independent technical report roberts-creelman property

INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REPORT

JWI 23~' C1l

GEOSCIEf\ICE ASSESSMEf11l Orf iCE

ROBER I S-(REELMi\N PROPI·. RI Y

Ontario, Canada

FIREBIRD RESOURCES INC. Suite 2400, 120 Adelaide St. W .

Toronto , Ontario, Canada M5H IT!

Date : June 23, 20 II

Prepared By:

CARACLE CREEK INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING lNC. Wayne Brown, P .Geo

0

- - --------

~CIC ,~--.. -..,

,.;:.

Office Locations

Toronto 34 King Street East, 9th Floor

Toronto, ON Canada, M5C 2X8

Tel: + 1.416.368.1801 Fax: + 1.416.368.9794 CDNops@ccicon I ine.com

Vancouver 409 Gran vi lie Street, Suite 1409 Vancouver, BC Canada, V6C I T2

Tel: + 1.604.637.2050 Fax: +1.604.602.9496 CDNops@ccicon line.com

Sudbury 25 Frood Road Sudbury, ON Canada, P3C 4 Y9

Tel: +1.705.671.1801 TF: +1.866.671.1801 Fax: + 1.705.671.3665 CDN [email protected]

Johannesburg 7th Floor The Mall Offices 1 1 Cradock A venue, Rose bank South Africa

Tel: + 1.27 (0) 11.880.0278 Fax: +1.27 (0) 11.447.4814 SAops@cciconl ine.com

\\'\\ \\ .caraclec reek co rn

This report has been prepared by

lndepc:ncknt Technical Reron : Roherts-Crcclman l'ropcrt\

Firebird Resources Inc.

Caracle Creek International Consulting Inc. (CC/C) on behalf of Firebird Resources Inc ..

20/J

Issued by: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Ju ne 2.1 2(1 II C \R. \ CI.J: C RLEK IN I ERNi\TI ON,\1 C ONS l l l . rJ N (i I NC . ·1 e>ro nt,, - Vancomt'r - Sudbury .I Ghanncshurg

Page 11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Independent Technica l Rcrt>rl : Robcns-Crcelman Proper!\

Fir~bird Respurces Inc.

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 4

2.0 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE ................................................................................. 4

2.1 rNTRODUCT!ON ....................................................................................................................... ........ ........ 4

2.2 CCIC QUALIFICATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 4

3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ....................................................................................... 5

3.1 LOCATION ...................................................... ... ..... ........ ... ........................ ........ ........................................ 5

3.2 DESCRJPTION AND OWNERSHIP ................ ........ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .............. .. ... ...... .. ......................................... 6

4.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND

PHYSIOGRAPHY ...................................................................................................................................................... 7

4. I ACCESS ............................................ ... ........ .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. .. .. .. .. ..................... .. .. .. .. .. .. .................................... 7

4.2 CLIMATE AND VEGETATION ..... .. ... ...................... .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. .............. .. ... ...... .. ...... .. ........................... 8

4.3 PHYSIOGRAPHY ................................................................................... ........................... ........ ........ ......... 8

5.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING ........................................................................................................................... 8

5.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY ........................... .. .. .. .................................. .. ........................................................ 8

5.2 PROPERTY GEOLOGY .............................. .. ....... ...................................................................................... 9

5.2. 1 Stratigraphy ........... .. ... ... ........................ ... .. ... ........................... ..... ........................... ............................... 9

5.2.2 Intrusive Rocks ................. .. ... ........ ................... .. ... ... ................................ ............................................. 10

5.2.3 Deformation .......................... .. .......... ... .. ... ..... ................... ... .. ... ........ ................ ... ... .. ........... .................. /0

5.2.4 Mineralization .......................... ........ ... .. ................... ... .... .. .. .. ...................... ... .. ...... .. ............................. 10

6.0 EXPLORATION .......................................................................................................................................... 1 0

6.1 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY ...... .. .. .. ..... .. .... .. ........ .. ...... .. ....... ........... .. .......... .. ......... .. ................................. !!

6.2 MAPPING ......................................... ... .. ... .......................... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ......... ........ .. .. .. .. .. ..... .. .... .......... 12

7.0 SAMPLING IVIETHOD AND APPROACH .............................................................................................. 13

8.0 SAMPLE SECURITY, PREPARATION, AND ANALYSIS ................................................................... 14

9.0 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 14

10.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................. I4

11.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................. I5

.lunc ~3 2(1 I I Cr\Rt\L 1.1' CREL IN n :RN!\li()N/\1. CUNSliL II NCI INC. Page 12 Toront<> - Vancl)uvcr - Sudbui") J\Jhanncsburg

FIGURES

lndepcndt:nt Technical Report : Roberts-Cn:elman Pmpcn'

l:ircbirJ Resources Inc.

Figure 3-1 Location ofthe Roberts-Creelman Property, Sudbury District... ..... .... ....... ... ..... ... ..... ................... ............. 5

Figure 3-2 Claim map of the Roberts-Creelman Property ..................................... ... ..... ... ........ ..................................... 7

TABLES

Table 3-1 List of claims on the Roberts-Creelman Property ......................................................................................... 6

Table 6-1 Daily log ................................................................................................. ..................................................... I 0

Table 6-2 Results of the RS-125 Super-Spectrometer survey ..................................................................................... II

Table 6-3 Sample locations and descriptions ..... ..... ........ ... ..... ... ..... ... ..... ... ..................................... ...... ..... ... ..... ... ...... 12

APPENDICES

Appendix 1 -Scintillometer reading location maps

Appendix 2- Sample location maps

Appendix 3- Analytical data

lunc 2.'1 20 I I C\R \CLL CREEK IN IU~N l\ rJO]\i ,\1 CONSl ' L IJ N(I INC. Toronto - Vanc(lU\ cr - SuJbur) - Johannesburg.

Page 13

(Ccac '~·-..._---,-_ ....

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

l ndep~nd~nt "I cchnical RcpML: Roberts-Creclman Propc1t\

Fi rcbird Resources Inc.

Caracle Creek International Consulting Inc. ("CCIC") of Sudbury, Ontario, Canada was contracted by

Firebird Resources Inc., Ontario, Canada, to carry out geological mapping and a geophysical survey

consisting of a RS-125 Super-Spectrometer, on the Roberts-Creelman property (the "Property"), and

prepare an Assessment Report (the "Report").

2.0 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE

2.1 Introduction

This report summanses the results of the mappmg and geophysical survey on Firebird's Roberts

Creelman Property, located north of Sudbury. The geophysical survey was completed on June 18, 2011

by Wayne Brown, Dave Perron and Brad Bertrand. The mapping was carried out between June 16th and

June 191h 2011 by Wayne Brown.

2.2 CCIC Qualifications

Caracle Creek International Consulting Inc. is an international consulting company with the head office of

Canadian operations based in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. CCIC provides a wide range of geological and

geophysical services to the mineral industry. With offices in Canada (Sudbury and Toronto, Ontario and

Vancouver, British Columbia) and South Africa (Johannesburg), CCIC is well positioned to service its

international client base.

CCIC's mandate is to provide professional geological and geophysical services to the mineral exploration

and development industry at competitive rates and without compromise. CCIC's professionals have

international experience in a variety of disciplines with services that include:

• Exploration Project Generation, Design and Management

• Data Compilation and Exploration Target Generation

• Property Evaluation and Due Diligence Studies

• Independent Technical Reports ( 43-101 )/Competent Person Reports

June"~ 21111 C,\R ,\CLE CRELK IN I LRN !\ IION ,\L CONS tiL ri NCi INC . Page 14 Tomntu - Vancull\ er - Sudbur) - .ltlhanncsburg

~CIC ,e;..., ~

Independent Technical Report : Robcrts-Credman Property

Fircbird Resources Inc.

• Mineral Resource/Reserve Modelling, Estimation, Audit; Conditional Simulation

• 3D Geological Modelling, Visualization and Database Management

In addition, CCJC has access to the most current software for data management, interpretation and

viewing, manipulation and target generation.

3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

3.1 Location

The Roberts-Creelman Property is located approximately 50 km north of Sudbury, In Roberts and

Creelman townships (Error! Reference source not found.).

,.,.... e PopuL'iled Plo1ooes Ro3ds l r..ak.&IPond

-- R.a• I.WI ')S c·:-; T""ms!Up6

- · Ul~l\l Uta Fireb4Jd Clowns RNtn/Stn!~ams

F•eblrd Rfti'CIUC)ft Inc Sudbury Jvea Ollt.'tl.,_ c.oado

Figure 3-1 Location of the Roberts-Creelman Property, Sudbury District

.lunc2320 11 C/\Rt\C' U : CREEK IN I"ERN!\TION/\l. CoNSlll. ri NG INC . Toronto - Yancouv~r - Sudbury- Johannesburg

Pag.~ I 5

3.2 Description and Ownership

Independent Technica l Report: Roberts-Cree lman Property

Fi rebird Resources Inc.

The Roberts-Creel man Property consists of three contiguous claims covering a total of 544 ha (Table 3-1

and Figure 3-2).

Table 3-1 List of claims on the Roberts-Creelman Property

Township Claim Recording Claim Percent Work Total Total Number Date Due Date Option Required Applied Reserve

CREELMAN 3014453 2005-Feb- 2011-

100% $2,688 $13,312 $0 03 Aug-03

CREELMAN 3016125 2004- 2011-Jun-

100% $4,000 $16,000 $0 Dec-23 23

ROBERTS 3014452 2005-Feb- 2012-Feb-

100% $6,400 $32,000 $0 03 03

June 23 20 11 CAR/\CLI : CREEK I TER i\ TIONAL Cu SliLllNG INC. Toronto - Vancouver - Sudbury- .l uhann~sburg

Claim Bank

$0

$0

$0

No. of units

8

10

16

Total area

Area (ha)

128

160

256

544

Page 16

(Cc1c ,e...,

I~-1

I I

_ .....

I t

'

·I

/

J I

!~ ' \ le ,~

l I

I II I L~~opu!il\00 Pt.tf'.es --+- ::::~

Tutd&

I ConiOUJS

I ! --,l.roo<.

L_ -------- ,. ... sv~

3014452

L5i lo.et.

• ' · • l!.,l(td;andAl$."1

c:.:-: 1own.n Fi•ebtf ti C&irnos

F"Rbl-cl ~~a Inc R:~fiiOi!'Mn Propet tv Onf8110. Caned.\

Figure 3-2 Claim map ofthe Roberts-Creelman Property

I nd.:pend~nt Technical Report Roberts-C reelman Property

Fi rcb ird Resources Inc.

j (


Cl"Mflli; Map. Rob&fla.C•~ Prop81'ty. 0.\lMJO. C&I\Ud~ -~~ ( aracle (reek ,.

4.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND

PHYSIOGRAPHY

4.1 Access

Good road access is available from Regional Road 80 north of Sudbury Ontario through Hanmer to

Capreol Road. Continue through_Capreol on Sellwood Ave. and to the north on Sellwood Road. This road

goes to the past producing Moose Mountain Iron Mine. Access to Roberts Twp. is south-west across the

mine property then north on lumber access roads. The Nordic occurrence is close to the access roads.

Access to Creelman Twp. is by turning north at the Moose Mountain Mine property and following north

and west the end of the lumber access roads. The Leslie No. 3 occurrence is a 2 km walk to the north.

There are currently no trails or roads to the showing although there is a grid near the showing.

.J une 23 201 I C ;\R ,\ L'Ll: CREEK IN I ERN ;\ -l! ON.\L CONSlll. I INCi INC . Page 17 Toronto- Van cull\ cr- Sudbur) - Johannesbu rg

~CIC '~·-~-.., ~

4.2 Climate and Vegetation

Independent Technical Rcp< lrl : Robcrt>-Crcdman Propet1\

Fircbird Resources Inc .

The claims lay in the North-Eastern Forest Region with an average annual temperature range of+ 18.5

de g. c and -11.3 de g. c and annual average precipitation of 860 mm

(http:/ /c I imate. weatheroffice.gc.ca/ climate Data).

The vegetation ranges from maple, birch, scrub oak and beech in the higher elevations and pine, spruce,

cedar and alder in the lower to swampy areas.

4.3 Physiography

The area is situated near the Great Lakes-Hudson Bay watershed divide. The topography is typical

Canadian Shield, relief is low but the terrain is rugged. In Creelman Twp. relief over granites is low to

swampy. The south-east of Roberts Twp. is a very flat low lying swamp and the south-west third is at a

higher elevation but still swampy.

5.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING

5.1 Regional Geology

The Roberts-Creelman Property is underlain by Archean granitic and supracrustal rocks of the eastern

extension of the Temagami greenstone belt, unconformably overlain by Proterzoic metasediments of the

Huronian Supergroup (Meyn, 1971 ).

Rocks of the Huronian Supergroup were deposited between 2.5 Ga, the youngest age of the Archean

rocks, and 2.219 Ga, the age of the Nipissing gabbro that intrudes the Huronian Supergroup (Van

Schmus, 1965; Fairbairn et al., 1969; Corfu and Andrews, 1986). The Huronian Supergroup consists of

the Elliot Lake Group, Hough Lake Group, Quirke Lake Group and Cobalt Group (Error! Reference

source not found.) (Robertson et al., 1969; Roscoe, 1969). The first three groups are known as the Bruce

Series. The deposition was cyclical with each group proceeding from deposition in a deep water

environment to deposition in shallow water.

The Sudbury Structure, located to the south of the Property, is an impact structure formed 1.85 Ga ago

(Rouse!!, 1975). It is an oval shaped body approximately 58 km long and 26 km wide.

.l unc 23 20 11 CA R.\ CU C RL L K I N ILR \Ji\ 11 01\: ,\ 1 C UN Sl l l. I"I NCI I NC . ·1 oronto - V ;mcoll\ cr - Sud bur\ - .llllmnnesburg.

Page \ 8

\nckpc:ndc:nt ·1 <::chnica\ Rc:port : Rohen s-Creclman !' ru pe rt ~

Fircb ird Resource:; In c.

Anomalous uranium mineralization has been reported near the Archean-Paleoproterozoic unconformity

(Meyn, 1971 ). The uranium mineralization occurs with the Paleoproterzoic metasediments, primarily

within pyritiferous argillite, oligiomictic quartz pebble conglomerates and polymictic conglomerates. The

highest uranium assays are associated with thin interbedded argillaceous units within the conglomerates.

5.2 Property Geology

5. 2.1 Stratigraphy

In the Roberts and Creelman townships the Archean basement is composed of metavolcanics and

metasediments that are intruded by granitic rocks and mafic igneous rocks of Archean age (Meyn, 1971 ).

The metavolcanics and metasediments are remnants in the granites. They range in composition from

basaltic to rhyolitic. A few lenses of iron formation occur in the metavolcanic sequence in Roberts Twp.

In the Roberts-Creelman area the Huronian Supergroup consists mainly of the Mississagi Formation,

which is underlain unconformably by the Archean rocks and overlain conformably by the Bruce

Formation (Meyn, 1971).

The Mississagi Formation consists of interbedded quartzite and argillite. The thickness of the argillite

beds decreases from up to 6 feet in the lower part of the formation to bedding plane parting less than 1/t

inch thick in the upper part of the formation (Meyn, 1971 ). The argillite is composed of fine grained

(0.2mm) grains of sericite, mica, quartz and feldspar.

A typical quartz-pebble conglomerate with pebbles from 6-25 mm in diameter in a quartzite matrix is

missing in the rocks ofthe Mississagi Formation east of the map area (Meyn, 1971 ).

In Roberts and Creelman townships the Mississagi Formation is exposed in a number of places and most

of the evidence indicates a sheared (faulted or rotated) contact with the basement rocks (Meyn, 1971). In

the southern block in Creelman Twp. the overlying Gowganda Formation rests unconformably on the

Mississagi Formation and in the north-eastern corner of Roberts Twp. and the north-western corner of

Creelman Township the Bruce Formation conformably overlies the Mississagi Formation. The estimated

thickness in the area around Roberts Lake is 2500 feet.

Polymictic conglomerate forms the base of the Mississagi Formation on the east side of the body of

granite between Roberts Lake and the Vermillion River (Meyn, 1971).

.lunc 23 20 I I C!\RM I E CRLLK I N I I:RN.t\ -11 0 1\ ,\ 1. C UNSlJ I. r 1 NCi I NC . 1 clr. lnlo -- Vancnu\ '" ~ Sud bun .l uhanncsburg.

Page I 9

lndcpcmknt 'I c~hnical Report :

5. 2. 2 Intrusive Rocks

Rob~rts-l'rcclman l'ropcrt~

Fircbiru ResPurccs Inc .

Gabbroic rocks classified as N ipissing-type diabase are found in both townships (Meyn, 1971 ). These

rocks intrude all older rocks, forming dike and sill like bodies of varying dimensions. The rock is a

medium to dark grey-weathering quartz bearing gabbro with diabasic texture.

The youngest rock in the area is represented by northwest-trending olivine diabase dikes (Meyn, 1971).

5. 2. 3 Deformation

The Huronian rocks in the Roberts and Creelman townships were folded and faulted (Meyn, 1971 ). The

folds are steeply dipping. The most prominent direction of the faults is north-northwest. The second major

direction for the faults is northwest, similar to the later olivine diabase dikes.

5. 2. 4 Mineralization

Uranium and thorium mineralization, associated with radioactive potassium, has been identified on the

Roberts-Creelman Property ( Meyn 1971; Simard and Knight, 1954). The minerals include monazite,

uraninite, zircon and thorianite with minor pyrite and pyrrhotite.

The mineralization is hosted in argillites, oligomictic and polymictic conglomerates.

6.0 EXPLORATION

The work on the Roberts-Creelman Property consisted of a geophysical survey using a RS-125 Super

Spectrometer and geological mapping.

Table 6-1 is a daily log describing in detail the nature and content ofthe work and the nature of rocks and

mineralization observed during the performance ofthe work.

Table 6-1 Daily lo Date

June 16.2011

.lun~ 2.1 20 11

Work

leave 7:30AM, arrive at Roberts Township 9:30AM Mapping, channel sampling, scintillometer recording on polymictic and oligiomictic conglomerates in south west township (Wayne, Dave, Brad)

access via logging roads and trails to the showings at the 'Nordic' Occurrence.

Location

Roberts Twp.claim 3014452

Rock type

polymictic and oligomictic conglomerate

C.\R .\Cll CREEK )\ll Ei{ N \ I ION .\! CUNSI I . I I ~ Ci )i\C . I Clnllll(l - Vancolll cr- Sud bur\ J,,IHli\1\C'>hurg

Mineralization

Py

!'age I I 0

Date

June 17,2011

Junel8,2011

June 19,2011

June 20,2011

June 2\,2021

Work

arrive at Creelman Township 9:30AM Mapping, sampling, scintillometer recording on polymictic (Wayne, Dave, Brad)

conglomerate and argillite, Leslie showing# 3. Access is by foot from the last logging road

report writing \ 0 Hrs.

report writing 12 Hrs.

writing assessment report

writing assessment report

6.1 Geophysical survey

Location

Creelman Twp -claim 3016125

Firebird Res.

Firebird Res.

Firebird Res.

CCIC office

lnlkpcnd~nl 'I <.:chn ica l R<.:purl :

Rock type

argillite

polymictic conglomerate

Rnbcrts-Credlllan l'ropai' Fir.:b ird R.:, ourc.:, Inc

Mineralization

Py

Py

On June 16, 2011, a geophysical survey was conducted usmg a RS-125 Super-Spectrometer

(scintillometer) to isolate anomalous highs, as outlined by Abitibi Geophysics in a ground gamma-ray

survey conducted for Falcon Ventures International Inc. in September 2009, (Abitibi Geophysics, 2009).

The survey was performed by Wayne Brown, Dave Perron and Brad Bertrand. A hand held Garman

'Trek' was used to record the location of the anomalies for follow up sampling.

The RS-125 Super-Spectrometer is a modem, portable, hand held radiation survey device manufactured

by Radiation Solutions, showing "Total Count" in CPS with a 1 /sec update rate. The assay mode

provides sample concentration analysis with direct data display of K (%), U and Th in parts per million

(ppm). (Radiation Solutions Inc.). The unit uses a 2.0" * 2.0" Na I crystal.

Table 6-2 is a summary of results of the RS-125 Super-Spectrometer survey. Appendix I contains maps

with the location and results of the scintillometer readings.

Table 6-2 Results of the RS-125 Super-Spectrometer survey

Station Easting Northing K u Th Total

number

wp# I 07 492325 5195784 K=1.5% U= 18.8ppm Th=\3.4ppm 1155.8

wp#\08 492327 5195814 K=2.2% U=239.2ppm Th=105.7ppm 8086.6

wp#\09 492325 5195815 K=l.9% U=286.0ppm Th= I 09.5ppm

102\2.1

wp#ll2 492348 5195765 K=2.5% U=27.4ppm Th=36.6ppm 1623.7

.lun<.: 23 2(1 11 C.\ R.\ ll. l Ci{l· l.K !:-; I I.: RN .\ I IU N,\1. C ONS \ i i. II NC i h e . !'age I I I I '".''lllll - Vancuu\ ~ r - Sud bur) J<Jh<mnc,burg

(Cc1c ln(k p<:iHklll 'I cchnica l Rq>t>rL. ,~-,

Rl>b<:rb-Crccl man l'rllpcrL\ ...,;;:t F i r~b i rd R<:">urc<: '> Inc.

wp# 113 492366 5195727 K=2.7% U=l2l.lppm Th=65.9ppm 4925.3

wp#ll4 492357 5195750 K=3.3% U=71.9ppm Th=50.9ppm 3206.4

wp# 117 492204 5195642 K=2.7% U=67.3ppm Th=72.9ppm 3564.9

wp#l21 495580 5195079 K=2.9% U=53.5ppm Th=45.1ppm 2422.3

wp# l22 495549 5195092 K=2.60% U=31.1 ppm Th=39.0ppm 1922.1

wp# 123 495479 5195513 K=O.l% U=49.5ppm Th=40.0ppm 2555.6

wp# 125 495476 5195323 K=4.6% U=216.7ppm Th=l41.1 ppm 9536.8

wp#l26 495476 5195323 K=3.5% U=302.8ppm Th=200.2ppm 10971.5

6.2 Mapping

The rocks where exposed were quartzites and conglomerates. Table 6-3 contains the sample locations and

descriptions. Appendix 2 contains maps with the location of samples.

Table 6-3 Samf!..le locations and descri£1ions

Sample Easting Northing Rock type Description

Mineraliz number at ion

688622 492329 5195817 polymictic cong med grey l%py






688628 492201 5195641 quartzite grey

2%py argi II iceous

688629 492201 5195641 quartzite grey

2%py argilliceous

688630 492201 5195641 quartzite grey

2%py argilliceous

- --·--·

.lu111: 2J 21111 Ci\ R.\l'l I· CfU.FK I I'\ II W'-J. \ 11 01\ ,\l ('()l\Sl ' l_li NCi hl' . !'age· I 11 ., (lnl llll.l ·-· Va11cou \ L'r Sudhur) - .lulwnncsburg

(Cc1c lndql~ntklll 'I cchnical Rc:pon . ,~.,

Robc:rb-l'rc:~hnan 1-'rop<Tl) _ .... Fircbird Rc:.;purc~s Inc

Sample Easting Northing Rock type Description

Mineraliz number ation

688631 492187 5195673 polymictic cong grey l%py

688632 492187 51 95673 polymictic cong grey l%py

5 1213 492326 5 195819 polymictic cong grey 2%py

5 1214 492328 51 9581 5 polymictic cong grey 2% py

51215 492329 51 95815 polymictic cong med dk grey l% py

51216 495470 5 .195848 siltstone med grey 2%py

51217 495470 51 95849 siltstone-quartzite dark grey < J%py

7.0 SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH

We used RS-125 Super Spectrometer to locate the anomalous high gamma count indicated on the Abitibi

Geophysics maps. Then we conducted our own survey to confirm their readings and to outline the extent

of the mineralization . The area was marked and data recording 'total length of time for the reading' , 'total

count' , ' K % (potassium) as a percent' , ' uranium in parts per million ', and ' thorium in parts per million'

were recorded . Grab samples were taken when possible and sample sections of up to one meter long were

marked in paint on the rock for channel samples .

Channel samples were taken by cutting a parallel 2 inch deep cut by 1.0-1.5 inches apart along the

indicated reference line using a gas powered diamond saw. Samples are terminated by a cross cut and the

layer of rock between the cuts removed by hammer and moil, bagged and labelled with the number of the

tags of the assay lab inserted . The length of cut is recorded, rock type and the GPS location of the

samples . The samples were placed in rice bags and placed is secure storage in the C.C.I.C. office. At the

completion of the survey and collection of samples the samples were taken to A.G.A.T. lab in Sudbury

for analysis.

. tu nc: 23 20 11 C'.\IUl'l L CRU .K h I I R'\.\ 11(1\ ,\1 Cu0:Sl I. IT'-'C' 1\!C . l'agc I I 3 I Prom<> - V<mC!lUI cr ·· Sudbur1 .luhann~,burg.

8.0 SAMPLE SECURITY, PREPARATION, AND ANALYSIS

111lkp~ncknt Tc.:hnical R.:p0r1 : l{oberts-Credman 1-'ropcrl}

Fircbird R~snurccs In<:.

The samples were taken to A.G.A.T. Laboratories at 2054 Kingsway Road on June 13, 2011 and

submitted for Analysis No. 201076-Lithium Borate Fusion-ICP-OES Finish, Summation of all oxides;

and analysis No. 20 I 078 Lithium Borate Fusion, ICP/ICP-MS finish.

Appendix 3 contains the analytical data on analyzed samples.

9.0 CONCLUSIONS

Our survey of the Roberts-Creelman claims confirmed the existence of uranium and thorium on the

property. The scintillometer readings were fairly closely matched by channel sampling.

The anomalies encountered were in uranium-thorium enriched argillites and polymictic conglomerate.

Historic work on the Property found modest grades of uranium and thorium in Mississagi Formation

rocks but the area ground exposure is limited by persistent ground cover and low relief.

10.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

I. Cut an access trail to the Leslie showings from the nearest lumber road.

2. Use the 'Abitibi Geophysics' scintillometer survey to isolate the best anomalies; strip and map

those areas to determine the extent of the mineralization.

3. Establish a sampling program, either channel samples or short drill holes to obtain fresh samples.

4. Sample for uranium-thorium-potassium and Rare Earth Elements.

5. If the results of the sampling program are promising then a more extensive drill program should

be undertaken to define the zone.

.June ~3 2011 C\R.\CI r: CRLLK IKII: R~ ;\ rJoN,\1. Coi\St iL n Ne; I c . l'agc I 1-l Toronto - Vancuuwr - Sudbm) - J uhann~sburg

11.0 REFERENCES

lndcpcnd o.:nt Technical Rcp<m : Roberts-Cro.:elman Propem

Fi r..:b i rd Resources Inc.

Corfu, F., and Andrews, A.J., 1986: A U-Pb age for mineralized Nipissing Diabase, Gowganda, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences vol. 23, p. 107-109.

Fairbairn, H.W., Hurley, P.M., Card, K.D. and Knight, C.J., 1969: Correlation of radiometric ages of Nipissing Diabase and Huronian metasediments with Proterozoic orogenic events in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 6, p. 489-497.

Meyn, H.D., 1971: Geology of Roberts, Creelman, and Fraleck Townships, Ontario Department of Mines and Northern Affairs, Geological Report 91, 48p.

Robertson, J.A., Frarey, M.J. and Card, K.D., 1969: The Federal -Provincial Committee on Huronian Stratigraphy Progress Report. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 6, number 2, p. 335-336.

Roscoe, S.M. 1969: Huronian rocks and uraniferous conglomerates in the Canadian Shield. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 68-40.

Rousell, D.H., 1975: The Origin of Foliation and Lineation in the Onaping Formation and the Deformation ofthe Sudbury Basin. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol.l2. p. 1379-1395.

Simard and Knight, 1954b: Private report on the geological survey for Elmridge Mines Limited on their mineral claims in Roberts Township; on file with the Ontario Dept. Mines.

Van Schmus, W.R., 1976: Early and Middle Proterozoic History of the Great Lakes Area, North America. Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions, vol. 280, p. 605-628.

.lun~ ~3 ~II I I Ci\R \Cl.l CRLLK I N ll : l~N!\1101\: . \1 CUJ\Sl i L I IN(i INC . l' agc I 15 "I e>ronto - Vanc,,u, cr - Sudbury- .i <lhanncsburg

495,000

~ ·· - - .. I .. - .. ·-·· . . . . . . . . ·-·· ·-·--···-· ·--·-· ~ .... -

. ···-- dJ :-:::J.((. :·::·.· .. _. ·-.. . . . .... w. . . ' . . . . . . -- .. ·-··

0 0 0 co (J) ...--

. . ··.• .. ·-. ·-0 · - ••.• 0 . - · ·-o:J 1.[) (J)

-r- --1.[) 1&: . :

-.. . ... -- ·-· • -. . .. ·-· . . . : . .. .. . . ·--·-- ..

··-·

1&: .. -.. . -- . -. ·-· ·-· . .. . ··-

··--. 0 Ji.:-: ~: ;_:~: 0 .. • • o • • I

<0 -_. :.. :.=..-. ··=-m·-· 1.()

. . - • • • • • .. . . ... ·-· ·- . . (J) ·-· · ,.... ~u. : . ~k -

1..() · - · · .. • . . .. .

. ··-·-· ~ ·

I ' I

c . t-o.. , ('f) {

I +

I +

;

I

Legend:

\

Rock Type

1

\

I

I

f

Quartzite

A Siltstone

~ Polymictic cong

L). Siltstone-quartzite

I

\

- -

495,200 495,400

+

I ---------~~20L---~--~

CREELMAN 51217-6--51216

3016125 + +

------~--------

- _ __.,.

390

+ +

Local Roads CJ Lakes

Rail Lines .. ··-· Wetland Area .. -..

Trails CJ Firebird Claims

Utility Lines Wooded Area .. ---

Contours I_ __ ! Townships

Rivers/Streams

I

495,600

+

+

+

495,800

+

+

I I

\

--------------~----- I N

W ~ E

s

Scale

----~==~--.c==~----m 0 25 50 75 100 125

Firebird Resources Inc. Rock Sample Location Map B,

Roberts-Creelman Property, Ontario, Canada.

Date: 21/06/1'1 Scale: 1:3,750 Figure:

Projection: UTM, Nad83, Zone 17N. Office/Author: Vancouver/gcn

CCIC ( ( '~q , aracle reek

0 0 0 1'-Q) r-l.(f

0 0 0 (0 0) r-

LO

0 0 0

1.[)

492,000

Legend:

e Populated Places Roads

Rail Lines

Trails

Contours

Utility Lines

Rivers/Streams

CJ ~ ~ , __ _

Lakes

Wetland Area

I_ __ ! Townships

D Firebird Claims

494,000 495,000

N

s

Scale

-::::::JI-=:::::::.-=:======::::::JI----C::======::::JITI 0 250 500 750 1.000

496 000

40rJ


Claims Map, Roberts-Creelman Property, Ontario, Canada.

Date: 17/06/11 Scale: ·1 :20,000 Figure:

Projection: UTM , Nad83, Zone 17N. Office/Author: Varicouverfgcn

495,000 495,200 0 0 <0 - + + LO en ..---LO

380 -

0 I 0 '<;!" - + + LO (j) ..---1.()

\

\

I 0 0 N - + 1.() 0) ..--1.()

'3 0

0 0 0

+ - + LO 0) ...... -1.()

Legend:

~ Scintillometer Local Roads Station# Rail Lines K% U (ppm) Trails Th (ppm)

Utility Lines - -

Contours

Rivers/Streams

) ~

D Lakes • • • ••

Wetland Area • .. ·--D Firebird Claims

Wooded Area ·---. '---~ Townships

495,400

0 O'l <"? ,

+

~ '0

+

CREELMAN

+

-

'· '

+

r r

495,600

+

- 390 --

~ wp#123

(0 .1 ) l (49.5),(40) ------------ /

3016125

0#'126 (3.5), (302.§_}r (2-00.2)

wp#122 (2.6),

+

-

+

(31.1 ),(39) wp#121 (2.9), ~(53.5),(45.1)

4?

~·rebrd

rts-Creelm n P

-+

- 380

w -=~

N

I\

s

Scale

0----2~5===5~0----75==~10·0--~1~

~'Or.:::,

495,800

\

\

I [1.\)\:J

\ J \

0 O'l + ("')

\

+

+

Firebird Resources Inc. Scintillometer Locations Map B,


Date: 21 /06/11 Seale: 1 :3,7 50 Figure:


0 0 0

0 0 co -lf) <J)

"'""" lf)

0 0 co l() <J)

"'""" -lf)

0 0 '<:t -l() (J)

"'""" l()

--

I

o ' 0 ~ ,

I

I I

~ 0

\ \

J

I

Legend:

Rock Type

~ Quartzite

A Siltstone

~ Polymictic cong -

~ Siltstone-quartzite

492,000 492,200

-+

688622

51213~ 51214 51215

+ +

I

0 I (l) (")

l \ 3014452

I

'------

+ +

Local Roads CJ Lakes

Rail Lines Wetland Area Ro

Trails CJ Firebird Claims

- Utility Lines Wooded Area .. ---

Contours I_ __ ! Townships

Rivers/Streams

492,400

+

+

+

N

1\

w-=;;;;;

s

Scale

-----===~----c===~---m 0 25 50 75 100 125

492,600

+ 1

+ /

+

I

I

\

I . . -·. . . . . . . . . . .. .• ;_:, ·-·-- ... ~ ~ ~ ··-·· .. ·-- -- "- l&: ··-... . . . .. . ... . .. ~ 0 0 0

0 0-

0 0 0 0 0

I 0 I

" I 0 -· · ·--••• •-•• ·-·-- ·-·-. . ·-- .. --.. :-:.ll&: ...• . . ·--•• • • ·-· • •. -.1.-. ·.:. • . ··-·-· . ... _ -.1~_.. ·• ···-. -~- ··-- .._-... "'-- ···- . • "-i~J.-.... ··-·-· ·-·· -·· ···- . -~- ··-·-· ·-·· .... .

···-· . ·-· -· ·-·· · . ., I~ . ···-. . . . . ···-· . ":-:::J.&: ···-· .. ~ .. ···-· . • ···-- . .. . . ···- . ·-··. ···--. .. I I -- I ---- ·-·· ... .. -

, 1 • • I, I :-:::J.&: , o o I I • • *- • o o "':: o o o . . . . . -·· ..... .. . ·-·· .

•-•• •-•-• .II I II

~~~.......-,···-· ·-- ...... :_: . •••• 0 0 0 .. 0 I I 0 I

··-·-· • . -. . ~ . .. • •

Firebird Resources Inc. Rock Sample Location Map A,


Date: 21/06/11 Scale: 1:3,750 Figure:


~CIC ( ( '~', aracle reek

0 0 0 -(1) m ..--L.()

0 0 co 1.{) 0> ..--L.()

0 0 (1)

L.() m ,.... -L.()

0 0

'?Jq,(J

I

I

I

'----

-

J

of 0

"'"

I I

J

I I

I

I I

492,000 492,200

-+

//

-

+ +

390

+

---

492,400

+

wp#1 08 (2.2), ~239.2),

wp#1 09 (1.9), (1 05.7) + (286),(1 09.5)~wp#1 07 (1.5),

(1~.8),(13.4)

wp#112 (2.5), ~ wp#114 (3.3), (27.4), 3 .6) ( 1.9),(50.9)

~ ROBERTS wp#113 (2. 7),

(121.1), (65.9)

3014452

+

492,600

( I

+ )

Rl~ ":J

{ \

I

a ~

I

)

I I

I . . - .. • .. .J • :.:..·. =--·-- •.. ,~· . . ··-·· ·-- -- ··~ . . . . . .:: . . .. . . .... -· . . . . . . . . :_ .. __ -·· ·--··· ·-·· ·-·-

• • ·------ .._-.lrl'_. ••••• • ·--·-· .... . ..... ·.: .. "):))./..(. ··-·-· ··. · ... ~_(_.,. ·. ···-. ~:-))/..{. ··-- .... I rl'_- ···- • • »JM. ··-·-· ·-·· -·· ···-. .':-))~..,(. ··-·-· ·-·· -·· . ···-· ··-·-· ·-·· ":-:::.1 ···-· .. . . ···-· . ":-;:..~.&: ···-· .. i.l' •• ···-· • • . . .;;..:-. . . ···--. . . ···- . ·-·· . . ··--.

-~ :·-:;~ ···-- .. 1 .. --~ ·: .... ~ ··:::· .. . . . . . . . -·. . .. -. . . . . ·-·· .. •-•• ·-·-- •oo o I o I I ···-· ·-- ··-- ·-·· E~~..J.--....:,: ... . .... . .. .. ·-. . ..

"<t_ + + + + ·~~~=====~~==~~====~~::~=~=~~====================~===~========~==;=====~=====~;;=~~~~;~=====~=====================r====~==========================; 1.{) ~ ~~· ~ ., ..

Gc C7 (J • Legend:

0 Scintillometer Local Roads D Lakes Station# Rail Lines Wetland Area K%

D U (ppm) Trails Firebird Claims ' Til (ppm) r

Utility Lines Wooded Area - -

Contours p---. I_ __ ~ Townships

Rivers/Streams

N

~=-- E

\ ~ t

s

Scale

----~==~---====----m 0 25 50 75 100 125

Firebird Resources Inc. Scintillometer Locations Map A,


Date: 21/06/11 Scale: 1 :3,750 Figure:


NAD83 5 degree grid

_t-,~_2 _.._ ) ~

WP2008-95

<l Ll!l' '\

I-

I 4213069

q

0 cJI~

. Bt:RTD

3009359

-t:::::~- ~ <-,'->'~~

~KIT~,

I 6 1~ 4213o~

I

~ ~

J (~=-

I

')

I --

\-;;(

?

! & \1\(' ·~ ~.

~;t.

= .

3014452 ~""-._

'---.

'>)

U!!!

4213061

I

I •

\ (/ "'--- ) ()

e e

L

425851fl

•

y "\~ c- ' l

,,~ ~ v I f" .._) iv 'i

\ l\ ~ ~BERESfORD

\

~-

-Q.;- - _,

~)

U!l'

{

\

independent technical report roberts-creelman property

Documents