investigations into serious incidents narpa september 9, 2014 aaryce hayes, lmsw 1
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS NARPA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Aaryce Hayes, LMSW 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d175503460f949ed36a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS
NARPASEPTEMBER 9, 2014Aaryce Hayes, LMSW
![Page 2: INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS NARPA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Aaryce Hayes, LMSW 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d175503460f949ed36a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS
• EVERYTHING CAN BE CONSIDERED AN INVESTIGATION
• Variance: – type of evidence collected and analyzed– entity responsible for the primary investigation– regulations governing the issue
![Page 3: INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS NARPA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Aaryce Hayes, LMSW 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d175503460f949ed36a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
PRIMARY VS SECONDARY INVESTIGATIONS
• Stakeholders are generally interested in:
allegations involving rights
abuse/neglect
including restraint/seclusion
![Page 4: INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS NARPA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Aaryce Hayes, LMSW 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d175503460f949ed36a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
SECONDARY INVESTIGATIONS
• REVIEW OF PRIMARY INVESTIGATORY
The quality of the entity’s investigation
Compliance with regulations and standards governing the investigations
Analysis of the evidence and the determination rendered
![Page 5: INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS NARPA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Aaryce Hayes, LMSW 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d175503460f949ed36a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
TOOLS TO EVALUATE PRIMARY INVESTIGATIONS
LAWS & REGULATIONS - Governing rights, medication, restraint & abuse investigations.
TRAINING – familiarity with the investigatory training – familiarity with the physical techniques used by the entity
• Labor Relations, Inc. provides training for investigations of incidents in health and human service settings
![Page 6: INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS NARPA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Aaryce Hayes, LMSW 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d175503460f949ed36a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
VIOLATIONS MOST LIKELY INVOLVE COMPLIANCE ISSUES
• Did the behavior meet the definition of behavioral emergency???
• Imminent harm to self or others
• Restraint or seclusion authorized as last resort less restrictive measures ineffective
![Page 7: INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS NARPA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Aaryce Hayes, LMSW 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d175503460f949ed36a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
POTENTIAL COMPLIANCE ISSUES
• Orders specify behaviors that were of risk of harm
Could others back away and be safe?
• Use of seclusion (least restrictive alternative)?(cannot be used for discipline, retaliation or punishment)
Can it ever be justified for self injury?
![Page 8: INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS NARPA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Aaryce Hayes, LMSW 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d175503460f949ed36a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
POTENTIAL COMPLIANCE ISSUES
• Care - (safety, bathroom and water)
• Release criteria (as soon as the threat is removed)(unconscious or asleep)
• Debriefing - Did it occur? With whom?
![Page 9: INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS NARPA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Aaryce Hayes, LMSW 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d175503460f949ed36a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
ALTERNATIVES TO RESTRAINT
CAREGIVERS How are you communicating?
• ROLE MODEL APPROPRIATE BEHAVIORSBACK OFF AND SHUT UP!
• DO NOT INCITE Body Language, Space, Tone of Voice
![Page 10: INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS NARPA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Aaryce Hayes, LMSW 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d175503460f949ed36a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
ALTERNATIVES TO R/S
• DEVELOP A CULTURE OF SAFETY & TRUST
• PROVIDE TRAUMA INFORMED SERVICES
• SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT & USE OF A DE-ESCALATION PREFERENCE TOOL
![Page 11: INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS NARPA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Aaryce Hayes, LMSW 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d175503460f949ed36a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
USE OF RESOURCES
• Limited resources require a screening of cases and a determination when issues are identified, how should they be addressed?
• Not every issue will rise to the level of litigation
![Page 12: INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS NARPA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Aaryce Hayes, LMSW 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649d175503460f949ed36a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
RESOLUTIONS
• You will find lack of compliance in many cases.• Is the compliance issue sufficient for litigation?• Prioritize how to handle issues that fail to rise
to the level of litigation.• Identifying patterns in practice issues have
resulted in changes in policies and development of best practices.