improving e ngagement of y oung people in e arly interventions: the eye project
DESCRIPTION
improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project. Dr Kathryn Greenwood Department of Psychology, University of Sussex Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. Co-applicants and Collaborators. Institute of Psychiatry. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
improving Engagement of Young People in Early interventions: the EYE
projectDr Kathryn Greenwood Department of Psychology, University of
Sussex Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
![Page 2: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Co-applicants and Collaborators
Institute of Psychiatry Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
University of Sussex, Psychology
![Page 3: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Service User Research Forum SURF -Brighton
•First episode psychosis service users
•Providing consultation on research project design and grant development
•Getting rid of jargon, using right language, helping to share information
•asking service user led questions and trying to answer these? (Rose 2004; Mosavel et al. 2005)
![Page 4: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What’s the problem with engagement?
Psychosis affects 7500 young people per year (375 in South East) (The NHS plan: DoH 2000)
Often devastating consequences • 25 years reduction in life expectancy (Parks et al
2006)
• Poor quality of life (Rossler et al. 2005)
• One third of premature deaths from suicide (Wiersma et al 1999, Bertelsen et al 2007)
Early Intervention in Psychosis in critical period improves• Symptoms, function, course, outcome and
suicide(Nordentoft et al 2004; Garety et al. 2006; Melle et al.Harris et al. 2008; Lester et al. 2009)
![Page 5: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
EIP improves outcomes in SussexKavanagh, Taylor, Lukats, Greenwood, Whale 2010
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Me
an
cli
nic
al g
lob
al i
mp
res
sio
n (
+/-
SE
M)
Time (months)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Time (months)
Me
an
glo
ba
l a
ss
es
sm
en
t o
f fu
nc
tio
n (
+/-
SE
M)
Clinical Global Impression
Global Assessment of Function
DUP 3-12 months
DUP≤3months
DUP≤3months
DUP 3-12 months
![Page 6: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What’s the problem with engagement?
25-30% of people disengage within 12 months(Cotton et al. 2009; Polari et al. 2009; Turner ey al. 2009)
Even in National Lead EIP service only 70% are well engaged at 12 months (Smith 2009)
Disengagement linked to younger age and other associated factors (e.g. substance use/lack of service knowledge) (Cotton et al. 2009; Schimelmann et al 2006; Krstev et al. 2004)
need more effective youth-focused service to improve engagement and outcome in this group
![Page 7: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
But a similar proportion of people drop out in Sussex
0
20
40
60
80
number of people
1 2
non-psychosis psychosis referrals
12 month outcome of 6 months referrals to EIP service
Series2
Series1
Non-engagersEngagers
![Page 8: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
And there’s a desire to develop youth focussed services
Headstart: Getting the fit right
A discussion briefing to investigate the establishment of Headstart: an early intervention and developmentally appropriate mental health care model for young people in England
Project Team: Nick Prendergast Rick Fraser
![Page 9: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Shaping development of research question and design
Set up and facilitation of SURF group
Shaping methodology around recruitmentsocial-educational sessions, peer researchers to aid access to those who don’t engage (and recently also ethics flyer)
Contributing to dissemination (training, leaflets, presentations)
Emphasising important outcomes (isolation and suicide).
Initial service user contribution – RDS PPI grant
![Page 10: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Research Question
What are facilitators and barriers to engagement in EIP?
What changes should be made to services based on knowledge of engagement?
Can youth-focussed service adaptations be effectively implemented to improve engagement and address the specific needs of those who disengage from EIP service?
![Page 11: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Phase 1- Focus Groups
Young Service users
Young PeopleSiblings/
Parents
Surrey, Sussex and Kent
12 x 6-8 people
(Purposive sampling for gender, engagement, status, family, substance use, severity)
![Page 12: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Phase 1 - Outcome
Thematic analysis leading to
• Set of themes around facilitators and barriers to engagement from each perspective
• Set of suggested service adaptations
![Page 13: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Phase 2 – Delphi Consultation & Implementation Science (Tansella and Thornicroft
2009)
Service managers, clinicians,
commissioners
![Page 14: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Phase 2 - Outcome
Service adaptationEngagement
BookletTraining (1 month)
Website(Tansella and Thornicroft 2009)
![Page 15: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
SURF suggested service adaptations
Provision and use of Information• Advertising and social educational
sessions
Approaches to engagement• Social networking, sites, texting, broader
health and youth sub-culture awareness
Involvement of young people in their services
![Page 16: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Phase 3 – Outcome Evaluation
Proportion of clients referred during a 6 month period, who drop out of service in the subsequent 12 months pre and post intervention (N=250)
Measures of quality of engagement (i.e. DNA rates, medication use, uptake of interventions)
Qualitative experience of the service adaptations from service user, carer and clinician perspective (n=18 -24)
![Page 17: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Benefits
Improved engagement options in EIPTraining, consultancy and resources
• Better skilled staff More effective and efficient intervention
• Fewer DNA’s Better service user and staff satisfactionCost effectivenessOutcomes to inform larger national
Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT)
![Page 18: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Phase 3 – Evaluation of outcome
0 monthsEnd of target referral period
12 monthsEnd of 12 months for follow up period
16 months Training for Intervention
17 monthsStart of target post intervention referral period
22 monthsEnd of target post intervention referral period
InterventionStart
34 monthsEnd of 12 months for follow up period
StudyStart
Study End
-6 monthsStart of target pre intetvention referral period
![Page 19: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Thanks to theResearch for Patient Benefit Programme
£207, 000
![Page 20: improving E ngagement of Y oung People in E arly interventions: the EYE project](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051623/56815a0c550346895dc75715/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Thank You
www.sussex.ac.uk/spriglab