interdisciplinary0medication0safety0initiative0to0improve0 ... design guide (--this section does not...

1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com Intervention A multi-disciplinary committee investigated possible solutions and leading practice change strategies for medication safety in the PACU. Working group 2 pharmacists, 6 front line nurses, 2 charge nurses, 1 nurse educator Process Map Developed based on current process. Used to facilitate discussion about high risk practices that users had become desensitized to within the current system. (see below) RATIONALE Due to frequency and complexity of medication administration in high acuity patients; the PACU is a high risk environment for medication errors. Multi-dosing from a single narcotic syringe is prevalent. In addition, a safe work environment for staff members with chemical dependencies needs to be promoted. Current studies report 7% of medication administration events are errors 1 (in an intensive care setting); 6% of those will cause serious harm to patients 2 . This suggests that 1 in 100 patients are harmed by medication errors in our PACUs. DESCRIPTION SELECTED REFERENCES 1 –Hicks, R. W., Becker, S. C., Windle, P. E., & Krenzischek, D. A. (2007). Medication errors in the PACU. Journal of perianesthesia nursing. 22(6), 413–419. 2 – Chapuis, C., Roustit, M., Bal, G., Schwebel, C., Pansu, P., David-Tchouda, S., Foroni, L., et al. (2010). Automated drug dispensing system reduces medication errors in an intensive care setting. Critical care medicine, 38(12), 2275–2281 3 –Brooke, J.SUS – a quick and dirty usability scale. Digital equipment corporation. 1986. Accessed: 17-Jan-2012 from: http://www.measuringusability.com/sus.php ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Anne Marie El-Kahlout and Michelle Stevenson for tireless efforts producing and managing the stock of pre-filled syringes during the study. Silvia Katsaros, Cathy Mezzalira, Amanda Staples, Danielle Lloyd, Michelle Marcoux, Claudia Gogishvilli, and Christine Body for their help with students, operationalizing the study and coping with day-to-day issues. Lehanna Thebane and Emmy Cheng for help with statistical elements. Toni Tidy for administrative support and advocacy. Factors Encouraging Workarounds – Staff identified aspects of their work environment they felt forced workarounds High frequency medication administration ( q15-30 mins) Wide dose ranges written by prescribers ( 2-15mg q3h PRN) Patients with acute medical issues and/or unpredictable medication needs due to unstable or acutely ill patients chronic pain histories want to “be prepared” and anticipate based on clinical judgment and previous experience Isolation of, and proximity of medication room and AcuDose Low staffing levels on weekends/evenings increases time stressors Solution development developed based on current process. Users proposed, and jointly identified areas for improvement. 1) Access to AcuDose i. Additional AcuDose machine, ii. Move AcuDose into closer proximity of nursing work areas 2) Narcotics left unattended or unlabeled i. Make/buy unit dose prefilled syringes (PFS) morphine (1mg/1ml, 2mg,3mg) HYDROmorphone (0.2mg/1ml, 0.4mg) ii. Secure bedside medication storage Data collection plan Agreement with system users about how success or failure is assessed: Retrospective chart review, nurse surveys, direct observation of practice & workload measures Nurse Survey – All respondents (100%) wanted to continue with narcotic PFSs; of them 39% believed higher dose PFS were needed. System Usability Scale 3 (worst=0, best 100) - This is a standardized 10 question survey that is used to quantitatively contrast system usability. Nurses completed surveys before ( SUS Score =78.1) and after (SUS Score = 75) the PFS pilot. No significant difference could be shown between the two systems. STEPS TAKEN CONT. Eric JP Romeril B.Sc.Pharm. 1 , Melanie MacInnis Pharm.D. 1,2 , Leslie Gauthier R.N. M.Sc. 1,3 , Leslie Gillies R.N. M.Ed. 1,3 , Marianne Kampf R.N. 1 , James Paul M.D. FRCPC 1,2 INTERDISCIPLINARY MEDICATION SAFETY INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE NARCOTIC USE PRACTICES IN A POST ANESTHESIA CARE UNIT (PACU) Direct Observation - The intervention completely eliminated narcotic waste documentation problems, and showed a trend towards reduction of patient’s average pain score. Data collection was not of high quality, no definitive conclusions possible. Workload - It took 7 hours of Pharmacy technician time a week to manufacture the unit dose syringes. It is inefficient to produce unit dose package sizes, given the doses used per week. Chart Review - A retrospective chart review uncovered irregularities with medication dispensing and documentation from the automated dispensing cabinet; such that the integrity of signature chain was interrupted. Current state: The unit now has 2 AcuDoses, which are more accessible and stock unit dose vials of narcotic medications. Future direction of research could be using higher dose PFS. EVALUATION CONTINUED 1) Our initial solution was popular, but was more resource intensive than predicted & caused dispensing problems 2) The PACU is a unique care environment, multi- disciplinary problem solving proved effective 3) Longer implementation period was needed to resolve logistical, manufacturing & nurse education issues IMPORTANCE Affilia.ons. 1= Hamilton Health Sciences, 2= McMaster University, DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, 3= McMaster University, School of Nursing STEPS TAKEN EVALUATION

Upload: duongxuyen

Post on 13-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

QUICK DESIGN GUIDE (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--)

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 36”x72” professional poster. It will save you valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics. Use it to create your presentation. Then send it to PosterPresentations.com for premium quality, same day affordable printing. We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the poster design process and answer your poster production questions. View our online tutorials at: http://bit.ly/Poster_creation_help (copy and paste the link into your web browser). For assistance and to order your printed poster call PosterPresentations.com at 1.866.649.3004

Object Placeholders

Use the placeholders provided below to add new elements to your poster: Drag a placeholder onto the poster area, size it, and click it to edit. Section Header placeholder Use section headers to separate topics or concepts within your presentation. Text placeholder Move this preformatted text placeholder to the poster to add a new body of text. Picture placeholder Move this graphic placeholder onto your poster, size it first, and then click it to add a picture to the poster.

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012

www.PosterPresentations.com

QUICK TIPS (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--)

This PowerPoint template requires basic PowerPoint (version 2007 or newer) skills. Below is a list of commonly asked questions specific to this template. If you are using an older version of PowerPoint some template features may not work properly.

Using the template

Verifying the quality of your graphics Go to the VIEW menu and click on ZOOM to set your preferred magnification. This template is at 50% the size of the final poster. All text and graphics will be printed at 200% their size. To see what your poster will look like when printed, set the zoom to 200% and evaluate the quality of all your graphics before you submit your poster for printing. Using the placeholders To add text to this template click inside a placeholder and type in or paste your text. To move a placeholder, click on it once (to select it), place your cursor on its frame and your cursor will change to this symbol: Then, click once and drag it to its new location where you can resize it as needed. Additional placeholders can be found on the left side of this template. Modifying the layout This template has four different column layouts. Right-click your mouse on the background and click on “Layout” to see the layout options. The columns in the provided layouts are fixed and cannot be moved but advanced users can modify any layout by going to VIEW and then SLIDE MASTER. Importing text and graphics from external sources TEXT: Paste or type your text into a pre-existing placeholder or drag in a new placeholder from the left side of the template. Move it anywhere as needed. PHOTOS: Drag in a picture placeholder, size it first, click in it and insert a photo from the menu. TABLES: You can copy and paste a table from an external document onto this poster template. To make the text fit better in the cells of an imported table, right-click on the table, click FORMAT SHAPE then click on TEXT BOX and change the INTERNAL MARGIN values to 0.25 Modifying the color scheme To change the color scheme of this template go to the “Design” menu and click on “Colors”. You can choose from the provide color combinations or you can create your own.

©  2012  PosterPresenta.ons.com          2117  Fourth  Street  ,  Unit  C          Berkeley    CA    94710          [email protected]  

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.

Intervention A multi-disciplinary committee investigated possible solutions and leading practice change strategies for medication safety in the PACU.

Working group – 2 pharmacists, 6 front line nurses, 2 charge nurses, 1 nurse educator

Process Map – Developed based on current process. Used to facilitate discussion about high risk practices that users had become desensitized to within the current system. (see below)

RATIONALE  Due to frequency and complexity of medication administration in high acuity patients; the PACU is a high risk environment for medication errors. Multi-dosing from a single narcotic syringe is prevalent. In addition, a safe work environment for staff members with chemical dependencies needs to be promoted. Current studies report 7% of medication administration events are errors1(in an intensive care setting); 6% of those will cause serious harm to patients2. This suggests that 1 in 100 patients are harmed by medication errors in our PACUs.

DESCRIPTION  

SELECTED  REFERENCES  1 –Hicks, R. W., Becker, S. C., Windle, P. E., & Krenzischek, D. A. (2007). Medication errors in the PACU. Journal of perianesthesia nursing. 22(6), 413–419. 2 – Chapuis, C., Roustit, M., Bal, G., Schwebel, C., Pansu, P., David-Tchouda, S., Foroni, L., et al. (2010). Automated drug dispensing system reduces medication errors in an intensive care setting. Critical care medicine, 38(12), 2275–2281 3 –Brooke, J.SUS – a quick and dirty usability scale. Digital equipment corporation. 1986. Accessed: 17-Jan-2012 from: http://www.measuringusability.com/sus.php

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  

Anne Marie El-Kahlout and Michelle Stevenson for tireless efforts producing and managing the stock of pre-filled syringes during the study.  Silvia Katsaros, Cathy Mezzalira, Amanda Staples, Danielle Lloyd, Michelle Marcoux, Claudia Gogishvilli, and Christine Body for their help with students, operationalizing the study and coping with day-to-day issues. Lehanna Thebane and Emmy Cheng for help with statistical elements.  Toni Tidy for administrative support and advocacy.

Factors Encouraging Workarounds – Staff identified aspects of their work environment they felt forced workarounds •  High frequency medication administration ( q15-30 mins) •  Wide dose ranges written by prescribers ( 2-15mg q3h PRN) •  Patients with acute medical issues and/or unpredictable medication

needs due to –  unstable or acutely ill patients –  chronic pain histories –  want to “be prepared” and anticipate based on clinical judgment and

previous experience

•  Isolation of, and proximity of medication room and AcuDose •  Low staffing levels on weekends/evenings increases time stressors

Solution development – developed based on current process. Users proposed, and jointly identified areas for improvement. 1)  Access to AcuDose

i.  Additional AcuDose machine, ii.  Move AcuDose into closer proximity of nursing work areas

2)   Narcotics left unattended or unlabeled i.  Make/buy unit dose prefilled syringes (PFS)

morphine (1mg/1ml, 2mg,3mg) HYDROmorphone (0.2mg/1ml, 0.4mg)

ii.  Secure bedside medication storage

Data collection plan – Agreement with system users about how success or failure is assessed: Retrospective chart review, nurse surveys, direct observation of practice & workload measures Nurse Survey – All respondents (100%) wanted to continue with narcotic PFSs; of them 39% believed higher dose PFS were needed. System Usability Scale3(worst=0, best 100) - This is a standardized 10 question survey that is used to quantitatively contrast system usability. Nurses completed surveys before ( SUS Score =78.1) and after (SUS Score = 75) the PFS pilot. No significant difference could be shown between the two systems.

STEPS  TAKEN  CONT.  

 Eric  JP  Romeril  B.Sc.Pharm.1,  Melanie  MacInnis  Pharm.D.1,2,  Leslie  Gauthier  R.N.  M.Sc.1,3,  Leslie  Gillies  R.N.  M.Ed.1,3,    Marianne  Kampf    R.N.1,    James  Paul  M.D.  FRCPC1,2        

 

INTERDISCIPLINARY  MEDICATION  SAFETY  INITIATIVE  TO  IMPROVE  NARCOTIC  USE  PRACTICES    IN  A  POST  ANESTHESIA  CARE  UNIT  (PACU)    

Direct Observation - The intervention completely eliminated narcotic waste documentation problems, and showed a trend towards reduction of patient’s average pain score. Data collection was not of high quality, no definitive conclusions possible. Workload - It took 7 hours of Pharmacy technician time a week to manufacture the unit dose syringes. It is inefficient to produce unit dose package sizes, given the doses used per week. Chart Review - A retrospective chart review uncovered irregularities with medication dispensing and documentation from the automated dispensing cabinet; such that the integrity of signature chain was interrupted. Current state: The unit now has 2 AcuDoses, which are more accessible and stock unit dose vials of narcotic medications. Future direction of research could be using higher dose PFS.

EVALUATION  CONTINUED    

1)  Our initial solution was popular, but was more resource intensive than predicted & caused dispensing problems

2)  The PACU is a unique care environment, multi-disciplinary problem solving proved effective

3)  Longer implementation period was needed to resolve logistical, manufacturing & nurse education issues

IMPORTANCE    

Affilia.ons.      1=  Hamilton  Health  Sciences,  2=  McMaster  University,  DeGroote  School  of  Medicine,  Department  of  Anesthesia,    3=  McMaster  University,    School  of  Nursing  

STEPS  TAKEN  

EVALUATION