in the supreme court of florida · a real estate closing between ronaldo delibero & graziela...
TRANSCRIPT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC09-477 Complainant, v. The Florida Bar File Nos. 2007-50,976(17E) MARILYN LESLIE MALOY, 2007-51,017(17E)
Respondent. /
REPORT OF REFEREE
I. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS
The Florida Bar filed its formal complaint against respondent in this matter
on or about March 16, 2009. Thereafter, the undersigned was appointed to preside
as referee in these proceedings by order of the Chief Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial
Circuit. The parties have presented to me a Conditional Guilty Plea for Consent
Judgment, which has been approved by The Florida Bar Board of Governors’
designated reviewer. After due deliberation, I have determined to recommend that
respondent’s Conditional Guilty Plea for Consent Judgment be approved, for the
reasons set forth herein. The pleadings and all other papers filed in this cause,
which are forwarded to the Supreme Court of Florida with this report, constitute
the entire record.
:
2
During the course of these proceedings, respondent was represented by
Albert L. Frevola, Jr. and The Florida Bar was represented by Alan Anthony
Pascal.
II. FINDINGS OF FACT:
I find that the following facts were alleged in the complaint and are admitted
by Respondent.
A. Jurisdictional Statement: Respondent is, and at all times mentioned
during this investigation was, a member of The Florida Bar, and subject to the
jurisdiction and Disciplinary Rules of the Supreme Court of Florida.
B. Narrative Summary
1. Respondent is a member of The Florida Bar subject to the jurisdiction
and disciplinary rules of the Supreme Court of Florida.
:
2. Predicated upon two notices from Wachovia Bank that two separate
checks (in the amounts of $179,446.46 and $15,761.65, respectively) from
respondent’s trust account were returned due to insufficient funds, the bar initiated
an investigation and audit of respondent’s trust account.
3. After contacting respondent regarding the checks returned due to
insufficient funds, respondent self reported to The Florida Bar that Attorneys’ Title
Insurance Fund (hereinafter “The Fund”) brought suit against her for breach of her
agreement to act as a title insurance agent for The Fund.
3
4. As an agent of The Fund, respondent was responsible for collecting
premiums payable to The Fund; maintaining a separate escrow/trust account with
sufficient monies to satisfy disbursements; and handling real estate closings in
which The Fund’s title insurance policies, commitments and closing protection
letters were issued.
5. The litigation resulted in respondent’s trust and operating accounts
being placed with a court appointed receiver.
6. The receiver also obtained respondent’s trust records as part of the
receivership.
7. Upon review of respondent’s trust account records, it was discovered
that respondent did not have monthly reconciliations of her trust account; she
failed to maintain monthly comparisons between totals of client ledgers and the
reconciled bank balance; and she failed to maintain a cash receipts or disbursement
journal as required by The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.
8. At all times material to this complaint, respondent worked as an
attorney and closing agent for “Organized Title.”
COUNT I
9. Respondent contracted with Mr. Jerry Omofoman (hereafter
Omofoman) and Organized Title to perform certain services related to her real
4
estate law practice, including handling of certain of respondent’s real estate
closings.
10. Despite having agreed to act as attorney and closing agent for clients,
respondent allowed Omofoman, a nonlawyer owner of Organized Title, and
Tamieka Funchess (hereafter Funchess), a paralegal, access to her practice so that
Omofoman and Funchess began to handle all aspects of certain closings, with no
supervision from or knowledge of the respondent.
11. Respondent further gave Omofoman (a nonlawyer and owner of
Organized Title) access to her trust account.
12. Respondent’s failed to supervise Omofoman and/or Funchess from on
or about April 1, 2005 through January 20, 2007, resulting in the misappropriation
of approximately $1,533,149.21 of client monies from respondent’s trust account.
13. In certain real estate transactions Omofoman and Funchess handled
purportedly on behalf of respondent’s practice, respondent failed to review any
documents or other information, failed to meet with the buyer or seller, and failed
to properly supervise Omofoman and Funchess to ensure these parties were not
acting without her knowledge or supervision.
COUNT II
5
14. A real estate closing between Willis and Angela McGahee (sellers)
and Richard Clarke (buyer) was handled by Omofoman and Funchess purportedly
acting on behalf of respondent’s office on January 17, 2007.
15. Respondent never met with the buyer or seller in the transaction.
16. Further, respondent allowed Omofoman and Funchess to act without
her knowledge so that they were able to handle the closing without any supervision
by respondent.
17. As a result of her lack of involvement, Omofoman and Funchess were
able to issue an Attorneys Title Insurance Fund, Inc., Commitment purportedly on
her behalf by cutting and pasting her signature, thereby binding The Fund to the
transaction.
18. On January 17, 2007, respondent received a wire transfer in the
amount of $615,454.60 pertaining to the McGahee/Clarke transaction.
19. Respondent had an obligation to hold such funds in her trust account
and to use such funds for the purposes for which they were received.
20. Such funds were not used for the purposes for which they were
received.
21. Respondent failed to ensure that the previous mortgage on the home
was satisfied.
6
22. In truth and in fact, Omofoman/Funchess misappropriated the closing
proceeds and The Fund was forced to pay $442,111.46 to satisfy the unpaid
mortgage loan.
7
23. A real estate closing between Mario and Else Calderin (sellers) and
Trust Fund Investment, Inc., (buyer) was handled by Omofoman and Funchess,
purportedly on behalf of respondent’s office on January 8, 2007.
COUNT III
24. Respondent never met with the buyer or seller in the transaction.
25. Further, respondent allowed Omofoman and Funchess to act without
her knowledge so that they were able to handle the closing without any supervision
by respondent.
26. As a result of her lack of involvement, respondent allowed Omofoman
and Funchess to issue an Attorneys Title Insurance Fund, Inc., Commitment,
purportedly on her behalf thereby binding The Fund to the transaction.
27. Thereafter, no monies were ever placed into respondent’s trust
account pertaining to the Calderin/Trust Fund Investment transaction.
28. Respondent failed to ensure that the funds were received and that such
funds were used to satisfy the previous mortgage on the home.
29. Because respondent purportedly issued the title commitment, The
Fund was forced to pay $238,083.03 to satisfy the unpaid mortgage loan.
8
30. A real estate closing between Landry and Lydie Jacob (sellers) and
Frantz and Rose Pervil (buyers) was handled by Omofoman and Funchess,
purportedly on behalf of respondent’s office on December 28, 2006.
COUNT IV
31. Respondent never met with the buyer or seller in the transaction.
32. Further, respondent allowed Omofoman and Funchess to act without
her knowledge so that they were able to handle the closing without any supervision
by respondent.
33. As a result of her lack of involvement, respondent allowed Omofoman
and Funchess to issue an Attorneys Title Insurance Fund, Inc., Commitment,
purportedly on her behalf thereby binding The Fund to the transaction.
34. On December 28, 2006, respondent received two separate wire
transfers pertaining to the Jacob/Pervil transaction. Such wire transfers totaled
$466,164.20.
35. Respondent had an obligation to hold such funds in her trust account
and to use such funds for the purposes for which they were received.
36. Such funds were not used for the purposes for which they were
received.
37. Respondent failed to ensure that the previous mortgage on the home
was satisfied.
9
38. In truth and in fact, Omofoman/Funchess misappropriated the closing
proceeds and The Fund was forced to pay $296,545.24 to satisfy the unpaid
mortgage loan.
39. A real estate closing between Yen Ho (seller) and Daphne Bromfield
(buyer) was handled by Omofoman and Funchess purportedly on behalf of
respondent’s office on January 3, 2007.
COUNT V
40. Respondent never met with the buyer or seller in the transaction.
41. Further, respondent allowed Omofoman and Funchess to act without
her knowledge so that they were able to handle the closing without any
supervision.
42. As a result of her lack of involvement, respondent allowed Omofoman
and Funchess to issue an Attorneys Title Insurance Fund, Inc., Commitment
purportedly on her behalf thereby binding The Fund to the transaction.
43. On January 3, 2007, respondent received two separate wire transfers
pertaining to the Ho/Bromfield transaction. Such wire transfers totaled
$298,531.66.
44. Respondent had an obligation to hold such funds in her trust account
and to use such funds for the purposes for which they were received.
10
45. Such funds were not used for the purposes for which they were
received.
46. Respondent failed to ensure that the previous mortgage on the home
was satisfied.
47. In truth and in fact, Omofoman/Funchess misappropriated the closing
proceeds and The Fund was forced to pay $250,416.50 to satisfy the unpaid
mortgage loan.
48. A real estate closing between Ronaldo Delibero & Graziela Martins
(sellers) and Christine Cobham (buyer) was handled by Omofoman and Funchess
purportedly on behalf of respondent’s office on December 27, 2006.
COUNT VI
49. Respondent never met with the buyer or seller in the transaction.
50. Further, respondent allowed Omofoman and Funchess to act without
her knowledge so that they were able to handle the closing without any supervision
by respondent.
51. As a result of her lack of involvement, respondent allowed Omofoman
and Funchess to issue an Attorneys Title Insurance Fund, Inc., Commitment
purportedly on her behalf thereby binding The Fund to the transaction.
11
52. On December 27, 2006, respondent received two separate wire
transfers pertaining to the Delibero & Martins/Cobham transaction. Such wire
transfers totaled $847,486.50.
53. Respondent had an obligation to hold such funds in her trust account
and to use such funds for the purposes for which they were received.
54. Such funds were not used for the purposes for which they were
received.
55. Respondent failed to ensure that the previous mortgage on the home
was satisfied.
56. In truth and in fact, Omofoman/Funchess misappropriated the closing
proceeds and The Fund was forced to pay $443,634.31 to satisfy the unpaid
mortgage loan.
III. RECOMMENDATION AS TO WHETHER RESPONDENT SHOULD BE FOUND GUILTY
A. By her failure to properly maintain her trust account, respondent
violated R. Regulating Fla. Bar 5-1.2(b)(5) [Minimum Trust Accounting Records.
The following are the minimum trust accounting records that shall be maintained:
A separate cash receipts and disbursements journal, including columns for receipts,
disbursements, transfers, and the account balance, and containing at least: (A) the
identification of the client or matter for which the funds were received, disbursed,
: My recommendation as to guilt is as follows:
12
or transferred; (B) the date on which all trust funds were received, disbursed, or
transferred; (C) the check number for all disbursements; and (D) the reason for
which all trust funds were received, disbursed, or transferred.]; 5-1.2(b)(6) [The
following are the minimum trust accounting records that shall be maintained: A
separate file or ledger with an individual card or page for each client or matter,
showing all individual receipts, disbursements, or transfers and any unexpended
balance, and containing: (A) the identification of the client or matter for which
trust funds were received, disbursed, or transferred; (B) the date on which all trust
funds were received, disbursed, or transferred; (C) the check number for all
disbursements; and (D) the reason for which all trust funds were received,
disbursed, or transferred.]; 5-1.2(c)(1)(A) [The lawyer shall cause to be made
monthly reconciliations of all trust bank or savings and loan association accounts,
disclosing the balance per bank, deposits in transit, outstanding checks identified
by date and check number, and any other items necessary to reconcile the balance
per bank with the balance per the checkbook and the cash receipts and
disbursements journal.]; and 5-1.2(c)(1)(B) [A lawyer shall cause to be made
monthly a comparison between the total of the reconciled balances of all trust
accounts and the total of the trust ledger cards or pages, together with specific
descriptions of any differences between the 2 totals and reasons therefor.].
13
B. Count I: By her failure to properly supervise Omofoman and/or
Funchess, respondent violated R. Regulating Fla. Bar 4-5.3(b) [With respect to a
nonlawyer employed or retained by or associated with a lawyer or an authorized
business entity as defined elsewhere in these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar:
(1) a partner, and a lawyer who individually or together with other lawyers
possesses comparable managerial authority in a law firm, shall make reasonable
efforts to ensure that the firm has in effect measures giving reasonable assurance
that the person’s conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of the
lawyer; (2) a lawyer having direct supervisory authority over the nonlawyer shall
make reasonable efforts to ensure that the person’s conduct is compatible with the
professional obligations of the lawyer; and (3) a lawyer shall be responsible for
conduct of such a person that would be a violation of the Rules of Professional
Conduct if engaged in by a lawyer if: (A) the lawyer orders or, with the knowledge
of the specific conduct, ratifies the conduct involved; or (B) the lawyer is a partner
or has comparable managerial authority in the law firm in which the person is
employed, or has direct supervisory authority over the person, and knows of the
conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to
take reasonable remedial action.]; and 4-5.3(c) [Although paralegals or legal
assistants may perform the duties delegated to them by the lawyer without the
14
presence or active involvement of the lawyer, the lawyer shall review and be
responsible for the work product of the paralegals or legal assistants.].
C. Count II: By the conduct set forth above, respondent violated R.
Regulating Fla. Bar 4-5.3(b) [With respect to a nonlawyer employed or retained by
or associated with a lawyer or an authorized business entity as defined elsewhere in
these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar: (1) a partner, and a lawyer who
individually or together with other lawyers possesses comparable managerial
authority in a law firm, shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has in
effect measures giving reasonable assurance that the person’s conduct is
compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer; (2) a lawyer having
direct supervisory authority over the nonlawyer shall make reasonable efforts to
ensure that the person’s conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of
the lawyer; and (3) a lawyer shall be responsible for conduct of such a person that
would be a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct if engaged in by a
lawyer if: (A) the lawyer orders or, with the knowledge of the specific conduct,
ratifies the conduct involved; or (B) the lawyer is a partner or has comparable
managerial authority in the law firm in which the person is employed, or has direct
supervisory authority over the person, and knows of the conduct at a time when its
consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial
action.]; 4-5.3(c) [Although paralegals or legal assistants may perform the duties
15
delegated to them by the lawyer without the presence or active involvement of the
lawyer, the lawyer shall review and be responsible for the work product of the
paralegals or legal assistants.]; 5-1.1(a)(1) [A lawyer shall hold in trust, separate
from the lawyer’s own property, funds and property of clients or third persons that
are in a lawyer’s possession in connection with a representation. All funds,
including advances for fees, costs, and expenses, shall be kept in a separate bank or
savings and loan association account maintained in the state where the lawyer’s
office is situated or elsewhere with the consent of the client or third person and
clearly labeled and designated as a trust account. A lawyer may maintain funds
belonging to the lawyer in the trust account in an amount no more than is
reasonably sufficient to pay bank charges related to the trust account.]; and
5-1.1(b) [Money or other property entrusted to an attorney for a specific purpose,
including advances for fees, costs, and expenses, is held in trust and must be
applied only to that purpose. Money and other property of clients coming into the
hands of an attorney are not subject to counterclaim or setoff for attorney’s fees,
and a refusal to account for and deliver over such property upon demand shall be
deemed a conversion.].
D. Count III: By the conduct set forth above, respondent violated R.
Regulating Fla. Bar 4-5.3(b) [With respect to a nonlawyer employed or retained by
or associated with a lawyer or an authorized business entity as defined elsewhere in
16
these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar: (1) a partner, and a lawyer who
individually or together with other lawyers possesses comparable managerial
authority in a law firm, shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has in
effect measures giving reasonable assurance that the person’s conduct is
compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer; (2) a lawyer having
direct supervisory authority over the nonlawyer shall make reasonable efforts to
ensure that the person’s conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of
the lawyer; and (3) a lawyer shall be responsible for conduct of such a person that
would be a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct if engaged in by a
lawyer if: (A) the lawyer orders or, with the knowledge of the specific conduct,
ratifies the conduct involved; or (B) the lawyer is a partner or has comparable
managerial authority in the law firm in which the person is employed, or has direct
supervisory authority over the person, and knows of the conduct at a time when its
consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial
action.]; 4-5.3(c) [Although paralegals or legal assistants may perform the duties
delegated to them by the lawyer without the presence or active involvement of the
lawyer, the lawyer shall review and be responsible for the work product of the
paralegals or legal assistants.]; 5-1.1(a)(1) [A lawyer shall hold in trust, separate
from the lawyer’s own property, funds and property of clients or third persons that
are in a lawyer’s possession in connection with a representation. All funds,
17
including advances for fees, costs, and expenses, shall be kept in a separate bank or
savings and loan association account maintained in the state where the lawyer’s
office is situated or elsewhere with the consent of the client or third person and
clearly labeled and designated as a trust account. A lawyer may maintain funds
belonging to the lawyer in the trust account in an amount no more than is
reasonably sufficient to pay bank charges related to the trust account.]; and
5-1.1(b) [Money or other property entrusted to an attorney for a specific purpose,
including advances for fees, costs, and expenses, is held in trust and must be
applied only to that purpose. Money and other property of clients coming into the
hands of an attorney are not subject to counterclaim or setoff for attorney’s fees,
and a refusal to account for and deliver over such property upon demand shall be
deemed a conversion.].
E. Count IV: By the conduct set forth above, respondent violated R.
Regulating Fla. Bar 4-5.3(b) [With respect to a nonlawyer employed or retained by
or associated with a lawyer or an authorized business entity as defined elsewhere in
these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar: (1) a partner, and a lawyer who
individually or together with other lawyers possesses comparable managerial
authority in a law firm, shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has in
effect measures giving reasonable assurance that the person’s conduct is
compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer; (2) a lawyer having
18
direct supervisory authority over the nonlawyer shall make reasonable efforts to
ensure that the person’s conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of
the lawyer; and (3) a lawyer shall be responsible for conduct of such a person that
would be a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct if engaged in by a
lawyer if: (A) the lawyer orders or, with the knowledge of the specific conduct,
ratifies the conduct involved; or (B) the lawyer is a partner or has comparable
managerial authority in the law firm in which the person is employed, or has direct
supervisory authority over the person, and knows of the conduct at a time when its
consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial
action.]; 4-5.3(c) [Although paralegals or legal assistants may perform the duties
delegated to them by the lawyer without the presence or active involvement of the
lawyer, the lawyer shall review and be responsible for the work product of the
paralegals or legal assistants.]; 5-1.1(a)(1) [A lawyer shall hold in trust, separate
from the lawyer’s own property, funds and property of clients or third persons that
are in a lawyer’s possession in connection with a representation. All funds,
including advances for fees, costs, and expenses, shall be kept in a separate bank or
savings and loan association account maintained in the state where the lawyer’s
office is situated or elsewhere with the consent of the client or third person and
clearly labeled and designated as a trust account. A lawyer may maintain funds
belonging to the lawyer in the trust account in an amount no more than is
19
reasonably sufficient to pay bank charges related to the trust account.]; and
5-1.1(b) [Money or other property entrusted to an attorney for a specific purpose,
including advances for fees, costs, and expenses, is held in trust and must be
applied only to that purpose. Money and other property of clients coming into the
hands of an attorney are not subject to counterclaim or setoff for attorney’s fees,
and a refusal to account for and deliver over such property upon demand shall be
deemed a conversion.].
F. Count V: By the conduct set forth above, respondent violated R.
Regulating Fla. Bar 4-5.3(b) [With respect to a nonlawyer employed or retained by
or associated with a lawyer or an authorized business entity as defined elsewhere in
these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar: (1) a partner, and a lawyer who
individually or together with other lawyers possesses comparable managerial
authority in a law firm, shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has in
effect measures giving reasonable assurance that the person’s conduct is
compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer; (2) a lawyer having
direct supervisory authority over the nonlawyer shall make reasonable efforts to
ensure that the person’s conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of
the lawyer; and (3) a lawyer shall be responsible for conduct of such a person that
would be a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct if engaged in by a
lawyer if: (A) the lawyer orders or, with the knowledge of the specific conduct,
20
ratifies the conduct involved; or (B) the lawyer is a partner or has comparable
managerial authority in the law firm in which the person is employed, or has direct
supervisory authority over the person, and knows of the conduct at a time when its
consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial
action.]; 4-5.3(c) [Although paralegals or legal assistants may perform the duties
delegated to them by the lawyer without the presence or active involvement of the
lawyer, the lawyer shall review and be responsible for the work product of the
paralegals or legal assistants.]; 5-1.1(a)(1) [A lawyer shall hold in trust, separate
from the lawyer’s own property, funds and property of clients or third persons that
are in a lawyer’s possession in connection with a representation. All funds,
including advances for fees, costs, and expenses, shall be kept in a separate bank or
savings and loan association account maintained in the state where the lawyer’s
office is situated or elsewhere with the consent of the client or third person and
clearly labeled and designated as a trust account. A lawyer may maintain funds
belonging to the lawyer in the trust account in an amount no more than is
reasonably sufficient to pay bank charges related to the trust account.]; and
5-1.1(b) [Money or other property entrusted to an attorney for a specific purpose,
including advances for fees, costs, and expenses, is held in trust and must be
applied only to that purpose. Money and other property of clients coming into the
hands of an attorney are not subject to counterclaim or setoff for attorney’s fees,
21
and a refusal to account for and deliver over such property upon demand shall be
deemed a conversion.].
G. Count VI: By the conduct set forth above, respondent violated R.
Regulating Fla. Bar 4-5.3(b) [With respect to a nonlawyer employed or retained by
or associated with a lawyer or an authorized business entity as defined elsewhere in
these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar: (1) a partner, and a lawyer who
individually or together with other lawyers possesses comparable managerial
authority in a law firm, shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has in
effect measures giving reasonable assurance that the person’s conduct is
compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer; (2) a lawyer having
direct supervisory authority over the nonlawyer shall make reasonable efforts to
ensure that the person’s conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of
the lawyer; and (3) a lawyer shall be responsible for conduct of such a person that
would be a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct if engaged in by a
lawyer if: (A) the lawyer orders or, with the knowledge of the specific conduct,
ratifies the conduct involved; or (B) the lawyer is a partner or has comparable
managerial authority in the law firm in which the person is employed, or has direct
supervisory authority over the person, and knows of the conduct at a time when its
consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial
action.]; 4-5.3(c) [Although paralegals or legal assistants may perform the duties
22
delegated to them by the lawyer without the presence or active involvement of the
lawyer, the lawyer shall review and be responsible for the work product of the
paralegals or legal assistants.]; 5-1.1(a)(1) [A lawyer shall hold in trust, separate
from the lawyer’s own property, funds and property of clients or third persons that
are in a lawyer’s possession in connection with a representation. All funds,
including advances for fees, costs, and expenses, shall be kept in a separate bank or
savings and loan association account maintained in the state where the lawyer’s
office is situated or elsewhere with the consent of the client or third person and
clearly labeled and designated as a trust account. A lawyer may maintain funds
belonging to the lawyer in the trust account in an amount no more than is
reasonably sufficient to pay bank charges related to the trust account.]; and
5-1.1(b) [Money or other property entrusted to an attorney for a specific purpose,
including advances for fees, costs, and expenses, is held in trust and must be
applied only to that purpose. Money and other property of clients coming into the
hands of an attorney are not subject to counterclaim or setoff for attorney’s fees,
and a refusal to account for and deliver over such property upon demand shall be
deemed a conversion.].
IV.
I recommend that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a
period of 90 days with automatic reinstatement at the end of the period of
RECOMMENDATION AS TO DISCIPLINARY MEASURES TO BE APPLIED:
23
suspension as provided in R. Reg. Fla. Bar 3-5.1(e). Additionally, respondent shall
be placed on 2-year probation and agrees to payment of The Florida Bar’s costs.
The conditions of respondent’s 2-year probation are as follows:
A. Within 30 days of this consent judgment being accepted by the
Supreme Court of Florida, Respondent will schedule an office procedures
and record-keeping analysis by and under the direction of the Law Office
Management Assistance Service (hereinafter referred to as LOMAS) of The
Florida Bar. Respondent shall cooperate with LOMAS in the conduct
thereof. Respondent shall fully comply with and implement, at respondent’s
sole cost and expense, all recommendations made by LOMAS, which
recommendations shall be in accordance with the Office Procedures and
Record Keeping Guidelines of LOMAS. The LOMAS analysis shall consist
of, at a minimum, an initial review within 60 days of the court order
accepting this plea and a final review prior to termination of the probation,
confirming compliance with, and implementation of, the recommendations
of LOMAS. LOMAS may require such additional interviews as it may, in its
sole discretion, deem necessary or advisable. Respondent shall pay all fees
and expenses of LOMAS incurred or required in connection with the
conduct of its analysis. LOMAS shall provide the Lawyer Regulation
Department of The Florida Bar with status reports as to ordered analysis.
24
V. PERSONAL HISTORY AND PAST DISCIPLINARY RECORD:
I considered the following personal history and prior disciplinary record of
respondent, to wit:
A. Personal History of Respondent:
Age: 39
Date Admitted to the Bar: June 21, 2005
B. Aggravating Factors: 9.22
(c) pattern of misconduct;
(d) multiple offenses.
C. Mitigating Factors: 9.32
(a) lack of a prior disciplinary record;
(b) there is no allegation in the complaint, and therefore no claim and
no evidence of dishonest or selfish motive;
(c) personal health problems (Respondent and son both had medical
illnesses diagnosed during the time of the misconduct.);
(d)timely, good faith effort to make restitution or to rectify
consequences of misconduct (It is not disputed that Respondent
promptly contacted her malpractice carrier and self reported to the
Florida Bar.);
25
(e) full and free disclosure to disciplinary board or cooperative
attitude toward proceedings (Respondent self reported her difficulties
and also has worked with Attorney’s Title to resolve claims.);
(g) remorse.
VI. STATEMENT OF COSTS AND MANNER IN WHICH COSTS SHOULD BE TAXED: I find that The Florida Bar has incurred reasonable costs in the matter and
that same should be assessed against the respondent, as follows:
A. Grievance Committee Level Costs: 1. Court Reporter Costs+ $ -0- 2. Bar Counsel Travel Costs $ -0-
B. Referee Level Costs:
1. Court Reporter Costs $ -0- 2. Bar Counsel Travel Costs $ -0-
C. Administrative Fee $ 1,250.00
D. Miscellaneous Costs: 1. Investigator Costs $ -0- 2. Witness Fees $ -0- 3. Copy Costs $ 7.80 53 pages. x .15 4. Telephone Charges $ -0-
5. Auditor costs $472.50 TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS: $1,730.30
Dated this __14th___ day of October, 2009.
_______/s/___________________________ EDWARD H. FINE, Referee
26
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the original of the foregoing Report of Referee has been mailed to THE HONORABLE THOMAS D. HALL, Clerk, Supreme Court of Florida, 500 South Duval Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1927, and that copies were mailed by regular U.S. mail to the following: STAFF COUNSEL, The Florida Bar, 651 East Jefferson Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2300; and ALAN ANTHONY PASCAL, Bar Counsel, The Florida Bar, Lake Shore Plaza II, 1300 Concord Terrace, Suite 130, Sunrise, Florida 33323; and ALBERT L. FREVOLA, JR., Counsel for respondent, Adorno & Yoss, 350 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1700, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 on this ___14th____ day of October, 2009. __________/s/______________________ EDWARD H. FINE, REFEREE