improved methods for fast analysis of producible ... · improved methods for fast analysis of...
TRANSCRIPT
Improved methods for fast analysis of producible
recombinant proteins in Hi5 insect cells
Maren Bleckmann, Margitta Schürig, Joop van den HeuvelRecombinant Protein Expression (RPEX)Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
Page 2 |
Structure and Function of Proteins
Protein Sample Production Facility-PSPFRG-Recombinant Protein Expression
Helmholtz Centre for Infection ResearchBraunschweig, Germany
Page 3 |
• Fast• Inexpensive• High yields
Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
• Not possible to produce all proteins
• No Glycosylation
• Not possible to produce all proteins
• Glycosylation pattern
• Simplest eukaryotic system
• Inexpensive• High yields
• Mammalian• Fast TGE
expression (Plasmid-based)
• High yields
• Stable• Time-intensive• Expensive• Glycosylation
pattern
• Mammalian• Long-time
expressionstable cell line
• Fast TGE optional
• Expensive• Time-intensive• “High” yields
(High copy cell lines)
• Low Yield(RMCE-single copy number)
E. coli Yeast HEK293-6E Sf9/Sf21/Hi5 CHO lec
Page 4 |
Role of Insect/BEVS in Recombinant Protein Expression
Page 4 |
Ø Eukaryotic system
Ø Serum free, high cell density and suspension culture
Ø Safety = Not human pathogenic
- Example: production of human vaccines
Ø Simple homogenous glycosylation pattern
- Advantages for crystallography
Source: PDB 06.11.2015
Baculoviral Expression Vector System I
Page 5 |
Bac-to-Bac™ (Invitrogen), Multibac, iACEMBL
Gene of interest
Tn7Tn7
Donor Transformation
Competent DH10BacTM E.coli Cells
lacZ
Bacmid
HelperBlue/WhiteSelection
RecombinantBacmid
Transformationof
Insect Cells
RecombinantVirus
VirusAmplification
Protein ProductionInfection of Insect Cells
Bacmid
lacZ orf1629orf603
Bsu36I Bsu36I Bsu36I
Gene of interest+orf603/1629
Donor
BakPAK6TM, Flashbac
a) Restriction with Bsu36I
b) Cotransfection of insect cells
RecombinantVirus
VirusAmplification
Protein ProductionInfection of Insect Cells
Baculoviral Expression Vector System II
Pro
Baculoviral System
Adv
anta
ges
Ø Very well established
Ø High yields
(especially for intracellular proteins)D
raw
back
s
Ø Time consuming
Ø Transient expression
Ø Lytic system
Page 7 |
Baculoviral System
Adv
anta
ges
Ø Very well established
Ø High yields
(especially for intracellular proteins)D
raw
back
s
Ø Time consuming
Ø Transient expression
Ø Lytic system (secreted protein)
Page 8 |
Contra
BaculoviralExpression
2-3weeks
72h
Challenge expressionGeneofInterest
Hugeworkloadandwhereistheprotein?
PlasmidbasedExpression
Maren BleckmannPage 9 |
LessWorkload !!!!!+PROTEIN
Page 10 |
Plasmid-BasedTransient Gene Expression
in Insect Cells
Page 11 |
Time after infection
Prom
oter
stre
ngth
Early
Late
Very Late(p10, polH)
Modified after King et al.
Host RNA Pol
ViralRNA Pol
Ø No host endogenous Sf21 promoters known so farØ Available promoters are restricted to EARLY viral promoters
Challenge: Choice of Promoters
GenomeSequencing
TranscriptomeSequencing
Data Alignment
Isolation of Putative
PromotersAnalysis of
Activity
Page 12 |
AAAAAA5` 3´
Strategy to identify endogenous Sf21 promoters
Ø Isolation of mRNA
Ø Sequencing six ScriptSeq RNA Libraries on the HiSeq2500
Ø Assembly of transcripts
Ø Transcript quantification with RSEM (RNA-Seq by Expectation Maximization)
High transcript level = strong promoter ?
Ø 30,405 transcripts with ORF >100bp
Ø Identification of 11,625 proteins with BLAST+
Strong analog promoter in other eukaryotic system = strong promoter ?
Page 13 |
GMAKRobert GeffersSabin BhujuMichael Jarek
Transcriptome Sequencing RNASeq
Page 14 |
Number of scaffolds (min 300bp) 51,304
N50 (bp) (QUAST 2.3) 133,811
Total basepairs 466,773,710
N's per 100 kb 3354.37
Largest scaffold (bp) 1,212,604
GC (%) 36.22
Complete ultra-conserved CEG hits (%) 99.19
Sf21 DNA was sequenced by Illumina sequencing technology and de-novo assembled
Draft genome of Spodoptera frugiperda published in August 2014 by Kakumani et al.
EMBL HeidelbergHüseyin Besir Markus H.-Y. FritzVladimir Benes
Sequencing results at a glance
De Novo Sf21 Genome Sequencing
Data Alignment
Page 15 |
ATG Intron Intron
AAAAAAAAAAAUG
5´ 3´
5´3´
TS
TS
Leader
Leader
Promising Upstream Region
~1000 bp
mRNA
DNA
Open Reading Frame
Open FrameReading
Page 16 |
Lipofectin®
Plasmid DNA
Insect Cells
Ø Transient plasmid transfection
Ø eGFP expression correlates with promoter activity
Ø Monitoring eGFP expression over 100 h
eGFP
PutativePromoter
Promoter Expression Analysis by TGE
17Maren BleckmannPage 17 |
Ø 48 well with max. 2 mL cell culture
Ø Shaking (400 – 1500 rpm; 3 mm orbital)
Ø Temperature (20oC- 50oC)
Ø Humidity (no/>80%)
Ø Online Biomass measurement (scattered light)
Ø Online GFP measurement (486 nm/510 nm)
High Throughput Analysis
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84
Tem
pera
ture
[°C
]R
elat
ive
Hum
idity
[%]
Hours after Transfection [h]
-100
100
300
500
700
900
1100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84
Tem
pera
ture
[°C
]R
elat
ive
Hum
idity
[%]
Bio
mas
s G
ain
30
Hours after Transfection [h]
-100
100
300
500
700
900
1100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84
Bla
nked
GFP
Gai
n 50
Hours after Transfection [h]
Page 18 |
27°C
84%
Biomass BlankedGFP
Online Measurement in the Biolector
-100
100
300
500
700
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84
Bla
nked
GFP
Gai
n 50
Bio
mas
s G
ain
30
Hours after Transfection [h]
Page 19 |
Max. GFP Yield
Corrected eGFP yield
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96
eGFP
Yie
ld
Time after Transfection [h]
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96
eGFP
Yie
ld
Time after Transfection [h]
Page 20 |
Ribos. 60S proteinRibos. C34 proteinRibos. S11 proteinRibos. L23A protein
EF-1alphaGAPDHEnolaseActinPGKHsp70
Early Viral:OpiE1 (OpMNPV)
Comparison of Promoter Activity in Sf21 cells
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96
eGFP
Yie
ld
Time after Transfection [h]
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96
eGFP
Yie
ld
Time after Transfection [h]
Page 21 |
Expression level of the viral OpiE2 promoter in Sf21 compared to Hi5 cells
~50x
169
8.261
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
SF21 OpiE2 Hi5 OpiE2
Max
eG
FP Y
ield
Max eGFP Yield for OpIE2 promoter in Hi5 50 times higher than Sf21
Page 22 |
Ribos. 60S proteinRibos. C34 proteinRibos. S11proteinRibos. L23A protein
EF-1alphaGAPDHEnolaseActinPGKHsp70
OpiE1 (OpMNPV)
Ø GAPDH and Ribosomal promoter are stronger than the early viral promoter OpiE1
Results of the endogenous Sf21 promoters in cells
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
max
. GFP
Yie
ld
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
max
. GFP
Yie
ld
Page 23 |
Ribos. 60S proteinRibos. C34 proteinRibos. S11proteinRibos. L23A protein
EF-1alphaGAPDHEnolaseActinPGKHsp70
OpiE1 (OpMNPV)hr5Ie1p10 (AcMNPV)
Results of the endogenous Sf21 promoters in cells
Ø hr5Ie1p10 has higher activity than all Sf21 promoters
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
max
. GFP
Yie
ld
Ø OpiE2 promoter best promoter by far
Page 24 |
Ribos. 60S proteinRibos. C34 proteinRibos. S11proteinRibos. L23A protein
EF-1alphaGAPDHEnolaseActinPGKHsp70
OpiE1 (OpMNPV)hr5Ie1p10 (AcMNPV)OpiE2 (OpMNPV)
Results of the endogenous Sf21 promoters in cells
Comparison to the BEVS system
12
54
1
59
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Plasmid based (hr5-OpiE2)
BEVS (MOI 2)
Plasmid based (OpIE2)
BEVS (MOI 2)
Hi5
Sf21
eGFP Yield [µg/106 cells]
Ø Volumetric yield of virus-free plasmid based expression ~50% of BEVS in Hi5
Cells continue to grow
Page 26 |
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96
CorrectedeG
FPYield
Hoursaftertransfection[h]
eGFPYieldinTransientExpression
HEK293-6E(CMV)
Hi5(OpiE2)
Ø Max. eGFP yield in Hi5 cells 55% of max. eGFP yield in HEK293-6E cells
Comparison of the Hi5 to the HEK293-6E transient expression
Page 27 |
Improved Transient Gene Expression in Insect Cell by
Transactivation with baculoviralco-infection
Page 28 |
Ø Transactivation improves expression by inducing viral promoter activity
Boost transient gene expression in Sf21 by transactivation
-5000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
NFI
[rfu
]
Cultivation time [hpt] hr5-IE1-p10 Plasmid-based
hr5-IE1-p10 Transactivation
p10 (pTriEx) Transactivation
Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV
Page 29 |
Ø Promoter constructs tested for transactivation
Analysis of essential promoter elements for transactivation
Page 30 |
Ø Transactivation requires both hr5 and p10
Transactivation in Sf21
Page 31 |
Ø Best promoter for transactivation hr5-OpIE2-p10
Transactivation in Sf21
Page 32 |
Summary
Ø Transient plasmid-based expression (TGE) in Hi5 lead to over half of the
protein levels gained in BEVS or HEK293-6E system
Ø Compared to BEVS the Protein Quality might be improved and TGE is much
faster (72 h compared to 2-3 weeks)
Ø TGE in Hi5 results in a suitable glycosylation for crystallography and is
cheaper than the HEK293-6E system (media!)
Outlook
Virus-free expression in Insect Cells
Ø Further improvement of the TGE in Hi5 cells for direct large scale protein production
Page 33 |
SplitGFP Expression AnalysisFast and Reliable Screening
System in Insect Cells
splGFP11(=15AA)
splGFP1-10
Ø Noexpression=>NOGFP
SplitGFP detection system
TGEwithPlasmidCo-transfection
construct
Maren BleckmannPage 34 |
splGFP11(=15AA)
splGFP1-10
SplitGFP detection system
TGEwithPlasmidCo-transfection
construct
Ø Expressibleconstruct=>GFP
Maren BleckmannPage 35 |
construct
36
Semi-High Throughput with BioLector
Maren BleckmannPage 36 |
High Throughput GFP Expression Analysis
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
ND1
ND2
ND3
ND4
ND5
ND6
ND7
ND8
ND9
ND1
0ND1
1ND1
2ND1
3ND1
4ND1
5ND1
6ND1
7ND1
8ND1
9ND2
0ND2
1ND2
2ND2
3ND2
4ND2
5ND2
6ND2
8ND3
1ND3
2ND3
3ND3
4ND3
5ND3
6ND3
7ND3
8ND3
9ND4
0ND4
1ND4
2ND4
3ND4
4ND4
5Med
ium Hi5
mcherry
GFP1
-10
mcherryGF
P11
iFLpGF
P11
Max.SplitG
FPYield
MWmaxYield
Maren BleckmannPage 37 |
Example: NOD2 (Stefan Schmelz, Andrea Scrima, RG SBAU)
Max SplitGFP Yield =Blanked GFP Gain50 x 1000OD Gain30 x Transfection efficiency
Maren BleckmannPage 38 |
Example: NOD2
! ?
Plasmid based Expression
BEVSExpression
Ø TheSplitGFPSignalcorrelatestotheSOLUBLEproteinexpressioninBEVS
100kDa70kDa
25kDa
15kDa
10kDa
55kDa
35kDa
1.Ab: Mouse α
Strep
2.Ab:Rabbit α
Mouse-AP
Insoluble Fraction
100kDa70kDa
25kDa
15kDa
10kDa
55kDa
35kDa
Soluble Fraction
Maren BleckmannPage 39 |
Comparison to HEK293-6E cells
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
ND1
ND2
ND3
ND4
ND5
ND6
ND7
ND8
ND9
ND1
0ND1
1ND1
2ND1
3ND1
4ND1
5ND1
6ND1
7ND1
8ND1
9ND2
0ND2
1ND2
2ND2
3ND2
4ND2
5ND2
6ND2
8ND3
1ND3
2ND3
3ND3
4ND3
5ND3
6ND3
7ND3
8ND3
9ND4
0ND4
1ND4
2ND4
3ND4
4ND4
5Med
ium
negativ
eGF
P1-10
mcherry-…
iFlp-GFP11
Max.SplitG
FPYield
HEKInsekten
Ø TheSplitGFP ScreenisfunctionalinHEK293-6Ecells
Page 40 |
Fast splitGFP Screening System in Insect Cells
Summary
Outlook
Ø Fastandreliablescreeningofdifficulttoexpressconstructs
Ø RepresentssolubleexpressionandcorrelatestoyieldinBEVS
Ø Intotaltestedfor71differentconstructsof4targetproteins
Ø Functionalinothereukaryoticcells
Ø EstablishSplitGFPforlibraries(systemforstablecelllines)
Ø Establishdetectionsystemforsecretedtargetproteins
Page 41 |
Thank you ………..
RPEXJoop van den HeuvelSteffen MeyerBahar BaserChristian SchinkowskiMargitta SchürigJohannes SpehrNadine KonischAnke SamuelsDaniela GebauerKatharina Karste………
Students/InternsFang-Fang ChenDorina SchäckermannNils LindemannZen-Zen YenMargitta Schürig Jaqueline FrankeSelina SanderAngela BrandMargó PuschnerLara Ehemann
SBAUAndrea ScrimaStefan SchmelzStefan LeupoldPetra Völler…..
GMAKRobert GeffersSabin BhujuMichael Jarek
EMBL HeidelbergHüseyin BesirVladimir BenesMarkus H.-Y. Fritz
PSPFAnja SchützArie Geerlof
Literature
Page 42 |
Genomic analysis and isolation of RNA polymerase II dependent promoters fromSpodoptera frugiperdaMaren Bleckmann, Markus H.-Y. Fritz, Sabin Bhuju, Michael Jarek, Margitta Schürig, Robert Geffers, Vladimir Benes, Hüseyin Besir, Joop van den HeuvelPloS One; PMID: 26263512
Fast plasmid based expression screen in insect cells using SplitGFPMaren Bleckmann, Stefan Schmelz, Christian Schinkowski, Andrea Scrima, Joop van den HeuvelBiotechnology and Bioengineering; doi: 10.1002/bit.25956
Identification of Essential Genetic Baculoviral Elements for Recombinant Protein Expression by Transactivation in Sf21 Insect CellsMaren Bleckmann, Margitta Schurig, Fang-Fang Chen, Zen-Zen Yen, Nils Lindemann, Steffen Meyer, Johannes Spehr, Joop van den HeuvelPlos One; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149424