income tax reviewer

Upload: karlo-marco-cleto

Post on 04-Jun-2018

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    1/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 1

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    CHAPTER 1GENERAL PRINCIPLES

    FEATURES OF PHILIPPINE INCOME TAXATION

    TAX SITUS! Literally means the place of taxation, or the country that has

    jurisdiction to levy a particular tax on persons, property, rights

    or business

    ! The basis of tax situs is the symbiotic relationshipthe state or

    unit that gives protection has the right to demand support

    SITUS OF PERSONS IN INCOME TAXATION1. Nationality theorya citizen of the Philippines is subject to

    Philippine income tax on his worldwide income, if he resides in

    the Philippines; or only on his income from sources within the

    Philippines if he qualifies as a non-resident citizenhence, hisincome from sources outside the Philippines shall be exempt

    from Philippine income tax

    2. Domicillary theorylegal residence; an alien is subject to

    Philippine income tax because of his residence in the Philippines

    3. Sourceplace where the income is derived (based on activity)

    PROGRESSIVE V. REGRESSIVE SYSTEM OF TAXATION! Progressive system of taxationrate of tax increases as the tax

    base or bracket increases

    ! Regressive systemthe rate of tax decreases as the tax base or

    bracket increases

    ! Note that we dont have any regressive taxes in the Philippines

    GLOBAL V. SCHEDULAR SYSTEM OF TAXATION! Individual income taxation adopted the schedular system of

    taxation

    ! Global systemthe total allowable deductions as well as

    personal and additional exemptions, in the case of individuals or

    the total allowable deductions only, in the case of corporations,

    are deducted from the gross income to arrive at the net taxable

    income subject to the graduated income tax rates, in the case of

    individuals, or to the 2-tiered income tax rates, in the case of

    corporations (all items of gross income, deductions, and personal

    and additional exemptions, if any, are reported in one income

    tax return, and one set of tax rates are applied on the tax base)

    ! Schedular systema system employed where the income tax

    treatment varies and made to depend on the kind or category ofthe taxpayers taxable income

    CHARACTERISTICS OF SCHEDULAR SYSTEM OF TAXATION1. It accords different tax treatment on the income of the

    individual taxpayer

    2. It classifies income

    GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF INCOME TAXATION

    WHAT ARE THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF INCOMETAXATION?1. A citizen of the Philippines residingtherein is taxable on all income

    derived from sources within and without the Philippines;2. A nonresident citizen is taxable only on income derived from sources

    within the Philippines;

    3. An individual citizen of the Philippines who is working and deriving

    income from abroad as an overseas contract worker is taxable only

    on income derived from sources within the Philippines: Provided,

    That a seaman who is a citizen of the Philippines and who receives

    compensation for services rendered abroad as a member of the

    complement of a vessel engaged exclusively in international trade

    shall be treated as an overseas contract worker;

    4. An alien individual, whether a resident or not of the Philippines, is

    taxable onlyon income derived from sources within the Philippines;

    5. A domestic corporation is taxable on all income derivedfrom sources

    within and without the Philippines; and

    6. A foreign corporation, whether engaged or not in trade or business

    in the Philippines, is taxable only on income derived from sources

    within the Philippines.

    SCOPE OF INCOME TAXATION

    DEFINITION OF TERMS

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    2/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 2

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    PERSONS

    ! It means an individual, a trust, estate or corporation.

    CORPORATION

    !

    It shall include partnerships, no matter how created ororganized, joint-stock companies, joint accounts (cuentas en

    participacion), association, or insurance companies, but does not

    include general professional partnerships and a joint venture or

    consortium formed for the purpose of undertaking construction

    projects or engaging in petroleum, coal, geothermal and other

    energy operations pursuant to an operating consortium

    agreement under a service contract with the Government.

    "General professional partnerships" are partnerships formed by

    persons for the sole purpose of exercising their common

    profession, no part of the income of which is derived from

    engaging in any trade or business.

    DOMESTIC! The term "domestic", when applied to a corporation, means

    created or organized in the Philippines or under its laws.

    FOREIGN

    ! The term "foreign", when applied to a corporation, means a

    corporation which is not domestic.

    NONRESIDENT CITIZEN

    1. A citizen of the Philippines who establishes to the satisfaction of

    the Commissioner the fact of his physical presence abroad with

    a definite intention to reside therein.

    2. A citizen of the Philippines who leaves the Philippines during

    the taxable year to reside abroad, either as an immigrant or foremployment on a permanent basis.

    3. A citizen of the Philippines who works and derives income from

    abroad and whose employment thereat requires him to be

    physically present abroad most of the time during the taxable

    year.

    4. A citizen who has been previously considered as nonresident

    citizen and who arrives in the Philippines at any time during

    the taxable year to reside permanently in the Philippines shall

    likewise be treated as a nonresident citizen for the taxable year

    in which he arrives in the Philippines with respect to his income

    derived from sources abroad until the date of his arrival in the

    Philippines.

    5.

    The taxpayer shall submit proof to the Commissioner to showhis intention of leaving the Philippines to reside permanently

    abroad or to return to and reside in the Philippines as the case

    may be for purpose of this Section.

    RESIDENT ALIEN

    ! It means an individual whose residence is within the Philippines

    and who is not a citizen thereof.

    NON-RESIDENT ALIEN

    ! It means an individual whose residence is not within the

    Philippines and who is not a citizen thereof.

    RESIDENT FOREIGN CORPORATION! The term applies to a foreign corporation engaged in trade or

    business within the Philippines.

    NON-RESIDENT FOREIGN CORPORATION

    ! The term applies to a foreign corporation not engaged in trade or

    business within the Philippines.

    FIDUCIARY

    ! The term means a guardian, trustee, executor, administrator,

    receiver, conservator or any person acting in any fiduciary

    capacity for any person.

    WITHHOLDING AGENT! The term means any person required to deduct and withhold

    any tax under the provisions of Section 57.

    SHARES OF STOCK

    ! The term shall include shares of stock of a corporation, warrants

    and/or options to purchase shares of stock, as well as units of

    participation in a partnership (except general professional

    partnerships), joint stock companies, joint accounts, joint

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    3/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 3

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    ventures taxable as corporations, associations and recreation or

    amusement clubs (such as golf, polo or similar clubs), and

    mutual fund certificates.

    SHAREHOLDER! The term shall include holders of a share/s of stock, warrant/s

    and/or option/s to purchase shares of stock of a corporation, as

    well as a holder of a unit of participation in a partnership

    (except general professional partnerships) in a joint stock

    company, a joint account, a taxable joint venture, a member of

    an association, recreation or amusement club (such as golf, polo

    or similar clubs) and a holder of a mutual fund certificate, a

    member in an association, joint-stock company, or insurance

    company.

    TAXPAYER

    ! The term means any person subject to tax imposed by this Title.

    INCLUDING OR INCLUDES

    ! The terms when used in a definition contained in this Title,

    shall not be deemed to exclude other things otherwise within the

    meaning of the term defined.

    TAXABLE YEAR

    ! The term means the calendar year, or the fiscal year ending

    during such calendar year, upon the basis of which the net

    income is computed under this Title. 'Taxable year' includes, in

    the case of a return made for a fractional part of a year under

    the provisions of this Title or under rules and regulations

    prescribed by the Secretary of Finance, upon recommendation of

    the commissioner, the period for which such return is made.

    FISCAL YEAR

    ! The term means an accounting period of twelve (12) months

    ending on the last day of any month other than December.

    PAID OR INCURRED/PAID OR ACCRUED

    ! The terms shall be construed according to the method of

    accounting upon the basis of which the net income is computed

    under this Title.

    TRADE OR BUSINESS! The term includes the performance of the functions of a public

    office.

    SECURITIES

    ! The term means shares of stock in a corporation and rights to

    subscribe for or to receive such shares. The term includes bonds,

    debentures, notes or certificates, or other evidence or

    indebtedness, issued by any corporation, including those issued

    by a government or political subdivision thereof, with interest

    coupons or in registered form.

    DEALER IN SECURITIES

    !

    The term means a merchant of stocks or securities, whether anindividual, partnership or corporation, with an established place

    of business, regularly engaged in the purchase of securities and

    the resale thereof to customers; that is, one who, as a merchant,

    buys securities and re-sells them to customers with a view to the

    gains and profits that may be derived therefrom.

    BANK

    ! The term means every banking institution, as defined in Section

    2 of Republic Act No. 337, as amended, otherwise known as the

    General banking Act. A bank may either be a commercial bank,

    a thrift bank, a development bank, a rural bank or specialized

    government bank.

    NON-BANK FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARY

    ! The term means a financial intermediary, as defined in Section

    2(D)(C) of Republic Act No. 337, as amended, otherwise known

    as the General Banking Act, authorized by the Bangko Sentral

    ng Pilipinas (BSP) to perform quasi-banking activities.

    QUASI-BANKING ACTIVITIES

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    4/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 4

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    ! The term means borrowing funds from twenty (20) or more

    personal or corporate lenders at any one time, through the

    issuance, endorsement, or acceptance of debt instruments of any

    kind other than deposits for the borrower's own account, or

    through the issuance of certificates of assignment or similarinstruments, with recourse, or of repurchase agreements for

    purposes of relending or purchasing receivables and other

    similar obligations: Provided, however, That commercial,

    industrial and other non-financial companies, which borrow

    funds through any of these means for the limited purpose of

    financing their own needs or the needs of their agents or dealers,

    shall not be considered as performing quasi-banking functions.

    DEPOSIT SUBSTITUTES

    ! The term shall mean an alternative from of obtaining funds

    from the public (the term 'public' means borrowing from twenty

    (20) or more individual or corporate lenders at any one time)

    other than deposits, through the issuance, endorsement, oracceptance of debt instruments for the borrowers own account,

    for the purpose of relending or purchasing of receivables and

    other obligations, or financing their own needs or the needs of

    their agent or dealer. These instruments may include, but need

    not be limited to bankers' acceptances, promissory notes,

    repurchase agreements, including reverse repurchase

    agreements entered into by and between the Bangko Sentral ng

    Pilipinas (BSP) and any authorized agent bank, certificates of

    assignment or participation and similar instruments with

    recourse: Provided, however, That debt instruments issued for

    interbank call loans with maturity of not more than five (5) days

    to cover deficiency in reserves against deposit liabilities,

    including those between or among banks and quasi-banks, shallnot be considered as deposit substitute debt instruments.

    ORDINARY INCOME

    ! The term includes any gain from the sale or exchange of

    property which is not a capital asset or property described in

    Section 39(A)(1). Any gain from the sale or exchange of property

    which is treated or considered, under other provisions of this

    Title, as 'ordinary income' shall be treated as gain from the sale

    or exchange of property which is not a capital asset as defined in

    Section 39(A)(1). The term 'ordinary loss' includes any loss from

    the sale or exchange of property which is not a capital asset. Any

    loss from the sale or exchange of property which is treated or

    considered, under other provisions of this Title, as 'ordinary loss'shall be treated as loss from the sale or exchange of property

    which is not a capital asset.

    RANK AND FILE EMPLOYEES

    ! The term shall mean all employees who are holding neither

    managerial nor supervisory position as defined under existing

    provisions of the Labor Code of the Philippines, as amended.

    MUTUAL FUND COMPANY

    ! The term shall mean an open-end and close-end investment

    company as defined under the Investment Company Act.

    TRADE, BUSINESS OR PROFESSION! The term shall not include performance of services by the

    taxpayer as an employee.

    REGIONAL OR AREA HEADQUARTERS

    ! The term shall mean a branch established in the Philippines by

    multinational companies and which headquarters do not earn or

    derive income from the Philippines and which act as

    supervisory, communications and coordinating center for their

    affiliates, subsidiaries, or branches in the Asia-Pacific Region

    and other foreign markets.

    REGIONAL OPERATING HEADQUARTERS

    !

    The term shall mean a branch established in the Philippines bymultinational companies which are engaged in any of the

    following services: general administration and planning;

    business planning and coordination; sourcing and procurement

    of raw materials and components; corporate finance advisory

    services; marketing control and sales promotion; training and

    personnel management; logistic services; research and

    development services and product development; technical

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    5/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 5

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    support and maintenance; data processing and communications;

    and business development.

    LONG-TERM DEPOSIT OR INVESTMENT CERTIFICATES

    !

    The term shall refer to certificate of time deposit or investmentin the form of savings, common or individual trust funds, deposit

    substitutes, investment management accounts and other

    investments with a maturity period of not less than five (5)

    years, the form of which shall be prescribed by the Bangko

    Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and issued by banks only (not by

    nonbank financial intermediaries and finance companies) to

    individuals in denominations of Ten thousand pesos (P10,000)

    and other denominations as may be prescribed by the BS.

    TAXPAYER! Refers to any person subject to tax imposed by this Title.

    PERSONS! It means an individual, a trust, estate or corporation

    PERSONS LIABLE TO TAX

    CIR V. PROCTER AND GAMBLE204 SCRA 378

    FACTS:

    PMC paid a 25-35% tax on its income for a relevant year. Thereafter,

    deriving at its net income, it declared dividends for the benefit of PMC-

    USA. From this declared dividends, it paid a 25% tax, as per taxation

    laws. The company did the same for the next few quarters. Then,

    contending that it is the withholding agent for the tax paid on thedividends paid to PMC-USA, it requested for the refund of its alleged

    overpayments of taxes. The company was denied the refund and

    coursing through the CTA, the latter ruled in its favor.

    HELD:

    The submission of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that PMC-Phil.

    is but a withholding agent of the government and therefore cannot claim

    reimbursement of the alleged over paid taxes, is completely meritorious.

    The real party in interest being the mother corporation in the United

    States, it follows that American entity is the real party in interest, and

    should have been the claimant in this case.

    Closely intertwined with the first assignment of error is the issue ofwhether or not PMC-U.S.A. is a non-resident foreign corporation under

    Section 24(b)(1) of the Tax Code (the subsidiary of an American) a

    domestic corporation domiciled in the United States, is entitled under

    the U.S. Tax Code to a United States Foreign Tax Credit equivalent to at

    least the 20 percentage paid portion (of the 35% dividend tax) spared or

    waived as otherwise considered or deemed paid by the government. The

    law pertinent to the issue is Section 902 of the U.S. Internal Revenue

    Code, as amended by Public Law 87-834, the law governing tax credits

    granted to U.S. corporations on dividends received from foreign

    corporations, which to the extent applicable reads:

    SEC. 902 - CREDIT FOR CORPORATE STOCKHOLDERS IN

    FOREIGN CORPORATION.(a) Treatment of Taxes Paid by Foreign Corporation - For purposes of this

    subject, a domestic corporation which owns at least 10 percent of the

    voting stock of a foreign corporation from which it receives dividends in

    any taxable year shall-

    (1) to the extent such dividends are paid by such foreign corporation out

    of accumulated profits [as defined in subsection (c) (1) (a)] of a year for

    which such foreign corporation is not a less developed country

    corporation, be deemed to have paid the same proportion of any income,

    war profits, or excess profits taxes paid or deemed to be paid by such

    foreign corporation to any foreign country or to any possession of the

    United States on or with respect to such accumulated profits, which the

    amount of such dividends (determined without regard to Section 78)bears to the amount of such accumulated profits in excess of such income,

    war profits, and excess profits taxes (other than those deemed paid); and

    (2) to the extent such dividends are paid by such foreign corporation out

    of accumulated profits [as defined in subsection (c) (1) (b)] of a year for

    which such foreign corporation is a less-developed country corporation,

    be deemed to have paid the same proportion of any income, war profits,

    or excess profits taxes paid or deemed to be paid by such foreign

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    6/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 6

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    corporation to any foreign country or to any possession of the United

    States on or with respect to such accumulated profits, which the amount

    of such dividends bears to the amount of such accumulated profits.

    xxx xxx xxx

    (c) Applicable Rules

    (1) Accumulated profits defined - For purpose of this section, the term

    'accumulated profits' means with respect to any foreign corporation.

    (A) for purposes of subsections (a) (1) and (b) (1), the amount of its gains,

    profits, or income computed without reduction by the amount of the

    income, war profits, and excess profits taxes imposed on or with respect

    to such profits or income by any foreign country.... ; and

    (B) for purposes of subsections (a) (2) and (b) (2), the amount of its gains,

    profits, or income in excess of the income, was profits, and excess profits

    taxes imposed on or with respect to such profits or income.

    The Secretary or his delegate shall have full power to determine from the

    accumulated profits of what year or years such dividends were paid,

    treating dividends paid in the first 20 days of any year as having been

    paid from the accumulated profits of the preceding year or years (unless

    to his satisfaction shows otherwise), and in other respects treating

    dividends as having been paid from the most recently accumulated gains,

    profits, or earnings.

    There is nothing in the aforecited provision that would justify tax return

    of the disputed 15% to the private respondent. Furthermore, as ably

    argued by the petitioner, the private respondent failed to meet certain

    conditions necessary in order that the dividends received by the non-

    resident parent company in the United States may be subject to thepreferential 15% tax instead of 35%. Among other things, the private

    respondent failed: (1) to show the actual amount credited by the U.S.

    government against the income tax due from PMC-U.S.A. on the

    dividends received from private respondent; (2) to present the income tax

    return of its mother company for 1975 when the dividends were received;

    and (3) to submit any duly authenticated document showing that the

    U.S. government credited the 20% tax deemed paid in the Philippines.

    CHAPTER 2CLASSIFICATION OF INCOME TAXPAYERS

    INDIVIDUALS

    CITIZENS

    Section 1. The following are citizens of the Philippines:

    (1) Those who are citizens of the Philippines at the time of the adoption

    of this Constitution;

    (2) Those whose fathers or mothers are citizens of the Philippines;

    (3) Those born before January 17, 1973, of Filipino mothers, who elect

    Philippine Citizenship upon reaching the age of majority; and

    (4) Those who are naturalized in the accordance with law.

    Section 2. Natural-born citizens are those who are citizens of the

    Philippines from birth without having to perform any act to acquire or

    perfect their Philippine citizenship. Those who elect Philippine

    citizenship in accordance with paragraph (3), Section 1 hereof shall be

    deemed natural-born citizens.

    NONRESIDENT CITIZEN

    1. A citizen of the Philippines who establishes to the satisfaction of

    the Commissioner the fact of his physical presence abroad with

    a definite intention to reside therein.

    2.

    A citizen of the Philippines who leaves the Philippines duringthe taxable year to reside abroad, either as an immigrant or for

    employment on a permanent basis.

    3. A citizen of the Philippines who works and derives income from

    abroad and whose employment thereat requires him to be

    physically present abroad most of the time during the taxable

    year.

    4. A citizen who has been previously considered as nonresident

    citizen and who arrives in the Philippines at any time during

    the taxable year to reside permanently in the Philippines shall

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    7/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 7

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    likewise be treated as a nonresident citizen for the taxable year

    in which he arrives in the Philippines with respect to his income

    derived from sources abroad until the date of his arrival in the

    Philippines.

    5.

    The taxpayer shall submit proof to the Commissioner to showhis intention of leaving the Philippines to reside permanently

    abroad or to return to and reside in the Philippines as the case

    may be for purpose of this Section.

    ALIENS

    RESIDENT ALIEN

    ! It means an individual whose residence is within the Philippines

    and who is not a citizen thereof.

    NON-RESIDENT ALIEN

    ! It means an individual whose residence is not within the

    Philippines and who is not a citizen thereof.

    GENERAL PROFESSIONAL PARTNERSHIP! Are partnerships formed by persons for the sole purpose of

    exercising their common profession, no part of the income of

    which is derived from engaging in any trade or business.

    Definition Sourcerule

    Individuals

    Citizens: Residents Within,

    without

    Non-residents Sec. 22, E w/in

    Aliens: Residents Sec. 22, F w/in

    Non-

    residents

    Engaged in

    trade or

    business

    w/in

    Not

    engaged

    Section 25,

    A

    GPP Sec. 22, B It depends

    Estate/trusts Depends

    Corporations

    Domestic w/in, w/out

    Foreign Resident w/in

    Non-

    resident

    w/in

    TAN V. CIRGR L-109289, OCTOBER 3, 1994

    FACTS:

    This case seeks to assail the constitutionality of Republic Act No. 7496,

    also commonly known as the Simplified Net Income Taxation Scheme

    ("SNIT"), amending certain provisions of the National Internal Revenue

    Code and, in G.R. No. 109446, the validity of Section 6, Revenue

    Regulations No. 2-93, promulgated by public respondents pursuant to

    said law.

    The several propositions advanced by petitioners revolve around the

    question of whether or not public respondents have exceeded their

    authority in promulgating Section 6, Revenue Regulations No. 2-93, to

    carry out Republic Act No. 7496.

    The questioned regulation reads:

    Sec. 6. General Professional Partnership The general professional

    partnership (GPP) and the partners comprising the GPP are covered by

    R. A. No. 7496. Thus, in determining the net profit of the partnership,

    only the direct costs mentioned in said law are to be deducted from

    partnership income. Also, the expenses paid or incurred by partners intheir individual capacities in the practice of their profession which are

    not reimbursed or paid by the partnership but are not considered as

    direct cost, are not deductible from his gross income.

    The real objection of petitioners is focused on the administrative

    interpretation of public respondents that would apply SNIT to partners

    in general professional partnerships.

    HELD:

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    8/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 8

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    The Court, first of all, should like to correct the apparent misconception

    that general professional partnerships are subject to the payment of

    income tax or that there is a difference in the tax treatment between

    individuals engaged in business or in the practice of their respective

    professions and partners in general professional partnerships. The fact ofthe matter is that a general professional partnership, unlike an ordinary

    business partnership (which is treated as a corporation for income tax

    purposes and so subject to the corporate income tax), is not itself an

    income taxpayer. The income tax is imposed not on the professional

    partnership, which is tax exempt, but on the partners themselves in

    their individual capacity computed on their distributive shares of

    partnership profits.

    There is, then and now, no distinction in income tax liability between a

    person who practices his profession alone or individually and one who

    does it through partnership (whether registered or not) with others in

    the exercise of a common profession. Indeed, outside of the gross

    compensation income tax and the final tax on passive investment income,under the present income tax system all individuals deriving income

    from any source whatsoever are treated in almost invariably the same

    manner and under a common set of rules.

    We can well appreciate the concern taken by petitioners if perhaps we

    were to consider Republic Act No. 7496 as an entirely independent, not

    merely as an amendatory, piece of legislation. The view can easily

    become myopic, however, when the law is understood, as it should be, as

    only forming part of, and subject to, the whole income tax concept and

    precepts long obtaining under the National Internal Revenue Code. To

    elaborate a little, the phrase "income taxpayers" is an all embracing term

    used in the Tax Code, and it practically covers all persons who derive

    taxable income. The law, in levying the tax, adopts the mostcomprehensive tax situs of nationality and residence of the taxpayer

    (that renders citizens, regardless of residence, and resident aliens subject

    to income tax liability on their income from all sources) and of the

    generally accepted and internationally recognized income taxable base

    (that can subject non-resident aliens and foreign corporations to income

    tax on their income from Philippine sources). In the process, the Code

    classifies taxpayers into four main groups, namely: (1) Individuals, (2)

    Corporations, (3) Estates under Judicial Settlement and (4) Irrevocable

    Trusts (irrevocable both as to corpus and as to income).

    Partnerships are, under the Code, either "taxable partnerships" or

    "exempt partnerships." Ordinarily, partnerships, no matter how createdor organized, are subject to income tax (and thus alluded to as "taxable

    partnerships") which, for purposes of the above categorization, are by law

    assimilated to be within the context of, and so legally contemplated as,

    corporations. Except for few variances, such as in the application of the

    "constructive receipt rule" in the derivation of income, the income tax

    approach is alike to both juridical persons. Obviously, SNIT is not

    intended or envisioned, as so correctly pointed out in the discussions in

    Congress during its deliberations on Republic Act 7496, aforequoted, to

    cover corporations and partnerships which are independently subject to

    the payment of income tax.

    "Exempt partnerships," upon the other hand, are not similarly identified

    as corporations nor even considered as independent taxable entities forincome tax purposes. A general professional partnership is such an

    example. 4 Here, the partners themselves, not the partnership (although

    it is still obligated to file an income tax return [mainly for administration

    and data]), are liable for the payment of income tax in their individual

    capacity computed on their respective and distributive shares of profits.

    In the determination of the tax liability, a partner does so as an

    individual, and there is no choice on the matter. In fine, under the Tax

    Code on income taxation, the general professional partnership is deemed

    to be no more than a mere mechanism or a flow-through entity in the

    generation of income by, and the ultimate distribution of such income to,

    respectively, each of the individual partners.

    Section 6 of Revenue Regulation No. 2-93 did not alter, but merelyconfirmed, the above standing rule as now so modified by Republic Act

    No. 7496 on basically the extent of allowable deductions applicable to all

    individual income taxpayers on their non-compensation income. There is

    no evident intention of the law, either before or after the amendatory

    legislation, to place in an unequal footing or in significant variance the

    income tax treatment of professionals who practice their respective

    professions individually and of those who do it through a general

    professional partnership.

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    9/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 9

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    ESTATES AND TRUSTS

    SEC. 60. Imposition of Tax. -

    (A) Application of Tax. - The tax imposed by this Title upon individuals

    shall apply to the income of estates or of any kind of property held in

    trust, including:

    (1) Income accumulated in trust for the benefit of unborn or

    unascertained person or persons with contingent interests, and income

    accumulated or held for future distribution under the terms of the will or

    trust;

    (2) Income which is to be distributed currently by the fiduciary to the

    beneficiaries, and income collected by a guardian of an infant which is to

    be held or distributed as the court may direct;

    (3) Income received by estates of deceased persons during the period of

    administration or settlement of the estate; and

    (4) Income which, in the discretion of the fiduciary, may be either

    distributed to the beneficiaries or accumulated.

    (B) Exception. - The tax imposed by this Title shall not apply to

    employee's trust which forms part of a pension, stock bonus or profit-

    sharing plan of an employer for the benefit of some or all of his

    employees (1) if contributions are made to the trust by such employer, or

    employees, or both for the purpose of distributing to such employees the

    earnings and principal of the fund accumulated by the trust in

    accordance with such plan, and (2) if under the trust instrument it is

    impossible, at any time prior to the satisfaction of all liabilities with

    respect to employees under the trust, for any part of the corpus or income

    to be (within the taxable year or thereafter) used for, or diverted to,

    purposes other than for the exclusive benefit of his employees: Provided,

    That any amount actually distributed to any employee or distributee

    shall be taxable to him in the year in which so distributed to the extent

    that it exceeds the amount contributed by such employee or distributee.

    (C) Computation and Payment. -

    (1) In General. - The tax shall be computed upon the taxable income

    of the estate or trust and shall be paid by the fiduciary, except as

    provided in Section 63 (relating to revocable trusts) and Section 64

    (relating to income for the benefit of the grantor).

    (2) Consolidation of Income of Two or More Trusts. - Where, in the

    case of two or more trusts, the creator of the trust in each instance is the

    same person, and the beneficiary in each instance is the same, the

    taxable income of all the trusts shall be consolidated and the tax

    provided in this Section computed on such consolidated income, and such

    proportion of said tax shall be assessed and collected from each trustee

    which the taxable income of the trust administered by him bears to the

    consolidated income of the several trusts.

    SEC. 61. Taxable Income. - The taxable income of the estate or trust

    shall be computed in the same manner and on the same basis as in the

    case of an individual, except that:

    (A) There shall be allowed as a deduction in computing the taxable

    income of the estate or trust the amount of the income of the estate or

    trust for the taxable year which is to be distributed currently by the

    fiduciary to the beneficiaries, and the amount of the income collected by

    a guardian of an infant which is to be held or distributed as the court

    may direct, but the amount so allowed as a deduction shall be included in

    computing the taxable income of the beneficiaries, whether distributed to

    them or not. Any amount allowed as a deduction under this Subsection

    shall not be allowed as a deduction under Subsection (B) of this Section

    in the same or any succeeding taxable year.

    (B) In the case of income received by estates of deceased persons during

    the period of administration or settlement of the estate, and in the case

    of income which, in the discretion of the fiduciary, may be either

    distributed to the beneficiary or accumulated, there shall be allowed as

    an additional deduction in computing the taxable income of the estate or

    trust the amount of the income of the estate or trust for its taxable year,

    which is properly paid or credited during such year to any legatee, heir or

    beneficiary but the amount so allowed as a deduction shall be included in

    computing the taxable income of the legatee, heir or beneficiary.

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    10/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 10

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    (C) In the case of a trust administered in a foreign country, the

    deductions mentioned in Subsections (A) and (B) of this Section shall not

    be allowed: Provided, That the amount of any income included in the

    return of said trust shall not be included in computing the income of the

    beneficiaries.

    SEC. 62. Exemption Allowed to Estates and Trusts. - For the purpose of

    the tax provided for in this Title, there shall be allowed an exemption of

    Twenty thousand pesos (P20,000) from the income of the estate or trust.

    SEC. 63. Revocable Trusts. - Where at any time the power to revest in

    the grantor title to any part of the corpus of the trust is vested (1) in the

    grantor either alone or in conjunction with any person not having a

    substantial adverse interest in the disposition of such part of the corpus

    or the income therefrom, or (2) in any person not having a substantial

    adverse interest in the disposition of such part of the corpus or the

    income therefrom, the income of such part of the trust shall be included

    in computing the taxable income of the grantor.

    SEC. 64. Income for Benefit of Grantor.-

    (A) Where any part of the income of a trust (1) is, or in the discretion of

    the grantor or of any person not having a substantial adverse interest in

    the disposition of such part of the income may be held or accumulated for

    future distribution to the grantor, or (2) may, or in the discretion of the

    grantor or of any person not having a substantial adverse interest in the

    disposition of such part of the income, be distributed to the grantor, or (3)

    is, or in the discretion of the grantor or of any person not having a

    substantial adverse interest in the disposition of such part of the income

    may be applied to the payment of premiums upon policies of insurance on

    the life of the grantor, such part of the income of the trust shall be

    included in computing the taxable income of the grantor.

    (B) As used in this Section, the term 'in the discretion of the grantor'

    means in the discretion of the grantor, either alone or in conjunction with

    any person not having a substantial adverse interest in the disposition of

    the part of the income in question.

    SEC. 65. Fiduciary Returns. - Guardians, trustees, executors,

    administrators, receivers, conservators and all persons or corporations,

    acting in any fiduciary capacity, shall render, in duplicate, a return of

    the income of the person, trust or estate for whom or which they act, and

    be subject to all the provisions of this Title, which apply to individuals in

    case such person, estate or trust has a gross income of Twenty thousand

    pesos (P20,000) or over during the taxable year. Such fiduciary or personfiling the return for him or it, shall take oath that he has sufficient

    knowledge of the affairs of such person, trust or estate to enable him to

    make such return and that the same is, to the best of his knowledge and

    belief, true and correct, and be subject to all the provisions of this Title

    which apply to individuals: Provided, That a return made by or for one or

    two or more joint fiduciaries filed in the province where such fiduciaries

    reside; under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of Finance,

    upon recommendation of the Commissioner, shall prescribe, shall be a

    sufficient compliance with the requirements of this Section.

    SEC. 66. Fiduciaries Indemnified Against Claims for Taxes Paid. -

    Trustees, executors, administrators and other fiduciaries are indemnified

    against the claims or demands of every beneficiary for all payments oftaxes which they shall be required to make under the provisions of this

    Title, and they shall have credit for the amount of such payments against

    the beneficiary or principal in any accounting which they make as such

    trustees or other fiduciaries.

    CIR V. VISAYAS ELECTRIC23 SCRA 715

    FACTS:

    Visayas Electric was given legislative franchise to operate and maintain

    an electric light, heat, and power system in the City of Cebu, certain

    municipalities in the Province of Cebu, and other surrounding places.

    In a board of directors' meeting, respondent company established a

    pension fund, known as the "Employees' Reserve for Pensions." Said fund

    is for the benefit of its "present and future" employees, in the event of

    retirement, accident or disability. Every month thereafter an amount has

    been set aside for this purpose. It is taken from the gross operating

    receipts of the company. This reserve fund was later invested by the

    company in stocks of San Miguel Brewery, Inc., for which dividends have

    been regularly received. But these dividends were not declared for tax

    purposes.

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    11/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 11

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    It was in a letter that the Auditor General gave notice that as the

    company has retained full control of the fund, therefore, the dividends

    are not tax exempt; but that such dividends may be excluded from gross

    receipts for franchise tax purposes, provided the same are declared forincome tax purposes.

    In pursuance of the above letter, the Provincial Auditor of Cebu allowed

    the company the option to declare the dividends either as part of the

    company's income for income tax purposes or as part of its income for

    franchise tax purposes. The company elected the latter. However, as per

    report of a revenue examiner, it was found out that the company was the

    full custodian of the funds and thus, the corporate income tax was

    imposed on the same.

    HELD:

    The disputed income are not receipts, revenues or profits of the company.

    They do not go to the general fund of the company. They are dividendsfrom the San Miguel Brewery, Inc. investment which form part of and

    are added to the reserve pension fund which is solely for the benefit of

    the employees, "to be distributed among the employees."

    Not escaping notice is that by the resolution of respondent company's

    board and the setting aside of monthly amounts from its gross operating

    receipts for that fund, said company was merely acting, with respect to

    such fund, as trustee for its employees. For, indeed, the intention to

    establish a trust in favor of the employees is clear. A valid express trust

    has thus been created. And, for tax purposes, the employees' reserve fund

    is a separate taxable entity. Respondent company then, while retaining

    legal title and custody over the property, holds it in trust for the

    beneficiaries mentioned in the resolution creating the trust, in theabsence of any condition therein which would, in effect, destroy the

    intention to create a trust.

    Given the fact that the dividends are returns of the trust estate and not

    of the grantor company, we must say that petitioner misconceived the

    import of the law when he assessed said dividends as part of the income

    of the company. Similarly, the tax court should not have considered them

    at all as the company's "receipts, revenues and profits" which are exempt

    from income tax.

    CIR V. CA, CTA, GCL RETIREMENT PLAN

    207 SCRA 487

    FACTS:

    Private Respondent, GCL Retirement Plan (GCL, for brevity) is an

    employees' trust maintained by the employer, GCL Inc., to provide

    retirement, pension, disability and death benefits to its employees. The

    Plan as submitted was approved and qualified as exempt from income

    tax by Petitioner Commissioner of Internal Revenue in accordance with

    Rep. Act No. 4917.

    Respondent GCL made investsments and earned therefrom interest

    income from which was witheld the fifteen per centum (15%) final

    witholding tax imposed by Pres. Decree No. 1959.

    Respondent GCL filed with Petitioner a claim for refund in the amounts

    of P1,312.66 withheld by Anscor Capital and Investment Corp., and

    P2,064.15 by Commercial Bank of Manila. On 12 February 1985, it filed

    a second claim for refund of the amount of P7,925.00 withheld by Anscor,

    stating in both letters that it disagreed with the collection of the 15%

    final withholding tax from the interest income as it is an entity fully

    exempt from income tax asprovided under Rep. Act No. 4917 in relation

    to Section 56 (b)of the Tax Code.

    The refund requested having been denied, Respondent GCL elevated the

    matter to respondent Court of Tax Appeals (CTA). The latter ruled in

    favor of GCL, holding that employees' trusts are exempt from the 15%

    final withholding tax on interest income and ordering a refund of the taxwithheld.

    HELD:

    It is to be noted that the exemption from withholding tax on interest on

    bank deposits previously extended by Pres. Decree No. 1739 if the

    recipient (individual or corporation) of the interest income is exempt

    from income taxation, and the imposition of the preferential tax rates if

    the recipient of the income is enjoying preferential income tax treatment,

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    12/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 12

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    were both abolished by Pres. Decree No. 1959. Petitioner thus submits

    that the deletion of the exempting and preferential tax treatment

    provisions under the old law is a clear manifestation that the single 15%

    (now 20%) rate is impossible on all interest incomes from deposits,

    deposit substitutes, trust funds and similar arrangements, regardless ofthe tax status or character of the recipients thereof. In short, petitioner's

    position is that from 15 October 1984 when Pres. Decree No. 1959 was

    promulgated, employees' trusts ceased to be exempt and thereafter

    became subject to the final withholding tax.

    To begin with, it is significant to note that the GCL Plan was qualified as

    exempt from income tax by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in

    accordance with Rep. Act No. 4917 approved on 17 June 1967. This law

    specificallyprovided:

    Sec. 1. Any provision of law to the contrary notwithstanding, the

    retirement benefits received by officials and employees of private firms,

    whether individual or corporate, in accordance with a reasonable privatebenefit plan maintained by the employer shall be exempt from all taxes

    and shall not be liable to attachment, levy or seizure by or under any

    legal or equitable process whatsoever except to pay a debt of the official

    or employee concerned to the private benefit plan or that arising from

    liability imposed in a criminal action; . . . (emphasis ours).

    In so far as employees' trusts are concerned, the foregoing provision

    should be taken in relation to then Section 56(b) (now 53[b]) of the Tax

    Code, as amended by Rep. Act No. 1983, supra, which took effect on 22

    June 1957. This provision specifically exempted employee's trusts from

    income tax and is repeated hereunder for emphasis:

    Sec. 56. Imposition of Tax. !(a) Application of tax. !The taxes imposedby this Title upon individuals shall apply to the income of estates or of

    any kind of property held in trust.

    xxx xxx xxx

    (b) Exception. ! The tax imposed by this Title shall not apply toemployee's trust which forms part of a pension, stock bonus or profit-

    sharing plan of an employer for the benefit of some or all of his

    employees . . .

    The tax-exemption privilege of employees' trusts, as distinguished from

    any other kind of property held in trust, springs from the foregoingprovision. It is unambiguous. Manifest therefrom is that the tax law has

    singled out employees' trusts for tax exemption.

    And rightly so, by virtue of the raison de'etre behind the creation of

    employees' trusts. Employees' trusts or benefit plans normally provide

    economic assistance to employees upon the occurrence of certain

    contingencies, particularly, old age retirement, death, sickness, or

    disability. It provides security against certain hazards to which members

    of the Plan may be exposed. It is an independent and additional source of

    protection for the working group. What is more, it is established for their

    exclusive benefit and for no other purpose.

    The tax advantage in Rep. Act No. 1983, Section 56(b), was conceived in

    order to encourage the formation and establishment of such privatePlans for the benefit of laborers and employees outside of the Social

    Security Act.

    It is evident that tax-exemption is likewise to be enjoyed by the income of

    the pension trust. Otherwise, taxation of those earnings would result in a

    diminution accumulated income and reduce whatever the trust

    beneficiaries would receive out of the trust fund. This would run afoul of

    the very intendment of the law.

    The deletion in Pres. Decree No. 1959 of the provisos regarding tax

    exemption and preferential tax rates under the old law, therefore, can

    not be deemed to extent to employees' trusts. Said Decree, being a

    general law, can not repeal by implication a specific provision.

    CORPORATIONS

    SEC. 22. Definitions - When used in this Title:

    xxx

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    13/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 13

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    (B) The term "corporation" shall include partnerships, no matter how

    created or organized, joint-stock companies, joint accounts (cuentas en

    participacion), association, or insurance companies, but does not include

    general professional partnerships and a joint venture or consortium

    formed for the purpose of undertaking construction projects or engagingin petroleum, coal, geothermal and other energy operations pursuant to

    an operating consortium agreement under a service contract with the

    Government.

    xxx

    DOMESTIC CORPORATIONS! Are those created or organized in the Philippines or under its

    laws

    AS DISTINGUISHED FROM CO-OWNERSHIP!

    There is co-ownership whenever the ownership of an undividedthing or right belongs to different persons. Contrary stipulation

    is void. (CC)

    FOREIGN CORPORATIONS! Resident foreign corporationIt is a foreign corporation engaged

    in trade or business within the Philippines! Non-resident corporationit is a foreign corporation not

    engaged in trade or business within the Philippines.

    OA V. CIR45 SCRA 74

    FACTS:Petitioners were surviving heirs of Julia Baales. An action for partition

    of estate was instituted wherein Oa was appointed as the

    administrator. He was also appointed as the guardian of the minor

    children. No partition took place however. Instead, the funds and

    properties were used to increase income. It was invested in many things.

    The income derived was then divided equally among the petitioners.

    This prompted the Commissioner to hold that there was a formed

    unregistered partnership and subjected them to corporate income tax.

    HELD:

    The petitioners pose for our resolution the following questions: (1) Under

    the facts found by the Court of Tax Appeals, should petitioners be

    considered as co-owners of the properties inherited by them from the

    deceased Julia Buales and the profits derived from transactionsinvolving the same, or, must they be deemed to have formed an

    unregistered partnership subject to tax under Sections 24 and 84(b) of

    the National Internal Revenue Code? (2) Assuming they have formed an

    unregistered partnership, should this not be only in the sense that they

    invested as a common fund the profits earned by the properties owned by

    them in common and the loans granted to them upon the security of the

    said properties, with the result that as far as their respective shares in

    the inheritance are concerned, the total income thereof should be

    considered as that of co-owners and not of the unregistered partnership?

    And (3) assuming again that they are taxable as an unregistered

    partnership, should not the various amounts already paid by them for

    the same years 1955 and 1956 as individual income taxes on their

    respective shares of the profits accruing from the properties they ownedin common be deducted from the deficiency corporate taxes, herein

    involved, assessed against such unregistered partnership by the

    respondent Commissioner?

    It is thus incontrovertible that petitioners did not, contrary to their

    contention, merely limit themselves to holding the properties inherited

    by them. Indeed, it is admitted that during the material years herein

    involved, some of the said properties were sold at considerable profit, and

    that with said profit, petitioners engaged, thru Lorenzo T. Oa, in the

    purchase and sale of corporate securities. It is likewise admitted that all

    the profits from these ventures were divided among petitioners

    proportionately in accordance with their respective shares in the

    inheritance. In these circumstances, it is Our considered view that fromthe moment petitioners allowed not only the incomes from their

    respective shares of the inheritance but even the inherited properties

    themselves to be used by Lorenzo T. Oa as a common fund in

    undertaking several transactions or in business, with the intention of

    deriving profit to be shared by them proportionally, such act was

    tantamonut to actually contributing such incomes to a common fund and,

    in effect, they thereby formed an unregistered partnership within the

    purview of the above-mentioned provisions of the Tax Code.

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    14/99

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    15/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 15

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    and that they intended to divide the profits among themselves.

    Respondent commissioner and/ or his representative just assumed these

    conditions to be present on the basis of the fact that petitioners

    purchased certain parcels of land and became co-owners thereof.

    In Evangelists, there was a series of transactions where petitionerspurchased twenty-four (24) lots showing that the purpose was not limited

    to the conservation or preservation of the common fund or even the

    properties acquired by them. The character of habituality peculiar to

    business transactions engaged in for the purpose of gain was present.

    The sharing of returns does not in itself establish a partnership whether

    or not the persons sharing therein have a joint or common right or

    interest in the property. There must be a clear intent to form a

    partnership, the existence of a juridical personality different from the

    individual partners, and the freedom of each party to transfer or assign

    the whole property.

    In the present case, there is clear evidence of co-ownership between thepetitioners. There is no adequate basis to support the proposition that

    they thereby formed an unregistered partnership. The two isolated

    transactions whereby they purchased properties and sold the same a few

    years thereafter did not thereby make them partners. They shared in the

    gross profits as co- owners and paid their capital gains taxes on their net

    profits and availed of the tax amnesty thereby. Under the circumstances,

    they cannot be considered to have formed an unregistered partnership

    which is thereby liable for corporate income tax, as the respondent

    commissioner proposes.

    And even assuming for the sake of argument that such unregistered

    partnership appears to have been formed, since there is no such existing

    unregistered partnership with a distinct personality nor with assets thatcan be held liable for said deficiency corporate income tax, then

    petitioners can be held individually liable as partners for this unpaid

    obligation of the partnershipIn the instant case, petitioners bought two

    (2) parcels of land in 1965. They did not sell the same nor make any

    improvements thereon. In 1966, they bought another three (3) parcels of

    land from one seller. It was only 1968 when they sold the two (2) parcels

    of land after which they did not make any additional or new purchase.

    The remaining three (3) parcels were sold by them in 1970. The

    transactions were isolated. The character of habituality peculiar to

    business transactions for the purpose of gain was not present.

    AFISCO INSURANCE CORPORATION V. CIR

    GR 112675, JANUARY 25, 1999302 SCRA 1

    FACTS:

    The petitioners are 41 non-life insurance corporations, organized and

    existing under the laws of the Philippines. Upon issuance by them of

    Erection, Machinery Breakdown, Boiler Explosion and Contractors' All

    Risk insurance policies, the petitioners entered into a Quota Share

    Reinsurance Treaty and a Surplus Reinsurance Treaty with the

    Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesselschaft (hereafter called Munich), a

    non-resident foreign insurance corporation. The reinsurance treaties

    required petitioners to form a pool. Accordingly, a pool composed of the

    petitioners was formed on the same day.

    The pool submitted its financial statements and they were accordingly

    assessed for deficiency corporate taxes to which they tried to opposed but

    unfortunately was denied.

    HELD:

    Ineludibly, the Philippine legislature included in the concept of

    corporations those entities that resembled them such as unregistered

    partnerships and associations. Parenthetically, the NIRC's inclusion of

    such entities in the tax on corporations was made even clearer by the tax

    Reform Act of 1997.

    In the case before us, the ceding companies entered into a Pool

    Agreement or an association that would handle all the insurancebusinesses covered under their quota-share reinsurance treaty 31 andsurplus reinsurance treaty with Munich. The following unmistakably

    indicates a partnership or an association covered by Section 24 of the

    NIRC:

    (1) The pool has a common fund, consisting of money and other valuables

    that are deposited in the name and credit of the pool. 33 This commonfund pays for the administration and operation expenses of the pool.

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    16/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 16

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    (2) The pool functions through an executive board, which resembles the

    board of directors of a corporation, composed of one representative for

    each of the ceding companies.

    (3) True, the pool itself is not a reinsurer and does not issue any

    insurance policy; however, its work is indispensable, beneficial and

    economically useful to the business of the ceding companies and Munich,

    because without it they would not have received their premiums. The

    ceding companies share "in the business ceded to the pool" and in the

    "expenses" according to a "Rules of Distribution" annexed to the Pool

    Agreement.

    CHAPTER 3TAX BASE AND TAX RATES

    TAX BASE AND TAX RATES: INDIVIDUALSIncome Source of income Tax rates Additional information

    Resident Citizens and Resident Aliens

    Taxable

    Income

    Liability for income tax

    1.

    Resident citizenwithin and withoutthe Philippines

    2. Non-resident citizen including OFWs

    within

    3. Resident alienwithin

    As of January 2000, graduated rate

    of 5%-32%

    Husband and wife, subject to the provision of

    Section 51 (D) hereof, shall compute separatelytheir individual income tax based on their

    respective total taxable income.

    If any income cannot be definitely attributed to or

    identified as income exclusively earned or

    realized by either of the spouses, the same shall

    be divided equally between the spouses for the

    purpose of determining their respective taxable

    income.

    N.B: given a basket of income, if it doesn't fallwithin the passive income, then it is taxable

    income and the graduated rate of 5-32% will beapplied accordingly.

    For example, a resident citizen derives interest

    income from his bank deposit abroad. The

    interest income shall be treated as regular

    income. The interest income contemplated in

    passive income is interest earned in bank

    deposits in the Philippines.

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    17/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 17

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDO

    ATENEO LAW 2010

    Interests, Royalties, Prizes and otherwinnings1. Interest on any currency bank deposit,

    yield or other monetary benefits from

    deposit substitute, trust fund andsimilar arrangement

    2. Royalties in general

    3. Prize exceeding P10,000

    4. Other winnings except PCSO and lotto

    sweepstakes

    Final tax of 20%

    *there is emphasis on the holding period and not

    the maturity period.

    Royalty from books, literary works, and

    musical compositionsFinal tax of 10%

    Prize less than P10,000 Regular income

    Interest under the expanded foreign

    currency deposit systemFinal tax of 7 ! %

    There is a preference to promote the increase in

    foreign exchange reserves

    Dividends:

    Dividend from a domestic corporation or

    from a joint stock company, insurance or

    mutual fund company, and regional

    operating headquarters of multinational

    company, or share in the distributable net

    income after tax of a partnership (except a

    general professional partnership), joint

    stock or joint venture or consortium taxable

    as a corporation

    1998: 6%

    1999: 8%

    Current: Final tax of 10%

    Dividend income from a foreign corporation doing

    business in the country is considered as regular

    income and would be taxed with the

    corresponding graduated rate.

    *Dividends don't stop with those coming from

    shares of stock.

    Passive Income

    Capital gains on shares of stock

    On sale of shares of stock of a domestic

    corporation not listed and traded through alocal stock exchange, held as capital asset

    On the net capital gain:

    Not over P100,000---------------finaltax of 5%

    On any amount in excess of

    P100,000-------------------------------------

    -----------final tax of 10%

    Sale of shares of stock of a domestic corporation

    through a local stock exchange or thru initial

    public offering pays the stock transaction tax and

    other percentage taxes, and having paid this tax,shall not be subject to the rules on income tax

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    18/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 18

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDOATENEO LAW 2010

    Capital gains on real propertyOn sale of real property in the Philippines

    held as capital asset

    Art. 415. The following are immovableproperty:

    (1) Land, buildings, roads and constructions

    of all kinds adhered to the soil;

    (2) Trees, plants, and growing fruits, while

    they are attached to the land or form an

    integral part of an immovable;

    (3) Everything attached to an immovable in

    a fixed manner, in such a way that it

    cannot be separated therefrom without

    breaking the material or deterioration of

    the object;

    (4) Statues, reliefs, paintings or other

    objects for use or ornamentation, placed inbuildings or on lands by the owner of the

    immovable in such a manner that it reveals

    the intention to attach them permanently

    to the tenements;

    (5) Machinery, receptacles, instruments or

    implements intended by the owner of the

    tenement for an industry or works which

    may be carried on in a building or on a

    piece of land, and which tend directly to

    meet the needs of the said industry or

    works;

    On the gross selling price, or the

    current fair market value at the

    time of sale, whichever is higher---

    final tax of 6%

    ~@~

    (6) Animal houses, pigeon-houses,

    beehives, fish ponds or breeding

    places of similar nature, in case

    their owner has placed them or

    preserves them with the intention

    to have them permanently attached

    to the land, and forming a

    permanent part of it; the animals inthese places are included;

    (7) Fertilizer actually used on a

    piece of land;(8) Mines, quarries, and slag

    dumps, while the matter thereof

    forms part of the bed, and waters

    either running or stagnant;

    (9) Docks and structures which,

    though floating, are intended by

    their nature and object to remain at

    a fixed place on a river, lake, or

    coast;

    (10) Contracts for public works, and

    servitudes and other real rights

    over immovable property. (334a)

    Exemptioncapital gain from the sale or

    disposition of a principal residence of a natural

    person, which is fully utilized in acquiring or

    constructing a new principal residence, provided:

    1.

    The proceeds of the sale or disposition isutilized within 18 months from the date of

    sale or disposition

    2. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue is

    notified by the taxpayer within 30 days from

    the date of sale or disposition

    3. Can avail of exemption once every 10 years

    4. A deposit is made of the 6% capital gain tax

    withheld by the buyer, in cash or managers

    check, in interest bearing account with an

    AAB, under an Escrow agreement between

    the taxpayer and BIR that the same shall be

    released to the seller when the proceeds of

    the sale shall have been utilized as intended

    Disposition of real property to the government:

    you have option to be subjected to final tax of 6%

    or graduated rate of 5-32%

    Non-Resident AlienEngaged in

    trade orbusiness in the

    Taxable incomefrom within thePhilippines

    Uniform rules of 5%-32% *The 180 days for one to be considered to be

    engaged in trade or business is counted with

    respect to each calendar year (Section 24 and 25)

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    19/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 19

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDOATENEO LAW 2010

    Passive income1. Interest

    2. Royalties in general

    3. Prize exceeding P10,000

    4.

    Other winnings except PCSO5. Dividends from a domestic corporation,

    or from a joint stock company,

    insurance or mutual fund company,

    and regional operating headquarters of

    multinational company, or share in the

    distributable net income after tax of a

    partnership (except general

    professional partnership), joint stock or

    joint venture or consortium taxable as

    a corporation

    Final tax of 20%

    6. Royalties from books, literary works

    and musical compositionsFinal tax of 10%

    7.

    Gross income from the Philippines

    from cinematographic films and similar

    works

    Final tax of 25%

    Philippines

    8. Interest under the expanded foreign

    currency deposit system

    9. Interest on long-term deposit or

    investment in banks (with maturity of

    5 years or more)

    Exempt

    Not engaged intrade orbusiness

    Gross income from within the Philippines

    Final tax of 25%

    They are not allowed any personal exemptions

    Special aliens 1. Alien Individual Employed by Regional

    or Area Headquarters and RegionalOperating Headquarters of

    Multinational Companies.

    2. Alien Individual Employed by Offshore

    Banking Units.

    3. Alien Individual Employed by

    Petroleum Service Contractor and

    Subcontractor.

    Final tax of 15% of such gross

    income

    On all taxable income5%-32% as

    a non-resident alien in the

    Philippines

    The preferential 15% rate refers to

    compensation/wages related to their employment.Other than this compensation or wages, the

    applicable rates would be the 5-32%.

    There is an option available to a Filipino

    occupying the same position as foreigner expat.

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    20/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 20

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDOATENEO LAW 2010

    TAX BASE AND TAX RATES: CORPORATIONS

    Domestic CorporationsNet income within and without the Philippines

    In general Taxable income derived from within andwithout the Philippines

    Normal tax of 35%

    Beginning 2009, 30%

    But beginning with the 4th year of

    operations, whichever is higher of

    The normal tax of 35% and the

    Minimum corporate income tax of

    2%

    The normal income tax is computed for each of

    the first 3 quarters of the year. In an annual

    return, the normal tax and the minimum

    corporate income tax are computed.

    Proprietary educational institutions and

    non-profit hospitalon all taxable income

    from all sources

    10% If the unrelated income exceeds 50%, then this

    premium wouldn't be applicable

    Resident international carrieron gross

    Philippine billings

    2 !%

    Non-resident owner or lessor of vesselgross income from the Philippines

    4 !%

    Non-resident cinematographic film owner,

    lessor or distributorgross income from the

    Philippines

    25%

    Non-resident lessor of aircraft, machinery

    and other equipment

    7 !% on gross rentals, charges, and

    other fees from Philippine sources

    Regional operating headquarters of

    multinational corporation

    10% on taxable income

    Specialcorporations

    GOCCs (they follow SEC registration

    requirements as well)

    Same rate as those engaged in

    similar business, industry, oractivity

    Except the GSIS, SSS, PHIC, and PCSO

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    21/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 21

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDOATENEO LAW 2010

    Interests and royaltiesInterest under the expanded foreign

    currency deposit system

    Interest on any currency bank deposit,yield or other monetary benefit from

    deposit substitute, trust fund and similar

    arrangement, and royalties

    Final tax of 7 !%

    Final tax of 20%

    Depositor bank deposits with another banks

    FCDU and it will earn interest income. This is

    exempt.

    Depositary bank who holds money fromdepositors and invests it to another as foreign

    loans or whatnot is subject to 10%

    Dividends Dividend from domestic corporation

    intercompany dividend

    ExemptPassive income

    Capital gains On sale of shares of stock of a corporation

    not listed and traded through the local

    stock exchange held as capital assets

    On sale of land and/or building held as

    capital asset

    On the net capital gain

    Not over P100000final tax of 5%

    Over P100000final tax of 10%

    On the gross selling price or currentfair market value prevailing at the

    time of sale, whichever is higher

    final tax of 10%

    Sale of shares of stock of a domestic corporation

    through a local stock exchange or thru initial

    public offering pays the stock transaction tax and

    other percentage taxes, and having paid this tax,

    shall not be subject to the rules on income tax

    Resident foreign corporationwithin the PhilippinesIn general 2005-200835%

    2008-after30%

    Has the option of being taxed with 15% gross

    income tax

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    22/99

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    23/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 23

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDOATENEO LAW 2010

    Branch profitremittance tax

    Any profit remitted by a branch to its head

    office

    15% which shall be based on the

    total profits applied or earmarked

    for remittance without any

    deduction for the tax component

    thereof (except those activitieswhich are registered with the

    Philippine Economic Zone

    Authority).

    The tax shall be collected and paid in the same

    manner as provided in Sections 57 and 58 of this

    Code: provided, that interests, dividends, rents,

    royalties, including remuneration for technical

    services, salaries, wages premiums, annuities,emoluments or other fixed or determinable

    annual, periodic or casual gains, profits, income

    and capital gains received by a foreign

    corporation during each taxable year from all

    sources within the Philippines shall not be

    treated as branch profits unless the same are

    effectively connected with the conduct of its trade

    or business in the Philippines.

    InterestInterest under the expanded foreign

    currency deposit system

    Interest under any current bank deposit,yield or other monetary benefit from

    deposit substitute, trust fund and other

    similar arrangement, royalties

    Final tax of 7 ! %

    Final tax of 20%

    DividendsDividend from domestic corporation

    intercompany dividend

    Exempt

    Passive income

    Capital gainsOn sale of shares of stock of a domestic

    corporation not listed and traded through a

    local stock exchange, held as capital assets

    On net capital gain

    Not over P100000final tax of 5%

    Over P100000final tax of 10%

    Subsidiary v.Branch of

    foreigncorporation

    SubsidiaryEntity separate and distinct from its

    stockholders (separate entity concept)

    Tax treatment is that of a domestic

    corporation

    32% on net income from within and

    without

    Stockholders are liable only to the extent of their

    subscription (parent company is the sole

    stockholder)

    If subsidiary remits to parent, subject to the 15%

    (conditional) linkparent company

    Parent may not be held liable for damages filed

    against subsidiary

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    24/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 24

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDOATENEO LAW 2010

    Branch Merely an extension of the foreign head

    office (single entity concept)

    Tax treatment is that of a foreigncorporation

    32% on net income from within The link is between the head office and home

    office

    If the branch remits to the head office, it is

    subject to the branch profit remittance tax

    Home is liable for all liabilities of the branch

    Subject to the 10% improperly accumulated

    earnings

    Home office Parent (NRFC)

    BPRT=15% Dividend=15%

    Branch Subsidiary

    RFC DC

    35% TI (within) 35% TI (within/without)

    Non-resident foreign corporationsWithin the Philippines

    In general Foreign corporation not engaged in trade orbusiness in the Philippines

    35%

    Non-resident cinematographic film owner,

    lessor, or distributor

    25% Filipino industry would like to be protected

    Non-resident owner or lessor of vessels

    chartered by Philippine nationals

    4 !%Special non-resident

    Non-resident owner or lessor of aircraft,

    machineries, and other equipment

    7 !%

    Interest on foreign loans Final tax of 20%Dividend from domestic corporations Final tax of 15% Conditioned at showing of proof of a tax pairing

    provision.Passive incomeOn sale of shares of stock of a domestic

    corporation not listed or traded through a

    local stock exchange, held as capital assets

    On net capital gain

    Not over P1000005%

    Over P10000010%

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    25/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 25

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDOATENEO LAW 2010

    IDENTIFY TAX TREATMENT(INTEREST INCOME EXERCISE)

    Metrobank Bank of TokyoMr. Juandela Cruz

    Mr.PedroPeduko

    Capt.JohnSmith

    Mr. MoriTanaka

    Mr.ShijeruTakeshi

    RBU(Peso)

    FCDU(Foreign

    Currency)

    RBU(Peso)

    FCDU OBU

    BostonBank

    ResidentCitizen

    Non-ResidentCitizen

    ResidentAlien

    Non-Resident

    AlienEngaged

    Non-Resdient

    AlienNot

    Engaged

    DomesticCorporation

    Resident Foreign Corporation

    Non-Reside

    ntForeig

    nCorporation

    1

    InterestIncome

    receivedfrom aPesoSavingsAccountin MetroBank

    20% FT 20% FT 20% FT 20% FT 25% FT 20% FT 35% FT

    2

    InterestIncomereceivedfrom aPesoSavings

    Accountin Bankof Tokyo

    20% FT 20% FT 20% FT 20% FT 25% FT20%FT

    35% FT

    3

    InterestIncomereceivedfrom aPesoSavings

    5 - 32% RTexempt(income

    w/o)

    exempt(income

    w/o)

    exempt(income

    w/o)

    exempt(income

    w/o)

    35%RT

    exempt(income w/o)

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    26/99

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    27/99

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    28/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 28

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDOATENEO LAW 2010

    greater than the tax computed under Subsection (A) of this Section for the taxable

    year.

    Carry Forward of Excess Minimum Tax

    !

    Any excess of the minimum corporate income tax over the normal tax shallbe carried over and credited against the normal tax for the three

    immediately succeeding taxable years. In the year to which carried

    forward, the normal tax should be higher than the MCIT.

    Relief from the Minimum Corporate Income Tax Under Certain Conditions.

    ! The Secretary of Finance is hereby authorized to suspend the imposition of

    the minimum corporate income tax on any corporation which suffers losses

    on account of prolonged labor dispute, or because of force majeure, or

    because of legitimate business reverses.

    ! The Secretary of Finance is hereby authorized to promulgate, upon

    recommendation of the Commissioner, the necessary rules and regulation

    that shall define the terms and conditions under which he may suspend

    the imposition of the minimum corporate income tax in a meritorious case.

    Gross income

    ! Shall mean gross sales less sales returns, discounts and allowances and

    cost of goods sold.

    Cost of goods soldshall include all business expenses directly incurred to produce

    the merchandise to bring them to their present location and use.

    ! For a trading or merchandising concern, "cost of goods sold' shall include

    the invoice cost of the goods sold, plus import duties, freight in

    transporting the goods to the place where the goods are actually sold

    including insurance while the goods are in transit.

    ! For a manufacturing concern, cost of "goods manufactured and sold" shall

    include all costs of production of finished goods, such as raw materialsused, direct labor and manufacturing overhead, freight cost, insurance

    premiums and other costs incurred to bring the raw materials to the

    factory or warehouse.

    ! In the case of taxpayers engaged in the sale of service, 'gross income' means

    gross receipts less sales returns, allowances, discounts and cost of services.

    ! Cost of servicesshall mean all direct costs and expenses necessarily

    incurred to provide the services required by the customers and clients

    including

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    29/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 29

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDOATENEO LAW 2010

    o Salaries and employee benefits of personnel, consultants and

    specialists directly rendering the service and

    o Cost of facilities directly utilized in providing the service such as

    depreciation or rental of equipment used and cost of supplies:

    Provided, however, That in the case of banks, "cost of services"shall include interest expense.

    Residentforeigncorporations

    Gross income 2% Under the same conditions

    Non-residentforeigncorporations

    Exempt

    IMPROPERLY ACCUMULATED EARNINGS TAX (IAET)Tax base Tax Rate Notes

    Improperly accumulated

    earnings

    10% The improperly accumulated earnings tax imposed in the preceding Section shall

    apply to every corporation formed or availed for the purpose of avoiding the incometax with respect to its shareholders or the shareholders of any other corporation, by

    permitting earnings and profits to accumulate instead of being divided or

    distributed.

    Exceptions

    a. Publicly-held corporations;

    b. Banks and other nonbank financial intermediaries; and

    c. Insurance companies.

    Evidence of purpose to avoid incomec tax

    (1) Prima Facie Evidence. - the fact that any corporation is a mere holding company

    or investment company shall be prima facie evidence of a purpose to avoid the tax

    upon its shareholders or members.

    (2) Evidence Determinative of Purpose. - The fact that the earnings or profits of acorporation are permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the

    business shall be determinative of the purpose to avoid the tax upon its

    shareholders or members unless the corporation, by the clear preponderance of

    evidence, shall prove to the contrary.

    Improperly Accumulated Taxable Income means taxable income adjusted by:

    (1) Income exempt from tax;

    (2) Income excluded from gross income;

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    30/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 30

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDOATENEO LAW 2010

    (3) Income subject to final tax; and

    (4) The amount of net operating loss carry-over deducted;

    And reduced by the sum of:

    (1) Dividends actually or constructively paid; and(2) Income tax paid for the taxable year.

    Provided, however, That for corporations using the calendar year basis, the

    accumulated earnings under tax shall not apply on improperly accumulated income

    as of December 31, 1997. In the case of corporations adopting the fiscal year

    accounting period, the improperly accumulated income not subject to this tax, shall

    be reckoned, as of the end of the month comprising the twelve (12)-month period of

    fiscal year 1997-1998.

    Taxable income for the year

    Add: income exempt from taxes

    Exclusions

    Income subject to final taxNOLCO (net operating loss carry-over)

    Deduct: income tax for the year

    Dividends paid

    Reserves

    Inappropriate accumulated earnings

    Pxxx

    xxx

    xxxxxx

    Pxxx

    xxx

    xxx

    P xxx

    xxx

    xxx

    Pxxx

    RESIDENT FOREIGN CORPORATIONS

    NV REEDERIT AMSTERDAM V. COMMISSIONER162 SCRA 487

    FACTS:

    HELD:

    BRANCH PROFIT REMITTANCE TAX

    MARUBENI CORPORATION V. COMMISSIONER177 SCRA 500

    FACTS:

    HELD:

    BANK OF AMERICA NT AND SA V. CA AND CIR

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    31/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 31

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDOATENEO LAW 2010

    234 SCRA 302

    FACTS:

    HELD:

    COMPANIA GENERAL DE TABACOS V. CTACTA 4451, AUGUST 23, 1993

    FACTS:

    HELD:

    NON-RESIDENT FOREIGN CORPORATION

    COMMISSIONER V. PROCTER AND GAMBLE160 SCRA 560, 204 SCRA 377

    FACTS:

    HELD:

    COMMISSIONER V. WANDER PHILS.160 SCRA 573

    FACTS:

    HELD:

    MARUBENI CORPORATION V. COMMISSIONER177 SCRA 500

    FACTS:

    HELD:

    IMPROPERLY ACCUMULATED EARNINGS TAX

    MANILA WINE MERCHANTS V. CIR127 SCRA 483

    FACTS:

    HELD:

    CIR V. TUASON JR.173 SCRA 397FACTS:

    HELD:

    CYANAMID V. CA322 SCRA 639

    FACTS:

    HELD:

    CHAPTER 4

    INCOME

    TAXABLE INCOME! The pertinent items of gross income specified in this Code, less

    the deductions and/or personal and additional exemptions, if

    any, authorized for such types of income by this Code or other

    special laws.

    ! Section 36-38, Regulations 2

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    32/99

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    33/99

  • 8/13/2019 Income Tax reviewer

    34/99

    INCOME TAX REVIEWER AND CASE DIGESTSPAGE- 34

    MA. ANGELA LEONOR C. AGUINALDOATENEO LAW 2010

    o The retiring official or employees must be in the service

    of the employer for at least 10 years and isnt less than

    50 years of age at the time of retirement

    o The retiring official or employee shouldn't have

    previously availed of the privilege under the retirement

    benefit plan of another employer

    Fixed or Variable Transportation, Representation, and otherAllowances

    ! In general, is subject to withholding, provided however, that

    representation and transportation allowance granted to public

    officers and employees under the General Appropriations Act

    and the Personal Economic Relief Allowance which essentially

    constitute reimbursement for expenses incurred in the

    performance of government personnels official duties shall not

    be subject to income tax and consequently to withholding tax

    o Provided further that Additional Compensation

    Allowance given to government personnel shall not besubject to withholding tax pending its formal

    integration into the basic pay

    o Consequently, and effective for the taxable year 2000,

    ACA shall be classified as part of the other benefits

    under the Tax Code which are excluded from gross

    compensation income provided the total amount of such

    benefits doesn't exceed P30000

    ! Any amount paid specifically either as advances or

    reimbursements for traveling, representation, and other bona

    fide ordinary and necessary expenses incurred or reasonably

    expected to be incurred by the employee in the performance of

    his duties are not compensations subject to withholding, if the

    following conditions are meto It is for ordinary and necessary traveling and

    representation and entertainment expenses paid or

    incurred by the employee in the pursuit of the trade,

    business, or profession

    o The employee is required to account/liquidate for the

    foregoing expenses in