ingas project – year 2 review meeting
DESCRIPTION
INGAS project – Year 2 Review Meeting. Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011. Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011. Reply to Technical Review Report for Period 2 issued by Reviewers: Written responses Revised 24 months Periodic Report - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011
INGAS project – Year 2 Review Meeting
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 2
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Time Item Name (Company)
09:00 Answers to general comments / questions
General status of the project
Coordinator Massimo Ferrera (CRF)
PM Stefania Zandiri (CRF)
10:00 SPA1: answers to reviewers comments/questions Andrea Gerini (CRF)
10:45 SPA2: answers to reviewers comments/questions Alois Fuerhapter (AVL), Harry Schüle (CONTI)
11:30 SPA3: answers to reviewers comments/questions Christoph Bollig (FEV), Bertold Hüchtebrock (FEV), Kenth Johansson (SAPT), Martin Müther (RWTH)
12:30 Lunch
13:00 SPB0: answers to reviewers comments/questions Manfred Hoppe (EON), Michal Takats (CVUT)
Micheline Montero (GDF SUEZ)
13:45 SPB1: answers to reviewers comments/questions David Storer (CRF), Volker Strubel (Xperion)
15:00 SPB2: answers to reviewers comments/questions Michel Weibel (DAI), Matthias Rink (USTUTT), Alois Fuerhapter (AVL)
16:30 End of reviewers meeting
17:30 Feedback of the reviewers & PO to the Core Group
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 3
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Reply to Technical Review Report for Period 2 issued by Reviewers:
1)Written responses
2)Revised 24 months Periodic Report
3)New version of rejected deliverables
4)Release of some delayed deliverables
Answers
Deliverables Period 2
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 4
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Common methodology to compare the 3 engine technology approaches
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 5
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Common methodology to compare the 3 engine technology approaches
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 6
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Common methodology to compare the 3 engine technology approaches
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 7
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Common methodology to compare the 3 engine technology approaches
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 8
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Common methodology to compare the 3 engine technology approaches
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 9
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Common methodology to compare the 3 engine technology approaches
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 10
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Common methodology to compare the 3 engine technology approaches
This methodology has been approved by PO and reviewers on October 2010
INGAS Targets
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 11
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Competitiveness vs benchmark
A comparison with a certain vehicle available today in the market is feasible only if vehicle parameters are well known and applied at the same time to all technologies considered inside INGAS project. Moreover current NG engines available into the market show a gap compared to gasoline ones that can be overcome only thanks to technologies developed in INGAS project.
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 12
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Competitiveness vs benchmark
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 13
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Emission targets
As written in table 3 of original and last amended versions of INGAS DoW, all demonstrators of INGAS Project have to comply with emission limits halved respect to Euro 6
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 14
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Cost assessment of different technologies
INGAS Consortium agrees that the control of costs of NG powered vehicles is a critical issue and we have scheduled in the final assessment / comparison of the 3 engine technology platforms to carry out a cost evaluation of innovative developed technologies, but before to manage this issue it’s mandatory to freeze the technologies to apply on final demonstrators.
Therefore the Consortium will provide a cost evaluation according to the list of technologies developed in INGAS project and mentioned above by Reviewers. This activity SP by SP will be carried only in the 3rd year of the project after the completion of definition of integrated technologies to apply on final demonstrators.
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 15
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
Choice of monofuel approach
The main scope of INGAS project is to develop technologies to apply on engines running only on NG and therefore the focus it to optimize and to maximize the exploitation of NG features to reduce fuel consumption and CO2 and to increase the performances.This approach is based on the hypothesis of a short term development of refuelling station network suitable for CNG monofuel vehicles. If this event won’t occur due to lack of adequate infrastructure available in the near future, there’s no chance that INGAS project can change this status because out of its scope according to contractual documents (i.e. DoW).
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 16
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011
Reviewed INGAS GANTT (1/2)
17
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
WP
SP
A3
WP
WP
WP
WP
SP
A2
WP
WP
WP
SP
A1
WP
WP
WP
WP
WP
A3.4 Vehicle Testing and Potential Evaluation
A3.1 Concept phase and design specifications
A3.2 Components, Engine Design and Procurement
A3.3 Component, Engine and Powertrain Testing
A2.4 Combustion System Development
A2.5 Transient Engine Testing
A2.6 Vehicle Validator
A1.5 Global assessment on the validator vehicle
A2.1 Engine Layout
WP
WP
A2.2 Injection System Development
A2.3 Hardware Procurement
A1.1 Base engine development
A1.4 Aftertreatment system development
A1.2 Engine control system development and calibration
A1.3 Combustion process investigations
Month
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
MA1.1
MA1.2
MA1.3
MA2.1
MA2.2
MA2.3
MA3.1,.2,.3
MA2.2
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011
Reviewed INGAS GANTT (2/2)
18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
Year 4
Month
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
SP
B0
WP B0.1 Determination of gas composition range, WTT calculations
WP B0.2 Numerical Simulations on the influence of gas quality on engine operation
WP B0.3 Supply of limit gases
WP B0.4 Engine tests on gas quality impacts
WP B0.5 Evaluation of gas quality identification methods for advanced CNG engines.
WP B0.6 Final assessment & WTW analysis
SP
B1
WP B1.1 CNG Storage System Requirements
WP B1.2 Development & validation of light weight, low cost composite vessels
WP B1.3 Advanced storage system components
WP B1.4 Storage Module Concepts
WP B1.5 Advanced CNG Vehicle Concepts
WP B2.4 Engine Testing/EAT System Management
SP
B2
WP B2.1 Requirements/boundary conditions
WP
B2.3 Exhaust heating/Catalyst Concepts
B2.2 Advanced Catalyst Development
WP
WP B2.5 EAT system integration / optimisation
MB0.1
MB0.2
MB1.1
MB1.2
MB1.4
MB2.1
MB2.2
MB2.3
MB1.3
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 19
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
SPA2 - Answers to Reviewer Comments
SP A2 Presentation
CONTI Presentation
INGAS INtegrated GAS PowertrainINGAS INtegrated GAS Powertrain
INGAS - 2° review meeting c/o EUCAR (Brussels) – 8 April 2011 20
Review meeting Period 2 – Brussels, 8 April 2011
SPB0 - Answers to Reviewer Comments
SP B0 Presentation