder. This device is used for short
work periods where a worker is in an H2S or other hazardous breathing
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
21/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xvii
environment. Also used for emergency situations to aid in the rescue of injured
personnel.
Safe ty Serv ice Com pany : A company that provides one or more of thefollowing: equipment, workers, training, and neutralising chemicals to reduce therisk to onsite workers and equipment during various well operations.
Sa f e t y S t andby Me t h od : Where a person outside of the hazardous area
monitors the work of persons inside the hazardous area, with no other purpose
than to monitor personnel and their safety equipment, and implement rescueprocedures when necessary.
Serv ice Com pany : Means a person, corporation or association who is contracted
to supply, sell, offer or expose for sale, lease, distribute or install a product orservice to another company, usually the owner of the worksite.
Shu t I n Tub ing Head Pr essu r e ( SI THP) : The pressure at surface on the
tubing in the well.
Shut I n Cas ing Head Pressure (S I CHP) : The pressure at surface on the
casing in the well.
St imu la t i ons : Stimulations are operations designed to improve well production
capability or, in the case of injection or disposal wells, to improve the ability of awell to accept fluid. These operations may include the use of hydrocarbon andwater based fracturing fluids, acids, various chemicals, and proppants.
Swabb ing : Swabbing is an operation conducted to reduce the hydrostaticpressure of the fluid in the wellbore to initiate flow from a formation.
Sw ive l Jo in t ( Ch iksan ) : A series of short steel pipe sections that are joined by
swivel couplings. The unit functions as a flexible flow line that provides a flow
path between the control head and the floor manifold.
Test L ine: A flow line from the drill stem tester's floor manifold to move fluid orgas to flare, test separator or storage.
Stabb ing Va lve : A full opening safety valve that can be installed to the top of
any joint of pipe being pulled out of or inserted into the well to prevent flow upthe pipe and out to atmosphere.
W el l K i l l i ng Oper a t i ons : Well killing operations are operations in which well
effluent is circulated from the wellbore using a fluid of sufficient density to
prevent further influx of reservoir fluids. The process is continued until the well isincapable of flow.
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
22/151
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
23/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xix
Ref e r ences/ L inks
Section IRP 4.2 Well Testing
IRP 6.0 Critical Sour Underbalanced Drilling
W o r k e r : Means a person who is engaged in an occupation in the service of anemployer.
Under ba lanced Dr i l l i ng : Entails allowing a well to flow oil, gas, and formationfluids to surface as it is being drilled as opposed to conventional or overbalanceddrilling where one of the prime considerations is in preventing hydrocarbons from
flowing during the drilling process.
Ref e r ences/ L inks
IRP 6.0 Critical Sour Underbalanced Drilling
Alberta Energy and Utilities Board Interim Directive ID94-3 and Directive 36,
Section 10, 20, 23, 24
4.0 .13 COMMON TERMS OF REFERENCE AND I RPS FOR ALL OPERATI ONSI N THI S VOLUME
4.0.13.1 Respons ib i l i t i es o f Ow ners and Serv ice Con t r acto r sIRP The wellsite owner is responsible for all activities on a lease. The safety
of on-site workers and environmental protection take precedence over
well testing data requirements. Owners shall maintain general health
and safety at the well site by coordinating all activities and ensuring
proper equipment, materials, and workers are provided to accomplish
the program and to satisfy all applicable regulatory requirements.
IRP The well site owner shall ensure the following breathing equipment is
provided as a minimum:
On all wells, regardless of designation, two Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus(SCBA) must be on location at all times. (Additional SCBA may be required as per
local authorities).
When well testing wells where the H2S concentration is greater than 100
ppm, the owner must provide supplied air breathing apparatus (SABAs)
in addition to the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA). As a
minimum this package must contain an adequate air supply system
http://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/critical_sour_underbalanced.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/critical_sour_underbalanced.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/critical_sour_underbalanced.aspx -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
24/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xx October 2009
complete with air cylinders, manifold, work lines and egress packs
(SABAs) and a minimum of two back packs (SCBAs).
On simple well-servicing operations (such as rod jobs, tubing changes,bleed-offs, plug retrieval, abandonments, swab cleanouts) where the
H2S concentration is greater than 10 ppm and where the venting of gas
to atmosphere is minimal and the bleed-off period is short in duration
and where more than two workers are present at the same time, an
additional two back packs would be adequate instead of a supplied air
system. (This does not apply to well testing.) Therefore a minimum of
four back packs are required on the well site. Two of the back packs
must be designated for emergency use only. The other packs are for use
by workers where breathing equipment is necessary to complete
operational tasks. Protection for the workers on the site and nearby
residents, from over-exposure to H2S, must be maintained whenconsidering this option.
IRP Refer to CSA stan dard CSA-Z94.4-0 2 Se lec t ion , care and use o f
r esp i r a t o r y equ ipmen t .
IRP Where an owner representative is assigned to the site, the
representative shall be present during all operations where gas will be
vented from open tank systems. Where an owner representative is not
assigned to the site, the contractor assigned to flow the well to open
tank systems must have a supervisor present during the operation.
IRP The owner shall ensure a gas detection meter is available to the site
workers and that they are properly trained in the use and operation of
the meter.
IRP The owners representative shall have a trained and competent person
onsite in the operation of an LEL meter. The owners representative
shall ensure availability of an LEL meter on all sites. (ReferenceIRP 7
Standards for Wellsite Supervision of Drilling, Completions and
Workovers, Alberta ERCB BM 033, CAPPFlammable Environments
GuidelinesandIRP 18 Upstream Petroleum Fire and Explosion Hazard
Management)
http://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.capp.ca/library/publications/healthSafety/pages/pubInfo.aspx?DocId=81688http://www.capp.ca/library/publications/healthSafety/pages/pubInfo.aspx?DocId=81688http://www.capp.ca/library/publications/healthSafety/pages/pubInfo.aspx?DocId=81688http://www.capp.ca/library/publications/healthSafety/pages/pubInfo.aspx?DocId=81688http://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.capp.ca/library/publications/healthSafety/pages/pubInfo.aspx?DocId=81688http://www.capp.ca/library/publications/healthSafety/pages/pubInfo.aspx?DocId=81688http://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspx -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
25/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xxi
IRP The owner shall or instruct the service contracting company to:
Provide signage ordering vehicles to stop at the lease entrance on
all sites where gas is being vented to atmosphere
Ensure there are an adequate number of qualified workers on the
well site at all times to conduct operations safely
Provide fluid hauling companies with shipping documents such as a
waste manifest that describes the properties and potential hazards
associated with fluids to be transported in appropriate
Transportation of Dangerous Goods (TDG) terms
Ref e r ences / L inks
Transport CanadaTDG Act, Sections 5, 6, 8 & 14.
Transport CanadaTDG Regulations, Part 3.
Transport CanadaTDG Act, Section 40(Clear language).
Ensure fluid hauling workers are oriented to site-specific procedures
Ensure sour fluids are transported during normal hours of operations
unless special arrangements and precautions have been made between
the owner and the truck operator. This may include standby workers,
equipment, and monitoring devices
Ensure appropriate safety equipment (i.e., H2S monitor, explosive
mixture monitor, and respiratory protective equipment) is available
Maintain a contingency plan including procedures for truck loading,
unloading, and transportation-related spills.
IRP The owners representative is responsible for conducting an on-site pre-
job equipment inspection to ensure the equipment is operational and as
ordered.
IRP Owners shall prepare a program of operations. The program shouldinclude but not be limited to:
The purpose of the operation
Relevant well data
Identify any potential hazards
http://www.tc.gc.ca/tdg/menu.htmhttp://www.tc.gc.ca/tdg/menu.htmhttp://www.tc.gc.ca/tdg/menu.htmhttp://www.tc.gc.ca/tdg/menu.htmhttp://www.tc.gc.ca/tdg/menu.htmhttp://www.tc.gc.ca/tdg/menu.htmhttp://www.tc.gc.ca/tdg/menu.htmhttp://www.tc.gc.ca/tdg/menu.htmhttp://www.tc.gc.ca/tdg/menu.htm -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
26/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xxii October 2009
Equipment requirements and layout having regard for pressures and
flows expected
Environmental and safety considerations, relative to on-site workersand the public
Special procedures to be employed
Emergency contacts
Minimum worker requirements and qualifications
Test objectives
Test sequence in appropriate detail
Technical contact in case of unexpected program deviations
Emergency response plan, contacts and procedures
Shall ensure the program is available for viewing by all participating
contractors prior to job commencement.
IRP The prime contractor shall ensure that their representative is able to
provide competent and effective supervision of the operations being
carried out. The owners representative shall have the following:
For well site supervision of drilling completions and workovers, the
prime contractors representative must be certified inIRP 7Standards for Wellsite Supervision of Drilling, Completions and
Workovers
First Aid Certificate
If well servicing, an appropriate blow-out prevention (BOP)
certificate
If drilling, an appropriate blow-out prevention (BOP) certificate
H2S Training and Certification for sour wells ( > 10 ppm)
Transportation of Dangerous Goods Certificate where hazardousmaterials will be shipped
WHMIS training
Complete awareness of IRP 4Well Testing and Fluids Handling as
they pertain to the operation being carried out and a full
http://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/standards_for_wellsite.aspx -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
27/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xxiii
understanding of the hazards related to the physical properties of
the fluid being handled, prior to conducting the operation
Shall make available and be competent in the operation ofequipment used to detect hazardous or explosive mixtures
An understanding of section 8.110 of the ERCB Regulations when
hydrocarbon mixtures with a Reid vapour pressure greater than 14
kPa or with an API gravity exceeding 50 degrees, are encountered
4.0.13.2 Dr i l l i ng Serv ice Com pany Respons ib i l i t i esIRP The drilling service company shall ensure that all required rig workers
are available during operation and that the workers are physically
capable and have been properly trained to carry out their designatedresponsibilities. The drilling service company shall ensure that the
equipment and facilities it is contracted to supply are available during
operation and it is designed for the parameters of the project. Pressure
test certification, material inspections, and sour service specifications
shall be made available when requested.
4.0.13.3 Dr i l l S tem Tes t ing Com pany Respons ib i l it i esIRP The drill stem testing company shall ensure that the workers it provides
are available during the drill stem test, the workers are physically
capable, and have been properly trained to carry out their designatedresponsibilities during the drill stem test at the worksite. The drill stem
testing company shall ensure that the equipment and facilities it is
contracted to supply are available during the drill stem test, are in good
working order and is designed for the parameters of the project.
Pressure test certification, material inspections, and sour service
specifications shall be made available when requested.
4.0.13.4 Safety Serv ice Com pany Responsib i l i t iesIRP The safety service company shall ensure that the workers it provides are
available during operations, the workers are physically capable, and
have been properly trained to carry out their designated responsibilities.
The safety service company shall ensure that the equipment it is
contracted to supply is available during the operation, is in good working
order, and is designed for the parameters of the project. The safety
service company must ensure proper equipment for respiratory
protection, H2S gas detection, breathing-air supply, determining
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
28/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xxiv October 2009
explosive limits, and neutralising chemicals is in sufficient quantities at
the worksite. Consideration should be given to having spare H2S and
LEL meter.
The safety service company must provide training of all workers on the
worksite in the specific use of this equipment as required.
4.0.13.5 Wel l Tes t ing Com pany Respons ib i l i t i esIRP The well testing company shall ensure their employees are physically
capable to carry out their designated responsibilities during the
operation. Well testing personnel must carry certificates of training with
them. The well testing company shall ensure the equipment and
facilities it is contracted to supply are designed and suited for the
application. Pressure test certification, material inspections, and sour
service specifications shall be made available when requested.
4.0.13.6 Flu id Hau l ing Com pany Respons ib i l it i esIRP Fluid hauling companies shall ensure the workers it provides are
available during the operations, the workers are physically capable to
carry out their designated responsibilities, and the workers carry
certificates of training with them. The fluid hauling company shall
ensure that the equipment and facilities it is contracted to supply are
available during the operation, are in good working order, and aredesigned for the parameters of the project. Pressure test certification,
material inspections, and sour service specifications shall be made
available when requested.
4.0.13.7 Wel l Designa t i on f o r Work e r Safe t y i n H 2S Env i r onm entsIRP Sweet and Sour designations are used by industry and legislative bodies
as a reference for administrative purposes. For technical purposes
specific concentrations of hydrogen sulphide will dictate appropriate
equipment requirements to conduct a task safely, maintaining the
health and safety of the worker while ensuring the integrity of theequipment. The well designations of this IRP are centred on hydrogen
sulphide (H2S) content, which through inhalation, is the most frequently
encountered hazardous substance by well testing workers. There may
be other substances as onerous for maintaining worker safety and must
be considered when planning work programs. Provincial Occupational
Health and Safety Acts define the exposure limits for numerous
substances. Those documents should be referred to when substances
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
29/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xxv
other than hydrogen sulphide (H2S) are known to be present at the well
site. The well designations in this IRP are designed for worker safety
when working in hydrogen sulphide (H2S) environments.Sweet Well
10 ppm hydrogen sulphide content or less: Designated as sweet.
A well with a hydrogen sulphide (H2S) content of 0.01 moles / kilomole
(10 ppm) or less is designated as sweet.
The hazards of sweet gas to the worker, from exposure or inhalation,
are less than those imposed by sour gas and therefore require a
minimum of two SCBAs on all wells to aid in protecting the worker.
Other requirements are detailed throughout these IRPs. Material
specifications relative to metallurgy for equipment used to flow wells
containing zero H2S content are not as stringent as those required forwells containing H2S.
Ref e r ences / L inks
Section 4.2 Well Testing
NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers)
ASME B31.3
4.0.13.7 .1 . Sour We l l More than 10 ppm hydrogen sulphide content: Designated as sour .
Any well with a hydrogen sulphide (H2S) concentration greater than
0.01 moles/ kilomole (10ppm) is designated as sour .
Sour gas hazards relative to worker safety requires specific equipment
to protect the worker.
Prescriptive guidelines for the quantity and use of breathing equipment
to protect the worker are outlined in this IRP and other provincial
regulations.
Additionally, gas, containing H2S, is more corrosive to metals and thus,
requires precautions when selecting equipment to perform well testing
operations.
Section4.2.3 H2S Service Equipment Requirementsof this IRP provides
guidelines relating to equipment selection for use in H2S environments.
http://search.asme.org/vivisimo/cgi-bin/query-meta?input-form=simple&v%3Asources=asme-test-vivisimo&v%3Aproject=asme-search&query=b31.3http://search.asme.org/vivisimo/cgi-bin/query-meta?input-form=simple&v%3Asources=asme-test-vivisimo&v%3Aproject=asme-search&query=b31.3http://search.asme.org/vivisimo/cgi-bin/query-meta?input-form=simple&v%3Asources=asme-test-vivisimo&v%3Aproject=asme-search&query=b31.3 -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
30/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xxvi October 2009
Ref e r ences / L inks
Section 4.2 Well Testing
Provincial Occupation Health and Safety Acts
Alberta Chemical Hazards RegulationSections 2 & 9
NACE MR 01-75 LATEST EDITION
ASME B31.3
4.0.13.7 .2 . Cri t ica l Sour W el l Critical Sour Wells are defined by appropriate Provincial Regulatory
Agencies.
They generally include all the elements of a sour well plus an amplified
concern for residents in close proximity to the well site along with
environmental issues.
In AlbertaDirective 071: Emergency Preparedness and Response
Requirements for the Petroleum Industry
4.0.13.8 Meta l lu rgy cons ide ra t ions fo r H 2S env i ronmen t s H2S affects the integrity of metals not designed for use in H2S
environments.
Other elements such as CO2 also have corrosive affects on metals. The
requirement for special metallurgy in equipment is not related to a sour
designation of a well.
It is related to H2S Partial Pressure and Sulphide Stress Cracking as
defined by the National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE).
Ref e r ences/ L inks
Section 4.2.3 H2S Service Equipment Requirements
NACE MR 01-75 LATEST EDITION specifications
http://www.employment.alberta.ca/SFW/307.htmlhttp://www.employment.alberta.ca/SFW/307.htmlhttp://www.nace.org/nace/index.asphttp://www.nace.org/nace/index.asphttp://search.asme.org/vivisimo/cgi-bin/query-meta?input-form=simple&v%3Asources=asme-test-vivisimo&v%3Aproject=asme-search&query=b31.3http://search.asme.org/vivisimo/cgi-bin/query-meta?input-form=simple&v%3Asources=asme-test-vivisimo&v%3Aproject=asme-search&query=b31.3http://www.ercb.ca/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_0_323_253_0_43/http%3B/ercbContent/publishedcontent/publish/ercb_home/industry_zone/rules__regulations__requirements/directives/directive071.aspxhttp://www.ercb.ca/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_0_323_253_0_43/http%3B/ercbContent/publishedcontent/publish/ercb_home/industry_zone/rules__regulations__requirements/directives/directive071.aspxhttp://www.ercb.ca/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_0_323_253_0_43/http%3B/ercbContent/publishedcontent/publish/ercb_home/industry_zone/rules__regulations__requirements/directives/directive071.aspxhttp://www.ercb.ca/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_0_323_253_0_43/http%3B/ercbContent/publishedcontent/publish/ercb_home/industry_zone/rules__regulations__requirements/directives/directive071.aspxhttp://www.nace.org/nace/index.asphttp://www.nace.org/nace/index.asphttp://www.nace.org/nace/index.asphttp://www.ercb.ca/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_0_323_253_0_43/http%3B/ercbContent/publishedcontent/publish/ercb_home/industry_zone/rules__regulations__requirements/directives/directive071.aspxhttp://www.ercb.ca/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_0_323_253_0_43/http%3B/ercbContent/publishedcontent/publish/ercb_home/industry_zone/rules__regulations__requirements/directives/directive071.aspxhttp://search.asme.org/vivisimo/cgi-bin/query-meta?input-form=simple&v%3Asources=asme-test-vivisimo&v%3Aproject=asme-search&query=b31.3http://www.nace.org/nace/index.asphttp://www.employment.alberta.ca/SFW/307.html -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
31/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xxvii
4.0.13.9
Gas De tec t ion Mon i to r ing fo r Exp los ive and Flam m ab le Lim i ts( Fu r th e r i n f o rm a t i on seeI RP 18- Fire and Explosion Hazard
Management)
IRP The owners site representative must be trained and competent in the
use of gas detection meters. The site representative must possess or
make available at the wellsite, a gas detection meter capable of
measuring LEL.
IRP Where the owner does not have a site representative, the owner shall
ensure a gas detection meter is available to the site workers.
IRP One person per shift must be trained and competent in the use of gas
detection meters where gas vapours will be vented to atmosphere or
there is a potential of gas vapours to be released to the atmosphere. All
users must be properly trained and competent.
IRP No worker shall enter the 50 metre sa f et y zone around an open tank
system where gas vapours have been vented to atmosphere until
cleared to do so by the owners site representative or the worker who is
responsible for monitoring the area with a gas detection meter.
NOTE: Refer toSection 4.3 Other Flowbacks, for more detail on the
requirement of gas detection and flowing wells to open tank systems.
I n t r o d u c t i o n : Gas detectors have become an everyday part of equipment
requirements on an oil and gas site. There must be accurate methods of detecting
the absence or presence of various gases, so the workplace can be maintained
safe and productive.
Exp los i ve o r F lamm ab i l i t y L im i t s :
The term limits of flammability or explosive limits, refers to the percentage by
volume of a fuel in a fuel/air mixture which will burn. The flammable rangespreads between the lower flammable limit and the upper flammable limit. Fuel
/air mixtures outside the flammable range will not burn or explode.
http://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspx -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
32/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xxviii October 2009
Flammable limits for some common flammable gases and vapours are in listed
below.
T ab l e 1 : F l amm ab l e L i m i t s
Exp los ive
L im i t s ( % b y
vo l . I n a i r )
LEL
UEL
Flash Point
Degrees
Cels ius
Vapour
Dens i t y A i r
= 1 .0
I g n i t i on
T emp .
Degrees
Cels ius
Ammonia 15.0 28.0 Gas 0.58 630
Butane 1.8 9.0 Gas 2.0 410
Carbon Monoxide 12.5 74.0 Gas 0.97 570
Diesel 0.3 10.0 52 > 3.0 < 171
Ethane 3.0 12.5 Gas 1.0 472
Hydrogen Sulphide 4.0 45.0 Gas 1.19 260
Ethyl Alcohol 3.3 19.0 +13 1.59 365
Methanol 6 7.6 16c 1.1 464
Methane 5.0 15.0 Gas 0.55 538
Propane 2.2 10.0 Gas 1.5 450
Toluene 1.3 7.0 +4 3.14 535
Common Frac Oils 1.0 7.0 (less than1.0)
200
Gasoline 1.3 8.0 3.2
NOTE: To caution about methanol vapours affecting sensors. Please refer to
your MSDS for all chemicals
A flammable gas is considered to be a gas that will burn when there is a
concentration of oxygen in the air. Flammable mixtures cannot be ignited and
continue to maintain a flame, unless the concentration of fuel is greater than the
LEL and lower than the UEL.
A methane/air mixture must contain more than 5% methane by volume for the
mixture to burn. If the mixture contains more than 15% methane by volume, it is
considered to be too rich and will not burn. The concentration must be within the
flammable range to ignite or sustain a fire.
Oxygen
The normal concentration of oxygen in ambient air is 20.9%. Abnormal
circumstances can cause this level to be increased or decreased. Oxygen
deficiency refers to abnormally low oxygen levels that can be serious and is often
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
33/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xxix
an undetected risk to human life. Reduction of oxygen levels is usually caused by
the consumption of oxygen by some chemical reaction or combustion within a
confined area or by displacement by other gases.
Oxygen enrichment refers to abnormally high concentrations of oxygen that can
be dangerous because of its tendency to increase the flammability and
explosiveness of materials and fuels. The leaking of compressed oxygen
containers in confined areas usually causes enrichment.
For safe entry, oxygen levels must be between 19.5% and 23.0%.
Flam m able and Exp los ive Gases
Explosions occur when a flammable mixture of gas comes into contact with a heat
source that exceeds the ignition temperature of the gas mixture. Not allconcentrations of flammable gases will explode. The Lower Explosive Limit (LEL)
determines the minimum concentration of the flammable gas in air that will burn.
Concentrations below the LEL and above the Upper Explosive Limit (UEL) will not
burn. Unfortunately, gas/air mixtures are seldom uniform so it is likely that if any
amount of combustible gas is detected then at some point in the system or
container, the concentration may be explosive. Flammable liquids normally have a
low flash point. This refers to the temperature at which the liquid releases vapours
at a rate sufficient to form an explosive mixture with air. Liquids with flash points
below ambient temperature will immediately release dangerous concentrations of
gas. Liquid leaks can be as hazardous as gas leaks.
Vapou r Dens i t y
When monitoring for the presence of gases or vapours, it is important to
understand vapour density, which provides valuable clues as to where to locate
gas sensors. Density is a characteristic of materials and is similar to weight. For
gases and vapours, air is considered to be the standard reference and its density
is set at 1.0. Gases and vapours lighter than air have densities less than 1.0 while
those heavier than air have densities greater than 1.0.
Assuming that air currents are negligible, it can be said that gases and vapours
with densities less than 1.0, such as methane, will tend to rise from the point of
escape and subsequently disperse into the atmosphere or accumulate in spaces
under roof structures of buildings.
Heavier-than-air gases such as propane and H2S tend to fall from the point of
escape, perhaps to floor level where some mixing with air occurs thus creating
pockets of mixtures, some explosive, others not. If there are sub-floor spaces
such as drain channels, pipe and cableways, and storage pits, then these heavier
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
34/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xxx October 2009
than air gases tend to accumulate there. A suitable source of ignition in such
areas will surely result in explosion and fire. Refer toFlammable limits for some
common flammable gases and vapourstable above.
I g n i t i o n Te m p e r a t u r e
Ignition temperature is the temperature that will cause a combustible mixture of
gas vapour to explode or burst into flame. Various fuels mixed in a variety of
concentrations can be explosive when ignited by the presence of a spark, flame or
hot surface that exceeds the ignition temperature. Variables such as
concentrations, pressure, and temperature all have an effect on ignition
temperature.
Pyr opho r i c I r on Su lph ides
Pyrophoric Iron Sulphides are created when rust and H2S combine in an oxygen
free environment
Pyrophoric meaning they can spontaneously ignite when exposed to oxygen.
They are created in oxygen free environments such as piping systems, reservoirs,
wellbore, and vessels where H2S has been present without oxygen.
Essentially rust (or Iron Oxide) is converted in Iron Sulphide, when these Iron
Sulphides are exposed to oxygen; an oxidation process begins that eventually
turns the iron sulphides back into iron oxide form.
This process creates an enormous amount of heat causing (in some cases) the
iron particles to illuminate and possibly glow. This is when nearby fuel sources
such as propane from a purge or other hydrocarbons can be ignited.
There is no set H2S content at which Pyrophoric Iron Sulphides will form or be
present, however there are some heavily researched indicators to the presence of
Iron Sulphides. They include
Scaling
Asphaltines
Sludge
Rust
Solids
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
35/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xxxi
The age of a sour well, and long periods of time with equipment on sour
operations such as multizone sour completions can also be factors in determining
whether or not Iron Sulphides may be present
With an auto ignition temperature below that of room temperature, they pose a
definite hazard.
IRP A hazard assessment should be completed on iron sulphides for sour
locations. The operating companys site representative must be present.
The above mentioned indicators should be addressed if applicable.
Previous well analysis information if applicable, or operating company
technical/physical judgment of possible Iron Sulphides should be
addressed.These hazard assessments may be able to identify a
operating company or your companys Pyrophoric Iron Sulphide
procedures and safety guidelines. Local or federal legislation may alsobe valid.
Locat ion of Gas Sensors
Location of the gas sensor is very important. In general, lighter than air gases
requires the sensor to be positioned near the ceiling and heavier than air gases
require sensors positioned at low levels or in pits or trenches. Some things to
consider include:
Hydrogen sulphide mixed with methane in a process stream may follow
the same migration patterns as methane during a gas leak
Temperature, humidity, and air ventilation patterns
Mounting detectors close to the entrance of buildings, on the outside
wall.
Gas Detec to rs Measur ing Percen t LEL
Some gas detectors have two scales; the 100% scale measuring the % of a
flammable gas in a mixture, and the 4% scale for measuring the % of the LEL
Assume that the meter has been designed to measure hydrogen in a mixture. The
LEL of hydrogen is 4%. If a reading taken on the 100% scale indicates 10%, thenthe mixture is 10% hydrogen and is above the LEL of hydrogen. If a reading on
the 4% range indicates 10%, then the mixture contains 10% of the hydrogen
necessary to produce a flammable mixture. The mixture actually contains 4% x
0.1 = 0.4% hydrogen by volume.
The equipment operator must understand the difference between measuring the
% LEL and the % of flammable gas.
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
36/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xxxii October 2009
Always consult the manufacturers operating instructions and procedures prior to
interpreting the results.
Caut ion:
No person shall remain in or enter into an area containing more than
20% LEL, unless it is for an emergency or rescue situation by trained
and competent individual(s)
When testing gas for LEL remember that the H2S concentration is
important relative to the safety of the worker conducting the LEL test.
The LEL of hydrogen sulphide is 4% gas by volume, which equates to
40,000 parts per million H2S.
Anytime the H2S exceeds 10 ppm special safety precautions must beimplemented.
At 40,000 ppm H2S, a worker would be immediately overcome while
testing for LEL.
These devices must not be used for continuous monitoring or for testing
H2S concentration in the gas
Pr epa r ing t he Me t e r
Be sure to follow the directions supplied by the manufacturer of your
gas detector.
Testing the atmospheres for the safety of workers requires that the gas
detection equipment be in perfect condition, properly calibrated, and will
be operated by trained and competent people.
Some portable equipment is designed to test for a combination of any of
the following: oxygen, hydrogen sulphide, carbon dioxide, and
flammable levels.
NOTE: Refer to CAPPFlammable Environments GuidelineandIRP 18 - Fire and
Explosion Hazard Management
4 .0 .13 .10 Moni to r ing fo r Exp los ive Mix tu r esIRP Monitoring for explosive mixtures with a suitable calibrated monitoring
device in the vicinity of potential ignition sources (e.g., pump) during
pumping/flowback operations is recommended. The monitoring device
must be calibrated using an appropriate calibration gas. The operations
http://www.capp.ca/Pages/DocInfo.aspx?DocID=81688http://www.capp.ca/Pages/DocInfo.aspx?DocID=81688http://www.capp.ca/Pages/DocInfo.aspx?DocID=81688http://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.capp.ca/Pages/DocInfo.aspx?DocID=81688 -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
37/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xxxiii
must be suspended or an alternate method of flowback initiated to
eliminate an explosion risk around potential ignition sources.
IRP Wind direction devices must be strategically located around the lease.
NOTE: Monitoring for explosive mixtures with a suitable device is the only
practical method of determining safe operating conditions. Judging
conditions based on sight, smell, wind directions, etc., may be very
deceiving in that explosive mixture levels can change rapidly during a
flow back situation. Portable monitoring devices are available that give
direct readout of combustible gas explosive limits. A fixed sensor could
be located in an enclosed area such as rig pump house, separator
building etc.
4 .0 .13 .11 Cal ib ra t ion o f Exp los ive Mix t u r e Mon i to rsIRP Explosive mixture monitors must be calibrated regularly by a qualified
individual (seeIRP 18). Monitoring devices must be calibrated using an
appropriate calibration gas. Defective devices must be replaced or
serviced prior to commencing a flow back operation where monitoring
for explosive mixture will be required. The owners representative must
be aware of the limitations of the monitor for the gases and fluids
expected.
NOTE: As with any safety device, the degree of dependability of a gas detector
is directly proportional to the care it receives. All explosive mixture
monitors require routine maintenance on a regular basis, which includes
cleaning the device and its sampling system, checking voltage supply to
the unit and performing regular calibrations. Some of this servicing may
require the services of a qualified technician.
4 .0 .13 .12 Hydr a tes : Aw areness and Hand l ingGas hydrates are crystalline compounds formed, by the chemical combination of
natural gas and water, under pressure at temperatures considerably above the
freezing point of water. In the presence of free water, hydrates will form when the
temperature of the gas is below a certain temperature, called the hydrate
temperature. Hydrate formation is often confused with condensation and the
difference between the two must be clearly understood. Condensation of water
from natural gas under pressure occurs when the temperature is at or below the
dew point at that pressure. Hence, the hydrate temperature would be below and
perhaps the same as, but never above the dew point temperature. (Dew point is
the state of a system characterized by the coexistence of a vapour phase with an
http://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspxhttp://www.enform.ca/publications/IRP/fire_and_explosion.aspx -
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
38/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xxxiv October 2009
infinitesimal quantity of liquid phase in equilibrium. Dew point pressure is the fluid
pressure in a system at its dew point.)
While conducting tests, it becomes necessary to define, and thereby avoid,
conditions that promote the formation of hydrates. This is essential to the proper
field conduct of tests since hydrates may choke the flow string, surface lines, and
the well testing equipment. Hydrate formation in the flow string would result in a
lower value for measured wellhead pressures. In a flowrate-measuring device,
hydrate formation could result in a lower or higher gas flow rate. Excessive
hydrate formation may also completely block flowlines and surface equipment.
I n s u m m a r y , c on d i t i o n s p r om o t i n g h y d r a t e f o r m a t i o n a r e :
Primary conditions:
Gas must be at or below its water dew point with free water present
Low temperature
High pressure
Secondary conditions:
High velocities
Pressure pulsations
Any type of agitation
Presence of H2S and C02
Introduction of a small hydrate crystal
High specific gas gravity
For the purpose of well testing it is convenient to divide hydrate formation into
two categories:
1) Hydrate formation due to decrease in temperature, with no sudden drop in
pressure, such as in flow string or surface lines.
2) Hydrate formation where a sudden expansion occurs and/or pressure drops
such as in flow provers, orifices, backpressure regulators, and chokes.
If ambient temperature is low enough, ice build up may occur on the inside of pipe
when left idle, after flowing, due to condensation residue left on the inside walls of
piping systems. This is not a hydrate although it could lead to the formation of a
hydrate by the introduction of a hydrate crystal to the flow stream.
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
39/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xxxv
IRP For the awareness and prevention of hydrates:
Programs supplied by the well owner should identify potential hydrate
problems by way of bottomhole temperatures, presence of free water,H2S and CO2 content, gas gravity, and downhole restrictions
Pre job safety meetings should reference the possibility of hydrates
Incorporate the primary and secondary conditions listed above
Provision for the injection of methanol should be planned prior to
flowing of the well
Consideration should be given to batching or injecting methanol down
the tubing and/or the annulus, if applicable, prior to flowing
Methanol should be batched or injected into the wellhead flowline before
opening the well to flow and during any future shutdown periods so as
to prevent ice build up on the inside walls of piping systems
Flowlines should be purged with a gas medium (propane/N2), where
available and when extended shut down periods are anticipated,
especially during cold weather operations
The introduction of surface heating facilities, such as line heaters, will
assist in the prevention of hydrates in surface equipment
Staging pressure drops will assist in the prevention of hydrates in
surface equipment.
Hydrate charts/tables must be available on the well site. The well test
supervisor must be trained and competent on the use of these charts
and tables.
IRP Where hydrate formation or ice build up is suspected in surface flow
lines, the lines must be proven to be clear by purging with methanol or
a warm gas or fluid before the lines are broken apart.
IRP During the pressure testing procedure and start up, all non-essential
workers must vacate the surrounding area of the testing equipment,flow lines, and wellhead.
SeeA p p en d i x V I I for hydrate graphs
Caut ion: Hydrates travelling through pipes have a high potential for plugging,
overpressuring, or rupturing lines.
NOTE: Sour gas more readily forms a hydrate than sweet gas
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
40/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xxxvi October 2009
4 .0 .13 .13 Work e r Sa fet y
IRP Before commencing any operation a pre-job safety meeting must beheld and hazard assessment performed and communicated. Suggested
topics are:
Scope of work
Procedures to be followed
Pertinent well and fluid characteristics
Responsibilities of each person involved in the operation
Emergency procedures, special hazards, and safe briefing areas
NOTE: Equipment must be routinely serviced and tested by qualified/competent
workers as per the manufacturer's specifications or regulatory
requirements. The owners representative is responsible to ensure an
onsite pre-job safety equipment inspection is completed (seeAppendix
V Production Testing Services Inspection Checklist).
IRP All applicable federal and provincial regulations must be adhered to,
such as TDG, WHMIS and Occupational Health and Safety, and WCB.
4 .0 .13 .14 Min imum Work e r Wear Requ i remen tsIRP A written protective clothing policy must be available onsite. The
following minimum work wear requirements must be followed:
A hardhat must be worn in the work area
Safety (steel toed) footwear must be worn in the work area
Safety goggles, safety glasses or safety prescription glasses with side
shields must be worn
Where hazardous chemicals exists, consult MSDS
Hearing protection where over exposure to noise may occur
Gloves must be worn as required, (e.g., specialty gloves for chemicals,
leather gloves for handling pipe, etc)
Un-torn, fitted clothing must be worn in the work area
Outer or covering apparel must be fire retardant where the potential for
fires exists
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
41/151
Well Testing and Fluid Handling IRP4
October 2009 xxxvii
Natural fibres for innerwear is preferred over synthetic fibres as
synthetic fibres do not provide adequate protection from heat related
exposure and they contribute to static electricity generation
All clothing that becomes contaminated with hazardous chemicals or
flammable fluids must be removed and replaced
Minimum safe standards for hard hats, footwear, eye wear, and ear
protection should be determined by the well testing company. The
following standards are appropriate:
Hardhats: CSA Z94.1
Footwear: CSA Z195 Grade 1
Eyewear, Goggles: CSA Z94.3
Hearing Protection: CSA Z94.2
4 .0 .13 .15 Min im um Genera l Sa fe ty S tandardsIRP The following minimum standards must be followed:
No smoking within 50 m of potentially flammable vapours
Facial hair must not impede the sealing of respiratory equipment
Intoxicating substances and intoxicated persons are not allowed on
location
General fatigue management
Firearms are not allowed on location except for emergency ignition of
uncontrolled gases.
An adequate supply of potable water must be on location (i.e., for
drinking, and emergency washing)
Good housekeeping practice is required for all of the location
The requirements of Workplace Hazardous Material Information Systemand TDG must be followed
A form of wind direction indicators must be present on location (e.g.,
windsocks, flagging tape, etc.)
An operational field phone must be present on location
A list of emergency contacts must be conspicuously posted on location
-
7/31/2019 IRP 4 2009 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
42/151
IRP4 Well Testing and Fluid Handling
xxxviii October 2009
A means of transport for injured persons must be on location in
accordance with local jurisdictions
An unobstructed exit path must be available
The safety standby method must be employed for all hazardous work
A properly calibrated gas detection apparatus must be on location.
Personnel must be properly trained in the use of this apparatus
H2S determinations must be performed while wearing breathing
apparatus. A minimum of two positive pressure type apparatus must be
at location and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's
specifications and regulatory requirements
On sour well sites where the H2S concentration is greater than 10 ppm,the owner must provideSABAs in addition toSCBA.
When a significant volume of wellhead gas is produced, either to an
orifice device, or through a separator, notification should be given as
required by the local provincial authority.
Se e Section 4.0.13.18 Gas Flares
First Aid equipment and/or attendants must be supplied as specified by
the provincial OH&S authority
Appropriate fire fighting equipment must be available as determined by
the Hazard Assessment, Fire and Explosion Control Plan, and applicable
regulations.
Cold separator or pressure tank rig-up: Minimum 2 Class ABC, 9 kg
Heated Unit and flare stack or line heater, pressure tank and flare stack:
Minimum 3 Class ABC, 9 kg
Heated unit or line heater/pressure tank combination with second stage
separation or more than one item of auxiliary flow equipment: Minimum
4 Class ABC, 9 kg
Wellsite illumination must be sufficient to safely perform the job (RefertoIRP 23 Lease Lighting Standardscurrently under construction)
Safety stairs (or equivalent devices that would allow a rescue at the top
of a tank other than by ladder access) are required whenever breathing
apparatus is required at the top of a tank
Fall arrest equipment and a fall protection plan must be available as
required by OH&S regulations