increasing the pneumococcal and ... - ut health san antoniouthscsa.edu/cpshp/cseproject/increasing...
TRANSCRIPT
Increasing the Pneumococcal
and Influenza vaccination
hospitalized patients
Dr. Robyn PoteetDr. Amruta Parekh
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio San Antonio, TX
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety
Robyn Poteet, M.D.
(210) 358-1944
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety
CONTACT
TEAM
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety
• PHYSICIANSHospital Medicine – Robyn Poteet
• FACILITATOR
Amruta Parekh, MD, MPH
• NURSING
• PHARMACY
• SOCIAL WORK
•TECH/STATISTICAL SUPPORT
Wayne Fischer, MS, PhD
Need team picture
Please fill in the names…
LIST OF CUSTOMERS
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety
• PATIENTS
• PROVIDERS
• NURSING
•PHARMACY
• HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety
• Literature….Please fill in
some literature
justifying the
aim statement
AIM STATEMENT
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety
To increase the rate of
Pneumococcal and Influenza
vaccination by 20% over a period
of 4 months in patients
hospitalized with Pneumonia
Preintervention data for
Influenza Vaccine
CL 0.101
UCL0.366
0.000
0.100
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.600
2007 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 Oct 2007 Nov 2007 Dec 2008 Jan 2008 Feb
Fra
cti
on
giv
en
vaccin
e
Months (given only during the "Flu" season)
LCL 0.0
Only 10% of eligible patients were receiving the vaccine on discharge !
Preintervention data for
Pneumococcal Vaccine
Only 30% of eligible patients were receiving the vaccine on discharge !
There was a lot of variation too.
CL0.300
UCL0.861
0.000
0.200
0.400
0.600
0.800
1.000
1.200
2007 Jan
2007 Feb
2007 Mar
2007 Apr
2007 May
2007 June
2007 July
2007 Aug
2007 Sept
2007 Oct
2007 Nov
2007 Dec
2008 Jan
2008 Feb
2008 Mar
2008 April
2008 May
2008 June
2008 July
2008 Aug
2008 Sept
Perc
en
tag
e g
iven
vaccin
e
Months
LCL 0.00
PROCESS FLOW - Pre Intervention
CAUSE & EFFECT DIAGRAM
Intervention• Team discussed the process
• Found out:
• Too cumbersome
• Missed some of the patients due to lack of
immunization records on charts
• Delay in getting vials form Pharmacy led to
delayed discharge or even patient refusal
• Action taken
• Have immunization data on electronic medical
record (EMR) on admission.
• Have vaccine vials on patient floors
PROCESS FLOW - Post Intervention
CL 0.101
0.771
UCL
0.353
1.000
LCL
0.422
0.000
0.200
0.400
0.600
0.800
1.000
1.200
2007 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 Oct 2007 Nov2007 Dec2008 Jan 2008 Feb 2008 Oct 2008 Nov2008 Dec2009 Jan 2009 Feb2009 Mar
Fra
cti
on
of
pati
en
ts g
iven
vaccin
e
Months
Preintervention PostinterventionPreintervention Postintervention
0.0
UCL
CL
LCL
Preintervention Postintervention
0.0
UCL
CL
LCL
Preintervention Postintervention
0.0
UCL
CL
LCL
Preintervention Postintervention
0.0
UCL
CL
LCL
Comparison of Pre and Post intervention
Influenza Vaccination in patients
Comparison of Pre and Post intervention
Pneumonia Vaccination in patients
CL 0.300
0.645
UCL
0.861
1.000
0.000
0.200
0.400
0.600
0.800
1.000
1.200
Perc
en
tag
e o
f p
ati
en
ts v
accin
ate
d
Months
Preintervention Post intervention
RESULTS
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety
•Influenza vaccination: Increased number of
immunized patients from 10% to 70%
•Pneumococcal vaccination: Increased
number of immunized patients from 30% to
64.5%
•More streamlined process
•Faster ..as vaccine available on floor
•Less duplication of work as EMR captured
data
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety
We put in… We hope to achieve…
•Cost of vaccine on floor
•Start-up cost = $•could include storage??
•Yearly cost = $
•Approx ?? medicine
admissions/month
•Average ?? Get vaccinated per
month
•$ generated
WHERE ARE WE GOING?
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety
Other possible interventions:
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety
PERTINENT POINTS FROM
LITERATURE
CONCLUSIONS
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety
•Baseline process was extremely complicated and
involved lot of steps.
•Critical evaluation of the process enabled us to identify
simple solutions that made a big difference.
•Seeing the variability in the SPC chart before and after
intervention showed surprising but reassuring results.
•Knowledge of basic tools was integral to visualizing
the goal and achieving the aims.
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety
QUESTIONS?
Educating for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety