integrated performance dashboard · integrated performance dashboard lead director ... my local...
TRANSCRIPT
INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE DASHBOARD
Lead Director – Director of Planning and Performance
6th July 2016 – Health Board Meeting
2
MY LOCAL HEALTH SERVICE 5
STAYING HEALTHY: I AM WELL INFORMED & SUPPORTED TO MANAGE MY OWN PHYSICAL & MENTAL HEALTH 10 INDICATOR 1: NUMBER OF EMERGENCY HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS FOR BASKET OF 8 CHRONIC CONDITIONS PER 100,000 OF POPULATION (ROLLING 12 MONTHS) .............................................................................. 10
STAYING HEALTHY: I AM WELL INFORMED & SUPPORTED TO MANAGE MY OWN PHYSICAL & MENTAL HEALTH 11 INDICATOR 2: NUMBER OF EMERGENCY HOSPITAL RE-ADMISSIONS FOR BASKET OF 8 CHRONIC CONDITIONS PER 100,000 OF POPULATION (ROLLING 12 MONTHS) .......................................................................... 11
INDICATOR 3: UPTAKE OF INFLUENZA VACCINATION AMONG... A) 65 YEAR OLDS AND OVER B) UNDER 65’S IN RISK GROUPS C) PREGNANT WOMEN D) HEALTH CARE WORKERS ................................................. 12
INDICATOR 4: THE % OF SCHEDULED VACCINATION UPTAKE RATES FOR ALL CHILDREN UP TO AGE 4 ............................................................................................................................................................... 13
INDICATOR 5: THE % OF RECEPTION CLASS CHILDREN (AGED 4/5) CLASSIFIED AS OVERWEIGHT OR OBESE ....................................................................................................................................................... 14
INDICATOR 6: THE % OF ADULT SMOKERS MAKE A QUIT ATTEMPT VIA SMOKING CESSATION SERVICES ............................................................................................................................................................ 15
INDICATOR 7: THE % OF THOSE SMOKERS WHO ARE CO VALIDATED AS QUIT AT 4 WEEKS............................................................................................................................................................................ 16
INDICATOR 12 & 13: USE OF ‘MY HEALTH ON LINE’ ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17
INDICATOR 15: NATIONAL PRESCRIBING INDICATOR RATE (INDICATOR IN DEVELOPMENT) ........................................................................................................................................................................... 18
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM 20 INDICATOR 16: DELAYED TRANSFER OF CARE DELIVERY PER 10,000 UHB POPULATION (DTOC) – MENTAL HEALTH (ALL AGES) ........................................................................................................................ 20
INDICATOR 17: DELAYED TRANSFER OF CARE DELIVERY PER 10,000 UHB POPULATION (DTOC) – NON MENTAL HEALTH (AGED 75+) ............................................................................................................... 21
CONTINUED: DELAYED BED DAYS TRANSFER OF CARE DELIVERY - MENTAL HEALTH..................................................................................................................................................................................... 22
CONTINUED: DELAYED BED DAYS TRANSFER OF CARE DELIVERY – NON MENTAL HEALTH ............................................................................................................................................................................ 23
CONTINUED: DELAYED TRANSFER OF CARE - CRITICAL CARE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24
INDICATOR 18: THE NUMBER OF LABORATORY CONFIRMED CASES OF CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE PER 100,000 OF THE POPULATION ...................................................................................................................... 25
INDICATOR 19: THE NUMBER OF LABORATORY CONFIRMED CASES OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS PER 100,000 OF THE POPULATION ................................................................................................................. 26
INDICATOR 20: THE NUMBER OF PREVENTABLE HOSPITAL ACQUIRED THROMBOSIS .................................................................................................................................................................................... 27
INDICATOR 21: THE NUMBER OF HEALTHCARE ACQUIRED PRESSURE SORES .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 28
INDICATOR 22: IN DEVELOPMENT: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNIVERSAL CASE NOTE MORTALITY REVIEW PROCESS .......................................................................................................................................... 29
INDICATOR 23 TO 26: COMPLIANCE WITH THE PATIENT SAFETY REPORTING SYSTEM .................................................................................................................................................................................. 30
INDICATOR 27: OF THE SERIOUS INCIDENTS DUE FOR ASSURANCE WITHIN THE MONTH, % WHICH ASSURED IN AGREED TIMESCALE ...................................................................................................................... 31
INDICATOR 28: NUMBER OF NEVER EVENTS ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31
LOCAL MEASURE: COMPLAINTS ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32
LOCAL MEASURE: INCIDENTS .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33
EFFECTIVE CARE: I RECEIVE THE RIGHT CARE & SUPPORT AS LOCALLY AS POSSIBLE & I CONTRIBUTE TO MAKING THAT CARE SUCESSFUL 35 INDICATOR 30: PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE AGED 50+ WHO HAVE A GP RECORD OF BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN THE PRECEDING 5 YEARS .................................................................................................... 35
INDICATOR 31 TO INDICATOR 32: NUMBER OF NISCHR CLINICAL RESEARCH PORTFOLIO STUDIES (CRP) & COMMERCIALLY SPONSORED STUDIES (CS) .......................................................................................... 36
INDICATOR 33 TO INDICATOR 34: NUMBER OF PATIENTS RECRUITED INTO NISCHR CLINICAL RESEARCH PORTFOLIO STUDIES & COMMERCIALLY SPONSORED STUDIES ....................................................................... 37
INDICATOR 36: CRUDE MORTALITY .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38
CONTENTS
3
INDICATOR 36 CONTINUED: CONDITION SPECIFIC MORTALITY – DEATHS OF HEART ATTACK (MI) AGED 35 TO 74 WITHIN 30 DAYS OF EMERGENCY ADMISSION ....................................................................... 40
INDICATOR 36 CONTINUED: CONDITION SPECIFIC MORTALITY – DEATHS OF STROKE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF EMERGENCY ADMISSION............................................................................................................... 41
INDICATOR 36 CONTINUED: CONDITION SPECIFIC MORTALITY – DEATHS OF HIP FRACTURE (NOF) AGED >64 WITHIN 30 DAYS OF EMERGENCY ADMISSION ............................................................................. 42
INDICATOR 37: RISK ADJUSTED MORTALITY INDEX - RAMI 2014 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
INDICATOR 38: PERCENTAGE VALID PRINCIPLE DIAGNOSIS CODE 3 MONTHS AFTER EPISODE END DATE (MONTHLY) .......................................................................................................................................... 44
INDICATOR 39: PERCENTAGE VALID PRINCIPLE DIAGNOSIS CODE 3 MONTHS AFTER EPISODE END DATE (ROLLING 12 MONTHS) ........................................................................................................................... 44
LOCAL MEASURE: CLINICAL CODING QUALITY .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45
DIGNIFIED CARE: I AM TREATED WITH DIGNITY & RESPECT & TREAT OTHERS THE SAME 47 INDICATOR 40: THE % OF PROCEDURES POSTPONED ON >1 OCCASION FOR NON-CLINICAL REASONS WITH LESS <8 DAYS NOTICE THAT ARE SUBSEQUENTLY CARRIED OUT WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS OR AT THE PATIENT’S
EARLIEST CONVENIENCE ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 47
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE 49 INDICATOR 45: % OF GP PRACTICES OPEN DURING DAILY CORE HOURS OR WITHIN 1 HOUR OF DAILY CORE HOURS .......................................................................................................................................... 49
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE 50 STROKE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MEASURES (QIMS) – EFFECTIVE FROM 1ST OCTOBER 2015 (INDICATIVE PERFORMANCE APRIL TO SEPTEMBER) ................................................................................................. 51
INDICATOR 52: THE % PATIENTS NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER, NOT VIA THE URGENT ROUTE, THAT STARTED DEFINITIVE TREATMENT WITHIN (UP TO & INC.) 31 DAYS OF DIAGNOSIS (REGARDLESS OF REFERRAL
ROUTE) - NUSC ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 52
INDICATOR 53: THE % PATIENTS NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER, VIA THE URGENT ROUTE, THAT STARTED DEFINITIVE TREATMENT WITHIN (UP TO & INCLUDING) 62 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF REFERRAL - USC .................. 53
INDICATOR 54: THE % OF PATIENTS WAITING LESS THAN 26 WEEKS FOR TREATMENT (RTT) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 54
CONTINUED: LOCAL MEASURE: THE NUMBER OF CAMHS ADHD PATIENTS WAITING FOR TREATMENT 26 & 36 WEEKS .................................................................................................................................. 55
INDICATOR 55: THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS WAITING MORE THAN 36 WEEKS FOR TREATMENT (RTT) ............................................................................................................................................................ 56
INDICATOR 56: THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS WAITING MORE THAN 8 WEEKS FOR A SPECIFIED DIAGNOSTIC ....................................................................................................................................................... 58
LOCAL MEASURE: THERAPIES WAITING TIMES: THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS WAITING MORE THAN 14 WEEKS FOR A SPECIFIED THERAPIES .............................................................................................................. 59
INDICATOR 57: LOCAL MEASURE: CARDIAC PATHWAY (IN DEVELOPMENT) .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 60
INDICATOR 58: THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS WAITING FOR A FOLLOW-UP WHO ARE DELAYED PAST THEIR TARGET DATE ...................................................................................................................................... 62
INDICATOR 59: THE % OF PATIENTS WHO SPEND LESS THAN 4 HOURS IN ALL HOSPITAL MAJOR & MINOR EMERGENCY CARE (I.E. A&E) FACILITIES FROM ARRIVAL UNTIL ADMISSION, TRANSFER OR DISCHARGE ................. 64
INDICATOR 60: THE % OF EMERGENCY RESPONSES TO RED CALLS (IMMEDIATELY LIFE THREATENING) CALLS ARRIVING WITHIN (UP TO & INCLUDING) 8 MINUTES ............................................................................ 65
LOCAL MEASURE: NUMBER OF AMBULANCE HANDOVERS WITHIN 15 MINUTES ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 66
INDICATOR 61: NUMBER OF AMBULANCE HANDOVERS OVER ONE HOUR ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 67
INDICATOR 62: THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS WHO SPEND 12 HOURS OR MORE IN ALL HOSPITAL MAJOR & MINOR EMERGENCY CARE FACILITIES FROM ARRIVAL UNTIL ADMISSION, TRANSFER OR DISCHARGE ....................... 68
INDIVIDUAL CARE: I AM TREATED AS AN INDIVIDUAL, WITH MY OWN NEEDS & RESPONSIBILITIES 70 INDICATOR 66: THE % OF ASSESSMENTS UNDERTAKEN WITHIN (UP TO & INCLUDING) 28 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF REFERRAL ............................................................................................................ 70
INDICATOR 67: THE % OF THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS STARTED WITHIN (UP TO & INCLUDING) 28 DAYS FOLLOWING AN ASSESSMENT BY LPMHSS............................................................................................ 71
INDICATOR 68: THE % OF HB RESIDENTS IN RECEIPT OF SECONDARY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES (ALL AGES) WHO HAVE A VALID CARE & TREATMENT PLAN (CTP) ............................................................................. 72
INDICATOR 70: THE % OF HOSPITALS WITHIN A HB WHICH HAVE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE TO ENSURE ADVOCACY IS AVAILABLE FOR ALL QUALIFYING PATIENTS .............................................................................. 73
INDICATOR 71: THE % OF REGISTERED OVER AGED 65 PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH DEMENTIA ..................................................................................................................................................................... 74
LOCAL MEASURE: THE % OF PATIENTS REGISTERED AS RECEIVING PALLIATIVE CARE WITH THEIR GP PRACTICE .................................................................................................................................................. 75
4
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM 77 INDICATOR 73: REDUCE WASTE IN SECONDARY & PRIMARY CARE THROUGH THE DELIVERY OF EFFICIENT & PRODUCTIVE SERVICES LOCAL MEASURE: THEATRE EFFICIENCY ................................................................. 77
LOCAL MEASURE: DELIVERED ACTIVITY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 78
LOCAL MEASURE: AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY (AVLOS) MEDICINE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 80
INDICATOR 74: THE % OF FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) DAYS LOST TO SICKNESS ABSENCE.......................................................................................................................................................................... 82
INDICATOR 74: THE % OF FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) DAYS LOST TO SICKNESS ABSENCE.......................................................................................................................................................................... 83
INDICATOR 77: ESTIMATED RATE OF DID NOT ATTEND (DNA) FOR GP APPOINTMENTS PER GP CLUSTER ...................................................................................................................................................... 88
INDICATOR 78: ESTIMATED HIGHEST & LOWEST RATE OF DID NOT ATTEND (DNA) FOR GP APPOINTMENTS PER GP CLUSTER ........................................................................................................................... 88
INDICATOR 79: THE % OF PATIENTS WHO DID NOT ATTEND (DNA) A NEW OUTPATIENT APPOINTMENT ....................................................................................................................................................... 89
INDICATOR 80: THE % OF PATIENTS WHO DID NOT ATTEND (DNA) A FOLLOW-UP OUTPATIENT APPOINTMENT .............................................................................................................................................. 90
LOCAL MEASURE: OUTPATIENT CLINIC CANCELLATIONS ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 91
INDICATOR 83: % OF STAFF UNDERTAKING A PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW................................................................................................................................................................... 92
LOCAL MEASURE: CORE SKILLS – TRAINING COMPLIANCE .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 93
INDICATOR 84: % OF TOTAL MEDICAL STAFF UNDERTAKING PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS - CONSULTANT JOB PLANNING .................................................................................................................................... 95
LOCAL MEASURE: FRACTURE NECK OF FEMUR (#NOF) - NUMBER OF PATIENTS ADMITTED TO ORTHOPAEDIC WARD WITHIN 4 HOURS 96
LOCAL MEASURE: FRACTURE NECK OF FEMUR (#NOF) - NUMBER OF PATIENTS WHO GO TO THEATRE FOR REPAIR WITHIN 36 HOURS 97
LOCAL MEASURE: HAND HYGIENE & NUTRITIONAL COMPLIANCE 98
LOCAL MEASURE: SURGICAL SITE INFECTION RATES (ARTHROPLASTY) 99
LOCAL MEASURE: CAESAREAN SECTION RATES & SURGICAL SITE INFECTION RATES (CAESAREAN SECTION) 100
COMMISSIONING 101
GLOSSARY 104
5
My Local Health Service In addition to this internal performance report, Cwm Taf UHB also participates in the Welsh Government initiative which enables sharing of quality and
performance information with the public. My Local Health Service is designed to share more information about Cwm Taf with the general public than
ever before.
Cwm Taf UHB is responsible to the public for the health and social care that is provided within its boundaries. My Local Health Service will present
information on the workings of all these areas in a user friendly way so everyone can see how we are performing for our population.
This is a journey of honesty and increasing openness, with a lot more information to be provided over the coming months and then regularly updated.
My Local Health Service will publish various measures showing the quality of NHS services all over Wales. The information is provided where possible
with comparisons to be made between regions and organisations across Wales and not just within Cwm Taf. We encourage members of the public to
use this information to navigate the NHS and to challenge where improvement is needed.
The Website currently includes:
Bilingual access to performance measures for NHS Wales
The option to view information as a table or chart
Direct links to useful websites for further information A frequently asked questions tab
Future work
My Local Health Service is an evolving project with scope for the publication of a wide variety of performance data and useful public health service
information. The vision for My Local Health Service is to provide health care measures of success in more details on a local level. This will include
information about the performance of individual services within a hospital or General Practice.
6
At a Glance – part 1
7
At a Glance – part 2
8
Key Priorities
9
10
STAYING HEALTHY: I AM WELL INFORMED & SUPPORTED TO MANAGE MY OWN PHYSICAL & MENTAL HEALTH Indicator 1: Number of emergency hospital admissions for basket of 8 chronic conditions per 100,000 of population (rolling 12 months) Strategic Aim: Excellent Population Health Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Medical Director
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 1342
Current Trend & Benchmark How are we doing?
The chart illustrates the number of admissions for the basket of chronic conditions for all Welsh HB’s. Emergency admissions are acknowledged as being directly influenced by the availability and quality of a comprehensive package of services for Integrated Chronic Conditions Management in the community.
Current Trend & Benchmark What actions are we taking?
This target will be achieved by improving chronic conditions management
services in the community, thus stabilising acute capacity. Work is underway with Morlais medical practice to explore the reasons for the practice being an outlier in this area, data quality issues and potential pathway changes.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf is an outlier in this area and further investigative work is required to look at the
reasons for this.
Source: NWIS/Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
No.
of
ad
mis
sio
ns
Number of emergency admissions for basket of 8 chronic conditions per 100,000 of population (rolling 12 months)
Cwm Taf Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Aneurin Bevan
Betsi Cadwaladr Cardiff & Vale Hywel Dda
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Cwm Taf Abertawe BroMorganwwg
Aneurin Bevan BetsiCadwaladr
Cardiff & Vale Hywel Dda
No.
of
ad
mis
sio
ns
Number of emergency admissions per 100,000 of population with one of the conditions specified in the basket of 8 chronic conditions in a
rolling 12 months to April 2016
Alzheimers Atrial Fibrillation Cardiovascular CVA
Diabetes Musculoskeletal Neurological Respiratory
11
STAYING HEALTHY: I AM WELL INFORMED & SUPPORTED TO MANAGE MY OWN PHYSICAL & MENTAL HEALTH Indicator 2: Number of emergency hospital re-admissions for basket of 8 chronic conditions per 100,000 of population (rolling 12
months) Strategic Aim: Excellent Population Health Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Medical Director
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 298
Current Trend & Benchmark How are we doing?
The chart illustrates the number of readmissions for the basket of chronic conditions for all Welsh HB’s. Emergency hospital readmissions are defined as the same patient being
admitted to the same LHB for the same chronic condition ‘category’
within a 12 month period (i.e. 365 days or less between the discharge date (from the original admission) and the admission date (of the subsequent admission). The chronic condition measure is based on primary diagnosis only.
Current Trend & Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Within A&E at Cwm Taf Health Board a multi professional clinical group regularly reviews patients with frequent attendance at A&E (more than 5 times per year) and a management plan is agreed to reduce further unplanned attendances and admissions.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf is an outlier in this area and further investigative work is required to look at the reasons for this.
Source: NWIS/Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
No.
of
ad
mis
sio
ns
Number of emergency re-admissions for basket of 8 chronic conditions per 100,000 of population (rolling 12 months)
Cwm Taf Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Aneurin Bevan
Betsi Cadwaladr Cardiff & Vale Hywel Dda
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Cwm Taf Abertawe BroMorganwwg
Aneurin Bevan BetsiCadwaladr
Cardiff & Vale Hywel Dda
No.
of
re-a
dm
issio
ns
Number of emergency re-admissions per 100,000 of population with one of the conditions specified in the basket of 8 chronic conditions in a
rolling 12 months to April 2016
Alzheimers Atrial Fibrillation Cardiovascular CVA
Diabetes Musculoskeletal Neurological Respiratory
12
STAYING HEALTHY: I AM WELL INFORMED & SUPPORTED TO MANAGE MY OWN PHYSICAL & MENTAL HEALTH Indicator 3: Uptake of influenza vaccination among... a) 65 year olds and over b) Under 65’s in risk groups c) Pregnant women
d) Health care workers Strategic Aim: Excellent Population Health Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Public Health
Period: Season 2015/16 (as at 23/03/2016) Target: (a-c) 75% Target: (d) 50%
Current Trend How are we doing?
The level of staff uptake increases year on year. Latest figures indicate
that uptake is approaching 49% of front line staff compared to 46% last yr. It is important to note that this figure does not include the uptake by Bank staff, which if included would have achieved the target of 50%.
Uptake of flu immunisation in primary care for the over 65’s has slightly increased across Wales to 66.6%, Cwm Taf UHB uptake currently stands at 64.9%, 5 practices however have reached over 70% uptake.
There has been a slight decrease in the under 65 at risk group but this is seen across Wales, more work needs to be undertaken in Primary Care to increase uptake. 2, 3 yr. olds flu uptake has seen a 10% increase this yr. School flu vaccination programme has been very successful and has achieved 70% uptake, 2nd highest HB in Wales.
Benchmark: What actions are we taking?
Further work in Primary Care to increase uptake.
Immunisation coordinator has been working with community
facilitator’s undertaking immunisation talks to groups. Immunisation coordinator has been working with one cluster that has
chosen increasing flu vaccine uptake as a priority
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
None of the Health Boards meet the targets. Cwm Taf is not an outlier in this area and performs comparatively with some other Health Boards.
Immunisation capacity in general practice Flu Myth’s within our communities
Source: Public Health Wales Health Protection Division
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 (CURRENTUPTAKE AS AT23/03/2016)
Perfo
rm
an
ce
Cwm Taf UHB % uptake of the influenza vaccine
Over 65'sUnder 65's in the at risk groupsPregnant womenHealthcare workers (current update Feb 2016)
13
STAYING HEALTHY: I AM WELL INFORMED & SUPPORTED TO MANAGE MY OWN PHYSICAL & MENTAL HEALTH Indicator 4: The % of scheduled vaccination uptake rates for all children up to age 4 Strategic Aim: Excellent Population Health Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Public Health
Period: Apr 2015 to Mar 2016 Target: 95% Current Status: as per table
Current Trend How are we doing?
Quarter 4 of this year has seen an increase in uptake in the MMR1
age 2 and PCV age 2 childhood vaccines and only a small decrease in the other vaccines for children up to age 4. Cwm Taf’s performance continues to exceed the All Wales average.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Work is currently being planned to identify practices with lowest
uptake. Subsequent practice visits will be arranged.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf is one of only 4 Health Boards that meets the target for each type of vaccination. Immunisation capacity in general practice.
Source: Public Health Wales Health Protection Division
90%
95%
100%
Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar
2015/16
Perfo
rm
an
ce
% uptake of scheduled vaccination uptake rates for all children up to age 4
5 in 1 age 1 MenC age 1 MMR1 age 2PCV age 2 HibMenC Booster age 2 Target
14
STAYING HEALTHY: I AM WELL INFORMED & SUPPORTED TO MANAGE MY OWN PHYSICAL & MENTAL HEALTH Indicator 5: The % of reception class children (aged 4/5) classified as overweight or obese
(To be calculated for health boards where the participation standard of 85% has been achieved) Strategic Aim: Excellent Population Health Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Public Health
Period: 2012 to 2014 Target: Reduction Current Status: 28.1%
Current Trend How are we doing?
Cwm Taf UHB’s participation in the Child Measurement Programme (CMP) for Wales (2014/15) is the joint highest at 96.3% with Betsi Cadwaladr UHB.
Since the CMP was introduced there has been a reduction in overweight and obese 4/5 year old children in Cwm Taf.
The latest report shows that 71.9% of 4/5 year olds in Cwm Taf are a healthy weight. However, this is the lowest in Wales.
Cwm Taf has the highest rate of obesity in Wales at 13.2%, comprising 12.9% in Rhondda Cynon Taf and 14.7% in Merthyr Tydfil.
Participation 2013/14 What actions are we taking?
Multi agency Childhood Obesity Steering Group established to lead and coordinate the action locally.
The development of actions to support the prevention of childhood obesity using Public Health Wales 10 Steps to a healthy weight
approach. Following on from social marketing insight work, the information
resource Merthyr Babies: the breast start is being piloted in Merthyr Tydfil.
The Bump Start programme for pregnant women with a BMI of 35+,
covers Rhondda Cynon Taf and is funded by Families First. The external evaluation of Bump Start is expected imminently but
findings from clients who completed the service between Jan-May 2016 have shown that the average weight gain is now 5.6kgs (within recommended guidelines of 5-9 kg, Institute of Medicine).
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf has improved its position year on year in relation to this measure. High rates of adult overweight and obesity
Uncertainty over funding of the Bump Start programme from April 2017. There is no programme in Merthyr Tydfil.
Source: Public Health Wales Child Development Programme
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Cwm Taf Abertawe BroMorgannwg
AneurinBevan
BetsiCadwaladr
Cardiff &Vale
Hywel Dda Powys
% o
verw
eig
ht/
obese
% of reception class children (aged 4/5) classified as overweight or obese
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15
50%
75%
100%
Cwm Taf AbertaweBro
Morgannwg
AneurinBevan
BetsiCadwaladr
Cardiff &Vale
Hywel Dda Powys
% o
f p
arti
cip
ati
on
Proportion of children aged 4 to 5 years participating in a child measurement programme 2014/15
Wales 94.5%
15
STAYING HEALTHY: I AM WELL INFORMED & SUPPORTED TO MANAGE MY OWN PHYSICAL & MENTAL HEALTH Indicator 6: The % of adult smokers make a quit attempt via smoking cessation services Strategic Aim: Excellent Population Health Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Public Health
Period: Q2 2015/16 Target: 5% Current Status: 1.82%
Current Trend: How are we doing?
The number of people accessing services to support a quit attempt increased in the last quarter. This was mainly due to increased numbers seen by the community pharmacy service, which reflects the increased
numbers of pharmacies providing this service. In addition, delivery of the MAMSS service for pregnant smokers in Rhondda, Cynon & Taf Ely is resulting in increased numbers accessing this support. The MAMSS service consistently treats not 5%, but 30% of pregnant smokers in Rhondda, Cynon and Taff.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Quarter 1
2015/160.86% 0.35% 0.52% 0.86% 0.36% 0.50% 0.47%
Quarter 2
2015/161.82% 0.83% 0.95% 1.83% 0.74% 1.03% 1.25%
Hywel Dda Powys
% Welsh resident smokers who make a quit attempt via smoking cessation services
(target 5% end of fin year)
Cwm Taf
Abertawe
Bro
Morgannwg
Aneurin
Bevan
Betsi
Cadwaladr
Cardiff &
Vale Period
Offering varenicline, as well as NRT, via our community pharmacy service.
Developing the role of health promotion champions within Cwm Taf community pharmacies.
Gaining access to text and remind service for community pharmacies delivering the Level 3 Stop Smoking Service.
Meeting monthly with Stop Smoking Wales (SSW) regarding
performance targets and establishing next steps in line with agreed actions.
Appointed a Stop Smoking Development Worker to work closely with Communities First teams in areas with high smoking prevalence rates. The post is initially based in Rhondda Fach.
Continuing to monitor the proportion of patients listed for surgery,
who want support to quit smoking. Maintaining support for the secondary care ‘no smoking ward
champions’.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Uptake in Cwm Taf of smoking cessation services is similar to that in Betsi Cadwaladr, and is
in excess of that achieved by other HBs.
Continuing low numbers accessing the Stop Smoking Wales service
provided by Public Health Wales. Funding to continue MAMSS and expand into Merthyr Tydfil.
Source: Smoking Cessation Services Data Collection, Welsh Government
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar
Cwm Taf UHB % smokers making a quit attempt
(Quarterly)
2013 2014 2015
16
STAYING HEALTHY: I AM WELL INFORMED & SUPPORTED TO MANAGE MY OWN PHYSICAL & MENTAL HEALTH Indicator 7: The % of those smokers who are CO validated as quit at 4 weeks Strategic Aim: Excellent Population Health Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Public Health
Period: Q2 2015/16 Target: 40% Current Status: 34.13%
Current Trend: How are we doing?
This quarter showed a decrease of smokers achieving a CO validated quit to 34.13% which is below the target, but this varies by service month on month.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Quarter 1
2015/1640.91% 44.76% 36.83% 32.26% 36.54% 50.17% 37.78%
Quarter 2
2015/1634.13% 41.57% 36.62% 32.02% 34.30% 47.77% 40.13%
% Welsh resident smokers who are CO validated as successfully quitting at 4 weeks
(target 40% end of fin year)
Hywel Dda PowysPeriod Cwm Taf
Abertawe
Bro
Morgannwg
Aneurin
Bevan
Betsi
Cadwaladr
Cardiff &
Vale
Availability of varenicline via community pharmacy service should
lead to an increased quit rate.
Access to CTUHB’s text and remind service for community pharmacies delivering the Level 3 Stop Smoking Service will enable community pharmacists to remind clients to attend appointments in a timely manner and will also help keep clients motivated. This should increase the quit rate beyond 40%.
SSW are contacting clients that DNA during their course to identify
reasons why and to remind them to return for their CO reading. SSW are trying to obtain the CO validation at the earliest time
within the Russell Standards parameters. SSW are developing a pathway for clients who receive telephone
support to be CO validated at a community pharmacy. SSW are interrogating their data to identify the reasons why clients
are not quit at 4 weeks, which lowers the number that can be CO
validated. MAMSS maternity support workers continue to make every effort to
CO verify at 4 weeks, including phone and text reminders.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
The Health Board’s performance is second highest to that of Hywel Dda and exceeds the Tier 1 target of 40%.
Source: Smoking Cessation Services Data Collection, Welsh Government
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar
Cwm Taf UHB % smokers who are CO validated as
successfully quitting (Quarterly)
2013 2014 2015
17
STAYING HEALTHY: I AM WELL INFORMED & SUPPORTED TO MANAGE MY OWN PHYSICAL & MENTAL HEALTH Indicator 12 & 13: Use of ‘My Health on Line’ Strategic Aim: Excellent Population Health Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Primary Care & Mental Health
Period: Mar 2015 to Feb 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: as per table
Current Trend & Benchmark How are we doing?
There has been a small decrease in practices offering appointment booking in February. Overall there has an increase in practices offering the service during the last year but Cwm Taf still compares poorly with some Health Boards. There has been a significant increase in the number of practices
offering repeat prescriptions during February however Cwm Taf still remains an outlier in offering this service.
What actions are we taking?
The Primary Care team will promote and support the use of MHOL during the annual Practice Development Visits and ensure that
appropriate information is given to patients about the service.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf has 100% of practices able to use MHOL but is an outlier in offering repeat prescriptions and compares poorly with other Health Boards in offering appointment bookings.
Balancing the number of appointments released. Ensuring that paperwork is completed appropriately. A more robust infrastructure is required to deal with multiple
sites.
Source: Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
18
STAYING HEALTHY: I AM WELL INFORMED & SUPPORTED TO MANAGE MY OWN PHYSICAL & MENTAL HEALTH Indicator 15: National prescribing indicator rate (indicator in development)
ANTIBIOTIC PRESCRIBING (these will be linked to the national prescribing indicators) Antibacterial items per 1000 STAR -PU’s (2013
onwards) Cephalosporin’s & Fluoroquinolones items per 1000 patients Strategic Aim: Excellent Population Health Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Primary Care & Mental Health
Period: Oct 2015 to Dec 2015 Target: Improvement Current Status:
Current Trend How are we doing?
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Prescribing Advisors working with practices across Cwm Taf. Specifically targeting those practices with high Antibiotic
prescribing to investigate and provide action plan to reduce rates.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Seasonal pressures in small practices. Patient demand. High use of Locum GPs due to recruitment problems.
Source: Local
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
0
100
200
300
400
500
Cynon Merthyr Tydfil Rhondda Taff Ely
% o
f C
ep
hals
po
rin
s/Q
uin
ole
ne
Nu
mb
er o
f A
nti
bacte
ria
l Ite
ms
Antibacterial Items Prescribed per 1000 STAR-PU(13)October to December 2015
Antibacterial Items Per 1000 STAR-PU(13)Cephalosporins Items % of Antibacterial ItemsQuinolone Items % of Antibacterial Items
Benchmark not available
19
20
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Indicator 16: Delayed transfer of care delivery per 10,000 UHB population (DToC) – Mental Health (all ages) Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Primary Care & Mental Health
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status Rolling 12 months: as per table
Current Trend: How are we doing?
Performance has declined during March and April and is poor across a number of specialties for the following reasons; Lack of availability of supported accommodation Lack of availability for specialist OPMH beds in the independent
sector; this has been exacerbated further by the recent closure of Rhondda Nursing Home (60 beds)
The LA process of SEWIC is causing delays in placements for some patients
Some internal ward efficiencies in following up referrals.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
All DTOC patients escalated to LA service managers by ADO when
required Further delays escalated to Directors and we are proactively
working through a plan with RCT and introducing a new decision making Matrix for S117 placements
Strategic meeting with LA planned Ensure all Ward Managers follow through on referrals Active member of Gold Command
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf’s performance in this area is average amongst its peers. Reduced patient flow.
Source: Local
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
No
. o
f D
ela
yed
Tran
sfe
r o
f P
ati
en
ts
Delayed transfer of care delivery per 10,000 UHB population - mental health(all ages)
21
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Indicator 17: Delayed transfer of care delivery per 10,000 UHB population (DToC) – non Mental Health (aged 75+) Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status Rolling 12 months: as per table
Current Trend: How are we doing
Acute DTOC within the Health Board remains comparably low. There was a decrease in March from February with a slight increase in April
with a number of delays related to other Health Board repatriations. A small number of the delays that do exist are however lengthy delays as there are family and legal issues.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Continue joint working between Health and Local Authority colleagues.
Escalation to neighboring HBs continues.
Use of the All Wales transfer database remains in place.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf’s performance in this area is better than 3 of the other Health Boards. A delay due to other Health Boards remains challenging.
Delays in social worker assessments are monitored daily. Legal and family issues constitute the most challenging and lengthy
delays.
Source: Local
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
No
. o
f D
ela
yed
Tran
sfe
r o
f P
ati
en
ts
Delayed transfer of care delivery per 10,000 UHB population - non mental health(aged 75+)
Acute Community
22
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Continued: Delayed bed days transfer of care delivery - Mental Health Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Primary Care & Mental Health
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status:
Current Trend: How are we doing
Performance is poor across a number of specialties for the following reasons;
Lack of availability of supported accommodation. Lack of availability for specialist OPMH beds in the independent
sector. Delays by LA in social worker allocation.
Lack of availability for specialist OPMH beds in the independent sector; this has been exacerbated further by the recent closure of Rhondda Nursing Home (60 beds)
The LA process of SEWIC is causing delays in placements. LA funding decisions delays. Some internal ward efficiencies in following up referrals.
What actions are we taking?
All DTOC patients escalated to LA service managers by ADO when required.
Further delays escalated to Directors. Strategic meeting with LA planned. Ensure all Ward Managers follow through on referrals.
What are the main areas of risk?
Reduced patient flow.
Source: Local
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
May-15
Jun-15
Jul-15
Aug-15
Sep-15
Oct-15
Nov-15
Dec-15
Jan-16
Feb-16
Mar-16
Apr-16
Total Beddays
Mental Health Delayed Bed Days Transfers of Care
Merthyr RCT Other LHBs
23
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Continued: Delayed bed days transfer of care delivery – Non Mental Health Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status:
Current Trend: How are we doing
The DTOC measure stays with a patient throughout their entire stay and is attributed to the location of the patient at the point of census i.e.
acute or community. If a patient moves from the acute setting to community the DTOC previously associated with acute is then transferred to the community setting.
The increase in community delayed bed transfers of care, particularly in RCT has been exacerbated further by the recent closure of Rhondda
Nursing Home.
What actions are we taking?
Improvements continue to be made in reducing the number of delayed
transfers of care
What are the main areas of risk?
Availability of community placements remain a challenge.
Source: Local
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
May-15
Jun-15
Jul-15
Aug-15
Sep-15
Oct-15
Nov-15
Dec-15
Jan-16
Feb-16
Mar-16
Apr-16
Total Beddays
Acute Delayed Bed Days Transfers of Care
Merthyr RCT Other LHBs
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
May-15
Jun-15
Jul-15
Aug-15
Sep-15
Oct-15
Nov-15
Dec-15
Jan-16
Feb-16
Mar-16
Apr-16
Total Beddays
Community Delayed Bed Days Transfers of Care
Merthyr RCT Other LHBs
24
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Continued: Delayed Transfer of Care - Critical Care Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: Apr 2015 to Mar 2016 Target: 5% Current Status: PCH > 5%, RGH > 5%
Current Trend: How are we doing?
From a critical care perspective the delays are calculated on a
basis of total number of delayed hours as a percentage of the
total number of hours used. The expected level of DToC by
the National Critical Care Network is no more than 5%.
The latest data demonstrates an improving picture in RGH of
just above the 5% target. However in PCH where the position has been relatively stable DTOC’s have increased to 15%. This is due to the unscheduled care pressures experienced in March. Moving into the summer period we would expect to see the position improve at both sites.
What actions are we taking?
The main actions to be taken to keep DTOC’s @ 5% target is to ensure patient flow is working well. It is proven that when beds are available on the wards to discharge patients DTOC’s
reduces.
What are the main areas of risk?
Ensuring that patient flow is maintained so that we do not
have any DTOC’s in the units.
Source: Local
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16
% D
To
C B
ed
Occu
pan
cy
Cwm Taf % DToC Bed Occupancy - Wales Target 5%
Prince Charles Hospital Royal Glamorgan Hospital Wales Target
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16
Ho
urs L
ost
Number of hours lost compared to tolerance allowed to meet 5% target
RGH Hours Lost to DToC PCH Hours Lost to DToC
RGH DToC Tolerance PCH DToC Tolerance
25
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Indicator 18: The number of laboratory confirmed cases of Clostridium Difficile per 100,000 of the population Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Nursing
Period: Oct 2015 to May 2016 Target: Oct 2015 to Mar 2017 no more than 26 per 100,000 population Current Status: 4 / Oct- May 53
Current Trend: How are we doing?
The lowest C.difficile rate currently in the major health boards is 18.2/100,000 population (Cwm Taf University Health Board). The rates in the other major health boards range from 18.7 to 43.97 per 100,000 of population.
There were 4 C.difficle cases in March of which only 1 was an in-patient.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Good Antimicrobial Stewardship – reducing the need for antibiotic
prescription where not indicated, targeting narrow spectrum therapy according to clinical findings & investigations; reviewing antibiotic prescription 24-48hrs after starting & de-escalating treatment where
appropriate. Multidisciplinary CDI RCAs are completed which have shown a recurring
theme of probable poor antimicrobial stewardship practices. Results are fed back to the clinical teams responsible for patients to ensure lessons learned. A second Antimicrobial Pharmacist has been appointed. Hand hygiene audits performed. The principles of bare below the elbow are encouraged.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf UHB maintains the lowest C.difficile rate in Wales apart from Powys. Poor antimicrobial stewardship. Poor hand hygiene
Source: Public Health Wales (WHAIP)
0
25
50
75
100
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Cu
mu
lati
ve
nu
mb
ers
of
C.d
Dif
ficil
e
Cumulative monthly numbers of C.difficile from October 2015 against the equivalent
period in 2014/15
Cumulative monthly numbers of C.difficile Oct 2014-Sep 2015
Cumulative monthly numbers of C.difficile Oct 2015
0
20
40
60
80
100
No
. o
f C
.dif
ficil
e
Monthly numbers of C. difficile from October 2015
Number of inpatient C.difficle Number of non-inpatient C.difficleCumulative target to achieve expected reduction Cumulative monthly numbers of C.difficile Oct 2015
26
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Indicator 19: The number of laboratory confirmed cases of Staphylococcus Aureus per 100,000 of the population Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Nursing
Period: Oct 2015 to May 2016 Target: Oct 2015 to Mar 2017 no more than 20 per 100,000 population. Current Status: 8 / Oct-May 70
Current Trend: How are we doing?
There has been a change in reporting in that the measure now includes all S.aureus
bacteraemias (MRSA and MSSA) There was 0 MRSA cases in April or May. The MRSA cases for the YTD 8 which shows
improvement over the same period last year.
Cwm Taf has along with Betsi Cadwaladr the lowest MRSA bacteraemia rate currently in the major health boards at 0/100,000 population (Cwm Taf University Health Board).
There were 8 MSSA bacteraemia cases in May, 5 of which were in-patients. Cwm Taf
has the highest MSSA bacteraemia rate in
Wales.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Increase hand washing audits within effected clinical areas. Deliver education & training for IV line management
Implemented care bundles which will be monitored & audited. Good Antimicrobial Stewardship – reducing the need for antibiotic
prescription where not indicated, targeting narrow spectrum therapy according to clinical findings & investigations; reviewing antibiotic prescription 24-48 hrs. after starting & de-escalating treatment where appropriate. CDI RCAs (root cause analysis) have shown a recurring theme of probable poor antimicrobial stewardship practices.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf Health Board has the lowest MRSA bacteraemia rate in the major health boards but has the highest MSSA rate.
Poor antimicrobial stewardship. Poor hand hygiene.
Source: Public Health Wales (WHAIP)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Cu
mu
lati
ve n
um
bers o
f
MR
SA
Cumulative monthly numbers of MRSA from October
2015 against the equivalent period in 2014/15
Cumulative monthly numbers of MRSA Oct 2014-Sep 2015Cumulative monthly numbers of MRSA Oct 2015
0
50
100
150
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Cu
mu
lati
ve n
um
bers o
f
MS
SA
Cumulative monthly numbers of MSSA from October
2015 against the equivalent period in 2014/15
Cumulative monthly numbers of MSSA Oct 2014-Sep…Cumulative monthly numbers of MSSA Oct 2015
0
20
40
60
80
Oct 15 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 16 Feb 16 Mar 16 Apr 16 May 16 Jun 16 Jul 16 Aug 16 Sep 16 Oct 16 Nov 16 Dec 16 Jan 17 Feb 17 Mar 17
No
. o
f S
.au
reu
s
bacte
raem
ia
Monthly numbers of S.aureus bacteraemia from October 2015
Total number of inpatient S.aureus bacteraemia Total number of non-inpatient S.aureus bacteraemia
Cumulative monthly numbers of S.aureus bacteraemia Oct 2015 Cumulative target to achieve expected reduction
27
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Indicator 20: The number of preventable hospital acquired thrombosis Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Medical Director
Period: Jun 2015 to May 2016 Target: Continuous Improvement Current Status: 18 (YTD 46)(rolling 12 months 292)
Current Trend: How are we doing?
VTE risk assessment compliance is monitored via monthly Pharmacy audits with immediate feedback provide to the Ward
Sister. Ward based compliance results are presented at the quarterly VTE Steering group and shared with Directorates. The VTE compliance rates have decreased to 85% for February
2016, which is below the below the average of 91% for the last 6 months. Further improvement is required and actions are being taken via medical education and induction, local feedback and
sharing of data. The electronic VTE root cause analysis tool and process designed by CTUHB has been further developed to stream line the reporting and monitoring process.
The RCAs are informing learning and improvement with regards to prescribing and administration timeliness.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Clinical Directors with MDTs to ensure completion of the VTE
risk assessments and prophylaxis, prescribing and administration as per local guidelines. To monitor via local Quality and Safety meetings and feedback learning to the VTE Steering group.
The CTUHB VTE RCA tool is now being made available via a web based method to improve tracking and completion of the
RCAs by the lead consultants. Clinical Audit Clerical Officers will assist Medical Records in the
appropriate tracking of patient notes for RCAs to improve RCA compliance rates.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
VTE Risk assessment compliance remains above the All Wales average due to the adoption
of CTUHB modified medication chart, which is under review for All Wales rollout.
Non-compliance with VTE risk assessment. Time for consultants to complete RCAs.
Source: Local
05
10152025303540
Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16
No
. o
f In
cid
en
ts
Potential Hospital Acquired Thromboses
40%
60%
80%
100%
Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16%
Co
mp
lian
ce
Proportion of patients with the VTE risk assessment documented on the medication chart
Cwm Taf All Wales
Benchmark not available
28
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Indicator 21: The number of healthcare acquired pressure sores Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Nursing
Period: Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 22 YTD 22
Current Trend How are we doing?
In April 2015 the healthboard adopted the all Wales guidelines for pressure ulcer reporting which increased the number of categories reported to six. These stages
are stage 1, 2, 3, 4, suspected deep tissue injury and unstageable/ungradeable. April 2016 saw 22 reported incidents of pressure ulcers which is above the target level for this year.
The graph illustrates the instances of HAPU broken down by the 4 grades of pressure ulcer.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Established monthly audits for compliance with the timely review and investigation of HAPU incidents.
Training on the Pressure Ulcer Investigation Tool for Senior Nurse Managers. Review of the issues affecting the measurement and monitoring of pressure
ulcers in community and accident and emergency areas
Engage WWIC research. Identifying the cost of improvements and/or cost of failure – working with
finance and PHW. Developing TVN Champion role within clinical areas. CTUHB is leading review of All Wales definitions for pressure damage at the
request of the Directors of Nursing for Wales, which will include making
recommendations for a standardized approach to management, reporting and monitoring of pressure damage across Wales.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Benchmarking demonstrates variability across Wales in how health boards capture,
monitor and measure pressure damage across Wales.
Timeliness of reporting Grade 3, 4 and multiple 2’s to WG.
Mis-categorisation and reporting of pressure ulcer incidents. Limited ownership of reviews, monitoring & investigation of pressure damage
incident.
Source: Fundamentals of Care/ Nursing Dashboard
3
13
3
3
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Apr 16 May 16 Jun 16 Jul 16 Aug 16 Sep 16 Oct 16 Nov 16 Dec 16 Jan 17 Feb 17 Mar 17
Cu
mu
lati
ve R
ep
orte
d C
ases o
f S
ores
No
. o
f R
ep
orte
d C
ases
at
Sta
ge o
f S
ore
Pressure Sores (Local Data) - Target 20% Reduction on 2015/16 Baseline
Stage 1 Stage 2Stage 3 Stage 4Stage Unknown Cumulative 2015/16Target (20% Reduction on 15/16) Cumulative 2016/17
245
278
389
537
336
191
3815
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Cwm Taf Abertawe
Bro
Morgannwg
Aneurin
Bevan
Betsi
Cadwaladr
Cardiff &
Vale
Hywel Dda Powys Velindre
To
tal
nu
mb
er o
f p
ressu
re s
ores
Total numbers of Pressure Sores for the 12 month period to April 2016
29
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Indicator 22: in development: Implementation of the universal case note mortality review process Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Medical Director
Period: Apr 2015 to Mar 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: % completed reviews 71.1% (2015/16)
Current Trend: Please note Quarters 3 & 4 are only partially complete and figures will rise significantly once all reviews are completed
How are we doing?
These figures demonstrate that, for our acute hospitals, there
has a slight drop in performance since April 2015, as was predicted having identified the sub optimal cover from Primary Care at Stage 1 (some Stage 1 support is provided by attending Secondary Care clinicians). Some UMRs continue to
be completed as an ongoing pilot of the medical examiner system by two pathologists in accordance with the expected posts being funded from 2018 and the agreed role of the ME
in the Welsh Mortality Review process. Participation in Stage 2 remains reasonably stable. The numbers for community are probably too low to draw any particular conclusion. As sessions are held on a monthly
basis, any deviation from normal attendance impacts greatly on performance times.
We are putting in place a database developed in ABMU which will link with the QlikSense business intelligence tool to add value to our reporting mechanisms to Directorates and other clinical areas.
What actions are we taking?
We have secured resource to fund additional sessions to review the backlog cases whilst using the existing resource to review recent cases to achieve a more “real time” service. We are vigilant about the threat of slippage in the months ahead
and continue to engage with the Medical Director accordingly.
What are the main areas of risk?
There are continued risks to the performance, in particular, the support from primary care at Stage 1 is too patchy and
subject to staff shortages reported in that workforce. A significant number of Stage 2 reviews were conducted by a single clinician who has now returned to clinical practice The Post Stage 2 process needs further refining to ensure that lessons learned are translated into effective changes in clinical
practice
Source: Local Data
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
% c
om
ple
ted
revie
ws
To
tal n
um
ber o
f d
eath
s
Mortality Reviews (Acute & Community)April 2015 to January 2016
Stage 1 only Stage 2 only Stage 3 only Not reviewed % Completed reviews
30
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Indicator 23 to 26: Compliance with the patient safety reporting system Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Nursing
Period: Q4 2014/15 – Q3 2015/16 Target: 100% Current Status: as per Q3 in table
Current Trend & Benchmark How are we doing?
National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) publications (prior to April 2014). The Health Board is 100% compliant with Patient Safety Alerts
and Patient Safety Rapid Response Reports, issued by the former National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA). No further Alerts in this category will be issued since the disbanding of the NPSA.
Patient Safety Solutions (after April 2014) Following the disbanding of the NPSA, Wales now issues its own safety notices, now known as Patient Safety Solutions – these include Alerts and Notices, which are reported
separately. Our current position is: Alerts. The Health Board is 100% compliant with the 2 Alerts issued. Notices. A total of 22 Notices have been now been issued. The
Health Board is compliant with 19 (86%) of these Notices. The four identified as non-compliant in the last report are now
complete.
What actions are we taking?
Of the 3 outstanding, 1 is outside of the timescales for completion. Action
is being taken and is expected to be completed by the end of January 2016. Work is in progress to implement the 2 safety notices received during December:
Appropriate leads have been identified Risk assessments have been undertaken
Action plans are in place No barriers have been identified - Completion is therefore on course within the timescales.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf University Health Board’s overall compliance in among the best in Wales.
Source: Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
31
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Indicator 27: Of the serious incidents due for assurance within the month, % which assured in agreed timescale
Indicator 28: Number of never events Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Nursing
Period: Mar 2015 to Feb 2016 Target: Indicator 27 – 0% Target: Indicator 28 – Zero Current Status: as per tables
Current Trend & Benchmark Indicator 27 How are we doing?
The Health Board reports a 100% of serious incidents to Welsh Government and ensures robust investigation is undertaken which results in learning and improvement.
The Health Board currently has a significant backlog of closure forms awaiting submission to the Welsh Government. It should be
noted for the majority of these incidents the investigation has been completed and lessons identified. However the formal closure process has not been completed.
A never event was reported by the Health Board during December 2015. The incident related to the wrong size prosthesis being used during a left total hip arthroplasty for a Cwm Taf patient at the Spire Hospital. The incident has been fully investigated and lessons learned identified.
Current Trend & Benchmark Indicator 28 What actions are we taking?
An action plan relating to the never event in December has been developed and all actions completed by the 31/01/2016. Focused work is being undertaken by the Concerns Team to address the significant backlog of outstanding closure forms requiring
submission to the WG, which is monitored weekly. In order to reduce the risk of further backlog the closure form will be included as the end point of the investigation process.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
The Welsh Government has identified the submission of closure forms as a specific risk for the Health Board which is being closely monitored to ensure improvement.
The main areas of clinical risk are being addressed through the Quality Delivery Plan. The remaining significant risk is that of organisational reputation in view of the percentage of overdue closures.
Source: Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
32
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Local Measure: Complaints Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Nursing
Period: Feb 2015 to Jan 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 69 Jan 2016 & (rolling 12 months) 850 (Feb 15 to Jan 16)
Current Trend How are we doing?
New complaints. The number of formal complaints being received continues to decrease. Many complaints which would have been managed
through the more protracted formal process are now being managed ‘on-the-spot’ or are being prevented in the first place through a more proactive approach by the Directorates.
Compliance with the 30 day target.
The number of complainants who received a final response within 30 days remained at 11% for December. Achieving better compliance in this area is dependent on both corporate management and the Directorates.
Compliance with 6 month target: Despite a slight improvement in compliance with the 6 month target during June, this has now fallen again to 81.82%. The current clinical pressures being experienced within the Clinical areas have impacted on the ability of staff to undertake investigations and provide information for complaint responses. In addition resources issues
within the Concerns Team have impacted on compliance with the response targets.
The Corporate Team continues to work with the Directorates to improve processes and provide responses in a timely manner, which will be reflected in future compliance.
Current Trend What are the main areas of risk?
Risk which results from these delays are: People raising the complaints become dissatisfied and in some cases
distressed waiting for responses,
Increased workload for who have to manage more queries from distressed patients and families.
Financial and reputational risks: Escalation to the press and local MPs / AMs Increased referrals to the Ombudsman Fines imposed for delays in managing complaints Increased likelihood of escalation to claims
Themes. The significant number of complaints relating to delays in
accessing treatment, which was previously reported as a risk particularly in Child & Adolescent Mental Health Services, Orthopaedics, and
Ophthalmology, has now improved as a result of more proactive management.
Source: Local
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16
Nu
mb
er o
f co
mp
lain
ts
Total number of new complaints (rolling 12 months)(inclusive of those managed by local resolution and on the spot)
Managed by local resolution Managed on the spot
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16
Perfo
rm
an
ce
Complaints managed by local resolution /Compliance within 30 day & 6 month response targets
Complaints responses - compliance with 30 day targetComplaints responses - compliance with 6 month target
33
SAFE CARE: I AM PROTECTED FROM HARM & PROTECT MYSELF FROM KNOWN HARM Local Measure: Incidents Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Nursing
Period: Mar 2015 to Feb 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 8635 (rolling 12 months)
Current Trend How are we doing?
The majority of patient safety incidents reported result in no harm or low harm for the patient. High numbers in these categories are an
indication of a good safety culture. The main area of risk relates to the % of incidents that result in moderate harm to patients. The Health Board has a higher number of
incidents reported as causing moderate harm than the national average of 7.9% - the Health Board currently reports 12.5%. This has not reduced as it should have done since previous quarters.
What actions are we taking?
Data quality issues identified within the information is being addressed through daily monitoring of moderate and severe incidents
is undertaken to identify inaccuracies and correct reported incidents targeted training continues to be provided to ensure accurate reporting and appropriate action is taken.
What are the main areas of risk?
Inaccurate reporting, which results in being unable to identify trends and real risks which need urgent action to address.
Source: Local
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Nu
mb
er o
f In
cid
en
ts
Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16
Death 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 2
Severe 71 72 71 63 70 52 45 32 34 33 30 20
Moderate 1126 1162 1202 1216 1194 1202 1202 1175 1139 1155 1158 1171
Low 2995 2980 3005 3021 3040 3067 3060 3054 2977 2914 2807 2898
No harm 4944 4994 5023 4988 4947 4861 4793 4692 4650 4571 4530 4544
Incidents Recorded by Level of Harm (rolling 12 months)
34
35
EFFECTIVE CARE: I RECEIVE THE RIGHT CARE & SUPPORT AS LOCALLY AS POSSIBLE & I CONTRIBUTE TO
MAKING THAT CARE SUCESSFUL Indicator 30: Percentage of people aged 50+ who have a GP record of blood pressure measurement in the preceding 5 years Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Primary Care & Mental Health
Period: April 1st 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: as per chart
Current Trend How are we doing?
In addition to access information, Health Boards are also requested to
monitor numbers and percentages of patients recorded with Dementia or as being on a Palliative Care pathway and also those that have had a blood pressure recorded within the last five years.
There has been an overall increase in the percentage of patients with a BP reading, and as can be seen from the graph the Cynon cluster has the highest percentage closely followed by Rhondda.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
A focus for action in the Cwm Taf UHB Tackling Inequalities in Health initiative.
Continuing to review through the QOF process. Part of the analysis by Locality Clinical Director identifying outliers
– this then to be used as part of the conversation in the clinical QOF visit.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf’s performance is currently the best in Wales. Registers come from QOF data – delays in applying the new year contract rules can be up to late October early November.
Read coding. QOF participation is voluntary.
Source: Local
89.5%
90.0%
90.5%
91.0%
91.5%
92.0%
92.5%
93.0%
93.5%
94.0%
94.5%
Cynon Merthyr Tydfil Rhondda Taff Ely
The % of patients aged 50+ who have a record of blood pressure in the preceding 5 years to April 1st 2016
36
EFFECTIVE CARE: I RECEIVE THE RIGHT CARE & SUPPORT AS LOCALLY AS POSSIBLE & I CONTRIBUTE TO
MAKING THAT CARE SUCESSFUL Indicator 31 to Indicator 32: Number of NISCHR clinical research portfolio studies (CRP) & commercially sponsored studies (CS) Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Medical Director
Period: 2012 to 2015/16 (Q2) Target: Improvement Current Status: as per chart
Current Trend How are we doing?
Key performance indicators set by DSCHR, WG relate to increased research activity within Wales. Organisations are expected to increase the number of open CRP and
commercial studies by 10% pa. across all services in primary and secondary care. The DSCHR provides R&D funding to organisations to develop their own research infrastructure to encourage high quality research is undertaken. The funding is based
on research activity i.e. the no. of open CRP studies, the no. of participants recruited to CRP studies and the no. of Chief Investigators affiliated to the organisation The number of CRP studies open in CTUHB shows a 110% increase in 2014-15 from
the previous year. In 2014-15, CTUHB also exceeded the 10% KPI for the no. of Chief Investigators affiliated to CTUHB. As a result the R&D funding in 2015/16 was £792,707, an increase of £201,508 from the previous year. This allowed further development of Cwm Taf’s research infrastructure, providing Cwm Taf patients with the opportunity to undergo new therapies and treatment regimes.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Appointment of a Band 6 research nurse in July 2015 to support the development of commercial and non-commercial research. This has had a positive impact on the no. of clinicians in Cwm Taf expressing an interest in undertaking commercial research and completing the commercial feasibility questionnaires requested by the commercial companies. 2 further commercial research studies have opened for recruitment during 2015-16.
Discussions with the Health and Care Research Wales Support Centre to embed a
HCRW industry manager within the R&D Dept. to enhance measures put in place by
the HB to develop the CRP. Discussions with the Health and Care Research Wales Support Centre to embed
fulltime a Band 5 research nurse and a clinical research officer. The R&D dept. provides a fully equipped office in KHHP to facilitate primary care
and community research.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
CT has low levels of CRPs & commercial activity compared to other HBs
Source: Local / Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
27 20 41 282 2 1 10
10
20
30
40
50
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 (Q1/Q2)
Nu
mb
er o
f S
tud
ies
Number of Clinical Research Portfolio & Commercially Sponsored Studies
Number of NISCHR Clinical Research Portfolio Studies
Number of commercially sponsored studies
37
EFFECTIVE CARE: I RECEIVE THE RIGHT CARE & SUPPORT AS LOCALLY AS POSSIBLE & I CONTRIBUTE TO
MAKING THAT CARE SUCESSFUL Indicator 33 to Indicator 34: Number of patients recruited into NISCHR clinical research portfolio studies & commercially sponsored
studies Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Medical Director
Period: 2012 to 2015/16 (Q2) Target: Improvement Current Status: as per chart
Current Trend How are we doing?
The total number of participants recruited to CRP studies in 2012-13 to 2014-15 and shows a 97% increase in 2014-15 from the previous year. Cwm Taf did not meet the DSCHR’s KPIs to increase the no. of open
commercial research studies and no of participants recruited to commercial studies by 10%, which has predominantly been due to insufficient time for clinicians to undertake the research, as well as a lack of nursing support.
Increasing commercial activity is a priority for the R&D Department.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
As above for indicators 31 & 32.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Although the total number of recruits for Cwm Taf is lower than some HBs, Cwm Taf had the best performance in terms of the increase in total number of recruits for CRP
studies (97%).
Increased research activity will necessitate the development of protocols and policies to meet MHRA requirements as well as development of a policy for
financial management of commercial research income.
Source: Local / Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
279 419 823 3494 3 1
0
200
400
600
800
1000
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 (Q1/Q2)
Pati
en
ts r
ecru
ited
in
to C
RP
Number of Patients Recruited into Clinical Research Portfolio & Commercially Sponsored Studies
Number of patients recruited into NISCHR Clinical Research Portfolio Studies
Number of patients recruited into commercially sponsored studies
38
EFFECTIVE CARE: I RECEIVE THE RIGHT CARE & SUPPORT AS LOCALLY AS POSSIBLE & I CONTRIBUTE TO
MAKING THAT CARE SUCESSFUL Indicator 36: Crude Mortality Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Medical Director
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 2.96% (in month) 2.57% (rolling 12 months)
Current Trend How are we doing?
In order to provide a more up to date position for mortality index, the graphs represent the position from an extrapolation of local data from CHKS.
Mortality and RAMI rely heavily on the completeness of clinical coding, the standard for which is for Health Boards to work towards achieving currently
95% at a 12 week rolling scale and 98% on a rolling 12 month scale by 31st March 2016. Cwm Taf is presently at 95.5% against the 95% target and 98.5% against the 98% target.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
There are currently a number of specific quality improvement projects being
undertaken: The systematic medical record reviews on the acute sites are continuing on a
weekly basis. The process is evolving in readiness for the medical examiner system when introduced.
The systematic reviews of deaths in community hospitals commenced on a fortnightly basis. (Currently a monthly basis due to small numbers).
Mortality reviews are regularly undertaken at both acute A&E depts. Mortality reviews follow a three stage process whereby stage 1 is to screen
out the expected deaths and stage 2 is for more detailed reviews of
unexpected deaths which could either prove to be unavoidable or proceed to stage 3 for potential learning and improvement.( figs 3 &4)
The All Wales Mortality Review Group is producing a new set of mortality indicators in line with the recommendations submitted to the Minister by Professor Stephen Palmer last year.
Fractured NOF peri-operative management, being led by the Clinical Director of Trauma & Orthopaedics.
Anticoagulation Review final recommendations were submitted to the Executive Board on 20th January 2016 and work is ongoing to implement the findings.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf does have both higher crude mortality rates and RAMI than Welsh Peers. For
a fuller explanation see Observations on the next page (p39).
Higher prevalence of chronic conditions in the Cwm Taf population.
Source: CHKS
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
Morta
lity
Rate
(%
)
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
Cwm Taf 2.65 2.10 2.09 2.67 2.21 2.27 2.45 2.84 3.08 2.73 2.87 2.96
Welsh Peers 1.75 1.54 1.42 1.53 1.54 1.62 1.67 1.74 1.91 1.83 1.99 1.70
Crude Mortality (in month)
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
Morta
lity
Rate
(%
)
Crude Mortality Rate - rolling 12 months
Cwm Taf Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Aneurin Bevan
Betsi Cadwaladr Cardiff & Vale Hywel Dda
39
EFFECTIVE CARE: I RECEIVE THE RIGHT CARE & SUPPORT AS LOCALLY AS POSSIBLE & I CONTRIBUTE TO
MAKING THAT CARE SUCESSFUL Indicator 36 continued: Crude Mortality (age bands) Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Medical Director
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: as per table below
Current Trend : Crude Mortality (age bands) Observations
Observations
0-15 years – the Health Board is on par with the All Wales mortality with very few deaths. 16-44 years – the Health Board reports higher % mortality than All Wales. Investigation of individual patients indicates this relates to those with a diagnosis of cancer. 45-64 years – the Health Board reports a more significantly higher level of mortality than other age group. This includes a case mix of cancer and drug & alcohol related deaths.
65-74 years – the Health Board reports a higher % than All of Wales. A high proportion of patients coded with palliative care, pneumonia, and stroke. 75+ years – the Health Board reports a high number of deaths. Age 75 to 90 deaths include pneumonias (lung diseases), stroke, heart failure, palliative care.
Age 91 to 100 again deaths include pneumonia, heart failure, palliative. Age 100+ pneumonia, sepsis and other age related diseases are observed. Cwm Taf’s population has higher rates of deprivation associated with higher rates of crude mortality as well as having greater rates of co-morbidities. Contributory
factors are lifestyle issues like obesity, smoking, alcohol and drug use which are more prevalent in the Cwm Taf population. Also life expectancy and healthy end of life years are shorter for the Cwm Taf population compared to Wales. The ratio of emergency care to elective care is higher in Cwm Taf and it is known that emergency care has higher risks and mortality. There are also a higher proportion of patients presenting with later stage cancer.65% of deaths in Cwm Taf take place in hospital compared to an All Wales average of 55.9% therefore further improvement is still required to support patients who wish to die outside of hospital. To address the contributory factors all Cwm Taf UHB local delivery plans have specific areas to address lifestyle issues and support early recognition and speedier management of illness particularly in cancer. These figures and factors should be interpreted in line with the CTUHB Risk Adjusted Mortality Index report which can be found at: http://www.cwmtafuhb.wales.nhs.uk/risk-adjusted-mortality-index-1
Source: CHKS
40
EFFECTIVE CARE: I RECEIVE THE RIGHT CARE & SUPPORT AS LOCALLY AS POSSIBLE & I CONTRIBUTE TO
MAKING THAT CARE SUCESSFUL Indicator 36 continued: Condition Specific Mortality – Deaths of Heart Attack (MI) aged 35 to 74 within 30 days of Emergency Admission Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Medical Director
Period: Feb 2015 to Jan 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 1.4%
Current Trend
How are we doing? What actions are we taking?
It should be noted that there is a Networking arrangement in place for acute coronary intervention for Cwm Taf patients. There has been some improvement regarding the transfer delay for Cwm Taf patients to access intervention in Cardiff however more improved is still required.
Younger patients with less comobidities are usually accepted for transfer to
Cardiff for intervention which means that the cohort of patients staying
within Cwm Taf tend to be older with more comobidities.
Unlike other Health Boards, there is no specific on-call service for Cardiology
at Cwm Taf. Cardiolgists form part of the General Medicine intake which
means there is no 24/7 cardiac service on either acute DGH.
Low numbers of cases can affect percentages.
Improvement is still required regarding consistency in defintion and coding for ACS and MI as shown by the decrepency in activity data between PEDW and MINAP.
There is a higher risk for CVD in Cwm Taf < 74 years old patients due to
higher incidence of smoking, high blood pressure, obesity and type 2
diabetes.
The Cwm Taf cardiac disease delivery plan aims to address underlying
risk factors for CVD across the whole pathway primary, community and
secondary care with emphasis on smoking cessation, weight
management and blood pressure control.
Cwm Taf UHB and ABUHB are working jointly on an inverse care law
programme to support improvement regarding prevention and reduction
of risk factors with regard to CVD.
Lead Cardiologists are looking into the pathology of MIs.
All in-patient deaths from MI are reviewed by a multi-disciplinary team
led by Jason Shannon, Assistant Medical Director.
Source: CHKS
0%
2%
4%
6%
Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16
Morta
lity
Rate
%
Deaths of Heart Attack (MI) aged 35 to 74 within 30 days of Emergency Admission (rolling 12 months)
Cwm Taf Welsh Peers
41
EFFECTIVE CARE: I RECEIVE THE RIGHT CARE & SUPPORT AS LOCALLY AS POSSIBLE & I CONTRIBUTE TO
MAKING THAT CARE SUCESSFUL Indicator 36 continued: Condition Specific Mortality – Deaths of Stroke within 30 days of Emergency Admission Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Medical Director
Period: Feb 2015 to Jan 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 15.8%
Current Trend Issues Affecting Performance: Agreed Actions:
How are we doing? What actions are we taking?
Small instances of deaths within stroke can cause signifcant fluctuations in the RAMI and can possibly be unreliable.
Low numbers of cases can affect percentages. There is still a requirement to develop 7 day stroke nurse coordinator input. There remain concerns on level of junior medical support.
Recent improvements in performance are as a result of improved patient
flow in general.
There is now a dedicated stroke bed on the ward, which has been
successfully ring-fenced.
There are now 24/7 thrombolysis services. (Networking arrangements).
Centralisation of acute stroke admission to Prince Charles Hospital was
completed in March 2015. All acute strokes are now admitted to the
single unit.
All nurses in the unit are trained and specialise in stroke care. There is
more robust and consistent stroke specialist therapist and senior medical
staffing.
All in-patient deaths from Stroke are reviewed by a multi-disciplinary
team led by Jason Shannon, Assistant Medical Director.
Source: CHKS
12%
13%
14%
15%
16%
Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16
Morta
lity
Rate
%
Deaths of Stroke within 30 days of Emergency Admission(rolling 12 months)
Cwm Taf Welsh Peers
42
EFFECTIVE CARE: I RECEIVE THE RIGHT CARE & SUPPORT AS LOCALLY AS POSSIBLE & I CONTRIBUTE TO MAKING
THAT CARE SUCESSFUL Indicator 36 continued: Condition Specific Mortality – Deaths of Hip Fracture (NoF) aged >64 within 30 days of Emergency Admission Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Medical Director
Period: Feb 2015 to Jan 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 5.4%
Current Trend Issues Affecting Performance: Agreed Actions:
How are we doing? What actions are we taking?
Work is ongoing to improve outcomes in fractured neck of femur (#NOF), using an approach targeted at different elements of the pathway. This includes:
Work with WAST for pre admission elements e.g. improved analgesia. Monitoring of delays in A&E to reduce these. Prioritising these patients to enable speedy access to theatre. Determining how to improve Ortho-geriatric input.
Again, small numbers at a local level will result in more variation at UHB level than
would be seen at all Wales level.
Fracture Neck of femur is prioritised on the emergency list on Saturday and
Sunday (supported by the anaesthetic department).
Implement a ring fenced cubicle on the ward for Fracture Neck of femur
patients.
Improved rates of local block in A&E.
All in-patient deaths associated with #NOF are reviewed by a multi-
disciplinary team led by Jason Shannon, Assistant Medical Director.
Source: CHKS
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16
Morta
lity
Rate
%
Deaths of Hip Fracture (NoF) aged >64 - Major Trauma within 30 days of Emergency Admission (rolling 12 months)
Cwm Taf Welsh Peers
43
EFFECTIVE CARE: I RECEIVE THE RIGHT CARE & SUPPORT AS LOCALLY AS POSSIBLE & I CONTRIBUTE TO MAKING
THAT CARE SUCESSFUL Indicator 37: Risk Adjusted Mortality Index - RAMI 2014 Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Medical Director
Period: Feb 2015 to Jan 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: Index 123
Current Trend How are we doing?
Mortality and RAMI rely heavily on clinical coding completeness. Cwm Taf presently is 95.5% against the 95% target and 98.5% against the 98% target.
A review of the Q4 2014/15 was conducted and a report was sent to the Board in May 2015. The internal process of structured mortality review meetings & use of Warwick charts in A&E highlighted the rise in mortality cases from Nov 2014. The investigation found:
The ratio of Stage 1 mortality reviews to Stage 2 increased from 6:1 to 10:1 Increased cases of community acquired pneumonia as % of total deaths Dec 14 to Mar 15,
increased admissions during that period and patients from DSH moved to RGH. Re-examination of the RAMI model showed that; it is heavily influenced by clinical coding
which is in turn influenced by PBR, uncoded deaths and that small numbers of deaths in specialties & sites have an impact, some chronic conditions e.g. cancer by nature of frequent admissions are assigned low risk of death on each episode and the method of coding transfers between consultants/specialties during the episode of care has an impact on the calculation.
The conclusion, shared with Terry Gill, is that whilst RAMI is important and useful to continue
monitoring and publishing mortality data it is unhelpful in a number of ways. Cwm Taf believes
that the best way of monitoring and learning by mortality reviews is by multi professional review of every death rather than relying on statistical review e.g. across the UKK units have shown low RAMI but with negative quality of care reports. A separate report regarding the investigation will be sent to the Board.
RAMI 2013 vs. RAMI 2014 (April 2011 to Sep 2015) What actions are we taking?
There are currently a number of specific quality improvement projects being undertaken: The systematic medical record reviews on the acute sites are continuing on a weekly basis.
The process is evolving in readiness for the medical examiner system when introduced. Mortality reviews are regularly undertaken at both acute A&E departments. Mortality reviews follow a three stage process whereby stage 1 is to screen out the
expected deaths and stage 2 is for more detailed reviews of unexpected deaths which
could either prove to be unavoidable or go to stage 3 for potential learning and improvement.
Thrombosis risk assessment & prophylaxis has been rolled out an. In December 2015 the number of suspected HAT was 18.
Fractured NOF perioperative management, being led by the Clinical Director of Trauma & Orthopaedics.
Anticoagulation Review final recommendations were submitted to the Executive Board on 20th January 2016.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
CTUHB has higher crude mortality rates and RAMI than Welsh Peers. Higher prevalence of chronic conditions in the Cwm Taf population.
Source: CHKS
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
In
dex
Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16
Cwm Taf 121 124 124 125 125 125 125 125 124 124 123 123
Welsh Peers 111 111 111 111 111 111 110 110 109 109 108 109
Risk Adjusted Mortality Index 2014(12 Monthly Rolling Index )
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
RA
MI S
core
RAMI 2013 & RAMI 2014
Prince Charles & Royal Glamorgan Hospitals (rolling 12 months)
PCH RAMI 13 RGH RAMI 13
44
EFFECTIVE CARE: I RECEIVE THE RIGHT CARE & SUPPORT AS LOCALLY AS POSSIBLE & I CONTRIBUTE TO MAKING
THAT CARE SUCESSFUL Indicator 38: Percentage valid principle diagnosis code 3 months after
episode end date (monthly)
Indicator 39: Percentage valid principle diagnosis code 3
months after episode end date (rolling 12 months) Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Planning & Performance
Period: Apr to Jan 2016 Target: Indicator 38: (95%) Current Status 95.1% Target: Indicator 39: (98%) Current Status: 98.6%
Current Trend & Benchmark All Wales How are we doing?
The reported coded position for January 2016 is at 95.1%, which is
higher than the All Wales coded average of 88%, and maintains the return to achieving the 95% in month target.
This can be attributed to the department concentrating on coding the relevant case notes for the appropriate time period. This has involved a great deal of effort in tracking down the relevant case notes which are often distributed across the Health Board.
The rolling 12 month target of 98% currently stands at 98.6% for Cwm Taf which is an improvement on last month. Prioritizing workloads to reach targets will continue to maintain and
improve the current position.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
The reporting position and the ongoing monitoring of productivity of the coding team are continuing on a weekly basis. This ensures that the coders code the case notes in turn.
One of the appointed clinical coders is now in post and will begin the in house training programme and will also be working on an e-learning package to support the Standards course run by Data Standards. The audit programme is embedded ensuring both quality and
completeness remains a priority to improve confidence in the coded
data. Previously overtime has been used to support compliance with targets but ceased from December 1st due to exhaustions of funds. Continuing promotion of Clinical Coding to Junior Doctors.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf’s position reported position demonstrates an average performance compared to its peers. A recent change to the central reporting algorithm is reflected in the performance trend.
Continuing sickness levels Availability of the case note
Information in the case note that is both legible and complete is an ongoing challenge.
Source: NWIS/Local
99.8 99.4 98.4 97.0 96.6 95.1 95.1 92.6
0
20
40
60
80
100
Powys Velindre Cwm Taf Aneurin Bevan Hywel Dda Abertawe Bro
Morgannwg
Betsi
Cadwaladr
Cardiff & Vale
Vali
d D
iag
nosis
%
Coding Completeness (reported position)April to January 2016
All WalesAverage 95.9%
45
EFFECTIVE CARE: I RECEIVE THE RIGHT CARE & SUPPORT AS LOCALLY AS POSSIBLE & I CONTRIBUTE TO MAKING
THAT CARE SUCESSFUL Local Measure: Clinical Coding Quality Strategic Aim: Excellent Patient Outcomes Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Planning & Performance
Period: 2014/15 & Apr to Jan 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: 94.6% (2015/16)
Current trend & All Wales Benchmark How are we doing?
The table outlines Cwm Taf’s position in comparison with rest of Wales in relation to some key data quality indicators. Coding completeness is the
main contributor to the quality index however the quality index is based on three elements :
Completeness – measured by the percentage of coding assigned, April 2015 to January 2016 we are 94.6% compared to the all Wales 91% Corrective – invalid diagnosis and procedure measures contribute to this,
for April 2015 to January 2016 CHKS reports all Cwm Taf Primary Diagnosis and Procedure codes are valid. Coding richness – Accuracy of Primary Diagnosis, Cwm Taf is still looking to improve the amount of Signs and Symptoms that are coded in a primary position, and to increase specificity.
Overall performance against the key quality elements is better than the Welsh peers. Two challenging areas are “Diagnosis Non-specific” and the “signs and symptoms” used as a primary diagnosis these two areas have deteriorated from last year and are higher than the Welsh peers.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Utilising CHKS reports, Cwm Taf’s position is compared to All Wales peer group. There is the ability within the reports to compare to wider peer groups e.g. the forty top performing organizations who submit data to CHKS.
In order to improve the use of “signs and symptoms” as a primary diagnosis Clinical Coding are working with Clinicians validating Information in the case note and on the Clinical Systems.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Currently Cwm Taf is performing well in relation to Percentage of Blank Primary Diagnosis, and Data Quality and Completeness Index.
The poor performance in relation to non-specific diagnoses and the use of signs and symptoms as a diagnosis highlights the importance of more focused work between clinical coding and the medical staffing body.
Source: CHKS
46
47
DIGNIFIED CARE: I AM TREATED WITH DIGNITY & RESPECT & TREAT OTHERS THE SAME Indicator 40: The % of procedures postponed on >1 occasion for non-clinical reasons with less <8 days notice that are subsequently
carried out within 14 calendar days or at the patient’s earliest convenience Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: 56.9%
Current Trend: How are we doing?
As part of WG’s manifesto, the Health Minister gave a commitment to patients that should their operations be cancelled on more than one occasion, with less than 8 days notice then they would receive treatment within 14 days of the second cancellation, or at the patient’s earliest convenience. This has now become a Tier 1 target on which Health Boards report monthly. The
data for this measure is extrapolated from the Health Board’s Myrddin
application at the end of each month. The graph opposite shows the level of procedures cancelled on more than one occasion recorded each month and whether the procedure is then carried out within 14 days of the second cancellation. The secondary axis (blue
dotted line) plots the % performance for the procedures carried out within 14 days. For example, in March 2015 56 patients had their procedure cancelled on more than one occasion and 18.2% were subsequently carried out within 14 days of the second cancellation. In April 2016 only 56.9% of 58 patients who had their appointments cancelled were seen within 14 days, which is a
marked decrease in performance.
The expectation is that this manifesto applies to 100% of patients to who it relates.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
The Health Board is raising awareness of this measure amongst patient
booking staff and ensuring that data capture accurately reflects the discussions being undertaken with patients. This will ensure increased compliance with this measure.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf compares poorly against other Health Boards. Bed availability issues adversely affect this measure.
Periods of patient unavailability need to be accurately recorded for this measure to be calculated accurately.
Source: Local
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
% p
ati
en
ts s
een
wit
hin
14
days
No.o
f P
ati
en
ts
Postponed Admitted Procedures
Seen Within 14 Days Not Seen Within 14 days Not Seen Patient Choice
Medically Unfit % Seen Within 14 days
48
49
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Indicator 45: % of GP practices open during daily core hours or within 1 hour of
daily core hours
Indicator 46 : % of GP practices offering appointments
between 17:00 & 18:30 hours at least 2 nights per week Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Prim. Care & Mental Health
Period: April 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: Indicator 45: 98% / Indicator 46: 100%
Current Trend How are we doing?
Under the domain of Timely Care, Health Boards are now to report on the following measures:
Percentages of GP Practices open during daily core hours or within one hour of
daily core hours.
Percentage of GP Practices offering appointments anytime between 17:00 and 18:30 hours at least two nights per week.
The charts show the distribution of registered patient’s between the four GP clusters and the appointment availability within each of the clusters. Within in Merthyr Tydfil locality the practice not meeting the requirement to open within one hour of daily core hours is a single hander working in an isolated and rural area of
the locality but to note they have good feedback on access from their patients.
Practices not offering appointments specifically between 18:00 and 18:30 hours it has been noted that in the majority of practices appointments run up to practice closing hours i.e. 18:30 hours. Depending on need the last appointment would be scheduled to conclude by closing hours 18:30 hours.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Regularly assessing if practices are meeting need by: Cluster Programme – all practices assessing patient satisfaction by survey and or
creation of patient participation group. Access Improvement Group (meet quarterly):
o Membership: Representatives from all localities, LMC, CHC, Clinical Director, OOH and Primary Care Team.
o Cwm Taf wide DNA policy. o Practices comply with opening and surgery times meeting the Contract
requirements. o Activity monitoring – seasonal planning. o OOH and A&E attendance.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
The published position (above) shows the Health Board comparing favourably
with other Welsh Health Boards.
Single handers and small practices.
Recruitment issues leading to pressure and difficulty in sustaining appointments.
Demand fluctuations and seasonal pressures. High use of Locum GPs.
Source: Local
118
158
1
100%89%
100%
100%
0
5
10
15
20
Cynon Merthyr Tydfil Rhondda Taff ElyNo.
of
practi
ces
% of GP practices open during daily core hours or within 1 hour of the daily core hours
YES NO
11 915
8
100% 100%
100%
100%
0
5
10
15
20
Cynon Merthyr Tydfil Rhondda Taff Ely
No.
of
practi
ces
% of GP practices offering appointments between 17:00 & 18:30 at least 2 days a week
50
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Local Measure: Number of GP referrals into Secondary Care Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Prim. Care & Mental Health
Period: Apr 2016 (rolling 12 months - May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 7267 YTD 7267
Current Trend How are we doing? –April 2016
What actions are we taking? What are the main areas of risk?
Source: Local
Cynon,
18643,
22%
Merthyr ,
14326,
18%Rhondda,
19915,
26%
Taf, 26262,
34%
Total GP Cluster Referrals to
Secondary Care
April 2015 to March 2016
1309
1245
1645
2372
Cynon
1619
Merthyr
1355
Rhondda
1825
Taf
2468
GP Cluster Referrals to Secondary
Care
April 2015 vs April 2016(outside ring represents April 2016)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
Nu
mb
er o
f refe
rrals
GP Cluster Referrals to Secondary Care
Cynon Merthyr Rhondda Taf
51
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Stroke Quality Improvement Measures (QIMs) – effective from 1st October 2015 (indicative performance April to September)
Thrombolysis Care Performance Measures: Access & Time
72-hour Pathway Care Performance Indicators: <4 hours / <12 hours / <24 hours / <72 hours Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Planning & Performance
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: as per table Current Status: as per table
Current Trend How are we doing?
The new Quality Improvement Measures came into force from October 2015 and include these bundles and Thrombolysis times. The main change is the more challenging timeline in which the interventions are to be delivered e.g. admission to the stroke ward within 4 hours rather than 24 hours. The table shows Cwm Taf's performance from April 2015 to April 2016.
Cwm Taf has seen a slight decline in compliance with bundle 2 to 94%,which is just below the target of 95%.The other bundles perform less well due to different challenges:
Bundle 1 – admissions to Stroke Ward Bundle 3 - weekend cover Bundle 4 – swallow/therapy assessment
There has been a decline in Performance in bundle 4 in comparison to the previous month, whilst there has been improvement in Bundles 1 and 3. There has been a large increase in the percentage of eligible patient’s thrombolysed from 25%. To 77.8%
What actions are we taking?
There are now 24/7 thrombolysis services. (Networking arrangements). All acute strokes are admitted to the single unit. Nurses in the unit are trained and specialise in stroke care. There is more
robust and consistent stroke specialist therapist and senior medical staffing.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Specialist services with few staffing numbers. Ability to repatriate “false” strokes to RGH.
Source: SSNAP
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16Perfo
rm
an
ce a
gain
st
targ
et
%
% Compliance with Stroke Quality Improvement measures (QIMs)
Bundle 1 - < 4 hours Bundle 2 - 12 hours Bundle 3 - < 24 hours
Bundle 4 - < 72 hours Target 95%
52
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Indicator 52: The % patients newly diagnosed with cancer, not via the urgent route, that started definitive treatment within (up to & inc.)
31 days of diagnosis (regardless of referral route) - NUSC Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: NUSC 98% Current Status: 95.9%
Current Trend & Benchmark All Wales How are we doing?
The target was missed in April 2016 (95.9%) with 4 breaches. The breaches were 3 Lung cancers and 1 Urology cancer. All 3 Lung breaches had the entire
wait from decision to treat at C&V and were treated with Surgery at Cardiff and Vale. The urology Breach had the entire wait from decision to treat in Velindre. On average 80% of Cwm Taf recorded breaches for this target occurred at C&V for treatment, with their entire wait in C&V. NUSC patients often have their decision to treat date (Clock Start Point) agreed at a networked MDT or at
tertiary centre MDTs. Cwm Taf has no input into the treatment plan for these patients and has little influence over the timeliness of treatment being delivered.
When the breach occurs it is attributed to the originating HB, even though all of the pathway events are managed within tertiary centres.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
We continue to work with tertiary centres to ensure our patients are treated in time, with regular exchange of information on progress.
Ensuring delays for patients treated within Cwm Taf are minimised where possible.
We continue to raise with the cancer network and the WG the issue of
where the above beaches are counted. We believe that as all pathway clock
events occur outside of Cwm Taf, then we should not be owning and reporting this as our breach.
We have asked the new Wales cancer network manager to establish a monthly performance meeting between DGH and Tertiary centres to address the cancer patient issues across HB boundaries.
The two areas above are equally relevant for both NUSC and USC pathways and reporting.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
The main cause of breaches is the tertiary centre capacity for treatment.
Source: CANISC / Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
94%
95%
96%
97%
98%
99%
100%
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
% P
ati
en
ts S
een
NUSC-31 Day Cancer Target (98%)
Cwm Taf All Wales
53
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Indicator 53: The % patients newly diagnosed with cancer, via the urgent route, that started definitive treatment within (up to &
including) 62 days of receipt of referral - USC Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: USC 95% Current Status: 89.8%
Current Trend & Benchmark All Wales How are we doing?
Compliance with the 62 day target remains challenging for the Health Board due to the small number of patients treated. We are however, still maintaining around 90% cumulatively since October 2014.The breaches this month were 1 Lung, 1 UGI, 1
Colorectal and 3 Urological. 2 of the Urology breaches and the Colorectal breach were treated in Cwm Taf. Urology breaches – the 1 patient treated at C&V was referred to C&V in 26 days and the delay occurred in Surgery at C&V. no delay at Cwm Taf. The 2 remaining patients had delays in diagnostic pathways within Cwm Taf.
Lung breach – the 1 patient was referred to C&V on day 16 and the treatment delays occurred there.
UGI breach – this was a complex pathway with 5 diagnostic events resulting in a referral to Velindre on day 48. Further treatment delay of 39 days occurred there.
Colorectal breach – The patient was treated in Cwm Taf on day 67 following a 7 day delay for cancellation of first OP attendance due to Consultant sickness and 29 days for endoscopy appointment.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Weekly meetings with each MDT management team to
scrutinise suspected cancer patient lists. Detailed review of the Urology position with the MDT and
Directorate teams. Ensure capacity flexibility to prioritise cancer patient’s
appointments and treatments. Increase dialogue and escalation with tertiary centres to speed
up patient pathway events.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Our maintenance of approx 90% cumulatively since October 2014 puts us at the top of performance of
Welsh HB’s.
Ongoing Urological capacity and the large delays at Cardiff And
Vale for treatment.
Source: CANISC / Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
70%
80%
90%
100%
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
% P
ati
en
ts S
een
USC-62 Day Cancer Target (95%)
Cwm Taf All Wales
Head and neckUpper
Gastrointestinal
LowerGastrointestin
alLung Skin(c) Breast Urological
Haematological(d)
Other(f)
>62 days 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0
<62 days 1 2 4 10 4 4 24 2 2
Performance 100.00% 50.00% 80.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 88.89% 100.00% 100.00%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Perfo
rm
an
ce
No
. P
ati
en
ts T
reate
d
62 day target by Tumour Site - April 2016
54
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Indicator 54: The % of patients waiting less than 26 weeks for treatment (RTT) Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Dir. Primary Care & MH
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: 95% Current Status: 86.6%
Current Trend: How are we doing?
Cwm Taf’s RTT performance for 26 week waits is in line with the rest of Wales. The main area of concern remains Ophthalmology with 799 patients awaiting their first outpatient appointment and in total
there are 1407 patients waiting over 26 weeks.
Improvements can be expected within the non-surgical specialties.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Develop comprehensive demand and capacity plans for delivery in 2015/16. Improve the rate of back fill for lists not being utilised due to planned annual leave and study leave. Minimise use of additional theatre sessions at weekends.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf’s performance is comparable with other Health Boards. Poor compliance with treat in turn and clinic cancellation
processes. Lengthy waits for non-surgical specialties.
Source: Local / Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
75%
77%
79%
81%
83%
85%
87%
89%
91%
93%
95%
97%
99%
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
Perfo
rm
an
ce
% of patients waiting <26 weeks for treatment (RTT) - all specialties
Target Cwm Taf RTT <26 Weeks - Total <26 Wks All Wales
55
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Continued: Local Measure: The number of CAMHS ADHD patients waiting for treatment 26 & 36 weeks Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: March 2016 Target: Current Status: 123 pts waiting
Current Trend: How are we doing?
Cardiff and Vale
Anticipated 17 % reduction by 31/03/16 due to waiting list initiative.
Anticipated 13% reduction in av. waiting times for assessment
Cwm Taf Anticipated 32% reduction by 31/03/16 due to waiting list
initiative. Anticipated av. length of wait will decrease by 23% to under
26 wks ABM
Anticipated 25% reduction by 31/03/16 due to waiting list initiative.
Anticipated av. length of wait will decrease by 14% to under 26 wks
Network Waiting List Initiative The combined impact of the waiting list initiative will mean a 25%
reduction in the total waiting list (approximately 608 patients) and will bring the average length of wait for NDM assessments to the 26 week waiting time target.
What actions are we taking?
Further work to predict how soon the overall targets will be met.
Recruit more staff from WG funding to reduce waiting lists for young people
Work towards reaching current waiting lists by Sept. 2016 and 28 days target by April 2017- this may vary according to
further funding decisions for 2016/17
What are the main areas of risk?
High levels of additional activity
High levels of clinical risk
Source: Local
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2 3 4 5 6 7 810
11
13
14
15
17
18
19
21
22
23
25
27
28
29
31
33
34
35
36
38
40
41
43
44
45
46
48
49
51
52
53
54
55
56
59
62
63
64
65
66
68
69
72
73
81
84
Nu
mb
er o
f P
ati
en
ts
Weeks Wait
CAMHS Waiting List - ADHD1st March 2016
Urgent Routine
56
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Indicator 55: The number of patients waiting more than 36 weeks for treatment (RTT) Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: 0 Current Status: 1392
Current Trend: How are we doing?
Reporting for March shows a decrease in the number of patients waiting over 36 weeks for treatment, from 2239 in January to 1120. The main area for concern remains Ophthalmology, with 184 patients at stage 1 and 425 at stage 4. Plans are in place to increase the
capacity for outpatients and ensure treatment of long waiting cataract
patients.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Develop comprehensive demand and capacity plans for delivery in 2015/16. Improve the rate of back fill for lists not being utilised due to planned annual leave and study leave. Minimise use of additional theatre sessions at weekends.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
The Health Board’s performance has deteriorated more than peers in percentage terms since March 2014.However, focusing on overall patient numbers, Cwm Taf is still recording fewer 36 week breaches than neighbouring Health Boards
Poor compliance with treat in turn and clinic cancellation processes. Sickness absence of key clinicians in high volume specialties.
Source: Local / Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
No
. o
f p
ati
en
ts
Number of patients waiting >36 weeks for treatment (RTT) - all specialties
RTT No Patient > 36 Weeks
57
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE RTT Continued – Performance Improvement Trajectories Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016
Current Trend: 26 Weeks Open Pathways RTT- 26 Weeks Trajectory
Current Trend: 36 Weeks Open Pathways RTT- 36 Weeks Trajectory
Source: Local
82%
84%
86%
88%
90%
92%
94%
96%
Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17
% <
26
weeks
Cwm Taf RTT 26 week 2016/17
Profile Actual
58
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Indicator 56: The number of patients waiting more than 8 weeks for a specified diagnostic Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: Apr 2016 Target: 0 Current Status: 2848
Current Trend How are we doing?
Radiology The ultrasound lists remain high with 1324 patients waiting over 8
weeks. MRI – has increased to 7 patients > 8 weeks CT – has decreased to 40patients waiting over 8 weeks.
Fluoroscopy – 93 patients waiting over 8 weeks due to limited
MSK capacity. Cardiology and Endoscopy waits have both decreased from last month.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Ultrasound – seeking permission for funding additional capacity. Ultrasound – advert for sonographer out – no suitable applicants. MRI mobile scanner on site until October 2015. Fluoroscopy – MSK – additional lists being undertaken where
possible.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Cwm Taf is an outlier for Radiology waiting times, mainly within non-obstetric ultra sound scanning. MRI – demand exceeding core capacity.
Ultrasound – demand exceeding core capacity. Fluoroscopy increasing because of limited MSK capacity.
Source: Local / Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
59
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Local Measure: Therapies waiting times: The number of patients waiting more than 14 weeks for a specified therapies Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: Apr 2016 Target: 0 Current Status: 6
Current Trend How are we doing?
Therapies generally perform well against the 14 week component wait
target and in March there are no patients waiting longer than the target period.
There are robust capacity and demand plans in place for the Physiotherapy service where historically there have been long term problems with extended waits and breaches for MSK services.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Each department is monitoring and managing waiting lists on a monthly basis at a minimum. The largest service Physiotherapy, is managing
their waiting lists by forecasting accurately using live capacity and demand tools.
In all services staff are mobilized and moved to cover periods of annual leave to ensure capacity is maintained.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Within Therapies standards of compliance with the target are comparable. Areas of risk are in Physio, Dietetics and SLT and relate to high staff
turnover recruitment delays and problems. We are endeavoring to aim for a 10 week position to ensure some safe headroom in waiting times
prior to winter period.
Source: Local / Welsh Government Statistics Website
60
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Indicator 57: Local Measure: Cardiac Pathway (in development) Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Current Status: 857
Current Trend: Waiting Lists How are we doing?
The charts show that the total volume of patients waiting for cardiology review. There has been a slight decrease in the total volume waiting this
month to 855 patients waiting. The number of urgent patients waiting has decreased to 133 (15.6%).
Although the majority of patients are seen within 20 weeks (graph 2), there is a tail of patients waiting up to 35 weeks, which is of concern.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
The main reason for the tail of long waits has been attributed to a capacity gap within some sub-specialty clinics due to long term staff absences and recent retirements. A full demand and capacity analysis of
the service is also being undertaken to redress the balance on a sustainable basis.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Capacity of sub specialty clinics.
Cardiac specific investigation capacity (MRI, CT and Echo).
Source: Local
1126 1178 1129 1168 1151 1053 987837 781 789 748 724
288 279248 220 173
194 210
196 188 191144 133
0
500
1000
1500
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
Pati
en
t N
um
bers
Cardiology Outpatient Waiting List Volumes
Routine Urgent
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Pati
en
t N
um
bers
Weeks Wait
Cardiology Outpatient Waiting List Profile: April 2016
Routine
Urgent
Benchmark not available
61
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Continued Indicator 57: Local Measure: Cardiac Pathway (in development) Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: Apr 2014 to Dec 2015 Target: Current Status: as per charts
Current Trend: Waiting Lists How are we doing?
Exploratory work is currently ongoing to review the pathway for cardiology patients with the consideration of
a pathway that achieved a decision to treat by week 16 and treatment delivered for 100% of patients by week 26.
The charts represent the number of Cwm Taf residents waiting for cardiology services outside of this pathway at all Welsh providers; this includes those waiting at
tertiary providers.
What actions are we taking?
The Health Board is working actively with Welsh
Government colleagues and neighbouring Health Board clinicians to measure and monitor compliance with this new indicator. Sub-specialty demand and capacity plans are being developed to facilitate delivery of this target.
What are the main areas of risk?
High volume of demand for new outpatients and
diagnostic investigations. Capacity for more invasive investigations and
treatment at tertiary units.
Source: Local / Welsh Government
534605
574516 488
412 402
314
215
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16
No
. o
f p
ati
en
ts
CTUHB resident cardiology stage 1-3 (excluding paediatric cardiology) 16+ weeks waiters at all providers
48
3329
21 22
14 1215
1824 26 27
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15
No
. o
f p
ati
en
ts
CTUHB resident stage 4 cardiothoracic surgery 10+ weeks waiters at all providers
3847 42
38 36 3828
25 28
0
100
200
Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16
No
. o
f p
ati
en
ts
CTUHB resident cardioology stage 4 & cardiothoracic surgery (stages 1-4) 10+ weeks waiters at all providers
CT residents waiting for cardiothoracic surgery stages 1-4 over 10 weeks (all providers)
CT residents waiting at cardiolgy stage 4 over 10 Weeks (all providers) (ex paediatric cardiology)
62
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Indicator 58: The number of patients waiting for a follow-up who are delayed past their target date Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Census Date: Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 18243
Current Trend: Outpatient Follow-up Delays – NOT BOOKED How are we doing?
The Health Board is making good progress in the validation of patients showing as awaiting a follow-up review but with no indicated target date. The overall volume has dropped from 58,000 to 3509 which is a decrease from 3794 in March.
The volume of patients with a lapsed target date where there is no appointment booked is 18,243 where there is currently no booked appointment. This is a month on month increase since April 2015 when the total waiting was 14,311 (27% increase). Currently, the highest volumes of patients are
currently within Ophthalmology (5,069), ENT (2,124), T&O (1,879), General Medicine (1,290) & Gynaecology
(1,283).
What actions are we taking?
Further work is being undertaken within the cohort of patients without an appointment date to manage the demand appropriately. It is anticipated that this
volume will reduce following this exercise. The backlog volumes have been incorporated into the
specialty demand and capacity plans and work is underway to remove the backlog by the end of March 2017.
What are the main areas of risk?
The area of Ophthalmology is the main concern due to the risk to patients and the availability of staff to address the backlog.
Source: Local
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000
Ophthalmology
ENT
Trauma &…
General Medicine
Gynaecology
Child & Adolescent…
Urology
Gastroenterology
Thoracic Medicine
Rheumatology
Dermatology
Old Age Psychiatry
General Pathology
Paediatrics
Cardiology
Mental Illness
Oral Surgery
Rehabilitation
General Surgery
Anaesthetics
Psychotherapy
Nephrology
Clinical Haematology
Orthodontics
Restorative Dentistry
Neurology
Palliative Medicine
Clinical Oncology
Mental Handicap
Midwifery
Geriatric Medicine
Obstetrics - AN…
Total number of patients waiting for a follow-up who are delayed past their target date -NOT BOOKED
(census date April 2016)
0% up to 25%
delay
Over 26 up to 50%
delay
Over 50% up to 100%
delay
Over 100% delay
63
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Continued Indicator 58: The number of patients waiting for a follow-up who are delayed past their target date Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Census Date: Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 6347
Current Trend: Outpatient Follow-up Delays – BOOKED How are we doing?
The number of patients awaiting a follow up appointment with a lapsed target date is now 6347. Again this is has increased significantly since April 2015 when the total was 3,220. The main areas of concern are:
Ophthalmology – 887
Rheumatology – 633 General Medicine – 540 Gynaecology – 454 Mental Illness – 406 ENT – 384 T&O – 363 Paediatrics 332
What actions are we taking?
The backlog volumes have been incorporated into the specialty demand and capacity plans and work is underway to remove
the backlog by the end of March 2017.
What are the main areas of risk?
The area of Ophthalmology is the main concern due to the risk to patients and the availability of staff to address the backlog.
Source: Local
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000
Ophthalmology
Rheumatology
General Medicine
Gynaecology
Mental Illness
ENT
Trauma &…
Paediatrics
Child & Adolescent…
Gastroenterology
Dermatology
Thoracic Medicine
Urology
General Surgery
Clinical Haematology
Cardiology
General Pathology
Oral Surgery
Anaesthetics
Neurology
Nephrology
Orthodontics
Old Age Psychiatry
Rehabilitation
Restorative Dentistry
Mental Handicap
Palliative Medicine
Total number of patients waiting for a follow-up who are delayed past their target date - BOOKED
(census date April 2016)
0% up to 25% delay 26% up to 50% delay Over 50% up to 100% delay Over 100% delay
64
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Indicator 59: The % of patients who spend less than 4 hours in all hospital major & minor emergency care (i.e. A&E) facilities from arrival
until admission, transfer or discharge Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: 95% Current Status: 79.3%
Current Trend How are we doing?
4, 8 and 12 hour performance across the Health Board remains challenging
although there is some improvement in April. The front door pressure
continues to reduce however both sites remain fragile due to the daily
variation in attendance numbers.
Patient flow continues to be monitored and appropriate actions are taken on a daily basis to balance elective and emergency admissions. Gold command meetings remain in place twice weekly and will be reviewed during April.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Daily deep dive work on all acute and community wards continues.
LA staff are fully engaged in all aspects of patient flow. Reduction in capacity to mitigate reduction in staffing levels. Daily review of actions to support patient flow.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
CT performance has been in the main comparable with the best performance in Wales. Staffing issues have reduced following the actions taken this will continue
to be monitored closely.
Source: EDDS
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
Att
en
dan
ces
Perfo
rm
an
ce a
gain
st
targ
et
% of new patients spend no longer than 4 hours in A&E
Patients waiting <4 hours Patients waiting >4 hours Cwm Taf %
All Wales % 95% Target
65
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Indicator 60: The % of emergency responses to RED Calls (immediately life threatening) calls arriving within (up to & including) 8 minutes
Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: week ending 6th Mar to 29th May 2016 Target: 65% Current Monthly Status: 72.8% (Apr 2016)
Current Trend How are we doing?
Performance against the 8 minute response times for red category
calls continues to be above the 65% target. This is due to a number of factors which include:
Good ambulance turn around by DGH sites Ring fencing of vehicles Use of non-emergency vehicles for HCP arrivals
The Health Board continues to work closely with WAST to maintain this performance and develop further alternative pathways.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
The UHB continue to work closely with WAST to maintain and
further improve this performance.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Source: WAST
17 25 29 24 16 26 28 29 21 35 31 23 35
27
8
1213
10
109 10
7
69
5
12
38.6%
75.8%70.7%
64.9%61.5%
72.2% 75.7% 74.4%75.0%
85.4%
77.5%
82.1%
74.5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0
20
40
60
06/03 13/03 20/03 27/03 03/04 10/04 17/04 24/04 01/05 08/05 15/05 22/05 29/05
Red
Call
Perfo
rm
an
ce
Red
Call
Resp
on
ses
Week Ending
RED Calls - 8 minute performance Cwm Taf Health Board Area
Hits (responses) <8 mins Responses >8 mins Cwm Taf Performance
Target All Wales Performance
69.1%
45.0%
55.0%
65.0%
75.0%
85.0%
ABMU AB BCUHB C&V Cwm Taf HDda Powys
Perfo
rm
an
ce a
gain
st
targ
et
RED Calls - 8 mins performance by health board area (target 65%)October 2015 to April 2016
Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16
Mar-16 Apr-16 Target 65% All Wales average
66
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Local Measure: Number of ambulance handovers within 15 minutes Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: 83.86% YTD: 83.86%
Current Trend How are we doing?
Handover performance during March / April improved on both sites despite the continued capacity pressures.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Monitoring of the handover performance continues and alerts sent to
senior managers when delays occur so that they can be challenged.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
CTUHB’s performance remains the best in Wales Handover performance during March / April improved on both sites despite the continued capacity pressures.
Source: WAST
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
May 15 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 15 Sep 15 Oct 15 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 16 Feb 16 Mar 16 Apr 16
Perfo
rm
an
ce
No
. o
f h
an
do
vers <
15
min
s
Number of Ambulance Handovers within 15 minutes
PCH RGH PCH RGH
Benchmark not available
67
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN
DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Indicator 61: Number of ambulance handovers over one hour Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status: 4 YTD: 4
Current Trend How are we doing?
Handover performance has improved on both sites with RGH meeting the 100% target. Staff continue to be mindful of the need to ensure handover is timely and this continues to be monitored closely, with alerts in place to
senior managers when delays occur.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Monitoring of the handover performance continues and alerts are sent to senior managers when delays occur so that they can be
challenged.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
CTUHB’s performance remains the best in Wales This area of performance is fairly stable and we do not anticipate any
problems.
Source: WAST
96%
97%
98%
99%
100%
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
May 15 Jun 15 Jul 15 Aug 15 Sep 15 Oct 15 Nov 15 Dec 15 Jan 16 Feb 16 Mar 16 Apr 16
Perfo
rm
an
ce
No
. o
f h
an
do
vers >
1 h
ou
r
Number of Ambulance Handovers over 1 hour
PCH RGH PCH RGH
68
TIMELY CARE: I HAVE TIMELY ACCESS TO SERVICES BASED ON CLINICAL NEED & AM ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN DECISIONS ABOUT MY CARE Indicator 62: The number of patients who spend 12 hours or more in all hospital major & minor emergency care facilities from arrival until
admission, transfer or discharge Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: 0 Current Status: 309 / YTD 309
Current Trend How are we doing?
12 hour performance has improved during April but still remains well
below UHB expectation.
12 hour breeches are in the main patients waiting admission or patients
who are awaiting senior review prior to discharge home. All patients are
seen on admission as per triage criteria and all 12 hour breeches are
reviewed to ensure all appropriate care is delivered in the department.
It is anticipated that this improvement will continue during May.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Daily deep dive work on all acute and community wards continues. LA staff are present on both community sites as routine and
patients waiting to transfer to community sites have reduced dramatically.
Concentrated effort is now being made to eradicate 12 hour waits.
In patient capacity has been reduced to mitigate the short term staffing shortages.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
CT performance has in the main been below the best performance in Wales during December.
Lack of inpatient capacity remains the key reason for delays in the A&E department, this is particularly evident on the RGH site where beds have been closed due to nurse staffing levels.
Source: EDDS
140
19 8
76
183135
172 170
313446
623
309
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
8000
10000
12000
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
Perfo
rm
an
ce
Att
en
dan
ces
Number of patients spending 12 hours or more in A&E (eradication of >12 hr waits)
Patients waiting <12 hours Patients waiting >12 hours Cwm Taf % All Wales %
69
70
INDIVIDUAL CARE: I AM TREATED AS AN INDIVIDUAL, WITH MY OWN NEEDS & RESPONSIBILITIES Indicator 66: The % of assessments undertaken within (up to & including) 28 days from the date of receipt of referral Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Primary Care & Mental Health
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: 80% Current Status: 46.1%
Current Trend: How are we doing & what actions are we taking?
46.1% of referrals were assessed in April 2016; the target is 80%. There remains a continued high rate of referrals and we have slot clinic slots
due to staff sickness and the Bank Holidays. Availability of assessment slots continues to be closely monitored and clinic
utilization remains high. Pressure on the Service to absorb changes in referral rates and staff absence continues to present with difficulties.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Continued liaison with GP’s remains a priority for the Service to better manage referrals and ensure people receive a treatment at the earliest opportunity
We have now had confirmation of an investment of 120k and will progress with recruitment. This may take 3 months therefore we expect performance
to increase above current levels from August 2016.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
A few other Health Boards in Wales are not achieving the 80% target for assessment.
The resilience of a relatively small number of teams to maintain performance when there is annual leave and sick leave. The volume of referrals from GPs is unsustainable.
Source: Local
167
216
176
144
257
304318
244
184
278
226
184
170
196
160
113
162 106
74
75
239131
116
215
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
To
tal
assessm
en
ts
Perfo
rm
an
ce
The % of assessments undertaken within 28 days of receipt of referral
Within 28 days > 28 days Performance against target Target
71
INDIVIDUAL CARE: I AM TREATED AS AN INDIVIDUAL, WITH MY OWN NEEDS & RESPONSIBILITIES Indicator 67: The % of therapeutic interventions started within (up to & including) 28 days following an assessment by LPMHSS Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Primary Care & Mental Health
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: 80% Current Status: 91.3%
Current Trend: How are we doing & what actions are we taking?
Performance for Part 1 Treatment target (28 days) during April 2016 has decreased to 91.3% and this has been aided through the Valley Steps
programme and our efficiency drives to fill all available slots.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
Myrddin is now fully operational since mid-September.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
The resilience of a relatively small number of teams to maintain performance
when there is annual leave and sick leave. In terms of data quality there is one risk for audit. We are currently implementing more checking systems to ensure all available patient slots are filled.
Source: Local
125
224268
70
173
402366
276
368 393336
411168
12945
162
160
2…
108
43
4438
26
39
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
To
tal
inte
rven
tio
ns
Perfo
rm
an
ce
The % of therapeutic interventions started within 28 days following an assessment by LPMHSS - new measure from
1st October 2015 (indicative performance May - September)
<28 days >28 days Performance against target
72
INDIVIDUAL CARE: I AM TREATED AS AN INDIVIDUAL, WITH MY OWN NEEDS & RESPONSIBILITIES Indicator 68: The % of HB residents in receipt of secondary mental health services (all ages) who have a valid care & treatment plan (CTP) Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Primary Care & Mental Health
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: 90% Current Status: 83.4%
Current Trend How are we doing
The 90% target was not met in April 2016 with compliance only being
83.4%. Two main issues affecting performance are: 1) there are still some
outstanding care plans needing to be completed 2) Care Plans have been
completed but have not received a CTP Review in the required timescale.
Psychiatrists remain the largest group of Care Co-ordinators as follows and
a request has been made for additional locum assistance to improve
compliance.
For April 2016 the compliance for CAMHs reduced which will require urgent addressing through a turnaround plan.
Benchmark What actions are we taking?
The plan to increase performance to 90% for Part 2 of the MHM is to examine the individual performance of each and every practitioner, including social worker care coordinators working in the local authority. This is being led by all professional heads including the local authority. The Directorate has also led an engagement on the definition of some
elements of current secondary care being discharged to GP shared care, following a paper to the May Executive Board. This will mainly affect the Consultant Psychiatrist compliance. Work has now begun on reviewing each case individually who meet the criteria and ensuring all relevant patients
understand the process under the measure. This stage has been more time consuming than anticipated.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
All but 1 of the other health boards in Wales are compliant (> 90%) Sickness levels and resilience of teams to undertake increases in workload.
No issues with data quality.
Source: Local
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
% o
f p
ati
en
ts w
ith
vali
d C
TP
% of Cwm Taf residents who have a valid CTP completed by the end of each month
CTP Plan Target
73
INDIVIDUAL CARE: I AM TREATED AS AN INDIVIDUAL, WITH MY OWN NEEDS & RESPONSIBILITIES Indicator 70: The % of hospitals within a HB which have arrangements in place to ensure advocacy is available for all qualifying patients Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Primary Care & Mental Health
Period: Apr 2014 to Sep 2015 Target: 100% Current Status: 100%
Current Trend & Benchmark: Advocacy Arrangements How are we doing
We have consistently maintained this level of performance.
What actions are we taking?
None
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
No risks at present
Source: Local
74
INDIVIDUAL CARE: I AM TREATED AS AN INDIVIDUAL, WITH MY OWN NEEDS & RESPONSIBILITIES Indicator 71: The % of registered over aged 65 patients diagnosed with dementia Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Prim. Care & Mental Health
Period: Apr 2016 Target: Current Status: 2.89%
Current Trend: How are we doing?
In addition to access information, Health Boards are also requested to monitor
numbers and percentages of patients recorded with Dementia.
Benchmark: 2014/2015 What actions are we taking
Dementia Appointment of Dementia Nurse to work in Primary Care and Nursing homes Included as a priority in clinical QOF visits Part of the analysis by Locality Clinical Director identifying outliers – this then to
be used as part of the conversation in the clinical QOF visit on Dementia to
investigate the reasons Mental Health Directorate are working on developments and improvements in
Older Person’s Mental Health applicable to the Primary Care setting
Practices taking part in Mental Health DES have completed training in Dementia
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Registers come from QOF data – delays in applying the new year contract rules can be up to late October early November
Read coding issues in collection of data Uncertainties about the diagnosis in some patients Practitioner concerns about coding being an inappropriate label
Practitioner concerns about the ethics and utility of coding QOF is voluntary and small practices may have very small registers
Source: Local
11637 10523 17172 16708
329
330
433528
2.83%
3.14%
2.52% 3.16%
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
Cynon Merthyr
Tydfil
Rhondda Taff Ely
Pati
en
ts r
eg
iste
red
ag
ed
65
plu
s
Of the registered patients aged over
65; the % diagnosed with dementia
Registered patients >65 diagnosed dementia
Registered patients >65
329 330 433 528
0.54%0.55%
0.49%
0.56%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Cynon Merthyr
Tydfil
Rhondda Taff Ely
No
. o
f p
ati
en
ts
Patients aged over 65 diagnosed with
dementia
as a % of total list size
Dementia
75
INDIVIDUAL CARE: I AM TREATED AS AN INDIVIDUAL, WITH MY OWN NEEDS & RESPONSIBILITIES Local measure: The % of patients registered as receiving palliative care with their GP practice Strategic Aim: Sustainable & Accessible Services Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Prim. Care & Mental Health
Period: Apr 2016 Target: Current Status: 0.21%
Current Trend: How are we doing & what actions are we taking?
In addition to access information, Health Boards are also requested to monitor numbers and
percentages of patients recorded with Dementia or as being on a Palliative Care pathway and also those that have had a blood pressure recorded within the last five years. As can be seen from the graph opposite, the Merthyr Tydfil cluster has a higher percentage of patients recorded on both the dementia and palliative care register.
Benchmark What actions are we taking
Guidance and links the Welsh Palliative Care Website on the Primary Care Resource Portal Advanced Care Planning Resource Pack available on the Primary Care Portal Primary Care Macmillan GP Facilitator supporting practices with care pathways and
system templates to record data in patients notes
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Registers come from QOF data – delays in applying the new year contract rules can be up to late October early November
Read coding issue in collection of data
Varying opinions amongst GPs about the purpose of a Palliative Care Register and the indications for including a patient on the Practice
GPs view is that a register is not a measure of quality but more around what care package is in place
Source: Local
60966 59955 88680 94619
0.17% 0.27%
0.18%
0.22%
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
100000
Cynon Merthyr Tydfil Rhondda Taff Ely
Reg
iste
red
pati
en
ts
Of the registered patients the % in need ofpalliative care / support
Registered patients % of Registered patients palliative care/support
76
77
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Indicator 73: Reduce waste in secondary & primary care through the delivery of efficient & productive services Local Measure: Theatre
Efficiency Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: May 2016 Local Target: Reduce cancellations using 2013/14 baseline Current Status: 504 YTD: 984
Current Trend: Theatre cancellations How are we doing?
There were 504 (22.26%) cancellations in May out of that 18.06% related
to no beds. The number of cancellations related to no beds has not improved greatly in April or May in total 165 to date. The other area is
the number of emergency cases undertaken which has meant electives have been cancelled which total 72, and some of these emergencies are much larger cases and require longer theatre time. Closure of 30 surgical beds in RGH due to nursing vacancies has had and
continues to have a major impact upon elective capacity. The pressure of unscheduled care continues to be a challenge upon the delivery of elective services.
Reasons for cancellation What actions are we taking?
The main action that can be taken is to invest in a a day surgery ward in
RGH. Ward 9 could accommodate this as it has previously operated as a day surgery unit until it closed 18 months ago. The other sustainable solution is investment in DSU in PCH to work 7 days a week. This would give flexibility in either providing a day case or 23/59 facility. Outsourcing these patients is not a sustainable solution as
we need to invest in our own facilities to ensure sustainability.
Cancellations by specialty – May 2016 What are the main areas of risk?
One of the risks we are now facing is that we have outsourced our fit & healthy patients ASA grades 1 & 2; leaving ASA grades 3 and above to be treated in the health board. These patients will usually have some co-morbidities and need more input from the anaesthetic pre-assessment
service to make them ready for surgery. These patients will also usually require a longer length of stay.
Source: Local
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
ENT Surgery General Surgery Gynaecology Ophthalmology Oral Surgery Orthopaedics Urology
Pati
en
ts
Patient Cancellations Clinical Cancellations Bed Cancellations Other Cancellations
78
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Continued: Indicator 73: Reduce waste in secondary & primary care through the
delivery of efficient & productive services (indicator in development)
Local Measure: Delivered Activity
The tables below a month by month and YTD comparison of activity delivered by Cwm Taf over 2015/16 and 2016/17. The inpatient activity includes both acute and community discharges and also emergency assessment admissions with a zero length of stay. It should be noted that the recording of assessment activity has been variable across these periods due to changes in clinical models at the Royal Glamorgan Hospital.
Source: Local
79
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Continued: Indicator 73: Reduce waste in secondary & primary care
through the delivery of efficient & productive services (indicator in
development) Local Measure: Admission on Day of Surgery
Target: To achieve
previously set
targets by specialty
Period: Feb 2015
to Jan 2016
Executive
Lead: COO
This indicator measures the percentage of patients, expected to have an overnight stay during their admission, who are admitted to hospital on the day of their intended operation. It should be noted that Ophthalmology inpatients are very small numbers. Central reporting of this measure ceased with the implementation of the 2013/14 Delivery Framework. However as it is a key indicator of efficiency in elective surgery, it will continue to be reported on a quarterly basis internally. All of the data for this measure is now sourced from CHKS which is more timely and reliable than data previously provided to the national repository.
How are we doing? What actions are we taking
Specialty TargetGeneral Surgery 62%Urology 75%Orthopaedics 55%ENT 81%Ophthalmology 79%Oral Surgery 46%Gynaecology 61%
General Surgery, Gynaecology and Urology have recently improved their performance in this area and are now achieving the expected targets. Orthopaedics improved on both sites achieving the agreed target in
December 2015.
Recent work undertaken with the Clinical Director of Orthopaedics has realised significant improvements in this area. Specific issues addressed were:
Anaesthetic Pre-assessment. Specialty specific pre-operative assessment –
including physio and OT input.
Nursing documentation.
Source: CHKS
20
40
60
80
100
Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16
Perfo
rm
an
ce %
Admission on Day of Surgery - General SurgeryTarget 62%
PCH RGH
40
60
80
100
Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16
Perfo
rm
an
ce %
Admission on Day of Surgery - UrologyTarget 75%
PCH RGH
0
20
40
60
80
100
Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16
Perfo
rm
an
ce %
Admission on Day of Surgery - Trauma & OrthopaedicsTarget 55%
PCH RGH
0
20
40
60
80
100
Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15Dec-15 Jan-16
Perfo
rm
an
ce %
Admission on Day of Surgery - GynaecologyTarget 61%
PCH RGH
80
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Continued: Indicator 73: Reduce waste in secondary &
primary care through the delivery of efficient & productive
services (indicator in development) Local Measure: Average Length of Stay (AvLoS) Medicine
Target: To achieve
previously set AQF
targets
Period: Jun 2015 to May 2016
Executive Lead:
COO
Central reporting of this measure ceased with the implementation of the 2013/14 Delivery Framework. However as it is a key indicator of efficiency in elective and emergency admissions, it will continue to be reported on a monthly basis internally. The charts illustrate the changes in average length of stay for medicine and how this length of stay is affected by the number of discharges with a zero length of stay.
How are we doing? What actions are we taking?
Performance against these indicators remains around the level previously set by the WG targets. However work continues to make improvements wherever possible.
Recent increases in the numbers of patients being turned around on the day of admission has resulted in an overall drop in the average length of stay in acute medical admissions.
Efficiency indicators including LOS will be a focus of the work being undertaken by
directorates going forward with the Matrix.
Focus work on LOS for emergency admissions. Derive historic elective and emergency LOS data from CHKS and compare to
previous published information.
Source: Local
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Em
erg
en
cy A
vLo
S
Zero
Lo
S
AvLoS & Zero LoS Activity - Acute Medicine
Acute Zero LoS Activity Acute Emergency AvLoS
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
100
200
300
400
Em
erg
en
cy A
vLo
S
Zero
Lo
S
PCH - AvLoS & Zero LoS Activity - Acute Medicine
Acute Zero LoS Activity Acute Emergency AvLoS
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
100
200
300
400
Em
erg
en
cy A
vLo
S
Zero
Lo
S
RGH - AvLoS & Zero LoS Activity - Acute Medicine
Acute Zero LoS Activity Acute Emergency AvLoS
81
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Continued: Indicator 73: Reduce waste in secondary & primary care
through the delivery of efficient & productive services (indicator in
development) Local Measure: Average Length of Stay (AvLoS) Surgery
Target: To achieve
previously set AQF
targets
Period: Jun 2015
to May 2016
Executive Lead:
COO
Source: Local
0
2
4
6
8
General Surgery AvLoS
Emergency Target - 6.0 / Elective Target - 3.3
Elective AvLoS TargetEmergency AvLoS Target
0
2
4
6
8PCH - General Surgery AvLoS
Elective AvLoS Target
Emergency AvLoS Target
0
2
4
6
8RGH - General Surgery AvLoS
Elective AvLoS Target
Emergency AvLoS Target
0
10
20
30
40
50General Surgery - Vascular AvLoS
Elective AvLoS Emergency AvLoS
0
10
20
30
40
PCH - General Surgery - Vascular AvLoS
Elective AvLoS Emergency AvLoS
0
10
20
30
40
50
RGH - General Surgery - Vascular AvLoS
Elective AvLoS Emergency AvLoS
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Orthopaedics AvLoS
Emergency Target - 10.2 / Elective Target - 3.6
Elective AvLoS Target
Emergency AvLoS Target
0
5
10
15PCH - Orthopaedics AvLoS
Elective AvLoS TargetEmergency AvLoS Target
0
2
4
6
8
10
12RGH - Orthopaedics AvLoS
Elective AvLoS Target
Emergency AvLoS Target
82
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Indicator 74: The % of full time equivalent (FTE) days lost to sickness absence Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Workforce & OD
Period: to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction (4.5%) Current Status: 5.16%
Current Trend: How are we doing?
The graph shows data as at end of April at 5.16%, and illustrates a
fairly consistent level of sickness absence throughout the year. Analysis of the data reveals no specific reasons for the continual month by month fluctuations within individual Directorates. The three year absence trend evidences that the absence rate has improved,
with this year yielding the best performance overall. The WG target for the UHB is 4.5% from 1st April 2015. Whilst this remains a stretch target, realistically we need to target achieving monthly results at <5%. This has only occurred once in the last 3 years (4.94% in June 2103). In the rolling 12 months we have achieved 5.15% & 5.16% in 2 months, so this is viewed as an
achievable target. The table illustrates those departments currently above the WG targets. It is positive to note that more departments are beneath the target than above.
Directorate Absence Rates: Dec 2015 What actions are we taking?
A new All Wales Policy has been agreed and Sickness absence training to support the new policy has been commenced and is being rolled out jointly with Trade Union colleagues. We have already trained in excess of 250 supervisors and managers. The policy became effective on 1
December 2015. We will be monitoring the implementation and
compliance over the coming months. Sickness absence is discussed at each Clinical Business meeting and work is continuing to analyze the various factors in each individual directorate and department, and to react and plan accordingly.
We are reviewing the comparative data from across Wales, and
looking at a more in depth analysis of the data to understand whether there are other trends or impacts that we could identify.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
We know that we are in the upper quartile in Wales, however we are making greater progress than most. Recent evidence presented at FP&W Committee meeting.
Source: ESR
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
5.5%
6.0%
6.5%
7.0%
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr
FT
E R
ate
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Sickness Rate - 3 year trend
2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 Target
83
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Indicator 74: The % of full time equivalent (FTE) days lost to sickness absence Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Workforce & OD
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction (4.5%) Current Status: 5.16%
Current Trend: How are we doing?
Long Term Sickness per FTE was reported at 3.85% in April, which is in the
middle of the range of results. Short Term sickness per FTE was at 1.38% for April 2016. This is the lowest result achieved with short term sickness, and demonstrates real progress made.
The overview of occurrences of sickness absence over the past year show that the number of occurrences of Long Term absence is on a slight downward
trajectory. This is the opposite with Short term occurrences where these are on a rising trajectory. However the sharp drop in April to 596 occurrences is the lowest yet achieved. Further detailed analysis is being undertaken to look at the trend data. The Long term trend is marginally down, with short term being marginally increased. If we are able to continue the results going forward we will be able to achieve results at
sub 5%.
Current Trend: What actions are we taking?
Current sickness absence activity is focused through the Directorate’s five point
activity plans which are agreed jointly with managers on a monthly basis and are used as the foundation for the CBM Reports. These include: Improving the quality, accuracy and timeliness of sickness absence though
maximum utilisation of ESR, improved reporting and data cleansing. Improved analysis of reasons, patterns and trends to identify hot spot areas,
understand reasons to inform support and interventions
Auditing records in areas with high levels of sickness absence to ensure that managers are complying with the policy are managing the absence.
Delivering bespoke training for managers as required.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Source: ESR
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
FT
E R
ate
Short Term / Long Term Sickness Rate - Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Long Term FTE Sickness Rate Short Term FTE Sickness Rate
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
No
. O
f O
ccu
rren
ces
Short Term/Long Term Sickness - Number of occurrences
Long Term Sickness Occurrances Short Term Sickness Occurrances
84
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Continued: Indicator 74: The % of full time equivalent (FTE) days lost to sickness absence Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Workforce & OD
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction (4.5%) Current Status: 5.16%
Current Trend: What actions are we taking?
The top five reasons for absence from over the past year has seen a slight
shift in the order of top reasons recorded. In comparing these two year periods, it is now strongly evident that the category ‘Unknown causes / not specified’ is no longer appearing in the top 5 reasons for absence.
The work with Managers and employees to more accurately record the reasons for absence is allowing us more ready access to robust data. This
is demonstrated by the ‘Unknown causes / not specified’ category reducing from 17.86% in 2014 to below 5% now. This in part will account for some of the percentage increases seen in the top 2 reasons over. Return to Work discussions are reported as 46.21% for the 12 month period April 2016, compared to 22.02% for the same period a year ago. Although the number of Return to Work discussions being entered onto
ESR has increased in the last 12 months, efforts are currently being focused on ensuring managers are entering the information onto ESR. We are also now feeding data into ESR from the Electronic Rosters. We have discovered that due to a technical issue not all of the data is being captured, and a solution is being developed. This will in turn have a further positive impact on the trend in future months.
Current Trend:
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Source: ESR
85
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Continued: Indicator 74: The % of full time equivalent (FTE) days lost to sickness absence Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Workforce & OD
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Reduction (4.5%) Current Status: 5.16%
Current Trend: What actions are we taking?
The data is evidence that our average time taken to input
sickness data has improved significantly during the year, down from 25 days to 13.95 days. This has been achieved via the ongoing use of a cohesive use of our E-Systems including ESR
and Rostering systems. With the advent of an improved use of self service and the deployment of rostering software to further areas in the health board, we anticipate this trend being maintained. In addition the timeliness of the data being recorded on ESR has significantly improved over the last 12 months. We are now
seeing close 60% of sickness consistently being entered within
11 days, and have been in excess of 50% ongoing since July. This means that more timely data is available to managers and the health board, and we can make more effective use of our Business Intelligence reports.
From 1st to 31st March 2016 the percentages of sickness entry by Self Service was 48.75%, and E-Rostering at 27.60%. This means that 75% of the entries are now being input electronically, reducing the need for manual pay card entries. This is a positive trend as we seek to reduce and eliminate all
entries by pay cards in the new financial year.
Source: ESR
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
Averarag
e n
um
ber o
f d
ays
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
Average number of days 24.81 21.81 19.04 19.51 17.66 16.78 16.11 16.94 15.62 14.94 15.50 13.95
Average number of days taken to enter sickness into ESR
59.15% 54.20% 49.07% 48.19% 45.24% 41.83% 37.61% 41.93% 45.37% 42.88% 50.43% 47.98%
40.85% 45.80% 50.93% 51.81% 54.76% 58.17% 62.39% 58.07% 54.63% 57.12% 49.57% 52.02%
0%
50%
100%
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
% T
ime T
aken
% Time taken to enter sickness into ESR
>11 Days <11 Days
27.60%
23.65%
48.75%
Analysis of Sickness entry by system April 2016
E-Rostering Payroll Self Service
86
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Local Measure: ESR Self Service Rollout Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Workforce & OD
Period: Apr 2016 Target: Current Status: 63.12%
Current Trend: What actions are we taking?
The current level of staff with Self Service accounts is 5,074. This represents 63.12% of the workforce. This has risen from 3,690 or 46.13% of the workforce in January. We have exceeded the 60% figure for the first time.
We have reviewed the delivery plan to accelerate progress, in advance of ESR Enhance deployment in November 2016. There are a number of
additional benefits to achieving the rollout as access to ESR Self Service underpins other activities e.g. Nurse Revalidation, Access to National and Local E-Learning, Electronic Pay Slips etc. that rely on self-service access. It is anticipated that we will achieve full deployment of self service by
the third quarter of the new financial year. This will require us to ensure that the hierarchies within ESR are drawn up in compliance with the
new Scheme of Delegation as approved by the audit committee. Employees from Workforce & Finance are working jointly to ensure this is delivered.
Source: ESR
87
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Local Measure: Resourcing Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Workforce & OD
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016
Current Trend: Staff in Post & Recruitment Activity
The recruitment data is currently unavailable to be reported by Shared Services due to the switch between electronic systems and the move to TRac. The data is planned to be available next month.
Source: ESR
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
FT
E
Starters / Leavers by month
Starters FTE Leavers FTE Cumulative FTE
88
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Indicator 77: Estimated rate of Did Not Attend (DNA) for GP
appointments per GP cluster
Indicator 78: Estimated highest & lowest rate of Did Not Attend
(DNA) for GP appointments per GP cluster Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Primary Care & Mental Health
Period: to February 2016 Target: Reduction Current Status:
Current Trend: How are we doing?
Chart shows the activity over the given month: GP Face to Face. GP telephone contact. GP DNA.
We also collect
Practice Nurse Face to Face. Practice telephone contacts. Practice Nurse DNA.
To Note collection of activity data is not a requirement under the
GMS contact: Not all practices supply on a regular basis
Cynon, 60876
Merthyr , 59955
Rhondda, 88680
Taf, 94431
GP Cluster List Size
What action are we taking?
Access Group: Continue to encourage activity reporting by all practices on a
regular basis. Encouraging all practices to report DNA rates on a regular basis.
To drill down into Rhondda data in regard to the limited use of telephone triage.
Survey use of DNA policy and its impact. To help practices analyse reasons for a high DNA rates and offer
options to address.
What are the main areas of risk?
Growing demand from patients. Seasonal pressures.
Recruitment of GPs. Impact of high use of Locum GPs.
Source: Local
1364
1,255
1,238
1082
360
258
166
300
927
755
797
690
53
39
28
28
36
24
49
33
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000
Cynon
Merthyr Tydfil
Rhondda
Taff Ely
No. of contacts
GP Practice Contact Activity per 1,000 registered patients (September 2015 to February 2016)
Number of GP face to face cotacts (including home visits) Number of GP telephone ContactsNumber of Practice Nurse face to face contacts Number of Practice Nurse telephone contactsNumber of GP appointment DNA
89
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE OF
RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Indicator 79: The % of patients who Did Not Attend (DNA) a new outpatient appointment Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: Jun 2015 to May 2016 Target: Reduction (12 month trend) Current Status: 8%
Current Trend: How are we doing?
Efficiency and activity measures will form part of the Health Board
Matrix at a strategic level and at an operational level the Consultant Dashboard, which will be utilised by CDs at directorate meetings.
Benchmark: Feb 2015 to Jan 2016 (12 month trend) What actions are we taking?
There are currently two initiatives about to come on board to improve attendance at clinical consultations: Text and Remind –This service was launched on 1st July 2015 and
reminds patients of their upcoming outpatient appointments. An initial
assessment of the impact of this service on DNA rates will take place
after 3 months of data has been collected.
Self Service Kiosk – this service will allow patients to update their own demographics as they attend for an appointment. It will ensure that we hold the right information for each patient and will aid
communication processes. This service was launched in August 2015.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Source: Local / Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
0%
5%
10%
15%
Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16
% D
NA
Rate
New Outpatient DNA Rates
Cwm Taf Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Aneurin Bevan
Betsi Cadwaladr Cardiff & Vale Hywel Dda
90
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE OF
RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Indicator 80: The % of patients who Did Not Attend (DNA) a follow-up outpatient appointment Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: Jun 2015 to May 2016 Target: Reduction (12 month trend) Current Status: 15.2%
Current Trend: How are we doing?
Good progress is being made in improving the booking
processes for follow-up appointments in line with RTT Rules or with previous Guide to Good Practice Guidance, It is anticipated that this will improve the number of DNAs experienced for follow-up appointments.
Currently the specialties are working on plans of how to address
their follow up backlogs through validation potentially through
case note review via virtual clinics.
Benchmark: Feb 2015 to Jan 2016 (12 month trend) What actions are we taking?
There are currently two initiatives about to come on board to
improve attendance at clinical consultations: Text and Remind –This service was launched on 1st July 2015
and reminds patients of their upcoming outpatient appointments. An initial assessment of the impact of this service on DNA rates will take place after 3 months of data has been collected.
Self Service Kiosk – this service will allow patients to update
their own demographics as they attend for an appointment. It will ensure that we hold the right information for each patient and will aid communication processes. This service was launched in August 2015.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Source: Local / Welsh Government Delivery & Performance Website
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16
% D
NA
Rate
s
Follow-up Outpatient DNA Rates
Cwm Taf Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Aneurin Bevan
Betsi Cadwaladr Cardiff & Vale Hywel Dda
91
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Local Measure: Outpatient Clinic Cancellations Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: COO
Period: Oct 2015 Local Target: Continuous Improvement Current Status: 84 YTD 613
Current Trend: cancellations <6 weeks’ notice by reason How are we doing?
The charts are derived from data collected by medical records as a result of forms received requesting clinics to be cancelled. At present this only relates to
those clinics managed by the medical records department. It excludes clinics that are arranged and administered by specialty teams within surgical directorates. This work will progress to cover all outpatient clinics.
The largest reason for short notice cancellation of clinics is captured under “Other”. This needs to be explored so that more granularity is available. The
Performance and Information team will work with the directorates to improve reporting in this area. As can be seen from the graph opposite, the second biggest reason of short notice cancellations are due to annual leave, which contravenes the Health Board’s 6 week annual leave policy for clinical staff.
The charts illustrate the number of clinics cancelled during the month of October
with less than 6 weeks’ notice of cancellation. The cross-cutting theme for outpatient improvement is focusing on short notice clinic cancellations as a strand of the project. Improving in this area will be pivotal to the implementation of the Text & Remind service which was launched on 1st July 2015.
Current Trend: cancellations <6 weeks’ notice by site
Source: Local
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Annual Leave
Other
Meeting
Study Leave
On call
Sickness Absence
Audit
Casualty/Emergency duty
Professional Leave
Number of cancelled Clinics
Clinic Cancellations < 6 weeks notice by reason for cancellation - October 2015
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
General Surgery
Paediatric
Respiratory
ENT
Orthodontics
Gynaecology
Dermatology
Urology
Nephrology
No. of clinic cancellations
Clinic Cancellations < 6 weeks notice by site - October 2015
North Locality
South Locality
92
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Indicator 83: % of staff undertaking a performance appraisal development review Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Workforce & OD
Period: Status May 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: 63.98%
Current Trend: How are we doing?
As at 1st June 2016 compliance is 63.98%, an increase of 2% on the previous month and the first significant increase recorded since August 2015.
The majority of Directorates continue to perform above 60% compliance. L&D continue to work in close partnerships with Business Partner colleagues
to support managers with persistent non-compliance issues and develop actions for improvement.
Using ESR Business Intelligence to report PDR compliance
ESR Business Intelligence (BI) continues to be used to report PDR compliance to Directorate Managers & Director of Nursing as part of their monthly PDR updates.
Managers are continually encouraged to access BI PDR Dashboards through their ESR Self Serve Accounts allowing them to view a full set of compliance data for their area of responsibility, accessible at any time and always less
than 24 hours old. Guides on “How to Access/Use BI Dashboards” are being developed by L&D
The Learning & Development Department continue to support Directorates in the following ways to improve PDR compliance:-
Providing a comprehensive suite of reports to DMs on a monthly basis providing the latest PDR compliance data, contextualising each Directorate’s performance; what to do to improve compliance; where to seek further help and guidance
Supporting the PDR agenda at the Clinical & Corporate Business Meetings
through preparation of summary reports in advance of each CBM and
attendance where necessary Training Reviewers to enable them to record PDRs via ESR Self Service;
offering on-going support and guidance. Providing a shortened, non-accredited PDR Awareness training course for
Managers, concentrating on How to improve compliance/impact of Pay Progression & Using ESR BI to monitor & report compliance. The 1-day
accredited PDR training for Reviewers has been temporarily suspended due to lack of available Training Officer resources within L&D.
Assigning L&D officers to individual Directorates to assist in the identification and rectifying of report anomalies; develop compliance plans;
provide 1:1 support to managers; raising awareness at briefing and department meetings
Key to chart below: % Improving or Static % Decreasing
Source: ESR
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
2013/14 62.6% 60.4% 57.5% 53.7% 54.2% 49.1% 49.9% 50.3% 53.1% 56.4% 57.9% 59.4%
2014/15 60.1% 62.5% 65.2% 64.3% 62.8% 59.6% 60.1% 62.4% 63.0% 63.2% 63.8% 68.0%
2015/16 71.4% 71.9% 72.8% 73.4% 74.5% 72.1% 69.3% 66.8% 65.9% 65.6% 65.8% 63.6%
2016/17 61.98 63.98
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
Co
mp
lian
ce R
ate
PDR Compliance - Non medical staff
96.00%93.18%
90.57%89.20%
84.48%77.27%76.92%76.40%
75.42%75.00%74.19%73.61%
72.38%72.38%
69.65%66.47%65.85%
55.12%53.23%
52.29%41.88%
40.50%35.29%
33.50%14.08%13.64%
0.00%0.00%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
EstatesCorporate Development
TherapiesMedicines Management
Performance & InformationFinance
PlanningLocalities
FacilitiesICT
PathologyMental HealthPrimary Care
Workforce & Organisational DevelopmentCAMHS Network
ACT and Medical Records & OutpatientsPaediatrics Acute & Community
Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Sexual HealthWelsh Health Specialist Services Committee
Patient Care & SafetyHead & Neck
General Surgery, Trauma & Orthopaedics and UrologyChief Executive
Acute Medicine and A&ERadiology
Operations ManagementContract and Commissioning Directorate
Innovation and Transformation Directorate
Non Medical Staff - PDR Compliance by Directorate
93
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Local Measure: Core Skills – Training Compliance Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Workforce & OD
Period: Status as at 27th April 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: as per table
Current Trend: How are we doing?
The new Core Skills Training Framework has been launched across the UHB. Reports are now being produced on a routine basis and supplied to Managers. This has also
been added to the performance data sets being reviewed at CBM’s. This should see a continuing trajectory of improvement. Whilst the majority of areas are in red, it is an improving picture. Our L&D colleagues are also supporting managers to import data records where these have previously been held locally. We are reviewing how we present that dashboard data in order that the trend is better displayed and able to be meaningful.
Source: ESR
94
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Continued: Indicator 83 continued: % of staff undertaking a performance appraisal development review Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Workforce & OD
Period: Apr 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: 61.98%
Current Trend:
PDR % excludes Medical & Dental staff. Appraisal data for M&D staff is held on MARS (Medical Appraisal and Revalidation System) not on ESR. Percentage rates for M&D
staff is therefore included in the narrative on the next page
Source: ESR
95
OUR STAFF & RESOURCES: I CAN FIND INFORMATION ABOUT HOW THE NHS IS OPEN & TRANSPARENT ON ITS USE
OF RESOURCES & I CAN MAKE CAREFUL USE OF THEM Indicator 84: % of total medical staff undertaking performance appraisals - Consultant Job Planning Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Workforce & OD
Period: as at end of Apr 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: Consultants 28.69% SAS Doctors 17.6%
Current Trend: Consultants How are we doing?
E-Job Planning There are 6 currently Directorates now fully trained and are utilising the e-job planning system in their recent rounds of job plan meetings.
The Directorate of General Surgery, Urology and T&O commenced their job plan cycle utilising the new e-system in October 2015,
starting with the teams in Trauma & Orthopaedics. 22 consultant reviews have now been undertaken, 11 of which have been signed off. ACT commenced their job plan cycle on 29th February 2016. 21 consultant reviews have been undertaken, 8 of which have received
full signed off. Remaining consultant reviews are scheduled to be undertaken prior to the end of April. The Directorate team due to commence SAS reviews, and a configuration meeting has been held on the 5th May. The Directorate of Acute Medicine and A&E commenced their job plan review cycle in
December 2015 and will continue through 2016. 20 consultant
reviews have been undertaken, 7 of which have been signed off.
Current Trend: SAS Doctors
The Mental Health Directorate commenced their job plan cycle on 22nd February 2016. 10 reviews have been undertaken, with 6 receiving full sign off. The remaining reviews are scheduled to be
completed by the end of May 2016. The Pathology Directorate have received their consultation meeting and training session to enable their reviews to be undertaken using
the e-job plan system. The Children and Young People Directorate implementation meeting
took place on the 6th May 2016 to enable 2016 reviews to be undertaken utilising the e-job plan system. It is intended that all directorates will have completed their job plans by the end of the financial year.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Source: ESR
96
Local Measure: Fracture Neck of Femur (#NoF) - Number of patients admitted to Orthopaedic Ward within 4 hours Strategic Aim: Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Public Health
Period: Apr 2015 to Mar 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: 55% YTD 67%
Current Trend: Number of patients admitted to Orthopaedic ward within 4 hours How are we doing?
The graph demonstrates the performance each month against the 4 hour measure for admission to an Orthopaedic ward.
What actions are we taking?
Following discussion with the Clinical Director for Trauma and Orthopaedics, it has been agreed that we will expand these metrics to also include those recommended by those bodies governing the National
Hip Fracture Database, which will allow benchmarking between Orthopaedic units nationally. Initially we will include:
Admission to an Orthopaedic ward within 4 hours,
In the longer term we will also seek to include the following, which will
give a complete view of the #NOF service at Cwm Taf:
Patients developing pressure ulcers Pre-operative assessment by an Ortho-geriatrician Discharged on bone protection medication, Received a falls assessment prior to discharge
Work has been undertaken to reduce overall length of stay, which improves outcomes, and eases bed pressures.
Current Trend: (per site)
What are the main areas of risk?
Source: Local
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0
10
20
30
40
50
Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16
Perfo
rm
an
ce
No.
of
pati
en
ts a
dm
itte
d t
oO
rth
op
aed
ic w
ard
Number of Fracture NoF patients admitted to Orthopaedic ward within 4 hours
< 4 hours wait in A&E > 4 hours wait in A&E % Achieved
1719
9
1413
812
9
93
7
8
4
4
10
11
65%
86%
56%
64%
76%
67%
55%45%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
PCH RGH PCH RGH PCH RGH PCH RGH
Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16
No
. p
ati
en
ts a
dm
itte
d t
o
Orth
op
aed
ic W
ard
Number of Fractured NoF patients admitted to Orthopaedic Ward within 4 hours
< 4 hours wait in A&E > 4 hours wait in A&E
97
Local Measure: Fracture Neck of Femur (#NoF) - Number of patients who go to theatre for repair within 36 hours Strategic Aim: Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Public Health
Period: Apr 2015 to Mar 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: 90% YTD 64%
Current Trend: Number of patients admitted to Orthopaedic ward within 4 hours How are we doing?
The graph demonstrates the performance each month against the 36 hour measure for patients who go to theatre.
What actions are we taking?
Following discussion with the Clinical Director for Trauma and Orthopaedics, it has been agreed that we will expand the metrics to also include those recommended by those bodies governing the National Hip
Fracture Database, which will allow benchmarking between Orthopaedic units nationally. Initially we will include:
Surgery within 48 hours and during working hours - since the beginning of January the Health Board has achieved 85% against
this measure which is comparable to the national achievement of 86% in 2013. Further work will be done to produce this
information over the last two years for completeness.
Current Trend: (per site)
What are the main areas of risk?
Source: Local
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16
Perfo
rm
an
ce
No.
of
pati
en
ts w
ho
wen
tto
Th
eatr
e
Number of Fracture NoF patients who go to theatre for repair within 36 hours
< 36 hours to Theatre > 36 hours to Theatre % Achieved
1719
11
21
9 9 9
17
93
5
1
8
3
13
3
65%
86%
69%
95%
53%
75%
41%85%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
PCH RGH PCH RGH PCH RGH PCH RGH
Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16
No
. p
ati
en
ts w
ho
wen
t
to T
heatr
e
Number of Fractured NoF patients who go to theatre for repair within 36 hours
< 36 hours to Theatre > 36 hours to Theatre
98
Local Measure: Hand Hygiene & Nutritional Compliance The recording of Hand Hygiene and Nutritional scroring compliance is now undertaken in the All Wales Nursing Dashboard Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Nursing
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 Target: Improvement Current Status: Hand Hygiene 96.4% / Nutrition Score 90.7%
Current Trend: Hand Hygiene How are we doing?
Hand hygiene performance improved again in April to 96.4% and remains above the All Wales average. During this period the largest single group of staff to be non-compliant were medical staff. However, there was also non-compliance noted with nursing and allied health professional staff.
The % compliance with Nutrition Score declined this month to 90.7% from 91.6% in March. This has continued a steady decline in compliance since January and is now below the All Wales average. The Chief Nursing Officer has directed that completion of the nutrition e-learning programme is mandatory for all nursing staff in Wales. CTUHB had committed to full compliance by July 2015 but currently compliance is only approximately 12%. There is
a need to consider alternative methods of support and/or delivery for this training in order to improve compliance and provide assurance.
Current Trend: Nutrition Score What actions are we taking?
100% complaince with nutrition e-learning by end of March 2016
HONs will be reminded of the CTUHB commitment that all nurses employed will
complete the nutrition e-learning programme. HONs will be supported to develop a
training strategy to improve compliance.
A MUST nutritional audit tool has been developed to monitor quality of documentation and actions taken following the admission assessment: the results will inform the quality assurance process.
The Infection Prevention and Control Team challenge staff who fail to perform hand
hygiene.
Hand hygiene awareness sessions are offered at ward level to improve staff
knowledge and understanding of the “WHO 5 Moments to Care”.
Non compliance with hand hygiene is reported and highlighted at Infection
Prevention and Control Directorate Group and Infection Prevention and Control
Operational/ Strategic Group meetings.
New signage is being sourced to encourage hand hygiene practices at ward level.
How do we compare with our peers? What are the main areas of risk?
Hand hygiene - CTUHB remain above the All Wales average. Nursing staff not having time to complete the nutrition e-learning Non-compliance with hand hygiene increases infection risks to patients and staff.
Source: Fundamentals of Care/Nursing Dashboard
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
May-15
Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15Sep-15 Oct-15Nov-15Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16Mar-16 Apr-16
% C
om
pli
an
ce
% Compliance with Hand Hygiene (WHO 5 moments)
Cwm Taf All Wales
90%
93%
95%
98%
100%
May-15
Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15Sep-15Oct-15Nov-15Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16Mar-16Apr-16
% C
om
pli
an
ce
% Compliance with Nutrition Score completed within 24 hrs of admission & appropriate action taken
Cwm Taf All Wales
99
Local Measure: Surgical Site Infection Rates (Arthroplasty) Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Nursing
Period: Jan 2011 to Dec 2014 Target: Reduction Current Status: as per table
Current Trend: Since 2003, Health Boards that carry out Orthopaedic procedures in Wales have been required by the Welsh Government to undertake continuous surveillance of surgical site infections (SSI) following Orthopaedic procedures. From 2007 onwards, surveillance has been restricted to just elective primary hip and elective primary knee arthroplasty.
How are we doing? What actions are we taking?
Performance in this area has improved considerably over the last 3 years. Infection rates for both primary knee and primary hip replacements are now below the all Wales level. However there is a variance between the recorded primary arthroplasty carried out and the number of forms received by WHAIP.
To ensure all relevant procedures are recorded and an accurate infection rate derived: Establish accurate number of arthroplasty operations carried out across relevant
years.
Ensure all relevant procedures are cross reference with WHAIP infection
information.
Derive infection rates in line with accurate numbers and rationale.
This work will be on-going until a satisfactory rationale for compliant procedures is implemented
Source: Public Health Wales (WHAIP)
Elective
Primary Hip
Arthroplasty
Total
Procedures
Number
of forms
received
Number
of valid
forms
received
Number
of
inpatient
SSI
Number
of post-
discharge
SSI
Overall
SSI Rate Period
Elective
Primary Knee
Arthroplasty
Total
Procedures
Number
of forms
received
Number
of valid
forms
received
Number
of
inpatient
SSI
Number
of post-
discharge
SSI
Overall
SSI Rate
Cwm Taf 416 264 264 1 2 1.1% Cwm Taf 466 335 335 0 3 0.9%
All Wales no data 2003 1985 7 11 0.9% All Wales no data 2131 2119 8 29 1.7%
Cwm Taf 388 286 286 2 3 1.8% Cwm Taf 441 368 368 0 5 1.4%
All Wales no data 2688 2675 3 28 1.2% All Wales no data 2973 2962 13 28 1.4%
Cwm Taf 427 353 353 4 1 1.4% Cwm Taf 561 543 543 3 6 1.7%
All Wales no data 3523 3513 19 36 1.6% All Wales no data 4177 4167 19 59 1.9%
Cwm Taf 434 272 272 6 6 4.4% Cwm Taf 543 419 419 1 9 2.4%
All Wales no data 3078 3038 31 33 2.1% All Wales no data 3770 3735 18 49 1.8%
Jan 2013 to Dec 2013
Jan 2011 to Dec 2011
Jan 2012 to Dec 2012
Jan 2014 to Dec 2014
100
Local Measure: Caesarean Section Rates & Surgical Site Infection Rates (Caesarean Section) Strategic Aim: Excellent People Strategic Change Programme: Executive Lead: Director of Nursing
Period: May 2015 to Apr 2016 (infection rates: Apr 2015 to Mar 2016)
Target: Reduction – baseline to be established
Current Status: Rate of C Section: 26%/Infection Rate: 5.6
Current Trend: Caesarean Section Rates Current Trend: Surgical Site Infections (Caesarean Section)
How are we doing? What actions are we taking?
All Health Boards in Wales have been required by the Welsh Assembly Government to
implement Caesarean Section surgical site infection surveillance since 01/01/2006, and to report these data to the WHAIP on a monthly basis. Previously reported high rates of infection within the Health Board have been reviewed and attributed to over reporting.
The directorate has since addressed these issues and the resulting drop in SSI rates reflects the accurate position going forward. Individual clinical practice and women’s choice have been identified as the main contributors to Cwm Taf’s high instances of Caesarean Section births. This is now being addressed by a Normal Birth Working Group with the aim of reducing by 1%
each year until the target rate is achieved.
Improved monitoring of reporting of C-sections and associated SSIs.
Established Multidisciplinary Normal Birth Working Group.
Audit of all CS performed in March 2014 to investigate peak.
Continuous audit of all Inductions of Labour.
Birth Environmental audit and refurbishment.
Cohort of Midwives trained to provide Aromatherapy.
Developing MDT Panel to review request for CS.
Developing Midwife Led VBAC Clinic.
Benchmarking practice across Wales.
Introduction of a standard operating procedure (SOP) for pre intra and post-
operative care.
Source: MITS / Public Health Wales (WHAIP)
32% 31%
27%28%
29%
27%
30% 29%
31%
33%
31% 31%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
150
200
250
300
350
May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16
Caesarean
Rate
(%
)
To
tal
Deli
verie
s
Caesarean Section Rates
Grade 4 - Delivery timed to suit woman/team
Grade 3 - No maternal/fetal compromise but needs early delivery
Grade 2 - Maternal/fetal compromise-not immediately life threatening
Grade 1- Immediate threat to life of woman/fetus
Normal Deliveries
Caesarean Rate as a % of hospital births
6 6 6 4 7 3 8 4 3 3 0 50%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Apr-15May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16
SS
I R
ate
Nu
mb
er o
f In
fecti
on
s
Caesarean Section Surgical Site Infection
Number of Infections Cwm Taf Infection Rate All Wales Infection Rate
101
Commissioning
The Information below provides an update on the position at the end of June in relation to services commissioned by Cwm Taf UHB from Cardiff and Vale UHB and also those
services commissioned via WHSSC. The comments to the right of the figures provide a narrative of the current position.
Source: Local
Cwm Taf Commissioner Activity Monitoring- 2015-16 Month 11 Comments
Cardiff Summary
SpecialtyMonth 12
Forecast
Month 12 2014-
15
Increase/
(Decrease)
Plan Act Var Perf (£) Perf (£) Perf (£) Perf (£)
Inpatients 1,744 1,392 (352) (200,688) (190,642) (204,156) 13,514 Increase in elective inpatient activity being seen in Cardiff for surgical
specialties
Daycases/RDAs 2,492 2,653 162 180,539 407,955 348,438 59,516 Early data shows a significant reduction in daycase activity- CT aim to
repatriate haematology activity in 2015-16
Outpatients 18,473 17,458 (1,015) (89,466) (72,827) (69,067) (3,760) Underperformance on the Cardiff contract for medical specialties
CAVOC 95,455 163,133 226,161 (63,028) Underspend currently forecast compared to 14-15
AICU 124,576 124,576 124,576 - Lower AICU performance than in 2014-15 currently forecast
NICE 1,350,607 1,350,607 1,350,607 - Decrease in haematology drugs being offset by increase in MS drugs
Other High Cost 251,746 254,431 256,454 (2,023) Overspend driven by high cost activity
TOTAL 22,708 21,503 (1,205) 1,712,768 2,037,232 2,033,013 4,220
Cardiff Cost and Volume Contract by Specialty
Specialty
Plan Act Var Perf (£) Plan Act Var Perf (£) Plan Act Var Perf (£)
Haematology M11 2014-15 130 199 69 #REF! 352 #REF! #REF! #REF! 1,180 #REF! #REF! #REF!
Haematology M11 2015-16 130 100 (30) (21,348) 352 808 456 108,072 1,180 1,147 (33) (763)
Haematology Increase/(Decrease) 0 (99) (99) #REF! - #REF! #REF! #REF! (0) #REF! #REF! #REF!
Rheumatology M11 2014-15 16 3 (13) #REF! 12 #REF! #REF! #REF! 1,008 #REF! #REF! #REF!
Rheumatology M11 2015-16 16 2 (14) (26,812) 12 154 142 43,302 1,008 663 (345) (15,549)
Rheumatology Increase/(Decrease) (0) (1) (1) #REF! (0) #REF! #REF! #REF! - #REF! #REF! #REF!
WHSSC Monitoring
Plan
(£'000)
Actual
(£'000)
Variance
(£'000)
CT Share
(£'000)
Cardiff & Vale University Health Board 178,633 180,008 1,375 308
Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board 89,453 90,332 879 (11)
Cwm Taf University Health Board 5,803 5,637 (166) (16)
Aneurin Bevan Health Board 3,221 3,070 (151) (3)
Hywel Dda Health Board 285 285 - -
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board Provider 34,924 36,182 1,258 -
Velindre NHS Trust 30,538 31,198 660 122
Welsh Ambulance Service NHS Trust 129,299 129,299 - -
0 - - - -
Non Welsh SLAs 97,132 104,579 7,447 689
IPM & NCA 46,136 50,012 3,876 133
Renal 5,431 5,314 (117) (3)
Unallocated Development and Savings targets 5,081 4,537 (544) (91)
2015/16 Plan Developments 4,907 1,075 (3,832) (494)
Direct Running Costs 4,852 4,600 (252) (27)
Total Expenditure 635,694 646,127 10,433 608
Outpatients
Savings target in 2015-16 to repatriate rheumatology daycase activity looks
to be little progres after 11 months.
Savings target in 2015-16 to repatriate haematology daycase activity looks
to be making significant progres after 11 months
The WHSSC end of year position was significantly overspent at 608k above
the £1.1m that Cwm Taf invested in the WHSSC IMTP
Month 11
Month 12
Contract
Inpatients Daycases/RDAs
102
Commissioning (continued)
The information below provides an update on the position at the end of June in relation to services commissioned by neighbouring Health Boards from Cwm Taf UHB. The
comments to the right of the figures provide a narrative update on the current position.
Source: Local
Cwm Taf Provider Activity Monitoring- 2015-16 Month 11 Comments
Summary Contract Performance
Commissioner
Plan Act Var Perf (£) Plan Act Var Perf (£) Plan Act Var Perf (£)
Aneurin Bevan 5,778 5,620 (158) (275,188) 929 1,382 453 114,087 6,068 5,891 (177) (39,844)
The Health Board continue to overperform for AB against baseline, as expected,
although early indications are that the overperformance is falling as AB
repatriate outpatients to YYF
Cardiff and Vale 1,512 1,219 (298) (52,198) 383 418 35 825 2,052 1,844 (219) (37,527) Month 2 shows some underperformance for Cardiff and Vale
ABMU 582 416 (166) (209,367) 123 245 122 13,866 791 583 (208) (63,514) Both Health Boards aim to repatriate activity in 2015-16. 60% MR negotiated on
this contract
Powys 269 285 16 37,303 98 101 3 7,973 324 340 16 (4,404) The baseline will be updated for 2015-16 to include recurrent overperformance
Hywel Dda 52 46 (6) (3,535) 8 10 2 315 39 45 6 (826) Cwm Taf only have a small contract with Hywel Dda, some underperformance
showing
TOTAL 8,193 7,586 (612) (502,985) 1,541 2,156 615 137,066 9,274 8,703 (582) (146,115)
Contract Performance against RTT Specialties
Specialty
Plan Act Var Perf (£) Plan Act Var Perf (£) Plan Act Var Perf (£)
General surgery 1,367 292 (1,075) (59,141) 95 721 626 (2,300) 936 283 (653) (3,447) Inpatient underperformance primarily delivered for AB
Trauma & Orthopaedics 843 (31) (875) (102,544) 44 1,278 1,234 2,499 1,640 481 (1,159) (3,686) Significant underperformance for IP
ENT 339 55 (285) 2,886 41 454 413 3,421 725 245 (480) (2,999) Some overperformance coming through- AB and ABMU
Ophthalmology 33 13 (21) (14,862) 72 611 539 1,209 860 240 (620) (2,487) Significant daycase overperformance being delivered for AB
Oral Surgery 159 85 (73) (2,088) 45 487 442 3,344 643 163 (480) 8,719 Some overperformance coming through for AB
Cardiology 2 73 71 26,376 53 256 203 5,852 372 87 (285) 27,456 Some overperformance coming through for CV and AB
TOTAL 2,743 487 (2,257) (149,374) 350 3,806 3,456 14,026 5,176 1,499 (3,677) 23,556
Inpatients Daycases New Outpatients
Inpatients Daycases New Outpatients
103
Commissioning (continued) Cwm Taf Residents awaiting treatment at Cardiff and Vale UHB – RTT
(March 2016) Cwm Taf Residents awaiting treatment at Aneurin Bevan UHB – RTT
(April 2016)
The table above depicts the specialty level waiting lists for Cwm Taf patients at Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and also shows the percentage performance against the 36 week target.
It should be noted that the longest waiting & highest volume of patients are within Neurology, Ophthalmology, Neurosurgery, T&O. There are currently 10 patients waiting
>52 weeks- Neurosurgery (2), Ophthalmology (1), Paediatric Surgery (3), T&O (4).
The table above depicts the specialty level waiting lists for Cwm Taf patients at Aneurin Bevan University Health Board and also shows the percentage performance against the 36 week target.
It should be noted that the longest waiting patients are within Orthopaedics with 1 patient waiting 57 weeks and 2 patients in Ophthalmology waiting 53 & 55 weeks.
Source: C&V/AB
104
Glossary
Acronym Detail Explanation
AvLos Average Length of Stay A mean calculated by dividing the sum of inpatient days by the number of patients admissions
C.difficle Clostridium difficile
CHKS Caspe Healthcare Knowledge Systems A Limited Company that is a provider of Healthcare Intelligence.
CTP Care and Treatment Planning
New measure within Mental Health Services
DNA Did not attend outpatient clinic A count of patients that failed to attend an outpatient appointment and did not notify the
hospital in advance.
DSU Delivery and Support Unit The Welsh Government established the Delivery and Support Unit (DSU) to assist National
Health Service (NHS) Wales in delivering the key targets and levels of service expected by both
the Welsh Government and the public of Wales.
DTOC Delayed transfers of care A patient who continues to occupy a hospital bed after his/her ready-for transfer of care date
during the same inpatient episode.
EDDS Emergency Department Data Set A data set which is made up of both injury data and illness data received from each of the Major
Emergency Departments across Wales.
FCE Finished Consultant Episode A period of care under one consultant within one hospital
FTE Full Time Equivalent Number of employed persons as a whole unit
GP Cluster GP Practice Cluster Grouping of GP’s & Practices locally determined by individual Local Health Boards
HAI Hospital Acquired Infection Any infection that occurs during a patient's stay in hospital
HPV Human Papilloma Virus vaccination A vaccination to reduce the incidence of communicable diseases
HONS Heads of Nursing
KSF Knowledge & Skills Framework KSF defines & describes the knowledge & skills NHS staff need to apply in their work to deliver
quality services
LPMHSS Local Primary Mental Health Support
Services
Under provisions of section 2 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010, all local mental
health partners must work jointly to agree a scheme for the provision of mental health
services within the area.
MMR Mumps, Measles, Rubella vaccination A vaccination to reduce the incidence of communicable diseases
MRSA Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
105
Acronym Detail Explanation
MSSA Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus
Mortality Measured as Crude Death Rate
The simplest death rate is the crude death rate & is usually calculated for periods of one year
NIHSS National Institute of Health Stroke Scale The NIH Stroke Scale/Score (NIHSS) quantifies stroke severity based on weighted evaluation
findings.
NISCHR National Institute for Social Care & Health
Research
Welsh Government body that develops, in consultation with partners, strategy and policy for
research in the NHS and social care in Wales.
NUSC Non Urgent Suspected Cancer Patients referred as non-urgent patients but subsequently diagnosed with cancer should start
definitive treatment within 31 days of diagnosis, regardless of the referral route
NWIS
NHS Wales Informatics Service
Have a national role to support NHS Wales to make better use of IT skills & resources
PDR Personal Development Review Process whereby an employee meets at least annually with their manager or nominated
deputy to discuss their performance for the last year, appraise objectives set for the previous
year and agree a Personal Development Plan (PDP) for the coming year
QOF
Quality Outcomes Framework The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) is a voluntary system of financial incentives. It is
about rewarding GP's for good practice through participation in an annual quality improvement
cycle.
RAMI
Risk Adjusted Mortality Index
The NHS uses a number of indicators to measure the quality & safety of healthcare in Wales
RTT Referral to treatment 95% of patients referred to Secondary Care planned care services to receive their treatment within
26 weeks. All patients referred to RTT included services are to receive treatment within 36 weeks of
referral.
TOMS
Theatre Operating Management System Cwm Taf’s local electronic system for managing theatre activity.
UMR Universal Mortality Review Process of reviewing In-Hospital Deaths
USC Urgent Suspected Cancer Patients referred as urgent suspected cancer and subsequently diagnosed with malignant cancer
to start definitive treatment within 62 days of receipt of referral
YTD Year to Date Period commencing 1st April