investors‘ attitudes towards robo- …€˜ attitudes towards robo-advisors evidence from the us...
TRANSCRIPT
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES
TOWARDS ROBO-
ADVISORS EVIDENCE FROM THE US
AND THE UK
Data - Analysis – Implications and Learnings
www.MyPrivateBanking.com
May 2016
Carmela Melone
Analyst
Report Extract
Original Report with 48 pages
Plus full set of US and UK survey data as Powerpoint Slides and Excel file
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 2
CONTENT TABLE
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
2.0 METHODOLOGY 7
2.1 REPORT OBJECTIVE 7
2.2 SURVEY SAMPLE 7
2.3 DEMOGRAPHICS 7
2.4 AMOUNT OF INVESTABLE ASSETS – CURRENCY CONVERSION 8
2.5 SURVEY QUESTIONS 8
2.6 DATA ANALYSIS 9
3.0 INTRODUCTION 10
3.1 UK AND U.S. – BREEDING GROUNDS FOR ROBO ADVICE 12
4.0 MAIN FINDINGS 16
4.1 US FINDINGS: INVESTORS ARE PREDOMINANTLY SELF-DIRECTED WITH A
MIXED PICTURE IN TERMS OF SUPPORT FROM AN ONLINE INVESTING PLATFORM 16
4.2 UK FINDINGS: THE YOUNGER UK INVESTORS ARE, THE MORE MIXED THEIR
INVESTMENT APPROACH 23
4.3 THE BIG PICTURE – MILLENNIALS ARE RE-SHAPING THE INVESTMENT LANDSCAPE 33
5.0 INVESTORS’ VIEWS ON ONLINE INVESTMENT TOOLS:
KEY TAKE-AWAYS 35
5.1 DATA RESULTS IN A NUTSHELL 37
5.2 IMPLICATIONS / LEARNING POINTS 38
APPENDIX 39
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE 39
PROVIDERS OF ROBO-ADVISORS 44
AUTHORS 47
DISCLAIMER 48
To order the full report, please click here.
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 3
TABLE OF CHARTS
Hybrid online investment services – key benefits 11
Current robo market coverage 12
The growth of the robo-advisor market 13
How robo-advisor terms are trending on Google 14
US investors’ willingness to pay for robo vs. human financial advice 17
Robo-advisor brand awareness in the US 19
Desirable technical features of online investment tools 21
People’s view about replacing in-person advice with digital communication tools 22
UK investors’ investment experience by age segment 25
How UK investors interact with their financial advisors/institutions by wealth segment 26
What do UK investors think about the likeliness that digital channels will replace in-person advice? 27
UK investors’ willingness to pay for robo vs. human financial advice 29
Technical features UK investors think robo-advisors should have 30
UK investors’ satisfaction levels with regard to their wealth managers’ services 31
Awareness of the robo technology among the respondents (US vs. UK) 32
Willingness to pay for robo advisory services: UK vs. USA 33
What people think about robo-advisors’ benefits 35
What people think about robo-advisors’ shortcomings 36
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 4
SUMMARY
The majority of affluent and high-net-worth
individuals recognize the potential of robo-advisors
and automated investment services to add value to
their wealth management services. This is a main
finding of MyPrivateBanking’s recent quantitative
panel survey, with insights from 600 affluent and
wealthy investors in the US and the UK. The report
analyzes in depth the views and opinions of
individual investors with regard to the robo-advisor
topic. Besides exploring investors’ attitudes
towards specific features of online investment
platforms, the survey tests brand awareness and
the target market’s level of openness towards
innovation in this field. In addition to the
comprehensive analysis all results are detailed in
extensive data appendices.
HIGH-NET-WORTH INDIVIDUALS USE ONLINE
INVESTMENT TOOLS MORE THAN OTHER
INVESTORS
More than 70% of overall respondents think that
such tools can positively influence their wealth
manager’s advice and decision-making process and
that automated advice potentially speeds up
onboarding processes such as registration and
account opening, making these processes more
efficient and convenient. This underlines how the
young and the wealthy are especially showing a
great openness, awareness and knowledge about
robo advice.
Interestingly, the adoption of automated wealth
advice is happening faster in the high-net-worth
segment than mass affluent with current usage of
online wealth management tools at 43% and 17%,
respectively.
The report also identifies the major concerns
investors have in respect to robo-advisors and how
the respondents rate the quality of human advice
compared to that of robos.
UK AND US INVESTORS ARE BOTH OPEN TO
ROBO-ADVICE, BUT DIFFER IN THEIR
SENSITIVITY TO PRICE
Overall, investors on both sides of the Atlantic
show strong similarities in their awareness and
openness towards automated / robo advice, which
are detailed in the report. Despite the trends both
countries have in common, some striking
differences were also observed. Among them, this
includes the finding that UK investors would pay
more for robo (and human-only) advice and in the
US, a much higher share of respondents state that
they don’t think they will use robo advice tools in
the future. The report identifies the price point
investors would pay and also the various levels of
brand awareness current leading robo-advisors
have with investors in the US and UK.
WEALTH MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY’S FUTURE
WILL BE IN AUTOMATED ADVISORY
SERVICES
The report provides clear, empirical evidence on
why automated advice and robo services are a
significant part of every wealth manager’s future. It
shows how automation can enhance client
satisfaction throughout the different stages of the
advisory process and which channels investors like
to use to contact their wealth managers. The
report also identifies the most important value-
added services investors would like to see in a
robo-advisor tool and to which target segments
automated services appeal most.
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 5
2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 REPORT OBJECTIVE
This report aims to reveal affluent and high-net-
worth investors’ views and opinions with regard to
the robo-advisor topic. Besides identifying
investors’ attitudes towards specific features of
online investment platforms, the survey tests
brand awareness and the target market’s level of
openness towards innovation in this field.
Additionally, we evaluate the digital
communication behavior of clients including their
preference for different channels and online
features, in order to track developments since our
Global Survey of Mobile Disruption in Wealth
Management 2014.
2.2 SURVEY SAMPLE
This report is based on a quantitative panel survey
launched in March 2016. The survey consists of 19
questions targeting mass affluent, affluent and
high-net-worth individuals in the UK and the US.
We selected these two countries as they are
today’s hotspots for FinTech startups and robo-
advisor tools.
The 600 participants in our survey were randomly
selected based on the following criteria:
(… more in full report)
2.3 DEMOGRAPHICS
The following table shows the distribution for the
most important variables by market.
(Details in full report)
Traits Variable USA UK
Age group
18-29 13% 23%
30-39 31% 27%
40-49 27% 29%
50-59 20% 16%
60+ 9% 5%
Gender Male 43% 58%
Female 57% 42%
Amount of investable
assets
$100k-$200k
91% 81%
$200k-$500k
8% 14%
More than $500k
0.7% 4.3%
(Note: n=600, some totals in the table are
shown as rounded values. )
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 6
2.4 AMOUNT OF INVESTABLE
ASSETS – CURRENCY
CONVERSION
In order to determine the segments for the
amount of investable assets, MyPrivateBanking
Research classified the ranges accordingly when
converting the segments into other currencies.
However, as currencies fluctuate over time, future
translation back to USD may cause values to differ.
Mass affluent
Affluent HNWI
US Up to $500k
$500k - $1 million
More than $1 million
UK Up to £300k
£300k - £600k
More than £600k
Throughout the report, the ranges are quoted in
USD for consistency.
2.5 SURVEY QUESTIONS
This report aims to analyze the attitudes of
affluent/wealthy individuals towards the use of
automated advice/guidance platforms, such as
those launched in the past 10 years, often by new
entrants characterized as FinTech players.
(… more in full report)
Our questions to investors cover the following
areas:
(… more in full report)
The full questionnaire is available on page 11 of
this extract.
2.6 DATA ANALYSIS
After the field phase, the data was analyzed with
regard to basic statistical measures such as
frequency distributions. In addition to the overall
statistics, the sample was segmented by country,
age group and the amount of investable assets in
order to determine any significant differences and
demographical trends.
The full survey results are available in the data
appendix.
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 7
3.0 INTRODUCTION
(… more in full report pages 10 to 15)
4.0 MAIN FINDINGS
(… more in full report pages 16 to 34)
5.0 INVESTORS’ VIEWS ON
ONLINE INVESTMENT
TOOLS: KEY TAKE-AWAYS
(… more in full report pages 35 to 38)
APPENDIX 1: PROVIDERS OF ROBO-
ADVISORS
The market overview charts in chapter 3 are based
on the following list of global providers of robo-
advisors or hybrid solutions for financial advice,
which does not claim completeness. Some
companies included do not yet offer their robo
advice product but are planning do so in the next
months (listed with those launched in 2016).
(… more in full report pages 39 to 48)
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 8
APPENDIX 2: DATASET U.S. (Powerpoint):
U.S. SURVEY
What do affluent and HNW investors
think about robo-advisors?
1
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 9
APPENDIX 3: DATASET UK (Powerpoint):
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 10
APPEDNIX 4: FULL DATASET (Powerpoint):
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 11
APPENIX 5: FULL SURVEY DATASET FOR 600 RESPONDENTS
(…)
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 12
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
INTRO:
There is a growing market of online tools that help users to develop investment strategies and monitor the
performance of their assets – a task traditionally performed by a financial advisor. In our study that will be
based on this questionnaire we would like to test the readiness of affluent and high-net-worth people to
using such online investment tools (also known as “robo-advisors”).
1.) Which of the following statements matches your investment type best?
I leave all investment decisions to my advisor
I consult my advisor before I make investment decisions but I take them myself
I take all decisions myself without consulting an advisor or an online investment platform
I take investment decisions myself but I am consulting an online investment platform
I delegate all my investment decisions to an online investment platform (robo-advisor)
2.) How do you usually interact with your financial advisor/financial institution?
In person
Via telephone
Via e-mail
Via text or video chat
On social networks
Via mobile apps offered by my financial institution/financial advisor
Other
3.) How much experience do you have in investing in the following?
Stocks
Bonds
Cash
Real estate
Savings account
Life insurance
ETFs
Mutual funds (US) | Unit trusts / OIECs (UK)
4.) Have you heard about/are you familiar with the concepts of robo-advisors, online investment
platforms or automated investment services?
I never came across these concepts or terms
I’ve heard/read about them
I know quite a lot about these concepts
I know them in detail
5.) Are you already using an online investment platform that supports you in your investment decisions?
yes (Q6)
no, and I don’t think I will in the future (Q7)
no, but I could imagine using an online investment tool in the future (Q6)
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 13
6.) What share of your investable assets would you consider managing/are you managing with an online investment tool? Jump to Q8 Less than 10 % Between 10% and 25% Between 25% and 50% Between 50% and 75% Between 75 and 100%
7.) Would you be more likely to use such an online platform if it was recommended by a trusted online service provider you already use (e.g. car/home/life insurer, sports club,…)? scale: very unlikely – unlikely – neutral – likely – very likely
8.) How much time would you expect to spend on completing a questionnaire about yourself during registration process? Up to 5 minutes Between 5 and 10 minutes Between 10 and 20 minutes Between 20 and 30 minutes More than 30 minutes
9.) What topics should such a questionnaire cover in your opinion? Age Family Income Planned retirement age Investable assets Attitude to risk Financial knowledge Personal investment preferences (e.g. social impact or ethics) I don’t know Other:
10.) Do you agree or disagree with the following: With regard to client-advisor collaboration, online
investment tools…
can help financial advisors to make better decisions/to improve the quality of their advice
can make registration and/or account opening processes faster and more efficient
can improve the client-advisor relationship through convenient contact options like text or video
chat
can help to make the advisory process more transparent and objective
11.) Do you agree or disagree with the following statements on the downsides of online investment tools?
These tools are too expensive
These tools are not transparent enough
My financial advisor knows me better than an online investment tool could ever do
I don’t believe a software platform can give advice of equal quality to a human advisor’s
I don’t think online-based investment tools are trustworthy
Advisors will probably rely too much on these tools and will stop to think and research on their own
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 14
12.) Which of the following companies do you connect with tools that support investors through online
investment tools?
US Survey UK Survey
Betterment Money on Toast
FutureAdvisor Nutmeg
Jemstep Moneyfarm
Wealthfront Zen Assets
Charles Schwab Intelligent Portfolios Wealth Horizon
Vanguard Personal Advisor Services Other, please specify
Wisebanyan
SigFig
Personal Capital
LearnVest
Other, please specify
13.) How satisfied are you with the following services of your existing wealth manager/financial advisor?
Retirement planning/Financial planning
Asset selection
Monitoring the investor’s assets
Automatic adjustments to the investor’s assets (re-balancing of portfolio)
Trading
Personalized investment proposals that match unique preferences, e.g. in terms of ethics or social
impact (‘thematic investing’)
Reporting
Access to research reports
Legal advice in financial matters
Investment account aggregation
Tax optimization
14.) For which of the following investment tasks would you consider to get support from an online advisory
platform?
Retirement planning/Financial planning
Asset selection
Monitoring the investor’s assets
Automatic adjustments to the investor’s assets (re-balancing of portfolio)
Trading
Personalized investment proposals that match unique preferences, e.g. in terms of ethics or social
impact (‘thematic investing’)
Reporting
Access to research reports
Legal advice in financial matters
Investment account aggregation
Tax optimization
Others (please enter)
I don’t know
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 15
15.) What technical features do you think an online investment tool should offer?
A corresponding mobile app
A mobile optimized website
Highest security and encryption standards
Chat function for live support
Video chat
Call center with live support
Quick and simple registration process
Other (please specify)
I don’t know
16.) Do you think that digital tools/features, such as apps, social media and chat are likely to replace in-
person or telephone advice to a large extent?
scale: very unlikely, unlikely, not so likely, likely, very likely
17.) Suppose you decided to use an automated online advisory tool to manage your investments: how
much would you be prepared to pay in fees as a percentage of your managed assets?
Less than 0.1%
Between 0.1% and 0.2%
Between 0.2% and 0.3%
Between 0.3% and 0.5%
Between 0.5% and 0.75%
Between 0.75% and 1.0%
Between 1.0% and 1.25%
Between 1.25% and 1.5%
More than 1.5%
I don’t know
18.) How much are you prepared to pay for a regular (human) financial advisor as a percentage of your
managed assets?
Less than 0.1%
Between 0.1% and 0.2%
Between 0.2% and 0.3%
Between 0.3% and 0.5%
Between 0.5% and 0.75%
Between 0.75% and 1.0%
Between 1.0% and 1.25%
Between 1.25% and 1.5%
More than 1.5%
I don’t know
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 16
19.) What is the approximate value of your investable assets?
US UK
Up to $ 200,000 Up to £ 125,000
$ 200,000 - $ 500,000 £ 125,000 - £ 300,000
$ 500,000 - $ 1 million £ 300,000 - £ 600,000
$ 1 million - $ 5 million £ 600,000 - £ 3 million
More than $ 5 million More than £ 3 million
Report Extract
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 17
AUTHORS
Carmela Melone, Analyst, specializes in research in the fields of social media for
wealth management and mobile apps for financial advisors. Her specific areas of
interest are in software benchmarking, channel strategy and online security. Prior
to this, she worked at an exchange platform for intellectual property rights,
responsible for the digital media marketing strategy. Carmela has a Bachelor’s
degree in International Economics and European Studies from the University of
Tübingen (Germany).
Emma Haffenden, Senior Analyst, has over 10 years of experience in wealth
management and technology, mostly delivering analysis, business and technology
strategy consulting and research services to C level Executives of the leading global
financial institutions. In her previous roles, she led the Wealth & Private Banking
practice at Expand Research, a subsidiary of BCG, and was a Senior Consultant and
member of the Wealth Leadership team at Capco in London. Emma has a degree in
IT and Criminology, and a Master’s in Database Systems from the University of
Westminster.
To order the full report, please click here.
INVESTORS‘ ATTITUDES TOWARDS ROBO-ADVISORS │ 18
DISCLAIMER
IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMERS:
NO INVESTMENT ADVICE
This report is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where
such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. This report is distributed for informational purposes only and
should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation to sell or buy any security or other
investment, or undertake any investment strategy. It does not constitute a general or personal
recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of
individual investors. The price and value of securities referred to in this report will fluctuate. Past
performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of all of the
original capital invested in a security discussed in this report may occur. Certain transactions, including those
involving futures, options, and other derivatives, give rise to substantial risk and are not suitable for all
investors.
DISCLAIMERS
There are no warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or results obtained from
any information set forth in this report. MyPrivateBanking GmbH will not be liable to you or anyone else for
any loss or injury resulting directly or indirectly from the use of the information contained in this report,
caused in whole or in part by its negligence in compiling, interpreting, reporting or delivering the content in
this report.
COPYRIGHT
MyPrivateBanking GmbH’s Products are the property of MyPrivateBanking GmbH, Switzerland, and are
protected by Swiss and international copyright law and other intellectual property laws. Customers are
prohibited to copy, forward or store MyPrivateBanking Products outside of the legal entity that has made the
purchase.
MyPrivateBanking GmbH
Hafenstrasse 50B
CH-8280 Kreuzlingen, Switzerland
Tel. +41 71 566 10 05
For our latest reports please check: http://www.myprivatebanking.com/Category/reports