interaction: animation

26
INTERACTION: ANIMATION Presented by Chris Luce 1

Upload: bono

Post on 21-Feb-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Interaction: Animation. Presented by Chris Luce. Animated Transitions in Statistical Data Graphics (Jeffrey Heer ). Switch between data graphics Keep readers oriented during transitions Understand relationships between the views. Pros of Animated Transitions. Stay oriented - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Interaction: Animation

1

INTERACTION: ANIMATIONPresented by Chris Luce

Page 2: Interaction: Animation

2

ANIMATED TRANSITIONS IN STATISTICAL DATA GRAPHICS (JEFFREY HEER)

Switch between data graphics Keep readers oriented during transitions

Understand relationships between the views

Page 3: Interaction: Animation

3

PROS OF ANIMATED TRANSITIONS

Stay oriented Facilitate learning Decision making Increase levels of engagement

Page 4: Interaction: Animation

4

CONS OF ANIMATED TRANSITIONS

No guarantee of improved performance Time and complexity Misleading

Animations that violate underlying data semantics

Page 5: Interaction: Animation

5

TRANSITION TYPES IN STATISTICAL DATA GRAPHICS View Transformation Substrate Transformation Filtering Ordering Timestep Visualization Change Data Schema Change

Page 6: Interaction: Animation

6

Page 7: Interaction: Animation

7

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Congruence

Maintain valid data graphics during transitions Use consistent semantic-syntactic mappings Respect semantic correspondence Avoid ambiguity

Page 8: Interaction: Animation

8

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Apprehension

Group similar transitions Minimize occlusion Maximize predictability Use simple transitions Use staging for complex transitions Make transitions as long as need, but no longer

Page 9: Interaction: Animation

9

DynaVis(video)

Page 10: Interaction: Animation

10

EXPERIMENT 1: OBJECT TRACKING

Page 11: Interaction: Animation

11

EXPERIMENT 1: RESULTS

Page 12: Interaction: Animation

12

EXPERIMENT 2: ESTIMATING CHANGING VALUES

Page 13: Interaction: Animation

13

EXPERIMENT 2: RESULTS

Page 14: Interaction: Animation

14

SUBJECTIVE PREFERENCES

Page 15: Interaction: Animation

15

EFFECTIVENESS OF ANIMATION IN TREND VISUALIZATION (GEORGE ROBERTSON)

Presenter knows what happens and tells audience what to look for

Problem with analysis or data exploration Replay animation many times

Page 16: Interaction: Animation

16

ANIMATION VISUALIZATION

Page 17: Interaction: Animation

17

QUESTIONS ABOUT TREND VISUALIZATION

What effect does the dataset size have? Does the animation technique work for

analysis? Are there alternatives that are more

effective?

Page 18: Interaction: Animation

18

TRACES VISUALIZATION

Page 19: Interaction: Animation

19

SMALL MULTIPLES VISUALIZATION

Page 20: Interaction: Animation

20

STUDY RESULTS Accuracy

Page 21: Interaction: Animation

21

STUDY RESULTS

Task Completion Time Animation was fastest in Presentation and

slowest in Analysis Traces and Small Multiples are both faster than

Animation when used for Analysis

Page 22: Interaction: Animation

22

STUDY RESULTS Subjective Preferences

Page 23: Interaction: Animation

23

ANIMATION: CAN IT FACILITATE? (BARBARA TVERSKY)

Evaluate animation Compare: animation vs. static graphics

Page 24: Interaction: Animation

24

SELECTIVE REVIEW

Incomparable content Incomparable procedures Failures of animation to benefit

Page 25: Interaction: Animation

25

WHY DO ANIMATIONS FAIL?

Animations may be hard to perceive Animations may be comprehended discretely Interactivity Caveats

Page 26: Interaction: Animation

26

REFERENCES Jeffrey Heer, George Robertson. Animated Transitions in Statistical Data

Graphics. IEEE Information Visualization (InfoVis) 2007. George Robertson, Roland Fernandez, Danyel Fisher, Bongshin Lee, John

Stasko, "Effectiveness of Animation in Trend Visualization", IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, (Paper presented at InfoVis '08), Vol. 14, No. 6, November/December 2008, pp. 1325-1332.

Animation: Can It Facilitate? Barbara Tversky, Julie Morrison, Mireille Betrancourt. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 57:4, pp 247-262, 2002.