integrated logistics probe

26
Integrated Logistics PROBE Princeton University, 10/31-11/1

Upload: kolina

Post on 13-Jan-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Integrated Logistics PROBE. Princeton University, 10/31-11/1. Presentation Outline. Defining Logistics Applications and Key Problems Facility Location Known Results Open Problems Hierarchical Network Design Known Results Open Problems. Defining Logistics. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Integrated Logistics PROBE

Princeton University, 10/31-11/1

Page 2: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Presentation OutlineDefining LogisticsApplications and Key ProblemsFacility Location

Known Results Open Problems

Hierarchical Network Design Known Results Open Problems

Page 3: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Defining LogisticsGiven service demands, must satisfy “transporting products” from A to BGoal is to minimize service costAggregation problems

Page 4: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Facility Location Problems Open facilities Each demand near

to some facility Minimize sum or

max distances Some restriction on

facilities to open NP Hard (1.46)

Page 5: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Hierarchical Aggregation More than one level

of “cluster” Basically building a

tree or forest Solve FL over and

over… but don’t want to pay much!

Page 6: Integrated Logistics PROBE

App: Trucking Service

Page 7: Integrated Logistics PROBE

App: Trucking ServiceTalk by Ted Gifford

Schneider LogisticsMulti-Billion dollar industrySolve FL problems

Difficult to determine costs, constraints Often solve problems exactly (IP) Usually ~500-1000 nodes

Page 8: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Open Problems: TruckingOften multi-commodity FLHierarchical, but typically only 3-4 levelsNeed extremely accurate solutions

“average case” bounds?

Page 9: Integrated Logistics PROBE

App: Databases

Page 10: Integrated Logistics PROBE

App: DatabasesTalk by Sudipto Guha

U. Penn, AT&T researchDistributed databases

Determining data placement on networkDatabase Clustering

Many models, measures Many different heuristics!

Page 11: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Open Problems: DatabasesDatabases can be VERY large

“polynomial-time” not good enough Streaming/sampling based approaches

Data may change with time Need fast “update” algorithm

No clear measure of quality “quick and dirty” may be best

Page 12: Integrated Logistics PROBE

App: Genetics

Page 13: Integrated Logistics PROBE

App: GeneticsTalk by Kamesh Munagala

Stanford University, Strand GenomicsFinding patterns in DNA/proteins

Known DNA code, but proteins mysterious Can scan protein content of cells fast Scan is not very accurate though Find patterns in healthy vs. tumor cells

Page 14: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Open Problems: GeneticsHuge amounts of data!

Also, not very accurate, many “mistakes”Try to find separating dimension

Potentially many clusterings, find “best”Really two-step problem

Find best “dimension” of exp. combinations Cluster it, see if it separates

Page 15: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Results: Facility LocationTalk by David Shmoys

Cornell UniversityThree main

paradigms Linear Program

Rounding Primal-Dual Method Local Search

Page 16: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Results: Facility LocationTalk by Kamal Jain

Microsoft ResearchTalk by Mohammad Mahdian

MITBest approximation: 1.52

Primal-dual based “greedy” algorithm Solve LP to find “worst-case” approx

Page 17: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Results: Facility LocationTalk by Martin Pal

Cornell UniversityProblem of FL with hard capacitiesO(1) via local searchOpen: O(1) via primal-dual or LP?

What is LP gap? Often good to have “lower bound”

Page 18: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Results: Facility LocationTalk by Ramgopal Mettu

Dartmouth UniversityFAST approximations for k-median

O(nk) constant approx Repeated sampling approach

Compared to DB clustering heuristics Slightly slower, much more accurate

Page 19: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Open Problems: FLEliminate the gap!

1.52 vs. 1.46, VERY close Analysis of Mahdian is tight Maybe time to revisit lower bound?

K-Median Problem Local search gives 3, improve?

Load Balanced Problem Exact on the lower bounds?

Page 20: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Results: Network Design Talk by Adam Meyerson

CMU

O(log n) for single-sink O(log n log log n) for

one function O(1) for one sink, one

function

Page 21: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Results: Network DesignTalk by Kunal Talwar

UC Berkeley

Improved O(1) for one sink, function LP rounding

Page 22: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Results: Network DesignConnected Facility Location

Talks by Anupam Gupta Lucent Research, CMU

Chaitanya Swamy Cornell University

Give 9-approx for the problem Greedy, primal-dual approaches

Page 23: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Results: Network DesignTalk by Amitabh Sinha

CMUCombining Buy-at-bulk with FL

O(log n) immediate, but what about O(1)?O(1) for one cable type, small constantO(1) in generalWhat about capacitated? K-med?

Page 24: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Open Problems: NDMulti-commodity, multiple function

No nontrivial approximations known!O(1) for single sink?

LP gap not even known!O(1) for single function?

Cannot depend on tree embeddingMake the constants reasonable!Euclidean problem: easier?

Page 25: Integrated Logistics PROBE

ConclusionsMany applications and open problems!Must get in touch with DB community…Workshop was a success, but…

Need more OR participation Too short notice for faculty?

Plan another workshop, late March Hope to have some more solutions!

Page 26: Integrated Logistics PROBE

Thanks to Princeton

Local Arrangements by Moses Charikar + Mitra Kelly