introduction objectives simulation & experiment

1
www.cranfield.ac.uk Team members: Sandy Kosalim, Fergus Crawley, Kwame Kumah, Kevin Lontin, Jemine Odugba 1. To understand when/how severe slugging occurs in a multiphase pipeline-riser system. 2. To develop numerical models to simulate and predict severe slugging 3. To validate the numerical results with experiment data. 4. To evaluate the economic impact of severe slugging on production output. OBJECTIVES CFD modelling provides a fundamental tool to support engineering design and research in multiphase systems Fluent is ran using High Performance Computing (HPC) at Cranfield. COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) SIMULATION OLGA SIMULATION OLGA, a transient multiphase 1- dimensional simulation software which is developed and commercialised by Schlumberger is used to investigate severe slugging in the pipeline-riser system. Experiments were carried out in the Process System Engineering (PSE) Lab at Cranfield University using a three-phase flow rig which can circulate air, water and oil at pressures up to 7 barg. LAB EXPERIMENT Water Mass Flow Rate Superficial Velocity kg/s m/s 1 0.109 2 0.218 5 0.546 SIMULATION & EXPERIMENT FLOW PROPERTIES *The experiment also used a choke valve to demonstrate what the effects of increased back pressure had on the system in terms of slug size and cycle period. INTRODUCTION CONCLUSIONS LAB RESULTS Over time, oil and gas exploration and production has advanced into deeper waters in West Africa, the Gulf of Mexico and South America and continues to go deeper. The configuration of the pipeline-riser systems, which is used to transport the extracted hydrocarbon, often has the pipeline section inclined downwards. This configuration can potentially lead to flow instability known as severe slugging in the pipeline-riser system. 1. The severe slugging phenomenon is caused by a combination of factors in a pipeline- riser system. The main factors include the pressure of the system, low fluid flow rates, inclination of the pipeline section. Increased fluid flowrate is directly proportional to increased slugging. 2. Numerical models have shown that they can simulate severe slugging in multiphase-flow to a useful degree of accuracy at a fraction of the cost of building a test rig system. They also have the added benefit of being able to create multiple models of any shape or size. However, CFD models require a relatively long computational time. 3. Severe slugging has a significant impact on a project’s capital expenditure (CAPEX), operating expenditure (OPEX) and revenue. 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Pressure at Riser Base (barg) Time (s) 1 kg/s Pressure vs Time I II III IV RESULTS 1 1.5 2 2.5 0 50 100 150 200 Pressure at Riser Base (barg) Time (s) Pressure at Riser Base vs Time 0.218 m/s 0.109 m/s 0.546 m/s SIMULATION RESULTS The variation of pressure with time in the pipeline-riser allows to better differentiate and classify severe slugging. One cycle of severe slugging can be classified into 4 stages: slug formation, slug production, blowout, and liquid fall- back (I, II, III, IV). Slugging increases with increasing superficial velocity, (cycle time-period decreases). Both the CFD & OLGA simulations gave out very different results regarding the 3 different liquid superficial velocity settings. The overall trend of slugging is seen throughout all the simulations, there are cycles of high pressure build up, leading to a blowout (sudden drop in pressure). The CFD model creates a clear pressure-time graph of the slugging effect over time. Supervisors: Dr. Patrick Verdin ([email protected] ) Dr. Liyun Lao ([email protected] ) Air Volumetric Flow Rate Superficial Velocity Sm 3 /h m/s 20 0.217 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Pressure(barg) Time(s) OLGA Result for U SL = 0.546m/s 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Pressure (barg) Time (seconds) Numerical Models vs Experiment U SL = 0.546 m/s Experiments CFD OLGA

Upload: others

Post on 19-Oct-2021

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES SIMULATION & EXPERIMENT

www.cranfield.ac.uk

Team members:

Sandy Kosalim, Fergus Crawley, Kwame Kumah, Kevin Lontin, Jemine Odugba

1. To understand when/how

severe slugging occurs in a

multiphase pipeline-riser

system.

2. To develop numerical models

to simulate and predict severe

slugging

3. To validate the numerical

results with experiment data.

4. To evaluate the economic

impact of severe slugging on

production output.

OBJECTIVES

CFD modelling provides a fundamental tool to support

engineering design and research in multiphase systems

Fluent is ran using High Performance Computing (HPC)

at Cranfield.

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID

DYNAMICS (CFD) SIMULATION OLGA SIMULATION

OLGA, a transient multiphase 1- dimensional

simulation software which is developed and

commercialised by Schlumberger is used to investigate

severe slugging in the pipeline-riser system.

Experiments were carried out in the Process System

Engineering (PSE) Lab at Cranfield University using a

three-phase flow rig which can circulate air, water and

oil at pressures up to 7 barg.

LAB EXPERIMENT

Water

Mass Flow

Rate

Superficial

Velocity

kg/s m/s

1 0.109

2 0.218

5 0.546

SIMULATION & EXPERIMENT

FLOW PROPERTIES

*The experiment also used a choke valve to

demonstrate what the effects of increased back

pressure had on the system in terms of slug size and

cycle period.

INTRODUCTION

CONCLUSIONS

LAB RESULTS

Over time, oil and gas exploration

and production has advanced into

deeper waters in West Africa, the

Gulf of Mexico and South America

and continues to go deeper. The

configuration of the pipeline-riser

systems, which is used to transport

the extracted hydrocarbon, often

has the pipeline section inclined

downwards. This configuration can

potentially lead to flow instability

known as severe slugging in the

pipeline-riser system.

1. The severe slugging phenomenon is caused

by a combination of factors in a pipeline-

riser system. The main factors include the

pressure of the system, low fluid flow rates,

inclination of the pipeline section. Increased

fluid flowrate is directly proportional to

increased slugging.

2. Numerical models have shown that they can

simulate severe slugging in multiphase-flow

to a useful degree of accuracy at a fraction

of the cost of building a test rig system.

They also have the added benefit of being

able to create multiple models of any shape

or size. However, CFD models require a

relatively long computational time.

3. Severe slugging has a significant impact on

a project’s capital expenditure (CAPEX),

operating expenditure (OPEX) and revenue.

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200Pre

ssu

re a

t R

ise

r B

ase

(b

arg)

Time (s) 1 kg/s Pressure vs Time

I II III IV

RESULTS

1

1.5

2

2.5

0 50 100 150 200

Pre

ssu

re a

t R

ise

r B

ase

(b

arg)

Time (s)

Pressure at Riser Base vs Time

0.218 m/s 0.109 m/s 0.546 m/s

SIMULATION RESULTS

The variation of pressure with time in the pipeline-riser allows to better differentiate and classify severe slugging.

One cycle of severe slugging can be classified into 4 stages: slug formation, slug production, blowout, and liquid fall-

back (I, II, III, IV). Slugging increases with increasing superficial velocity, (cycle time-period decreases).

Both the CFD & OLGA simulations gave out very different results regarding the 3 different liquid superficial velocity settings.

The overall trend of slugging is seen throughout all the simulations, there are cycles of high pressure build up, leading to a

blowout (sudden drop in pressure). The CFD model creates a clear pressure-time graph of the slugging effect over time.

Supervisors:

Dr. Patrick Verdin ([email protected])

Dr. Liyun Lao ([email protected])

Air

Volumetric

Flow Rate

Superficial

Velocity

Sm3/h m/s

20 0.217

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

Pre

ssu

re(b

arg)

Time(s)

OLGA Result for USL = 0.546m/s

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

2.4

2.6

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Pre

ssu

re (

bar

g)

Time (seconds)

Numerical Models vs Experiment USL = 0.546 m/s

Experiments

CFD

OLGA