inventory review 2006 preliminary results
DESCRIPTION
Inventory Review 2006 Preliminary results. Vigdis Vestreng, Met.no/MSC-W/ETC-ACC Elisabeth Rigler, UBA-V, ETC-ACC (new) Martin Adams, AEAT, ETC-ACC TFEIP 12-14 June 2006, Amersfoort, the Netherlands. Stage-2 review. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Inventory Review 2006 Preliminary results
Vigdis Vestreng, Met.no/MSC-W/ETC-ACCElisabeth Rigler, UBA-V, ETC-ACC (new)
Martin Adams, AEAT, ETC-ACC
TFEIP 12-14 June 2006, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Stage-2 review
“I would like to say, that review results will help for inventory improving for further submissions and for preparing of plan of quality assurance and control regarding emission estimation for UNECE/NEC”
Stage-2 country specific review reports:
Issued 10th May 2006Replied by deadline 10th June: 11 (22%)
Total number last two yrs 37% (18)
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
OUTLINE
1. Stage 2 review perspective and connection with Stage 1 and Stage 3
2. Developments/Improvements 3. Preliminary results4. Further streamlining and
improvements
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Data included in review
• Emissions reported under the Convention on LRTAP to the UNECE Secretariat by: March 10th 2006
• Emissions reported under the National Emission Ceilings Directive to the European Commission by: February 28th 2006
• Emission and activity data reported to the UNFCCC by: 08th April 2006
• The LRTAP data was made available to the Parties through a pre-release of WEBDAB.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Tests included in the review
• Key source analysis• Timeliness• Format• Completeness by pollutant (priority)• Completeness by sector (NE)• Consistency• X-pollutants• Recalculations• Inventory comparison (LRTAP/NEC/UNFCCC)• Trend plots (national totals)• Time series flagging based on log -10 curve fitting• IEFs
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
2006 developements• First draft html reports are “serie” produced• Separate testing and reporting of results for LRTAP and NEC
data if the totals are proved to differ by more than 0.1%• Improved key source analysis including percentage
contribution for each sector and both aggregated and detailed sectors
• Introduction of two average reports, one for Eastern Europe and one for Western Europe
• Improved completeness testing with stronger focus on priority compounds, key sources and reporting of Not Estimated
• Improved comparability testing by introduction of more pollutant ratios
• Inclusion of inventory comparisons with UNFCCC data• Inclusion of trend plots• Streamlining and extension of the time series check for
main pollutants to 1980 • Review reports has also been sent from the UNECE
secretariat by ordinary snail mail to ten Parties which we were regarded as needing more support (AM, AZ, BA, GE, HR, KG, KZ, LI, RO, TR)
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Timeliness
Timeliness 2046 Reporting Official submissions - 35 (71%) Parties (left)
Not submitted - 14 Parties (right)Black - Template not used for some or all data
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Th
e R
ussia
n F
ed
era
tion
(De
c)F
ran
ce (D
ec)
Ge
rma
ny (Ja
n)
Irela
nd
(Jan
)R
ep
ub
lic of M
old
ova
(Jan
)B
ulg
aria
(Fe
b)
Slo
vakia
(Fe
b)
Mo
na
co (F
eb
)S
we
de
n (F
eb
)T
FY
R o
f Ma
ced
on
ia (F
eb
)H
un
ga
ry (Fe
b)
Lith
ua
nia
(Fe
b)
Se
rbia
an
d M
on
ten
eg
ro (F
eb
)U
krain
e (F
eb
)A
ustia
(Fe
b)
Be
laru
s (Fe
b)
Ca
na
da
(Fe
b)
Cze
ch R
ep
ub
lic (Fe
b)
De
nm
ark (F
eb
)E
ston
ia (F
eb
)F
inla
nd
(Fe
b)
Gre
ece
(Fe
b)
La
tvia (F
eb
)N
orw
ay (F
eb
)S
love
nia
(Fe
b)
Un
ited
Kin
gd
om
(Fe
b)
Un
ited
Sta
tes o
f Am
erica
(Fe
b)
Po
lan
d (F
eb
)S
witze
rlan
d (F
eb
)N
eth
erla
nd
s (Ma
r)B
elg
ium
(Ma
r)Isla
nd
(Ma
r)P
ortu
ga
l (Ma
r)M
alta
(Ma
y)C
ypru
s (Ma
y)
Arm
en
iaA
zerb
aija
nB
osn
ia a
nd
He
rzeg
ovin
aC
roa
tiaG
eo
rgia
Italy
kaza
khsta
nK
yrgyzsta
nL
ichte
nste
inL
uxe
mb
ou
rgR
om
an
iaS
pa
inT
urke
yE
uro
pe
an
Un
ion
Da
te o
f m
on
th s
ub
mis
sio
n r
ec
eiv
edNum
ber of s
ubmiss
ions incre
ase (u
p 4%, 2
Parties)
Submissions w
ithin deadlin
e incre
ased by 3
Parties
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
COMPLETENESS
30% (15) of Parties report complete time series 1990-2004 (PMs 2000-2004) in NFR02 for main pollutants and PMs
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
CompletenessSector 1 SOx
0
10
20
30
40
50
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Year
Nu
mb
er
Gap 01
SNAP 01
NFR1 01
NFR2 01
Sector 7 NOx
0
10
20
30
40
50
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Year
Nu
mb
er
Gap 07
SNAP 07
NFR1 07
NFR2 07
Sector 10 NH3
0
10
20
30
40
50
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Year
Nu
mb
er
Gap 10
SNAP 10
NFR1 10
NFR2 10
Sector 7 NMVOC
0
10
20
30
40
50
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
YearN
um
ber
Gap 07
SNAP 07
NFR1 07
NFR2 07
Sector 2 PM2.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Year
Nu
mb
er
Gap 02
SNAP 02
NFR1 02
NFR2 02
Sector 2 PM10
0
10
20
30
40
50
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Year
Nu
mb
er
Gap 02
SNAP 02
NFR1 02
NFR2 02
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Recalculations and Inventory comparison
• Some countries have substantial differences (>20%) in nationalt total from year to year due to recalculations – Stage 2 review will provide overview of the recalc and whether or not these recalc are explained (IIRs and or review replies) and make sense as input to the revision of the GP
• NEC/LRTAP differences (as above except GP)
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Transparency
IIR submission increases
2004: 72005: 122006:17
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
HM review by ESPREMEAs (tons/year)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Fuel combustionto produce heatand electrisity
Iron and steelproduction
Other sources,and cementproduction
Sum
EMEP
ESPREME
Cd (tons/year)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Fuel combustionto produce heatand electrisity
Iron and steelproduction
Other sources,and cementproduction
Sum
EMEP
ESPREME
Cr (tons/year)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Fuelcombustion toproduce heatand electrisity
Iron and steelproduction
Other sources,and cementproduction
Sum
EMEP
ESPREME
Ni (tons/year)
0500
100015002000250030003500400045005000
Fuel combustionto produce heatand electrisity
Iron and steelproduction
Other sources,and cementproduction
Sum
EMEP
ESPREME
Pb (tons/year)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Fuel combustion toproduce heat and
electrisity
Other sources, andcement production
Sum
EMEP
ESPREME
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Highlights
• Significant gaps and missing sources for HMs other than Hg introduce considerable uncertainties in the modeling and assessment of their environmental fate and thus, finally, their impacts on human health.
• Officially reported emissions are substantially underestimated (up to a factor 2 (Cd)
• Pb in ”unleaded” gasoline – missing source in some countries
• More focus should be placed on estimates of emissions during wastedisposal, mainly, incineration of wastes. This source is clearly the leastaccurately estimated.
• Emission measurements can be proposed in selected fossil fuel powerplants, as combustion of fossil fuels is the main source of emissions of HMsselected in this review.
• Historical trends of HM emissions can be prepared within EMEP using the
information on statistics and emission factors properly selected.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Preliminary results: POP review by TNO
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Turkey
Poland
Romania
Czech Republic
Bulgaria
Slovak Republic
Hungary
Lithuania
Slovenia
Latvia
Estonia
Cyprus
Malta
reported to EMEP
Pulles et al. (2006)
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
POP review by TNO
Closest to 2000 2000EMEP Pulles et al.,2006 low high
Turkey 960 190 2600Poland 333.4 790 220 2000Romania 100.6 490 110 1300Czech Republic 743.8 320 72 880Bulgaria 232.5 290 66 790Slovak Republic 89.9 180 36 500Hungary 99.4 120 35 300Lithuania 12.7 48 7.1 140Slovenia 3.7 36 8.2 97Latvia 13.5 18 2.4 54Estonia 2.4 8.7 1.6 25Cyprus 5.3 6.6 0.8 20Malta 3.9 0.34 13
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
HM review by ESPREME
EMEP ESPREME EMEP ESPREME EMEP ESPREME EMEP ESPREME EMEP ESPREME
1. Fuel combustion to produce heat and electricity 322 (49) 391(51) 119 (44) 367 (62) 825 (50) 1394 (51) 3403 (85) 3795 (79) 1377 (13) 1623 (12)
2. Non ferrous metal 132 (20) 132 (17) 52 (19) 52 (9) 54 (3) 54 (2) 49 (1) 49 (1) 1471 (13) 1471 (10)
3. Iron and steel production 106 (16) 114 (15) 37 (14) 46 (8) 409 (25) 571 (21) 106 (3) 171 (4) 0 (0) 2282 (16)
4. Waste disposal 2 (0) 2 (0) 9 (3) 9 (2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 13 (0) 13 (0) 116 (1) 116 (1)
5. Cement procuction and othe sources 92 (14) 124 (16) 52 (19) 116 (20) 370 (22) 692 (26) 447 (11) 769 (16) 247 (2) 892 (6)
6. Gasoline combustion 7712 (71) 7712 (55)
Sum 654 763 269 590 1658 2711 4017 4797 10923 14096
Ni PbAs Cd Cr
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Future improvements
• x-pollutant tests - landfills • Inconsistency test harmonized with
REPDAB • The time series test: Little flagging when
large sigma. Use expected value=midpoint instead? Flag when deviate e.g. 20% on SNAP type aggregation level
• Deadlines: Submission process for NEC submissions
• System for filtering of questions and storing replies
• NB! Added values of Stage -2 review and cc report
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Key source: West
Component Key source categories (Sorted from high to low from left to right) Total (%) Not listed
SOx 1 A 1 a (47.3%)
1 A 1 b (10.0%)
1 A 2 f (9.7%)
1 A 4 b i (5.6%)
1 A 2 a (2.9%)
1 A 3 d ii (2.3%)
1 B 2 a (2.3%)
1 A 4 a (2.3%)
2 B 5 (2.0%)
1 A 2 c (1.6%)
86.0 8
NOx 1 A 3 b iii (20.2%)
1 A 3 b i (15.3%)
1 A 1 a (15.3%)
1 A 2 f (9.1%)
1 A 4 c ii (5.1%)
1 A 4 b i (5.0%)
1 A 3 b ii (4.4%)
1 A 3 d ii (3.6%)
4 D 1 (2.3%)
1 A 1 c (2.1%)
82.5 14
NH3 4 B 1 b (24.8%)
4 B 1 a (21.7%)
4 D 1 (17.2%)
4 B 8 (15.2%)
4 B 9 (10.6%)
1 A 3 b i (2.2%)
4 B 3 (1.5%)
4 B 13 (1.4%)
4 B 6 (1.0%)
95.5 0
NMVOC 1 A 3 b (19.0%)
3 D (17.5%)
3 A (14.8%)
1 B 2 a (8.7%)
1 A 4 b i (8.3%)
3 C (3.4%)
2 D 2 (3.1%)
2 B 5 (3.1%)
4 D 1 (2.8%)
3 B (2.1%)
82.9 13
CO 1 A 3 b i (31.2%)
1 A 4 b i (21.1%)
1 A 2 a (10.3%)
2 C (9.5%)
1 A 2 f (3.9%)
1 A 3 b iv (3.2%)
1 A 4 b ii (2.5%)
1 A 3 b ii (2.3%)
1 A 1 a (1.7%)
6 C (1.6%)
87.1 12
TSP 2 A 7 (22.6%)
4 D 1 (17.4%)
1 A 4 b i (9.8%)
1 A 5 b (7.1%)
1 A 3 b vi (5.2%)
2 A 6 (4.9%)
2 C (4.2%)
1 A 2 f (2.8%)
7 (2.1%)
1 A 4 c ii (2.0%)
78.1 16
PM10 1 A 4 b i (20.2%)
2 A 7 (12.1%)
4 D 1 (7.8%)
2 C (5.5%)
1 A 3 b vi (4.6%)
1 A 2 f (4.2%)
1 A 3 b i (4.0%)
4 B 9 (3.6%)
1 A 1 a (3.2%)
7 (3.1%)
68.2 22
PM2.5 1 A 4 b i (29.5%)
2 A 7 (9.1%)
2 C (5.9%)
1 A 3 b i (5.7%)
1 A 2 f (5.1%)
1 A 3 b iii (4.5%)
1 A 3 b ii (4.2%)
1 A 4 c ii (3.8%)
1 A 1 a (3.2%)
4 D 1 (2.9%)
74.0 20
Pb 1 A 2 f (42.7%)
2 C (12.8%)
1 A 2 a (6.2%)
1 A 3 a ii (ii) (5.0%)
1 A 3 b i (4.5%)
1 A 4 b i (4.3%)
1 A 1 a (4.0%)
1 A 3 b iii (3.0%)
1 A 3 b ii (2.6%)
1 A 4 a (2.5%)
87.8 5
Hg 1 A 1 a (36.2%)
6 A (11.2%)
1 A 2 f (10.7%)
6 C (9.9%)
2 B 5 (8.3%)
2 C (5.5%)
1 A 4 b i (4.7%)
1 A 2 a (2.4%)
1 A 1 b (2.3%)
1 A 2 d (2.2%)
93.5 2
Cd 1 A 2 f (22.4%)
2 C (22.1%)
1 A 1 a (13.2%)
1 A 1 b (12.8%)
1 A 4 b i (8.3%)
1 A 2 a (3.7%)
1 A 2 d (3.1%)
1 A 2 b (3.0%)
6 C (1.4%)
1 A 3 b i (1.3%)
91.2 4
DIOX 1 A 1 b (67.7%)
6 C (10.5%)
1 A 1 a (4.1%)
1 A 3 b i (3.4%)
1 A 4 b i (3.0%)
2 C (3.0%)
1 A 2 f (1.9%)
1 A 2 a (1.4%)
1 A 3 b iii (0.9%)
95.8 0
PAH 1 A 4 b i (24.2%)
3 D (23.4%)
2 G (15.1%)
1 A 3 b i (12.9%)
2 C (7.9%)
1 A 3 b iii (3.5%)
1 A 3 b ii (2.1%)
1 B 1 b (1.9%)
1 A 2 f (1.3%)
2 A 6 (1.0%)
93.4 2
HCB 1 A 2 b (88.5%)
2 C (4.5%)
1 A 4 b i (2.8%)
95.7 0
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Key source: East
Component Key source categories (Sorted from high to low from left to right) Total (%) Not listed
SOx 1 A 1 a (59.1%)
1 A 2 (16.2%)
1 A 4 b (5.3%)
1 A 3 b (4.0%)
1 A 3 e ii (2.8%)
1 A 4 a (1.8%)
2 C (1.2%)
1 A 1 b (1.2%)
1 A 1 c (1.0%)
1 A 4 c i (0.6%)
93.2 31
NOx 1 A 3 b (37.6%)
1 A 1 a (24.8%)
1 A 3 e ii (14.7%)
1 A 2 (9.0%)
1 A 4 b (3.0%)
1 A 4 c ii (1.9%)
2 C (1.2%)
1 A 3 c (0.9%)
2 B (0.8%)
1 A 4 a (0.7%)
94.5 2
NH3 4 B (77.0%)
4 D 1 (8.1%)
2 B 1 (3.0%)
1 A 4 c (0.8%)
6 B (0.8%)
6 D (0.7%)
1 B 2 (0.4%)
1 A 3 b (0.3%)
2 B 5 (0.2%)
4 F (0.1%)
91.4 26
NMVOC 1 A 3 b (51.4%)
1 A 2 (9.4%)
1 B 2 (8.5%)
7 (6.3%)
3 A (4.3%)
1 A 4 b i (3.0%)
3 D (2.2%)
1 A 4 b ii (2.0%)
3 C (1.3%)
3 B (1.3%)
89.8 7
CO 1 A 3 b (61.6%)
1 A 2 (11.2%)
1 A 4 b i (11.0%)
2 C (5.0%)
6 C (3.9%)
1 A 4 c i (1.2%)
1 A 1 a (0.6%)
1 A 4 b ii (0.5%)
95.1 0
TSP 2 C (15.3%)
1 A 1 a (4.5%)
2 A 6 (2.7%)
1 A 4 b i (1.4%)
1 A 2 b (0.6%)
1 A 2 f (0.5%)
1 A 2 a (0.2%)
2 A 1 (0.1%)
1 A 3 b (0.1%)
1 A 4 c ii (0.1%)
25.5 39
PM10 1 A 1 a (33.8%)
1 A 4 b i (20.2%)
1 A 3 b (6.8%)
1 A 2 a (6.5%)
1 A 2 b (4.8%)
2 A (4.7%)
1 B 2 (3.6%)
2 C (1.8%)
1 A 4 c i (1.7%)
1 A 1 c (1.7%)
85.6 10
PM2.5 1 A 1 a (30.8%)
1 A 4 b i (23.7%)
1 A 3 b (9.4%)
1 A 2 a (6.9%)
1 A 2 b (4.9%)
2 A (4.8%)
1 B 2 (3.7%)
1 A 4 c i (1.7%)
1 A 4 c ii (1.4%)
6 C (1.4%)
88.8 8
Pb 1 A 2 (43.7%)
1 A 1 a (13.9%)
2 A 7 (7.7%)
2 C (7.7%)
6 C (7.0%)
1 A 4 c i (6.4%)
1 A 3 b (4.4%)
1 A 4 b (3.5%)
1 B 1 b (1.2%)
95.4 0
Hg 1 A 1 a (41.6%)
1 A 2 (23.8%)
1 A 3 b (13.0%)
6 C (4.4%)
1 A 4 b i (4.2%)
1 A 1 c (3.2%)
2 A (2.4%)
1 A 4 c i (1.6%)
2 B 5 (1.4%)
95.6 0
Cd 1 A 2 (48.2%)
1 A 1 a (19.5%)
1 A 4 c i (13.5%)
1 A 4 b i (5.0%)
1 B 1 b (3.8%)
2 C (2.5%)
6 C (2.3%)
1 A 3 b (1.7%)
96.5 0
DIOX 1 A 4 b i (27.7%)
6 D (18.7%)
1 A 2 (17.7%)
1 A 1 a (13.3%)
2 C (10.9%)
6 C (5.0%)
1 A 3 b i (1.2%)
1 A 4 a (0.9%)
95.5 0
PAH 1 A 4 b i (71.6%)
1 A 4 c i (12.8%)
1 B 1 b (10.0%)
2 C (3.6%)
98.0 0
HCB 2 C (51.7%)
1 A 2 (25.9%)
1 A 1 a (8.7%)
1 A 4 b i (6.1%)
6 C (5.5%)
97.9 0
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
West (left) East (right)
Component Key source categories (Sorted from high to low from left to right) Total (%) Not listed
SOx 1 A 1 a (47.3%)
1 A 1 b (10.0%)
1 A 2 f (9.7%)
1 A 4 b i (5.6%)
1 A 2 a (2.9%)
1 A 3 d ii (2.3%)
1 B 2 a (2.3%)
1 A 4 a (2.3%)
2 B 5 (2.0%)
1 A 2 c (1.6%)
86.0 8
NOx 1 A 3 b iii (20.2%)
1 A 3 b i (15.3%)
1 A 1 a (15.3%)
1 A 2 f (9.1%)
1 A 4 c ii (5.1%)
1 A 4 b i (5.0%)
1 A 3 b ii (4.4%)
1 A 3 d ii (3.6%)
4 D 1 (2.3%)
1 A 1 c (2.1%)
82.5 14
NH3 4 B 1 b (24.8%)
4 B 1 a (21.7%)
4 D 1 (17.2%)
4 B 8 (15.2%)
4 B 9 (10.6%)
1 A 3 b i (2.2%)
4 B 3 (1.5%)
4 B 13 (1.4%)
4 B 6 (1.0%)
95.5 0
NMVOC 1 A 3 b (19.0%)
3 D (17.5%)
3 A (14.8%)
1 B 2 a (8.7%)
1 A 4 b i (8.3%)
3 C (3.4%)
2 D 2 (3.1%)
2 B 5 (3.1%)
4 D 1 (2.8%)
3 B (2.1%)
82.9 13
CO 1 A 3 b i (31.2%)
1 A 4 b i (21.1%)
1 A 2 a (10.3%)
2 C (9.5%)
1 A 2 f (3.9%)
1 A 3 b iv (3.2%)
1 A 4 b ii (2.5%)
1 A 3 b ii (2.3%)
1 A 1 a (1.7%)
6 C (1.6%)
87.1 12
TSP 2 A 7 (22.6%)
4 D 1 (17.4%)
1 A 4 b i (9.8%)
1 A 5 b (7.1%)
1 A 3 b vi (5.2%)
2 A 6 (4.9%)
2 C (4.2%)
1 A 2 f (2.8%)
7 (2.1%)
1 A 4 c ii (2.0%)
78.1 16
PM10 1 A 4 b i (20.2%)
2 A 7 (12.1%)
4 D 1 (7.8%)
2 C (5.5%)
1 A 3 b vi (4.6%)
1 A 2 f (4.2%)
1 A 3 b i (4.0%)
4 B 9 (3.6%)
1 A 1 a (3.2%)
7 (3.1%)
68.2 22
PM2.5 1 A 4 b i (29.5%)
2 A 7 (9.1%)
2 C (5.9%)
1 A 3 b i (5.7%)
1 A 2 f (5.1%)
1 A 3 b iii (4.5%)
1 A 3 b ii (4.2%)
1 A 4 c ii (3.8%)
1 A 1 a (3.2%)
4 D 1 (2.9%)
74.0 20
Pb 1 A 2 f (42.7%)
2 C (12.8%)
1 A 2 a (6.2%)
1 A 3 a ii (ii) (5.0%)
1 A 3 b i (4.5%)
1 A 4 b i (4.3%)
1 A 1 a (4.0%)
1 A 3 b iii (3.0%)
1 A 3 b ii (2.6%)
1 A 4 a (2.5%)
87.8 5
Hg 1 A 1 a (36.2%)
6 A (11.2%)
1 A 2 f (10.7%)
6 C (9.9%)
2 B 5 (8.3%)
2 C (5.5%)
1 A 4 b i (4.7%)
1 A 2 a (2.4%)
1 A 1 b (2.3%)
1 A 2 d (2.2%)
93.5 2
Cd 1 A 2 f (22.4%)
2 C (22.1%)
1 A 1 a (13.2%)
1 A 1 b (12.8%)
1 A 4 b i (8.3%)
1 A 2 a (3.7%)
1 A 2 d (3.1%)
1 A 2 b (3.0%)
6 C (1.4%)
1 A 3 b i (1.3%)
91.2 4
DIOX 1 A 1 b (67.7%)
6 C (10.5%)
1 A 1 a (4.1%)
1 A 3 b i (3.4%)
1 A 4 b i (3.0%)
2 C (3.0%)
1 A 2 f (1.9%)
1 A 2 a (1.4%)
1 A 3 b iii (0.9%)
95.8 0
PAH 1 A 4 b i (24.2%)
3 D (23.4%)
2 G (15.1%)
1 A 3 b i (12.9%)
2 C (7.9%)
1 A 3 b iii (3.5%)
1 A 3 b ii (2.1%)
1 B 1 b (1.9%)
1 A 2 f (1.3%)
2 A 6 (1.0%)
93.4 2
HCB 1 A 2 b (88.5%)
2 C (4.5%)
1 A 4 b i (2.8%)
95.7 0
Component Key source categories (Sorted from high to low from left to right) Total (%) Not listed
SOx 1 A 1 a (59.1%)
1 A 2 (16.2%)
1 A 4 b (5.3%)
1 A 3 b (4.0%)
1 A 3 e ii (2.8%)
1 A 4 a (1.8%)
2 C (1.2%)
1 A 1 b (1.2%)
1 A 1 c (1.0%)
1 A 4 c i (0.6%)
93.2 31
NOx 1 A 3 b (37.6%)
1 A 1 a (24.8%)
1 A 3 e ii (14.7%)
1 A 2 (9.0%)
1 A 4 b (3.0%)
1 A 4 c ii (1.9%)
2 C (1.2%)
1 A 3 c (0.9%)
2 B (0.8%)
1 A 4 a (0.7%)
94.5 2
NH3 4 B (77.0%)
4 D 1 (8.1%)
2 B 1 (3.0%)
1 A 4 c (0.8%)
6 B (0.8%)
6 D (0.7%)
1 B 2 (0.4%)
1 A 3 b (0.3%)
2 B 5 (0.2%)
4 F (0.1%)
91.4 26
NMVOC 1 A 3 b (51.4%)
1 A 2 (9.4%)
1 B 2 (8.5%)
7 (6.3%)
3 A (4.3%)
1 A 4 b i (3.0%)
3 D (2.2%)
1 A 4 b ii (2.0%)
3 C (1.3%)
3 B (1.3%)
89.8 7
CO 1 A 3 b (61.6%)
1 A 2 (11.2%)
1 A 4 b i (11.0%)
2 C (5.0%)
6 C (3.9%)
1 A 4 c i (1.2%)
1 A 1 a (0.6%)
1 A 4 b ii (0.5%)
95.1 0
TSP 2 C (15.3%)
1 A 1 a (4.5%)
2 A 6 (2.7%)
1 A 4 b i (1.4%)
1 A 2 b (0.6%)
1 A 2 f (0.5%)
1 A 2 a (0.2%)
2 A 1 (0.1%)
1 A 3 b (0.1%)
1 A 4 c ii (0.1%)
25.5 39
PM10 1 A 1 a (33.8%)
1 A 4 b i (20.2%)
1 A 3 b (6.8%)
1 A 2 a (6.5%)
1 A 2 b (4.8%)
2 A (4.7%)
1 B 2 (3.6%)
2 C (1.8%)
1 A 4 c i (1.7%)
1 A 1 c (1.7%)
85.6 10
PM2.5 1 A 1 a (30.8%)
1 A 4 b i (23.7%)
1 A 3 b (9.4%)
1 A 2 a (6.9%)
1 A 2 b (4.9%)
2 A (4.8%)
1 B 2 (3.7%)
1 A 4 c i (1.7%)
1 A 4 c ii (1.4%)
6 C (1.4%)
88.8 8
Pb 1 A 2 (43.7%)
1 A 1 a (13.9%)
2 A 7 (7.7%)
2 C (7.7%)
6 C (7.0%)
1 A 4 c i (6.4%)
1 A 3 b (4.4%)
1 A 4 b (3.5%)
1 B 1 b (1.2%)
95.4 0
Hg 1 A 1 a (41.6%)
1 A 2 (23.8%)
1 A 3 b (13.0%)
6 C (4.4%)
1 A 4 b i (4.2%)
1 A 1 c (3.2%)
2 A (2.4%)
1 A 4 c i (1.6%)
2 B 5 (1.4%)
95.6 0
Cd 1 A 2 (48.2%)
1 A 1 a (19.5%)
1 A 4 c i (13.5%)
1 A 4 b i (5.0%)
1 B 1 b (3.8%)
2 C (2.5%)
6 C (2.3%)
1 A 3 b (1.7%)
96.5 0
DIOX 1 A 4 b i (27.7%)
6 D (18.7%)
1 A 2 (17.7%)
1 A 1 a (13.3%)
2 C (10.9%)
6 C (5.0%)
1 A 3 b i (1.2%)
1 A 4 a (0.9%)
95.5 0
PAH 1 A 4 b i (71.6%)
1 A 4 c i (12.8%)
1 B 1 b (10.0%)
2 C (3.6%)
98.0 0
HCB 2 C (51.7%)
1 A 2 (25.9%)
1 A 1 a (8.7%)
1 A 4 b i (6.1%)
6 C (5.5%)
97.9 0
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Preliminary results: HM review by ESPREME
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Fo
ssil
fu
elco
mb
ust
ion
to p
rod
uce
hea
t an
d
No
n-f
erro
us
met
als
Iro
n a
nd
stee
lp
rod
uct
ion
Was
ted
isp
osa
l
Cem
ent
pro
du
ctio
nan
d o
ther
sou
rces
Gas
oli
ne
com
bu
stio
n
As EMEP
As ESPREME
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Fo
ssil
fu
elco
mb
ust
ion
to p
rod
uce
hea
t an
d
No
n-f
erro
us
met
als
Iro
n a
nd
stee
lp
rod
uct
ion
Was
ted
isp
osa
l
Cem
ent
pro
du
ctio
nan
d o
ther
sou
rces
Gas
oli
ne
com
bu
stio
n
Cd EMEP
Cd ESPREME
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Fo
ssil
fu
elco
mb
ust
ion
to p
rod
uce
hea
t an
d
No
n-f
erro
us
met
als
Iro
n a
nd
stee
lp
rod
uct
ion
Was
ted
isp
osa
l
Cem
ent
pro
du
ctio
nan
d o
ther
sou
rces
Gas
oli
ne
com
bu
stio
n
Cr EMEP
Cr ESPREME
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Fo
ssil
fu
elco
mb
ust
ion
to p
rod
uce
hea
t an
d
No
n-f
erro
us
met
als
Iro
n a
nd
stee
lp
rod
uct
ion
Was
ted
isp
osa
l
Cem
ent
pro
du
ctio
nan
d o
ther
sou
rces
Gas
oli
ne
com
bu
stio
n
Ni EMEP
Ni ESPREME
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Fo
ssil
fu
elco
mb
ust
ion
to p
rod
uce
hea
t an
d
No
n-f
erro
us
met
als
Iro
n a
nd
stee
lp
rod
uct
ion
Was
ted
isp
osa
l
Cem
ent
pro
du
ctio
nan
d o
ther
sou
rces
Gas
oli
ne
com
bu
stio
n
Pb EMEP
Pb ESPREME