innovation leadership training day four evaluation roles february 20, 2009 all materials ©...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
212 views
TRANSCRIPT
Innovation Leadership TrainingDay Four
Evaluation Roles
February 20, 2009
All materials © NetCentrics 2008 unless otherwise noted
Welcome• In this section of the innovation process
training we’ll examine the roles and teams necessary to ensure a complete evaluation and selection
What We Want to Accomplish
Goals for this section
• Our goal this section– Examine the roles and responsibilities within the
evaluation process– Understand the insights and skills necessary– Understand the commitment required to
complete each activity
Key Points
• While a process is important, people define the process and do the real work– There are a number of roles that are necessary
and a range of perspectives and knowledge required
• These individuals need to understand their roles and the work they will be called on to do– The roles must be defined and people recruited
and trained to accomplish these tasks
Roles
• As pre-work for the class today we recommended a white paper on Innovation roles and also Tom Kelly’s book on innovation roles
• Any thoughts or comments coming out of the reading?
Teams and Roles
• There are at least six significant categories of teams or roles in most successful innovation programs– Central innovation team – responsible for organization and
coordination– Trend spotters– Idea generator or submitter – responsible for entering the idea– Evaluator (usually as part of a team)– Selection team / Steering– Sponsor / Adopter
Corporate Assistance
the provost
Central Team
• The central innovation team exists to sponsor innovation and encourage a common approach– They address training and cultural issues related to
innovation– They provide a common innovation process and
framework
Central Team
• This team has several other responsibilities:– Generate and cultivate disruptive ideas– Act as a coach or facilitator to innovation in the
departments– Provide visibility to innovation throughout the
University of the Pacific– Assist in the capture and synthesis of trends and
customer insights
Innovation Locations
CEO
VP VPMkt
R&D ProductGroup
You
VPFinance
ProductGroup
ProductGroup
BusinessPartner
CIT
White Space
Central Team
• Generally, the central team is a small, full time team responsible for creating a consistent innovation capability
• The team may consist of 3 to 5 full time individuals and leverage a broad portfolio of virtual team members or subject matter experts
Trend Spotters / Scouts
• Who is responsible for keeping a close eye on the environmental and demographic trends and competitive movements?
• More importantly, who translates that data into useable information?
Idea Submitters
• This role can be filled by virtually anyone in the company as part of a brainstorm or a campaign
• The role is an exceptionally ad-hoc role, since anyone can be involved and ideation does not belong to one group or individual
Idea Evaluators
• Most idea evaluators will remain in their regular jobs but will be called on to help evaluate or create business plans for selected ideas
• They will need basic training in the innovation program and must provide a considerable amount of time investigating and evaluating ideas
• There may be a consistent set of evaluators and a floating set of subject matter experts
“Brain Troopers”
Selection / Steering
• A steering team or selection team is necessary to identify the best ideas and assign those ideas to departments and provide additional funding as necessary
• These individuals will represent the major departments
• They will review business cases for new ideas and help determine which ideas move forward
Sponsor / Adopter
• An idea can be “sponsored” by a department. In this regard the originating team requests additional review and evaluation, but the idea is “owned” by the sponsoring team
• An idea can be “adopted” by a department. An idea may have been generated but is not necessarily sponsored or owned by a department.
What is required for these roles
• We should consider how the people who fill these roles are:– Evaluated and compensated– Trained to be effective– Assigned to their roles– Provided the processes and information systems
necessary to succeed
Evaluation / Compensation
• Since the individuals who fill these roles are asked to contribute significant time to the innovation process, we must consider their compensation and how they are evaluated
• If the evaluation criteria is not changed, then the individuals will revert to their regular jobs and can’t/won’t participate
Training
• For many of these roles, especially evaluators, it is important to provide training so there is a consistent application of the evaluation criteria and people understand what is expected of them within the process
Advocates
• There is one other role that we believe is exceptionally important
• We call the role an innovation advocate• This is a person who can contribute in many
different ways to an innovation program and is viewed as a leader in his/her department
• The advocate helps and encourages others in his/her team to innovate
Advocate
• Your team is a great example of what we think of when we deploy an advocate program– You are all recognized leaders– You will have a basic understanding of the entirety
of the innovation program– You may be called on to participate in any of the
roles we’ve discussed
• We hope you’ll advocate innovation and act as a facilitator for your team or department
Recapping
• Throughout today we’ve reviewed the innovation process, phases and roles
• Our goal is to introduce you to the entire process, not make you an expert in the process
• We also want you to understand the value and importance of the central team, as well as the key role of part time participants such as idea submitters, evaluators and steering teammembers
Questions?
More Reading
• Ten Faces of Innovation by Tom Kelley• Innovation Roles white paper from OVO
Homework
• For our last class, please review:– The Future of Management by Gary Hamel– Think Better by Tim Hurson– Project Red Stripe by Andrew Carey