infrastructure working council meeting: presentations 1 presentations oct2014.pdf · ‐ i will...

October 2014

Infrastructure Working CouncilMeeting: Presentations

Day One

‐ Supporter of OCPP since 2010. V1, 1.2 and 1.5

‐ First charging network that is OpenADR 2.0b certified

‐ The use of open standards gives us a solid base to develop and innovate applications around payment, smart charging, and to enable different business models for public charging (example: credit cards swipes)

‐ SKY is our real‐time network management cloud

‐ Our driver‐facing solutions include credit card payments with the mobile app and support for EZ‐charge, which is quickly gaining traction as de facto roaming standard

2

‐ There are many flavors of smart charging

‐ I will focus on technical pathways to implement demand management of EV charging, and leave out V2G and dynamic pricing

‐ 3 main pathways to control the charging load

‐ 1: direct load control of the EVSE, either with a direct backend connection to the DRMS or utility; or via an existing AMI; or even a local smart controller like a home gateway

‐ 2: let the vehicle decide, based on real‐time grid conditions, communicated over the wire using HP‐GP. This method can leverage standards like SEP2 and OADR all the way to the car

‐ 3: another form of vehicle‐side control, but this time over the air using telematics, like the OEM central server pilot seeks to demonstrate

‐ Our project with EPRI focused on #1 and #2

3

‐ In early 2012, we met with EPRI and recognized a need to demonstrate off the shelf EVSE using smart energy standards (then emerging) to demonstrate that smart charging can be done

‐ We iterated back and forth for a few months, and put together a scope that would demonstrate 2 things:

‐ 1) a straightforward EVSE using OCPP, showing that the standard met all core functionalities and was flexible enough to accommodate additional features like a retractable cable, without needing major redevelopment

‐ 2) take a commercially available EVSE and using emerging HP‐GP boards and a Linux controller, and enable it to understand SEP2 and relay it via the pilot wire to the vehicle, while preserving the J1772 charging functionality

‐ This was a challenge because there were no HP‐GP modules commercially available yet, and SEP2 was a standard that was being finalized as we developed the project scope

4

• Thru open standards, we are able to provide a platform that can interoperate with disparate standards, while maintaining one front‐end to the grid operator

• Our OpenADR2.0b certification allows us to plug‐in to DR programs seamlessly and system allows management by groups (sites, feeder level or other logical groups)

• Key part which many pilots overlook is customer engagement. Critical because of learning curve to consumer and need to allow override at any time, especially with EV charging

9

1© 2014 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Potential Revenue Flow

Host Subsidy

User Fees

Advertising Revenue

Other Subsidy

Network Fees

Energy/Demand Charges

Maintenance

Repair

Management

Installation Cost

Charge Station or Charge

Site

$One time/Recurring

One time/Recurring

Recurring

Recurring

Recurring

Recurring

Recurring

Recurring

One time

One time/Recurring

Station ActivationOne time

Land/Parking Access

One time/recurring


Business Models in Vehicle ChargingPublic Access/Workplace/Multi-unit Dwelling (MuD)

a) Provide Components (hardware/access/billing,etc.) – Freestyle assemblies – Operating and Maintenance provided/coordinated by host location

Clipper Creek, Liberty Access Tech., Aerovironment,

b) Membership Models – Annual or fee for transaction – Access control, Billing provided,

ChargePoint, Blink,

c) Subscription Models – Monthly fee for predefined access – O&M and administration provided

NRG/eVgo,

d) Others - Greenlots?,

Restricted © Siemens AG 2013 All rights reserved.

Italy E-Car Project


EPRI Electric Transportation WorkshopOctober 22, [email protected]


E-Car Drivers in Italy

Page 2


Italy E-Car Market Forecasts

Page 3


… anche per la rete di distribuzione

Load reduction during peak hours Recharging during off-peak hours Follow renewable production

E-Cars as a Smart Grid building block

Italy figures (2012): 20 GW of renewable 45 GW of peak

Electromobility Vision: Zero emissions


Parking facilities in Italy

Page 5


Reference business models

Page 6


DSO Charging unit

owners

Energy VendorService Provider

Market actors view:“Distribution System Operators (DSOs)” are key enablers

CORPORATE USER

MUNICIPALITY OEM

eCar Operation Center


System architecture view

Page 8


Enel charging units

Page 9


Enel charging units – socket

Page 10


Enel charging units – metering

Page 11


Enel charging units – customer ID

Page 12


Enel charging units – communications

Page 13


Siemens E-Car operation center:Data and transactions

Operation CenterRecharge and meter data

Diagnostics and Alarms

Customer data

Interoperability between different CUs and customer!

Reservation and remote start

CU and Driver data


eCar OC (IT) eCar OC (ES)

Clearing House (like Hubject)

eCar OC Enel eCar OC Endesa

Siemens E-Car operation center :Roaming

Endesa Charging units

Enel Charging units

Compliant to new standard defined by European Green Emotion

Endesa Customer

Enel customer

OR


System security

Security audit regulary performed

All system interfaces are protected with secure protocols (https, IPSec)

Access to the system is secured with username/password and OTP via sms

Aspetti di Sicurezza InformaticaAnalizzati e suddivisi in Macro-TematicheThreat modelling and Analisys

CU FE

BE

OCWebPortal

Aspetti di Sicurezza InformaticaAnalizzati e suddivisi in Macro-TematicheAnalysis area of security positioning


Operator interface


Charging Unit commands


Alarm management


Customer view – mobile phone applications


Customer view – web


Enel project status

Page 22

• 1800 Charging Units• 3000 customers/subscriptions managed• Key commercial customers

•Poste Italiane• Hera Group (energy, environmental services)

• Globally•Endesa• Chile• Brazil


Industries: AREVA T&D, Better Place, Bosch, IBM, SAP, Siemens

Utilities: Dansk Energy, EDF, Endesa, Enel, ESB, Eurelectric, Iberdrola, RWE, PPCElectric Vehicle Manufacturers:BMW, Daimler, Micro-Vett, Nissan, RenaultMunicipalities: Barcelona, Berlin Bornholm, Copenhagen, Cork, Dublin, Malaga, Malmö, RomeResearch Institutions and Universities: Cartif, Cidaut, DTU, ECN, Imperial, IREC, RSE, TCD, TECNALIAEV Technology Institutions: DTI, FKA, TÜV Nord

MISSION Development and demonstration of a unique and user-friendly framework for green electro-mobility

European electro-mobility project consortium


Thank you!

Chris KingChief Global Regulatory OfficerSiemens Smart [email protected]


ANSI Electric Vehicles Standards Panel: Preliminary Progress Report

Jim McCabeSenior Director, Standards FacilitationAmerican National Standards Institute

EPRI IWC MeetingOctober 22, 2014

Objective

EVSP will publish before end 2014 progress report

Efforts to address gaps identified in Standardization Roadmap Version 2.0 (May 2013)

New gaps identified (gap = no published standard addressing issue)

Other significant activity in relevant issue areas

This is a preliminary report subject to change prior to publication

Standards compendium also being updated

Slide 2ANSI Electric Vehicles Standards Panel

Breakdown of Gaps

62 issues explored; 13 of which no gap found

5 new gaps identified

3 gaps previously reported closed

1 gap previously reported closed re-opened

1 additional gap closed

45 total gaps open

29 are near-term priorities (0-2 years)

15 are mid-term priorities (2-5 years)

1 is a long-term priority (5+ years)

Approximately 400 standards identified from 40 organizations

ANSI Electric Vehicles Standards Panel Slide 3

New Gap – Crash Test Lab Safety Guidelines

Gap: Need laboratory guidance and instruction to help mitigate risks to personnel, equipment, and facilities that may exist in event of catastrophic failure of the battery system

Recommendation: Complete work to develop an Information Report (SAE J3040) that can be readily available to any crash test laboratory conducting, or planning to conduct full scale crash tests on EV/HEVs


New Gap – Coordination of Wireless Charging Communication Standards

Gap: Automotive manufacturers do not want to support three separate activities dealing with the same issue. Initiative underway to understand how work can be done once or divided between ISO, IEC and SAE. No clear cut technology solution right now.

Recommendation: Organizations developing standards, guidelines or use cases related to wireless charging communications should coordinate their activities in order to avoid duplication of effort, assure alignment, and maximize efficiency.

EMC aspects also being looked atSlide 5ANSI Electric Vehicles Standards Panel

New Gap – EV Coupler Safety –Overheating

Gap: Connectors are overheating in the field. (Compatibility issues between connectors and inlets from different suppliers, different contact materials, types and ratings. Reasons unclear.)

Recommendation: Address connectors overheating in the field

Various groups looking at issue: IEC, ISO, SAE, UL, NIST


New Gap – Certification Standards for Mobile Inverters

Gap: UL 1741 safety standard for grid-connected inverters not appropriate for distributed inverter systems in an EV. New standard needed for on-board inverter systems. UL 2594 is safety standard for EVSE connected to an EV with on-board charger but does not cover interconnection to EV with on-board inverter

Recommendation: Create SAE J3072 to ensure an EV on-board inverter system can be safely interconnected to the electric power system. Modify UL 9741 to serve as the standard for an EVSE which is interoperable with an EV inverter system which conforms to SAE J3072.


New Gap – Mobile Inverters: Interconnection Agreements

Gap: There are no simple utility procedures to approve an EV with an on-board inverter to interconnect to the grid.

Recommendation: Coordinate an approach with utilities and federal and state government agencies on how an EV with an on-board inverter can be approved to discharge at a specific EVSE location.


Significant Update to Gap – Vehicle asSupply / Reverse Power Flow

Gap: Differences exist between DER model in SAE J2836/3TM, IEC/TR 61850-90-7, IEC/TR 61850-90-8, and SEP 2.0.

Update: SAE J2836/3TM functionality aligns with SEP 2.0, now published by IEEE

SAE worked with EPRI to align Version 3 of Common Functions for Smart Inverters report with SAE J2836/3TM

IEC using EPRI V3 report to update DER model contained in IEC 61850-7-420 rather than flow it using an interim technical report, such as IEC/TR 61850-90-8 or 90-9. This part of the gap will be closed once IEC 61850-7-420 is published.


Gap Previously Reported Closed Re-opened – Power Quality

Gap: SAE J2894/1 on requirements for power quality was published in December 2011. At the time of publication of roadmap version 2.0, SAE J2894, Part 2, on test methods was still in development.

Recommendation: Complete work on SAE J2894, Part 2.

Ballot closed end of September with favorable result

Gap will be closed once SAE J2894/2 is published


Additional Gap Closed – Packaging andTransport of Waste Batteries

Gap: Current standards and regulations do not adequately cover transportation aspects of waste batteries (damaged, aged, sent for repair, end-of-life) in terms of packaging, loading limitations, combination with other dangerous goods on same transport, etc.

Recommendation: Need a harmonized approach toward communication, labeling, packaging restrictions, and criteria for determining when a battery is waste.

Gap closed with approval of new UN regulation on transport of dangerous goods


Other Notable Activity – Power Levelsand Batteries

Work re-started on power rating standards SAE J2907 and 9088

DOT/NHTSA-funded SAE Cooperative Research Project (CRP) to Develop Repeatable Safety Performance Test Procedures for Rechargeable Energy Storage Systems (RESS) should conclude by end November; report expected Spring 2015

SAE J2984, Identification of Transportation Battery Systems for Recycling Recommended Practice, published

SAE J2974, Technical Information Report on Automotive Battery Recycling, out for ballot

UL 1974 on secondary life applications for batteries proposed


Other Notable Activity – ChargingSystems / EVSE Interoperability

IEC 61851-23 and IEC 61851-24 were published dealing with DC EV charging stations and digital communication for DC charging

IEC 62196-1 and IEC 62196-3 were published on general and dimensional requirements for EV couplers

SAE J1772TM combo coupler configuration included in IEC 62916-3

Differences exist between SAE and IEC standards in terms of allowing AC and DC charging to occur on same contact pins

SAE J2953, parts 1 and 2, published on requirements and test procedures for interoperability between PEV and EVSE


Other Notable Activity –Communications for EV Charging

Several standards of SAE task force on PEV / EVSE communications published or nearing publication

ISO 15118, parts 1 and 2, on vehicle to grid communication interfaces also published

Multiple Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) working on standardization of locating and reserving charging stations and inter-provider protocols for various aspects of EV roaming (NEMA et al.)


Other Notable Activity – Communication& Measurement of Energy Consumption

NEMA continuing to develop guide for EVSE embedded metering and communication

NIST U.S. National Work Group on Measuring Systems for Electric Vehicle Fueling and Submetering (USNWG EVF&S) continuing work on proposed requirements for commercial electricity-measuring devices

Uniform Regulation for the Method of Sale of Electricity Sold as a Vehicle Fuel adopted by National Conference on Weights and Measures (NCWM) and published in NIST Handbook 130

USNWG EVF&S developing a draft device code for review and possible national adoption, and field test requirements and test procedures

SGIP PAP22 coordinating with these activities


Other Notable Activity – Privacy, Security; Customer to PEV Comm.

Cyber Security and Data Privacy

Work on SAE J2931/7 re-started

ISO 15118-1 published

SGIP and NIST reviewing comments on Draft NISTIR 7628 Rev 1

Customer to PEV Communications

SAE J2836/5TM will identify use cases for customer convenience functions and network synchronization


Other Notable Activity – Installation Issues

National Electrical Code ® (NEC®) Article 625 amended that when an automatic load management system is used, the maximum load on a feeder or service shall be the maximum load permitted by the automatic load management system

Proposals were approved by the ICC A117.1 committee for technical criteria on how to make an EV charging station accessible

Modifications made to Article 625 of NEC® to define a cable management system and related to height of cables; work in progress to address output cable ampacity


Other Notable Activity – Fire Protectionand Stranded Energy

NFPA Fire Protection Research Foundation published report on best practices for emergency response to incidents involving EV battery hazards

NHTSA and Argonne NL project to develop universal diagnostic and battery discharge system (including methods of diagnosing / extracting stranded energy) should be completed by Nov 2014 with report due in Spring 2015; Sandia NL and Idaho NL also working on diagnostic strategy

Not much progress on SAE J3009 on stranded energy but committee restarting with a new chair


Other Notable Activity – WorkforceTraining

DOE clean cities issued funding opportunity announcement that includes alternative fuel training for emergency first responders, public safety officials, critical service providers

DOE clean cities also working on a zoning codes and ordinances website for community, municipal and state planning officials

NFPA received DHS grant to develop training modules for EV and hybrid commercial trucks, buses, medium sized delivery vehicles

NFPA expanding first responder training to law enforcement, EMS including best practices on stranded energy

UL offering training related to EV infrastructure installation


American National Standards Institute

Headquarters New York Office1899 L Street, NW 25 West 43rd Street11th Floor 4th FloorWashington, DC 20036 New York, NY 10036

T: 202.293.8020 T: 212.642.4900 F: 202.293.9287 F: 212.398.0023

www.ansi.orgwebstore.ansi.org

www.nssn.org

Jim McCabeSenior Director,

Standards [email protected]: 1-212-642-8921

www.ansi.org/evsp

LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/pub/jim-mccabe/12/a78/742/

The Wide WideWorld of Parking Payments

Payments are an up‐close and personal engagement

with our clients.

Payments…

Provide choices

Provide convenience

Reflect your customer service

Are your best chance to provide a lasting impression

HISTORY OF PARKING

PAYMENTS

HISTORY OF PARKING PAYMENTSCREDIT CARDS

HISTORY OF PARKING PAYMENTSTOLL AUTHORITY INTEGRATION

HISTORY OF PARKING PAYMENTS“M” PAYMENTS

HISTORY OF PARKING PAYMENTSNON‐PROPRIETARY WALLETS

ISIS

THE COST OF ACCEPTING PAYMENTS

• Processing fees

• Network / clearing agency fees

• Verification of bank statements

• Credit card terminal costs

• PCI compliance costs

• Upkeep of CC units in automated units

COST OF ACCEPTING PAYMENTS

CREDIT CARD PROCESSING

• Cost of special infrastructure

• Cost of instruction signage

• Transaction fees

• Specialized audit practices

• Exception transaction processing


“M” PAYMENT & PROPRIETARY APPS

• Cost of special infrastructure/terminals

• Cost of instruction signage

• Transaction fees –situationally dependent


ELECTRONIC WALLETS

OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

PHYSICAL SECURITY ‐ TRANSACTIONAL SECURITY

EXTERNAL INFLUENCES

Compliance Requirement• PCI DSS 3.0 November 2013

EMV Specification• Processing specifications V2.2 June 2012

Timelines• Acceptance of EMV payments April 2013• Liability shifts October 2015*

EXTERNAL INFLUENCES

Card Types for Physical Transactions

• Magnetic Strip

• Embedded Chip

• Contactless

• Pin and Chip

• Pin and Signature

OPTIONS CAN BE CONFUSING

• The more choices the more opportunity for confusion

• Signage must be crystal‐clear

• Customer must understand convenience fees and limitations of various options

• Different customers can benefit from different option – based on• Age

• Location

• Other demographic data

• Purpose

SUCESSFUL COMMUNICATIONS TO YOUR PATRONS

Clear

Concise

Intuitive

Consistent

Legible

EXTERNAL INFLUENCES

HUGE GROWTH EXPECTED IN MOBILE TRANSACTION VOLUMEBetween 2011 and 2016

42%Average Annual Growth

$617 BillionMarket by 2016

Source: Gartner

THE FUTURE

NON‐TRADITIONAL PAYMENT OPTIONS

• Continued growth of non‐traditional payment methods

• Pay‐by‐electronic device• PayPal• End of 2006 there were 133 million accounts (most active)

• PayPal processes more transactions annually than American Express!

• Smart Cards and the “e‐Wallet”• Google Wallet

HOW DOES THIS IMPACT CHARGING STATIONS?

• Consider the payment options being used on site.

• Swipe

• Contactless

• Mobile payment

• Network / loyalty

• Mobile Payment

• Phone

• Vehicle

• E wallet

Questions and Comments

Thank you!

H-GAC Funding for Vehicles & Infrastructure

National Electric Transportation Infrastructure Working Council Electric Power Research Institute

Introduction – Houston-Galveston Area Council

• H-GAC is the regional Council of Governments through which local governments consider issues and cooperate in solving area-wide problems.

• H-GAC also serves as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for Fort Bend, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery, Chambers, Brazoria, Matagorda and Waller Counties.

Regional Air Quality

Ground Level Ozone

• “Severe” non-attainment under 1997 standard

• “Marginal” under the 2008

standard

Fine Particle Pollution (PM2.5)

• Currently classified “attainment” but near standard

Source: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Ground-level ozone is the region’s most prevalent air pollutant:

Clean Cities Program • Originally created in 1994, it is one of almost 100 US

Department of Energy designated Clean Cities Coalitions across the nation

• Mission is to reduce air pollution by promoting and facilitating the usage of alternative fuels, advanced vehicle technologies, and fuel conservation strategies

Clean Cities Program Activities • Staffed by the H-GAC air quality group, the program

works closely with H-GAC's Clean Vehicles Program and other funding initiatives, in order to assist organizations in secure funding for alternative fuel projects

• Recipe for Fueling Diversity of Alternative Fuels Project – DOE grant for education, training and outreach of regional alternative fueling infrastructure

• Zero-Emission Cargo Transportation Project – DOE grant for the purchase and deployment of all-electric medium/heavy-duty delivery vehicles (open call for projects)

Clean Cities Information Resources

www.afdc.energy.gov

http://www.afdc.energy.gov/�

Clean Vehicles Program

• Provides grant assistance to public and private fleets for replacement of old, higher-polluting heavy-duty vehicles

• Supported mainly through federal CMAQ and Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP) funds

Funding Type Available Amount CMAQ (Congestion Mitigation Air Quality)

$3 million (renewed annually)

Vehicle replacement projects receive approximately:

• $40,000-$50,000 per heavy-duty engine replaced

• $1,000-$10,000 per light-duty engine replaced

Infrastructure projects receive approximately:

• 40-50% of eligible equipment

Clean Vehicles Funding Availability

Regional Texas Emission Reduction Plan

• TERP funds available: $2.9 million

• The Regional TERP provides grants to local governments for the replacement of non-road and on-road heavy duty diesel vehicles

• Local governments eligibility: Up to 100% of Incremental costs, 80% Replacement of vehicle or nonroad

• Cost effectiveness cap of $10,000/ton of NOx reduced

• EPA Diesel Emission Reduction Act (DERA) programs has awarded H-GAC funding for the replacement of marine engine and construction equipment upgrades.

• Program will be administered through a Call for Projects.

Project Type Amount Available

Reimbursement Rate

Marine Equipment and Installation

$193,536 Up to 40%

Nonroad (Construction) Equipment

$552,000 Up to 25%

Marine and Nonroad (Construction Equipment) Funding

2013: Vehicle/Engine Replacement Programs NOx Reductions (tons)

Marine (80)

Buses (3.2)

Trucks (260)

2013 Total: 343.2 Tons

Clean Air Champions

• Recognizes businesses, local governments and other organizations

• 110 companies/local governments designated since inception

• 2013: 24 Clean Air Champions designated

For more information visit: www.mysolutionis.com Contact: Kelli Angelone [email protected] 713-993-2444

http://www.mysolutionis.com/�

mailto:[email protected]�

Demand Management for

Plug in Vehicle Charging

IWC Meeting – Houston, TX

Presented by: Barbara M. GonzalezOctober 22, 2014

2

Agenda About Us Vehicles in Maryland Maryland’s EV Initiatives Demand Management for Plug-in Vehicle Charging

• Our Program & Rates• Outreach Efforts & Program Status• Technology

– Architecture– Installations– Communications & Security

Moving Forward Q & A

3

Pepco Quick Facts

• First incorporated in 1896• Service territory: 640 square miles• Customers served: 801,000

– Washington, D.C.: 264,000 – Montgomery County: 312,000– Prince George’s County: 225,000

• Population served: 2.2 million• Employees: 1,429• Facilities: 9• Substations: 150

4

Recent Efforts Completed our participation in EPRI / Ford Escape PHEV

Program Completed the DOE/Chevy Volts program in fleet Installed Charging Stations

Level 2 Level 13 Edison Place 5 Edison Place1 NCRO 1 NCRO1 Bay Region 1 Bay2 ACE 2 ACE2 Rockville 2 RSC1 Forestville 1 FSC1 Benning 1 Benning

Pilot for an EV program in MD Established EV Leadership

• Board Member of Electric Drive Transportation Association• MD Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Council• MD PSC EV Working Group• EPRI Advisor & Infrastructure Working Council

Continue to support standards as well as State regulatory and legislative efforts to prepare for PEVs

5

Vehicles by County

An increase of 32% over a year period.

6

Maryland’s Efforts

Maryland Senate Bill 179Goals

– Increase reliability & efficiency of the electric distribution system– Lower electricity use at time of high demand (peak)Incentives TOU Pricing Credits on Distribution Charges Rebates on the Costs of Charging Systems Demand Response Programs Other Programs as approved

Maryland PSC Case No. 9261 Created a Working Group with major stakeholders Issued the Final Report (Feb 13, 2012) Focused on reliability and promoting “off peak” charging Developed consensus for desirable elements of a pilot (Pilot Framework)

7

The Working Group Defined Framework for Evaluating Proposed Pilot Programs

8

Our Program In a Picture

9

Rates• Whole House Time of Use (R-PIV)• PIV Only – Time of Use rate for the PIV• PIV Green – Renewable Energy Adder for PIV Only

PIV & Whole House TOU :Peak: 12:00 PM – 8:00 PM

Off-peak: 8 PM – 12 PM; and all hours weekends and holidaysRates are designed to be revenue neutral

1PIV Only Rate will require the installation of a separate AMI meter to measure the charger consumption

10

Renewable Adder to PIV Only Rate

PIV Green

Summer Winter

On‐Peak $0.20612 $0.18853

Off‐Peak $0.09650 $0.08463

PIV Only

Summer Winter

On‐Peak $0.18822 $0.17063

Off‐Peak $0.07860 $0.06673

Adds $0.0179/kWhto PIV rate

■ The purpose of this option is to test whether customers will be willing to apply savings to claim zero tailpipe emissions

■ It will reduce annual savings by $25 - $35

11

Outreach Efforts & Program Status

Outreach efforts• Vehicle Drivers Group (EV/DC, MD Volts, etc.)• National Organizations (EDTA, EPRI, EEI)• Pepco web site• Pepco Bill insert• Dealers: Posters and brochures

Enrollment Status• 44 program participants

– 8 R-PIV and 36 PIV– 10 in the process

Participants feedback• Very satisfied

Successful executed two DM events• Aug 27 and Sep 2, 2014

Program was extended until 2015

12

Technology

13

Smart Charging Architecture

Internet

Utility

Itron Cloud Itron EE

AMI Network

EV Meter

Home Meter

Metering data, station

data, DR

ClipperCreek Charging Station (EVSE)

Home Broadband

14

An Installation

15

Inside the EVSE

16

Communications & Security

17

Itron’s Solutions

Smart Energy Management Tools• Demand Management/Direct Load Control• Price• Messaging

Monitoring and Communications Reports• Embedded meter interval readings (5 min)• Embedded meter interval readings (15 min) • Demand Over time• Communications & Missed Session Data• Demand Management Event

– Summary – Opt Out reporting

• Temperature readings• Other (on cord time, detail charging events, utilization, etc.)

18

Web Portal

19

Summary View

20

Details Charging Session View

21

Moving Forward

Manage vehicle charging while meeting the needs of our customers

Focus on reliability at the local distribution level Continue to support the EV customer community Explore DC Fast Charging (if valuable to our

customers) Data Analytics with Itron & EPRI

• Charging behavior and patterns• Embedded EVSE meter vs AMI meter• Other

Partnering with EPRI to develop the program report

23

Barbara M. GonzalezManager, Special Projects - NERC

Email: [email protected]

Contact Information

10/29/2014

1

Powering forward. Together.

Energy R&D Program Review

Ralph TrouteElectric Transportation

October 22, 2014

DC Fast Charging

Participants / Schedule / Funding:• SMUD HQ, Amtrak, Citrus Heights• HQ soft opening 3/14 with a Grand Opening 3/27• Funding: Original budget was for eight sites. Due to

cost per site will now have three sites.• Schedule: SMUD real estate is negotiating contracts

with the Amtrak and Citrus Heights.

Technology / Objective:• Develop and deploy DC Fast Charging in the SMUD

service district• Address Range Confidence and increase PEV Adoption• Supports SMUD Brand Image• Gain knowledge on the cost to develop and serve this

new retail business model.

Benefits / Payoff:• Gain knowledge on the new business model• Increase PEV adoption and associated energy revenue

for our service district• Build SMUD brand to support electric transportation

Technical Challenges / Background:• Creation of a entirely new retail business model• Design: mechanical and electrical for construction• SAP setup for billing required new DC Fast Charger

Rate to collect the taxes• Network controls and outsourcing customer service• Accounting and treasury process

Standards• SAE

– 18 New standards for EV’s• Utilities, DC Charging, V2G, Diagnostics, Customer HAN /

SEP2.0, Interoperability, Testing and Cyber Security

• NIST (consumer protection)– Handbook 130: Uniform laws and regulations

• Marking, labels and signs– Handbook 44: Codes for EV Fueling

• Regulations for metering, revenue collection and calibration

10/29/2014

2

SAE – Utility Communications

• DC Fast Charging– SAE DCFC standard is harmonized with IEC 15118

• OEM’s (GM, Ford, Chrysler, others)– Not all vehicles will have communications capability

• OEM’s don’t see a unified movement in one direction for customer service interface

– PEV’s may use IEC 15118 which is a XML based protocol and not compatible with SEP2.0

• EU automakers are united with IEC 15118• Not all US and Japanese OEM’s agree to SEP2.0

– Toyota has opted-out for a private communications protocol

• Some OEM’s want SEP2.0 to be “cloud based”

NIST• Handbook 130

– Provides a general outline for the sale of electricity as a vehicle fuel– Code is 3 pages for PEV’s– New revision was released 2014

• State of California legislators have not adopted this new revision

• Handbook 44- Drafted passed National Work Group Ballet (8/21/14)– National Weights and Measurement Committee in July 2015

• If approved, CFR in 1/1/2016• Then the states Rulemaking adopts the standard

– California DFA would recommend adoption in 7/1/16– Grand father existing equipment till ___?

NIST: Handbook 44• EVSE shall have internal metering certified and traceable

– Cable and connector losses are accounted for in calibration – EV Innovators Pilot Project

• Remove sub-meter and Level 2 EVSE, replace with new complaint EVSE?

• Annual verification by county Weights and Measures– $200 fee per location + $20 per device

• SMUD Meter shop shall conduction audits– New Capital Equipment– Staff and training

• Energy Sold– Energy sold at a flat fee or by kWh: Nissan Dealership versus SMUD Owned EV

Charging sites– Work Place Charging where employees pay to charge PEV’s

10/29/2014

3

Accomplishments / Progress / Results

• SMUD HQ design site opening March 14, 2014• Two additional sites selected and generic design complete• SMUD Real Estate Service is negotiating a sublease

agreement with the property owners at SVS - Amtrak and Citrus Heights

9

Future Plans (CY 2014 and beyond)• The CEC/SACOG grant: 3 DCFC parking lots

– Nugget Market, Elk Grove– Nugget Market, South Sacramento– Sacramento Food Coop, S street

• Sale for Resale for Profit– SMUD Co-branding value– Special Rates for co-branding versus non-cobranding– Rule 16– Proposition 26 legislation:

• SMUD must charge based on cost of service• Cross-subsidization is prohibited

10

ADA Layout

11

National Electric Code – 2017 “Comments”

EPRI NEC Task Force Report

Greg Nieminski, Chair

October 21, 2014

Time Line for 2017 NEC

Closing Date for Paper Submittal Oct. 3, 2014

Closing Date for Online Submittal Nov. 7, 2014

Code Panel (First Draft) Meeting January 2015

First Draft Circulated for Public Comment July 17, 2015

Comment Closing Date for Paper Submittal Aug. 8, 2015

Comment Closing Date for Online Submittal Sept. 25, 2015

Code Panel (Second Draft) Meeting November 2015

EPRI NEC TF Considerations

Article 625 Electric Vehicle Charging Systems

• For conductive/inductive coupled systems

– minor changes only.

• For wireless charging systems

– New format for charging EV’s.

– Major additions and revisions to introduce.

concept, definitions, equipment considerations.

• Article 626 – no changes recommended.

•

EPRI NEC TF Process

Defined elements of a wireless charging system.

Drafted presentation to explain what a wireless charging system was, and how it operated with pictorials for introduction to CMP12.

Made a comparison to conventional coupled charging systems.

Reviewed 2014 NEC to find Articles where wireless charging equipment conformed to present Articles and where changes or additions were needed.

Conclusions

625.1 Scope ‐ Changes and rationale needed to introduce wireless charging systems.

625.2 Definitions ‐ Additional terms for wireless charging systems:

• Charger Power Converter. .

• Output Cable to the Primary Pad.

• Primary pad.

• Wireless Power Transfer (WPT).

• Wireless Power Transfer Equipment (WPTE)

Conclusions (cont.)

Several Articles were generic and could apply to either EVSE or WPTE. These included:

• 625.2 Cable Management System

• 625.2 Power Supply Cord

• 625.15 Marking

• 625.22 Personnel Protection System

• 625.40 Overcurrent Protection

• 625.41 Rating

• 625.42 Disconnecting Means

• 625.44 Equipment Connection

• 625.52 Ventilation

Conclusions (cont.)

In each case, the words “Electric Vehicle Supply “ was deleted.

The remaining text referred to “equipment” that could be EVSE or WPTE.

Conclusions (cont.)

Two Article were proposed to be modified to include separate options for Wireless Power Transfer Equipment.

• 625.16 Means of Coupling,

• 625.17 Cords and Cables

A new Section IV Wireless Power Transfer Equipment was added to include specific details unique to wireless charging systems.

Conclusions (cont.)

Section IV Wireless Power Transfer Equipment

625.101 (New) Grounding – Addresses grounding of exposed metal parts.

625.102 (New) Construction – Addresses:

A. Type (i.e. Pedestal, wall/pole mounted, or raised concrete pad.

B. Mounting Height

C. Primary Pad (installation & enclosure rating)

D. Protection of Output Cable

E. Other Wiring Systems

Conclusions (cont.)

Other proposed changes to Article 625 include:

625.2 Cable Management Systems – clarifies that the

management system applies to the entire cable length,

not just the “unused length.”

625.4 Voltages – proposes to increase the supply source

voltages to 1000 volts. This was done in many articles

within the 2014 NEC based on a proposal by the (NFPA)

High Voltage Task Group (HVTG).

Conclusions (cont.)

625.48 Interactive Systems – clarifies that the NEC applies to Listed and marked interactive system that serves as an optional standby system or an electric power production source or a bi‐directional power feed, not on‐board vehicle systems or components.

Other Actions 2015

Time has been requested to make a more detailed presentation to CMP12 at their initial meeting in January 2015 to make the CMP members aware of what Wireless Power Transfer is, the equipment needed and for questions and answers so Panel members understand the differences between conventional conductive charging systems and WPTE.

In July, 2015, the NEC TF will review the “First Draft” and comment further, where necessary, in response to CMP 12’s initial actions.

October 2014

P a g e | 1

IEC Project Stages and Timetable for Standards Development

Project Stage Associated Document Name Abbreviation Minimum Timeline (for comment and/or voting)

Proposal stage New Work Item Proposal NWIP 3 months for voting

Preparatory stage Working draft WD 12 months recommended

Committee stage Committee draft CD 2‐4 months for comment

Enquiry stage Enquiry draft IEC/CDV ISO/DIS

5 months for translation (2), comment and voting (3)

Approval stage Final Draft International Standard FDIS 2 months for voting

Publication stage International Standard IEC or ISO/IEC 1.5 ‐2 months

October 2014

P a g e | 2

Projects: Key: In Publications Published - New - Status Change * Update Needed

IEC Edition

Stage

NWIP Working Draft CD

NEXT CD (CD#) CDV FDIS Publication

61851‐1 2 Published 2010‐11

61851‐1 3 ‐ 2012‐07 (3rd) 2014‐07 (3rd) 2014‐11 2015‐02 2015‐?? *

61851‐21‐1 1 ‐ 2012‐07 (3rd) 2014‐09 2014‐12 2015‐01 *

61851‐21‐2 1 ‐ 2012‐07 2012‐08 (4) 2014‐06 2014‐03 *

61851‐22 1 ‐ 2010‐02 2013‐05 To be withdrawn – Consolidated into 61851‐1

61851‐21 1 Withdrawn – Replaced by 61851‐21‐1 and 61851‐21‐2

61851‐23 1 Published 2014‐03New MT5 Maintenance Team Formed 61851‐24 1

61851‐23, 61851‐24 2 ‐ MT5 initial meeting November 4‐7, 2014, Tokyo, Japan

61851‐3‐1, ‐2, ‐3, ‐4 1 2013‐01 2014‐08 (2nd) 2014‐11/12 2016‐12 2017‐07 2017‐12

IEC TC69 Charging Station (EVSE) Standards

61851‐1: Electric vehicle conductive charging system ‐ Part 1: General requirements

61851‐21‐1: Electric vehicle conductive charging system ‐ Part 21‐1 Electric vehicle onboard charger EMC requirements for conductive connection to a.c./d.c. supply

61851‐21‐2: Electric vehicle conductive charging system ‐ Part 21‐1: EMC requirements for OFF board electric vehicle charging systems

61851‐22: Electric vehicle conductive charging system ‐ Part 22: a.c. electric vehicle charging station

61851‐23: Electric vehicle conductive charging system ‐ Part 2‐3: D.C electric vehicle charging station

61851:24: Electric vehicle conductive charging system ‐ Part 24: Digital communication between a dc EV charging station and an electric vehicle for control of d.c. charging

61851‐3 (series): (NEW) Electric Vehicles conductive power supply system –

Part 3‐1: General Requirements for Light Electric Vehicles (LEV) AC and DC conductive power supply systems

Part 3‐2: Requirements for Light Electric Vehicles (LEV) DC off‐board conductive power supply systems

Part 3‐3: Requirements for Light Electric Vehicles (LEV) battery swap systems

Part 3‐4: Requirements for Light Electric Vehicles (LEV) communication

October 2014

P a g e | 3

IEC SC23H Standards EV Couplers

IEC Edition

Stage



62196‐1 3 Published 2014‐06

62196‐2 1 Published 2011‐10

62196‐2 2 ‐ 2013‐12 2014‐08 2014‐12 2015‐05

62196‐3 1 Published 2014‐06

62196‐3‐1 1 2012‐10 2013‐09 Project closed 2014‐09

62196‐4 1 2013‐07 2014‐07 2014‐12 2015‐??

TS62196‐3‐1 New 2014‐03 Failed

TS62196‐3‐1 New 2nd NP 2014‐09 Vote 2015‐01

62196‐1: Plugs, socket‐outlets, vehicle connectors and vehicle inlets ‐ Conductive charging of electric vehicles ‐ Part 1: General requirements

62196‐2: Plugs, socket‐outlets, vehicle connectors and vehicle inlets ‐ Conductive charging of electric vehicles ‐ Part 2: Dimensional compatibility and interchangeability requirements for a.c. pin and contact‐tube accessories

62196‐3: Plugs, socket‐outlets, and vehicle couplers ‐ conductive charging of electric vehicles ‐ Part 3: Dimensional compatibility and interchangeability requirements for DC and AC/DC pin and tube‐type contact vehicle couplers (excludes couplers with common contacts for AC/DC power transfer)

62196‐3‐1: Plugs, socket‐outlets, and vehicle couplers ‐ conductive charging of electric vehicles ‐ Part 3: Dimensional compatibility and interchangeability requirements for DC and AC/DC pin and tube‐type contact vehicle couplers with common contacts for AC/DC)

62196‐4: (NEW) Plugs, socket‐outlets, and vehicle couplers ‐ conductive charging of electric vehicles – Part 4: Dimensional compatibility and interchangeability requirements for AC, DC and AC/DC vehicle couplers for Class II or Class III light electric vehicles (LEV).

TS62196‐3‐1: Plugs, socket‐outlets, and vehicle couplers ‐ conductive charging of electric vehicles ‐ Part 3‐1: Dimensional compatibility and interchangeability requirements for a.c./d.c. pin and contact‐tube vehicle couplers ‐ Combined a.c./d.c. accessories for use with IEC62196‐2 Type 1 and Type 2 a.c. rated accessories and other combined a.c./d.c. accessories, for d.c. charging

October 2014

P a g e | 4

IEC SC23H (Non‐Road) Standards (Shore to Ship Connectors)

IEC Edition

Stage



62613‐1 1 Published 2011‐06

62613‐2 1 Published 2011‐11

62613‐3 New 2014‐08 Vote 2014‐11

62613‐1: Plugs, socket-outlets and ship couplers for high-voltage shore connection systems (HVSC-Systems) - Part 1: General requirements

62613‐2: Plugs, socket‐outlets and ship couplers for high‐voltage shore connection systems (HVSC‐SYSTEMS) ‐ Part 2: Dimensional compatibility and interchangeability requirements for accessories to be used by various types of ships

62613‐3: (NEW) Plugs, socket‐outlets and ship couplers for low‐voltage shore connection systems (LVSC‐Systems) – Up to 1000 volts, 500 A, (max. 1 MW)

October 2014

P a g e | 5

IEC TC69 Wireless Charging Standards

IEC Edition

Stage



61980‐1 1 2011‐07 2012‐12 2013‐04 2013‐11 2014‐02 2014‐07 2015‐02

61980‐2 1 2012‐12 2013‐08 2015‐01 2015‐12 2014 TS 2017‐01

61980‐3 1 2012‐12 2013‐08 2015‐01 2014 TS 2017‐01

61980‐1: Electric vehicle wireless power transfer systems (WPT) ‐ Part 1: General requirements

61980‐2: Electric vehicle wireless power transfer (WPT) systems - Part 2 specific requirements for communication between electric road vehicle (EV) and infrastructure with respect to wireless power transfer (WPT) systems

61980‐3: Electric vehicle wireless power transfer (WPT) systems ‐ Part 3 specific requirements for the magnetic field power transfer systems.

October 2014

P a g e | 6

IEC TC69 Road Vehicles – Vehicle To Grid Communications Interface Standards

ISO Edition

Stage



15118‐1 1 Published 2013‐04

15118‐2 1 Published 2013‐03

15118‐3 1 2011‐10 2012‐11 2014‐05 2014‐08 2015‐02

15118‐4 1 (2nd) 2014‐07 (2nd) 2014‐12

15118‐5 1 2014‐08 (2nd) 2015‐01

15118‐6 1 2014‐07 (2nd) 2014‐10

ISO 15118‐1: Road vehicles ‐ Vehicle to grid communication interface ‐ Part 1: General information and use‐case definition

ISO 15118‐2: Road vehicles – Vehicle to Grid communication Interface ‐ Part 2: Technical protocol description and Open Systems Interconnections (OSI) layer requirements

ISO 15118‐3: Road Vehicles ‐ Vehicle to grid communication interface ‐ Part 3: Physical layer and Data Link layer requirements

ISO 15118‐4 Ed.1: Road vehicles — Vehicle to grid communication interface — Part 4: Network and application protocol conformance test

ISO 15118‐5 Ed.1: Road vehicles ‐ Vehicle to grid ccommunication interface - Part 5: Physical and data link layer conformance test

ISO 15118‐6 Ed. 1.0: Road vehicles ‐ Vehicle to grid communication interface ‐ Part 6: General information and use‐case definition for wireless communication

October 2014

P a g e | 7

ISO/IEC JTC TC22/SC21/Electrically Propelled Road Vehicle Standards

ISO/IEC Edition

Stage


NEXT CD (CD#) CDV (CDV#) FDIS Publication

17409 1 2012 2012‐09 (2) 2013‐02 (2) 2014‐03 2014‐09 2015‐05

ISO/IEC 17409 Electrically propelled road vehicles ‐ Connection to an external electric power supply ‐ Safety specifications

John HalliwellPrinciple Project Manager, EPRIInfrastructure Working Council

October 22, 2014

SAE J1772™ Update


Highlights

•Gery Kissel completed his tenure as Task Force chair in July

•John Halliwell assumed the role in September

•Version 6 document (which includes Combo connector) went to ballot in June, 2014– Received nearly 70 comments


Review and Disposition of Version 6 Comments• Comments were sorted into 5 areas:

– Editorial– Technical– Connector Dimensions– Connector Test Procedures– New State Diagrams in Appendix E

• Editorial, Technical, and Test Procedure comments have been handled by the full task force

• Connector dimension issues are being reviewed by connector manufacturers

• A small working group is reviewing and revising the Appendix E comments for full Task Force review


Version 6 Ballot Status

•Hope to complete comment resolution in November

•Submit to ballot process in early December•SAE document process would run well into Q1 of 2015

•Some comments will be deferred to a Version 7 document– Work expected to start on V7 in mid to late

2015– Will likely have a refined test procedure in V7

Together…Shaping the Future of Electricity

SAE PEV Communication & Interoperability Task Force Status

IWC Meeting

October 22, 2014

10/22/2014Rich Scholer ‐ SAE Communication Task

Force Status1

Background


Force Status2

SAE Communication BackgroundMajor Documents and Functions

Rich Scholer ‐ SAE Communication Task Force Status

3

1. J2836™ - Use Cases (establishes requirements) TIR and harmonized with ISO/IEC 15118-1

2. J2847 – Messages, diagrams, etc. (derived from the use case requirements) RP and harmonized with ISO/IEC 15118-2

3. J2931 – Communication Requirements & Protocol TIR and harmonized with ISO/IEC 15118-3

4. J2953 – Interoperability RP and harmonized with ISO/IEC 15118-4 (PHY/MAC) & -5

(upper layers)

5. J3072 – Interconnection Requirements for Onboard, Utility-Interactive, Inverter Systems

10/22/2014

J2931/7 Security


4

Document Interaction

Smart Charging(U1 – U5)

DC Charging

PEV as Distributed Energy Resource (DER)

(U6 & U7)

Diagnostics

Customer to PEV and HAN/NAN

(U8 & U9)

Wireless Power Flow

Use Cases Applications & Signals Protocol

PLC(BB OFDM)

Internet

IEEE 802.11n or 802.11p

Requirements

J2836/1™ J2847/1 J2931/1

J2836/2™ J2847/2

J2836/3™ J2847/3

J2836/4™ J2847/4

J2931/4

J2836/5™ J2847/5 J2931/5

J2836/6™ J2847/6 J2931/6

J2953/1 Interoperability, J2953/2 Test Procedures

10/22/2014

J3072On-board Inverter

Current Status


Force Status5

Activate SAE Documents ‐ 20141. J2836/3™ ‐ V2 ‐ Use Cases for the PEV Communicating as a Distributed

Energy Resource (DER)

2. J2836/5™ ‐ V1 ‐ Use Cases for Customer to PEV

3. J2847/2 – V3 ‐ DC Charging messages/signals

4. J2847/6 – V1 – Wireless Charging messages/signals

5. J2931/1 – V3 ‐ Protocol Requirements

6. J2931/4 – V3 ‐ Broadband PowerLine Carrier (PLC) communications for PEVs

7. J2931/6 – V1 ‐ Digital Communication for Wireless Charging Plug‐in Electric Vehicles

8. J2931/7 – V1 ‐ Security

9. J2953/1 – V2 ‐ Interoperability requirements

10. J2953/2 – V2 – Interoperability Plan and Report

11. J3072 ‐ V1 ‐ Interconnection Requirements for Onboard, Utility‐Interactive, Inverter Systems


Force Status6


Force Status7

V2G, DER, and Reverse Power Flow StandardsHank McGlynn

J2836/3TM V2 - Use Cases for PEV as a DER

J3072 V1 - Interconnection Requirements for Onboard, Utility-Interactive, Inverter Systems

UL 9741 - Standard for Safety for Bidirectional Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging System Equipment

Safety StandardDER FunctionsCommunication

KEY TO STANDARDS

J2836/5™ V1 - Use Cases for Customer to PEV com (Telematics) – George Bellino


Force Status8

• Document is updated and in ballot cycle.• 14 day “Topic” to task force ended Oct 20th

• Three comments need addressing, then back into affirmation to task force.

• Next ballot is Hybrid committee• J2847/5 is next for messages and signals.• J2931/5 for protocol follows.

DC chargingRich Scholer/Papiya Bagchi/Jim Allen

• J2847/2 ‐ V3 – DC charging messages and signals– Update from DIN SPEC 70121 (Candidate 2) to Candidate 6a

– Completed Hybrid ballot, in SAE formatting, next is MVC ballot

• J2931/1 – V3 – Protocol Requirements– Updated for DC Charging

– Completed Hybrid ballot, in SAE formatting

• J2931/4 – V3 – Broadband PLC– Updated for DC Charging

– SAE formatting complete 10‐15‐14, ready to publish10/22/2014


9

J2847/6 – V1 - Wireless charging messagesMark Klerer/Peter Thompson


Force Status10

• Ballot issues being resolved in task force on patent. Resolution expected this year and will proceed thru ballot cycle, restarting with task force.

J2931/6 – V1 ‐Wireless charging protocol

• Initial document posted and discussions to start in November’s meeting.

Security

• J2931/1 – V4 – Protocol Requirements

– Updated V3 for DC Charging

– Upon publication, will reopen to include security updates (high level)

• J2931/7 – V1 – Security

– Restarted this month and correlating with SGIP comments on J2931/1.


Force Status11

J2953/1 & /2 – Interoperability(Ted Bohn)

• J2953/1 (requirements).

– V1 started testing at Intertek (control pilot and prox)

– V2 is DC communications plus J1772 V6 changes

• J2953/2 (plan & procedure)

– V1 & 2 ‐ Tracking J2953/1 effort.


Force Status12

Summary/Backup


Force Status13

Use Case Document StatusJ2836/1™ ‐ Utility Use Cases

– V1 Published 2010‐04‐08

J2836/2™ ‐ DC Charging Use Cases– V1 Published 2011‐09‐15

J2836/3™ ‐ PEV as a Distributed Energy Resource (DER) Use Cases– V1 Published 2013‐01‐03– V2 being revised to add requirements for DC RPF for J2847/2 & role of

J3072

J2836/4™ ‐ Diagnostics Use Cases– V1 Started for failures on control pilot and prox, but waiting for J2953/1 &

/2 (Interoperability) for more data

J2835/5™ ‐ Customer to PEV Use Cases– V1 in ballot cycle

J2836/6™ ‐Wireless Charging Use Cases– V1 Published 5‐3‐13.


1410/22/2014

Signal/Message Document StatusJ2847/1 ‐ Utility signals/messages

– V1 Published 2010‐06‐16, V2 2011‐05‐09, V3 2011‐11‐9, V4 11‐5‐13

J2847/2 ‐ DC Charging– V1 Published 2011‐10‐21, – V2 ‐ 2012‐08‐20 to align with J1772 V5 (DC charging).– V3 in ballot cycle & aligning with DIN SPEC 70121 Candidate 6a & – V4 will be started to cover

• EVSE inverter with DC RPF (J2836/3 V2) • Include ISO/IEC 15118‐2 & ‐3 updates (DIN SPEC variations)

J2847/3 ‐ PEV as a Distributed Energy Resource (DER)– V1 Published 2013‐12‐10

J2847/4 ‐ Diagnostics– Started but waiting for J2836/4™ & J2953/1 & /2 (Interoperability)

J2847/5 ‐ Customer to PEV– Waiting for J2836/5™ Use cases

J2847/6 ‐Wireless Charging– V1 in ballot cycle


1510/22/2014

Requirements and Protocol DocumentsJ2931/1 – Requirements

– V1 Published 2012‐01‐24, V2 Published 2012‐09‐07– V3 In ballot cycle ‐ updated for DC Charging – V4 to reopen for Security additions

J2931/4 – PowerLine Carrier (PLC) – wired communication protocol

– V1 Published 2012‐07‐26, V2 Published 2013‐11‐14– V3 In ballot cycle ‐ updated for DC Charging

J2931/5 – Telematics – wireless communication protocol– Waiting for J2847/5

J2931/6 – Wireless Charging Communication (IEEE 802.11p) wireless charging protocol– Started meetings

J2931/7 ‐ Security– Restarted to align with J2931/1


1610/22/2014

Interoperability Documents ‐ RP

J2953/1 – Requirements

– V1 Published 2013‐10‐07.

• V1 started testing for the analogue communications (J1772™ control pilot and prox).

• V2 is addressing digital communication for DC charging

J2953/2 – Test plan

– V1 Published 2014‐01‐22

– V2 started to track /1 effort


1710/22/2014

The End

Questions?


1810/22/2014

SAE J2953 PEV-EVSE Interoperability Standard Update, Global and ANL

Interoperability Activities

Presented at EPRI IWC meeting‐Houston, TX; October 22, 2014

This work supported by DOE Vehicle Technology Program, Lee Slezak sponsor

Ted Bohn Argonne National Laboratory

Contact: [email protected]; www.transportation.anl.gov

High Level Summary of PEV Charging InteroperabilityStandards Activities

DOE Sponsored PEV‐EVSE Interoperability testing at Intertek continues; to be concluded by the end of calendar 2014; final results report due by March 2015

SAE J2953/v2 document development and regular meetings continue with incremental sections added to the draft each monthISO/IEC‐SAE Joint AC/DC Charging Protocol Testing event at ANL (Nov 2014) will be leveraged to help define DC charging test requirements, cases, procedures…

European vehicle OEMs are still pursuing ‘Golden Test Tool’ specification that can achieve very high levels of PEV and EVSE compliance to standards, substituting as a proxy for actual A‐B (PEV‐EVSE) device/system interoperability

ISO/IEC‐SAE Joint AC/DC Charging Protocol Testing event at ANL (Nov 2014) planning and coordination event continues; outstanding global participation (~100 attendees indicated with representation from most PEV, EVSE and component OEMs.)

2

DOE Sponsored PEV-EVSE Interoperability Testing at Intertek-Plymouth:11-15 PEVs, 16 EVSE brands-19 EVSEs

EVSE List (16 manufacturers‐ 19 EVSEs)EatonGE (Commercial & Residential Unit)Schneider ElectricSiemensAerovironmentCMI‐EVSE LLCTelefonixChargepoint

3

Clipper Creek (CS100 level 2 & LCS25 level1)Add Energie (SmartTwo and the CoRe+)EVI_Electric Vehicle InstituteMeritChargePEP Stations/HubbellElectric Motor WerksAdvanced Charging Technologies (ACT)Bosch

Intertek Hosted PEV-EVSE Testing Apparatus Photos(Intertek, Plymouth MI, July 15th, 2014)

4

ANL supplied 19” Rack mount test chassis, scope and host PC; External AC programmable source for Tier 2 tests

Compact Second Generation SAE J2953 PEV-EVSE Interoperability (AC) Test Fixture Completed at ANL

5

• Reduced form factor from 19” rack mount chassis and external oscilloscope (for measuring pilot edge/rise time with high accuracy) to Pelican case with scope and NI. Compact RIO modules/signal conditioning inside.

• Programmable supply used for Tier 2 testing

• Automated report generation on pass/fail results with wireless connection to laptop/remote PC

(Dan Dobrzynski and Jason Harper of ANL lead this activity)

Features Added to J2953-v2: PEV J1772 Compliance Requirements and Test Procedures

SAE J1772 EVSE Compliance Requirements Defined in Appendix HGridTest and others have EVSE test tools emulating the PEV

Currently No PEV Side Compliance Requirements Defined in SAE J1772Task team (John Halliwell, Jason Harper, Dan Dobrzynski, Ted Bohn, others) have defined a table of requirements extracted from J1772, ~20 items

Divide and Conquer Approach: John Halliwell is focusing on the vehicle side measurements/test casesANL group is focusing on the EVSE side measurements of the vehicle

Summary: This is not a plug‐in test tool operation. Measurements ‘behind the inlet’ will be required on the vehicle side.

6

SAE J1772 PEV Compliance Test System (EVSE emulator with diagnostics for SAE J2953 test cases)

7

• EVSE functions hosted by ANL SpEC communication controller module (above) with single board PC/Linux operating system

• Automated report generation on pass/fail results with wireless connection to tablet PC

(Dan Dobrzynski and Jason Harper of ANL lead this activity)

European/US Vehicle OEMs Pursuing ‘Golden Test Device’ (GTD) Specification

8

High levels of separate PEV and EVSE compliance verification to their standards are being used as a proxy for actual PEV‐EVSE interoperability testing. Test the PEV, test the EVSE; if they both comply to standards then they ‘must be’ interoperable….

Avoiding disclosing details of the GTD specification, it includes definition of ‐ Required hardware, required test‐sets, reference implementation, standardized report and protocol format

JRC ‘Man in the Middle’ Test Tools Being Evaluated

9

ANL to Host SAE-ISO/IEC International PEV-DC EVSE AC/DC Charging Protocol Testing Event (Nov 13-14)5 PEVs-5 DCFC EVSEs; 4 EVCC-6 SECC module OEMs Lots of PEVs, EVSE and controller modules on test benches at this event

10

Very International/Global Test Event Attendance List~70 participants plus observers for a two day event

11

6 Test tool solutions/vendors at the event (Vector, P3 Group, eNterop, etc)

PEVs‐EVSEs: GM, VW, Chrysler, BMW and Toyota PEVs (5) test against ANL, Siemens, BTCP, IES, Efacec DC EVSEs (5) (all were invited, many bringing just control modules)

AC EVSE from RWE and ChargePartner

SECC module suppliers (4) test against the EVCC module suppliers(6), using up to ~6 different tool vendors.

Closing Notes: SAE J2954/IEC61980 Wireless Charging Standards and Magnetic Interoperability Issues (magnetic topologies, gap classes, power classes)

12

• Preferring not to cite the SAE J2954 Wireless PEV Charging standard directly, the numbers below are quoted from an article quoting J2954… http://chargedevs.com/features/whats‐wireless‐ev‐charging/

• Frequency is now standardized (85kHz on both SAE and ISO standards)• Power classes include: WPT1 (Home) 3.6 kW; WPT2 (Fast Charge) 7kW‐19.2 kW; and

WPT3 (buses) 150 kW• Magnetic topology (polarization) is still under discussion; nearly settled on circular• Gap Classes: As part of the tradeoff assessments, different height vehicles are

assumed to be optimized for different Z‐height gaps between the stationary and vehicle side magnetics. These may include up to three gap classes from several centimeters to tens of centimeters.

• Interaction of these parameters may lead tointeroperability issues for wireless charging

ANL Fixture for evaluating magnetic interoperability of wireless charging systems

SAE J2954 Wireless Charging Standards and Magnetic Interoperability Testing at ANL

13

Seven parking spots for outside area co‐existence testing of multiple wireless charging systems next to each other operating simultaneously, along with conductive charging in the presence of wireless charging; field emission measurements, conducted emissions, etc

First spot has ‘flush mount’ wireless EVSE fiberglass grating covered trench