investing in r&d pathway to low-carbon lignite...

29
Investing in R&D Pathway to Low-Carbon Lignite Utilization Mike Holmes Director of Energy Systems Development

Upload: ngodieu

Post on 17-May-2019

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Investing in R&D

Pathway to Low-Carbon Lignite Utilization

Mike Holmes

Director of Energy Systems Development

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

• Investment in R&D

– Industry Pathway

– Carbon Management

– Next-Generation Lignite Fired Power

PIONEERS AND SYNERGIES

TRENDS

www3.epa.gov/airtrends/aqtrends.html

www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/#electricity

CO, O3, Pb, NO2, PM, SO2

CARBON MANAGEMENT

5

• Carbon Utilization and Storage / EOR

• CO2 Capture Technology Development

• Development of Next Generation Power Systems

Oil Fields

6000+ fields evaluated.

Fields in the Williston, Powder River,

Denver–Julesberg, and Alberta Basins

were evaluated.

Used two methods:

enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and volumetric

• EOR approach:

Evaluated ~160 fields.

Sequestration capacity

= 1 billion tons

Incremental oil

>3 billion bbl

• Volumetric approach:

Thousands of fields, total

capacity >10 billion tons.

BAKKEN CO2 DEMAND FOR NORTH DAKOTA –

A 30,000-FT VIEW

Based on the following:

• Traditional evaluation techniques

• North Dakota Industrial Commission (NDIC)

original-oil-in-place (OOIP) estimates

• 4% incremental recovery

• Net utilization of 5000 and 8000 ft3/bbl

2–3.2 Bt of CO2 needed, yielding 4–7 Bbbl of oil.

North Dakota currently produces ~33 Mtpy of CO2.

Bakken growth is creating a projected increase in

power demand.

PATHWAY TO LOW-CARBON LIGNITE UTILIZATION

PROJECT TEAM AND INDUSTRY CONTACTS

• State of North Dakota – Mike Jones, LEC/LRC

• ALLETE (MP and BNI) – Bill Sawyer

• Basin Electric (Basin and DGC) – Jim Sheldon

• 8 Rivers Capital – Mike McGroddy

• EERC – Jason Laumb

9

PATHWAY TO

LOW-CARBON

LIGNITE

UTILIZATION

WHAT IS THE ALLAM CYCLE?

The Allam Cycle is a supercritical CO₂ Brayton cycle:

– Oxy-fueled and direct-fired.

– Recuperates turbine exhaust heat via a recycle stream.

– Can utilize a heat sources in addition to the turbine exhaust.

– Turbine inlet temperature above 800°C (1000°‒1200°C optimal)

– Turbine inlet pressure above 80 bar (200‒400 bar optimal).

– Exhaust is CO2 with moderate impurities.

Contains the intellectual property of 8 Rivers Capital, LLC and NET Power, LLC

Natural Gas Allam Cycle 58.9% Efficiency LHV

ALLAM CYCLE PROCESS DIAGRAM

9

Core Allam Cycle

Natural Gas

Process

• High efficiency with

existing gasifier

technologies

• Minimal gasifier

integration required,

low complexity

• Process simplification

significantly reduces

cost vs. IGCC

• Zero emissions. No

additional capture or

compression

equipment needed

Efficiency LHV HHV

Gross Turbine Output 76.3% 72.5%Coal prep & feed -0.2% -0.2%

ASU -10.2% -9.7%CO2, Syngas Comp. -9.1% -8.7%Other Auxiliaries -6.5% -6.1%

Net Efficiency 50.3% 47.8%

• The Allam Cycle can be used with both natural gas and

solid fuels while maintaining full carbon capture.

• Use with solid fuels requires the addition of a coal gasifierExisting, mature,

proven

technology

13

PHASE 1A TECHNICAL CHALLENGE AREAS

Gasifier Selection 2

Combustor Modeling4

1

3

Corrosion

Impurities Removal

14

Task 1 - CORROSION MANAGEMENT

• Undertaking two stages to the study:

– Under Phase 1A: Static coupon testing at the EERC.

– Under Phase 1B: Dynamic testing at a selected facility.

• The results of Phase 1A will enable high-level design decisions.

15

LOW-TEMPERATURE ALLOYS

• Alloy 20 – 34% Ni, 20Cr, 4Cu, 3Mo, balance Fe, resists

pitting, acid corrosion, and stress corrosion cracking.

• AL-6XN – 24% Ni, 21Cr, 7Mo, balance Fe, super austenitic,

stronger than stainless, resists corrosion and stress

corrosion cracking.

• 347 Stainless – 11% Ni, 18Cr, 1(Nb+Ta), balance Fe

• 321 Stainless – 11% Ni, 18Cr, 0.75Cu, 0.75Mo, 0.7Ti,

balance Fe.

• 316L Stainless – 12%Ni, 17Cr, 3Mo, balance Fe.

• 304L Stainless – 9% Ni, 19Cr, balance Fe.

Decreasing

Nickel

Increasing Cost

3.91

3.42

1.21

1.10

1.29

1.00

Relative

Cost

Factor

ADVANCING THE PROJECT, CORROSION

• Results to date indicate that exotic alloys are not needed in areas exposed to liquid

pH as low as 3.

• Impurity removal testing has highlighted the possibility of selective condensation of

acids.

– The final test will aid in determining the resistance of these alloys to this type of

attack.

• Result of the work will be projections of material corrosion rates to be used during

Phase 2a discussions with vendors: a basis to determine materials of construction

and design specifications for system components.

• No major barriers.

16

17

TASK 2 –GASIFIER SELECTION

• Gasifier selection will impact all areas

of the Allam Cycle.

• Lignite fuel spec developed.

• The team is currently developing

process models for selected

technologies.

• The goal is to have identified two to five

technologies for further consideration in

Phase 1b.

18

DETAILS OF SELECTED SYSTEMS

• The team is progressing on further downselection of gasification systems based on additional criteria:

– Costs

– Commercial guarantees

– Sodium impacts

– Overall system efficiency

Gasifier Name Vendor

Vendor

Headquarters System Type Feed Ash

Original

Rank

Lurgi Air Liquide Germany Fixed bed Dry Nonslagging 1

BGL Envirotherm Germany Fixed bed Dry Slagging 2

SE ECUST/Sinopec China Entrained flow Dry Slagging 3

TRIG KBR/Southern Company USA Fluid bed Dry Nonslagging 4

HTW ThyssenKrupp Uhde Germany Fluid bed Dry Nonslagging 5

U-GAS SES USA Fluid bed Dry Agglomerated 6

SFG Siemens Germany Entrained flow Dry Slagging 7

SCGP Shell Netherlands Entrained flow Dry Slagging 8

Prenflo ThyssenKrupp Uhde Germany Entrained flow Dry Slagging 9

TASK 3 – IMPURITY MANAGEMENT

• The Allam Cycle lends itself to cost-effective

postcombustion removal of impurities; however, this

requires that the turbine and heat exchanger have high

resistance to corrosive materials.

• Precombustion technologies are commercially available.

• The team will review options for both technical fit in the

process and commercial readiness.

20

TASK 3 – IMPURITY MANAGEMENT

• Three test campaigns completed.

– Two under oxy-combustion conditions.

– One under a two-stage concept with

gasifier and syngas combustor.

• DeSNOx process tested as

postcombustion removal.

21

22

AREA 3: IMPURITIES REMOVAL

• High SOx and NOx removals

– SOx: >99% removal

– NOx ~95% removal

23

ADVANCING THE PROJECT, IMPURITY MANAGEMENT

• The DeSNOx process provides a high degree of acid gas capture.

• The pH of solutions in the process must be controlled to prevent selective acid

condensation.

– Specialty metals

– Corrosion task

• Sulfur can be removed with oxygen if NOx is not present.

– 60% removal at 1% oxygen, >90% removal at 3% oxygen

• Water management will be critical for DeSNOx

– pH <1 without water additions

• Precombustion removal tested in the next phase.

• No major barriers.

TASK 4 –SYNGAS COMBUSTOR DESIGN

• Development of the syngas combustor variant is a critical item for the coal-based Allam Cycle.

• DOE program (~$1M) at 8 Rivers Capital has completed initial phase to develop initial specifications for pilot-scale test article:

– Now undertaking selection of partner to support subsequent testing phase.

– EERC evaluating capabilities to support both design and testing phases of the program.

• Gasifier selection and syngas stability study are key inputs needed from the current work.

24

26

ADVANCING THE PROJECT, SYNGAS COMBUSTOR

DESIGN

– 2-D and 3-D CFD models indicate good mixing of fuel and oxidizer. Negligible

pressure oscillations.

– Four fuel compositions were simulated to verify capability for burning a range of

fuels.

– CFD shows that excess O2 leads to low levels of CO in the exhaust but increases

O2 content.

– Full mechanical test of combustor design was conducted to verify structural

integrity and instrumentation of the test rig.

– Test rig and program design completed.

TASK 4 –STATUS UPDATE

• Several viable test sites identified and vetted, with preliminary costing

and rig design completed for each

– NASA White Sands and DGC are leading candidates

• NET Power demo is also a possible site (time line issues)

• Team is talking with EPRI regarding support

• First step funded with University of Central Florida (~$60K)

• 8RC applying for SBIR (~$150K) to avoid delay in progress

27

28

BUYING DOWN THE OVERALL PROGRAM RISK

• Materials exist that can survive in low-temperature areas.

– Dynamic and high-temperature tests forthcoming

• Gasification platforms exist that will gasify lignite.

– Which is best for the Allam Cycle?

– Consider polygen?

• Post-combustion sulfur removal technology shows great promise:

– pH dependent

– Water addition crucial

– Technologies do exist – energy penalty

– Precombustion testing coming

• Syngas combustor evaluation

– Design for syngas

– Demonstration on natural gas

SUMMARY

• World coal use is growing, while U.S. coal use is losing ground because of regulations, low natural gas prices, policy uncertainties …

• Technology advancements are needed to both meet compliance goals and maintain the current cost of electricity (COE).

• CO2 EOR can be a large factor in economics to help drive carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) applications.

• Supercritical CO2 cycles offer great potential for next-generation power.

– High efficiency, low COE, simplified CCUS …

– Barriers need to be addressed.

– Accelerated schedules needed.

• Leadership, teamwork, taking advantage of synergies will be key to the future of coal.

28

POLYGENERATION

EERC Working on Front-End Engineering and Design (FEED) and Regional, Economic, and Political Factors

Polygen considerations

• Direct or indirect liquefaction

• Gas separation for CO2 and H2 production

• Syngas to liquid fuels, chemicals, fertilizer, and other

products

Electricity considerations

• Supercritical combustion or high-efficiency advanced

integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC)

• CO2 capture for EOR

THANK YOU!

CONTACT INFORMATION

Energy & Environmental Research Center

University of North Dakota

15 North 23rd Street, Stop 9018

Grand Forks, ND 58202-9018

www.undeerc.org

701.777.5000 (phone)

701.777.5181 (fax)

Mike Holmes

Director of Energy Systems Development

701.777.5267

[email protected]