in the united states district court for the middle district of pennsylvania...

24
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : vs. : 3:CR-09-272 : (Kosik, J.) : (Electronically Filed) MICHAEL T. CONAHAN, and : MARK A. CIAVARELLA, JR. : : Defendants : MOTION OF DEFENDANT, MICHAEL T. CONAHAN, FOR DISCLOSURE OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE AND EVIDENCE/ MATERIALS IMPEACHING OR BEARING UPON THE CREDIBILITY OF A GOVERNMENT WITNESS The Defendant, Michael T. Conahan, by and through his undersigned counsel, pursuant to the dictates of Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995), Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), U.S. v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976), U.S. v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985), Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, respectfully moves this Honorable Court for the entry of an order requiring the government to disclose and provide the

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

    :

    vs. : 3:CR-09-272

    : (Kosik, J.)

    : (Electronically Filed)

    MICHAEL T. CONAHAN, and :

    MARK A. CIAVARELLA, JR. :

    :

    Defendants :

    MOTION OF DEFENDANT, MICHAEL T. CONAHAN, FOR

    DISCLOSURE OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE AND EVIDENCE/

    MATERIALS IMPEACHING OR BEARING UPON THE CREDIBILITY

    OF A GOVERNMENT WITNESS

    The Defendant, Michael T. Conahan, by and through his undersigned

    counsel, pursuant to the dictates of Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995), Brady v.

    Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), U.S. v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976), U.S. v. Bagley,

    473 U.S. 667 (1985), Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and Rule 16 of the

    Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, respectfully moves this Honorable Court for

    the entry of an order requiring the government to disclose and provide the

  • 2

    following specific information and material known to, or that with the exercise of

    due diligence, should be known to the government.

    INTRODUCTION

    1. Pursuant to the above, the Defendant requests all evidence not

    otherwise specified herein, which may be favorable to the Defendant and material

    to the issue of guilt or punishment, or could reasonably weaken or affect any

    evidence proposed to be introduced against the Defendant, or could be used in any

    way to impeach or discredit government witnesses, or which is relevant to the

    subject matter of the Indictment, or in any manner may aid the Defendant in the

    ascertainment of the truth, whether or not such evidence is deemed admissible at

    trial, in addition to any other matters known to the government that may be

    exculpatory or otherwise favorable to the defendant.

    2. If the requested materials contain statements which the government

    determines fall within the scope of the Jencks Act, the government should be

    required to disclose said documents, since the obligation of the government to

    produce Brady and Giglio materials is of a constitutional dimension. U.S. v.

    Bagley, 473 U.S. 667(1985).

    3. If the government’s attorney questions the exculpatory nature of any

    information requested herein or the materiality or relevance of any information

  • 3

    requested herein, and on that basis seeks to deny disclosure, the Defendant, in the

    alternative, requests that such information be submitted to the Court for an in

    camera inspection . U.S. v. Marshall, 985 F.2d 901 (7th

    Cir. 1993); U.S. v.

    Walden, 578 F.2d 966 (3rd

    Cir. 1978) ; U.S. v. Quinn, 364 F.Supp 432 (ND Ga

    1973).

    4. In order to comply with the requests contained in his Motion, the

    Defendant requests that the government make an affirmative search of all its

    records and information and those of all related government agencies and

    repositories of possible evidence responsive to these requests, as well as all state

    agencies involved. See, Strickler v. Greene, 527 U.S. 263 (1999); Kyles v. Whitley,

    514 U.S. 419 (1995).

    5. Pursuant to Strickler, supra, and Kyles, supra, a certification from the

    government is requested that an inquiry was made of all law enforcement

    authorities involved in this prosecution for the foregoing exculpatory evidence; the

    prosecutor’s certification is requested that a good faith effort was made in seeking

    the discovery requested, and to the extent that such discovery was found, it was

    provided, and to the extent the prosecutor believed such discovery should not be

    provided, it was refused.

  • 4

    6. In addition, the Defendant requests a certification from the

    government that the requirements outlined in Deputy Attorney General David W.

    Ogden’s memorandum of January 4, 2010 to federal prosecutors entitled Guidance

    for Prosecutors Regarding Criminal Discovery has been followed in this case and

    that all information uncovered during this process has been disclosed to the

    Defendant.

    7. The Defendant hereby incorporates by reference his brief in support,

    which will be filed pursuant to M.D.Pa. Local Rule 7.5, as if fully stated herein.

    SPECIFIC REQUESTS

    8. The name and address of every person who the government has

    interviewed in connection with this case, even if it does not intend to call the

    person as a witness at trial.

    9. Every written statement, transcript, recording, summary or notes of

    oral statements given by any person described in Paragraph 9 above.

    10. Any written or recorded statement including any testimony before any

    court or grand jury or the substance of any oral statement obtained from any person

    who will not be called as a government witness at trial, which may assist the

    Defendant in the preparation of his defense or which may discredit any

  • 5

    government witness or which may otherwise be exculpatory. Brady v. Maryland,

    supra.

    11. Any information or evidence, which would tend to show bias or

    prejudice against the Defendant on the part of any government witness,

    investigator or prosecutor or that said witness or investigator has a motive to falsify

    or distort his/her testimony. See, Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987); U.S.

    v. Strifler, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). This request shall be deemed to include

    any evidence or information which may tend to impeach the credibility of any

    government witness whether or not such information or evidence is deemed

    admissible at trial. Brady v. Maryland, supra.

    12. Any reports, memoranda, press releases or other documents made by

    any federal agent in connection with this investigation, which is material or

    relevant to the preparation of a defense or which may assist the Defendant in

    impeaching the credibility of any government witness or which is otherwise

    exculpatory. Brady v. Maryland, supra.

    13. The names and addresses of all persons known by the government

    who may give testimony or information favorable to the Defendant in this case and

    a summary of that testimony or information. Brady v. Maryland, supra.; U.S. ex

    rel. Meers v. Wilkins, 326 F.2d 135 (2nd

    Cir. 1964) .

  • 6

    14. Material of any kind whatsoever bearing upon the guilt or innocence

    of the Defendant, or upon the credibility of any witness, or the reliability of any

    tangible evidence.

    15. Any evidence that any prospective witness is under investigation by

    federal, state or local authorities for any criminal or official misconduct. U.S. v.

    Chitty, 760 F. 2d 425 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 945 (1985).

    16. Any information and/or evidence, including any medical or

    psychiatric reports or evaluations, tending to show that any prospective witness' s

    ability to perceive, remember, communicate, or tell the truth is impaired; and any

    evidence that a witness has ever used narcotics or other controlled substance, or is

    an alcoholic. U.S. v. Strifler, 851 F. 2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988); Chavis v. North

    Carolina, 637 F. 2d 213, 224 (4th Cir. 1980); U.S. v. Butler, 567 F. 2d 885 (9th

    Cir.1978).

    17. State whether any payment, grant or promise of immunity, promise or

    agreement not to prosecute for any offense, recommendation or non-

    recommendation at sentencing or any other favorable consideration, in federal or

    state court, direct or indirect, has been made to any witness, any person or entity

    interviewed by any federal, state or local law enforcement officer, or any other

  • 7

    person or entity, in connection with the investigation or prosecution of this case, or

    the agents or relatives of any such person.

    18. If the answer to Paragraph 17, above, is in the affirmative, the

    Defendant requests the name, address, and telephone number of each person who

    received or benefitted from such payment, grant, promise, agreement,

    recommendation, non-recommendation, or any other favorable consideration, and

    requests to be permitted to inspect and copy every document or paper in the

    possession of the government which authorizes, approves, implements, or

    evidences any such payment, grant, promise, agreement, recommendation, non-

    recommendation, or any other favorable consideration or the summary of any oral

    agreement to such effect.

    19. Any and all statements, testimony, memoranda, interviews,

    documents or summaries, relating to this case, or any portion thereof, by any

    person, that contradict, in whole or in part, any statement (by that person or any

    other person) that the government does not intend to use or rely on in any manner

    in connection with the trial of this case. Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995).

    20. Any evidence that tends to minimize or negate the probative effect of

    the government's evidence of Defendant’s participation in the alleged crimes set

  • 8

    forth in the Indictment. See, U.S. ex rel. Smith v. Fairman, 769 F.2d 386 (7th Cir.

    1985).

    21. Any written or oral statement and/or confession made by the

    Defendant which is, or may be, unknown to defense counsel. See, Prosecutor of

    Virgin Islands v. Martinez, 780 F.2d 302 (3d Cir. 1985).

    22. Any information about any eyewitness for whom the prosecution has

    a name and/or address, but whom the government does not intend to call at trial

    and a copy of any statement made by or summary of an interview with such a

    witness. Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995); U.S. v. Cadet, 727 F.2d 1453 (9th

    Cir. 1984).

    23. Any information which would tend to lessen the impact of the

    advisory Sentencing Guidelines on the Defendant in the event of a conviction,

    including but not limited to the role in the offense, ignorance of the true scope of

    any conspiracy and/or other crimes charged in the Indictment and any evidence of

    acceptance of responsibility.

    24. With respect to any participant in any of the conduct giving rise to the

    criminal charge in this case, or any other government witness or person, was then

    or is now cooperating with, in the employ of, or working at the behest of the

  • 9

    United States government or any law enforcement agency, either directly or

    indirectly, specify the following:

    a. The name and address of each cooperating witness.

    b. The dates on which he was employed or cooperated.

    c. The scope of his employment or cooperation including any oral or

    written instructions given to the individual by any law enforcement

    agent.

    d. The time, date and location of each meeting between such individual

    and any law enforcement personnel concerning his employment or

    cooperation and the names and titles of each law enforcement

    personnel participating in such a meeting.

    e. Any reports, notes, correspondence, memoranda or other documents

    relating to the employment or cooperation of such an individual with

    any law enforcement agency.

    f. Any statement made, or information or document provided by a

    prospective government witness that conflicts in part, or in whole,

    with: (1) the statement of another prospective witness, (2) a prior

    statement made by the same government witness with regard to the

  • 10

    subject matter of the expected trial testimony of witness, or (3) any

    other document or witness.

    g. Any “records” maintained by law enforcement agencies relating to the

    cooperating witness utilized in this case, including, but not limited to,

    records evidencing: 1.) that the witness was given a code name, 2.)

    that the witness was given an assumed/false identify, 3.) reasons for

    cooperation, 4.) that the witness was given a polygraph examination,

    5.) that the witness was briefed on entrapment, 6.) that the witness

    executed contracts with any law enforcement agency, 7.) that the

    witness executed any release forms, 8.) that the witness was advised

    to pay Federal Income Taxes, 9.) that the witness was advised he

    could not violate the law, 10.) the witness is required to protect his

    false identity, 11.) the witness cannot use any illegal drugs, and 12.)

    the witness consented to the recording of any conversation with any

    party.

    h. If given a polygraph exam, the results of any polygraph examination

    performed on any potential government witness, as well as any

    information concerning the failure of any potential cooperating

    witness to submit to a polygraph examination.

  • 11

    i. Any press releases issued by prosecuting agency or official

    concerning the investigation or prosecution of the witness.

    25. With respect to the individuals described in Paragraph 24, please

    provide the following regarding the benefits received by or promised to the

    witness:

    a. The terms of any agreement or understanding between the individual

    and any law enforcement agency relating to his/her cooperation;

    b. The case number and name of the prosecutions in which the

    cooperating witness utilized in this case has previously been utilized

    as a cooperating witness and/or testified;

    c. The case names and numbers of any trials or evidentiary hearings at

    which the cooperating witness has testified concerning his own prior

    criminal activity, payments or rewards provided him by the

    government, efforts made to induce others to participate in criminal

    activity, or other purported law enforcement-related matters;

    d. Any and all compensation or other benefit given to or offered to any

    such individual;

    e. Any ledger, sheet, or other document which details the sums paid or

    benefits provided to the cooperating witness or his family in this and

  • 12

    other cases in which the informant assisted the government and the

    purpose of each such payment;

    f. Any information, whether or not memorialized in a memorandum,

    agent’s report or other writing, regarding promises of immunity,

    leniency, preferential treatment or other inducements made to the

    cooperating witness or any family member, friend or associate of the

    informant in exchange for the informant's cooperation, including the

    dismissal or reduction of charges, assisting in matters of sentencing or

    deportation, promises or expectancies regarding payments for

    expenses or testimony or eligibility for any award or reward; In

    addition to information regarding payments, promises of immunity,

    leniency, preferential treatment or other inducements made to the

    government witnesses, any records or information regarding

    payments, promises of immunity, leniency, preferential treatment

    offered or afforded to any family member, friend or associate of any

    prospective witness in exchange for said witness cooperation;

    g. Any information or records concerning any actual or implied threats

    of investigation or prosecution (including deportation, exclusion, etc.,

    by ICE (formerly INS)) made by the government to any prospective

  • 13

    government witness or family member or associate of the witness,

    including information as to the underlying conduct precipitating such

    investigations.

    h. Any report, document or information which details the criminal

    activities of the cooperating witness which were undertaken by him

    without the authority or approval of the government, but for which the

    government has elected, formally or informally, not to prosecute.

    26. With respect to the individuals described in Paragraph 24, please

    provide the following regarding prior conduct of the witness:

    a. FBI rap sheet, NCIC printout, NADDIS, EPIC, NLETS, ATS, TECS,

    and any other records available to the government reflecting the

    arrest, conviction and investigative history of the cooperating witness.

    b. Information concerning prior misconduct by the cooperating witness

    in the performance of his role as an informant including: any prior

    refusal of the informant to testify for or assist the government; any

    prior allegation that the informant entrapped another person to commit

    an offense or made false statements in connection with a criminal

    investigation; and any prior “blackballing” of the informant by any

    law enforcement agency.

  • 14

    c. Information concerning misconduct by the cooperating witness other

    than in his role as an cooperating witness, including misconduct that

    reflects a lack of candor, truthfulness or law-abiding character of the

    informant, such as uncharged criminal conduct or fraud.

    d. All information, records and transcripts which in any way indicate or

    reveal that any prospective government witness, in connection with

    this or any other case, has provided untruthful, false, misleading,

    incomplete, or inaccurate information or testimony to: 1.) Any state or

    federal law enforcement officer, government attorney or agency, 2.)

    Any state or federal grand jury, and 3.) Any state or federal trial court

    while testifying at trial and/or any related or preliminary proceeding.

    e. Information reflecting the nature and extent of assets obtained by the

    informant in connection with his illegal activities over the past ten

    years.

    27. With respect to the individuals described in Paragraph 24, please

    provide the following regarding the witness’ credibility:

    a. Any government agency files or other information revealing matters

    relevant to the cooperating witness' credibility, mental or physical

    health, narcotic or alcohol use, or any other dependency.

  • 15

    b. All information and records revealing any potential impairment of the

    capacity of any prospective cooperating witness to observe, recollect

    and testify about the events giving rise to the charges filed in this case

    including impairments or sight, hearing, memory, language, or any

    other physical or psychological disability.

    c. All information and records indicating that any prospective

    cooperating witness (1) may have suffered from any physical, mental

    or emotional disease, disorder, illness, or defect at any time during the

    time-span alleged in the indictment filed in this case, or (2) sought or

    received treatment for any such mental or emotional disease, disorder,

    illness or defect at any time within the past seven (7) years.

    d. All information and records indicating that the prospective

    government witness (1) may have used cocaine, marijuana, or any

    other controlled substance, or used alcohol, to excess, at any time

    during the time span alleged in the Indictment filed in this case, or (2)

    sought or received treatment for any substance abuse problem

    (including alcohol) at any time within the past seven (7) years.

  • 16

    e. Any inconsistent statement made by a prospective government

    witness or cooperating witness to law enforcement and/or government

    attorney.

    28. With respect to the individuals described in Paragraph 24, please

    provide the following regarding the prior contact of the witness with the criminal

    justice system:

    a. Any applicable record of the United States Probation department,

    including but not limited to, any and all presentence report prepared

    relative to said witness, if the witness has been placed on probation or

    a Pre-Sentence Investigation “PSI” has been conducted. U.S. v.

    Strifler 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988).

    b. Any government or State sentencing memorandum or other document,

    report or transcript reflecting the position of the government or State

    relative to the sentencing of the witness.

    c. If said witness has been incarcerated during or subsequent to his

    cooperation, provide the place and date of incarceration and any files,

    reports or other documents prepared or maintained by the institution

    where the witness was incarcerated or by any Federal or State Bureau

    of Prisons or Corrections.

  • 17

    d. Any action taken by the government or by any State impacting on: i.)

    The witness’ place of incarceration; ii.)Any parole determination

    made relative to the witness; iii.)Any furlough determination made

    relative to the witness; iv.)Any other considerations, accommodations

    or privileges given to the witness while incarcerated, including

    anything impacting on the type or length of incarceration of the

    witness.

    29. If any government witness or cooperating witness was arrested or

    otherwise in custody, provide the following:

    a. At the time of arrest, was bail set and if so, in what amount?

    b. Specify each change in the bail status of the witness including any bail

    violations, any increase or reduction in bail, any change in the

    conditions of release.

    c. Specify any act taken by any law enforcement agent, state or federal,

    relating to the witnesses detention or release on bail including any

    recommendation or agreement as to the amount of bail or conditions

    of release.

    30. All electronic surveillance of any government witness evidencing

    their participation in criminal conduct.

  • 18

    31. Whether any witness intended to be called at trial by the government

    has been granted or offered any plea bargain or any benefits of any kind (monetary

    or otherwise), whether by state or federal authorities and if so, specify:

    a. The name and address of the witness.

    b. Itemize all benefits offered or conferred upon said witness or any

    family member, including dates on which said benefits were offered

    or given.

    c. Provide a copy of any written plea agreement and if not reduced to

    writing, the substance of the plea agreement.

    d. Provide any correspondence, notes, memoranda or other

    documentation reflecting any discussions or negotiations concerning

    plea agreements or other benefits for a government witness, whether

    or not any final agreement was reached and provide the substance of

    any oral negotiations or discussions concerning the same.

    e. Provide the date of the entry of any guilty plea and identify the Court

    where the plea was entered.

    f. Provide the date of sentencing, the Court which imposed the sentence

    and the sentence imposed.

  • 19

    32. Whether on behalf of any witness the government intends to call at

    trial, the government has interceded or has offered to intercede with respect to any

    criminal charge pending against said witness or any family member or with respect

    to any criminal charges which was anticipated against any such witness or any

    family member, including any representation made by any government agent to

    any witness which intimated that said witness or any family member might be

    investigated for a crime, charged with the crime or penalized in anyway if he did

    not cooperate with the government.

    33. Any information or evidence which would tend to show that

    information provided to the government by any prospective witness was false or

    misleading or which would in any way contradict any information provided by any

    such witness.

    34. Whether any proceedings have been instituted or are or were

    anticipated against any government witness by the Internal Revenue Service, the

    United States Bureau of Immigration and Naturalization (now U.S. Immigration

    and Customs Enforcement (ICE)) or any other federal or state agency which might

    result in the imposition of a fine, penalty or other sanction against any government

    witness and if so, describe that proceeding in detail.

  • 20

    35. Any agreements or understandings by the government to help one of

    its witnesses including without limitation any promise made to help a witness with

    respect to employment or legal proceeding.

    36. Any promise of anonymity or confidentiality made to any witness.

    37. Any promise or other representation made by the government or the

    State concerning any benefit to a witness under Section 5K1.1 of the Sentencing

    Guidelines, Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or 18 U.S.C. §

    3553.

    38. Provide any and all evidence or information which would in any way

    support a defense of entrapment or prosecutorial overreaching.

    39. Provide any and all evidence that in any way indicates that the

    Defendant had voluntarily or involuntarily ceased or terminated his involvement

    with the activities charged in the Indictment, or is probative of non-participation in

    the conduct described in the Indictment as to any Defendant, including the date and

    manner of such withdrawal, cessation or termination.

    40. Any notes or memoranda of any government attorney containing or

    relating to exculpatory information concerning any defendant and any exculpatory

    information presented to the grand jury.

  • 21

    41. Documents showing the identification and whereabouts of all persons

    known to the prosecution, or who may become known by the exercise of

    reasonable diligence, who possess information relevant to the Indictment whom

    the government does not intend to call as a witness at trial.

    42. All records of governmental agencies reflecting any disciplinary

    action taken against any governmental official or employee who is expected to

    testify.

    43. Provide any and all exculpatory evidence contained in personnel files

    of local, state or federal law enforcement officers intended to be called by the

    government at trial.

    44. Provide any and all records of arrests and/or contact with local, state

    and Federal law enforcement of government witnesses, the witnesses’ family,

    including the witnesses’ children.

    45. The defendant requests that the government examine the personnel

    files and other files within its custody, care or control, or which could be obtained

    by the government through due diligence, for all testifying witnesses, including

    testifying officers and agents who may have been controlling or contacting any

    confidential informants in this case. The defendant requests that these files be

    reviewed by the government attorney for evidence of perjurious conduct or other

  • 22

    like dishonesty, or any other material relevant to impeachment, or any information

    that is exculpatory. See, U.S. v. Henthorn, 931 F. 2d 29 (9th Cir. 1991).

    WHEREFORE, the Defendant moves this Honorable Court for an order

    requiring the government to provide him with the requested material as soon as

    possible.

    Respectfully submitted,

    /s/ Arthur T. Donato, Jr. Esquire

    ARTHUR T. DONATO

    216 Front Street, 2nd Floor

    Media, PA 19063

    (610) 565-4747

    (610) 892-9786 (Fax)

    [email protected]

    /s/ Philip Gelso, Esquire

    PHILIP GELSO

    Briechle & Gelso, LLC

    63 Pierce Street

    Kingston, PA 18704

    (570) 763-0006

    (570) 288-0243 (Fax)

    [email protected]

    Dated: March 1, 2010 Counsel for Michael T. Conahan

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • 23

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

    :

    vs. : 3:CR-09-272

    : (Kosik, J.)

    : (Electronically Filed)

    MICHAEL T. CONAHAN, and :

    MARK A. CIAVARELLA, JR. :

    :

    Defendants :

    CERTIFICATE OF NON-CONCURRENCE

    On March 1, 2010, counsel for the Defendant contacted Assistant United

    States Attorney Michael A. Consiglio, to discuss the foregoing motion wherein he

    indicated that the government does not concur in the same at this time. However,

    the government may file an amended Certificate after reviewing the foregoing

    Motion.

    /s/ Arthur T. Donato, Jr. Esquire

    ARTHUR T. DONATO

    216 Front Street, 2nd Floor

    Media, PA 19063

    (610) 565-4747

    (610) 892-9786 (Fax)

    [email protected]

    Dated: March 1, 2010 Counsel for Michael T. Conahan

    mailto:[email protected]

  • 24

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

    :

    vs. : 3:CR-09-272

    : (Kosik, J.)

    : (Electronically Filed)

    MICHAEL T. CONAHAN, and :

    MARK A. CIAVARELLA, JR. :

    :

    Defendants :

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I, Philip Gelso, do hereby certify that on March 1, 2010, I served a true and

    correct copy of the forgoing Motion to the following persons and in the manner

    indicated below.

    SERVED BY ECF:

    Gordon A.D. Zubrod, AUSA William S. Houser, AUSA

    Michael A. Consiglio, AUSA Amy Phillips, AUSA

    United States Attorney’s Office United States Attorney’s Office

    228 Walnut Street Federal Building - Room 309

    Harrisburg, PA 18708 Scranton, PA 18501

    /s/ Philip Gelso, Esquire

    PHILIP GELSO (PA 81934)

    Briechle & Gelso, LLC

    63 Pierce Street

    Kingston, PA 18704

    (570) 763-0006 | (570) 288-0243 (Fax)

    [email protected]

    Dated: March 1, 2010 Counsel for Michael T. Conahan

    mailto:[email protected]